Loading...
93-075 Attachment I RESOLUTION NO. 93R-?$ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN APPLICATION FOR A COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT FOR FISCAL YEAR 1993-1994 PURSUANT TO THE HOUSING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ACT OF 1980, AS AMENDED, AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE AND FILE THE APPLICATION THEREFOR WHEREAS, Activities and Programs under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1980, as amended (the "Housing and Community Development Act"), have been duly considered and appropriate public hearings have been conducted; and WHEREAS, such solicitation of public opinion has resulted in a "Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds"; and WHEREAS, the City Council hereby gives assurance that the City of Anaheim will comply with all laws, regulations, and executive orders as more particularly set forth in that certain Department of Housing and Urban Development document entitled "Certifications," a copy of which is attached hereto as Exhibit "A" and made a part hereof as though fully set forth herein. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, by the City Council of the City Anaheim as follows: 1. The City Council of the City of Anaheim hereby approves the "Final Statement of Community Development Objectives and Projected Use of Funds" as the application for a Community Development Block Grant for fiscal year 1993-1994 (the "Application") for the Nineteenth Year funding under Title I of the Housing and Community Development Act. 2. The City Manager of the City of Anaheim be, and hereby is, authorized to execute and file the Application pursuant to the Housing and Community Development Act. CDBGRES93 3503-10618 04/14/93:9:32 pne.c -- 1 -- THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim this 11th day of May _, 1993. ATTEST: CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI~ CDBGRES93 3503-1(]618 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 93R-75 was Introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the Anaheim City Council held on the 11th day of May, 1993, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Feldhaus, Hunter, Pickler, Simpson, Daly NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said Resolution No. 93R-75 on the 12th day of May, 1993. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 12th day of May, 1993. CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (SEAL) I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing is the original of Resolution No. 93R-75 was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim on May 11, 1993. Attachment II PROPOSED STATEMENT OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES AND PROJECTED USE OF FUNDS OVERALL GOALS The proposed 1993-94 Comnmnity Development Block Grant (CDBG) Program for the City of Anaheim will undertake activities from the perspective of meeting the primary objective of Title 1 of the Housing and Community Development Act of 1980, as amended, which is the development of viable urban communities by providing decent housing, a suitable environment and expanding economic opportunities principally for persons of low and moderate income. Community Development Block Grant funded activities will meet the standard of one of three national objectives. These objectives are that the activities (1) benefit low and moderate income persons, (2) aid in the prevention or elimination of slums and blight and (3) are designed to meet the community development needs having a particular urgency which pose a serious immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community. The major need in the revitalization of neighborhoods in Anaheim is to improve the housing stock and upgrade the other physical conditions. The housing and neighborhood improvements which will be funded through the 1993-94 CDBG entitlement grant will be concentrated in the CDBG Target Areas. OBJECTIVES 1. HOUSING AND NEIGHBORHOOD IMPROVEMENTS IN TARGET AREAS The centermost part:of Anaheim has been designated as the location of the four CDBG Target Areas which are: Central City, Citron, South Anaheim, and Patrick Henry. The long term objective for the four areas is to preserve neighborhoods, rehabilitate housing, remove substandard housing, preserve historic housing structures, remove physical barriers to the handicapped in housing units, provide for public improvements, park developments, neighborhood facilities and related public service programs necessary to stabilize or revitalize neighborhoods. The short term objectives and goals are to concentrate on rehabilitation of existing honsing, complete or initiate needed park improvements, recreational and neighborhood facilities and public works (i.e., construction of storm drains, street reconstruction, etc.) market rehabilitation loans for rental units tied to Section 8 (Housing Assistance Program) participation, and to continue Code Enforcement activities in the CDBG Target Areas. The City of Anaheim 1993-94 CDBG Program will reflect a continued concentrated effort of manpower and resources to meet the needs of persons residing in these areas to renovate deteriorating neighborhoods. Multi-family housing rehabilitation will be carried out with a "targeted" approach. Resources will be focused in such a manner as to revitalize the targeted area with improvements to streets, street lighting, providing for open green spaces where possible, and including the'..d, evelopment of a collective property management program. Currently there are two areas i~entified for purposes of this focased revitalization: (1) South of Romneya Apartment Area located in the Patrick Henry Neighborhood Target Area; and (2) the Jeffrey-Lynne Apartment Area located in the South Anaheim Neighborhood Target Area. The following housing improvement programs will be continued in the four Target Areas: CDBG funded rehabilitation loans for eligible owner-occupant households in the target areas (#1 Hsg. Rehab, page 7). · Owner investor rehabilitation loans to benefit low and moderate income renters (#1 Hsg. Rehab, page 7). · Deferred loans (#1 Hsg. Rehab, page 7). · Housing improvement incentives which include rebates and tool rental assistance. The following activities will be implemented or continued in each respective Target Area for neighborhood enhancement: Central City Neighborhood Target Area · Neighborho0'd Beautification Project (Phase 111) (#1 Neigh./Pub. Facilities, pg.7): Treatment to parkways (planting trees, ground cover, etc.), improvements to curbs, sidewalks, undergrounding of utilities, where possible, along Sycamore Street from Anaheim Blvd. to Olive Street. · Street Light Installation (#2 Neigh./Pub. Facilities, page 7): Residents have requested that "old style" street light staudards be installed that will increase security and will harmonize with the character of the neighborhood housing Area where lights are to be installed is bordered by La Palma on the north, Harbor Blvd. on the west, Lemon Street on the east and North Street on the south. This is the second incremental set aside for this project; $80,000 in 1992-93 CDBG funds are currently set aside for this project. Design Costs for Downtown Community Center (#11 Neigh./Pub. Facilities, page 7): Funds ar~e set aside to develop conceptual plans for a downtown community center that Will ultimately provide for senior citizen program needs primarily; provide community meeting space, an arts/crafts studio and gallery space. The community center will be located at the corner of Center Street and Philadelphia Street on a City owned parcel. · Improvements to George Washington Community Center Tot Lot (//13 Neigh./Pub. Facilities, page 7): Installation of new tot lot equipment for use by children of Head Start Program operating out of the George Washington Center. The George Washington Center is located at 250 E. Cypress Street, Anaheim. Citron Neighborhood Target Area · Street Light Installation (//3 Neigh./Pub. Facilities, page 7): Residents have requested continuance of installation of "old style" street lights for enhancement and increased neighborhood security. The general area where street light installation will be carried out is bordered by Santa Ana Street to the north, Harbor Blvd. to the west, Sonth Street to the south, Anaheim Blvd. to the East. · Ben Franklin School Enhancements (//8 Neigh./Pub. Facilities, page 7): Residents have expressed need to enhance the school grounds by developing a covered area for outdoor lunching and replace the play equipment. · Parkland Development (//12 Neigh./Pub. Facilities page 7): Residents have requested that funds be set aside for the identification of potential parkland sites in this Target Area; currently there is no park in the 3 census tracts that comprise this Target Area. Patrick tIenry Neighborhood Target Area · Manzanita Park Sound Wall Construction (//7 Neigh./Pub. Facilities, page 7): Funds have been set aside to design and construct the sound wall which will reduce noise generated by the 91 Freeway which abuts the park to the north and will enhance security. This is the second incremental set aside; project will be undertaken in the 1993-94 program year. · Streetscape Improvements (//9 Pub. Svc. page 7): Project consists of planting trees, treatment to parkways and curb and gutter improvements along Romneya Drive between Harbor Blvd. and Euclid Street. South Anaheim Neighborhood Target Area "*~" · Jeffrey-Lynne Center Operation Costs (//7 Pub. Svc. page 7): Funds have been allocated for the costs of operating a community center in the Jeffrey-Lynne apartment neighborhood. · Street Light ~nstallation (#4 Neigh./Pub. Facilities, page 5): An allocation of $130,000 Has been set aside to install street lighting standards along Walnut Avenue between Ball Road and Santa Ana Street. 2. CITYWIDE ACTIVITIES Although the majority of substaodard housing is located in the four CDBG ~F,arget Areas, substandard housing does exist in neighborhoods throughout the City on a spot basis. Low interest rehabilitatl'0n loans will be made a~,ailable to low and moderate income persons on a citywide basis. First priority in processing loan applications will be given to those persons residing in the Target Areas. 3 3. PUBLIC SERVICE, INTERIM, AND SPECIAL ACTIVITIES Public service activities will be carried by nonprofit organizations, as subrecipients, and through city operated programs. The following activities will be provided through city departments: The Library Bookmobile (#1 Public Srvices, pg.5): The Bookmobile provides outracb library services at low income neighborhood sites whithin the four Target Areas. · Gang Enforcement Team (#5 Public Services page 7): Efforts are carried out by the Police Department. This specialized team consists of 6 officers and a Lieutenant; the salaries and benefits, training and supplies for two officers are paid for through the CDBG allocation. · The Jeffrey-Lynne Community Center (#6 Public Svcs., page 7): The Center ~'" Operation has been allocated $70,300 to cover staffing costs to operate the center. This Center is located in a low income neighborhood, a large percentage of whose residents primarily speak spanish. The Center provides a wide range of social services from employment leads and English Classes to nutritional classes in their native tongue. · Gang/Drug Strategy Coordination (//8 Pub. Svcs., pg.7): In July, 1992, the City of Anaheim adopted a Gang/Drug Strategy aimed a reducing the incidence of gang or drug related activities and targets efforts at preventing or intervening in the involvement of the City's youth in gangs or drugs. An allocation of $80,300 covers the salaries and benefits of I full time facilitator and two part time employees. Activities to be carried out include, but are not limited to, the development of an Anti-Gang/Drug Directory and its distribution; creation of a Gang/Drug Hotline; assist the creation of an Anti-Graffiti Ordinance. Although ~ efforts are to be focused in those areas of the city where there is a high incidence of gangs and drug or substance abuse, this is a citywide activity. · Paint Your Heart Out Anaheim, (#10 Pub. Svcs, pg. 7): This is a program earmarked to improve, through volunteer efforts, the exteriors of homes owned and occupied by low and moderate income elderly or handicapped persons. Improvements consist of painting the exterior of the house and yard clean-up. Funds are expended to pay a consultant who in turn recruits volunteers, procures donations of paint and materials, recruits and screens potential candidates, promotes the program through the media, plans and coordinates the entire project. This allocation will ensure the programs fourth year of activity; a total of 106 homes of elderly/handicapped property owners have been painted e..x. teriorly. 4 Activities to be carried out by non profit organizations as subrecipients are as follows: · Anaheim Interfaith Shelter (#9 Pub. Svcs.,pg.7): This agency has been allocated $30,000 for operating costs incurred in providing food and shelter to homeless families at their 10 unit facility in Anaheim. · The Orange County Council on Aging (#2 Pub. Svcs., pg.7): This agency will continue to provide state mandated ombudsman services to elderly residents of long term residential care facilities in Anaheim. The 1993-94 allocation in $13,000 and is the fourth consecutive allocation from the City of Anaheim. · Feedback Foundation (#4 Pub. Svcs., pg.7): This agency earmarked to provide meals to senior citizens that are "shut in", extremely limited in their mobility and unable to take advantage of senior feeding programs at local senior facilities. · The Boys and Girls Club of Anaheim (#3 Pub. Svcs., pg.7): Is to receive an allocation of:S100,000 to cover operational costs, such as material, supplies and staff salaries and benefits. The Boys and Girls Club is part of a city endorsed effort to curtail involvement in gangs and drugs of elementary school age childreu. Fxlucational and recreational opportunities are offered to these youths. · The Orange County Center ~br Health (#7 Pub. Svcs.,pg.7): Has been allocated to $40,470 for the development of design plans for a new facility in Anaheim. This is the second incremental set aside; $30,428 was set aside in 1992-93 CDBG funds bringing the total for this activity to $70,898. Interim and special activities to be undertaken are as follows: · Code Enforcement activities will continue to be carried out in CDBG Target Areas. Service has improved with the addition of employing a City Attorney that focuses his efforts on the prosecution of code enforcement cases only. This action has redriced the backlog of code enforcement cases requiring prosecution that had deve!oped. · Graffiti Removal Services, under the administration of the Code Enforcement Department, will continue efforts at eliminating unsightly graffiti in the four Target Areas. Interim Activities such as Graffiti Removal and Cleanup Campaigns are carried out in areas where permanent improvements, such as the installation of street lights, curb and gutter improvements, sidewalk reconstruction, etc., are to be undertaken. ~., Activities to affirmatively further fair housing will continue to be provided by the Orange County Fair Housing Council. An allocation of $66,230 is earmarked for this purpose. 5 1993-94 FUNDING ALLOCATION: The CDBG entitlement grant for the program year beginning July 1, 1993 that the City of Anaheim will receive is $3,455,000. Each year approximately $350,000 is generated in CDBG Program income. These are funds that result from rehabilitation loan paybacks. All such funds are made available to residents as rehabilitation loans. This practice will continue per City Council Approval. Proposed activities were recommended during public hearings and meeting held by the Communitywide CDBG Citizen Participation Committee, Funding Commitments were made by the Anaheim City Council at a public hearing held on April 6, 1993. ASSESSMENT OF RELATIONSIIIP Attached is ~ assessment of the relationship of the use of funds to the community development objectives identified in the Final Statement of 1992-93 as well as to the broad national objectives. Activities proposed for funding from the 1993-94 grant are described in the following section. 6 PROPOSED PROGRAM ACTIVITY: Below is a summary of the housing and neighborhood improvement and public activities which will be funded by the 1993-94 Community Development Block Grant Entitlement: HOUSING, REHABILITATION & PRESERVATION ACTIVITIES: $ 898,338 1. Loan subsidies, deferred loans, housing incentives including reha~)ilitation ..................... $158,000 2. Code Enforcement including attorney costs ............... 740,338 PUBLIC SERVICE ACTIVITIES & SUBRECIPIENT GRANTS: 608,720 1. *Library Bookmobile .............................. 33,250 2. *O.C. Council on Aging ............................. 13,000 3. *Boys & Girls Club ............................... 100,000 4. *Feedback Foundation .............................. 11,000 5. *Gang Enforcement Project .......................... 205,400 G. *Jeffrey-Lynne Comm. Ctr. Operating Costs ............... 70,300 ~ 7. Orange County Center for Health - Design Costs ............ 40,470 8. *Gang/Drug Strategy Coordination ...................... 80,300 9. *Anaheim Interfaith Shelter .......................... 30,000 10. *Paint Your Heart Out, Anaheim ....................... 25,000 NEIGHBORHOOD/PARKS/PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPROV.: 750,250 1. Neighborhood Beautification Project III - (CCNC) ........... 220,000 2. Street Light Installation ~. (CCNC) ....................... 50,000 3. Street Light Installation Ill - (CNC) ..................... 250,000 4. Street Light Installation :i,(SANC) ...................... 130,000 5. Clean-up Campaigns - (4TA) .......................... 75,000 6. Graffiti Removal- (4TA) ............................. 60,000 7. Manzanita Park Sound Wall Const - (PHNC) .............. 234,784 8. Ben Franklin School Enhancement Project - (CNC) ........... 50,000 ~ Streetscape Improvements - (PHNC) ..................... 72,500 -~ 10. Ponderosa Park Center Expansion - (SANC) ............... 100,000 11. Downtown Community Ctr. Design - (CCNC) .............. 250,000 12. Parkland Development ~ Citron Target Area ................ 49,200 13. George Washington Ctr. Tot Lot Improv. - (CCNC) ........... 35,000 ADMINISTRATION: 270,835 1. General Management & Overhead ..................... 204,605 2. Fair Housing Activities .............................. 66,230 CITIZEN PARTICIPATION: ', 100,623 CONTINGENCY: ;~ ~,' -0- TOTAL ALLOCATIONS: $3,455,000 *Activities subject to public service cap. ASSESSMENT: RELATIONSHIP OF USE OF FUNDS TO COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT OBJECTIVES IN THE FINAL STATEMENT The City of Anaheim's Community Development Block Grant Program for 1991-92 and 1992-93 were undertaken with the intent of meeting the following national obiectives: prevention or elimination of slums and blight; and principally benefiting low and moderate income household through the activities undertaken. The target areas, as described in the Final Statement of 1993-94, are retained in an effort to concentrate manpower and resources to revitalize deteriorating neighborhoods and to meet the needs of residents in those target areas. PROJECT STATUS AND OBJECTIVES The following housing improvement programs were implemented or continued in the four CDBG Target Areas: CDBG Funded rehabilitation loans for eligible households in the target areas (also Citywide on a spot basis) Owner-investor rehabilitation loans to benefit low and moderate income renters (also Citywide) Deferred loans (also Citywide) Rebates for housing improvements (Target areas only) The housing improvements programs are intended to conserve the housing stock and meet the objective principally benefiting low and moderate income residents in the Target Areas and Citywide through spot rehabilitation of housing. The City of Anaheim recognizes that although the majority of s~bstandard housing is located in the Target Areas, substandard housing units are found throughout the City on a spot basis. ihese projects listed below met two objectives: benefit to areas in which the majority of households ~were of low or moderate income, and contributed to the prevention or elimination of blight. Neighborhood improvement activities were as follows: CENTRAL CITY NEIGHBORHOOD TARGET AREA Accomplished in 1991-92: ,r,i · Revitalization of 10 miles of alleys in CTS 865.01, 873. · Reconstruction of restrooms at west end of Pearson Park. · Neighborhood Beautification Project-Phase 1 consisting of installation of "old style" street light standards, treatment to sidewalks and parkway improvements on Philadelphia Street, Adele Street, Emily Street, and Cypress Street. · Feasibility Study - Westside Senior Citizen Center. Intend to accomplish in 1992-93: · Installation of security lights at Julianna Park. · Expansion of Little People's Park. · Neighborhood Beautification Project - Phase II - consisting of installation of old style street light standards, treatment to sidewalks and parkway improvements on Philadelphia Street, Emily Street and Claudina Street from Adele Street to Sycamore Street. · Design of street light installation (old style type standards) on Lemon Street, Clementine Street, Dickle Street and Helena Street between North Street and La Palma Avenue. CITRON NEIGHBORHOOD TARGET AREA ~,Accomplished in 1991-92: · Construction of Benjamin Franklin School Child Care Modulars for provision of child care services to low and moderate income parents. Intend to accomplish in 1992~93: · Installation of "old style" street light standards on Citron Street, Ohio Street, Indiana Street, Illinois Street, and West Street, from Linconln Avenue to Santa Ana Street. · Begin design on street light standards to be installed around Benjamin Franklin School; on Water Street between Pine Street and Janss Street; Janss Street between Water Street and Santa Ana Street; north,side of Santa Aria Street between Janss and alleyway, just west of Harbor Blvd. SOUTH ANAHEIM NEIGHBORHOOD TARGET AREA Accomplished in 1991-92: · Audre/Ninth Street Storm Drain Installation. Intend to accompish in 1992-93: · Street lights upgraded from 70 watt globes to 200 watt globes on Leatrice Street, Wakefield Street and Mountainview Avenue. PATRICK HENRY NEIGHBORHOOD TARGET AREA Accomplished in 1991-92: · Victor and Julianne Street Closures to reduce high speed traffic through these streets. Intend to accomplish in 1992-93: · Upgrade of existing street lighting from 70 watt to 200 watts in entire 866.01 census tract that makes up the Patrick Henry Target Area. Other activities that benefitted low and moderate income residents of all target areas which were carried out as a part of the Cit¥'s annual CDBG objectives are as follows: · Code enforcement activities and graffiti removal services were carried out and supplemented with the services of a city attorney that focused efforts on prosecution of code enforcement ~ cases. · The Bookmobile provided outreach library services to residents of low and moderate income neighborhoods and readership continues to increase each year. · Clean-up campaigns were continued as an interim activity in the four Target Areas, · Ombudsman services to elderly residents of long term residential care facilities continue to be provided by the Orange County Council Aging. · Operational costs incurred in providing needed social services at Jeffrey-Lynne Community Center were offset by a,CDBG allocation of $70,000 in 1992~93. The Boys and Girls Club (~f Anahiem received an allocation of $25,000 in 1992-93 CDBG funds to continue their anti-gang efforts with youth of low and moderate income neighborhoods as a part of the City's Gang/Drug Strategy. · Paint Your Heart Out, Anaheim accomplished the painting of exteriors of 37 homes owned and occupied by low and moderate income elderly or handicapped persons. · A facilitator to coordinate and facilitate the implementation of the City's Gang/Drug Strategy was hired, a portion of whose salary will be paid by 1992-93 CDBG funds. Most of the City's gangs have been identified as originating in the four CDBG Target Areas. · Services which affirmatively further fair housing were provided again in 1992-93 by the Orange County Fair Housing Council. No new objectives were developed during the 1992-93 program year. Once all projects and activities are completed, the objectives for 1991-92 and 1992-93 program years will have been met. 10 "EXHIBIT A" COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT GRANTEE CERTIFICATIONS The Grantee certifies that: (a) It possesses legal authority to make a grant submission and to execute a community development and housing program; (b) Its governing body has duly adopted or passed as an official act a resolution, motion or similar action authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the grantee to submit the final statement and amendments thereto and all understandings and assurances contained therein, and directing and authorizing the person identified as the official representative of the grantee to act in connection with the submission of the final statement and to provide such additional information as may be required; (c) Prior to submission of its final statement to HUD, the grantee has: Met the citizen participation requirements of 570.301 (b); 2. Prepared its final statement of community development objectives and projected use of funds in accordance with 570.301 (c) and made the final statement available to the public; (d) It is following a detailed citizen participation plan which: 1. Provides for and encourages citizen participation, with particular emphasis on participation by persons of low and moderate income who are residents of slum and blighted areas and of areas in which funds are proposed to be used, and provides for participation of residents in low and moderate income neighborhoods as defined by the local jurisdiction; 2. Provides citizens with reasonable and timely access to local meetings, information, and records relating to the grantee's proposed use of funds, as required by the regulations of the Secretary, and relating to the actual use of funds under the Act; 3. Provides for technical assistance to groups representatives of persons of low and moderate income that request such assistance in developing proposals with the level and type of assistance to be determined by the grantee; 4. Provides for public hearings to obtain citizen views and to respond to proposals and questions at all stages of the community development program, including at least the development of needs, the review of proposed activities, and review of program performance, which hearings shall be held after adequate notice, at times and locations convenient to potential or actual beneficiaries, and with accommodation for the handicapped; 5. Provides for a timely written answer to written complaints and grievances, within 15 working days where practicable; and 6. Identifies how the needs of non-English speaking residents will be met in the case of public hearings where a significant number of non-English speaking residents can be reasonably expected to participate; (e) The grant will be conducted and administered in compliance with: 1. the Vl of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Public Law 88.352; 42 U>S>C> 2000d et seq.): and 2. The Fair Housing Act (42 U.S.C. 3601-20) (f) It will affirmatively further fair housing; (g) It has developed its final statement of projected use of funds so as to give maximum feasible priority to activities which benefit low and moderate income families or aid in the prevention or elimination of slums or blight; (the final statement of projected use of funds may also include activities which the grantee certifies are designed to meet other community development needs having a particular urgency because existing conditions pose a serious and immediate threat to the health or welfare of the community, and other financial resources are ~ not available); except that the aggregate use of CDBG funds received under section 106 of the ACT, and if applicable, under section 108 of the ACT, during the 1993-1994 program year(s) (a period specified by the grantee consisting of one, two or three consecutive years), shall principally benefit persons of low and moderate income in a manner that ensures that not less than 70 percent of such funds are used for activities that benefit such persons during such period; (h) It has developed a community development plan, for the period specified in paragraph (g) above, that identifies community development and housing needs and specifies community development and housing needs and specifies both short and long-term community development objectives that have been d,eveloped in accordance with the primary objective and requirements of the Act; ~- (i) It is following: 1. A current housing affordability strategy which has been approved by HUD in accordance with a section 105 of the Cranston-Gonzalez National Affordable Housing Act; or 2. For purposes of assessing any amount against properties owned and occupied by persons of moderate income, the grantee certifies to the Secretary that it lacks sufficient funds received under section 106 of the Act to comply with the requirements of subparagraph (1) above; (k) Its notification, inspection, testing and abatement procedures concerning lead- based paint will comply with 570.608; (I) It will comply with the acquisition and relocation requirements of the Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Policies Act of 1970 as ~ required under 570.606 (a) and Federal implementing regulations; the requirements in 570.606 (b) governing and the residential anti-displacement and relocation assistance plan under section 104 (d) of the Act (including a certification that the grantee is following such a plan); the relocation requirements of 570.606 (c) governing displacement subject to section 104 (k) of the Act; and the relocation requirements of 570.606 (c) covering optional relocation assistance under section 105 (a) (11) of the Act; and (m) It has adopted and is enforcing: 1. A policy prohibiting the use of excessive force by law enforcement agencies within its jurisdiction against any individuals engaged in non-violent civil rights demonstrations; and 2. A policy of enforcing applicable State and local laws against physically barring entrance to or exit from a facility or location which is the subject of such non-violent civil rights demonstrations within its jurisdiction; (n) To the best of its knowledge and belief: 1. No Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid, by or on behalf of it, to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with the awarding of any Federal contract, the making of any Federal grant, the making of any Federal loan, the entering into of any cooperative agreement, and the extension, continuation, renewal, amendment, or modification of any Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement; 2. If any funds other than Federal appropriated funds have been paid or will be paid to any person for influencing or attempting to influence an officer or employee of any agency, a Member of Congress, an officer or employee of Congress, or an employee of a Member of Congress in connection with this Federal contract, grant, loan, or cooperative agreement, it will complete and submit Standard Form-LLL, "disclosure Form to Report Lobbying," in accordance with its instructions; and 3. It will require that the language of paragraph (n) of this certification be included in the award documents for all subawards at all tiers (including subcontracts, subgrants, and contracts under grants, loans, and cooperative agreements) and that all subrecipients shall certify and disclose accordingly; (o) It will continue to provide a drug-free workplace by: 1. Publishing a statement notifying employees that the unlawful manufacture, distribution, dispensing, possession or use of a controlled substance is prohibited in the grantee's workplace and specifying the actions that will be taken against employees for violation of such prohibition; 2. Establishing an ongoing drug-free awareness program to inform its employees about: (a) The dangers of drug abuse in the workplace; '~,.,. (b) The grantee's policy of maintaining a drug-free workplace; (c) Any available drug counseling, rehabilitation, and employee assistance programs; and (d) The penalties that may be imposed upon employees for drug abuse violations occurring in the workplace; 3. Making it a requirement that each employee to be engaged in the performance of the grant to be given a copy of the statement required by paragraph 1; 4. Notifying the employee in the statement required by paragraph (1) that, as a condition of employment under the grant, the employee will: (a) Abide by the terms of the statement; and (b) Notify the employer in writing of his or her conviction for a violation of a criminal drug statute occurring in the workplace no later than five calendar days after such conviction; 5. Notifying the agency in writing, within ten calendar days after receiving notice under subparagraph 4 (b) from an employee or otherwise receiving actual notice of such conviction. Employers of convicted employees must provide notice, including position title, to every grant officer or other designee on whose grant activity the convicted employee was working, unless the Federal agency has designated a central point for the receipt of such notices. Notice shall include the identification number (s) of each ~,,~' affected grant; 6. Taking one of the following ~ctions, within 30 calendar days of receiving notice under subparagraph 4 (b), with respect to any employee who is so convicted - (a) Taking appropriate personnel action against such an employee, up to and including termination; or consistent with the requirements of the Rehabilitation Act of 1973, as amended; or (b) Requiring such employee to participate satisfactorily in a drug abuse assistance or rehabilitation program approved for such purposes by a Federal, State, or local health, law enforcement, or other appropriate agency; 7. Making a good faith effort to continue to maintain a drug-free workplace through implementation of paragraphs (1), (2), (3), (4), (5) and (6). 8. The grantee shall insert in the space provided on the attached "Place of Performance" form the site(s) for the performance of work to be carried out with the grant funds (including street address, city, county, state, and zip code). The grantee further certifies that, if it is subsequently determined that additional sites will be used for the performance of work under the grant, it shall notify the U.S. Department of Housing & Urban Development immediately upon the decision to use such additional sites by submitting a revised "Place of Performance" form. 5 PLACE OF PERFORMANCE FOR CERTIFICATION REGARDING DRUG-FREE WORKPLACE REQUIREMENTS Name of Grantee: City of Anaheim Grant Program Name: Community Development Block Grant Grant Number: B-93-MC-06-0501 Date: 5/4/93 The grantee shall insert in the space provided below the site(s) expected to be used for the performance of work under the grant covered by the certification: Place of Performance (include street address, city, county, state, zip code for each site): Address: 201 S. Anaheim Blvd., 2nd Floor, Anaheim Orange County, California 92805 GRANTCERT.4.92 6