Loading...
RA1978/05/0978 -72 ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY MAY 9, 1978, (1:00 P.M.) Council Chamber Anaheim City Hall PRESENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Roth and Seymour ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Kott PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: William 0. Talley CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins SECRETARY: Linda D. Roberts EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Norman J. Priest Chairman Seymour called the regular meeting of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency to order. MINUTES: On motion by Mrs. Kaywood, seconded by Mr. Roth, minutes of the regular meetings held April 4 and April 11, 1978 were approved. Mr. Overholt abstained. Mr. Kott absent. MOTION CARRIED. FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY in the amount of $1,114,440-32, in accordance with the - udget, were approved. 161.128: FINANCIAL STATEMENT AS OF MARCH 31, 1978 On motion by Mr. Roth, seconded by Mrs. Kaywood, the Alpha Project Financial Statement, summarizing activities to March 31, 1978, was ordered XM% received and filed as submitted by the Community Development Depart- ment. Mr. Kott absent. MOTION CARRIED. 161.158: RELOCATION COSTS CASE NO. OB -154 In accordance with the recommendation submitted by the Executive Director, on motion by Mrs. Kaywood, seconded by Mr. Overholt, the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency authorized the payment of relocation claim in residential relocation case No. OB -154, in the amount of $18,000. Mr. Kott absent. MOTION CARRIED. 161.123: AGREEMENT WITH ALAN AND LA DEL CLENDENEN- RENOVATION OF CAHEN HOUSE: Mr. Priest explained that the proposed agreement be- tween the Agency and Mr. and Mrs. Clendenen does carry out the program as discussed and approved at the time the Cahen house was sold. 78 -73 ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, MAY 9, 1 978 - 1:00 P.M. This agreement was,in fact,one of the conditions imposed on the pur- chase. Mr. Priest emphasized for clarification that the original form of the sale agreement indicated the restoration of the house was to be com- pleted within 360 days after the date of the agreement, and this has �-.- so far been construed to mean 360 days after the date of January 3, 1978, when the sale was originally approved, as opposed to the date of the agreement now under consideration. He advised that Mr. Clendenen is aware of this and finds it agreeable. The Agency Members concurred that the original date of January 3, 1978 should be construed as the date beginning the 360 -day period for restora- tion. The Chairman recognized Lt. Col. Earl Rhoads (Ret.), 122 North Vine Street, who wished to comment on the proposed agreement. He stated that he was presenting his own views and not those of the Project Area Committee of which he is a member. Lt. Col. Rhoads stated that in review of the situation he could not determine whether this property was listed on the tax rolls as commercial, industrial or residential property. He noted that it is usually required that such property being sold or developed be brought up to code for residential use with installation of curbs, gutters, sidewalks, dedication of right -of -way, payment of park -in -lieu fees, etc. Lt. Col. Rhoads further questioned that section of the agreement which sets forth the date of June 30, 1979 as the date by which purchase of the real property is to have occurred and noted that there will be --- six months difference between the date by which the restoration work is to be completed and the date by which the property must be pur- chased. Mr. Priest responded that there is a clause in the agreement which provides that the title to whatever improvement is on the property would revert back to the Agency in this event. The Agency would then proceed with the necessary action to acquire the real property. He explained that this is not a situation exclusive to this particular agreement, but in any development agreement the dates given are out- side dates governing the participant's activities as well as the Agency activities. In further response to Lt. Col. Rhoads, Mr. Priest advised that if the participant fails to complete the restoration or maintain the property, the Agency can excercise eminent domain against the house and real property. He also explained that such joint buyer- Agency participation opportunities are available occasionally and are ad- vertised and open to bids from the general public. 78 -74 ANAHEIM REDEVELO AGENCY, MAY 9, 1978 - 1:00 P.M. Mr. Roth offered Resolution No. ARA78 -58 for adoption. RESOLUTION NO. ARA78 -58 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN OWNER PARTICIPATION AGREEMENT AND AN AGREEMENT TO BE RECORDED AFFECTING REAL PROPERTY (Alan Clendenen, et al.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Roth and Seymour NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Kott The Chairman declared Resolution No. ARA78 -58 duly passed and adopted. 161.123: FIRST AMENDMENT TO COOPERATION AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT NO. 3: Mr. Priest reported that it is necessary to amend the original Cooperation Agreement No. 3 to provide that the Agency will advance funds to the City prior to the design and /or construction of the im- provements covered in said Agreement. The amendment further accommo- dates minor changes in the design of the improvements, necessitated by changes in the design of Project Alpha; and sets out the fact that the Agency rather than the City will complete all acquisitions required to accomplish the improvements. Mr. Roth offered Resolution No. ARA78 -59 for adoption. RESOLUTION NO. ARA78 -59 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A "FIRST AMENDMENT TO COOPERATION AND REIMBURSEMENT AGREEMENT" WITH THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, AND AUTHORIZING THE CHAIRMAN AND SECRETARY TO EXECUTE SAID AMENDMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood Roth and Seymour NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Kott The Chairman declared Resolution No. ARA78 -59 duly passed and adopted. 78 -75 ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, MAY 9, 1978 - 1:00 P.M. 161.155: CERTIFICATION OF INITIAL STUDY - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT - COOPERATION AGREEMENT NO. 7: In accordance with the recommendation submitted by the Executive Director, Mrs. Kaywood offered Resolution No. ARA78 -60 for adoption. RESOLUTION NO. ARA78 -60: A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY CERTIFYING THAT THE INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THE INITIAL STUDY CONDUCTED AND PREPARED BY THE AGENCY STAFF ON THE PROPOSED "COOPERATION AGREEMENT NUMBER SEVEN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION AND INSTALLA- TION OF PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS" BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY HAS BEEN REVIEWED AND CONSIDERED; AND FINDING THAT SAID COOPERATION AGREEMENT WILL NOT HAVE A SIGNIFICANT EFFECT ON THE ENVIRONMENT AND THAT A SUBSEQUENT EIR NEED NOT BE PRE- PARED. Roll Call Vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Roth and Seymour NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Kott The Chairman declared Resolution No. ARA78 -60 duly passed and adopted. 161.123: AUTHORIZING COOPERATION AGREEMENT NO. 7 Report from the Executive Director recommending authorization of Cooperation Agree- ment No. 7, which consists of 9 different public improvement projects, as shown on "Attachment 1" to said agreement was submitted. Mr. Roth advised that he had reviewed the list of proposed improve- r" ments and determined that none of these would be.of benefit to Lincoln Avenue or his property. Mr. Priest corroborated this statement. Mr. Overholt offered Resolution No. ARA78 -61 for adoption. RESOLUTION NO. ARA78 -61 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DETERMINING CERTAIN PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS TO BE OF BENEFIT TO REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT ALPHA PROJECT AREA AND APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF THE COOPERATION AGREEMENT NUMBER SEVEN FOR THE CON- STRUCTION AND INSTALLATION OF IMPROVEMENTS THEREFOR BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY. Roll Call Vote: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: Overholt, Kaywood, Roth and Seymour NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: Kott The Chairman declared Resolution No. ARA78 -61 duly passed and adopted. 78 -76 ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY, MAY 9, 1978 - 1:00 P.M. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business before the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency, Mrs. Kaywood moved to adjourn. Mr. Roth seconded the motion. Mr. Kott absent. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 1:17 P.M. LINDA D. ROB