The URL can be used to link to this page

ARA1987-012RESOLUTION NO. ARA 87 - A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY RECEIVING THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA INCLUDING CHANGES RECOMMENDED BY THE PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE, THE REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE PROPOSED PLAN, AND RULES GOVERNING OWNER PARTICIPATION AND PREFERENCES, AND RATIFYING THE ACTIONS OF THE COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION CONCERNING THE AFORESAID DOCUMENTS WHEREAS, the Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission (the "Commission ") and the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency ") have prepared a Redevelopment Plan for the Katella Redevelopment Project Area; and WHEREAS, the Commission submitted the Proposed Redevelopment Plan to the Katella Redevelopment Project Area Committee and in accord with Section 33347.5 of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et. seq.) the Katella Redevelopment Project Area Committee has submitted its report and recommendation on the Proposed Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, the Commission submitted the Proposed Redevelopment Plan to the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim for its report and recommendation and has received such report and recommendation; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 33352 of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et. seq.), the Commission has prepared a Report to the City Council on the Proposed Redevelopment Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 33339.5 and 33345 of the Community Redevelopment Law, the Commission has prepared Rules Governing Participation and Preferences for Property Owners and Business Occupants; and WHEREAS, Section 33355 of the California Community Redevelopment Law authorizes a Joint Public Hearing on the Proposed Redevelopment Plan with the consent of the Commission and City Council; and NOW THEREFORE, THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS: Section 1. The Agency does hereby receive the Proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Katella Redevelopment Project Area, the Report to the City Council on the Proposed Plan, and Rules Governing Owner Participation and Preferences, in the form attached hereto as Exhibit A. Section 2. The Agency does hereby ratify the actions taken by the Commission at its Adjourned Regular Meeting of May 28, 1987, A.) approving the changes to the Proposed Redevelopment Plan recommended by the Katella Redevelopment Project Area Committee, B.) approving its Report to the Anaheim City Council on the Proposed Redevelopment Plan, C.) approving and adopting the Rules Governing Participation and Preferences by Property Owners and Business Occupants, D.) submitting the aforesaid documents to the City Council, E.) consenting to a Joint Public Hearing of the Redevelopment Commission, the Redevelopment Agency, and the City Council, and requesting the City Council to call such Joint Public Hearing at such time as it may determine, and F.) authorizing the Executive Director of the Commission and the City Clerk of the City of Anaheim to prepare, publish, and mail such notices and documents and do other acts as may be necessary to carry out the purposes of the Commission's resolution. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION IS APPROVED AND ADOPTED this 9th day of June , 1987. CHAIRMAN ATTEST: SECRETARY rz -res2 STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, LEONORA N. SOHL, Secretary of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. ARA87 -12 was passed and adopted at a regular meeting of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency held on the 9th day of June, 1987, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: AGENCY MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Pickler, Kaywood and Bay NOES: AGENCY MEMBERS: None ABSENT: AGENCY MEMBERS: None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Chairman of the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency signed said Resolution on the 9th day of June, 1987. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and seal this 9th day of June, 1987. &451� ot— SECRETARY OF THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY (SEAL) Exhibit A Proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Katella Redevelopment Project Area Report to the City Council on the Proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Katella Redevelopment Project Area Rules Governing Participation and Preferences by Property Owners and Business Occupants in the Anaheim Katella Redevelopment Project Area 051487/bl 0923.anh/2 EMBIT A RULES GOVERNING PARTICIPATION AND PREFERENCES BY PROPERTY OWNERS AND BUSINESS OCCUPANTS IN THE ANAHEIM HATELLA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Adopted by: Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission For the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency Date: Resolution No: TABL OF CONTENTS PAGE I. [Section 1001 PURPOSE AND INTENT ................ ..............................1 II. [ Section 2001 DEFINITIONS ............................... ..............................1 III. [Section 3001 TYPES OF PARTICIPATION .......... ..............................2 IV. [Section 4001 PREFERENCES TO EXISTING OWNERS AND BUSINESS OCCUPANTS WITHIN PROJECT AREA ....... .2 V. [Section 5001 CONFORMING PROPERTIES .......... ..............................4 VI. [Section 6001 PARTICIPATION PROCEDURES ..... ..............................5 A. [Section 6011 Notice and Statement of Interest ......................5 B [Section 6021 Participation Agreements ..... ..............................5 1 . [Section 6031 General- ................................. o .................... 5 2 . [Section 6041 Contents ........................ ..............................6 VII. [Section 7001 ENFORCEMENT ............................. ..............................6 VIII. [Section 8001 AMENDMENT OF RULES ............... ..............................6 "Statement of Interest in Participating" Form EXHIBIT A RULES GOVERNING PARTICIPATION AND PREFERENCES BY PROPERTY OWNERS AND BUSINESS OCCUPANTS IN THE I;ATE REDEVELO PROJECT A REA I. [Section 1001 PURPOSE AND INTENT These rules are adopted to implement the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan for the Katella Redevelopment Project Area regarding participation and the exercise of preferences by property owners, business occupants and others within the Project. These rules set forth the procedures governing such preferences and participation. The California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code Section 33000 et seq.) requires the adoption of these rules by the Agency to permit participation in the redevelopment of the Project Area by owners of real property and persons engaged in business within the boundaries of the Project Area to the maximum extent feasible consistent with the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. Ii. [Section 2001 DEFINITIONS As used herein, the following definitions apply: (1) "Redevelopment Plan" means the the Redevelopment Plan for the Katella Redevelopment Project Area, as adopted by the City Council of the City of Anaheim. (2) "Project Area" means the project area described in Section 200 of the Redevelopment Plan and shown on Exhibit "A ", Redevelopment Plan Map, attached thereto. (3) "Agency" means the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency. (4) "Owner" means any person, persons, corporation, association, partnership, or other entity holding fee title to or a long term lease of real property in the Project Area on the date of adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the City Council, for so long as it holds such title or lease. (5) "Long Term Lease" means a lease of real property with a term of twenty (20) years or more, with at least five (5) yearn remaining on such term. (6) "Business Occupants" means persons engaged in business within the Project Area on the date of adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the City Council. (7) "Other Owners" means any person, persons, corporation, association, partnership, or other entity who purchase or otherwise acquire title to or a long term lease of real property in the Project Area subsequent to the date of adoption of the Redevelopment Plan by the City Council. (8) "Other Business business within the Project Redevelopment Plan by the Cit y in the Project Area on the date Occupants" means persons engaged in Area subsequent to the adoption of the Council who were not engaged in business of adoption of the Redevelopment Plan. (9) "Participation Agreement" means an agreement entered into by an Owner, Other Owner, Business Occupant, Other Business Occupant or others with the Agency in accordance with the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan and these rules. III. [Section 3001 TYPES OF PARTICIPATION Participation may involve existing Owners and Other Owners and, if they acquire property within the Project Area, participation may involve existing Business Occupants, Other Business Occupants, and others. Participation includes remaining in substantially the same location either by retaining all or portions of the property, or by retaining all or portions of the property and purchasing adjacent property from the Agency or joining with another person or entity for the development of the owner's property and, if appropriate, other property. An Owner or Other Owner who participates in the same location may be required to rehabilitate or demolish all or part of his /her existing buildings, or the Agency may acquire the buildings only and then remove or demolish the buildings. Participation also includes the Agency buying land and improvements at fair market value from existing Owners and Other Owners and offering other parcels for purchaRe by such Owners and Other Owners, or offering an opportunity for such owner or other owner to develop property jointly with other persons or entities. IV. [Section 4001 PREFERENCES TO EXISTING OWNERS AND BUSINESS OCCUPANTS WITHIN PROJECT AREA Participation is desired in the rehabilitation and redevelopment of the Project Area by as many existing Owners and Business Occupants as practicable. The Agency shall extend preferences to existing Owners and Business Occupants to continue in or, if the Agency acquires the land of an existing property Owner or the land on which an existing Business Occupant is located, to re -enter the Project Area if any such Owner or Business Occupant meets the requirements prescribed in the Redevelopment Plan and in these rules. Subject to these rules, existing Owners of real property in the Project Area shall be extended a reasonable preference to participate in redevelopment of their properties by rehabilitation, by retention of improvements, by new development, by retaining all or a portion of their properties, by acquiring adjacent properties from the Agency, by participating with developer(s) in the redevelopment of all or a portion of their properties or by other suitable means; provided, however, that such development will be consistent with and will not impair the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan as determined by the Agency and is otherwise consistent with the guidelines provided by these rules. Page 2 Subject to these rules, existing Owners within the Project Area who desire to acquire new property within the Project Area shall be extended a reasonable preference to acquire and develop substitute properties within the Project Area at such time as the Agency is able to make available for private development for such purpose properties within the Project Area; provided, however, that such development will be con- sistent with and will not impair the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan as determined by the Agency, and is otherwise consistent with the guidelines provided by these rules. Subject to these rules, existing Business Occupants within the Project Area who desire to continue or re -enter into business within the Project Area shall be extended a reasonable preference to acquire and develop substitute locations for such purpose within the Project Area at such times as the Agency is able to make available for private development for such purpose properties within the Project Area; provided,. however, that such development will be consistent with and will not impair the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan as determined by the Agency. Participation opportunities shall necessarily be subject to and limited by factors such as the following: (1) The elimination and changing of some land uses; (2) The construction, realignment, abandonment, widening, opening and /or other alteration or elimination of public rights -of -way; (3) The removal, relocation, and /or installation of public utilities and public facilities; (4) The ability of participants to finance the proposed acquisition, development or rehabilitation in accordance with the Redevelopment Plan; (5) The ability and experience of participants to undertake and complete the proposed rehabilitation or development; (6) Any reduction in the total number of individual parcels in the Project Area; (7) The construction or expansion of public improvements and facilities, and the necessity to assemble areas for such; (8) Any change in orientation and character of the Project Area; (9) The necessity to assemble areas for public and /or private development; (10) The requirements of the Redevelopment Plan and applicable rules, regulations, and ordinances of the City of Anaheim; Page 3 (11) Any design guide adopted by the Agency pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan; and (12) The feasibility of the participant's proposal. If conflicts develop between the desires of potential participants for particular sites or land uses, the Agency is, subject to the preference provisions above, authorized to establish reasonable priorities and preferences among the potential participants and to determine a solution by consideration of such factors as: - length of time in the area; - accommodation of as many participants as possible; - ability to perform; - similar land use to similar land use; and - conformity with intent and purpose of the Redevelopment Plan and these rules. Participation to the extent feasible shall be available for two or more persons, firms or institutions to join together in partnerships, corporations, or other joint entities. Preferences set forth in this Section 400 may be given to Other Owners and Other Business Occupants as well as to existing Owners and Business Occupants. V. [Section 500] CONFORMING PROPERTIES The Project Area is large and contains many parcels of real property. As a result, there is a need to simplify the availability of participation opportunities. Therefore, as an alternative to requiring a Participation Agreement for each property not to be purchased or subject to Agency acquisition by eminent domain, the Agency may, in its sole and absolute discretion, determine that certain real properties within the Project Area presently meet the requirements of the Redevelopment Plan and the Owners or Other Owners of such properties will be permitted to remain as owners of conforming properties without a Participation Agreement with the Agency, provided such Owners or Other Owners continue to operate, use, and maintain the real properties within the requirements of the Redevelopment Plan or of any design guide approved by the Agency pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan. A certificate of conformance to this effect may be issued by the Agency and recorded. In the event that any of the owners of conforming properties or their tenants desire to (1) construct any additional improvements or substantially alter or modify existing structures on any of the real property described above as conforming, or (2) acquire additional property within the Project Area, then, in such event, such owners of conforming properties may Page 4 be required by the Agency to enter into a Participation Agreement with the Agency. VI. [Section 600) PARTICIPATION PROCEDURES A. [Section 6011 Noti a St atement or Interest Before entering into any Participation Agreements, disposition and development agreements, exclusive negotiation agreements, or taking other actions which may involve the acquisition of real property in the Project Area, the Agency shall first notify Owners, Other Owners, Business Occupants, or Other Business Occupants of property which may be acquired and call upon them to submit Statements of Interest in participating in the proposed development or in otherwise participating in the redevelopment of the Project Area. The Agency shall deliver to each Owner, Other Owner, Business Occupant or Other Business Occupant of real property which may be acquired, a form Statement of Interest at least forty -five (45) days prior to considering any of the actions requiring acquisition of real property. Those desiring to submit Statements of Interest must complete and submit such statements to the Agency within thirty (30) days of receipt. Such statements shall include information requested by the Agency and shall be in the form requested by the Agency. Any Owner, Other Owner, Business Occupant, Other BusinesR Occupant, or others may also submit such a Statement at any time before such notification. The Agency shall consider such Statements as are submitted on time and shall seek to develop reasonable participation for those submitting such Statements whether to stay in place, to move to another location, or to obtain preferences to re -enter the Project Area. The Agency may in its sole discretion determine that a participation proposal is not feasible or otherwise in the best interest of the Redevelopment Project or the community, or is otherwise limited by one or more of the criteria set forth in Section 400 hereof. In such event, the Agency shall select a developer from among prospective participants submitting Statements of Interest and others invited to submit proposals. B. [Section 602] Parti cipation Agreement 1. [Section 6031 General Public and private Owners, Other Owners, Business Occupants or Other Business Occupants wishing to develop or improve their properties within the Project Area may be required, as a condition to Agency approval of such development, to enter into a binding, written Participation Agreement with the Agency if the Agency determines it is necessary to impose upon such property any of the standards, restrictions and controls of the Redevelopment Plan or of any design guide adopted by the Agency pursuant to the Redevelopment Plan. Page 5 2. [Section 6041 Contents A Participation Agreement shall obligate the Owner, or Other Owner, his /her heirs, and successors and assigns, and /or a Business Occupant or Other Business Occupant to acquire, rehabilitate, develop and use the property in conformance with the Redevelopment Plan and to be subject to such other provisions and conditions of the Redevelopment Plan for the period of time that the Redevelopment Plan is in force and effect, excepting those provisions related to non - discrimination and non - segregation which shall run in perpetuity. Each Participation Agreement will require the participant to join in the recordation of such documents as the Agency may require in order to insure the property will be acquired, rehabilitated, developed and used in accord with the Redevelopment Plan and the agreement. Participation Agreements will be effective only if approved by a majority vote of the members of the Agency. VII. [Section 7001 ENFORCEMENT In the event a property is not acquired, developed, rehabilitated, or used in conformance with the Redevelopment Plan, with an Agency determination of conformance, or a Participation Agreement, then the Agency is authorized to (1) purchase the property, (2) purchase any interest in the property sufficient to obtain conformance, or (3) take any other appropriate action sufficient to obtain such conformance. The Agency shall not acquire real property retained or developed under an approved Participation Agreement if the participant fully performs under the agreement. VIII. [Section 8001 AMENDMENT OF RULES The Agency may amend these rules at any regular meeting or duly called special meeting held after their adoption, but only after notice to the Agency members and the public. The text of the proposed change shall be furnished along with the notice of the meeting. Such notice shall be delivered at least fourteen (14) days before the date of the meeting at which the proposed amendment will be considered. The method of notice is at the discretion of the Agency. No such amendment shall retroactively impair the rights of any parties who have executed Participation Agreements with the Agency in reliance upon these rules as presently constituted. Page 6 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. D2 7. S OF IN IN PARTICIPATING I hereby express my interest in participating in the Redevelopment Project and submit the following information: Name__ Home Address --- --_. -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - — Name of Business Address of Business _ -- My present involvement in the Project Area is: I now own property in the Project I now lease property in the Project Explain: I am interested in participating: As a Property Owner ^ — As a Tenant If I participate: I would like to continue at the same location I would like to change my present location I would like to acquire real property for expansion (indicate approxi- mate requirements) REMARKS: I understand that submission of this Statement of Interest form does not obligate me to participate if the Redevelopment Plan is carried out, nor does it indicate an opinion concerning the Project Area within the Katella Redevelopment Project Area. Signed Date Katz Hol l is REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Adopted: Ordinance No: Prepared by the ANAHEIM COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA for the ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 041787/5 0925.anh /bl Katz Hol 1 is TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE I. [Section 1001 INTRODUCTION ............................... .............................. II. [Section 2001 PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION ...................... ..............................4 III. [Section 300] PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES .................... A . [Section 3011 General ................................ ..............................5 B. [Section 302] Owner Participation and Business Re -Entry Preferences ........ ............................... 6 1. [Section 3031 Opportunities for Owner Participation ..... 6 2. [Section 304] Preferences for Persons Engaged in Business in the Project Area .............. 6 3. [Section 3051 Participation Agreements ..........................7 - 4. [Section 3061 Implementing Rules ..... ..............................7 C. [Section 3071 Property Acquisition ........... ..............................7 1. [Section 3081 Acquisition of Real Property ....................7 2 . [Section 3091 Personal Property ....... ..............................8 D. [Section 3101 Property Management .......... ..............................8 E. [Section 3111 Relocation of Occupants Displaced byAgency Acquisition ........ ..............................8 1. [Section 3121 Relocation Housing Requirements ............. 8 2. [Section 3131 Replacement Housing Plan ........................ 9 3. [Section 3141 Assistance in Finding Other Locations .................... ............................... 9 4. [Section 3151 Relocation Payments .... .............................10 F. [Section 3161 Payments to Taxing Agencies for in Lieu Taxes and To Alleviate Financial Burden ................. .............................10 G. [Section 3171 Demolition, Clearance, Public Improvements, Building and Site Preparation .........................10 1. [Section 3181 Demolition and Clearanc ...........................10 2. [Section 3191 Public Improvements ... .............................10 3. [Section 320] Preparation of Building Sites .................. H. [Section 321] Property Disposition and Development ............ 11 1. [ Section 3221 Real Property Disposition andDevelopment ......... .............................11 G) Katz Hol l is PAGE (ii) a. [Section 3231 General ................... .............................11 b. [Section 3241 Disposition and Development Documents .............. .............................12 c. [Section 3251 Development by the Agency or Other Public Bodies or Entities ....12 d. [Section 3261 Development Plans . .............................13 2. [Section 3271 Personal Property Disposition .................13 I. [Section 3281 Cooperation with Public Bodies .......................14 J. [Section 3291 Rehabilitation, Conservation and Moving of Structures .......... .............................14 1. [Section 3301 Rehabilitation and Conservation ..............14 - 2. Section 3311 Moving of Structures . 15 K. [Section 332] Low or Moderate Income Housing ....................15 1. [Section 3331 Authority Generally .... .............................15 2. [Section 3341 Replacement Housing ... .............................15 3. [Section 335] Increased and Improved Supply .............16 4. (Section 3361 New or Rehabilitated Dwelling Units Developed Within Project Area...... 17 5. [Section 3371 Duration of Dwelling Unit Availability .................. .............................17 IV. (Section 4001 LAND USES AND DEVELOPMENT REQUIREMENTS ........ 19 A. [Section 401] Redevelopment Plan Map ..... .............................19 B. [Section 4021 Major Land Uses and Alternative Major Land Uses .......................... ..............................1 1. [Section 4031 Residential ................... .............................19 2 [Section 4041 Commercial ................... .............................19 3. [Section 405] Industrial .................... .............................19 4. [Section 4061 Commercial or Industrial .........................19 5 [Section 4071 Parks ........................... .............................19 6. [Section 4081 Alternative Land Uses .............................19 C. [Section 4091 Other Land Uses ................. .............................20 1. [Section 4101 Public Rights of Way .. .............................20 2. [Section 4111 Other Public, Semi - Public, Institutional and Non - Profit Uses ........... 21 D. [Section 4121 Conforming Properties ........ .............................21 E. [Section 4131 Interim Uses ...................... ............................... F . [Section 4141 Nonconforming Uses ............ .............................21 (ii) Katz Hol I is PAGE G. [Section 4151 General Controls and Limitations .....................2 1. [Section 4161 Construction ................ .............................22 2. [Section 4171 Limitation on the Number of Buildings ................ .............................22 ._ 3. [Section 4181 Number of Dwelling Units ........................22 4. [Section 4191 Limitations on Type, Size and Height of Buildings ..... .............................22 5. (Section 4201 Open Spaces, Landscaping, Light, Air and Privacy .......... .............................22 6 . (Section 4211 Signs ........................... .............................23 7. [Section 4221 Utilities ....................... .............................23 8 . [Section 4231 Incompatible Uses ....... .............................23 9. [Section 4241 Non - Discrimination and Non - Segregation .......... .............................23 10. [Section 4251 Subdivision of Parcels ............................. 11. [Section 4261 Minor Variations .......... .............................23 12 . (Section 427] Design Guide ............... .............................24 13. [Section 4281 Building Permits ......... .............................24 V. [Section 5001 METHODS OF FINANCING THE PROJECT ......................26 A. [Section 5011 General Description of the Proposed Financing Method .............................26 B. [Section 5021 Tax Increment Funds .......... .............................26 C [Section 503] Agency Bonds ...................... .............................27 D. [Section 5041 Time Limit on Establishment of Indebtedness .................. .............................28 E. (Section 5051 Other Loans and Grants ..... .............................28 VI. [Section 600] ACTIONS BY THE CITY .................. .............................29 VII. (Section 7001 ENFORCEMENT ................................ .............................31 VIII. (Section 8001 DURATION OF THIS PLAN .............. .............................32 IX. [Section 900] PROCEDURE FOR AMENDMENT ........ .............................33 - EXHIBIT "A" REDEVELOPMENT PLAN MAP EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA EXHIBIT "C" PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND FACILITIES PROJECTS EXHIBIT "D" DIAGRAM ILLUSTRATING LIMITATIONS ON TYPE, SIZE AND HEIGHT OF BUILDINGS EXHIBIT "E" DIAGRAM ILLUSTRATING APPROXIMATE AMOUNT OF OPEN SPACE (iii) Katz Hol 1 is REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA I. [Section 100] JNTRODUCTION ..........._ ......... ........ _............................... This is the Redevelopment Plan (the "Plan ") for the Katella Redevelopment Project Area (the "Project ") in the City of Anaheim (the "City "), County of Orange, State of California. This Plan consists of text (Sections 100 through 900), the Redevelopment Plan Map (Exhibit "A "), a Legal Description of the Project Area (Exhibit "B "), the Proposed Public Improvements and Facilities Projects (Exhibit "C "), a Diagram Illustrating Limitations on Type, Size and Height of Buildings (Exhibit "D "), and a Diagram Illustrating Approximate Amount of Open Space (Exhibit "E "). This Plan was prepared by the Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission (the "Commission ") and will be implemented by the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency (the "Agency ") pursuant to the Community Redevelopment Law of the State of California (Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et seq.; all statutory references hereinafter shall be to the Health and -- Safety Code unless otherwise designated), the California Constitution, and all applicable local codes and ordinances. The definitions of general terms which are contained in the Community Redevelopment Law govern the construction of this Plan, unless more specific terms and definitions therefor are otherwise provided in this Plan. The project area (the "Project Area ") includes all properties within the Project boundary shown on the Redevelopment Plan Map and described in the Legal Description of the Project Area. The proposed redevelopment of the Project Area as described in this Plan conforms to the General Plan for the City of Anaheim, as applied in accord with local codes and ordinances. This Redevelopment Plan is based upon the Preliminary Plan formulated and adopted by the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission ") on September 16, 1986. This Plan provides the Agency with powers, duties and obligations to implement and further the program generally formulated in this Plan for the redevelopment, rehabilitation, and revitalization of the Project Area. This Plan does not present a specific plan or establish priorities for specific projects for the redevelopment, rehabilitation, and revitalization of any °- particular area within the Project Area. Instead, this Plan presents a process and a basic framework within which specific development plans will be presented, priorities for specific projects will be established, and specific _. solutions will be proposed, and by which tools are provided to the Agency to fashion, develop, and proceed with such specific plans, projects, and solutions. In general, the goals and objectives of a redevelopment program in the Project Area are as follows: 041787/5 0925.anh /bl KatzHollis 1. The elimination and prevention of the spread of blight and deterioration and the redevelopment of the Project Area in accord with the General Plan, specific plans, the Redevelopment Plan and local codes and ordinances. 2. The elimination or amelioration of certain environ- mental deficiencies, including substandard vehicular circulation systems and other similar public improvements, facilities and utilities deficiencies adversely affecting the Project Area, and also including facilities designed to accommodate systems of mass transportation. 3. The achievement of an environment reflecting a high level of concern for architectural, landscape and urban design and land use principles appropriate for attainment of the objectives of this Redevelopment Plan. 4. The enhancement of major, region- serving thorough- fares to provide a quality design identity and smooth, safe circulation. 5. The replanning, redesign and development of undevel- oped /vacant, underutilized and underdeveloped areas which are stagnant or improperly utilized. 6. The encouragement of investment by the private sector in the development and redevelopment of the Project Area by eliminating impediments to such development and redevelopment. 7. The provision for increased sales, business license, hotel occupancy and other fees, taxes and revenues to the City and other taxing bodies. 8. The expansion and upgrading of the community's supply of housing, including opportunities for low - and moderate - income households. 9. The establishment and implementation of performance criteria to assure high standards for site design, environmental quality and other design elements which provide unity and integrity to the entire Project. 10. The promotion and creation of new local employment opportunities. 11. The encouragement of uniform and consistent land use patterns. FO wti KatzHollis 12. The provision of a pedestrian and vehicular circulation system which is coordinated with land uses . and densities and adequate to accommodate projected traffic volumes. 13. To encourage the cooperation and participation of residents, business owners, public agencies and s� community organizations in the development and redevelopment of the area. 14. The encouragement of the development of a commercial and office environment which positively relates to adjacent land uses and to upgrade and stabilize existing commercial and office uses. 15. The examination of assisting in the undergrounding of unsightly overhead utility lines in commercial and residential areas. 16. The provision of adequate off - street parking to serve current and future uses within the Project Area. Redevelopment of the Project Area pursuant to this Plan and the above goals and objectives will attain the purposes of the California Community Redevelopment Law by: (1) elimination of areas suffering from economic dislocation and disuse; (2) replanning, redesign and /or redevelopment of areas which are stagnant or improperly utilized, and which could not be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone without public participation and assistance; (3) protecting and promoting sound development and redevelopment of blighted areas and general welfare of the citizens of the City by remedying such injurious conditions through the employment of appropriate means; (4) installation of new or replacement of existing public improvements, facilities and utilities in areas which are currently inadequately served with regard to such improvements, facilities and utilities; and (5) other means as determined appropriate. 3 KatzHollis H. [Section 2001 PROJECT AREA BOUNDARY AND LEGAL DESCRIPTION _...... ..... _.... ... _.. The boundary of the Project Area is shown on the Redevelopment Plan Map attached as Exhibit "A ", and is described in the Legal Description of the Project Area attached as Exhibit "B ". 4 Katz Hol 1 is III. [Section 3001 PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT ACTIVITIES ....__ _ _ A. [Section 3011 General The Agency proposes to eliminate and prevent the spread of blight - and blighting influences, and to strengthen the economic base of the Project Area and the community by: 1. Permitting participation in the redevelopment process by owners - and occupants of properties located in the Project Area, consistent with this Plan and rules adopted by the Agency; 2. Acquisition of real property; 3. Management of property under the ownership and control of the Agency; 4. Relocation assistance to displaced occupants of property acquired in the Project Area; 5. Demolition or removal of buildings and improvements; 6. Installation, construction, expansion, addition, extraordinary maintenance or re- construction of streets, utilit- ies, and other public facilities and improvements; 7. Disposition of property for uses in accordance with this Plan; 8. Redevelopment of land by private enterprise and public agencies for uses in accordance with this Plan; 9. Rehabilitation of structures and improvements by present owners, their successors, and the Agency; 10. Rehabilitation, development or construction of low and moderate income housing within the Project and /or the City; and 11. Providing for the retention of controls and establishment of restrictions or covenants running with the land so that property will continue to be used in accordance with this Plan. In the accomplishment of these activities, and in the implementation and furtherance of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to use all the powers provided in this Plan and all the powers to the extent now or hereafter permitted by law, which powers are not expressly limited by this Plan. 5 Katz Hol l is B. (Section 3021 Owner Participation and Business Re -Entry Preferences 1. [Section 3031 Opportunities for Owner Participation ._ _. _.._ The Agency is authorized to permit persons who are owners of commercial and other types of real property in the Project Area to be given the opportunity to participate in the redevelopment of their properties by rehabilitation, by retention of improvements, or by new development by retaining all or a portion of their properties, by acquiring adjacent properties from the Agency, by purchasing other properties in the Project Area, by participating with developers in the redevelopment of all or a portion of their properties, or by other suitable means. Persons and firms who own property within the Project Area shall be afforded the opportunity to participate in the redevelopment of their properties consistent with the objectives and proposals of. this Plan and implementation rules adopted by the Commission for the Agency. �- In addition to opportunities for participation by individual persons and firms, participation to the extent it is feasible shall be available for two or more persons, firms or institutions, to join together in partnerships, corporations, or other joint entities. Participation opportunities shall necessarily be subject to and limited by factors including but not limited to the following: (1) the elimination and changing of some land uses; (2) the construction, realignment, abandonment, widening, opening and /or other alteration or elimination of rights -of -way; (3) the removal, relocation, and /or installation of public utilities and public facilities; (4) the ability of participants to finance the proposed acquisition, development or rehabilitation in accordance with this Redevelopment Plan; (5) the ability and experience of participants to undertake and complete the proposed development; (6) any reduction in the total number of individual parcels in the Project Area; (7) the construction or expansion of public improvements and facilities, and the necessity to assemble areas for such; (8) any change in orientation and character of the Project Area; (9) the necessity to assemble areas for public and /or private development; (10) the requirements of this Plan and applicable laws and regulations of the City of Anaheim; (11) any Design Guide adopted by the Agency pursuant to Section 421 hereof; and (12) the feasibility of the participant's proposal. 2. (Section 3041 Preferences for Persons Engaged in Business in the Project Area The Agency shall extend reasonable preferences to persons who are engaged in business in the Project Area to re -enter in business within the redeveloped area if they otherwise meet the requirements prescribed by this Plan. 0 I�atZHollis 3. [Section 305] Participation Agreements _....... The Agency may require that, as a condition to participate in redevelopment or to obtain a building permit pursuant to Section 422 hereof, each participant shall enter into a binding written participation agreement with the Agency by which the participant agrees to acquire, rehabilitate, develop or use the property in conformance with this Plan and to be subject to provisions hereof and such other provisions and conditions to which the parties may agree. In such agreements, participants who retain real property may be required to sign and join in the recordation of such documents as is necessary to make the provisions of this Plan and such participation agreement applicable to their properties. In the event an owner or participant fails or refuses to develop, or use and maintain, its real property pursuant to this Plan and such participation agreement, the real property or any interest therein may be acquired by the Agency and sold or leased for development in accordance with this Plan. Whether or not a participant enters into a participation agreement with the Agency, the provisions of this Plan are applicable to all public and private property in the Project Area. 4. [Section 3061 Implementing Rules The provisions of Sections 302 through 305 shall be implemented according to the rules adopted by the Commission for the Agency prior to the approval of this Plan, and the same may be from time to time amended by the Agency. Where there is a conflict between the participation and re- entry preferences provisions in this Plan and such rules adopted by the Commission, the rules shall prevail. C. [Section 3071 Property Acquisition 1. [Section 3081 Acquisition of Real Property . _ ........._ .................. The Agency may acquire, but is not required to acquire, any real property located in the Project Area by gift, devise, exchange, lease, purchase, eminent domain or any other lawful method. It is in the public interest and is necessary in order to execute this Plan for the power of eminent domain to be employed by the Agency to acquire real property in all portions of the Project ,Area. No eminent domain proceeding to acquire property within the Project Area shall be commenced after twelve (12) years following the date of adoption of the ordinance approving and adopting this Plan. Such time limitation may be extended only by amendment of this Plan. The Agency is authorized to acquire structures without acquiring the land upon which those structures are located. The Agency is also authorized to acquire any other interest in real property less than a fee. 7 Katz Hol l is Without the consent of the owner, the Agency shall not acquire property to be retained by an owner pursuant to a participation agreement if the owner fully performs under the agreement. The Agency shall not acquire real property on which an existing building is to be continued on its present site and in its present form and use without the consent of the owner, unless such building requires structural alteration, improvement, modernization, or rehabilitation, or the site or lot on which the building is situated requires modification in size, shape or use, or it is necessary to impose upon such property any of the standards, restrictions and - controls of this Plan or of any Design Guide adopted by the Agency pursuant to this Plan, and the owner fails or refuses to participate in the Plan or in conformance with any such Design Guide by executing a participation agreement. Any covenants, conditions, or restrictions existing on any real property within the Project Area prior to the time the Agency acquires title to such property, which covenants, conditions, or restrictions restrict or purport to restrict the use of, or building upon, such real property, shall, when the Agency complies with the procedures of Section 33397 of the �- Community Redevelopment Law, be void and unenforceable as to the Agency and any other subsequent owners, tenants, lessees, easement holders, mortgagees, trustees, beneficiaries under a deed of trust, or any other persons or entities acquiring an interest in such real property from such time as title to the real property is acquired by the Agency. 2. [Section 3091 Personal Property _ ..... ...._ _ ._ .. ... ._ .......................... Generally, personal property shall not be acquired. However, where necessary in the execution of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to acquire personal property in the Project Area by any lawful means, including eminent domain. D. [Section 3101 Property Management During such time as property, if any, in the Project Area is owned by the Agency, such property shall be under the management and control of the Agency. Such property may be rented or leased by the Agency pending its disposition for redevelopment, and such rental or lease shall be pursuant to such policies as the Agency may adopt. E. [Section 3111 Relocation of Occupants Displaced by Agency Acquisition - - - -- 1. [Section 3121 Relocation Housing Requirements No persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced unless and until there is a suitable housing unit available and ready for occupancy by such displaced person or family at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Such housing units shall be suitable to the needs of such displaced persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary, and otherwise standard dwellings. The .Agency shall not displace Katz Hollis such person or family until such housing units are available and ready for occupancy. Permanent housing facilities shall be made available within three years from the time occupants are displaced. Pending the development of such facilities, there will be available to such displaced occupants adequate temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the community at the time of their displacement. 2. [Section 3131 Replacement Housing Plan Not less than thirty days prior to the execution of an agreement for acquisition of real property, or the execution of an agreement for the disposition and development of property, or the execution of an owner participation agreement, which agreement would lead to the destruction or removal of dwelling units from the low and moderate income housing market, the Agency shall adopt by resolution a replacement housing plan. The replacement housing plan shall include: (1) the general location of housing to be rehabilitated, developed, or constructed pursuant to Section 33413 of the Community Redevelopment Law; (2) an adequate means of financing such rehabilitation, development, or construction; (3) a finding that the replacement housing does not require the approval of the voters pursuant to Article XXXIV of the California Constitution, or that such approval has been obtained; (4) the number of dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate income planned for construction cr rehabilitation; and (5) the timetable for meeting the plan's relocation, rehabilitation, and replacement housing objectives. A dwelling unit whose replacement is required by Section 33413 but for which no replacement housing plan has been prepared, shall not be destroyed or removed from the low and moderate income housing market until the Agency has by resolution adopted a replacement housing plan. Nothing in this section shall prevent the Agency from destroying or removing from the low and moderate income housing market a dwelling unit which the Agency owns and which is an immediate danger to health and safety. The Agency shall, as soon as practicable, adopt by resolution a replacement housing plan with respect to such dwelling unit. 3. [Section 3141 Assistance in Finding Other Locations .....__ ............................................. ...... . ................ ...__ ............. ....... _ ....................... ........... .......... ..... ..... ........... -- The Agency shall assist all persons (including individuals and families), business concerns, and others displaced by Agency action in the Project in finding other locations and facilities. To the extent practicable it shall be the objective of the Agency to assist all displacees in finding suitable new locations within the City of Anaheim. In order to carry out the Project with a minimum of hardship to persons (including individuals and families), business concerns, and others, if any, displaced from their respective places of residence or business, the Agency shall assist such persons, business concerns and others in finding new locations that are decent, safe, sanitary, within their respective financial means, in reasonably convenient locations, and otherwise suitable to their respective needs. The 9 KatzHollis Agency may also provide housing inside or outside the Project Area for displaced persons. 4. [Section 3151 Relocation Payments The Agency shall make all relocation payments required by law to persons (including individuals and families), business concerns, and others displaced from property in the Project. Such relocation payments shall be made pursuant to the California Relocation Assistance Law (Government Code Section 7260 et seq.) and Agency rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto as such may be amended from time to time. The Agency may make such other payments as it may deem appropriate and for which funds are available. F. [Section 3161 Payments to Taxing Agencies for In Lieu ....................... Taxes and to Alleviate Financial Burden Subject to the provisions of Section 33401 of the Community Redevelopment Law, the Agency may make the payments specified in this Section 316. In any year during which it owns property in the Project Area, the Agency is authorized, but not required, to pay directly to any City, County, City and County, District, including, but not limited to, a School District, or other public corporation for whose benefit a tax would have been levied upon such property had it not been exempt, an amount of money in lieu of taxes. The Agency may also pay to any taxing agency with territory located within the Project Area (other than the City), any amounts of money which, in the Agency's determination, are appropriate to alleviate any financial burden or detriment caused to such taxing agency by the Project. G. [Section 3171 Demolition, Clearance, Public Improvements, Building and Site Preparation 1. [Section 318] Demolition and Clearance The Agency is authorized to demolish and clear buildings, structures, and other improvements from any real property in the Project Area as necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. 2. [Section 3191 Public Improvements The Agency is authorized to install and construct, or to cause to be installed and constructed, the public improvements, facilities and utilities (within or outside the Project Area) necessary to carry out this Plan. Such public improvements, facilities and utilities include, but are not limited to, the following: (1) over- and under - passes; (2) sewers; (3) storm drains; (4) electrical, natural gas, telephone and water distribution systems; (5) parks and plazas; (6) playgrounds; (7) parking and transportation facilities; (8) landscaped areas; (9) street and circulation improvements; and (10) flood control improvements and facilities. 10 KatzHollis 3. [Section 3201 Preparation of Building Sites .._ .... ._ _...... The Agency is authorized to prepare, or cause to be prepared, as building sites any real property in the Project Area owned by the Agency. The Agency is also authorized to construct foundations, platforms, and other structural forms necessary for the provision or utilization of air rights sites for buildings to be used for commercial, public, and other uses provided in this Plan. H. [Section 3211 Property Disposition and Development 1. [Section 3221 Real Property Disposition and _..... . Development ......................... ............................... a. [Section 3231 General For the purposes of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to sell, lease for a period not to exceed 99 years, exchange, subdivide, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber by mortgage or deed of trust, or otherwise dispose of any interest in real property. The Agency is authorized to dispose of real property by negotiated lease, sale, or transfer without public bidding but only after public hearing. Before any interest in real property of the Agency acquired in whole or in part, directly or indirectly, with tax increment moneys is sold, leased, or otherwise disposed of for development pursuant to this Plan, such sale, lease or disposition shall be first approved by the City Council after public hearing in conformance with Section 33433 of the Community Redevelopment Law. All real property acquired by the Agency in the Project Area shall be sold or leased to public or private persons or entities for development for the uses permitted in this Plan. Real property may be conveyed by the Agency to the City and, where beneficial to the Project Area, to any other public body without charge or for an amount at less than fair market value. All purchasers or lessees of property from the Agency shall be made obligated to use the property for the purposes designated in this Plan, to begin and complete development of the property within a period of time which the Agency fixes as reasonable, and to comply with other conditions which the Agency deems necessary to carry out the purposes of this Plan. During the period of development in the Project Area, the Agency shall ensure that the provisions of this Plan and of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan are being observed, and that development in the Project Area is proceeding in accordance with development documents w and time schedules. 11 Katz Hol 1 i s b. [Section 3241 Disposition and Development "`�"` Documents The Agency shall reserve powers and controls in disposition and development documents as may be necessary to prevent transfer, retention, or use of property for speculative purposes and to ensure that development is expeditiously carried out pursuant to this Plan. To provide adequate safeguards to ensure that the provisions of this Plan will be carried out and to prevent the recurrence of blight, all real property sold, leased, or conveyed by the Agency, as well as all property subject to participation agreements, shall be made subject to the provisions of this Plan and any adopted Design Guide and other conditions imposed by the Agency by leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, declarations of restrictions, provisions of the zoning ordinance, conditional use permits, or other means. Where appropriate, as determined by the Agency, such documents or portions thereof shall be recorded in the Office of the Recorder of the County. The leases, deeds, contracts, agreements, and declarations of restrictions may contain restrictions, covenants, covenants running with the land, rights of reverter, conditions subsequent, equitable servitudes, or any other provision necessary to carry out this Plan. All property in the Project Area is hereby subject to the restriction that there shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon sex, marital status, race, color, religion, national origin, or ancestry in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of property in the Project Area. All property sold, leased, conveyed, or subject to a participation agreement, by or through the Agency, shall be expressly subject by appropriate documents to the restriction that all deeds, leases, or contracts for the sale, lease, sublease, or other transfer of land in the Project Area shall contain such non - discrimination and non - segregation clauses as are required by law. C. [Section 3251 Development by the Agency or Other Public Bodies or Entities __..........._..... ... _ ........................... .... .................. To the extent now or hereafter permitted by law, the Agency may, with the consent of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, pay all or part of the value of the land for and the cost of the installation and construction of any building, facility, structure, or other improvement which is publicly owned either within or outside the Project Area, if the City Council determines: (1) that such buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements are of benefit to the Project Area or the immediate neighborhood in which the Project is located, regardless of whether such improvement is within another project area; and (2) that no other reasonable means of financing such buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements are available to the community. Such determinations by the Agency and the City Council shall be final and conclusive. 12 Katz Hol l is Specifically, the Agency may pay all or part of the value of the land for and the cost of the installation and construction of any building, facility, structure or other improvement set forth in Section 319 of this Plan, including those set forth in Exhibit "C ", Proposed Public Improvements and Facilities Projects. When the value of such land or the cost of the installation and construction of such building, facility, structure, or other improvement, or both, has been, or will be paid or provided for initially by the City or other public corporation, the Agency may enter into a contract with the City or other public corporation under which it agrees to reimburse the City or other public corporation for all or part of the value of such land or all or part of the cost of such building, facility, structure, or other improvement, or both, by periodic payments over a period of years. The obligation of the Agency under such contract shall constitute an µ indebtedness of the Agency for the purpose of carrying out the redevelopment project for the Project Area, which indebtedness may be made payable out of taxes levied in the Project Area and allocated to the Agency under subdivision (b) of Section 33670 of the California Redevelopment Law and Section 502 of this Plan, or out of any other available funds. In a case where such land has been or will be acquired by, or the cost of the installation and construction of such building, facility, structure or other improvement has been paid by, a parking authority, joint powers entity, or other public corporation to provide a building, facility, structure, or other improvement which has been or will be leased to the City such contract may be made with, and such reimbursement may be made payable to, the City. Before the Agency commits to use the portion of taxes to be allocated and paid to the Agency pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 33670 for the purpose of paying all or part of the value of the land for, and the cost of the installation and construction of, any publicly owned building, other than parking facilities, the City Council shall hold a public hearing in accord with the provisions of Section 33679 of the Community Redevelopment Law. d. [Section 3261 Development Plans _...._ _...I .. All development plans (whether public or private) shall be processed in the manner provided by applicable City codes as they are or as they may be amended from time to time. All development in the Project Area must conform to City and Agency design review procedures, including any Design -- Guide adopted by the Agency pursuant to Section 421 hereof. 2. [Section 3271 Personal Property Disposition For the purposes of this Plan, the Agency is authorized to lease, sell, exchange, transfer, assign, pledge, encumber, or otherwise dispose of personal property which is acquired by the Agency. 13 Katz Hol l is _.. I. [Section 3281 Cooperation with Public Bodies Certain public bodies are authorized by state law to aid and cooperate with or without consideration in the planning, undertaking, construction, or operation of this Project. The Agency may seek the aid and cooperation of such public bodies and attempt to coordinate this Plan with the activities of such public bodies in order to accomplish the purposes of redevelopment and the highest public good. The Agency, by law, is not authorized to acquire real property owned by public bodies without the consent of such public bodies. The Agency, however, will seek the cooperation of all public bodies which own or intend to acquire property in the Project Area. Any public body which owns or leases property in the Project Area will be afforded all the privileges of owner participation if such public body is willing to enter into a participation agreement with the Agency. All plans for development of property in the Project Area by a public body shall be subject to Agency approval. The Agency may impose on all public bodies the planning and design controls contained in and authorized by this Plan to ensure that present uses and any future development by public bodies will conform to the $- requirements of this Plan. The Agency is authorized to financially (and otherwise) assist any public entity in the cost of public land, buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements (within or outside the Project Area) which land, buildings, facilities, structures, or other improvements are of benefit to the Project. J. [Section 3291 ...... .. .. -._.. _.._ _..._......_...-...._ ... .........__._._.._._...._..__..__...._. __.._...__ _ ............... of Structures 1. [Section 3301 Rehabilitation and Conservation The Agency is authorized to rehabilitate and conserve, or to cause to be rehabilitated and conserved, any building or structure in the Project Area owned by the Agency. The Agency is also authorized to advise, encourage, and assist (through a loan program or otherwise) in the rehabilitation and conservation of property in the Project Area not owned by the Agency. The Agency is also authorized to acquire, restore, rehabilitate, move and conserve buildings of historic or architectural significance. It shall be the purpose of this Plan to allow for the retention of as many existing businesses as practicable and to add to the economic life of these businesses by a program of voluntary participation in their conservation and rehabilitation. The Agency is authorized to conduct a program of assistance and enforcement to encourage owners of property within the Project Area to upgrade and maintain their property consistent with this Plan and such standards as may be developed for the Project _ Area. 14 KatzHollis The extent of rehabilitation in the Project Area shall be subject to the following limitations: a. The rehabilitation of the structure must be compatible with land uses as provided for in this Plan; b. Rehabilitation and conservation activities on a structure must be carried out in an expeditious manner and in conformance with the requirements of this Plan and such property rehabilitation standards as may be adopted by the Agency and the City. C. The expansion of public improvements, facilities and utilities. d. The assembly and development of areas in accordance with this Plan. The Agency may adopt property rehabilitation standards for the rehabilitation of properties in the Project Area. The Agency shall not assist in the rehabilitation or conservation of properties which, in its opinion, is not economically and /or structurally feasible. 2. [Section 3311 Moving of_ Structures As necessary in carrying out this Plan, the Agency is authorized to move or to cause to be moved, any standard structure or building or any structure or building which can be rehabilitated to a location within or outside the Project Area. K. [Section 3321 Low or Moderate Income housing 1. [Section 3331 Authority Generally The Agency may, inside or outside the Project Area, acquire land, improve sites, or construct or rehabilitate structures in order to provide housing for persons and families of low or moderate income. The Agency may also provide subsidies to, or for the benefit of, such persons and families or households to assist them in obtaining housing. The Agency may also sell, lease, grant, or donate real property owned or acquired by the Agency to the Anaheim Housing Authority and may otherwise cooperate with the Housing Authority in carrying out the provisions of Section 335 hereinbelow. 2. [Section 3341 Replacement Housing In accordance with Sections 33334.5 and 33413 of the Community Redevelopment Law, whenever dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate income are destroyed or removed from the low and moderate income housing market as part of a redevelopment project, the Agency shall, 15 Katz Hol l is within four years of such destruction or removal, rehabilitate, develop, or construct, or cause to be rehabilitated, developed, or constructed, for rental or sale to persons and families of low or moderate income an equal number of replacement dwelling units at affordable housing costs within the territorial jurisdiction of the Agency, in accordance with all of the provisions of Sections 33413 and 33413.5 of the Community Redevelopment Law. 3. [Section 3351 Increased and Improved Supply Pursuant to Section 33334.2 of the Community Redevelopment Law, not less than 20 percent of all taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to subdivision (b) of Section 33670 of the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 502 of this Plan shall be used by the Agency for the purposes of increasing and improving the City's supply of low and moderate income housing available at affordable housing cost, as defined by Section 50052.5 of the Health & Safety Code, to persons and families of low or moderate - income, as defined in Section 50093 of the Health & Safety Code, and very low income households, as defined in Section 50105 of the Health & Safety Code, unless one or more of the following findings are made: (1) that no need exists in the City to improve or increase the supply of low and moderate income housing in a manner which would benefit the Project Area to improve or increase the supply of housing for persons and families of low or moderate income or very low income households; or (2) that some stated percentage less than 20 percent of the taxes which are allocated to the Agency pursuant to Section 502 is sufficient to meet such housing need; or (3) that a substantial effort to meet low and moderate income housing needs in the City is being made and that this effort, including the obligation of funds currently available for the benefit of the City from state, local, and federal sources for low and moderate income housing alone or in combination with the taxes allocated under Section 33334.2, is equivalent in impact to the funds otherwise required to be set aside pursuant to said Section. In carrying out the purposes of Section 33334.2, the Agency may exercise any or all of its powers, including, but not limited to, the following: 1. Acquire land or building sites; 2. Improve land or building sites with on -site or off -site improvements; 3. Donate land to private or public persons or entities; 4. Construct buildings or structures; 5. Acquire buildings or structures; 6. Rehabilitate buildings or structures; 7. Provide subsidies to or for the benefit of persons or families of very low, low, or moderate income; and PI KatzHollis 8. Develop plans, pay principal and interest on bonds, loans, advances, or other indebtedness, or pay financing or carrying charges. The Agency may use these funds to meet, in whole or in part, the replacement housing provisions in Section 334 above. These funds may be used inside or outside the Project Area provided, however, that funds may be used outside the Project Area only if findings of benefit to the Project are made as required by said Section 33334.2 of the Community Redevelopment Law. The funds for this purpose shall be held in a separate Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund until used. Any interest earned by such Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund shall accrue to the Fund. 4. [Section 3361 New or Rehabilitated Dwelling Unit ......................................_. ......_........._.__....._..... - - - - Developed Within Project Area At least thirty percent (30%) of all new or rehabilitated dwelling units developed by the Agency, if any, shall be available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low or moderate income. Not less than fifty percent (50°x) of the dwelling units required to be available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low or moderate income shall be �- available at affordable housing cost to, and occupied by, very low income households. At least fifteen percent (15 %) of all new or rehabilitated units developed within the Project Area by public or private entities or persons other than the Agency, if any, shall be available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low or moderate income. Not less than forty percent (40%) of the dwelling units required to be available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low or moderate income shall be available at affordable housing costs to very low income households. The percentage requirements set forth in this Section shall apply independently of the requirements of Section 334 and in the aggregate to housing made available pursuant to the first and second paragraphs, respectively, of this Section 336 and not to each individual case of rehabilitation, development or construction of dwelling units. If all or any portion of the Project Area is developed with low or moderate income housing units, the Agency shall require by contract or other appropriate means that such housing be made available for rent or . purchase to the persons and families of low and moderate income displaced ' by the Project. Such persons and families shall be given priority in renting or buying such housing; provided, however, failure to give such priority shall not effect the validity of title to real property. 5. [Section 3371 Duration of Dwelling Unit Availability .... ...... ... . The Agency shall require that the aggregate number of replacement dwelling units and -other dwelling units rehabilitated, developed or 17 KatzHollis constructed pursuant to Sections 334 and 336 shall remain available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low income, moderate income and very low income households, respectively, for not less than the period set forth in Section 800 for the duration of this Plan's development controls. 19 Katz Hol I is IV. [Section 4001 LAND USES AND DE .. VELOPMENT REQUIREM - ..__._.. _ A. [ Section 4011 Redevelopment Plan Map The Redevelopment Plan Map ("Map"), attached hereto as Exhibit "A," illustrates the Project boundary, identifies the major streets within the Project Area, and illustrates the major and alternative major land uses permitted within the Project Area. B. [Section 4021 Major Land Uses and Alternative Major Land ....... ..... .... .... ... ........ ............... ....... ...... ......... ....... ............. ............. ................................ ............... _ ........ ......... Uses ................... 1. [Section 4031 Residential The areas illustrated on the Map as Residential are or may be developed and used for residential housing types representing a mix of purchase prices and rental rates. 2. [Section 404] Commercial The areas illustrated on the Map as Commercial are or may be developed and used for commercial uses, including but not limited to office, retail, service, entertainment, and related auxiliary uses. 3. [Section 4051 Industrial ................ .........I..................... The areas illustrated on the Map as Industrial are or may be developed and used for general industrial uses, including but not limited to light and heavy industrial and manufacturing, research and development, warehouse and distribution, industrially related office, and related uses. Commercial uses may be permitted within the areas shown on the Redevelopment Plan Map as exclusively industrial if such uses are compatible with and serve an appropriate need related to the industrial use or uses found in such areas, as determined by the Agency. 4. [Section 4061 Commercial or Industrial The areas illustrated on the Map as Commercial or Industrial are or may be developed and used for either commercial or industrial uses as those uses are described in Sections 404 and 405. 5. [Section 4071 Parks ................... The areas illustrated on the Map as Parks are or may be developed and used for green belt, or other open space uses. New park sites may be developed in any other land use area shown on the Redevelopment Plan Map. 6. [Section 4081 Alternative Major Land Uses Certain areas are shown on the Redevelopment Plan Map with alternate land uses. Such areas or any portion of such areas may be used for the 19 Katz Hol l is designated alternate land use, subject to a General Plan amendment providing for such use. C. [Section 4091 Other Land Uses ......... ............................... _..................... 1. [Section 4101 Public Rights of Way Major public streets within the Project Area are generally described as Ninth Street, Walnut Street, West Street, Harbor Boulevard, Clementine �- Street, Haster Street, Anaheim Boulevard, Lewis Street, State College Boulevard, Douglass Road, Orangewood Avenue, Convention Way, Pacifico Avenue, Katella Avenue, Freedman Way, Cerritos Avenue, Ball Road, Vermont , Avenue, South Street, and Santa Ana Street. Additional public streets, alleys and easements may be created in the Project Area as needed for proper use and /or development. Existing streets and alleys may be abandoned, closed or modified as necessary for proper use and /or development. It is anticipated that Project development may entail vacation and /or realignment of certain streets, alleys, and other -- rights-of-way. Any changes in the existing street layout shall be in accord with the General Plan, the objectives of this Plan, and the City's design standards, shall be effectuated in the manner prescribed by state and local law, and shall be guided by the following criteria: 1. A balancing of the needs of proposed and potential new development for adequate pedestrian and vehicular access, vehicular parking, and delivery loading docks with similar needs of existing developments proposed or potentially proposed to remain. Such balancing shall take into consideration the rights of existing owners and tenants under the participation and preferences rules adopted by the Commission for the Project, and any participation agreements executed thereunder; 2. The requirements imposed by such factors as topography, traffic safety and aesthetics; 3. The potential need to serve not only the Project Area and new - or existing developments, but to also serve areas outside the Project by providing convenient, efficient vehicular access and movement; and 4. The potential need or desire to accommodate the facilities and /or equipment of mass transportation modes. The public rights -of -way may be used for vehicular and /or pedestrian traffic, as well as for public improvements, public and private utilities, and activities typically found in public rights -of -way. In addition, all necessary easements for public uses, public facilities, and public utilities may be retained, amended or created. 20 hatzHollis 2. [Section 4111 Oth er _Public, Semi - Rgti and Non- Profit Uses In any area the Agency is authorized to permit the maintenance, establishment or enlargement of public, semi - public, institutional, or non- profit uses, including park and recreational facilities, libraries, educational, fraternal, employee, philanthropic, religious and charitable institutions, utilities, railroad rights -of -way, and facilities of other similar associations or organizations. All such uses shall conform so far as possible to the provisions of this Plan applicable to the uses in the specific area involved. The Agency may impose such other reasonable restrictions as are necessary - to protect the development and uses in the Project Area. D. [Section 4121 Confo Properties The Agency may, at its sole and absolute discretion, determine that certain real properties within the Project Area meet the requirements of this Plan, and the owners of such properties may be permitted to remain as owners of conforming properties without a participation agreement with the Agency, provided such owners continue to operate, use, and maintain the real properties within the requirements of this Plan. A certificate of w conformance to this effect may be issued by the Agency and recorded. An owner of a conforming property may be required by the Agency to enter into a participation agreement with the Agency in the event that such owner desires to (1) construct any additional improvements or substantially alter or modify existing structures on any of the real property described above as conforming; or (2) acquire additional property within the Project Area. E. [Section 4131 Interim Uses Pending the ultimate development of land by developers and participants, the Agency is authorized to use or permit the use of any land in the Project Area for interim uses not in conformity with the uses permitted in this Plan. Such interim use shall conform to all applicable City Codes. F. [Section 4141 NonconforminCUses The Agency is authorized to permit an existing use to remain in an existing building in good condition, which use does not conform to the provisions of this Plan, provided that such use is generally compatible with existing and proposed developments and uses in the Project Area, and abatement of such uses is not required by applicable City codes. The owner of such a property may be required to enter into a participation agreement, to record a covenant of restrictions against the property, and agree to the _ imposition of such reasonable restrictions as may be necessary to protect the development and uses in the Project Area. The Agency may authorize additions, alterations, repairs or other improvements in the Project Area for uses which do not conform to the provisions of this Plan where such improvements are within a portion of the Project where, in the determination of the Agency, such improvements would be compatible with surrounding and Project uses and development and are permitted under applicable City codes. 21 Katz Hol 1 is G. [Section 4151 General Controls and Limitations All real property in the Project Area is hereby made subject to the controls and requirements of this Plan. No real property shall be developed, rehabilitated, or otherwise changed after the date of the adoption of this Plan, except in conformance with the provisions of this Plan. 1. [Section 4161 Construction All construction in the Project Area shall comply with all applicable state and local laws in effect at such time. In addition to applicable codes, ordinances, or other requirements _ governing development in the Project Area, additional specific performance and development standards may be adopted by the Agency to control and direct redevelopment activities in the Project Area, including property rehabilitation standards adopted pursuant to Section 330 hereof, and one or more Design Guides adopted pursuant to Section 421 hereof. 2. [Section 4171 L imitatio n on t N umber of Building The approximate number of buildings in the Project Area shall not exceed the maximum number allowed under the densities permitted under the City's General Plan, as implemented and applied by local codes and ordinances. 3. [Section 4181 Num of Dwell Units The number of dwelling units in the Project Area shall not exceed the maximum number allowed under the densities permitted under the City's General Plan, as implemented and applied by local codes and ordinances. The number of dwelling units permitted in the Project will be approximately 16,500. 4. [Section 4191 Limitations on T e Size i e and ..._ .._.._._..__ Height of Buildings _ Except as set forth in other sections of this Plan, the type, size, and height of buildings shall be as limited by the applicable federal, state and local statutes, ordinances and regulations, and as generally diagramed in Exhibit "D" of this Plan. 5. [Section 420] Onen Spaces Landscaping., Li�ht Air and Privacy The approximate amount of open space to be provided in the Project Area is the total of all area which will be in the public rights -of -way, the - public grounds, spaces around buildings, and all other outdoor areas not permitted to be covered by buildings, as generally diagramed in Exhibit "E" of this Plan. Landscaping shall be developed in the Project Area to insure optimum use of living plant material. 22 KatzHollis In all areas, sufficient space shall be maintained between buildings to provide adequate light, air and privacy. 6. [Section 421] Signs All signs shall conform to City requirements. Design of all proposed new signs shall be submitted prior to installation to the Agency and /or City for review and approval pursuant to the procedures permitted by this Plan. New signs must contribute to a reduction in sign blight currently existing in the Project Area. 7. [Section 4221 Utilities The Agency shall require that all utilities be placed underground whenever physically possible and economically feasible. S. [Section 423] Incompatible Uses No use or structure which by reason of appearance, traffic, smoke, w glare, noise, odor, or similar factors would be incompatible with the surrounding areas or structures shall be permitted in any part of the Project Area. 9. [Section 4241 Non - Discrimination and Non- Segregation There shall be no discrimination or segregation based upon race, color, creed, sex, marital status, religion, national origin, or ancestry permitted in the sale, lease, sublease, transfer, use, occupancy, tenure, or enjoyment of property in the Project Area. 10. [Section 425] Subdivision of Parcels No parcels in the Project Area, including any parcel retained by a participant, shall be consolidated, subdivided or re- subdivided without the approval of the appropriate City body, and, if necessary for purposes of this Plan, the Agency. 11. [Section 426] Minor Variations The Agency is authorized to permit minor variations from the limits, restrictions and controls established by this Plan. In order to permit any such variation, the Agency must determine that: a. The application of certain provisions of the Plan would result in practical difficulties or unnecessary hardships inconsistent with the general purpose and intent of the Plan. b. There are exceptional circumstances or conditions applicable to the property or to the intended development of the property which do not apply generally to other properties having the same standards, restrictions, and controls. 23 KatzHollis C. Permitting a variation will not be materially detrimental to the ' public welfare or injurious to property or improvements in the area. d. Permitting a variation will not be contrary to the objectives of the Plan. No such variation shall be granted which permits other than a minor departure from the provisions of this Plan. In permitting any such variation, the Agency shall impose such conditions as are necessary to protect the public health, safety, or welfare, and to assure compliance with the purposes of the Plan. Any such variation permitted by the Agency �- hereunder shall not supersede any other approval required under City codes and ordinances. 12. [Section 4271 Design Guide Within the limits, restrictions, and controls established in this Plan, the Agency is authorized to establish heights of buildings, land coverage, setback requirements, design and sign criteria, traffic circulation, traffic access, parking, and other development and design controls necessary for proper development of both private and public areas within the Project Area. These may be established by the approval of specific developments, by the adoption of general restrictions and controls by resolution of the Agency, or by the adoption of one or more Design Guides pursuant to this Section. No new improvement shall be constructed and no existing improvement shall be substantially modified, altered, repaired, or rehabilitated except in accordance with architectural, landscape, and site plans submitted to and approved in writing by the Agency and the Planning Commission unless allowed pursuant to the procedures of Section 428 hereof. One of the objectives of this Plan is to create an attractive and pleasant environment in the Project Area. Therefore, such plans shall give consideration to good design, open space, and other amenities to enhance the aesthetic and otherwise architectural quality of the Project Area. The Agency and Planning Commission shall not approve any plans that do not comply with this Plan. 13. [Section 4281 Building Permits .. . ................... ............................... No permit shall be issued for the construction of any new building or any addition, construction, moving, conversion or alteration to an existing building in the Project Area from the date of adoption of this Plan until the application for such permit has been processed in the manner provided hereinbelow. Any permit that is issued hereunder must be in conformance with the provisions of this Plan, any Design Guide adopted by the Agency, any restrictions or controls established by resolution of the Agency, and any applicable participation or other agreements. Upon receipt of such an application, the City shall request the Agency to review the application to determine what effect, if any, the issuance 24 KatZHollis thereof would have upon the Plan for said Project Area. Within 25 days thereafter the Agency shall file with the City a written report setting forth its findings of fact, including but not limited to, the following: a. Whether the proposed improvements would be compatible with the standards and other requirements set forth in the Plan and in terms of design; and b. What modifications, if any, in the proposed improvements would be necessary in order to meet the requirements of the Plan and in terms of design; and C. If required, whether the applicant has entered into an agreement with the Agency for the development of said improvements and submitted architectural landscape and site plans to the Agency. The Agency is authorized to establish permit procedures and approvals in addition to those set forth above where required for purposes of this Plan. A building permit shall be issued only after the applicant for same has been granted all approvals required by the City and the Agency at the time of application. 25 I:atzHollis V. [Section 5001 METHOD OF FINANCING THE PROJECT A. [Section 5011 General Description of the Proposed Financing Method The Agency is authorized to finance this Project with tax increment funds, interest income, Agency bonds, donations, loans from private financial institutions, the lease or sale of Agency -owned property, participation in development, or with financial assistance from the City, State of California, the federal government, or any other available source, public or private. The Agency is also authorized to obtain advances, borrow funds, issue - bonds, and create indebtedness in carrying out this Plan. The principal and interest on such indebtedness may be paid from tax increments or any other funds available to the Agency. Advances and loans for survey and planning and for the operating capital for administration of this Project may be provided by the City until adequate tax increment or other funds are available or sufficiently assured to repay the advances and loans and to permit borrowing adequate working capital from sources other than the City. The City, as it is able, may also supply additional assistance through issuance of bonds, loans and grants and in -kind assistance. The City or any other public agency may expend money to assist the Agency in carrying out this Project. As available, gas tax funds from the state and county may be used for street improvements and public transit facilities. All or a portion of the parking may be installed through a parking authority or other public or private entities. Tax increment financing, as authorized by Section 502 of this Plan, is intended as a source of financing in combination with other sources of financing that may be available for specific project activities. B. [Section 5021 Tax Increment Funds All taxes levied upon taxable property within the Project Area each ro- year, by or for the benefit of the State of California, the County of Orange, the City of Anaheim, any district or any other public corporation (hereinafter sometimes called "taxing agencies ") after the effective date of the ordinance approving this Plan, shall be divided as follows: 1. That portion of the taxes which would be produced by the rate upon which the tax is levied each year by or for each of said taxing agencies upon the total sum of the assessed value of the taxable property in the Project Area as shown upon the assessment roll used in connection with the taxation of such property by such taxing agency, last equalized prior to the effective date of such ordinance, shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid to the respective taxing agencies as taxes by or for said taxing agencies on all other property are paid (for the purpose of allocating taxes levied by or for any taxing agency or agencies which did not include the territory of the Project on the effective date of such ordinance but to which CP _w Katz Hol 1 is such territory has been annexed or otherwise included after such effective date, the assessment roll of the County of Orange last equalized on the effective date of said ordinance shall be used in determining the assessed valuation of the taxable property in the Project Area on said effective date); and 2. That portion of said levied taxes each year in excess of such amount shall be allocated to and when collected shall be paid into a special fund of the Agency to pay the principal of and interest on bonds, loans, monies advanced to, or indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed or otherwise) incurred by the Agency to finance or refinance, in whole or in part, this Project. Unless and until the total assessed valuation of the taxable property in the Project Area exceeds the total assessed value of the taxable property in the Project Area as shown by the last equalized assessment roll referred to in subdivision (1) hereof, all of the taxes levied and collected upon the taxable property in the Project Area shall be paid into the funds of the respective taxing agencies. When said bonds, loans, advances and indebtedness, if any, and interest thereon, have been paid, all monies thereafter received from taxes upon the taxable property in the Project Area shall be paid to the respective taxing agencies as taxes on all other property are paid. The portion of taxes mentioned in subdivision (2) above is hereby irrevocably pledged for the payment of the principal of and interest on the advance of monies, or making of loans, or the incurring of any indebtedness (whether funded, refunded, assumed or otherwise) by the Agency to finance or refinance the Project, in whole or in part. The Agency is authorized to make such pledges as to specific advances, loans and indebtedness as appropriate in carrying out the Project. The portion of taxes divided and allocated to the Agency pursuant to subdivision (2) of this section shall not exceed a cumulative total of $2,255,000,000, except by amendment of this Plan. Such limitation is exclusive of: (1) any payments to taxing agencies to alleviate financial burden made by the Agency pursuant to Section 33401 of the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 316 of this Plan; and 2) any funds required by Section 33334.2 of the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 335 of this Plan to be deposited by the Agency in a Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund as a result of such payments to taxing agencies. C. [Section 5031 Agency Bonds ................. _ .... .... The Agency is authorized to issue bonds from time to time, if it deems it appropriate to do so, in order to finance all or any part of the Project. Neither the members of the Agency nor any persons executing the bonds are liable personally on the bonds by reason of their issuance. 27 Katz Hol 1 is The bonds and other obligations of the Agency are not a debt of the City, or the State, nor are any of its political subdivisions liable for them, nor in any event shall the bonds or obligations be payable out of any funds or properties other than those of the Agency; and such bonds and other obligations shall so state on their face. The bonds do not constitute an indebtedness within the meaning of any constitutional or statutory debt limitation or restriction. The amount of bonded indebtedness to be repaid in whole or part from the allocation of taxes described in subdivisions (2) of Section 502 above which can be outstanding at any one time shall not exceed $500,000,000 in principal amount, except by amendment of this Plan. Such limitation is exclusive of: 1) any payments to be made from such principal amount by the Agency to any taxing agency pursuant to Section 33401 of the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 316 of this Plan to alleviate financial burden; and 2) any funds required by Section 33334.2 of the Community Redevelopment Law and Section 335 of this Plan to be deposited by the Agency in a Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund as a result of such payments to taxing agencies. D. [Section 5041 Time Limit on Establishment of Indebtedness The Agency shall not establish or incur loans, advances, or indebtedness to finance in whole or in part the Project beyond 35 years from the date of adoption of this Plan. Loans, advances, or indebtedness may be repaid over a period of time beyond said time limit. Such time limitation may be extended only by amendment of this Plan. E. [Section 5051 Other Loans and Grants Any other loans, grants, guarantees, or financial assistance from the United States, the State of California, or any other public or private source will be utilized if available as appropriate in carrying out the Project. In addition, the Agency may make loans as permitted by law to public or private entities for any of its redevelopment purposes. W Katz Hol l i s VI. [Section 6001 ACTIONS OF THE CITY ..._... ._.._ .................... ...... ._.................. The City shall aid and cooperate with the Agency in carrying out this Plan and shall take all actions necessary to ensure the continued fulfillment of the purposes of this Plan and to prevent the recurrence or spread in the area of conditions causing blight. Actions by the City may include, but are not limited to, the following: 1. Institution and completion of proceedings for opening, closing, vacating, widening, or changing the grades of streets, alleys, and other public rights -of -way, and for other necessary modifications of the streets, the street layout, and other public rights -of -way in the Project Area. Such action by the City shall include the requirement of abandonment, removal, and relocation by the public utility companies of their operations in public rights -of -way as appropriate to carry out this Plan, provided that nothing in this Plan shall be construed to require the cost of such abandonment, removal, and relocation be borne by others than those legally required to bear such costs. 2. Institution and completion of proceedings necessary for changes and improvements in private and publicly -owned public utilities within or affecting the Project Area. 3. Revision of the Zoning Ordinance within the Project Area to permit the land uses and development authorized by this Plan. 4. Imposition wherever necessary (by covenants of restrictions, conditional use permits or other means) of appropriate controls within the limits of this Plan upon parcels in the Project Area to ensure their proper development and use. 5. Provision for administrative enforcement of this Plan by the City after development. 6. Performance of the above actions, and of all other functions and services relating to public health, safety, and physical development normally rendered in accordance with a schedule which will permit the redevelopment of the Project Area to be commenced and carried to completion without unnecessary delays. .. 7. Provision of services and facilities and the various officials, offices and departments of the City for the Agency's purposes under this Plan. 8. Provision of financial assistance in accordance with Section 500 of this Plan. 9. The undertaking and completing of any other proceedings necessary to carry out the Project. W latz Hol l is The foregoing actions to be taken by the City may involve financial outlays by the City, but do not constitute a commitment to make such outlays. 30 KatZHollis VII. [Section 700] ENFORCEMENT The administration and enforcement of this Plan, including the preparation and execution of any documents implementing this Plan, shall be performed by the Agency and /or the City. The provisions of this Plan or other documents entered into pursuant to this Plan may also be enforced by court litigation instituted by either the Agency or the City. Such remedies may include, but are not limited to, specific performance, damages, re- entry, injunctions, or any other remedies appropriate to the purposes of this Plan. In addition, any recorded provisions which are expressly for the benefit of owners of property in the Project Area may be enforced by such owners. 31 Katz Hollis VIII. [Section 800] DURATION OF THIS PLAN Except for the non - discrimination and non - segregation provisions which shall run in perpetuity, the provisions of this Plan shall be effective, and the provisions of other documents formulated pursuant to this Plan may be made effective, for 35 years from the effective date of adoption of this Plan by the_ City Council; provided, however, that the Agency may issue bonds and incur obligations pursuant to this Plan which extend beyond the termination date, and in such event, this Plan shall continue in effect for the purpose of repaying such bonds or other obligations until the date of retirement of such bonds or other obligations, as determined by the City Council. 32 Katz Hollis IX. [Section 9001 PROCEDURE FOR AMENDMENT u . _. . _._... .... _......... _ _.. This Plan may be amended by means of the procedure established in Sections 33450 -33458 of the Community Redevelopment Law, or by any other procedure hereafter established by law. 33 0 Z Q J a O f ! � C i W < a Z W W F _' W O I< > < f � w _ <pW � J F < aP »» J ui J Q .. Q W Q W W � Q 0 J > �QC1Q ZQ p � W Lu cc cc O J J W J m m D z -co < W W O cc � V Ic < + J y J U Z Z W H Z V W N h- W J W ' 7 C a o o 0 2 W V d j W U ¢ v ? a a ? v 0 0 0 0 0 -- ,•Y 0 �'• - O O O O S �- J O f ! � C i W < a Z W W F _' W O I< > < f � w _ <pW � J F < aP »» 0 J > • %r T T' + K -? J o 0 0 0 - a o o 0 0 0 o a :o W o«a '0 '0 0 0 0 0 0 -- ,•Y 0 �'• - O O O O S �- J : ;: ;•:;:;:::::: . o o a! 0 D 0 0 0 0 o o �-- � a m o o - - - - v aQ 0 O O O O O O 0 -_ o 0 o a � ........................ .......................:. I O e . » > > D > O - 7 D> .... , O f ! � C i W < a Z W W F _' W O I< > < f � w _ <pW � J F < • %r T T' + i v � L I O f ! � C i W < a Z W W F _' W O I< > < f � w _ <pW � J F < Katz Hol l is EXHIBIT "B" LEGAL DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT AREA Katella Redevelopment Project Area All that certain real property in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, being a portion of Sections 13 through 16 inclusive, Sections 21 through 24 inclusive and Sections 26 and 27 of the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana per map recorded in Book 51, Page 7 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said County, a portion of Sections 27 and 28 of the Rancho Las Bolsas per map recorded in Book 51, Page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said County, a portion of the Rancho Santiago de Santa Ana as described in the Final Decree of Partition entered September 12, 1868 in Book B, Page 410 of Judgments of the District Court of the 17th Judicial District in and for Los Angeles County, State of California, and a portion of the original Townsite of Anaheim as shown on a map recorded in Book 4, Pages 629 and 630 of Deeds, records of said Los Angeles County, more particularly described as follows: Beginning at the centerline intersection of Orangewood Avenue and Ninth Street said point being the center of Section 28, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, San Bernardino Meridian; thence West 40 feet along the City of Anaheim City Limit Line per City of Anaheim Ordinance No. 1032 dated January 30, 1956, titled the South Anaheim Annexation, to an angle point in said line; thence West 5 feet more or less along the Westerly pro - longation of said City Limit Line to the Southerly prolongation of the Westerly right -of -way line of Ninth Street; thence North 661 feet more or less along said Southerly prolongation and said Westerly right -of -way line to an angle point in said line; thence East 25 feet to the Westerly right -of -way line of Ninth Street, said line being 20.00 feet Westerly measured at right angles from the centerline of Ninth Street; thence �. North 211 feet more or less along said Westerly right -of -way line to an angle point in said line; thence West 10 feet to the Westerly right -of -way of Ninth Street, said line being 30.00 feet Westerly measured at right an- gles from the centerline of Ninth Street; thence North 284 feet more or less along said Westerly right -of -way line to the Southerly right -of -way line of Wakefield Avenue; thence West 15 feet more or less along the Southerly right -of -way of Wakefield Avenue to the Southerly prolongation - of the Westerly right -of -way line of Ninth Street said line being 45.00 feet Westerly measured at right angles from the centerline of Ninth Street; thence North 1,400 feet more or less along said Southerly prolon- gation and said Westerly right -of -way line to a point 25.00 feet Southerly from the Easterly prolongation of the Southerly right -of -way line of Katella Avenue said point being the beginning of a tangent curve concave Page 1 of 6 KatzHollis �. Southwesterly having a radius of 25.00 feet; thence Northerly, North - westerly and Westerly 39.27 feet along said curve through a central angle of 90 00' 00" to the Southerly right -of -way line of Katella Avenue said right -of -way line being 60.00 feet Southerly measured at right angles from the centerline of said Avenue; thence West 542 feet more or less to the Easterly right -of -way line for the Orange County Flood Control Dis- trict Anaheim - Barber City Channel; thence North 8 feet more or less along said Easterly line to Southerly right -of -way line of Katella Avenue said line being 52.00 feet Southerly of the centerline of Katella Avenue measured at right angles; thence West 345 feet more or less to an angle in said Southerly line; thence South 45 West 11.3 feet along said line to an angle point in said line said point being 60.00 feet Southerly measured at right angles from the centerline of Katella Avenue; thence West 1,200 feet more or less along said Southerly right -of -way line to the Southerly prolongation of the Westerly right -of -way line of Tiara Street; thence North 612 feet more or less along said Southerly prolongation, said Westerly right -of -way line and the Northerly prolongation of said Westerly right -of -way line to the Northerly right -of -way line of Sumac Lane; thence East 831 feet more or less along said Northerly right -of -way line to the Westerly line of Tract No. 2903 per map recorded in Book 99, Pages 21 through 23 inclusive, of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Or- ange County; thence North 839 feet along said Westerly line and the Northerly prolongation of said Westerly line to the Northerly right -of -way line for the Southern Pacific Railroad Company said point being a point on a nontangent curve concave Northerly to which point a radial line of said nontangent curve bears South 2 23' 46" East; thence along said right -of -way line Easterly, Northeasterly and Northerly the following de- scribed courses; along said nontangent curve to the left having a radius of 2834.83 feet, through a central angle of 0 30' 11" an arc distance of 24.89 feet; along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 2,516.52 feet, through a central angle of 0 40' 30" an arc distance of 29.65 feet; along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 2,261.88 feet, through a central angle of 0° 45' 00" an arc distance 29.61 feet; along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 2,053.53 feet, through a central angle of 0° 49' 30" an arc distance of 29.57 feet; along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 1,879.91 feet, through a central an- gle of 0° 54' 00" an arc distance of 29.53 feet; along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 1,733.01 feet, through a central angle of 0° 58' 30" an arc distance of 29.49 feet; along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 1,607.09 feet, through a central angle of 1° 03' 00" an arc distance of 29.45 feet; along a tangent curve to the left having a ra- dius of 1,497.96 feet, through a central angle of 1 07' 30" an arc dis- tance of 29.41 feet; along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 1,402.47 feet, through a central angle of 1 12' 00" an arc distance of 29.37 feet; along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 1,318.21 - feet, through a central angle of 1 16' 30" an arc distance of 29.33 feet; Page 2 of 6 Katz Hol l is along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 1,243.32 feet, through a central angle of 71 59' 02" an arc distance of 1,562.05 feet; along a tangent curve to the left having a radius of 3,789.75 feet, through a central angle 2° 19' 22" an arc distance of 153.64 to the North- east corner of Tract No. 2446 per map recorded in Book 136, Pages 33 through 36 inclusive, of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County to which point a radial line bears South 85° 58' 51" East; thence North 70 feet more or less to the Southeast corner of Tract No. 1979 per map recorded in Book 89, Pages 2 through 5 inclusive, of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County said point also being on the Wester- ly right -of -way line for the Southern Pacific Railroad Company; thence North 2,609 feet more or less along said Westerly right -of -way line to the Southerly right -of -way line of Ball Road said line being 53.00 feet South- erly measured at right angles from the centerline of said road; thence West along said Southerly right -of -way line 1,316 feet more or less to the Southerly prolongation of the Westerly right -of -way line of Loara Street; thence North 726 feet more or less along said Southerly prolongation and said Westerly right -of -way line to an angle point in said line; thence East 2 feet more or less to the Westerly right -of -way line of Loara Street said line being 30.00 feet Westerly measured at right angles from the center- line of Loara Street; thence North 186 feet more or less to the Westerly prolongation of the Northerly right -of -way line of Beacon Avenue; thence East 1,126 feet more or less along said prolongation and said Northerly w right -of -way line to a point 15.00 feet Westerly of the Westerly right -of -way of Gilbuck Drive said point being the beginning of a tangent curve concave Northwest having a radius of 15.00 feet; thence Easterly, Northeasterly and Northerly 23.56 feet along said curve through a central angle of 90 00' 00" to the Westerly right -of -way line of Gilbuck Drive said line being 30.00 feet Westerly measured at right angles from the cen- terline of said Gilbuck Drive; thence North 335 feet more or less to the beginning of a tangent curve concave Westerly having a radius of 370 feet; thence Northwesterly 37.01 feet along said curve through a central angle of 5° 43' 50" to the beginning of a reverse curve concave Easterly having a radius of 430 feet; thence Northerly 43.01 feet along said curve through a central angle of 5° 43' 50 "; thence North 1,381 feet more or less along the Westerly right -of -way line of Gilbuck Drive to the Norther - ly line of Tract No. 2155 per map recorded in Book 73, Pages 30 through 34 inclusive, of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said Orange County; thence East 240 feet more or less along said Northerly line and the Eas- terly prolongation of said Northerly line to the Westerly line of Tract No. 3970 per map recorded in Book 141, Pages 42 and 43, of Miscellaneous Maps, records of said County; thence South 1.7 feet more or less along said Westerly line to the Southwest corner of said Tract; thence East 1,250 feet more or less along the Southerly line of said Tract and the Page 3 of 6 KatzHollis Easterly prolongation of the Southerly line of said Tract to the Westerly right -of -way line of Walnut Street; thence North 785 feet more or less along said Westerly right -of -way line to the Northerly right -of -way line of Santa Ana Street said line being 34.50 feet Northerly measured at right angles from the centerline of said street; thence South 82 East 61 feet more or less along the Southeasterly prolongation of said Northerly right -of -way line to the intersection of said prolongation with the Easterly right -of -way line of Walnut Street; thence North 77° East 40 feet more or less along the Northerly right -of -way line of Santa Ana Street to the Southwesterly right -of -way line of Manchester Boulevard; thence North 71* East 106 feet more or less to the intersection of the Northeasterly right -of -way of Manchester Boulevard with the Northerly right -of -way line of Santa Ana Street said Northerly line being 34.75 feet Northerly from the centerline of Santa Ana Street measured at right angles; thence- North 76° East 3,081 feet more or less along said Northerly right -of -way line to the centerline of Harbor Boulevard; thence continuing along the Northerly right -of -way line of Santa Ana Street North 76 East 983 feet more or less - to an angle point in said line; thence South 14 East 8 feet more or less to the Northerly right -of -way of Santa Ana Street said line being 26.75 feet Northerly of the centerline of said street measured at right angles; thence North 76 East 65 feet more or less to an angle point in said Northerly line; thence South 14 East 1 foot to the Northerly right -of -way line of Santa Ana Street said line being 25.75 feet Northerly of said - centerline measured at right angles; thence North 76° East 87.5 feet more or less to an angle point in said Northerly line; thence North 14° West 0.5 feet to the Northerly right -of -way line of Santa Ana Street said line being 26.25 feet Northerly of said centerline measured at right angles; thence North 76° East 614 feet more or less along said Northerly line to the Westerly right -of -way line of Anaheim Boulevard; thence North 14° West 8.5 feet more or less along said Westerly line to the Westerly prolongation of the Northerly line of Santa Ana Street said line being 34.75 feet northerly of the centerline of Santa Ana Street measured at right angles; thence North 76 East 1,246 feet more or less along said Westerly prolongation and said Northerly line to the centerline of Olive Street; thence South 14° East, 5,230 feet more or less along said centerline to the Westerly prolongation of the Northerly right -of -way line of Ball Road said Northerly line being 53.00 feet Northerly measured at right angles from the centerline of said Road; thence East 7,185 feet more or less along said Westerly prolongation and said Northerly line to the - Southerly prolongation of the Easterly right -of -way line of Sunkist Street; thence South 3 feet along said Southerly prolongation to the Westerly prolongation of the Northerly right -of -way of Ball Road; thence East 1,775 feet more or less along said Westerly prolongation and said Northerly line to the City Limit Line for the City of Anaheim per Ordi- nance No. 2060 dated October 20, 1964, titled the Wagner - Rio Vista Annexation; thence South 53 feet more or less along said line to the City Page 4 of 6 Katz Hol l is Limit Line for the City of Anaheim per Resolution No. 75R -647 dated Jan- uary 19, 1976 titled the Ball - Freeway Annexation; thence along said City Limit Line the following courses: Easterly 97.21 feet; along a tangent curve right having a radius of 1,200 feet, through a central angle of 30 25' 59" an are distance of 637.38 feet to the City Limit Line for the City of Anaheim per Resolution No. 82R -25B dated May 18, 1982 titled the Ball - Freeway No. 3 Annexation; thence along said City Limit Line the following courses: along a tangent curve right having a radius of 1,200 feet, through a central angle 0° 27' 04" an arc distance of 9.45 feet; Southeasterly 52.64 feet; Southerly 732.28 feet; Easterly 59.97 feet; Southerly 1,292.78 feet to the City Limit Line for the City of Anaheim per Ordinance No. 2814 dated June 30, 1970 titled the Douglas - Katella Annexation; thence along said City Limit Line the following courses: Eas- terly 450 feet more or less to an angle point, Southwesterly 2,458.24 feet; Westerly 390 feet to a nontangent curve concave Northwesterly having a radius of 430 feet; 163.75 feet along said curve through a central angle of 21° 49' 07" to a tangent line; Southwesterly 420 feet more or less along m said line; Northerly 115 feet to the City Limit Line for the City of Ana- heim per Ordinance No. 1380 dated October 13, 1959, titled the Placentia - Cerritos Annexation; thence along said City Limit Line the following course: Southwesterly 86 feet more or less along said line to its intersection with the centerline of Douglas Street; thence along the City Limit Line for the City of Anaheim per Resolution No. 76R -500 dated September 27, 1976, titled the Douglas - Katella No. 2 Annexation and the centerline of Douglas Street the following courses: Southerly 92.60 feet; along a tangent curve right having a radius of 300 feet, through a central angle of 21 14' 05" an arc distance of 111.19 feet; Southwesterly 702.91 feet to the City Limit Line for the City of Anaheim per Ordinance No. 1119 dated March 29, 1957, titled the Katella Annexation; thence along said City Limit Line the following courses; Southeasterly 530 feet more or less along said line to an angle point; Southwesterly 2,675 feet more or less; Southerly 735 feet more or less; Westerly 1,790 feet more or �- less to an angle point, Northerly 205.43 feet; Westerly 783 feet more or less; Northerly 870 feet more or less to an angle point; Westerly 1,830 feet more or less to the Southwesterly right -of -way line for the Southern -a- Pacific Railroad Company, Southeasterly 1,810 feet more or less along said line to the Southerly line of the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana; Southwesterly 620 feet more or less along said Rancho line to the City µ� Limit Line for the City of Anaheim per Resolution No. 68R -720 dated December 5, 1968, titled Boundary Line Adjustment Between City of Anaheim and City of Orange; thence along said City Limit Line the follow - _, ing courses; Southerly 41.08 feet; Westerly 41.00 feet; Northerly 1.31 feet; Southwesterly 562.23 feet to an angle point; Southwesterly 616.41 feet; along a tangent curve right having a radius of 1,925.00 feet, through a central angle of 3 31' 58" an arc distance of 121.78 feet to a Page 5 of 6 Katz Hol 1 is nontangent line; Northerly 30.15 feet along said nontangent line to the City Limit Line for the City of Anaheim per Ordinance No. 1119 dated March 29, 1957, titled the Katella Annexation; thence along said City Limit Line the following courses: Southwesterly 20 feet more or less to an angle point; Northerly 680 feet more or less to the Southerly right -of -way line for Simmons Avenue; Westerly 2,760 feet more or less along said Southerly line to an angle point; Northerly 40 feet more or less to the City Limit Line for the City of Anaheim per Ordinance No. 1138 dated May 1, 1957, titled the Haster Street Annexation; thence along said City Limit Line the following course: Westerly 20 feet more or less to the City Limit Line for the City of Anaheim per Ordinance No. 1487 dated August 12, 1960, titled the Sirus and Tiller Avenue Annexation; thence -. along said City Limit Line the following courses: Southerly 659.97 feet; Westerly 1,270.35 feet to the City Limit Line for the City of Anaheim per Ordinance No. 1403 dated November 13, 1959, titled the Chapman - Har- bor Boulevard Annexation; thence along said City Limit Line the following courses: Southerly 630 feet more or less; Westerly 1,350 feet more or less; Northerly 1,290 feet more or less to the City Limit Line for the City of Anaheim per Ordinance No. 1032 dated January 30, 1956, titled the South Anaheim Annexation; thence along said City Limit Line the following courses: Westerly 600 feet more or less to an angle point; Northerly 660 feet more or less to the City Limit Line for the City of Anaheim per Reso- lution No. 4277 -A dated January 16, 1958, titled the Garden Grove - Ana- heim Boundary Relocation; thence along said City Limit Line the following courses: Westerly 20 feet more or less; Northerly 680 feet more or less to the City Limit Line for the City of Anaheim per Ordinance No. 1032 dated January 30, 1956, titled the South Anaheim Annexation; thence along said City Limit Line the following courses: Westerly 1,930 feet more or less; Northerly 970 feet more or less; Westerly 1,354 feet more or less; Southerly 990 feet more or less; Westerly 1,305 feet more or less to the Point of Beginning. dA tQ on was prepared by �' �" �• Date � 9 � v � NAME 0 JOHN W. PFEIFER NO N 5329 OF CAUf -0 Page 6 of 6 hatzHollis EXHIBIT "C" Katella Redevelopment Project Area PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND FACILITIES PROJECTS ..... . ................. _... I. TRANSPORTATION, TRAFFIC AND STREET IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS LOCA ........ _ .... ...._.. _. _ _..._.........._..._........._. ....._.._..__........._.._ ..... ........ — _._.............. ._.........._....__..__...._... .............. A .. -- FREEWAY) .... ............................... . Freeway, street and alley construction, reconstruction, widening, signalization, curbs, gutters, sidewalks and other improvements as necessary to upgrade, modernize and improve the following: A. Grade Separations /Overcrossings 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 11. 12. 13. 14. 15. Pedestrian overcrossing, Orangewood w/o Rampart Pedestrian overcrossing, State College @ Pacifico Pedestrian overcrossing, Katella @ Convention Ctr. Pedestrian overcrossing, Harbor @ Disneyland Pedestrian overcrossing, West St. @ Disneyland Bridge overcrossing, Cerritos @ I -5 Grade separation, Katella & SPRR Grade separation, State College & SPRR Grade separation, State College & ATSFRR Grade separation, Ball & ATSF Grade separation, Ball & SPRR Grade separation, Cerritos & ATSFRR Bridge separation, Orangewood @ I -5 Bridge overcrossing, Pacifico @ I -5 Grade separation, Cerritos & SPRR B. Flyovers 1. Harbor @ Katella 2. Harbor @ Ball 3. Pacifico @ St. College 4. St. College @ Orangewood 5. Cerritos @ St. College 6. St. College @ Katella 7. St. College @ Ball 8. Katella @ Howell C. Critical Intersections Ball Rd. @ Harbor 2. Katella @ Harbor 3. Katella @ St. College 4. St. College @ Orangewood 5. St. College @ Ball 6. Orangewood @ Harbor 1086.anh /4 040987/bl [Continued on following Page.] Katz Hol l is Katella Redevelopment Project Area Proposed Public Improvements and Facilities Projects ~ °- Page 2 7. Haster @ Katella 8. Cerritos @ St. College 9. Lewis @ Katella - 10. Cerritos @ Anaheim Blvd. 11. Ball @ Anaheim Blvd. 12. Katella @ Howell 13. Ball @ Lewis 14. City Dr. @ St. College 15. St. College @ Pacifico 16. Harbor @ Convention Way 17. Ball @ Euclid 18. Ball @ West 19. Katella @ Clementine - 20. Katella @ Clemintine 21. Haster @ Convention Way 22. Haster @ Orangewood D. Street Widening,'s /Realignments /Extensions _ ............................ ......................._..._ - . . ... ... ....... 1. Widen St. College Blvd. (N /O City Dr. to Rt. 91) - 2. Realign /widen Lewis /East Streets (Pacifico to Rt. 91) 3. Katella widening (Euclid to 57 Fwy.) 4. Orangewood Ave. widening (9th St. to 57 Fwy.) - 5. Ball Rd. widening (Euclid to 57 Fwy.) 6. West St. widening (Convention Way to Ball) 7. Cerritos widening (Sunkist to Anaheim Blvd. & Euclid to 9th St.) 8. Pacifico widening (St. College to I -5) 9. Convention Way extension (Harbor to I -5) 10. Harbor Blvd. widening (Broadway to Chapman) 11. Walnut St. widening (Cerritos to Ball) 12. Anaheim Blvd. widening (Ball to SCL - including I -5 Bridge) 13. Clementine widening (Katella to Freedman Way) 14. Douglass Road widening (Cerritos to Katella) 15. Sunkist widening (Ball to Lincoln) E. Freeway, Signalization, Median, and other Transportation Pro- jects - -- 1. Construct interchange - I -5 @ West St. (Including realignment of West from Ball to Broadway) 2. Bridge widening Harbor @ I -5 3. Reconstruct interchange Katella @ I -5 4. Reconstruct Ball Rd. (Anaheim Blvd. to St. College) 5. Reconstruct Ball Rd. (Brookhurst to I -5) 6. Reconstruct Orangewood (Anaheim to St. College) 7. Median upgrade - Katella (I -5 to Santa Ana River) [Continued on following Page.] Katz Hol l is Katella Redevelopment Project Area Proposed Public Improvements and Facilities Projects Page 3 8. Increase ramp capacity SR 57 @ Orangewood 9. Orangewood /I -5 access ramps 10. Upgrade /modify existing signals - misc. locations 11. Coordinate signals on Katella, Ball, Anaheim Blvd. /Haster, and St. College 12. Upgrade and install signal interconnects - 28 local controllers in South Central Anaheim 13. Construct one -way couplet paralleling I -5 /Manchester/ Anaheim Blvd. 14. People mover system 15. Master pedestrian circulation system (Commercial Recreation Area) 16. Commercial Recreation Area parking structures (approx. 10,000 Spaces) 17. Assist in Reconstruction of I -5 from SR22 to SR91 18. Miscellaneous alley reconstructions 19. Increase capacity of SR57 (SR22 to SR91) 20. Increase ramp capacity SR57 8 Katella 21. Increase ramp capacity SR57 ® Ball II. STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS Installation, construction, upgrading, reconstruction, replacement and /or other improvement of or to storm drain facilities, as follows: 1. Vermont Street - E/O Anaheim Blvd. to ATSFRR 2. Cerritos- Anaheim - Barber -City Channel to Walnut 3. Orangewood - E/O 9th St., Jacalene Ln; including Jacalene Ln. & Gail Ln. Laterals 4. Walnut - Cerritos to Goodhue 5. Harbor - N/O Orangewood to Convention Way 6. Clementine - N/O Orangewood to end 7. Haster - Leatrice to Wakefield and alley extension to Mountain View 8. Orangewood - Spinnaker to Anaheim Blvd. 9. Open channel E/O Palm - Midway Dr. to Santa Ana Fwy. 10. Katella- Anaheim- Barber -City Channel to Haster 11. Harbor - Katella to Manchester including Manchester to Santa Ana Fwy. 12. Harbor - Chapman to Orangewood 13. Ball Rd.- Anaheim - Barber -City Channel to Walnut to South St. to Olive Storm Drain 14. Katella - Lewis to .3 miles +/- E/O Lewis 15. Lewis St. - ATSFRR to Ball Rd. 16. Anaheim Blvd. - Cerritos to Palais 17. Anaheim Blvd. - Spinnaker Channel N. to 440' S/O Katella 18. Orangewood Ave. - S.E. Anaheim Channel to 100' W/O St. College Blvd. [Continued on following Page.) Katz Hollis Katella Redevelopment Project Area Proposed Public Improvements and Facilities Projects Page 4 19. St. College Blvd. - Orangewood to Pacifico 20. Miscellaneous other system deficiencies at various project area locations III. SEWER IMPROVEMENTS Installation, construction, upgrading, reconstruction, replacement and /or other improvement of or to miscellaneous local sewer line facilities IV. WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Installation, construction, upgrading, reconstruction, replacement and /or other improvement of or to water line facilities, as follows: 1. Walnut St. - Santa Ana to Ball 2. Walnut St. - Ball to Katella 3. Crone Ave. - Walnut to Hampstead 4. Cerritos Ave. - Walnut to 9th St. 5. 9th St. - Well #36 to Cerritos 6. West St. - Santa Ana to South 7. West St. - PR -19 in Ball to Cerritos 8. Illinois - Santa Ana to South 9. Indiana - Santa Ana to South 10. Ohio - Santa Ana to South 11. Water St. - Olive to West 12. Ball Rd. - I -5 Fwy. overcrossing 13. Harbor Blvd. - Ball to South City limit (including I -5 overcrossing) 14. Clementine - Katella to Orangewood 15. Pacifico - Hilton Hotel to Manchester 16. Pacifico - Manchester to St. College (including I -5 overcrossing) 17. Katella - I -5 Fwy. overcrossing 18. Manchester - Katella to Orangewood 19. Lewis St. - Katella to Pacifico 20. St. College - Katella to Orangewood 21. Lemon St. - South to Vermont 22. Citron - Santa Ana to Water ti V. ELECTRICAL SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS Installation, construction, upgrading, replacement and /or other improvement of or to electrical system facilities, as follows: 1. Undergrounding of overhead distribution facilities in area bounded by Ball Rd., Katella, Walnut, & Manchester 2. Conversion of individual services for above area [Continued on following Page.] -r- Katz Hol t is Katella Redevelopment Project Area Proposed Public Improvements and Facilities Projects Page 5 3. Construct new S.E. Anahaim substation 4. Underground of overhead facilities in S.E. Anaheim area bounded by Orangewood Ave. on the South, Anaheim Blvd. on the West, Katella from I -5 to Euclid, and St. College Blvd. from Katella to the ATSFRR tracks 5. Underground SCE facilities on R/W from Walnut St. to I -5 6. Underground balance of SCE facilities in Area W/O I -5 7. Underground telephone, CATV, Western Union in conjunction with above undergrounding work VI. OTHER PUBLIC FACILITIES IMPROVEMENTS Provide following new public facilities within and serving the Project Area I. Neighborhood parks in Citron Area and other unspecified _w locations to provide recreational opportunities for currently under - served residential area. Note: This listing of projects is set forth for planning purposes, and shall not be deemed as a limitation on the Redevelopment Agency's authorities to implement the Redevelopment Plan. Katz Hollis EXHIBIT "D" DIAGRAM ILLUSTRATING Limitations on Type, Size and Height of Buildings Ratella Redevelopment_ Pr BUILDING CHARACTERISTIC PROPOSED REGULATORY LIMITATION* TYPE Zoning Code, Building Code, Fire Code SIZE General Plan, Zoning Code HEIGHT General Plan, Zoning Code, F.A.A. Regulations * In addition to the specific limitations noted, all applicable Federal, State, and Local ordinances and regulations shall apply to developments proposed in the Project Area. Within the limits, restrictions, and controls established under the Plan, the Agency is authorized to establish additional development and design controls pursuant to Section 427 of the Plan. KatzHollis DIAGRAM ILLUSTRATING Approximate Amount of Open Space KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Building Area 50 -60% W_. N07 ES: 1. Percentages are approximate. 2. "OPEN SPACE" means the total area which will be in the public rights —of —way, the public grounds, spaces around buildings and al! other outdoor areas not permitted to be covered by buildings 3. "BUILDING AREA" means Land area devoted to buildings. Katz Hol l is REPORT TO CITY COUNCIL on the PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN _ for the KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA Prepared by Katz, Hollis, Coren & Associates, Inc. w" for the ANAHEIM COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION and the ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY May, 1987 1016.anh /5 �° 051987/bl KatzHollis TABLE OF CONTENTS . _ ..__ _ .__ _.._..... I .................__..._.....__ . __ PART Page ..................... INTRODUCTION ............................................................ ............................... 1 I. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF PROJECT AREA; DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC PROJECTS PROPOSED BY COMMISSION; DESCRIPTION OF HOW PROPOSED PROJECTS WILL IMPROVE OR ALLEVIATE BLIGHT CONDITIONS; AND EXPLANATION OF WHY PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISHED BY PRIVATE ENTERPRISE ACTING ALONE ....................................... ............................I -1 A. Reasons for Selection of Project Area .............. ............................I -1 B. Description of Specific Projects Proposed by Commission i n Project Area ........................................... ............................... I -3 C. Description of How Projects Proposed by Commission Will Improve on Alleviate Blight Conditions ............. ............................I -3 D. Explanation of Why Proposed Public Improvements Cannot be Accomplished by Private Enterprise Acting Alone ..................I -4 II. DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL, SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS EXISTING IN PROJECT AREA .................. ...........................II -1 A. Existing Physical Conditions ......................... ............................... II -1 1. Project Location ....................................... ...........................II -1 2. Land Uses and Structures ...................... ...........................II -1 3. Predominantly Urbanized Area ................ ...........................II -2 4. Properties Included for Planning Purposes ...................... II -2 5. Buildings and Structures ..................... :............................. II -3 a. b. C. d. e. f. g• Deterioration and Dilapidation ......... ...........................II -3 Defective Design and Character of Physical Construction ...................... ...........................II -5 Age and Obsolescence ................. ............................... II -5 Mixed Character of Buildings .......... ...........................II -7 Shifting Uses ................................... ...........................II -7 Faulty Interior Arrangement and Exterior Spacing..II -8 Inadequate Light, Ventilation and Open Space .........II -8 6. Properties .............................................. ...........................II -8 a. Lots That Are of Irregular Form, Shape and Size ...II -9 b. Inadequate Public Improvements, Facilities and Utilities........................................ ............................... II -9 . 1. Transportation and Circulation Deficiencies .... II -9 2. Water System Deficiencies .... ..........................II -12 Katz Hol 1 is PART . Page ....................... 3. Sewer System Deficiencies ............................. II -13 4. Storm Drainage Deficiencies . ..........................II -13 5. Electrical System Deficiencies ........................II -14 6. Parks /Recreation Deficiencies ........................ II -14 B. Existing Social Conditions ........................... ............................... II -14 - 1. Population .......................................... ............................... II -15 2. Income ................................................ ............................... II -15 3. Education Levels and School Population ..........................II -16 4. Housing .............................................. ............................... II -16 5. Infectious Diseases ............................ ............................... II -17 6. Crime ....................................................... ..........................II -17 7. Lack of Open Space and Recreation Facilities ................. II -18 C. Existing Economic Conditions ...................... ............................... II -18 1. Prevalence of Impaired Investments ...... ..........................II -19 - 2. Prevalence of Economic Maladjustment ............................ II -19 3. Existence of Inadequate Public Improvements, Public Facilities, Open Space and Utilities ...................... II -20 Attachments 1 - 4 ............................................. ..........................II -20 III. PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING REDEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT AREA............................................ ............................... ..........................III -1 A. General Financing Methods Available to Agency ........................III -1 B. Proposed Redevelopment Activities and Estimated Costs ...........III -I - C. Estimated Project Revenues .............................. ..........................III -2 1. Tax Increment Revenue ........................... ..........................III -3 2. Loans, Grants and Contributions from City, State and Federal Government and from Private Developers .... ............................... ..........................III -3 3. Land Sale Proceeds .. ............................... ..........................III -3 4. Special Assessment Districts ................... ..........................III -4 - 5. Development Fees ...... ............................... ..........................III -4 D. Proposed Financing Method and Economic Feasibility of the Project ..................... ............................... ..........................III -4 E. Reasons for Including Tax Increment Financing in Proposed Redevelopment Plan ........................... ..........................III -5 F. Tax Increment Use Limitations and Requirements ......................III -6 ii Katz Hollis PART Page IV. PLAN AND METHOD OF RELOCATION .......................... ...........................IV -1 A. Agency Displacement ......................................... ...........................IV -1 B. Relocation in the Event of Agency Displacement ...................... ..IV -1 C. Rules and Regulations .................................. ............................... IV -2 D. Agency Determinations and Assurances ........... ...........................IV -2 E. Replacement Housing Plan ............................ ............................... IV -4 F. Relocation Assistance Advisory Program and Assurance of Comparable Replacement Housing ................. ...........................IV -4 - 1. Administrative Organization ............................................ ...IV -5 a. Responsible Entity ............ . ....................... . ................ IV -5 b Functions ........... . ....................................................... IV -5 2 . Information Program ....... . .................................................. IV -7 3 . Relocation Records .................................. ...........................IV -7 4 . Relocations Resources Survey. ...... o ....... o ................. o ......... IV-7 5 . Relocation Payments ....................................... . ................... IV -7 w- 6. Temporary Moves ...................... . ................ . ................ . ...... IV -8 7 . Last Resort Housing ........................... ............................... IV -8 8 . Grievance Procedures. ................ o ................ o ..................... IV-8 9 . Relocation Appeals Board ........................ ...........................IV -8 V. ANALYSIS OF PRELIMINARY PLAN .............................. ............................V -1 VI. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION .............. VI -1 VII. PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE RECORD .................... ............................... VII -1 A. Formation of PAC ......................................... ............................... VII -1 B. Information and Documents Presented to PAC by Agency........ VII -1 C. PAC Recommendation on Proposed Plan ...... ............................... VII -2 - Attachments 1 - ...................................................... ............................... VIII. REPORT REQUIRED BY SECTION 21151 OF PUBLIC RESOURCES - CODE (PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT) .. .........................VIII -1 IX. REPORT OF COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER .................. ............................... IX -1 X. REPORT OF FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE ................... ............................X -1 XI. NEIGHBORHOOD IMPACT REPORT ............................ ............................... XI -1 iii Katz Hol 1 is PART Page A. Impact on Residents in Project Area and Surround- i ng Area ........................................................ ............................... XI -1 1. Relocation, Traffic Circulation, Environmental Quality and Community Facilities and Services .............................................. ............................... XI -I 2. School Population and Quality of Education ..................... XI -2 3. Property Assessment and Taxes ......... ............................... XI -3 B. Relocation and Low and Moderate Income Housing ..................... XI -4 1. Housing Units to be Destroyed or Removed ..................... XI -4 2. Projected Residential Displacement .... ............................... XI -5 3. Number and Location of Replacement Housing .................. XI -5 -« 4. Number and Location of Low and Moderate Income Housing Planned Other than Replacement Housing ............................................... ............................... XI -5 5. Financing Method for Replacement Housing Requirements ....................................... ............................... XI -5 6. Timetable for Provision of Relocation and Housing Objectives ............................. ............................... XI -6 C. Other Matters Affecting the Physical and Social Quality of the Environment .......................... ............................... XI -6 XII. ANALYSIS OF REPORT OF COUNTY FISCAL OFFICER; SUMMARY OF CONSULTATIONS WITH AFFECTED TAXING AGENCIES; AND ANALYSIS OF AND RESPONSE TO REPORT OF FISCAL REVIEW COMMITTEE........................................................... ............................... XII -I A . Introduction ................................................. ............................... XII -1 B. Analysis of Report of County Fiscal Officer .............................. XII -1 1. Report Requirements .......................... ............................... XII -1 2. Analysis of Data Reported by County Fiscal Officer....... XII -2 a. Total Assessed Valuation of All Taxable Property Within Project Area as Shown on Base Year Assessment Roll ........ ............................... XII -2 b. Identification of Each Taxing Agency Levying Taxes in Project Area . ............................... XII -2 -, C. Amount of Tax Revenue to be Derived by Each Taxing Agency From Base Year Assessment Roll From Project Area ......................... XII -3 d. Total Ad Valorem Tax Revenues for Each Taxing Agency, From All Property Within its Boundaries, Whether Inside or Outside Project Area .... ............................... .......................... X11 -3 iv llatzHollis PART C. Page e. Estimated First Year Taxes Available to Redevelopment Agency, Broken Down by Taxing Agencies ......................... ............................... XII -4 f. Assessed Valuation of Project Area for Preceding Year, or, for Preceding Five Years, Except for State Assessed Property on Board Roll ............................. ............................... XII -4 Summary of Consultations With Affected Taxing Agencies........ XII -4 Analysis of and Response to Report of Fiscal Review Committee ..................................................... ............................... XII -4 MAPS ........................ . Following No. Page I -1 Project Location Map .............................................. ............................I -1 II -1 Project Area Quarter Sections ................................... ...........................II -2 II -2 Community Development Block Grant Target Areas within Project Area ............................................................... ...........................II -4 II -3A, 3B, 3C Public Improvements and Facilities Deficiencies - Transportation, Traffic and Street Improvement - Projects (3 maps) II -10 II -4 Intersection Capacity Deficiencies ............................ ..........................II -10 II -5 Projected Key Intersection Volume /Capacity Ratios and Levels of Service ............................................... ..........................II -10 II -6 Public Improvements and Facilities Deficiencies - Water System and Other Infrastructure ............................. ..........................II -13 II -7 Public Improvements and Facilities Deficiencies - Storm Drain /Sewer System .................................................. ..........................II -13 II -8 Public Improvements and Facilities Deficiencies - Electrical System .................................................................. ............................... II -14 TABLES Following No. Page ..................... II -1 Existing Land Uses and Acreages ............................. ...........................II -1 II -2 Presence of Blight Conditions ............................... ............................... II -3 II -3 Residential Structure Deficiencies ............................. ...........................II -3 v Katz Hollis Following Na. page ...................... II -4 Non - Residential Structure Deficiencies and Ages . ............................... II -3 II -5 Structural Conditions Rating Criteria ....................... ...........................II -3 II -6 Off - Street Parking Deficiencies, Including Garage Conversions .........II -5 II -7 Residential Structure Ages ........................................ ...........................II -6 II -8 Infrastructure Deficiencies ........................................ ...........................II -9 II -9 Major Crimes in Project Area, 1984- 86 ..................... ..........................II -17 II -10 Retail Business Activity in Project Area .................. ..........................II -19 II -11 Taxable Motel Receipts, 1980- 86 ................................ ..........................II -20 III -1 Estimated Public Improvements and Facilities Costs ..........................III -2 III -2 Estimated Project Costs .............. ............................... ..........................III -2 III -3 Estimated Net Project Costs ....... ............................... ..........................III -2 III -4 Projected New Development ........ ............................... ..........................III -3 III -5 Tax Increment Projection ............ ............................... ..........................III -3 III -6 Capital Improvements Program Funding Gaps ........... ..........................III -5 PHOTOGRAPHS ....................................... __ ...... _.............. Following No. Page ...................... Plates 1- 31 .......................................................................... ..........................II -20 vi Katz Hol 1 is REPORT TO THE CITY COUNCIL ON THE PROPOSED REDEVELOPMENT PLAN FOR THE KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA INTRODUCTION ................................... ............................... This Report to the City Council ( "Report ") on the proposed Redevelopment Plan ( "Redevelopment Plan ") for the Katella Redevelopment Project Area ( "Project ") has been prepared for the Anaheim Redevelopment Commission ( "Commission ") and the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency ( "Agency ") pursuant to Section 33352 of the California Community Redevelopment Law (Health and Safety Code, Section 33000 et seq.). ......... ..... _......... The Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission was created by the Anaheim City Council pursuant to Section 33201 of the California Community Redevelopment Law ( "CRL ") by the adoption of Ordinance No. 2934 on June 8, 1971. Among the functions that the Commission may perform, Section 33202 of the CRL provides that it "...shall... prepare a redevelopment plan for each project area, hold and conduct public hearings thereon, adopt and µ submit such plan, together with a report to the (City Council], pursuant to all the provisions, requirements and procedures [of the CRL] and the Redevelopment Agency shall not be required to perform such functions." The purpose of this Report is to provide the information, documentation, and evidence required by Section 33352 of the Community Redevelopment Law to accompany the proposed Redevelopment Plan when it is submitted by the Commission to the City Council. Such information, documentation and evidence is provided to assist the Council in its consideration of the proposed Plan and in making the various determinations it must make in connection with the adoption of the proposed Plan. This Report is divided into 12 parts which generally correspond to the subdivisions contained within CRL Section 33352, with each part having a separate function as described in the summary listing which follows this paragraph. Certain parts of the Report, as noted in the summary, have been prepared by entities other than the Commission. Section 33352, however, requires the Commission to aggregate and submit such documents as a part of this Report. 1016.anh /5 051887/bl Katz Hol l is Part No. and CRL Responsible Section No. Title Entity Part I Reasons for Selection of Project Area; Commission [33352(a)] Description of Specific Projects Proposed by Commission; Description of How Proposed Projects Will Improve or Alleviate Blight Conditions; and Explanation of Why Proposed Public Improvements Cannot be Accomplished by Private Enterprise Acting Alone Part II Description of Physical, Social and Commission (33352(b)] Economic Conditions Existing in Project Area Part III Proposed Method of Financing Redevel- Commission [33352(c)] opment of Project Area Part IV Plan and Method of Relocation Commission [33352(d)] Part V Analysis of Preliminary Plan Commission (33352(e)] Part VI Report and Recommendations of Plann- Planning [33352(f)] ing Commission, and Report Required Commission [33352(h)] by Section 65402 of Government Code Part VII Project Area Committee Record Commission [33352(8)] Part VIII Project Required by Section 21151 of Commission [33352(i)] Public Resources Code (Project Environmental Impact Report) Part IX Report of County Fiscal Officer Orange [33352(i)] County Auditor - Controller Part X Report of Fiscal Review Committee Fiscal [33352(k) ] Review Committee Part XI Neighborhood Impact Report Commission [33352(1)] Page 2 Katz Hollis Part XII Analysis of Report of County Fiscal Commission (33352(m)) Officer; Summary of Consultations with Affected Taxing Agencies; and Analysis of and Response to Report of Fiscal Review Committee This Report contains all information and documents required by the above CRL sections that could be completed (if a Commission responsibility) or had been received (if another entity's responsibility) as of May, 1987. A supplemental report to this Report will be issued as soon as necessary data or documents are available in order to complete the following parts: Part VI (Report and Recommendation of Planning Commission, and Report Required by �- Section 65402 of Government Code), Part X (Report of Fiscal Review Committee), and Sections C (Summary of Consultations with Affected Taxing Agencies) and D (Analysis of and Response to Report of Fiscal Review Committee) of Part XII. Page 3 Katz Hollis Part I. REASONS FOR SELECTION OF PROJECT AREA; DESCRIPTION_ OF SPECIFIC PROJECTS PROPOSED BY COMMISSION• DESCRIPTION OF HOW PROPOSED PROJECTS WILL IMPROVE OR ALLEVIATE BLIGHT CONDITIONS; AND ............... E %PLANATION OF WHY PROPOSED PUBLIC .............. ................. ................ IMPROVBMENTS CANNOT BE ACCOMPLISHED BY PRIVATE ENTERPRISE . ACTIIJG .. ALONGE ...... ................................................................................_......_..............._............._......_.... ............__............_.._. A. Reasons for Selection of Project Area The City of Anaheim has been concerned about declining physical, social and economic conditions in the Project Area for some time. The Commercial- Recreation area to the west of the Santa Ana I -5 freeway is an international tourist and convention destination, but the attractions and visitor facilities are set in an area experiencing increasing physical deterioration and crime, and inadequate public improvements. The portion of the Project Area that lies to the east of the Santa Ana I -5 freeway and surrounds Anaheim Stadium is also a source of concern for the City, burdened by incompatible land uses, noticeable vacancy rates and underutilization of properties, and inadequate public improvements. In December, 1983, the Anaheim City Council contracted with Phillips Brandt Reddick to conduct a comprehensive study of the Stadium area's land use, traffic and market conditions to develop guidelines for the area's future growth and development. The adoption of a General Plan Amendment that reflects the results of that study was adopted by the City Council on March 17, 1987. The Project Area is generally bounded by Santa Ana Street and Ball Road on the northwest and north, respectively, by the Santa Ana River on the east, along the southerly City limits on the south, and generally west of Walnut Street on the west, as shown on Map I -1. On September 15, 1986, the Anaheim Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC 86 -243 that selected the Project Area, established the boundaries and adopted the Preliminary Plan. The selection of the Katella Redevelopment Project Area was in response to the problems of the area and the need for public participation and assistance to solve those problems. In general, the goals and objectives of a redevelopment program in the Project Area are as follows: 1. The elimination and prevention of blight and deterioration and the redevelopment of the Project Area in accord with the General Plan, specific plans, the Redevelopment Plan and local codes and ordinances. 2. The elimination or amelioration of certain environmental deficiencies, including substandard vehicular circulation systems and other similar public improvements, facilities and utilities deficiencies adversely affecting the Project Area. 3. The achievement of an environment reflecting a high level of concern for architectural, landscape, and urban design and land use principles (I -1) Project Location Map KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA .. ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY ►� Katz Hol 1 i S KATE P REDEVELOP PROJECT AREA MAP 1 -1 - KatzHollis appropriate for attainment of the objectives of the Redevelopment Plan. 4. The enhancement of major, region- serving thoroughfares to provide a quality design identity and smooth, safe circulation. 5. The replanning, redesign and development of undeveloped /vacant, underutilized and underdeveloped areas which are stagnant or improperly utilized. 6. The encouragement of investment by the private sector in the development and redevelopment of the Project Area by eliminating impediments to such development and redevelopment. 7. The provision for increased sales, business license, hotel occupancy and other fees, taxes and revenues to the City and other taxing bodies. 8. The expansion and upgrading of the community's supply of housing, including opportunities for low- and moderate- income households. 9. The establishment and implementation of performance criteria to assure high standards for site design, environmental quality, and other design elements which provide unity and integrity to the entire Project. 10. The promotion and creation of new local employment opportunities. 11. The encouragement of uniform and consistent land use patterns. 12. The provision of a pedestrian and vehicular circulation system which is coordinated with land uses and densities and adequate to accommodate projected traffic volumes. 13. To encourage the cooperation and participation of residents, business owners, public agencies and community organizations in the development and redevelopment of the area. 14. The encouragement of the development of a commercial and office environment which positively relates to adjacent land uses and to upgrade and stabilize existing commercial and office uses. 15. The examination of assisting in the undergrounding of unsightly overhead utility lines. 16. The provision of adequate off - street parking to serve current and future uses within the Project Area. Redevelopment of the Project Area pursuant to the above goals and objectives will attain the purposes of the California Community Redevelopment Law by: (1) elimination of areas suffering from economic dislocation and disuse; (2) replanning, redesign and /or redevelopment of (I -2) Katz Hollis areas which are stagnant or improperly utilized, and which could not be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone without public participation and assistance; (3) protecting and promoting sound development and redevelopment of blighted areas and the general welfare of the citizens of the City be remedying such injurious conditions through the employment of appropriate means; and (4) installation of new or replacement of existing - public improvements, facilities and utilities in areas which are currently inadequately served with regard to such improvements, facilities and utilities; and (5) other means as determined appropriate. B. Description of _ Specific Projects Proposed by Commission in .......................... Prnject__Area As will be described more fully in the following section of this Report, the Commission and Agency propose to acquire some properties within the Project Area, relocate some existing occupants, demolish some existing buildings and improvements, and to provide certain street and other improvements needed to serve the area. Details of the proposed program of activities, estimated Agency costs, and proposed financing methods are set forth in Part III of this Preliminary Report. C. Description of How Projects Proposed by Commission will Improve ................ ............._. . or Alleviate Blight Conditions Existing physical, social and economic conditions within the Project Area are described in Part II of this report. It is shown that the area suffers from a multitude of problems of such nature and degree that it may be found to be a blighted area under the criteria established in the California Community Redevelopment Law (CRL). As required by the CRL, and as demonstrated in Part II, the problems affecting the Project Area are -" of such nature and degree that they cannot reasonably be expected to be reversed or alleviated by private enterprise acting alone without public participation and assistance. The Commission proposes a program of redevelopment activities that will systematically address the conditions of blight within the Project Area. Financial assistance for rehabilitation and conservation of structures in need of minor to moderate rehabilitation, coupled with selective property acquisition, demolition, and relocation as necessary would serve to remove the conditions of buildings suffering from deterioration and dilapidation, age and obsolescence and defective design and character of physical construction. The lots that are of irregular form, shape and size can be acquired by the Agency for assembly into parcels suitable for development. - The Agency can selectively acquire key properties to solve the problem of mixed character of buildings. and to eliminate inappropriate shifted uses. The alleviation of specific blighting influences in the Project Area should work to create in investment environment in which private developers and property owners would have the incentive to redevelop their properties. The Commission's proposed program of public improvements and facilities is intended to comprehensively address the inadequacies of the public improvements, which are not only a physical blight problem, but (I -3) Katz Hol 1 is contribute to the economic maladjustment, depreciated values and impaired investments. The public improvements and facilities listed in Table III -I in Part III will correct the deficiencies in traffic circulation, pedestrian safety, storm drainage, sanitary sewers, water lines, and ' overhead utilities. Alleviation of these specific blighting influences in the Project Area will create an investment incentive and the means to redevelop properties. The Agency's program of activities will remove the current inhibitions to development in the Project Area. Projected new developments, in addition to other redevelopment programs (i.e., rehabilitation, low and moderate income housing subsidies), will improve social and economic conditions in the Project Area by creating jobs, expanding and improving housing, and stimulating the economic base of the Project Area. D. Explanation of Why Proposed Public Improvements Cannot be ...... ..................................... ............................... Am- mmn1»ahPei by U.•;vrnto A—+,-- sl,. -- The public improvements that the Commission proposes to undertake through redevelopment (described in Parts II and III of this Report) are intended primarily to eliminate impediments to private development of vacant or underutilized parcels in the Project Area. Many of the improvements are regional in nature; all serve the entire Project Area rather than specific development sites, and thus would not be appropriate for a private developer of a single property to undertake. Moreover, these deficiencies have been blighting influences that have discouraged private investment for taking place to date, and are improvements typically provided by most municipal jurisdictions. By establishment of a development fee district within a portion of the Project Area (as described more fully in Part III.C.5), the City has imposed part of the burden of providing public improvements upon current and future Project Area developers. If the City were to require private developers to assume additional costs beyond those already imposed, it could further dissuade private investment in the Project Area, since there are competitive development sites available without such extra costs. (I -4) Katz Hollis PART II. DESCRIPTION OF PHYSICAL,_ SOCIAL AND ECONOMIC CONDITIONS E%ISTING . IN PROJECT AREA Information presented in this Part II of the Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commissions Report to City Council on the Proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Katella Redevelopment Project Area was compiled from various sources, including: 1. A field survey of the Project Area conducted by Planning Department and Redevelopment Agency staff in July and October, 1986. 2. Interviews with Agency and City staff and officials, and businesses in the area. 3. A review and analysis of various reports, documents, plans and other background data provided by staff, including but not limited to, the following: - City of Anaheim General Plan - "Anaheim Stadium Area Study: Land Use Strategy Plan ", Phillips " Brandt Reddick, August 22, 1985 - "Anaheim Stadium Business Center: Proposed General Plan - Amendment: General Plan Amendment No. 214: Draft Program Environmental Impact Report #274," City of Anaheim, June 1986. "Anaheim Commercial /Recreation Area Transportation and Circulation Management Study ", JHK and Associates, June, 1980. Where appropriate, sources of data are cited throughout this Report to City Council. A. Existing Physical Conditions 1. Project Location ........................ _................. As described in Part I of this Report, and as shown on Map I -1 - therein, the Project Area is generally bounded by Santa Ana Street and Ball Road on the northwest and north, respectively, by the Santa Ana River on the east, along the southerly City limits on the south and generally west of Walnut Street on the west. (II -1) 2. Land Uses and Structures ........................ ........ ....... ........ _.. ......................... ..... ............ .............. "` -- in Table The Project Area contains approximately II -1, the developed 4,387 acres. As detailed area of equally between residential, commercial the Project and industrial Area is devoted nearly percent and 19 percent, respectively). One -fifth uses of the (25 percent, 24 total devoted services to transportation, 5 percent to agriculture, 3 percent acreage is to community exhibited and 4 percent is vacant. in Plates 25 through 29. Examples of vacant properties are (II -1) Table II -1 Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission [atella Redevelopment Project Area Katz Hol l i s EXISTING LAND - USES AND ACREAGES ACREAGE VACANT TOTAL 0.0 39.2 0.0 10.8 COMMUNITY A6RICUL- TRANS - D.S. RESIDENTIAL COMMERCIAL INDUSTRIAL SERVICES TURAL UORTATIDN 55 26.9 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 12.3 56+ 3.6 0.0 0.0 3.5 0.0 3.7 57-1 30.0 2.7 0.1 4.7 4.5 15.9 63+ 12.1 0.0 1.9 1.4 0.0 13.3 64 i06.1 1.6 0.0 3.8 4.0 45.2 65 64.2 42.4 0.0 4.1 29.3 24.3 66 50.3 49.2 0.0 0.4 9.7 31.8 67 86.6 10.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.5 73# 44.3 4.1 0.8 9.8 1.7 24.2 74 68.3 33.9 0.0 11.2 0.0 44.9 75 0.0 150.7 0.0 0.0 0.0 13.9 76 0.0 151.8 0.0 0.0 0.0 8.7 77 25.3 114.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 17.0 78 6.8 8.4 0.0 0.0 0.0 5.9 80 58.3 9.9 24.7 3.8 3.0 31.1 85 71.4 31.2 0.1 7.7 0.1 39.5 86 68.8 29.9 2.1 8.8 0.0 48.6 87 0.0 69.3 27.6 19.8 0.0 30.4 88 47.6 16.1 0.0 0.7 57.4 14.8 89 75.7 18.1 0.0 0.0 0.0 28.1 95f 9.6 0.4 8.5 0.0 0.0 7.5 % 0.0 24.2 105.3 0.4 2.5 29.9 97 0.0 21.3 72.6 0.9 15.9 44.9 98 75.8 18.2 17.4 0.0 0.0 39.9 99 52.6 0.8 0.0 7.0 0.0 i9.8 106 0.0 0.9 131.2 0.0 11.4 21.4 107 0.0 12.3 80.8 0.0 33.8 29.2 108 0.6 8.9 119.3 0.0 0.0 20.4 109 21.0 5.7 0.0 21.1 0.0 6.8 116 37.1 12.8 61.2 0.5 28.6 24.9 117 0.0 24.7 92.6 0.0 8.4 30.4 118 0.0 126.0 16.7 0.5 0.0 11.2 119 0.1 20.7 25.0 3.7 0.0 10.5 126 49.8 0.5 13.4 9.5 0.3 38.7 127 11.0 2.0 20.0 22.6 7.4 42.3 128 0.0 11.6 0.0 2.4 0.0 11.9 129 0.0 0.2 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 TOTAL 1103.9 1035.2 821.3 148.3 218.0 876.9 % OF - - - - - -- - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - - -- T07AL 25.2% 23.6% 18.7% 3.4% 5.0% 20.0% (Partial inclusion and approximate numbers Q.S. = City Ouarter Section Map number, as shown on Map 11-1 Sources: 1986 Land Use Survey Acreage Data: City of Anaheim Planning Department July 1986 Dwelling Unit i Population Statistics, City of Anaheim 1016 - lanh /4 VACANT TOTAL 0.0 39.2 0.0 10.8 1.4 59.3 2.0 30.7 0.5 161.2 0.0 164.3 20.3 161.7 0.0 130.8 0.6 85.5 2.2 160.5 0.5 165.1 0.0 160.5 1.5 i57.8 0.0 21.1 0.6 131.4 10.0 160.0 7.5 165.7 13.3 160.4 22.8 159.4 16.9 136.8 0.0 26.0 2.9 165.2 4.7 i60.3 7.8 159.1 0.0 80.2 0.6 165.5 4.3 160.4 10.0 159.2 4.3 58.9 0.0 165.1 3.9 160.0 5.1 159.5 1.1 61.1 32.5 144.7 0.1 105.4 5.8 31.7 0.0 0.3 183.2 4386.6 4.2% Katz Hol l is The data contained in Table II -1, as well as statistical data presented in other tables in this report, has been aggregated by numbered areas called "quarter sections." The City as a whole is currently divided into 238 quarter sections, each a half mile square. The Katella Redevelopment Project Area encompasses portions or all of 37 contiguous quarter sections. Map II -1 identifies the location and identification number of these 37 quarter sections. Population and dwelling unit statistics developed in July, 1986 by the Anaheim Planning Department indicate that the Project Area contains just over 31,000 residents living within 12,559 housing units. This includes 3,972 single family homes, 1,539 mobile homes, 780 condominiums and 6,268 multi - family units. 3. Predominantly Urbanized Area Section 3320.1 of the California Community Redevelopment Law requires redevelopment projects selected after January 1, 1984 to be "predominantly urbanized," which means that: 1) not less than 80 percent of the privately owned property has been or is developed for urban uses (uses which are consistent with zoning or otherwise permitted by law); or 2) the area is characterized by certain defined blight conditions; or 3) the area is an integral part of an area developed for urban uses. The Project Area qualifies as a predominantly urbanized are under all three of the given criteria. First, although there is some land currently vacant in the Project Area (less than five percent), at least 80 percent of the privately owned property has been or is developed for urban uses. Second, as discussed in a later section of this report, the Project Area contains lots that are of irregular form and shape and inadequate size, which has contributed to the economic deterioration, dislocation and disuse of the area. This is one of the specified blight conditions which qualify areas as being predominantly urbanized. Finally, since the Project Area is located in an area of Orange County which is completely urbanized, is now totally surrounded by developed urban uses, and is served by streets which serve such uses, it - qualifies as a predominantly urbanized area in that it is manifestly an integral part of an area developed for urban uses. 4. Properties Included for Planning Purposes Certain properties within the Project Area are not blighted properties. Such properties have been included: (1) in order to plan and carry out the Project as a uniform whole; (2) to impose uniform requirements over a geographically defined and identified area of the City; (3) because such properties are impacted by the conditions of the blight - existing on surrounding properties, and correction of such conditions may require the imposition of design, development of use requirements on the (II -2) latz Hol l is unblighted properties in the event they are rehabilitated or redeveloped by their owners; and (4) because such properties will share in the physical, social and economic benefits which will accrue to the area through the elimination of blighting conditions, including the replacement or provision of new public improvements and facilities serving the Project Area. 5. Buildings and Structures The Project Area contains examples of buildings and structures, - used or intended to be used for living, commercial, industrial, or other purposes, which are unfit or unsafe to occupy for such purposes because of any one or a combination of the factors described below and illustrated in part by the photographs appearing in Plates 1 through 31. In July, 1986 staff from the Anaheim Planning Department surveyed all Project Area properties to rate structural conditions and to note the presence of blight conditions. The results of this survey (with the exception of structural conditions) is presented in summary form, by quarter section, in Table II -2. Survey results are discussed in more detail below. a. Deterioration and Dilapidation There are various examples of buildings and structures within the Project Area that suffer from deterioration, some appearing dilapidated. During the July, 1986 Planning Department survey, buildings and structures were rated according to five categories of condition which included "well maintained ", (category 1), "minor maintenance required" �- (category 2), "poor maintenance" (category 2 -), "major repairs" (category 3), and "dilapidated /demolition" (category 4). Rating criteria developed for each category generally centered around the existence of observable or probable building code violations. Survey findings, which include both residential and non - residential structures, are presented in Tables II -3 and II -4. Structural conditions rating criteria used in the survey are contained in Table II -5. In addition to the structural deficiencies noted in Tables ._ II -3 and II -4, many of the Project Area's buildings and structures contain numerous housing, health, zoning and other code violations including faulty plumbing, hazardous electrical wiring, lack of heating or hot water, insufficient off - street parking and /or loading space, signage deficiencies, set _- back and landscaping irregularities, poor vehicular access, insect and vermin infestation, and nuisances (abandoned autos, graffiti, trash and debris accumulation). (II -3) As determined during the survey, over 38 percent of the Project Area's residential structures contained deficiencies. One out of every 10 residential structures is in need of major repairs. Examples of deteriorated residential structures, single and multiple family, can be seen in Plates 1 and 2. Survey findings also determined that over half (56 percent) of all non - residential structures contained some deficiencies, including three percent exhibiting major deficiencies. In addition to the structural deficiencies noted in Tables ._ II -3 and II -4, many of the Project Area's buildings and structures contain numerous housing, health, zoning and other code violations including faulty plumbing, hazardous electrical wiring, lack of heating or hot water, insufficient off - street parking and /or loading space, signage deficiencies, set _- back and landscaping irregularities, poor vehicular access, insect and vermin infestation, and nuisances (abandoned autos, graffiti, trash and debris accumulation). (II -3) Katz Hol l is Table II -2 Anaheim Community Redevelopeent Commission Katella Redevelopment Project PRESENCE OF BLIGHT CONDITIONS SMALL SMALL AND /OR EXCESSIVE LOT IRREGULAR LOT SHIFTING MIXED OBSOLETE OVERCROWDED SECTION NO. SIZES LOTS COVERAGE USES USES USES HOUSING CRIME GRAFFITI TRASH NOISE 55 - - [ #] - - - - - - [*] I *l 56 - - - - - - - - - [ *l I *l 57 [ *l [ *l [ *l [ *l - - - - - Is] I *l 64 - - - - - - [ *l I*] Is] I*] [ *l 65 - - - [ *l - - - - - [ *l I *l 73 I*] It] I*] It] I*] [ *l - [ *] - It] I *] 74 I*] [ *I It] I *l I *l - I*] [ *l I *l [ *l [ *] 7-5 - - - - - - - - - - - 76 - 77 - - - [ #] - - [ #] {#] - - - 78 - - { #] - - - - [ #] - - - 84 [ *] [ *l [ *l [ *l [ *l - - [ *l I#] I#] I *l es [ *l [ *l [ *l [ *l [ *l - - [ *l - [*] - 86 - - It] [ *l It] - It] [ *l It] I*] [ *] 08 N 96 - 97 - 98 I *] { *l [ *] [ *] [ *l [ *l [ *l [ *l [ *l [ *l I *l 99 - 106 100 116 117 - 118 - - - - - - - - - - - 119 126 127 129 - - - - - - -- - ------ - - - - -- - --- - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - -- - - - -- -- - - - - -- - ----- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - NO. OF SECTIONS -- - -- - -- - (OF 37 SECTIONS): 7 ------- 14 ------ - - - - -- 19 ---- - - - - -- 12 13 7 -- - - - - -- - - - - -- -- - - - - -- 8 ----- - - - - -- 13 - - - - -- 9 --- - - - - -- 20 - - - -- is - - - -- Section No_ : City Ouarter Section Map number, as shown on Map II -1. Source: Cite of Anaheim Planning Department survey, July, 1986_ Table II -3 Katz H o l l i s Anaheia Coeeunity Redevelopsent Comission Katella Redevelopeent Project Area RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE DEFICIENCIES CONDITION (1) 2,2- 3,4 TOTAL UNITS (2) SECTION NO. SF ME TOTAL SF ME TOTAL SF ME CONDOS MO &.HOMES TOTAL 55 11 92 103 1 21 22 93 231 0 0 324 56 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 0 0 19 57 17 0 17 1 0 1 164 0 0 0 164 63 3 0 3 6 0 6 77 0 0 0 77 64 83 0 "03 34 0 34 624 0 0 0 624 65 16 0 lb 1 0 1 167 130 290 0 587 66 22 400 422 1 339 340 164 739 0 0 903 67 19 20 39 0 0 0 448 162 0 0 610 73 60 0 60 36 0 36 425 0 0 0 425 74 45 0 45 24 501 525 190 587 0 0 777 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 7b 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 W 77 0 0 0 0 0 0 38 0 221 0 259 78 2 0 2 0 0 0 1 352 0 0 353 "04 78 47 125 9 4 13 350 179 22 0 551 85 74 107 181 18 2 20 363 367 0 45 775 86 62 0 62 1 345 346 225 410 0 285 920 87 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 88 0 528 528 0 0 0 0 957 0 0 957 89 83 144 227 5 72 77 289 346 218 0 853 95 10 0 10 3 0 3 36 104 0 0 140 96 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 98 7 895 902 1 80 81 5 975 0 379 1359 99 27 8 35 0 0 0 184 213 29 0 426 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 108 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 189 189 116 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 516 0 215 731 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - 119 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 126 427 0 427 0 0 0 107 0 0 426 533 127 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 2 128 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 0 0 - - - - -- - - - - -- 0 - - - - -- 0 - - - - -- 0 - - - - -- 0 - - - - -- 0 0 0 0 0 TOTAL 1,046 2,241 3,287 141 1,364 1,505 - - - - -- 3,972 - - - - -- 6,268 - - - - -- 780 - - - - -- 1,539 - - - - -- 12,559 PERCENT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- OF PROJECT AREA: 26.171 11.991 31.631 49.911 6.211 12.251 100.001 Section No_ = City Quarter Map Section nueber as shown on Map II -1. Scurce_ City of Anaheis Planning Departeent survey, July, 1986. (1) Key to Condition Ratings: Table II -5. (2) includes units rated as Category 1_ Table II -4 K atz Hol 1 is Anaheim Community Redevelo Co mmission Catella Redevelopment Project Area NON - RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE DEFICIENCIES AND ----------------------------------------------- AGES CONDITION PREDOMINANT AGE OF STRUCTURES SECTION NO. 1 2,2- 3,4 TOTAL {15 YEARS 15+ YEARS 20+ YEARS 25+ YEARS 55 0 0 0 0 - - - - 1% 0 9 0 9 57 0 0 0 0 [ #] - - - 63 1 1 0 2 64 4 1 0 5 65 5 3 0 8 - 66 3 8 0 11 - 67 2 6 0 8 73 0 1 0 1 - 74 26 8 0 34 75 2 9 1 12 76 0 16 0 16 77 8 12 1 21 78 1 9 0 10 84 4 57 2 63 85 11 19 0 30 - 86 4 31 0 35 - 87 11 46 2 59 - 88 4 12 1 17 [ #] - - - 89 9 9 0 18 [ #] - - - 95 3 6 0 9 - - 96 17 44 1 62 - - 97 18 23 0 41 - - [ #] - 98 9 43 10 65 - - 99 0 1 0 1 - 106 14 19 0 33 - 107 26 20 3 49 - 108 87 8 3 98 109 4 2 0 6 - 116 46 7 5 60 117 42 14 0 56 - - - 118 7 3 2 12 - - 119 8 23 0 31 - 126 7 3 0 10 127 20 6 0 26 - 128 0 1 0 1 - 129 - 0 - - - -- 0 - - - - -- 0 0 - - - - �° -_ TOTAL - 403 - - - -- 480 - - - - -- - - - -- - - - - -- 31 919 - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- ------ PERCENT OF - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- PROJECI AREA: ------------------------------------------------ 43.851 52.231 3 -371 100.001 13 1 5 16 Section No. - City Ouarter Map Section number, as shown on Map 11 -1. key to Condition Ratings: Table II -5. Source: City of Anaheim Planning Department from survey of July, 1906, and City building permit records- llatzHollis Table II -5 _ Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission Katella Redevelopment Project Area STRUCTURAL CONDITIONS RATING CRITERIA (Relates to Tables II -3 and II -4) Category Definition 1 "Well Maintained" Structure is recent construction or a well - maintained older construction. No noticeable deficiencies in the structural - condition of roof, walls, or foundation. Structure appears to be in compliance with current building codes. Structure appears to have adequate plumbing and electrical service and is subject to a regular program of maintenance. Exterior walls and other surfaces are well - painted and clean, and windows and doors are intact. µ 2 "Minor Maintenance Less recent or older construction, with slight to moderate Required" structural deterioration. Structure may show signs of deferred maintenance such as peeling paint, broken m windows, and cracked plaster. Roof may show signs of minor water leaks. Does not appear that significant deterioration would continue with normal maintenance. Usually exhibits several minor code deficiencies. 2- "Poor Maintenance" In addition to the maintenance deficiencies of 2, structure is suffering severely from deferred maintenance, and there is evidence of one or more major code deficiencies. May show signs of small cracks. requiring repair, some settlement, minor roof on structural repairs, and work may be required of porches, patios and stairs. 3 "Major Repairs" Older to very old construction with several major and minor code deficiencies. Structure show signs of - structural deterioration such as sagging roof or walls or crumbling and cracking foundations, offset of leaning columns and posts, window or door frames which are out of alignment and sagging roof eaves. Structure may have inadequate plumbing or hazardous electrical service, wood or inadequate foundations, and holes may be apparent in roof or walls. Paint may be largely peeled or faded or even non - existent, and broken windows are often apparent. Major costs would be incurred to bring structure into conformance with current building codes. 4 "Dilapidated/ Building is structurally unsound with numerous major Demolition" code deficiencies. Maintenance is non - existent. Structure's fitness for human occupation is highly questionable, and the state of deterioration and neglect is such that it is a candidate for demolition. Source: Anaheim Planning Department, 1986. Katz Hollis Approximately two - thirds of the residential portions of the Project Area are within census tracts included in the City's Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) target areas. To qualify for the special federal financial assistance available to such areas, more than 50 percent of the area residents must be at or below 80 percent of the area's medium income, and the area must exhibit certain defined blighting conditions such as deteriorated housing and infrastructure. Three these CDBG target area neighborhoods within the Project Area account for a disproportionate amount of the City's housing, crime, drug, and other social problems. General descriptions of these areas are: 1) the Lynne Avenue /Jeffrey Drive area located south of Cerritos Avenue and west of Walnut Street; 2) the Wakefield Avenue /Leatrice Lane /Pearson Avenue /Sprague Lane area located east of Haster Street and north of Orangewood Avenue (across from Ponderosa Park); and 3) the Palais Road /Midway Drive /Guinida Lane /Palm Street area located west of Anaheim Boulevard and north of Cerritos Avenue. CDBG target areas within the Project Area are shown on Map II -2. Housing conditions within the Lynne /Jeffrey area have become of such concern that by City Council action the area has been targeted for an intensive code enforcement effort. Code Enforcement Department records indicated that nearly 2,300 inspections were made within this small 40 -acre area in 1986, which accounted for nearly 10 percent of all inspections made city -wide. Inspectors report that they frequently encountered instances of severely over - crowded living units. The City Fire Marshall reports that fire department personnel have experienced the following problems in all three neighborhoods (to a lesser degree in the Palais /Midway /Guinda /Palm area than the other two): 1. Significant anti - social behavior from residents 2. High incidence of drug usage, resulting in frequent overdose calls by paramedics - 3. Instances of arson from the above, and from homeless people living in garages and carports 4. Overcrowded living conditions (three and four families in one apartment) 5. Garages rented or loaned out as living quarters 6. Uncooperative attitudes from both owners and tenants concerning compliance with fire regulations, especially in the more deteriorated properties 7. Discarded furniture and debris in alleys, causing access problems, and occasional arson cases. The grounds of many properties in the Project Area are poorly maintained and have a deteriorated appearance with accumulated trash, brush and debris. Examples of deteriorated site conditions on residential and commercial properties are exhibited in Plates 3 through 5. A number of multifamily residential properties lack enclosures for trash receptacles, which has led to trash becoming scattered about the property; �- Plate 6 contains four examples. Graffiti, shown in Plate 23, also contributes (II -4) N 4 og 3 �NrY C < . M •Nr - `' It d°N- �� t SSwIDnoo tow 0 O 7Mn.r11 aot r Yln I- dS iiu n it1YH i ns 2 4. Nww. I lmL W Z O ~ S1w3Y I Ar ml j J )� d 3 ON M V �' 11101fM] ' 1JJ?r� W r13AO1D; 307110' u u 0 }s Q 0 W a3nY ` I 1 ~ t 7O97A GAIN i0i770 111115 iJ S/ 4 6 !_ V S Nvw97NS ; re-am /WC C Y W u NONN S S \ D 7SA pWEt S. tt sANLY� K H NO m aazl msl I � - 1 � V 1f SW Ain 1S SIM71 �. I - W W t O u Nn M o31c �,f` E w mnro 1�A Y Al m oY► s Z I' ,+ < � a SANTA SE ' ST ►►aaua� It { Y• � W ?E4 �■ if 3NLLH7.A17 A711170 �sl 1E 4 1 r gil tl IRON W lwv w o II J > K ® - W mil 00.1 W ^ � ` - O Ja `• -■ � `�V S 77113 // 1 : ~ • _ Z _ •� 1071 Y1 1101 ..1377( Nl i 7 1I 30 ui wlY uivo rn� .Siwwo"I r ST 1 w li 1S ® 6 6 y I c !t Hl m Hroom � M, a Z 1 i ia . 4 i Y l 1117 wl 1N1w11 n 1NtwY x N Y S OIAwO 66 7 an Ion 3M s \1LL = 1009909 O i i � S 37K 1MArM 0 � Nl � O 1nNl.M ,, __,,,,,,, CC u,__.. 1 Y3 "'�C - l Ni > iNK yl. ZI 1 33r ; kt d Kt 9I S< . I ; IMl TNA SI f 3A I rlNl H > i i S Ml ,r„ 01.w z,3�MY1'w 13557r `lr 3 r • sdWVH is 1 = > I 7 . t i� Yo AIVIAwM Yi S < tlKYIID N \ SS311tI - . C�7yL7� A, I — w Z r ..d I i I t E s 3; ..� -r a - i I ! t � I I �'f ` �. is 1N1/liv - F F in0. - 1S i ANDS Y YANOS S S SIY0O 4 [ ` `Y �I p 4 1- Z �wi1101 y 1T ��>I \ N UwY u �nbl �< I 11.01 NO1S TEESS �' M M yYO. .1901 < I 1 19101 I �a 7� 1 1S KYO = I'` !.M 3 O LS .9101 x r ! E S YwQ,� t 1- 1 3'1171 >i�- 113Otlw I F Ntl.� 9vN1' cI ' _ G ■ Zp= 1S NNIN.1 a S 15 �Otl. >� IA1 ,� > ' n . 1 6 111. � fi o uwwY p M wlrr 1�k} if , !003 i I� 17 7 I T $RRel Y s is I.. I'S [ I I I Ooh Y 1 S` ! 1 J • - ^`IJNI 1 _p ►IY OIT01 i t'}1901 J 3 _ �� n3 } FI p_oys��j}e •.7rtMi - 1S I .,i,,,r is t LS. Irm1i i N l•` [ \� !s "", i j . i I I I 1— sy13°7ni I � r 'a -k 7NN193 z a F` Y i S EI ; QQ I> Wilma I.. ,tiyM ► i �� JZ .. _ I �1 r Katz Hol 1 is to a deteriorated appearance. As shown in Table II -2, twenty of the 37 "-" quarter sections have properties with excessive trash. b. Defective Design and Character of Physical Construc- .... ............._......_. ` Buildings of any type may suffer deterioration or disuse, or may contribute to such problems in other buildings, because of inherent defects in design or character of their physical construction. Such defects may exist from the moment a given building is completed; or, they may evolve as uses within the building or within surrounding buildings change over a period of time. Within the Project Area, for instance, many of the buildings, particularly residential structures, are defective in terms of modern code standards. Such defects are not technically code violations (although most older buildings suffer from many of these, too), but rather are substandard and sometimes unsafe inadequacies in such areas as plumbing, heating, electrical service and even structural characteristics because of evolutionary improvements in the code standards which have occurred since the building was constructed. A classic example of this problem is the existence of 2 -line electrical service connections in many older buildings. This poses definite limitations on the number of circuits and the total amperage which may be drawn from any single circuit -- limitations which are all but eliminated in the more modern 3 -line service connection. A number of the older residential buildings within the Project Area are served with outmoded, unsafe 2 -line electrical service connections. Another example of defective design is the existence of limited off - street parking facilities, which can contribute significantly to circulation system deficiencies, as discussed in a subsequent section of this report. Plates 6 and 21 provide several examples of properties where off - street parking is inadequate. Table II -6 documents the Project Area's off- street parking and garage deficiencies by quarter section. Nearly two - thirds of the quarter sections (23 of 37) suffer from an insufficient supply of off - street parking facilities; 740 single family residential units have only a one -car garage and 180 units have no garage now because of conversions to create separate residential units or to add space to existing residential units. Most multiple family units also have only one garage or carport, and many have no garages at all. Seventeen quarter sections experience ~- excessive daytime on- street parking, suggesting that commercial properties have an inadequate supply of parking for employees and customers. C. Age and Obsolescence Older buildings, unless modernized, are more likely to contain structural problems and code deficiencies than newer buildings. ° Generally, the older the building is the more problems and deficiencies it will have. The following tabulations illustrate how these problems and deficiencies increase with age: (II -5) Katz Hol 1 s Table II -6 Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission Katella Redevelopment Project Area OFF- STREET PARKING DEFICIENCIES, INCLUDING GARAGE CONVERSIONS ---------------------------------------------------------- Presence of Presence of Single Family Sing. Fat. Units Insufficient Excess Daytime Units With With Garage Section No. Off Street Parking On Street Parking 1 Car Garages Conversions 55 [x) [x) 0 2 56 - - 0 0 57 - - 2 2 63 64 [ *) - 18 22 65 - - 1 5 66 (x) (x) 0 0 67 ( *] [ *] 0 3 73 ( *) [x] 121 43 74 [ *] [ *] 24 5 75 [ *] - 0 0 76 [ *] - 0 0 77 ( *) - 0 0 84 (x) [x] 174 54 05 [ *) [ *] 118 25 �. 86 [ *) [ *] 106 12 87 ( *l - 0 0 89 ( *] ( *] 150 5 95 [ *) [x} 14 1 96 ( *) ( *) 0 0 97 [x] [x) 0 0 98 [ *] [ *) 0 0 44 (x) ( *) 1 4 106 - - 0 0 107 - - 0 0 108 [ *l (xl 0 0 109 - - 0 0 116 - - 0 0 0 118 - - 0 0 119 - - 0 1 v� 126 - - 0 0 127 - - 0 0 128 - - 0 0 129 - - 0 0 TOTAL 740 - - - - - -- 180 - - - - - -- NO. OF SECTIONS (OF 37 SFCTIONS): 23 17 - - - - - -- - - - - - -- Section No_ = City Ouarter Section Map number, as shown on Map II -1. Note: Garages converted to separate residential units or additional space in residential units. Source: City of Anaheim Planning Department survey, July 1986_ Katz Hol l is Structures Aged 25 -35 Years: 1. Energy preservation code requirements lacking 2. Improper egress from bedrooms or rooms used for sleeping 3. Gas pipes below concrete slabs 4. Inadequate plumbing (moisture barriers, drains, piping too small, etc.) 5. Asbestos prevalent acoustic ceiling and heat ducts 6. Lack of garbage disposal 7. Improper glass treatment (plate glass vs. shatter- proof shower doors and sliding doors) Structures Aged 36 -60 Years: 1. All deficiencies noted above for structures aged 25 -35 years 2. Inadequate windows preventing fire escape from bedrooms and sleeping areas 3. Slab -type construction lacking moisture barriers 4. Roofing not fire - proofed 5. Improper fire separations 6. Inadequate laundry plumbing 7. Inadequate or lack of insulation 8. Inadequate, 2 -wire electrical wiring and insufficient number of circuits Structures Aged in Excess of 60 _Years: 1. All deficiencies noted above for structures aged 25 -35 years and 36 -60 years 2. Improper foundations 3. Inadequate, substandard room sizes and lack of closets 4. Inadequate light and ventilation (smaller and fewer windows) 5. Inadequate heating facilities 6. Improperly sized plumbing pipes and /or pipes clogged with lime deposits. Lead piping 7. Substandard water heaters (location and heater) 8. Lack of sewer hook -up (septic tank, drain field, seepage pit) 9. Lack of sprinklers, proper ingress and egress and other fire safety items (commercial and industrial structures) Project Area residential structures include a large percentage of the older buildings in Anaheim. As shown on Table II -7, two - thirds of the residential buildings are in excess of 25 years old, including 52 percent between 25 and 35 years, 8 percent over 35 years, and 6 percent over 60 years old. Of 767 residential buildings over 60 years old, 588 (77 percent) are single family residences. (II -6) Katz Hol 1 i s Table I1-7 Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission latella P.edeyelopment Project Area RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURE AGES (25 YEARS 25+ YEARS 35+ YEARS 60+ YEAP,S TOTAL SECTION NO. SF HF — TOTAL SF HF TOTAL SF HF TOTAL SF HF TOTAL SF HF TOTAL - - -- - - - -- -- - - - -- - - - -- - --- - - -- - - - - -- - --- - -- -- - -- — 55 0 0 0 N 231 324 0 0 0 0 0 0 93 231 324 56 0 0 0 19 0 19 0 0 0 0 0 0 19 0 19 57 63 0 63 101 0 101 0 0 0 0 0 0 164 0 164 " 63 0 0 0 42 0 42 35 0 35 0 0 0 77 0 77 64 6 0 6 616 0 610 0 0 0 0 0 0 624 0 624 uS 0 420 420 U 0 0 167 0 167 0 0 0 167 420 567 66 0 0 0 0 739 739 164 0 164 0 0 0 164 739 903 67 0 0 0 44 0 '0 162 610 0 0 0 0 0 0 446 162 610 73 0 0 0 0 0 0 210 0 210 215 0 215 425 0 425 74 0 So 66 190 501 691 0 0 0 0 0 0 190 567 777 75 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 70' 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 77 0 221 221 0 0 0 33 0 36 0 0 0 38 221 2S9 700 0 240 240 1 112 113 0 0 0 0 0 0 I 352 353 64 0 22 22 0 0 0 0 0 0 350 179 529 350 201 551 85 45 40 65 0 327 327 340 0 340 23 0 23 408 367 775 36 0 0 0 510 410 920 0 0 0 0 0 0 510 410 920 67 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 065 "065 0 92 92 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 957 957 29 24 S64 530 265 0 265 0 0 0 0 0 0 209 564 1 053 95 0 56 56 36 43 84 0 0 0 0 0 0 36 104 140 ` 9ti 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 97 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 9 5 0 5 379 975 1,354 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 34 975 1,359 99 40' 150 1 136 92 228 0 0 0 0 0 0 I84 242 426 106 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 107 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 1 89 0 18 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 109 ll0 215 510 7) 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 215 516 731 117 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 118 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 119 0 0 0 1 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 126 533 0 533 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 S33 0 533 �- 127 0 0 0 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 123 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 129 0 O 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 - - -- - -- - -- -- - -- - - - - -- - - -- - - - -- - 10TAL 1,128 3,130 4,306 2,641 3,00'i 6,530 954 0 954 500 179 74, 7 5,511 7,043 12,559 PERCENT OF TOTAL: 34.302 51.992 7.605 6.115 43.88: 56.12,' 100.005 -� Section Ho. = City Ouarter Hap Section number, as shown on Nap II -1. Source: City of Anaheim Planning Department from buiiding permit records. Katz Hol l is Older buildings may have their usefulness diminished as newer more efficiently designed buildings are constructed, as market conditions change, or as other factors important to the function for which the buildings were designed change. Such buildings become, in effect, obsolete in terms of their original functions or purposes. Obsolete uses were noted as prevalent within seven of the 37 quarter sections in the Project Area during the 1986 Planning Department Survey. d. Mixed Character ,of_ Buildings Buildings and structures are generally characterized by the uses that are made of them. A building used for living purposes is characterized as a residential building. A building used for business purposes is of commercial character. And a building housing manufacturing, fabricating, or processing functions is considered industrial in character. -- When more than one use is made of a building, or when two buildings of different uses exist on the same parcel, or adjacent to each other on abutting parcels, then such buildings are considered to be of mixed character. Mixed character buildings often have different but compatible uses. Frequently, however, they have incompatible uses, with all the accompanying aesthetic (physical), social, and sometimes economic problems such mixing can generate. The Project Area is characterized by numerous examples of industrial uses among commercial and transient residential uses, as shown in - Plate 7. This presence of industrial uses among hotels and motels is particularly _troublesome because of Anaheim's role as an international tourist destination. The top photograph of Plate 8 contains an example of a commercial use in a predominantly residential area. Table II -2 shows that 13 of the 37 Project Area quarter sections contain excessive and harmful mixed uses. e. Shifting Uses An area which is declining or stagnating is usually marked by (1) an increased turnover in business operations and tenancies (i.e., start -ups and failures), accompanied and evidenced by corresponding changes in the uses of buildings, and (2) by conversions of buildings from the uses for which they were originally constructed to uses inconsistent with their design. Business turnovers will be discussed in Part II. C. of this report. As noted on Table II -2, 12 of the 37 quarter sections within the Project Area contain evidence of shifting uses. One of the more prevalent and troublesome of these shifting uses is the conversions of motels to longer -term or even permanent residential apartments. Such conversions are seldom accompanied by the architectural modifications appropriate to meet building and housing code standards for residential uses. A typical motel apartment lacks appropriate kitchen facilities and other living amenities. Children, in particular, can suffer from motel occupancy when yard space is lacking for recreation, and they are (II -7) Katz Hol l is subjected to noise, overcrowding, and lack of privacy. The superintendent for the Anaheim City Elementary School District recently identified 501 students with living address at Project Area motels and other transient occupancy quarters. Examples of shifting uses, especially transient occupancy shifts, are seen in Plates 8 and 9. f. Faulty__ Interior . Arrangement and . S_Pacin Buildings may be constructed too close together, they may be improperly spaced, or they may be of such size as to leave insufficient space or no space at all between them. These conditions are examples of faulty exterior spacing. They may result in impairing the appearance and use of the buildings themselves, and may have a substantial adverse impact on the surrounding neighborhood. Some of the older commercial and industrial buildings within the Project Area were constructed with little regard to lot coverage, setback and side yard space. The original building may have had sufficient open space, but this was frequently negated by subsequent construction of additional rooms or buildings. In some locations, buildings cover 90 to 100 percent of their parcel area, such as the one shown in Plate 10. Table II -2 indicates that 19 of the 37 Project Area quarter sections contain cases of excessive lot coverage. An example of faulty interior arrangement is the poor vehicular access and traffic circulation, lack of plumbing facilities, light and ventilation and other adverse consequences that usually result from conversions of garages to separate dwelling units or additional living space. The Project Area contains 180 such garage conversions. Similar problems result from the conversion of motels to semi - permanent or permanent residential occupancy. Several problems arise from faulty exterior spacing of buildings. When lot coverage is excessive, the principal casualty is the space needed for off - street parking. Insufficient off - street parking in the Project Area occurs in 23 of the 37 Project Area quarter sections. This can be and is often a major contributor to traffic circulation problems because motorists must search longer to find parking, or, in some cases, park illegally thus impeding other traffic. g. Inadequate Light, Ventilation and Open Space As noted above, the Project Area contains many examples of garage and motel conversions, resulting in adverse living conditions, including inadequate light, ventilation and open space. 6. Properties The Project Area is characterized by properties which suffer from deterioration and disuse because of the factors described below (II -8) Katz Hol l is and illustrated in part by the photographs appearing in Plates 1 through 31. a. Lots that Are of Irregular Form, Shape and Size The Project Area contains lots (parcels) that are of irregular form or shape and size in terms of contemporary development standards. This often results in hindering or even prohibiting development or redevelopment of such parcels because of economic infeasibility. The configuration or small size of many of these parcels is attributable to the construction of the Santa Ana I -5 Freeway, slicing through large parcels and creating dead end cul -de -sacs in former thoroughfares. Table II -2 shows that nearly one -fifth of the Project Area's quarter sections contain small and /or irregularly shaped lots often resulting in inadequate ingress and egress, inadequate parking, and in some cases, landlocked parcels. b. Inadequate Public Improvements, Facilities and Utilities _... _... ......... _ .................. Properties in the Project Area are impacted by deficiencies in the transportation and circulation system (vehicular and pedestrian), in infrastructure utilities such as water lines, storm drainage, sanitary sewers and undergrounding of utilities, and in public facilities such as parks and fire stations. These problems are described in general terms below, and in more detail in the Project environmental impact report (EIR). Table II -8 contains a summary of local (non - regional) infrastructure deficiencies in each quarter section of the Project Area. 1. Transportation and Circulation _Deficiencies ........................ _ ............... _ .... .. .. ............................... The Project Area suffers from severe transportation and circulation problems. Three attractions in the Project Area (Disneyland, Anaheim Stadium, and the Anaheim Convention Center) draw the majority of the area's 15,000,000 annual transient vehicles. Disneyland is characterized by distinct and substantial fluctuations in seasonal demand with peak visitation occurring in the summer and certain days at other times of the year also showing such peaks. The California Angels and the Los Angeles Rams occupy Anaheim Stadium for approximately nine months of the year, while numerous other events make it a constant traffic generator. Finally, the Convention Center has gained national prominence as a convention location with annual attendance exceeding 2,500,000 people. Traffic w- congestion is compounded when events occur simultaneously, both because of the higher volume of vehicles involved as well as the inadequate number of parking spaces. The Project Area is traversed by Interstate 5 (the Santa Ana Freeway), the major north -south route from Orange County north to Los Angeles County and south to San Diego County. Within the Project - Area, I -5 has six travel lanes (three in each direction) with various auxiliary lanes and ramps at major interchanges. Major interchanges with on and off ramps providing freeway access into the Project Area are located at Ball - Road /Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim /Katella /Raster (this split interchange intertwines on and off ramps among several streets), State College (I1 -9) Matz Hollis Table II -2 Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission latella Redevelopment Project INFRASTRUCTURE DEFICIENCIES Parks and Curbs and Gutters Sidewalks Curbs b Railroad Grade Section Storm Recreation and /or Sidewalks in Poor Gutters in Separations No. Streets Drains Sewers Facilities Lacking Condition Poor Condition Needed ----- - - - - -- 55 -- - -- - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - -- 57 [ #] I#] 64 - [ #1 - N I #1 65 I#] I t] 66 [ #] [ #1 - [ #1 - 6-1 [ #1 [ #1 - It] 74 76 - 77 [ #] It] - 78 - 84 25 I #1 I #1 [ #1 [ #] [ #1 [ #] [ #1 [ #1 86 27 29 - 95 - I #1 [ #1 I #1 [ #1 [ #1 I #] [ #1 92 I #1 It] 99 - 106 107 [ #1 I#] 102 109 117 112 127 - 122 - 129 - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - -- - - - - - -- No. OF SECTIONS (OF 37 SECTIONS). 12 24 4 33 32 14 11 14 --------------- Section Ne.: - City ttuarter Section Map number, as shown on Nap II -1. Source: City of Anaheim Planning Department survey, July, 1986. Katz Hol 1 is Boulevard /The City Drive (also a split interchange) and Chapman Avenue (southerly end of Project Area). This freeway contributes the majority of transient traffic into the Project Area. It currently operates beyond its capacity level, and the overflow adds to the traffic congestion on the arterial connectors. an intersection in accommodating given volumes of traffic. The alphabetical designations "A" through "F" describe "best" to "worst" To alleviate adverse freeway traffic circulation conditions within the Project Area, which conditions heavily impact existing commercial and industrial uses and constitute a substantial barrier to the - private sector's ability to upgrade and redevelop, three key interchange improvements have been determined to be necessary, including 1) a new interchange at I -5 and West Street (including realignment of West from Ball to Broadway), 2) widening of the Harbor Boulevard /I -5 bridge, and 3) reconstruction of the interchange at Katella and I -5. In addition, the following major Freeway - related improvements are needed in connection with the Santa Ana (I -5) Freeway, and the SR57 Freeway: 1) access ramps �- at Orangewood and I -5; 2) reconstruction of I -5 from SR22 to SR91; 3) increase capacity of SR57 from SR91 to SR22; and 4) increased ramp capacities at SR57 and Orangewood, Katella and Ball. Maps II -3A, 3B and 3C - locate and identify these and other needed transportation, traffic and street improvement projects described below. The Project Area contains a network of arterial streets on an orthogonal grid one -half mile apart. These streets have had high vehicular volumes for a number of years, particularly before and after events at Anaheim Stadium. Map II -4 illustrates the 1980 "level of service" ratings for 30 Project Area intersections, calculated prior to a stadium event. Nine of the intersections (nearly one - third) were operating at a level of service D, half (fifteen) were choked to level of service E, and one - fifth (six) were clogged completely at level of service F. "Level of Service" is a term used to indicate the general acceptability of a roadway or an intersection in accommodating given volumes of traffic. The alphabetical designations "A" through "F" describe "best" to "worst" conditions, calculated according to the "critical movement analysis" procedure documented in Circular 212 of the Transportation Research Board using peak hour turning movement counts, the existing intersection lane geometry, signal phasing, truck percentages, bus frequencies and other peak hour factors. A level of service F generally means that traffic volumes exceed an intersection's ability to handle it. From 1980 to 1987, traffic circulation conditions have continued to deteriorate. Current volumes on Project Area arterial streets are rapidly approaching maximum capacity, even without the impact of periodic stadium events. If intersection and other traffic circulation improvements are not made, traffic engineers predict that conditions will continue to deteriorate to the point where key intersection capacities will be met or exceeded. As shown on Map II -5, of 24 key intersections east of and ` including Harbor Boulevard, eight (33 percent) are projected to deteriorate to level of service D, six (25 percent) will drop to level of service E, and three will fall to an F level of service. Thus, over 70 percent of these key intersections will experience nearly total congestion. Conditions in several (II -10) i 0 N WI M W d G GI a U V 1 W 2 Z 2 a W W e Wi a a o c i 1L W CM d H W H Q d d d V W W i N � O 4 ❑ 6. Z J W Q Q S Z - W C� pN ot W ui LU LU ri ui Q it �y Z – I � a•,� � � _ —� ` \ � ��- may, _ � / „� O Z r _ J � uyt 1 LV 1 � 1 1 r - 4 -+ ❑ r= uj .. • Al ` Ofmftk _ 1 M v► x M w e W a aj W W ca z Q li W :: o � O Q Q J W ;M d cc 0 N 4 • H Cas W t 3 Z J W mow, Z W _ W 4 c ui ag Z m F- �� _: � IoI•j IOF � Z a J W uj 4 - c i v g ' I J i 1 r• fi � ,, I I j .:.j c I I r L onons of amn. lions o� 1` o g W W u a m O M a Q _ a ui ~ FO r U W Amok a ,µ. ' O J - W W m z z W z W _ SW z Q W o� i zi xu o a S a o i • Y H d i W �i lttttfMMOOtt■ O1 ' - W i. LL u< i u ,> a i ` r J ~ Q 3 ro W O � f N <> �� > O 6 2 W ci oz a S V LLI L6 C W NL H zz�m `0000000 z W W �u-� W J ■ > � Z LE z O - J H 00 C � d o d z t z 1` o g W W u a m O M a 0 G >u s U¢ 6 0 LQ J zzp FO � !! C Q� 1 Q _ a ui ~ FO r U W Amok a ,µ. ' O J - W W 1 1 _ W _ Q 1 J " J W • Y 0 G >u s U¢ 6 0 LQ J zzp FO � !! C Q� 1 Amok 1 1 _ L sl 1 lttttfMMOOtt■ O1 ' - f`�"1 1 0 G >u s U¢ 6 0 LQ J zzp FO � !! C Q� 1 hat? Hol I is I KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT I MAP 11 -4 PROJECT AREA Key Intersection PROJECTED KEY INTERSECTION Volume /Cap R atios LOS VOLUME /CAPACITY RATIOS AND O 0.00 - 0 .89 A LEVELS OF SERVICE (LOS) O 0.90 - 1.14 D ® 1.15 - 1.39 E ® 1.40 - UP F Source Anaheim Stadium Business Center. Proposed General Plan Amendment, Draft EIA, June 1986 Katz Hol l is KATE P REDEVELOPMENT MAP 11-5 PROJECT AREA Katz Hol 1 is key arterial streets, including Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue, are shown on Plates 11 through 14. City traffic engineers have identified 22 critical intersections needing major traffic circulation improvements. Eight of these intersections also require construction of "flyovers" to facilitate uninterrupted turning movements. In addition to these improvements, if relatively free traffic flow is to be restored and future gridlock prevented, the signals at Katella, Ball, Anaheim Boulevard /Raster, and State College need to be coordinated; other signals need modification or upgrading; signal interconnects are needed at 28 local controllers; pedestrian overcrossings are needed at five locations, for pedestrian safety as well as for vehicle w _ circulation; and a one - way couplet needs to be constructed paralleling I- 5 /Manchester /Anaheim Boulevard. A people mover system and a master pedestrian circulation system have also been proposed as key improvements required to mitigate pedestrian and vehicular traffic circulation deficiencies in the Project Area. Insufficient street width, abrupt jogs, dead -ends, and lack of or inadequate medians are additional problems contributing to poor traffic circulation in the Project Area. In some cases, street widths may vary from one block or parcel to the next, such as on Ball Road shown in the left photograph on Plate 12. Fourteen prime segments of arterial streets have been identified for widening. One major street realignment is required, and one street extension is needed. Extensive median improvements are necessary at one location. The surfaces of many local and arterial streets in the Project Area are deteriorated and cracked or in need of repair, as determined by a City survey conducted in 1985. Freeway bridge overcrossings are another problem; three are substandard and characterized by a reduction in lane width or lane number, with nonexistent sidewalks making pedestrian crossing of extreme concern. There are thirty -three railroad street crossings in the Project Area. Two examples are shown in Plates 15 and 16, and Plate 15 shows an instance of a train in the middle of the street. The crossings create delays in traffic, add to congestion, and create a hazard for vehicles traveling over them. At a minimum, grade separations are needed at seven key locations to alleviate this problem. Insufficient off - street parking, both in residential and non - residential areas, also contributes to traffic congestion. The resultant -- curb -side parking eliminates a lane needed for vehicular circulation and often creates vehicular - pedestrian conflicts. Details concerning insufficient off - street parking are provided in Table II -6. Several examples of this condition in the Project Area are provided in Plates 6 and 21. At least 10,000 additional spaces are needed within the Commercial Recreation portion of the Project Area (the area in the vicinity of Disneyland and the Anaheim Convention Center). (I1 -11) i W_ V W V 61 M H W Q H LL J _ V � I f ell � W � N W � F W N o • W Y � , � 2 - 8 - O I 2 0 W G i O IL IL W --- � -- -- ° Z ® W J / its G' v Lu ui ui ✓ - - -_ - - -- - - — -_� W � � ' Q 1 E *emN ! - .�. valwan 0� : i r Katz Hol 1 is In those areas where sidewalks are non - existent, there are no pedestrian overcrossings to separate pedestrians and vehicles. At times pedestrians are forced onto the road due to the lack of sidewalks. Two examples of the absence of curbs, gutters and sidewalks are depicted in Plate 18. Plate 19 contains examples of sidewalks that are non - continuous or °- non - existent. As described in Table II -8, 11 of the 37 Project Area quarter sections have curbs and gutters in poor condition, 14 have sidewalks in poor condition, and in 32, curbs and gutters and /or sidewalks are lacking. Another condition contributing to hazardous vehicular - pedestrian interface is a lack of properly placed traffic signals for pedestrian crossings. A key example is on Harbor Boulevard north of Freedman Way, south of Manchester Avenue, depicted in Plate 17. 2. Water System Deficiencies Because portions of the Project Area were developed over 50 years ago, some water lines need replacing because of inadequate size, deterioration from age, maintenance problems or poor quality construction and defects in initial design. Willdan Associates recently studied the Project Area to determine where water lines need to be replaced or installed. The following locations were identified: Walnut Street (Santa Ana to Katella); Crone Avenue (Walnut to Hampstead); Cerritos Avenue (Walnut to Ninth); Ninth Street (Well #36 to Cerritos); West Street (Santa Ana to South and PR -19 in Ball to „., Cerritos), Illinois (Santa Ana to South); Indiana (Santa Ana to South); Ohio (Santa Ana to South); Water Street (Olive to West); Ball Road (I -5 Freeway Overcrossing); Harbor Boulevard (Ball to Orangewood); Clementine (Katella to Orangewood); Pacifico (Hilton Hotel to State College); Katella Avenue (I -5 Freeway Overcrossing); Manchester (Katella to Orangewood); Lewis Street (Katella to Pacifico); State College (Katella to Orangewood); Lemon Street (South to Vermont); and Citron (Santa Ana to Water). (II -12) There were 673 reported traffic accidents resulting in injury in 1985 on the Project Area's major arterial streets. Non- injury accident statistics (property damage only) are not recorded, thus under - representing the seriousness of the problem. City Traffic and Transportation Engineering staff attribute the high accident rate to traffic congestion and deficiencies in the circulation system. The City's Department of Public Works surveyed the alleys of the Project Area in 1985 and determined that one -third of the Project Area's quarter sections, containing approximately 65 alleys, need reconstruction or maintenance, ranging from slurry seal to removal and reconstruction. An example of an unpaved alley is depicted in Plate 20. - Curbs, gutters and sidewalks are lacking in various places in the Project Area, jeopardizing the safety of pedestrians, particularly tourists making their way from their accommodations to tourist attractions. In those areas where sidewalks are non - existent, there are no pedestrian overcrossings to separate pedestrians and vehicles. At times pedestrians are forced onto the road due to the lack of sidewalks. Two examples of the absence of curbs, gutters and sidewalks are depicted in Plate 18. Plate 19 contains examples of sidewalks that are non - continuous or °- non - existent. As described in Table II -8, 11 of the 37 Project Area quarter sections have curbs and gutters in poor condition, 14 have sidewalks in poor condition, and in 32, curbs and gutters and /or sidewalks are lacking. Another condition contributing to hazardous vehicular - pedestrian interface is a lack of properly placed traffic signals for pedestrian crossings. A key example is on Harbor Boulevard north of Freedman Way, south of Manchester Avenue, depicted in Plate 17. 2. Water System Deficiencies Because portions of the Project Area were developed over 50 years ago, some water lines need replacing because of inadequate size, deterioration from age, maintenance problems or poor quality construction and defects in initial design. Willdan Associates recently studied the Project Area to determine where water lines need to be replaced or installed. The following locations were identified: Walnut Street (Santa Ana to Katella); Crone Avenue (Walnut to Hampstead); Cerritos Avenue (Walnut to Ninth); Ninth Street (Well #36 to Cerritos); West Street (Santa Ana to South and PR -19 in Ball to „., Cerritos), Illinois (Santa Ana to South); Indiana (Santa Ana to South); Ohio (Santa Ana to South); Water Street (Olive to West); Ball Road (I -5 Freeway Overcrossing); Harbor Boulevard (Ball to Orangewood); Clementine (Katella to Orangewood); Pacifico (Hilton Hotel to State College); Katella Avenue (I -5 Freeway Overcrossing); Manchester (Katella to Orangewood); Lewis Street (Katella to Pacifico); State College (Katella to Orangewood); Lemon Street (South to Vermont); and Citron (Santa Ana to Water). (II -12) Katz Hol l is located on Map II -6. Needed water system improvements are identified and 3. Sewer System Deficiencies Table II -8 identifies four Project Area quarter sections with sewer line deficiencies, including deteriorated physical condition, improper design, and inadequate capacity. Willdan's evaluation identified several Project Area locations as requiring sewer line replacement or installation. These are identified and located on Map II -7. Underutilized /vacant properties on the east side of the I -5 Freeway that develop in accordance with the land uses permitted under the General Plan and Redevelopment Plan will require the installation of additional sewer lines. 4. Storm Drainage Deficiencies More than two - thirds of the Project Area quarter sections have inadequate storm drains, as shown on Table II -8. Plate 22 contains three examples of poor drainage and the concomitant damage to street surfaces. Willdan Associates also analyzed the storm drainage system. In the portion of the Project Area west of the I -5 Freeway, 13 key locations were identified with storm drainage deficiencies requiring either replacement, installation, construction and /or other improvements: Vermont Street (east of Anaheim Boulevard to SPRR); Cerritos (the ABC Channel to Walnut); Orangewood (east of 9th Street, Jackalene Lane including the Jackalene Lane and Gail Lane laterals); Walnut (Cerritos to Goodhue); Harbor (north of Orangewood to Convention Way); Clementine extension (north of Orangewood to end); Haster (Leatrice to Wakefield and alley extension to Mountain View); Orangewood (Spinnaker to Anaheim Boulevard); Midway Drive to Santa Ana Freeway (open channel east of Palm Street); the Katella - Anaheim- Barber City Channel to Haster; Harbor (Katella to Manchester including Manchester to Santa Ana Freeway); Harbor - Chapman to Katella; and Ball Road to Walnut to South Street to Olive. In the portion of the Project area east of the I -5 freeway, six locations were identified with storm drainage deficiencies requiring either replacement, installation, construction and /or other improvements: Katella (east of Lewis Street); Lewis Street - ATSFRR to Ball Road; Anaheim Boulevard (Cerritos to Palais); Anaheim Boulevard (Spinnaker channel Northerly); Orangewood Avenue southeast Anaheim Channel (west of State College Boulevard); and State College Boulevard (Orangewood to Pacifico). Other miscellaneous deficiencies throughout the Project Area were also identified. Map II -7 identifies and locates the above - described storm drainage deficiencies. (II -13) 2 I W I ~ I � N I d' W W { N f Z Q J � . O C > O : F- _ V► C �i ..I AIMI 4ow r s o e� w e� = ° ' d r � 3 o ° z 'a a zo a W O a U w - a y ' ui C O i�L > W Katz Hollis 5. Electrical System Deficiencies The Project Area is Criss- crossed by overhead electrical distribution facilities creating a sense of urban clutter, as visible in Plates 10, 14, 15, 16 and 19. Undergrounding of these unsightly facilities is important because their presence, along with other blight conditions, is a deterrent to Project Area development. Locations where utility undergrounding is needed are identified on Map II -8. 6. Park /Recreation Deficiencies The Project Area has over 1,100 acres of residential uses containing over 12,000 housing units with an estimated population of - 31,000 people. There is only one park within the Project Area, Pondrosa Park, a nine - acre neighborhood park located at Orangewood Avenue and Haster Street at the south end of the Project Area. There are also two other neighborhood parks, located on the periphery of the Project boundaries, that have service radii overlapping the Project Area. These are Palm Lane Park, a seven - acre school /park facility east of Euclid between Ball Road and Cerritos Avenue, and Stoddard Park, a 9.4 - acre school /park - facility located west of 9th Street between Katella Avenue and Orangewood Avenue. The smaller facilities of various other schools are also available within the Project Area. City Park Department staff have stated that these parks are operating at capacity, and that additional park space is critically needed, especially in the Citron area north of Ball Road. - Of the 37 quarter sections in the Project Area, 33 are deficient in terms of park and recreation facilities. (See Table II -8). The City's minimum standard for park facilities is two acres per 1,000 residents. Based on the estimated 31,000 Project Area population, and accounting for - the service areas of Ponderosa, Palm Lane and Stoddard Parks, the Project Area needs an additional 56 acres of park /recreation facilities. Development of a park of this magnitude within an urban area would be disruptive and costly; however a 10 - acre facility at an undefined location in the northern portion of the Project Area is appropriate. B. Existing__ Conditions The California Redevelopment Law bases the need for redevelopment in part on the existence of physical problems that contribute to blight, that is the impairment of utilization of an area to the extent that it constitutes a serious physical, social, or economic burden on the community. In addition, the law also specifies that a prebalance of social and economic maladjustment may be a contributing cause of blight. Social conditions which contribute to lowering the general welfare of an area's inhabitants give rise to economic liabilities that cannot be alleviated by private enterprise acting alone. The purpose of this section of the report is to present the facts which show the existence of social ralad justment in the Katella Redevelopment Project Area. For this purpose, the identification of appropriate indications of social maladjustment is critical. No single measure can provide an adequate (II -14) f W F I y I y f J I � 1 V r F 1 W E � � W i FI � lil 2 W f � m ly F r 0 0 D u W d u u F r j J U m U < ■ Q i F W C J W 41 x mWrr r - .Wy IS \ IWWIIq ov z� 0 o z o �_ Iz � su uo 0 of ° a is it o- r- V �j^ O W /? LLI LLI cc W F— Q ��I : Y x mWrr r - .Wy IS \ IWWIIq ov z� 0 o z o �_ Iz � su uo 0 of ° a is it o- ItatzHollis sense of the way in which society treats the many groups in a diverse community. However, there are a number of generally recognized indicators of social and economic performance that may be taken as a basis for assessing social functioning. In this report we focus on population, income, housing, and indicators such as crime, education, and disease. Data from the 1980 U.S. Census, although seven years old, provides the most accurate information available on the ethnic background, income and education levels of Project Area residents. Data from 10 Census tracts which fall roughly into the Project Area was compiled by Redevelopment Agency staff and is sumarized below. Using more current data, the Planning Department staff estimated Project Area population and dwelling units in conjunction with its July, 1986 Dwelling Unit Population Statistics Report. 1. Population .................. ............................... The estimated population of the Project Area is 31,009 persons. The ethnic composition of this population is 66 percent white, 27 percent Hispanic, 1 percent Black, 8 percent Asian and 3 percent other. The total proportion of non -white classifications in the Project Area is 39 percent compared to the City -wide percentage of 26 percent. Hispanics are the dominant minority, comprising 27 percent of the population, while they are 17 percent of the City -wide population. These figures are probably underestimates, as the Census either substantially undercounts or does not include the large number of resident aliens who are without legal status. Approximatly 22 percent of Project Area residents are foreign born as compared to 13 percent City -wide. For approximately 26 percent of Project Area residents English is a second .language or not spoken in the home compared to about 17 percent City -wide. The implications of these population characteristics are that there is an increasingly high demand for services, especially bi- lingual employment and educational services. Approximately 28 percent of the Project Area residents are under 19 years of age; 63 percent are between 20 and 64 years of age; and about 8 percent are over the age of 65. These percentages generally mirror the City -wide population age percentages. 2. Income More than 59 percent of the Project Area's residents are - classified as "low or moderate" income, in contrast to the City as a whole with 33 percent. Of the Project Area's total population, 12.8 percent is below the poverty level, compared to 7.6 percent City -wide and 5 percent - - county -wide. Of the 3,905 households in the area that have children, 1,056 (27 percent) are headed by single females, compared to 9.2 percent that are headed by single females City -wide. The Project Area's 1980 median - household income of $16,650 contrasts sharply with the City's 1980 median household income of $20,026. As noted earlier in this report, approximately two - thirds of the residential area in the Project are located within the City's Community (I1 -15) KatzHollis Development Block Grant target areas. Low income and blight conditions are required in targeting areas for CDBG assistance. 3. Education Levels and School Population The percentage of people in Anaheim 25 years or older who have completed four years of high school is 36 percent. The high school age population of the Project Area attend three high schools: Anaheim, Katella, and Loara. While the percentage of minority students district -wide is 35.4 percent, these three schools contain an average of 43 percent minority enrollment; Anaheim High School has a 66 percent minority students enrollment. Anaheim High School leads the - district with the highest dropout rate: 43 percent in 1984 as against 31 percent district -wide. The junior high school enrollment is drawn primarily from two schools - -Ball and South Junior High Schools. Minority students in junior high schools in Anaheim comprise 38 percent of the student population, while minority enrollment at these two Project Area - serving schools is an average of 41 percent. The elementary school age population of the Project Area attends seven schools in the Anaheim district. The average minority population for these schools is 59 percent; the district -wide minority population is 54 percent. A portion of the school population is drawn from the Project Area's long -term transient occupancy motels. The Anaheim City Elementary School District superintendent recently estimated over 500 elementary students are drawn from these facilities. 4. Housing ............................ _ _.... Of the 12,559 housing units in the Project Area, 54 percent are rental units and 45 percent are owner - occupied. City -wide, 47 percent of the housing units are rental units and 50 percent are owner occupied. The relatively lower owner - occupancy rate in the Project Area may be influencing the maintenance and operating behavior of property owners. Indeed, studies conducted in other cities have concluded that regardless of - area, resident ownership is the keystone to good maintenance and that resident owners are less likely than absentee owners to abandon properties. The substantial proportion of housing rated in the previous section as in need of repairs and /or maintenance points to the prevalence of such a -- situation in the Project Area. The condition of Project Area housing units and living conditions was described in detail earlier in this report, and presented statistically in a number of tables. Many of the housing units are older, in poor condition, and exhibit major code violations. Certain neighborhoods account for a disproportionate percentage of the City's code enforcement activities. Although current rent levels in the Project Area are comparable (II -16) Katz Hollis to those City -wide, the income levels of residents are such that it is unlikely that current market conditions in the area would support the higher rent levels that would be necessary to offset reinvestment into the housing stock. The median 1980 rent in the Project Area was $293 compared to $307 City -wide. The median 1980 house value was $82,500 compared to $93,000 City -wide. These numbers have increased substantially since the 1980 census. More importantly, the differences between Project Area and City - wide rents and values have also increased. Additionally, a number of motels have been converted to and used as living quarters, almost always without providing necessary living amenities. Insect and rodent infestations are frequently found. Many units accommodate three, four or more families, conditions resulting in serious overcrowding. 5. Infectious Diseases Physical and social well being are strongly associated with health status. One of the measures of the health of an area that is specifically identified in the CRL is disease rates. The data pertaining to this measure of public health are reported below and indicate that the Project Area does have health problems, many of them related to its social conditions. Infectious diseases occur at higher rates in the population of the Project Area than in Anaheim's City -wide population, according to statistics provided by the County of Orange Health Care Agency. In the area north of Katella Avenue, east of 9th Street, west of I -5 and south of Ball Road, gonococcal infections (venereal diseases) occur at the City's highest rate, 1,266 cases per 100,000. While the Project Area contains 13.1 percent of the City's population, 17 percent of the Hepatitis A cases, 21 percent of the Salmonella cases and 26 percent of the tuberculosis cases in Anaheim were reported from the Project Area in 1985. 6. Crime One of the most significant social problems within the - Project Area is crime. Table II -9 compares crime rates within the Project Area to City -wide rates in eight major crime categories. While the Project Area covers only 15.6 percent of the City's land area, and includes only 13.1 percent of the total population, during the last three years the Project Area has had 19 to 26 percent of the City's robberies, 65 to 89 percent of the City's assaults, 20 percent of the City's burglaries, 23 to 25 percent of the City's larcenies, 22 to 27 percent of the City's auto thefts, and 20 to 31 percent of the City's rapes. Of the eight major crime categories, only homicide appears to be in proportion to population and area. The significance of these statistics can be more easily seen in the bar chart following Table II -9. Within the Lynne Avenue /Jeffrey Drive neighborhood alone, the Anaheim Police Department reports that on the average over one - half of one percent of all the City's major crimes have been committed there (II -17) Katz Hollis Table I1 -9 Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission [atella Redevelopment Project Area MAJOR CRIMES IN PROJECT AREA, 1984 -1986 1984 1985 1906 (1) No. of Crimes As Z of No. of Crimes As i of No. of Crimes As Z of Type of Crime in Project Area Total City in Project Area Total City in Project Area Total City ------- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- ------- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- --------- - - - - -- ---- - - - - -- HOMCIDE 2 142 1 6Z 1 72 RAPE 21 25Z 34 311 19 20Z ROBBERY 166 261 118 192 141 251 ASSAULT 471 741 395 651 425 89Z BURGLARY 1009 202 1126 21Z 884 20Z LARCENY 2262 242 2235 23Z 1923 25Z AUTO THEFT 396 272 461 272 368 221 ARSON 12 141 21 242 12 202 Note: The Project Area contains 13.12 of the City's population in 15.662 of the City's land area. --------- - - - - -- (1) January - October only Source: Anaheim Police Department, November, 1986 1016anhIJ4 03118; /bi KatzHollis Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission Katella Redevelopment Project Area MAJOR CRIMES IN PROJECT AREA AS PERCENTAGE OF CITYWIDE TOTALS FOR 1984, 1985 AND 1986( HUMCIDE RARE ROBBERY AGGAULT BURGLARY LARCENY AUTO THEFT .ARGON 1984 1 ?80 .-1 7 98w Note: The Project Area contains 13.1% of the City's population and 15.7% of the City's land area. (1> January - October, 1986 Source: Anheim Police Department, November, 1986 1016a.anh /4 022787/tn►c 91% 80% 70% _ 4 Q w 50 % 0 ty C� 4 L` rL 30% 20% of HUMCIDE RARE ROBBERY AGGAULT BURGLARY LARCENY AUTO THEFT .ARGON 1984 1 ?80 .-1 7 98w Note: The Project Area contains 13.1% of the City's population and 15.7% of the City's land area. (1> January - October, 1986 Source: Anheim Police Department, November, 1986 1016a.anh /4 022787/tn►c Katz Hol lis during the past three years. The neighbor hood comprises only six one - - _ hundredths of one percent of the City's land area. Moreover, since 1984, there has been, a 500 percent increase in' arson cases, assaults have increased 89 percent, burglaries have increased 19 percent, and larceny has jumped 13 percent in the Lynne /Jeffrey area. In addition to the major crime problems, the Lynne /Jeffrey area has been targeted by the police department as one of two major narcotics trafficking areas of the City. In early 1986, a new unit "Street Crime Action Team" (SCAT) was formed to deal with this and other problems. In one four -month period 148 arrests were made by SCAT in the Lynne /Jeffrey area, primarily for narcotic - related offenses. -- The police department also reports heavy narcotic trafficking in the vicinity of Olive /South Streets in the Project Area. In addition, the department has identified the neighborhood south of Ball Road and east of Harbor Boulevard as the territory of the Hispanic street gang -' "Anaheim Vats Locos ". Residents have reported acts of malicious mischief, assaults, intimidation, and narcotic trafficking. In the southerly portion of the Project Area along Harbor Boulevard to the City limits, vice investigators report a high concentration of prostitution arrests. In the Ponderosa Park vicinity, three percent of all the City's robberies occurred during a two - month period in mid 1986. It is also an area of street gang activity, both Black and Hispanic. Prostitution and narcotics trafficking arrests have also been made at various motels in the vicinity of Disneyland, including some of the motels that have been converted to permanent residential apartments. Table II -2 indicates that 13 of the - 37 Project Area quarter sections have been determined to have higher than average crime rates. Table II -2 also shows that graffiti is a problem in 9 quarter sections. Evidence of graffiti and vandalism can be seen in Plate 23. In summary, it is evident that the Project Area is a dangerous place. All types of crimes are prevalent in the area, but felony crimes of personal assault, crimes against property, and narcotics offenses are especially common. From the perspective of the environment of the -- area, the impact of crime on street life and businesses that are client - dependent in these areas are particularly problamatic. 7. Lack of Open Space and Recreation Facilities Table II -8 documents that seven of the Project Area's 36 quarter sections have insufficient parks and recreation facilities to serve - the resident population. This is discussed in detail in Part II. A. above. C. Existing Economic Conditions The physical and social conditions described above have contributed to economic decline in the Project Area. One -third of the Project Area's developed land is devoted to commercial uses and another third to industrial uses. According to City business license records, there (II -18) KatzHollis are 453 active retail businesses in the Project Area. Table II -10 compares the retail business license activity of the Project Area to that of the City from 1980 to 1986 and the percent change each succeeding year. While the Project Area and the City experienced steady increases in the numbers of retail businesses each year except for 1986, the increases in the Project Area businesses are about two- thirds that of the City's increases. 1. Prevalence of Impaired Investments ............_ ......................_...._.._......._.._......................................................................_....._. ............................... The prevalence of impaired investments is indicated by the increasing vacancy rates in the Project Area, and inappropriate uses of buildings or land. Examples of vacant buildings are depicted in Plates 27 and 28. As shown on Table II -1, 5.0 percent,. or 218 acres, of the Project Area is still devoted to agricultural uses, despite its setting in an urban area, even adjacent to modern multi -story office buildings. City staff indicate that much of this land is under Williamson Act protection. Plates 30 and 31 show some of the agricultural properties among commercial and industrial uses. Examples of inharmonious uses of buildings include the industrial uses among retail commercial uses shown in Plate 7, the commercial use in a residential area shown in Plate 8, the transient occupancy businesses converted to permanent housing in a commercial area shown in Plates 8 and 9, and businesses inappropriate for a wholesome family- oriented commercial- recreation area, as shown in Plate 24. 2. Prevalence of Economic Maladjustment The prevalence of economic maladjustment in the Project Area is evident from the extent of building turnover, vacant and underutilized properties, the cost of public services vs. tax revenues, stagnation in retail sales tax revenues, decline in motel revenues, and the inability of property owners to bear additional special assessments. While no firm statistics are available concerning business failures vs. move -outs, the vacant buildings throughout the Project Area -- _ demonstrate the existence of business failures and turnover in buildings. Plates 27 through 29 depict numerous examples. - Vacant and underutilized properties are also common throughout the Project Area. The Project Area's vacant acreage is 183.2 acres, or 4 percent of the total Project Area. Examples of vacant properties are illustrated in Plates 25 and 26. The cost of providing public service within the Project Area is disproportiontely high compared to the remainder of the City and is in excess of the property tax revenue generated by the area. Crime statistics comparing the Project Area to the City as a whole in eight major crime categories show that the Project Area's percentage of the City's total crime occurrences ranges from 14 percent to 89 percent (averaging 21 percent), although the Project Area contains only 13.1 percent of the City's population in 15.6 percent of the City's land area. The Lynne /Jeffrey residential area (Plates 2, 3, and 6) keeps two code enforcement officers occupied full time. (II -19) Katz Hollis Table II -10 Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission Katella Redevelopment Project Area RETAIL BUSINESS ACTIVITY IN PROJECT AREA Source: Keyser /Narston Associates and City of Anaheim Finance Department, 1987 1010 031187/bl Project Area City ---------------------- — ---- — ------------------- - - - - -- Project Area Z Change Z Change Businesses as from Prior from Prior Z of City Total No_ of Businesses Year No. of Businesses Year Businesses IWO 180 - 1110 - 16.2Z 1981 225 25.01 1472 32.61 15.31 1982 294 30.71 2073 40.81 14.21 1983 383 30.32 2814 35.01 13.62 1984 436 13-OZ 3487 24.OZ 12.52 1985 463 6.2Z 3824 93Z 12.12 1980 453 -2.21 3790 -83Z 11.91 Source: Keyser /Narston Associates and City of Anaheim Finance Department, 1987 1010 031187/bl KatzHollis An analysis of annual revenue levels for Project Area motels from 1980 to 1986 (Table II -11) shows that the average annual increase in total revenues is only 3.17 percent. When this figure is converted to 1980 dollars, an average -1.74 growth rate results. These figures would be even lower were it not for an uncharacteristic 12.6 percent increase for the 1985 year. Respondants to a recent economic conditions survey by the Agency's economic consultant uniformly estimated that current motel occupancy rates are at a sub -par 60 to 70 percent. Physical deterioration, together with the social and economic problems -° that exist in the Project Area, have had an impact on business activities. The Agency has received numerous letters from the business community in the Project Area voicing their concerns. A sample of these letters is - attached as Attachments 1 through 4 to this Part II, and include compelling correspondence from Disneyland, hotel managers, and property owners. Overall, their concerns focus on infrastructure and transportation /circulation deficiencies in the Project Area, the high turnover of marginal businesses in the area, community safety and crime, and other physical, social and economic conditions that are jeopardizing the economic viability of their current and planned business activities. It appears that the businesses most affected by conditions in the Project Area, are tourist dependent businesses which. are a major portion of the City -wide business community. 3. Exi . .. ........... ........................... _ Open Space and Utilities . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ............................. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . _ . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .......................... The deficiencies of the public improvements, public facilities, open space and utilities in the Project Area are documented in Section A.6.b. of this Part II and exhibited in Plates 11 -22. The deficiencies in the transportation circulation system are a critical factor inhibiting the Project .� Area's economy. The majority of the respondents in a recent economic conditions survey stated that traffic circulation problems and insufficient off - street parking are of high significance and in part responsible for the area's unfavorable conditions. The undersized or deteriorated water and ~- sewer lines may be inhibiting the full utilization of the vacant and underutilized properties. The inadequate storm drainage is another negative element impacting the Project Area. (II -20) KatzHollis Table II-11 Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission Katella Redevelopment Project Area TAXABLE MOTEL RECEIPTS, 1980 -86 (1) 1016 -13/4 041587/bl TOTAL TOTAL TOTAL 12 NO TOTAL Z CHANGE 12 NO ------------- - - - - -- ----- Z CHARGE - - - - -- ----------- 1980 DOLLARS - - - - -- 1980 DOLLARS --------------- 1980 510,788,001 $10,788,001 1981 $11,322,692 4.961 $10,258,592 -4.911 1982 $11,890,845 5.021 $10,151,022 -1.051 1983 $12,613,599 6.082 $10,432,427 2.772 1984 $11,736,609 -6.95Z $9,310,816 - 10.752 1985 $13,690,700 16.652 $10,486,855 12.632 1986 $12,772,248 -------------- -6.711 $9,528,993 -9.131 ----------------- AGGREGATE Z CHANGE 3.171 -1.74Z (1) Includes representative sample of 24 Project Area motels Source: Keyser /Marston Associates and City of Anaheim Finance Department, 1987 1016 -13/4 041587/bl KatzHollis Attachments 1 through 4 to Part II Letters from Project Area business property owners 3WRATHER - C O R P O R A T 1 O N BY MESSENGER March 19, 1987 MAR 3 0 1987 Anaheim Redevelopment Agency X"s" t 76 South Claudina Street Anaheim, California 92805 Attention: Norman J. Priest Executive Director RE: Proposed Katella Redevelopment Area Gentlemen: Wrather Corporation realized the potential and promise of the Katella area in Anaheim more than 30 years ago when we developed and opened our Disneyland Hotel. Over time, the hotel has grown from the 100 -room facility that first welcomed guests in the summer of 1955 to the 1,174 rooms and full service recreational and convention facilities of today. To a large extent this progress was possible because the City of Anaheim has worked to create an environment which encourages growth and success. As Wrather Corporation plans for the future development of -- its property interests in Anaheim, it has become apparent that along with the prosperity that has accompanied the ambitious growth in the Katella area have come some less fortunate side effects, such as inadequate access and circulation systems and an overburdened public infrastructure. We feel that these problems which are area -wide in nature require area -wide solutions. Although we have not yet had an opportunity to review the Redevelopment Agency's plan for the Katella area, we firmly support the redevelopment process and feel that it can provide an excellent mechanism to facilitate the resolution of these area -wide problems. We look forward to working with you in the future on these issues. Sincerely, Eugene L. Saenger, Jr. Executive Vice President - Development ELS:kmm Attachment No. 1 to Part II 270 NOVTH CANON DRIVE, BEVERL1 HILLS, CALIFORNIA 00210 213 P.O. BOX 111, BEV'ERL': }-TILLS, CALIFORNIA y0213 BUSINESS PROPERTIES DEVELOPMENT CONSTRUCTION MANAfGEMEXT 17631 FITCH P. 0. BOX 19689 IRVINE, CALIFORNIA 98713 -9689 (714) 474 -8900 March 9, 1987 Norman J. Priest Executive Director of Community Development and Planning City of Anaheim 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Suite 244 �- Anaheim, California 92805 Reference: General Plan Amendment Number 214 Anaheim Stadium Business Center Dear Mr. Priest: As a major property owner in the Anaheim Stadium area, I am vitally concerned over the efforts being made by the City of Anaheim in developing a plan that insures the vitality of the business community. I have reviewed the proposed general plan amendment and the establishment of a redevelopment district as referenced to above and wish to make the following comments. The establishment of a redevelopment district is essential because I believe it is the only way in which private enter- prise can participate on a sensible economic basis to bring the needed and necessary corrective elements of the redevelop- ment plan into being. Without this development plan in place, there will be continued physical deterioration and a definite slowness of desirable business growth environment. You and your staff are to be congratulated for your progressive redevelopment plans. Along with other members of the business community, I congratulate you for your efforts. I believe you have properly analyzed the future development problem and have come up with the only solution that makes sense in the competi- tive economic environment that currently exists. Very truly yours, BUSINESS PROPERTIES M '8 _ L. C. Smull t LCS:dt Attachment No. 2 to Part II land lsne� .� R OFFI HOTE O F TH MAG K A MOBIL * * ** AND AAA •+*• RESORT March 19, 1987 Mr. Norman J. Priest Executive Director ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 - Dear Mr. Priest: As Chairman of the Anaheim Visitor & Convention Bureau's Executive Committee, and Board Member for many years, I - wanted to write to you about the proposal for the Katella Redevelopment Project. We believe that redevelopment is necessary in this area to correct the following: • Deteriorated housing. • Traffic congestion. • Inadequate street system throughout the area. • Rapid turnover of marginal businesses. • Hotels and motels oriented toward weekly and monthly family housing. • Inadequate parks and recreational facilities. • Crime; particularly drugs and prostitution. We are very concerned that conditions such as these will indeed jeopardize the strength of our recreation and tourism area -- one of the showcases of Anaheim. I know these problems cannot be corrected by private business • alone. We need to work with Government to arrest the present decline in the area. Re / ds', ✓ V Michael A. Bullis R.4Ap ` , � - President r - 1 MAB:jb cc: William F. Snyder, President Anaheim Visitor & Convention Bureau - -a Attachment No. 3 to Part II sNe Development Company March 5, 1987 Mr. Norman J. Priest w Director Anaheim Redevelopment Agency Civic Center Post Office Box 3222 - Anaheim, California 92803 Dear Mr. Priest: The Walt Disney Company, Disneyland, Incorporated, and Disney Development Company urge the City of Anaheim to make the strongest possible commitment to approve and adopt the Stadium /Katella Redevelopment Project Area Plan. We firmly believe that significant advantages are to be gained from this commitment and the implementation of the overall plan is absolutely necessary to preserve and enhance the long -term viability of Anaheim and the Disneyland area. The substantial benefits received from the stated objectives of the -- redevelopment plan to improve the existing strain on infrastructure traffic congestion, removal of blighted conditions and an improved community safety and pedestrian environment, will insure the opportunity for Disney to maintain and strengthen its existing base in Anaheim. At present, we have a significant financial investment and commitment to our Disney operations and would like to continue to have the business option to enhance our base of operation over time. Therefore, from a corporate planning perspective, the proposed Redevelopment Project Area Plan is critical to preserve that option for possible future development expansion. Sincerely, Peter S. Rummell President PSR /dp RECEIVED MAR 3 Y87 Commun:t; Cav,�l:prmnt Piariwng rip LS AC'L "'i AM f AS xxx%xxx ( 818 ) 846 -4034 Attachment No. to Part II 0 W E-4 < a a O h NOW N a� U � 3 0 c bo w � w W � p .0 A W r. a W x O h NOW 4 Ammw �, •�s), )t 7i �i, l - • � � �..t. \1. \�� . / 1, j- � `• S � '{ ' -• .ail .. . DETERIORATED SITE GUNDITIC DENTIAL PROPEF =crow iI vkIKIC w Wl MA - w �; - 6'el �.m �a 0 1 W1 r Aft vAn PR O . O -q • / , • , • • 0 1 W1 State College Boulevard, south of Orangewood Winston Street off of West Street Katz o s KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT I PLATE 5 PROJECT AREA Molt- j < Winston Street off of West Street Katz o s KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT I PLATE 5 PROJECT AREA WNZ U) 0 L _ W O U WW I= �- 0 4 aW AW �Q o� °C o LL. cr) W W W LAM :D p 11 - -- co O O I- Z Z W �-- Om �CC aZ �O U zw CD W Q J CL a w a U w 1) O cr Z 2 0 J w w w a w r s s MIXED OR SHIFTING USES (Plates 7 -9) INDUSTRIAL AMONG COMMERCIAL AND TRANSIENT RESIDENTIAL USES - tz H l i KATE PRO PROJECT AREA East PLATE 7 East side of Anaheim Boulevard, south of Katella On Lewis Street, north of Anaheim Boulevard Utz ollis t KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA PLATE 8 Commercial in a residential area around Santa Ana Street Motel in commercial area shifted to long term apartment use �w i ki n4�.. '� *� _j �� I ItAI tLLA f(CUCVCLVrIVICIV I K [ lol PROJECT AREA PLATE 9 O I g r W F- J s t i 1 W V c a c o c c.� c 0 Z W t J W cu Q > W Cl) c J W co Q) w 0 W r �' Or INADEQUATE PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS (Plates 10 -22) View north on f -* east side of Harbor Boulevard, south of Manchester View south on Harbor Boulevard at Orangewood Harbor Boulevard, at Wilken Way DEFICIENCIES IN CIRCULATION SYSTEM: HARBOR BOULEVARD KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT Katz Hol 1 is Mrr AQGA PLATE 11 At Haster Street KATELLA AVENUE DEFICIENCIES at7 of 11s KATE PROJECT AREAMENT PLATE 13 At West Street, view northwest West Street. Irregular width. Katella Avenue at Katella Way �f Orangewood at Mallul Crossing of Anaheim Boulevard, south of Katel la Anaheim Boulevard Olive Street KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT I PLATE 16 K PROJECT AREA r� + . 0 F v { • t 4 t • f "Wlr• • : r• • � R � j • r I � 1 f PIP 1 R.; : #•s,: Vii. � ##. -� . �� ` 9l coyly /' U WAIN Iitoo • t - G. • 4 jjy t I � 1 f PIP 1 R.; : #•s,: Vii. � ##. -� . �� ` 9l coyly /' U WAIN Iitoo ,= *+� tt ,,�. -,�: Cp �$r a.� : ,n r s• +: �- '. as , 1 I 4 f �" Al F �• $ g =`ci. 3 t f Ti 00 : } \kz < Ll 31L op at 16 DI W1 Olive Street, view southeast at Water Street North side of Katella Avenue, west of Harbor Boulevard East side of Vernon Street, south of Winston Road PLATE 22 IWIAND r . rAM 1 �R AO t 44 R � 0 ► } 1 �, }� , R «£ USES INAPPROPRIATE FOR WHOLESOME FAMILY - ORIENTED COMMERCIAL - RECREATION AREA: KATELLA AVENUE AND ANAHEIM BOULEVARD Katz llol l is I KATE PROJECT AREA I PLATE 24 VACANT AND UNDERUTILIZED PROPERTIES (Plates 25 -29) lit r _ Harbor Boulevard, south of Katella Avenue Katz 11ol l is KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT PROJECT AREA PLATE 25 Katella, east of Walnut Street KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT I PLATE 26 PROJECT AREA South Street, view southeast Freedman Way, view northwest N W a a C U O Q Ui LO M T c� a� O m E L ca c Q O c i c6 O c O .Ln Cl) cu 3: R L a O �c U) m Q as Y a o W L w O 0 a F � U co W m V+ cc Z a co _ 0 N Z J o W cc CL r mN O Cl) J Za > R -- W U a W � Q � � J J c W Q a c° Y (1) Y O L O cn E R7 O •� m ^� O �"► = r... r ,, .... co N W Q J 0. 0 0 c a co 0 :. 0 m E t c co C a 0 0 a 0 0 cm co m 0 0 U) a co a� 0 m E 4) -C as C CD Q � 0 CD Q .o co CO CO CO a� W co Q W Q U W O a Z W 2 CL O J W W W a J J W l Imo! r - co o m CO > ( E o ,+ — ) C m �'. f c _ co �o c Q t o Q -- � o•d' o 0 w m cn _ U > U > m t , Q W Q U W O a Z W 2 CL O J W W W a J J W l Imo! r L C= co W > -- - C= a� 0 of o trn m _ 0 1) O L o ; H a z 3 W 2 o 0 3 O J c' }, i O ' ca >� c W O cn O U Q L C J Co J U W (o H > C= W C -- - C= co 0 of > trn 0 _ F 1) O 0 L co 0 m L O L cc ■ N 0 = (1) c W(1) c = Y co LL o N W Q J M Q W a U W 1) O a H z W 2 O J W a W ca >� ! W o m Q L 0 J L J co W = H o Y rn c L N O i L �_ •tom Cl) �r C =- (0 = LL OBSOLETE, INAPPROPRIATE LAND USES: AGRICULTURE AMONG COMMERCIAL AND INDUSTRIAL USES (Plates 30 and 31) Katella Avenue east of West Street Middle and bottom: Harbor Boulevard, south of Katella Avenue � �,r tz 1fol t i KATELLA REDEVELOPMENT I� PROJECT AREA PLATE 30 T CV) W O O 0 U) C13 LLJ Y. as 0 CL E 0 0 co ...7 CD (D " o U) E = 0 c C13 c 0 (D M 0 0) cts cc W co 4 LLI ui 1 ) 0 Z LLI 0 —i LLJ ui 0 LLJ ui Katz Hol l is PART III. PROPOSED METHOD OF FINANCING REDEVELOPMENT OF PROJECT . AREA A. General Financing ...... .................... Methods Available to Agency .. .. The proposed Redevelopment Plan authorizes the Agency to finance the project with financial assistance from the city, State of California, federal government, tax increment funds, interest income, Agency bonds, donations, loans from private financial institutions, the lease or sale - of Agency -owned property, participation in development or any other available source, public or private. The Agency is also authorized to obtain advances, borrow funds and create indebtedness in carrying out the Redevelopment Plan. The principal and interest on such advances, funds and indebtedness may be paid from tax increments or any other funds available to the Agency. Advances and loans for survey and planning and for the operating capital for nominal administration of the project have been and will continue to be provided by the city until adequate tax increment or other funds are available, or sufficiently assured, to repay the advances and loans and to permit borrowing adequate working capital from sources other than the city. The city, as it is able, may also supply additional assistance through city loans and grants for various public facilities and other project costs. B. Proposed Redevelopment Activities and Estimated Costs ._...__ .........................................................................................._......... ............................... As detailed in Part II of this report, the Project Area is a blighted area suffering from certain problems which cannot be remedied by private enterprise acting alone. The area's problems center around a number of issues, including: poor vehicular and pedestrian access and circulation, and insufficient off - street parking; buildings and structures characterized by deterioration, mixed and shifting uses, and other adverse physical conditions such as inadequate public improvements and facilities; - adverse social and economic conditions such as substandard housing, high crime rates, underutilized properties, and other such conditions leading to economic maladjustment. The Commission proposes that the redevelopment process be used, to the extent possible, to alleviate these problems in order to provide a proper environment for revitalization and controlled growth to occur. Such activities will facilitate the full utilization of property and will enhance the economic vitality of the Project Area and the city as a whole. - Proposed redevelopment activities required to promote and achieve the goals and objectives of the Redevelopment Plan and to address the Project Area's problems will include: 1) a program of reconstruction, - replacement and installation of needed public improvements and facilities; 2) a selective land assembly and disposition program; 3) a structural rehabilitation program; and 4) a program addressing the Project Area's (and city's) low and moderate income housing needs. The Commission's proposed public improvements and facilities program for the Project Area, and its estimated cost in current dollars, are detailed in Table III -1. Local and freeway transportation, traffic (III -1) Katz Hol lis and street improvement projects needed to remedy the area's major traffic access, circulation and parking deficiencies total $1.12 billion, of which $329.5 million is proposed for project funding. Storm drain, sewer and water system improvements will cost an estimated $33.1 million. Of this amount $24.9 million will be funded by the project. Just over $72.1 million in electrical system improvements are proposed, with $49.8 million to be paid from project funds. Finally, a $14.7 million neighborhood park is proposed to be fully funded by the project. The relationship between the various components of the public improvements and facilities program can be seen on the chart following this page. The proposed land assembly and disposition program will focus on three areas: 1) non - conforming and other blighting uses; 2) property -owner or developer- initiated efforts where public assistance is required to assemble property needed for the expansion of existing uses or to create a fully developable site; and 3) "opportunity" acquisitions in which - an existing owner desires to sell. It is estimated that the Redevelopment Agency may acquire up to 120 acres of property over the life of the project, at a cost (in 1987 dollars) of $263 million. In addition, the Agency may be required to acquire portions or all of some parcels of property for public improvement purposes. A structural rehabilitation program is proposed to assist residential and commercial business owners to eliminate code deficiencies and otherwise improve their properties. This program is estimated to cost $82.5 million. Up to 20 percent of total project costs will be devoted to increasing and improving the community's low and moderate income housing stock are required by state law. This program will involve an estimated - cost of up to $198.3 million. Administrative costs over the 35 -year life of the project will total approximately two percent of project costs. With the addition of a ten percent contingency factor and an escalation factor of 15 percent to cover inflation over the life of the project, total project costs, exclusive of debt service and issuing fees, are $1.25 billion. Estimated project costs are - detailed in Table III -2. In Table III -3 projected land sale proceeds of $120 million -- are netted against total project costs, and, based on assumed bond issuances totaling a cumulative $500 million, debt service and issuance costs of $1.62 billion are combined to give a total estimated net project cost of $2.26 billion over the life of the project. C. Estimated Project Revenues .... .. ......_ ........................ Potential revenue sources to fund project costs include: tax increment receipts and proceeds from tax increment bonds; loans, grants and contributions from the city, state or federal government and from - project developers; proceeds from the sale of Agency -owned land; special assessment districts; and development fees. (III -2) KatzHollis Anaheim Community Development Commission Katella Redevelopment Project Area PROPOSED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND FACILITIES PROGR ...... (in millions) E ...... - $139,3 M. 4 $24.9 1 cc�'sci: 3 9,5 $32 q $49.8 D $73.5 $19,2 $14,7 B **::1.::::::::::::::: ............ .::::::• ..................... ................ ••::::::::::::::::: ...... :::::::::::::::::::•• .............. • $41,6 $55.9 Program Components 1. Transportation, traffic & street improvements A. Critical intersections B. Flyovers C. Grade separations /overcrossings D. Street wide nings /realignments /extensions E. Freeway, signalization, median & other improvements 2. Neighborhood park _ 3. Electrical system improvements 4. Storm drain, sewer & water system improvements _ Source: Anaheim Redevelopment Agency KatzHollis Table III - 1 Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission Katella Redevelopment Project Area ESTIMATED PUBLIC IMPROVEMENTS AND FACILITIES COSTSM ...__ ................................_.............._......................._......__..........._......................._..............................__.............. ............................... Portion Proposed for Project Funding ............................................... ............................... Estimated Total Cost Amount Percent I. Transportation, Traffic and Street ..................... .. ............. Improvement Projects (Local a nd Freeway) _ ......... ............................... _........................... ._ .._............... ...... .. ...._ .................. Freeway, street and alley construction, 367,000 reconstruction, widening, signalization, 612,000 curbs, gutters, sidewalks and other 612,000 improvements as necessary to upgrade, 10,200,000 modernize and improve the following: 2,448,000 A. Grade Separations /Overcrossings _. ...._... __....._ ..............._..........__......_....._ .._.................._........I 1,785,000 1. Pedestrian overcrossing 2,448,000 Orangewood w/o Rampart $ 1,224,000 2. Pedestrian overcrossing State college @ Pacifico 1,224,000 3. Pedestrian overcrossing Katella @ Convention Ctr. 1,224,000 4. Pedestrian overcrossing Harbor @ Disneyland 1,224,000 5. Pedestrian overcrossing West St. @ Disneyland 1,224,000 6. Bridge overcrossing Cerritos @ I -5 20,400,000 7. Grade separation, Katella & SPRR 12,240,000 8. Grade separation, State College & SPRR 8,925,000 9. Grade separation, State College & ATSFRR 12,240,000 10. Grade separation, Ball & ATSFRR 12,240,000 1090.anh /5 040987/bl $367,000 30% 367,000 30% 367,000 30% 612,000 50% 612,000 50% 10,200,000 50% 2,448,000 20% 1,785,000 20% 2,448,000 20% 2,448,000 20% Katz Hollis _ [Table III - 1, Page 2] Portion Proposed for Project ............................................. Funding ............................... Estimated Total Cost ........._._ ............._................. Amount ............................... Percent ... ........ _ ...... _............... 11. Grade separation, Ball & SPRR $12,240,000 $2,448,000 20% 12. Grade separation, Cerritos & ATSFRR 12,240,000 2,448,000 20% 13. Bridge separation, Orangewood 0 I -5 18,707,000 3,741,000 20% 14. Bridge Overcrossing, Pacifico @ I -5 23,113,000 23,113,000 100% 15. Grade Separation, Cerritos & SPRR 12,240,000 2448,000 20% ,,- Subtotal A $150,705,000 $55,852,000 B. Flyovers 1. Harbor @ Katella $ 8,160,000 $8,160,000 100% 2. Harbor @ Ball 8,160,000 8,160,000 100% 3. Pacifico @ St. College 8,160,000 4,080,000 50% 4. St. College @ Orangewood 8,160,000 3,264,000 40% 5. Cerritos @ St. College 8,160,000 3,264,000 40% 6. St. College @ Katella 8,160,000 3,264,000 40% 7. St. College @ Ball 8,160,000 3,264,000 40% 8. Katella @ Howell 8,160,000 _..._ .................. 8,160,0000 _ . 100% °- Subtotal B $65,280 $41 C. Critical Intersections 1. Bali Rd. @ Harbor $ 1,786,000 $1,340,000 75% 2. Katella @ Harbor 1,786,000 1,340,000 75% 3. Katella @ St. College 1,786,000 393,000 22% 4. St. College @ Orangewood 1,786,000 393,000 22% Katz Hol l is [Table III - 1, Page 3] Portion Proposed _ for Project Funding .................. Estimated Total Cost .............................. _.. Amount ........ Percent .. ............................... 5. St. College @ Ball $1,786,000 $ 572,000 32% 6. Orangewood @ Harbor 1,786,000 1,340,000 75% 7. Raster @ Katella 1,786,000 1,340,000 75% 8. Cerritos @ St. College 1,786,000 393,000 22% 9. Lewis @ Katella 1,786,000 393,000 22% 10. Cerritos @ Anaheim Blvd. 1,786,000 393,000 229 11. Ball @ Anaheim Blvd. 1,786,000 393,000 22% 12. Katella @ Howell 1,786,000 393,000 22% 13. Ball @ Lewis 1,786,000 393,000 22% 14. City Dr. @ St. College 1,786,000 393,000 22% 15. St. College @ Pacifico 1,786,000 393,000 22% 16. Harbor @ Convention Way 1,786,000 1,340,000 75% 17. Ball @ Euclid 1,786,000 1,340,000 75% 18. Ball @ West 1,786,000 1,340,000 75% 19. Katella @ West 1,786,000 1,340,000 75% 20. Katella @ Clementine 1,786,000 1,340,000 75% 21. Raster @ Convention Way 1,786,000 1,340,000 75% w° 22. Raster @ Orangewood 1,786,000 1,340,000 75% Subtotal C $39,292,000 $19,242,000 D. Street Widenings /Realignments /Extensions 1. Widen St. College Blvd. (N /O City Dr. to Rt. 91) $ 3,978,000 $995,000 25% 2. Realign /widen Lewis /East Streets (Pacifico to Rt. 91) 38,887,500 9,722,000 25% Katz Hol l is [Table III - 1, Page 41 3. Katella widening (Euclid to 57 Fwy.) 4. Orangewood Ave. widening (9th St. to 57 Fwy.) 5. Ball Rd. widening (Euclid to 57 Fwy.) 6. West St. widening (Convention Way to Ball) 7. Cerritos widening (Sunkist to Anaheim Blvd. and Euclid to 9th St.) 8. Pacifico widening (St. College to I -5) 9. Convention Way extension (Harbor to 1 -5) 10. Harbor Blvd. widening (Broadway to Orangewood) 11. Walnut St. widening (Cerritos to Ball) 12. Anaheim Blvd. widening (Ball to SCL - including I -5 Bridge) 13. Clementine widening ( Katella to Freedman Way) 14. Douglass Road widening. (Cerritos to Katella) 15. Sunkist widening (Ball to Lincoln) Subtotal D Portion Proposed for Project Funding ................ ........... Estimated Total Cost ................ ...........I................... Amount ... ............................... Percent .... ............................... $14,871,000 $7,436,000 50% 8,282,000 2,070,000 25% 12,485,000 6,242,000 50% 1,591,000 1,193,000 75% 8,589,000 2,147,000 25% 2,303,000 1,152,000 50% 2,302,000 1,151,000 50% 15,483,000 7,741,000 509 2,269,500 1,702,000 75% 30,906,000 30,906,000 100% 673,000 673,000 100% 216,500 108,000 50% 303,000 227,000 75% $143,139,500 $73,465,000 Katz Hol l is (Table III - 1, Page 51 Portion Proposed for Project Funding ..... .............................. . . Estimated Total Cost ._ ... __....... Amount ... ............................... Percent E. Freeway, Signalization, Median, and ............................ Other Transportation Prects .... ............................ 1. Construct Interchange - I -5 @ West St. (Including realignment of West from Ball to Broadway) $ 37,409,000 $37,409,000 100% 2. Bridge widening Harbor @ 1 -5 7,784,000 5,838,000 75% 3. Reconstruct interchange 12,730,000 6,365,000 50% Katella @ I -5 4. Reconstruct Ball Rd. (Anaheim Blvd. to St. College) 714,000 357,000 50% 5. Reconstruct Ball Rd. (Brookhurst to 1 -5) 1,020,000 204,00 20% 6. Reconstruct Orangewood (Anaheim to St. College) 174,500 87,000 50% 7. Median upgrade - Katella (I -5 to Santa Ana River) 342,000 171,000 50% 8. Increase ramp capacity SR 57 @ Orangewood 2,040,000 510,000 25% 9. Orangewood /I -5 access ramps 7,013,000 1,753,000 25% 10. Upgrade /modify existing signals - misc. locations 2,270,000 1,702,000 75% 11. Coordinate signals on Katella, Ball, Anaheim Blvd. /Haster, and St. College 893,000 670,000 75% 12. Upgrade and install signal inter- connects - 28 local controllers in So. Central Anaheim 796,000 597,000 75% 13. Construct one -way couplet paralle- ling I -5 /Manchester /Anaheim Blvd. 28,560,000 8,568,000 30% 14. People mover system 450,000,000 15,750,000 3.5% llatzHollis [Table III - 1, Page 61 Portion Proposed for Project Funding Estimated Total Cost Amount Percent 15. Master pedestrian circulation system (Commercial Recreation Area) $ 5,100,000 $ 5,100,000 100% 16. Commercial Recreation Area parking structures (approx. 10,000 Spaces) 89,965,000 44,982,000 50% 17. Assist in reconstruction of I -5 from SR22 to SR91 53,761,000 5,376,000 10% 18. Miscellaneous alley reconstructions 1,530,000 1,530,000 100% 19. Increase capacity of SR57 (SR22 to SR91) 13,515,000 1,351,000 10% 20. Increase ramp capacity SR57 @ Katella 2,040,000 510,000 25% 21. Increase ramp capacity SR57 @ Ball 2,040,000 510,000 25% Subtotal E $ 719,965,500 $139,340,000 Subtotal I $1,118,382,000 $329,515,000 II. Storm Drain Improvements .. ......_ ...................................................................................... ... .. .......................... Installation, construction, upgrading, reconstruction, replacement and /or other improvement of or to storm drain facilities, as follows: 1. Vermont Street - E/O Anaheim Blvd. to AT & SFRR $ 475,000 $ 475,000 100% 2. Cerritos- Anaheim - Barber- City Channel to Walnut 408,000 408,000 100% 3. Orangewood - E/O 9th St., Jacalene Ln; including Jacalene Ln. & Gail Ln. Laterals 673,000 673,000 100% 4. Walnut - Cerritos to Goodhue 546,000 546,000 100% Katz Hol l is [Table III - 1, Page 71 Portion Proposed for Project Funding . Estimated Total Cost ................. ............................... Amount ........... ... ........._...... Percent . ......................_........ 5. Harbor - N/O Orangewood to Convention Way $ 255,000 $ 255,000 100% 6. Clementine - N/O Orangewood to end 204,000 204,000 100% 7. Haster - Leatrice to Wakefield and alley extension to Mountain View 204,000 204,000 100% 8. Orangewood - Spinnaker to Anaheim Blvd. 408,000 408,000 100% 9. Open Channel E/O Palm - Midway Dr. to Santa Ana Fwy. 306,000 306,000 100% 10. Katella- Anaheim- Barber - City Channel to Haster 2,040,000 2,040,000 100% 11. Harbor - Katella to Manchester including Manchester to Santa Ana Fwy. 1,020,000 1,020,000 100% 12. Harbor - Chapman to Orangewood 816,000 816,000 100% 13. Ball Rd. - Anaheim - Barber -City Channel to Walnut to South St. to Olive Storm Drain 1,530,000 1,530,000 100% 14. Katella - Lewis to .3 miles E/O Lewis 422,000 84,000 20% 15. Lewis St. - ATSFRR to Ball Rd. 612,000 184,000 30% 16 Anaheim Blvd. - Cerritos to Palais 255,000 255,000 100% 17. Anaheim Blvd. - Spinnaker Channel N. to 440' S/O Katella 352,000 352,000 100% 18. Orangewood Ave. - S.E. Anaheim Channel to 100' W/O St. College Blvd. 281,500 56,000 20% 19. St. College Blvd. - Orangewood to Pacifico 255,000 77,000 30% KatZHollis [Table III - 1, Page 81 Estimated Total Cost Portion Proposed for Project Funding .......................... Amount Percent 20. Miscellaneous other system deficiencies 10,200,000 5,100,000 50% Subtotal II $21,262,500 $14,993,000 III. Sewer Projects ....................................... ............................... Installation, construction, upgrading, reconstruction, replacement and /or other improvement of or to miscellaneous local sewer line facilities $4,264,000 $4,264,000 100% Subtotal III $4,264,000 $4,264,000 IV. Water System Improvements ........... _ -.1-.1 ............... .............................. Installation, construction, upgrading, reconstruction, replacement and /or other improvement of or to water line facilities, as follows: 1. Walnut St. - Santa Ana to Ball $ 398,000 $ 298,000 75% 2. Walnut St. - Ball to Katella 324,000 243,000 75% 3. Crone Ave. - Walnut to Hampstead 136,000 102,000 75% 4. Cerritos Ave. - Walnut to 9th St. 102;000 77,000 75% 5. 9th St. - Well #36 to Cerritos 125,500 94,000 75% 6. West St. - Santa Ana to South 265,000 199,000 75% 7. West St. - PR -19 in Ball to Cerritos 294,000 220,000 75% 8. Illinois - Santa Ana to South 128,500 96,000 75% 9. Indiana - Santa Ana to South 128,500 96,000 75% 10. Ohio - Santa Ana to South 128,500 96,000 75% 11. Water St. - Olive to West 211,000 158,000 75% 12. Ball Rd. - I -5 Fwy. overcrossing 377,500 283,000 75% Katz Hol l is (Table III - 1, Page 91 V. Electrical System Improvements ... ................ ..................... ..... Installation, construction, upgrading, reconstruction, replacement and /or other improvement of or to electrical system facilities, as follows: 1. Undergrounding of overhead distribution facilities in area bounded by Ball Rd., Katella, Walnut, & Manchester 2. Conversion of individual services for above area Portion Proposed for Estimated Amount ... ............................... Percent ..... ............................... Total Cost .................... ... .... ........ 13. Harbor Blvd. - Ball to Orangewood 75% 474,000 (including I -5 overcrossing) $1,224,000 14. Clementine - Katella to Orangewood 178,500 15. Pacifico - Hilton Hotel to Manchester 632,000 16. Pacifico - Manchester to St. College (including I -5 overcrossing) 1,224,000 17. Katella - I -5 Fwy. overcrossing 691,500 18. Manchester - Katella to Orangewood 303,000 19. Lewis St. - Katella to Pacifico 153,000 20. St. College - Katella to Orangewood 321,000 21. Lemon St. - South to Vermont 153,000 22. Citron - Santa Ana to Water _ ...............85 Subtotal "IV" X7,5847000 V. Electrical System Improvements ... ................ ..................... ..... Installation, construction, upgrading, reconstruction, replacement and /or other improvement of or to electrical system facilities, as follows: 1. Undergrounding of overhead distribution facilities in area bounded by Ball Rd., Katella, Walnut, & Manchester 2. Conversion of individual services for above area Portion Proposed for Project Funding ................... . . Amount ... ............................... Percent ..... ............................... $ 918,000 75% 134,000 75% 474,000 75% 918,000 519,000 227,000 115,000 241,000 115,000 64,000 ................. ............................... #5,687,000 $16,932,000 $16,932,000 3,327,000 3,327,000 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 75% 100% 100% Katz Hol l is [Table III - 1, Page 10] Portion Proposed for Project Funding ................ ............_.................. _.............. ........... Estimated Total Cost ... ....._......._........._....... Amount .................. Percent .................................... 3. Construct new S.E. Anaheim substation $ 4,849,000 $ 970,000 206 4. Undergrounding of overhead facilities in S.E. Anaheim area bounded by Orangewood Ave. on the south, Anaheim Blvd. on the west, Katella from I -5 to Euclid, and St. College Blvd. from Katella to the ATSFRR tracks 10,200,000 10,200,000 100% 5. Underground SCE facilities on R/W from Walnut St. to I -5 18,666,000 9,333,000 50% 6. Underground balance of SCE facilities in area W/O I -5 3,032,000 1,516,000 50% µ- 7. Underground telephone, CATV, Western Union in conjunction with above undergrounding work 15,096,000 7,548,000 50% Subtotal V $72,102,000 $49,826,000 VI. Other Public Facilities Improvements .........................._......._........_.............._..... ..I.........._.._.............. ....... . Provide following new public facility within and serving the project area: 1. Citron Area neighborhood park $14,650, . ........ Subtotal VI $14,650,000 1. $_14,6 , TOTAL ESTIMATED COSTS $1 ......... ;418 . _ _ 33.8% �l> Where necessary, estimated costs include right -of -way acquisition. Source: Anaheim Redevelopment Agency. Katz Hol l is 04/13/8' Table III -2 Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission Katella Redevelopment Project Area ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS ------------------------------------------ (OOO's Omitted) Proposed Public Improvements and $418,935 Facilities Projects (Table III -1) Land Assembly: Acquisition 120 Acres @ $1,600,000 /Acre 1192,000 Site Occupant Relocation 30.00% of Acquis. Cost $57,600 Demo. and Site Prep. 7.00% of Acquis. Cost $13,440 -------- - - - - -- Total Land Assembly Costs 263,040 Structural Rehabilitation Program Residential 5000 Units @ $15,000 !Unit $75,000 Commercial 300 Units @ $25,000 /Unit $7,500 -------- - - - - -- Total Structural Rehabilitation Program 82,500 Administration Years 1 - 14 $1,000,000 /Year $14,000 Years 15 - 25 $800,000 /Year $8,800 Years 26 - 35 $600,000 /Year $6,000 -------- - - - - -- Total Administration 28,800 Low and Moderate Income Housing (20% of total below) -------- 198,319 - - - - -- Sub-Total $991,594 Plus: Contingencies 10.00% -------- 99,159 - - - - -- Sub -Total $1,090,753 Plus: Escalation 15.00% -------- 163,613 - - - - -- TOTAL ESTIMATED PROJECT COSTS -------- -------------- $1,254,366 - - - - -- i Estimated Project costs do not include payments to affected taxing agencies to alleviate financial detriment, if any, caused by the Project, or for deposits into the Project Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund as a result of such payments. In addition, the cost of providing replacement housing for low and moderate income dwelling units demolished by the Project is not included in the estimated Project cost total. It is assumed that any replacement housing cost obligations incurred by the Agency would be funded by moneys deposited into the Project Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund. Sources: Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission Katz Hollis KatzHollis Table III -3 Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission Katella Redevelopment Project Area ESTIMATED NET PROJECT COSTS .. . ...... ......... ...... . ........ ....................... .........................�000JS Omitted.).... Total Estimated Project Costs (Table III -2) $1,254,366 Less: Estimated Land Sale Proceeds <120,000> Less: Bond Proceeds(2) <.500,000> Total Costs Not Funded with Bond Proceeds $ 634,366 Plus: Debt Service on Bond Issues 1,593,750 Plus: Bond Issuance CostsM 25,000 TOTAL ESTIMATED NET PROJECT COSTS $2,253,116 Round to 2.,255�,000 ............ .. ...... ................ ......... (1) 120 acres Q $800,000 /acre, plus 25% contingencies and escalation. (2) Assumes series of $20 million issues totaling $500 million in principal 0 12% interest and 25 -year terms. (3) 5 percent of bond principal amount. Sources: Anaheim Redevelopment Agency Katz Hollis Katz Hol l is 1. Tax Increment Revenues _ ........ ............... ............................... Table III -4 shows Agency staff's projections of the scope, type, and pace of potential new developments that may occur within the Project Area over the life of the project. Given the physical, social, _ and economic conditions existing in the Project Area and described in Section II of this report, it is unlikely that these new projected developments would occur but for redevelopment activities, that is, °- redevelopment activities either directly relating to and assisting these new developments, or ancillary redevelopment activities that provide infrastructure and other improvements necessary for such developments to occur. A description of how these and other specific projects proposed by the Commission will improve or alleviate blighting conditions in the Project Area is more fully discussed in Part V. of this report. A projection of annual estimated tax increment revenues that would be generated within the Project Area over the 35 -year life of the project is presented in Table III -5. The projection total, $3.71 billion, is based upon: 1) new developments and values included in Table III -4; and 2) underlying annual growth rates of two percent for years 1 -15, and five percent for years 16 -35 to reflect transfers of ownership and other new construction. Other assumptions on which the projection is based are noted in footnotes to the projection. 2. Loans, Grants and Contributions from City, State 11 ............ .. ...... ........................ ....................... ............................. ... ............ and Federal Government and from Project Developers _............ .... ._ .._ ............._..............._.. .................................... _ ........... ............... ........._ ..................... Currently, Commission and Agency administrative costs are being partially funded by city advances and loans, a situation which will continue until other sources of revenues are available. It is likely that additional city funds or other loans will be necessary if all the implementation activities and programs identified above are to be timely completed. Such loans may include loans and advances from future Project Area developers. A major component of the Project Area's existing blighting conditions is the existence of inadequate public improvements, facilities and utilities. Local and freeway transportation, traffic and street improvement projects needed to alleviate the area's major traffic access, circulation and parking deficiencies total over $1.1 billion. As detailed in Table III -1, nearly two- thirds of this cost is proposed to be borne by sources other than project funding. Such sources will include the city's -- general fund and various public improvement funds, some of which are funded by contributions from state and federal programs. 3. Land Sale Proceeds The proposed implementation program contemplates the acquisition of privately owned parcels to be sold for development in -- accord with the Redevelopment Plan. For purposes of this report it is assumed that sales prices from the Agency to private developers will (II1 -3 ) Katz Hol l is - Table III -4 Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission KateUa Redevelopment Project Area PROJECTED NEW DEVELOPMENT Office (square feet) Hotel (rooms) Motel (rooms) Food and Beverage (square feet) Light Industrial /Office (square feet) Residential: Condominiums (units) Apartments (units) Construction Completion Period .. ... 1986 -87 to . 1 93 to 1998 -9 Total .......... 1991 -92 1997 -98 to _End 3,337,000 3,992,000 9,403,000 16,732,000 1,650 3,900 450 6,000 920 2,640 440 4,000 150,000 150,000 50,000 350,000 47,600 - 47,600 270 1,130 2,170 3,570 470 950 2,170 3,590 Disneyland: - - Upgrading and New Attractions $265 million $332 million - Separate Gated Attraction - $900 million Note: All development includes necessary parking spaces p Source: Anaheim Redevelopment Agency $597 million $900 million Katz Hol lis 04/17/87 Table III -5 Anaheim Conunity Redevelopment Commission Katella Redevelopment Project Projection of Incremental Tax Revenue ------------------------------------- (000's Omitted) Increment Fiscal Real Other Total Over Base Gross Total Year Property (1) Property (1) Value =2,471,913 - - - - -- ------ Revenue (2) - - - - -- ===--- Cumulative -- ---- - - - - -- 1986-87 ------- - - - - -- ------- 2,171,760 - - - - -- ------ 300,152 - - - - -- ------ 2,471,913 0 N/A - - - - N/A 1987 -88 2,303,725 306,637 2,610,362 138,449 N/A N/A 1968-89 2,552,559 317,608 2,870,167 398,255 4,008 4,008 1989-90 3,012,799 324,488 3,337,287 865,375 8,656 12,664 1990 -91 3,501,184 352,670 3,853,854 1,381,942 13,819 26,484 1991-92 4,093,672 384,559 4,478,231 2,006,318 20,063 46,547 1992 -93 4,602,360 418,777 5,021,138 2,549,225 25,492 72,039 1993-94 5,177,422 461,103 5,638,525 3,166,613 31,666 103,705 1994 -95 5,957,506 485,548 6,443,054 3,971,142 39,711 143,417 1995 -96 6,782,787 519,965 7,302,751 4,830,839 48,308 191,725 1996 -97 7,739,082 548,019 8,287,102 5,815,189 58,152 249,877 W- 1997-98 8,190,132 576,356 8,766,488 6,294,576 62,946 312,823 1998 -99 8,667,669 598,180 9,265,848 6,793,936 67,939 380,762 1999 -00 9,012,008 620,629 9,632,637 7,160,725 71,607 452,369 2000 -01 9,475,238 630,488 10,105,726 7,633,813 76,338 528,708 2001 -02 10,002,961 666,317 10,669,278 8,197,365 81,974 610,681 2002-03 10,560,408 691,001 11,251,409 8,779,496 87,795 698,476 2003 -04 11,149,336 716,394 11,865,730 9,393,817 93,938 792,414 2004 -05 11,772,072 742,547 12,514,619 10,042,707 100,427 892,841 - 2005 -06 12,429,682 769,424 13,199,106 10,727,194 107,272 1,000,113 2006 -07 13,124,726 797,077 13,921,803 11,449,891 114,499 1,114,612 2007-08 13,859,441 825,530 14,684,971 12,213,058 122,131 1,236,743 2008 -09 14,636,746 854,839 15,491,585 13,019,673 130,197 1,366,940 2009 -10 15,458,097 884,967 16,343,064 13,871,152 138,711 1,505,651 2010 -11 16,326,713 915,971 17,242,684 14,770,771 147,708 1,653,359 2011-12 17,245,450 947,878 18,193,328 15,721,416 157,214 1,810,573 2012 -13 18,217,981 980,752 19,198,732 16,726,820 167,268 1,977,841 2013-14 19,244,445 1,014,551 20,258,996 17,787,083 177,871 2,155,712 2014 -15 20,269,151 1,049,340 21,318,491 18,846,579 188,466 2,344,178 2015 -16 21,353,536 1,085,151 22,438,689 19,966,776 199,668 2,543,846 2016 -17 22,485,278 1,122,051 23,607,329 21,135,416 211,354 2,755,200 "- 2017 -18 23,490,106 1,158,894 24,649,001 22,177,088 221,771 2,976,971 2018-19 24,553,890 1,183,771 25,737,661 23,265,749 232,657 3,209,628 2019 -20 25,680,528 1,209,519 26,890,047 24,418,134 244,181 3,453,809 2020 -21 26,874,188 1,236,168 28,110,356 25,638,443 256,384 3,710,194 TOTAL 3,710,194 See Footnotes on Attached Page. Katz Hol l is Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission Katella Redevelopment Project Footnotes to Projection of Incremental Tax Revenue _ ...................................... ............. _ ............. _................ ......... _ ...... _............ ..._.......................__.. (Relates to Table III -5) 1. The 1986 -87 base year assessed valuation of the Project Area has been determined based upon local secured and unsecured values reported by the Orange County Auditor - Controller for fiscal year 1986 -87. State assessed public utility assessment records as reported by the State Board of Equalization were incorporated in the base year valuation total. Real Property values (i.e. land and improvements) reflect an annual .... _ ............................ .............................. two percent increase as allowed by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution and, an additional increase to reflect unidentified transfers of ownership or new construction as follows: Years 1 through 15: 2 percent Years 16 through 35: 5 percent Other Prope..........rty values (i.e. personal property and State assessed __ ........................................._ property) . .. .. .. _ .. . are assumed to increase as a result of unidentified new construction as follows: Years 1 through 15: 2 percent Years 16 through 35: 3.5 percent New Development (real and other property) reflects taxable value ..................................................... aaa. . e .1 a as . ........ .. a res .. .. .. ult of identified new developments and includes an annual four percent inflationary growth factor to reflect assumed -- market increases to development costs and tenant improvements. New development real property once on the tax -rolls is increased two percent annually as allowed by Article XIIIA of the California Constitution. 2. Gross tax revenue is projected on the basis of a representative area tax rate which includes the basic $1 per $100 rate plus an override rate. Future override rates reflect an assumed annual decline equivalent to the average annual decline of the override tax rate between 1980 -81 and 1986 -87. - Katz Hol I is average $1.0 million per acre (including allowance for contingencies and - escalation) and will total an estimated $120.0 million. 4. Special Assessment Districts ... .... ................................... .. .......................... ...... ............................ .......... .. ................... The use of special assessment districts is not presently considered a viable alternative to the use of tax increment revenues to fund project costs. By definition, and as described earlier in this report, the Project Area is a blighted area. Existing owners and potential outside private developers are reluctant to invest in such areas without substantial public assistance. It is believed that requiring contributions above and beyond the normal costs of land acquisition and private development may become a self- defeating disincentive to private development. Under current conditions it is also unlikely that existing businesses and owners could afford to participate in an assessment district to finance major project activities. 5. Development Fees ....................... ....... ..........._ ...... I ............. . Current and future developers will bear a portion of the cost of addressing the Project Area's public improvements and facilities needs. In late 1985, the Anaheim City Council adopted, by ordinance, an interim development fee program for the area within the Project Area - bounded by the Southern California Edison easement on the north (which generally runs parallel to and north of Katella Avenue) the city limit line on the south, the Santa Ana River on the east, and the Santa Ana Freeway on the west. Under this program, a fee of $4.12 per square foot of gross building area is assessed against all new development in the area except industrial buildings, which are exempted. Fees raised from this source will, along with the other local, state and federal sources noted above, pay a substantial portion of the Project Area's public improvements and facilities costs. - In addition, it should be noted that all future Project Area development will be subject to development fees of 25 cents /sq. ft. (commercial and industrial) and $1.50 /sq. ft. (residential) which per AB 2926 (Chapter 887, 1986 Statutes, effective January 1, 1987), will be levied by local school districts to assist in building new and renovating existing schools. D. Proposed Financing Method and Economic Feasibility of Project As shown on Tables III -2 and III -3, the Commission proposes a program of redevelopment activities that total an estimated $1.25 billion. The Agency will have funding resources of $120 million in land sale proceeds, and will incur an estimated $1.1 billion in bond interest and issuance costs. The estimated net project cost of $2.26 billion includes an assumed full 20 percent deposit into the project Low and Moderate Income Housing Fund from annual increment allocations and from the proceeds of bond issues. With estimated tax increment resources totaling $3.9 billion over the life of the project (Table III -5), all costs are fully fundable. (III -4) Katz Hol 1 is Because tax increment revenues build up slowly in early years, the Agency will likely continue to use city loans to finance initial activities. As revenues increase, such loans may be repaid, and the Agency may choose to fund the activities through other financing sources secured by tax increment. Bond issues are likely to be sold by the Agency - in order to leverage future revenue flows. Because of the 1986 federal tax act, such issues, if tax exempt, may be restricted to essential government purposes such as the construction of public improvements and facilities. Based on the financing method discussed above, the Commission has established the following tax increment and bond limits in the Redevelopment Plan, as required by the Community Redevelopment Law: 1) the total tax increment bonds which may be outstanding at one time may not exceed $500 million in principal amount, and 2) the total amount of tax increment revenues which may be allocated to the Agency from the Project Area may not exceed $2.255 billion. Both of these limits exclude any payments made by the Agency to affected taxing agencies to alleviate financial detriment caused by the project. Any such payments the Agency may be required to make could potentially reduce the funds available for project activities, especially in the project's early years. E. Reasons for Including Tax Increment Financing in .................. ............... .............. . I............... ... A redevelopment program, in addition to providing a proven method of securing desired developments in locations otherwise not attractive, also provides a financing tool in tax increments. The Agency and the city must look to this source of funding in order to assist in solving the Project Area's problems. Both entities have and will consider every alternative source of funding available to finance project improvements prior to considering the use of tax increment revenues. (See Section F below.) The financing method envisioned by the Commission for the project, as described above, places heavy reliance on all such sources, including substantial contributions from the city and state and federal sources. It is believed that neither the city nor the private market could bear costs in excess of those assumed in the financing program. In the city's case, a cut -back in capital improvements and services needs in other areas of the city would be required. In the case of the private market, once the anticipated investment return on a property is reduced below a rate comparable to alternative investments, the development of the property is jeopardized. Like most cities, since the passage of Proposition 13 in 1978 Anaheim has experienced funding shortages in the provision of services and particularly in the installation and maintenance of public improvements and facilities. This problem has been compounded by state and federal cutbacks in local government funding programs. Table III -6 summarizes requested and funded amounts within the city's capital improvements program during the 1984 -85 fiscal year and the prior two fiscal ,years. _ During this three -year period, on the average, less than 62 percent of the cost of requested projects was approved for funding. (III -5) KatzHollis Table III -6 Anaheim Community Redevelopment Commission Katella Redevelopment Project Area CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PROGRAM FUNDING GAPS ................. ............ ..... (000'S Omitted . Capital Improvement Projects ...................... Amount Requested Amount Funded (Percent Funded) Amount Unfunded (Gap) (Percent Unfunded) 1982 -83 1983 -84 1984 -85 Fiscal Year _ .................._ ............................... Fiscal Year ...... ............................... Fiscal Year Average $42,837 $48,108 $43,056 $44,667 $36,319 $19,779 $27,634 $27,911 (84.8 %) (41.1 %) (64.2 %) (62.5 %) $ 6,518 $28,329 $15,422 $16,756 (15.2 %) (58.9 %) (35.8 %) (37.5 %) Source: City of Anaheim Katz Hol l is F. Tax Increment Use Limitations and Requirements 1 __ . __.111. 1. __ ..... ...................._ ................_....._...._....................................__...._.. ._...._...._- ........_.__...... 111............ As noted above, the proposed Redevelopment Plan establishes the following tax increment and bond limits, as required by the Community Redevelopment Law: 1) the amount of bonds supportable in whole or in part by tax increment revenues which may be outstanding at one time may not exceed $500 million; and 2) the total amount of tax increment revenues which may be allocated to the Agency from the Project Area may not exceed $2.255 billion. Both of these limits exclude payments which the Agency may make to affected taxing agencies to alleviate fiscal detriment, if any, caused by the project, and the 20 percent low and moderate income housing set -aside required relating to such payments. Any such payments the Agency may be required to make would potentially reduce the funds available for project activities. In addition to tax increment and bonded indebtedness limits discussed above, there are several other statutory requirements relating to the Agency's use of tax increment funds. The Agency is - cognizant of such requirements and intends to fully adhere to them to the extent they are applicable to the Agency and to the project. A summary of these requirements is presented below. 1. Prior to paying all or part of the value of land for and the cost of installation and construction of any publicly owned building, facility, structure, or other improvement within or outside the Project Area, the Agency will request the City Council to consent to such payment and to determine: a. That such building, facility, structure or improvement is of benefit to the Project Area or the immediate neighborhood; and b. That no other reasonable means of financing the building, facility, structure or improvement is available to the community. 2. Prior to committing to use tax increment funds to pay for all or part of the value of the land for, and the cost of installation and construction of, a publicly owned building (other than parking facilities) the Agency will request the City Council to hold a public hearing and to make the above determinations. In connection with such public hearing a summary will be prepared to: a. Show the estimated amount of tax increment funds proposed to be used to pay for such land and construction (including interest payments); b. Set forth the facts supporting the Council's determinations; and (III -6) Katz Hol l is C. Set forth the redevelopment purposes for which such expenditure is being made. 3. The Agency will not, without the prior consent of the City Council, develop a site for industrial or commercial use so as to provide streets, sidewalks, utilities or other improvements which the owner or operator of the site would otherwise be obligated to provide. 4. Prior to entering into any agreement to sell or lease any property acquired in whole or in part with tax increment funds, the Agency will request the City Council to approve such sale or lease after holding a public hearing. In connection with such public hearing the Agency shall make available a summary describing and specifying: a. The cost of the agreement to the Agency; b. The estimated value of the interest to be conveyed or leased, determined at the highest uses permitted under the Redevelopment Plan; and C. The purchase price or the sum of the lease payments, and, if the sale price or total rental amount is less than the fair market value of the interest to be conveyed or leased determined at the highest and best use consistent with the Redevelopment Plan, an explanation of the reasons for such difference. (III -7) Katfflollis Part IV. PLAN AND METHOD OF RELOCATION Section 33352(d) of the CRL requires the Commission's Report to the City Council on the proposed Redevelopment Plan to present a plan and method of relocation for those site occupants who may be displaced by Agency action. A. Agency Displacement As noted in Part III of this Report, the Commission anticipates that its program of upgrading and installation of public improvements and facilities needed within the Project Area will provide an incentive for the private sector to develop or redevelop vacant, underutilized and blighted " properties. As an additional aid to the private sector, the Agency may also selectively acquire and dispose of property: 1) to eliminate non - conforming and other blighting uses; 2) in response to property -owner and developer initiated efforts where public assistance is necessary to assemble property needed for expansion of existing uses or to create developable sites for proposed new uses; and 3) "opportunity" acquisitions in which an existing owner may desire to sell in order to pursue opportunities out of the Project Area. Under this selective acquisition approach, it is estimated that up to 120 acres of property could be acquired over the Project life. To the extent that the Agency acquires occupied property for land assembly or other purposes, or enters into agreements with developers or others under which occupants will be required to move, the Agency will cause or will be responsible for causing such displacement of occupants. The Agency is not responsible for any displacement which may occur as a result of private development activities not directly assisted by the Agency under a disposition and development, participation, or other such agreement. B. Relocation in the Event of Agency Displacement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ....... . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . ....................... _ . . _ .......................... . . . . . . . . . .. ............... As noted above, displacement of persons, families, businesses or - tenants is anticipated under current Commission plans. When such displacement occurs the Agency will provide persons, families, business owners and tenants displaced by Agency Project Area activities with monetary and advisory relocation assistance consistent with the California Relocation Assistance Law (Government Code, Section 7260 et seq.), the State Guidelines adopted and promulgated pursuant thereto, Relocation Rules and Regulations adopted by the Agency and the provisions of the Redevelopment �. Plan for the Project. . The Agency will pay all relocation payments required by law. The following portions of this Part IV of the Report to City Council outline the general relocation rules and procedures which must be adhered to by the Agency in activities requiring the relocation of persons and businesses. Also identified below are the Agency determinations and assurances which �-- must be made prior to undertaking relocation activities. The Agency's functions in providing relocation assistance and benefits are also summarized. (IV -I ) Matz Hol l is C. Rules and Regulations The Agency has adopted rules and regulations that: (1) implement the requirements of California Relocation Assistance Law (Government Code, Chapter 16 of Division 7 of Title 1, commencing with Section 7260) (the "Act "); (2) are in accordance with the provisions of the California Department of Housing and Community Development's "Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition Guidelines" (the "State Guidelines "); (3) meet the requirements of the California Community Redevelopment Law and the provisions of the Redevelopment Plan; (4) are appropriate to the particular activities of the Agency and not inconsistent with the Act or the State Guidelines. Such rules or regulations issued by the Agency shall be promptly revised as necessary to conform to applicable amendments of the Act, the California Community Redevelopment Law or the State Guidelines. D. Agency Determinations and Assurances ....... ............................... _ _.................................. ............................... ............. 1. The Agency may not proceed with any phase of a project or other activity which will result in the displacement of any person or busi- ness until it makes the following determinations: a. Fair and reasonable relocation payments will be provided to eligible persons as required by law, the State Guidelines and Agency �- rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. b. A relocation assistance advisory program offering the services described in Article 2 of the State Guidelines will be established. C. Eligible persons will be adequately informed of the assistance, benefits, policies, practices and procedures, including grievance -' procedures, provided for in the State Guidelines. d. Based upon recent survey and analysis of both the housing needs of persons who will be displaced and available replacement housing, and considering competing demands for that housing, comparable replacement dwellings will be available, or provided, if necessary, within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement sufficient in number, size and cost for the eligible persons who require them. e. Adequate provisions have been made to provide orderly, -- timely and efficient relocation of eligible persons to comparable replacement housing available without regard to race, color, religion, sex, marital status, or national origin with minimum hardship to those affected. f. A relocation plan meeting the requirements of law and the State Guidelines has been prepared. 2. No person shall be displaced until the Agency has fulfilled the obligations imposed by the Act, the California Community Redevelopment Law, the Redevelopment Plan, the State Guidelines and the Agency rules and regulations adopted pursuant thereto. (IV -2) Katz Hol I is 3. No persons or families of low and moderate income shall be displaced unless and until there is a suitable housing unit available and ready for occupancy by such displaced person or family at rents comparable to those at the time of their displacement. Such housing units shall be suitable to the needs of such displaced persons or families and must be decent, safe, sanitary and an otherwise standard dwelling. The Agency shall not displace such persons or families until such housing units are available arid ready for occupancy. -� 4. If any portion of the Project Area is developed with low or moderate income housing units, the Agency shall require by contract or other appropriate means that such housing be made available for rent or purchase to the persons and families of low and moderate income displaced - by the Project. Such persons and families shall be given priority in renting or buying such housing; provided, however, that failure to give such priority shall not affect the validity of title to real property. 5. If insufficient suitable housing units are available in the community for low and moderate income persons and families to be displaced from the Project Area, the City Council shall assure that sufficient land is made available for suitable housing for rental or purchase by low and moderate income persons and families. If insufficient suitable housing units are available in the City for use by such persons and families of low and moderate income displaced by the Project, the Agency may, to the extent of that deficiency, direct or cause the development, rehabilitation, or construction of housing units within the City. 6. Permanent housing facilities shall be made available within three years from the time occupants are displaced, and pending the development of such facilities there will be available to such displaced occu- pants adequate temporary housing facilities at rents comparable to those in the City at the time of their displacement. «- 7. Whenever dwelling units housing persons and families of low or moderate income are destroyed or removed from the low and moderate income housing market as part of the Project, the Agency shall, within four years of such destruction or removal, rehabilitate, develop or construct, or cause to be rehabilitated, developed or constructed, for rental or sale to persons and families of low or moderate income an equal number of replacement dwelling units at affordable housing costs within the Project Area or the City. 8. At least 30 percent of all new or rehabilitated dwelling units developed by the Agency, if any, shall be available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low and moderate income. Not less than 50 percent of the dwelling units required to be available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low or moderate income shall be available at affordable housing cost to, and occupied by, very low income households. At least 15 percent of all new or rehabilitated dwelling units developed within the Project Area by public or private entities or persons other- than the Agency, if any, shall be available at affordable housing cost to persons arid families of low or moderate income. Not less than 40 percent of the (IV -3) Katz Hof l is dwelling units required to be available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low or moderate income shall be available at affordable housing cost to very low income households. These percentage requirements shall apply independently of the requirements of paragraph 7 above and in the aggregate to housing made available by the Agency and by public or private entities or persons other than the Agency, respectively, and not to each individual case of rehabilitation, development or construction of dwelling units. The Agency shall require that the aggregate number of dwelling units rehabilitated, developed or constructed pursuant to these requirements remain available at affordable housing cost to persons and families of low income, moderate income and very low income households, respectively, for not less than the period of the land use controls established in the Redevelopment Plan. E. Replacement Ho ........................ Not less than 30 days prior to the execution of an agreement for acquisition of real property, or the execution of an agreement for the dispo- sition and development of property, or the execution of a participation „- agreement, which agreement would lead to the destruction or removal of dwelling units from the low and moderate income housing market, the Agency shall adopt by resolution a replacement housing plan. For a reasonable time prior to adopting a replacement housing plan by resolution, the Agency shall make available a draft of the proposed replacement housing plan for review and comment by the Project Area Committee, other public agencies, and the general public. - The replacement housing plan shall include those elements required by the Community Redevelopment Law. A dwelling unit housing persons of low or moderate income whose replacement is required by the Agency, but for which no replacement housing plan has been prepared, shall not be destroyed or removed from the low and moderate income housing market until the Agency has by resolution adopted a replacement housing plan. Nothing, however, shall prevent the Agency from destroying or removing from the low and moderate income housing market a dwelling unit _ which the Agency owns and which is an immediate danger to health and safety. The Agency shall, as soon as practicable, adopt by resolution a replacement housing plan with respect to such dwelling unit. F. Relocation Assistance Advisory Program and Assurance of Comparable Replacement Housing The Agency shall implement a relocation assistance advisory program which satisfies the requirements of the State Law and Article 2 of the State Guidelines and the Civil Rights Act. Such program shall be administered so as to provide advisory services which offer maximum assistance to minimize the hardship of displacement and to ensure that (a) all persons and families displaced from their dwellings are relocated into housing meeting the criteria for comparable replacement housing contained (IV-4) Katz Hol hs in the State Guidelines, and (b) all persons displaced from their places of business are assisted in reestablishing with a minimum of delay and loss of earnings. No eligible person shall be required to move from his /her dwelling unless within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement a comparable replacement dwelling or, in the case of a temporary move, an adequate replacement dwelling is available to such person. The following outlines the general functions of the Agency in providing relocation assistance advisory services. Nothing in this section is �- intended to permit the Agency to displace persons other than in a manner prescribed by law, the State Guidelines and the adopted Agency rules and regulations prescribing the Agency's relocation responsibilities. 1. Administrative Organization .. . .._...._ ........... ............................... ............ a. Responsible Entity .................... ... ............................... The Anaheim Redevelopment Agency is responsible for providing relocation payments and assistance to site occupants (persons, families business owners and tenants) displaced by the Agency from the Project Area, and the Agency will meet its relocation responsibilities through the use of its staff and consultants, supplemented by assistance from local realtors and civic organizations. b. Functions The Agency's staff and /or consultants will perform the following functions. 1) Prepare a Relocation Plan as soon as possible following the initiation of negotiations for acquisition of real property by the Agency and prior to proceeding with any phase of a public improvement or facility project or other implementation activity that will result in any displacement other than an insignificant amount of non - residential displacement. Such Relocation Plan shall conform to the requirements of the Section 6038 of the State Guidelines. The Agency shall interview all eligible persons, business concerns, including non - profit organizations, to obtain information upon which to plan for housing and other accommodations, as well as to provide counselling and assistance needs. 2) Provide such measures, facilities or services as needed in order to: a) Fully inform persons eligible for reloca- tion payments and assistance within 15 days following the initiation of negotiations for a parcel of land as to the availability of relocation benefits and assistance and the eligibility requirements therefor-, as well as the procedures for obtaining such benefits and assistance, in accordance with the requirements of Section 6046 of the State Guidelines. (IV -5) Katz Hol l is b) Determine the extent of the need of each such eligible person for relocation assistance in accordance with the requirements of Section 6048 of the State Guidelines. c) Assure eligible persons that within a reasonable period of time prior to displacement there will be available com- parable replacement housing meeting the criteria described in Section 6008(c) of the State Guidelines, sufficient in number and kind for and avail- able to such eligible persons. d) Provide current and continuing informa- tion on the availability, prices and rentals of comparable sales and rental housing, and of comparable commercial properties and locations, and as to security deposits, closing costs, typical down payments, interest rates, and terms for residential property in the area. e) Assist each eligible person to complete applications for payments and benefits. „- f) Assist each eligible, displaced person to obtain and move to a comparable replacement dwelling. g) Assist each eligible person displaced from his /her business in obtaining and becoming established in a suitable replacement location. h) Provide any services required to insure that the relocation process does not result in different or separate treat- ment on account of race, color, religion national origin, sex, marital status or other arbitrary circumstances. i) Supply to such eligible persons informa- tion concerning federal and state housing programs, disaster loan and other ° programs administered by the Small Business Administration, and other federal or state programs offering assistance to displaced persons. j) Provide other advisory assistance to eli- gible persons in order to minimize their hardships. As needed, such assistance may include counselling and referrals with regard to housing, financing, employment, training, health and welfare, as well as other assis- tance. k) Inform all persons who are expected to be displaced about the eviction policies to be pursued in carrying out the Project, which policies shall be in accordance with the provisions of Section 6058 of the State Guidelines. 1) Notify in writing each individual tenant and owner- occupant to be displaced at least 90 days in advance prior to requiring a person to move from a dwelling or to move a business. (IV -6) Matz Hol l is 2. Information Program The Agency shall establish and maintain an information program that provides for the following: a. Within 15 days following the initiation of negotia- tions and not less than 90 days in advance of displacement, except for those situations described in subsection 6042(e) of the State Guidelines, the Agency shall prepare and distribute informational materials (in the language ° most easily understood by the recipients) to persons eligible for Agency relocation benefits and assistance. b. Conducting personal interviews and maintaining personal contacts with occupants of the property to the maximum extent practicable. -` C. Utilizing meetings, newsletters and other mecha- nisms, including local media available to all persons, for keeping occupants of the property informed on a continuing basis. d. Providing each person written notification as soon as his /her eligibility status has been determined. e. Explaining to persons interviewed the purpose of relocation needs survey, the nature of relocation payments and assistance to be made available, and encouraging them to visit the relocation office for information and assistance. 3. Relocation Record The Agency shall prepare and maintain an accurate relocation record for each person to be displaced as required by the State of California. 4. Relocation Resources Survey ......... . .... __.._........ ... __ .. The Agency shall conduct a survey of available relocation resources in accordance with Section 6052 of the State Guidelines. 5. Relocation Payments The Agency shall make relocation payments to or on behalf of eligible displaced persons in accordance with and to the full extent permitted by State Law and Article 3 of the State Guidelines. The obligations for relocation payments are in addition to any acquisition payments made pursuant to the Agency's real property acquisition guidelines, which may be adopted at the time the Agency's relocation rules - and regulations are adopted. (IV--I) KatZHollis 6. Temporary Moves Temporary moves would be required only if adequate resources for permanent relocation sites are riot available. Staff shall make every effort to assist the site occupant in obtaining permanent relocation resources prior to initiation of a temporary move, and then only after it is » -W determined that Project Area activities will be seriously impeded if such move is not performed. 7. Last Resort Housing The Agency shall follow State law and the criteria and procedures set forth in Article 4 of the State Guidelines for assuring that if the Agency action results, or will result in displacement, and comparable replacement housing will not be available as needed, the Agency shall use its funds or fund authorized for the Project to provide such housing. 8. Grievance Procedures The Agency has adopted grievance procedures to implement the provisions of the State Law and Article 5 of the State Guidelines. The purpose of the grievance procedures is to provide Agency requirements for processing appeals from Agency determinations as to the eligibility for, and the amount of a relocation payment, and for processing appeals from persons aggrieved by the Agency's failure to refer them to comparable permanent or adequate temporary replacement housing. Potential displacees will be informed by the Agency of their right to appeal regarding relocation payment claims or other decisions made affecting their relocation. 9. Relocation Appeals Board The Mayor of the City of Anaheim may appoint a relocation appeals board composed of five members, and approved by the City Council. The relocation appeals board shall promptly hear all complaints brought by residents of the Project Area relating to relocation and shall determine if the Agency has complied with the applicable State relocation requirements and where applicable, federal regulations. The board shall, after a public hearing, transmit its findings and recommendations to the Agency. (IV -8) Katz Hol l i s Part V. ANALYSIS OF PRELIMINARY PLAN ..................... __ - ..__....... The Preliminary Plan for the Katella Redevelopment Project Area, adopted by the Planning Commission on September 15, 1986 by Resolution No. PC86 -243, describes the boundaries of the Project Area, contains general statements of land uses, layout of principal streets, population densities, building intensities and building standards proposed as the basis for the redevelopment of the Project Area. The Preliminary Plan also shows how the purposes of the Community Redevelopment Law would be attained through the redevelopment of the area, and states that the proposed redevelopment conforms to the General Plan of the City. The Preliminary Plan also describes generally the impact of the Project upon the surrounding neighborhood. The proposed Redevelopment Plan for the Project Area conforms with the standards and provisions of the Preliminary Plan. The Project Area boundary remains, with some minor technical corrections, the same. The Redevelopment Plan proposes the same land uses and provides for all principal streets indicated in the Preliminary Plan. Certain parcels of property are identified in the proposed Redevelopment Plan with permitted land uses and alternative permitted land uses. Any such area, or any portion of any such area, may be used for the designated alternative land use, subject to a General Plan amendment providing for such use. Building intensities are in compliance with limits established in the Preliminary Plan. Proposed building standards also remain the same. �. As set forth in the Preliminary Plan, the proposed Redevelopment Plan will attain the purposes of the California Community Redevelopment Law by the elimination of areas suffering from economic dislocation and disuse; by the replanning, redesign and /or redevelopment of areas which are stagnant or improperly utilized, and which could not be accomplished by private enterprise acting alone without public participation and assistance; by protecting and promoting sound development and redevelopment of blighted areas and general welfare of the citizens of the City by remedying such injurious conditions through the employment of appropriate means; through the installation of new or replacement of existing public improvements, facilities and utilities in areas which are currently - inadequately served with regard to such improvements, facilities and utilities; and other means as determined appropriate. (V -1) Katz Hol 1 is Part VI. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF PLANNING COMMISSION, AND 1-11-11 REPORT RERUIRED............................................... ......... ..... ..... .... .... Section 33352(f) of the Community Redevelopment Law requires the report and recommendations of the Planning Commission on the proposed Redevelopment Plan to be included in this Report to City Council. Section 65402 of the Government Code states that no real property should be acquired by dedication or otherwise for public purposes, no real property shall be disposed of, no street shall be vacated or abandoned and no public building or structure shall be constructed or authorized until such activities have been submitted to and reported upon by the local planning agency as to conformity with the jurisdiction's adopted general plan. When the Anaheim Planning Commission has adopted its report and recommendations on the proposed Redevelopment Plan and its report required by Section 64502 of the Government Code, they will be added to this Report to City Council or will be forwarded to the City Council for addition to this Report. (VI -1) KatzHollis Part VII. PROJECT AREA COMMITTEE RECORD Section 33385 of the Community Redevelopment Law (CRL) provides that the City Council shall call upon the residents and existing community organizations in the Project Area to form a project area committee (PAC) if a substantial number of low and moderate income families are to be displaced by the Project. A. Formation of PAC As described more fully in Part III of this Report, the Commission proposes a program of redevelopment activities which includes selective acquisition and site assembly. Some of the parcels acquired by the Agency could include residential uses which may be occupied by low or moderate income families. Although Agency acquisitions are not likely to result in a substantial displacement of low and moderate income families, it was determined that formation of a PAC would be beneficial to Project -- adoption and implementation. Accordingly, on October 10, 1986 the Anaheim City Council adopted Resolution No. 86 which called upon the residents, existing community organizations and businesses within the Project Area to form a PAC, and established the procedures therefor. On March 17, 1987, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 87R -83, which approved a representative PAC for the Katella Redevelopment Project Area. A copy of Resolution No. 87R -83, including the attached PAC roster, is included as Attachment I to this Part VII of the Commission's Report to City Council. B. Information and Documents Made Available to PAC by _._......_...__ ... ...... ..... _.... ............ .... ...................._.__....... Commission Manner /Date of Dissemination Information /Documents .......... ....................................... _ ..... _ First PAC, organizational o Orientation to PAC responsibilities meeting held 4/1/87 o Status report on proposed Katella w° Redevelopment Project o Identification and discussion of documents to be submitted to PAC o Presentation of Community Redevelopment Agencies Association's videotape: "Redevelopment, A California Success Story" PAC meeting held o Impact of Brown Act up on PAC on 4/15/87 o Discussion of Fair Political Practices Act o Project status update o EIR process summary o Slide presentation on Project blight and financing (VII -1) Katz Hol l is PAC meeting held o Review of redevelopment plan adoption on 5/6/87 process and major documents involved o Executive summary of proposed Redevelopment Plan and Commission's Preliminary Report o Proposed Redevelopment Plan o Preliminary Report o Draft Environmental Impact Report PAC meeting held o Furthur review, discussion of proposed on 5/20/87 Redevelopment Plan o Proposed Owner Participation and Preferences Rules; and review and discussion thereof Copies of available agendas and minutes from PAC meetings are attached as Attachment 2 to this Part VII of the Commission's Report to City Council. C. PAC Recommendations on Proposed Redevelopment Plan At its meeting of May 20, 1987, the PAC voted to recommend that the City Council approve and adopt the proposed Redevelopment Plan, subject to the following recommended changes: 1. In reference to Section 100 - Page 3, Item 15, "The examination of assisting in the undergrounding of unsightly overhead utility lines," the PAC requested that on Exhibit "C ", Proposed Public Improvements and Facilities Projects, Section V. "Electrical Systems Improvements," should be - clarified to allow for undergrounding of utilities within residential areas. 2. Section 314, Assistance in Finding Other Locations - the PAC recommended that present businesses in the Project Area that may be required to relocate be given preference to relocate in Project Area or in the City of Anaheim. also, that this recommendation should be incorporated in the future Relocation Plan when it is prepared. ` 3. The PAC recommended that the need for additional park development be expanded beyond the Citron area to include locations throughout the Project. Specifically, add to Exhibit "C ", Item VII., Other Public Facilities, revised wording which would permit other locations in addition to the Citron area. 4. The PAC recommeded that on Exhibit "C" Item D, Street Widenings /Realignments /Extensions, Item #10, Harbor Boulevard Widening (Broadway to Orangewood) be changed to Broadway to Chapman. (VII -2) Katz Hol 1 is 5. The PAC recommended a change to Section 100, Item #2, to add the following phrase: "to accomodate the facilities and /or equipment of mass transportation mode." 6. The PAC recommended that Section 421, Signs, stress the importance of street sign requirements and stress the need to correct signage blight within the Project area. 7. The PAC recommended that on Exhibit "C ", Section IV., "Water System Improvements," Item #13, "Harbor Boulevard - . Ball to Orangewood" be changed to Harbor Boulevard, Ball to southerly City limit. In addition, at the meeting of May 20, 1987 the PAC also voted to recommend that the Community Redevelopment Commission adopt the proposed Owner Participation and Preferences Rules for the Project. (VII -3) Katz Hol I i s Attachment 1 to Part VII Resolution No. 87R -83