Public Utilities 2010/04/28CITY OF ANAHEIM
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD
MINUTES
APRIL 28, 2010
The Agenda having been posted on Friday, April 23, 2010, the Regular Meeting of the Public Utilities
Board was called to order by Chairperson Lon Cahill at 5:00 p.m. on Wednesday, April 28, 2010, in the
1 lth Floor Large Conference Room, Anaheim West Tower, 201 S. Anaheim Blvd., Anaheim, California.
Board Members Present: L. Cahill, J. Brandman, J. Machiaverna, K. Murray, D. Morgan
Board Members Absent: C. Peltzer, P. Carroll
Staff Present: M. Edwards, D. Calkins, E. Zacherl, M. Long, M. Ward, A. Kott, D. Lee,
B. Beelner, R. Shintaku, S. Sciortino, J. Lehman, R. Watkins, M. Samra,
S. Welch, G. Turner, M. Lopez, R. Dowell, R. Westergard, A. Nguyen,
L. Quiambao, P. Oviedo
Guest(s) Present: S. FaesseI, Planning Commission Member and Resident; P. Bos,
Resident; D. Wain, Resident and Member of the East Anaheim
Neighborhood Council
AGENDA ITEM
1. PUBLIC COMMENTS.
K. Murray acknowledged R. Westergard, Water Quality
Laboratory Supervisor, for the exemplary customer service that
he provided to an Anaheim resident.
S. Faessel congratulated M. Long on her retirement and
expressed thanks on behalf of the community for all the ways
that she has made Anaheim a better place with the various
projects that she and her staff have worked on over the years.
2. APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD (PUB) MEETING HELD
ON MARCH 24,2010.*
3. IMPLICATIONS OF AB 32: GLOBAL WARMING
SOLUTIONS ACT PRESENTATION.
M. Edwards stated that this would be a joint presentation by S.
Sciortino and J. Lehman. M. Edwards added that this
presentation is meant to be informative to facilitate a discussion
ACTION TAKEN
There being no further public
comments, L. Cahill closed the
public continents portion of the
meeting.
D. Morgan moved approval of the
March 24, 2010, Public Utilities
Board Meeting Minutes. K.
Murray seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED: 5 -0.
ABSTAINED: 0. ABSENT:2
(C. Peltzer, P. Carroll).
2010 -22
AGENDA ITEM
between Board Members and staff. There is no action to be
taken on this item.
J. Lehman began with an overview of the Global Warming
Solutions Act of 2006. The presentation was divided into five
parts. The status, Anaheim's involvement, potential impacts
and the options for remediation, and the sustainability
information management system. J. Lehman stated that AB 32
was passed in September of 2006 with the goal to reduce Green
House Gas Emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, which is about a
30% reduction in statewide greenhouse gas emission levels.
Utilities overall will end up with the largest emission reductions
because they are easier to regulate and the reductions are easier
to measure than in other industries. All electric companies are
required to comply with this program. For the electric utility
industry, the reductions will come in two prongs. There are
measures that must be implemented, and there is a cap and trade
system that Anaheim Public Utilities will have to participate in.
Staff has been actively involved in the development of this for
several years. The final regulations have to be developed by the
California Air Resources Board by January 1, 2011. J. Lehman
stated that the first way in which reductions will be achieved is
through a set of prescriptive measures. The solar program,
energy efficiency, and the renewable portfolio standards (RPS),
are all measures that Anaheim has underway.
In September 2009, Governor Schwarzenegger issued an
Executive Order that increased the State's RPS from 20% to
33% by 2020. As one of the statewide programs, entities are
allowed to use renewable energy credits to offset individual
RPS. Credits are separate from energy; for example, if a utility
has excess renewable energy, that utility can use the energy to
meet its load, but it can sell its credits to another utility so that
utility can meet their RPS. J. Lehman stated the Department
can meet part of its renewable standards with credits. The
reporting standards are very strict. Anaheim subscribes in a
group called Western Renewable Energy Generation
Information System (WREGIS) that tracks our renewable
energy use. The program serves as a certification of our
renewable credits on an annual basis for reporting purposes. J.
Lehman stated the penalties for noncompliance are significant,
$75,000 a day.
J. Lehman indicated that the second part of the presentation will
be about Cap and Trade. By 2012, only utilities and large
industrial customers will have to participate in Cap and Trade.
By 2015, other small commercial users will have to participate.
Under Cap and Trade, allowances are issued at the level of the
Cap. Allowances have to be surrendered to cover emissions. J.
Lehman indicated that on March 23, 2010, the California Air
ACTION TAKEN
2010 -23
AGENDA ITEM
Resources Board (GARB) issues its recommendation which
stated no allowances should be allocated on a "grand fathered"
basis but that they should all be obtained through an auction
process. The Governor sent a letter the next day indicating that
a transition period was needed and that allowances should be
allocated. This issue of allowance allocation has yet to be
settled.
M. Edwards asked if there had been any feedback to the
Governor's letter. J. Lehman indicated nothing official, but that
the draft regulations on Cap and Trade that were to have come
out this month have been delayed until May 2010.
M. Edwards referenced a graph showing the rate of impact to
Anaheim if Anaheim has to purchase 100% of its emission
allowances and impact if Anaheim is freely allocated 100% of
the emissions allowances. The customer rate impacts range
from about 0% to 40 %, depending upon how many allowances
are allocated to Anaheim at no cost.
There were a variety of questions posed by various Board
members and substantial discussion insued on the likely timing
and impacts of how CARB will implement AB 32.
4. FY 2010/2011 PROPOSED BUDGET PRESENTATION.
E. Zacherl presented the proposed FY2010/2011 budget. He
indicated that the budget was developed with direction to staff
that there would be no increase in the Department's budget
from the current budget year to the next budget year. The result
is a proposed budget that is actually less than the current
adopted budget. The total proposed Department budget for
FY2010/2011 is 19.4 million or 3.8 percent less than the
Department's current adopted budget. E. Zacherl indicated that
that there are signs that the economy may be leveling out, but
expenses continue to be monitored closely, and caution is being
maintained in the use of funds and estimates for growth. He
also indicated that the budget assumes no increases in
Anaheim's electric demand or water usage.
Budget binders were prepared for each Board Member with
additional details on the Department's budget. E. Zacherl
welcomed all questions that the Board Members might have.
Indicating that all questions and answers will be compiled and
distributed to all of the members.
M. Edwards indicated that the Board was not expected to
immediately present all of their questions and inquiries. Other
than immediate clarifying questions, the Board will phone /email
in to staff all of their questions, and those questions will be
ACTION TAKEN
2010 -24
AGENDA ITEM ACTION TAKEN
accumulated and responded to in writing as a group prior to the
next Board Meeting. Further, binders will be provided to the
absent Board Members with staff providing individualized
budget presentations as needed.
5. PRESENTATION REGARDING LANDSCAPE WATER
EFFICIENCY GUIDELINES.
M. Edwards recommended to the Board that the presentation
regarding Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines be deferred
until the May 26, 2010 meeting due to the lateness of the hour
to which the Board had no objections.
6. DISCUSSION OF THE SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL
UTILITIES DISTRICT (SMUD) STAFF REPORT
REGARDING "THE IMPACT OF PROPOSITION 16,
`THE NEW TWO - THIRDS REQUIREMENT FOR
LOCAL ELECTRICITY PROVIDERS' TO SMUD'S
BUSINESS OPERATIONS" AND POTENTIAL BOARD
REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL POSITION.*
After a lengthy discussion about Proposition 16, the Board
L. Cahill moved approval of a
decided that a subcommittee of its members be formed with the
subcommittee of no more than
subcommittee to meet with individual City Council members to
three members of the Public
discuss Proposition 16 to suggest that City Council consider
Utilities Board be authorized to
taking a position in support or opposition to Proposition 16.
meet with City Council members.
J. Machiaverna seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED:
5 -0. ABSTAINED: 0.
ABSENT-2
(C. Peltzer, P. Carroll).
7. UPDATE ON WATER SYSTEM ISSUES.
Water Supply Conditions Update
D. Calkins indicated that the water supply conditions look good
for the past winter and have improved from last month. The
Department of Water Resources (DWR) increased the amount
of water that will be delivered by the State Water Project by
increasing its allocation to 30% of requested deliveries. D.
Calkins added that Metropolitan Water District (MWD) is
anticipating, based on snow pack and precipitation data, to
potentially increase allocations to 35 or 40 %. If DWR
increases the allocations to 40 %, MWD supplies would almost
equal demand, resulting in little draw from our local
groundwater supply. D. Calkins indicated that by the end of
the year, total water usage in Anaheim should be about 7%
below the MWD allocation (i.e., rationing) target.
2010 -25
AGENDA ITEM
Wholesale Water Rates for 2010/2011
D. Calkins reported that the MWD Board recently established
water rates for 2011 and 2012. Rates will increase 7.5% in
each of the next two years. MWD extended the Stage 2 Supply
Allocation or rationing of imported supplies for the coming
fiscal year. In addition, the Orange County Water District set
the pumping percentage and pump tax for the coming fiscal
year; there will be no change from the current fiscal year.
Overall, these actions are in line with assumptions made in the
proposed Budget, which the PUB members were presented
with earlier in the meeting.
K. Murray added that MWD had originally proposed a budget
with rate increases upwards of 20 %. The MWD Board did not
support this recommendation and challenged MWD staff to
look at options for reducing costs, which led to a series of
budget workshops and committee meetings. As a result, MWD
staff proposed four options for MWD Board's consideration:
ranging from a 7.5% rate increase up to a 12.4% rate increase.
MWD staff recommended the 12.4% rate increase as it allowed
for a full cost of service and likely ensured strong bond ratings.
A compromise was reached resulting in the lower rate increase
of 7.5 %, but with direction from the MWD Board to MWD
staff to further reduce budgeted expenditures for full cost of
service and not to draw on reserves to prevent, MWD's bond
ratings from being jeopardized.
Orange County Water Summit
D. Calkins mentioned the Orange County Water Summit,
which will be held on May 14, 2010 and asked the Board
Members to reply to staff if they are interested in attending.
Water Awareness Month
D. Calkins indicated that May is Water Awareness Month and
that an informational memo was given to the Board Members
identifying all activities staff planned for the month.
Nohl Canyon Tank
D. Calkins reported on the Nohl Canyon Water Storage Tank
project. The tank has been partially backf'illed and the leak
testing and the disinfection have been completed. The finished
storage tank will be online in approximately four months.
8. UPDATE ON ELECTRIC SYSTEM ISSUES
Canyon Power Plant
M. Ward indicated that the mobilization has begun on the
Canyon Power Plant Project with the site being prepared for
construction.
ACTION TAKEN
2010 -26
AGENDA ITEM
Proposed Roadway Projects in Anaheim
M. Ward commented that at the last PUB meeting, Board
Members asked for more information about roadway projects
being monitored through the City's roadway work coordination
and tracking database. M. Ward indicated that he included in
their packets a map referencing the projects that have been
entered into the database and are being coordinated by all City
departments, including Utilities.
M. Ward indicated that the project map is a snapshot, and that
the Iist of projects could change.
D. Morgan asked about the large generators that were
purchased for Canyon Power Project. M. Ward indicated that
two are on site and two are at the Utility Service Center.
9. UPDATE ON FINANCE ISSUES.
M. Edwards indicated that members of the finance staff and the
Mayor will be going to New York to make rating agency
presentations for the Canyon Power Plant Bonds.
10. UPDATE ON JOINT SERVICES ISSUES.
California Municipal Utilities Association Award
M. Long commented on the Award that Anaheim received from
the California Municipal Utilities Association (CMUA) for
accomplishments of the Energy Programs for the Green
Connection.
Taste of Anaheim
M. Long reported that the Utilities will have an information
booth at the Taste of Anaheim on May 13, 2010.
M. Long indicated that this would be her last Board meeting as
she was retiring and thanked the Board for their support for all
the programs indicating that she felt grateful to have worked in
Anaheim.
11. AGENDA ITEM(S) FOR THE NEXT MEETING ON
MAY 26, 2009.
• Water Supply Conditions Update
• Water Rate Public Hearing
• Underground Conversion Five -Year Plan*
• Schedule a Public Hearing Date for Public Health Goals
Report
• Recommendations for the Proposed 2010/2011 Budget*
• Landscape Guidelines Presentation
ACTION TAKEN
2010 -27
AGENDA ITEM
*Indicates item(s) will be forwarded to City Council for action
after presentation to the PUB.
12. ITEM(S) BY SECRETARY.
M. Edwards spoke about M. Long and her level of contribution
to the City of Anaheim. M. Edwards indicated that S. Scionino
would be the Acting AGM, Joint Services.
M. Edwards discussed the Neophyte Guide to the Changing
EIectric Utility Industry, which has been given to the Board
Members. M. Edwards indicated that this guide will provide a
global understanding of Electric Utility, and recommended it to
the Board members for their review.
M. Edwards introduced A. Nguyen, Utilities Analyst 1, who is
participating in the City Perspective Program.
13. ITEM(S) BY BOARD MEMBERS.
L. Cahill thanked M. Long for her hard work over the years and
expressed that she will be missed.
J. Machiaverna spoke about the article in the National
Geographic edition on Water, and that the article on California,
to the Groundwater Replenishment System Project. J.
Machiaverna also commented that M. Edwards and staff have
done a tremendous job on the AB 32 issues and is confident that
Anaheim will be able to handle it. J. Machiaverna expressed
that he will miss M. Long.
J. Brandman indicated that he would miss M. Long.
D. Morgan thanked M. Long for her contribution to Joint
Services.
K. Murray thanked M. Long and commented that it has been an
incredible honor to have worked with her. K. Murray added
that it is fun participating with J. Brandman at the Solar Flag
Dedications, and acknowledged Principal Finley from Orange
County Christian School.
L. Cahill requested a motion to adjourn the meeting.
ACTION TAKEN
14. ADJOURNMENT: (TO THE PUBLIC J. Brandman moved to adjourn the
HEARING/REGULAR MEETING DATE OF MAY 26, meeting at 7:30 p.m. to Regular
2010, AT 5 :00 P.M., IN THE 2 " FLOOR GORDON HOYT meeting/Public Hearing date of
2010 -28
AGENDA ITEM
CONFERENCE ROOM, ANAHEIM WEST TOWER, 201
S. ANAHEIM BLVD., ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA.)
Respectfully submitted,
�ftype��
Marcie L. Edwards
Secretary, Public Utilities Board
ACTION TAKEN
May 26, 2010 at 5:00 p.m. in the
2 Floor Gordon Hoyt
Conference Room of Anaheim
West Tower, 201 S. Anaheim
Blvd, Anaheim, California. K.
Murry seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED: 5 -0.
ABSTAINED: 0. ABSENT: 2
(C. Peltzer, P. Carroll).