96-095 RESOLUTION NO. 96R-95
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 1989-3 (THE SUMMIT)
ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1996/97.
WHEREAS, the voters of California on November 6, 1977,
added Article XIII B to the State Constitution placing various
limitations on the appropriations of the state and local
governments; and
WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the State Constitution
provides that the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1996/97 is
calculated by adjusting the 1995/96 fiscal appropriations limit
for changes in the cost of living and population except as
otherwise provided in said Article XIII B; and
WHEREAS, the information necessary for making these
adjustments is attached in Exhibits A through G; and
WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim has complied with all the
provisions of Article XIII B of the State Constitution in
determining the Community Facilities District No. 1989-3 (The
Summit) appropriations limit for fiscal year 1996/97.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that the Community Facilities District No.
1989-3 (The Summit) appropriations limit for fiscal year 1996/97
be established in the amount of $149,847,962.00.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Anaheim, by recorded vote of the City Council adopting
this resolution, hereby determines and selects that, with regard
to fiscal year 1996/97 and the calculations specified herein for
such fiscal year, the term "change in the cost of living" for
purposes of Section 8(e) (2) of Article XIII B of the Constitution
of the State of California shall mean the percentage change in
the California per capita personal income from the preceding
year.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Anaheim, by recorded vote of the City Council adopting
this resolution, hereby determines and chooses that, with regard
to fiscal year 1996/97 and the calculations specified herein for
such fiscal year, the term "change in population" for purposes of
Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California and
Division 9 of Article 1 of the Government Code of the State of
California shall mean the change in population within the city of
Anaheim.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit
herein established may be changed as deemed necessary by
resolution of the City Council.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this ilth day of
3une , 1996.
MAYOR OF THE M
ATTEST:
O019038.02/EEGAN/May 20, 1996 2
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 96R-95 was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of
the Anaheim City Council held on the 11th day of June, 1996, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS: Tait, Zemel, Felhaus, Lopez, Daly
NOES: MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: MAYOR/COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said Resolution
No. 96R-95 on the 11th day of June, 1996.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City
of Anaheim this 11th day of June, 1996.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
(SEAL)
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing
is the original of Resolution No. 96R-95 was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim on June 1 lth, 1996.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHE~-~
EXHIBIT A
1996/97 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1989-3 (THE SUMMIT)
CALCULATIONS & COMPARISON OF APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMIT
FY 1995/96 Adopted Appropriations Limit $142,322,580
Adjustment Factor 1.0529
FY 1996/97 Appropriations Limit $149,847,962
FY 1996/97 Appropriations Limit $149,847,962
FY 1996/97 Appropriations Subject To Limit 212,777
FY 1996/97 Appropriations Limit Margin $149,635,185
FY 1996/97 Appropriations Limit Margin. As a Percent of Limit 99.9%
EXHIBIT B
1996/97 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1989-3 (THE SUMMIT)
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
POPULATION - Selected Factor: City Populalion Growth
Population count provided by thc
State Finartec Department 293,245
Population percent change pursuant
to Sections 2227 and 2228 of the
Revenue and T~xation Code 0.59%
PRICE FACTOR - Selected Factor:
California Per Capita Personal 4.67%
Income Growth
POPULATION AND PPdCE FACTOR
CONVERTED TO AN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR
A) Population: Converted to a factor 1.0059
B) Price Factor: Converted to a factor 1.0467
Ratio of change: A x B = 1.0529
EXHIBIT C
1996/97 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1989-3 (THE SUMMIT)
APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMIT CALCULATION
Total All Revenues $1,067,200
Reduce by Non-Proceeds of Taxes 0 $1,067,200
Add User Fees in Excess of Costs 0 1,067,200
Add User Fees in Replacement of Taxes 0 1,067,200
Subtract Debt Setvice Appropriations 854,423 212,777
Total All Appropriations $1,067,200
Reduce by Non-Proceeds of T~x¢s 0 $1,067,200
Subtract Debt Service Appropriations 854,423 212,777
Appropriations Subject to Limit $212,777
EXHIBIT D
1996/97 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1989-3 (THE SUMMIT)
PROCEEDS OF TAXES CALCULATION
PROCEEDS NON-PROCEEDS
OF TAXES OF TAXES TOTAL
Taxes $1,067,200 0 $1,067,200
State Subventions 0 0 0
Service Charges 0 0 0
Permit Fees 0 0 0
Fines and Forfeitures 0 0 0
Rentals 0 0 0
Sales 0 0 0
Refunds and Reimbursements 0 0 0
Internal Service Charges 0 0 0
Federal and County Subventions 0 0 0
Contributions 0 0 0
Subtotal $1,067,200 $0 $1,067,200
Interest 0 0 0
To~al $1,067,200 $0 $1,067,200
EXHIBIT F
TEXT OI/ C;,ANN SI'F. NDIN(;-I.IMIT..\]'ION INI'I'I,\
LIMITATION OF GOVERNMI':NT APPROPRIATIONS. INITIATIVE CONSTITuTIONAl.
AMENDMENT. Establishes Had defines annroll appropri~tion limits on shire ~md Io(.~H
Covernmental entities based on annual appropriations {or p~ior fiscal year. ITequirux
adjustments [or eha~es in cost of living, ~pui~tion end other s~cified fueLors.
Appropriation limits may ~ established or tem~raPily changed by electorate. Xequire~
revenues received in excess oF appropriations ~rmitted by this measure to be returned by
revision o~ tax rates or rue schedules within two fiscal ye~rs next followinC year excess
created. With exeeptio~ provides for reimbuPsement o{ local governments top new
prorams or higher level of ~rviees mandated by state. Financial Impact:
lndeterminab~e.
ARTICLE Xlll B.
Sec. !. The total annual appropriations subjeer to limitation of the state and of each
local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity ot government
for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and [x~ulation excopt as
otherwise provided in this Article.
See. 2. Revenues received by any entity of government in excess of that amount
· which is appropriated by such entity in compliance with this Article during the fiscal year
rd~aU be returned by a revision of tax rates or fee schedules within the next two
subsequent fiscal years.
See. 3. The appropriations limit for any fiscal year pursuant to See. t shaJl be
adjusted as follows:
(a) In the event that the financial responsibility of providif~g services is
transferred, in whole or in part, whether by annexation, ineorporntion or otherwise, from
one entity of government to another, then for the year in which such transfer becomes
effective the appropriations limit of the transferee entity shall be increased by such
reasonable amount as the said entities shall mutually agree and the appropriations limit ot
the transferor entity shall be decreased by the same amount.
(b) In the event that the financial responsibility of providing s~rviees is
transferred, in whole or in part, from an entity of government to a private entity, or the
financial source for the provision of services is transferred, in whole or in part, from other
reven~e.~ of un entity o£ government, to regulatory licenses, user charges or user fees,
then for the year of such transfer the appropriations limit of such entity of government
shall be decreased accordingly.
(c) Io the event of an emergency, the appropriation limit may be exceeded
provided that the appropriation limits in tile following three years are reduced accordingly
to prevent u~ a~gre~ate increase in appropri~tion.~ resulting from the emergency.
Sec. 4. The appropriations Ihnit imposed on any new or existing entity o~
government by th~s Article may be established or cha~gedby the electors of such entity,
subject to a,~d in conformity with constitutio~d and statutory voting requirements. The
durutton of uny such ehunl~e shuU I)e us det~rmi~ed by said electors, hut shall in no event
exceed four years from the most recent vote of said electors ere.ting or continuing such
change.
1. o~
contrih[~tions are derived J'rom :he pro~'ecds of taxe.% shMll ~or p~rpo~es o~ thl~ Act,cle
~o~;'l[11[e appropclation5 5uhjec[ t() ~iiRi[~11i{,~, {i, I1~[ ye,ir o~ (:(mlrioH[lofl. Nc[th~:r
e,~n~tif.t~ appropriations su~,jec[ t~
Sec. G. Wheftever the Ec~isla[ure nr a~y ~l~te a~ency mandates a new program or
h~[her level of service on un~' local [0vernmenl, [he st,&te sh~II provide ~ suhventio~
[[mds to reimburse such local ~ovcrnment f~r ti~ costs o~ such procrum or increased level
(,~ serv[~e, except that the [~luture ,~eV, b~i need not, prr, vtde st~eh ~ubvention
~un~ (or the ~ollowi~' mandate:~:
(u) be~islutive man.ares ~equc~ted by the local e[enc~ ~ffeeted;
(b) 'CeEisl~[ion definin[ a new crime o~ ehan~io[ an exist;n[ de~iniLinn of
crime; or
(c) J.e~isl.tive m~n~.tes enMcted prior Io January I, I975, or execu[ivc orders
or reKul.tions initinlly ifnplementi;~ legislation enacted prior [o January I,
~e. 1. Nothin~ in this Article shall be co~trued to im~i~ the ab[iIity o~ the state
o~ o~ mty local [overnment to meet its obli~atio~ with res~ct to ex~tin~ o~ ~utufe
bonded in~btedne~.
Sec. 8. As .~d in this Article and except us otherwi~ ex~re~ly p~ovided
(e) "A~r~riatio~ subject to hmitation" of the state s~!l mean any
authorization to ex~nd duH~ a [ise61 year the proeee~ of taxes levied by or ~o~ ~
state, exeh~sive of state subventio~ ~e~ the ~e a~ ~ation of toeat [ove~nment (other
than subven[im~ t,mde ~umua~t to ~etion G of this A~tiele) and further exet~ive
re~un~ o~ taxes, ~nefit payments from retirement, unemployment i~u~a~e and
disability ir~u~anee ~un~;
(b) "~ppropriatio~ subject to limitation" of an entity of local Kove~nment
shal; mean any authorization to ex~nd durinK a fiscal year the p~oeee~ of taxes levied by
or for that entity un~ the p~oeee~ of state subven[io~ to that entity (othe~ than
subventio~ made pursuant to ~ction 6 of this Article) exclusive of refunds of taxes;
(e) "Proeee~ o~ taxes" shall include, bu[ no[ be restricted to, all tax revenues
end the proeee~ to an entity of [ove~nment, fcom (i) re[uleto~y liee~es, ~e~ char[es,
and use~ fees to the ex[e~tt [hut such p~oeee~ exeee~ the costs reasonably ~rne by such
e.tlty i. p~ovidin~ the r~ulatio~, product, o~ ~vice, and (ii) the investment o(
revenues. ~ith re~et to any local ~ove~nment, "proeee~ o~ taxes" shall inelu,le
~bvef~ttn.~ received from [he ~[ute, other [hun pur~,m;H to ~etion 6 of this Article,
with re.peet to the state, p~ee~ of LaXRS shall exclude such ~ubve~tions;
~:1) "l~eul ~w~rmne~[" sh~11 me,~n a~y eity,.eounty, c~y and courtly, sch~l
district, s[mc~ul dis[riot, ~uth~rity, or oiltar pohtie~t suhd~visio~ of or within the stute;
(~'} "Co~[ ~)[ Iivt~tK" ~ltull mc.n lhe L~o~sumer Price Index for the United States
aS reportc~l ~,v I1,~' U~HcH Si~He~ I)el~rimc~[ ~ Labor, or suc,:essur uKe"cy of the b~ited
~[u[es (;ovcr~.c~H; provi, leC, however, Ih~t for purposes of ~ctiol~ 1, ~l~c ch~nge it, cost
of I~vi~g fr,,m the preceding yeur ~h~11 ill IIo ~vcllt ex~teed ~l~e ehm~ge in California ~r
2o[ 3
dally attendale(:(: as determ~ed by a ~,~(:thod pr~.'~crihcd hy th,~ I.~t~sluture;
(~) "l)~bt setwee" slmll mca~ uf~pcopr~t,on~ re~u~r(~d to pay th~ co~t of
interest and redemption ehar~e~, includi~ the funding of uny reserve or sinkln~ fund
required in connection therewith, on indebtedness existing oc legally authorized as of
January I, 1979 or on ~nded indebtedness thereufter approved according to law by a vote
of the electors of the issuin~ entity votin[ in un election for such pur~se,
(h) The "appropriations limit" of each entity o~ government for each fiscal
year shall be that amount which total annual appropriations subject to limitation may not
exceed under ~ction t and Section 3; provided, Imwever, that the "appropriations limit"
of each entity of government for fiscal year ~978-T9 shall ~ the total of the
appropriatio~ subject to limitation of such entity for that fiscal year. For fiscal year
1978-79, state subventio~ to local governments, exclusive o[ federal grants, shaU be
deemed to have ~en ~rived from the proeee~ o[ state taxes.
(i) Except as otherwise provided in Section 5, "'appr~riatio~ subject to
limitation" shall not inelu~ local agency loan fun~ or indebtedne~ fun~, inv~tment (or
authori~atio~ to invest) fun~ of the state, or o~ an entity of l~al ~overnment in
accounts at bm~s or ~vinKs and loan as~eiatio~ or in liquid ~eurities.
Sec. 9. "Appropriatio~ subject to limitation" for each entity of government shall
~t inetu~:
(a) Debt service.
(b) Ai,pr~riatio~ required for pur~ses of eomplyi~ with mandates of the
eourt~ or the federal ~overnment which, without discretion, require an ex~nditure for
additional ~ervices or which unavoidably make the providi~ of existi~ ~rvices more
costly.
(e) Appreciations of any special district which existed on January t, t978,
and which did not as of the 1~77-?8 fiscal year levy an ad valorem tax on pro~rty in
excess of 12~ e~nts ~r $100 of as~ed value; or the appropriatio~ of any s~cial
district theu existin~ or thereafter created by a vote of the ~le, which ~ totally funded
by other thun the procee~ of taxes.
Sec. tO. 'l'hi~ Article ~hull be (,~fective ~ommc~emg with the first ~y of the fiscal
yeur following it5
Sec. II. I[ uny ~p~)copriution celerity ~hell be added to or re~noved ~rom
uppro{)riuli(~L~ 5uhje~t t~) li~n~t4Hion, pur~uultt to final judgment o[any court of competent
jurisd~<.l~(m ~d ~lty up[~H theta[corn, the ~[~prop¥~atio~s limit 5hull he adjusted
accordingly. If ~y s~uth)n, i)~r[, ~l.use or phrase in thi~ Artiule i~ for any c~uson held
invuhd or u~n~tst Hutlug.H, the remui~in~ ~rt~o~ts of thi~ Article sh~HI ~ot be a[~ected but
~h:HI rc~uht i~ full fnrue ~nd effect.
3of 3
EXHIBIT G
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
915 L STREET
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814~998
May I, 1996
PRICE AND POPULATION DATA FOR LOCAL JURISDICTIONS
Appropriations Limit
Article XIII B of the California Constitution specifies that app[opriations made by State and local
governments may increase annually by a factor comprised of the change in population combined with
either the change in California per capita personal income or the change in the local assessment roll due
to local nonresidential construction.
The Department of Finance is mandated to provide the populatiofi and California per capita personal
income change data for local jurisdictions to calculate their appropriation limits. The change in the
local assessment roll due to local nonresidentiai construction may be obtained from your county
Assessor. The enclosures contain price and population factors for setting your 1996-97 appropriation
limit.
Enclosure I provides the change in Califomia's per capita personal income price factor. An example of
how to utilize this price factor and the population percentage change factor in calculating your 1996-97
limit is included.
Enclosure II provides the population percentage change factors for cities and counties.
Enclosure IIA provides the population pementage change factor for counties and for the total
incorporated population of each county.
These population percentage changes were prepared pursuant to Sections 2227 and 2228 of the
Revenue and Taxation Code and are calculated as of January I, 1996. Section 2227 specifies that state
mental institutions, federal military bases and state and federal prisons be excluded from the percentage
change calculations.
Population Factors for Cities and Counties
The Demographic Research Unit has adopted a new method of estimating population for the cities and
counties. This new method was used for the numbers presented here. The effect is to lower population
for the State and most jurisdictions. The new method was used to revise city and county numbers for
earlier years in the 1990s. The revisions are available on request.
Cities and counties should consult Section 7901 of the Government Code for the various population
factors that may be used for purposes of change in population.
1 of 5
EXHIBIT G
Enclosure I
A. Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies thin local jurisdictions select their
cost-of-living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote o.f their
governing body. Local jurisdictions may select either the percentage ch~mge in
Califomia per capita personal income or the percentage change in the local
assessment roll due to [he addition of local nonresidential new construction. If the
percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage changes
to be used in setting the 1996-97 appropriation limit are:
Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Percentage change
~ Year (FY) over prior year
1996-97 5.21
B. Following is an example using sample population changes and the changes in
California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 1996-97
appropriations limit.*
1996-97:
Per Capita Change = 5.21 percent
Population Change = 1.06 p~rcent
Per Capita converted to a ratio: 5.21 + 100 = 1.0521
100
Population converted to a ratio: 1.06 + I00 = 1.0106
100
Calculationof factor forFY96-97: 1.0521 x 1.0106:1.0633
Conversion of the factor to a ratio eliminates minus numbers.
2 of 5
EXHIBIT G
ENCLOSURE II
ANNUAL PERCENTAGE CHANGE IN POPULATION MINUS EXCLUSIONSm JANUARY I, 1995 DATE PRINTED
TO JANUARY 1, 1996 AND TOTAL POPULATION JANUARY I, 1996. 04/30/96
POPULATION MINUS EXCLUSIONS
~ POPULATION
~NNUAL TOTAL
COUNTY PERCENT CHANGE POPULATION
CiTY 1995 TO 1996 1-I-95 1-1-96 1-1-96
ORANGE
ANAHEIM 0.59 291,536 293,245 293,245
BREA 0.80 34,527 34,802 34,802
BUENA PARK O.11 72,617 72,700 72,700
COSTA MESA O.11 101,155 101,269 102,O84
CYPRESS 0.50 46,167 46,397 46,397
DANA POINT 0.85 35,679 35,984 35,984
FOUNTAIN VALLEY o.13 54,239 54,311 54,311
FULLERTON 0.35 121,630 122.O59 122,O59
GARDEN GROVE 0.09 151,247 151,376 151,376
HUNTINGTON BEACH 0.32 186,587 187,180 187,180
IRVINE 4.45 120,474 125,836 127,220
LAGUNA BEACH 0.89 23,581 23,790 23,790
LAGUNA HILLS 0.32 24,940 25,O21 25,O21
LAGUNA NIGUEL 1.43 54,778 55,561 55,561
LA NABRA 0.25 53,980 54,117 54,1t7
LAKE FOREST O.10 57,571 57,631 57,631
LA PALMA -O.O6 15,513 15,504 15,504
LOS ALAMITOS 0.75 11,422 11,508 12,307
MISSION VIEJO 1.79 88,323 89,906 89,906
NEWPORT BEACH 0.22 68,920 69,O69 69,O69
ORANGE 1.39 118,105 119,742 119,742
PLACENTIA 0.96 44.575 45,003 45,003
SAN CLEMENTE 1.38 45,972 46,607 46,607
SAN JUAN CAPISTRANO 1.11 28,629 28,948 28,948
SANTA ANA -O.17 306,327 305,800 305.800
SEAL BEACH 0.09 25,646 25,668 26,366
STANTON 0.07 31,861 31.882 31.882
TUSTIN 3.73 56,821 58,940 63,619
VILLA PARK 0.46 6,336 6,365 6,365
WESTMINSTER 0.80 81,879 82,536 82,536
YORBA LINDA 0.96 57.084 57,632 57,632
UNINCORPORATED 5.40 165,624 174.,570 179,571
ORANGE COUNTY
1.05 2,583,745 2,610,959 2,624,335
* EXCLUSIONS INCLUDE STATE MENTAL INSTITUTIONS, FEDERAL MILITARY BASES AND STATE
AND FEDERAL PRISONS.
PAGE 1
3 of 5
STATE OF CALIFORNIA EXHIBIT G PETEWILSON, Governor
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE ~.~
915 L STREET
SACRAMENTO, CA 95814-3706
May 13, 1996
REVISED APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT DATA FOR LOCAL JURISDICTIONS
This letter is to inform you that the Department of Finance has corrected the Price Factor,
that is, the percentage change in per capita personal income, to be used in setting the
1996 - 1997 appropriation limit.
The revised Price Factor is lower than the Price Factor given in Enclosure I of the letter,
Price and Population Data for Local Jurisdictions sent to you on May 1, 1996.
The old Price Factor was 5.21 percent. The new Price Factor is 4.67 percent.
We have revised Enclosure I to reflect the new Price Factor and to show how the new price
factor and population factor are used in computing an appropriations limit.
We apologize for any inconvenience this revision causes. But we do ask that you notify any
affected offices within your jurisdiction of this revision.
If you have any questions, please call us at (916) 323-4086.
Sincerely,
Linda Gage, Chief
Demographic Research Unit
915 k Street, 8th Floor
Sacrameoto, CA 95814
4 of 5
EXHIBIT G
May 13, 1996 Revised
Enclosure I
A. Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their
cost-of-living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their
governing body. Local jmisdictions may select either the percentage change in
California per capita personal income or the percentage change in the local
assessment roll due to the addition of local nonresidential new construction. If the
percentage change in per capita personal income is selected, the percentage changes
to be used in setting the 1996-97 appropriation limit are:
Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Percentage change
Year (FY') over prior year
1996-97 4.67
B. Following is an example using sample population changes and the changes in
California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 1996-97
appropriations limit.*
1996-97:
Per Capita Change = 4.67 percent
Population Change = 1.58 percent
Per Capita converted to a ratio: 4.67 + 100 = 1.0467
100
Population converted to a ratio: 1.58 + 100 = 1.0158
100
Calculation of factor for FY 96-97: 1.0467 x 1.0158 = 1.0632
* Conversioa of the factor to a ratio eliminates minus nuinbers.
5 of 5