The URL can be used to link to this page

PC 2010/11/22H:\TOOLS\PC Admin\PC Agendas\(112210).doc City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Monday, November 22, 2010 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California • Chairman: Stephen Faessel • Chairman Pro-Tempore: Peter Agarwal • Commissioners: Todd Ament, Joseph Karaki, Harry Persaud Victoria Ramirez, John Seymour • Call To Order - 5:00 p.m. • Pledge Of Allegiance • Public Comments • Consent Calendar • Public Hearing Items • Commission Updates • Discussion • Adjournment For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary. A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, November 18, 2010, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the Planning Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, during regular business hours. You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net 11/22/10 Page 2 of 7 Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. Public Comments: This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. Consent Calendar: The items on the Consent Calendar will be acted on by one roll call vote. There will be no separate discussion of these items prior to the time of the voting on the motion unless members of the Planning Commission, staff, or the public request the item to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action. Minutes ITEM NO. 1A Receiving and approving the Minutes from the Planning Commission Meeting of September 13, 2010. These minutes have been provided to the Planning Commission and are available for review at the Planning Department. Motion 11/22/10 Page 3 of 7 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2010-05527 VARIANCE NO. 2010-04833 (DEV2010-00154) Owner: Anaheim Corporate Office Plaza, L.P. One Towne Square, Suite 1913 Southfield, CA 98076 Applicant: H. Hendy Associates Terri Lee 4770 Campus Drive, Suite 100 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Location: 2170 South Towne Centre The applicant proposes to establish an adult real estate training facility within an existing office building with fewer parking spaces than allowed by code. Environmental Determination: The proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Vanessa Norwood vnorwood@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2010-141 (DEV2010-00165) Owner/ Applicant: Greg Hearn The Hearn Family Trust 1 Post Suite #200 Irvine, CA 92618 Location: 1000-1010 North Edward Court The applicant proposes to establish a 1-lot, 4-unit, industrial condominium subdivision. Environmental Determination: The proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Class 15 (Minor Land Division). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Della Herrick dherrick@anaheim.net 11/22/10 Page 4 of 7 ITEM NO. 4 VARIANCE NO. 2009-04788A (DEV2009-00015) Owner/ Applicant: Steven Shotwell Kaiser Permanente 3400 E. La Palma Ave. Anaheim, CA 92806 Location: 3460 East La Palma Avenue The applicant proposes to construct three new freestanding directional signs for a Kaiser Hospital campus. The size and height of the signs exceed Code allowances. Environmental Determination: The proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Class 11 (Accessory Structures). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Dave See dsee@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 5 VARIANCE NO. 2010-04834* (DEV2010-00168) Owner: MMI/BDI Anaheim Magnolia Ave, Inc. 18201 Von Karman, Suite 1170 Irvine, CA 92612 Applicant: Bill Henigsman TNT Electric Sign, Inc. 3080 E. 29th Street Long Beach, CA 90806 Location: 1201 North Magnolia Avenue The applicant proposes to permit a wall sign and monument sign that are larger than permitted by Code. Environmental Determination: The proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Class 11 (Accessory Uses). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Scott Koehm skoehm@anaheim.net *Advertised as Variance No. 2009-04789 11/22/10 Page 5 of 7 ITEM NO. 6 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2010-05525 (DEV2010-00146) Owner: Raymond DeAngelo D&O Partnership 1170-1172 N. Armando Street Anaheim, CA 92807 Applicant: Elias Osorio 11446 Hart Street Artesia, CA 90701 Location: 1172 North Armando Street The applicant proposes to establish an indoor soccer facility within an existing industrial building. Environmental Determination: The proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Scott Koehm skoehm@anaheim.net Adjourn to Monday, December 6, 2010 at 5:00 p.m. 11/22/10 Page 6 of 7 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 4:30 p.m. November 17, 2010_ (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. RIGHTS OF APPEAL TO CITY COUNCIL FROM PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION 11/22/10 Page 7 of 7 The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada. S C H E D U L E 2010 December 6 December 20 O-L DEV 2010-00154 OFFICES O-L OFFICES PR (PTMU) Gateway Sub-Area C NORTH NET FIRE TRAINING CENTER I IND. FIRM O-L OFFICES C-G OFFICES C-G OFFICES I IND. FIRM I IND. FIRM I (PTMU) Orangewood IND. FIRM I (PTMU) Orangewood IND. FIRM I IND. FIRM I IND. FIRM I IND. FIRM I IND. FIRM I IND. FIRM I IND. FIRM O-L OFFICES O-L OFFICES PR (PTMU) Stadium ANGEL STADIUM OF ANAHEIM ||522'65' E ORANGEWOOD AVE S RAMPART S TS DUPONT DRS TOWNE CENTRE PL5 57E. KATELLA AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVE E. CHAPMAN AVE E. GENE AUTRY WAY 110412170 South Towne Centre Place DEV2010-00154 Subject Property APN: 232-011-46 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ALL PROPERTIES ARE IN THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE.°0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: April 2009 E ORANGEWOOD AVE S RAMPART STS DUPONT DRS TOWNE CENTRE PL 5 57E. KATELLA AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVE E. CHAPMAN AVE E. GENE AUTRY WAY 110412170 South Towne Centre Place DEV2010-00154 Subject Property APN: 232-011-46 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 ALL PROPERTIES ARE IN THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE.°0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: April 2009 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2010-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2010-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT CLASS 1 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION IS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2010-05527 AND VARIANCE NO. 2010-04833 (DEV2010-00154) (2170 SOUTH TOWNE CENTRE PLACE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-05527 and Variance No. 2010-04833 to establish an adult real estate training facility within an existing office building with fewer parking spaces than allowed by code located on the subject property; and WHEREAS, this 1.97 acre property is developed with a three-story office building. The property is located in the O-L (Office Low) zone and the Anaheim General Plan designates the property for Office High land uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on November 22, 2010, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed tentative parcel map and conditional use permit to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request an adult real estate training facility with fewer parking spaces than allowed by code should be approved for the following reasons: 1. The proposed the conditional use permit request to establish an adult real estate training facility within an existing office building is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized under Code Section Nos. 18.08.030.010.0402 (Educational Institutions) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 2. The proposed the conditional use permit to establish an adult real estate training facility within an existing office building, as conditioned herein, would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the building is surrounded by and integrated with similar buildings and uses; and the proposed the real estate training facility is located within an existing office building with no adverse affects to adjoining land uses. - 2 - PC2010-*** 3. The size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the real estate training facility within an existing office building in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and safety because the proposed training facility will be located within the existing 3-story, office building. 4. The traffic generated by an adult real estate training facility will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic generated by this use will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic. 5. The variance, under the conditions imposed will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed real estate training facility than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of the training facility because the on-site parking for the existing office building will adequately accommodate peak parking demands for both the office uses and the real estate training facility. Further, the peak hours of operation for the training facility are during the evenings and weekends when most offices are closed or minimally staffed. 6. The variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the on-site parking for the real estate training facility will adequately accommodate the peak parking demands of the office building including the training facility. 7. The variance will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas provided for the real estate training facility since all parking is contained on-site and will not encroach into other parking facilities and the supply of parking is adequate for the training facility. Further, the project does not propose new ingress or egress points and is designed to allow adequate on-site circulation and therefore will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the training facility. 8. The granting of the conditional use permit and the variance under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the proposed land use will continue to be compatible with the surrounding area because the use is integrated with other uses on the property and is not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim. WHEREAS, the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities) as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-05527 and Variance No. 2010-04833 and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of - 3 - PC2010-*** the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this permit is approved without limitations on the hours of operation or the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this application. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of November 22, 2010. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 4 - PC2010-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on November 22, 2010, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 22nd day of November, 2010. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 5 - PC2010-*** - 6 - PC2010-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2010-05527 AND VARIANCE NO. 2010-04833 (DEV2010-00154) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 1 The business shall be equipped with an alarm system (silent or audible). Police 2 Address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily readable from the street. Numbers should be visible during hours of darkness. Police 3 Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application, Form APD 516, and return it to the Police Department prior to initial alarm activation. This form is available at the Police Department front counter, or it can be downloaded from the following web site: http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=678 Police 4 All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g. deadbolt locks. Police 5 Wide-angle peepholes or other viewing device should be installed in solid doors where natural surveillance is compromised. Police 6 Security personnel and/or receptionists should be positioned in an area of the main lobby where they can monitor subjects entering and exiting the building, and observe the elevators and restroom entrances. Police GENERAL CONDITIONS 7 This facility shall be used for adult real estate training purposes only. Planning 8 The hours of operation for real estate training facility classroom shall be consistent with the letter of operation on file with the City of Anaheim Planning Department. Permitted hours of operation for the classroom are evenings 6 p.m. to 10:30 p.m. and weekends 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. Any change in the hours of operation shall be subject to review and approval by Planning staff to determine substantial conformance with the letter of operation and compatibility with the surrounding uses. Code Enforcement - 7 - PC2010-*** 9 On-going during project operation, no required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage. Code Enforcement 10 No outdoor activities involving gathering of persons shall be permitted on-site. Code Enforcement 11 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Code Enforcement 12 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit No. 1 (Site Plan), Exhibit No. 2 (Floor Plan), and as conditioned herein. Planning ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. SP 94-1 DA1 DEV 2010-00165 OFFICES SP 9 4 -1 D A 1 VAC AN T RM-4 EASTWOOD APARTMENTS 108 DU SP 94-1 DA1 VOIT LA PALMA CORPORATE PARK RM-4 FRONTERA WOODS APARTMENTS 26 DU SP 94-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL T NURSERY RM-4 LA RAMADA APTS 193 DU SP 94-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1 DA1 INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1 DA1 INDUSTRIALS P 94-1DA2VOIT LA PALMACORPORATE PARKSP 94-1 DA2 VOIT LA PALMA CORPORATE PARK SP 94-1 DA1 VOIT LA PALMA CORPORATE PARKSP 94-1 DA1 VOIT LA PALMA CORPORATE PARK 91 FREEWAY|335'! ! 44' E L A P A L M A A V E E F R O N T E R A S T E W HITE STAR AVE N ARMANDO STN VIA PORTO91 57 E . L A P A L M A A V E E . M I R A L O M A A V E E. LINCOLN AVEN. BLUE GUM STS. SUNKIST STN. RIO VISTA ST110441000 - 1010 North Edward Court DEV2010-00165 Subject Property APN: 344-414-12 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: April 2009 E L A P A L M A A V E E F R O N T ER A S T E W HITE STAR AVE N ARMANDO STN VIA PORTON EDWARD CT91 57 E . L A P A L M A A V E E . M I R A L O M A A V E E. LINCOLN AVEN. BLUE GUM STS. SUNKIST STN. RIO VISTA ST110441000 - 1010 North Edward Court DEV2010-00165 Subject Property APN: 344-414-12 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: April 2009 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2010-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2010-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT A CLASS 15 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION IS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND APPROVING TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2010-141 (DEV2010-00165) (1000-1010 NORTH EDWARD COURT) WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission (hereinafter referred to as "Planning Commission") did receive a verified Petition for Variance for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California shown on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the petitioner requests a tentative parcel map for a one lot 4-unit condominium subdivision in the SP94-1 DA 1 Northeast Industrial Zone Development Area 1 and the Anaheim General Plan designates this property for Industrial land uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on November 22, 2010, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60 “Procedures”, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the proposed subdivision, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the Industrial land use designation in the Anaheim General Plan and the development standards contained in the Northeast Area Specific Plan, Development Area 1 (Industrial Area). 2. That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed industrial condominium subdivision. 3. That the design of the subdivision is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat, as the site is developed with an existing industrial building. 4. That the design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems, as the site contains an existing building and no new construction is proposed only demising walls will be constructed in the interior of the building which will be in compliance with Code requirements. - 2 - PC2010-*** WHEREAS, the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Class 15 (Minor Land Division) as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 2010-141 subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of November 22, 2010. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 3 - PC2010-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on November 22, 2010, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 22nd day of November, 2010. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 4 - PC2010-*** - 5 - PC2010-*** EXHIBIT “B” TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2010-141 (DEV2010-00165) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY PRIOR TO FINAL MAP APPROVAL 1 Prior to final map approval, a maintenance covenant shall be submitted to Public Works, Development Services and approved by the City Attorney’s office. The covenant shall include provisions for maintenance of private facilities. Public Works 2 Prior to final map approval, a use agreement shall be recorded satisfactory to the City Attorney’s office for all parcels sharing fire protection equipment and associated appurtenances. Fire PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT 3 That on-going during project operation, no required parking areas shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage uses. Traffic 4 Each individual unit should be clearly marked with its appropriate building number and address. These should be positioned so they are easily viewed from vehicular and pedestrian pathways throughout the complex. Main building numbers should be a minimum height of 12” and illuminated during the hours of darkness. Police 5 Address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily readable from the street. Numbers should be illuminated during hours of darkness. Police - 6 - PC2010-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY 6 Rooftop address numbers for the police helicopter. Minimum size 4’ in height and 2’ in width. The lines of the numbers are to be a minimum of 6” thick. Numbers should be spaced 12” to 18” apart. Numbers should be painted or constructed in a contrasting color to the roofing material. Numbers should face the street to which the structure is addressed. Numbers are not to be visible from ground level. Police 7 All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g. deadbolt locks. The locks shall be so constructed that both the deadbolt and deadlocking latch can be retracted by a single action of the inside doorknob/lever/turn piece. Police 8 The subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3 (Parcel Map, Site Plan and Floor Plan) as conditioned herein. Planning Division ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 http://172.20.34.196/floor%20pln.JPG[11/8/2010 9:37:53 AM] 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. SP 94-1 DA4 DEV 2009-00015 VACANT (KAISER HOSPITAL UNDER CONSTR.) SP 94-1 DA4 INDUSTRIAL S P 9 4 -1 D A 3 A U T O R E P A I R SP 94-1 DA4 AUTO REPAIR DA1RAILROADS P 9 4 -1 D A 3 P A N A T T O N I A N A H E I M C O N C O U R S E INDUSTRIAL S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L SP 94-1 DA5 FRY'S ELECTRONICS S P 9 4 -1 D A 3 O F F I C E S SP 94-1 DA4 AUTO REPAIR S P 9 4 -1 D A 3 R E T A I L SP 94-1 DA3 INDUSTRIAL S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L SP 94-1 DA6 ORANGE COUNTY WATER DISTRICTSP 94-1DA4INDUSTRIALSP 94-1 DA4 INDUSTRIAL SP 94-1 DA4 THE CROSSING CONDOS 132 DU (UNDER CONST.) SP 94-1 DA5 INDUSTRIAL S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 3 R E T A I L S P 9 4 -1 D A 3 R E T A I L S P 9 4 -1 D A 3 A U T O R E P A I R S P 9 4 -1 D A 3 R E T A I L S P 9 4 -1 D A 3 R E T A I L SP 94-1DA4INDUSTRIALS P 9 4 -1 D A 4 B U S I N E S S P A R K S P 9 4 -1 D A 4 B U S I N E S S P A R K S P 9 4 -1 D A 3 R E T A I L 9 1 F R E E W A Y E L A P A L M A A V EN MILLER STN GROVE STN COSBY WAYN FOUNTAIN WAYE F R O N T E R A S T N GROVE ST91 E . L A P A L M A A V E E . M I R A L O M A A V E N. T U S TI N AVEE . R I V E R D A L E AV EN. KRAEMER BLVDN. MILLER ST110423460 East La Palma Avenue DEV2009-00015 Subject Property APN: 345-121-26 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 All properties are in the Alpha (Northeast Area) Redevelopment Area.°0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: April 2009 E L A P A L M A A V EN MILLER STN GROVE STN COSBY WAYN FOUNTAIN WAYE F R O N T E R A S T N GROVE ST91 E . L A P A L M A A V E E . M I R A L O M A A V E N. T U S TI N AVEE . R I V E R D A L E AV EN. KRAEMER BLVDN. MILLER ST110423460 East La Palma Avenue DEV2009-00015 Subject Property APN: 345-121-26 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: April 2009 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 -1- PC2010-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2010-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT A CLASS 11 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION IS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO VARIANCE NO. 2009-04788 AND AMENDING CERTAIN CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL OF RESOLUTION NO. PC2009-78 (TRACKING NOS. VAR2009-04788A AND DEV2009-00015) (3460 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE) WHEREAS, on September 14, 2009, the Anaheim City Planning Commission, by its Resolution No. PC2009-78, did approve Variance No. 2009-04788 to install new wall signs and freestanding monument signs for a Kaiser Hospital campus where the number, size, location, and height of the signs exceeded Code requirements; and WHEREAS, the 27-acre property is currently developed with a 4-story medical office building and is located in the SP 94-1, D.A. 4 zone (Northeast Area Specific Plan; Transit Core Area) and the General Plan designates this property for Institutional land uses; and WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for an amendment to Variance No. 2009-04788 to construct new freestanding directional signs for a Kaiser Hospital campus where the size and height of three signs exceed Code allowances for that certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as particularly shown on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "subject property"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on November 22, 2010, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for an amendment to the variance, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the applicant requests a variance from the following development standards to construct new freestanding directional signs for a Kaiser Hospital campus: (a) SECTION NO. 18.44.110.020 Maximum size of directional signs (4 square feet permitted; 11 and 41 square feet proposed). (b) SECTION NO. 18.44.110.020 Maximum height of directional signs (4 feet high permitted; 5 and 9 feet high proposed). -2- PC2010-*** 2. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, due to the large size and depth of the property, long distance of the buildings from the street, frontage on two streets, and the unique regional nature of the hospital compared to other businesses in the vicinity. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal and does hereby find that a Class 11 Categorical Exemption in connection with Variance No. 2009-04788 is adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation in connection with this request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission, for the reasons hereinabove stated, does hereby approve the proposed amendment of Variance No. 2009-04788 to construct new freestanding directional signs for a Kaiser Hospital campus for the property located at 3460 East La Palma Avenue, as requested by the applicant. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby amend, in their entirety, the conditions of approval adopted in connection with Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2009-78, adopted in connection with Variance No. 2009- 04788 to read as shown in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which conditions are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this permit is approved without limitations on the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, except as expressly amended herein, the provisions of Resolution No. PC2009-78, approving Variance No. 2009-04788, shall remain in full force and effect. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. -3- PC2010-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this application. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of November 22, 2010. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 “Procedures” of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on November 22, 2010 by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 22nd day of November, 2010. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -4- PC2010-*** -5- PC2010-*** EXHIBIT “B” AMENDMENT TO VARIANCE NO. 2009-04788 (DEV2009-00015) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY GENERAL 1 The subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 25 (sign program previously-approved by the Planning Commission on 9/14/09) and Exhibit Nos. 26 through 30 (sign program for freestanding directional signs). Planning ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ITEM NO. 6 PLANNING COMMISSION AGENDA City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 14, 2009 FROM: PLANNING SERVICES MANAGER DAVE SEE, PROJECT PLANNER SUBJECT: VARIANCE NO. 2009-04788 LOCATION: 3460 East La Palma Avenue APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and owner is Kuther Jagganath with Kaiser Hospital. REQUEST: The applicant proposes to construct new freestanding monument signs and wall signs for a Kaiser Hospital campus. The number, size, location, and height of the signs exceed Code requirements. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution determining that a Class 11, Categorical Exemption is the appropriate environmental documentation for this request and approving Variance No. 2009-04788. BACKGROUND: The 27-acre property is currently developed with a 4-story medical office building and is located in the SP 94-1, D.A. 4 zone (Northeast Area Specific Plan; Transit Core Area). The General Plan designates this property for institutional land uses. Properties to the north are designated for industrial land uses; properties to the east are designated for mixed use land uses; the property to the west is designated for general commercial land uses; and the SR-91 freeway abuts the property to the south. On November 6, 2007, the City Council approved Development Agreement No. 2007-00003 to permit the development of the Kaiser Hospital campus. The campus will be constructed in three phases over an estimated 25 year period. At full build out, the campus will include a 360 bed hospital, 518,000 square feet of medical office space, two parking structures, and a central utility plant. ATTACHMENT NO. 4 VARIANCE NO. 2009-04788 September 14, 2009 Page 2 of 4 PROPOSAL: The applicant requests approval to install monument and wall signs for the Kaiser Hospital campus. The number, size, location, and height of the signs exceed Code requirements. The submitted sign program indicates twenty nine wall signs for the campus, including twelve business identification channel letter signs with logos and seventeen directional and address signs. Five of these wall signs do not comply with Code requirements. The program also indicates two monument signs along La Palma Avenue which do not comply with Code. Please refer to the attached project summary chart (Attachment No. 4) to the staff report for project details. ANALYSIS: A variance is being requested for wall signs and monument signs that do not comply with Code. The following includes a description and analysis of the proposed signs. Maximum number and height of wall signs: Code permits a maximum letter height of 4 feet and a maximum logo height of 4 feet, 6 inches for signs installed on 6-story buildings. Code also permits a maximum letter height of 1 foot, 6 inches and a maximum logo height of 2 feet for signs installed on 2-story buildings. The applicant proposes a maximum letter height of 6 feet, and a maximum logo height of 8 feet, 9 inches on the 6-story hospital building elevation facing the freeway. The applicant also proposes a maximum letter height of 3 feet, 11 inches, and a maximum logo height of 5 feet, 9 inches on the 2-story utility building elevation facing the freeway. Lastly, a maximum of two wall signs are allowed for the campus and twelve business identification signs are proposed. Number and size of freeway-oriented wall signs: Code permits a maximum of one freeway- oriented wall sign and the applicant proposes one wall sign on the utility building, three wall signs on the hospital building, and one sign on the parking structure, for a total of five wall signs visible from the SR-91 freeway. Code also permits a maximum sign area of 250 square feet and the applicant proposes 578 square feet for the sign located on the sixth floor of the hospital building. Number, height, and area of freestanding monument signs: Code permits a maximum of one freestanding sign along La Palma Avenue and the applicant proposes two monument signs along this frontage. Code also permits a maximum monument sign height of 4 feet and a maximum sign area of 40 square feet. The applicant proposes two, 16-foot monument signs with a sign area of 95 square feet each. The applicant indicates that the variance for the number, size, location, and height of the proposed wall and freestanding signs which exceed Code requirements is being requested based on the following: • The 27-acre hospital campus is substantially larger than other properties in the Northeast Area Specific Plan, Transit Core development area. • The property is located on three street frontages (La Palma Avenue, Grove Street, and the SR-91 Freeway) and more signage would be needed than Code permits to identify the business from each street. VARIANCE NO. 2009-04788 September 14, 2009 Page 3 of 4 • At full build-out, the campus will be developed with up to nine buildings ranging in height from 3 to 7 stories, many of which will not be visible from La Palma Avenue or the SR-91 freeway. • The campus is designated as an Essential Services Facility by the State of California, providing emergency support in the event of a natural disaster. As such, larger signs will be needed to maximize the visibility from the freeway in order to provide emergency services for a regional population. • A larger sign height and area is needed because the wall signs for the main hospital building will be located as far as 550 feet from La Palma Avenue and 350 feet from the freeway. The intent of the sign height limitation and maximum sign area is to ensure that the sizes of wall signs are in proportion to the building elevation. Staff researched Planning Department records and found that a total of fourteen letter height variances have been granted for various projects in the commercial and industrial zones since the code was amended in 2004. The variances were approved based upon the scale of the signs in relation to the building and also due to the signs being located approximately 35 to 410 feet from the street. Staff believes the proposed wall signs are in scale with the size of the building and there are unique circumstances that warrant larger signs for this campus because the signs would be located up to 550 feet from the street. In addition, the proposed sign height would improve sign legibility from the street and provide appropriate business identification for a hospital campus designated as an Essential Services Facility by the State of California and serving a regional population. The intent of the monument sign height, number, and area limitation is to ensure that the amount of freestanding signage is in proportion to the size of the property and does not result in visual clutter. Staff believes the 16-foot high, vertically-oriented monument signs are in scale with the size of the property and would complement the architecture of the hospital campus buildings. In addition, the two signs would be spaced approximately 350 feet apart in compliance with Code and would not result in visual clutter along La Palma Avenue, which has a frontage of 990 feet. Staff supports the variance request because there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, location and surroundings due to the large size and depth of the property, long distance of the buildings from the street, frontage on three streets, and the unique regional nature of the hospital compared to other businesses in the vicinity. In addition, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity because similar wall sign variances have been granted for other commercial and industrial properties in the City. CONCLUSION: Staff supports this variance request to permit new freestanding monument signs and wall signs for a Kaiser Hospital campus because there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including the large size and depth of the property, distance of the buildings from the street, frontage on three streets, and the unique regional nature of the hospital compared to other businesses in the vicinity. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this variance request. VARIANCE NO. 2009-04788 September 14, 2009 Page 4 of 4 Respectfully submitted, Concurred by, Senior Planner Planning Services Manager Attachments: 1. Aerial and Vicinity Maps 2. Draft Resolution 3. Letter of Justification 4. Project Summary The following attachments were provided to the Planning Commission and are available for public review at the Planning Services Division at City Hall or on the City of Anaheim’s web site at www.anaheim.net/planning. 5. Site Photographs 6. Plans (Sign Program) -1- PC2009-078 RESOLUTION NO. PC2009-078 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT A CLASS 11 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION IS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND APPROVING VARIANCE NO. 2009-04788 (3460 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for a Variance for a deviation in the number, size, location, and height of freestanding monument signs and wall signs for a Kaiser Hospital campus, for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as more particularly described in Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the 27-acre property is currently developed with a 4-story medical office building and is located in the SP 94-1, D.A. 4 zone (Northeast Area Specific Plan; Transit Core Area) and the General Plan designates this property for Institutional land uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on September 14, 2009, at 2:30 p.m. notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60 “Procedures”, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The applicant requests a variance from the following development standards to install new wall signs and freestanding monument signs for a Kaiser Hospital campus: (a) SECTION NO. 18.120.090.140.1412 Maximum number of freeway-oriented wall signs (one permitted; five proposed). (b) SECTION NO. 18.120.090.140.1412 Maximum size of freeway-oriented wall signs (250 square feet permitted; 304 and 578 square feet proposed). (c) SECTION NO. 18.120.090.160.1601 Maximum number of arterial highway monument signs (one permitted; two proposed). (d) SECTION NO. 18.120.090.160.1602 Maximum height of arterial highway monument signs (4 feet high permitted; 16 feet high proposed). ATTACHMENT NO. 5 -2- PC2009-078 (e) SECTION NO. 18.120.090.160.1602 Maximum area of arterial highway monument signs (40 square feet permitted; 96 square feet proposed). (f) SECTION NO. 18.120.090.180.1802 Maximum number of wall signs (two permitted; twelve proposed). (g) SECTION NO. 18.120.090.180.1802(b) Maximum letter and logo height of wall signs (4-foot letters and 4-foot, 6- inch logos permitted; up to 6-foot letters and 8-foot, 9-inch logos proposed). 2. There are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, due to the large size and depth of the property, long distance of the buildings from the street, frontage on three streets, and the unique regional nature of the hospital compared to other businesses in the vicinity. 3. Strict application strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity because similar sign variances have been granted for other commercial and industrial properties in the City. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal and does hereby find that a Class 11 Categorical Exemption in connection with Variance No. 2009-04788 is adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation in connection with this request. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission, for the reasons hereinabove stated, does hereby approve Variance No. 2009-04788 subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant’s compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State, and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. -3- PC2009-078 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of September 14, 2009. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 “Procedures” of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on September 14, 2009 by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BUFFA, FAESSEL, KARAKI, ROMERO NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: AGARWAL, AMENT, RAMIREZ IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 14th day of September, 2009. SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -4- PC2009-078 -5- PC2009-078 EXHIBIT “B” VARIANCE NO. 2009-04788 NO. CONDITION OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE FOR MONITORING GENERAL 1 The subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 - 25 (Sign Program). Planning DRAFT APPROVAL ____________________ ____________________ Fontana Medical Center Hospital & Support Buildi Site signsng DRAFT Job #:2008.043B Issued date: October 26, 2010 Anaheim Medical Center City of Anaheim Photographs for Sign Variance Part 1 of 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 Photo for K4 & K5Photo for K1. Area not fully developed yet.Photo for K4 & K5P-1Kaiser Permanente Anaheim Medical Center Site2008.043B / 10.26.2010Photos for sign variancePlan for K3. Existing condition does not exist yet.Photo for K6. Area not fully developed yet.Photo for K6. Area not fully developed yet.K5K4K4K1K6K6K5SIGN K3NORTH9ft Directional Plan for M3. Existing condition does not exist yet.Plan for M4. Existing condition does not exist yet.Plan for M1. Existing condition does not exist yet.Photo for M2. Replaces existingPhoto for M5. Replaces existingPhoto for M5. Replaces existingLOT DAMBULANCESSIGN M3SIGN M15ft Directional5ft DirectionalLOT DAMBULANCES5ft DirectionalSIGN M4NORTHNORTHP-2Kaiser Permanente Anaheim Medical Center Site2008.043B / 10.26.2010Photos for sign varianceNORTH Project site aerial photo Project site aerial photo P-3 Kaiser Permanente Anaheim Medical Center Site 2008.043B / 10.26.2010 Photos for sign variance NORTH NORTH VAR2009-04788A KAISER HOSPITAL Aerial view – looking southwest Easterly driveway Main driveway – looking north toward La Palma Ave. Aerial view – looking north Main driveway – looking south Driveway in front of office building DRAFT APPROVAL ____________________ ____________________ Fontana Medical Center Hospital & Support Buildi Site signsng DRAFT Job #:2008.043B Issued date: October 26, 2010 Anaheim Medical Center City of Anaheim Sign Plan for Sign Variance Part 2 of 2 ATTACHMENT NO. 7 I-0 Kaiser Permanente Anaheim Medical Center Site 2008.043B / 10.26.2010 Index ANAHEIM MEDICAL CENTER CITY OF ANAHEIM SIGN PLAN FOR SIGN VARIANCE SHEET DESCRIPTION SP-1 SIGN PLAN - SIGN LOCATION PLAN SP-2 SIGN PLAN - SIGN DETAIL DIMENSIONED PLAN SP-3 SIGN PLAN - 9 FOOT DIRECTIONAL ILLUMINATED SIGN SP-4 SIGN PLAN - 5 FOOT DIRECTIONAL POST & PANEL NON ILLUMINATED SIGN A1.01 SITE PLAN 11x17 A1.01 SITE PLAN 30x42 NORTHPHASE 2:9 FT. ILLUMINATED DIRECTIONALSSIGN K5 Ft. NON-ILLUMINATED POST & PANEL DIRECTIONALSIGN MSP-1Kaiser Permanente Anaheim Medical Center Site2008.043B / 10.26.2010Sign Plan - Location Plan36"36" T-Tab ChrT-Tab ChrT-Tab ChrT-Tab ChrR VANVAN VAN VAN SIGN K6SIGN K4SIGN K5REMOVE EXISTING SIGNREPLACES EXISTING SIGNREPLACES EXISTING SIGNSIGN M251.12i.cus54.10r.cus51.12i.cusSIGN K1SIGN K3SIGN M19ft Directional51.12i.cus9ft Directional51.12i.cus9ft Directional9ft Directional5ft Directional54.10r.cus5ft Directional54.10r.cusSIGN M35ft Directional5ft Directional9ft Directional54.10r.cusSIGN M451.12i.cusSEE DRAWING SP-2, DETAIL SIGN K4 & K5SEE DRAWING SP-2, DETAIL SIGN M2SEE DRAWING SP-2, DETAIL SIGN M5SEE DRAWING SP-2, DETAIL SIGN K6LOT DLOT CLOT BLOT ASIGN M554.10r.cus5ft DirectionalSEE DRAWING SP-2, DETAIL SIGN K1SEE DRAWING SP-2, DETAIL SIGN K3SEE DRAWING SP-2, DETAIL SIGN M1SEE DRAWING SP-2, DETAIL SIGN M3SEE DRAWING SP-2, DETAIL SIGN M4 SP-2Kaiser Permanente Anaheim Medical Center Site2008.043B / 10.26.2010Sign Plan- Detailed location planPOST & PANELPOST & PANELPOST & PANELPOST & PANELPOST & PANEL 1 FACE ONLYFACE AFACE A1 FACE ONLY FACE B FACE B Hospital Entrance Medical Of fice 2 Medical Of fice 1 Med. Of f. 1 Parking Emergency Hospital Entrance Medical Of fices Exit La Palma Ave. Parking Receiving Parking Emergency Hospital Entrance Medical Of fices Emergency 9"6" 4'-6" 6"3'-6"9"9"9"9"9"2'-6"2 3/8"6 5/8”Center of arrow 4 1/2" BASE REVEAL CONCRETE BASE ACCENT PANEL DIRECTIONAL PANEL 3” Futura Heavy EMERGENCY PANEL SIGN K1SIGN K1A SIGN K4B SIGN K4A Emergency Parking Ambulance Receiving Emergency SIGN K6A Receiving Emergency SIGN K5 SIGN K6B SIGN K3 Hospital Entrance Medical Office 2 Medical Of fice 1 Emergency Parking Hospital Entrance Medical Of fices Emergency Parking Parking Exit La Palma Ave. Directional Sign Illuminated Monument Custom because of emergency red panel. Description Freestanding monolith sign providing directional information. Scale: 3/8"=1'-0" Sign Area: 41 square feet per side Structure Painted aluminum sign cabinet with extruded interior support frame, mounted to concrete base with stainless steel anchors. Refer to Detail C.11/C.12(i). Illumination Internal - Fluorescent lamps mounted within sign cabinet are to be accessible. Owner to provide electrical feed to sign location. All illuminated signs may be powered by 277 volt electrical power feeds. The default for all illuminated signs is 120 volt. Final electrical connections by electrical contractor. Kaiser Permanente to provide external illumination when necessary. Graphics 3” Futura Heavy upper & lower case, flushed left, pressure sensitive reflective vinyl graphics & text. Directional Panels - 9”x 54” Color Specifications Accent panel - BLUE 1, PMS 308 Directional panel - MED. GREY 4, PMS 424 Emergency panel - RED 11, 3M230-73 Frame - Match adjacent panel Retainer - Match adjacent panel Base reveal - Black 6, Mathews Black Graphics - WHITE 15, 3M Reflective White Concrete - LIGHT GREY 3 SIGN K4B is the only sign face that is not custom (without Emergency red panel). K4 and K6 are double sided signs. K1, K3 and K5 are single sided signs. SIGN TYPE 8'-6"3"9'-0"1'-0"3"FRAME RETAINER 51.12i.cus SCALE: 3/8" = 1' - 0" SITE MONOLITH DIRECTIONAL SIGN COPY ELEVATIONS 3 Exit La Palma Ave. NOTE: SIGN K2 WAS DELETED ON 04.29.10 ALTERNATE EXECUTION FOR SIGNS 53.14 AND 54,10 © Copyright 2000, AGS, all rights reserved Kaiser Permanente EXTERIOR SIGN ST ANDARDS MODIFIED CUSTOM SIZEDirectional Sign Illuminated MonolithDescriptionFreestanding monolith sign providing directional information.Scale1/2"=1'-0"IDENTIFICATION / SITE ORIENT ATION DIRECTIONAL INFORMATION REGULATOR Y 20.20i and 20.21i 51.10i 51.10i 51.10i 51.10i51.10i 51.10i51.10i51.10i 51.10i SCALE: 3/8" = 1' - 0" SIGN ELEVATION: 1 FACE ONLY SCALE: 3/8" = 1' - 0" SIDE ELEVATION SIGN: APPROX. 40.5 SQ. FT. 12 SP-3 Kaiser Permanente Anaheim Medical Center Site 2008.043B / 10.26.2010 Sign Plan- Sign type 9 ft Directional Monument KAISER PERMANENTE Anaheim Medical Center Site Way-Finding Signage 2008.043B / 10.27.08 G-3.1 SIGN K3FRONT ELEVATIONSIDE ELEVATION 54.10r.cusSIGN TYPE Direction & Emergency Sign Non-illuminated Freestanding Post and Panel Construction Reflective Vinyl Graphics Custom because of reduced overall height & Emergency red panels. Sign Ar ea: 18 square feet per side Scale:1/2"=1'-0" Structure Painted aluminum sign cabinet with extruded interior support frame. Painted aluminum extruded posts, 3 1/4" square, with ends enclosed with non-visible aluminum caps, directly buried. Graphics Futura Heavy, 2-1/2" Capital letter height upper and lower case, flushed left with reflective Scotchcal pressure sensitive vinyl applied to sign surface. Color Specifications Accent panel - BLUE 1, PMS 308 and/or RED 11, 3M230-73 Sign panel - MED. GREY 4, PMS 424 Post - Black 6, Mathews Black Reveal - Black 6, Mathews Black Graphics - WHITE 15, 3M Reflective White Concrete - LIGHT GREY 3 3’-0” w x 2’-6” h PANEL 6” HIGH HEADER ACCENT PANEL POST 2 1/2” H FUTURAHEAVY REVEAL SCALE: 1/2" = 1' - 0" SITE POST & PANEL DIRECTIONAL SIGN COPY ELEVATIONS - ALL SINGLE SIDED 2 SIGN M3 SIGN M4 Receiving Central Plant SIGN M1 SIGN M2 Exit La Palma Ave. Emergency Medical Office 1 Patient Drop-off & Parking Exit La Palma Ave. Receiving Emergency Medical Office 1 Accessible Parking Pharmacy Emergency Hospital Entrance Medical Offices Parking Ambulance ONLY Ambulance ON LY SCALE: 1/2" = 1' - 0" SIGN ELEVATION: ONE FACE ONLY SIGN M5 SIGN: APPROX. 18 SQ. FT.1 Medical Office 1 Parking Exit La Palma Ave. Hospital Entrance Parking 5 ft - 0 in3 ft - 0 in 3 ft - 7 in 6"30"STANDARD SIGN TYPE 54.10r REPLACES EXISTING SIGN REPLACES EXISTING SIGN Emergency SP-4 Kaiser Permanente Anaheim Medical Center Site 2008.043B / 10.26.2010 Sign Plan- Sign type 5 ft Directional Post & Panel KAISER PERMANENTE Anaheim Medical Center Site Way-Finding Signage 2008.043B / 11.20.08 G-4.0 DIRECT 12 DIRECT 2 DIRECT 3 DIRECT 7 DIRECT 10 DIRECT 6 DIRECT 1 NOTE: NUMBERED SIGNS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET THAT MATCH SIGN NUMBERS SHOWN ALSO ON SHEET G-3.0 ARE PROPOSED AS ALTERNATE SIZED SIGNS TO BE CONSIDERED IN LIEU OF THE LARGER SIGNS RECOMMENDED ON SHEET G-3.0 THE AFFECTED SIGN NUMBERS SHOWN ON THIS SHEET ARE AS FOLLOWS: 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. I DEV 2010-00168 VACANT IOFFICESI VACANT I BUSINESS PARKI VOCATIONAL SCHOOL C-G IMPERIAL THEATER I OFFICES I DELPHI BASEBALL FIELD I MEDICAL OFFICE C-G OFFICES I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIALI INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIALI INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I INDUSTRIAL I OFFICES I VACANT I OFFICES350'||1,160'! !N KNOLLWOOD CIRW WOODLAND DR N HUBBELL WAYN KNOLLWOOD CIR 5 W. LA PALMA AVE N. MAGNOLIA AVEN. DALE AVEN. BROOKHURST ST. ORANGETHORPE AVE 110451201 North Magnolia Avenue DEV2010-00168 Subject Property APN: 070-781-03 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: April 2009BUENA PARK CITY BOUNDARYANAHEIM CITY BOUNDARYBUENA PARK CITY BOUNDARY ANAHEIM CITY BOUNDARY 5 F R E E W A Y N MAGNOLIA AVEN KNOLLWOOD CIRW WOODLAND DR N HUBBELL WAYN KNOLLWOOD CIR 5 W. LA PALMA AVE N. MAGNOLIA AVEN. DALE AVEN. BROOKHURST ST. ORANGETHORPE AVE 110451201 North Magnolia Avenue DEV2010-00168 Subject Property APN: 070-781-03 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: April 2009BUENA PARK CITY BOUNDARYANAHEIM CITY BOUNDARYBUENA PARK CITY BOUNDARY ANAHEIM CITY BOUNDARY 5 F R E E W A Y [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2010-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2010-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT A CLASS 11 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION IS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND APPROVING, IN PART, VARIANCE NO. 2010-04834 (DEV2010-00168) (1201 NORTH MAGNOLIA AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission (hereinafter referred to as "Planning Commission") did receive a verified Petition for Variance No. 2010-04834 for that certain real property located at 1201 North Magnolia Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as more particularly shown on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the petitioner requests a variance to construct a new monument sign and wall sign with sizes that are greater than permitted by code in the I (Industrial) Zone and the Anaheim General Plan designates this property for Industrial land uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on November 22, 2010, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60 “Procedures”, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the applicant requests a variance to construct a new monument sign and wall sign with a size that is greater than permitted by code: SECTION NO. 18.44.090.020.0201 Maximum Size of Monument Sign (65 square feet permitted; 80 square feet proposed); (maximum 10 foot width permitted; 13 feet, 4 inch width proposed) SECTION NO. 18.44.110.010.0103 Maximum Letter Height (24-inch letters permitted; 42-inch letters proposed) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does find and determine that the request for the variance from code requirements pertaining to the maximum letter height to permit 42- inch letters on a wall sign should be granted for the following reasons: - 2 - PC2010-*** 1. The distribution building wall is over 800 feet in length and is set back 180 feet from the street. The requested sign would comprise less than one percent of the area of the wall and provide the needed visibility from the street that could not be accomplished with 24-inch letters as required by Code. 2. Strict application of the Code would deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity because there is another business across Magnolia Avenue with letter heights larger than permitted by code. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does find and determine that the request for the variance from code requirements pertaining to the maximum sign size to permit a 106 square foot monument sign should be denied for the following reasons: 1. Although there is justification to allow a monument larger than permitted by Code, including the property’s size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; there is no apparent need or justification to allow a sign that is 60% larger than permitted by Code, and 2. Strict application of the Code would not deprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity. WHEREAS, the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Class 11 (Accessory Structures) as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Variance No. 2010-04834 in part, approving the request to permit a wall sign with letter heights greater than permitted by Code, subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the Planning Commission does hereby deny Variance No. 2010-04834 in part, denying the request to permit a monument sign that is larger than permitted by Code. - 3 - PC2010-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Variance is approved without limitations on the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of November 22, 2010. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 4 - PC2010-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on November 22, 2010, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 22nd day of November, 2010. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 5 - PC2010-*** - 6 - PC2010-*** EXHIBIT “B” VARIANCE NO. 2010-04834 (DEV2010-00168) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY GENERAL 1 The subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit No. 1 and 2 (Site Plan and Sign Plan) as conditioned herein. Planning Division ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Photo 1 Photo 2 Photo 3 Photo 4Looking East at Bldg Main Entry from Magnolia Ave. Looking North on Magnolia Ave from Property SEC Looking North on Ballfield Access Drive Looking S at Building from Property NEC on Magnolia Avenue Gonzalez Northgate Markets Sign Program Photos (October 2010) Page 1 of 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 Photo 8 Photo 7 Photo 6 Photo 5 Looking South on Magnolia Ave from project entrance Wickes signage east of subject site across Magnolia Talber t Medical Office East of Site across Magnolia American Career College SE of site across Magnolia Page 2 of 3 Gonzalez Nor thgate Mar kets Sign Program Photos (October 2010) GONZALEZ 1201 ANAHEIM SIGNS 11 TNTELECTRICSIGN.COM SIGN TYPE ADDRESS PROJECT NAME SALESMAN PAGE DATE DESIGNER SCALE 1201 N MAGNOLIA AVE, ANAHEIM, CA 92801 10.13.2010 SOKHON BILL HENIGSMAN GONZALEZ NORTHGATE MARKET FONT STYLE Futura BdCn BT THIS SIGN IS INTENDED TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. THIS INCLUDES PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF THE SIGN. CA Lic. # C45-629097 AZ Lic # L38-ROC170223 803133 C-453080 East 29th Street, Long Beach, CA 90806 Bus: (800) 655-6366 (562) 595-7725 Fax: (562) 595-5434 FILE NAME EMAIL WEB BILL@TNTELECTRICSIGN.COM / TNTNEONSIGN@AOL.COM 5 OF 5SITE PLAN N.T.S REVISION DATE MAIN WALL SIGNS/F MONUMENT SIGN B A ATTACHMENT NO. 5 1 OF 5REVISION GONZALEZ 1201 ANAHEIM SIGNS 7 TNTELECTRICSIGN.COM DATESIGN TYPE ADDRESS PROJECT NAME SALESMAN PAGE DATE DESIGNER SCALE 1201 N MAGNOLIA AVE, ANAHEIM, CA 92801 10.13.2010 SOKHON HALO LED CHANNEL LETTERS BILL HENIGSMAN GONZALEZ NORTHGATE MARKET FONT STYLE UNKNOWN AS NOTED THIS SIGN IS INTENDED TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. THIS INCLUDES PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF THE SIGN. CA Lic. # C45-629097 AZ Lic # L38-ROC170223 803133 C-453080 East 29th Street, Long Beach, CA 90806 Bus: (800) 655-6366 (562) 595-7725 Fax: (562) 595-5434 FILE NAME EMAIL WEB BILL@TNTELECTRICSIGN.COM / TNTNEONSIGN@AOL.COM 42'-5"43'-0"12'-0"28'-5"SIGN LIGHTING CONTROLS Controls for All Signs. All signs with permanently connected lighting shall meet the requirements of Section 133. Automatic Time Switch Control. All signs with permanently connected lighting shall be controlled with an automatic time switch control that complies with the applicable requirements of Section 119. Photocontrol or outdoor astronomical time switch control. All outdoor signs shall be controlled with a photocontrol or outdoor astronomical time switch control unless exempted from the exceptions. See Section 133(a)2. Dimming. All outdoor signs shall be controlled with a dimmer that provides the ability to automatically reduces sign power by a minimum of 65 percent during nighttime hours unless exempted from the 5 possible exceptions. See Section 133)a)3. Demand Responsive Electronic Message center Control (EMC), newly connected lighting power load greater that 15 kW shall have a control installed that is capable of reducing the lighting power by a minimum of 30% when receiving a demand response signal that is sent out by the local utility. SIGN SPECIFICATIONS SCALE: 3/32” = 1’-0” SIGN AREA: 175.06 SQ. FT. SCALE: 3/16” = 1’-0”A ALL CONSTRUCTIONS & WIRING TO BE UL LISTED APPROVED WHITE LED. ALL COMPONENTS TO BE UL LISTED. GONZALEZ LOGO: NORTHGATE MARKET: TO BE FABRICATED FROM .090 ALUMINUM PAINTED BRONZE W/ RETURN TO BE 3 ½” DEEP AND PEGGED 1” OFF FASCIA. ‘GONZALEZ’ - TO BE FABRICATED FROM .050 ALUMINUM W/ .125” THICK BRONZE LETTERS PEGGED 2” OFF FASCIA. TO BE FABRICATED FROM .090 ALUMINUM PAINTED BRONZE W/ RETURN TO BE 3 ½” DEEP AND PEGGED 1” OFF FASCIA. SINGLE FACE ILLUMINATED HALO LED CHANNEL LETTERS 9’-1”10’-4”4’-10”3’-6”35’-9” ATTACHMENT NO. 6 GONZALEZ 1201 ANAHEIM SIGNS 7 TNTELECTRICSIGN.COM SIGN TYPE ADDRESS PROJECT NAME SALESMAN PAGE DATE DESIGNER SCALE 1201 N MAGNOLIA AVE, ANAHEIM, CA 92801 10.13.2010 SOKHON BILL HENIGSMAN GONZALEZ NORTHGATE MARKET FONT STYLE UNKNOWN THIS SIGN IS INTENDED TO BE INSTALLED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE REQUIREMENTS OF ARTICLE 600 OF THE NATIONAL ELECTRICAL CODE AND/OR OTHER APPLICABLE LOCAL CODES. THIS INCLUDES PROPER GROUNDING AND BONDING OF THE SIGN. CA Lic. # C45-629097 AZ Lic # L38-ROC170223 803133 C-453080 East 29th Street, Long Beach, CA 90806 Bus: (800) 655-6366 (562) 595-7725 Fax: (562) 595-5434 FILE NAME EMAIL WEB BILL@TNTELECTRICSIGN.COM / TNTNEONSIGN@AOL.COM 2 OF 5MONUMENT SIGN AS NOTED REVISION DATE SIGN LIGHTING CONTROLS Controls for All Signs. All signs with permanently connected lighting shall meet the requirements of Section 133. Automatic Time Switch Control. All signs with permanently connected lighting shall be controlled with an automatic time switch control that complies with the applicable requirements of Section 119. Photocontrol or outdoor astronomical time switch control. All outdoor signs shall be controlled with a photocontrol or outdoor astronomical time switch control unless exempted from the exceptions. See Section 133(a)2. Dimming. All outdoor signs shall be controlled with a dimmer that provides the ability to automatically reduces sign power by a minimum of 65 percent during nighttime hours unless exempted from the 5 possible exceptions. See Section 133)a)3. Demand Responsive Electronic Message center Control (EMC), newly connected lighting power load greater that 15 kW shall have a control installed that is capable of reducing the lighting power by a minimum of 30% when receiving a demand response signal that is sent out by the local utility. SIGN SPECIFICATIONS SINGLE FACE MONUMENT SIGN WITH ILLUMINATED HALO LED CHANNEL LETTERS GONZALEZ LOGO: NORTHGATE MARKET: SUPPORT CENTER & CORPORATE OFFICE: TOP CORNICE: BASE: TO BE FABRICATED FROM .090 ALUMINUM PAINTED BRONZE W/ RETURN TO BE 3 ½” DEEP AND PEGGED 1” OFF ALUMINUM FASCIA. ‘GONZALEZ’ - TO BE FABRICATED FROM .050 ALUMINUM W/ .125” THICK BRONZE LETTERS PEGGED 2” OFF ALUMINUM FASCIA. TO BE FABRICATED FROM .090 ALUMINUM PAINTED BRONZE W/ RETURN TO BE 3 ½” DEEP AND PEGGED 1” OFF ALUMINUM FASCIA. TO BE .125 ALUMINUM PEGGED 1” OFF MOUNTED SURFACE AND PAINTED BRONZE. TO BE “CANTERA STONE” PROVIDED BY OTHERS. TO BE “CANTERA STONE” W/ 2” CONCRETE PADS. SIGN AREA: 79.16 SQ. FT. SCALE: 1/2” = 1’-0” CANTERA STONE BRONZE BOUTIQUE BEIGE (DE 6178) B 8'-0"1'-8"5'-4"12'-6" 13'-4" 1'-8" 2'-6"2'-0"1'-0"8"1'-6"D I S T R I B U T I O N C E N T E RDISTRIBUTION C E N T E R 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 D E V 2 0 1 0 -0 0 1 4 6 I N D U S TR I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 A N G E L 'S N I T E C L U B S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 R E T A I L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 O F F I C E S S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 B U S I N E S S P A R K S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 B U S I N E S S P A R K S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 B U S I N E S S P A R K S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 B U S I N E S S P A R K S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L|815' ! ! 4 4 ' S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 R E T A I L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 R E T A I L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L A l p h a (N o r t h e a s t A r e a ) R e d e v e l o p m e n t A r e a A l p h a (N o r t h e a s t A r e a ) R e d e v e l o p m e n t A r e a S P 9 4 -1 D A 1 I N D U S T R I A L E L A P A L M A A V EN KRAEMER PLE C O R O N A D O S TN LANCE LNE B L U E S T A R S T N SIMON CIRN BARSTEN WAYN ARMANDO STN RED GUM ST91 57 E . L A P A L M A A V E E . M I R A L O M A A V E N. KRAEMER BLVDN. BLUE GUM STN. MILLER STN. SUNKIST STN. RIO VISTA ST110431170-1172 North Armando Street DEV2010-00146 Subject Property APN: 344-371-18 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: April 2009 E L A P A L M A A V EN KRAEMER PLE C O R O N A D O S TN LANCE LNE B L U E S T A R S T N SIMON CIRN BARSTEN WAYN ARMANDO STN RED GUM ST91 57 E . L A P A L M A A V E E . M I R A L O M A A V E N. KRAEMER BLVDN. BLUE GUM STN. MILLER STN. SUNKIST STN. RIO VISTA ST110431170-1172 North Armando Street DEV2010-00146 Subject Property APN: 344-371-18 ATTACHMENT NO. 1 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo: April 2009 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2 - 1 - PC2010-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2010-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT A CLASS 1 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION IS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2010-05525 (DEV2010-00146) (1172 NORTH ARMANDO STREET) WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-05525, to permit an indoor soccer facility in an existing industrial building proposed for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, shown on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. WHEREAS, this property is developed with an industrial building located in the SP94-1, DA1 (Northeast Area Specific Plan 94-1, Development Area 1) zone and the Anaheim General Plan designates the property for Industrial land uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on November 22, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for a conditional use permit, does find and determine the following facts: WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The request to permit an indoor soccer facility in the SP94-1, DA1 (Northeast Area Specific Plan 94-1, Development Area 1) zone is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.120.050.050.0531 (Conditional Uses and Structures) of the Zoning Code. 2. The request to permit an indoor soccer facility would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the property is currently developed with industrial buildings and the proposed use is compatible with the surrounding area. - 2 - PC2010-*** 3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health, safety and general welfare of the public because the property is currently improved with industrial buildings with no proposed expansion and a parking study was conducted and determined that the parking demand of the proposed uses would not exceed the number of spaces provided. 4. The traffic generated by the indoor soccer facility would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the facility would be operating during off-peak hours of the surrounding industrial businesses and surrounding streets. 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and will provide a land use that is compatible with the surrounding area. WHEREAS, the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities) as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-05525 subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this permit is approved without limitations on the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this application. - 3 - PC2010-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of November 22, 2010. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 “Zoning Provisions - General” of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on November 22, 2010, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 22nd day of November, 2010. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION - 4 - PC2010-*** - 5 - PC2010-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2010-05525 (DEV2010-00146) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY SIGNED OFF BY GENERAL 1 Business to be equipped with alarm system (silent or audible). Police 2 Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application, Form APD 516, and return it to the Police Department prior to initial alarm activation. This form is available at the Police Department front counter, or it can be downloaded from the following web site: http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=678 Police 3 Rear or side entrance doors shall be numbered with the same address numbers or suite number of the business. Minimum height of 4” recommended. Police 4 Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all person, property, and vehicles on-site. Additionally, the position of such lighting shall not disturb the normal privacy and use of any neighboring residences. Police 5 All exterior doors shall have their own light source, which shall adequately illuminate door areas at all hours to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises and provide adequate illumination for persons exiting the building. Police 6 An automatic fire sprinkler system shall be designed, installed and maintained as required by the Fire Department. Fire 7 A fire alarm system shall be designed, installed and maintained as required by the Fire Department. Fire - 6 - PC2010-*** 8 The occupancy shall comply with the requirements of an “A” occupancy in accordance with 2007 California Building Code. Fire 9 The hours of operation shall be consistent with the letter of operation on file with the City of Anaheim Planning Department. The hours of operation shall be Monday through Thursday from 5 p.m. to 11 p.m. and Fridays from 5 p.m. to 8 p.m. Any change in the hours of operation shall be subject to review and approval by Planning staff to determine substantial conformance with the letter of operation and compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning 10 Subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked as Exhibit No. 1 (Site Plan) and Exhibit No. 2 (Floor Plan). Planning ATTACHMENT NO. 3 FINAL 951 East Ball Road Parking Study Soccer World Anaheim City of Anaheim, California Prepared for City of Anaheim Planning Department 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 September 30, 2010 Prepared by IBI Group 18401 Von Karman Ave, Suite 110 Irvine, CA 92612 (949) 833-5588 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - ii - Table of Contents 1.0 INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 PROJECT LOCATION ................................................................................................................................. 2 3.0 SITE DESCRIPTION ................................................................................................................................... 4 3.1 Existing Site ......................................................................................................................... 4 3.2 Proposed Site ...................................................................................................................... 4 3.3 Traffic and Access .............................................................................................................. 4 4.0 SITE USES ................................................................................................................................................ 7 4.1 Existing Site Uses ................................................................................................................ 7 4.2 Proposed Site Uses ............................................................................................................. 7 5.0 PARKING REQUIREMENTS ....................................................................................................................... 8 5.1 Existing Site Parking Requirements .................................................................................... 8 5.2 Proposed Project Parking Requirements ............................................................................ 8 6.0 SIMILAR SITE PARKING COUNTS ............................................................................................................ 9 6.1 South Coast Soccer City Parking Survey ............................................................................ 9 6.2 Existing Site Parking Survey .............................................................................................. 12 7.0 METHODOLOGY OF STUDY .................................................................................................................... 16 8.0 FINDINGS ................................................................................................................................................ 18 8.1 Parking Space Requirements ........................................................................................... 18 9.0 RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS ............................................................................................ 20 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - iii - List of Figures Figure 2.1 Project Location .............................................................................................................. 3 Figure 3.1 Existing Site .................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3.2 Proposed Project Site Plan ............................................................................................. 6 Figure 6.1 South Coast Soccer City Location ................................................................................ 10 Figure 6.2 Project Site Parking Areas ............................................................................................ 13 List of Tables Table 4-1: World Cup Soccer League Schedule ............................................................................. 7 Table 5-1: Off-Street Parking Space Requirements for Existing Site .............................................. 8 Table 5-2: Existing Site Parking Space Requirement Calculation ................................................... 8 Table 6-1 Soccer City Parking Occupancy – Weekday ................................................................ 11 Table 6-2 Soccer City Parking Occupancy – Weekend ................................................................ 12 Table 6-3 Existing Site Parking Occupancy – Weekday ............................................................... 14 Table 6-4 Existing Site Parking Occupancy – Weekend ............................................................... 15 Table 7-1: Proposed Project Parking Generation .......................................................................... 16 Table 7-2: Proposed Project Parking Space Requirement Calculation ........................................ 17 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - 1 - 1.0 Introduction This report documents the results of a parking survey and demand analysis prepared for World Soccer Anaheim, a proposed indoor soccer facility located at 951 East Ball Road in the City of Anaheim. World Soccer Anaheim would function as an indoor soccer facility for the World Cup Soccer League. The World Cup Soccer League started several years ago and has expanded to include nearly 300 teams. World Cup Soccer League has been renting soccer fields at various parks in Anaheim and Buena Park to hold practices and tournaments. Due to the size of the league, it has become difficult to coordinate and request enough soccer fields to accommodate practices and tournaments. The project proposes to utilize a portion of an existing industrial warehouse building that is currently occupied by two other tenants. Soccer World Anaheim will be one of three tenants sharing the building, which provides 525 surface parking spaces. The proposed indoor soccer facility will provide soccer fields for league practices and tournaments during weekday evenings and all day on weekends. The purpose of this parking study is to identify the parking demand generated by the proposed project and determine the minimum number of parking spaces required for this use. The City of Anaheim Zoning Code does not have an established minimum parking requirement for this type of land use. To identify a recommended parking ratio for the proposed project, the study has conducted a parking survey at a similar site to capture peak parking demand generated by a similar use and at the existing site to capture existing parking demand at the project site. 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - 2 - 2.0 Project Location The proposed Soccer World facility site is located at 951 East Ball Road in the City of Anaheim within an industrial complex consisting of two single-story industrial warehouse buildings. The project site is bounded by industrial uses to the north, Ball Road to the south, East Street to the east, and a Burlington Northern Santa Fe (BNSF) industrial rail spur to the west. Ball Road is a Primary Arterial that runs east and west through Orange County and East Street is a Secondary Arterial that runs north and south starting from Ball Road, through Anaheim, and eventually becoming Raymond Avenue in Fullerton. Other major streets that parallel Ball Road include Lincoln Avenue to the north and Katella Avenue to the south. Major streets that run perpendicular to Ball Road include Anaheim Boulevard and Harbor Boulevard to the west and State College Boulevard to the east. The project site is located east of the Santa Ana Freeway (I-5), south of the Riverside Freeway (SR- 91) and west of the Orange Freeway (SR-57). Figure 2.1 provides a vicinity map showing the relative location of the project site. 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study Figure 2.1 – Project Location Legend Project Site September 2010 Ball Rd East St Vermont A v e Arlee Pl Lacy Ave Ol ive St 57 91 5 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - 4 - 3.0 Site Description 3.1 EXISTING SITE The project site is located within an industrial complex consisting of two single story industrial warehouse buildings. The subject warehouse building is 132,672 square feet and consists of four units. Two of the units are currently occupied by Sara Lee Bakery and Extron Electronics. Sara Lee Bakery occupies 26,547 square feet and Extron Electronics occupies 47,319 square feet. The other two units are currently vacant, with one being 26,909 square feet and the proposed project unit being 31,897 square feet. The second industrial building is approximately 109,000 square feet. There are 525 parking spaces available for use at the existing project site. Surface parking spaces are provided on all sides of the project building. There are currently 113 spaces provided to the south of the project building, 74 spaces provided to the west of the project building, 80 spaces provided north of the project building, and 133 spaces provided to the east of the project building. A site plan illustrating the existing site is provided in Figure 3.1. The site plan shows 423 parking spaces, however, a recent field observation shows that 23 parking spaces located along the Lewis Street access roadway have been removed. There is an additional 125 parking spaces provided adjacent to the second industrial building that is not shown on the site plan. 3.2 PROPOSED SITE The project is proposing to lease a vacant unit of the existing industrial warehouse. The physical aspects of the existing site, parking configuration, and access will remain the same. The existing interior layout of the leased portion of the building will be reconfigured. The proposed Soccer World Anaheim facility will utilize 31,897 square feet of the existing warehouse. The proposed location within the building will be the vacant unit in the south-west corner of the warehouse building. The proposed indoor soccer facility will include up to six soccer fields, with the ability to convert into two large soccer fields. There will be two entrances into the facility, with the main entrance located on the south side of the building and the side entrance located on the east side of the building. The proposed facility will also provide two office- administration rooms, five small storage rooms, a small snack bar, retail store, and restrooms. The main entrance leads to the main lobby, office rooms, retail store, and two storage rooms. The side entrance leads to a hallway where the snack bar, women’s restroom and men’s restroom and three additional storage rooms are located. A site plan illustrating the proposed interior reconfiguration of the site is provided in Figure 3.2. 3.3 TRAFFIC AND ACCESS All existing access driveways will remain the same. The project site is accessible via Ball Road and East Street. The proposed project building is located in the center of the industrial complex and is not visible from Ball Road and East Street. Two access roadways within the industrial complex provide access between Ball Road and East Street to the surface parking lots and project building. From Ball Road, the project site is accessible via Lewis Street. From East Street, the project site is accessible via an unsignalized driveway. 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study Figure 3.1 – Existing Site Plan September 2010 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study Figure 3.2 – Proposed Project Floor Plan September 2010 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - 7 - 4.0 Site Uses 4.1 EXISTING SITE USES The project site building is partially occupied by two tenants: Sara Lee Bakery and Extron Electronics. This Sara Lee Bakery location serves as a distribution outlet for the company. Sara Lee delivery trucks were observed to be parked at the facility throughout the day and overnight. Extron Electronics is a manufacturer of audio/visual system integration products, with this location serving as an office and warehouse building for the company. 4.2 PROPOSED SITE USES The proposed project would function as an indoor soccer facility for World Cup Soccer League practice games, tournaments, and events. The World Cup Soccer League consists of 300 teams made up of five players on each team. The proposed project would provide six soccer fields for training and practice games during weekdays. The six soccer fields will have the ability to convert into two large soccer fields for tournaments on weekends. The facility will also include a small snack bar, some office space, restrooms, and storage rooms. Operating hours are proposed to be seven days a week, from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday; and 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday and Sunday. Facility staff will include three administrators, nine referees, and one security guard. It is anticipated that up to six practice games will be held every hour between 6:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. During the weekends, it is anticipated that up to two tournaments will be held every hour between 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Table 4.2 provides a summary of the league’s practice and tournament schedule. Table 4-1: World Cup Soccer League Schedule Time AM AM AM AM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM PM 8:oo 9:00 10:00 11:00 12:00 1:00 2:00 3:00 4:00 5:00 6:00 7:00 8:00 9:00 10:00 WEEKDAYS Monday 6 6 6 6 Tuesday 6 6 6 6 Wednesday 6 6 6 6 Thursday 6 6 6 6 Friday 6 6 6 6 WEEKENDS Saturday 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Sunday 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Source: World Cup Soccer League #: Number of active fields 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - 8 - 5.0 Parking Requirements 5.1 EXISTING SITE PARKING REQUIREMENTS The minimum number of off-street parking spaces required for each land use type is defined in Section 18 of the City of Anaheim Zoning Code. The existing site consists of two single-story warehouse buildings that fall under the Industrial – General land use category. Table 5-1 shows the Non-Residential Parking Requirements of the existing use as stated in the City of Anaheim Zoning Code. Table 5-1: Off-Street Parking Space Requirements for Existing Site Use Classification Minimum Required Parking Spaces Industrial – General 1.55 spaces per 1,000 square feet of building GFA, which may include a maximum of 10% office space, plus, if percentage of office space exceeds 10% of the GFA, 4 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA for the floor area in excess of 10% Source: City of Anaheim Zoning Code Section 18.42.040 GFA – gross floor area The existing project building is 132,672 square feet and the second industrial building is approximately 109,000 square feet. Per the City of Anaheim Zoning Code, a minimum of 375 parking spaces must be provided for the existing project site. The number of off-street parking spaces required for the project site is calculated in Table 5-2. Table 5-2: Existing Site Parking Space Requirement Calculation Use Classification Unit Quantity Min Rate (Spaces/Unit) Spaces Required Industrial – General (Project Building) SF 132,672 1.55 206 Industrial – General (Adjacent Building) SF 109,000 1.55 169 Total 375 Source: City of Anaheim Zoning Code Section 18.42.040 SF –square feet There are currently 525 parking spaces provided at the site for use by the two existing buildings. Based on the City’s minimum parking requirement, there is an excess of 150 parking spaces provided at the project site. 5.2 PROPOSED PROJECT PARKING REQUIREMENTS The proposed project is an indoor soccer facility, or Commercial Recreation – Indoor use classification. The City of Anaheim Zoning Code does not have an established minimum parking requirement for this type of land use. Per Section 18.42.040 of the City of Anaheim Zoning Code: “For uses not listed, parking requirements may be those determined to be reasonably necessary by the Planning Services Manager of the Planning Department and/or his or her designee. The Planning Services Manager of the Planning Department and/or his or her designee may require a parking study in order to make this determination.” To determine a minimum parking ratio for the proposed project, similar site parking counts were conducted. The following section summarizes the parking surveys conducted at the existing site and a similar site. 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - 9 - 6.0 Similar Site Parking Counts As noted in the previous section, the City of Anaheim Zoning Code does not specify a minimum parking requirement for an indoor soccer facility. To identify a recommended minimum parking ratio, a similar site parking survey was conducted at South Coast Soccer City in Torrance, California to capture the peak parking demand generated by a similar use. The purpose of the similar site parking survey is to establish an appropriate parking rate for this type of use. In addition to the similar site parking counts, a parking count was conducted at the project site to determine existing parking demand and the availability of parking spaces at the project site. 6.1 SOUTH COAST SOCCER CITY PARKING SURVEY South Coast Soccer City is an indoor soccer and Futsal facility located at 540 Maple Avenue in Torrance, California. The facility is located in a similar environment to the proposed project site and provides similar uses. Soccer City operates from a 73,000 square feet single-story warehouse building located in a light industrial area. The facility provides two turf fields and five Futsal fields for youth and adult leagues, pick-up games, open field time, contract field time for clubs, high school and college teams, tournaments, camps, and other programs. Regular hours of operation are Monday through Friday from 9 a.m. to 11 p.m. and weekends from 9:00 a.m. to 6:00 p.m. Parking for the site is provided in two surface parking lots, located in the front and rear of the building. There are 129 off-street parking spaces provided on the two surface parking lots. On- street parking on Maple Avenue and California Street is permitted and functions as an additional source of parking for Soccer City users. The location of the facility and parking supply is provided in Figure 6.1. 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study Figure 6.1 – South Coast Soccer City Location Torrance Blvd Maricopa St Hawaii AveCalifornia St Maple AveLegend Project Site September 2010 405 110 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - 11 - Parking counts were conducted on four separate days to capture peak parking demand generated by the facility. The counts were scheduled to coincide with events being held at the facility. Weekday parking space occupancy counts were conducted at Soccer City on Wednesday, September 1, 2010 between 7:00 p.m. and 10:00 p.m. (Day 1) and on Friday, September 4, 2010 between 5:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. (Day 2). During these times, open pick-up games for adults and youth were being offered. The results are summarized in Table 6-1, and the detailed occupancy data sheets are provided in the Appendix. Peak parking demand at Soccer City occurred on Day 1 at 9:00 p.m. At this time, 69 vehicles were parked on the surface parking lots and 43 vehicles were parked on Maple Avenue and California Street. Average parking demand on Day 1 was 92 vehicles, including 56 off-street vehicles and 35 on-street vehicles. Average parking demand on Day 2 was 61 vehicles, including 35 off-street vehicles and 26 on-street vehicles. Table 6-1 Soccer City Parking Occupancy – Weekday Time Off-Street Parking On-Street Parking Total Day 1 Day 2 Day 1 Day 2 Day 1 Day 2 5:00 PM - 33 - 15 - 48 5:30 PM - 36 - 19 - 55 6:00 PM - 24 - 28 - 52 6:30 PM - 30 - 26 - 56 7:00 PM 49 43 32 35 81 78 7:30 PM 51 41 31 23 82 64 8:00 PM 60 49 40 35 100 84 8:30 PM 57 31 37 25 94 56 9:00 PM 69 31 43 27 112 58 9:30 PM 53 - 31 - 84 - 10:00 PM 54 - 34 - 88 - Average 56 35 35 26 92 61 Weekend parking space occupancy counts were conducted at Soccer City on Saturday, September 4, 2010 between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. (Day 3) and Sunday, September 5, 2010 between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. (Day 4). During these times, youth pick-up games were being offered at the facility. The results are summarized in Table 6-2, and the detailed occupancy data sheets are provided in the Appendix. Peak parking demand for at Soccer City occurred on Day 3 at 12:00 p.m. At this time, 32 vehicles were parked on the surface parking lots and 6 vehicles were parked on Maple Avenue and California Street. Average parking demand on Day 3 was 34 vehicles, including 20 off-street vehicles and 12 on-street vehicles. Average parking demand on Day 4 was 17 vehicles, including 15 off-street vehicles and 5 on-street vehicles. 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - 12 - Table 6-2 Soccer City Parking Occupancy – Weekend Time Off-Street Parking On-Street Parking Total Day 3 Day 4 Day 3 Day 4 Day 3 Day 4 11:00 AM 38 18 20 5 58 23 11:30 AM 37 7 22 5 59 12 12:00 PM 32 6 31 5 63 11 12:30 PM 11 7 12 5 23 12 1:00 PM 7 14 10 5 17 19 1:30 PM 7 20 4 5 11 25 2:00 PM 5 13 3 5 8 18 Average 20 12 15 5 34 17 The peak parking demand generated by the similar site over the four day count period was 112 vehicles during the week and 63 vehicles during the weekend. Average parking demand was 92 vehicles on a Wednesday night and 61 vehicles on a Friday night. During the weekend, average parking demand was 34 vehicles on a Saturday and 17 vehicles on a Sunday. The peak parking occupancy observed over the four day count period occurred on Wednesday night at 9:00 p.m. At this time, 112 vehicles were parked at the facility and along Maple Avenue and California Street. Based on this peak parking occupancy and the square footage of the facility, the observed peak parking rate for this use is 1.53 spaces per 1,000 square feet. 6.2 EXISTING SITE PARKING SURVEY A parking survey was conducted at the project site on a weekday and a Saturday to capture existing demand. Counts were scheduled to occur during the proposed project’s operating hours. Weekday parking space occupancy counts were conducted at the project site on Thursday, September 2, 2010 between 11:00 a.m. and 10:00 p.m. The results are summarized in Table 6-3, and the detailed occupancy data sheets are provided in the Appendix. Figure 6.1 illustrates the on- site parking areas. Maximum weekday utilization of the project site occurred at 1:30 p.m. At that time, 111 of the 400 spaces contained parked vehicles, for an occupancy of 28 percent (28%). The maximum occupancy in the parking area south of the building (Area 1) was 18 percent (18%), and occurred prior to 5:00 p.m. There were no parked vehicles after 5:00 p.m. in this area. The parking area to the west of the building (Area 2) experienced maximum utilization at 12:00 p.m. At this time, 23 of 74 spaces were occupied, with five of the parked vehicles being Sara Lee delivery trucks. After 5:00 p.m., the maximum utilization in Area 2 occurred at 9:00 p.m., with 20 spaces occupied. Ten of the occupied spaces were Sara Lee delivery trucks. The maximum utilization of the parking area to the north of the building (Area 3) occurred at 3:00 p.m., with 33 of the 80 spaces (41%) occupied. After 5:00 p.m., there were on average 28 vehicles parked. Twenty-three of these vehicles were Sara Lee delivery trucks. The maximum utilization of the parking area to the east of the building occurred during the day between 11:00 a.m. and 2:00 p.m. During this time, 39 to 40 of the 133 spaces contained parked vehicles for an occupancy of 29 percent (29%) to 30 percent (30%). After 5:00 p.m., the occupancy rate was less than 5 percent (5%). 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study Figure 6.2 – Project Site Parking Areas Area 3 Area 1 Area 4Area 2Legend Parking Area September 2010East StAccess Roadway Lewis St Access Roadway 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - 14 - Table 6-3 Existing Site Parking Occupancy – Weekday Time Area 1 (113 spaces) Area 2 (74 spaces) Area 3 (80 spaces) Area 4 (133 spaces) Total Parked Vehicles Percent Occupied Parked Vehicles Percent Occupied Parked Vehicles Percent Occupied Parked Vehicles Percent Occupied Parked Vehicles Percent Occupied 11:00 AM 19 17% 20 27% 28 35% 40 30% 107 27% 11:30 AM 20 18% 21 28% 28 35% 39 29% 108 27% 12:00 PM 18 16% 23 31% 29 36% 39 29% 109 27% 12:30 PM 20 18% 19 26% 29 36% 40 30% 108 27% 1:00 PM 20 18% 18 24% 32 40% 40 30% 110 28% 1:30 PM 19 17% 20 27% 32 40% 40 30% 111 28% 2:00 PM 19 17% 17 23% 26 33% 40 30% 102 26% 2:30 PM 17 15% 16 22% 32 40% 34 26% 99 25% 3:00 PM 18 16% 16 22% 33 41% 27 20% 94 24% 3:30 PM 20 18% 17 23% 28 35% 28 21% 93 23% 4:00 PM 13 12% 15 20% 26 33% 24 18% 78 20% 4:30 PM 14 12% 15 20% 31 39% 20 15% 80 20% 5:00 PM 3 3% 15 20% 30 38% 15 11% 63 16% 5:30 PM 0 0% 14 19% 29 36% 6 5% 49 12% 6:00 PM 0 0% 14 19% 27 34% 1 1% 42 11% 6:30 PM 0 0% 14 19% 27 34% 0 0% 41 10% 7:00 PM 0 0% 18 24% 27 34% 0 0% 45 11% 7:30 PM 0 0% 18 24% 29 36% 0 0% 47 12% 8:00 PM 1 1% 18 24% 28 35% 1 1% 48 12% 8:30 PM 0 0% 18 24% 28 35% 0 0% 46 12% 9:00 PM 0 0% 20 27% 28 35% 0 0% 48 12% 9:30 PM 0 0% 19 26% 28 35% 0 0% 47 12% 10:00 PM 0 0% 20 27% 28 35% 0 0% 48 12% Peak 20 Vehicles 23 Vehicles 33 Vehicles 40 Vehicles 111 Vehicles Weekend parking space occupancy counts were conducted at the existing project site during proposed project operation hours on Saturday, September 4, 2010 between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The results are summarized in Table 6-4, and the detailed occupancy data sheets are provided in the Appendix. Maximum utilization of the existing site occurred at 1:30 p.m. At that time, 51 of the 400 spaces contained parked vehicles, for an occupancy of 13 percent (13%). No vehicles were parked during this entire count period in the parking area to the south of the building (Area 1) and to the east of the building (Area 4). The maximum utilization of the parking area to the west of the building (Area 2) occurred at 9:00 a.m. At this time, 21 of the 74 parking spaces contained parked vehicles, for an occupancy of 28 percent (28%). Three of the parked vehicles were Sara Lee delivery trucks. The maximum utilization of the parking area to the north of the building (Area 3) occurred at 1:00 p.m. and 1:30 p.m. At this time, 31 of the 80 spaces contained parked vehicles, for an occupancy of 39 percent (39%). Nine of the parked vehicles were Sara Lee delivery trucks. 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - 15 - Table 6-4 Existing Site Parking Occupancy – Weekend Time Area 1 (113 spaces) Area 2 (74 spaces) Area 3 (80 spaces) Area 4 (133 spaces) Total Parked Vehicles Percent Occupied Parked Vehicles Percent Occupied Parked Vehicles Percent Occupied Parked Vehicles Percent Occupied Parked Vehicles Percent Occupied 9:00 AM 0 0% 21 28% 25 31% 0 0% 46 12% 9:30 AM 0 0% 21 28% 25 31% 0 0% 46 12% 10:00 AM 0 0% 16 22% 25 31% 0 0% 41 10% 10:30 AM 0 0% 17 23% 25 31% 0 0% 42 11% 11:00 AM 0 0% 16 22% 25 31% 0 0% 41 10% 11:30 AM 0 0% 17 23% 25 31% 0 0% 42 11% 12:00 PM 0 0% 17 23% 24 30% 0 0% 41 10% 12:30 PM 0 0% 18 24% 27 34% 0 0% 45 11% 1:00 PM 0 0% 15 20% 31 39% 0 0% 46 12% 1:30 PM 0 0% 20 27% 31 39% 0 0% 51 13% 2:00 PM 0 0% 20 27% 28 35% 0 0% 48 12% 2:30 PM 0 0% 20 27% 27 34% 0 0% 47 12% 3:00 PM 0 0% 20 27% 28 35% 0 0% 48 12% 3:30 PM 0 0% 19 26% 27 34% 0 0% 46 12% 4:00 PM 0 0% 19 26% 28 35% 0 0% 47 12% 4:30 PM 0 0% 18 24% 28 35% 0 0% 46 12% 5:00 PM 0 0% 15 20% 28 35% 0 0% 43 11% Peak 0 Vehicles 21 Vehicles 31 Vehicles 0 Vehicles 51 Vehicles 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - 16 - 7.0 Methodology of Study Typical parking studies involve identifying the minimum number of parking spaces required pursuant to the City’s Zoning Code or utilizing the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Parking Generation Manual to determine parking demand generated by a specific land use. This parking study is unique, as the proposed project use, an indoor soccer facility or Commercial Recreation – Indoor, is not established in the City of Anaheim Zoning Code or in the ITE Parking Generation Manual. To determine an appropriate minimum parking ratio for the proposed project, the methodology used for this study was a simplified version of the ITE Parking Generation Manual’s methodology for determining parking demand generation. A site similar to the proposed project was identified. The site had similar components to the proposed project, including similar hours of operation, similar number of soccer fields, and the same number of players permitted on each team. Parking occupancy surveys were conducted at the similar site to collect data on parking demand generated by the similar site. The parking surveys were conducted over a four day period during peak hours of operations and coincided with pick-up games that were scheduled on weekdays and weekends. The peak parking demand generated by the similar site over the four day count period was 112 vehicles. Using the parking observation data collected, a parking ratio per 1,000 square feet was determined based on the weekday peak parking demand of 112 vehicles and facility size of 73,000 square feet. The observed parking generation ratio for this indoor soccer facility is 1.53 spaces per 1,000 square feet. Based on the parking ratio derived above for a similar indoor soccer facility, the minimum number of parking spaces for the proposed project would be 49 spaces. The proposed project is expected to host up to a maximum of six games at one time, with five players on each team. Assuming each player drives alone, the maximum number of parking spaces generated by players would be up to 60 parking spaces. In addition to the three facility administrators, nine referees, one security guard, maximum number of parking spaces generated at peak usage times based on a ratio of 1 vehicle per employee and player would be up to 73 parking spaces. Table 7-1 summarizes the estimated parking demand generated by the facility based on square footage and employees/players. Table 7-1: Proposed Project Parking Generation Type Unit Quantity Min. Rate (Spaces/Unit) Min. Spaces Required Indoor Soccer Facility Square Feet 31,897 1.53 49 Indoor Soccer Facility Employees/Players 73 1.00 73 The expected parking demand generated by the proposed project based on square footage is 49 spaces. The expected parking demand generated based on one vehicle per employee and player is 73. While not all players and employees are expected to drive alone, there is the potential for overlap parking to occur between games. Given this assumption, the minimum number of parking spaces generated by the proposed project would be 49 spaces, and the maximum number of parking spaces generated would be 80 spaces. Table 7-2 summarizes the parking space requirements for the proposed project and project site. 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - 17 - Table 7-2: Proposed Project Parking Space Requirement Calculation Type Use Classification Min. Spaces Required Max. Spaces Required Total Spaces Provided Existing Project Site Industrial - General 375 375 Project Building - 132,672 sqft Adjacent Building - 109,000 sqft Proposed Project Indoor Soccer Facility 49 80 Total (Existing Project Site and Proposed Project) 424 455 525 Source: City of Anaheim Zoning Code Section 18.42.040 SF –square feet In addition to the similar site parking surveys, a parking survey was also conducted at the existing project site to gather data on existing parking demand generated by the existing uses and the availability of parking spaces. The purpose of this parking survey was to provide a comparison with the anticipated parking generated by the proposed project, and to identify if there are enough parking spaces provided at the project site to meet existing and future demand. The existing site provides 525 parking spaces for use by the project building. The parking survey showed that peak occupancy is 111 vehicles on the weekday and 51 vehicles on the weekend. Based on the parking space requirement provided in Table 7-2, the existing site provides 150 more parking spaces than the minimum number of spaces required for the existing uses. With the addition of the proposed project, the project site will continue to have sufficient parking available to accommodate the proposed use and existing uses. 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - 18 - 8.0 Findings 8.1 PARKING SPACE REQUIREMENTS • 18.42.110.0101: The variance under the conditions imposed will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation. The existing project site consists of two single-story buildings with a combined 241,672 square feet of Industrial – General use. The minimum parking requirement for the existing uses is 375 parking spaces per City of Anaheim Zoning Code. The proposed 31,897 square foot indoor soccer facility is expected to generate demand for 49 to 80 parking spaces. The minimum parking requirements for the existing uses and proposed project would be between 424 and 455 parking spaces. The existing project site provides 525 parking spaces for use by the project building. The number of parking spaces provided exceeds the minimum number of parking spaces required by the City. • 18.42.110.0102: The Soccer World Anaheim project will not increase demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. The anticipated parking demand generated by the proposed project will not increase demand or competition for parking spaces on public streets in the vicinity of the project site. The project site is located within an industrial complex that provides more parking spaces than the minimum required number of parking spaces and observed parking demand. The project building is surrounded on all sides by off-street parking spaces, limiting the opportunity for on-street parking usage. • 18.42.110.0103: The Soccer World Anaheim project will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. The proposed project will not increase the demand or competition for parking spaces on adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the project site. The parking demand for existing and proposed uses is less than the number of spaces provided on the site. In addition, a field review conducted at the project site observed that existing demand for parking typically occurs in parking Area 3 and Area 4 – the lots located furthest away from the main entrance of the proposed project. Some parking was observed in Area 1 and Area 2 (the lots located near the main and side entrances of the proposed project), however the number of vehicles parked in this area was minimal and vehicles were concentrated further away from the main and side entrances of the proposed project. • 18.42.110.0104: The Soccer World Anaheim project will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided. The existing site is currently occupied by industrial uses that operate during normal business hours. The proposed project site is planning to operate during weekdays between 5:00 p.m. and 9:00 p.m. and on weekends between 9:00 a.m. and 5:00 p.m. The hours of operation for the existing uses and proposed project do not coincide. Traffic generated by 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - 19 - the proposed project will not conflict with existing traffic within the off-street parking areas or lots provided. • 18.42.110.0105: The Soccer World Anaheim project will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. The proposed project will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties along the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. The estimated parking generation from the proposed project is expected to be 49 parking spaces. Furthermore, operating hours for the proposed project do not coincide with operating hours of the existing uses. 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL - 20 - 9.0 Recommendations and Conclusions Soccer World Anaheim is proposing to lease a portion of an existing single-story industrial warehouse building, located within an industrial complex along Ball Road and East Street in the City of Anaheim. The proposed project would be one of three tenants at the building, and would be located at the south-east corner of the building. The proposed project is 31,897 square feet and would consist of up to six soccer fields with the ability to convert to two large soccer fields for league practices, games, and tournaments. The existing project site consists of two single-story industrial warehouse buildings. The project building is 132,672 square feet and consists of four units and the adjacent building is approximately 109,000 square feet. The project site provides 525 parking spaces for use by the two buildings. Per the City of Anaheim Zoning Code, the minimum parking requirement for the existing project site is 375 spaces. The City of Anaheim Zoning Code does not establish a minimum parking requirement for the proposed use. A parking survey was conducted at a similar site over a four day period to determine an appropriate parking generation ratio to apply for this type of use. The four day parking survey was scheduled to coincide with peak operating hours of the similar site. The parking survey showed that peak parking demand at the similar site was 112 vehicles on a weekday and 63 vehicles during the weekend, which equates to 1.53 spaces per 1,000 square feet. A parking survey was also conducted at the project building to determine existing demand and availability of parking. Based on the parking survey conducted on a weekday and Saturday at the project site, peak parking demand from the existing uses is 111 vehicles and occurs during a weekday at 1:30 p.m. The study used two methodologies to determine the minimum and maximum number of parking spaces the proposed project would generate. Based on the observed peak parking occupancy of the similar site, a parking generation ratio per 1,000 square feet can be derived using the peak parking demand during the weekday and the size of the similar site. The observed parking generation ratio for the observed indoor soccer facility is 1.53 parking spaces per 1,000 square feet. The estimated parking demand for a 31,897 square feet indoor soccer facility, as proposed for the project site, would be 49 parking spaces. Based on a ratio of one vehicle per employee and player, and potential overlap between games, the maximum number of parking spaces generated by the proposed project would be 80 parking spaces. The existing site provides 525 parking spaces for use by the project building, 70 to 101 spaces more than the minimum required amount for existing and proposed uses. All parking spaces for tenants of the project building are “shared and in-common,” with no spaces specifically reserved. The proposed project is not expected to increase parking demand or competition for parking spaces. The proposed hours of operation for Soccer World Anaheim are Monday through Friday, 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. and Saturday and Sunday, 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. These hours do not coincide with the operating hours of the existing uses. In conclusion, the proposed project is expected to generate demand for 49 to 80 parking spaces, however; this demand is not expected to impact parking demand for existing uses due to different operating hours. The project building provides 525 parking spaces for use by all tenants in the building. This supply is 70 to 101 spaces more than the minimum parking requirement for existing and proposed uses. The parking survey conducted at the project confirms that during peak periods, only 111 of the 525 parking spaces provided are utilized. No significant impacts to parking supply are anticipated from this use. 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL APPENDIX PARKING SURVEY – EXISTING SITE THURSDAY - SEPTEMBER 2, 2010 PARKING STUDY: 951 EAST BALL ROAD - ANAHEIM CA10-0910-02-001SECTION: IN-LOT PARKING SPACES 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830 1900 1930 2000 2030 2100 2130 2200A: UNMARKED 933222331233300000000000A:TOTAL PARKING 933222331233300000000000PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 33.3% 33.3% 22.2% 22.2% 22.2% 33.3% 33.3% 11.1% 22.2% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%B: UNMARKED 48 30 30 29 29 30 29 29 29 20 21 17 14 125100010000B:TOTAL PARKING 48 30 30 29 29 30 29 29 29 20 21 17 14 125100010000PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 62.5% 62.5% 60.4% 60.4% 62.5% 60.4% 60.4% 60.4% 41.7% 43.8% 35.4% 29.2% 25.0% 10.4% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%C: UNMARKED 84 14 15 14 15 15 14 14 12 12 157800000000000C:TOTAL PARKING 84 14 15 14 15 15 14 14 12 12 157800000000000PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 16.7% 17.9% 16.7% 17.9% 17.9% 16.7% 16.7% 14.3% 14.3% 17.9% 8.3% 9.5% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%D: UNMARKED 2855455555656630000010000D:TOTAL PARKING 2855455555656630000010000PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 17.9% 17.9% 14.3% 17.9% 17.9% 17.9% 17.9% 17.9% 21.4% 17.9% 21.4% 21.4% 10.7% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 3.6% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%E: AUTOS & MOTORCYCLES 60 12 12 13 107764434454445544333E: SARA DELIVER VANS X22445778888877777778999E:TOTAL PARKING 60 14 14 17 14 12 14 13 12 12 11 12 12 12 11 11 11 12 12 11 12 12 12 12PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 23.3% 23.3% 28.3% 23.3% 20.0% 23.3% 21.7% 20.0% 20.0% 18.3% 20.0% 20.0% 20.0% 18.3% 18.3% 18.3% 20.0% 20.0% 18.3% 20.0% 20.0%20.0% 20.0%F: UNMARKED 1122211100000000002222444F:TOTAL PARKING 1122211100000000002222444PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 18.2% 18.2% 18.2% 9.1% 9.1% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 18.2% 18.2% 18.2% 18.2% 36.4% 36.4% 36.4%G: UNMARKED 211111111110000001000000G: HANDICAP 101100000000000000000001G:TOTAL PARKING 312211111110000001000001PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 33.3% 66.7% 66.7% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 33.3%H: AUTOS & MOTORCYCLES 27 9 9 10 11 14 1076642442222222222H: SARA DELIVER VANS X11111345665555555555555H:TOTAL PARKING 27 10 10 11 12 15 13 11 11 12 107997777777777PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 37.0% 37.0% 40.7% 44.4% 55.6% 48.1% 40.7% 40.7% 44.4% 37.0% 25.9% 33.3% 33.3% 25.9% 25.9% 25.9% 25.9% 25.9% 25.9% 25.9% 25.9%25.9% 25.9%I: AUTOS & MOTORCYCLES 50 15 15 15 14 12 1289955545333333333I: SARA DELIVER VANS X333357712121314171717171717191818181818I:TOTAL PARKING 50 18 18 18 17 17 19 15 21 21 18 19 22 21 22 20 20 20 22 21 21 21 21 21PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 36.0% 36.0% 36.0% 34.0% 34.0% 38.0% 30.0% 42.0% 42.0% 36.0% 38.0% 44.0% 42.0% 44.0% 40.0% 40.0% 40.0% 44.0% 42.0% 42.0% 42.0%42.0% 42.0%J: UNMARKED 7712222222333221000000000J: HANDICAP 300000000000000000000000J:TOTAL PARKING 8012222222333221000000000PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 1.3% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 2.5% 3.8% 3.8% 3.8% 2.5% 2.5% 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%K: TRUCKS X11111211111111111232211K: AUTO & MOTORCYCLE X22222222222222222222222K: TOTAL PARKING(DOCK) X33333433333333333454433L: UNMARKED X66666662211110000000000L:TOTAL PARKING X66666662211110000000000ALL SECTIONS SPACES 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700 1730 1800 1830 1900 1930 2000 2030 2100 2130 2200TOTAL 400 107 110 110 107 109 111 102 99 94 91 78 80 63 49 42 41 45 47 48 46 48 47 48PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 26.8% 27.5% 27.5% 26.8% 27.3% 27.8% 25.5% 24.8% 23.5% 22.8% 19.5% 20.0% 15.8% 12.3% 10.5% 10.3% 11.3% 11.8% 12.0% 11.5% 12.0%11.8% 12.0% SATURDAY - SEPTEMBER 4, 2010 PARKING STUDY: 951 EAST BALL ROAD - ANAHEIM CA10-0910-02-001SECTION: IN-LOT PARKING SPACES 900 930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700A: UNMARKED 900000000000000000A:TOTAL PARKING 900000000000000000PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%B: UNMARKED 4800000000000000000B:TOTAL PARKING 4800000000000000000PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%C: UNMARKED 8400000000000000000C:TOTAL PARKING 8400000000000000000PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%D: UNMARKED 2800000000000000000D:TOTAL PARKING 2800000000000000000PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00% 0.00%E: AUTOS & MOTORCYCLES 60 15 15 13 13 12 12 11 10 10 11 10 9 118875E: SARA DELIVER VANS X20002334446768777E:TOTAL PARKING 60 17 15 13 13 14 15 14 14 14 15 16 16 17 16 15 14 12PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 28.3% 25.0% 21.7% 21.7% 23.3% 25.0% 23.3% 23.3% 23.3% 25.0% 26.7% 26.7% 28.3% 26.7% 25.0% 23.3% 20.0%F: UNMARKED 1134110000000000000F:TOTAL PARKING 1134110000000000000PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 27.3% 36.4% 9.1% 9.1% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%G: UNMARKED 200000000000000000G: HANDICAP 100000000000000000G:TOTAL PARKING 300000000000000000PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%H: AUTOS & MOTORCYCLES 2777777766896776576H: SARA DELIVER VANS X12222223411211111H:TOTAL PARKING 278999998912107987687PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 29.6% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 33.3% 29.6% 33.3% 44.4% 37.0% 25.9% 33.3% 29.6% 25.9% 22.2% 29.6% 25.9%I: AUTOS & MOTORCYCLES 50 14 13 13 13 13 12 12 13 14 13 12 10 11 9 12 9 8I: SARA DELIVER VANS X333334455898911101113I:TOTAL PARKING 50 17 16 16 16 16 16 16 18 19 21 21 18 20 20 22 20 21PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 34.0% 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 32.0% 36.0% 38.0% 42.0% 42.0% 36.0% 40.0% 40.0% 44.0% 40.0% 42.0%J: UNMARKED 7700000000000000000J: HANDICAP 300000000000000000J:TOTAL PARKING 8000000000000000000PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 0.0%K: TRUCKS X00000010022211221K: AUTO & MOTORCYCLE X12232224132222222K: TOTAL PARKING(DOCK) X12232234154433443L: UNMARKED X00000000000000000L:TOTAL PARKING X00000000000000000ALL SECTIONS SPACES 900 930 1000 1030 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400 1430 1500 1530 1600 1630 1700TOTAL 400 46 46 41 42 41 42 41 45 46 51 48 47 48 46 47 46 43PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.0% 11.5% 11.5% 10.3% 10.5% 10.3% 10.5% 10.3% 11.3% 11.5% 12.8% 12.0% 11.8% 12.0% 11.5% 11.8% 11.5% 10.8% 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL APPENDIX PARKING SURVEY – SOUTH COAST SOCCER CITY WEDNESDAY - SEPTEMBER 1, 2010 PARKING STUDY: 540 MAPLE AVE - TORRANCE CA10-0910-02-002SECTION: ON-STREET PARKING SPACES 1900 1930 2000 2030 2100 2130 2200A: NS OF CALIFORNIA STREET 7 5 107966B: SS OF CALIFORNIA STREET 12 10 13 13 15 8 9C: ES OF MAPLE STREET7987868D: WS OF MAPLE STREET 6 7 9 10 11 11 11TOTAL STREET PARKING STREET 32 31 40 37 43 31 34SECTION: IN-LOT PARKING SPACES 1900 1930 2000 2030 2100 2130 2200E: UNMARKED 84 10 12 19 18 28 20 17E: EMPLOYEE ONLY83455544E:TOTAL PARKING 92 13 16 24 23 33 24 21PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.00% 14.13% 17.39% 26.09% 25.00% 35.87% 26.09% 22.83%F: UNMARKED 32 32 32 32 31 32 27 31F: HANDICAP52111111F: ILLEGAL 02232311F:TOTAL PARKING 37 36 35 36 34 36 29 33PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.00% 97.30% 94.59% 97.30% 91.89% 97.30% 78.38% 89.19%TOTAL ALL SECTIONS SPACES 1900 1930 2000 2030 2100 2130 2200TOTAL STREET PARKING STREET 32 31 40 37 43 31 34TOTAL PARKING LOT PARKING 129 49 51 60 57 69 53 54PERCENT ALL LOTS OCCUPIED 100.00% 37.98% 39.53% 46.51% 44.19% 53.49% 41.09% 41.86%TOTAL LOT + STREET PARKING TOTAL 81 82 100 94 112 84 88NOTE: THERE WERE 2 LARGE TRUCKS PARKED IN LOT E FOR THE ENTIRE STUDY PERIOD. FRIDAY - SEPTEMBER 3, 2010 PARKING STUDY: 540 MAPLE AVE - TORRANCE CA10-0910-02-002SECTION: ON-STREET PARKING SPACES 1700 1730 1800 1830 1900 1930 2000 2030 2100A: NS OF CALIFORNIA STREET104452856B: SS OF CALIFORNIA STREET 3 5 10 7 12 8 13 10 8C: ES OF MAPLE STREET 9 11 10 10 118856D: WS OF MAPLE STREET234575657TOTAL STREET PARKING STREET 15 19 28 26 35 23 35 25 27SECTION: IN-LOT PARKING SPACES 1700 1730 1800 1830 1900 1930 2000 2030 2100E: UNMARKED 847445813161010E: EMPLOYEE ONLY8000000111E:TOTAL PARKING 927445813171111PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.00% 7.61% 4.35% 4.35% 5.43% 8.70% 14.13% 18.48% 11.96% 11.96%F: UNMARKED 32 26 30 18 24 32 26 29 18 18F: HANDICAP5001100000F: ILLEGAL 0021032322F:TOTAL PARKING 37 26 32 20 25 35 28 32 20 20PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.00% 70.27% 86.49% 54.05% 67.57% 94.59% 75.68% 86.49% 54.05% 54.05%TOTAL ALL SECTIONS SPACES 1700 1730 1800 1830 1900 1930 2000 2030 2100TOTAL STREET PARKING STREET 15 19 28 26 35 23 35 25 27TOTAL PARKING LOT PARKING 129 33 36 24 30 43 41 49 31 31PERCENT ALL LOTS OCCUPIED 100.00% 25.58% 27.91% 18.60% 23.26% 33.33% 31.78% 37.98% 24.03% 24.03%TOTAL LOT + STREET PARKING TOTAL 48 55 52 56 78 64 84 56 58NOTE: THERE WERE 1 LARGE TRUCK PARKED IN LOT E FOR THE ENTIRE STUDY PERIOD. SATURDAY - SEPTEMBER 4, 2010 PARKING STUDY: 540 MAPLE AVE - TORRANCE CA10-0910-02-002SECTION: ON-STREET PARKING SPACES 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400A: NS OF CALIFORNIA STREET6273321B: SS OF CALIFORNIA STREET3591100C: ES OF MAPLE STREET8996522D: WS OF MAPLE STREET3662100TOTAL STREET PARKING STREET 20 22 31 12 10 4 3SECTION: IN-LOT PARKING SPACES 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400E: UNMARKED 842222222E: EMPLOYEE ONLY80000000E:TOTAL PARKING 922222222PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.00% 2.17% 2.17% 2.17% 2.17% 2.17% 2.17% 2.17%F: UNMARKED 32 32 30 258453F: HANDICAP52220000F: ILLEGAL 02331100F:TOTAL PARKING 37 36 35 309553PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.00% 97.30% 94.59% 81.08% 24.32% 13.51% 13.51% 8.11%TOTAL ALL SECTIONS SPACES 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400TOTAL STREET PARKING STREET 20 22 31 12 10 4 3TOTAL PARKING LOT PARKING 129 38 37 32 11 7 7 5PERCENT ALL LOTS OCCUPIED 100.00% 29.46% 28.68% 24.81% 8.53% 5.43% 5.43% 3.88%TOTAL LOT + STREET PARKING TOTAL 58 59 63 23 17 11 8NOTE: (1) THERE WERE 1 LARGE TRUCK PARKED IN LOT E FOR THE ENTIRE STUDY PERIOD. (2) THE GATE TO LOT E WAS CLOSED AND LOCKED. DURING THE ENTIRE STUDY PERIOD. SUNDAY - SEPTEMBER 5, 2010 PARKING STUDY: 540 MAPLE AVE - TORRANCE CA10-0910-02-002SECTION: ON-STREET PARKING SPACES 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400A: NS OF CALIFORNIA STREET0000021B: SS OF CALIFORNIA STREET0000000C: ES OF MAPLE STREET5544434D: WS OF MAPLE STREET0011100TOTAL STREET PARKING STREET5555555SECTION: IN-LOT PARKING SPACES 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400E: UNMARKED 842222222E: EMPLOYEE ONLY80000000E:TOTAL PARKING 922222222PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.00% 2.17% 2.17% 2.17% 2.17% 2.17% 2.17% 2.17%F: UNMARKED 32 16 5 4 5 12 17 10F: HANDICAP50000000F: ILLEGAL 00000011F:TOTAL PARKING 37 16 5 4 5 12 18 11PERCENT OCCUPIED 100.00% 43.24% 13.51% 10.81% 13.51% 32.43% 48.65% 29.73%TOTAL ALL SECTIONS SPACES 1100 1130 1200 1230 1300 1330 1400TOTAL STREET PARKING STREET5555555TOTAL PARKING LOT PARKING 129 18 7 6 7 14 20 13PERCENT ALL LOTS OCCUPIED 100.00% 13.95% 5.43% 4.65% 5.43% 10.85% 15.50% 10.08%TOTAL LOT + STREET PARKING TOTAL 23 12 11 12 19 25 18NOTE: (1) THERE WERE 1 LARGE TRUCK PARKED IN LOT E FOR THE ENTIRE STUDY PERIOD. (2) THE GATE TO LOT E WAS CLOSED AND LOCKED. 951 East Ball Road Soccer World Anaheim Parking Study FINAL APPENDIX LETTER FROM WORLD CUP SOCCER LEAGUE May 10, 2010 To whom it may concern: We want to thank you for the opportunity to present a proposal to lease the property located at 951 Ball Road in Anaheim, CA. Several years ago we started a soccer league. We had about 20 teams and the whole purpose was to have small tournaments and have fun with friends and family. Soon after we started playing, teams all over Orange County came to join and the league started to grow. Last year our affiliated teams with the league reached 300. For over 5 years we have been renting park facilities with the cities of Anaheim and Buena Park but we have lost the opportunity to expand our business because the soccer fields cannot be rented as we have requested. That is the reason we want to have our own facilities that will be very similar to the Anaheim Sports Center just a few blocks from your property. We will be playing during the week 6PM to 10 PM and during the weekend 8 AM to 5 PM. We are including a schedule of the tournaments. World Cup Soccer League was incorporated just a few months ago and cannot provide financials but we are very confident in the success of the business that are willing to have a company well established and with enough assets to be the collateral of our lease agreement. We are also including letters from the cities above mentioned to support the statement mentioned before. Thank you, RAPIDS PALLETS WORLD CUP SOCCER LEAGUE By: Erika Perez By: Susana Leal ATTACHMENT NO. 5 ATTACHMENT NO. 6 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item.