93-010 RESOLUTION NO. 93R-10
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE
NO. 4205
WHEREAS, after a request for variance was received to
permit an additional 20 sq.ft. wall sign, a public hearing before
the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim was held upon due
and proper notice, a result of which Variance No. 4205 was denied
covering the following described property:
THOSE PORTIONS OF PARCELS 8 AND 9 AS SHOWN ON A
MAP FILED IN BOOK 222, PAGES 37 TO 41
INCLUSIVE, OF PARCEL MAPS, AND AS AMENDED BY
THAT CERTAIN CERTIFICATE OF CORRECTION RECORDED
DECEMBER 15, 1989 AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-680795,
OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY
RECORDER OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, SHOWN
AND DESCRIBED AS PARCEL 1 IN THAT CERTAIN LOT
LINE ADJUSTMENT PLAT NO. 196, RECORDED
SEPTEMBER 22, 1989, AS INSTRUMENT NO. 89-
509923, OFFICIAL RECORDS; and
WHEREAS, thereafter, within the time prescribed by law,
an interested party or the City Council, on its own motion, caused
the review of said Planning Commission action at a public hearing
noticed and held as prescribed by law and, as a result thereof, the
City Council does hereby make the following findings:
1. That the applicant failed to present evidence that there
are special circumstances applicable to the property which do not
apply to other property in the same vicinity and zone.
2. That the applicant failed to present evidence that strict
application of the zoning code deprives the property of privileges
enjoyed by other property in the same vicinity and zone (other than
properties which have been granted variances based upon special
circumstances applicable to such properties).
3. That subject property was previously granted a minimum
building setback waiver so existing wall signage is closer and more
visible to the adjacent highway than it would be if the setback
waiver had not been granted.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the
City of Anaheim that said Variance be, and the same is hereby,
denied.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the time within which
rehearings must be sought is governed by the provisions of Section
1.12.100 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and the time within which
judicial review of final decisions must be sought is governed by
Section 1094.6 of the Code of Civil Procedure and Anaheim City
Council Resolution No. 79R-524.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this 5th day of January, 1993.
MAYO O~OF~THE CIT~~ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
~.CITY CLERK OF THi OF ANAHEIM
JLW: lm
R42V4205.12
- 2 -
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, ANN M. SAUVAGEAU, Assistant City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certffy that the foregoing
Resolution No. 93R-10 was Introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provEled by law, of the Anaheim
City Council held on the §th day of January, 1993, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: FeElhaus, Hunter, Pickler, Simpson, Daly
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AN D I FURTHER certify that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said Resolution No. 93R-10 on the 6th
day of January, 1993.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 6th
day of January, 1993.
(SEAL)
I, ANN M. SAUVAGEAU, Assistant City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is
the original of Resolution No. 93R-10 duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim
on January 5, 1993.
ASSISTANT CI?TY C~F ANAHEIM