The URL can be used to link to this page

PC 2011/07/06City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Wednesday,July 6, 2011 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California Chairman: Stephen Faessel Chairman Pro-Tempore: Peter Agarwal Commissioners: Todd Ament, Joseph Karaki, Harry Persaud Victoria Ramirez, John Seymour Call To Order -5:00 p.m. Pledge Of Allegiance Public Comments Consent Calendar Public Hearing Items Commission Updates Discussion Adjournment For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary. A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planningonFriday,July 1, 2011, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regardingany item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the Planning Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, during regular business hours. You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following planningcommission@anaheim.net e-mail address: APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, 10calendar days Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. AnaheimPlanning Commission Agenda -5:00 P.M. Public Comments: This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. 07/06/11 Page 2of 9 Public Hearina Items ITEM NO. 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2010 -05537 Request for Withdrawal VARIANCE NO. 2011 -04843 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2010 -00074 (DEV2010- 00177) Location: 1168 South State College Boulevard The applicant proposes to establish a nightclub in an Project Planner: existing commercial building, to include a Type 48 (Public David See Premise) ABC license, sale and consumption of alcoholic dseeaanaheim.net beverages, public dancing, cover charge, and live entertainment with less parking than required by Code. Environmental Determination: The proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 1 (Existing Facilities). Continued from the January 19, January 31, February 28, March 28, April 11, May 9, and June 6, 2011 Planning Commission meetings. ITEM NO. 3 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2011 -00078 Resolution No. _ (DEV2011- 00053) Location: 720 West La Palma Avenue The applicant proposes to upgrade an existing Alcohol Project Planner: Beverage Control license from a Type 20 license (allowing Scott Koehm the sale of beer and wine for off - premises consumption) to a skoehm(cDanaheim.net Type 21 license (allowing the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for off - premises consumption) for an existing market (Northgate Market). Environmental Determination: The proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 1 (Existing Facilities). 07/06/11 Page 3 of 9 ITEM NO. 4 PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2011 -00079 Resolution No. _ (DEV2011- 00054) Location: 929 South Euclid Street The applicant proposes to upgrade an existing Alcohol Project Planner: Beverage Control license from a Type 20 license (allowing Della Herrick the sale of beer and wine for off - premises consumption) to a dherrick(a-)anaheim.net Type 21 license (allowing the sale of beer, wine and distilled spirits for off - premises consumption) for an existing market (Northgate Market). Environmental Determination: The proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 1 (Existing Facilities). ITEM NO. 5 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2011 -05564 Resolution No. VARIANCE NO. 2011 -04857 (DEV2011- 00061) Location: 1012 North Tustin Avenue The applicant proposes to establish a dance studio with Project Planner: fewer parking spaces than required by code. Vanessa Norwood morwood(cr�.anaheim. net Environmental Determination: The proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 1 (Existing Facilities). 07/06/11 Page 4 of 9 ITEM NO. 6 VARIANCE NO. 2011 -04855 Resolution No. _ (DEV2011- 00049) Location: 2657 -2717 West Lincoln Avenue The applicant proposes to modify two legal nonconforming Project Planner: pole- mounted freestanding signs in conjunction with a Scott Koehm facade remodel and coordinated sign program for an skoehm(clanaheim.net existing commercial retail center. Environmental Determination: The proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 11 (Accessory Structures). ITEM NO. 7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003- 04817A Resolution No. VARIANCE NO. 2011 -04859 (DEV2011- 00034) Location: 1500 South Anaheim Boulevard 1620 South Anaheim Boulevard The applicant proposes to amend a previously- approved Project Planner: conditional use permit to expand an existing indoor sports David See complex, permit the sale of beer and wine for on -site dsee(CDanaheim.net consumption within a restaurant, and use an off -site parking lot on a vacant Southern California Edison (SCE) property with less parking lot landscaping than required by Code (American Sports Centers). Environmental Determination: The proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 1 (Existing Facilities). 07/06/11 Page 5 of 9 ITEM NO. 8 GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2010 -00481 SPECIFIC PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2010 -00061 DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENT NO. 99 -01C CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4078E FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2006- 00002A (DEV2010- 00166) Location: 321 West Katella Avenue The applicant proposes amendments to the Anaheim General Plan, Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92 -1 (SP 92 -1), Development Agreement No. 99 -01, Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 and Final Site Plan 2006 -00002 related to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay, to modify the total amount of retail, dining and entertainment uses by reducing the permitted amount of retail; increasing the permitted amount of dining, including permitting an outdoor restaurant in an area currently used for pedestrian circulation /food court common area; and, increasing the permitted amount of entertainment uses. In addition, the proposed amendments would reduce the size of the bus terminal /facility and include a waiver of the minimum number of parking spaces. The proposed amendments only pertain to the bus terminal /facility and the retail, dining and entertainment uses permitted within Development Area A of the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay; no modifications are proposed for the hotels and hotel accessory uses permitted within Development Area A or the or the retail, dining and entertainment uses, hotels, hotel accessory uses or parking permitted within Development Area B. Environmental Determination: Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study /Mitigated Negative Declaration Anaheim GardenWalk Project. Resolution No. Resolution No. Resolution No. Resolution No. Resolution No. Project Planner: Susan Kim skim(o1anaheim.net 07/06/11 Page 6 of 9 ITEM NO. 9 APPEAL OF AN ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4153 (DEV2011- 00033) Location: 1855 and 1915 South Manchester Avenue 1929 - 1937 South Manchester Avenue Request to consider an appeal of a Planning Director decision approving an Administrative Amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 4153, relating to the proposed reconfiguration of parking and vehicular circulation areas for two hotels located at 1855 South Manchester Avenue and 1915 South Manchester Avenue. Note: Parking lot reconfiguration includes establishment of parking spaces on contiguous properties located at 1929 — 1937 South Manchester Avenue. Environmental Determination: The proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 32 (Infill Development). Motion Project Planner: Linda Johnson liohnson(o1 anaheim. net Adjourn to Monday, July 18, 2011 at 4:00 p.m. 07/06/11 Page 7 of 9 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copyof this agenda was posted at: 4:30 p.m.June 30, 2011_ (TIME)(DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearingsaccessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada. 07/06/11 Page 8of 9 S C H E D U L E 2011 July 18 August 1 August 15 August 29 September 12 September 26 October 10 October 24 November 7 November 21 December 5 December 19 07/06/11 Page 9of 9 ûèèûùôï÷îèîí êé éöê êé êé êé êé êé êé êé éöêéöêéöê éöêéöê éöê éöê êé éöê êé éöê êé êé êé êé êé êé éöê éöê éöêéöê éöê éöê êï êï êïêï êï ûìèé öíçêìð÷ä öíçêìð÷äöíçêìð÷ä öíçêìð÷ä øç êï éçùûéûûðïíîèåííøé ùõ ûìèé ê÷èûóð øç êï êï ùõ ûìèé ùõ öíçêìð÷ä úçéóî÷éé øç ø÷æ ùíðð÷õ÷ ê÷éèûçêûîè ó ó ê÷èûóð ûçèí ó èêçùñ ê÷èûóð ìûêèé ùõ ê÷èûóð ó ùõ é÷êæóù÷ é÷êæóù÷ éèûèóíî éèûèóíî ó ùõ ó é÷êæóù÷ é÷êæóù÷ èóð÷ éèûèóíî éèûèóíî éèíê÷ ùõ ê÷éèûçêûîè êï åûè÷êêóøõ÷ ó ûìûêèï÷îèé ù÷îè÷êìíóîè ó øç úçéóî÷ééìûêñ ùõ èóð÷éèíê÷ ê÷èûóð û×ÊÓÛÐìÔÍÈÍ ûÌÊÓÐ ûìî éÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ø÷æ éÍÇÈÔéÈÛÈ×ùÍÐÐ×Õ×úÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ ûèèûùôï÷îèîí û×ÊÓÛÐìÔÍÈÍ ïÛÃ ûìî éÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ø÷æ éÍÇÈÔéÈÛÈ×ùÍÐÐ×Õ×úÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò î City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ûèèûùôï÷îèîí êï è ûìûêèï÷îèé ùóèãíööçðð÷êèíî øç åûè÷êå÷ððéìçïìóîõìðûîè êïïôì ïôì ùõ ùõ øç ùõ ûîûô÷óïõûêø÷îé ùóèãíööçðð÷êèíî êï ðûìûðïû ê÷èóê÷ï÷îè åûè÷êå÷ððé ûîûô÷óï ïíè÷ð ùûê÷ù÷îè÷ê ìçïìóîõìðûîè ûìèé øç û×ÊÓÛÐìÔÍÈÍ ïÛÃ ûìî éÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ø÷æ å×ÉÈðÛìÛÐÏÛûÆ×ÎÇ× ûèèûùôï÷îèîí û×ÊÓÛÐìÔÍÈÍ ïÛÃ ûìî éÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ø÷æ å×ÉÈðÛìÛÐÏÛûÆ×ÎÇ× [DRAFT]ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PC2011-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT A CLASS 1 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION IS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ANDAPPROVING PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITYNO. 2011-00078 FOR A TYPE 21,OFF-SALE OF ALCHOLIC BEVERAGE GENERAL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE (DEV2011-00053) (720WEST LA PALMA AVENUE) WHEREAS, on July 11, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95R-134 establishing procedures and delegating certain responsibilities to the Planning Commission relating to the determination of "public convenience or necessity" on those certain applications requiring that such determination be made by the local governing body pursuant to applicable provisions of the Business and Professions Code, and prior to the issuance of a license by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC); and WHEREAS, Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code provides that the ABC shall deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law enforcement problem, or if issuance would result in or add to an undue concentration of licenses, except when an applicant has demonstrated that public convenience or necessity would be served by the issuance of a license; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive an application for a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit the sales of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption in conjunction with a grocery store for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,shown on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim onJuly 6,2011, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by lawand in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed determination of public convenience or necessity for an alcoholic beverage control license and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itselfand in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1.That the C-G(General Commercial) zone permits the sales of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption in conjunction with agrocery market over 15,000 square feet, pursuant to Sections18.08.030 (Primary Uses, Commercial Zones),of the Anaheim Municipal Code. The proposed sales of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the sale of alcoholic beverages represents a minor component of the store’s overall sales and the sale of alcoholic beverages is tightly controlled by the store operator. -1-PC2011-*** 2.That California state law requires a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity when property is located in a reporting district with a high crime area,and that Section 23958 of the Business andProfessions Code provides that the ABC shall deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law enforcement problem or if issuance would result in, or add to, an undue concentration of licenses, except when an applicant has demonstrated that public convenience or necessity would be served by issuance of a license. 3.That Resolution No. 95R-134 authorizes the City of Anaheim Police Department to make recommendations related to the public convenience or necessity determinations; and said recommendations shall take the form of conditions of approval to be imposed on the determination in order to ensure that the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages does not adversely affect any adjoining land use or the growth and development of the surrounding area. 4.That subject property is located within Census Tract 866.02with a population that allowsfouroff-premises sales licenses and there are currently eightoff-premises sales licensesin the tract. The existing Type 20 ABC license would be upgraded to a Type 21 license so the number will not change.Police Department staff indicates that this site is located within Police Reporting District 1524which has a crime rate that is 213% above the citywide average. Although the area has an above-average crime rate, the Police Department does not feel that the upgrade of the license will be a detriment to the surrounding neighborhooddue to the nature of reported crimes in the area. 5.That the traffic generated by the grocery market with off-premises alcoholic sales will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. 6.That the Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity can be made based on the finding that the upgraded license requested is consistent with the Planning Commission’s previous approvals for such determinationsand further that granting the Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the sale of alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the store and would serve as an added convenience to residents and visitors to the areawho choose to shop at this establishment. The Police Department indicates no specific concerns related to off-premises alcoholic beverage sales and operation of this business, subject to the recommended conditions of approval. WHEREAS, the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Section 15303, Class 1 (Existing Facilities) as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby determine that the public convenience or necessity will be served by the issuance of a license for the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption at this location subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference which are found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health,safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. -2-PC2011-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED this permit is approved without limitations on the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment of Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City- Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the findings hereinabove set forth. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby approve the Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2011-00078subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting ofJuly 6, 2011. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -3-PC2011-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Grace Medina,Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission heldonJuly 6, 2011,by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: th IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6day of July2011. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -4-PC2011-*** -5-PC2011-*** EXHIBIT “B” PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2011-00078 (DEV2011-00053) REVIEW SIGNED BYOFF BY NO.CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL 1There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind Police or type, including advertising directed to the exterior Department from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to the exterior shall constitute a violation of this condition. No display of alcoholic shall be located outside of a 2 Police building or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to Department the building. The area of alcoholic displays shall not exceed 25% of 3 Police the total display area in a building. Department Sale of alcoholic shall be made to customers only when 4 Police the customer is in the building. Department The gross sales of alcoholic beverages shall not exceed 5 Police 35 percent of all retail sales during any three (3) month Department period.The applicant shall maintain records on a quarterly basis indicating the separate amounts of sales of alcoholic beverages and other items.These records shall be made available for inspection by any City of Anaheim official when requested. The sale of beer or malt beverages in quantities of quarts, 6 Police 22 oz., 32 oz., 40 oz., or similar size containers is Department prohibited. No beer ormalt beverages shall be sold in quantities of less than six per saleor other pre-packaged offering of an equivalent volume. All distilled spirits shall be displayed in a locked cabinet 7 Police accessible only to the on-duty manager or assistant Department manager. The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers 8 Police and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are Department prohibited on or around these premises. Wine shall not be sold in bottles or containers smaller 9 Police than 750 ml and nowine-coolers and beer-coolersshall Department be sold in quantities of less than four per sale or equivalent volume in manufacturer prepackaged multi- unit quantities. -6-PC2011-*** Anygraffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on 10 Police any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall Department be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Petitioner(s) shall police the area under their control in an 11 Police effort to prevent the loitering of persons around the Department premises. The parking lot of the premises shall be equipped with 12 Police lighting of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily Department discernible the appearance and conduct of all person on or about the parking lot. Additionally, the position of such lighting shall not disturb the normal privacy and use of any neighboring residences. 13The subject property shall be developed substantially in Planning accordance with plans submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 (Site Plan) and 2 (Floor Plans) and as conditioned herein. -7-PC2011-*** ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò í ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò ë City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ûèèûùôï÷îèîí ùõ ê÷èûóð éóîõð÷öûïóðãê÷éóø÷îù÷ êï ûìèé ùõ øç êé êé ê÷èûóð éóîõð÷öûïóðãê÷éóø÷îù÷ éóîõð÷öûïóðãê÷éóø÷îù÷ êï ùõ êé öíçêìð÷ä ê÷èûóð êé éóîõð÷öûïóðãê÷éóø÷îù÷ éóîõð÷öûïóðãê÷éóø÷îù÷ À À êï ûìèé êé êé øç éóîõð÷öûïóðãê÷éóø÷îù÷ éóîõð÷öûïóðãê÷éóø÷îù÷ êé êï éóîõð÷öûïóðãê÷éóø÷îù÷ ûìèé øç ùõ éôíììóîõù÷îè÷ê êï êé êï ùõ ûìèé éóîõð÷öûïóðãê÷éóø÷îù÷ ûìèé ø÷æ øç øç ê÷èûóð êï êé ûìèé ùõ éóîõð÷öûïóðãê÷éóø÷îù÷ øç êï éôíììóîõù÷îè÷ê ûìèé øç êï êï êï êï ûìèé òçîíùíçêè ûìèé ûìèé øç øç øç øç êï ûìèé ùõ ùõ êï øç ê÷èûóð êï êï êï éôíììóîõù÷îè÷ê ûìèé êï öíçêìð÷äûìèé ûìèé øç ûìèé øç øç øç èêï ùõ ùõ ùõ éöêûìûêèï÷îèé êï ê÷èûóð ê÷èûóð ï÷øóùûð øç êï ûìèé íööóù÷é ûìûêèï÷îèé øç øç êï ùõ ìûðïóððû ê÷èûóð ûìûêèï÷îèé øç û×ÊÓÛÐìÔÍÈÍ ïÛÃ ûìî éÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ø÷æ éÍÇÈÔ÷ÇÙÐÓØéÈÊ××È ûèèûùôï÷îèîí û×ÊÓÛÐìÔÍÈÍ ïÛÃ ûìî éÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ø÷æ éÍÇÈÔ÷ÇÙÐÓØéÈÊ××È [DRAFT]ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PC2011-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT A CLASS 1 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION IS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ANDAPPROVING PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITYNO. 2011-00079 FOR A TYPE 21,OFF-SALE OF ALCHOLIC BEVERAGE GENERAL ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE (DEV2011-00054) (929 SOUTH EUCLID STREET) WHEREAS, on July 11, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95R-134 establishing procedures and delegating certain responsibilities to the Planning Commission relating to the determination of "public convenience or necessity" on those certain applications requiring that such determination be made by the local governing body pursuant to applicable provisions of the Business and Professions Code, and prior to the issuance of a license by the Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC); and WHEREAS, Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code provides that the ABC shall deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law enforcement problem, or if issuance would result in or add to an undue concentration of licenses, except when an applicant has demonstrated that public convenience or necessity would be served by the issuance of a license; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did receive an application for a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to permit the sales of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption in conjunction with a grocery store for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,shown on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim onJuly 6,2011, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by lawand in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed determination of public convenience or necessity for an alcoholic beverage control license and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itselfand in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1.That the C-G(General Commercial) zone permits the sales of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption in conjunction with agrocery market over 15,000 square feet, pursuant to Sections18.08.030 (Primary Uses, Commercial Zones),of the Anaheim Municipal Code. The proposed sales of alcoholic beverages for off-site consumption will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be locatedbecause the sale of alcoholic beverages represents a minor component of the store’s overall sales and the sale of alcoholic beverages is tightly controlled by the store operator.. -1-PC2011-*** 2.That California state law requires a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity when property is located in a reporting district with a high crime area,and that Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code provides that the ABC shall deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law enforcement problem or if issuance would result in, or add to, an undue concentration of licenses, except when an applicant has demonstrated that public convenience or necessity would be served by issuance of a license. 3.That Resolution No. 95R-134 authorizes the City of Anaheim Police Department to make recommendations related to the public convenience or necessity determinations; and said recommendations shall take the form of conditions of approval to be imposed on the determination in order to ensure that the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages does not adversely affect any adjoining land use or the growth and development of the surrounding area. 4.That subject property is located within Census Tract 871.03with a population that allowsnine off-premises sales licenses and there are currently nine off-premises sales license in the tract. The existing Type 20 ABC license would be upgraded to a Type 21 license so the number will not change..Police Department staff indicates that this site is located within Police Reporting District 1821which has a crime rate that is 171% above the citywide average. Although the area has an above-average crimerate, the Police Department does not feel that the upgrade of the license will be a detriment to the surrounding neighborhooddue to the nature of reported crimes in the area. 5.That the traffic generated by the grocery market with off-premises alcoholic sales will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. 6.That the Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity can be made based on the finding that the upgraded license requested is consistent with the Planning Commission’s previous approvals for such determinationsand further that granting the Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the sale of alcoholic beverages is ancillary to the store and would serve as an added convenience to residents and visitors to the areawho choose to shop at this establishment. The Police Department indicates no specific concerns related to off-premises alcoholic beverage sales and operation of this business, subject to conditions of approval. WHEREAS, the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Section 15303, Class 1 (Existing Facilities) as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby determine that the public convenience or necessity will be served by the issuance of a license for the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption at this location subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference which are found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health,safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. -2-PC2011-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED this permit is approved without limitations on the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment of Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City- Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption ofthis Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the findings hereinabove set forth. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days ofthe issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby approve the Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2011-00077subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting ofJuly 6, 2011. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -3-PC2011-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Grace Medina,Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission heldonJuly 6, 2011,by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: h IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6day of July2011. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -4-PC2011-*** -5-PC2011-*** EXHIBIT “B” PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2011-00079 (DEV2011-00054) REVIEW SIGNED BYOFF BY NO.CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL GENERAL 1There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind Police or type, including advertising directed to the exterior Department from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior displays of alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to the exterior shall constitute a violation of this condition. No display of alcoholic shall be located outside of a 2 Police building or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to Department the building. The area of alcoholic displays shall not exceed 25% of 3 Police the total display area in a building. Department Sale of alcoholic shall be made to customers only when 4 Police the customer is in the building. Department The gross sales of alcoholic beverages shall not exceed 5 Police 35 percent of all retail sales during any three (3) month Department period.The applicant shall maintain records on a quarterly basis indicating the separate amounts of sales of alcoholic beverages and other items.These records shall be made available for inspection by any City of Anaheim official when requested. The sale of beer or malt beverages in quantities of quarts, 6 Police 22 oz., 32 oz., 40 oz., or similar size containers is Department prohibited.No beer or malt beverages shall be sold in quantities of less than six per sale or other pre-packaged offering of an equivalent volume. All distilled spirits shall be displayed in a locked cabinet 7 Police accessible only to the on-duty manager or assistant Department manager. The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers 8 Police and the consumption of alcoholic beverages are Department prohibited on or around these premises. Wine shall not be sold in bottles or containers smaller 9 Police than 750 ml and no wine-coolers and beer-coolers shall Department be sold in quantities of less than four per sale or equivalent volume in manufacturer prepackaged multi- unit quantities. -6-PC2011-*** Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on 10 Police any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall Department be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Petitioner(s) shall police the area under their control in an 11 Police effort to prevent the loitering of persons around the Department premises. The parking lot of the premises shall be equipped with 12 Police lighting of sufficientpower to illuminate and make easily Department discernible the appearance and conduct of all person on or about the parking lot. Additionally, the position of such lighting shall not disturb the normal privacy and use of any neighboring residences. 13The subject property shall be developed substantially in Planning accordance with plans submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 (Site Plan) and 2 (Floor Plans) and as conditioned herein. -7-PC2011-*** ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò í ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò ì ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò ë ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò ê ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò é City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ûèèûùôï÷îèîí øû éì ï÷èêíðóîñûîûô÷óï éì øû ùûîãíîéèûèóíî øû íööóù÷é éì ìûùóöóù øû ù÷îè÷ê íùöùø éì éì øû øû éì ìûùóöóù íööóù÷é øû ù÷îè÷ê ìûùóöóù ù÷îè÷ê éì øû ìûùóöóù éì ù÷îè÷ê éì øû øû ìûùóöóù ø÷æ ù÷îè÷ê íööóù÷é éì øû éì ìûùóöóù øû ù÷îè÷ê íùöùø éì øû ìûùóöóù ù÷îè÷ê éì øû ÷äè÷îø÷ø éèûã ûï÷êóùû éì øû íùöùø û×ÊÓÛÐìÔÍÈÍ ûððìêíì÷êèó÷éûê÷óîèô÷ûðìôûîíêèô÷ûéèûê÷ûê÷ø÷æ÷ðíìï÷îèûê÷û ïÛÃ ûìî éÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ø÷æ îÍÊÈÔèÇÉÈÓÎûÆ×ÎÇ× ûèèûùôï÷îèîí û×ÊÓÛÐìÔÍÈÍ ûððìêíì÷êèó÷éûê÷óîèô÷ûðìôûîíêèô÷ûéèûê÷ûê÷ø÷æ÷ðíìï÷îèûê÷û ïÛÃ ûìî éÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ø÷æ îÍÊÈÔèÇÉÈÓÎûÆ×ÎÇ× [DRAFT]ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PC2011-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT CLASS 1 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION IS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2011-05564& VARIANCE NO. 2011-04857 (DEV2011-00061) (1012 NORTH TUSTIN AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2011-05564and Variance No. 2011-04857to permit a dancestudio within an existing commercialcomplexwith few parkingfor certain real property in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California shown on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, this 5.85-acre property is developed with abusiness complex consisting of a variety of wholesale and retail businesses. The property is located in the SP94-1 Northeast Industrial Specific Plan,Development Area 5, Commercial AreaZone and the Anaheim General Plan designates the propertyfor Industrialland uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim onJuly 6,2011at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearingwith respect to the requestto permit a dancestudio should be approved for the following reasons: 1.The proposed conditional use permit requestto permit a dancestudiowithin an existing business complexis properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized under Code Section Nos.18.120.100.050.0513(Health spas and physical fitness centers larger than four thousand (4,000) square feet in gross floor area) of the Anaheim MunicipalCode. 2.The proposed conditional use permit to permit adancestudio within an existing business complex, as conditioned herein, would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the building is surrounded by compatible buildingsanduses;and,the dancestudio would be located within an existing buildingwithno adverse affects to adjoining land uses. -1-PC2011-*** 3.The size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the dancestudio in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and safety because thefacilitywould be located within an existingbusiness complex. 4.The traffic generated by the dancestudio will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic generated by this use will not exceed the anticipated volumes of trafficon the surrounding streets and there is adequate parking on-site to accommodate the use. 5.The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the proposed land use will continue to be integrated with the surrounding commercialand industrialarea and would not pose a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request for a variance forless parking than required by Codeshould be approvedfor the following reasons: SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010Minimum number of parking spaces. (496spaces required;305spaces proposed). 1.That the variance, under the conditions imposed will not cause fewer off- street parking spaces to be provided for the business complex than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to this use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of the dance studio because the on-site parking for the dance studio will adequately accommodate peak parking demands of all uses on the site. This dance studio generates a peak parking demand of 15 parking spaceswhich is less than the minimum retail parking requirement for this size unit; 2.That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity ofthe proposed use because the on-site parking for the dance studio and other uses within the business complex will adequately accommodate the peak parking demands of the dance studio; 3.The variance will not increase traffic congestion within the off-streetparking areas provided for the dance studio since all parking is contained on-site and will not encroach into other parking facilities and the supply of parking is adequate for the dance studio. Further, the project does not propose new ingress or egresspoints and is designed to allow adequate on- site circulation and therefore will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the dance studio. WHEREAS, the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities)as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation. -2-PC2011-*** NOW, THEREFORE,BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby approveConditional Use Permit No. 2011-05564and Variance No. 2011-04857and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditionsof approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this permit is approved without limitations on the hours of operation or the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of thisapplication constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that itcomplies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this application. -3-PC2011-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting ofJuly 6, 2011. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission heldonJuly 6, 2011,by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: th IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6day ofJuly, 2011. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -4-PC2011-*** -5-PC2011-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2011-05564 (DEV2011-00061) REVIEW SIGNED NO.CONDITIONS OF APPROVALBYOFF BY GENERAL CONDITIONS 1This facility shallonly be used asadancestudio / ballet Planning company. 2The hours of operation for the dancestudio shall be Code consistent with the letter of operation on file with the City of Enforcement Anaheim Planning Department. Any change in the hours of operation shall be subject to review and approval by Planning staff to determine substantial conformance with the letter of operation and compatibility with the surrounding uses. No required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise 3Code enclosed for outdoor storage. Enforcement 4No outdoor activitiesinvolving gathering of persons shall be Code permitted on-site.Enforcement 5The applicantshall be responsible for maintaining the area Code adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an Enforcement orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or onany adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within two business days of being applied. Business to be equipped with alarm system (silent or 6Police audible). Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application, 7Police Form APD 516, and return it to the Police Department prior to initial alarm activation. This form is available at the Police Department front counter, or it can be downloaded from the following web site: http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=678 Rear entrance doors shall be numbered with the same address 8Police numbers or suite number of the business. Minimum height of 4” recommended. 9Theproperty shall be developed substantially in accordance Planning with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicantand which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit No.1 (Site Plan), Exhibit No. 2 (Floor Plan), and as conditioned herein. -6-PC2011-*** ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò í ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò ì ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò ë City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ûèèûùôï÷îèîí è öíçêìð÷ä êé éíçèô÷êîùûðóöíêîóû êï êé éöê öíçêìð÷ä÷øóéíî÷ûé÷ï÷îè éóîõð÷öûïóðãê÷éóø÷îù÷ êï êé êï ïíêíùùí éóîõð÷öûïóðãê÷éóø÷îù÷ ùíîøíïóîóçï ûìûêèï÷îèé øç øç å×ÉÈûÎÛÔ×ÓÏùÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐùÍÊÊÓØÍÊÉ ê×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈûÊ×Û êï êï è éûîùûêðíé éûîïûêùçé êï éíçèô÷êîùûðóöíêîóûûìûêèï÷îèé øç öêûîùóéùûî ùõ ÷øóéíîùí÷ûé÷ï÷îèøç ûìûêèï÷îèé ðóîùíðî øç êæìûêñ êï ùíîøíé øç ùõ ùõ ùõ ùûêåûéô ø÷æ ùõ ø÷æ ê÷èûóð ê÷èûóð ê÷èûóð å×ÉÈûÎÛÔ×ÓÏùÍÏÏ×ÊÙÓÛÐùÍÊÊÓØÍÊÉ ê×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈûÊ×Û è ùê÷éè è ïíè÷ð ùõ ùõ îçêé÷êã ê÷èûóð êï ê÷èûóð ùíçêèãûêø ùõ ûìûêèï÷îèé æûð÷îùóûóîî øç è êï éöê ú÷ûùôéóø÷ êï êï ûìûêèï÷îèé ðóîùíðîìûêñ øçìð÷ä øç ûìûêèï÷îèé êï øç æûùûîè êï éöê êï ìûðïå÷éè íùöùø ûìûêèï÷îèé ûõûè÷ïûîíê øç û×ÊÓÛÐìÔÍÈÍ ïÛÃ ûìî éÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ åùê÷éù÷îèûæ÷ ø÷æ å×ÉÈðÓÎÙÍÐÎûÆ×ÎÇ× ûèèûùôï÷îèîí û×ÊÓÛÐìÔÍÈÍ ïÛÃ ûìî éÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ åùê÷éù÷îèûæ÷ ø÷æ å×ÉÈðÓÎÙÍÐÎûÆ×ÎÇ× [DRAFT]ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PC2011-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT A CLASS 11CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION IS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DETERMINATION ANDAPPROVINGVARIANCE NO. 2011-04855 (DEV2011-00049) (2657-2717WEST LINCOLN AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission(hereinafter referred to as "Planning Commission") did receive a verified Petition for Variance for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California shown on Exhibit “A”, attached hereto andincorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the petitioner requestsa variance to modify twolegal nonconforming freestanding signsinthe Commercial, General(C-G)zone and the Anaheim General Plan designates this property for Low-Medium Densityland uses;and WHEREAS, the Planning Commissiondid hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim onJuly 6,2011,at 5:00p.m.,notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60 “Procedures”, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, thePlanning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offeredat said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1.That the applicant requests to modify two legal nonconforming freestanding signs under the following Code provision: SECTION NO. 18.56.060.020Continuation of Non-Conforming Signs 2.Therequested varianceis hereby approvedbecause there are special circumstances applicable to the propertybecause of the narrowness of the landscaped setback area and hazards created with compliance with the Code. 3.Strictapplication of the Code woulddeprive the property of privileges enjoyed by other propertiesunder the identical zoning classification in the vicinitybecause there are other pole signs located in narrow landscape setbacksor without landscapingin the vicinity on Lincoln Avenue. -1-PC2011-*** WHEREAS, the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Class 11(AccessoryStructures)as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commissiondoes hereby approveVariance No. 2011-04855subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies theoriginal intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Varianceis approved without limitations on the duration of the use.Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliancewith each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of thisapplication constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that itcomplies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoiceor prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shallresult in delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application. -2-PC2011-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of July 6, 2011. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commissionheld onJuly 6, 2011, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: th IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6day ofJuly, 2011. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -3-PC2011-*** -4-PC2011-*** EXHIBIT “B” VARIANCE NO. 2011-04855 (DEV2011-00049) SIGNED OFF NO.CONDITIONS OF APPROVALREVIEW BYBY GENERAL 1The subject property shall be developed substantially in Planning accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the Division City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 4(Site Plans and Sign Plans)as conditioned herein. -5-PC2011-*** ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò í ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò ì ÜßÇ Ì×ÓÛ Ê×ÛÉ Ò×ÙØÌ Ì×ÓÛ Ê×ÛÉÜßÇ Ì×ÓÛ Ê×ÛÉÒ×ÙØÌ Ì×ÓÛ Ê×ÛÉ ÌßÕßÍ ÞßÍÕ×Ò ÎÑÞÞ×ÒÍ ÛÔ ÝØ×Ô×ÌÑÝÛÒÌËÎÇ ÌÊ Þß×Ì ú ÌßÝÕÔÛ ×ÒÝÑÓÛ ÌßÈÌÎßÊÛÔ ÐÔËÍ ÒËÌÎ×Ì×ÑÒÒËÌÎ×Ì×ÑÒ×ÒÍËÎßÒÝÛ×ÒÍËÎßÒÝÛ ÑÐÌÑÓÛÌÎÇÑÐÌÑÓÛÌÎÇØß×Î ú Òß×ÔÍØß×Î ú Òß×ÔÍ ÒÑÒó×ÔÔËÓ×ÒßÌÛÜ ÌßÕßÍ Õ×ÓÍ Òß×ÔÍËÒ×ÚÑÎÓÍËÒ×ÚÑÎÓÍ Þß×Ì ú ÌßÝÕÔÛ Ü×ÓÛÒÍ×ÑÒßÔ ßÜÜÎÛÍÍ ÔÛÌÌÛÎÍ Ô×ÏËÑÎÝÑ×Ò ÔßËÒÜÎÇ îíêèôéóø÷éíçèôéóø÷îíêèôéóø÷ éíçèôéóø÷ Ðß×ÒÌÛÜ ßÝÝÛÒÌÐß×ÒÌÛÜ ßÔËÓ×ÒËÓÜßÇ Ò×ÙØÌÛßÝØ ÐßÒÛÔ ×Í Ðß×ÒÌÛÜ ßÔËÓ×ÒËÓ Ü×ÓÛÒÍ×ÑÒßÔ ÎËÔÛÍÚßÞÎ×ÝßÌÛÜ Ú×ÒÐËÍØ ÌØÎËÝØßÒÙÛßÞÔÛÚßÞÎ×ÝßÌÛÜ ÝßÞ×ÒÛÌ Ô×ÒÛÍÝÑÔÑÎæ ÝØßÎÝÑßÔ ÙÎßÇÔÛÌÌÎÍÝÑÔÑÎæ Í×ÔÊÛÎ ÓÛÌßÔÔ×Ý ÝÑÎÎËÙßÌÛ ÓÛÌßÔ ÐÑÔÛ ÝÑÊÛÎÍ ÑÊÛÎ ÛÈ×ÍÌ×ÒÙ ÐÑÔÛÍ ÷ð÷æûèóíîìãðíî÷ð÷æûèóíîìãðíî éùûð÷ ÿª ¨éùûð÷ ÿª ¨ éëçûê÷öííèûõ÷íöéóõîûê÷û ÉËÖÈ Ì×ÊÉÓØ×éëçûê÷öííèûõ÷íöéóõîûê÷û ÉËÖÈ Ì×ÊÉÓØ× ê÷æóéóíîéøêûåîúãéèûêèøûè÷ìêíò÷ùèîûï÷éô÷÷èèóèð÷ê÷ö÷ê÷îù÷îçïú÷ê èô÷øûèûóîèôóéøíùçï÷îèïûãóîùíêìíêûè÷ìêíìêó÷èûêãêóõôèéíöèô÷ùðó÷îèûîãìûêèã êóùñåíòùóùñó ðóîùíðîù÷îè÷êðóîùíðîù÷îè÷êìãðíîé ûùù÷ìèóîõèôóéøíùçï÷îèøí÷ééíóîùíîöóø÷îù÷ûîøûõê÷÷éèôûèóèéôûððîíèú÷øçìðóùûè÷ø óîåôíð÷íêóîìûêèîíêøóéùðíé÷øèííèô÷êéåóèôíçèèô÷åêóèè÷îùíîé÷îèíöèô÷ùðó÷îè ùíîèêûùèíêéôûððæ÷êóöãûððùíîøóèóíîéíîèô÷òíúéóè÷ûîøîíèóöãèô÷ìêíò÷ùè÷îõóî÷÷ê éô÷÷èîçïú÷ê ûììêíæ÷øûééôíåîûéîíè÷ø íöûîãæûêóûèóíîéöêíïèô÷øóï÷îéóíîééôíåîíîèô÷é÷øêûåóîõéú÷öíê÷ìêíù÷÷øóîõåóèô ìêíò÷ùèðíùûèóíîòíúîçïú÷ê ûììêíæ÷øúã ðù ûîãùíîéèêçùèóíîåêóèè÷îøóï÷îéóíîéèíé÷èìê÷ù÷ø÷îù÷íæ÷êéùûð÷øøêûåóîõé ðûñ÷ù÷îè÷êøêóæ÷éûîèûûîûùû ìö ûîûô÷óïùûðóöíêîóûèúø øûè÷ ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò ë City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ûèèûùôï÷îèîí óéûúù óîøçéèêóûð èéûúù ùõéûúù ê÷èûóð ûîûô÷óïïûêñ÷èìðûù÷ óîøííêéåûìï÷÷è óéûúù ó óîøçéèêóûð óîøçéèêóûð èéûúù ê÷èûóð ùõéûúù ê÷éèûçêûîè óéûúù óîøçéèêóûð ó óîøçéèêóûð óéûúù ø÷æ óîøçéèêóûð ùõéûúù ûîûô÷óïúçéóî÷éé ó ìûêñ óîøçéèêóûð óéûúù æûùûîè óéûúù óîøçéèêóûð óéûúù éíçèô÷êîùûðóöíêîû ÷øóéíîùí÷ûé÷ï÷îè óéûúù óîøçéèêóûð óéûúù é÷ðöéèíêûõ÷ öûùóðóèã óéûúù óéûúù ùõéûúù óîøçéèêóûð óîøçéèêóûð æûùûîè û×ÊÓÛÐìÔÍÈÍ ïÛÃ ûìî éÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×ØìÛÊÑÓÎÕðÍÈ ø÷æ éÍÇÈÔûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØéÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ éÍÇÈÔûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØìÊÍÌÍÉ×ØìÛÊÑÓÎÕðÍÈ ûèèûùôï÷îèîí û×ÊÓÛÐìÔÍÈÍ ïÛÃ ûìî éÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ìÊÍÌÍÉ×ØìÛÊÑÓÎÕðÍÈ ø÷æ éÍÇÈÔûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØéÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ éÍÇÈÔûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØìÊÍÌÍÉ×ØìÛÊÑÓÎÕðÍÈ [DRAFT]ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PC2011-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THAT A CLASS 1 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION IS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATIONAND APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.2003-04817 ANDAPPROVINGVARIANCE NO. 2011-04859ANDAMENDINGCONDITIONSOF APPROVAL OFRESOLUTIONNO.PC2004-6(DEV2011-00034) (1500AND 1620 SOUTH ANAHEIM BOULEVARD) WHEREAS, on January 12, 2004, the Anaheim City Planning Commission (hereinafter referred to as "Planning Commission"), by its Resolution No. PC2004-6did approve Conditional Use Permit 2003-04817to permit an indoor sports complex within an existing industrial buildingfor that certain real propertylocated at 1500 South Anaheim Boulevard in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as more particularly shown on Exhibit “A” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did receivea verified Petition to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-04817toexpand an existing indoor sports complex, permit the sale of beer and wine for on-site consumption within a restaurant facility, and use an off-site parking facility on a vacant Southern California Edison (SCE) propertylocated at 1620 South Anaheim Boulevard; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Variance No. 2011-04859 to permit less parking lot landscaping than required by Code on the vacant SCE property in conjunction with the indoor sports complex; and WHEREAS, the 19-acre subject property at 1500 South Anaheim Boulevard is developed with two industrial buildings and the 7.7-acre SCE right-of-way property at 1620 South Anaheim Boulevard is currently vacant. Both properties arelocated in the I (Industrial) zone and the Anaheim General Plan designates both propertiesfor General Commercialland uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in theCity of Anaheim on July 6, 2011, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against the proposed amendment to said conditional use permitand variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, thePlanning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearingwith respect to the request for a conditional use permit, does find and determine the following facts: -1-PC2011-*** 1.The request toamend saidconditional use permit toexpand an existing indoor sports complexandpermit the sale of beer and wine for on-site consumption within a restaurant facilityis properly one for which a conditional use permit isauthorized under Code Section No. 18.10.030.010(Recreation –Commercial Indoor)and (Alcoholic Beverage Sales –On-Sale)of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 2.The proposed amendment to the conditional use permit toexpand an existing indoor sports complexandpermit the sale of beer and wine for on-site consumption within a restaurant, as conditioned herein, would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the building is surrounded by,and integrated with,similar commercial and industrial uses. 3.The size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the indoor sports complexin a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and safetybecause the proposed facilitywill be located within the existing industrial buildingand no outdoor uses are proposed. 4.The traffic generated by the expansion of the indoor sports complex will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic generated by this use will not cause any significant impacts as described in the updated 2011 Traffic Impact and Parking Study prepared by LLG Traffic Engineers. 5.The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the proposed land use will continue to be compatible with the surrounding area because the use is integrated with other uses on the property and is not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim. WHEREAS, the PlanningCommission does further find and determine that the request for a variance to permitless parking lot landscaping than required by Code on the off-site SCE parking lotin conjunction with the indoor sports complex,should be approvedfor the following reasons: SECTION NO. 18.46.060Required parking lot landscaping. (111 trees required; 38trees proposed). 1.The variance pertaining to the request for less parking lot landscapingthan required by Code is hereby approved because there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings since the property owner, SCE,does not allow the installation of trees and raised planter curbs in most of the parking lot area to ensure that vehicular access to the overhead power lines is provided at all times.In addition, the property has along and narrow configuration, with a depth of 1,230 feet and narrow frontages on two streets, and the overhead electrical transmission lines and support towers occupy most of the property; therefore, there is a minimal amount of area where landscaping can be installed. Lastly, layered landscaping with trees, shrubs, vines, and groundcover will be -2-PC2011-*** provided in the planters along both street frontages and therefore will screen the parking lot from view of the public rights-of-way. NOW THEREFORE BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal and does hereby find that the proposed project falls within the definition of Categorical Exemptions, Section 15301, Class 1 (Existing Facilities)as defined in the State CEQA Guidelines, and is therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare additional environmental documentation. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission, for the reasons hereinabove stated does hereby approve the amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 2003- 04817and VarianceNo. 2011-04859(DEV2011-00034)toexpand an existing indoor sports complex, permit the sale of beer and wine for on-site consumption within a restaurant facility, and use an off-site parking facility on a vacant Southern California Edison (SCE) propertywith less parking lot landscaping than required by code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby amend, in their entirety, the conditions of approval adopted in connection with Planning Commission Resolution No. PC2004-6, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-04817, as previously amended, to read as stated in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated by this reference which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that, except as expressly amended herein, the provisions of Resolution No. PC2004-6, approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2003-04817,as previously amended, shall remain if full force and effect. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this permit is approved without limitations on the hours of operation or the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-InitiatedRevocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. -3-PC2011-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of thisapplication constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that itcomplies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this application. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of July 6,2011. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission heldonJuly 6, 2011,by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: th IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6day ofJuly, 2011. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -4-PC2011-*** -5-PC2011-*** EXHIBIT “B” AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2003-04817 AND VARIANCE NO. 2011-04859 (DEV2011-00034) REVIEW SIGNED NO.CONDITIONS OF APPROVALBYOFF BY PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT The developer shall submit to the Public Works Department, 1Public Development Services Division,street improvement plans. Works The plans shall include the installation and construction of landscape, irrigation, driveway approach and storm drain improvementsin the public right-of-way. A bond shall be posted to guarantee the construction of all public works improvements. The storm drain improvements shall be designed to convey the allowable peak release rate. On site surface flows in excess of downstream storm drain and street capacities may requireall tributary areas to retain flows onsite, construction of detention basins or the retention of excess flows within on-site pipes. The landscape and irrigation improvement plans shall be prepared in accordance with the City Master Street Tree Plan for Arterial Corridors, and Public Works Landscape and Irrigation Manual for Public Street and Highway. 2The legal property owner shall dedicate to the City of Public Anaheim an easement eight (8) feet in width for road and Works utility purposes along the frontage of the property on Cerritos Avenue. 3The applicant shall submit to the Building Divisionfor Building review and approval a Water Quality Management Plan that: Addresses Site Design Best Management Practices (BMPs) such as minimizing impervious areas, maximizing permeability, minimizing directly connected impervious areas, creating reduced or “zero discharge” areas, and conserving natural areas. Incorporates the applicable Routine Source Control BMPs as defined in the Drainage Area Management Plan. Incorporates Treatment Control BMPs as defined in DAMP. Describes the long-term operation and maintenance requirements for the Treatment Control BMPs. -6-PC2011-*** Identifies the entity that will be responsible for long-term operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMPs, and describes the mechanism for funding the long-term operation and maintenance of the Treatment Control BMPs. PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING INSPECTION 4ATraffic and Parking Management Plan for tournaments, Public other special events, and any other circumstance that requires Works the use of the SCE property for parking shall be updated and submitted to the City Traffic and Transportation Manager for review and approval. Said plan shall specify the number of parking attendants needed to direct traffic, and how traffic will be directed to the overflow parking lot in the SCE parking lot accessed from Claudina Way via Anaheim Way. 5Provide rooftop address numbers for the police helicopter;Police minimum size 4ft. in height and 2ft. in width. The lines of the numbers are to be a minimum of 6inchesthick. Numbers should be spaced 12 to 18inchesapart. Numbers should be painted or constructed in a contrastingcolor to the roofing material. Numbers should face the street to which the structure is addressed. Numbers are not to be visible from ground level. 6Parking lots shall include controlled access points to limit Police ingress and egress. This shall include lockable gating at ingress/egress points to prevent afterhours loitering and overnight parking/camping. 7A Knox box shall be installed at main ingress/egress gates on Police, Fire Claudina Way and Anaheim Boulevard for after-hour fire and police access. 8Post “No Trespassing 602(k) P.C.” signsat the entrances of Police parking lots/structures and located in other appropriate places. Signs must be at least 2’ x 1’ in overall size, with white background and black 2” lettering. 9All entrances to parking areas shall be posted with Police appropriate signs per 22658(a) C.V.C., to assist in removal of vehicles at the property owners/managers request. 10Trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a Public location acceptable to the Public Works Department and in Works accordance with approved plans on file with said Department. Said storage areas shall be designed, located and screened so as not to be readily identifiable from adjacent streets or highways. -7-PC2011-*** 11The applicant shall:Building Demonstrate that all structural BMPs described in the Project WQMP have been constructed and installed in conformance with approved plans and specifications. Demonstrate that the applicant is prepared to implement all non-structural BMPs described in the Project WQMP. Demonstrate that an adequate number of copies of the approved Projects WQMP are available onsite. Submit for review and approval by the City an Operation and Maintenance Plan for all structural BMPs. GENERAL CONDITIONS–RESTAURANT WITH BEER& WINE SALES 12At all times when the premise is open for business, the Police premise shall be maintained as a bona fide restaurant and shall provide a menu containing an assortment of foods normally offered in such restaurant. 13The gross sales of beer and wineshall not exceed 40 percent Police of the gross sales of all retail sales during any three (3) month period. The applicant shall maintain records on a quarterly basis indicating the separate amounts of sales of alcoholic beverages and other items. These records shall be made available for inspection by any City of Anaheim official when requested. 14The sale of beer and wine for off premises consumption shall Police be prohibited. 15There shall be no exterior advertising of any kind or type, Police including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. 16That subject alcoholic beverage license shall not be Police exchanged for a public premise (bar) type license nor shall the establishment be operated as a public premise as defined in Section 23039 of the Business and Professions Code. 17There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor minimum purchase required. 18There shall be no live entertainment, amplified music or dancing permitted on the premise at any time unless the proper permits have been obtained from the City of Anaheim. 19There shall be no lounge or bar area upon the licensed premise maintained for purpose of sales, service, or -8-PC2011-*** consumption of beer and wine directly to patrons for consumption. GENERAL CONDITIONS 20The parking lot shall be equipped with lighting of sufficient Police power to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance and conduct of all persons on or about the parking lot. 21Alldoors serving subject restaurantshall conform to the Fire requirements of the Uniform Fire Code and shall be kept closed and unlocked at all times during hours of operation except for ingress/egress, deliveries and in cases of emergency. 22Security measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the Police Anaheim Police Department to deter unlawful conduct of employees and patrons, promote the safe and orderly assembly and movement of persons and vehicles, and to prevent disturbances to the neighborhood by excessive noise created by patrons entering or leaving the premises. 23That on-going during project operation, as directed per the Public approved Traffic and Parking Management Plan, parking Works attendants, directional signage, and any other measures identified in the approved Plan shall be provided to direct overflow traffic to the overflow parking lot in the Edison Right of Way, accessed via Claudina Way. 24That on-going during project operation, bike racks shall be Public provided adjacent to the facility.Works On-going during project operation, no required parking area 25Code shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for outdoor storage. Enforcement 26The applicantshall be responsible for maintaining the area Code adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an Enforcement orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or onany adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. 27Theproperty shall be developed substantially in accordance Planning with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicantand which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit No.1 (Overall Site Plan), 2 (Basketball Floor Plan),3 (Volleyball Floor Plan), and 4(SCE Site Plan),and as conditioned herein. -9-PC2011-*** ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò í ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò ì ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò ë ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò ê Í×ÌÛ ÐØÑÌÑÙÎßÐØÍ ßÓÛÎ×ÝßÒ ÍÐÑÎÌÍ ÝÛÒÌÛÎÍ ÝËÐîððíóðìèïé ×²¬»®·±® ª·»© ±º ßÍÝ º¿½·´·¬§ Í±«¬¸ ·¼» ±º ßÍÝ ¾«·´¼·²¹ Ú®±²¬ »²¬®¿²½» Ú®±²¬ °¿®µ·²¹ ´±¬ Ú®±²¬ ª·»© º®±³ Ý»®®·¬± ßª»ò Ú®±²¬ ª·»© ¿´±²¹ Ý»®®·¬± ßª»ò ß²¿¸»·³ ×²¼±±® Ó¿®µ»¬°´¿½» ×²¬»®·±® ª·»© ±º ÍÝÛ °®±°»®¬§ ÍÝÛ °®±°»®¬§ ¿´±²¹ Ý´¿«¼·²¿ É¿§ ×²¬»®·±® ª·»© ±º ÍÝÛ °®±°»®¬§ ÍÝÛ °®±°»®¬§ ¿´±²¹ ß²¿¸»·³ Þ´ª¼ò ÍÝÛ °®±°»®¬§ ¿´±²¹ ß²¿¸»·³ Þ´ª¼ò Ð®±°»®¬§ ²±®¬¸ ±º ÍÝÛ °®±°»®¬§ ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò é City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ûèèûùôï÷îèîí éì éì êûïûøûïûóîõûè÷ ìûêñóîõðíè éì éíçèô÷êîùûðóöíêîóû÷øóéíî éì ùí÷ûé÷ï÷îè éíçèô÷êîùûðóöíêîóû÷øóéíîùí÷ûé÷ï÷îè éì éì éì ûîûô÷óïìðûâû ûîûô÷óï øûõ ôíè÷ð éì ê÷éóø÷îù÷ õûêø÷îåûðñ öóê÷éèûèóíî óîî éì éì ùûéèð÷óîî óîøçéèêóûð éçóè÷é éì éçì÷ê ïíè÷ðéì éì ôíè÷ðùóêùð÷ æûùûîè ðûëçóîèû óîîéçóè÷é éì éì éì ôíðóøûã éì ûï÷êóùûé êûïûøû óîî éì ê÷èûóð ú÷éè ìðûâû ÷äìê÷éé ê÷îèûùûê æûðç÷ ôíè÷ð ûîûô÷óï óîî éçóè÷é éì éì éì óéðûîø÷ê âûúãé éì æûùûîè éì éì óîî ïíèíê æûùûîè êóæó÷êû æûùûîè éçóè÷é ðíøõ÷ ïíè÷ð éì éì ìûêñóîõðíè ìûêñóîõðíè û×ÊÓÛÐìÔÍÈÍ ïÛÃ ûìîÉ éÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ø÷æ å×ÉÈñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× ûèèûùôï÷îèîí û×ÊÓÛÐìÔÍÈÍ ïÛÃ ûìîÉ éÇÚÒ×ÙÈìÊÍÌ×ÊÈÃ ø÷æ å×ÉÈñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× [DRAFT]ATTACHMENT NO. 2 RESOLUTION NO. PC2011-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THE THIRD ADDENDUM TO THE PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED POINTE ANAHEIM INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ANAHEIM GARDENWALK PROJECT SERVESAS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2010-00481 PERTAINING TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT (THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-1, ANAHEIM GARDENWALK OVERLAY) (DEV2010-00166) WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Council did adopt the Anaheim General Plan by Resolution No. 69R-644, showing the general description and extent of possible future development within the City; and WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council, by its Resolution No. 2004-95, adopted a comprehensive update to the General Plan for the City of Anaheim; and WHEREAS, on September 27, 2010, pursuant to Chapters 18.66, 18.68, 18.72 and 18.114 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Peter Houck, as authorized agent for Katella Anaheim Retail, LLC, submitted applications for General Plan Amendment No. 2010-00061, Amendment No. 8 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Amendment No. 3 to the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-01 by and between the City and Katella Anaheim Retail, LLC, and amendments to Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 andFinal Site Plan No. 2006-00002 (hereinafter referred to as the “Proposed Project Actions”),all of which applications pertain to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlayof The Disneyland ResortSpecific Plan, as more particularly shown in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference;and WHEREAS, the proposed changes relate to the mix and allocation of land uses, zoning standards, phasing, project layout and minor modifications to project conditions of approval and mitigation measures to provide for the development of 590,265 square feet of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment, including a multiplex movie theater; 1,628 hotel rooms/suites (including up to500 vacation ownership units) and 278,817 square feet of hotel accessory uses; a transportation center; and 4,800 parking spaces and 15 bus spaces; and WHEREAS, the applicant has requested an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan to modify “Table LU-4: General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City/General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Plans Within The Anaheim Resort and for The Platinum Triangle Area” (heretofore referred to as “Table LU-4”) to reflect modifications to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2011-00481proposes to amend Table LU-4of the Land Use Element of the General Plan to reflect the following density for The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1,Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay: up to 590,265square feet of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses, including movie theaters; 1,628 hotel rooms/suites(including up to 500 vacation ownership units) and 278,817 square feet of hotel accessory uses; a transportation center, and 4,800 parking spaces; and WHEREAS, the proposed modifications to Table LU-4areshown in Exhibit “B”attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference as if setforth in full; and WHEREAS, the Anaheim Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic Center, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, on July 6, 2011, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim -1-PC2011-*** Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said General Plan Amendment and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, DOES HEREBY FIND: 1.That the evidence presented substantiates the need for an amendment to the Anaheim General Plan and that the proposed amendment maintains the internal consistency of the General Planas the proposed modifications to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay are consistent with the goals and policiesset forth in the General Plan forthe Commercial Recreation land use designation and The Anaheim Resort and the modified density does not result in the need for additional infrastructure improvementsor public facilities, beyond those previously planned for The Anaheim Resort. 2.The proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City; 3.The proposed amendment would maintain the balance of land uses within the City; and CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING:That the Anaheim Planning Commission has reviewed the Proposed ProjectActions, including General Plan Amendment No. 2010-00481, and did find and determineand recommend that the City Council find and determine pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), based upon its independent review and consideration of the Third Addendum to the previously-approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Anaheim GardenWalk Project and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004aconducted for the Proposed Project Actions pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, including Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, and the evidence received at the public hearing, that the ThirdAddendum to the previously-approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Anaheim GardenWalk Project together with Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004a, are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for this General Plan Amendment and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA, and that no further environmental documentation need be prepared for this General Plan Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to the above findings, the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby adopt and recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 2010-00481pertaining to Table LU-4 toreflect modifications to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1, Anaheim GardenWalk Overlayas set forth in Exhibit “B” to this Resolution. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTIONwas adopted at the Planning Commission meeting ofJuly 6, 2011. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60, “Procedures” of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITYPLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -2-PC2011-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I,Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Planning Commission held on July 6, 2011, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: th IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6day ofJuly, 2011. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -3-PC2011-*** -4-PC2011-*** Exhibit “B” Deletions are shown in strikethrough, additions are shown in bold and underline. TABLE LU-4: GENERAL PLAN DENSITY PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY LocationGeneral Plan Land Use DesignationsPermitted Density The Mountain Low Medium Hillside Density Residential 485 Park Area(Up to 6 du/ac) Low Medium Density Residential 2,015 (Up to 16 du/ac)(Up to 2,500 dwelling units) Area “A” (Parcel Map Low-Medium Density ResidentialUp to 140 dwelling units 94-205) The Disneyland Resort Specific Commercial RecreationSee Note No. 1 on next page. Plan (SP 92-1) Area The Anaheim ResortSpecific Commercial RecreationSee Note No. 2 on next page. Plan (SP 92-2) Area Hotel Circle Commercial RecreationThe Hotel Circle Specific Plan allows for a Specific Plan master planned hotel project including up to (SP 93-1) Area969 hotel rooms and integrated guest oriented amenities including full-service restaurants, conference room/banquet facilities, pool and spa areas, tour bus/shuttle facilities, and pedestrian promenades and plaza areas with comprehensive landscaping. The Platinum Mixed-Use Triangle AreaResidential18,909 dwelling units Commercial4,909,682 square feet Office9,862,166 square feet Institutional1,500,000 square feet Office High and Office Low4,478,356 square feet* Institutional3.0FAR Industrial0.5FAR Open Space0.1FAR *The maximum FAR for properties designated Office- Low is 0.5; the maximum FAR for properties designated Office-High is 2.0. The Stonegate Low Density ResidentialUp to 35 dwelling units Development Area -5-PC2011-*** TABLE LU-4: GENERAL PLAN DENSITY PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY (CONTINUED) Note No. 1: The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of an approximate 489.7 acre international multi-day vacationdesignation resort including ongoing modifications to the Disneyland theme park, the development of a new theme park, additional hotels and entertainment areas, administrative office facilities, new public and private parking facilities, and an internal transportation system. This development is within five planning Districts (Theme Park, Hotel, Parking, Future Expansion and District A) and a C-R Overlay, which allows development within the Overlay to either be consistent with the underlying Resort District or subject to the same land uses as in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zone. The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan also identifies maximum development density designations for hotel/motel development in the Hotel District (up to 5,600 hotel rooms for the entire District with up to 1,000 hotel rooms transferable to the Theme Park District), in District A (the maximum number of units permitted would be 75 hotel/motel rooms per gross acre or 75 hotel/motel rooms per parcel existing on June 29, 1993, whichever is greater) and the C-R Overlay (the maximum number of units permitted on a parcel would be the following: 1) for parcels designated Low Density –up to 50 hotel rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms, whichever is greater; and 2) for parcels designated Medium Density –up to 75 hotel rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms, whichever is greater; provided that for those parcels that are developed with hotel/motel rooms which exceeded the maximum density designation, the number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Ordinance may be rebuilt or modified at their existing density.) It should be noted that accessory uses may be developed as well as other visitor-serving commercial/retail and restaurant uses along with these hotel/motel uses. The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan also provides for the development of the Anaheim GardenWalk project pursuant to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay at the following density and subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, as amended, to permit the following: 590,265 up to 569,750square feet of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses, including movie theaters; 1,628 hotel rooms/suites (including up to 500 vacation ownership units) and 278,817 square feet ofhotel accessory uses; a transportation center, and 4,800 parking spaces. The Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay encompasses District A and the portion of the Parking District (East Parking Area)/CR Overlay south of Disney Way. Note No. 2: The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of approximately 582acres within the C-R (Commercial Recreation) District which allows for hotels, motels, convention and conference facilities, as well as restaurants, retail shops and entertainment facilities; the PR (Public Recreation) District which encompasses the Anaheim Convention Center and associated parking facilities and provides for the orderly use of City-owned property as well as the existing Anaheim Hilton Hotel; the Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay which encompasses existing mobilehome parks within the C-R District and provides development standards for mobilehome parks and regulations and procedures to mitigate relocation concerns and adverse effects of displacement upon mobilehome owners when a ; park isconverted to another land useand, the Anaheim Resort Residential Overlay, which applies to focused areas of the Specific Plan and provides for the incorporation of residential uses into hotel developments when such uses are fully integrated into a minimum 300-room full-service hotel. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan also identifies maximum development density designations in the C-R District. These designations are based upon hotel/motel development and allow up to 20% of each hotel/motel project grosssquare footage, excluding parking facilities, to be developed with integrated (i.e., included within the main hotel/motel complex) accessory uses. These accessory uses will reduce the otherwise maximum permitted hotel/motel density at the rate of one hotel/motel room per six hundred (600) gross square feet of accessory use. For properties proposed to be developed with permitted and conditionally permitted uses other than hotels/motels with accessory uses, the traffic generation characteristics of said uses shall not exceed those associated with the otherwise permitted hotel/motel (including accessory uses) density as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager prior to Final Site Plan review and approval. The density designations are as follows: “Low Density,” which has a maximum density of up to 50 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater; “Low-Medium Density,” up to 75 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater;“Low- Medium Density (Modified),” up to 252 rooms and 75,593 square feet of accessory uses; “Medium Density,” up to 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater; and, “Convention Center (CC) Medium Density,” up to 125 rooms per gross acre with trip generation characteristics mitigated to the equivalent of 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater. For those parcels that are developed with hotel/motel rooms which exceed the maximum density designation, the number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Ordinance may be rebuilt or modified at their existing density. For projects that are developed in accordance with the Anaheim Resort Residential Overlay, the maximum number of dwelling units allowed shall be less than the number of hotel rooms proposed and such projects shall not create infrastructure impacts greater than the subject property’s permitted hotel/motel density, as permitted by the property’s underlying C-R District density designation unless otherwise mitigated through subsequent environmental analysis. -6-PC2011-*** [DRAFT]ATTACHMENT NO. 3 RESOLUTION NO. PC2011-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THE THIRD ADDENDUM TO THE PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED POINTE ANAHEIM INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ANAHEIM GARDENWALK PROJECT SERVESAS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND RECOMMENDING ADOPTION OF AMENDMENT NO. 8TO THE DISNEYLAND RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-1 (INCLUDING AMENDMENTS TO EXHIBITS AND ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS) (DEV2010-00166) WHEREAS, on April 29, 1986, City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Ordinance No. 4709 to establish uniform procedures for the adoption and implementation of Specific Plans for the coordination of future development within the City, and “Zoning and Development Standards” when the Specific Plan includes zoning regulations and development standards to be substituted for existing zoning under the Zoning Code, which “Zoning and Development Standards” shall be adopted by ordinance independent of the rest of the Specific Plan; and WHEREAS, pursuantto the procedures set forth in Chapter 18.72(formerly, Chapter 18.93)of the Anaheim Municipal Code, on June 29, 1993, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Ordinance No. 5377 amending the zoning map to reclassify certain real property described therein into The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 Zone subject to certain conditions as specified therein, and Ordinance No. 5378 relating to the establishment of Zoning and Development Standards for The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 by the addition of Chapter 18.114 (formerly,Chapter 18.78)to said Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, on April 12, 1994, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5420 amending Ordinances Nos. 5377 and 5378 relating to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1, Amendment No. 1, which amendment established “District A,” redesignated a portion (approximately 9 acres) of the East Parking Area to District A, and established “Zoning and Development Standards” for District A; and WHEREAS, on June 20, 1995, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5503 amending Ordinance Nos. 5377 and 5378, as previously amended, relating to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1, Amendment No. 2, which amendment redesignated a portion (approximately 10 acres) of the East Parking Area to District A; and WHEREAS, on October 22, 1996, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5580 amending Ordinance Nos. 5377 and 5378, as previously amended, relating to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1, Amendment No. 3, which amendment encompassed modifications to The Disneyland Resort Project including a Revised Phasing Plan;modifications to the Specific Plan (including the Zoning and Development Standards, Design Plan and Guidelines and Public Facilities Plan) to implement the Revised Phasing Plan; and, incorporation of text and graphic modifications to the document; and WHEREAS, on September 16, 1997, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5613 amending Ordinance Nos. 5377 and 5378, as previously amended, relating to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1, Adjustment No. 1, which adjustment encompassed standards addressing permitted encroachments, screening requirements and height limitations; and WHEREAS, on July 13, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5689 amending Ordinance Nos. 5377 and 5378, as previously amended, relating to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1, Amendment No. 4, which amendment pertained to the Pointe Anaheim Lifestyle Retail and Entertainment Complex (the “Pointe Anaheim Project”) on approximately 29.1 acres; and which amendment established “Zoning and Development Standards” for the Pointe Anaheim Overlay, modified the Land Use Plan, the Public Facilities Plan, the Design Plan and the Conditions of Approval, and incorporated textand graphic modifications to implement the Pointe Anaheim Project, and redesignated a portion of District A (18.9 acres) and Parking District (East Parking Area)/C-R Overlay (10.2 acres) to the Pointe Anaheim Overlay; and WHEREAS, on March 19, 2002, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5807 amending Ordinance Nos. 5377 and 5378, as previously amended, relating to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1, Amendment No. 5, which amendment pertained to the Pointe Anaheim Project on approximately 29.1acres; and which amendmentincorporated text and exhibit modificationsthroughout the Specific Plan document relatingto the mix and allocation of land uses, zoning standards, phasing, project layout and minor modifications to project conditions of approval and mitigation measures to provide for the development of 569,750 square feet of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment, including a multiplex movie theater; 1,628 hotel rooms/suites (including up to 500 vacation ownership units) and 278,817 square feet of hotel accessory uses; a transportation center; and 4,800 parking spaces and 15 bus spaces; and WHEREAS, on April 25, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6022amending Ordinance Nos. 5377 and 5378, as previously amended, relating to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1, Amendment No. 6, which amendment pertained to the Anaheim GardenWalk Project (formerly Pointe AnaheimProject); and which amendment incorporatedtext and exhibit changes throughout the specific plan document, including amendments to the Executive Summary, Planning Context, Land Use Plan, Public Facilities Plan, Design Plan, General Plan Consistency, Zoning and Development Standards, Zoning Explanation, Conditions of Approval, and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Programto provide for the development of 569,750 square feet of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment, including a multiplex movie theater; 1,628 hotel rooms/suites (including up to 500 vacation ownership units) and 278,817 square feet of hotel accessory uses; a transportation center; and 4,800 parking spaces and 15 bus spaces;and WHEREAS, on April 17, 2007, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6056 amending Ordinance No. 5378, as previously amended, relating to The Disneyland ResortSpecific Plan No. 92-1, Amendment No. 7, which amendment pertained to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay tomodify zoning and development standards pertaining to permitted architectural encroachments in required building setback areas and to modify exhibits pertaining to the maximum number and location of permitted wall signs within The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1, Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay; and WHEREAS, on September 27, 2010, pursuant to Chapters 18.66, 18.68, 18.72 and 18.114 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Peter Houck, as authorized agent for Katella Anaheim Retail, LLC, submitted applications for General Plan Amendment No. 2010-00061, Amendment No. 8 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Amendment No. 3 to the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-01 by and between the City and Katella Anaheim Retail, LLC, and amendments to Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 andFinal Site Plan No. 2006-00002 (hereinafter referred to as the “Proposed Project Actions”),all of which applications pertain to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlayof The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, as more particularly shown in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference;and WHEREAS, proposed Amendment No. 8to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92- 1includes text and exhibit changes to modify and increase the total amount of retail, dining and entertainment (RDE) uses within the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay by reducing the permitted amount of retail, increasing the permitted amount of dining, increasing the permitted amount of entertainment uses and reducing the size of the bus terminal/facility. The proposed amendments only pertain to the bus terminal/facility and the RDE uses permitted within Development Area A of the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay and do not change the existing building footprint. No modifications are proposed for the hotels and hotel accessory uses permitted within Development Area A or the RDE uses, hotels, hotel accessory uses or parking permitted within Development Area B; and WHEARAS, proposed Amendment No. 8 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92- 1 also includes minor corrections to text and exhibits to provide consistency between previous development agreement and zoning code amendments that were not previously reflected in the Specific Plan document; and WHEREAS, proposed Amendment No. 8 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92- 1 also includes the deletion of Exhibits5.8.3.F.1 through 5.8.3.f.8pertaining to floor plans, sign plans and building elevations. WHEARAS,the proposed amendments are more fully identified in Exhibit“B”to this Resolution and incorporated herein; WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic Center, Council Chambers, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, in the City of Anaheim on July 6, 2011, at 5:00 p.m.,notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapters 18.60 (Procedures) to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project Actions and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself and inits behalf, and after due consideration of the information provided in the Specific Plan document and other information and evidence received during the public hearing process, the Planning Commission DOES HEREBY FIND: 1.That the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay, which is the subject of Amendment No. 8to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1, is sited in The Anaheim Resort, adjacent to Katella Avenue (a Resort Smart-Street), and which unique visitor-serving location warrantsthe specialsite development standards of the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay, as proposed to be amended. 2.That Amendment No. 8to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, as proposed,is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan, and with the purposes, standards and land use guidelines therein. 3.That Amendment No. 8to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 results in development of desirable character inasmuch as the proposed amendments provide for internal consistency throughout the document and with associated regulatory documents, and reduce redundancy between documents, in that more detailed floor plans, sign plans and building elevations have been approved through the associated conditional use permit and the final site plan. 4.That Amendment No. 8to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 respects the environmental and aesthetic resources consistent with economic realities by providing for improved leasing opportunities that reflect anticipated marked conditions within the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay and The Anaheim Resort with the implementation of the Anaheim GardenWalk project and by fulfilling the goals and objectives of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan.The Third Addendum to the Previously Approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Anaheim GardenWalk Project and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004aalso address project-related environmental impacts and provide for the feasible mitigation of said impacts. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING:That the Anaheim Planning Commission has reviewed the Proposed Project Actions, includingAmendment No. 8 to the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 90-1, and did find and determine and recommend that the City Council find and determine pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), based upon its independent review and consideration of the Third Addendum to the previously-approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Anaheim GardenWalk Project and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004aconducted for the Proposed Project Actions pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, including Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, and the evidence received at the public hearing, that the Third Addendum to the previously- approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Anaheim GardenWalk Project together with Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004a, are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for this Specific Plan Amendment and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA, and that no further environmental documentation need be prepared for this SpecificPlan Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to the abovefindings, the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council, by ordinance, adopt Amendment No. 8to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (including amendments to the Specific Plan exhibits andzoning and development standards); and that the proposed amendments to the Specific Plan are identified in Exhibit“B”to this Resolution and incorporated herein; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing ofthis discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of July 6, 2011.Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM) I,Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held onJuly 6, 2011, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: th day ofJuly, 2011. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6 SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION Exhibit “B” The proposed amendments to the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan include the following modification , additions are shown in bold and underline): (deletions are shown in strikethrough A.Section 1.0: Executive Summary, 1.6.5.5 Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay: The Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay encompasses District A and the portion of the Parking District (East Parking Area)/C-R Overlay south of Disney Way (approximately 29.1 acres). This Overlay is a special provision of the Specific Plan that provides for the development of the Anaheim GardenWalk project subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, as amended. The Anaheim GardenWalk project includes the following: 569,750 590,265 gross square feet of specialty retail/ dining/entertainment uses, including movie theaters; 1,628 hotel rooms/suites (including up to 500 Vacation Ownership Resort units) and 278,817 gross square feet of hotel accessory uses; and parking facilities with up to 4,800 striped parking spaces and 15 bus parking 7,700gross square foot bus terminal/transportation center for airport spaces with a 10,200 transport and to/from sightseeing venues. The Anaheim GardenWalk project will be an integrated development to be constructed in two areas, (Areas A and B, as identified in Exhibit 1.6.6d). 460,115 square Area A encompasses approximately 20.3 acres of the project site, with 439,600 feet of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses, including movie theaters; 1,266 hotel rooms (Including up to 400 vacation ownership units) and 216,820 square feet of hotel accessory uses, a transportation center, and 3,200 parking spaces. The main retail concourse and 3,076 parking spaces will be developed first, followed by the hotels and the remaining 124 parking stalls. The remaining 8.8 acres (Area B) would be developed as a subsequent phase with up to 130,150 square feet of specialty retail, restaurants and entertainment uses, 362 hotel rooms (including up to 100 vacation ownership units) and 61,997 square feetof hotel accessory uses, and 1,600 parking spaces. B.Section 2.0: Planning Context, 2.4.3 CEQA Requirements, last paragraph: In conjunction with Specific Plan Amendment Nos. 5,and 6and 7, Addenda to the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration were prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA. The Addenda demonstrated that the changes to Anaheim GardenWalk which were analyzed the Mitigated Negative Declaration which were included in Amendment No. 5,and the changes to theMitigated Negative Declaration which were included in Amendment No. 6, and Amendment No. 7,would not result in any new or substantially worse environmental impacts and that no supplemental or subsequent environmental review was required. C.Section 3.0: Land Use Plan, 3.3.6 Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay: The 29.1-acre Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay encompasses District A (approximately 18.9 acres) and the portion of the Parking District (East Parking Area)/C-R Overlay south of Disney Way (approximately 10.2 acres) as shown in Exhibit 3.3.6a. This Overlay is a special provision of the Specific Plan that provides for the development of the Anaheim GardenWalk project subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, as amended. The Anaheim GardenWalk project is a fully-integrated, mixed-use development which will have an integrated management, a festive theme orientation and plaza/pedestrian-oriented amenities, 590,265 square feet of specialty retail; restaurants, and consist of the following: up to 569,750 and entertainment uses, including movie theaters; 1,628 hotel rooms/suites (including up to 500 vacation ownership resort units) and 278,817 square feet of hotel accessory uses; a transportation center, and 4,800 parking spaces. Program Summary for Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay Land UseProject Total HOTELS Number5 hotels 4 hotels Rooms1,628 rooms (including up to 500 vacation ownership units) Hotel Accessory Uses278,817 square feet RETAIL/DINING/ENTERTAINMENT (RDE) SpecialtyRetail248,033 389,850square feet Dining163,988 113,900square feet Entertainment178,244 66,000 square feet Total RDE590,265 569,750square feet PARKING Structured/Covered Parking1,949,800 square feet 4,800 auto spaces 15 bus spaces 7,700 10,200square feet Bus Terminal/Facility a.Up to 500 of the total number of hotel units shown in the proposed project may, at the developer’s discretion, be developed as fractional interest (i.e., Vacation Ownership Resort) units. b.The previously-approved project included a live theater complex with 4,600 seats. Proposed project deletes these theater uses and includes 66,000 square feet of entertainment uses (movie theater). c.The previously-approved project includes an additional 400 spaces via tandem parking and valet, for a total of 5,200. The proposed project assumes that all parking needs are served with striped self-park spaces (3,200 parking spaces in Area A and 1,600 parking spaces in Area B). The Anaheim GardenWalk project density is set forth in more detail in Exhibit 3.3.6ab. The retail/dining/entertainment square footage would include the following: banking facilities; children’s, men’s and women’s apparel, shoes, jewelry and accessories; entertainment facilities (amusement arcades, skating rinks, outdoor recreational playground areas, etc.); shopping services; specialty merchandise, gifts and toys; transportation/ travel services including an automobile rental agency office (with no on-site storage of cars); radio and television studio to enable live and/or taped broadcast facilities at the site; baby-sitting services; fast-food/food court- type and walk-up/specialty restaurants; enclosed and semi-enclosed full-service and theme-type restaurants/clubs with on-site sale and consumption of beer, wine and alcoholic beverages and associated entertainment uses (billiards, dancing, live and recorded performances, etc.) and art galleries/museum uses. The Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay would also permit, as part of Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 as amended, outdoor events and uses held within the confines of Anaheim GardenWalk, out of view of the public right-of-way and not directed toward the public right-of-way including open-air festival events oriented toward tourists and guests (i.e.,for public gatherings, speeches, concerts, presentations or shows); outdoor booths, kiosks, and stands; and outdoor special lighting. In Area A, the majority of the project would be concentrated on three levels of developmentas shown on Exhibits 5.8.3.f.1 through 5.8.3.f.4. Level 1 is at street level at the outer perimeter and descends to approximately three feet below grade at the center of the project. The Street Level would consist primarily of hotel ground floors and parking, and accessory and services uses supporting the restaurants and retail stores, including truck loading areas. Level 2 also starts at street grade at the outer perimeter of the project, beginning at the same point as Level 1. Level 2 is built on an ascending incline over Level 1. At the center of the project, the floor of Level 1 is at four feet below street grade, Level 2 is 14 feet above street grade. Levels 2 and 3 would include the various retail uses listed above and hotel rooms. Remaining hotel rooms would be on higher floors. More detailed descriptions of the various land uses are provided below. The Site Plan for Area B will be determined in connection with the processing of a Final Site Plan prior to the issuance of the first building permit for said Area. Hotel Uses The plan depicts up to four fivehotels on-site. Hotel uses are proposed generally along the perimeter of the project site fronting on Disney Way, Clementine Street, and Katella Avenue. The hotels would feature convention, specialty and family suites-oriented facilities including, but not limited to, banquet and meeting spaces, exercise facilities, restaurants, and retail facilities. In Area A, one hotel is located in the south-eastern portion of the site at the corner of Clementine Street and Katella Avenue. Another hotel is planned at the southwest corner of Disney Way and Clementine Street. One hotel is planned on Clementine Street mid-block between the north side of Katella Avenue and Disney Way, and onehotel is planned on top of the parking structure on the north side of Katella Avenue. In Area B, a fifth hotel is planned at the southeast corner of Harbor Boulevard and Disney Way. The total number of hotel rooms will be 1,628 . The hotels would be high-rise construction. As currently designed, the hotels would range in height up to 135 feet. The ultimate height of the structures will be deter-mined by the hotel companies who develop within the project site; however, the hotels will comply with the height requirements of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, and if shade/ shadow impacts exceed those addressed in this document, additional environmental review will be conducted. Up to 500 of the 1,628 hotel rooms may be developed as Vacation Ownership Resort units. All remaining hotel rooms in the Overlay may be developed as commercial condominium hotels, provided no residential uses are permitted. The final design and ultimate number of hotels will be based on the hotel developer(s) and will be shown on Final Site Plans to be reviewed and approved by the Planning Commission prior to issuance of building permits. Retail/Dining/Entertainment (RDE) Retail, dining, and entertainment (RDE) uses are located primarily on Levels 1, 2and32of the project. Restaurants include fast-food and food court-type service, semi-enclosed, walk- up/specialty, enclosed full service establishments, and theme-type restaurants. Bus Terminal/Facility in the Parking Structure A bus terminal/facility is planned in conjunction with the project to provide bus transport to and from regional airports for visitors to The Anaheim Resort. In addition, the facility may be used as a terminal for sightseeing bus trips to accommodate hotel visitors. An enclosed loading area on the Street Level in the center of the project will be utilized. Bus ingress and egress is planned to be via Clementine Street. The facility is not planned to serve as a “park and ride” facility for local residents. A high fee will be charged for overnight parking (other than for hotel guests) as a deterrent to use the facility as a park and facility or for other overnight parking needs. Landscaping The perimeter of the project site will be landscaped in accordance with the requirements of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. The following fully-landscaped setback areas will be provided: a minimum of 26-foot wide setback adjacent to Harbor Boulevard; a minimum 11-foot wide setback area adjacent to Katella Avenue; a minimum 20-foot wide setback area adjacent to Disney Way and Clementine Street except adjacent to the hotel lot at the southwest corner of Disney Way and Clementine Street where the building height exceeds 75 feet, where the minimum setback will then be 30 feet wide. Temporary landscaping will be installed in the setback area on an interimbasis until development occurs on the street frontage adjacent to the setback areas. Signs A coordinated signage program will be developed for Anaheim GardenWalk. All signage will be reviewed and approved by the Planning Department as being in conformance with the Specific Plan, as amended, or processed with waiver or variance, prior to the issuance of sign permits. Signs which require the approval of a Conditional Use Permit will be processed concurrently with the Final Site Plan. Conceptual Site Plan Exhibits The Conceptual Site Plan exhibits are provided in Section 5.0, ‘Design Plan’ in Exhibits 5.8.3.f.1 to 5.8.3.f.5. D.Section 3.0: Land Use Plan, 3.4 Phasing Plan: The anticipated opening date for the new theme park is in 2001. Development of TheDisneyland Resort is planned to take place in several phases: the first completed in 1996; the second concluding in 2001; the third (build out) completing in 2010. Phasing for development within District A and the C-R Overlay is not known at this time. The Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay project will be an integrated development which will be phased over time. Construction activity of project buildout will progress over the two major was projected to openmid-2007 and is project areas (Area A and Area B). The first phase is planned to includesthe specialty retail/dining/entertainment uses of Area A and the parking includes approximately 439,600460,115 facilities (with 3,050 spaces). This Initial Phase will square feet of RDE and other commercial uses. The remaining hotel rooms and an additional 150 parking spaces in Area A and development of Area B, with hotel rooms, commercial square footage and 1,600 parking spaces will be added as market conditions permit. E.Section 4.0 Public Facilities Plan, Introduction: The Public Facilities Plan contains a description of the proposed plans for transportation, utilities, infrastructure and services for the Specific Plan area. The first two Subsections describe planned regional improvements which have an impact on theproject. The improvements described under each of the remaining sections are intended to summarize all the services needed for build out of The Disneyland Resort project with the exception of any improvements which may be identified through further environmental review associated with the Future Expansion District. As described in Section 3.4, the primary objective of the Phasing Plan is to minimize the effect of construction on the local street thoroughfares while ensuring the provision of adequate infrastructure and allowing the smooth operation of existing uses during construction. Each proposed public facility improvement summarized in this Section is followed by a number that indicates in which of the project phases the improvement will be made. More detailed information concerning the proposed public facilities/services is contained in Final EIR No. 311 including the Addendum and modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0067 associated therewith. Additional information is contained in the Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Addenda prepared in connection 6, and 7pertaining to the Anaheim GardenWalk with Specific Plan Amendment Nos. 5 and project. F.Section 5.0: Design Plan: Delete the following exhibits in their entirety: Exhibit 5.8.3.F.1 Anaheim GardenWalk Concept Design Level One Plan, Exhibit 5.8.3.f.2 Anaheim GardenWalk Concept Design Level Two Plan, Exhibit 5.8.3.f.3 Anaheim GardenWalk Concept Design Level Three Plan, Exhibit 5.8.3.f.4 Anaheim GardenWalk Concept Design Roof Plan, Exhibit 5.8.3.f.5 Anaheim GardenWalk Interior Signage and Icon/Themed Signage Element Plan, Exhibit 5.8.3.f.6 Anaheim GardenWalk Business Identification Sign Site Key Plan, Exhibit 5.8.3.f.7 Anaheim GardenWalk Disney Way Elevation, and Exhibit 5.8.3.f.8Anaheim GardenWalk Katella Avenue Elevation. G.Section 6.0 General Plan Consistency, create6.10.1.3 Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay: Amendment No. 8to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 related to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay allows revisions to Area A of Anaheim GardenWalk. The revised project (Areas A and B) consists of 590,265 square feet of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses, including movie theaters; 1,628 hotel rooms (including up to 500 vacation ownership units) and 278,817 square feet of hotel accessory uses; a transportation center, and 4,800 parking spaces. Pursuant to California Government Code Section 65454, a Specific Plan must be consistent with the City’s General Plan. In order to implement the Specific Plan, a General Plan Amendment is required to change the density proposed within the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay. The Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay, a portion of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1, implements the General Plan’s goals and policies, and is consistent with the City’s General Plan. The Third Addendum to the previously-approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration analyzes the consistency of the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay with the General Plan. Amendment No. 8 to TheDisneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 related to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay implements a variety of goals and policies in the General Plan by providing an integrated and attractive shopping and entertainment destination in the City. H.Section 7.0: Zoning and Development Standards a.18.114.010 .010Purpose.The regulations set forth in this chapter have been established to provide for orderly development of, and upon adoption of an ordinance reclassifying said property to SP 92-1 (the "Zone"), shall be applicable to that certain property (hereinafter referred to as the "Specific Plan area") described in that Specific Plan No. 92-1 document (hereinafter referred to as the "Specific Plan") marked "Exhibit A" and on file in the Office of the City Clerk approved by the City Council on June 29, 1993; and as amended on April 12, 1994 (Ordinance No. 5420); June 20, 1995 (Ordinance No. 5503); October 22, 1996 (Ordinance No. 5580); July 13, 1999 andApril 25, 2006 (Ordinance No. (Ordinance No. 5689); March 19, 2002 (Ordinance No. 5807); 6022); and_[INSERT DATE], 2011 (Ordinance No. __________),or as the same may be hereinafter amended in accordance with the Specific Plan Amendment procedures set forth in Chapter 18.72 (Specific Plans). b.18.114.020 .020Disneyland Resort Design Plan.The site development standards set forth in Sections 18.114.050 through 18.114.130 have been adopted to operate in conjunction with the Design Plan for The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan identified in Section 5.0 of the Specific Plan document (hereinafter referred to in this Chapter as the "Design Plan") approved by the City Council on June 29, 1993, as amended on April 12, 1994 (Ordinance No. 5420); June 20, 1995 (Ordinance No. 5503); October 22, 1996 (Ordinance No. 5580); July 13, 1999 (Ordinance No. 5689); March 19, 2002 (Ordinance No. 5807); and April 25, 2006 (Ordinance No. 6022) ); and_[INSERT DATE], 2011 (Ordinance No. __________), as the same may be hereinafter amended in accordance with the Specific Plan amendmentprocedures set forth in Chapter 18.72 (Specific Plans).Said Design Plan is incorporated herein by this reference as if fully set forth in this chapter.All development otherwise permitted by this chapter shall comply with any applicable provisions of the Design Plan. c.Sec. 18.114.040 .0201.01(e)Final detailed layout of the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay, Area A, as identified on Exhibit 5.8.3.f.1shall be designed in accordance with Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, as amended. One or more Final Site Plans may be processed for Area A provided that the retail concourse and parking facility shall be processed as one Final Site Plan and the hotels may be processed as separate Final Site Plans. If the Final Site Plan is found to be in substantial conformance with the Specific Plan and the provisions of this Chapter, the Planning Commission shall approve the Final Site Plan.The Planning Commission's decision shall be final unless appealed to the City Council within ten (10) days from the date of such decision.Plans submitted for issuance of building permits shall be in substantial conformance with the approved Final Site Plan.(Ord. 5807 § 2 (part); March 19, 2002) d.Sec. 18.114.040 .0201.05Final detailed layout of the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay, Area B, as 3.4b. One Final Site Plan encompassing the entirety of Area B shall identified on Exhibit 5.8.3.f.1 be processed in the following manner: (a)Review and Approval. Final Site Plans, including but not limited to Site Plans, Floor Plans, Elevations, Landscape Plans and such other plans and information as required by the Planning Director, shall be prepared and submitted to the Planning Department for review and approval by the City of Anaheim Planning Commission as a public hearing item. If the Final Site Plan is found to be in conformance with the Specific Plan, the Design Plan, Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, as amended, and the provisions of this Chapter, the Final Site Plan shall be approved. The Planning Commission’s decision shall be final unless appealed to the City Council, within ten (10) days from the date of such decision. Plans submitted for issuance of building, landscape or signage permits shall be in conformance with the approved Final Site Plan. (b)Appeal Process. The appeal shall be processed in the same manner as appeals for decisions or reclassifications, conditional use permits or variances as set forth in Section 18.60.130through 18.60.150except that the appeal period shall be a maximum of ten (10) days. (c) Environmental Review. Notwithstanding any other provision of this Chapter, Final Site Plan review by the Planning Department under subparagraph 18.114.040.020.0201.05(a) (Review and Approval) shall include a ministerial determination whether the proposed building, structure, or use has been environmentally cleared by the Second Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration/Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004aand Addenda. If not, then the proposed activity shall be subject to the preparation of an Initial Study and potential further environmental review and mitigation pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act requirements. e.18.114.105 .020.0201.02All uses and structures set forth in subsection 18.116.070.0350 (Permitted Accessory Uses and Structures) and in subsection 18.116.070.040060(Permitted Temporary Uses and Structures) shall be permitted in the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay; a.18.114.105 .020.0201.03With the exception of paragraph 18.116.070.060.0619(Prohibited Signs) all uses set forth in subsection 18.116.070.060 (Prohibited Uses) shall be prohibited in the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay b.18.114.105 .020.0201.05The Anaheim GardenWalk project shall be designed in accordance with CUP 4078, as amendedExhibits 5.8.3.f.1, the Conceptual Site Plans and Sign Plans shown in 5.8.3.f.2, 5.8.3.f.3, 5.8.3.f.4, 5.8.3.f.5, 5.8.3.f.6, 5.8.3.f.7 and 5.8.3.f.8 of the Specific Plan document. c.18.114.105 f.18.114.105 .030Anaheim GardenWalk Density.The Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay encompasses two areas (Areas A and B) as identified on Exhibit No. 5.8.3.f.1. The maximum density for the 569,750590,265square feet of specialty Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay shall be as follows: retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses, including movie theaters; 1,628 hotel rooms (including up to 500 vacation ownership units) and 278,817 square feet of hotel accessory uses; a transportation center, and 4,800 parking spaces. The Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay density is set forth in more detail in Exhibit 3.3.6b of the Specific Plan document (Program Summary for Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay). g.18.114.120.020.0201 .02Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay.Sign standards and regulations contained within this section shall apply to development in the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay subject to the following exceptions: (a)Signs, objects or structures located in the interior areas of the Anaheim GardenWalk project shall be exempt from the requirements set forth in Section 18.114.130 (Sign Regulations).Signs, objects or structures shall be considered to be located in an “interior” area for the purposes of this section if they are: (i)Not visible to pedestrian or vehicular traffic from the public right-of-way at an equal elevation as the Anaheim GardenWalk property line (measured five (5) feet above the grade of the sidewalk on the opposite side of the street from the Anaheim GardenWalk project; or, (ii)For Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay, Area A, at least one hundred sixty (160) feet from the adjacent public right-of-way or correspond with the setback ofthe last building bordering the view corridor, whichever is further as shown on Exhibit 5.8.3.f.5 (Anaheim GardenWalk Interior Signage and Icon/Themed Signage Element), and are visible only to pedestrian and/or vehicular traffic through limited view corridors at the entrances to the Anaheim .The final dimensions of the view corridor GardenWalk project (as shown on Exhibit 5.8.3.f.5) shall be shown on the Final Site Plan, and shall not exceed the corridor widths shown on Exhibit 5.8.3.f.5. (iii)For Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay, Area B, the Planning Commission shall review and approve an exhibit submitted as part of the Final Site Plan which identifies interior areas and the view corridor consistent with criteria set forth in subparagraph 18.114.130.020.0201.02 (a)(i) and (ii) (Signs -General). (b)Icon/themed signage elements, as defined in subparagraph 18.114.130.060.0602.05(Business and Identification Signs) may be permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit as set forth therein. (c)On-site Informational, Regulatory and Directional (“IRD”) Signs.IRD Signs visible from the public right-of-way shall comply with the following: (i)The maximum sign area shall be eight (8) square feet. (ii)The design, location and number of signs shall be approved as part of the Coordinated Signage Program with the Final Site Plan for the Lifestyle Retail and Entertainment Complex. (iii)If a company symbol or logo is included in the sign copy, said symbol or logo shall occupy a maximum of twenty-five percent (25%) of the sign area. (iv)An IRD sign may encroach into the required minimum setback abutting the adjacent public right-of-way provided that the location of the sign shall comply with the applicable Engineering Standard Details on file in the office of the Director of Public Works pertaining to commercial driveway approaches and relating to line-of-sight standards. (d)Business and Identification Signs for Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay, Area A. Business and identification signs located in the exterior areas of the Anaheim GardenWalk project shall be developed in accordance with Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, as amendedExhibit Nos. 5.8.3.f.6 (Business Identification Signs -Key Plan), 5.8.3.f.7 (Business Identification Signs - Disney Way) and 5.8.3.f.8 (Business Identification Signs -Katella Avenue).Business identification signs are defined as those signs intended to advertise individual tenants of the Anaheim GardenWalk project (excluding hotels and vacation ownership resort units) and may consist of wall signs and/or freestanding signs.Business identification signs within exterior areas of the Anaheim GardenWalk project shall be shown on Final Site Plans subject to the review and approval of the Planning Commission.Prior to the issuance of sign permits, plans shall be submitted to the Planning Department indicating substantial conformance with sign plans approved as part of Final Site Plans and in accordance with Exhibit Nos. 5.8.3.f.6, 5.8.3.f.7 and 5.8.3.f.8.Business identification signs shall be considered to be located in an “exterior” area of the project for the purposes of this section if they are not otherwise considered as “interior” as defined in subparagraph 18.114.130.020.0201.02(a). h.18.114.130.060.0602 .05In the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay, up to two (2) icon/themed signage elements (defined as “a structure, sculpture, or having the nature of, an icon, which is a nationally- recognized image or object, including, but not limited to, trademarked objects, logos, or other images and figures associated with nationally-recognized corporate identities”) shall be permitted subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, as amended, or a separate conditional use permit provided that the signage shall be associated with a use approved for the Anaheim GardenWalk project pursuant to Section 18.114.105 (Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay); the size, the location shall be in compliance with Exhibit 5.8.3.f.5 and further provided that location, height (not to exceed thirty (30) feet in height measured from the elevation of the public sidewalk closest to the location of the element), and design of the signage shall be determined by the conditional use permit, and further provided that the maximum height of the icon/themed project element in the interior of Area A may be permitted up toa height of 75 feet measured from the elevation of the public sidewalk closest to the location of the element (Disney Way) to the top of the element,provided that the element is proposed without any signage, including logos, trademarked objects or otherimages and figures associated with nationally-recognized corporate identities, excluding signage that is visible to the interior of the project only, and is located a minimum of two hundred (200) feet from the public right-of-way. I.Section 8.0 Zoning Explanation, add 8.7.7 Amendment No. 7 and 8.7.8 Amendment No. 8 8.7.7 Amendment No. 7 Amendment No. 7 to the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan related to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay modifieszoning and development standards pertaining to permitted architectural encroachments in required building setback areas and exhibits pertaining to the maximum number and location of permitted wall signs. 8.7.8 Amendment No. 8 Amendment No. 8 to the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan related to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlayincludes text and exhibit changes to modify and increase the total amount of retail, dining and entertainment (RDE) uses within the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay by reducing the permitted amount of retail, increasing the permitted amount of dining, increasing the permitted amount of entertainment uses and reducing the size of the bus terminal/facility. The proposed amendments only pertain to the bus terminal/facility and the RDE uses permitted within Development Area A of the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay and do not change the existing building footprint. No modifications are proposed for the hotels and hotel accessory uses permitted within Development Area Amendment No. 8 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 also includes minor corrections to text and exhibits to provide consistency between previous development agreement and zoning code amendments that were not previously reflected in the Specific Plan document.Amendment No. 8 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 also includes the deletion of Exhibits 5.8.3.F.1 through 5.8.3.f.8 pertaining to floor plans, sign plans and building elevations. J.Section 10.0 General Plan Amendment, 10.1 Introduction, paragraph before last paragraph, add: General Plan Amendment No. 2010-00481, which wasadopted by City council on [INSERT DATE], 2011, amended the General Plan Land Use Element Table LU-4 “General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas for the City” which describes the land uses and density of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, including the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay to increase the permitted amount of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses to up to 590,265 square feet. K.Section 10.0 General Plan Amendment, 10.1 Introduction, last paragraph: Following is a section describing General Plan Amendments No. 331 through 393 which were adopted prior to the Comprehensive General Plan update in 2004. Following said section is a discussion of the amendment to the description of the Anaheim GardenWalk project and the Land Use Element per General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00440and Table LU-4 “General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas for the Cityper General Plan Amendment No. 2010- 00481. L.Section 10.0 General Plan Amendment, add Section 10.3 General Plan Amendment no. 2010- 00481: General Plan Amendment No. 2010-00481, associated with Amendment No. 8 to the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan amended the General Plan Land Use Element Table LU-4 “General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas for the City” which describes the land uses and density of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, including the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay to increase the permitted amount of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses to up to 590,265 square feet.The project, as amended, continues to be in compliance with the General Plan. [DRAFT]ATTACHMENT NO. 4 *** RESOLUTION NO. PC2011- A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THE THIRD ADDENDUM TO THE PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED POINTE ANAHEIM INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ANAHEIM GARDENWALK PROJECT SERVES AS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF AMENDMENT NO.3TO THE SECOND AMENDED AND RESTATED DEVELOPMENTAGREEMENT NO. 99-01BY AND BETWEENTHE CITY OF ANAHEIM ANDKATELLA ANAHEIM RETAIL, LLC (DEV2010-00166) WHEREAS, the City and Anaheim GW, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (the “Original Developer”), entered into that certain Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-01 dated as of April 11, 2006 and recorded in the Official Records of Orange County, California on June 2, 2006 as Instrument No. 2006000373943 (the “Development Agreement”) with respect to that certain real property described in the “Legal Descriptions” which are attached hereto as Exhibit “A”and incorporated herein by this reference; WHEREAS, unless otherwise defined in this Amendment No. 3, all capitalized terms shall have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Development Agreement. Copies of the Development Agreement are available as a public record in the office of the City Clerk located at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California; WHEREAS, the Original Developer assigned the Development Agreement with respect to the Parking Structure No. 1, Retail No. 1 and Vacation Ownership Resort No. 1 to Anaheim GW II, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Anaheim GW II”) pursuant to that certain Partial Assignment of Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-1 dated as of January 31, 2007 and recorded in the Official Records of Orange County California on February 7, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007000092571; WHEREAS, the Original Developer assigned, and GardenWalk Hotel I, LLC, a California limited liability company (“GardenWalk Hotel”) assumed, the Development Agreement with respect to the Hotel Property and theHotels pursuant to that certain Partial Assignment of Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-1 dated as of July 19, 2007 and recorded in the Official Records of Orange County California on July 19, 2007 as Instrument No. 2007000453402; WHEREAS, in 2008, Anaheim GW II completed construction of Retail No. 1 and Parking Structure No. 1. Shortly thereafter, these components of Anaheim GardenWalk opened to the public; WHEREAS, Anaheim GW II assigned the Development Agreement with respect tothe 1 to Westgate Resorts Anaheim LLC, a Florida Timeshare Parcel and the Vacation Ownership Resort limited liability company (“Westgate Resorts”) pursuant to that certain Partial Assignment of Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-1 dated as of February 29, 2008 and recorded in the Official Records of Orange County California on March 6, 2008 as Instrument No. 2008000105443; WHEREAS, GardenWalk Hotel, Westgate Resorts and the City of Anaheim amended the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-1 on March 1, 2010 and recorded in the Official Records of Orange County California on July 19, 2010 as Instrument No. 2010000341657 to (i) redefine Hotel No. 1, Hotel No. 2 and Hotel No. 3 as (1) Project element consisting of two (2) Hotels totaling approximately 866 Hotel Rooms in the aggregate, (ii) to require the Commencement of 1 This Partial Assignment defines “Timeshare Parcel” as a portion of the Property described in the Purchase Agreement between the Assignor and Assignee. “Vacation Ownership Resort” is defined in Section 1.74 of the Development Agreement, andthis definition is different from the “Vacation Ownership Resort No. 1” defined in Section 1.75 of the Development Agreement. Construction of the Hotels to occur on or before May 26, 2011 and to (iii) require the 2 Commencement of Construction of Vacation Ownership No. 1to occur on or before March 23, 2019; WHEREAS, Anaheim GW II defaulted on its loan secured by the retail/entertainment component of Area A of Anaheim GardenWalk. On April 8, 2010 foreclosure occurred whereby Katella Anaheim Retail, LLC,a Delaware Limited Liability Corporation (“Katella Anaheim”) became the new entity succeeding in interest to Anaheim GW II. Shortly thereafter, in correspondence datedJune 7, 2010, Katella Anaheim re-affirmed its right, title or interest, subject to all of the terms and conditions of the Development Agreement, that it is entitled to the rights and obligations under the Development Agreement; WHEREAS, GardenWalk Hotel requested that the City further amend the Development Agreement to require Commencement of Construction of the Hotels to occur on or before May 26, 2013. In Amendment No. 2 to the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-1 dated ________, 2010 and recorded in the Official Records of Orange County California on ___________, 2010 as Instrument No. 2010____________________, the City and GardenWalk Hotel amendedthe Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-1 to require that Commencement of Construction of the Hotels occur on or before May 26, 2013 and Completion of Construction and Opening for Business (as defined in Amendment No. 2) shall occur no later than 36 months after Commencement of Construction of the Hotels; WHEREAS, Katella Anaheim desires to make changes to the mix of uses and minor changes to the square footage of Retail No. 1. These changes would reposition Anaheim GardenWalk to be more successful in these challenging economic times. WHEREAS, the City and Katella Anaheim Retail, LLC intend, in this Amendment No. 3, to amend said Development Agreement as set forth above; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim onJuly 6, 2011 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60, to hear and consider evidence for and against said Amendment No. 3and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of and based upon all of the evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine that said amendment to Development Agreementmeets the following standards set forth in theProcedures Resolution: 1.The Project is consistent with the City’s General Plan in that it is in conformance with the General Plan Commercial Recreation land use designation and with the goals, policies and objectives for The Disneyland Resort Specific Planas set forth in the General Plan. 2.The Project is compatible with the uses authorized in and the regulations prescribed for the applicable zoning district in that the Project is in compliance with the Disneyland Resort Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay requirements. 3.The Project is compatible with the orderly development of property in the surrounding area in that it is in conformance with and implements The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Land Use Plan and the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay Zone requirements. 4.TheProject is not otherwise detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. 2 The Amendment calls it “Vacation Ownership No. 1” and not “Vacation Ownership Resort No. 1,” even though that is the term defined in the Development Agreement. 5.TheDevelopment Agreementconstitutes a lawful, present exercise of the City’s police power and authority under the Statute, the Enabling Ordinance and the Procedures Resolution. 6.Theamendment to the Development Agreementis entered into pursuant to and is in compliance with the City’s charter powers and the requirements of Section 65867 of the Statute, the Enabling Ordinance and the Procedures Resolution. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING:That the Anaheim Planning Commission has reviewed the Proposed Project Actions, including Amendment No. 3 to Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement no. 99-01, and did find and determine and recommend that the City Council find and determine pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), based upon its independent review and consideration of the Third Addendum to the previously-approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Anaheim GardenWalk Project and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004aconducted for the Proposed Project Actions pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, including Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, and the evidence received at the public hearing, that the Third Addendum to the previously-approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Anaheim GardenWalk Project together with Mitigation MonitoringProgram No. 004a, are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for this Amendment No. 3 to Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement no. 99-01and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA, and that no further environmental documentation need be prepared for this amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that based upon the aforesaid findings and determinations, the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council approve Amendment No. 3 to Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement no. 99-01. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon Katella Anaheim Retail, LLC’s compliance with each and all of the conditions set forth in the Development Agreement, as amended. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this application. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of July 6, 2011. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 “Zoning Provisions -General” of the Anaheim Municipal Codepertaining to appeal procedures. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I,Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held onJuly 6, 2011, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: th day of July, 2011. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my handthis 6 SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION Exhibit A DAG99-01C ÅÜÎßÚÌÃ ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò ë RESOLUTION NO. PC2011-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSIONDETERMINING THE THIRD ADDENDUM TO THE PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED POINTE ANAHEIM INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ANAHEIM GARDENWALK PROJECT SERVES AS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCILAPPROVAL OFCONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4078, AS AMENDED, INCLUDING MODIFICATIONS TO THE MIX AND ALLOCATION OF LAND USES, THE WAIVER OF MINIMUM NUMBER OF PARKING SPACES,THE CONDITIONS OF APPROVALAND THE EXHIBITS(CUP4078E) (DEV2010-00166) WHEREAS, on June 22, 1999, the Anaheim City Council did, by its Resolution No. 99R- 136, grant Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 to permit the Pointe Anaheim Lifestyle Retail and Entertainment Complex consisting of up to 565,000 gross square feet of retail/dining/entertainment uses; two to three hotels comprising 1,050 rooms/suites with approximately 86,985 gross square feet of related accessory uses (the hotel rooms/accessory uses would encompass a maximum of923,800 gross sq.ft.) and an approximately 141,200 gross sq.ft. area on the top floor of the parking structure to be used to provide parking and/or hotel amenities serving guests and patrons of the Pointe Anaheim hotels only; up to three theaters with a total of 4,600 seats for live performances or, alternatively, a 24-screen movie theater with 4,757 seats; a 1,600,000 gross sq.ft. parking structure with 4,800 striped parking spaces and 25 bus spaces with provision to park an additional 400 vehicles, which would bring the total number of vehicles that can be accommodated in the garage to 5,200 cars, and including a 21,600 gross sq.ft. bus terminal/facility for airport transport and to/from sightseeing venues; andwaiver of the minimum number of parking spaces (7,668 spaces required, 4,800 striped spaces proposed with provision for an additional 400 vehicles which would bring the total number of vehicles that can be accommodated in the parking structure to 5,200); withdevelopment of the project to take place in a single phase; and WHEREAS, on February 26, 2002, the Anaheim City Council did, by its Resolution No. 2002R-57, amend Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 to permit the Pointe Anaheim Lifestyle Retail and Entertainment Complex consisting of up to 634,700gross sq.ft. of retail/dining/entertainment uses (which includes a 94,000 sq.ft. aquarium); up to four hotels comprising a maximum of 1,662 hotel rooms/suites (of which up to 200 units may be Vacation Ownership Resort units) with approximately 322,071 gross sq.ft. of related accessory uses,of which up to 178,120 gross sq.ft on top of the parking structure may be used for a hotel conference center (the hotel rooms/suites and accessory uses would encompass a maximum of 1,370,711 gross sq.ft.); and,a 1,949,800 gross sq.ft. parking structure with up to 4,800 striped parking spaces and 15 bus spaces with a 10,200 sq.ft. bus terminal/facility for airport transport and to/from sightseeing venues; withthe proposed development takingplace in up to five phases; and,with a waiver of the minimum number of parking spaces (6,581 spaces required, up to 4,800 spaces proposed at full project build-out); and, WHEREAS, on December 14, 2004, the City Councildid, by its Resolution No. 2002R- 253amend Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, to extend the date by which the developer must commence construction of the Initial Phase of Development (from within 3 years after February 26, 2002 to February 26, 2006) and to reflect the name of the new owner (Anaheim GW, LLC);and WHEREAS, on December 12, 2005, the Planning Commission,by its Resolution No. PC2005-160,approved an amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 4078,to extend the date by which the developer must commence construction of the Initial Phase of Development (from February 26, 2006 to February 26, 2007); and WHEREAS, on April 11, 2006, the City Council did, by its Resolution No. 2006-063, approved an amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, to modify the Anaheim GardenWalk project (formerly Pointe Anaheim Lifestyle Retail and Entertainment Complex)to permit the following: 569,750 gross square feet ofretail/dining/entertainment uses, including movie theaters; 1,628 hotel rooms (including up to 500 vacation ownership units) and 278,817 square feet of hotel accessory uses; a -1-PC2011-*** transportation center, and 4,800 parking spaces and 15 bus spaces with a 10,200 sq. ft. bus terminal/facility; and with a waiver of the minimum number of parking spaces (6,984 spaces required, up to 4,800 spaces proposed at full project build-out); and WHEREAS, on September 27, 2010, pursuant to Chapters 18.66, 18.68, 18.72 and 18.114 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Peter Houck, as authorized agent for Katella Anaheim Retail, LLC, submitted applications for General Plan Amendment No. 2010-00061, Amendment No. 8 to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Amendment No. 3 to the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-01 by and between the City and Katella Anaheim Retail, LLC, and amendments to Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 andFinal Site Plan No. 2006-00002 (hereinafter referred to as the “Proposed Project Actions”),all of which applications pertain to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlayof The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, as more particularly shown in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference;and WHEREAS, the retail, dining and entertainment uses and associated parking facilities for Anaheim GardenWalk have been subsequently developed in accordance Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 within a three-story concourse featuring landscaping, fountains, and seating areas. Tenants include a mix of general purpose merchandise stores; full-service restaurants; specialty and walk-up/fast food establishment; bar/nightclubs; a 14-screen movie theater; a 20,000-square foot fitness facility; and a 44- lane bowling facility. The concourse structure also includes back-of-house areas such as management and security offices, service corridors, utility rooms, and loading areas. The constructed parking facilities include a multi-level parking garage with 2,606 parking spaces and a transportation center with parking for 15 buses. In addition, a concierge/ticket service and Police substation are located on the ground floor; and, WHEREAS, although the current permitted development intensity allows up to 439,600 square feet of retail, dining and entertainment uses; the applicant has identified approximately 449,115 square feet of existing building space that could be leased to accommodate retail, dining and entertainment uses. These 9,515 square feet of potential retail, dining and entertainment space reflects a reclassification of a limited amount of back-of-house and circulation areas, utilizing 2,500 square feet of the Transportation Center for retail, dining and entertainment uses, and updated as-built drawings demonstrating that the existing retail, dining and entertainment square footage is slightly larger than previously indicated on the Final Site Plan; and, WHEREAS, the proposed amendments relate to the mix and allocation of land uses, project layout and minor modifications to project conditions of approval and exhibits for the development of 590,265 square feet ofretail, dining and entertainment uses, including a multiplex movie theater; 1,628 hotel rooms/suites (including up to 500 vacation ownership units) and 278,817 square feet of hotel accessory uses; a transportation center; and 4,800 parking spaces and 15 bus spaces; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendments would modify the conditions of approval previously approved by City Council Resolution No. 2006-063, as indicated in Exhibits “B”attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full; and WHEREAS, the proposed amendment would update Conditional Use Permit No. 4078to revise and consolidatethe Project Description and Project Summary and updateExhibits 3A-3C (floor plans for building levels 1-3)to reflect the proposed mix and allocation of land uses and project layout,as shown in Exhibits “C”and “D”attached tothis Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full; and WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Anaheim Civic Center, Council Chambers, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, in the City of Anaheim on July 6, 2011, at 5:00p.m.,notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapters 18.60 (Procedures) to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project Actions and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and -2-PC2011-*** WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1.That the proposed amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, in its entirety, including amending the conditions of approval,is properly one that is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.60.190 (Amendment of Permit Approval) of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) and Section 18.66.070 (Procedures) of Chapter 18.66 (Conditional Use Permits). 2.That the use, as amended in its entirety,is authorized by the Anaheim Municipal Code. 3.That the use,as amendedin its entirety,which is substantially similar to the previously proposed land use, will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located. 4.That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use, as amendedin its entirety, is adequate to allow full development of the use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to health and safetyof the citizens of Anaheim. 5.That theproposal includes waiver of minimum number of parking spaces to reflect the Anaheim GardenWalk project, as proposed to be modified: Sections 18.42.040.010-Minimum number of parking spaces. and 18.114.110.010.0104(7,198required; 4,800total in Areas A and B proposed) 6.That the waiver of minimum number of parking spaces is hereby approved on the basis of the information containedin the Transportation Analysis Updatedated March 17, 2011,prepared by Iteris, Inc(hereinafter referred to as the “Traffic Study”), which has been incorporated into the Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Anaheim GardenWalk Project. The Traffic Studyincluded a parking analysis that determined that the peak parking demand for build-out of the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay (Development Areas A and B) to be 3,793 spaces at 8:00 PMon a Friday night; and, therefore this demand could be accommodated by the proposed 4,800 parking spaces in Areas A and B. Additionally, the Traffic Study determined that the currently constructed parking facilities, which include 2,606striped parking spaces,would accommodate the peak parking demand for the proposed retail, dining and entertainmentuseswithin Area Aand would provide a surplus of at least 339 parking spaces at all hours of the day. Furthermore, upon the future construction of the hotelswithin Area A, valet parking will be used as needed to accommodate a shortfall of 42 parking spaces between the parking spaces that are proposed to be constructed (3,200 parking spaces) within Area A and the projected peak demand of the hotel and retail, dining and entertainment uses at 8:00 p.m. (3,242 parking spaces). The applicant has submitted a conceptual valet parking plan that indicatesareas of the parking facility that can be used for valet parking to accommodate an additional 204 parking spaces. This valet plan provides for a total of 3,404 parking spaces, a 5% margin on top of the projected peak parking demand; 7.That on-streetparking is not provided on any of the streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed project, so visitors to the project would not expect to park on the street; that visitors will park in the on-site parking structuresprovided at the Anaheim GardenWalkproject; and that, therefore, the waiver will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the Anaheim GardenWalk project. 8.That, as demonstrated in theTraffic Study, the Anaheim GardenWalk parking structure will provide adequate spaces to meet the project’s parking demands on-site, so the waiver will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the Anaheim GardenWalk project. -3-PC2011-*** 9.That on-site circulation in the parking structure will be designed to minimize congestion on-site and that within sixty (60) days of the approval of this conditional use permit, the property owner or his/her designee will submit an updated Parking Maintenance and Operation Plan,as required by Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004a. In addition to review and approval by the Planning Department, the plan will also be submitted for review and approval by the Chief of Police or his/her designee. The plan shall promote a safe environment for the circulationof persons and vehicles and theprevention crime within the parking facilities. This plan shall include measures to ensure reasonable egress times for vehicles out of the parking lotin order to avoid congestion. Any amendments to the plan shall be filed with the Police Department, Vice Detail and the Planning Department.Therefore, the waiver will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for such use. 10.That City’s Traffic and Transportation Managerhas reviewed the Traffic Study and determined that the proposed Anaheim GardenWalk driveway entry and exit locations are appropriate for the project site; and that with the installation of a right-turn lane on the south side of Disney Way and installation of dual left turn lanes prior to development of Area B for west-bound traffic along Disney Way to the signalized project entry between Harbor Boulevard and Clementine Street, the waiver, pursuant to the mitigation measures set forth in Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004a, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the use, as proposed to be modified. 11.That the proposal is consistent with the goals and policies of the Anaheim General Plan, as proposed for amendment pursuant to General Plan Amendment No. 2010-00481, and with the purposes, standards and land use guidelines therein. 12.That as demonstrated in the findings for approval of Amendment No. 7to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (SPN2010-00061), which proposes to amendthespecific plan to reflect the modification in the allocation of land use to reflect the proposed project, the proposed Anaheim GardenWalk uses will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which said uses are proposed to be located. 13.That inasmuch as the Anaheim GardenWalk project is proposed to be developed in accordance with the zoning and development standards set forth for the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay, as proposed for amendment pursuant to Amendment No. 7to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1, the size and shape of the site for the proposed use is adequate to allow full development of the proposal in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and general welfare. 14.That as demonstrated in theTraffic Study, the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. 15.That granting this conditional use permit, under the conditions of approval herein, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. 16.That this conditional use permit entitles the uses, maximum gross square footage and conceptual site plans and elevations associated with the Anaheim GardenWalk project,as set forth in Code Section No. 18.114.105.030 (Anaheim GardenWalk Density) of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1, as proposed for amendment; and that detailed Final Site Plans are required to be submitted for Planning Commission review and approval as “Reports and Recommendations” items prior to approval of the first grading plan or subdivision plan or prior to issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, for each development phase. 17.That, with regards to the provision of vacation ownership resort units as part of this conditional use permit, that there are adequate visitor-serving facilities in the City and that the proposed -4-PC2011-*** number of vacation ownership resort unitswill not preclude or significantly reduce the development of other needed tourist facilities or hotel or motel facilities. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING:That the Anaheim Planning Commission has reviewed the Proposed Project Actions, includingthe proposed amendments to Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, and did find and determine and recommend that the City Council find and determine pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), based upon its independent review and consideration of the Third Addendum to the previously-approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Anaheim GardenWalk Project and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004aconducted for the Proposed Project Actions pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, including Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, and the evidence received at the public hearing, that the Third Addendum to the previously-approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Anaheim GardenWalk Project together with Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004a, are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for this amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA, and that no further environmental documentation need be prepared for said amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby recommend City Council approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, asproposed for amendment, with awaiver of minimum number of parkingspaces, subject to the conditions of approval approved by City Council Resolution No. 2006-063 with the modifications described in Exhibit “B” attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference,which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisiteto the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application. -5-PC2011-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of July 6, 2011.Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM) I,Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held onJuly 6, 2011, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: th IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 6day ofJuly, 2011. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -6-PC2011-*** -7-PC2011-*** ÛÈØ×Þ×Ì Þ ÝÑÒÜ×Ì×ÑÒßÔ ËÍÛ ÐÛÎÓ×Ì ÒÑò ìðéèÛ øÜÛÊîðïðóððïêê÷ ÎÛÊ×ÛÉ Í×ÙÒÛÜ ÞÇ ÑÚÚ ÞÇ ÒÑò ÝÑÒÜ×Ì×ÑÒÍ ÑÚ ßÐÐÎÑÊßÔ Ý±²¼·¬·±² º®±³ Ý·¬§ Ý±«²½·´ Î»±´«¬·±² Ò±ò îððêóðêí ¬¸¿¬ ¿®» °®±°±»¼ ¬± ¾» ³±¼·º·»¼ ø¼»´»¬·±² ¿®» ¸±©² ·² ¬®·µ»¬¸®±«¹¸å ¿¼¼·¬·±² ¿®» ¸±©² ·² ¾±´¼ ¿²¼ «²¼»®´·²»÷ That in connection with submittal of the first Final 34Planning Site Plan for Area A the property owner/developer shall submit a comprehensive sign program.Each subsequent Final SitePlan shall include a sign program that shall be in compliance with the comprehensive signprogram and the development standards of the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay.The comprehensive sign program shall at a minimum include the following A.A sign theme/concept which demonstrates an overall appearance quality and type ofsign, banner or other display device;the quality of such signage shall be equivalentto those utilized at Universal City Walk,Fashion Island or Irvine Spectrum.This is aquality standard and is not intended,nor does it provide,additional signage rights orpermit any specific type of sign which does not conform with the signage regulations set forth in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, as amended per the AnaheimGardenWalk Overlay. B.Sign criteria for interior corporate sponsorship displays (said displays could include “jumbotrons,”banners or placards)which are oriented towards the interior of theAnaheim GardenWalk project.The staff report to the Planning Commission shallinclude a recommendation by the Planning Director regarding his or herdetermination as to the orientation of such displays.Such displays shall not be visiblefrom the public right-of-way at an equal elevation as the Anaheim GardenWalk property line (measured at five (5)feet above the grade of the sidewalk on theopposite side of the street from the Anaheim GardenWalk project) except through thelimited view corridors set forth in the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay (as -8-PC2011-*** shown on Exhibit 5.8.3.f.5, titled “Interior Signage and Icon/Themed Signage Element Plan”ofThe Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No 91-2 document). C.Sign criteria limiting interior wall signs from projecting more than fifty percent (50%)of the vertical height of the signabove the roof parapet or fifty (50%)of thehorizontal length ofthe sign beyond the side ofa building. D.Sign Criteria consistent with the adopted sign regulations for the AnaheimGardenWalk Overlay. E.Standards for maintenance and replacement of damaged/brokensigns and bannersand installation and maintenance of changeable sign copy neon signage or electronicreaderboards. Prior to issuance of building permits for the retail 35Planning and parking structure component ofAreaA,the property owner/developer shall submit final design plans for the icon/themedsignage element indicated onExhibit No. 5.8.3.f.5 of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No 91-2 andExhibit No 12 of this conditional use permit and that the height of the icon element would be reduced from a maximum height of 120 feet to a maximum height of 75feet as measured from the grade level of the sidewalk on Disney Way and that lighting onthe icon will be limited to subtle lighting that slowly changes colors. If the icon elementdoes not include any signage visible from the public rights-of-way at an equal elevation asthe Anaheim GardenWalk property line (measured at five (5)feet above the grade of the sidewalk on the opposite side of the street from the Anaheim GardenWalk project),plansshall be reviewed by the Planning Director for substantial conformance with the Final SitePlans.If the icon includes any signage,a conditional use permit in compliance withSection18.114.130.020.0201.02(b) and 18.114.130.060.0602.05 shall be required,with themaximum height and design of the element subject to the review and approval of thePlanning Commission.Preliminary design plans for said icon/ themedelement withoutsignage shall be shown on plans submitted as part of Final Site Plans subject to the reviewand approval of the Planning Commission.Said plans shall include the location, -9-PC2011-*** design,height,dimensions,and lighting scheme of the icon/themed structure.Final design plansshall be subject to the review and approval ofthe Planning Director prior to the issuance ofbuilding permits and/or may be recommended for review and approval by the Planning Commission as a report and recommendation item at the sole discretion of the PlanningDirector That prior to issuance of each sign permit the 36 property owner/developer/tenant shallsubmit a letter and plans demonstrating that the sign plans conform with the comprehensivesign program approved by the Planning Commission and with the business identificationsign locations for Disney Way and Katella Avenue as depicted in Exhibit Nos. 5.8.3.f.6, 5.8.3.f.7, and 5.8.3.f.8 of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No 91-2. That the subject property shall be developed in 42Planning substantial conformance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1through 12of Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 and Exhibit Nos. 1 through 17 of Final Site Plan No. 2006-00002 (which includes Exhibits Nos. 1through 12of ô ¿ ¿³»²¼»¼ Conditional Use Permit No. 4078). The Anaheim GardenWalk project shall be developed in accordance with the quality, design and architectural integrity as shown on the exhibits. That granting of the parking waiver is contingent 69Planning upon operation of the use in conformance with the assumptions and/or conclusions relating to the operation and intensity of use as contained in the Anaheim GardenWalk Transportation Analysis Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±² Updated, dated February 26, 2006, ß²¿´§· Ë°¼¿¬» °®»°¿®»¼ ¾§ ×¬»®·ô ×²½ º±® ¬¸» ß¼¼»²¼«³ ¬± ¬¸» Ð±·²¬» ß²¿¸»·³ ×²·¬·¿´ Í¬«¼§ñÓ·¬·¹¿¬»¼ Ò»¹¿¬·ª» Ü»½´¿®¿¬·±² ß²¿¸»·³ Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ð®±¶»½¬ô ¼¿¬»¼ Ó¿®½¸ ïéô îðïïô that formed the basis for approval of said waiver. Exceeding, violating, intensifying or otherwise deviating from any of said assumptions and/or conclusions, as contained in the Anaheim GardenWalk Transportation Analysis Update dated Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±² ß²¿´§· February 28, 2006 Ë°¼¿¬» °®»°¿®»¼ ¾§ ×¬»®·ô ×²½ º±® ¬¸» ß¼¼»²¼«³ -10-PC2011-*** ¬± ¬¸» Ð±·²¬» ß²¿¸»·³ ×²·¬·¿´ Í¬«¼§ñÓ·¬·¹¿¬»¼ Ò»¹¿¬·ª» Ü»½´¿®¿¬·±² ß²¿¸»·³ Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ð®±¶»½¬ô ¼¿¬»¼ Ó¿®½¸ ïéô îðïï shall be deemed a violation of the expressed conditions imposed upon said waiver which shall subject this conditional use permit to termination or modificationpursuant to the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code. That the Anaheim GardenWalk project shall be 72Planning developed in accordance with the following provisions, as set forth inDevelopment Agreement ò No. 99-01, as amended: A. The property owner/developer shall obtain approval of Final Site Plans, obtain the appropriate building and other permits, and commence construction of the retail and parking facility components of the Initial Phase (Area A) on or before February 26, 2007. B. The property owner/developer shall complete the construction of and open the retail and parking facility components of the Initial Phase within a period of two (2) years after commencement of construction of the Initial Phase. C. The property owner/developer shall obtain approval of Final Site plans, obtain the appropriate building and other permits, and commence construction of anyone of the three hotels proposed in Area A within four years of the effective date of the Development Agreement. D. The property owner/developer shall obtain approval of Final Site Plans, obtain the appropriate building and other permits, and commence construction of each of the remaining project elements within Area A (including the two remaining hotels and vacation ownership resort) at twenty-four (24) month intervals after commencement of construction of the immediately prior project element and complete construction and open for business no later than twenty-four (24) months after commencement of construction of that project element. That approval of this conditional use permit is 73Planning contingent upon the approval and adoption of îðïðó General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00440 ððìèï è and Amendment No. 6to The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1. -11-PC2011-*** That prior to issuance of any permit by the City of 76Planning Anaheim for construction of any development within the Anaheim GardenWalk project, all pre-existing land uses, buildings and structures on the property underlying said development phase(s) shall have been removed; and that the property owner/developer shall have obtained the appropriate permits from the City for the removal or demolition of such buildings or structures. In no event shall any land use, building, structure and/or other improvement approved in connection with the Anaheim GardenWalk project be allowed in addition to pre-existing land uses and/or structures. New Conditions The owner/manager of any business licensed by the 83Police State Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control and/or which requires an Entertainment Permit from the City of Anaheim shall submit a detailed security plan for approval of the Chief of Police or his/her designee that includes security measures including the number of security personnel. Security personnel will complywith Business and Professions Code 7574. Any amendments to the plan shall be approved by the Chief of Police or his/her designee and shall also be filed with the Police Department, Vice Detail and the Planning Department. Within sixty (60) days of the approval of 84Police Conditional Use Permit No. 4078E, the property owner or his/her designee shall submit a detailed security plan to address the additional security needs created by the changing tenant mix. This plan should included minimum staffing levels by day and time. Once approved, a copy of the security plan shall be maintained with the Police Department, Vice Detail and the Planning Department. Any amendments to the plan shall be approved by the Chief of Police or his/her designee and shall also be filed with the Police Department, Vice Detail and the Planning Department. Within sixty (60) days of the approval of 85Police Conditional Use Permit No. 4078E, the property owneror his/her designee shall submit an updated Parking Maintenance and Operation Plan as required by Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004. In addition to review and approval by the Planning Department, the plan shall also be submitted for -12-PC2011-*** review and approvalby the Chief of Police or his/her designee. The plan shall promote a safe environment for the circulation of persons and vehiclesand the prevention of crime inthe parking facilities. This plan shallinclude measures to ensure reasonable egress times for vehicles out of the parking lotin order to avoid congestion.Any amendments to theplan shall be filed with the Police Department, Vice Detail and the Planning Department. Following the issuance of a Certificate of 86Planning Occupancy for build-out of the hotels within Area A, project ownership will implement a valet program during peak demand periods that will create sufficient additional parking supply to satisfy such demand. The valet program shallbe implemented in accordance with the Parking Maintenance and Operations Plan. -13-PC2011-*** ÛÈØ×Þ×Ì Ý Î»ª·»¼ ¿²¼ Ý±²±´·¼¿¬»¼ Ð®±¶»½¬ Ü»½®·°¬·±²ñÐ®±¶»½¬ Í«³³¿®§ The narrative and tables below are intended to replace the existing Project Description and Project Summary in their entirety. The Anaheim GardenWalkproject is located within the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan in The Anaheim Resort, City of Anaheim, California. The irregularly-shaped project site consists of approximately 29.1 acres located between Harbor Boulevard and Clementine Street, and Disney Way and Katella Avenue (excluding Fire Station No. 3 at 1713-1717 South Clementine Street). The project site is currently developed with a three-story concourse featuring landscaping, fountains, and seating areas. Tenants include a mix of general purpose merchandise stores; full- service restaurants; specialty and walk-up/fast food establishment; bar/nightclubs; a 14-screen movie theater; a 20,000-square footfitness facility; and a 44-lane bowling facility. The concourse structure also includes back-of-house areas such as management and security offices, service corridors, utility rooms, and loading areas. The constructed parking facilities includea multi-level parking garage with 2,606parking spacesand a transportation center with parking for 15 buses.In addition, a concierge/ticket service and Police substation are located on the ground floor. The following actions will be considered as part of the request to amend existing entitlements for the previously-approved project: amend the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use element, Table LU-4; General Plan Density Provisionsfor Specific Areas of the City; amend the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (SP 92-1), including zoning and development standards; amend Conditional Use Permit No. 4079; modify the previously approved waiver of minimum number of parking spaces; amend Development Agreement No. 99-01: and, amend Final Site Plan No. 2006-00002. Implementation of the proposed project would allow development of 590,265square feet of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses, including movie theaters; 1,628 hotel rooms (including up to 500 vacation ownership units) and 278,817 square feet of hotel accessory uses; a transportation center; and, 4,800 parking spaces. A comparison between the originally- approved, currently-approved and the proposed project is shown in Table 1. The project includes two development phases. The first phase includes the development of approximately 20.3 acres of the project site (Area A on the Location Map) with 460,115square feet of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses, including movie theaters; 1,266 hotel rooms (including up to 400 vacation ownership units) and 216,820 square feet of hotel accessory uses, a transportation center, and 3,200 parking spaces. See Table 2 for approved and proposed development intensities forArea A and Table 3 for proposed development intensities by floor. The remaining 8.8 acres (Area B on the Location Map) would be developed as a subsequent phase with up to 130,150 square feet of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses, 362 hotel rooms (including up to 100 vacation ownership units) and 61,997 square feet of hotel accessory uses, and 1,600 parking spaces. See Table 4 for approved development intensities for Area B. -14-PC2011-*** Table 1: Original, Approved and Proposed Development Intensities Areas A and B Combined OriginalCurrently ApprovedProposed Project (gross square feet unle (gross square feet unles (gross square feet unle Land Useotherwise noted)otherwise noted)otherwise noted) Hotels Number2 or 3 hotels4 hotels4 hotels Rooms1,050 rooms1,628 rooms1,628 rooms Hotel Accessory Uses86,985278,817278,817 Retail/Dining/Entertainment (RDE) Specialty Retail335,000389,850 248,033 Dining140,000113,900 163,988 Entertainment90,00066,000 178,244 Total RDE565,000569,750590,265 Parking 1,600,0001,949,8001,949,800 Structured/Covered Parkin4,800 auto spaces4,800 auto spaces4,800 auto spaces 25 bus spaces15 bus spaces15 bus spaces Bus Terminal/Facility21,60010,2007,700 Roof Top Family 141,20000 Entertainment Center Table 2: Approved and Proposed Development Intensities for Area A Approved Proposed Difference (gross square feet (gross square feet (gross square feet unless otherwise unless otherwise unless otherwise Land Usenoted)noted)noted) Hotels Number3 hotels3 hotels0 1,266 rooms (including 1,266 rooms (including Roomsup to 400 vacation up to 400 vacation 0 ownership units)ownership units) Hotel Accessory Uses216,820216,8200 Retail/Dining/Entertainment (RDE) Specialty Retail275,500133,683-141,817 Dining98,100148,18850,088 Entertainment66,000178,2441,716,441 20,515 Total RDE439,600460,115 Parking 1,299,8671,299,867 Structured/Covered 3,200 auto spaces3,200 auto spaces0 Parking 15 bus spaces15 bus spaces Bus Terminal/Facility10,2007,700-2,500 -15-PC2011-*** Table 3: Area A Retail, Dining and Entertainment (RDE) Uses and Transportation Center/Office Facilities by Floor Level 1 Level 2Level 3 Total (gross square (gross square (gross square (gross square Land Usefeet)feet)feet)feet) Retail, Dining and 74,647240,562144,906460,115 Entertainment Transportation 2,576002,576 Center/Office Facilities Table 4: Approved Development Intensities for Area B (No Changes Proposed) Land UseApproved (gross square feet unless otherwise noted) Hotels Number1 hotel Rooms362 rooms (including up to 100 vacation ownership units) Hotel Accessory Uses61,997 Retail/Dining/Entertainment (RDE) Specialty Retail114,350 Dining15,800 Entertainment0 Total RDE130,150 Parking 649,933 Structured/Covered 1,600 auto spaces Parking 0 bus spaces Bus Terminal/Facility0 -16-PC2011-*** ÛÈØ×Þ×Ì Ü Î»ª·»¼ Ú´±±® Ð´¿² º±® Ô»ª»´ ïóí -17-PC2011-*** ÅÜÎßÚÌÃ ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò ê RESOLUTION NO. PC2011-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION DETERMINING THE THIRD ADDENDUM TO THE PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED POINTE ANAHEIM INITIAL STUDY/MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION ANAHEIM GARDENWALK PROJECT SERVES AS THE APPROPRIATE ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND RECOMMENDING TO THE CITY COUNCIL APPROVAL OF FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2006-00002A (ANAHEIM GARDENWALK PROJECT) (DEV2010-00166) WHEREAS, on March 6, 2006 the Anaheim Planning Commission approved Final Site for the development of retail, dining and entertainment uses and associated parking facilities within Development Area A, of the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay, of the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1; and, WHEREAS, the retail, dining and entertainment uses and associated parking facilities have been subsequently developed in accordance to the final site plan within a three-story concourse featuring landscaping, fountains, and seating areas. Tenants include a mix of general purpose merchandise stores; full-service restaurants; specialty and walk-up/fast food establishment; bar/nightclubs; a 14-screen movie theater; a 20,000-square foot fitness facility; and a 44-lane bowling facility. The concourse structure also includes back-of-house areas such as management and security offices, service corridors, utility rooms, and loading areas. The constructed parking facilities include a multi-level parking garage with 2,606 parking spaces and a transportation center with parking for 15 buses. In addition, a concierge/ticket service and Police substation are located on the ground floor; and, WHEREAS, although the current permitted development intensity allows up to 439,600 square feet of RDE uses; the applicant has identified approximately 449,115 square feet of existing building space that could be leased to accommodateretail, dining and entertainment uses. These 9,515 square feet of potential retail, dining and entertainment space reflects a reclassification of a limited amount of back-of-house and circulation areas, utilizing 2,500 square feet of the Transportation Center for RDE uses, and updated as-built drawings demonstrating that the existing retail, dining and entertainment square footage is slightly larger than previously indicated on the Final Site Plan; and, WHEREAS, on September 27, 2010, pursuant to Chapters 18.66, 18.68, 18.72 and 18.114 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Peter Houck, as authorized agent for Katella Anaheim Retail, LLC, submitted applications for General Plan Amendment No. 2010-00061, Amendment No. 8 toThe Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Amendment No. 3 to the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-01 by and between the City and Katella Anaheim Retail, LLC, and amendments to Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 andFinal Site Plan No. 2006-00002 (hereinafter referred to as the “Proposed Project Actions”),all of which applications pertain to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlayof The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, as more particularly shown in Exhibit “A”, attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference;and WHEREAS, the proposed changes relate to the mix and allocation of land uses and project layout to provide for the development of 590,265 square feet of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment, including a multiplex movie theater; 1,628 hotel rooms/suites (including up to 500 vacation ownership units) and 278,817 square feet of hotel accessory uses; a transportation center; and 4,800 parking spaces and 15 bus spaces; and WHEREAS,the proposed amendment would update Final Site Plan No. 2006-00002 to reflect the proposed change in the allocation of retail, dining and entertainment uses and the bus terminal/facility in Area A by revising and consolidating the Project Description and Project Summary and updating Exhibits 3A-3C (floor plans for building levels 1-3) as shown inExhibits“B”and “C”attached to this Resolution and incorporated herein by this reference as if set forth in full; and -1-PC2011-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center inthe City of Anaheim onJuly6, 2011, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60 “Procedures”, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed final site plan and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following: 1.The requestprovides consistency between Final Site Plan No. 2006-00002 and the General Plan, The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Development Agreement No. 99-01 and Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, as concurrently proposed for amendment. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Planning Commission has reviewed the Proposed Project Actions, including Final Site Plan No. 2006-00002A, and did find and determine and recommend thatthe City Council find and determine pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (“CEQA”), based upon its independent review and consideration of the Third Addendum to the previously-approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Anaheim GardenWalk Project and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004a conducted for the Proposed Project Actions pursuant to the requirements of CEQA, including Section 21166 of the California Public Resources Code and Section 15162of the CEQA Guidelines, and the evidence received at the public hearing, that the Third Addendum to the previously-approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Anaheim GardenWalk Project together with Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004a, are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for this Final Site Plan Amendment and satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA, and that no further environmental documentation need be prepared for this Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the Anaheim City Planning Commission, for the reasons hereinabove stated does hereby recommend City Council approval ofFinal Site Plan No. 2006-00002A for the Anaheim GardenWalk Project. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this permit is approved without limitations on the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this application. -2-PC2011-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of July 6, 2011. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 “Procedures” of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I,Grace Medina, SeniorSecretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held onJuly 6, 2011, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES:COMMISSIONERS: NOES:COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT:COMMISSIONERS: th IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this6day of July, 2011. SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -3-PC2011-*** -4-PC2011-*** EXHIBIT “B” Revised and Consolidated Project Description/Project Summary The narrative and tables below are intended toreplace the existing Project Description and Project Summary in their entirety. The Anaheim GardenWalkproject is located within the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan in The Anaheim Resort, City of Anaheim, California. The irregularly-shaped project site consists of approximately 29.1 acres located between Harbor Boulevard and Clementine Street, and Disney Way and Katella Avenue (excluding Fire Station No. 3 at 1713-1717 South Clementine Street). The project site is currently developed with a three-story concourse featuring landscaping, fountains, and seating areas. Tenants include a mix of general purpose merchandise stores; full-service restaurants; specialty and walk-up/fast food establishment; bar/nightclubs; a 14-screen movie theater; a 20,000-square footfitness facility; and a 44-lane bowling facility. The concourse structure also includes back-of-house areas such as management and security offices, service corridors, utility rooms, and loading areas. The constructed parking facilities includea multi-level parking garage with 2,606 parking spacesand a transportation center with parking for 15 buses.In addition, a concierge/ticket service and Police substation are located on the ground floor. The following actions will be considered as part of therequest to amend existing entitlements for the previously-approved project: amend the City of Anaheim General Plan Land Use element, Table LU-4; General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City; amend the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (SP 92-1), including zoning and development standards; amend Conditional Use Permit No. 4079; modify the previously approved waiver of minimum number of parking spaces; amend Development Agreement No. 99-01: and, amend Final Site Plan No. 2006-00002. Implementation of the proposed project would allow development of 590,265square feet of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses, including movie theaters; 1,628 hotel rooms (including up to 500 vacation ownership units) and 278,817 square feet of hotel accessory uses; a transportation center; and, 4,800 parking spaces. A comparison between the originally-approved, currently-approved and the proposed project is shown in Table 1. The project includes two development phases. The first phase includes the development of approximately 20.3 acres of the project site (Area A on the Location Map) with 460,115square feet of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses, including movie theaters; 1,266 hotel rooms (including up to 400 vacation ownership units) and 216,820 square feet of hotel accessory uses, a transportation center, and 3,200 parking spaces. See Table 2 for approved and proposed development intensities for Area A and Table 3 for proposed development intensities by floor. The remaining 8.8 acres (Area B on the Location Map) would be developed as a subsequent phase with up to 130,150 square feet of specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses, 362 hotel rooms (including up to 100 vacation ownership units) and 61,997 square feetof hotel accessory uses, and 1,600 parking spaces. See Table 4 for approved development intensities for Area B. -5-PC2011-*** Table 1: Original, Approved and Proposed Development IntensitiesAreas A and BCombined OriginalCurrently ApprovedProposed Project (gross square feet (gross square feet (gross square feet unless otherwise unless otherwise unless otherwise Land Usenoted)noted)noted) Hotels Number2 or 3 hotels4 hotels4 hotels Rooms1,050 rooms1,628 rooms1,628 rooms Hotel Accessory Uses86,985278,817278,817 Retail/Dining/Entertainment (RDE) Specialty Retail335,000389,850 248,033 Dining140,000113,900 163,988 Entertainment90,00066,000 178,244 Total RDE565,000569,750590,265 Parking 1,600,0001,949,8001,949,800 Structured/Covered 4,800 auto spaces4,800 auto spaces4,800 auto spaces Parking 25 bus spaces15 bus spaces15 bus spaces Bus Terminal/Facility21,60010,2007,700 Roof Top Family 141,20000 Entertainment Center Table 2:Approved and Proposed Development Intensities for Area A Approved Proposed Difference (gross square feet(gross square feet(gross square feet unless otherwise unless otherwise unless otherwise Land Usenoted)noted)noted) Hotels Number3 hotels3hotels0 1,266 rooms (including 1,266 rooms (including Roomsup to 400 vacation up to 400 vacation 0 ownership units)ownership units) Hotel Accessory Uses216,820216,8200 Retail/Dining/Entertainment (RDE) Specialty Retail275,500133,683-141,817 Dining98,100148,18850,088 Entertainment66,000178,2441,716,441 Total RDE439,600460,11520,515 Parking 1,299,8671,299,867 Structured/Covered 3,200 auto spaces3,200 auto spaces0 Parking 15 bus spaces15 bus spaces Bus Terminal/Facility10,2007,700-2,500 -6-PC2011-*** Table 3: Area A Retail, Dining and Entertainment (RDE) Uses and Transportation Center/Office Facilities by Floor Level 1 Level 2Level 3Total (gross square (gross square (gross square (gross square Land Usefeet)feet)feet)feet) Retail,Dining and 74,647240,562144,906460,115 Entertainment Transportation 2,576002,576 Center/Office Facilities Table 4: Approved Development Intensities for Area B(No Changes Proposed) Land UseApproved (gross square feetunless otherwise noted) Hotels Number1 hotel Rooms362 rooms (including up to 100 vacation ownership units) Hotel Accessory Uses61,997 Retail/Dining/Entertainment (RDE) Specialty Retail114,350 Dining15,800 Entertainment0 Total RDE130,150 Parking 649,933 Structured/Covered 1,600 auto spaces Parking 0 bus spaces Bus Terminal/Facility0 -7-PC2011-*** EXHIBIT “C” Revised Floor Plansfor Levels 1-3 -8-PC2011-*** ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò é ûØØ×ÎØÇÏÈÍÈÔ×ìÍÓÎÈ×ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ óÎÓÈÓÛÐéÈÇØÃ ïÓÈÓÕÛÈ×Øî×ÕÛÈÓÆ× ø×ÙÐÛÊÛÈÓÍÎ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ Prepared forCity of Anaheim Planning Department 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Suite 162 Anaheim, California 92805 Prepared by BonTerra Consulting 151 Kalmus Drive, Suite E-200 Costa Mesa, California 92626 T: (714) 444-9199 F: (714) 444-9599 June 6, 2011 Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND TABLE OF CONTENTS SectionPage Section 1.0Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1-1 Section 2.0Purpose of the Document ................................................................................ 2-1 Section 3.0Project Background ......................................................................................... 3-1 Section 4.0Project Description .......................................................................................... 4-1 4.1Existing Conditions ................................................................................. 4-1 4.2Project Components ............................................................................... 4-1 4.3Discretionary Actions .............................................................................. 4-4 Section 5.0Environmental Analysis ................................................................................... 5-1 5.1Transportation/Traffic.............................................................................. 5-1 5.1.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ........................... 5-1 5.1.2Project Environmental Review .................................................... 5-2 5.2Air Quality ............................................................................................. 5-20 5.2.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-20 5.2.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-21 5.3Noise .................................................................................................... 5-26 5.3.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-26 5.3.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-27 5.4Land Use And Planning ........................................................................ 5-29 5.4.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-29 5.4.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-30 5.5Population And Housing ....................................................................... 5-31 5.5.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-31 5.5.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-32 5.6Public Services ..................................................................................... 5-34 5.6.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-34 5.6.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-36 5.7Recreation ............................................................................................ 5-40 5.7.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-40 5.7.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-40 5.8Utilities And Service Systems ............................................................... 5-41 5.8.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-41 5.8.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-45 5.9Aesthetics ............................................................................................. 5-54 5.9.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-54 5.9.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-54 i Table of Contents R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND 5.10Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................ 5-56 5.10.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-56 5.10.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-57 5.11Agriculture & Forest Resources ............................................................ 5-61 5.11.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-61 5.11.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-61 5.12Biological Resources ............................................................................ 5-62 5.12.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-62 5.12.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-62 5.13Geology And Soils ................................................................................ 5-63 5.13.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-63 5.13.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-64 5.14Hazards And Hazardous Materials ....................................................... 5-66 5.14.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-66 5.14.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-67 5.15Cultural Resources ............................................................................... 5-71 5.15.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-71 5.15.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-71 5.16Mineral Resources ................................................................................ 5-73 5.16.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-73 5.16.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-73 5.17Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................. 5-74 5.17.1Summary of Previous Environmental Analysis ......................... 5-74 5.17.2Project Environmental Review .................................................. 5-74 Section 6.0Summary of Findings ....................................................................................... 6-1 Section 7.0References ........................................................................................................ 7-1 ii Table of Contents R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND TABLES TablePage 1 CurrentLY Approved Project Entitlements by Development Area .................................. 3-4 2 Proposed Project Buildout by Development Area .......................................................... 4-2 3 Comparison of the Originally Approved Project (1999 IS/MND), the Existing Entitlements and the Proposed Project .......................................................................... 4-3 4 2010 Forecast and Actual ICU Summary ....................................................................... 5-3 5 Year 2015 Without Project ICU Summary ...................................................................... 5-4 6 Area A Gross Vehicle Trip Generation Weekday PM Peak Hour................................... 5-5 7 Area B Gross Vehicle Trip Generation Weekday PM Peak Hour................................... 5-5 8 Area A Net Vehicle Trip Generation Weekday PM Peak Hour....................................... 5-6 9 Area B Net Vehicle Trip Generation Weekday PM Peak Hour....................................... 5-6 10 Vehicle Trip Generation Summary (PM Peak Hour) ...................................................... 5-6 11 Year 2015 With Project ICU Summary ........................................................................... 5-7 12 Net Vehicle Trip Generation Weekday Late Evening Hour (7–8 PM) ............................ 5-8 13 Vehicle Trip Generation Summary (7–8 PM Hour)......................................................... 5-8 14 Year 2015 With Project Late Evening ICU Summary ..................................................... 5-9 15 Net Vehicle Trip Generation Weekday Late Night Hour (10–11 PM) ........................... 5-10 16 Vehicle Trip Generation Summary (10–11 PM) ........................................................... 5-10 17 Net Vehicle Trip Generation Comparisons for Different Time Periods ......................... 5-11 18 1999 IS/MND Table 4.3-8 Locations For Implementation of Scoot Signal System Upgrade Mitigation Measure ........................................................................................ 5-15 19 Estimated Average Daily Traffic Volumes .................................................................... 5-22 20 Estimated Peak Daily Operations Emissions ............................................................... 5-23 21 Projected Employment ................................................................................................. 5-32 22 Water Demand ............................................................................................................. 5-46 23 Wastewater Production ................................................................................................ 5-47 24 Solid Waste Generation ............................................................................................... 5-48 25 Estimated Annual GHG Emissions .............................................................................. 5-75 EXHIBITS ExhibitFollows Page 1Regional Location .......................................................................................................... 1-1 2Local Vicinity .................................................................................................................. 1-1 3Aerial Photograph .......................................................................................................... 3-1 4Site Plan ......................................................................................................................... 4-2 5Existing Lane Configurations ......................................................................................... 5-2 6Existing Intersection Volumes ........................................................................................ 5-2 7Year 2015 Without Project Weekday 5:00 PM–6:00 PM Peak Hour Volumes ............... 5-4 8Project Trip Distribution .................................................................................................. 5-7 9Year 2015 With Project Weekday 5:00 PM–6:00 PM Peak Hour Volumes .................... 5-7 10Valet Plan ..................................................................................................................... 5-11 iii Table of Contents R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND APPENDICES Appendix A Air Quality Calculations B Greenhouse Gas Emissions C Traffic Study iv Table of Contents R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION This document, the Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared to demonstrate that there are no new significant environmental effects nor is there a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects associated with the proposed project, which is defined as amendments to the Anaheim General Plan, The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Anaheim Municipal Code, Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, Development Agreement No. 99-01, the Disposition and Development Agreement by and between the City of Anaheim and Anaheim GW, LLC and Final Site Plan No. 2006-00002. The proposed amendments would modify the amount and type of retail, dining and entertainment (RDE) uses permitted as a part of the Anaheim GardenWalk project. In June 1999, the City of Anaheim approved the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. This Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (IS/MND) evaluates the environmental impacts associated with the establishment and implementation of the Anaheim GardenWalk project (previously known as Pointe Anaheim), which is located within The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan’s approximately 489.7-acre area in the City of Anaheim. As shown on Exhibits 1, Regional Location, and 2, Local Vicinity, the Anaheim GardenWalk site is located in the City of Anaheim in Orange County, and is bordered by Katella Avenue to the south, Disney Way to the north, Clementine Street to the east, and Harbor Boulevard to the west. Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity, shows the project site, The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan boundaries, and surrounding area, including the boundary of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan. Regional access to the project vicinity is provided by Interstate 5 (I-5) via Katella Avenue, Disney Way, and Harbor Boulevard. The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area and, specifically, the Anaheim GardenWalk site, are designated by the Anaheim General Plan for Commercial Recreation land uses. This designation is intended to provide for tourist and entertainment industries such as theme parks, hotels, tourist-oriented retail, restaurants, theaters, and other visitor-serving facilities. Section 65450 et seq. of the California Government Code (Planning and Zoning Law) allows and regulates the establishment of Specific Plans. TheDisneyland Resort Specific Plan sets forth land uses, design guidelines, zoning, development standards, and public facilities requirements for the 489.7 acre Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area. The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan is one of three specific plans that comprise the Anaheim Resort in the City of Anaheim. In addition to TheDisneyland Resort Specific Plan, The Anaheim Resort also includes the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (ARSP) and the Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 (see Exhibit 2 for the boundaries of these Specific Plans). The ARSP was adopted in September 1994, encompasses approximately 581.3 acres, and provides for the development of hotel, convention, retail, and other visitor-serving uses. The Hotel Circle Specific Plan was adopted in August 1994, encompasses approximately 6.8 acres, and provides for the development of up to 969 hotel rooms (818 hotel rooms currently exist). Together, these three Specific Plans encompass the entire 1,078-acre Anaheim Resort. 1-1 Introduction R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx 138 395 14 Santa Clarita Hesperia 15 Angeles 173 National 210 118 Forest 138 San Gabriel Reservoir 170 101 Glendale Rancho Cucamonga 134 2 30 Pasadena 215 210 110 Rialto 710 2 10 West Hollywood Santa Monica West Covina Ontario Los Angeles 10 605 187 60 Riverside 710 110 Whittier 405 142 72 Downey 71 Orange 105 91 Hawthorne 90 Yorba Linda 57 91 Corona Lakewood 19 107 Lake Anaheim 5 Buena Park Mathews 213 241 Carson Project Location Long Beach Palos Verdes 15 22 Westminster Seal Beach 261 Santa Ana Cleveland 55 39 National Canyon Huntington 241 Costa Mesa Beach Forest Lake Irvine RanchoElsinore Santa Margarita Lake Elsinore PACIFIC 1 Mission 73 Viejo 74 OCEAN 133 Laguna Beach San Juan San Diego Capistrano San Clemente Camp Pendleton 5 Î»¹·±²¿´ Ô±½¿¬·±²Û¨¸·¾·¬ ï Anaheim GardenWalk Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim IS/MND 105010 Miles (031711 SJE) R:\Projects\Anaheimr\J066\Graphics\addendum\ex1_RL.pdf ëé ë Ü·²»§´¿²¼ ß²¿¸»·³ Ü·²»§ É§ Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ ß®®±©¸»¿¼ Ð±²¼ ß²¿¸»·³ Ý±²ª»²¬·±² Ý»²¬»® ß²¿¸»·³ Í¬¿¼·«³ Ð®±¶»½¬ Í·¬» Ü·²»§´¿²¼ Î»±®¬ Í°»½·º·½ Ð´¿² øÍÐçîóï÷ ß²¿¸»·³ Î»±®¬ Í°»½·º·½ Ð´¿² øÍÐçîóî÷ Ø±¬»´ Ý·®½´» Í°»½·º·½ Ð´¿² øÍÐçíóï÷ îî Í±«®½»æ ÛÍÎ× Í¬®»»¬Ó¿° ËÍßô îððë Ô±½¿´ Ê·½·²·¬§Û¨¸·¾·¬ î ß²¿¸»·³ Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ ß¼¼»²¼«³ ¬± ¬¸» Ð±·²¬» ß²¿¸»·³ ×ÍñÓÒÜ ðòëðòîëððòë Ó·´» øðëîíïï ÖÚÙ÷ ÎæÄÐ®±¶»½¬Äß²¿¸»·³ÄÖðêêÄÙ®¿°¸·½Ä¿¼¼»²¼«³Ä»¨îÁÔÊò°¼º Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND In conjunction with the approval of the ARSP, the City Council also approved The Anaheim Resort Identity Program and The Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program to create a uniform identity and landscape program to improve the visual quality of the entire Anaheim Resort. These plans address the Public Realm (the area within the public right-of-way) and the Setback Realm (the area between the public right-of-way and the private buildings). 1-2 Introduction R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND SECTION 2.0 PURPOSE OF THE DOCUMENT This addendum is prepared in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) (California Public Resources Code §21000 et seq.) and the State CEQA Guidelines (California Code of Regulations §15000 et seq.). Section 15164(b) of the CEQA Guidelines states that “an addendum to an adopted negative declaration may be prepared if only minor technical changes or additions are necessary or none of the conditions described in Section 15162 calling for the preparation of a subsequent EIR or negative declaration have occurred.” Pursuant to Section 15162(a) of the CEQA Guidelines, a subsequent EIR is only required when: (1) Substantial changes are proposed in the project which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; (2) Substantial changes occur with respect to the circumstances under which the project is undertaken which will require major revisions of the previous EIR or negative declaration due to the involvement of new significant environmental effects or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified significant effects; or (3) New information of substantial importance, which was not known and could not have been known with the exercise of reasonable diligence at the time the previous EIR was certified as complete or the negative declaration was adopted, shows any of the following: (A) The project will have one or more significant effects not discussed in the previous EIR or negative declaration; (B) Significant effects previously examined will be substantially more severe than shown in the previous EIR; (C) Mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would in fact be feasible and would substantially reduce one or more significant effects of the project, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative; or (D) Mitigation measures or alternatives which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous EIR would substantially reduce one or more significant effects on the environment, but the project proponents decline to adopt the mitigation measure or alternative. This document is an addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration, as amended, which was approved by the City of Anaheim on June 22, 1999, and subsequently amended as discussed in Section 3.0, Project Background. As described in detail herein, an analysis has been conducted that confirms that the impacts from the proposed project will be no more severe than those projected to result from implementation of the previously approved and amended project and that no new significant impacts are projected to occur. The projected impacts of the proposed project would have no substantial increase in 2-1 Purpose of the Document R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND severity when compared to the approved Pointe Anaheim project, and no new significant impacts would result. Therefore, in accordance with Section 15164 of the CEQA Guidelines, an Addendum to the previously approved Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate environmental documentation for the proposed project. 2-2 Purpose of the Document R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND SECTION 3.0 PROJECT BACKGROUND The City of Anaheim is the Lead Agency responsible for The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Environmental Impact Report (EIR) No. 311, the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (1999 IS/MND), the Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (2001), the 2006 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration and the subject Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Anaheim GardenWalk Project. Development Standards The 29.1-acre Anaheim GardenWalk site is located within The Anaheim Resort, in an area of the City regulated by The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan consists of five planning districts: Theme Park District ¼ Hotel District ¼ Parking District ¼ Future Expansion District ¼ District A ¼ The 29.1-acre Anaheim GardenWalk site contains properties located within District A and the Parking District.The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan also includes two overlays: C-R Overlay, which allows development consistent with the underlying planning district ¼ or subject to the same land uses as in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zone Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (hotels, motels, convention and conference facilities, as well as restaurants, retail shops and entertainment facilities). Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay (previously known as the “Pointe Anaheim Overlay”), ¼ which allows for the development of the Anaheim GardenWalk project subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, as amended. Portions of the Anaheim GardenWalk site are within the C-R Overlay and the entire site is within the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay. As shown in Exhibit 3, Aerial Photograph, the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay is divided into two development areas in response to future anticipated phasing: (1) Area A, which encompasses approximately 20.3 acres of the project site along Clementine Street on the eastern portion of the project site, and (2) Area B, which encompasses approximately 8.8 acres at the southeastern corner of Harbor Boulevard and Disney Way and is currently developed with the Anaheim Plaza Hotel & Suites. Environmental Documentation In June 1993, the City of Anaheim certified Final EIR No. 311 for The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. EIR No. 311, as subsequently amended, provides for the development of an international vacation destination resort, including the development of a new theme park, additional hotel and entertainment areas, administrative office facilities, back-of-house facilities, new public and private parking facilities, an internal transportation system, and the on-going modification of the Disney Theme Parks. The Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay was not a part of the original Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. 3-1 Project Background R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Disney Way Project Site Area A Area B Source: Aerial Express, flown April-May 2009 ß»®·¿´ Ð¸±¬±¹®¿°¸Û¨¸·¾·¬ í Anaheim GardenWalk Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim IS/MND n 2501250250 Feet (Rev 03-17-11 WAD) R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Graphics\addendum\ex3_aerial.pdf Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND In June 1999, the City Council approved amendments to the Anaheim General Plan,The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan,Anaheim Municipal Code andAnaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program; and, approved Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, and Development Agreement No 99-01 between the City of Anaheim and Excel Pointe Anaheim, LLC. The amendments added text to the Commercial Recreation land use designation recognizing that The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of the Pointe Anaheim (now Anaheim GardenWalk) Overlay at the following density: up to 565,000 gross sf of restaurant/dining/entertainment uses, two to three hotels comprising a maximum of 1,050 hotel rooms/suites with related accessory retail uses (total hotel maximum 923,800 sf); a multiplex theater including either 4,600 seats for live performances or 4,757 seats for movies, a parking structure with approximately 4,800 parking spaces, an approximately 141,200 sf open-air family entertainment center on the top floor of the parking structure, and a bus terminal/facility for airport transport and to/from sightseeing venues. The 1999 IS/MND (hereafter referred to as the 1999 IS/MND) was prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts of these amendments and entitlements, which established the Pointe Anaheim Overlay and allowed development of the 29.1-acre project site with the uses described above. On February 26, 2002, the City Council approved amendments to the Anaheim General Plan, The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Anaheim Municipal Code, Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program, Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 and Development Agreement No. 99-1. The environmental impacts of these amendments were evaluated by the Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration (2001) (hereafter referred to as the 2001 Addendum). These amendments addressed modifications to the Pointe Anaheim project to add an additional hotel; delete the live theater complex entitlement and replace it with another commercial attraction such as an aquarium; reduce the area proposed for retail/dining/entertainment uses by 24,300 square feet (sf); and increase the overall square footage of the covered parking facility to accommodate an additional 400 spaces via tandem parking and valet while reducing the size of the bus terminal. Additional changes include project phasing and addition of a signalized median break on Disney Way. The City Council also approved a Disposition and Development Agreement (DDA) by and between the City and Applicant that provided for the sale of approximately 1.35 acres located at the southwestern corner of Disney Way and Clementine Street, north of Fire Station No. 3 (to the then developer), and for the lease (to the City) of certain public parking facilities to be constructed on the project site. On December 14, 2004, the City Council approved amendments to Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, Development Agreement No. 99-01, and the Disposition and Development Agreement to extend, by one year, the date by which construction of the Initial Phase of Development must commence (by February 26, 2006); and, to assign Anaheim GW, LLC as the successor-in-interest to Excel Pointe Anaheim, LLC for both the Development Agreement and the Disposition and Development Agreement. No modifications were made to the project description and the City Council determined that the 2001 Addendum was adequate to serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for these actions. On January 31, 2006, the City Council approved amendments to Development Agreement No. 99-01, and the DDA to extend, by one year, the date by which construction of the Initial Phase of Development must be commenced (by February 26, 2007). On December 12, 2005, the Planning Commission approved a related amendment to Conditional Use Permit No. 4078. The proposed extension was intended to provide sufficient time to process the proposed modifications to the Anaheim GardenWalk project entitlements and facilitate the project moving forward in a timely manner. The Planning Commission and City Council determined that the 2001 Addendum was adequate to serve as the appropriate environmental documentation for these actions. 3-2 Project Background R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND On April 11, 2006, the City Council approved amendments to the Anaheim General Plan, The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Anaheim Municipal Code, Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, Development Agreement No. 99-01, and the DDA by and between the City of Anaheim and Anaheim GW, LLC; and, approved Tentative Parcel Map No. 2002-205 and Final Site Plan No. 2006-00002. The City Council determined that the 2006 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration was adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for these actions. The modified project increased the number of hotels to 5 and reduced the maximum number of hotel rooms from 1,662 to 1,628. Additionally, the square footage assigned to hotel accessory uses was reduced from 282,071 sf to 278,817 sf. Within the retail, dining and entertainment component of the project, plans for an aquarium were replaced with plans for an equivalent amount of specialty retail uses; total dining area was increased from 90,850 sf to 113,900 sf; and entertainment uses were reduced from 154,000 sf to 66,000 sf with the potential for a multiplex movie theater. On March 23, 2010 the City Council approved an amendment to Development Agreement No. 99-01 to change the construction start date for the hotels associated with the Anaheim GardenWalk project to May 26, 2011, change the construction start date for the timeshare component to March 23, 2019 and redefine the project description from five hotels with up to 1,628 rooms to four hotels with up to 1,628 rooms. The City Council determined that the 2006 Addendumwas adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for the amendment. On August 24, 2010 the City Council approved Amendment No. 2 to the Second Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 99-01 to defer the commencement of hotel construction by up to two additional years, to commence no later than May 26, 2013. The City Council determined that the 2006 Addendumwas adequate to serve as the environmental documentation for the amendment. Existing Entitlements Table 1 provides a summary of existing entitlements associated with the Anaheim GardenWalk project. 3-3 Project Background R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND TABLE 1 CURRENTLY APPROVED PROJECT ENTITLEMENTS BY DEVELOPMENT AREA Area A (gross sf unless Area B (gross sf unless Land Use otherwise noted) otherwise noted) Project Total Hotels Number 3 hotels 1 hotel 4 hotels 1,266 rooms (including up 362 rooms (including up to 1,628 rooms (including up Rooms to 400 vacation ownership 100 vacation ownership to 500 vacation ownership units) units) units) Hotel Accessory Uses 216,820 61,997 278,817 Retail/Dining/Entertainment (RDE) Specialty Retail 275,500 114,350 389,850 Dining 98,100 15,800 113,900 66,000 Entertainment (includes a multiplex 0 66,000 movie theater) Total RDE 439,600 130,150 569,750 Parking 1,299,867 649,933 1,949,800 Structured/Covered Parking 3,200 auto spaces 1,600 auto spaces 4,800 auto spaces 15 bus spaces 0 bus spaces 15 bus spaces Bus Terminal/Facility 10,200 0 10,200 sf: square feet 3-4 Project Background R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND SECTION 4.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION 4.1 EXISTING CONDITIONS Area A of the Anaheim GardenWalk site has been developed with retail, dining and entertainment (RDE) uses in a three-story concourse featuring landscaping, fountains, and seating areas. Tenants include a mix of general purpose merchandise stores; full-service restaurants; specialty and walk-up/fast food establishment; bar/nightclubs; a 14-screen movie theater; a 20,000 sf fitness facility; and a 44-lane bowling facility. The concourse structure also includes back-of-house areas such as management and security offices, service corridors, utility rooms, and loading areas. In addition, a concierge/ticket service and Police Substation are located on the ground floor. Area A also includes a multi-level parking garage with 2,606 parking 1 spaces and a transportation center with parking for 15 buses. Currently, approximately 449,115 sf of building area has been developed that can be leased to accommodate RDE uses. This includes 2,500 sf within the Bus/Terminal Facility. However, Area A has only been entitled for 439,600 sf of RDE uses. Although there is a difference of 9,515 sf between the potential leasable area and the permitted amount of RDE uses, it should be noted this area is not new development. Rather, this area reflects (1) a re-classification of (a) a limited amount of back-of-house and circulation areas and (b) 2,500 square feet of the Transportation Center into RDE uses, and (2) updated as-built drawings demonstrating that the existing area of RDE square footage is slightly larger than previously analyzed . As of January 2011, development has been limited to the RDE component and associated parking structure of Area A of the Anaheim GardenWalk site which is under a single ownership entity (the Project Applicant); development plans for the hotels or timeshare, which are under separate ownership entities, have not been submitted. Additionally, no development plans have been submitted for Area B. 4.2 PROJECT COMPONENTS As discussed above, Area A of the Anaheim GardenWalk site is partially developed with a variety of RDE uses. Implementation of the current project would modify the development entitled in Development Area A to: Reduce the permitted square footage of retail uses and increase the permitted square ¼ footage of dining and entertainment uses; Allow development of an approximately 11,000 sf outdoor restaurant in a location that is ¼ currently used for pedestrian circulation/food court common area; Increase the overall amount of RDE to 460,115 sf to reflect the potential 449,115 sf that ¼ can be leased to RDE uses and the proposed 11,000 square foot outdoor restaurant; Reduce the square footage allocated to the Bus/Terminal Facility to reflect the 2,500 sf ¼ currently being used for retail uses (concierge/ticket service). 1 Under existing conditions, the top level of the parking structure is not yet fully constructed; therefore, the number of available parking spaces is currently less than the entitled amount for Area A. 4-1 Project Description R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Table 2 provides a summary of proposed project modifications by development area. As shown, no changes are proposed for the hotel component of Area A and no modifications are proposed for Area B. Exhibit 4, Site Plan, illustrates the layout of the RDE area and parking structure, as proposed. TABLE 2 PROPOSED PROJECT BUILDOUT BY DEVELOPMENT AREA Area A (gross sf unless Area B (gross sf unless Land Use otherwise noted) otherwise noted) Project Total Hotels Number 3 hotels 1 hotel 4 hotels 1,266 rooms (including up 362 rooms (including up to 1,628 rooms (including up Rooms to 400 vacation ownership 100 vacation ownership to 500 vacation ownership units) units) units) Hotel Accessory Uses 216,820 61,997 278,817 Retail/Dining/Entertainment (RDE) Specialty Retail 133,683 114,350 248,033 Dining 148,188 15,800 163,988 1 Entertainment 178,244 0 178,244 Total RDE 460,115 130,150 590,265 Parking 1,299,867 649,933 1,949,800 Structured/Covered Parking 3,200 auto spaces 1,600 auto spaces 4,800 auto spaces 15 bus spaces 0 bus spaces 15 bus spaces Bus Terminal/Facility 7,700 0 7,700 sf: square feet 1 Entertainment includes bowling, multiplex movie theater, live theater, nightclub/bar, and an 11,000 sf outdoor restaurant. In general, the proposed project’s adjustment in allowable uses would provide the ability to lease currently vacant space to new tenants providing goods and services in types of uses that are more compatible with the anticipated future market-based activity at Anaheim GardenWalk. The proposed project is intended to enhance customer penetration into the more central portions of the project site, and in the direction of Disney Way. The change in the mix of uses is intended to reinvigorate and reposition Anaheim GardenWalk with additional destination and entertainment venues to create a unique shopping and entertainment center drawing patrons from the local community, Convention Center, local hotels and entertainment attractions. Anaheim GardenWalk would be infused with more active food and beverage and new retail tenants to provide compelling reasons for customers to walk from the front entrance on Katella into and beyond the heart of the center. Tenants would be located in order to activate the Disney Way portion of the project and the currently challenged third level of the facility. In addition, the proposed project involves a reconfiguration of the currently underperforming food court to a destination type food and beverage facility. Taken together, the proposed project is intended to further activate and enliven Anaheim GardenWalk. Table 3 illustrates a comparison among the originally approved project, as analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND, the existing entitlement, and the currently proposed project. 4-2 Project Description R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Source: Lyons Warren 2011 ñØÇØÑ ÷ÑÎÎËíÑÜÏøÅÕÔÛÔÉ Ü Anaheim GardenWalk Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim IS/MND (052311 jfg) R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Graphics\addendum\ex4a_Level1_floorplan.pdf Source: Lyons Warren 2011 ñØÇØÑ÷ÑÎÎËíÑÜÏøÅÕÔÛÔÉ Û Anaheim GardenWalk Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim IS/MND (052311 jfg) R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Graphics\addendum\ex4b_Level2_floorplan.pdf Source: Lyons Warren 2011 ñØÇØÑ øÅÕÔÛÔÉ Ú Anaheim GardenWalk Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim IS/MND (052311 jfg) R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Graphics\addendum\ex4c_Level3_floorplan.pdf Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND TABLE 3 COMPARISON OF THE ORIGINALLY APPROVED PROJECT (1999 IS/MND), THE EXISTING ENTITLEMENTS AND THE PROPOSED PROJECT 1999 IS/MNDExisting EntitlementProposed Project (gross sf unless (gross sf unless (gross sf unless Land Use otherwise noted) otherwise noted) otherwise noted) Hotels Number 2 or 3 hotels 4 hotels 4 hotels Rooms 1,050 rooms 1,628 rooms 1,628 rooms Hotel Accessory Uses 86,985 278,817 278,817 Retail/Dining/Entertainment (RDE) Specialty Retail 335,000 389,850 248,033 Dining 140,000 113,900 163,988 2 Entertainment 90,000 66,000 178,244 1 Total RDE 565,000 569,750 590,265 Parking 1,600,000 1,949,800 1,949,800 Structured/Covered Parking 4,800 auto spaces 4,800 auto spaces 4,800 auto spaces 25 bus spaces 15 bus spaces 15 bus spaces Bus Terminal/Facility 21,600 10,200 7,700 Roof Top Family 141,200 0 0 Entertainment Center sf: square feet 1 Increases in the total RDE between scenarios represent an increase in the utilization of leasable area within the existing building footprint. The Proposed Project does not include any construction or development of additional square footage. 2 Includes a proposed 11,000 sf outdoor restaurant on the third floor in a location that is currently used for pedestrian circulation/food court common area. The proposed project would reposition Anaheim GardenWalk with a change in the mix of uses, tenant improvements (TI) and other minor construction for the purpose of increasing entertainment and restaurant square footage, and decreasing retail square footage. While there would be an approximately 9,515 square foot increase in the amount of RDE area, this is not due to any increase in the massing or physical size of the existing Anaheim GardenWalk structures. Instead, the increase in RDE square footage is predominantly related to (1) a re-classification of (a) a limited amount of back-of-house and circulation areas and (b) 2,500 square feet of the Transportation Center into RDE uses, and (2) updated as-built drawings demonstrating that the existing area of RDE square footage is slightly larger than previously analyzed. The repositioning would involve minor construction, such as TI and façade improvements, sporadic and limited in duration, with no change to the previously analyzed plans for the hotels or timeshare in Area A, or Area B. It would not include development of additional uses beyond the shell of the existing Anaheim GardenWalk development, originally approved in January 1999. As shown in Table 3, Anaheim GardenWalk includes a number of other components, none of which would be changed as a result of the proposed project; in Area A, there would be no change in use, density or area of the hotels or hotel accessory uses and there would be no change in any of the uses or densities in Area B. None of the impacts of these other components have changed and only the incremental changes of the RDE portion of Area A are analyzed as the proposed project in this Addendum. The footprint of the proposed project would cover the same area as currently exists and as previously approved with similar land use types and densities. Therefore, the project, as proposed, is defined as buildout of the Anaheim GardenWalk project as described previously in Table 2. 4-3 Project Description R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND 4.3 DISCRETIONARY ACTIONS This Addendum, in conjunction with the previous environmental documents prepared for the Pointe Anaheim and Anaheim GardenWalk projects, is intended to serve as the primary environmental document for all future actions associated with the proposed project, including all discretionary approvals requested or required to implement the project. In addition, this Addendum is the primary reference document for the formulation and implementation of a mitigation monitoring program for the proposed project. All applicable mitigation measures in the 1999 IS/MND Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004, as amended, which includes relevant measures from The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0067, have been incorporated into this document for ease of reference. This document is intended to provide sufficient information to allow permitting agencies to evaluate the potential impacts from construction and implementation of the proposed project. Potential actions to be considered as part of the request to amend existing entitlements for the previously approved project may include, but are not limited to, amendments to: Anaheim General Plan ¼ The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan ¼ Anaheim Municipal Code ¼ Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 ¼ Development Agreement No. 99-01 ¼ Final Site Plan No. 2006-00002 ¼ 4-4 Project Description R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND SECTION 5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS This portion of the Addendum examines each environmental topical issue analyzed in EIR No. 311 and the 1999 IS/MND specific to the proposed project. Additionally, the Addendum includes additional areas of analysis, including forestland resources and greenhouse gas emissions, pursuant to the 2010 CEQA Guidelines amendments. The City of Anaheim Environmental Checklist has been subsequently revised to reflect these amendments. For each topical issue, summaries of the previous environmental analyses from EIR No. 311, the 1999 IS/MND, the 2001 Addendum, and the 2006 Addendum are provided. Following this discussion, an analysis of the proposed project is provided and compared to the previous findings. The required mitigation measures for the project are included; however, no new mitigation measures are proposed. This document is an addendum to the subsequent CEQA documents outlined in Section 3.0. By definition, an addendum to a CEQA document is intended to demonstrate that the modifications/alterations to the previously approved project will not substantially increase environmental impacts or create any new significant impacts. The following analysis is a documentation of why and how this conclusion has been made. Because the proposed project represents a minor modification to a previously analyzed and approved project, this Addendum does not include an analysis specific to the Mandatory Findings of Significance topic identified in the City of Anaheim Environmental Checklist. As appropriate, the analysis takes various related projects and development into account, particularly related to traffic and greenhouse gas emissions. 5.1 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC 5.1.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR No. 311 The evaluation of traffic impacts associated with development of the SP92-1 in EIR No. 311 determined that prior to implementation of mitigation, four intersections (Euclid Avenue/Ball Road, Euclid Avenue/Katella Avenue, Harbor Boulevard/Katella Avenue, and Haster Street/ Katella Avenue) would become deficient with a level of service (LOS) E condition in the year 2010. It was determined that implementation of project design features and mitigation measures would reduce impacts to a level considered less than significant. EIR No. 311 also concluded that significant deficiencies in levels of service would occur if future background traffic growth was not mitigated, or if planned improvements were not implemented. However, the Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to these potential deficiencies. Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The Pointe Anaheim project would have increased the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) value of the intersection of Haster Street and Katella Avenue by 0.02 in the PM peak hour. This increase would cause the intersection to remain at LOS E at peak hour, resulting in a significant impact. Additionally, it was determined that the increase in project-related traffic (primarily in conjunction with the proposed theater use) would also result in a significant impact and, therefore, warranted an additional left turn lane on Disney Way in the westbound direction at the intersection with Clementine Street and on Clementine Street in the north bound direction at the intersection with Disney Way. These impacts would be fully mitigated upon implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. 5-1 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND 2001 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration As reported in the 2001 Addendum, the modified project would result in fewer PM peak hour trips than identified in the previously-approved IS/MND. Despite the reduction in traffic, the intersection of Haster Street and Katella Avenue would experience LOS E, representing a significant impact. This impact would be reduced through implementation of project mitigation. The design of the modified project would improve access along Disney Way thus eliminating the need for dual left-turn lanes from Disney Way to Clementine Street and from Clementine Street to Disney Way. Anticipated parking demands would be accommodated with the on-site parking provided in the multi-level parking structure. No new significant impacts would occur. 2006 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration According to the 2006 Addendum, the Anaheim GardenWalk project was anticipated to result in fewer PM peak hour trips. Pedestrian volumes were also expected to decrease or remain unchanged. A significant impact was projected at Haster Street/Katella Avenue in 2010 in the PM peak hour. No impacts were identified for parking. 5.1.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW The following analysis is based on the Draft Transportation Analysis Update prepared by Iteris, Inc. (March 2011) for the proposed project, which is included as Appendix C of the Addendum. Would the project: a) Conflict with an applicable plan, ordinance or policy establishing measures of effectiveness for the performance of the circulation system, taking into account all modes of transportation including mass transit and non-motorized travel and relevant components of the circulation system, including but not limited to intersections, streets, highways and freeways, pedestrian and bicycle paths, and mass transit? The project study area includes the same 13 intersections identified by City of Anaheim staff that were analyzed in the 1999 Pointe Anaheim IS/MND and that have been analyzed in addenda subsequent to the original Project 1999 IS/MND. The study area also includes the signalized project driveway on Disney Way (referred to as intersection 14). The locations of the study intersections and the existing intersection lane configurations are illustrated in Exhibit 5, Existing Lane Configurations. In the 1999 Pointe Anaheim IS/MND, the existing conditions were from 1998, and the future year analyzed was 2010. For informational purposes and to document current conditions, new intersection turning movement counts were conducted at the 14 study intersections. The existing PM peak hour intersection turning movement volumes are illustrated in Exhibit 6, Existing Intersection Volumes. Intersection operations can be characterized in terms of level of service (LOS), which varies from LOS A, which represents uncongested freeflow conditions, to LOS F, which represents overcapacity, jammed conditions. As specified in the City of Anaheim traffic impact study guidelines, intersection levels of service calculations were conducted using the Intersection Capacity Utilization (ICU) method, which assigns an ICU value between 0 and 1 to each intersection based on its capacity and the volume of traffic traveling through it. The City of Anaheim and the County of Orange Growth Management Program (GMP) have established 5-2 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx ð×Õ×ÎØ úÛÐÐêØ éÈÇØÃóÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ä úÛÐÐêØóîúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ úÛÐÐêØ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óîúêÛÏÌÉ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ãó÷ðø ù×ÊÊÓÈÍÉûÆ× ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óéúêÛÏÌÉôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÊ×Ûú ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ûÊ×Ûû ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆóéúíÖÖêÛÏÌ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ îíèèíéùûð÷ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ óîúêÛÏÌÉ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ Source: Iteris 2010 øÅÔÊÉÔÏÖñÜÏØúÎÏ×ÔÖÈËÜÉÔÎÏÊøÅÕÔÛÔÉ Anaheim GardenWalk Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim IS/MND Map Not to Scale (031711 KFD) R: Projects\Anaheim\J066\Graphics\Ex5_ExistLane.pdf ð×Õ×ÎØ úÛÐÐêØ éÈÇØÃóÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ä ìïì×ÛÑôÍÇÊæÍÐÇÏ× äää úÛÐÐêØóîúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ úÛÐÐêØ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óîúêÛÏÌÉ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ù×ÊÊÓÈÍÉûÆ× ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óéúêÛÏÌÉôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÊ×Ûú ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ûÊ×Ûû ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆóéúíÖÖêÛÏÌ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ îíèèíéùûð÷ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ óîúêÛÏÌÉ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ Source: Iteris 2010 øÅÔÊÉÔÏÖôÏÉØËÊØÚÉÔÎÏçÎÑÈÐØÊøÅÕÔÛÔÉ Anaheim GardenWalk Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim IS/MND Map Not to Scale (031711 KFD) R: Projects\Anaheim\J066\Graphics\Addendum\Ex6_ExistVolumes.pdf Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND LOS D (ICU value of 0.90) as the lowest acceptable level of service for peak hour operating conditions on local arterial streets. The Orange County Congestion Management Program (CMP) specified LOS E (ICU value of 1.00) as the lowest acceptable level of service for an intersection on the CMP highway network, as discussed later under question b. Table 4 shows year 2010 with project LOS as forecast in the 1999 IS/MND, compared to the actual 2010 LOS calculated from the current traffic counts. As shown, all of the study intersections are currently operating at LOS B or better, indicating that conditions in the study area are better today than they were projected to be in the 1999 IS/MND. This is at least in part because of the previously proposed 439,600 square feet of retail/dining/entertainment land uses in the Anaheim GardenWalk Area A, only approximately 250,000 square feet are currently leased and in use. In addition, over 20,000 hotel rooms have been entitled but are not yet built within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) area. TABLE 4 2010 FORECAST AND ACTUAL ICU SUMMARY 2010 Forecast From 1999 IS/MNDActual 2010 Conditions Weekday PM IntersectionICULOSICULOS 1. Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road 1.03 F 0.63 B 2. Harbor Boulevard and I5 NB Ramp 0.73 C 0.48 A 3. Harbor Boulevard and I5 SB Ramp 0.86 D 0.30 A 4. Harbor Boulevard and Disney Way 0.82 D 0.36 A 5. Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue 0.87 D 0.54 A 6. Clementine Street and Disney Way 0.68 B 0.20 A 7. Clementine Street and Katella Avenue 0.89 D 0.52 A 8. I5 SB Ramps and Disney Way 0.52 A 0.21 A 9. Anaheim Boulevard and Disney Way 0.76 C 0.43 A 10. Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street and Katella 0.95 E 0.51 A Avenue 11. Haster Street and Orangewood Avenue 0.88 D 0.62 B 12. I5 SB Ramps and Katella Avenue 0.66 B 0.50 A 13. I5 NB Ramps and Katella Avenue 0.87 D 0.46 A Note: Because the 1999 IS/MND did not evaluate intersection operations at the Project Driveway on Disney Way (Intersection 14), this intersection is not included in the table. Source: Iteris 2011 Future Conditions Without Project The future "without project" traffic volumes for the year 2015 were developed from data provided by the City of Anaheim using the Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model (ATAM). Because the comparisons in the transportation analysis compare forecast traffic conditions with the project as currently proposed to those that would prevail under the original 1999 Pointe Anaheim IS/MND, forecast traffic volumes from the ARSP were modified to establish 2015 “no project” traffic volumes that include Anaheim GardenWalk as originally approved. Therefore, 2015 no project volumes were developed by subtracting traffic volumes that would be generated by the Anaheim GardenWalk 2006 Addendum project from the 2015 turning movement volumes analyzed in DSEIR No. 340 and then adding the 1999 Pointe Anaheim IS/MND project trip volumes. The 2015 no project PM peak hour turning movement volumes are illustrated in Exhibit 7, Year 2015 5-3 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Without Project Weekday 5:00 PM–6:00 PM Peak Hour Volumes. The resulting 2015 no project intersection levels of service are indicated in Table 5. As shown in this table, all of the study intersections are projected to operate at a satisfactory level of service. TABLE 5 YEAR 2015 WITHOUT PROJECT ICU SUMMARY Year 2015 No Project Weekday PM Intersection ICULOS 1. Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road 0.74 C 2. Harbor Boulevard and I5 NB Ramp 0.62 B 3. Harbor Boulevard and I5 SB Ramp 0.39 A 4. Harbor Boulevard and Disney Way 0.54 A 5. Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue 0.75 C 6. Clementine Street and Disney Way 0.32 A 7. Clementine Street and Katella Avenue 0.76 C 8. I5 SB Ramps and Disney Way 0.33 A 9. Anaheim Boulevard and Disney Way 0.61 B 10. Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street and 0.75 C Katella Avenue 11. Haster Street and Orangewood Avenue 0.81 D 12. I5 SB Ramps and Katella Avenue 0.68 B 13. I5 NB Ramps and Katella Avenue 0.63 B 14. Project Driveway on Disney Way 0.41 A Source: Iteris 2011 Trip Generation The proposed project contains a mix of land uses that will share a consolidated parking facility, resulting in “internal” trips which will be made between the land uses of the project without the use of automobiles. In addition, because of the project’s location within The Anaheim Resort, many trips to/from the Anaheim GardenWalk project will be made by persons visiting other attractions or by persons traveling past the site between those attractions and other hotels/motels in the project area. The methodology used to calculate the project’s trip generation is based on rates published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (Trip Generation, 8th Edition, hereafter referred to as the “ITE”). The proposed RDE entitlements were classified to different land uses as defined by the ITE. The gross vehicle trips are calculated based on application of the ITE trip generation rates to the square footage of land use or number of hotel rooms or movie theater seats. Tables 6 and 7 show the gross vehicle trip generation calculations for the two areas of the project site. The gross vehicle trips were then adjusted to reflect trip reductions due to walking, transit, passby, and internal trips. The trip reductions calculated for each land use category for walking, transit, passby and internal trips are shown in Tables 8 and 9. 5-4 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx ð×Õ×ÎØ úÛÐÐêØ éÈÇØÃóÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ä ìïì×ÛÑôÍÇÊæÍÐÇÏ× äää úÛÐÐêØóîúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ úÛÐÐêØ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óîúêÛÏÌÉ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ù×ÊÊÓÈÍÉûÆ× ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óéúêÛÏÌÉôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÊ×Ûú ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ûÊ×Ûû ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆóéúíÖÖêÛÏÌ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ îíèèíéùûð÷ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ óîúêÛÏÌÉ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ Source: Iteris 2010 äØÜË æÔÉÕÎÈÉíËÎÓØÚÉæØØÒÙÜÄ íð íð íØÜÒõÎÈËçÎÑÈÐØÊ øÅÕÔÛÔÉ Anaheim GardenWalk Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim IS/MND Map Not to Scale (031711 KFD) R: Projects\Anaheim\J066\Graphics\Addendum\Ex7_Yr2015without.pdf Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND TABLE 6 AREA A GROSS VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR InboundOutbound Total Land Use Quantity RateTripsRateTrips Trips Retail Shopping Center 133,683 Sq Ft 1.83 245 1.90 254 499 Dining Quality Restaurant 123,372 Sq Ft 5.02 619 2.47 305 924 HighTurnover Restaurant 24,816 Sq Ft 6.58 163 4.57 113 276 Entertainment Night Club/Bar 47,769 Sq Ft 7.48 357 3.86 184 541 Live Theater 900 Seats 0.01 9 0.01 9 18 Multiplex Movie Theater 2,165 Seats 0.03 65 0.05 108 173 Bowling 47,665 Sq Ft 1.24 59 2.30 110 169 Outdoor Restaurant 11,000 Sq Ft 7.48 82 3.86 42 124 Total R/D/E 3.481,5992.451,1252,724 Hotel 1,266 Rooms 0.18 228 0.24 304 532 Total Area A Gross Trips 1,8271,4293,256 Note: Rates are per 1000 Sq Ft. Rates obtained from , 8th Edition. ITE Trip Generation Manual Source: Iteris 2011 TABLE 7 AREA B GROSS VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR InboundOutbound Total Land Use Quantity RateTripsRateTrips Trips Retail Shopping Center 114,350 Sq Ft 1.83 209 1.90 217 426 Dining Quality Restaurant 10,902 Sq Ft 5.02 55 2.47 27 82 HighTurnover Restaurant 4,898 Sq Ft 6.58 32 4.57 22 54 Total R/D/E 130,150 Sq Ft2.272962.04266562 Hotel 362 Rooms 0.18 65 0.24 87 152 Total Area B Gross Trips 361353714 Note: Rates are per 1000 Sq Ft. Rates obtained from , 8th Edition. ITE Trip Generation Manual Source: Iteris 2011 5-5 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND TABLE 8 AREA A NET VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR Gross Walk/TransitInternalPassbyNet Vehicle Trips Vehicle Land Use Trips Total In Out In Out In Out In Out Total 139 Retail 499 19 43 167 84 15 32 44 95 460 Dining 1,200 107 84 353 80 64 51 257 203 627 Entertainment1,0258241241824723419208 222 Hotel532327162550018041 Total 3,256 241 175560601126106901 5471,448 Note: Totals may not exactly match the sum of values due to rounding. Source: Iteris 2011 TABLE 9 AREA B NET VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION WEEKDAY PM PEAK HOUR Gross Walk/TransitInternalPassbyNet Vehicle Trips Vehicle Land Use Trips Total In Out In Out In Out In Out Total 191 Retail 426 44 41 34 53 33 31 99 92 24 Dining 136 3 7 76 20 2 4 7 17 0 Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 63 Hotel 152 9 2 5 73 0 0 51 12 Total 714 56 501141463535157 122279 Note: Totals may not exactly match the sum of values due to rounding. Source: Iteris 2011 Table 10 shows the proposed project vehicle trip generation for the two areas of the project site (Areas A and B) and compares the build out values to those used in the 1999 Pointe Anaheim IS/MND. The total PM peak hour vehicle trip generation of the proposed project is estimated as 1,727 trips (1058 inbound and 669 outbound). As shown in Table 10, the revised project would generate about the same number of inbound peak hour trips and about 19 percent fewer outbound peak hour trips; therefore no new impact related to trip generation would occur for this time period. TABLE 10 VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY (PM PEAK HOUR) Weekday PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips InOutTotal Proposed Project Area A 901 547 1,448 Area B 157 122 279 Project Totals 1,058 669 1,727 1999 Pointe Anaheim IS/MND Project Totals 1,058 827 1,885 Difference 0 -158 -158 Percentage Change 0% -19% -8% 5-6 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Vehicle Trip Distribution The general characteristics of the project as a mixeduse RDE and hotel project have not changed, and, while there have been improvements to the circulation network in the area, the overall roadway network has not changed since the approval of the 2006 Addendum. Therefore, the project trip distribution is the same as what was analyzed in the 2006 Addendum. Anticipated project trip distribution is illustrated in Exhibit 8, Project Trip Distribution. Future Conditions With Project The proposed project trips were assigned to the roadway network using the trip distribution percentages shown in Exhibit 8. The 2015 with project p.m. peak hour turning movement volumes are illustrated in Exhibit 9, Year 2015 With Project Weekday 5:00 PM–6:00 PM Peak Hour Volumes. The intersection operating conditions were determined using ICU methodology which are shown in Table 11. A comparison of levels of service with the no project conditions is also shown in Table 11. TABLE 11 YEAR 2015 WITH PROJECT ICU SUMMARY 2015 No Project2015 With Project Weekday PM Change In Intersection ICULOSICULOSICUImpact 1. Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road 0.74 C 0.74 C 0.00 No 2. Harbor Boulevard and I5 NB Ramp 0.62 B 0.61 B 0.01No 3. Harbor Boulevard and I5 SB Ramp 0.39 A 0.38 A 0.01No 4. Harbor Boulevard and Disney Way 0.54 A 0.53 A 0.01No 5. Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue 0.75 C 0.75 C 0.00 No 6. Clementine Street and Disney Way 0.32 A 0.32 A 0.00 No 7. Clementine Street and Katella Avenue 0.76 C 0.74 C 0.02No 8. I5 SB Ramps and Disney Way 0.33 A 0.33 A 0.00 No 9. Anaheim Boulevard and Disney Way 0.61 B 0.60 A 0.01No 10. Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street and 0.01 0.75 C 0.74 C No Katella Avenue 0.01 11. Haster Street and Orangewood Avenue 0.81 D 0.80 C No 12. I5 SB Ramps and Katella Avenue 0.68 B 0.68 B 0.00 No 13. I5 NB Ramps and Katella Avenue 0.63 B 0.63 B 0.00 No 0.03 14. Project Driveway on Disney Way 0.41 A 0.38 A No Source: Iteris 2011 Late Evening Analysis The 1999 IS/MND included an analysis of intersection operations during the 7–8 PM hour because trip generation for movie theaters is considerably higher during that hour than during the p.m. peak commute hour. Because the proposed project would increase the amount of space devoted to entertainment uses, a similar analysis was conducted for this study. Table 12 shows the net trip generation for the two areas of the project site during the 7–8 PM weekday hour. 5-7 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx ð×Õ×ÎØ úÛÐÐêØ éÈÇØÃóÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ä ù×ÊÊÓÈÍÉûÆ× øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÊ×Ûú ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ûÊ×Ûû ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ× îíèèíéùûð÷ Source: Iteris 2010 íËÎÓØÚÉéËÔÍùÔÊÉËÔÛÈÉÔÎÏøÅÕÔÛÔÉ Anaheim GardenWalk Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim IS/MND Map Not to Scale (031711 KFD) R: Projects\Anaheim\J066\Graphics\Addendum\Ex8_ProjectTrip.pdf ð×Õ×ÎØ úÛÐÐêØ éÈÇØÃóÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ä ìïì×ÛÑôÍÇÊæÍÐÇÏ× äää úÛÐÐêØóîúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ úÛÐÐêØ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óîúêÛÏÌÉ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ù×ÊÊÓÈÍÉûÆ× ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óéúêÛÏÌÉôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÊ×Ûú ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ûÊ×Ûû ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆóéúíÖÖêÛÏÌ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ îíèèíéùûð÷ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ óîúêÛÏÌÉ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ Source: Iteris 2010 äØÜË æÔÉÕíËÎÓØÚÉæØØÒÙÜÄ íð íð íØÜÒõÎÈËçÎÑÈÐØÊ øÅÕÔÛÔÉ Anaheim GardenWalk Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim IS/MND Map Not to Scale (031711 KFD) R: Projects\Anaheim\J066\Graphics\Addendum\Ex9_Yr2015with.pdf Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND TABLE 12 NET VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION WEEKDAY LATE EVENING HOUR (7–8 PM) Gross Walk/TransitInternalPassbyNet Vehicle Trips Vehicle Land Use Trips Total In Out In Out In Out In Out Total AREA A Retail 492 19 42 166 83 14 32 42 95 137 Dining 1,572 157 115 387 94 94 69 377 277 654 Entertainment 1,489 139 49 35 205 79 28 707 249 955 Hotel 558 34 8 17 266 0 0 191 43 234 Area A Subtotal 4,111 348 214 606 648 187 128 1,316 664 1,980 AREA B Retail 421 40 38 44 62 30 29 91 86 177 Dining188810852856202445 Entertainment0000000000 Hotel16010257600551267 Area B Subtotal 769 58 51 134 167 35 35 166 123 288 Project Total 4,880 406 2657408152221631,482 7872,268 Note: Totals may not exactly match the sum of values due to rounding. Source: Iteris 2011 Table 13 compares the late evening trip generation between the proposed project and the project as previously evaluated in the 1999 IS/MND. As shown in the table, the proposed project would generate more trips during the late evening hour (7–8 PM) when compared to the analysis in the 1999 IS/MND; however, an assessment of the potential impact of project traffic volumes indicates that the 14 project intersections are all projected to operate at LOS B or better during the 7–8 PM hour of a weekday in year 2015. Therefore, despite the increase in trips generated, no new significant impact or substantially worse impact beyond what was previously identified would occur. TABLE 13 VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY (7–8 PM HOUR) Weekday PM Peak Hour Vehicle Trips InOutTotal Proposed Project Area A 1,316 664 1,980 Area B 166 123 288 Project Totals 1,482 787 2,268 1999 Pointe Anaheim IS/MND Project Totals 1,731 432 2,163 Difference -299 355 105 Percentage Change -14.4% 45% 4.7% Table 14 shows the 2015 with project weekday 7–8 PM hour intersection levels of service. 5-8 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND TABLE 14 YEAR 2015 WITH PROJECT LATE EVENING ICU SUMMARY Year 2015 With Project Weekday PM Intersection ICULOS 1. Harbor Boulevard and Ball Road 0.60 A 2. Harbor Boulevard and I5 NB Ramp 0.50 A 3. Harbor Boulevard and I5 SB Ramp 0.32 A 4. Harbor Boulevard and Disney Way 0.48 A 5. Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue 0.61 B 6. Clementine Street and Disney Way 0.28 A 7. Clementine Street and Katella Avenue 0.65 B 8. I5 SB Ramps and Disney Way 0.29 A 9. Anaheim Boulevard and Disney Way 0.51 A 10. Anaheim Boulevard / Haster Street and Katella 0.62 B Avenue 11. Haster Street and Orangewood Avenue 0.66 B 12. I5 SB Ramps and Katella Avenue 0.56 A 13. I5 NB Ramps and Katella Avenue 0.52 A 14. Project Driveway on Disney Way 0.50 A Note: No significant impact due to change in ICU from without project conditions. Source: Iteris 2011 Late Night Analysis The traffic analysis prepared for the 2006 Addendum included a late night analysis of the project entrance on Disney Way during the 10 to 11 PM hour which was not evaluated in the 1999 IS/MND. During this hour, heavy volumes of traffic have been documented on Disney Way associated with traffic exiting the Disneyland Resort. Eastbound traffic exiting The Disneyland Resort traveling toward the I-5 freeway crosses the path of traffic entering the Anaheim GardenWalk via the left turn onto the project driveway from Disney Way. For that reason, the level of service at this project access point was evaluated for late night traffic conditions. In the past year, Disneyland Resort’s Toy Story parking lot has opened on Harbor Boulevard, and the World of Color nighttime attraction at Disney California Adventure Park has begun operating. Therefore, a re-evaluation of the potential impact of Anaheim GardenWalk traffic on late-night traffic operations at the project entrance on Disney Way was conducted. Hourly machine traffic counts were conducted over a Friday night to determine the hour of highest traffic volumes on Disney Way, which was confirmed to be the 10–11 PM hour. Table 15 shows the net late night trip generation for the two areas of the project site. 5-9 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND TABLE 15 NET VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION WEEKDAY LATE NIGHT HOUR (10–11 PM) Gross Walk/TransitInternalPassbyNet Vehicle Trips Vehicle Land Use Trips Total In Out In Out In Out In Out Total Area A 29 Retail 108 4 9 38 18 3 7 8 21 292 Dining 758 7 114 235 36 4 69 17 275 988 Entertainment 1,387 90 103 20 75 51 59 460 528 310 Hotel 646 39 16 18 263 0 0 222 88 Area A Subtotal 2,899 140 24331139358134708 9111,619 Area B 33 Retail 93 6 8 21 14 5 6 14 19 25 Dining 86 0 10 33 11 0 7 0 25 0 Entertainment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 109 Hotel 185 11 8 6 52 0 0 63 45 Area B Subtotal 364 17 27607641376 91166 Total 3,263 157 27037146962147784 1,0021,785 Note: Totals may not exactly match the sum of values due to rounding. Source: Iteris 2011 Table 16 compares the late night trip generation between the proposed project and the Anaheim GardenWalk project as previously evaluated in the 2006 Addendum. As shown in the table, the proposed project would generate more trips during the late night hour (10–11 PM) when compared to the analysis in the 2006 Addendum; however, an assessment of the potential impact of project traffic volumes indicates that the project driveway on Disney Way is projected to operate at LOS A with an ICU value of 0.34 during the 10–11 PM hour of a weekday in year 2015. The ICU calculations are included in Appendix C. Therefore, despite the increase in trips generated, no new significant impact or substantially worse impact beyond what was previously identified would occur. TABLE 16 VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION SUMMARY (10–11 PM) Weekday Late Night Hour Vehicle Trips InOutTotal Proposed Project Area A 708 911 1619 Area B 76 91 166 Project Totals 784 1002 1785 2006 Addendum Project Totals 392 674 1,066 Difference 392 328 719 Percentage Change 100% 49% 67% Peak Arrival Analysis According to the traffic analysis prepared for the 2006 Addendum, the peak hour of arrivals at the Anaheim GardenWalk was determined to be mid-Saturday afternoon. Based on the proposed modification to the Anaheim GardenWalk and the change in the mix of uses to more nighttime uses, the peak hour of arrivals was also re-evaluated. Project trip generation for the 5-10 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Saturday 12–1 PM hour, the Saturday 2–3 PM hour and the Friday 7–8 PM hour were calculated with the highest inbound project trip generation during the Friday 7–8 PM hour. Table 17 shows the comparison of net trip generation for the project site during the Saturday 12–1 PM hour, the Saturday 2–3 PM hour and the Friday 7–8 PM hour. TABLE 17 NET VEHICLE TRIP GENERATION COMPARISONS FOR DIFFERENT TIME PERIODS Net Time Period InOutTotal 1,726 Weekday 5–6 PM peak hour 1,057 669 1,614 Saturday 12–1 PM hour 919 695 1,539 Saturday 2–3 PM hour 1,023 517 2,770 Friday 7–8 PM hour 1,880 890 Source: Iteris 2011 A queuing analysis was conducted to determine the queue lengths in the westbound left turn pockets on Disney Way at Clementine Street and at the project entrance. The length of the westbound turn pocket at the intersection of Disney Way and Clementine Street is 250 feet, and at the intersection of Disney Way and the project entrance it is 230 feet. The results show that the th 95 percentile queue lengths in these turn pockets will be 96 feet and 228 feet, respectively. Therefore, the storage length at these left turn pockets during the Friday 7–8 PM hour is adequate and no new impact would occur. As shown in Table 13, the Friday 7–8 PM hour represents the worst case scenario in terms of trip generation which also means it represents the worst case scenario for vehicle queuing at the intersection of Disney Way and Clementine Street. Parking Anaheim GardenWalk as currently constructed (the RDE portion of Area A) has a shared parking garage that extends two levels below the site and includes a multilevel abovegrade garage in the southwest portion of the site. These parking facilities have a potential capacity of 3,050 automobile parking spaces, although the current capacity is 2,606 spaces because the top deck of the structure has not been finished. The current capacity is adequate to meet parking demands prior to hotel buildout. When the hotels are constructed in Area A, an additional 150 spaces will be provided on the hotel sites, bringing the total Area A parking supply to 3,200 spaces. Area B, when constructed, will add another 1,600 parking spaces, . resulting in a total supply at build out of the entire project of 4,800 parking spaces A shared parking analysis was conducted for the proposed project. For buildout of Area A, the peak parking demand would be reached at 8:00 PM with a total demand of 3,242 spaces. Adding a 5 percent margin on top of the projected peak parking demand will result in a total parking requirement of 3,404 spaces. In addition to the proposed parking supply of 3,200 spaces, it is possible to provide up to 204 additional parking spaces in the existing parking garage through the use of valet operations, as depicted on Exhibit 10, in the loading dock of the transportation center and within the parking structure to accommodate additional demand. With these additional spaces, a total of 3,404 spaces would be provided. Because the peak demand begins at roughly 7:00 PM and is associated with heavy dining uses, valet operations are a feasible solution at this time. The loading dock and the transportation center will not be in use for their primary functions at this time, so these areas will be available for valet parking of cars. Therefore, with the use of valet parking, the proposed parking supply in Area A would also accommodate the peak parking demand for the project after the hotels are 5-11 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Source: Lyons Warren 2011 çÜÑØÉíÑÜÏøÅÕÔÛÔÉ Anaheim GardenWalk Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim IS/MND (052311 jfg) R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Graphics\addendum\ex10_valet.pdf Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND constructed; therefore, parking demand would be accommodated and no new significant impacts or substantially worse impacts beyond what was previously evaluated would occur. For project buildout (Areas A and B), the peak parking demand is reached at 8:00 PM and totals 3,793 spaces. Adding a 5 percent margin on top of the projected peak parking demand results in a total parking requirement of 3,982 spaces. The proposed parking supply of 4,800 spaces at build out of the entire project in Area A and B would accommodate the peak parking demand for the project and would provide a surplus of at least 818 spaces at all hours of the day. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Alternative Modes of Transportation Consistent with the analysis presented in the 1999 IS/MND, visitors and patrons to the Anaheim GardenWalk development will have access to a variety of alternative transportation options including use of the interconnected, pedestrian friendly walkways that connect the project with other visitor-serving uses in the area, access to the Anaheim Resort Transit service, and various hotel-operated shuttle services. As shown in Tables 8 and 9, alternative transportation via pedestrian and transit trips is projected to account for over 13 percent of total trip generation during the PM peak hour. As stated in the Transportation Analysis Update, the proposed project will continue to be served by public transit vehicles, tour buses and shuttles, including 15 shuttle routes of the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN). The project will also continue to accommodate pedestrian traffic through prominent sidewalk frontage and pedestrian-friendly access and bicycle traffic due to the presence of bicycle parking throughout the project site. Additionally, there is a planned Class I bike path in the Southern California Edison right-of-way located north of Disney Way; however, implementation of the modified project would not conflict with the bike lane. No new significant impacts or substantially worse impacts beyond what was previously evaluated would occur. b) Conflict with an applicable congestion management program, including, but not limited to level of service standards and travel demand measures, or other standards established by the county congestion management agency for designated roads or highways? As stated previously, the County of Orange Congestion Management Program (CMP) specifies LOS E (ICU value of 1.00) as the lowest acceptable level of service for intersections on the CMP highway network. Of the 14 intersections that were analyzed as part of the proposed project, only the intersections of Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue, Harbor Boulevard at the I5 Ramps, and Katella Avenue at the I5 Ramps are in the CMP network. Therefore, the lowest acceptable level of service for these intersections is LOS E. All of the study intersections are currently operating at LOS B or better, indicating that conditions in the project study area are better today than they were projected to be in the 1999 Pointe Anaheim IS/MND. This is at least in part because of the previously proposed 565,000 square feet of retail/dining/entertainment land uses in the Anaheim GardenWalk, only approximately 250,000 square feet are currently leased. In addition, over 20,000 hotel rooms have been entitled but not built within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) area. Additionally, as demonstrated in Table 11, these intersections are projected to operate at LOS C or better in year 2015 with implementation of the proposed project. As a result, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to the CMP network, and no mitigation is required. c) Result in a change in air traffic patterns, including either an increase in traffic levels or a change in location that results in substantial safety risks? 5-12 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND The proposed project would not include any land uses that would change air traffic patterns or locations nor would it increase the amount of air traffic. Fullerton Municipal Airport is the closest airport to the project site and is located approximately 6 miles northwest of the project site. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. d) Substantially increase hazards due to a design feature (e.g., sharp curves or dangerous intersections) or incompatible uses? As discussed in Section 4.0, Project Description, the proposed project would include changes to the existing balance of land uses within the RDE component of the project. Proposed modifications do not include any changes in the design of the internal or external circulation system beyond what was previously analyzed; therefore, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. e) Result in inadequate emergency access? As stated previously, the project does not propose any construction or development of additional structures or development beyond what was previously evaluated and approved in the 1999 IS/MND. Project design will continue to be done in coordination with the Anaheim Police and Fire Departments to ensure that adequate access is provided and all site plans would be subject to plan check prior to construction. In addition, Mitigation Measure 10 requires the submission of a Parking Maintenance and Operation Plan to the Planning Department Planning Services Division, and this Plan would ensure that emergency access points are not compromised. Therefore, this future coordination with City of Anaheim staff would ensure that the project would not impact emergency access. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. f) Conflict with adopted policies, plans, or programs regarding public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian facilities, or otherwise decrease the performance or safety of such facilities? As stated previously, the proposed project would increase the amount of RDE uses while decreasing the amount of allowable retail space within the existing project footprint and would not impact any adopted plans, policies, or programs supporting alternative transportation. As stated in the Transportation Analysis Update, the proposed project will continue to be served by public transit vehicles, tour buses and shuttles, including 15 shuttle routes of the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN). Because the demand for transit would be less than what was analyzed for the 1999 IS/MND project, no new impacts or substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to the capacity of available transit systems would occur. The project will continue to accommodate pedestrian traffic through prominent sidewalk frontage and pedestrian-friendly access. Additionally, there is a planned Class I bike path in the Southern California Edison right-of-way located north of Disney Way. Because the Anaheim GardenWalk project would not involve any modifications to this area, no impacts to the planned bike path would occur. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Further, the proposed project must comply with Chapter 14.60 – Transportation Demand of the Anaheim Municipal Code which serves as the City’s Trip Reduction and Travel Demand Ordinance for compliance with the Orange County Congestion Management Program. The City of Anaheim’s Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program promotes increased ridesharing and the use of alternative modes of transportation by employees. The TDM program provides a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce project-generated trips and 5-13 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND requires employers to conduct an annual commuter survey to ascertain project trip generation, trip origin, and average vehicle ridership. Projects with over 250 employees are required to submit annual commuter surveys to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) under SCAQMD’s Rule 2202. The City’s TDM program is coordinated with the ATN, as all projects requiring compliance with the TDM program also are required to join the ATN. Therefore, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Mitigation The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 and related to transportation and circulation were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to approval of the first final subdivision map or issuance of the first building permit, whichever occurs first, in Area A and Area B, the property owner/ developer shall irrevocably offer for dedication (with subordination of easements), including necessary construction easements, the ultimate rights-of-way (as indicated in the General Plan Circulation Element) for the following arterial highway/ street half- sections on or adjacent to parcels under its ownership or control to the City of Anaheim: Area A a. Katella Avenue (to ultimate 8-lane facility) b. Disney Way, along the frontage of Area A c. Clementine Street Area B a. Harbor Boulevard b. Disney Way, along the frontage of Area B 2. Within 120 days of acquiring properties adjacent to arterial highways/street intersection half sections, if, after the initial dedications, any additional parcels are acquired by the property owner/developer adjacent to the arterial highway/street intersection half-sections included in MM 3.3-2 of Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004, the property owner/developer shall notify the City in writing of said acquisition and the ultimate rights-of-way for said properties shall be irrevocably offered for dedication to the City of Anaheim. 3. Prior to approval of the first grading plan in Area A; implemented prior to first final building and zoning inspection in Area A, a phasing plan shall be submitted for review and approval to the City Engineer demonstrating how the following improvements, as approved by the City Engineer, will be constructed by the property owner/developer: Clementine Street/ Anaheim GardenWalk driveway intersection; and ¼ Clementine Street between Disney Way and Katella Avenue (including the ¼ median). 4. Prior to issuance of each building permit, appropriate traffic impact and improvement fees shall be paid by the property owner/developer to the City of Anaheim in amounts determined by the City Council Resolution in effect at the time of issuance of the building permit with credit given for City-authorized improvements provided by 5-14 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND the property owner/developer; and, participate in all applicable reimbursement or benefit districts which have been established. 5. To be shown on street improvement plans and to be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspection for the parking structure, access roads leading up to the parking facilities shall be sized to accommodate traffic at peak hours, thereby substantially reducing the likelihood of backups onto City streets and freeway ramps. 6. Prior to issuance of the first building permit in Area A, the property owner/developer shall fully fund the implementation of the SCOOT System at the Haster Street/Katella Avenue intersection and along the Harbor Boulevard, Katella Avenue, Disney Way, and Clementine Street corridors in the Anaheim Resort area. The specific improvements to be implemented are identified in Table 4.3-8 which follows (from the 1999 IS/MND). Property owner/ developer shall also fund the installation of SCOOT loop detectors at all 16 locations as well as the installation of new traffic signal controllers and cabinets at the eight locations identified in Table 4.3-8, which will also include signal preemption for fire response vehicles. Implementation will be to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. Pavement repair, if needed to provide additional conduit, will be provided by the property owner/developer to the satisfaction of the City Engineer. If, however, any or all of the above mentioned improvements have been implemented prior to the time the property owner/developer implements the project, the City Engineer may instead require the property owner/developer to pay an equal amount of funding to be used towards an alternate traffic improvement in the immediate area that will benefit traffic movement in the Anaheim Resort Area. TABLE 18 1999 IS/MND TABLE 4.3-8 LOCATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION OF SCOOT SIGNAL SYSTEM UPGRADE MITIGATION MEASURE Install SCOOT Install 2070 Traffic Intersection Loop Detectors Signal Controller Ball & Harbor X Harbor & I-5 NB Ramps X Harbor & I-5 SB Ramps X Harbor & Manchester X Harbor & Esplanade X Harbor & Disney Way X Harbor & Katella X Katella & Clementine X Katella & Haster X X Katella & I-5 SB Ramps X X Katella & I-5 NB Ramps X X Katella & Lewis X X Clementine & Disney Way X X Disney Way & I-5 SB Ramps X X Disney Way & Anaheim Boulevard X X Disney Way & Anaheim GardenWalk X X Access 5-15 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND 7. Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall provide proof of participation in the Anaheim Transportation Network (ATN). On-going during Project operations, every property owner and/or lessee shall be a voting member of the ATN, subject to the terms and provisions of the by-laws and association rules of the ATN. Every property owner and/or lessee shall participate in ATN coordinated transportation demand management efforts designed to decrease traffic congestion and increase ridesharing. Every property owner and/or lessee shall financially participate in the operation of a clean fuel shuttle system, if established. Every property owner and/or lessee shall designate an on-site contact who will be responsible for coordinating with the ATN and implementing all trip mitigation measures. The requirements of the mitigation measure will be included in the lease or other agreement with all of the project participants. Documentation indicating compliance with this mitigation measure will be included in the annual monitoring report ongoing during project operation. 8. Prior to approval of each Final Site Plan encompassing a parking facility, a Parking Structure Layout and Signing Plan demonstrating a layout of required parking spaces and signage shall be provided to the Planning Department, Planning Services Division, for review and approval. 9. Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection in Area A and in Area B; and on- going during Project operations with verification by participating lessees, the property owner/developer will implement and administer a comprehensive Transportation Demand Management (TDM) program for all employees. Objectives of the TDM program shall be to increase ridesharing and use of alternative transportation modes by guests and provide a menu of commute alternatives for employees to reduce project-generated trips. A menu of TDM program strategies and elements for future employee commute options include, but are not limited to, the following: Onsite Service. Onsite services, such as food, retail, and other services be ¼ provided. Ridesharing. A computer listing of all employee members be developed for the ¼ purpose of providing a “matching” of employees with other employees who live in the same geographic areas and who could rideshare. Vanpooling. A computer listing of all employees for the purpose of matching ¼ numbers of employees who live in geographic proximity to one another and could comprise a vanpool. Transit Pass. Southern California Rapid Transit District and Orange County ¼ Transportation Authority (including commuter rail) passes be promoted through financial assistance and onsite sales to encourage employees to use the various transit and bus services from throughout the region. 5-16 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Commuter Bus. As commuter “express” bus service expands throughout the ¼ region, passes for use on these lines may be provided for employees who choose to use this service. Financial incentives be provided. Shuttle Service. A computer listing of all employees living in proximity to the ¼ project be generated, and a local shuttle program offered to encourage employees to travel to work by means other than the automobile. Bicycling. A Bicycling Program be developed to offer a bicycling alternative to ¼ employees. Secure bicycle racks, lockers, and showers be provided as part of this program. Maps of bicycle routes throughout the area be provided to inform potential bicyclists of these options. Rental Car Fleet. A “fleet vehicle” program be developed to provide employees ¼ who travel to work by means other than an automobile with access to automobiles in case of emergency, medical appointments, etc. This service would help employees use alternative modes of transportation by ensuring that they would be able to have personal transportation in the event of special circumstances. Guaranteed Ride Home Program. A program to provide employees who ¼ rideshare, or use transit or other means of commuting to work, with a prearranged ride home in a taxi, rental car, shuttle, or other vehicle, in the event of emergencies during the work shift. Target Reduction of Longest Commute Trip. An incentives program for ¼ ridesharing and other alternative transportation modes to put highest priority on reduction of longest employee commute trips. Stagger shifts. ¼ Develop a “compressed work week” program, which provides for fewer work ¼ days but longer daily shifts as an option for employees. Explore the possibility of a “telecommuting” program that would link some ¼ employees via electronic means (e.g., computer with modem). Develop a parking management program that provides incentives to those who ¼ rideshare or use transit means other than single-occupant auto to travel to work. Access. Preferential access to high occupancy vehicles and shuttles may be ¼ provided. Financial Incentive for Ridesharing and/or Public Transit. (Currently, Federal law ¼ provides tax-free status for up to $60 per month per employee contributions to employees who vanpool or use public transit including commuter rail and/or express bus pools). Financial Incentive for Bicycling. Employees offered financial incentives for ¼ bicycling to work. Special “Premium” for the Participation and Promotion of Trip Reduction. ¼ Ticket/passes to special events, vacations, etc. be offered to employees who recruit other employees for vanpool, carpool, or other trip reduction programs. Actively recruit prospective employees residing within a 30-minute commute shed. ¼ 5-17 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Design incentive programs for carpooling and other alternative transportation ¼ modes so as to put highest priority on reduction of longest commute trips. Every property owner and/or lessee shall designate an on-site contact who will be responsible for coordinating with the ATN and implementing all trip mitigation measures with an on-site coordinator. The on-site coordinator will be the one point of contact representing the project with the ATN. The requirements of the mitigation measure will be included in the lease or other agreement with all of the project participants. Documentation indicating compliance with this mitigation measure will be included in the annual monitoring report ongoing during project operation. 10. Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection in Area A and in Area B; and implementation on-going during Project operations, the property owner/developer will provide a Parking Maintenance and Operation Plan to the Planning Department Planning Services Division, for review and approval; and said Plan shall be implemented on an on-going basis during Project operation. 11. Prior to approval of the first Final Site Plan for Area A, the parking facility serving development within Area A shall be designed to provide striped parking spaces for 3,076 cars and 15 bus spaces. Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan for the last hotel in Area A, the remaining 124 parking spaces shall be provided in Area A. 12. Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan for Area B, parking facilities serving Area B shall be shown on the Final Site Plan and designed to accommodate 1,600 cars for a total of 4,800 parking spaces for the full build-out of the Anaheim GardenWalk project. 13. Upon commencement of any activity/uses authorized by Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 as amended; and, on-going during Project operations, if reasonably needed in order to regulate the flow of pedestrian traffic to the project, as determined by the City’s Traffic and Transportation Manager, the property owner/developer shall pay all costs associated with providing one or more pedestrian crossing officers at Harbor Boulevard and Disney Way, in order to facilitate the flow of pedestrians during the “Peak Period,” which is defined as the time period from 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m. during the following seasonal peaks: the Memorial Day weekend through the Labor Day weekend; the week prior to, during and following Christmas week; Easter weeks (one week before and one week after); and at any other time determined to be necessary by the City’s Traffic and Transportation Manager. The continued need for this officer(s) will be reviewed by the City’s Traffic and Transportation Manager at least once annually, and the days and/or hours of pedestrian crossing officer staffing shall be adjusted, when determined necessary by the City’s Traffic and Transportation Manager. 14. Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection in Area A, the property owner/developer shall submit to the City’s Traffic and Transportation Manager for review and approval, a program for coordinating traffic signal timing in the area (within the limits of the SCOOT signal upgrades) which shall thereafter be implemented by the property owner/developer. In addition, the property owner/developer shall submit to the City’s Traffic and Transportation Manager for review and approval, a study assessing the benefits of restricting, during certain peak exiting times, pedestrian crossings on the crosswalk located on the north side of the intersection of Harbor Boulevard and Disney Way to improve the circulation of vehicular traffic by causing all east-west crossing pedestrian traffic to occur on the 5-18 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND south side of such intersection where pedestrian crossings will not slow the east to north turning movement of cars exiting The Disneyland Resort. 15. On-going during Project operations, if such restricted pedestrian movement is determined to be necessary by the City’s Traffic and Transportation Manager, the property owner/developer shall pay all costs associated with the design and implementation of such restricted crosswalk for this intersection to the satisfaction of the City Engineer, within the timeframe established by the City Engineer. 16. Prior to issuance of the first building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a Traffic Mitigation and Construction Phasing and Control Plan. The Traffic Mitigation, Construction Phasing and Control Plan shall identify the following: a. A Construction Staging Area Plan showing the location and size of the construction staging area. The Plan shall also show how the staging area will be screened from view in compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. b. Prior to approval of grading plan or issuance of demolition or building permits, whichever occurs first, a Construction Barrier Plan showing the location and types of barriers that will be in place during grading and construction. Said plan shall provide for all construction areas to be screened from view, in compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code and shall include provision for the type and height of the barriers to be placed along all construction perimeters prior to the commencement of demolition, site preparation, or grading, whichever occurs first. c. Prior to approval of a grading plan or issuance of demolition or building permit, whichever occurs first, a Truck Route Plan identifying truck routes along arterials, avoiding residential areas to the extent feasible and in compliance with Chapter 6.70 (Sound Pressure Levels). The Plan shall show conformance with the external noise limits for construction between 7 p.m. and 7 a.m. The Plan shall also prohibit construction traffic on residential streets where improvements are not planned and shall provide measures to ensure that truck drivers are directed away from residential streets and travel on approved routes only. Measures to assist in guiding truck movement on the arterial roadway system include, but are not limited to, provision of truck route maps to truck drivers and placement of flag persons and construction signage at appropriate locations. The Truck Route Plan shall provide for monitoring of street conditions and potential repairing and/or re- paving by property owner/developer after completion of construction as required by the City Engineer. This plan shall be adhered to throughout the project construction period. d. Prior to approval of grading plan or issuance of demolition or building permit, whichever occurs first, a Construction Traffic Management Plan which includes mechanisms to reduce construction-related traffic congestion which shall be implemented during grading and construction, including, but not limited to, the following: 1. Configure construction parking to minimize onsite and offsite traffic interference. 2. Minimize obstruction of through-traffic lanes. 5-19 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND 3. Provide flag persons to guide traffic, as determined in the plan. 4. Coordinate scheduling with other infrastructure improvements to allow them to be facilitated efficiently during roadway improvements, such as sewer, storm drain, and water line improvements. 5. Outline procedures for any required traffic detours during construction, including provision of tour bus stops. 6. Phase each roadway improvement to allow access to all existing businesses. In some instances, this will require lane-by-lane renovation, temporary bypass roads, or traffic reroutes. 7. Employ vertical shoring as often as possible. This will minimize the amount of road surface that will be disturbed at a given location. 8. Sequence the construction of each roadway improvement to minimize disruption to residents and businesses. The property owner/developer shall coordinate with the Convention Center and area hotels to ensure continued operations of these facilities, as well as the continued operation of the existing Disneyland theme park and Disneyland Hotel. 9. Establish off-site parking and staging areas, where practical and possible, to minimize the impact to existing level of service on adjacent roadways. These off-site parking and staging areas will allow a dispersion of traffic flow to non- critical areas and will encourage bussing of construction workers from the off- site areas to the construction sites. e. Prior to approval of each grading plan, a Trip Reduction Plan for construction crew vehicles shall be prepared to reduce potential vehicle trips on the road and identify parking locations for construction employees and equipment for each project component that exceeds 100 construction employees. 17. On-going during construction, the property owner/developer shall submit a monthly update report showing construction activities for the upcoming month which shall include traffic mitigation and control planning and construction scheduling. 18. On-going during construction, if Anaheim Police Department or Anaheim Traffic Management Center personnel are required to provide temporary traffic control services, the property owner/developer shall reimburse the City, on a fair share basis, if applicable, for reasonable costs associated with such services. 5.2 AIR QUALITY 5.2.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR No. 311 EIR No. 311 concluded that increases in emissions resulting from construction-related activities of SP92-1 would not result in a significant adverse impact on a cumulative basis. Similarly, stationary sources and utilities would not contribute to adverse impacts on a cumulative basis after offsetting pursuant to SCAQMD regulations. In addition, local air quality impacts would not result in a significant adverse local carbon monoxide impact on a project or cumulative basis. 5-20 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND However, the increase in emissions from vehicle trips associated with the project, without mitigation, would contribute to a significant impact on a cumulative basis. Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The 1999 IS/MND reported that emissions of carbon monoxide, reactive organic compounds, and nitrogen oxides resulting from development of the Pointe Anaheim project would add no new air emissions which were not previously accounted for by regional air quality plans. The Pointe Anaheim project was found not to have a significant impact on local air quality. 2001 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The modified Pointe Anaheim project was determined to be comparable to the Pointe Anaheim project both in land uses and development intensity. According to the Traffic Report prepared by Meyer, Mohaddes Associates, Inc. in March 2001, a slight reduction in vehicular project-related traffic would have occurred, thereby reducing corresponding automobile emissions. In addition, due to the phasing of the project the construction emissions would not have been as great as previously projected. The modified project was found to be substantially similar to the original Pointe Anaheim project so no new impacts were identified. 2006 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The air quality impacts of Anaheim GardenWalk project were determined to be comparable to those uses previously evaluated. As indicated in the Anaheim GardenWalk Transportation Analysis Update prepared by Meyer Mohaddes and Associates, Inc. in February 2006, the overall volume of project-related traffic would be reduced when compared to the previously- approved Pointe Anaheim project. 5.2.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Where available, the significance criteria established by the applicable air quality management or air pollution control district may be relied upon to make the following determinations. Would the project: a) Conflict with or obstruct implementation of the applicable air quality plan? The main purpose of an AQMP is to bring an area into compliance with the requirements of federal and State air quality standards. The two principal criteria for conformance to the AQMP are (1) whether a project will result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations, cause or contribute to new violations, or delay timely attainment of air quality standards and (2) whether a project will exceed the land use assumptions in the AQMP (SCAQMD 1993). The 2007 South Coast Air Quality Management Plan (AQMP) is the plan applicable to the proposed project. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) adopted the AQMP on June 1, 2007. The 2007 AQMP is an update of the 2003 AQMP and incorporates new scientific data, primarily in the form of updated emissions inventories, ambient measurements, new meteorological episodes, and new air quality modeling tools. The plan was also approved by the California Air Resources Board (CARB) when the State Strategy for the State Implementation Plan (SIP) was adopted on September 27, 2007. The Draft SIP has been submitted to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) for review and approval. However, for CEQA analysis, projects must be analyzed for consistency with 2007 AQMP requirements. 5-21 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Construction associated with the proposed project would be limited to relatively minor tenant improvements and façade improvements, all of which were evaluated previously in the 1999 IS/MND. Related air pollutant emissions would be small relative to SCAQMD CEQA significance thresholds because there would be no grading or other construction activities requiring the use of bulldozers or similar large diesel-engine equipment or generation of fugitive dust. Impacts would be less than significant. Operations emissions include the use of natural gas for heating and hot water, periodic repainting of interior and exterior surfaces, consumer products, and vehicle emissions. Operational GHG emissions for the 1999 IS/MND and the proposed project were estimated using the CalEEMod model released by SCAQMD in February 2011. Land use sizes were taken from the respective project descriptions. In order to calculate vehicle emissions, operational average daily traffic volumes (ADT) were estimated for the 1999 IS/MND and the proposed project; see Table 19. TABLE 19 ESTIMATED AVERAGE DAILY TRAFFIC VOLUMES Average Daily Traffic Volume WeekdaySaturdaySunday 1999 IS/MND 27,380 32,646 26,430 Proposed Project 25,090 28,171 22,625 Source: See Appendix A. As shown in Table 4, the overall volume of project-related traffic would be decreased by approximately 8 percent on weekdays and 14 percent on weekends when compared to the previously-approved Pointe Anaheim project (as evaluated in the 1999 IS/MND). Vehicle emission inputs to the model were based on the average daily trip data shown in Table 19. The results of the operations emissions calculations and comparison are shown in Table 20. Emissions from the proposed project would be less than for the 1999 IS/MND; there would be no impact. 5-22 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND TABLE 20 ESTIMATED PEAK DAILY OPERATIONS EMISSIONS Emissions in Pounds per Day VOCNOxCOPM10PM2.5 1999 IS/MND Natural Gas 3 29 24 2 2 Architectural Coating 14 0 0 0 0 Consumer Products 44 0 0 0 0 Vehicle Emissions 195 385 1,824 443 32 Total2564141,848445 34 Proposed Project Natural Gas3 31 26 2 2 Architectural Coating13 0 0 0 0 Consumer Products41 0 0 0 0 Vehicle Emissions173 340 1,611 392 28 Total2313711,636394 30 Net Increase (Decrease) with (25) (43) (212) (51) (4) Proposed Project SCAQMD Significance Thresholds 55 55 550 150 55 Significant Impact? NONONONONO Some totals do not add due to rounding CALEEMOD model data sheets are included in Appendix A. The proposed project does not include land uses that were not anticipated in the AQMP projections for the area. There would be no new major stationary sources of emissions. As shown above, long-term vehicle emissions, which are the major source of emissions from commercial development, would be less than anticipated in the 1999 IS/MND, and therefore less than anticipated in the AQMP. Therefore, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. b) Violate any air quality standard or contribute substantially to an existing or projected air quality violation? c) Result in a cumulatively considerable net increase of any criteria pollutant for which the project region is non-attainment under an applicable Federal or State ambient air quality standard (including releasing emissions which exceed quantitative thresholds for ozone precursors)? d) Expose sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations? As shown above, because the overall volume of project-related traffic would be less when compared to the previously-approved Pointe Anaheim project (as evaluated in the 1999 IS/MND); total operational emissions would be less. Construction emissions from tenant improvements would be small when compared to CEQA significance thresholds. Therefore, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to violation of an air quality standard, contribution to an existing or projected air quality violation, creation of a cumulatively considerable net increase of a criteria pollutant, or exposure of sensitive receptors to substantial pollutant concentrations. 5-23 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND e) Create objectionable odors affecting a substantial number of people? Consistent with the previously analyzed project (as analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND), the operation of the proposed project would not be a significant source of offensive odors. Any odors generated from the project would be related to cooking odors associated with the on-site dining options and would not be considered offensive. Overall, the proposed project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) does not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance which would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (4) introduce mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to air quality analysis provided in the 1999 IS/MND. Mitigation The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 and related to air quality were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and implementation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) for all permitted new and modified stationary sources. Copies of permits shall be given to the Planning Department. 2. On-going during Project operations, the property owner/developer shall schedule goods movements for off-peak traffic hours to reduce emissions to the extent practicable. 3. Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit evidence that low emission paints and coatings are utilized in the design and construction of buildings in compliance with AQMD regulations. This information shall be denoted on the project plans and specifications. 4. Prior to issuance of each building permit, the project design will incorporate the following energy-saving features which will also contribute to reduced emissions: Improved thermal integrity of structures and reduced thermal load through use of ¼ automated time clocks or occupant sensors. Efficient heating and other appliances. ¼ Incorporation of appropriate passive solar design. ¼ Proper sealing of buildings. ¼ 5. On-going during Project operations, the property owner/developer shall participate in marketing programs which promote The Anaheim Resort area as a Vacation Destination to encourage use of facilities within the area rather than taking cars to destinations off-site. This will be demonstrated through documentation in the MMRP 5-24 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Annual Report of the various marketing programs in which the Anaheim GardenWalk participated during the year. 6. On-going during construction, the following measures will be followed by the property owner/developer to reduce air quality impacts: a. Normal wetting procedures or other dust palliative measures shall be followed during earth-moving operations to minimize fugitive dust emissions, in compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. b. Roadways adjacent to the project shall be swept and cleared of any spilled export material at least twice a day to assist in minimizing fugitive dust; haul routes shall be cleared as needed if spills of material exported from the project site occur. c. Where practicable, heavy-duty construction equipment shall be kept onsite when not in operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated with vehicles repetitiously entering and exiting the project site. d. Trucks importing or exporting soil material and/or debris shall either be covered prior to entering public streets, or shall comply with the vehicle freeboard requirements of Section 23114 of the California Vehicle Code for both public and private roads. This California Vehicle Code section stipulates that the load, where it contacts the sides, front and back of the cargo area, remain six inches from the upper edge of the container area, and that the load does not extend, at its peak, above any part of the upper edge of the cargo container area. e. Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems necessary to water and maintain the vegetation as soon as planting is completed. f. Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour or less. g. Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as instantaneous gust) exceed 25 miles per hour and during second stage smog alerts. h. The project will comply with the SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that no dust impacts offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403, which restricts visible emissions from construction. i. Use low emission mobile construction equipment (e.g., tractors, scrapers, dozers) where practicable. j. Utilize existing power sources (e.g., power poles) or clean-fuel generators rather than temporary power generators, where practicable. k. Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them properly tuned. l. Use low sulfur fuel for equipment, to the extent practicable. 7. On-going during construction, the property owner/developer shall implement the following to limit emissions from architectural coatings and asphalt usage: a. Use non-solvent-based coatings on buildings, wherever appropriate. 5-25 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND b. Use solvent-based coatings, where they are necessary, in ways that minimize solvent emissions. c. Encourage use of high-solid or water-based coatings. 8. On-going during construction, all construction contractors shall comply with SCAQMD regulations, including Rule 402 which specifies that no there be no dust impacts offsite sufficient to cause a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403, which restricts visible emissions from construction. Rule 403 was amended by the SCAQMD after preparation of The Disneyland Resort EIR No. 311. Specific measures contained in the rule to reduce fugitive dust include the following: a. Apply chemical stabilizers to disturbed surface areas (completed grading areas) within five days of completing grading or apply dust suppressants or vegetation sufficient to maintain a stabilized surface. b. For open storage piles, apply water hourly or cover with temporary coverings. c. Water exposed surfaces at least twice a day under calm conditions and as often as needed on windy days when winds are less than 25 miles per day or during very dry weather in order to maintain a surface crust and prevent the release of visible emissions from the construction site. d. Wash mud-covered tires and under-carriages of trucks leaving construction sites. e. Provide for street sweeping as needed, on adjacent roadways to remove dirt dropped by construction vehicles or mud, which would otherwise be carried off by trucks departing project sites. 5.3 NOISE 5.3.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR No. 311 EIR No. 311 determined that implementation of the recommended mitigation measures would reduce any potential noise impacts from fireworks and the proposed amphitheater to a level considered less than significant. Traffic-related noise impacts were within the limits of the Noise Ordinance and therefore would be considered less than significant. Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The 1999 IS/MND reported that development of the Pointe Anaheim project would develop uses that would exceed noise levels in the City of Anaheim Noise Ordinance. The potential impact of amplified music uses would exceed the limits of the Noise Ordinance, resulting in a significant impact. However, implementation of the recommended mitigation measures would reduce this impact to a level considered less than significant. 2001 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The 2001 Addendum found that the modified project did not propose any uses that would increase expected noise levels beyond those considered in the 1999 IS/MND. Therefore, the 5-26 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND amended project was found to be substantially similar to the original Pointe Anaheim project; no new impacts were identified. 2006 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The Anaheim GardenWalk project proposed uses similar to those previously evaluated; and, therefore, it was determined that the project would not increase expected noise levels beyond those previously evaluated. 5.3.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project result in: a) Exposure of persons to or generation of noise levels in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? b) Exposure of persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? c) A substantial permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? d) A substantial temporary or periodic increase in ambient noise levels in the project vicinity above levels existing without the project? Consistent with previous environmental analyses, potential noise impacts related to the proposed project including on-site uses, traffic and off-site operational noise impacts would not be significant. Consistent with the noise standards identified in the 1999 IS/MND and according to Table N-3 of the City of Anaheim General Plan Noise Element, the City of Anaheim exterior noise standard for residential land use is 65 community noise level equivalent (CNEL), and the interior noise standard for residential land use is 45 CNEL (Anaheim 2004). The City also has an interior noise standard of 50 CNEL for commercial office space which is applicable to the interior retail space within the project site (Anaheim 2004). The 1999 IS/MND analyzed live entertainment as well as amplified sound in the project site. While the individual mix of RDE uses would change, along with a slight increase in the amount of RDE square footage, the live entertainment and amplified sound levels would remain similar to the levels analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. Noise levels would remain consistent with the existing sound characteristics of Anaheim GardenWalk because the noise sources anticipated for the proposed project would be similar to outdoor festivals, restaurants, outdoor background music, and similar noise sources presently permitted and occurring at Anaheim GardenWalk. In addition, the proposed project would comply with the noise mitigation measures contained in Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 004, as amended, and listed below. Because the project-related noise sources would be substantially similar to those evaluated in the 1999 IS/MND and because the established noise 2 standards are the same as those identified in the 1999 IS/MND, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to on-site noise levels. As shown in Section 5.2, Air Quality, the trip generation associated with the proposed project would be less than the level evaluated in the 1999 IS/MND. Therefore, traffic-related noise 2 The noise standards that were adopted as part of the 2004 General Plan Update are the same as the standards in the 1999 IS/MND. 5-27 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND levels would be similar or less than what was considered previously. In addition, construction of the proposed project would be limited to TI and potential façade improvements which were previously analyzed, and construction noise levels would be similar to the levels previously evaluated and approved for the project site. Most of the construction work would use electrically driven tools and large diesel-engine equipment would not be required. Thus, there would not be a substantial increase in temporary noise. There would be no new excavation or use of large construction equipment associated with the proposed project,, and therefore no vibration impacts. Therefore, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to traffic and construction noise levels. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport or helistop, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? Similar to the conditions evaluated in the 1999 IS/MND, there are no public airports, public use airports, heliports, or private airstrips in the project vicinity. The project would not expose people residing or working in the area to excessive levels of aircraft- or airport-related noise. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Overall, the proposed project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance which would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (4) introduce mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the noise analysis provided in the 1999 IS/MND. Mitigation The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to noise were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. On-going during project operations, the property owner/developer shall ensure that noise from areas which involve live amplified music and/or open-air festival events, do not exceed the noise levels established by Chapter 6.70 (Sound Pressure Levels) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 2. Prior to commencement of amplified music or the generation of noise from open-air festival events, within nine months from the commencement of said noise generating activities and on-going during project operations, a Noise Monitoring Program prepared by a certified acoustical engineer shall be submitted to the Planning Department, Planning Services Division, for review and approval for any component 5-28 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND of Anaheim GardenWalk that has the potential to involve amplified music or noise from open-air festival events and, within nine months of commencement of said activity, the property owner/developer shall submit the results of the Noise Monitoring Program conducted by a certified acoustical engineer to ensure that there are no violations of Chapter 6.70 (Sound Pressure Levels) from the Anaheim GardenWalk activity outside the Project. If noise in excess of Chapter 6.70 (Sound Pressure Levels) is detected, the property owner/developer shall modify operations immediately to bring the noise-generating activity into conformance with Chapter 6.70. 3. On-going during demolition and construction, construction noise shall be limited by the property owner/developer to 60 dBA along the property boundaries before 7:00 AM and after 7:00 PM as governed by Chapter 6.70 (Sound Pressure Levels) of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 4. On-going during construction, the property owner/developer shall ensure that all internal combustion engines on construction equipment are fitted with properly maintained mufflers. 5.4 LAND USE AND PLANNING 5.4.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR No. 311 The analysis of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan in EIR No. 311 determined that the project would require an amendment to the Orange County Transportation Authority’s Master Plan of Arterial Highways. This was not considered a significant impact. Additionally, the project would be consistent with all other land use plans and policies, therefore resulting in no significant impacts as long as implementation of project mitigation measures would occur. According to EIR No. 311, SP92-1 would allow for the replacement of on-site uses with similar land uses, thus resulting in no significant impact with implementation of project mitigation measures. Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The 1999 IS/MND reported that development of the Pointe Anaheim project would be generally consistent with the goals and policies of the City ofAnaheim General Plan’s Land Use Element andThe Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. Therefore, no significant land use plan or policy impacts would result from development of this previously approved project. 2001 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The modified project, which was previously evaluated and approved in the 1999 IS/MND, proposed development of the project site with uses similar to those evaluated in the 1999 IS/MND. The amended project was found to be substantially similar to the original Pointe Anaheim project, so no new impacts were identified. 2006 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The Anaheim GardenWalk project included development of the project site with land uses similar to those previously evaluated with only minor changes in land use allocation. Therefore, 5-29 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND it was determined that no significant land use plan or policy impacts would result from project implementation. 5.4.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Physically divide an established community? The proposed project includes development of the project site with a modified allocation of the same land uses as those previously evaluated in the 1999 IS/MND. Therefore, the proposed project would continue to be compatible with surrounding land uses would not physically divide and established community. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. b) Conflict with any applicable land use plan, policy, or regulation of an agency with jurisdiction over the project (including, but not limited to the general plan, specific plan or zoning ordinance) adopted for the purpose of avoiding or mitigating an environmental effect? Consistent with previous environmental analyses, proposed land uses include hotels, theaters, retail, restaurants, entertainment and parking, all of which are consistent with the goals and policies of the City of Anaheim General Plan’s Land Use Element for the City’s Commercial Recreation designation and The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. Minor amendments to each of these documents would be required to adjust the mix of land use types as stated in the project description; however, the proposed project would not conflict with these land use plans and policies. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. c) Conflict with any applicable habitat conservation plan or natural community conservation plan? The project proposes to reallocate/redistribute RDE land uses within the fully constructed Anaheim GardenWalk development; therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not result in land use impacts. Specifically, because the project site is not located within or nearby any designated habitat conservation plans or natural community conservation plans, the project would not conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan; Natural Community Conservation Plan; or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Overall, the proposed project would be consistent with the project analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance which would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (4) introduce mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the Land Use and Planning analysis provided in the 1999 IS/MND. 5-30 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Mitigation The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to land use and its related plans and policies were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan, plans (including, but not limited to, a site plan, elevations, landscape plans and signage plans) shall be submitted by the property owner/developer and will be reviewed for consistency with The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. 2. Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan, the property owner/developer shall submit plans detailing the setbacks for the parking structures and landscaping plans which minimize compatibility impacts of the parking facilities on surrounding areas, consistent with Section 5.8 of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. 3. Prior to issuance of each hotel building permit, a pre-project study of radio transmission from the AM 1500 Highway Advisory Radio Transmission Tower located on the Fire Station No. 3 site shall be conducted by the property owner/developer to determine baseline conditions for the entire Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay. Six months after topping out or any earlier time as determined necessary by the City of Anaheim, a follow-up study of radio tower transmissions shall be undertaken immediately by the property owner/developer. If the City of Anaheim determines that the proposed project creates a significant impact on radio transmission, a signal booster relay system, tower relocation, or other solution as approved by the City of Anaheim shall be implemented by the property owner/developer as soon as practicable. 5.5 POPULATION AND HOUSING 5.5.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR No. 311 EIR No. 311 determined that SP92-1 would result in minimal growth within the City and would not create a significant impact to employment, population, or housing with implementation of mitigation measures. Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The 1999 IS/MND reported that the Pointe Anaheim project would develop uses that generate approximately 3,830 employment positions (i.e., 536 jobs were associated with the project site at the time of analysis and a total of 3,294 new employees would be required with buildout of the project) and would benefit the City with expanded employment opportunities. No significant impacts to population growth would be expected. According to projections of full-time employees, the project would potentially result in 274 new Anaheim households. This number is within the growth projections for the City of Anaheim and therefore would not result in a significant impact. 2001 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The modified Pointe Anaheim project would create 3,763 employment positions and 3,227 net new jobs, which is 2 percent less than the original Pointe Anaheim project. Additionally, it was determined that phasing the modified project would stagger the hiring of new employees and 5-31 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND their subsequent need for housing over a period of years, thus further reducing the project impact. No new impacts would occur. 2006 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The Anaheim GardenWalk project proposed to reduce the number of hotel rooms and increase restaurant uses. These changes were anticipated to insignificantly increase the number of employment positions generated by the project; and, therefore no new impacts would occur. 5.5.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Induce substantial population growth in an area, either directly (for example, by proposing new homes and businesses) or indirectly (for example, through extension of roads or other infrastructure)? b) Displace substantial numbers of existing housing, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? c) Displace substantial numbers of people, necessitating the construction of replacement housing elsewhere? The proposed project would involve the reallocation/redistribution of allowable RDE-oriented land uses within the same footprint and building shell as what was previously analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. The reallocation would thus not displace any structures or residents. These proposed changes would increase the number of employment positions generated by the project relative to current onsite employment numbers. TABLE 21 PROJECTED EMPLOYMENT Projected Jobs by Category Amount of Use Employment Factor Employment 1999 IS/MND Hotel 1,050 rooms 1 employee/room1,050 Retail/Dining/Entertainment 565,000 sf 1 employee/214 sf2,640 (RDE) Theater- Live 4,600 Seats 140 a Total 3,830 Proposed Project Hotel 1,628 rooms 1 employee/room 1,628 Retail/Dining/Entertainment 590,265 sf 1 employee/214 sf 2,759 (RDE) a Total4,387 a This figure represents the gross employment projection As shown in Table 21, the proposed project would increase the overall employment projections for the project site from 3,830 identified in the 1999 IS/MND to 4,387 associated with the proposed project. This reflects a 14.5 percent increase in total employment opportunities, or 557 additional jobs. Based on the factors and assumptions identified for the adjacent Anaheim Resort Specific Plan in the The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Draft EIR No. 313 with Addendum (1994), it is assumed that 13.3 percent of employees would choose to relocate to the 5-32 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND City of Anaheim and each relocated employee would require one dwelling unit. Therefore, of the 557 additional jobs associated with the proposed project, 75 employees are expected to relocate to the City of Anaheim, creating 75 new households. The balance of the employees are assumed to either already live within the City of Anaheim or live in another city and choose to commute to Anaheim for employment. Assuming one (1) Anaheim GardenWalk employee per household and 3.3 persons per household, the new households would result in 248 additional residents within the City at full buildout of the Anaheim GardenWalk project beyond what was evaluated previously in the 1999 IS/MND. Based on population and housing projections, the City of Anaheim population is projected to increase by 61,267 between 2011 and 2020 and the housing supply is project to increase by 10,336 housing units between 2011 and 2020 (DOF 2011 and CDR 2007). According to the California Department of Finance, as of January 1, 2011, the City of Anaheim was experiencing a vacancy rate of 5.7 percent, or 6,016 units. (DOF 2011). Therefore, the minor increase in population associated with the proposed project would be well within the population projections for the Cityand the increase in housing would be accommodated by existing vacant units. Therefore, no new significant impacts or substantially worse impacts beyond what was previously identified would occur related to population or housing. Therefore, the project would not substantially induce population growth nor displace a substantial number of people or existing housing. Additionally, under existing conditions, the City of Anaheim, along with the State and nation, is experiencing a high percentage of unemployment (11.4 percent unemployment for the Los Angeles-Long Beach-Santa Ana Metropolitan Statistical Area for March 2011 according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics [BLS 2011]). Therefore, the provision of employment opportunities would assist in reducing local unemployment rates, thereby resulting in a beneficial impact. Overall, the proposed project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance which would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (4) introduce mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the Population and Housing analysis provided in the 1999 IS/MND. Mitigation The following mitigation measure from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to employment, population, and housing was adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. This measure would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. On-going during Project operations, the property owner/developer will aggressively recruit workers who are already part of the resident work force in the region. Implementation of The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan will further efforts in offering employment opportunities at various socioeconomic levels. The requirements of the mitigation measure will be included in the lease or other agreement with all of the project participants. Documentation indicating compliance with this mitigation measure will be included in the annual monitoring report ongoing during project operation. 5-33 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND 5.6 PUBLIC SERVICES 5.6.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR No. 311 Fire Protection EIR No. 311 reported that SP92-1 would increase the demand for fire protection services, thus increasing (1) response times; (2) the number of service call responses; and (3) the number of search, rescue, and disaster responses. However, this increased demand would be satisfied with implementation of project mitigation measures to include an additional inspector and plan checker in combination with roadway and intersection improvements. Police Protection According to EIR No. 311, development of SP92-1 would increase the volume of calls for police services. However, implementation of the recommended mitigation measures would reduce impacts to a level considered less than significant. Schools EIR No. 311 determined that development of SP92-1 would not create any direct impacts to local schools because the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan does not allow for the construction of new dwelling units. However, school-aged children of project employees would create a potential indirect impact from development of SP92-1 that would be mitigated through payment of State-mandated Development Fees. Thus, the potential impacts would be reduced to a level considered less than significant. Parks EIR No. 311 determined that development of SP92-1 would result in increased use of ball fields by project cast members (employees). Implementation of adopted mitigation measures would reduce this impact to a level considered less than significant. Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Fire Protection The Pointe Anaheim project would develop similar high-risk uses as those outlined in EIR No. 311, significantly impacting fire protection services for the City of Anaheim. However, the location and operation of Fire Station No. 3 adjacent to and serving the project site along with other mitigation measures from MMP No. 004 would reduce these impacts to a level considered less than significant. Police Protection The 1999 IS/MND identified that implementation of the Pointe Anaheim project would increase demand for the police protection services, creating a significant impact. Implementation of the proposed mitigation measures included in MMP No. 004 would reduce this impact to a level considered less than significant. 5-34 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Schools The 1999 IS/MND reported that development of the Pointe Anaheim project would develop uses which could indirectly generate 99 students in the Anaheim City School District (ACSD) and 68 students in the Anaheim Union High School District (AUHSD). This increase in the number of students for the ACSD and the AUHSD would be considered an indirect significant impact. Implementation of the required mitigation would reduce this impact to a level considered less than significant. Parks The 1999 IS/MND determined that the Pointe Anaheim project would not create land uses that would increase the projected deficit in City parklands or result in increased use of existing park facilities within the City of Anaheim. 2001 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Fire Protection The modified Pointe Anaheim project would develop similar land uses requiring a similar level of fire protection services. The impact associated with the increase in demand for fire protection services would be reduced to a level considered less than significant through implementation of project mitigation measures. Emergency vehicle access under the modified project would be accommodated with a median opening for emergency vehicles only that would allow left turns in and out of Fire Station No. 3 onto Clementine Street. Police Protection According to 2001 Addendum, police protection services, response times, and emergency access to and from the project site would remain consistent with the previous analyses. Schools The modified Pointe Anaheim project would have created fewer employment positions than the original Pointe Anaheim project, thereby decreasing the number of projected new students indirectly generated by project employment. In addition, the phasing of the modified project would stagger the hiring of new employees and their subsequent need for housing and schools for their children over a period of years, thus reducing the impact over time. No new impacts would occur and all potential impacts would be reduced to a level considered less than significant with implementation of mitigation measures. Parks Similar to the original Pointe Anaheim project, the modified project, which was proposed in the 2001 Addendum, would not create land uses that would increase the projected deficit in City parklands or result in increased use of existing park facilities within the City of Anaheim. 2006 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Fire Protection Land uses proposed for the Anaheim GardenWalk project were similar to those proposed by the original and modified Pointe Anaheim projects with the same access and site density; therefore, 5-35 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND it was determined that fire protection services and response times would remain consistent with the previous analyses. Emergency access to and from the project site would continue to be accommodated with a median opening for emergency vehicles only, which would allow left turns in and out of the Fire Station No. 3 driveway onto Clementine Street. Police Protection Land uses, site design, access, and Police Department office space proposed for the Anaheim GardenWalk project were similar to those proposed by the original and modified Pointe Anaheim projects; therefore, it was determined that police protection services and response times would remain consistent with the previous analyses. Schools The Anaheim GardenWalk project proposed to reduce the number of hotel rooms and increase restaurant uses. These proposed changes would increase the number of employment opportunities generated by the project by 3.4 percent. This would increase the number of projected new students indirectly generated by the project employment; however, this was not considered a significant change. Parks Similar to the original Pointe Anaheim project, the Anaheim GardenWalk project would not create land uses that would increase the projected deficit in City parklands or result in increased use of existing park facilities within the City of Anaheim. 5.6.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives for any of the public services: a) Fire protection? b) Police protection? c) Schools? d) Parks? e) Other public facilities? The proposed project would involve a reallocation of RDE uses. Although the mix of land uses would be altered, allowing for more restaurant and entertainment uses and less retail uses, these changes would not require any additional construction beyond what was previously evaluated and analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. Fire and police protection services are currently provided to the project site by the Anaheim Fire and Police Departments. An on-site police substation has been constructed within the Anaheim GardenWalk development and is operational in accordance with the mitigation presented below. Additionally, the Resort Fire Station #3, a fully operational fire station, is located immediately adjacent to the Anaheim GardenWalk project site along Clementine Street. As indicated in Section 5.5, Population and Housing, all direct and indirect growth associated with the proposed project could be accommodated within existing housing and would not require additional infrastructure. Based on coordination with the Anaheim Fire and Police Departments and consideration of all direct and 5-36 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND indirect growth associated with the project and the proposed increase in entertainment venues, the proposed project would not result in substantial adverse physical impacts associated with the provision of new or physically altered governmental facilities, the need for new or physically altered governmental facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental impacts, in order to maintain acceptable service ratios, response times or other performance objectives (Lutz 2011 and Nguyen 2011). No new significant impacts or substantially worse impacts beyond what was previously identified related to fire protection and police protection would occur. The proposed project would reduce the amount of retail and increase dining and entertainment uses when compared to what was analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. These proposed changes would increase the number of employment opportunities generated by the project by 14.5 percent as shown previously on Table 21, Projected Employment, which would add approximately 75 households within the City according to the analysis presented previously in Section 5.5.2. According to student generation rates for the Anaheim City School District (0.3609 students per household) and Anaheim Union High School District (0.07 students per household), buildout of the Anaheim GardenWalk project has the potential to generate 34 students (Pidgen 2010a and Oskoui 2010). The square footage of the proposed project has increased slightly, as described in Section 4.0, Project Description. Therefore, the school impact fees to be paid will be in accordance to the current square footage of the proposed project. There are over 50 City-owned and operated parks and recreational facilities totaling 677 acres within the City of Anaheim, including the Anaheim Convention Center with a basketball arena and over 800,000 square feet of exhibition floor space. Within the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, Disney provides commercial recreational opportunities via the Disneyland Resort, which includes the Disneyland Park, Disney’s California Adventure Park, and the Downtown Disney shopping district. Multiple Disney-owned and independent hotels provide recreational opportunities for guests. As indicated in Section 5.5, Population and Housing, all direct and indirect growth associated with the proposed project could be accommodated within existing housing; therefore, the increase in population would be served by existing park facilities. Therefore, the presence of park resources and recreational opportunities throughout the City would provide adequate facilities to accommodate the slight increase in population. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Overall, the proposed project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance which would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (4) introduce mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the public services analysis provided in the 1999 IS/MND. 5-37 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Mitigation Fire Protection The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to fire protection were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to commencement of structural framing on each parcel or lot, on-site fire hydrants shall be installed and charged, as required, by the property owner/ developer. 2. Prior to approval of each grading plan, the property owner/developer shall submit an emergency fire access plan to ensure that service to the site is in accordance with Fire Department service requirements. 3. Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a Construction Fire Protection Plan, which shall include detailed design plans for accessibility of emergency fire equipment, fire hydrant location, and any other construction features required by the Fire Marshal. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for securing facilities acceptable to the Fire Department and hydrants shall be operational with required fire flow. 4. Prior to issuance of each building permit, and to be implemented prior to each final building and zoning inspection, plans shall indicate that all buildings, exclusive of open parking structures, shall have sprinklers installed by property owner/developer, as required by the Anaheim Fire Department. 5. Prior to Issuance of each building permit, plans shall be submitted to ensure that development is in accordance with the City of Anaheim Fire Department Standards, including: a. Overhead clearance shall not be less than fourteen (14) feet for the full width of access roads. b. Bridges and underground structures to be used for Fire Department access shall be designed to support Fire Department vehicles weighing seventy-five thousand (75,000) pounds. c. All underground tunnels shall have sprinklers. Water supplies are required at the entrances. Standpipes shall also be provided when determined to be necessary by the Fire Department. d. Adequate offsite public fire hydrants contiguous to the Specific Plan area and onsite private fire hydrants shall be provided by the property owner/developer. The precise number, types, and locations of the hydrants shall be determined during building permit review. Hydrants are to be a maximum of four hundred (400) feet apart. e. A minimum residual water pressure of 20 psi shall remain in the water system. Flow rates for public parking facilities shall be set at 1,000 to 1,500 gpm. 6. Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall comply with the Fire Protection Facilities and Paramedic Services Impact Fee Program (per 5-38 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Ordinance No. 5496 and Resolution No. 95R-73 dated May 16, 1995), as may be amended by the City. 7. Prior to approval of street improvement plans, the water supply system shall be designed by the property owner/developer to provide sufficient fire flow pressure and storage for the proposed land uses and fire protection in accordance with Fire Department requirements. 8. Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall place emergency telephone service numbers in prominent locations as approved by the Fire Department. 9. On-going during Project operations, an on-site coordinator for the project shall coordinate earthquake training with the Fire Department for hotel staff and other employees. The requirements of the mitigation measure will be included in the lease or other agreement with all of the project participants. Documentation indicating compliance with this mitigation measure will be included in the annual monitoring report ongoing during project operation. 10. Prior to issuance of each building permit for hotels, the property owner/developer shall submit an earthquake emergency response plan for review and approval by the Fire Department. That plan shall require posted notices in all hotel rooms on earthquake safety procedures. Police Protection The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to police protection were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to approval of the first Final Site Plan for Area A; to be identified on plans submitted for building permits, plans shall be submitted showing the location of a police/security office identifiable and easily accessible by the public (i.e., “store-front” type of space) along with dedicated parking spaces for Police Department employees working in the space within the project site to the satisfaction of the Police Department. Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection for Area A, said police/security office space shall be made available to the Police Department for permanent occupancy at no cost to the City. 2. On-going during Project operations, property owner/developer shall staff the Project with the needed level of uniformed private security officers working in pairs for patrol and surveillance of the facilities to the satisfaction of the Police Department, including possibly 24-hour coverage. 3. Prior to issuance of each building permit, the Police Department shall review and approve the safety measures incorporated into the project including the parking structures. The security measures shall include, but not be limited to, closed circuit television surveillance/cameras and recording equipment or other substitute security measures as may be approved by the Police Department for the parking structures/ facilities, lighting, and other defensible space measures throughout the project, as determined necessary by the Police Department. 5-39 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Schools The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to schools were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall provide proof that school impact fees have been paid consistent with State statute. (Note: On January 25, 2006, the State Allocation Board increased the maximum Level 1 school fees from $0.36 to $0.42 per square foot of enclosed and covered space for commercial/industrial development.) 2. Prior to commencement of uses/activities authorized by Conditional Use Permit No 4078, as amended, and on-going during Project operations, the property owner/developer shall coordinate with the Anaheim Union High School District to incorporate a retail training program into the Project for interested high school seniors. An on-site project coordinator shall ensure compliance with the plan. Proof of this program shall be submitted to the Planning Department within ninety (90) days following commencement of the uses/activities. Parks As there will be no negative impacts to parks created by development of the Pointe Anaheim project, no mitigation was required. 5.7 RECREATION 5.7.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The previous environmental documents, including EIR No. 311, the 1999 IS/MND and the two previous addenda (2001 and 2006) to the 1999 IS/MND, did not provide specific analyses of recreation. 5.7.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Increase the use of existing neighborhood and regional parks or other recreational facilities such that substantial physical deterioration of the facility would occur or be accelerated? b) Include recreational facilities or require the construction or expansion of recreational facilities which might have an adverse physical effect on the environment? As discussed above in Section 5.6, Public Services, all direct and indirect growth associated with the proposed project could be accommodated within existing housing; therefore, the increase in population would be served by existing park facilities. Therefore, the presence of park resources and recreational opportunities throughout the City would provide adequate facilities to accommodate the slight increase in population. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. 5-40 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Mitigation No mitigation measures are required. 5.8 UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS 5.8.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Water Service Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR No. 311 Water Service The analysis of water service impacts in EIR No. 311 concluded that the capacity of the existing water supply system would be exceeded, resulting in a significant impact. With implementation of the project design features and the recommended mitigation measures, this impact would be reduced to a level considered less than significant. Wastewater Service EIR No. 311 reported that the existing wastewater/sewer facilities in the area were at capacity and local improvements would be required to accommodate project-related volume increases. Implementation of the recommended improvements in the City’s South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study would also be required to accommodate the development of SP92-1 in the future. However, the Orange County Sanitation District was determined to have adequate treatment plant capacity to serve the project. Implementation of the recommended mitigation outlined in EIR No. 311 would reduce all impacts to a level considered less than significant. Solid Waste In the analysis of impacts related to solid waste, EIR No. 311 identified that the Olinda-Alpha Landfill had limited available capacity. For this reason, development of SP92-1 would create a significant, unavoidable project and cumulative impact. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations to address this impact. Electricity EIR No. 311 determined that existing electrical facilities were inadequate to accommodate the increased demand for electricity that would be generated with development of land uses in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. It was identified that a new substation in addition to other mitigation measures would be required to reduce impacts to a level considered less than significant. Natural Gas According to EIR No. 311, Southern California Gas Company would be able to meet the demand for natural gas created by The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area. Telephone EIR No. 311 indicated that Pacific Bell would accommodate all increased demand for telephone services associated with development of SP92-1 without disrupting existing service. 5-41 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Cable It was identified in EIR No. 311 that cable television service would be accommodated without creating a significant impact. Television reception of residents and businesses without cable television might be impacted by construction of SP92-1. However, implementation of the recommended mitigation measure would reduce potential impacts to less than significant levels. Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Water Service The 1999 IS/MND stated that development of the Pointe Anaheim project would result in an increased demand on water services (gross demand of 648,142 gallons per day [gpd]). This increase in water demand would be mitigated by the required mitigation measures to a level considered less than significant. Wastewater Service The 1999 IS/MND stated that development of the project would result in an increase in wastewater output from the project site (gross generation of 531,105 gpd). This increase in wastewater flow would be mitigated by the required mitigation measures to a level considered less than significant. Solid Waste According to the Countywide Integrated Waste Management Plan approved for the County of Orange in 1996, the County landfill system has capacity in excess of 30 years and would be able to accommodate any solid waste generated by the Pointe Anaheim project. Thus, the Integrated Waste Management District (IWMD) reported that development of the Pointe Anaheim project would develop uses that would not have a significant impact on solid waste. Electricity The 1999 IS/MND reported that development of the project would create a net increase in demand of 11.7 mega volt amps (MVA), resulting in a significant impact. However, it was determined that implementation of the mitigation measures from MMP No. 004 would reduce the impact to a level considered less than significant. Natural Gas The 1999 IS/MND stated that existing gas mains would meet the needs associated with development and operation of the Pointe Anaheim project, thus creating no impact associated with natural gas service. Telephone The 1999 IS/MND reported that Pacific Bell would meet the needs associated with development and operation of the Pointe Anaheim project without impacting existing customers, which would therefore create no impact associated with telephone service. 5-42 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Cable The 1999 IS/MND reported that development of multi-story hotels or other tall structures, as identified for the Pointe Anaheim project, may interfere with television reception in the project vicinity. This significant impact would be reduced to a level considered less than significant upon implementation of the required mitigation measure identified in the document. 2001 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Water Service The modified Pointe Anaheim project would have a reduced water demand, dropping from 648,142 gpd to 623,102 gpd, a 3.9 percent reduction. No new impacts would occur. Wastewater Service The modified project resulted in reduced wastewater flows. Therefore no new impacts were anticipated. Solid Waste Due to the available capacity within the Orange County landfill system and due to the similar project density and types of uses proposed, the modified Pointe Anaheim project was also determined not to have a significant impact on solid waste. Electricity The modified project evaluated in the 2001 Addendum was determined to generate a slightly reduced demand for electricity in comparison to the original Pointe Anaheim project. Therefore, no new impacts were identified. Natural Gas The 2001 Addendum stated that existing gas mains would meet the needs associated with development and operation of the modified Pointe Anaheim project, thus creating no impacts associated with natural gas service. Telephone Due to the similarities in proposed land use types and densities, it was determined that Pacific Bell would also be able to meet the demand for telephone service created by the modified project evaluated in the 2001 Addendum. Cable Similar to the Pointe Anaheim project, the modified Pointe Anaheim project could also impact local television reception. Identified mitigation measures would reduce this impact to a level considered less than significant; no new impacts would occur. 5-43 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND 2006 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Water Service The water use associated with the modified project evaluated in the 2006 Addendum was projected to be the same as the previously approved project. Wastewater Service The modified project resulted in a less than one percent increase in wastewater flows when compared to the previously approved project. However, it was determined that the increase was not enough to result in a new impact. Solid Waste The IWMD maintains their position that the County landfill facilities have adequate capacity to accommodate County-generated waste beyond the 15-year threshold established by the California Integrated Waste Management Board (Arnau 2006). Thus, the Anaheim GardenWalk project would not result in a significant impact related to solid waste. Electricity The modified project evaluated in the 2006 Addendum was determined to require a total of 598,604 fewer volt amps of electricity compared to the previously approved Pointe Anaheim project. Natural Gas The modified project proposed development of the project site with land uses similar to those previously evaluated. Therefore, the demand for natural gas was determined to not be substantially different than the previously approved project. Telephone The modified project proposed development of the project site with land uses similar to those previously evaluated. Therefore, it was determined that the current telephone service provider would be able to serve the modified project. Cable It was determined that the modified project may interfere with television reception in the project vicinity as multi-story hotels or other tall structures are developed. Implementation of the previously required mitigation measures would have lessened the impact to a level considered less than significant. 5-44 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND 5.8.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Exceed wastewater treatment requirements of the applicable Regional Water Quality Control Board? The GardenWalk project includes the development of a variety of visitor-serving uses, such as hotels, restaurants, retail uses, bars/night clubs, and entertainment uses. The sewage and wastewater from these uses would be discharged into the City’s sewer system and conveyed to the Reclamation Plant No. 1 in Fountain Valley. No pre-treatment is required for the wastewater from the Anaheim GardenWalk project since the proposed land uses would not (1) process any industrial wastewater; (2) involve dewatering or groundwater clean up; (3) directly discharge sewage effluent; and (4) engage in other activities that would generate wastewater requiring treatment beyond what is provided at Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Treatment Plant No. 1. Future food service establishments shall provide on-site treatment (such as grease traps and grinders) as part of the permit conditions from OCSD. Other land uses or activities that may generate wastewater requiring special treatment shall comply with OCSD’s Wastewater Discharge Regulations. Thus, the wastewater treatment requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board would not be exceeded by the proposed project. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. b) Require or result in the construction of new water or wastewater treatment facilities (including sewer (waste water) collection facilities) or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? d) Have sufficient water supplies available to serve the project (including large-scale developments as defined by Public Resources Code Section 21151.9 and described in Question No. 20 of the Environmental Information Form) from existing entitlements and resources, or are new or expanded entitlements needed? e) Result in a determination by the wastewater treatment provider which serves or may serve the project that it has adequate capacity to serve the project's projected demand in addition to the provider's existing commitments? Water Demand As shown in Table 22, below, the proposed project would create a smaller demand for water when compared to that analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. Due to the reduced demand, adequate water supply would be available based on the 1999 IS/MND analysis. The reduction in water demand is due to recent conservation efforts that have been implemented since 1999 and revised water use factors developed in consultation with the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Department and based on actual historic usage rates; therefore, no new significant impacts or substantially worse impacts beyond what was previously evaluated would occur related to water facilities or water supply. 5-45 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND TABLE 22 WATER DEMAND Water Use Average Annual Land Use Area Factor Demand (gpd) Net Total for Approved Pointe Anaheim648,142 Proposed Project 4 hotels ab Hotel125 gpd/unit 203,500 1,628 rooms b Retail 248,033 sf 0.195 gpd/sf 48,367 b Restaurant 163,988 sf 1.0 gpd/sf 163,988 c Entertainment 130,475 sf 0.12 gpd/sf 15,657 d Night Club/Bar 47,769 1.0 gpd/sf 47,769 Total 479,281 Change from Approved Density -168,861 sf: square feet; gpd: gallons per day a Includes hotel accessory uses. b PSOMAS 2009 c BonTerra Consulting 2006 d In order to account for a higher water use factor associated with night club/bar uses than other typical entertainment uses, the restaurant water use factor was applied. Wastewater Generation Consistent with the technical analysis prepared for the 2006 Addendum, the existing and planned sewer infrastructure, although capable of handling more flow at present, has been planned for buildout of the proposed project and any additional flow would push the system beyond capacity at project buildout (BonTerra Consulting 2006). Therefore, additional wastewater volume beyond that previously evaluated and planned for cannot be accommodated. As shown in Table 23, Wastewater Production, the projected wastewater flow related to the proposed project would be less than what was analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. Because the Anaheim GardenWalk project is included in the City’s sewer system master plans and because the proposed project would not exceed the wastewater generation assumptions for the Anaheim GardenWalk project as evaluated in the 1999 IS/MND, no new significant impacts or substantially worse impacts beyond that previously evaluated would occur. Implementation of the mitigation measures identified below would continue to reduce any impacts to less than significant levels. 5-46 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND TABLE 23 WASTEWATER PRODUCTION Wastewater Average Annual Generation Generation Land Use Area Factor (gpd) Net Total for Approved Pointe Anaheim531,785 Proposed Project 4 hotels ab Hotel100 gpd/unit 162,800 1,628 rooms b Retail 248,033 sf 0.156 gpd/sf 38,693 b Restaurant 163,988 sf 0.8 gpd/sf 131,190 c Entertainment 130,475 sf 0.1 gpd/sf 13,047 d Night Club/Bar 47,769 sf 0.8 gpd/sf 38,215 Total 383,945 Change from Approved Density -147,840 sf: square feet; gpd: gallons per day a Includes hotel accessory uses. b CH2M Hill 2009 c BonTerra Consulting 2006 d In order to account for a higher wastewater production factor associated with night club/bar uses than other typical entertainment uses, the restaurant wastewater generation factor was applied. c) Require or result in the construction of new storm water drainage facilities or expansion of existing facilities, the construction of which could cause significant environmental effects? The physical configuration of the proposed project is substantially similar to the previously evaluated project in the 1999 IS/MND with the entire site being developed. Therefore, the impervious surface area associated with project development is the same. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. f) Be served by a landfill with sufficient permitted capacity to accommodate the project's solid waste disposal needs? g) Comply with Federal, State, and local statutes and regulations related to solid waste? Table 24 provides an estimate of solid waste generation associated with the Anaheim GardenWalk development. As shown, the Anaheim GardenWalk project at buildout is expected to generate 12,261 pounds of solid waste per day (2,238 tons per year). 5-47 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND TABLE 24 SOLID WASTE GENERATION Solid Waste Generation Average Annual Land Use Area Factor Generation Proposed Project 4 hotels ab Hotel4 lbs/room/day 6,512 lbs/day 1,628 rooms 2.5 lbs/1,000 Retail 248,033 sf 620 lbs/day b sf/day b Restaurant 163,988 sf 0.005 lbs/sf/day 820 lbs/day 3.12 lbs/100 Entertainment 130,475 sf 4,070 lbs/day c sf/day b Night Club/Bar 47,769 sf 0.005 lbs/sf/day 239 lbs/day Total 12,261 lbs/day sf: square feet; lbs: pounds a Includes hotel accessory uses. b CalRecycle 2009 c CalRecycle 2009 Consistent with previous environmental analyses and according to OC Waste & Recycling, the Orange County landfill system would have adequate landfill capacity to accommodate the proposed project (Keith 2011). In addition, the proposed project would comply with federal, State and local statues and regulations related to solid waste. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. h) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to electricity? The proposed project would develop the project site with land uses similar to those previously evaluated. Therefore, the demand for electricity is not anticipated to be substantially different than the previously approved project. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. i) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to natural gas? The proposed project would develop the project site with land uses similar to those previously evaluated. Therefore, the demand for natural gas is not anticipated to be substantially different than the previously approved project. The availability of natural gas is based upon conditions of gas supply and the regulations set forth by the California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC 2010). Therefore, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. j) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to telephone service? The proposed project would develop the project site with land uses similar to those previously evaluated. Therefore, the demand for telephone service is not anticipated to be substantially different than the previously approved project. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. 5-48 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND k) Result in a need for new systems or supplies, or substantial alterations related to television service/reception? Consistent with previous environmental analyses, the proposed project has the potential to interfere with television reception in the project vicinity as multi-story hotels or other tall structures are developed. Implementation of the previously required mitigation measures will lessen the impact to a level considered less than significant. Additionally, the demand for cable television service is not anticipated to be substantially different than the previously approved project. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Mitigation Water Service The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to water service were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to issuance of each building permit; and to be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspections, among the water conservation measures to be shown on plans and implemented by the property owner/developer shall include the following: Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation system ¼ Use of waterway re-circulation systems ¼ Low-flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including low flush toilets and urinals ¼ Use of self-closing valves on drinking fountains ¼ Use of reclaimed water for irrigation and wash-down when it becomes available ¼ Continuation of the existing cooling tower re-circulation system ¼ Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and automatic systems ¼ which use moisture sensors Low-flow shower heads in hotels ¼ Water-efficient ice machines, dishwashers, clothes washers, and other water- ¼ using appliances Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when evaporation rates are lowest ¼ Provide information to the public in conspicuous places regarding water ¼ conservation Use of water-conserving landscape plant materials, as appropriate ¼ Use of vacuum and other equipment to reduce the use of water for wash-down of ¼ exterior areas 5-49 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND 2. Prior to each final zoning and building inspection, the property owner/developer shall submit a certified water audit for landscape irrigation to the Public Utilities Systems Department, Electric Services Administration, Resource Efficiency Division, for review and approval. 3. Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall comply with the adopted Anaheim Resort Water Facilities Fee Program (Rule 15E of the Water Utilities Rates, Rules and Regulations per Resolution No. 95R-140, effective September 1, 1995), as may be amended by the City. 4. Prior to issuance of building permits; and prior to final building and zoning inspections, the water backflow equipment and any other large water system equipment shall be shown on plans to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department, Water Utility Division, in either underground vaults or behind the Setback Realm area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys; and the facilities will be installed in accordance with the plans. 5. Prior to approval of the Water System Improvement Plan, property owner/developer shall enter into an agreement recorded against the property with the City of Anaheim, to the satisfaction of the Utilities Department and City of Anaheim Attorney’s Office, to guarantee the property owner/developer’s participation in water system improvements necessitated by the project. The agreement shall contain provisions requiring the property owner/developer to pay or cause to be paid its fair share funding for said improvements and/or construct said improvements, if determined to be necessary by the Utilities Department, with reimbursement by other beneficiaries in accordance with the Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Costs shall include the payment for consultant/contractor services for the preliminary engineering, soils analysis, right-of-way acquisition, demolition, construction and inspection, and any other related expenses. Further, the property owner/developer shall submit an engineering report and phasing plan for review and approval by the Utilities Department setting forth the extent and timing of the water system improvements necessitated by the project for use in implementing the agreement. The property owner/developer shall at all times perform its obligations as set forth in said agreement. Wastewater Service The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to wastewater were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the owner/developer shall comply with the Sewer Impact and Improvement Fee Program for the South Central City Area (per Ordinance No. 5490 and Resolution No. 95R-60 dated April 18, 1995, as may be amended by the City). This SCASDS Fee Program applies to the sewer discharge generated above the rate from the building footprints existing prior to the demolition of building on the project site (in 2003) and up to the maximum of 639,000 peak gpd. This Fee Program does not apply and mitigate the need of the reverse sewer line in Gene Autry Way. 2. Prior to issuance of the first building permit; to be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspection, a report documenting sewer capacity shall be submitted for review and approval. Prior to the first final building and zoning inspection, either a reverse-flow public sewer line shall be constructed in Gene Autry Way from a point 5-50 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND east of the I-5/Anaheim Boulevard to State College Boulevard or other improvement(s) to the sewer system shall be made to accommodate the sewage flow in excess of that projected from the land uses permitted by The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan within the boundaries of Anaheim GardenWalk, which cannot be accommodated by current capacity. Line sizing and implementation of this measure will be as follows: Analyze the Anaheim GardenWalk sewer flows with the City’s updated Basin 8 ¼ Combined Central Anaheim Master Plan model to determine local sewer impacts and downstream impacts to the Gene Autry Way sewer system. Determine the size and limits of a new public sewer in Gene Autry Way, east of ¼ Interstate 5, to intercept and redirect flows from the ASAMLUP tributaries. Coordinate all analysis, findings, and conclusions for approval with the City of ¼ Anaheim. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for funding this improvement. Storm Drains The following mitigation measure from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to storm drains was adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. This measure would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall comply with the Storm Drain Impact and Improvement Fee Program for the South Central City Area (per Ordinance No. 5491 and Resolution No. 95R-61 dated April 18, 1995, as may be amended by the City); or, the City may enter into alternative financing arrangements with the property owner/developer prior to approval of the first Grading Plan. Solid Waste The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to solid waste were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to the first final zoning and building inspection, the property owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Director of Maintenance for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, as implemented by the City of Anaheim, the County of Orange Integrated Waste Management Plan, and the City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plan. 2. Prior to the first final zoning and building inspection; and to be implemented during Project operations a Solid Waste Management Plan shall be submitted for review and approval by the property owner/developer to ensure that the project plans comply with AB 939, as administered by City of Anaheim, and the County’s and City’s Integrated Waste Management Plans. Waste management mitigation measures that shall be taken to reduce solid waste generation shall include: a. Detailing the locations and design of solid waste and recyclables storage and collection facilities. 5-51 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND b. Complying with all Federal, State, and City regulations for hazardous material disposal. c. Participating in the City of Anaheim’s voluntary “Recycle Anaheim” program or other substitute program as may be developed by the City. In order to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989 (AB 939), the property owner/developer shall implement numerous solid waste reduction programs including, but not limited to, the following: Facilitating paper recycling by providing chutes or convenient locations for ¼ sorting and recycling bins. Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially from retail areas) by providing ¼ adequate space and centralized locations for collection and baling. Facilitating glass recycling (especially from restaurants) by providing ¼ adequate space for sorting and storing. Providing trash compactors for non-recyclable materials, whenever feasible, ¼ to reduce the total volume of solid waste and the number of trips required for collection. Prohibition of curbside pick-up within the Anaheim GardenWalk project. ¼ Recycling of landscape green waste. ¼ Electricity The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to electricity were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans showing that each of the project's buildings will comply with the State Energy Conservation Standards for New Residential and Nonresidential Buildings (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California Code of Regulations). 2. Prior to issuance of each building permit for tenant improvements; and to be implemented prior to each final building and zoning inspection, in order to conserve energy, the property owner/developer shall implement numerous energy saving practices in compliance with Title 10, which may include the following: Consultation with the City energy-conservation experts for assistance with ¼ energy-conservation design features. Use of high-efficiency air conditioning systems controlled by a computerized ¼ management system including features such as a variable air volume system, a 100-percent outdoor air economizer cycle, sequential operation of air conditioning equipment in accordance with building demands, isolation of air conditioning to any selected floor or floors. Use of electric motors designed to conserve energy. ¼ 5-52 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Use of special lighting fixtures such as motion sensing light switch devices and ¼ compact fluorescent fixtures in place of incandescent lights. Use of T8 lamps and electronic ballast. Metal halide or high-pressure sodium for ¼ outdoor lighting and parking lots. 3. Prior to issuance of the first building permit (submittal of conduit plans); to be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall install electrical and communication conduit and substructures within the development site to provide for electrical distribution to serve the various uses within the development. 4. Prior to issuance of the first building permit for Area A and Area B, the property owner/developer shall pay fees in accordance with Anaheim’s Electric Rates, Rules & Regulations for installation of backbone cables, switches and related facilities to provide electrical distribution to the development site. 5. Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall pay fees in accordance with Anaheim’s Electric Rates, Rules and Regulations for electrical commercial/industrial services for specific uses within the development site. Natural Gas The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to natural gas were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans which shall ensure that buildings are in conformance with the State Energy Conservation Standards for nonresidential building (Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California Administrative Code). 2. Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall implement a program (The Southern California Gas Company has developed several programs which are intended to assist in the selection of the most energy-efficient water heaters and furnaces) to reduce the demand on natural gas supplies. Proof of this program shall be submitted to the Planning Department in the form of a letter documenting compliance. Telephone As there will be no significant impacts to telephone service created by development of the project, no mitigation is required. Cable The following mitigation measure from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to television service/reception was adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. Prior to issuance of the first building permit for Area A, a pre-project study of area television reception shall be undertaken by the property owner/developer to determine baseline conditions; and six months after topping out of each building over 75 feet in height, a follow-up 5-53 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND study of area television reception shall be undertaken immediately by the property owner/developer. If the City of Anaheim determines that the proposed project creates a significant impact on broadcast television reception at local residences, a signal booster or relay system shall be installed on the roof of the tallest project building to restore broadcast television reception to its original condition as soon as practicable. 5.9 AESTHETICS 5.9.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR No. 311 The visual analysis for EIR No. 311 determined that implementation of SP92-1 would be visually consistent with the existing land uses. Shade and shadow analyses determined that any impacts related to shade and shadow were insignificant. 1999 Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The 1999 IS/MND reported that development of the Pointe Anaheim project would include uses that would improve the aesthetic character of the area without creating any significant shade or shadow impacts. 2001 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The modified Pointe Anaheim project proposed density and land uses similar to those proposed as part of the original Pointe Anaheim project (as evaluated in the 1999 IS/MND). These were determined to be visually consistent with the existing land uses. It was determined for the original Pointe Anaheim project that building heights would not exceed the maximum allowable height (according to zoning); therefore, no impacts related to shade and shadow would occur. 2006 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The Anaheim GardenWalk project proposed similar land uses as those evaluated for the Pointe Anaheim project. The proposed uses would not exceed the maximum allowable height as determined by zoning; therefore, the modified project would not result in any significant impacts related to shade and shadow. Additionally, the uses proposed as part of the Anaheim GardenWalk project were visually comparable to those surrounding the site and those previously proposed by the Pointe Anaheim project. 5.9.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect on a scenic vista? b) Substantially damage scenic resources, including, but not limited to, trees, rock outcroppings, and historic buildings within a State scenic highway or local scenic expressway, scenic highway, or eligible scenic highway? The project site and surrounding area are located within a highly urban portion of the City that does not contain any scenic vistas or resources and is not visible from State and local scenic highways. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. 5-54 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND c) Substantially degrade the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings? d) Create a new source of substantial light or glare which would adversely affect day or nighttime views in the area? The proposed project modifications would alter the mix of land uses within the RDE component of the Anaheim GardenWalk project but not within the overall project envelope. All current and future tenants of the Anaheim GardenWalk project would be required to comply with the design guidelines and standards set forth in The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan and analyzed previously in EIR No. 311 and the 1999 IS/MND. No additional construction is proposed beyond what was previously evaluated and approved for the project site. Therefore, no new impacts related to degradation of the existing visual character or quality of the site and its surroundings or creation of a new source of substantial light or glare would occur. Overall, the proposed project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance which would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (4) introduce mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the aesthetics analysis provided in the 1999 IS/MND. Mitigation The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to visual resources were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to approval of the Final Site Plan; shown on plans submitted for building permits; and to be implemented prior to final building and zoning inspections, the property owner/developer shall submit plans, which illustrate that all mechanical equipment and trash areas for the subject buildings will be screened from adjacent public streets. 2. Prior to approval of the first building permit in Area A and in Area B, the property owner/developer shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan in conformance with the landscape plan submitted as part of the Final Site Plan(s) for the Area. This plan shall be prepared by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall include a phasing plan for the installation and maintenance of landscaping. 3. On-going during project operation, the property owner/developer shall participate in a landscape assessment and maintenance district for any properties owned by the owner/developer, as adopted for the Anaheim Resort. 4. Prior to submittal of each Final Site Plan, if the height of any building onsite is higher than shown on the conceptual plans/exhibits submitted in connection with Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, the property owner/developer shall submit a shade and shadow analysis to the Planning Department for review and approval 5-55 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND demonstrating that the proposed structure(s) would not create significant shade and shadow impacts on adjacent land uses. A significant shade and shadow impact would occur when outdoor active areas (e.g., eating areas along Harbor Boulevard, hotel/motel swimming pool areas, etc.) or structures that include sensitive uses (e.g., residences) have windows that normally receive sunlight are covered by shadows for more than 50 percent of the sunlight hours. If the analysis identifies shade and/or shadow impacts would occur and the building setback, architectural massing and landscape requirements provisions set forth in Section 5.0, Design Plan of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, do not function as feasible mitigation measures, additional technical review of the structure(s) will be required. The height of all structures shall not exceed the maximum height permitted by The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan. 5. Prior to issuance of the first building permit in Area A and in Area B, the property owner/developer shall submit plans which detail the outdoor and, when applicable, indoor lighting system. The systems shall be designed and maintained in such a manner as to conceal light sources to the extent feasible to minimize light spillage and glare to the adjacent uses. The plans shall be prepared and signed by a licensed electrical engineer, with a letter from the engineer stating that, in the opinion of the engineer, this requirement has been met. 5.10 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY 5.10.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR No. 311 EIR No. 311 determined that despite storm water runoff increases related to the development of SP92-1, compliance with NPDES permit requirements and implementation of Best Management Practices (BMPs) would reduce any impacts to groundwater and surface hydrology to less than significant levels. Additionally, the project site was found to be located outside the 100-year floodplain. No significant impacts were projected with implementation of mitigation measures. Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The 1999 IS/MND reported that the Pointe Anaheim project would develop uses that would not significantly impact site groundwater and surface hydrology. 2001 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The modified Pointe Anaheim project proposed development of similar land uses on the same site as the original project evaluated in the 1999 IS/MND; therefore, no new impacts would occur. 2006 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The Anaheim GardenWalk project proposed to develop the 29.1-acre site with land uses similar to those previously evaluated. As the entire site was approved for development previously, it was determined that there would not be an increase in the amount of impervious surface area associated with development of the modified project. 5-56 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND 5.10.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Violate any water quality standards or waste discharge requirements? b) Substantially deplete groundwater supplies or interfere substantially with groundwater recharge such that there would be a net deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table level (e.g., the production rate of pre- existing nearby wells would drop to a level which would not support existing land uses or planned uses for which permits have been granted)? c) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, in a manner which would result in substantial erosion or siltation on- or off-site? d) Substantially alter the existing drainage pattern of the site or area, including through the alteration of the course of a stream or river, or substantially increase the rate or amount of surface runoff in a manner which would result in flooding on- or off-site? e) Create or contribute runoff water which would exceed the capacity of existing or planned stormwater drainage systems or provide substantial additional sources of polluted runoff? f) Otherwise substantially degrade water quality? k) Substantially degrade water quality by contributing pollutants from areas of material storage, vehicle or equipment fueling, vehicle or equipment maintenance (including washing), waste handling, hazardous materials handling, or storage, delivery areas, loading docks or other outdoor work areas? l) Substantially degrade water quality by discharge which affects the beneficial uses (i.e., swimming, fishing, etc.) of the receiving or downstream waters? The project area is considered urbanized and would have similar impacts to groundwater and surface hydrology assumed in EIR No. 311 which was incorporated by reference into the 1999 IS/MND. Consistent with previous environmental analyses, implementation of the proposed project would not increase impervious surfaces beyond what was previously analyzed as part of EIR No. 311. As discussed in Section 5.8, the proposed project would not increase the demand for water supply beyond what was previously identified and evaluated. Therefore, no impacts related to groundwater levels would occur. Furthermore, the proposed drainage system, as analyzed in the previous environmental documents, would not be altered with implementation of the proposed project. Compliance with NPDES permit requirements and implementation of BMPs would reduce impacts to groundwater and surface hydrology to less than significant levels. As a result, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to groundwater and surface hydrology. 5-57 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND g) Place housing within a 100-year flood hazard area as mapped on a federal Flood Hazard Boundary or Flood Insurance Rate Map or other flood hazard delineation map? h) Place within a 100-year flood hazard area structures which would impede or redirect flood flows? Similar to the analysis in the 1999 IS/MND, the proposed project site is located within Flood Zone X 500, which is between the 100-year and 500-year flood limits (flooding below 1 foot) and outside of the 100-year floodplain. Therefore, because the project site is in the same location, a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects would not be created in relation to the 100-year flood hazard area from the proposed project. i) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding, including flooding as a result of the failure of a levee or dam? Figure 5.5-5 of the Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update EIR No. 330 identifies that the project site is located within the flood impact zone associated with the Prado Dam, which is located over 17 miles northeast of the project site. Although the project site is located within the designated flood impact zone, the actual threat of flooding is low due to the extensive development and natural features that exist between the dam and the project site, including several freeways, the Santa Ana River, and portions of the Santa Ana mountain range which would act to block, reduce, or slow the risk of flooding. Additionally, the Prado Dam is subject to annual safety inspections to ensure that the dam is safe, performing as intended, and is not developing problems (DWR 2010). Therefore, impacts associated with the risk of loss, injury or death involving flooding would be less than significant. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. j) Inundation by seiche or mudflow? Consistent with the analysis provided in the 1999 IS/MND, the nearest water body continues to be the Anaheim Barber City Channel, located approximately 1.25 miles west of the project site, and the Santa Ana River Channel, located approximately 2 miles east of the project site. Due to the development that exists between these water bodies and the project site, the potential for inundation by seiche is low and does not represent a significant impact. Additionally, the site is located within a developed area with limited topography and limited exposed soil that would be subject to erosion; therefore, the project site would not be subject to mudflow. As a result, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Overall, the proposed project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance which would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (4) introduce mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the Hydrology and Water Quality analysis provided in the 1999 IS/MND. 5-58 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Mitigation The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to groundwater and surface hydrology were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to approval of a grading plan; and, implementation during Project construction and operation, the property owner/developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Runoff Management Plan (MDRMP) for review and approval and pay the required South Central Area Master Plan of Drainage (SCAMPD) storm drain fees. The Master Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the following items: a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including supporting hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storms up to and including the 100-year storm. b. A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for control of project- generated drainage and runoff. c. Detailed assessment of existing water quality, potential water quality impacts, and a description of proposed measures to maintain water quality to the extent required by the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) and its regulations, including the following: (1) Incorporation of structural and nonstructural City-controlled Best Management Practices (BMPs). BMPs shall, to the extent permitted by law, include, but are not limited to, containment of masonry and paint wastes on the construction site; proper disposal of vehicle fuel and maintenance wastes; disposal of trash and debris; prohibiting water wash down of paved areas (both during and after construction unless allowed by the NPDES permit); and education/training for construction workers on these practices. Engineering details, maintenance procedures, and funding responsibilities of these BMPs shall also be described. (2) Incorporation of measures to comply with applicable actions to be identified by the RWQCB in conformance with the State Water Resources Control Board (SWRCB) statewide water quality control plan for inland surface waters, adopted April 11, 1991. (3) Description of a water quality monitoring program to monitor water quality during and subsequent to construction and to evaluate the effectiveness of BMPs. The water quality monitoring program shall identify: (1) the person/agency responsible for implementing the program, (2) sources of pollutants in runoff (e.g., nuisance flows from development areas, irrigation flows), (3) specific types of pollutants expected in runoff that will be monitored (e.g., total suspended solids, phosphorous, lead), (4) water quality sampling stations that are representative of runoff from the sources identified above, (5) sampling program methodology, including devices to be used and frequency and duration of sampling, (6) method for evaluating data collected from a sampling program, including threshold standards for determining effectiveness of BMPs, and (7) additional measures, if necessary, to increase the effectiveness of the BMPs to the threshold standards identified in C(1) above. 5-59 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND 2. Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit landscaping and irrigation plans and an Irrigation Management Program. This landscape plan shall include a maintenance program to control the use of fertilizers and pesticides, and an irrigation system designed to minimize surface runoff and over-watering. Additionally: a. The landscape plans shall be prepared and certified by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape architect shall submit plans in accordance with Anaheim's Landscape Water Efficiency Ordinance and Guidelines. b. The Irrigation Management Program shall specify methods for monitoring the irrigation system and shall be designed by an irrigation engineer (plans to be submitted in accordance with the Specific Plan). The system shall ensure that irrigation rates do not exceed the infiltration of local soils and that the application of fertilizers and pesticides do not exceed appropriate levels of frequencies. c. The landscape and irrigation plans shall be developed to be consistent with the provisions of the Specific Plan, which require that the maximum annual water allowance for the project not exceed 80 percent of the mean annual evapotranspiration, or that the landscape irrigation system include water- conserving features such as low-flow irrigation heads, automatic irrigation scheduling equipment, flow sensing controls, rain sensors, soil moisture sensors, and other water-conserving equipment. In addition, all irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with reclaimed water, if it should become available. 3. On-going during Project operations, the property owner/developer shall provide for the following: cleaning of all paved areas not maintained by the City of Anaheim including, but not limited to, private streets and parking lots on not less than a monthly basis. Using water to clean streets, parking lots, and other areas shall be allowed on a periodic basis if allowed in the applicant's NPDES permit. Nightly washdown shall be allowed where advisable to maintain safe and sanitary working conditions, if allowed in the property owner/developer's and City's NPDES permit. Flushing debris, residue, and sediment down the storm drains shall conform to the property owner/developer's NPDES requirements. Property owner/developer agrees that material deposited in City storm drains shall not be in violation of the City's NPDES permit. 4. Prior to each final building and zoning inspection, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter from a landscape architect stating that landscape materials and irrigation systems have been installed as specified in the approved landscaping and irrigation plans. Any modifications to the landscape plan shall be specifically approved by the Planning Department. 5. To reduce the project’s demand on potable water, the property owner/developer shall install water lines on-site so that reclaimed water may be used for landscape irrigation and other purposes to be installed with the project water mains; and to be connected if reclaimed water becomes available. 6. On-going during grading operations, the property owner/developer shall implement standard practices from all applicable codes and ordinances to prevent erosion. 5-60 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND 7. Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall obtain required NPDES construction storm permits from the State Water Resources Control Board, if applicable. Copies of the Notice of Intent or permits, as applicable, shall be submitted to the City Engineer. 5.11 AGRICULTURE & FOREST RESOURCES 5.11.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The previous environmental documents, including EIR No. 311, the 1999 IS/MND and the two previous addenda (2001 and 2006) to the 1999 IS/MND, did not provide specific analyses of agriculture and forest resources. 5.11.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW In determining whether impacts to agricultural resources are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to the California Agricultural Land Evaluation and Site Assessment Model (1997) prepared by the California Department of Conservation as an optional model to use in assessing impacts on agriculture and farmland. In determining whether impacts to forest resources, including timberland, are significant environmental effects, lead agencies may refer to information compiled by the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection regarding the State’s inventory of forest land, including the Forest and Range Assessment Project and the Forest Legacy Assessment project; and forest carbon measurement methodology provided in Forest Protocols adopted by the California Air Resources Board. Would the project: a) Convert Prime Farmland, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Statewide Importance (Farmland), as shown on the maps prepared pursuant to the Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program of the California Resources Agency, to non-agricultural use? b) Conflict with existing zoning for agricultural use, or a Williamson Act contract? c) Conflict with existing zoning for, or cause rezoning of, forest land (as defined in Public Resources Code section 12220(g)), timberland (as defined by Public Resources Code section 4526), or timberland zoned Timberland Production (as defined by Government Code section 51104(g))? d) Result in the loss of forest land or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? e) Involve other changes in the existing environment which, due to their location or nature, could result in conversion of Farmland, to non-agricultural use or conversion of forest land to non-forest use? Data from the State of California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and Monitoring Program, indicates that the project site contains no land that is designated as Prime Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland, or Farmland of Local Importance (FMMP 2008) or zoned for agricultural use. In addition, the project site is not in agricultural use or under Williamson Act contracts and no such designated land is nearby. Therefore, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to agricultural resources. Since the project site is in an urban area, no changes would result in conversion of farm or forest land to non-agricultural or non-forest uses. The project site is not considered to be 5-61 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND farmland of significance or land in agricultural use. The project site is not defined as forest land according to Section 12220(g) of the California Public Resources Code, which defines forest land as “land that can support 10 percent native tree cover of any species, including hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation, and other public benefits,” nor is it zoned for Timberland Production as defined by Section 51104(g) of the California Government Code. No additional construction is proposed beyond what was previously evaluated and approved for the project site. Therefore, no new impacts related to agricultural and forest resources would occur. Although the CEQA questions listed above related to forest resources were not on the checklist when the original project MND was prepared (i.e., the 1999 IS/MND), there are no environmental impacts associated with this issue, and therefore, this does not preclude the use of an addendum to the previous document. Overall, the proposed project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance which would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (4) introduce mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the agriculture and forest resources analysis provided in the 1999 IS/MND. Mitigation No mitigation measures are required. 5.12 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES 5.12.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The previous environmental documents, including EIR No. 311, the 1999 IS/MND and the two previous addenda (2001 and 2006) to the 1999 IS/MND, did not provide specific analyses of biological resources. 5.12.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Have a substantial adverse effect, either directly or through habitat modifications, on any species identified as a candidate, sensitive, or special status species in local or regional plans, policies, or regulations, or by the California Department of Fish and Game or U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service? b) Have a substantial adverse effect on any riparian habitat or other sensitive natural community identified in local or regional plans, policies, regulations or by the California Department of Fish and Game or US Fish and Wildlife Services? c) Have a substantial adverse effect on federally protected wetlands as defined by Section 404 of the Clean Water Act (including, but not limited to, marsh, vernal 5-62 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND pool, coastal, etc.) through direct removal, filling, hydrological interruption, or other means? d) Interfere substantially with the movement of any native resident or migratory fish or wildlife species or with established native resident or migratory wildlife corridors, or impede the use of native wildlife nursery sites? e) Conflict with any local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources, such as a tree preservation policy or ordinance? f) Conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan? The proposed project would reallocate/redistribute RDE land uses within the fully constructed Anaheim GardenWalk and would not involve new development; therefore, implementation of the proposed project would not impact biological resources. Specifically, the proposed project would not create impacts related to habitat modification, effects on riparian habitat or sensitive natural communities, federally protected wetlands, migratory wildlife corridors, or native wildlife nursery sites. The project would not conflict with local policies or ordinances protecting biological resources or conflict with the provisions of an adopted Habitat Conservation Plan, Natural Community Conservation Plan, or other approved local, regional, or State habitat conservation plan since no habitat, wetlands, or corridors are present on the project site or nearby. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to biological resources. Overall, the proposed project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance which would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (4) introduce mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the biological resources analysis provided in the 1999 IS/MND. Mitigation No mitigation measures are required. 5.13 GEOLOGY AND SOILS 5.13.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR No. 311 Analysis of potential impacts related to earth resources in EIR No. 311 revealed that the project would expose people to seismic risk typical of Southern California. Such a risk was considered less than significant with implementation of project mitigation measures. 5-63 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The 1999 IS/MND reported that development of the Pointe Anaheim project would develop uses that would require excavation of the site material. However, the excavation of the project site would not be expected to result in significant adverse impacts with implementation of project mitigation measures. 2001 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The modified Pointe Anaheim project was proposed for development within the same site boundary as the previously evaluated project in the 1999 IS/MND; therefore, the same area was found to be subject to impacts. The modified project was determined to be substantially similar to the original Pointe Anaheim project so no new impacts were identified. 2006 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The Anaheim GardenWalk project proposed development in a similar manner on the 29.1-acre site previously evaluated; therefore, the same area would be subject to the same impacts as previously analyzed. 5.13.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Expose people or structures to potential substantial adverse effects, including the risk of loss, injury, or death involving: i) Rupture of a known earthquake fault, as delineated on the most recent Alquist- Priolo Earthquake Fault Zoning Map issued by the State Geologist for the area or based on other substantial evidence of a known fault? Refer to Division of Mines and Geology Special Publication 42. ii) Strong seismic ground shaking? iii) Seismic-related ground failure, including liquefaction? iv) Landslides? Seismic risk at the project site was comprehensively analyzed as part of the previous environmental documentation and nothing has changed related to local geologic conditions. Construction associated with the Anaheim GardenWalk project has historically occurred in a manner consistent with City and State codes and mitigation measures. All future development will comply with applicable mitigation measures as detailed below; therefore, impacts related to exposure of people or structures to seismic-related hazards would be the same for the proposed project. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. b) Result in substantial soil erosion or the loss of topsoil? Due to the nature of the project and the location of the site within a relatively flat and developed area, the proposed project is not anticipated to result in substantial erosion or loss of topsoil. Furthermore, construction activities would be performed pursuant to the current National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit requirements as discussed in more detail in Section 5.10, Hydrology and Water Quality. No additional ground disturbance beyond what was previously evaluated would occur. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. 5-64 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND c) Be located on a geologic unit or soil that is unstable, or that would become unstable as a result of the project, and potentially result in on- or off-site landslide, lateral spreading, subsidence, liquefaction or collapse? d) Be located on expansive soil, as defined in Table 18-1-B of the Uniform Building Code (1994), creating substantial risks to life or property? Consistent with previous environmental analyses, surface loading and other stresses can cause soils to settle. Because the earth materials underlying the site have relatively high densities, it is anticipated that for structures associated with the proposed project, estimated settlements would be minimal, causing no significant adverse impacts. Furthermore, no structures beyond what was previously analyzed are proposed for construction. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. e) Have soils incapable of adequately supporting the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems where sewers are not available for the disposal of wastewater? As with the previously analyzed projects, the proposed project would not involve the use of septic tanks or alternative wastewater disposal systems. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Overall, the proposed project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance which would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (4) introduce mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the geology and soils analysis provided in the 1999 IS/MND. Mitigation The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to earth resources were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to approval of each grading plan, the property owner/developer shall submit a thorough soils and geological report for the area to be graded, based on proposed grading and prepared by an engineering geologist and geotechnical engineer. The report shall comply with Title 17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 2. Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit for review and approval detailed foundation design information for the subject buildings, prepared by a civil engineer, based on recommendations by a geotechnical engineer. 3. Prior to issuance of each foundation permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a report prepared by a geotechnical engineer for review and approval which shall investigate the subject foundation excavations to determine if soft layers are present immediately beneath the footing site and to ensure that compressibility does not underlie the footing. 5-65 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND 4. Prior to issuance of each building permit, the property owner/developer shall submit plans showing that the proposed structure has been analyzed for earthquake loading and designed according to the most recent seismic standards in the Uniform Building Code adopted by the City of Anaheim. 5. Prior to issuance of each grading permit (for Import/ Export Plan) and prior to issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan) for Area B, the property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export Plans. The plans shall include identification of offsite locations for material export from the project and options for disposal of excess material. These options may include recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall be encouraged to offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all can be reused on the project site. 5.14 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 5.14.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR No. 311 EIR No. 311 concluded that impacts associated with the potential release of hazardous materials would be reduced to a level considered less than significant with implementation of the recommended mitigation measures. Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The 1999 IS/MND reported that a portion of the project site could contain hazardous materials, as identified in the Phase I Environmental Site Assessment (ESA) prepared by Northwest Envirocon, Inc. in 1998. However, implementation of the proposed mitigation would reduce all impacts associated with hazardous materials to levels considered less than significant. 2001 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The modified Pointe Anaheim project proposed development of the same project site with similar land uses; therefore, the impacts would remain the same and the identified mitigation measures would continue to reduce impacts to less than significant levels. 2006 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The Anaheim GardenWalk project proposed development of the same 29.1-acre project site with land uses similar to those proposed by the original Pointe Anaheim project. Due to the generally similar nature of the two projects, no new impacts were identified. 5-66 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND 5.14.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through the routine transport, use, or disposal of hazardous materials? b) Create a significant hazard to the public or the environment through reasonably foreseeable upset and accident conditions involving the release of hazardous materials into the environment? A Phase I ESA was prepared by Northwest Envirocon, Inc. in 1998. Consistent with previous environmental analyses, a portion of the site was identified to contain hazardous materials as discussed further under question d, below. Consistent with the analysis contained in the 1999 IS/MND, the potential for people, specifically construction workers, to be exposed to hazardous materials is considered a significant impact; however, implementation of applicable mitigation measures from EIR No. 311 and the 1999 IS/MND (identified below) would reduce this impact to a less than significant level. Therefore, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Although there are no industrial uses onsite requiring regular transport, use, and disposal of hazardous materials, there is expected to be incidental use of materials categorized as hazardous during construction and operation associated with the project. These include paints, solvents, certain cleaners and other corrosive materials. The use of these materials is required to comply with all regulations governing their use. All future construction and operation of the Anaheim GardenWalk project would be in compliance with all applicable federal, State, and local laws and regulations regarding hazardous waste, including the Hazardous Materials Transportation Act, Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the California Hazardous Waste Control Act, and the California Accidental Release Prevention Program. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. c) Emit hazardous emissions or handle hazardous or acutely hazardous materials, substances, or waste within one-quarter mile of an existing or proposed school? The proposed project is not located within ¼-mile of an existing or proposed school; the nearest school is Paul Revere Elementary School, which is located approximately 0.4 mile northeast of the project site. Therefore, the project would not result in hazardous emissions or require the handling of hazardous materials in proximity to nearby schools. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. d) Be located on a site which is included on a list of hazardous materials sites compiled pursuant to Government Code Section 65962.5 and, as a result, would it create a significant hazard to the public or the environment? As stated previously, aPhase IESA was prepared for the Pointe Anaheim project. The results of the Phase I ESA identified the following environmental conditions that could potentially impact the proposed project site: A Chevron gasoline station formerly occupied at the northwestern corner of the ¼ project site. 5-67 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Two light industrial structures on the site (1731-1741 and 1751-1755 South ¼ Clementine Street). Suspect asbestos-containing materials (ACMs) that were identified in all of the ¼ inspected older existing buildings during on-site observations. Potential lead-based paints (LBP) (based upon the building age). ¼ Because structures that existed on the eastern portion of the project site (Area A) at the time of the Phase I ESA have since been demolished and construction of the Anaheim GardenWalk RDE component and the related parking structure has taken its place, potential impacts related to the eastern portion of the site are not a concern for this project. The western portion of the project site (Area B) continues to exist as was described in the Phase I ESA; therefore, identified impacts still exist. No further environmental risks or recognized environmental conditions indicating the presence of hazardous conditions were observed. According to a recent review of federal, state, and local databases, no identified hazardous materials sites are located on the project site (EDR 2010). According to the database search, the nearest listed sites and their clean-up status include the following: Former Katella Car Wash, 350 Katella Avenue. This was the site of a leaking ¼ underground gasoline storage tank discovered in 1991 where the soil was affected. The site was subject to remediation and monitoring. The case was closed in 1996 and does not pose a hazard to the project site. Former Anaheim Fire Station #3, 1680 Clementine Street. This was the site of a leaking ¼ underground diesel storage tank discovered in 1998 where the soil was affected. The affected soil was cleaned up and the case was closed in 1998 and does not pose a hazard to the project site. Chevron, 1801 Harbor Boulevard. This was the site of a leaking underground gasoline ¼ storage tank discovered in 1998 where the soil was affected. The site was subject to remediation and monitoring. The case was closed in 1999 and does not pose a hazard to the project site. Several other underground storage tanks exist on the site and do not pose a hazard to the project site. Mobil, 1800 Harbor Boulevard. This was the site of a leaking underground gasoline ¼ storage tank discovered in 1990 where the underlying aquifer was affected. The site was subject to remediation and monitoring. The case was closed in 1998 and does not pose a hazard to the project site. Several other underground storage tanks exist on the site and do not pose a hazard to the project site. This was also the site of an accidental gasoline spill (approximately five gallons) which was reported in 1993 when a customer drove off with the nozzle in the tank. The surface spill was cleaned-up and no further contamination was noted. The case was closed in 1998 and does not pose a hazard to the project site. Unocal, 1779 Harbor Boulevard. This was the site of a leaking underground gasoline ¼ storage tank discovered in 1965 where the soil was affected. Due to the historic nature of the reported leak, details are limited; however, the case was closed in 1986. Therefore, the site does not pose a hazard to the project site. 5-68 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Consistent with the analysis contained in the 1999 IS/MND, the potential for people to be exposed to hazardous materials during future construction associated with the hotels or Area B is considered a significant impact. With implementation of identified mitigation measures, impacts related to hazardous materials would be reduced to a less than significant level. However, there will be no impacts associated with the project since no hazardous materials exist on the retail site and no ground disturbance would occur. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. e) For a project located within an airport land use plan (Los Alamitos Armed Forces Reserve Center or Fullerton Municipal Airport), would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? f) For a project within the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport or helistop, would the project result in a safety hazard for people residing or working in the project area? The project site is not within an adopted Airport Land Use Plan or located in the vicinity of a private airstrip, heliport, or helistop. No new impacts are anticipated. g) Impair implementation of or physically interfere with an adopted emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan? According to the City of Anaheim General Plan’s Safety Element (May 2004), the City has an emergency preparedness plan that complies with State law and that interfaces with other cities and counties in Southern California. Project implementation would neither impair implementation of nor interfere with an emergency response plan or emergency evacuation plan because there would be no changes to local roadways or the circulation network and no significant increased density will occur at the site. Additionally, with implementation of mitigation measures identified in Section 5.1 of this Addendum, traffic associated with the proposed project would not create roadway segment or intersection deficiencies that would affect an emergency response or evacuation plan. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. h) Expose people or structures to a significant risk of loss, injury or death involving wildland fires, including where wildlands are adjacent to urbanized areas or where residences are intermixed with wildlands? The project site is located within an urban, developed area and would not be subject to wildland fire risks. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Overall, the proposed project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance which would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (4) introduce mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the hazards and hazardous materials analysis provided in the 1999 IS/MND. 5-69 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Mitigation The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to hazardous materials were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to approval of the first grading plan or issuance of the first demolition permit for Area B, whichever occurs first, investigation for the presence of cryptic tanks using geophysical methods shall be conducted in the subject area for the property owner/developer by a qualified environmental professional in the areas of former service stations and those areas known or thought to have been formerly occupied by USTs and where tank removal has not been verified prior to excavation or grading in these areas. Soil sampling or a soil organic vapor survey may be required if soil sampling results are not available or indicate contamination is present above regulatory guidelines. If warranted, subsurface investigation and sampling shall be undertaken in these areas, and appropriate remediation measures developed, if necessary, before demolition, excavation, or grading takes place in these areas. 2. Prior to removal of underground tanks, a permit shall be obtained from the Environmental Protection Section of the Fire Department for removal of underground tanks by the property owner/developer. During removal of the underground storage tank, a representative from the Fire Department, Environmental Protection Section, shall be onsite to direct soil sampling. 3. On-going during remediation, remediation activities conducted on behalf of the property owner/developer of surface or subsurface contamination not related to USTs shall be overseen by the Orange County Health Department. Information on subsurface contamination from an underground storage tank shall be provided to the Public Utilities Department, Water Services Administration, Environmental Services. 4. Prior to approval of the first grading plan or issuance of the first demolition permit, whichever occurs first, the property owner/developer shall submit a plan for review and approval by the Fire Department, which details procedures that will be taken if a previously unknown UST or other unknown hazardous materials or waste is discovered onsite. 5. Prior to relocation of any transformers within the Project boundaries that may contain PCBs which are being moved or relocated as part of project development, the transformers shall be tested by the property owner/developer for PCBs. 6. Prior to approval of a grading plan in Area B, a subsurface investigation and sampling of Area B, if needed, shall be undertaken by a qualified environmental professional for the property owner/developer to the satisfaction of the Public Utilities Department, Water Services Administration, Environmental Services, to determine if the former Chevron station’s USTs and/or business practices have environmentally impacted the subject property. 7. On-going during demolition in Area B, appropriate disposal of lead and other hazardous materials to landfill shall be required in compliance with all applicable federal, state, and local regulations, depending on waste characterization. The State of California requires that all waste streams be characterized based on Waste 5-70 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Extraction Tests (WET), such as total Soluble Threshold Limit Concentrations (STLC), to determine appropriate disposal facility and procedures. 8. On-going during demolition and construction, in the event that hazardous waste, including asbestos, is discovered during site preparation or construction, the property owner/developer shall ensure that the identified hazardous waste and/or hazardous material are handled and disposed of in the manner specified by the State of California Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and Safety Code, Division 20, Chapter 6.5), according to the requirements of the California Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 22, and the Uniform Fire Code, Article 87. 5.15 CULTURAL RESOURCES 5.15.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS Disneyland Resort Specific Plan EIR No. 311 EIR No. 311 concluded that no impacts to cultural, historic, or prehistoric resources were expected to occur from development of SP92-1. However, implementation of the required mitigation measures would ensure that if any cultural resources were discovered during grading or project development, potential impacts would be mitigated to a level considered less than significant. Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration The 1999 IS/MND reported that no cultural resources are known to exist on site and implementation of the required mitigation measures would reduce any potential impacts to a level considered less than significant. 2001 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Evaluation of the modified Pointe Anaheim project, proposed for development on the same site as the original Pointe Anaheim project, also determined that no known cultural resources exist on site. No new impacts would occur with the modified project. 2006 Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Due to the generally similar nature of the Anaheim GardenWalk project and the approved Pointe Anaheim project, combined with the fact that both projects were proposed on the same project site, no new impacts to Cultural Resources were anticipated. 5.15.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of a historical resource as defined in §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines and/or identified on the Qualified Historic Structures list of the Anaheim Colony Historic District Preservation Plan (July 20, 1999)? The project proposes to reallocate/redistribute RDE land uses within the fully constructed portion of the Anaheim GardenWalk development. No additional ground disturbance would occur beyond what was evaluated and approved in the previous environmental documents; therefore, the same area would be subject to impacts and no new impacts related to cultural 5-71 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND resources would occur. Specifically, there are no designated or eligible historical resources in the project area. As a result, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to cultural resources would occur. b) Cause a substantial adverse change in the significance of an archaeological resource pursuant to §15064.5 of the CEQA Guidelines? c) Directly or indirectly destroy a unique paleontological resource or site or unique geologic feature? d) Disturb any human remains, including those interred outside of formal cemeteries? Consistent with previous environmental analyses, a records search conducted for the Disneyland Resort Specific Plan area and the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area, prepared by the California Archaeological Information Center at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA), Institute of Archaeology in May of 1991, identified no historic (archaeological) or prehistoric (paleontological) cultural resources, including no evidence of human remains, within the study area. Due to the highly urbanized nature of the immediate project area since the original survey in 1991 and because no additional construction is proposed beyond what was previously evaluated and approved for the project site, the proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects related to cultural resources. Additionally, on April 19, 2011, the City of Anaheim sent out letters to seven local Native American tribe representatives pursuant to the requirements of Senate Bill 18, notifying the tribe representatives of the proposed project and inviting comment. As of May 2011, the City has not received any response. Overall, the proposed project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance which would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (4) introduce mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the cultural resources analysis provided in the 1999 IS/MND. Mitigation The following mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 related to cultural resources were adopted in connection with the 1999 IS/MND. These measures would also be applicable to the proposed project. 1. Prior to approval of each grading plan, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified archaeologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: a. The archaeologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of artifacts if potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and determined to be 5-72 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND significant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to an appropriate educational or research institution. c. Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered during grading operations when the archaeological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Upon completion of the grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City as to when the final report will be submitted. 2. Prior to approval of each grading plan, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the certified paleontologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented: a. The paleontologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures to temporarily halt or redirect work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of fossils if potentially significant paleontological resources are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and found to be significant, the paleontological observer shall determine appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage. b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to an appropriate educational research institution. c. Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified paleontologist. If any fossils are discovered during grading operations when the paleontological monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area. d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall be submitted. Upon completion of the grading, the paleontologist shall notify the City as to when the final report will be submitted. 5.16 MINERAL RESOURCES 5.16.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The previous environmental documents, including EIR No. 311, the 1999 IS/MND, and the two previous addenda (2001 and 2006) to the 1999 IS/MND, did not provide specific analyses of mineral resources. 5.16.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Would the project: a) Result in the loss of availability of a known mineral resource that would be of value to the region and the residents of the state? 5-73 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND b) Result in the loss of availability of a locally-important mineral resource recovery site delineated on a local general plan, specific plan or other land use plan? According to the City of Anaheim General Plan’s Green Element (May 2004), the project is not located in an area designated as a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) or Regionally Significant Aggregate Resources Area. Because no additional excavation beyond what was previously evaluated would occur, the project would not result in the loss of any mineral resource. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. Overall, the proposed project would be consistent with the project as analyzed in the 1999 IS/MND. The proposed project would not create a new significant impact or a substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines, the proposed project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have circumstantial changes when the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new information of substantial importance which would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (4) introduce mitigation measures which are considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no major revisions required to the Mineral Resources analysis provided in the 1999 IS/MND. Mitigation No mitigation measures are required. 5.17 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS 5.17.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS The previous environmental documents, including EIR 311, the 1999 IS/MND, and the two previous addenda to the 1999 IS/MND (2001 and 2006), did not provide specific analyses of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. 5.17.2 PROJECT ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW Effective March 18, 2010, the State has adopted amendments to the CEQA Guidelines requiring the analysis and mitigation of the effects of GHG emissions in CEQA documents Analysis of GHG emissions does not necessarily constitute “new information” under CEQA Section 21166 and CEQA Guidelines Section 15162 (a) (3). Would the project: a) Generate greenhouse gas emissions, either directly or indirectly, that may have a significant impact on the environment? As discussed in Section 4.0, Project Description, the proposed project would reallocate land uses within the currently constructed RDE component of Area A of the Anaheim GardenWalk project. The type of tenant improvements anticipated for the proposed project were previously evaluated in prior environmental documents. Therefore in accordance with current SCAQMD recommended practice, construction GHG emissions are not evaluated independently for significance, but are amortized over the lifetime of the project, usually taken as 30 years, and included with operational emissions (SCAQMD 2008). Thus, in development projects with 5-74 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND substantial building area and vehicle trip generation, construction emissions become a minor contributor to long-term GHG emissions. Operational GHG emissions include the direct emissions from vehicle trips and natural gas use and the indirect emissions resulting from the off-site generation of electricity used on site and used to obtain, transport, and treat water used on site. Operational GHG emissions for the 1999 IS/MND and the proposed project were estimated using the CalEEMod model released by SCAQMD in February 2011. Land use sizes were taken from the respective project descriptions. Vehicle emission inputs to the model were based on the average daily trip data shown in Table 4 in Section 5.2, Air Quality. Model default values were used for electricity and natural gas consumption. Indoor and outdoor water use data were taken from Tables 22 and 23 in Section 5.8, Utilities and Service Systems. As shown in Table 25, implementation of the proposed project would result in a reduction of approximately 5,000 MTCOe/year in GHG 2 emissions than estimated for the 1999 IS/MND project configuration, a reduction of approximately 6.6 percent. The principal sources of reduced GHG emissions are vehicle operations and reduced water use. Because proposed project GHG emissions would be less than would occur with the project anticipated in the 1999 IS/MND, there would be no impact. TABLE 25 ESTIMATED ANNUAL GHG EMISSIONS GHG Emissions -MTCO2e/year Increase/ Source 1999 IS/MND Proposed Project (Decrease) Vehicle emissions 49,94344,960(4,983) Electricity 18,16918,099(70) Natural gas 5,6676,101434 Water 1,9301,550(380) Total 75,70970,710(4,999) Source: See Appendix B. b) Conflict with an applicable plan, policy or regulation adopted for the purpose of reducing the emissions of greenhouse gases? There are numerous State plans, policies and regulations adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions. The principal overall State plan and policy is Assembly Bill (AB) 32, the California Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006. The quantitative goal of AB 32 is to reduce GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. Statewide plans and regulations such as GHG emissions standards for vehicles (AB 1493), the Low Carbon Fuel Standard, and regulations requiring an increasing fraction of electricity to be generated from renewable sources are being implemented at the statewide level; therefore, compliance at the project level is not addressed. Therefore, the proposed project does not conflict with those plans and regulations. The regulations, plans, and polices adopted for the purpose of reducing GHG emissions that are directly applicable to the proposed project include the Title 24 Energy Efficiency Standards for Residential and Nonresidential Buildings and the Title 24 California Green Building Standards Code. These codes are enforced by the City, and adherence to standard requirements for construction and operations would ensure that the proposed project would comply with both of these regulations. Implementation of the mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 004 for the proposed project, as described in the Mitigation section below, would provide GHG emission 5-75 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND reductions through reduced vehicle miles traveled, reduction of water use, and improved energy efficiency. Some of these reductions would be in addition to the vehicle, electricity use, and water use reductions quantified in response a). Thus, the proposed project is consistent with AB 32, and it can be concluded that the proposed project would not conflict with an applicable plan, policy, or regulation of State, regional, or local agencies. This impact is less than significant The analyses of issues a) and b) above demonstrate that there would be no new significant environmental effects in accordance with CEQA Guidelines section 15162 (a) (2). Mitigation The following mitigation measures are stated previously throughout this document as applicable to the proposed project and would also reduce vehicle GHG emissions or GHG emissions associated with energy use: mitigation measures 6, 7, 9, 13, 14, and 15 from Section 5.1 Transportation/Traffic; measures 2, 4 and 5 from Section 5.2, Air Quality; and measures 1 from the water subsection, measure 2 from the solid waste subsection, measures 1 and 2 from the electricity subsection, and measures 1 and 2 from the natural gas subsection of Section 5.8, Utilities and Service Systems. 5-76 Environmental Analysis R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND SECTION 6.0 SUMMARY OF FINDINGS As demonstrated throughout this document, the proposed Anaheim GardenWalk Project would not result in any impacts that are considered to be new significant impacts or impacts that are substantially worse than the Pointe Anaheim project as evaluated in 1999 IS/MND. Because the proposed project would not meet any of the criteria identified in Section 15162 of the CEQA Guidelines requiring preparation of a subsequent document, it can be concluded that an addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration is the appropriate document type for the proposed project. 6-1 Summary of Findings R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND SECTION 7.0 REFERENCES Anaheim, City of. 2004 (May). General Plan for the City of Anaheim (City Council Resolution No. 2004-94). Anaheim, CA: the City. BonTerra Consulting. 1999 (January 19). Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration Pointe Anaheim. Costa Mesa, CA: BonTerra Consulting. ———. 2001 (October 29). Addendum to the Pointe AnaheimInitial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. Costa Mesa, CA: BonTerra Consulting. ———. 2006 (March 1). Anaheim GardenWalk SecondAddendum to the Pointe AnaheimInitial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. Costa Mesa, CA: BonTerra Consulting. California Air Resources Board (CARB). 2010 (November 16, last reviewed). History of Air Resources Board. Sacramento, CA: CARB. http://www.arb.ca.gov/knowzone/ history.htm. California Department of Finance (DOF). 2011 (May). E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State 2010-2011, with 2010 Benchmark. Sacramento, CA: DOF. California Department of Resources Recycling and Recovery (CalRecycle). 2009. (December 30, last updated). Estimated Soled Waste Generation Rates for Service Establishments. Sacramento, CA: CalRecycle. http://www.calrecycle.ca.gov/wastechar/wastegenrates/S ervice/htm. California Department of Water Resources, Division of Safety of Dams (DWR). 2010 (November 18, last updated). Frequently Asked Questions: General Information Questions. Sacramento, CA: DWR. http://www.water.ca.gov/damsafety/FAQAnswer/index.cfm #safety. Center for Demographic Research (CDR). 2007 (March). Orange County Projections-2006. Fullerton, CA: California State University, Fullerton, CDR. CH2M Hill. 2009 (August). Combined Central Anaheim Area Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers – Amendment to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan. Los Angeles, CA: CH2M Hill. California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC). 2010 (January 19, last modified). Natural Gas and California. San Francisco, CA: CPUC. http://www.cpuc.ca.gov/PUC/energy/Gas/natgas andCA.htm. Iteris Inc. 2011 (March 17). Draft Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the Pointe Anaheim Initial Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration Traffic Analysis Update. Los Angeles, CA: Iteris Inc. Keith, M. 2011 (February 24). Personal Communication. Telephone Conversation between M. Keith (Environmental Planner, BonTerra Consulting) and J. Arnau (Administrative Manager, OC Waste & Recycling) regarding Landfill Capacity. Costa Mesa, CA: BonTerra Consulting. 7-1 References R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx Anaheim GardenWalk Project Addendum to the 1999 IS/MND Lutz, J. 2011 (April 5). Personal communication. Email from J. Lutz (Fire Marshal, Anaheim Fire Department) to J. Marks (Project Manager, BonTerra Consulting), which includes the following attachment: Anaheim GardenWalk (as PDF).pdf. Nguyen, M. 2011 (April 8). Personal communication. Email from M. Nguyen (Police Officer, Planning and Research Unit, Anaheim Police Department) to J. Marks (Project Manager, BonTerra Consulting). Anaheim, CA: Anaheim Police Department. Oskoui, J. 2010 (April 14). Personal communication. Email from J. Oskoui, Director of Planning, Design and Construction (AUHSD) to A. Armanino (BonTerra Consulting). ———. 2009 (December 9). Personal communication. Email from J. Oskoui, Director of Planning, Design and Construction (AUHSD) to A. Armanino (BonTerra Consulting). Pidgen, K. 2010a (April 14). Personal communication. Email from K. Pidgen (Facilities Technician ACSD) to A. Armanino (BonTerra Consulting). PSOMAS. 2009 (November). Amendment to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Water Supply Assessment.Santa Ana, CA: PSOMAS. South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD). 1993 (November, as revised). CEQA Air Quality Handbook. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD (Updates found at: http://www.aqmd.gov/CEQA/hdbk.html). ———. 2008 (October). Draft Guidance Document – Interim CEQA Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Significance Thresholds. Diamond Bar, CA: SCAQMD. State of California, Department of Finance, E-5 Population and Housing Estimates for Cities, Counties, and the State, 2010-2011, with 2010 Benchmark. Sacramento, California, May 2011. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS). 2011 (April 27, last updated). Unemployment Rates for Large Metropolitan Areas. Washington, D.C.: BLS. http://www.bls.gov/web/ metro/laulrgma.htm. 7-2 References R:\Projects\Anaheim\J066\Addendum_Clean-060611.docx APPENDIX A AIR QUALITY CALCULATIONS CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2011.1.1Date: 5/23/2011 Garden Walk Existing A 050511 Orange County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land UsesSizeMetric Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru401000sqft Health Club251000sqft High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)601000sqft Hotel1050Room Movie Theater (No Matinee)5100Seat Quality Restaurant801000sqft Racquet Club251000sqft Regional Shopping Center3351000sqft 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Utility CompanyAnaheim Public Utilities UrbanizationUrbanWind Speed (m/s) Climate Zone82.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 1 of 6 30 1.3 User Entered Comments Project Characteristics - Land Use - Fast food restaurant is Night Club/Bar; Racquet Club is Game/Video Arcade; Health Club is Museum. Unique ID needed for each land use in order to get separate line items for trip generation. Added note: The "built-in" land use names are used in order not to upset this tempermental model. Vehicle Trips - Trip rates adjusted per project trip analysis. Analysis included diversion, internal; therefore all trips primary or passby. Passby estimated from traffic analysis. Water And Wastewater - Water and wastewater use data from 1999 Pointe IS/MND Solid Waste - Default solid waste quantities. Landfill data for Olinda-Alpha landfill 2.0 Emissions Summary Unmitigated Operational ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitiveExhaustPM2.5 PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total Categorylb/day Area57.630.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 Energy3.1428.5323.960.170.002.170.002.17 Mobile195.71385.301,823.663.56426.0117.22443.2314.3617.2231.58 Total256.48413.831,847.623.73426.0117.22445.4014.3617.2233.75 2 of 6 4.0 Mobile Detail 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitive ExhaustPM2.5 PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total Categorylb/day Mitigated195.71385.301,823.663.56426.0117.22443.2314.3617.2231.58 Unmitigated195.71385.301,823.663.56426.0117.22443.2314.3617.2231.58 TotalNANANANANANANANANANA 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip RateUnmitigatedMitigated Land UseWeekdaySaturdaySundayAnnual VMTAnnual VMT Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru3,483.604,528.004528.0015,517,70015,517,700 Health Club1,536.002,627.502197.506,920,0166,920,016 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)2,899.203,610.803006.0011,739,50411,739,504 Hotel3,769.503,780.002751.0014,945,92714,945,927 Movie Theater (No Matinee)5,865.005,865.005865.0024,038,12724,038,127 Quality Restaurant2,734.402,868.802193.6010,281,25310,281,253 Racquet Club2,043.003,492.502922.509,393,7939,393,793 Regional Shopping Center5,035.055,859.152958.0517,849,97817,849,978 Total27,365.7532,631.7526,421.65110,686,297110,686,297 3 of 6 4.3 Trip Type Information MilesTrip % H-O or C-NW Land UseH-W or C-WH-S or C-CH-O or C-NWH-W or C-WH-S or C-C Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru8.9013.307.401.5079.5019.00 Health Club8.9013.307.4016.9064.1019.00 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)8.9013.307.408.5072.5019.00 Hotel8.9013.307.4019.4061.6019.00 Movie Theater (No Matinee)8.9013.307.401.8079.2019.00 Quality Restaurant8.9013.307.4012.0069.0019.00 Racquet Club8.9013.307.4011.5069.5019.00 Regional Shopping Center8.9013.307.4016.3064.7019.00 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitive ExhaustPM2.5 PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total Categorylb/day NaturalGas Mitigated3.1428.5323.960.170.002.170.002.17 NaturalGas3.1428.5323.960.170.002.170.002.17 Unmitigated TotalNANANANANANANANANANA 4 of 6 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGas UseROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitive ExhaustPM2.5 Total PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5 Land UsekBTUlb/day Fast Food 288690.312.832.380.020.000.220.000.22 Restaurant w/o Drive Health Club1482.190.020.150.120.000.000.010.000.01 High Turnover (Sit 43303.60.474.253.570.030.000.320.000.32 Down Restaurant) Hotel1494111.6114.6512.300.090.001.110.001.11 Movie Theater (No 6803.260.070.670.560.000.000.050.000.05 Matinee) Quality Restaurant57738.10.625.664.750.030.000.430.000.43 Racquet Club1482.190.020.150.120.000.000.010.000.01 Regional Shopping 1881.510.020.180.150.000.000.010.000.01 Center Total3.1428.5423.950.170.002.160.002.16 5 of 6 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitive ExhaustPM2.5 PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total Categorylb/day Mitigated57.630.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 Unmitigated57.630.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 TotalNANANANANANANANANANA 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitive ExhaustPM2.5 PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total SubCategorylb/day Architectural Coating13.980.000.000.000.00 Consumer Products43.650.000.000.000.00 Landscaping0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 Total57.630.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 6 of 6 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2011.1.1Date: 5/23/2011 Garden Walk Proposed 052311 Orange County, Winter 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land UsesSizeMetric Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru47.771000sqft Health Club111000sqft High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)29.711000sqft Hotel1628Room Movie Theater (No Matinee)2165Seat Quality Restaurant134.271000sqft Racquet Club58.661000sqft Regional Shopping Center248.031000sqft 1.2 Other Project Characteristics UtilityAnaheim Public Utilities UrbanizationUrbanWind Speed (m/s) Company Climate Zone82.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 1 of 6 30 1.3 User Entered Comments Project Characteristics - Land Use - Fast food restaurant is Night Club/Bar; Racquet Club is Bowling; Health Club is Outdoor Restaurant. Unique ID needed for each land use in order to get separate line items for trip generation. Added note: The "built-in" land use names are used in order not to upset this tempermental model. Off-road Equipment - Minimal equipment Vehicle Trips - Trip rates adjusted per project trip analysis. Analysis included diversion, internal; therefore all trips primary or passby. Passby estimated from traffic analysis. Water And Wastewater - Water and wastewater use data from proposed project study. Solid Waste - Default solid waste quantities. Landfill data for Olinda-Alpha landfill Off-road Equipment - minimal equipment 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitiveExhaustPM2.5 PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total Categorylb/day Area55.270.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 Energy3.3630.5225.640.180.002.320.002.32 Mobile172.79340.341,610.583.15376.4615.21391.6812.6915.2127.90 Total231.42370.861,636.223.33376.4615.21394.0012.6915.2130.22 2 of 6 4.0 Mobile Detail 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitive ExhaustPM2.5 PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total Categorylb/day Mitigated172.79340.341,610.583.15376.4615.21391.6812.6915.2127.90 Unmitigated172.79340.341,610.583.15376.4615.21391.6812.6915.2127.90 TotalNANANANANANANANANANA 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip RateUnmitigatedMitigated Land UseWeekdaySaturdaySundayAnnual VMTAnnual VMT Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru4,160.295,407.565407.5618,532,01318,532,013 Health Club957.991,245.201245.204,028,8004,028,800 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)1,435.591,787.951488.475,813,0115,813,011 Hotel5,844.525,860.804265.3623,173,30323,173,303 Movie Theater (No Matinee)2,489.752,489.752489.7510,204,42010,204,420 Quality Restaurant4,589.354,814.923681.6817,255,79717,255,797 Racquet Club1,875.362,792.222429.118,246,0488,246,048 Regional Shopping Center3,727.894,338.042190.1013,215,91113,215,911 Total25,080.7428,736.4423,197.24100,469,304100,469,304 3 of 6 4.3 Trip Type Information MilesTrip % H-S or C-CH-O or C-NW Land UseH-W or C-WH-S or C-CH-O or C-NWH-W or CW Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru8.9013.307.401.5079.5019.00 Health Club8.9013.307.4016.9064.1019.00 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)8.9013.307.408.5072.5019.00 Hotel8.9013.307.4019.4061.6019.00 Movie Theater (No Matinee)8.9013.307.401.8079.2019.00 Quality Restaurant8.9013.307.4012.0069.0019.00 Racquet Club8.9013.307.4011.5069.5019.00 Regional Shopping Center8.9013.307.4016.3064.7019.00 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitive ExhaustPM2.5 PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total Categorylb/day NaturalGas Mitigated3.3630.5225.640.180.002.320.002.32 NaturalGas3.3630.5225.640.180.002.320.002.32 Unmitigated TotalNANANANANANANANANANA 4 of 6 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGas UseROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitive ExhaPM2.5 PM10PM10PM2.5ustTotal PM2. Land UsekBTUlb/day Fast Food 34476.10.373.382.840.020.000.260.000.26 Restaurant w/o Drive Health Club652.1640.010.060.050.000.000.000.000.00 High Turnover (Sit 21445.40.232.101.770.010.000.160.000.16 Down Restaurant) Hotel1494111.6114.6512.300.090.001.110.001.11 Movie Theater (No 3557.260.040.350.290.000.000.030.000.03 Matinee) Quality Restaurant969091.059.507.980.060.000.720.000.72 Racquet Club3477.810.040.340.290.000.000.030.000.03 Regional Shopping 1393.060.020.140.110.000.000.010.000.01 Center Total3.3730.5225.630.180.002.320.002.32 5 of 6 6.0 Area Detail 6.1 Mitigation Measures Area ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitive ExhaustPM2.5 PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total Categorylb/day Mitigated55.270.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 Unmitigated55.270.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 TotalNANANANANANANANANANA 6.2 Area by SubCategory Unmitigated ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitive ExhaustPM2.5 PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total SubCategorylb/day Architectural Coating13.410.000.000.000.00 Consumer Products41.860.000.000.000.00 Landscaping0.000.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 Total55.270.000.000.000.000.000.000.00 6 of 6 APPENDIX B GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2011.1.1Date: 5/8/2011 GardenWalk 1999 IS/MND Configuration Garden Walk Existing A 050511 Orange County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land UsesSizeMetric High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)601000sqft Hotel1050Room Movie Theater (No Matinee)5100Seat Quality Restaurant801000sqft Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru401000sqft Racquet Club251000sqft Health Club251000sqft Regional Shopping Center3351000sqft 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Anaheim Public Utilities Utility Company Urban UrbanizationWind Speed (m/s) 82.2 Climate Zone Precipitation Freq (Days) 1.3 User Entered Comments 30 Project Characteristics - Land Use - Fast food restaurant is Night Club/Bar; Racquet Club is Game/Video Arcade; Health Club is Museum. Unique ID needed for each land use in order to get separate line items for trip generation. Added note: The "built-in" land use names are used in order not to upset this tempermental model. Vehicle Trips - Trip rates adjusted per project trip analysis. Analysis included diversion, internal; therefore all trips primary or passby. Passby estimated from traffic analysis. Water And Wastewater - Water and wastewater use data from 1999 Pointe IS/MND Solid Waste - Default solid waste quantities. Landfill data for Olinda-Alpha landfill 1 of 5 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalNBio- CO2Total CO2FugitiveExhaustPM2.5Bio- CO2CH4N2OCO2e PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total Categorytons/yrMT/yr Area0.000.000.000.000.00 Energy23,836.2723,836.270.480.2423,922.30 Mobile49,493.1949,493.191.960.0049,534.30 Water1,929.561,929.565.960.162,105.00 Total75,259.0233.730.40 4.0 Mobile Detail 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitiveExhaustPM2.5Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total Categorytons/yrMT/yr Unmitigated49,493.1949,493.191.960.0049,534.30 TotalNANANANANA 4.2 Trip Summary Information Average Daily Trip RateUnmitigatedMitigated 2 of 5 Land UseWeekdaySaturdaySundayAnnual VMTAnnual VMT Hotel3,769.503,780.002751.0014,945,92714,945,927 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)2,899.203,610.803006.0011,739,50411,739,504 Movie Theater (No Matinee)5,865.005,865.005865.0024,038,12724,038,127 Quality Restaurant2,734.402,868.802193.6010,281,25310,281,253 Regional Shopping Center5,035.055,859.152958.0517,849,97817,849,978 Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru3,483.604,528.004528.0015,517,70015,517,700 Health Club1,536.002,627.502197.506,920,0166,920,016 Racquet Club2,043.003,492.502922.509,393,7939,393,793 Total27,365.7532,631.7526,421.65110,686,297110,686,297 4.3 Trip Type Information MilesTrip % Land UseH-W or C-WH-S or C-CH-O or C-NWH-W or C-WH-S or C-CH-O or C-NW Hotel8.9013.307.4019.4061.6019.00 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)8.9013.307.408.5072.5019.00 Movie Theater (No Matinee)8.9013.307.401.8079.2019.00 Quality Restaurant8.9013.307.4012.0069.0019.00 Regional Shopping Center8.9013.307.4016.3064.7019.00 Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru8.9013.307.401.5079.5019.00 Health Club8.9013.307.4016.9064.1019.00 Racquet Club8.9013.307.4011.5069.5019.00 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitive ExhaustPM2.5Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total Categorytons/yrMT/yr Electricity Mitigated18,168.8018,168.800.370.1418,220.34 Electricity18,168.8018,168.800.370.1418,220.34 Unmitigated NaturalGas Mitigated5,667.465,667.460.110.105,701.96 NaturalGas5,667.465,667.460.110.105,701.96 Unmitigated TotalNANANANANA 3 of 5 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated NaturalGas UseROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitive ExhaustPM2.5 TotalBio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5 Land UsekBTUtons/yrMT/yr Fast Food 1.05372e+007562.31562.310.010.01565.73 Restaurant w/o Drive Health Club54100028.8728.870.000.0029.05 High Turnover (Sit 1.58058e+007843.46843.460.020.02848.59 Down Restaurant) Hotel5.45349e+0072,910.192,910.190.060.052,927.90 Movie Theater (No 2.48319e+006132.51132.510.000.00133.32 Matinee) Quality Restaurant2.10744e+0071,124.611,124.610.020.021,131.45 Racquet Club54100028.8728.870.000.0029.05 Regional Shopping 68675036.6536.650.000.0036.87 Center Total5,667.475,667.470.110.105,701.96 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity UseROGNOxCOSO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e Land UsekWhtons/yrMT/yr Fast Food 1.5732e+0061,010.970.020.011,013.84 Restaurant w/o Drive Health Club231000148.450.000.00148.87 High Turnover (Sit 2.3598e+0061,516.460.030.011,520.76 Down Restaurant) Hotel1.53832e+0079,885.600.200.089,913.64 Movie Theater (No 1.06029e+006681.370.010.01683.30 Matinee) Quality Restaurant3.1464e+0062,021.950.040.022,027.68 Racquet Club231000148.450.000.00148.87 Regional Shopping 4.288e+0062,755.570.060.022,763.38 Center Total18,168.820.360.1518,220.34 4 of 5 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water ROGNOxCOSO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e Categorytons/yrMT/yr Mitigated1,929.565.960.162,105.00 Unmitigated1,929.565.960.162,105.00 TotalNANANANANANANANA 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/OutdoorROGNOxCOSO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e Use Land UseMgaltons/yrMT/yr Fast Food 11.68 / 2.336114.540.360.01125.09 Restaurant w/o Drive Health Club0.9125 / 0.18258.950.030.009.77 High Turnover (Sit 43.8 / 9.49434.751.350.04474.33 Down Restaurant) Hotel57.4875 / 563.761.770.05615.70 11.4975 Movie Theater (No 8.68153 / 85.140.270.0192.98 Matinee)1.73631 Quality Restaurant58.4 / 14.6593.561.790.05646.38 Racquet Club0.9125 / 0.18258.950.030.009.77 Regional Shopping 12.2275 / 2.4455119.910.380.01130.96 Center Total1,929.565.980.172,104.98 5 of 5 CalEEMod Version: CalEEMod.2011.1.1Date: 5/8/2011 GardenWalk Proposed Project Configuration Orange County, Annual 1.0 Project Characteristics 1.1 Land Usage Land UsesSizeMetric Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru47.771000sqft Health Club111000sqft High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)29.711000sqft Hotel1628Room Movie Theater (No Matinee)2165Seat Quality Restaurant134.271000sqft Racquet Club58.661000sqft Regional Shopping Center248.031000sqft 1.2 Other Project Characteristics Utility CompanyAnaheim Public Utilities UrbanizationUrbanWind Speed (m/s) Climate Zone82.2 Precipitation Freq (Days) 30 1.3 User Entered Comments Project Characteristics - 1 of 10 Land Use - Fast food restaurant is Night Club/Bar; Racquet Club is Bowling; Health Club is Outdoor Restaurant. Unique ID needed for each land use in order to get separate line items for trip generation. Added note: The "built-in" land use names are used in order not to upset this tempermental model. Vehicle Trips - Trip rates adjusted per project trip analysis. Analysis included diversion, internal; therefore all trips primary or passby. Passby estimated from traffic analysis. Water And Wastewater - Water and wastewater use data from proposed project study. Solid Waste - Default solid waste quantities. Landfill data for Olinda-Alpha landfill 2 of 10 2.0 Emissions Summary 2.2 Overall Operational Unmitigated Operational ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalNBio- CO2Total CO2FugitiveExhaustPM2.5Bio- CO2CH4N2OCO2e PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total Categorytons/yrMT/yr Area0.000.000.000.000.00 Energy24,111.5924,111.590.490.2524,199.69 Mobile44,922.5844,922.581.780.0044,959.89 Water1,422.781,422.784.310.121,549.53 Total70,456.9533.100.37 4.0 Mobile Detail 4.1 Mitigation Measures Mobile ROGSO2Fugitive NOxCOExhaustPM10 TotalFugitiveExhaustPM2.5Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total Categorytons/yrMT/yr Mitigated44,922.5844,922.581.780.0044,959.89 Unmitigated44,922.5844,922.581.780.0044,959.89 TotalNANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA 4.2 Trip Summary Information 3 of 10 Average Daily Trip RateUnmitigatedMitigated Land UseWeekdaySaturdaySundayAnnual VMTAnnual VMT Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru4,160.295,407.565407.5618,532,01318,532,013 Health Club957.991,245.201245.204,028,8004,028,800 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)1,435.591,787.951488.475,813,0115,813,011 Hotel5,844.525,860.804265.3623,173,30323,173,303 Movie Theater (No Matinee)2,489.752,489.752489.7510,204,42010,204,420 Quality Restaurant4,589.354,814.923681.6817,255,79717,255,797 Racquet Club1,875.362,792.222429.118,246,0488,246,048 Regional Shopping Center3,727.894,338.042190.1013,215,91113,215,911 Total25,080.7428,736.4423,197.24100,469,304100,469,304 4 of 10 4.3 Trip Type Information MilesTrip % H-W or C-WH-S or C-C Land UseH-W or C-WH-S or C-CH-O or C-NWH-O or C-NW Fast Food Restaurant w/o Drive Thru8.9013.307.401.5079.5019.00 Health Club8.9019.00 13.307.4016.9064.10 High Turnover (Sit Down Restaurant)8.9013.307.408.5072.5019.00 Hotel8.9013.307.4019.4061.6019.00 Movie Theater (No Matinee)8.9013.307.401.8079.2019.00 Quality Restaurant8.9019.00 13.307.4012.0069.00 Racquet Club8.9013.307.4011.5069.5019.00 Regional Shopping Center8.9013.307.4016.3064.7019.00 5.0 Energy Detail 5.1 Mitigation Measures Energy ROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitive ExhaustPM2.5Bio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5Total Categorytons/yrMT/yr Electricity Mitigated18,047.7318,047.730.370.1418,098.93 Electricity18,047.7318,047.730.370.1418,098.93 Unmitigated NaturalGas Mitigated6,063.866,063.860.120.116,100.76 NaturalGas6,063.866,063.860.120.116,100.76 Unmitigated TotalNANANANANANANANANANANANANANANANA 5.2 Energy by Land Use - NaturalGas Unmitigated 5 of 10 NaturalGas UseROGNOxCOSO2Fugitive ExhaustPM10 TotalFugitive ExhaustPM2.5 TotalBio- CO2NBio- CO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e PM10PM10PM2.5PM2.5 Land UsekBTUtons/yrMT/yr Fast Food 1.25838e+007671.52671.520.010.01675.61 Restaurant w/o Drive Health Club23804012.7012.700.000.0012.78 High Turnover (Sit 7.82756e+006417.71417.710.010.01420.25 Down Restaurant) Hotel5.45349e+0072,910.192,910.190.060.052,927.90 Movie Theater (No 1.2984e+00669.2969.290.000.0069.71 Matinee) Quality Restaurant3.53718e+0071,887.571,887.570.040.031,899.06 Racquet Club1.2694e+00667.7467.740.000.0068.15 Regional Shopping 50846827.1327.130.000.0027.30 Center Total6,063.856,063.850.120.106,100.76 6 of 10 7 of 10 5.3 Energy by Land Use - Electricity Unmitigated Electricity UseROGNOxCOSO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e Land UsekWhtons/yrMT/yr Fast Food 1.87875e+0061,207.330.020.011,210.75 Restaurant w/o Drive Health Club10164065.320.000.0065.50 High Turnover (Sit 1.16865e+006751.000.020.01753.13 Down Restaurant) Hotel1.53832e+0079,885.600.200.089,913.64 Movie Theater (No 554400356.270.010.00357.28 Matinee) Quality Restaurant5.281e+0063,393.690.070.033,403.31 Racquet Club542018348.310.010.00349.30 Regional Shopping 3.17482e+0062,040.210.040.022,046.00 Center Total18,047.730.370.1518,098.91 7.0 Water Detail 7.1 Mitigation Measures Water ROGNOxCOSO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e Categorytons/yrMT/yr Mitigated1,422.784.310.121,549.53 Unmitigated1,422.784.310.121,549.53 TotalNANANANANANANANA 8 of 10 7.2 Water by Land Use Unmitigated Indoor/OutdoorROGNOxCOSO2Total CO2CH4N2OCO2e Use Land UseMgaltons/yrMT/yr Fast Food 13.9485 / 141.770.430.01154.38 Restaurant w/o Drive 3.48721 Health Club0.4015 / 0.08033.940.010.004.30 High Turnover (Sit 8.67649 / 88.190.270.0196.03 Down Restaurant)2.16912 Hotel59.422 / 14.8555603.951.830.05657.69 Movie Theater (No 2.19 / 0.43821.480.070.0023.46 Matinee) Quality Restaurant39.208 / 9.802398.501.200.03433.96 Racquet Club2.17084 / 21.290.070.0023.25 0.434168 Regional Shopping 14.1229 / 143.680.430.01156.46 Center3.55064 Total1,422.804.310.111,549.53 9 of 10 10 of 10 APPENDIX C TRAFFIC STUDY Í«¾³·¬¬»¼¾§æ ÜÎßÚÌ ßÙÉÐ ÒßØÛ×ÓßÎÜÛÒßÔÕÎÑÖÛÝÌ ßÐß× ÜÜÛÒÜËÓÌÑÌØÛÑ×ÒÌÛÒßØÛ×ÓÒ×Ì×ßÔ ÍñÓÒÜ ÌËÜÇ×Ì×ÙßÌÛÜÛÙßÌ×ÊÛÛÝÔßÎßÌ×ÑÒ Í«¾³·¬¬»¼¬±æ Ý·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ Ð®»°¿®»¼Þ§ ×¬»®·×²½ò èðïÍòÙ®¿²¼ßª»ôÍ«·¬»ëíð Ô±ß²¹»´»ôÝ¿´·º±®²·¿ôçððïé Ì»´æøîïí÷ìèèðíìëÚ¿¨æøîïí÷ìèèçììð Ó¿®½¸ïéôîðïï Öïðïêìêñïêëï Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ÜÊÝ ÑÝËÓÛÒÌÛÎÍ×ÑÒÑÒÌÎÑÔ Ü±½«³»²¬Ò¿³»Í«¾³·¬¬¿´Ü¿¬»Ê»®·±²Ò±ò ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µÌ®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬»Ú»¾®«¿®§ìôîðïïßòï ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µÌ®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬»Ó¿®½¸íôîðïïßòî ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µÌ®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬»Ó¿®½¸ïðôîðïïßòí ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µÌ®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬»Ó¿®½¸ïéôîðïïßòì Ý·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ÌÝ ßÞÔÛÑÚÑÒÌÛÒÌÍ ïòð×ÒÌÎÑÜËÝÌ×ÑÒòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòï ïòïÐÎòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòï ËÎÐÑÍÛÑÚÌØÛÛÐÑÎÌ ïòîÐÜòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòï ÎÑÖÛÝÌÛÍÝÎ×ÐÌ×ÑÒ ïòíÛÝòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòë È×ÍÌ×ÒÙÑÒÜ×Ì×ÑÒÍ îòðÚËÌËÎÛÝÑÒÜ×Ì×ÑÒÍÉ×ÌØÑËÌÐÎÑÖÛÝÌòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòç íòðÌÎ×ÐÙÛÒÛÎßÌ×ÑÒòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïî ìòðÊÛØ×ÝÔÛÌÎ×ÐÜ×ÍÌÎ×ÞËÌ×ÑÒòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïë ëòð×ÓÐßÝÌÝÎ×ÌÛÎ×ßòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïë êòðÚËÌËÎÛÝÑÒÜ×Ì×ÑÒÍÉ×ÌØÐÎÑÖÛÝÌòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïë éòðÔßÌÛÛÊÛÒ×ÒÙßÒßÔÇÍ×Íòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïç èòðÔßÌÛÒ×ÙØÌßÒßÔÇÍ×Íòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîï çòðÐÛßÕßÎÎ×ÊßÔßÒßÔÇÍ×Íòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîí ïðòðÍØßÎÛÜÐßÎÕ×ÒÙßÒßÔÇÍ×Íòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîì ïðòïßßÐÜòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîì ÎÛßßÎÕ×ÒÙÛÓßÒÜ ïðòîÐÞÑøßßÞ÷ÐÜòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîè ÎÑÖÛÝÌË×ÔÜËÌÎÛßÍßÒÜßÎÕ×ÒÙÛÓßÒÜ ïïòðÐÛÜÛÍÌÎ×ßÒßÒÜÌÎßÒÍ×ÌßÒßÔÇÍ×Íòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòíð ß ÐÐÛÒÜ×ÝÛÍ ß°°»²¼·¨ßæÛ¨·¬·²¹Ì®¿ºº·½Ê±´«³» ß°°»²¼·¨ÞæÌ®·°Ù»²»®¿¬·±²Ý¿´½«´¿¬·±²É±®µ¸»»¬ ß°°»²¼·¨ÝæÊ±´«³»Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬É±®µ¸»»¬ ß°°»²¼·¨ÜæÔ»ª»´±ºÍ»®ª·½»Ý¿´½«´¿¬·±²É±®µ¸»»¬ Ý·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ÔÌ ×ÍÌÑÚßÞÔÛÍ Ì¿¾´»ïæÐ®±°±»¼Ô¿²¼Ë»¾§Ü»ª»´±°³»²¬ß®»¿òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòì Ì¿¾´»îæÝ±³°¿®·±²±º¬¸»Ð®»ª·±«ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µÐ®±¶»½¬¿²¼Ð®±°±»¼Ó±¼·º·½¿¬·±²òòòòòòòòë Ì¿¾´»íæ×²¬»®»½¬·±²Ô»ª»´±ºÍ»®ª·½»Ü»º·²·¬·±²òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòè Ì¿¾´»ìæîðïðÚ±®»½¿¬úß½¬«¿´×ÝËÍ«³³¿®§òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòç Ì¿¾´»ëæÇ»¿®îðïëÉ·¬¸±«¬Ð®±¶»½¬×ÝËÍ«³³¿®§òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïð Ì¿¾´»êæß®»¿ßÙ®±Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·°Ù»²»®¿¬·±²É»»µ¼¿§ÐÓÐ»¿µØ±«®òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïí Ì¿¾´»éæß®»¿ÞÙ®±Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·°Ù»²»®¿¬·±²É»»µ¼¿§ÐÓÐ»¿µØ±«®òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïí Ì¿¾´»èæß®»¿ßÒ»¬Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·°Ù»²»®¿¬·±²É»»µ¼¿§ÐÓÐ»¿µØ±«®òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïì Ì¿¾´»çæß®»¿ÞÒ»¬Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·°Ù»²»®¿¬·±²É»»µ¼¿§ÐÓÐ»¿µØ±«®òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïì Ì¿¾´»ïðæÊ»¸·½´»Ì®·°Ù»²»®¿¬·±²Í«³³¿®§òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïì Ì¿¾´»ïïæÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³×³°¿½¬Ý®·¬»®·¿òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïë Ì¿¾´»ïîæÇ»¿®îðïëÉ·¬¸Ð®±¶»½¬×ÝËÍ«³³¿®§òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïè Ì¿¾´»ïíæß®»¿ßÒ»¬Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·°Ù»²»®¿¬·±²É»»µ¼¿§Ô¿¬»Ûª»²·²¹Ø±«®òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïç Ì¿¾´»ïìæß®»¿ÞÒ»¬Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·°Ù»²»®¿¬·±²Ô¿¬»Ûª»²·²¹Ø±«®òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïç Ì¿¾´»ïëæÇ»¿®îðïëÉ·¬¸Ð®±¶»½¬Ô¿¬»Ûª»²·²¹×ÝËÍ«³³¿®§òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîï Ì¿¾´»ïêæß®»¿ßÒ»¬Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·°Ù»²»®¿¬·±²É»»µ¼¿§Ô¿¬»Ò·¹¸¬Ø±«®òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîî Ì¿¾´»ïéæß®»¿ÞÒ»¬Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·°Ù»²»®¿¬·±²Ô¿¬»Ò·¹¸¬Ø±«®òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîî Ì¿¾´»ïèæÒ»¬Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·°Ù»²»®¿¬·±²Ý±³°¿®·±²º±®Ü·ºº»®»²¬Ì·³»Ð»®·±¼òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîí Ì¿¾´»ïçæÐ¿®µ·²¹Ü»³¿²¼Þ§Ô¿²¼Ë»¬ß®»¿ßòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîë Ì¿¾´»îðæÎÜÛÐ¿®µ·²¹Ü»³¿²¼Þ§Ø±«®¬ß®»¿ßøÒ±Ø±¬»´÷òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîê Ì¿¾´»îïæÐ¿®µ·²¹Ü»³¿²¼Þ§Ø±«®¬ß®»¿ßòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîé Ì¿¾´»îîæÐ¿®µ·²¹Ü»³¿²¼Þ§Ô¿²¼Ë»¬ß®»¿ß¿²¼Þòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîè Ì¿¾´»îíæÞ«·´¼Ñ«¬Ð¿®µ·²¹Ü»³¿²¼Þ§Ø±«®¬ß®»¿ß¿²¼Þòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîç ÔÚ ×ÍÌÑÚ×ÙËÎÛÍ Ú·¹«®»ïæß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µÐ®±¶»½¬Ô±½¿¬·±²òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòî Ú·¹«®»îæß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µÍ·¬»Ð´¿²òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòí Ú·¹«®»íæÛ¨·¬·²¹×²¬»®»½¬·±²Ô¿²»Ý±²º·¹«®¿¬·±²òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòê Ú·¹«®»ìæÛ¨·¬·²¹×²¬»®»½¬·±²Ì«®²·²¹Ó±ª»³»²¬Ê±´«³»òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòé Ú·¹«®»ëæÚ«¬«®»É·¬¸±«¬Ð®±¶»½¬ëêÐÓ×²¬»®»½¬·±²Ì«®²·²¹Ó±ª»³»²¬Ê±´«³»òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïï Ú·¹«®»êæÐ®±¶»½¬Ì®·°Ü·¬®·¾«¬·±²òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïê Ú·¹«®»éæÚ«¬«®»É·¬¸Ð®±¶»½¬ëêÐÓ×²¬»®»½¬·±²Ì«®²·²¹Ó±ª»³»²¬Ê±´«³»òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòïé Ú·¹«®»èæÚ«¬«®»É·¬¸Ð®±¶»½¬éèÐÓ×²¬»®»½¬·±²Ì«®²·²¹Ó±ª»³»²¬Ê±´«³»òòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòòîð Ý·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ïòð×ÒÌÎÑÜËÝÌ×ÑÒ ïòï ÐÎ ËÎÐÑÍÛÑÚÌØÛÛÐÑÎÌ Ì¸·®»°±®¬¼±½«³»²¬¬¸»¬®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²¿²¿´§·½±²¼«½¬»¼¾§×¬»®·ô×²½òº±®¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³ Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µÐ®±¶»½¬·²½±²¶«²½¬·±²©·¬¸¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µÐ®±¶»½¬ß¼¼»²¼«³¬±¬¸» Ð±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×²·¬·¿´Í¬«¼§ñÓ·¬·¹¿¬»¼Ò»¹¿¬·ª»Ü»½´¿®¿¬·±²ø×ÍñÓÒÜ÷òÌ¸·®»°±®¬½±³°¿®» ¬¸»¬®¿ºº·½¹»²»®¿¬·±²¿²¼°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼º±®¬¸»½«®®»²¬´§°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬¬±¬¸±»º±®¬¸» °®±¶»½¬±®·¹·²¿´´§¿°°®±ª»¼·²¬¸»ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜòÌ¸»¬®¿ºº·½¿²¼°¿®µ·²¹·³°¿½¬ ±º¬¸»±®·¹·²¿´´§¿°°®±ª»¼°®±¶»½¬ô¬¸»²½¿´´»¼¬¸»Ð±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³Ð®±¶»½¬ô¿²¼«¾»¯«»²¬´§ô ¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ°®±¶»½¬ô©»®»¬«¼·»¼·²¬¸»Ð±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²Í¬«¼§ øÓ»§»®ôÓ±¸¿¼¼»ß±½·¿¬»ôÜ»½»³¾»®îïôïççè÷ô¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µÌ®¿ºº·½Í¬«¼§ øÓ»§»®ôÓ±¸¿¼¼»ß±½·¿¬»ôÓ¿®½¸ïîôîððï÷ô¿²¼¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µÌ®¿ºº·½ øÎ»ª·»¼÷ Í¬«¼§øß¼¼»²¼«³××÷øÓ»§»®ôÓ±¸¿¼¼»ß±½·¿¬»ôÚ»¾®«¿®§îèôîððê÷òÌ¸»½«®®»²¬¿²¿´§· ©¿«²¼»®¬¿µ»²¬±½±³°¿®»½«®®»²¬¬®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²½±²¼·¬·±²·²¬¸»°®±¶»½¬¿®»¿¬±½±²¼·¬·±² ½¸¿²¹» ¿¬¬¸»¬·³»±º¬¸»±®·¹·²¿´°®±¶»½¬¿°°®±ª¿´¿²¼¬±¼»¬»®³·²»·º¬¸»½«®®»²¬´§°®±°±»¼ ¬±¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ°®±¶»½¬©±«´¼®»«´¬·²¿²§¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´¬®¿ºº·½±®°¿®µ·²¹·³°¿½¬ ¾»§±²¼¬¸±»°®»ª·±«´§¼·½´±»¼¿²¼³·¬·¹¿¬»¼òÌ¸»®»º±®»ô·²¬¸·®»°±®¬ô¬®¿ºº·½¿²¼°¿®µ·²¹ ½±²¼·¬·±²¿²¬·½·°¿¬»¼©·¬¸¬¸»½«®®»²¬´§°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬¿®»½±³°¿®»¼¿¹¿·²¬¬¸±»¬¸¿¬ ©±«´¼°®»ª¿·´©·¬¸¬¸»°®±¶»½¬¼»½®·¾»¼·²¬¸»ïççèÌ®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²Í¬«¼§ô©¸·½¸©¿ ·²½±®°±®¿¬»¼·²¬±¬¸»ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜòÍ·²½»¬¸»º«¬«®»§»¿®¿²¿´§¦»¼º±®¬¸» ïççç×ÍñÓÒÜ©¿îðïðô¬¸»¿²¿´§·±ºº«¬«®»½±²¼·¬·±²·²¬¸·¬«¼§¸¿¾»»²«°¼¿¬»¼¬± îðïëô©¸·½¸·½±²·¬»²¬©·¬¸¬¸»·²¬»®·³§»¿®¿²¿´§¦»¼·²¬¸»Ü®¿º¬Í«°°´»³»²¬¿´ Û²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´×³°¿½¬Î»°±®¬Ò±òíìðº±®ß³»²¼³»²¬Ò±òïì¬±¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Î»±®¬Í°»½·º·½ Ð´¿²øÜÍÛ×ÎÒ±òíìð÷¬¸¿¬©¿«²¼»®©¿§¿±ºÓ¿®½¸îðïïò ïòî ÐÜ ÎÑÖÛÝÌÛÍÝÎ×ÐÌ×ÑÒ Ì¸»ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ°®±¶»½¬·¬»·°¿®¬·¿´´§¼»ª»´±°»¼©·¬¸¿ª¿®·»¬§±º®»¬¿·´ô¼·²·²¹ô »²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬øÎÜÛ÷¿²¼¸±¬»´¿²¼ª¿½¿¬·±²±©²»®¸·°«»ò Ú·¹«®»ï·´´«¬®¿¬»¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ ´±½¿¬·±²òÚ±®°´¿²²·²¹°«®°±»ô¬¸»·¬»·¼·ª·¼»¼·²¬±¬©±¿®»¿æß®»¿ß·¬¸»»¿¬»®²°±®¬·±² ±º¬¸»·¬»¬¸¿¬¸¿¾»»²½´»¿®»¼±º°®»ª·±«¼»ª»´±°³»²¬¿²¼¼»ª»´±°»¼©·¬¸¿«²·º·»¼ÎÜÛ ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ô©¸·´»ß®»¿Þô¬¸»©»¬»®²°±®¬·±²±º¬¸»·¬»½«®®»²¬´§½±²¬¿·²¿²¿½¬·ª»ô°®» »¨·¬·²¹¸±¬»´«»øß²¿¸»·³Ð´¿¦¿Ø±¬»´¿²¼Í«·¬»÷òÌ±¼¿¬»ôß®»¿ß¸¿¾»»²¼»ª»´±°»¼©·¬¸ ÎÜÛ«»ô¾«¬²±²»©¸±¬»´¸¿ª»¾»»²½±²¬®«½¬»¼òÌ¸»°®±°±»¼¸±¬»´©·´´±½½«°§¬¸»º¿® »¿¬»®²°±®¬·±²±º¬¸»·¬»ô¿´±²¹Ý´»³»²¬·²»Í¬®»»¬òÌ¸»°®±°±»¼ìððª¿½¿¬·±²±©²»®¸·° «²·¬©·´´¾»½±²¬®«½¬»¼¿¾±ª»¬¸»»¨·¬·²¹°¿®µ·²¹¬®«½¬«®»·²ß®»¿ßò Ú·¹«®»î·´´«¬®¿¬»¬¸»´¿§±«¬·¬»°´¿²±º¬¸»°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬ò×³°´»³»²¬¿¬·±²±º¬¸»½«®®»²¬ °®±°±¿´©±«´¼³±¼·º§¬¸»¿´´±©¿¾´»³·¨±ºÎÜÛ´¿²¼«»·²ß®»¿ßò Ì¿¾´»ï°®±ª·¼»¿ «³³¿®§±º¬¸»³·¨±º«»¿´´±©»¼«²¼»®¬¸»³±¼·º·½¿¬·±²°®±°±»¼·²¬¸·ß¼¼»²¼«³ò Ð¿¹»ïÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ úÛÐÐêØ ù×ÊÊÓÈÍÉûÆ× øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÊ×Ûú ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ûÊ×Ûû ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ× îíèèíéùûð÷ öÓÕÇÊ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎûÎÛÐÃÉÓÉçÌØÛÈ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ëà ààòÍÚÉàò ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑàÕÊÛàìÊÍÒ×ÙÈðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÙØÊ NOT TO SCALE Figure 2 ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑ Project Site Plan èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎûÎÛÐÃÉÓÉçÌØÛÈ× Q:\2010\16\Jobs\J10-1646 Anaheim Garden Walk\gra\Project Layout.cdr Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ÌïæÐÔËÜß ßÞÔÛÎÑÐÑÍÛÜßÒÜÍÛÍÞÇÛÊÛÔÑÐÓÛÒÌÎÛß ß®»¿ßø¹®±º«²´»ß®»¿Þø¹®±º«²´» Ô¿²¼Ë»Ð®±¶»½¬Ì±¬¿´ ±¬¸»®©·»²±¬»¼÷±¬¸»®©·»²±¬»¼÷ Ø±¬»´ Ò«³¾»®í¸±¬»´ï¸±¬»´ì¸±¬»´ Î±±³ïôîêê®±±³ø·²½´«¼·²¹ íêî®±±³ø·²½´«¼·²¹«°ïôêîè®±±³ø·²½´«¼·²¹«° «°¬±ìððª¿½¿¬·±²¬±ïððª¿½¿¬·±²±©²»®¸·°¬±ëððª¿½¿¬·±²±©²»®¸·° ±©²»®¸·°«²·¬÷«²·¬÷«²·¬÷ Ø±¬»´ß½½»±®§Ë»îïêôèîðêïôççéîéèôèïé Î»¬¿·´ñÜ·²·²¹ñÛ²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬øÎÜÛ÷ Í°»½·¿´¬§Î»¬¿·´ïííôêèíïïìôíëðîìèôðíí Ü·²·²¹ïìèôïèèïëôèððïêíôçèè ï Û²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬ïéèôîììðïéèôîìì Ì±¬¿´ÎÜÛìêðôïïëïíðôïëðëçðôîêë Ð¿®µ·²¹ Í¬®«½¬«®»¼ñÝ±ª»®»¼Ð¿®µ·²¹ïôîççôèêé êìçôçííïôçìçôèðð íôîðð¿«¬±°¿½»ïôêðð¿«¬±°¿½»ìôèðð¿«¬±°¿½» ïë¾«°¿½»ð¾«°¿½»ïë¾«°¿½» Þ«Ì»®³·²¿´ñÚ¿½·´·¬§éôéðððéôéðð ºæ¯«¿®»º»»¬ ïÛ²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬·²½´«¼»¾±©´·²¹ô³«´¬·°´»¨³±ª·»¬¸»¿¬»®ô´·ª»¬¸»¿¬»®ô²·¹¸¬½´«¾ñ¾¿®¿²¼¿ïïôðððº±«¬¼±±® ®»¬¿«®¿²¬ò Ì¿¾´»î°®»»²¬¿½±³°¿®·±²¿³±²¹¬¸»±®·¹·²¿´´§¿°°®±ª»¼°®±¶»½¬ô¿¿²¿´§¦»¼·²¬¸»ïççç Ð±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜô¬¸»»¨·¬·²¹»²¬·¬´»³»²¬ô¿²¼¬¸»½«®®»²¬´§°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬òß ¸±©²ô¬¸»½«®®»²¬´§°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬©±«´¼·²½®»¿»¬¸»¿³±«²¬±º¼·²·²¹¿²¼»²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬ «»©¸·´»¼»½®»¿·²¹¬¸»¿³±«²¬±º¿´´±©¿¾´»®»¬¿·´°¿½»òÒ±½¸¿²¹»¿®»°®±°±»¼¬±¬¸» ¸±¬»´½±³°±²»²¬±ºß®»¿ß±®ß®»¿Þò Ì¸»°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬¼±»²±¬°®±°±»¿²§½±²¬®«½¬·±²±®¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±º¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´«» ¾»§±²¼¬¸»¸»´´±º¬¸»»¨·¬·²¹ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬ô©¸·½¸©¿±®·¹·²¿´´§ ¿°°®±ª»¼º±®¼»ª»´±°³»²¬·²Ö¿²«¿®§ïçççòß´´³±¼·º·½¿¬·±²©±«´¼¾»¿½½±³°´·¸»¼©·¬¸·²¬¸» »¨·¬·²¹¾«·´¼·²¹¿²¼ñ±®¬®«½¬«®»ô¿²¼±²´§³·²±®½±²¬®«½¬·±²©±«´¼¾»²»½»¿®§¬± ¿½½±³³±¼¿¬»°»½·º·½ªªÅ²»»¼òß²§½±²¬®«½¬·±²©±«´¼¾»®»´¿¬»¼¬±¾«·´¼·²¹·²¬»®·±® ¿²¼º·²·¸»¿²¼©±«´¼¾»°±®¿¼·½¿²¼´·³·¬»¼·²¼«®¿¬·±²òÌ¸»®»º±®»ô²±¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ½±²¬®«½¬·±²¿½¬·ª·¬§©±«´¼±½½«®¾»§±²¼©¸¿¬©¿°®»ª·±«´§»ª¿´«¿¬»¼·²°®·±®»²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´ ¼±½«³»²¬òÌ¸»º±±¬°®·²¬±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬©±«´¼½±ª»®¬¸»¿³»¿®»¿¿½«®®»²¬´§»¨·¬¿²¼¿ °®»ª·±«´§¿°°®±ª»¼©·¬¸·³·´¿®´¿²¼«»¬§°»¿²¼¼»²·¬·»òÌ¸»°¸§·½¿´·³°¿½¬±º¬¸» °®±¶»½¬©±«´¼®»³¿·²´¿®¹»´§·³·´¿®¬±¬¸»°®»ª·±«´§¿°°®±ª»¼°®±¶»½¬ô¿²¼¬¸»¿²¿´§» ¿±½·¿¬»¼©·¬¸³¿²§±º¬¸»»²ª·®±²³»²¬¿´·«»©±«´¼»»²¬·¿´´§®»³¿·²«²½¸¿²¹»¼ò Ð¿¹»ìÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ÌîæÝÐßÙÉÐÐ ßÞÔÛÑÓÐßÎ×ÍÑÒÑÚÌØÛÎÛÊ×ÑËÍÒßØÛ×ÓßÎÜÛÒßÔÕÎÑÖÛÝÌßÒÜÎÑÐÑÍÛÜ Ó ÑÜ×Ú×ÝßÌ×ÑÒÍ Ð®±°±»¼ß²¿¸»·³ ïççç×ÍñÓÒÜÛ¨·¬·²¹Û²¬·¬´»³»²¬ Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ô¿²¼Ë»ø¹®±º«²´»±¬¸»®©·»ø¹®±º«²´»±¬¸»®©·» ø¹®±º«²´»±¬¸»®©·» ²±¬»¼÷²±¬»¼÷ ²±¬»¼÷ Ø±¬»´ Ò«³¾»®î±®í¸±¬»´ì¸±¬»´ì¸±¬»´ Î±±³ïôðëð®±±³ïôêîè®±±³ïôêîè®±±³ Ø±¬»´ß½½»±®§Ë»èêôçèëîéèôèïéîéèôèïé Î»¬¿·´ñÜ·²·²¹ñÛ²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬øÎÜÛ÷ Í°»½·¿´¬§Î»¬¿·´ííëôðððíèçôèëðîìèôðíí Ü·²·²¹ïìðôðððïïíôçððïêíôçèè î Û²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬çðôðððêêôðððïéèôîìì ï Ì±¬¿´ÎÜÛëêëôðððëêçôéëðëçðôîêë Ð¿®µ·²¹ Í¬®«½¬«®»¼ñÝ±ª»®»¼Ð¿®µ·²¹ïôêððôðððïôçìçôèððïôçìçôèðð ìôèðð¿«¬±°¿½»ìôèðð¿«¬±°¿½»ìôèðð¿«¬±°¿½» îë¾«°¿½»ïë¾«°¿½»ïë¾«°¿½» Þ«Ì»®³·²¿´ñÚ¿½·´·¬§îïôêððïðôîððéôéðð ºæ¯«¿®»º»»¬ ï×²½®»¿»·²¬¸»¬±¬¿´ÎÜÛ¾»¬©»»²½»²¿®·±®»°®»»²¬¿²·²½®»¿»·²¬¸»«¬·´·¦¿¬·±²±º´»¿¿¾´»¿®»¿©·¬¸·²¬¸»»¨·¬·²¹¾«·´¼·²¹º±±¬°®·²¬ò Ì¸»Ð®±°±»¼Ð®±¶»½¬¼±»²±¬·²½´«¼»¿²§½±²¬®«½¬·±²±®¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±º¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´¯«¿®»º±±¬¿¹»ò î×²½´«¼»¿°®±°±»¼ïïôðððº±«¬¼±±®®»¬¿«®¿²¬±²¬¸»¬¸·®¼º´±±®·²¿´±½¿¬·±²¬¸¿¬·½«®®»²¬´§«»¼º±®°»¼»¬®·¿²½·®½«´¿¬·±²ñº±±¼½±«®¬ ½±³³±²¿®»¿ò ïòí ÛÝ È×ÍÌ×ÒÙÑÒÜ×Ì×ÑÒÍ Ì¸»¬«¼§¿®»¿·²½´«¼»¬¸»¿³»ïí·²¬»®»½¬·±²·¼»²¬·º·»¼¾§Ý·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³¬¿ººº±® ¿²¿´§··²¬¸»ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜ¿²¼¬¸¿¬¸¿ª»¾»»²¿²¿´§¦»¼·²°®»ª·±«¿¼¼»²¼¿ò Ì¸»¬«¼§¿®»¿¿´±·²½´«¼»¬¸»·¹²¿´·¦»¼°®±¶»½¬¼®·ª»©¿§±²Ü·²»§É¿§òÌ¸»´±½¿¬·±²±º ¬¸»¬«¼§·²¬»®»½¬·±²¿²¼¬¸»»¨·¬·²¹·²¬»®»½¬·±²´¿²»½±²º·¹«®¿¬·±²¿®»·´´«¬®¿¬»¼·² Ú·¹«®»íò ×²¬¸»ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜô¬¸»»¨·¬·²¹½±²¼·¬·±²©»®»º®±³ïççèô¿²¼¬¸»º«¬«®» §»¿®¿²¿´§¦»¼©¿îðïðòÚ±®·²º±®³¿¬·±²¿´°«®°±»¿²¼¬±¼±½«³»²¬½«®®»²¬½±²¼·¬·±²ô²»© ·²¬»®»½¬·±²¬«®²·²¹³±ª»³»²¬½±«²¬©»®»½±²¼«½¬»¼¿¬¬¸»ïí¬«¼§·²¬»®»½¬·±²¿²¼¬¸» °®±¶»½¬¼®·ª»©¿§±²Ü·²»§É¿§òÌ¸»»¨·¬·²¹°ò³ò°»¿µ¸±«®·²¬»®»½¬·±²¬«®²·²¹³±ª»³»²¬ ª±´«³»¿®»·´´«¬®¿¬»¼·² Ú·¹«®»ì ò Ð¿¹»ëÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ ð×Õ×ÎØ úÛÐÐêØ éÈÇØÃóÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ä úÛÐÐêØóîúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ úÛÐÐêØ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óîúêÛÏÌÉ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ãó÷ðø ù×ÊÊÓÈÍÉûÆ× ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÊ×Ûú ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ûÊ×Ûû ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆóéúíÖÖêÛÏÌ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ îíèèíéùûð÷ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ óîúêÛÏÌÉ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ öÓÕÇÊ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎûÎÛÐÃÉÓÉçÌØÛÈ× ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕðÛÎ×ùÍÎÖÓÕÇÊÛÈÓÍÎÉ ëà ààòÍÚÉàò ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑàÕÊÛàðÛÎ×ÉæÍÐÇÏ×ÉÙØÊ ð×Õ×ÎØ úÛÐÐêØ éÈÇØÃóÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ä ìïì×ÛÑôÍÇÊæÍÐÇÏ× äää úÛÐÐêØóîúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ úÛÐÐêØ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óîúêÛÏÌÉ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ù×ÊÊÓÈÍÉûÆ× ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÊ×Ûú ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ûÊ×Ûû ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆóéúíÖÖêÛÏÌ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ îíèèíéùûð÷ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ óîúêÛÏÌÉ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ öÓÕÇÊ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎûÎÛÐÃÉÓÉçÌØÛÈ× ÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕóÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎæÍÐÇÏ×É ëà ààòÍÚÉàò ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑàÕÊÛàðÛÎ×ÉæÍÐÇÏ×ÉÙØÊ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ×²¬»®»½¬·±²±°»®¿¬·±²½¿²¾»½¸¿®¿½¬»®·¦»¼·²¬»®³±º´»ª»´±º»®ª·½»øÔÑÍ÷ô©¸·½¸ª¿®·» º®±³ÔÑÍßô©¸·½¸®»°®»»²¬«²½±²¹»¬»¼º®»»º´±©½±²¼·¬·±²ô¬±ÔÑÍÚô©¸·½¸®»°®»»²¬ ±ª»®½¿°¿½·¬§ô¶¿³³»¼½±²¼·¬·±²òß°»½·º·»¼·²¬¸»Ý·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³¬®¿ºº·½·³°¿½¬¬«¼§ ¹«·¼»´·²»ô·²¬»®»½¬·±²´»ª»´±º»®ª·½»½¿´½«´¿¬·±²©»®»½±²¼«½¬»¼«·²¹¬¸»×²¬»®»½¬·±² Ý¿°¿½·¬§Ë¬·´·¦¿¬·±²ø×ÝË÷³»¬¸±¼ô©¸·½¸¿·¹²¿²×ÝËª¿´«»¾»¬©»»²ð¿²¼ï¬±»¿½¸ ·²¬»®»½¬·±²¾¿»¼±²·¬½¿°¿½·¬§¿²¼¬¸»ª±´«³»±º¬®¿ºº·½¬®¿ª»´·²¹¬¸®±«¹¸·¬òÜ»½®·°¬·±²±º »¿½¸´»ª»´±º»®ª·½»¿²¼¬¸»®¿²¹»±º×ÝËª¿´«»¿±½·¿¬»¼©·¬¸·¬¿®»¸±©²·² Ì¿¾´»í ò Ìíæ×ÔÍÜ ßÞÔÛÒÌÛÎÍÛÝÌ×ÑÒÛÊÛÔÑÚÛÎÊ×ÝÛÛÚ×Ò×Ì×ÑÒÍ Ô»ª»´ ±ºÜ»½®·°¬·±²×ÝË Í»®ª·½» ßË²½±²¹»¬»¼±°»®¿¬·±²å¿´´¯«»«»½´»¿®·²¿·²¹´»·¹²¿´½§½´»òäðòêðð ÞÊ»®§´·¹¸¬½±²¹»¬·±²å¿²±½½¿·±²¿´¿°°®±¿½¸°¸¿»·º«´´§«¬·´·¦»¼òâðòêðð¬±ðòêçç ÝÔ·¹¸¬½±²¹»¬·±²å±½½¿·±²¿´¾¿½µ«°±²½®·¬·½¿´¿°°®±¿½¸»òâðòéðð¬±ðòéçç Í·¹²·º·½¿²¬½±²¹»¬·±²±²½®·¬·½¿´¿°°®±¿½¸»ô¾«¬·²¬»®»½¬·±² Üº«²½¬·±²¿´òÝ¿®³«¬©¿·¬¬¸®±«¹¸³±®»¬¸¿²±²»½§½´»¼«®·²¹¸±®¬âðòèðð¬±ðòèçç °»¿µòÒ±´±²¹¬¿²¼·²¹¯«»«»º±®³»¼ò Í»ª»®»½±²¹»¬·±²©·¬¸±³»´±²¹¬¿²¼·²¹¯«»«»±²½®·¬·½¿´ Û¿°°®±¿½¸»òÌ®¿ºº·½¯«»«»³¿§¾´±½µ²»¿®¾§·²¬»®»½¬·±²«°¬®»¿³±ºâðòçðð¬±ðòççç ½®·¬·½¿´¿°°®±¿½¸»ò ÚÌ±¬¿´¾®»¿µ¼±©²ô¬±°¿²¼¹±±°»®¿¬·±²òâïòððð Í±«®½»æ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²Î»»¿®½¸Ý·®½«´¿®îïîô Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²Î»»¿®½¸Þ±¿®¼ôïçèðò Ì¿¾´»ì¸±©§»¿®îðïð©·¬¸°®±¶»½¬ÔÑÍ¿º±®»½¿¬·²¬¸»ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜô ½±³°¿®»¼¬±¬¸»¿½¬«¿´îðïðÔÑÍ½¿´½«´¿¬»¼º®±³¬¸»½«®®»²¬¬®¿ºº·½½±«²¬òÌ¸»Ý·¬§±º ß²¿¸»·³¿²¼¬¸»Ñ®¿²¹»Ý±«²¬§Ù®±©¬¸Ó¿²¿¹»³»²¬Ð®±¹®¿³øÙÓÐ÷¸¿ª»»¬¿¾´·¸»¼ÔÑÍÜ ø×ÝËª¿´«»±ºðòçð÷¿¬¸»´±©»¬¿½½»°¬¿¾´»´»ª»´±º»®ª·½»º±®°»¿µ¸±«®±°»®¿¬·²¹½±²¼·¬·±² ±²´±½¿´¿®¬»®·¿´¬®»»¬òÌ¸»Ñ®¿²¹»Ý±«²¬§Ý±²¹»¬·±²Ó¿²¿¹»³»²¬Ð®±¹®¿³øÝÓÐ÷°»½·º·» ÔÑÍÛø×ÝËª¿´«»±ºïòðð÷¿¬¸»´±©»¬¿½½»°¬¿¾´»´»ª»´±º»®ª·½»º±®·²¬»®»½¬·±²±²¬¸»ÝÓÐ ¬«¼§ô±²´§¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±º ¸·¹¸©¿§²»¬©±®µòÑº¬¸»ïí·²¬»®»½¬·±²¿²¿´§¦»¼·²¬¸·¬®¿ºº·½ Ø¿®¾±®Þ±«´»ª¿®¼ñÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª»²«»ôØ¿®¾±®Þ±«´»ª¿®¼ñ×ëÎ¿³°ô¿²¼Õ¿¬»´´¿ßª»²«»ñ×ëÎ¿³° ¿®»±²¬¸»ÝÓÐ²»¬©±®µòÌ¸»®»º±®»ô¬¸»´±©»¬¿½½»°¬¿¾´»´»ª»´±º»®ª·½»º±®¬¸»» ·²¬»®»½¬·±²·ÔÑÍÛòÌ¸»´±©»¬¿½½»°¬¿¾´»´»ª»´±º»®ª·½»º±®¬¸»®»³¿·²·²¹¬«¼§ ·²¬»®»½¬·±²·ÔÑÍÜò Ð¿¹»èÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ÌìæîðïðÚúß×ÝËÍ ßÞÔÛÑÎÛÝßÍÌÝÌËßÔËÓÓßÎÇ îðïðÚ±®»½¿¬Ú®±³ ß½¬«¿´îðïðÝ±²¼·¬·±² ×ÍñÓÒÜ ×²¬»®»½¬·±² É»»µ¼¿§ÐÓÉ»»µ¼¿§ÐÓ ×ÝËÔÑÍ×ÝËÔÑÍ ïòðíÚðòêíÞ ïòØ¿®¾±®Þ´úÞ¿´´Î¼ ðòéíÝðòìèß îòØ¿®¾±®Þ´ú×ëÒÞÎ¿³° ðòèêÜðòíðß íòØ¿®¾±®Þ´ú×ëÍÞÎ¿³° ðòèîÜðòíêß ìòØ¿®¾±®Þ´úÜ·²»§É¿§ ðòèéÜðòëìß ëòØ¿®¾±®Þ´úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª ðòêèÞðòîðß êòÝ´»³»²¬·²»Í¬úÜ·²»§É¿§ ðòèçÜðòëîß éòÝ´»³»²¬·²»Í¬úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª ðòëîßðòîïß èò×ëÍÞÎ¿³°úÜ·²»§É¿§ ðòéêÝðòìíß çòß²¿¸»·³Þ´úÜ·²»§É¿§ ðòçëÛðòëïß ïðòß²¿¸»·³Þ´ñØ¿¬»®Í¬úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª ðòèèÜðòêîÞ ïïòØ¿¬»®Í¬úÑ®¿²¹»©±±¼ßª ðòêêÞðòëðß ïîò×ëÍÞÎ¿³°úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª ðòèéÜðòìêß ïíò×ëÒÞÎ¿³°úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª ß´´±º¬¸»¬«¼§·²¬»®»½¬·±²¿®»½«®®»²¬´§±°»®¿¬·²¹¿¬ÔÑÍÞ±®¾»¬¬»®ô·²¼·½¿¬·²¹¬¸¿¬ ½±²¼·¬·±²·²¬¸»¬«¼§¿®»¿¿®»¾»¬¬»®¬±¼¿§¬¸¿²¬¸»§©»®»°®±¶»½¬»¼¬±¾»·²¬¸»ïçççÐ±·²¬» ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜòÌ¸··¿¬´»¿¬·²°¿®¬¾»½¿«»ô±º¬¸»°®»ª·±«´§°®±°±»¼ìíçôêðð¯«¿®» º»»¬±º®»¬¿·´ñ¼·²·²¹ñ»²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬´¿²¼«»·²¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µß®»¿ßô±²´§ ¿°°®±¨·³¿¬»´§îëðôððð¯«¿®»º»»¬¿®»½«®®»²¬´§¾»·²¹«»¼ò×²¿¼¼·¬·±²ô±ª»®îðôððð¸±¬»´ ®±±³¸¿ª»¾»»²»²¬·¬´»¼¾«¬²±¬¾«·´¬©·¬¸·²¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Î»±®¬Í°»½·º·½Ð´¿²øßÎÍÐ÷¿®»¿ò îòðÚËÌËÎÛÝÑÒÜ×Ì×ÑÒÍÉ×ÌØÑËÌÐÎÑÖÛÝÌ Ì¸»º«¬«®»þ©·¬¸±«¬°®±¶»½¬þ¬®¿ºº·½ª±´«³»º±®¬¸»§»¿®îðïë©»®»¼»ª»´±°»¼º®±³§»¿®îðïë ª±´«³»·²½´«¼»¼·²ÜÍÛ×ÎÒ±òíìð«²¼»®©¿§¿±ºÓ¿®½¸îðïïô°®±ª·¼»¼¾§¬¸»Ý·¬§±º ß²¿¸»·³òÌ¸»»º±®»½¿¬©»®»°®±¼«½»¼«·²¹¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Ì®¿ºº·½ß²¿´§·Ó±¼»´øßÌßÓ÷ò Ì¸»îðïë¬®¿ºº·½ª±´«³»¿²¿´§¦»¼·²ÜÍÛ×ÎÒ±òíìð¿«³»º«®¬¸»®¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±º¬¸»´¿²¼ «»·²½´«¼»¼·²¬¸»Ü·²»§´¿²¼Î»±®¬Í°»½·º·½Ð´¿²ô¬¸»Ø±¬»´Ý·®½´»Í°»½·º·½Ð´¿²¿²¼¬¸» ß²¿¸»·³Î»±®¬Í°»½·º·½Ð´¿²ô¿©»´´¿º«´´¾«·´¼±«¬±º¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ°®±¶»½¬¿ ¿°°®±ª»¼·²¬¸»îððêß¼¼»²¼«³¬±·¬ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜòÌ±¾»½±²·¬»²¬©·¬¸¬¸» ±®·¹·²¿´ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜô¬¸»º±½«±º¬¸»¿²¿´§··²¬¸·¬®¿ºº·½¬«¼§¸¿¾»»²±² ¬¸»°ò³ò°»¿µ¸±«®ø·ò»òôëæðð°ò³òêæðð°ò³ò÷¼«®·²¹¬¸»Í«³³»®»¿±²¾»½¿«»¬¸¿¬·¬¸» Ð¿¹»çÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ¬·³»°»®·±¼¼«®·²¹©¸·½¸¬¸»¾¿½µ¹®±«²¼½±³³«¬»¬®¿ºº·½°»¿µ¿²¼Ü·²»§Î»±®¬°®±¶»½¬¬®·° ¹»²»®¿¬·±²··¹²·º·½¿²¬ò Þ»½¿«»¬¸»½±³°¿®·±²·²¬¸·¬®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²¿²¿´§·½±³°¿®»º±®»½¿¬¬®¿ºº·½½±²¼·¬·±² ©·¬¸¬¸»°®±¶»½¬¿½«®®»²¬´§°®±°±»¼¬±¬¸±»¬¸¿¬©±«´¼°®»ª¿·´«²¼»®¬¸»±®·¹·²¿´ïççç Ð±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜø²±¬«²¼»®°®»ª·±«¿¼¼»²¼¿÷ô·¬©¿²»½»¿®§¬±³±¼·º§¬¸»º±®»½¿¬ ¬®¿ºº·½ª±´«³»º®±³¬¸»ßÎÍÐ¬±»¬¿¾´·¸îðïëÂª££·Á¬®¿ºº·½ª±´«³»¬¸¿¬·²½´«¼» ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ¿±®·¹·²¿´´§¿°°®±ª»¼òÌ¸»®»º±®»ôº±®°«®°±»±º¬¸·¬«¼§ôîðïë²± °®±¶»½¬ª±´«³»©»®»¼»ª»´±°»¼¾§«¾¬®¿½¬·²¹¬®¿ºº·½ª±´«³»¬¸¿¬©±«´¼¾»¹»²»®¿¬»¼¾§¬¸» ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µîððêß¼¼»²¼«³°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬º®±³¬¸»îðïë¬«®²·²¹³±ª»³»²¬ ª±´«³»¿²¿´§¦»¼·²ÜÍÛ×ÎÒ±òíìð¿²¼¬¸»²¿¼¼·²¹¬¸»ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜ°®±¶»½¬ ¬®·°ª±´«³»òÜ»¬¿·´»¼ª±´«³»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬©±®µ¸»»¬¿®»·²½´«¼»¼·² ß°°»²¼·¨Ý òÌ¸»îðïë ²±°®±¶»½¬°ò³ò°»¿µ¸±«®¬«®²·²¹³±ª»³»²¬ª±´«³»¿®»·´´«¬®¿¬»¼·² Ú·¹«®»ë ò Ì¸»®»«´¬·²¹îðïë²±°®±¶»½¬·²¬»®»½¬·±²´»ª»´±º»®ª·½»¿®»·²¼·½¿¬»¼·² Ì¿¾´»ë òß¸±©²·² Ì¿¾´»ë ô¿´´±º¬¸»¬«¼§·²¬»®»½¬·±²¿®»°®±¶»½¬»¼¬±±°»®¿¬»¿¬¿¿¬·º¿½¬±®§´»ª»´±º»®ª·½»ò ÌëæÇîðïëÉÐ×ÝËÍ ßÞÔÛÛßÎ×ÌØÑËÌÎÑÖÛÝÌËÓÓßÎÇ Ç»¿®îðïëÒ±Ð®±¶»½¬ ×²¬»®»½¬·±² É»»µ¼¿§ÐÓ ×ÝËÔÑÍ ðòéìÝ ïòØ¿®¾±®Þ´úÞ¿´´Î¼ ðòêîÞ îòØ¿®¾±®Þ´ú×ëÒÞÎ¿³° ðòíçß íòØ¿®¾±®Þ´ú×ëÍÞÎ¿³° ðòëìß ìòØ¿®¾±®Þ´úÜ·²»§É¿§ ðòéëÝ ëòØ¿®¾±®Þ´úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª ðòíîß êòÝ´»³»²¬·²»Í¬úÜ·²»§É¿§ ðòéêÝ éòÝ´»³»²¬·²»Í¬úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª ðòííß èò×ëÍÞÎ¿³°úÜ·²»§É¿§ ðòêïÞ çòß²¿¸»·³Þ´úÜ·²»§É¿§ ðòéëÝ ïðòß²¿¸»·³Þ´ñØ¿¬»®Í¬úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª ðòèïÜ ïïòØ¿¬»®Í¬úÑ®¿²¹»©±±¼ßª ðòêèÞ ïîò×ëÍÞÎ¿³°úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª ðòêíÞ ïíò×ëÒÞÎ¿³°úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª ðòìïß ïìòÐ®±¶»½¬Ü®·ª»©¿§±²Ü·²»§É¿§ Ð¿¹»ïðÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ ð×Õ×ÎØ úÛÐÐêØ éÈÇØÃóÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ä ìïì×ÛÑôÍÇÊæÍÐÇÏ× äää úÛÐÐêØóîúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ úÛÐÐêØ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óîúêÛÏÌÉ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ù×ÊÊÓÈÍÉûÆ× ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÊ×Ûú ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ûÊ×Ûû ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆóéúíÖÖêÛÏÌ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ îíèèíéùûð÷ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ óîúêÛÏÌÉ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ öÓÕÇÊ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑ ã×ÛÊ åÓÈÔÍÇÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎûÎÛÐÃÉÓÉçÌØÛÈ× å××ÑØÛÃìïì×ÛÑôÍÇÊæÍÐÇÏ×É ëà ààòÍÚÉàò ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑàÕÊÛàðÛÎ×ÉæÍÐÇÏ×ÉÙØÊ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì íòðÌÎ×ÐÙÛÒÛÎßÌ×ÑÒ Ì¸»°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬½±²¬¿·²¿³·¨±º´¿²¼«»¬¸¿¬©·´´¸¿®»¿½±²±´·¼¿¬»¼°¿®µ·²¹º¿½·´·¬§ô ©¸·½¸©·´´®»«´¬·²¿°¿¬¬»®²±º¬®·°³¿µ·²¹¬¸¿¬·¼·ºº»®»²¬º®±³©¸¿¬©±«´¼¸¿°°»²·º»¿½¸±º ¬¸»°®±¶»½¬½±³°±²»²¬©»®»¿¬¿²¼¿´±²»°®±¶»½¬òÂñªª±Á¬®·°©·´´¾»³¿¼»¾»¬©»»²¬¸» ´¿²¼«»±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬©·¬¸±«¬¬¸»«»±º¿«¬±³±¾·´»ò×²¿¼¼·¬·±²ô¾»½¿«»±º¬¸»£·Å ´±½¿¬·±²©·¬¸·²Ì¸»ß²¿¸»·³Î»±®¬ô³¿²§¬®·°¬±ñº®±³¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ°®±¶»½¬©·´´ ¾»³¿¼»¾§°»®±²ª··¬·²¹±¬¸»®¿¬¬®¿½¬·±²±®¾§°»®±²¬®¿ª»´·²¹°¿¬¬¸»·¬»¾»¬©»»² ¬¸±»¿¬¬®¿½¬·±²¿²¼±¬¸»®¸±¬»´ñ³±¬»´·²¬¸»°®±¶»½¬¿®»¿òÌ¸»¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²½¿´½«´¿¬·±² º±®¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ°®±¶»½¬¬¸»®»º±®»®»¯«·®»¿½¿®»º«´»ª¿´«¿¬·±²±º¬¸»«²·¯«» ²¿¬«®»±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬½±³°±²»²¬¿²¼¿²¿»³»²¬±º¸±©¬®·°¾»¬©»»²¬¸»·²¼·ª·¼«¿´ ½±³°±²»²¬©±«´¼¿ºº»½¬±ºº·¬»¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²ò Ì¸»°®±°±»¼£·Å´¿²¼«»º¿´´·²¬±¬©±¹»²»®¿´½¿¬»¹±®·»ô¸±¬»´¿²¼ ®»¬¿·´ñ¼·²·²¹ñ»²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬øÎÜÛ÷òÌ¸»¬®¿ºº·½¬«¼·»°®»°¿®»¼º±®¬¸»±®·¹·²¿´ïçççÐ±·²¬» ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜ¿²¼º±®°®»ª·±«¿¼¼»²¼¿«¬·´·¦»¼¼·ºº»®»²¬¿°°®±¿½¸»º±®½¿´½«´¿¬·²¹¬¸»¬®·° ¹»²»®¿¬·±²±º¬¸»»¬©±½¿¬»¹±®·»òÌ¸·©¿¼±²»¾»½¿«»¬¸»·²¬»®²¿´¬®·°½¿°¬«®» ³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§¿ª¿·´¿¾´»¿¬¬¸»¬·³»¼·¼²±¬»¨°´·½·¬´§¿½½±«²¬º±®¬¸»¸¿®»±º¬®·°³¿¼»¬±»¿½¸ ´¿²¼«»½¿¬»¹±®§ª·¿¬¸»³±¼»±º©¿´µ·²¹¿²¼¬®¿²·¬òß²»©·²¬»®²¿´¬®·°½¿°¬«®» ³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§ô¼·½«»¼¾»´±©ô·²±©¿ª¿·´¿¾´»¬¸¿¬¼±»¿½½±«²¬º±®©¿´µ·²¹¿²¼¬®¿²·¬¬®·° º±®¿´´´¿²¼«»½¿¬»¹±®·»òÌ¸·«°¼¿¬»¼³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§©¿«»¼·²¬¸»°®»»²¬¿²¿´§»ô¿²¼ ¬¸»®»º±®»¿«²·º±®³¿°°®±¿½¸©¿»³°´±§»¼º±®¬¸»¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²±º¿´´´¿²¼«»·²¬¸» °®±¶»½¬òØ±©»ª»®ô¬±º¿½·´·¬¿¬»½±³°¿®·±²©·¬¸¬¸»°®»ª·±«¬«¼·»ô«¾¬±¬¿´º±®¬¸»ÎÜÛ¿²¼ ¸±¬»´½¿¬»¹±®·»¿®»¸±©²·²¬¸»¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²¬¿¾´»·²¬¸·®»°±®¬ò Ì¸»³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§«»¼¬±½¿´½«´¿¬»¬¸»£·Å¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²¾»¹·²©·¬¸®¿¬»°«¾´·¸»¼¾§ ¬¸»×²¬·¬«¬»±ºÌ®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²Û²¹·²»»®ø Ì®·°Ù»²»®¿¬·±² ôè¬¸Û¼·¬·±²ô¸»®»¿º¬»®®»º»®®»¼¬±¿ ¬¸»Âñ¼Á¡ÈÌ¸»°®±°±»¼ÎÜÛ»²¬·¬´»³»²¬©»®»½´¿·º·»¼¬±¼·ºº»®»²¬´¿²¼«»¿¼»º·²»¼¾§ ¬¸»×ÌÛòÎ»¬¿·´©¿¿²¿´§¦»¼«·²¹¬¸»Í¸±°°·²¹Ý»²¬»®×ÌÛ´¿²¼«»½¿¬»¹±®§òÜ·²·²¹©¿ ¼·ª·¼»¼·²¬±¬¸»Ï«¿´·¬§Î»¬¿«®¿²¬¿²¼Ø·¹¸Ì«®²±ª»®Î»¬¿«®¿²¬×ÌÛ´¿²¼«»½¿¬»¹±®·»ò Û²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬©¿¼·ª·¼»¼·²¬±¬¸»Ò·¹¸¬Ý´«¾ñÞ¿®ôÔ·ª»Ì¸»¿¬®»ôÓ«´¬·°´»¨Ó±ª·»Ì¸»¿¬»®ô¿²¼ Þ±©´·²¹×ÌÛ´¿²¼«»½¿¬»¹±®·»òÌ¸»Ñ«¬¼±±®Î»¬¿«®¿²¬©¿½±²»®ª¿¬·ª»´§¿²¿´§¦»¼«·²¹¬¸» ¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²¿«³°¬·±²º±®¬¸»Ò·¹¸¬Ý´«¾ñÞ¿®×ÌÛ´¿²¼«»½¿¬»¹±®§¿²¼¬¸»®»º±®» ½±²·¼»®»¼¿°¿®¬±ºÛ²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬òÌ¸»»®¿¬»¿®»«»¼¬±½¿´½«´¿¬»¬¸»ÂÐ£ª»¸·½´»ÃÁ ¹»²»®¿¬»¼º±®»¿½¸×ÌÛ´¿²¼«»¿¸±©²·² Ì¿¾´»ê¿²¼é òÌ¸»¹®±ª»¸·½´»¬®·°¿®»¬¸»² ½±²±´·¼¿¬»¼¾¿½µ·²¬±¬¸»ÎÜÛ½¿¬»¹±®·»¿²¼¿¼¶«¬»¼º±®¬®·°®»¼«½¬·±²«½¸¿©¿´µ·²¹¬®·°ô ¬®¿²·¬¬®·°ô·²¬»®²¿´¬®·°¿²¼°¿¾§¬®·°ô¿¸±©²·² Ì¿¾´»è¿²¼ç òÌ¸»³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§º±® »¬·³¿¬·²¹·²¬»®²¿´¬®·°½¿°¬«®»º±®³·¨»¼«»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬¼»½®·¾»¼·²¬¸»×ÌÛÖ±«®²¿´±º ß«¹«¬ôîðïð©¿«»¼¬±½¿´½«´¿¬»¬®·°®»¼«½¬·±²º±®¬¸·¬«¼§ò Ì¿¾´»ê¿²¼é¸±©¬¸»¹®±ª»¸·½´»¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²½¿´½«´¿¬·±²º±®¬¸»¬©±¿®»¿±º¬¸» °®±¶»½¬·¬»òÌ¸»¹®±ª»¸·½´»¬®·°¿®»½¿´½«´¿¬»¼¾¿»¼±²¿°°´·½¿¬·±²±º¬¸»×ÌÛ¬®·° Ð¿¹»ïîÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ¹»²»®¿¬·±²®¿¬»¬±¬¸»¯«¿®»º±±¬¿¹»±º´¿²¼«»±®²«³¾»®±º¸±¬»´®±±³±®³±ª·»¬¸»¿¬»® »¿¬òÌ¸»¹®±ª»¸·½´»¬®·°©»®»¬¸»²¿¼¶«¬»¼¬±®»º´»½¬¬®·°®»¼«½¬·±²¼«»¬±©¿´µ·²¹ô ¬®¿²·¬¿²¼°¿¾§¬®·°ô«·²¹°»®½»²¬¿¹»½±²·¬»²¬©·¬¸¬¸»ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜ ¬®¿ºº·½¬«¼§òÌ¸»·²¬»®²¿´¬®·°³¿µ·²¹½¸¿®¿½¬»®·¬·½±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬©»®»¯«¿²¬·º·»¼«·²¹¬¸» ×ÌÛ³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§ô¿²¼¬¸»½¿´½«´¿¬·±²¿®»·²½´«¼»¼·² ß°°»²¼·¨Þ òÌ¸»¬®·°®»¼«½¬·±² ½¿´½«´¿¬»¼º±®»¿½¸´¿²¼«»½¿¬»¹±®§º±®©¿´µ·²¹ô¬®¿²·¬ô°¿¾§¿²¼·²¬»®²¿´¬®·°¿®»¸±©² ·² Ì¿¾´»è¿²¼ç ò ÌêæßßÙÊÌÙÉÐÓÐØ ßÞÔÛÎÛßÎÑÍÍÛØ×ÝÔÛÎ×ÐÛÒÛÎßÌ×ÑÒÛÛÕÜßÇÛßÕÑËÎ ×²¾±«²¼Ñ«¬¾±«²¼ Ì±¬¿´ Ô¿²¼Ë»Ï«¿²¬·¬§ Ì®·° Î¿¬»Ì®·°Î¿¬»Ì®·° Î»¬¿·´ Í¸±°°·²¹Ý»²¬»®ïííôêèíÍ¯Ú¬ïòèíîìëïòçðîëììçç Ü·²·²¹ Ï«¿´·¬§Î»¬¿«®¿²¬ïîíôíéîÍ¯Ú¬ëòðîêïçîòìéíðëçîì Ø·¹¸Ì«®²±ª»®Î»¬¿«®¿²¬îìôèïêÍ¯Ú¬êòëèïêíìòëéïïíîéê Û²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬ Ò·¹¸¬Ý´«¾ñÞ¿®ìéôéêçÍ¯Ú¬éòìèíëéíòèêïèìëìï Ô·ª»Ì¸»¿¬»®çððÍ»¿¬ðòðïçðòðïçïè Ó«´¬·°´»¨Ó±ª·»Ì¸»¿¬»®îôïêëÍ»¿¬ðòðíêëðòðëïðèïéí Þ±©´·²¹ìéôêêëÍ¯Ú¬ïòîìëçîòíðïïðïêç Ñ«¬¼±±®Î»¬¿«®¿²¬ïïôðððÍ¯Ú¬éòìèèîíòèêìîïîì Ì±¬¿´ÎñÜñÛíòìèïôëççîòìëïôïîëîôéîì Ø±¬»´ïôîêêÎ±±³ðòïèîîèðòîìíðìëíî Ì±¬¿´ß®»¿ßÙ®±Ì®·°ïôèîéïôìîçíôîëê ¬¸ Ò±¬»æÎ¿¬»¿®»°»®ïðððÍ¯Ú¬òÎ¿¬»±¾¬¿·²»¼º®±³×ÌÛÌ®·°Ù»²»®¿¬·±²Ó¿²«¿´ôèÛ¼·¬·±²ò ÌéæßÞÙÊÌÙÉÐÓÐØ ßÞÔÛÎÛßÎÑÍÍÛØ×ÝÔÛÎ×ÐÛÒÛÎßÌ×ÑÒÛÛÕÜßÇÛßÕÑËÎ ×²¾±«²¼Ñ«¬¾±«²¼ Ì±¬¿´ Ô¿²¼Ë»Ï«¿²¬·¬§ Ì®·° Î¿¬»Ì®·°Î¿¬»Ì®·° Î»¬¿·´ Í¸±°°·²¹Ý»²¬»® ïïìôíëðÍ¯Ú¬ïòèíîðçïòçðîïéìîê Ü·²·²¹ Ï«¿´·¬§Î»¬¿«®¿²¬ ïðôçðîÍ¯Ú¬ëòðîëëîòìéîéèî Ø·¹¸Ì«®²±ª»®Î»¬¿«®¿²¬ ìôèçèÍ¯Ú¬êòëèíîìòëéîîëì Ì±¬¿´ÎñÜñÛïíðôïëðÍ¯Ú¬îòîéîçêîòðìîêêëêî Ø±¬»´ íêîÎ±±³ðòïèêëðòîìèéïëî Ì±¬¿´ß®»¿ÞÙ®±Ì®·°íêïíëíéïì ¬¸ Ò±¬»æÎ¿¬»¿®»°»®ïðððÍ¯Ú¬òÎ¿¬»±¾¬¿·²»¼º®±³×ÌÛÌ®·°Ù»²»®¿¬·±²Ó¿²«¿´ôèÛ¼·¬·±²ò Ð¿¹»ïíÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ÌèæßßÒÊÌÙÉÐÓÐØ ßÞÔÛÎÛßÛÌÛØ×ÝÔÛÎ×ÐÛÒÛÎßÌ×ÑÒÛÛÕÜßÇÛßÕÑËÎ Ù®± É¿´µñÌ®¿²·¬×²¬»®²¿´Ð¿¾§Ò»¬Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·° Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·° Ô¿²¼Ë» Ì±¬¿´Ì±¬¿´ ×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬ Î»¬¿·´ìççïçìíïêéèìïëíîììçë ïíç Ü·²·²¹ïôîððïðéèìíëíèðêìëïîëéîðí ìêð Û²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬ïôðîëèîìïîìïèîìéîíìïçîðè êîé Ø±¬»´ëíîíîéïêîëëððïèðìï îîî Ì±¬¿´íôîëêîìïïéëëêðêðïïîêïðêçðïëìéïôììè Ò±¬»æÌ±¬¿´³¿§²±¬»¨¿½¬´§³¿¬½¸¬¸»«³±ºª¿´«»¼«»¬±®±«²¼·²¹ò ÌçæßÞÒÊÌÙÉÐÓÐØ ßÞÔÛÎÛßÛÌÛØ×ÝÔÛÎ×ÐÛÒÛÎßÌ×ÑÒÛÛÕÜßÇÛßÕÑËÎ Ù®± É¿´µñÌ®¿²·¬×²¬»®²¿´Ð¿¾§Ò»¬Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·° Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·° Ô¿²¼Ë» Ì±¬¿´Ì±¬¿´ ×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬ Î»¬¿·´ìîêìììïíìëííííïçççî ïçï Ü·²·²¹ïíêíééêîðîìéïé îì Û²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬ððððððððð ð Ø±¬»´ïëîçîëéíððëïïî êí Ì±¬¿´éïìëêëðïïìïìêíëíëïëéïîîîéç Ò±¬»æÌ±¬¿´³¿§²±¬»¨¿½¬´§³¿¬½¸¬¸»«³±ºª¿´«»¼«»¬±®±«²¼·²¹ò Ì¿¾´»ïð¸±©¬¸»°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬ª»¸·½´»¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²º±®¬¸»¬©±¿®»¿±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ ·¬»¿²¼½±³°¿®»¬¸»¾«·´¼±«¬ª¿´«»¬±¬¸±»«»¼·²¬¸»ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜòÌ¸» ¬±¬¿´ÐÓ°»¿µ¸±«®ª»¸·½´»¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²±º¬¸»°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬·»¬·³¿¬»¼¿ïôéîé¬®·° øïðëè·²¾±«²¼¿²¼êêç±«¬¾±«²¼÷¿¸±©²·² Ì¿¾´»ïð òß´±¸±©²·² Ì¿¾´»ïð·¿ ½±³°¿®·±²©·¬¸¬¸»°®±¶»½¬¿¿°°®±ª»¼·²¬¸»ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜòÌ¸»®»ª·»¼ °®±¶»½¬©±«´¼¹»²»®¿¬»¿¾±«¬¬¸»¿³»²«³¾»®±º·²¾±«²¼°»¿µ¸±«®¬®·°¿²¼¿¾±«¬ïç °»®½»²¬º»©»®±«¬¾±«²¼°»¿µ¸±«®¬®·°ò ÌïðæÊÌÙÍ ßÞÔÛÛØ×ÝÔÛÎ×ÐÛÒÛÎßÌ×ÑÒËÓÓßÎÇ É»»µ¼¿§ÐÓÐ»¿µØ±«®Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·° ×²Ñ«¬Ì±¬¿´ Ð®±°±»¼Ð®±¶»½¬ ß®»¿ßçðïëìéïôììè ß®»¿Þïëéïîîîéç Ð®±¶»½¬Ì±¬¿´ïôðëèêêçïôéîé ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜ Ð®±¶»½¬Ì±¬¿´ïôðëèèîéïôèèë Ü·ºº»®»²½»ðïëèïëè Ð»®½»²¬Ý¸¿²¹»ðûïçûèû Ð¿¹»ïìÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ìòðÊÛØ×ÝÔÛÌÎ×ÐÜ×ÍÌÎ×ÞËÌ×ÑÒ Ì¸»¼·¬®·¾«¬·±²±º°®±¶»½¬¹»²»®¿¬»¼¬®·°¬¸®±«¹¸¬¸»¬«¼§·²¬»®»½¬·±²·¼»¬»®³·²»¼¾§¬¸» ¬§°»±º¬®·°ø»ò¹òô¬®·°º®±³¸±³»¬±©±®µô¬®·°º®±³¸±³»¬±¸±°°·²¹¼»¬·²¿¬·±²÷¿²¼¬¸» ´±½¿¬·±²±º¬¸»¼»¬·²¿¬·±²·²®»´¿¬·±²¬±¬¸»«®®±«²¼·²¹®±¿¼©¿§²»¬©±®µòÌ¸»¹»²»®¿´ ½¸¿®¿½¬»®·¬·½±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬¿¿³·¨»¼«»ÎÜÛ¿²¼¸±¬»´°®±¶»½¬¸¿ª»²±¬½¸¿²¹»¼ô¿²¼ô ©¸·´»¬¸»®»¸¿ª»¾»»²·³°®±ª»³»²¬¬±¬¸»½·®½«´¿¬·±²²»¬©±®µ·²¬¸»¿®»¿ô¬¸»±ª»®¿´´ ®±¿¼©¿§²»¬©±®µ¸¿²±¬½¸¿²¹»¼·²½»¬¸»¿°°®±ª¿´±º¬¸»îððêß¼¼»²¼«³òÌ¸»®»º±®»ô¬¸» °®±¶»½¬¬®·°¼·¬®·¾«¬·±²«»¼·²¬¸·¬«¼§·¬¸»¿³»¿¬¸¿¬«»¼·²¬¸»îððêß¼¼»²¼«³¬± ¬¸»ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜòÌ¸»°®±¶»½¬¬®·°¼·¬®·¾«¬·±²··´´«¬®¿¬»¼·² Ú·¹«®»ê ò ëòð×ÓÐßÝÌÝÎ×ÌÛÎ×ß Í·¹²·º·½¿²¬¬®¿ºº·½·³°¿½¬¿®»¼»¬»®³·²»¼¾¿»¼±²¬¸»¬¸®»¸±´¼±º·¹²·º·½¿²½»¿¼»¬»®³·²»¼ ¾§¬¸»®»°±²·¾´»¶«®·¼·½¬·±²òÌ¸»Ý·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³¸¿»¬¿¾´·¸»¼¬¸®»¸±´¼½®·¬»®·¿¬± ¼»¬»®³·²»·º¿°®±¶»½¬¸¿·¹²·º·½¿²¬¬®¿ºº·½·³°¿½¬òË²¼»®¬¸»ÃYÅ¬¿²¼¿®¼ô¿°®±¶»½¬·³°¿½¬ ©±«´¼¾»½±²·¼»®»¼·¹²·º·½¿²¬·º¬¸»½±²¼·¬·±²¸±©²·² Ì¿¾´»ïï¿®»³»¬ò ÌïïæÝß×Ý ßÞÔÛ×ÌÇÑÚÒßØÛ×ÓÓÐßÝÌÎ×ÌÛÎ×ß ÔÑÍÂ¬ÃÆÉ£·Á×ÝËÐ®±¶»½¬Î»´¿¬»¼×²½®»¿»·²×ÝË Ýðòéðð¬±ðòèððÛ¯«¿´¬±±®¹®»¿¬»®¬¸¿²ðòðëð Üðòèðð¬±ðòçððÛ¯«¿´¬±±®¹®»¿¬»®¬¸¿²ðòðíð ÛôÚâðòçððÛ¯«¿´¬±±®¹®»¿¬»®¬¸¿²ðòðïð êòðÚËÌËÎÛÝÑÒÜ×Ì×ÑÒÍÉ×ÌØÐÎÑÖÛÝÌ Ì¸»°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬¬®·°©»®»¿·¹²»¼¬±¬¸»®±¿¼©¿§²»¬©±®µ«·²¹¬¸»¬®·°¼·¬®·¾«¬·±² °»®½»²¬¿¹»¸±©²·² Ú·¹«®»ê òÌ¸»îðïë©·¬¸°®±¶»½¬ª±´«³»©»®»¼»ª»´±°»¼¾§«¾¬®¿½¬·²¹ °®±¶»½¬¬®·°ª±´«³»±º¬¸»îððêß¼¼»²¼«³º®±³¬¸»îðïë¬«®²·²¹³±ª»³»²¬ª±´«³»±ºßÎÍÐ ¿²¼¬¸»²¿¼¼·²¹¬¸»°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬¬®·°ª±´«³»òÜ»¬¿·´»¼ª±´«³»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬©±®µ¸»»¬ ¿®»·²½´«¼»¼·² ß°°»²¼·¨Ý òÌ¸»îðïë©·¬¸°®±¶»½¬°ò³ò°»¿µ¸±«®¬«®²·²¹³±ª»³»²¬ª±´«³» ¿®»·´´«¬®¿¬»¼·² Ú·¹«®»éò Ì¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±°»®¿¬·²¹½±²¼·¬·±²©»®»¼»¬»®³·²»¼«·²¹×ÝË ³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§òÌ¸»×ÝË½¿´½«´¿¬·±²©±®µ¸»»¬¿®»·²½´«¼»¼·² ß°°»²¼·¨Ü òÌ¸»îðïë©·¬¸ °®±¶»½¬·²¬»®»½¬·±²´»ª»´±º»®ª·½»¿®»¸±©²·² Ì¿¾´»ïî òß½±³°¿®·±²±º´»ª»´±º»®ª·½» ©·¬¸¬¸»²±°®±¶»½¬½±²¼·¬·±²·¿´±¸±©²·² Ì¿¾´»ïî ò Ñ²¬¸»¾¿·±º¬¸»Ý·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³¬®¿ºº·½¬«¼§¹«·¼»´·²»ô¬¸»®»ª·»¼°®±¶»½¬©±«´¼²±¬ ½®»¿¬»¿²§·¹²·º·½¿²¬¬®¿ºº·½·³°¿½¬¿¬¬¸»¬«¼§·²¬»®»½¬·±²¼«®·²¹¿©»»µ¼¿§°ò³ò°»¿µ¸±«® ·²¬¸»§»¿®îðïëò Ð¿¹»ïëÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ ð×Õ×ÎØ úÛÐÐêØ éÈÇØÃóÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ä ù×ÊÊÓÈÍÉûÆ× øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÊ×Ûú ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ûÊ×Ûû ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ× îíèèíéùûð÷ öÓÕÇÊ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎûÎÛÐÃÉÓÉçÌØÛÈ× ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈèÊÓÌøÓÉÈÊÓÚÇÈÓÍÎ ëà ààòÍÚÉàò ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑàÕÊÛàìÊÍÒ×ÙÈðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎÙØÊ ð×Õ×ÎØ úÛÐÐêØ éÈÇØÃóÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ä ìïì×ÛÑôÍÇÊæÍÐÇÏ× äää úÛÐÐêØóîúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ úÛÐÐêØ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óîúêÛÏÌÉ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ù×ÊÊÓÈÍÉûÆ× ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÊ×Ûú ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ûÊ×Ûû ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆóéúíÖÖêÛÏÌ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ îíèèíéùûð÷ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ óîúêÛÏÌÉ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ öÓÕÇÊ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑ ã×ÛÊ åÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎûÎÛÐÃÉÓÉçÌØÛÈ× å××ÑØÛÃìïì×ÛÑôÍÇÊæÍÐÇÏ×É ëà ààòÍÚÉàò ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑàÕÊÛàðÛÎ×ÉæÍÐÇÏ×ÉÙØÊ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ÌïîæÇîðïëÉÐ×ÝËÍ ßÞÔÛÛßÎ×ÌØÎÑÖÛÝÌËÓÓßÎÇ îðïëÉ·¬¸Ð®±¶»½¬îðïëÒ±Ð®±¶»½¬ Ý¸¿²¹» ×²¬»®»½¬·±² É»»µ¼¿§ÐÓÉ»»µ¼¿§ÐÓ ×³°¿½¬ ×²×ÝË ×ÝËÔÑÍ×ÝËÔÑÍ ðòéìÝðòéìÝðòððÒ± ïòØ¿®¾±®Þ´úÞ¿´´Î¼ Ò± ðòêïÞðòêîÞðòðï îòØ¿®¾±®Þ´ú×ëÒÞÎ¿³° Ò± ðòíèßðòíçßðòðï íòØ¿®¾±®Þ´ú×ëÍÞÎ¿³° Ò± ðòëíßðòëìßðòðï ìòØ¿®¾±®Þ´úÜ·²»§É¿§ Ò± ðòéëÝðòéëÝðòðð ëòØ¿®¾±®Þ´úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª Ò± ðòíîßðòíîßðòðð êòÝ´»³»²¬·²»Í¬úÜ·²»§É¿§ Ò± ðòéìÝðòéêÝðòðî éòÝ´»³»²¬·²»Í¬úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª Ò± ðòííßðòííßðòðð èò×ëÍÞÎ¿³°úÜ·²»§É¿§ Ò± ðòêðßðòêïÞðòðï çòß²¿¸»·³Þ´úÜ·²»§É¿§ Ò± ðòéìÝðòéëÝðòðï ïðòß²¿¸»·³Þ´ñØ¿¬»®Í¬úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª Ò± ðòèðÝðòèïÜðòðï ïïòØ¿¬»®Í¬úÑ®¿²¹»©±±¼ßª Ò± ðòêèÞðòêèÞðòðð ïîò×ëÍÞÎ¿³°úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª Ò± ðòêíÞðòêíÞðòðð ïíò×ëÒÞÎ¿³°úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª Ò± ðòíèßðòìïßðòðí ïìòÐ®±¶»½¬Ü®·ª»©¿§±²Ü·²»§É¿§ Ð¿¹»ïèÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì éòðÔßÌÛÛÊÛÒ×ÒÙßÒßÔÇÍ×Í Ì¸»±®·¹·²¿´ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜº±®¬¸»°®±¶»½¬·²½´«¼»¼¿²¿²¿´§·±º·²¬»®»½¬·±² ±°»®¿¬·±²¼«®·²¹¬¸»éè°ò³ò¸±«®¾»½¿«»¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²±º³±ª·»¬¸»¿¬»®·½±²·¼»®¿¾´§ ¸·¹¸»®¼«®·²¹¬¸¿¬¸±«®¬¸¿²¼«®·²¹¬¸»°ò³ò°»¿µ½±³³«¬»¸±«®òÞ»½¿«»¬¸»Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ ®»°±·¬·±²·²¹··²½®»¿·²¹¬¸»¿³±«²¬±º°¿½»¼»ª±¬»¼¬±»²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬«»ô¿·³·´¿® ¿²¿´§·©¿½±²¼«½¬»¼º±®¬¸·¬«¼§òË·²¹®»½»²¬îì¸±«®½±«²¬½±²¼«½¬»¼©·¬¸·²Ì¸» ß²¿¸»·³Î»±®¬ô¬¸»°»®½»²¬¿¹»®»¼«½¬·±²·²¬®¿ºº·½ª±´«³»·²¬¸»¿®»¿¾»¬©»»²¬¸»ëê°ò³ò ¸±«®¿²¼¬¸»éè°ò³ò¸±«®©¿½¿´½«´¿¬»¼òÌ¸·®»¼«½¬·±²©¿¬¸»²¿°°´·»¼¬±¬¸»¬®¿ºº·½ ª±´«³»°®±ª·¼»¼¾§¬¸»Ý·¬§º±®¬¸»ëê°ò³ò¸±«®¬±¼»ª»´±°éè°ò³ò¾¿»½¿»¬®¿ºº·½ ª±´«³»òß·²¬¸»°ò³ò°»¿µ¸±«®¿²¿´§·ô´¿¬»»ª»²·²¹øéè°ò³ò÷îððêß¼¼»²¼«³°®±¶»½¬ ¬®·°©»®»«¾¬®¿½¬»¼º®±³¬¸»»ª±´«³»ô¿²¼ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜ´¿¬»»ª»²·²¹ °®±¶»½¬¬®·°©»®»¬¸»²¿¼¼»¼¬±¼»¬»®³·²»¬¸»²±°®±¶»½¬´¿¬»»ª»²·²¹ª±´«³»òÔ¿¬»»ª»²·²¹ øéè°ò³ò÷¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²º±®¬¸»°®±°±»¼Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ°®±¶»½¬©¿¼»ª»´±°»¼ô¿²¼¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ ¬®·°©»®»¿¼¼»¼¬±¬¸»²±°®±¶»½¬¬®¿ºº·½ª±´«³»¬±¼»¬»®³·²»¬¸»©·¬¸°®±¶»½¬´¿¬»»ª»²·²¹ ¬®¿ºº·½ª±´«³»ò Ì¿¾´»ïí¿²¼ïì¸±©¬¸»²»¬¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²º±®¬¸»¬©±¿®»¿±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ ·¬»òÜ»¬¿·´»¼ª±´«³»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬©±®µ¸»»¬¿®»·²½´«¼»¼·² ß°°»²¼·¨Ý ò Ú·¹«®»è·´´«¬®¿¬» ¬¸»îðïë©·¬¸°®±¶»½¬©»»µ¼¿§éè°ò³ò¸±«®¬«®²·²¹³±ª»³»²¬ª±´«³»ò ÌïíæßßÒÊÌÙÉÔÛØ ßÞÔÛÎÛßÛÌÛØ×ÝÔÛÎ×ÐÛÒÛÎßÌ×ÑÒÛÛÕÜßÇßÌÛÊÛÒ×ÒÙÑËÎ Ù®± É¿´µñÌ®¿²·¬×²¬»®²¿´Ð¿¾§Ò»¬Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·° Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·° Ô¿²¼Ë» Ì±¬¿´Ì±¬¿´ ×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬ Î»¬¿·´ìçîïçìîïêêèíïìíîìîçë ïíé Ü·²·²¹ïôëéîïëéïïëíèéçìçìêçíééîéé êëì Û²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬ïôìèçïíçìçíëîðëéçîèéðéîìç çëë Ø±¬»´ëëèíìèïéîêêððïçïìí îíì Ì±¬¿´ìôïïïíìèîïìêðêêìèïèéïîèïôíïêêêì ïôçèð Ò±¬»æÌ±¬¿´³¿§²±¬»¨¿½¬´§³¿¬½¸¬¸»«³±ºª¿´«»¼«»¬±®±«²¼·²¹ò ÌïìæßÞÒÊÌÙÔÛØ ßÞÔÛÎÛßÛÌÛØ×ÝÔÛÎ×ÐÛÒÛÎßÌ×ÑÒßÌÛÊÛÒ×ÒÙÑËÎ Ù®± É¿´µñÌ®¿²·¬×²¬»®²¿´Ð¿¾§Ò»¬Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·° Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·° Ô¿²¼Ë» Ì±¬¿´Ì±¬¿´ ×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬ Î»¬¿·´ìîïìðíèììêîíðîççïèêïéé Ü·²·²¹ïèèèïðèëîèëêîðîììë Û²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬ðððððððððð Ø±¬»´ïêðïðîëéêððëëïîêé Ì±¬¿´éêçëèëïïíìïêéíëíëïêêïîíîèè Ò±¬»æÌ±¬¿´³¿§²±¬»¨¿½¬´§³¿¬½¸¬¸»«³±ºª¿´«»¼«»¬±®±«²¼·²¹ò Ð¿¹»ïçÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ ð×Õ×ÎØ úÛÐÐêØ éÈÇØÃóÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎ ä ìïì×ÛÑôÍÇÊæÍÐÇÏ× äää úÛÐÐêØóîúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ úÛÐÐêØ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óîúêÛÏÌÉ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ù×ÊÊÓÈÍÉûÆ× ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ óéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÊ×Ûú ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ðÍÙÛÈÓÍÎ ûÊ×Ûû ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆóéúíÖÖêÛÏÌ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ îíèèíéùûð÷ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈ íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ óîúêÛÏÌÉ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÊÓÆ×ÅÛÃ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ öÓÕÇÊ× ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑ ã×ÛÊ åÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ èÊÛÎÉÌÍÊÈÛÈÓÍÎûÎÛÐÃÉÓÉçÌØÛÈ× å××ÑØÛÃìïì×ÛÑôÍÇÊæÍÐÇÏ×É ëà ààòÍÚÉàò ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑàÕÊÛàðÛÎ×ÉæÍÐÇÏ×ÉÙØÊ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ß²¿»³»²¬±º¬¸»°±¬»²¬·¿´·³°¿½¬±º°®±¶»½¬¬®¿ºº·½ª±´«³»¿¬¿´´¬«¼§·²¬»®»½¬·±²º±®¬¸» éè°ò³ò¸±«®©¿½±²¼«½¬»¼ò Ì¿¾´»ïë¸±©¬¸»îðïë©·¬¸°®±¶»½¬©»»µ¼¿§éè°ò³ò¸±«® ·²¬»®»½¬·±²´»ª»´±º»®ª·½»òÌ¸»×ÝË½¿´½«´¿¬·±²¿®»·²½´«¼»¼·² ß°°»²¼·¨Ü òÑ²¬¸»¾¿·±º ¬¸»Ý·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³°»®º±®³¿²½»¬¿²¼¿®¼º±®·²¬»®»½¬·±²±°»®¿¬·±²ô·²½»¿´´±º¬¸» ·²¬»®»½¬·±²¿®»°®±¶»½¬»¼¬±±°»®¿¬»¿¬ÔÑÍß±®Þ©·¬¸¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ô¬¸»®»ª·»¼°®±¶»½¬©±«´¼ ²±¬½®»¿¬»¿²§·¹²·º·½¿²¬¬®¿ºº·½·³°¿½¬¿¬¬¸»¬«¼§·²¬»®»½¬·±²¼«®·²¹éè°ò³ò¸±«®±º¿ ©»»µ¼¿§·²¬¸»§»¿®îðïëò ÌïëæÇîðïëÉÐÔÛ×ÝËÍ ßÞÔÛÛßÎ×ÌØÎÑÖÛÝÌßÌÛÊÛÒ×ÒÙËÓÓßÎÇ Ç»¿®îðïëÉ·¬¸Ð®±¶»½¬ ×²¬»®»½¬·±² É»»µ¼¿§éèÐÓ ×ÝËÔÑÍ ïòØ¿®¾±®Þ´úÞ¿´´Î¼ðòêðß îòØ¿®¾±®Þ´ú×ëÒÞÎ¿³°ðòëðß íòØ¿®¾±®Þ´ú×ëÍÞÎ¿³°ðòíîß ìòØ¿®¾±®Þ´úÜ·²»§É¿§ðòìèß ëòØ¿®¾±®Þ´úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßªðòêïÞ êòÝ´»³»²¬·²»Í¬úÜ·²»§É¿§ðòîèß éòÝ´»³»²¬·²»Í¬úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßªðòêëÞ èò×ëÍÞÎ¿³°úÜ·²»§É¿§ðòîçß çòß²¿¸»·³Þ´úÜ·²»§É¿§ðòëïß ïðòß²¿¸»·³Þ´ñØ¿¬»®Í¬úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßªðòêîÞ ïïòØ¿¬»®Í¬úÑ®¿²¹»©±±¼ßªðòêêÞ ïîò×ëÍÞÎ¿³°úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßªðòëêß ïíò×ëÒÞÎ¿³°úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßªðòëîß ïìòÐ®±¶»½¬Ü®·ª»©¿§±²Ü·²»§É¿§ðòëðß Ò±¬»æÒ±·¹²·º·½¿²¬·³°¿½¬¼«»¬±½¸¿²¹»·²×ÝËº®±³©·¬¸±«¬°®±¶»½¬½±²¼·¬·±²ò èòðÔßÌÛÒ×ÙØÌßÒßÔÇÍ×Í Ì¸»îððêß¼¼»²¼«³¬®¿ºº·½¿²¿´§·º±®¬¸·°®±¶»½¬·²½´«¼»¼¿´¿¬»²·¹¸¬¿²¿´§·±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ »²¬®¿²½»±²Ü·²»§É¿§¼«®·²¹¬¸»ïð¬±ïï°ò³ò¸±«®òÜ«®·²¹¬¸·¸±«®ô¬¸»®»¿®»±³»¬·³» ¸»¿ª§ª±´«³»±º¬®¿ºº·½±²Ü·²»§É¿§¿±½·¿¬»¼©·¬¸¬®¿ºº·½»¨·¬·²¹¬¸»Ü·²»§´¿²¼Î»±®¬ò Û¿¬¾±«²¼¬®¿ºº·½»¨·¬·²¹¬¸»Ü·²»§´¿²¼Î»±®¬¬®¿ª»´·²¹¬±©¿®¼¬¸»×ëº®»»©¿§©±«´¼¸¿ª»¬± ½®±¬¸»°¿¬¸±º¬®¿ºº·½»²¬»®·²¹¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µª·¿¬¸»´»º¬¬«®²·²¬±¬¸»°®±°±»¼ °®±¶»½¬òÚ±®¬¸¿¬®»¿±²ô¬¸»´»ª»´±º»®ª·½»¿¬¬¸·°®±¶»½¬¿½½»°±·²¬©¿»ª¿´«¿¬»¼º±®´¿¬» ²·¹¸¬¬®¿ºº·½½±²¼·¬·±²ò Ð¿¹»îïÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ×²¬¸»°¿¬§»¿®ôÃªYÅÌ±§Í¬±®§°¿®µ·²¹´±¬¸¿±°»²»¼±²Ø¿®¾±®Þ±«´»ª¿®¼ô¿²¼¬¸»É±®´¼ ±ºÝ±´±®²·¹¸¬¬·³»¿¬¬®¿½¬·±²¿¬Ü·²»§Ý¿´·º±®²·¿ß¼ª»²¬«®»¸¿¾»¹«²±°»®¿¬·²¹òÌ¸»®»º±®»ô¿ ®»»ª¿´«¿¬·±²±º¬¸»°±¬»²¬·¿´·³°¿½¬±ºß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ¬®¿ºº·½±²´¿¬»²·¹¸¬¬®¿ºº·½ ±°»®¿¬·±²¿¬¬¸»°®±¶»½¬»²¬®¿²½»±²Ü·²»§É¿§©¿½±²¼«½¬»¼òØ±«®´§³¿½¸·²»¬®¿ºº·½ ½±«²¬©»®»½±²¼«½¬»¼±ª»®¿Ú®·¼¿§²·¹¸¬¬±¼»¬»®³·²»¬¸»¸±«®±º¸·¹¸»¬¬®¿ºº·½ª±´«³»±² Ü·²»§É¿§ô©¸·½¸©¿½±²º·®³»¼¬±¾»¬¸»ïðïï°ò³ò¸±«®òÔ¿¬»²·¹¸¬¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²º±® Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ©¿¬¸»²¼»ª»´±°»¼ô¿²¼·²¬»®»½¬·±²¬«®²·²¹³±ª»³»²¬ª±´«³»©»®»¼»ª»´±°»¼ º±®¬¸»°®±¶»½¬»²¬®¿²½»«·²¹¬¸»³¿½¸·²»½±«²¬±²Ü·²»§É¿§¿²¼¬¸»´¿¬»²·¹¸¬°®±¶»½¬¬®·° ¹»²»®¿¬·±²ò Ì¿¾´»ïê¿²¼ïé¸±©¬¸»²»¬¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²º±®¬¸»¬©±¿®»¿±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ ·¬»òß¼»¬¿·´»¼¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²¬¿¾´»··²½´«¼»¼·² ß°°»²¼·¨Þ ô¿²¼¼»¬¿·´»¼ª±´«³» ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬©±®µ¸»»¬¿®»·²½´«¼»¼·² ß°°»²¼·¨Ý ò ÌïêæßßÒÊÌÙÉÔÒØ ßÞÔÛÎÛßÛÌÛØ×ÝÔÛÎ×ÐÛÒÛÎßÌ×ÑÒÛÛÕÜßÇßÌÛ×ÙØÌÑËÎ Ù®± É¿´µñÌ®¿²·¬×²¬»®²¿´Ð¿¾§Ò»¬Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·° Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·° Ô¿²¼Ë» Ì±¬¿´Ì±¬¿´ ×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬ Î»¬¿·´ïðèìçíèïèíéèîïîç Ü·²·²¹éëèéïïìîíëíêìêçïéîéëîçî Û²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬ïôíèéçðïðíîðéëëïëçìêðëîèçèè Ø±¬»´êìêíçïêïèîêíððîîîèèíïð Ì±¬¿´îôèççïìðîìííïïíçíëèïíìéðèçïïïôêïç Ò±¬»æÌ±¬¿´³¿§²±¬»¨¿½¬´§³¿¬½¸¬¸»«³±ºª¿´«»¼«»¬±®±«²¼·²¹ò ÌïéæßÞÒÊÌÙÔÒØ ßÞÔÛÎÛßÛÌÛØ×ÝÔÛÎ×ÐÛÒÛÎßÌ×ÑÒßÌÛ×ÙØÌÑËÎ Ù®± É¿´µñÌ®¿²·¬×²¬»®²¿´Ð¿¾§Ò»¬Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·° Ê»¸·½´»Ì®·° Ô¿²¼Ë» Ì±¬¿´Ì±¬¿´ ×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬×²Ñ«¬ Î»¬¿·´çíêèîïïìëêïìïçíí Ü·²·²¹èêðïðííïïðéðîëîë Û²¬»®¬¿·²³»²¬ðððððððððð Ø±¬»´ïèëïïèêëîððêíìëïðç Ì±¬¿´íêìïéîéêðéêìïíéêçïïêê Ò±¬»æÌ±¬¿´³¿§²±¬»¨¿½¬´§³¿¬½¸¬¸»«³±ºª¿´«»¼«»¬±®±«²¼·²¹ò ß²¿»³»²¬±º¬¸»°±¬»²¬·¿´·³°¿½¬±º°®±¶»½¬¬®¿ºº·½ª±´«³»¿¬¬¸»°®±¶»½¬»²¬®¿²½»±² Ü·²»§É¿§©¿³¿¼»òÌ¸»×ÝË½¿´½«´¿¬·±²¿®»·²½´«¼»¼·² ß°°»²¼·¨Ü òÌ¸»°®±¶»½¬¼®·ª»©¿§ ±²Ü·²»§É¿§·°®±¶»½¬»¼¬±±°»®¿¬»¿¬ÔÑÍß©·¬¸¿²×ÝËª¿´«»±ºðòíì¼«®·²¹¬¸»ïðïï°ò³ò ¸±«®±º¿©»»µ¼¿§·²¬¸»§»¿®îðïë©·¬¸¬¸»°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬òÌ¸»®»º±®»ô²±°®±¶»½¬·³°¿½¬· °®±¶»½¬»¼¬±±½½«®¿¬¬¸·´±½¿¬·±²ò Ð¿¹»îîÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì çòðÐÛßÕßÎÎ×ÊßÔßÒßÔÇÍ×Í ×²¬¸»¬®¿ºº·½¬«¼§º±®¬¸»îððêß¼¼»²¼«³±º¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ°®±¶»½¬ô¬¸»°»¿µ¸±«® ±º¿®®·ª¿´¿¬¬¸»°®±¶»½¬©¿¼»¬»®³·²»¼¬±¾»³·¼Í¿¬«®¼¿§¿º¬»®²±±²ô¿²¼¿²¿´§»©»®» ½±²¼«½¬»¼±º¬¸»©»¬¾±«²¼´»º¬¬«®²°±½µ»¬±²Ü·²»§É¿§¿¬Ý´»³»²¬·²»Í¬®»»¬¿²¼¿¬¬¸» °®±¶»½¬»²¬®¿²½»±²Ü·²»§É¿§òÞ»½¿«»±º¬¸»°®±°±»¼®»°±·¬·±²·²¹¿²¼¬¸»½¸¿²¹»·²¬¸» ³·¨±º«»¿¬¬¸»°®±¶»½¬¬±©¿®¼³±®»²·¹¸¬¬·³»«»ô¬¸»°»¿µ¸±«®±º¿®®·ª¿´©¿¿´± ®»»ª¿´«¿¬»¼òÐ®±¶»½¬¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²º±®¬¸»Í¿¬«®¼¿§ïîï°ò³ò¸±«®ô¬¸»Í¿¬«®¼¿§îí°ò³ò ¸±«®¿²¼¬¸»Ú®·¼¿§éè°ò³ò¸±«®©»®»½¿´½«´¿¬»¼ô¿²¼¬¸»®»«´¬©»®»½±³°¿®»¼¬±¬¸» ©»»µ¼¿§°ò³ò°»¿µ¸±«®òÌ¸»¸·¹¸»¬·²¾±«²¼°®±¶»½¬¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²©¿º±«²¼¬±¾»¼«®·²¹ ¬¸»Ú®·¼¿§éè°ò³ò¸±«®ò×²¬»®»½¬·±²¬«®²·²¹³±ª»³»²¬½±«²¬©»®»¬¸»²½±´´»½¬»¼¿¬¬¸» ·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºÜ·²»§É¿§¿¬Ý´»³»²¬·²»Í¬®»»¬¿²¼¬¸»°®±¶»½¬»²¬®¿²½»¼«®·²¹¬¸»Ú®·¼¿§éè °ò³ò¸±«®òË·²¹¬¸»»½±«²¬¿²¼¬¸»Ú®·¼¿§éè°ò³ò¸±«®°®±¶»½¬¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²ôº«¬«®»îðïë ¬«®²·²¹³±ª»³»²¬ª±´«³»©»®»¼»ª»´±°»¼¬±»¨¿³·²»»¨°»½¬»¼±°»®¿¬·±²±º¬¸»»¬©± ·²¬»®»½¬·±²¼«®·²¹¬¸»°»¿µ¿®®·ª¿´¸±«®±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ôº±½«·²¹±²©¸»¬¸»®¬¸»©»¬¾±«²¼ ´»º¬¬«®²°±½µ»¬¸¿ª»«ºº·½·»²¬½¿°¿½·¬§ò Ì¿¾´»ïè¸±©¬¸»½±³°¿®·±²±º²»¬¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±² º±®¬¸»¬©±¿®»¿±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬·¬»¼«®·²¹¬¸»Í¿¬«®¼¿§ïîï°ò³ò¸±«®ô¬¸»Í¿¬«®¼¿§îí°ò³ò ¸±«®¿²¼¬¸»Ú®·¼¿§éè°ò³ò¸±«®òß¼»¬¿·´»¼¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²¬¿¾´»··²½´«¼»¼·² ß°°»²¼·¨Þ ô ¿²¼¼»¬¿·´»¼ª±´«³»¼»ª»´±°³»²¬©±®µ¸»»¬¿®»·²½´«¼»¼·² ß°°»²¼·¨Ý ò ÌïèæÒÊÌÙÝÜÌÐ ßÞÔÛÛÌÛØ×ÝÔÛÎ×ÐÛÒÛÎßÌ×ÑÒÑÓÐßÎ×ÍÑÒÍÚÑÎ×ÚÚÛÎÛÒÌ×ÓÛÛÎ×ÑÜÍ Ò»¬ Ì·³»Ð»®·±¼ Ì±¬¿´ ×²Ñ«¬ É»»µ¼¿§ëê°ò³ò°»¿µ¸±«®ïôðëéêêç ïôéîê Í¿¬«®¼¿§ïîï°ò³ò¸±«®çïçêçë ïôêïì Í¿¬«®¼¿§îí°ò³ò¸±«®ïôðîíëïé ïôëíç Ú®·¼¿§éè°ò³ò¸±«®ïôèèðèçð îôééð Ò±¬»æÌ±¬¿´³¿§²±¬»¨¿½¬´§³¿¬½¸¬¸»«³±ºª¿´«»¼«»¬±®±«²¼·²¹ò ß²¿»³»²¬±º¬¸»°±¬»²¬·¿´·³°¿½¬±º°®±¶»½¬¬®¿ºº·½ª±´«³»¿¬¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºÜ·²»§ É¿§¿¬Ý´»³»²¬·²»Í¬®»»¬¿²¼¬¸»°®±¶»½¬»²¬®¿²½»©¿³¿¼»òÌ¸»×ÝË½¿´½«´¿¬·±²¿®» ·²½´«¼»¼·² ß°°»²¼·¨Ü òÞ±¬¸¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±²Ü·²»§É¿§¿®»°®±¶»½¬»¼¬±±°»®¿¬»¿¬ ÔÑÍß©·¬¸×ÝËª¿´«»´»¬¸¿²ðòêð¼«®·²¹¬¸»éè°ò³ò¸±«®±º¿Ú®·¼¿§·²¬¸»§»¿®îðïë©·¬¸ ¬¸»°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬ò ß¯«»«·²¹¿²¿´§·«·²¹¬¸»Í§²½¸®±é±º¬©¿®»©¿½±²¼«½¬»¼¬±¼»¬»®³·²»¬¸»¯«»«» ´»²¹¬¸·²¬¸»©»¬¾±«²¼´»º¬¬«®²°±½µ»¬±²Ü·²»§É¿§¿¬Ý´»³»²¬·²»Í¬®»»¬¿²¼¿¬¬¸» °®±¶»½¬»²¬®¿²½»òÌ¸»´»²¹¬¸±º¬¸»©»¬¾±«²¼¬«®²°±½µ»¬¿¬¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºÜ·²»§É¿§ ¿²¼Ý´»³»²¬·²»Í¬®»»¬·îëðº»»¬ô¿²¼¿¬¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºÜ·²»§É¿§¿²¼Ð®±¶»½¬Û²¬®¿²½»·¬ ¬¸ ·îíðº»»¬òÌ¸»®»«´¬¸±©¬¸¿¬¬¸»çë°»®½»²¬·´»¯«»«»´»²¹¬¸·²¬¸»»¬«®²°±½µ»¬©·´´¾» çêº»»¬¿²¼îîèº»»¬ô®»°»½¬·ª»´§òÌ¸»®»º±®»ô¬¸»¬±®¿¹»´»²¹¬¸¿¬¬¸»»´»º¬¬«®²°±½µ»¬ ¼«®·²¹¬¸»Ú®·¼¿§éè°ò³ò¸±«®·¿¼»¯«¿¬»òÏ«»«·²¹®»«´¬¿®»·²½´«¼»¼·² ß°°»²¼·¨Ü ò Ð¿¹»îíÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ïðòðÍØßÎÛÜÐßÎÕ×ÒÙßÒßÔÇÍ×Í ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ¿½«®®»²¬´§½±²¬®«½¬»¼ø¬¸»ÎÜÛ°±®¬·±²±ºß®»¿ß÷¸¿¿¶±·²¬°¿®µ·²¹ ¹¿®¿¹»¬¸¿¬»¨¬»²¼¬©±´»ª»´¾»´±©¬¸»·¬»¿²¼·²½´«¼»¿³«´¬·´»ª»´¿¾±ª»¹®¿¼»¹¿®¿¹»·² ¬¸»±«¬¸©»¬°±®¬·±²±º¬¸»·¬»òÌ¸»»°¿®µ·²¹º¿½·´·¬·»¸¿ª»¿°±¬»²¬·¿´½¿°¿½·¬§±ºíôðëð ¿«¬±³±¾·´»°¿®µ·²¹°¿½»ô¿´¬¸±«¹¸¬¸»½«®®»²¬½¿°¿½·¬§·îôêðê°¿½»¾»½¿«»¬¸»¬±°¼»½µ ±º¬¸»¬®«½¬«®»¸¿²±¬¾»»²º·²·¸»¼òÉ¸»²¬¸»¸±¬»´¿®»½±²¬®«½¬»¼·²ß®»¿ßô¿²¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ïëð°¿½»©·´´¾»°®±ª·¼»¼±²¬¸»¸±¬»´·¬»ô¾®·²¹·²¹¬¸»¬±¬¿´ß®»¿ß°¿®µ·²¹«°°´§¬±íôîðð °¿½»òß®»¿Þô©¸»²½±²¬®«½¬»¼ô©·´´¿¼¼¿²±¬¸»®ïôêðð°¿®µ·²¹°¿½»ô®»«´¬·²¹·²¿¬±¬¿´ «°°´§¿¬¾«·´¼±«¬±º¬¸»»²¬·®»°®±¶»½¬±ºìôèðð°¿®µ·²¹°¿½»ò ×¬»®·½±²¼«½¬»¼¿²¿²¿´§·±º¬¸»°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼º±®»¿½¸±º¬¸»»¬¸®»»¬¿¹»±º ¼»ª»´±°³»²¬±º¬¸»°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬¬±¼»¬»®³·²»·º¬¸»¿ª¿·´¿¾´»°¿®µ·²¹«°°´§©±«´¼¾» ¿¼»¯«¿¬»¬±³»»¬¬¸»°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬²»»¼òÌ¸»Ë®¾¿²Ô¿²¼×²¬·¬«¬»øËÔ×÷¸¿°«¾´·¸»¼¿ ³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§¬¸¿¬·©·¼»´§«»¼·²¼»¬»®³·²·²¹¸±©°¿®µ·²¹º¿½·´·¬·»³¿§¾»¸¿®»¼¾§ ³«´¬·°´»´¿²¼«»òÌ¸»¿²¿´§·±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ù°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼©¿½±²¼«½¬»¼«·²¹¬¸· ³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§ô©¸·½¸½±²·¬±º¬©±¬»°åøï÷¼»¬»®³·²¿¬·±²±º¬¸»°»¿µ°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼º±® »¿½¸¬§°»±º´¿²¼«»±²·¬»ô¿²¼øî÷·¼»²¬·º·½¿¬·±²±º¬¸»°®±°±®¬·±²±º¬¸»°»¿µ°¿®µ·²¹ ¼»³¿²¼º±®»¿½¸´¿²¼«»¬¸¿¬±½½«®¼«®·²¹»¿½¸¸±«®±º¬¸»¼¿§òÌ¸·³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§¿´´±©º±® ¬¸»¼»¬»®³·²¿¬·±²±º©¸»¬¸»®¬¸»®»¿®»±°°±®¬«²·¬·»¬±¸¿®»°¿®µ·²¹«°°´§¿³±²¹´¿²¼«»ò ïðòï ßßÐÜ ÎÛßßÎÕ×ÒÙÛÓßÒÜ Ð¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼»¬·³¿¬»©»®»¼»ª»´±°»¼º±®¬¸»·²¼·ª·¼«¿´´¿²¼«»±²¬¸»¾¿·±º°»¿µ ²¼ °¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼º¿½¬±®½±²¬¿·²»¼·²¬¸»×ÌÛ°«¾´·½¿¬·±² Ð¿®µ·²¹Ù»²»®¿¬·±²ô îÛ¼·¬·±²ô±®¬¸» ²¼ Ë®¾¿²Ô¿²¼×²¬·¬«¬»°«¾´·½¿¬·±² Í¸¿®»¼Ð¿®µ·²¹ ôîÛ¼·¬·±²òß³»²¬·±²»¼»¿®´·»®·²¬¸»Ì®·° Ù»²»®¿¬·±²»½¬·±²ô¬¸»°®±°±»¼»²¬·¬´»³»²¬©»®»½´¿·º·»¼¬±¼·ºº»®»²¬´¿²¼«»¿¼»º·²»¼ ¾§¬¸»×ÌÛò Ì¿¾´»ïç·´´«¬®¿¬»¬¸»°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼½¿´½«´¿¬·±²º±®»¿½¸´¿²¼«»·²ß®»¿ß¿²¼ ·²½±®°±®¿¬»³±¼»«»¿¼¶«¬³»²¬½±²·¬»²¬©·¬¸¬¸»¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²½¿´½«´¿¬·±²º±®¬¸» °®±¶»½¬òß´¬¸±«¹¸«³³»¼º±®¿¬±¬¿´ô²±¬¿´´±º¬¸»°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼°»¿µ¿¬¬¸»»¨¿½¬¿³» ¬·³»ò×¬¿´±·²½´«¼»¿½±³°¿®·±²¬±¬¸»Ý·¬§½±¼»®»¯«·®»¼°¿®µ·²¹·º»¿½¸´¿²¼«»·¿»»¼ ·²¼»°»²¼»²¬´§ò ß®»¿ßÎÜÛÍ¸¿®»¼Ð¿®µ·²¹ß²¿´§·øÒ±Ø±¬»´÷ Ì¸»ËÔ×Í¸¿®»¼Ð¿®µ·²¹³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§©¿¿°°´·»¼¿²¼·®»º´»½¬»¼·² Ì¿¾´»îð òÌ¸»ËÔ× ³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§·¼»²¬·º·»¸±©¬¸»°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼¾§´¿²¼«»ª¿®§¾§¸±«®±º¬¸»¼¿§ô·²¬»®³ ±º¬¸»°»®½»²¬¿¹»±º°»¿µ¼»³¿²¼òÌ¸»°»¿µ°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼·®»¿½¸»¼¿¬èæððÐÓ¿²¼¬±¬¿´ îôïëç°¿½»òÌ¸»Ý·¬§®»¯«»¬»¼¿ëû³¿®¹·²±²¬±°±º¬¸»°®±¶»½¬»¼°»¿µ°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼ô ©¸·½¸®»«´¬·²¿¬±¬¿´°¿®µ·²¹®»¯«·®»³»²¬±ºîôîêé°¿½»òÌ¸»»¨·¬·²¹°¿®µ·²¹«°°´§±º îôêðê°¿½»·²ß®»¿ß©±«´¼¿½½±³³±¼¿¬»¬¸»°»¿µ°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼º±®¬¸»°®±¶»½¬¾»º±®» ¬¸»¸±¬»´¿®»½±²¬®«½¬»¼¿²¼©±«´¼°®±ª·¼»¿«®°´«±º¿¬´»¿¬ííç°¿½»¿¬¿´´¸±«®±º¬¸» ¼¿§ò Ð¿¹»îìÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ÌïçæÐÜÞÔË¬ßß ßÞÔÛßÎÕ×ÒÙÛÓßÒÜÇßÒÜÍÛÎÛß Code Code Raw DemandDemandMode Split Land UseQuantityDemand Rate RequirementsRequired (Spaces)(Spaces)Adjustments Retail Walk % reduction20% 5.5/KSF upto 100 KSF 133,683Sq.ft4.1/KSF 548274 Shopping Center702Transit % reduction5% 4.5/KSF over 100 KSF Internal % reduction25% Dining Walk % reduction20% 123,372Sq.ft8/KSF98715.4/KSF1,9001,045 Quality RestaurantTransit % reduction5% Internal % reduction20% Walk % reduction20% 24,816Sq.ft5.5/KSF1368.2/KSF20392 High-Turnover RestaurantTransit % reduction5% Internal % reduction30% Entertainment Walk % reduction10% 17/KSF81210/KSF478358 47,769Sq.ft Night Club/BarTransit % reduction5% Internal % reduction10% Walk % reduction10% 0.4/seat + 900Seats8200.4/Seat360234 Live Theater Transit % reduction20% 0.8/employee Internal % reduction5% Walk % reduction20% 2,165Seats0.3/seat + 2/screen0.26/Seat563366 Multiplex Movie Theater650Transit % reduction0% 28Internal % reduction15% Walk % reduction20% 47,665Sq.ft2466/lane3.1/KSF 14975 BowlingTransit % reduction5% Internal % reduction25% Walk % reduction10% 11,000Sq.ft18717/KSF10/KSF11083 Outdoor RestaurantTransit % reduction5% Internal % reduction10% Hotel 0.8/room1,013 Hotel Rooms866Rooms0.25/emp317 1,3711,371 P = 1.13X -60 Time Share Units400Units8/KSF food/bev128 Subtotal Hotel1,266Rooms8/KSF Mtg Rms1,173 Total7,1983,898Total5,682Total Ò±¬»æÌ±¬¿´³¿§²±¬»¨¿½¬´§³¿¬½¸¬¸»«³±ºª¿´«»¼«»¬±®±«²¼·²¹ò ß®»¿ßÞ«·´¼Ñ«¬Í¸¿®»¼Ð¿®µ·²¹ß²¿´§·øÎÜÛ¿²¼Ø±¬»´÷ Ì¸»ËÔ×Í¸¿®»¼Ð¿®µ·²¹³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§©¿¿°°´·»¼¿²¼·®»º´»½¬»¼·² Ì¿¾´»îï òÌ¸»°»¿µ°¿®µ·²¹ ¼»³¿²¼·®»¿½¸»¼¿¬èæðð°ò³ò¿²¼¬±¬¿´íôîìî°¿½»òß¼¼·²¹¿ëû³¿®¹·²±²¬±°±º¬¸» °®±¶»½¬»¼°»¿µ°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼©·´´®»«´¬·²¬±¿¬±¬¿´°¿®µ·²¹®»¯«·®»³»²¬±ºíôìðì°¿½»ò×² ¿¼¼·¬·±²¬±¬¸»°®±°±»¼°¿®µ·²¹«°°´§±ºíôîðð°¿½»ô·¬·°±·¾´»¬±°®±ª·¼»¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ °¿®µ·²¹°¿½»·²¬¸»»¨·¬·²¹°¿®µ·²¹¹¿®¿¹»¬¸®±«¹¸¬¸»«»±ºª¿´»¬±°»®¿¬·±²·²¬¸»´±¿¼·²¹ ¼±½µ¬¸»¬®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²½»²¬»®ô¿²¼±²´»ª»´ï±º¬¸»°¿®µ·²¹¬®«½¬«®»¬±¿½½±³³±¼¿¬» ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´¼»³¿²¼òÞ»½¿«»¬¸»°»¿µ¾»¹·²¿¬®±«¹¸´§é°ò³ò¿²¼·¿±½·¿¬»¼©·¬¸¸»¿ª§ ¼·²·²¹«»ôª¿´»¬±°»®¿¬·±²¿®»¿º»¿·¾´»±´«¬·±²¿¬¬¸·¬·³»òÌ¸»´±¿¼·²¹¼±½µ¿²¼¬¸» ¬®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²½»²¬»®©·´´²±¬¾»·²«»º±®¬¸»·®°®·³¿®§º«²½¬·±²¿¬¬¸·¬·³»ô±¬¸»»¿®»¿ ©·´´¾»¿ª¿·´¿¾´»º±®ª¿´»¬°¿®µ·²¹±º½¿®òÌ¸»®»º±®»ô©·¬¸¬¸»«»±ºª¿´»¬°¿®µ·²¹ô¬¸»°®±°±»¼ °¿®µ·²¹«°°´§·²ß®»¿ß©±«´¼¿´±¿½½±³³±¼¿¬»¬¸»°»¿µ°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼º±®¬¸»°®±¶»½¬ ¿º¬»®¬¸»¸±¬»´¿®»½±²¬®«½¬»¼ò Ð¿¹»îëÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ÌîðæÎÜÛÐÜÞØ¬ßßøÒØ÷ ßÞÔÛßÎÕ×ÒÙÛÓßÒÜÇÑËÎÎÛßÑÑÌÛÔ Í¸±°°·²¹Ó«´¬·°´»¨Ó±ª·»Ò·¹¸¬Ý´«¾Ï«¿´·¬§Ø·¹¸Ì«®²±ª»®Ô·ª»Ñ«¬¼±±® Ô¿²¼Ë»Þ±©´·²¹Ì±¬¿´ Ý»²¬»®Ì¸»¿¬»®Þ¿®Î»¬¿«®¿²¬Î»¬¿«®¿²¬Ì¸»¿¬»®Î»¬¿«®¿²¬ Ð¿®µ·²¹ Ð»¿µ Ü»³¿²¼¾§ îéìíêêíëèéëïðìëçîîíìèí Ü»³¿²¼ Ø±«® Ø±«®ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½» êæððßÓðûððûððûððûððûððûððûððûð éæððßÓíûèðûððûððûððûðîûîðûððûðïð èæððßÓïðûîéðûððûððûððûðëûëðûððûðíî çæððßÓíðûèîðûððûððûððûðïðûçðûððûðçï ïðæððßÓìëûïîíðûððûððûððûðîðûïèðûððûðïìî ïïæððßÓéíûîðððûððûððûðîïûîïçíðûîèðûððûðììé ïîæððÐÓèëûîííîëûçîðûððûðêìûêêçëðûìêðûððûðïôðíç ïæððÐÓçëûîêðêëûîíèðûððûðëçûêïééðûêìëðûïïéðûðïôîçê îæððÐÓïððûîéìêëûîíèðûððûðéìûééíêðûëëïððûîíìðûðïôëéì íæððÐÓïððûîéìêëûîíèðûððûðíïûíîìêðûëëïððûîíìðûðïôïîë ìæððÐÓçðûîìéêëûîíèðûððûðëðûëîíëðûìêïððûîíìðûðïôîèé ëæððÐÓéëûîðêêëûîíèðûðëïûíèíçûìðèéðûêìëðûïïéðûðïôðéï êæððÐÓêëûïéèéëûîéëìðûïìíèíûêîéîûéëîçðûèíðûðìðûííïôëîê éæððÐÓêðûïêìèðûîçíëéûîðìççûéìïððûïðìëïððûçîëðûïïéëéûìéîôðíé èæððÐÓëëûïëïïððûíêêéíûîêïïððûéëèèûçîðïððûçîïððûîíìéíûêï îôïëç çæððÐÓìðûïïðèëûíïïèëûíðìèïûêïðûðïððûçîïððûîíìèëûéïïôïèî ïðæððÐÓíèûïðìçðûíîççîûíîçðûððûðçðûèíïððûîíìçîûéêïôïëê ïïæððÐÓïíûíêéëûîéëçêûíììðûððûðéðûêìëðûïïéçêûèðçïë ïîæððßÓðûððûðïððûíëèðûððûðëðûìêðûðïððûèíìèé Ò±¬»æÌ±¬¿´³¿§²±¬»¨¿½¬´§³¿¬½¸¬¸»«³±ºª¿´«»¼«»¬±®±«²¼·²¹ò Ð¿¹»îêÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ÌîïæÐÜÞØ¬ßß ßÞÔÛßÎÕ×ÒÙÛÓßÒÜÇÑËÎÎÛß Ø±¬»´Í¸±°°·²¹Ó«´¬·°´»¨Ó±ª·»Ò·¹¸¬Ý´«¾Ï«¿´·¬§Ø·¹¸Ì«®²±ª»®Ô·ª»Ñ«¬¼±±® Ô¿²¼Ë»Þ±©´·²¹Ì±¬¿´ Ý»²¬»®Ì¸»¿¬»®Þ¿®Î»¬¿«®¿²¬Î»¬¿«®¿²¬Ì¸»¿¬»®Î»¬¿«®¿²¬ Ð¿®µ·²¹ Ð»¿µ Ü»³¿²¼¾§ ïíéïîéìíêêíëèéëïðìëçîîíìèí Ü»³¿²¼ Ø±«® Ø±«®ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½» êæððßÓïððûïôíéïðûððûððûððûððûððûððûððûðïôíéï éæððßÓçëûïôíðîíûèðûððûððûððûðîûîðûððûðïôíïí èæððßÓçïûïôîìèïðûîéðûððûððûððûðëûëðûððûðïôîèð çæððßÓèéûïôïçííðûèîðûððûððûððûðïðûçðûððûðïôîèì ïðæððßÓèîûïôïîììëûïîíðûððûððûððûðîðûïèðûððûðïôîêê ïïæððßÓïððûïôíéïéíûîðððûððûððûðîïûîïçíðûîèðûððûðïôèïè ïîæððÐÓçèûïôíììèëûîííîëûçîðûððûðêìûêêçëðûìêðûððûðîôíèí ïæððÐÓçðûïôîíìçëûîêðêëûîíèðûððûðëçûêïééðûêìëðûïïéðûðîôëíð îæððÐÓèîûïôïîìïððûîéìêëûîíèðûððûðéìûééíêðûëëïððûîíìðûðîôêçç íæððÐÓéðûçêðïððûîéìêëûîíèðûððûðíïûíîìêðûëëïððûîíìðûðîôðèë ìæððÐÓéðûçêðçðûîìéêëûîíèðûððûðëðûëîíëðûìêïððûîíìðûðîôîìé ëæððÐÓêêûçðëéëûîðêêëûîíèðûðëïûíèíçûìðèéðûêìëðûïïéðûðïôçéë êæððÐÓéíûïôððïêëûïéèéëûîéëìðûïìíèíûêîéîûéëîçðûèíðûðìðûííîôëîé éæððÐÓèïûïôïïïêðûïêìèðûîçíëéûîðìççûéìïððûïðìëïððûçîëðûïïéëéûìéíôïìé èæððÐÓéçûïôðèíëëûïëïïððûíêêéíûîêïïððûéëèèûçîðïððûçîïððûîíìéíûêï íôîìî çæððÐÓèðûïôðçéìðûïïðèëûíïïèëûíðìèïûêïðûðïððûçîïððûîíìèëûéïîôîéç ïðæððÐÓèðûïôðçéíèûïðìçðûíîççîûíîçðûððûðçðûèíïððûîíìçîûéêîôîëí ïïæððÐÓïððûïôíéïïíûíêéëûîéëçêûíììðûððûðéðûêìëðûïïéçêûèðîôîèê ïîæððßÓïððûïôíéïðûððûðïððûíëèðûððûðëðûìêðûðïððûèíïôèëè Ò±¬»æÌ±¬¿´³¿§²±¬»¨¿½¬´§³¿¬½¸¬¸»«³±ºª¿´«»¼«»¬±®±«²¼·²¹ò Ð¿¹»îéÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ïðòî ÐÞÑøßßÞ÷ÐÜ ÎÑÖÛÝÌË×ÔÜËÌÎÛßÍßÒÜßÎÕ×ÒÙÛÓßÒÜ Ð¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼»¬·³¿¬»©»®»¼»ª»´±°»¼º±®¬¸»·²¼·ª·¼«¿´´¿²¼«»·²¾±¬¸ß®»¿ß¿²¼Þô ¿«³·²¹¬¸»¾«·´¼±«¬±º¬¸»»²¬·®»°®±¶»½¬ò Ì¿¾´»îî·´´«¬®¿¬»¬¸»°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼ ½¿´½«´¿¬·±²º±®»¿½¸´¿²¼«»·²ß®»¿ß¿²¼Þ¿²¼·²½±®°±®¿¬»³±¼»«»¿¼¶«¬³»²¬ ½±²·¬»²¬©·¬¸¬¸»¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²½¿´½«´¿¬·±²º±®¬¸»°®±¶»½¬òß´¬¸±«¹¸«³³»¼º±®¿¬±¬¿´ô²±¬ ¿´´±º¬¸»°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼°»¿µ¿¬¬¸»»¨¿½¬¿³»¬·³»ò×¬¿´±·²½´«¼»¿½±³°¿®·±²¬±¬¸» Ý·¬§½±¼»®»¯«·®»¼°¿®µ·²¹·º»¿½¸´¿²¼«»·¿»»¼·²¼»°»²¼»²¬´§ò ÌîîæÐÜÞÔË¬ßßÞ ßÞÔÛßÎÕ×ÒÙÛÓßÒÜÇßÒÜÍÛÎÛßßÒÜ Code Code Raw DemandDemandMode Split Land UseQuantityDemand Rate RequirementsRequired (Spaces)(Spaces)Adjustments Retail Walk % reduction20% 5.5/KSF upto 100 KSF 248,033Sq.ft4.1/KSF1,017508 Shopping Center 1216Transit % reduction5% 4.5/KSF over 100 KSF Internal % reduction25% Dining Walk % reduction20% 134,274Sq.ft8/KSF107415.4/KSF2,0681,137 Quality Restaurant Transit % reduction5% Internal % reduction20% Walk % reduction20% 29,714Sq.ft5.5/KSF1638.2/KSF244110 High-Turnover RestaurantTransit % reduction5% Internal % reduction30% Entertainment Walk % reduction10% 47,769Sq.ft17/KSF81210/KSF478358 Night Club/BarTransit % reduction5% Internal % reduction10% Walk % reduction10% 0.4/seat + 900Seats8200.4/Seat360234 Live Theater Transit % reduction20% 0.8/employee Internal % reduction5% Walk % reduction20% 2,165Seats0.3/seat + 2/screen0.26/Seat563366 Multiplex Movie Theater650Transit % reduction0% 28Internal % reduction15% Walk % reduction20% 47,665Sq.ft6/lane75 2463.1/KSF149 Bowling Transit % reduction5% Internal % reduction25% Walk % reduction10% 11,000Sq.ft17/KSF18710/KSF11083 Outdoor Restaurant Transit % reduction5% Internal % reduction10% Hotel 0.8/room1,302 Hotel Rooms1,228Rooms0.25/emp407 1,7801,780 P = 1.13X -60 Time Share Units400Units8/KSF food/bev128 Subtotal Hotel1,628Rooms8/KSF Mtg Rms1,173 TotalTotal8,2076,768Total4,651 Ò±¬»æÌ±¬¿´³¿§²±¬»¨¿½¬´§³¿¬½¸¬¸»«³±ºª¿´«»¼«»¬±®±«²¼·²¹ò Þ«·´¼Ñ«¬øß®»¿ß¿²¼Þ÷Í¸¿®»¼Ð¿®µ·²¹ß²¿´§· Ì¸»ËÔ×Í¸¿®»¼Ð¿®µ·²¹³»¬¸±¼±´±¹§©¿¿°°´·»¼¿²¼·®»º´»½¬»¼·² Ì¿¾´»îí òÌ¸»°»¿µ°¿®µ·²¹ ¼»³¿²¼·®»¿½¸»¼¿¬èæððÐÓ¿²¼¬±¬¿´íôéçí°¿½»òß¼¼·²¹¿ëû³¿®¹·²±²¬±°±º¬¸» °®±¶»½¬»¼°»¿µ°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼®»«´¬·²¿¬±¬¿´°¿®µ·²¹®»¯«·®»³»²¬±ºíôçèî°¿½»òÌ¸» °®±°±»¼°¿®µ·²¹«°°´§±ºìôèðð°¿½»¿¬¾«·´¼±«¬±º¬¸»»²¬·®»°®±¶»½¬·²ß®»¿ß¿²¼Þ ©±«´¼¿½½±³³±¼¿¬»¬¸»°»¿µ°¿®µ·²¹¼»³¿²¼º±®¬¸»°®±¶»½¬¿²¼©±«´¼°®±ª·¼»¿«®°´«±º ¿¬´»¿¬èïè°¿½»¿¬¿´´¸±«®±º¬¸»¼¿§ò Ð¿¹»îèÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ÌîíæÞÑÐÜÞØ¬ßßÞ ßÞÔÛË×ÔÜËÌßÎÕ×ÒÙÛÓßÒÜÇÑËÎÎÛßßÒÜ Ø±¬»´Í¸±°°·²¹Ó«´¬·°´»¨Ó±ª·»Ò·¹¸¬Ý´«¾Ï«¿´·¬§Ø·¹¸Ì«®²±ª»®Ô·ª»Ñ«¬¼±±® Ô¿²¼Ë»Þ±©´·²¹Ì±¬¿´ Ý»²¬»®Ì¸»¿¬»®Þ¿®Î»¬¿«®¿²¬Î»¬¿«®¿²¬Ì¸»¿¬»®Î»¬¿«®¿²¬ Ð¿®µ·²¹ Ð»¿µ Ü»³¿²¼¾§ ïéèðëðèíêêíëèéëïïíéïïðîíìèí Ü»³¿²¼ Ø±«® Ø±«®ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½»ûÍ°¿½» êæððßÓïððûïôéèððûððûððûððûððûððûððûððûðïôéèð éæððßÓçëûïôêçïíûïëðûððûððûððûðîûîðûððûðïôéðè èæððßÓçïûïôêïçïðûëïðûððûððûððûðëûêðûððûðïôêéê çæððßÓèéûïôëìèíðûïëîðûððûððûððûðïðûïïðûððûðïôéïî ïðæððßÓèîûïôìëçìëûîîçðûððûððûððûðîðûîîðûððûðïôéïð ïïæððßÓïððûïôéèðéíûíéïðûððûððûðîïûîíçíðûííðûððûðîôìîî ïîæððÐÓçèûïôéììèëûìíîîëûçîðûððûðêìûéîèëðûëëðûððûðíôðëð ïæððÐÓçðûïôêðîçëûìèíêëûîíèðûððûðëçûêéïéðûééëðûïïéðûðíôïèé îæððÐÓèîûïôìëçïððûëðèêëûîíèðûððûðéìûèìïêðûêêïððûîíìðûðíôíìé íæððÐÓéðûïôîìêïððûëðèêëûîíèðûððûðíïûíëîêðûêêïððûîíìðûðîôêìì ìæððÐÓéðûïôîìêçðûìëéêëûîíèðûððûðëðûëêçëðûëëïððûîíìðûðîôéçè ëæððÐÓêêûïôïéëéëûíèïêëûîíèðûðëïûíèíçûììíéðûééëðûïïéðûðîôìêç êæððÐÓéíûïôîççêëûííðéëûîéëìðûïìíèíûêîéîûèïççðûççðûðìðûíííôðêð éæððÐÓèïûïôììîêðûíðëèðûîçíëéûîðìççûéìïððûïïíéïððûïïðëðûïïéëéûìéíôéîç èæððÐÓéçûïôìðêëëûîéçïððûíêêéíûîêïïððûéëèèûïððïïððûïïðïððûîíìéíûêï íôéçí çæððÐÓèðûïôìîììðûîðíèëûíïïèëûíðìèïûêïðûðïððûïïðïððûîíìèëûéïîôéïè ïðæððÐÓèðûïôìîìíèûïçíçðûíîççîûíîçðûððûðçðûççïððûîíìçîûéêîôêèë ïïæððÐÓïððûïôéèðïíûêêéëûîéëçêûíììðûððûðéðûééëðûïïéçêûèðîôéíè ïîæððßÓïððûïôéèððûððûðïððûíëèðûððûðëðûëëðûðïððûèíîôîéê Ò±¬»æÌ±¬¿´³¿§²±¬»¨¿½¬´§³¿¬½¸¬¸»«³±ºª¿´«»¼«»¬±®±«²¼·²¹ò Ð¿¹»îçÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ Ü®¿º¬ Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²ß²¿´§·Ë°¼¿¬» Î»°±®¬ßòì ïïòðÐÛÜÛÍÌÎ×ßÒßÒÜÌÎßÒÍ×ÌßÒßÔÇÍ×Í Þ¿»¼±²¬¸»°»¿µ¸±«®¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²½¿´½«´¿¬·±²¼·½«»¼»¿®´·»®ô¬¸»°»¼»¬®·¿²¬®·°º±® ¬¸»°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬©»®»¼»¬»®³·²»¼º®±³¬¸»©¿´µ·²¹¿²¼¬®¿²·¬¬®·°½¿´½«´¿¬»¼·²¬¸»Ì®·° Ù»²»®¿¬·±²»½¬·±²¼·½«»¼»¿®´·»®òÌ¸»°±¬»²¬·¿´·³°¿½¬±º¬¸»¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´°»¼»¬®·¿²¬®·° ¹»²»®¿¬»¼¾§¬¸»Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ®»°±·¬·±²·²¹±²¬¸»·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºØ¿®¾±®Þ±«´»ª¿®¼¿²¼ Ü·²»§É¿§¿²¼Ø¿®¾±®Þ±«´»ª¿®¼¿²¼Õ¿¬»´´¿ßª»²«»©»®»¿»»¼¼«®·²¹¬¸»°ò³ò°»¿µ ¸±«®òÐ»¿µ¸±«®°»¼»¬®·¿²½±«²¬©»®»½±²¼«½¬»¼¿¬¬¸»»¬©±·²¬»®»½¬·±²òÌ¸»¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ °»¼»¬®·¿²¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬»¼¾§¬¸»°®±¶»½¬©»®»¿¼¼»¼¬±¬¸»»¨·¬·²¹½±«²¬ô¿²¼¬¸»®»«´¬·²¹ °»¼»¬®·¿²ª±´«³»©»®»½±³°¿®»¼¬±¬¸»½¿°¿½·¬§±º¬¸»½®±©¿´µ¿¬¬¸»»·²¬»®»½¬·±²ò Ì¸»¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²½¿´½«´¿¬·±²¼»¬»®³·²»¼¬¸¿¬îîï·²¾±«²¼¿²¼ïéí±«¬¾±«²¼©¿´µ·²¹¬®·° ©·´´¾»¹»²»®¿¬»¼¼«®·²¹¬¸»°ò³ò°»¿µ¸±«®¾§¬¸»°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬ò×²¬¸»ïçççÐ±·²¬» ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜ¬®¿ºº·½¬«¼§ô¬¸»¸±«®´§½¿°¿½·¬§±º¬¸»½®±©¿´µ¿¬»¿½¸±º¬¸»¬©± ·²¬»®»½¬·±²¿¬´»ª»´±º»®ª·½»Ü©¿½¿´½«´¿¬»¼¬±¾»ïôððð°»®±²òÌ¸»®»º±®»ô»ª»²·ºïððû ±º¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µª··¬±®½®±»¼Ø¿®¾±®Þ±«´»ª¿®¼ô¬¸»§©±«´¼²±¬»¨½»»¼¬¸» ½¿°¿½·¬§±º¬¸»½®±©¿´µ¿ª¿·´¿¾´»¬±¬¸»³ò Ì¸»°»¼»¬®·¿²ª±´«³»¹»²»®¿¬»¼¾§¬¸»°®±°±»¼ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ°®±¶»½¬©·´´²±¬ ®»«´¬·²«²¿½½»°¬¿¾´»´»ª»´±º»®ª·½»·²¬¸»½®±©¿´µ¿´±²¹Ø¿®¾±®Þ±«´»ª¿®¼¿²¼©·´´¸¿ª» ²±·¹²·º·½¿²¬¿¼ª»®»·³°¿½¬±²ª»¸·½«´¿®¬®¿ºº·½±°»®¿¬·±²ò Ì¸»¬®·°¹»²»®¿¬·±²½¿´½«´¿¬·±²¿´±¼»¬»®³·²»¼¬¸¿¬éê·²¾±«²¼¿²¼ëî±«¬¾±«²¼¬®¿²·¬¬®·° ¾»½¿®®·»¼ ©·´´¾»¹»²»®¿¬»¼¼«®·²¹¬¸»°ò³ò°»¿µ¸±«®¾§¬¸»°®±°±»¼°®±¶»½¬òÌ¸»»¬®·°©·´´ ±²°«¾´·½¬®¿²·¬ª»¸·½´»ô¬±«®¾«»¿²¼¸«¬¬´»òÌ¸»°®±¶»½¬·»®ª»¼¾§ïë¸«¬¬´»®±«¬»±º ¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³Ì®¿²°±®¬¿¬·±²Ò»¬©±®µøßÌÒ÷¿´±²¹©·¬¸¬¸»¸±¬»´°®·ª¿¬»¸«¬¬´»¿²¼¬¸» ·²¬»®»½¬·±²±ºØ¿®¾±®Þ±«´»ª¿®¼úÕ¿¬»´´¿ßª»²«»·¬¸»¼»·¹²¿¬»¼¬±°º±®¬¸»ß²¿¸»·³ ïçççÐ±·²¬»ß²¿¸»·³×ÍñÓÒÜô¿³¿´´°»®½»²¬¿¹»±º°®±¶»½¬¬®·° Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µòß²±¬»¼·²¬¸» ¿®»»¨°»½¬»¼¬±¾»½¿®®·»¼¾§°«¾´·½¬®¿²·¬òÌ±«®¾«»©±«´¼¾»»¨°»½¬»¼¬±½¿®®§±³»©¸¿¬ ³±®»ô©¸·´»¸«¬¬´»¿®»»¨°»½¬»¼¬±¬®¿²°±®¬¬¸»³¿¶±®·¬§±º¬¸»¬®¿²·¬®·¼»®©·¬¸·²Ì¸» ß²¿¸»·³Î»±®¬òÌ¸·´»ª»´±º¸«¬¬´»»®ª·½»©±«´¼²±¬¾»¼·ºº·½«´¬¬±¿½¸·»ª»¹·ª»²¬¸»´¿®¹» ²«³¾»®±º¸«¬¬´»°®±ª·¼»¼¾§¬¸»°®·ª¿¬»¸±¬»´±°»®¿¬±®·²Ì¸»ß²¿¸»·³Î»±®¬ò Ð¿¹»íðÝ·¬§±ºß²¿¸»·³ ß²¿¸»·³Ù¿®¼»²É¿´µ óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐÆØùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî úÛÐÐêØ ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐÆØùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî úÛÐÐêØ ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐÆØùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî óîúêÛÏÌÉ ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐÆØùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî óéúêÛÏÌÉ ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐÆØùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐÆØùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐÆØùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ôÛÊÚÍÊúÐÆØùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É óéúíÖÖêÛÏÌùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É óéúíÖÖêÛÏÌùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐÆØùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐÆØùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÐÆØùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî óéúíÎêÛÏÌ ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ× ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ïÛÎÙÔ×ÉÈ×ÊûÆ×ùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ïÛÎÙÔ×ÉÈ×ÊûÆ×ùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏåÃùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏåÃùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É óéúíÎêÛÏÌùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑøÅÃùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑøÅÃùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø óÎÈ×ÊÉ×ÙÈÓÍÎèÇÊÎÓÎÕïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈ ìÊ×ÌÛÊ×ØÚÃ îÛÈÓÍÎÛÐøÛÈÛéÇÊÆ×ÃÓÎÕé×ÊÆÓÙ×É ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑøÅÃ ùÓÈÃÍÖûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ îééèê÷÷èøûè÷ ðíùûèóíî ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ× ÷åéèê÷÷èøûãå÷øî÷éøûãìêíò÷ùè îíêèôúíçîøéíçèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø îðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð ðûî÷é ìï ìï ìï ìï èíèûðîðîèîêéðéèéê÷ð÷è÷êåðåèåêèíèûð æíðçï÷éÿ ÎÚÛÎÚØÉÚÛÉÚØ×ÚÛ×ÚØÅÚÛÎÚØ ìïì×ÛÑôÊú×ÕÓÎÉÛÈ ìï ì÷ûñ æíðçï÷éÿ ì÷ûñôê öûùèíê ùíîèêíð éÓÕÎÛÐÓÂ×Ø Anaheim GardenWalk Repositioning Area A Trip Generation (Weekday 5-6 PM) (For Peak Arrival Analysis) InboundOutboundITE 8th Edition Land UseSq FtQuantityTotal Trips RateTrip EndsRateTrip EndsRate%InCode %OutPageITE Landuse Quality Restaurants7.49931 123,372123,372Sq Ft5.026192.4730592467331778Quality Restaurants High-Turnover Restaurant11.15932 24,81624,816Sq Ft6.581634.5711327659411797High-Turnover Restaurant 66341773 Night Club/Bars11.34925 47,76947,769Sq Ft7.483573.86184541Night Club/Bars Shopping Center3.73820 133,683133,683Sq Ft1.832451.9025449949511502Shopping Center Live Theater0.02441 11,810900Seats0.0190.019185050790Live Theater Multiplex Movie Theater0.08445 60,0002,165Seats0.03650.051081733664827Multiplex Movie Theater Bowling3.54437 47,66547,665Sq Ft1.24592.301101693565786Bowling R/D/E (Enclosed) 449,1153.381,5172.411,0832,600 5.79 Outdoor Restaurant11.34925 11,00011,000Sq Ft7.48823.864212466341773Night Club/Bars Total R/D/E 460,1153.481,5992.451,1252,724 5.92 Hotel0.42330 1,266Rooms0.182280.24304532Hotel 4357655 Total Area A Trips 1,8271,4293,256 Area B Trip Generation (Weekday 5-6 PM) InboundOutboundITE 8th Edition Land UseSq FtQuantityTotal Trips RateTrip EndsRateTrip EndsRate%InCode %OutPageITE Landuse Quality Restaurants7.49931 10,90210,902Sq Ft5.02552.47278267331778Quality Restaurants High-Turnover Restaurant11.15932t 4,8984,898Sq Ft6.58324.57225459411797High-Turnover Restauran Shopping Center3.73820 114,350114,350Sq Ft1.832091.9021742649511502Shopping Center Total R/D/E 130,150130,150Sq Ft2.272962.04266562 4.32 Hotel0.42330 362Rooms0.18650.2487152Hotel 4357655 Total Area B Trips 361353714 Notes: "High-Turnover" restaurant category includes restaurant types that would be considered "Fast Food" if free-standing; however, because of the lack of easy automobile access, these restaurants are not expected to generate as many vehicle trips as a free-standing establishment would. Although described as "Specialty Retail" in previous studies, the "Shopping Center" rate has always been used for the retail portions of the project. The "Shopping Center" category also includes the health/fitness center, which would have a slightly lower rate as a separate category. "Live theater" includes uses that will have fixed showtimes. Since tenants are not known, the majority of the potential theater space has been included in the "night club/bar" category, which has a higher trip generation rate, when calculated at an average of 13 sq. ft. per seat. The use allocations, number of seats in the entertainment venues, and the classification of the restaurants into quality versus high-turnover was provided by the Related Companies. 2/23/2011 èÊÓÌÉ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÉûÊ×Ûû ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊûõåÉÈÇØÓ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×ûæíÓÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊÎ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌ óÎíÇÈ èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔíÙÙÇÌÛÎÙÃ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÙÛÌÈÇÊ×Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÚÛÉ×Ø ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉûæíÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ× ôÍÈ×Ð ÛÉÉÇÏÌÈÓÍÎÉ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíï èÔ×ÈÊÓÌÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÊÛÈ×ÉÛÊ×ÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ× ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÓÎÈÔ×ûÇÕÇÉÈ óè÷ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ òÍÇÊÎÛÐùÛÐÙÇÐÛÈ×ÔÍÅÏÛÎÃÈÊÓÌÉ×ÛÙÔ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÙÛÎÕÓÆ×ÍÊÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÈÍ×ÛÙÔ ôÍÈ×Ð ÍÈÔ×ÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÎØÈÛÑ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÅ×ÊÍÖ ×ÛÙÔÌÛÓÊÓÎÕûÉÎÍÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔÓÉÙÛÐÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÉØÍÎ×ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÓÎÈÔ×Î×Å öêíï Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃ ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ î×ÅÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÛÐÉÍÔÛÉÛÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÖÍÊÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÍÖÇÉ×ÉîÍ ôÍÈ×Ð ÉÇÙÔÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÔÛÉÚ××ÎÈÛÑ×ÎÓÎÈÔÓÉÙÛÉ× Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÛÐÐÇÉ×ÉÛÊ×ÓÎÙÐÍÉ×ÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÛÉ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ ÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÉÓÎÕÐ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð öÓÎÛÐóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ× öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×ÐèÍÈÛÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐ×Û êÈÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ×ËÇÛÐÉÈÍÈÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×ÏÓÎÇÉÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÛÊ×ÙÍÎÆ×ÊÈ×Ø ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ÚÛÙÑÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÇÉÓÎÕÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÉÌÐÓÈÛÏÍÎÕ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÅÛÐÑÈÊÓÌÉ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ìÛÉÉÚÃèÊÓÌê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ìÛÉÉÚÃèÊÓÌê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ ìÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉ ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÈÛÓÐÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÌÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÉÓÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉîÍÌÛÉÉÚÃÖÍÊÔÍÈ×Ð ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈûÊ×Ûû÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈûÊ×Ûú ðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÈÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÓÉ×ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÆ×ÔÓÙÐ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÈÊÓÌÉÏÓÎÇÉÌÛÉÉÚÃ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÊÓÌÉ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÉûÊ×Ûú ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊûõåÉÈÇØÓ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×ûæíÓÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊÎ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌ óÎíÇÈ èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔíÙÙÇÌÛÎÙÃ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÙÛÌÈÇÊ×Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÚÛÉ×Ø ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉûæíÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ× ôÍÈ×Ð ÛÉÉÇÏÌÈÓÍÎÉ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíï èÔ×ÈÊÓÌÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÊÛÈ×ÉÛÊ×ÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ× ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÓÎÈÔ×ûÇÕÇÉÈ óè÷ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ òÍÇÊÎÛÐùÛÐÙÇÐÛÈ×ÔÍÅÏÛÎÃÈÊÓÌÉ×ÛÙÔ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÙÛÎÕÓÆ×ÍÊÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÈÍ×ÛÙÔ ôÍÈ×Ð ÍÈÔ×ÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÎØÈÛÑ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÅ×ÊÍÖ ×ÛÙÔÌÛÓÊÓÎÕûÉÎÍÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔÓÉÙÛÐÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÉØÍÎ×ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÓÎÈÔ×Î×Å öêíï Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃ ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ î×ÅÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÛÐÉÍÔÛÉÛÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÖÍÊÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÍÖÇÉ×ÉîÍ ôÍÈ×Ð ÉÇÙÔÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÔÛÉÚ××ÎÈÛÑ×ÎÓÎÈÔÓÉÙÛÉ× Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÛÐÐÇÉ×ÉÛÊ×ÓÎÙÐÍÉ×ÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÛÉ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ ÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÉÓÎÕÐ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð öÓÎÛÐóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ× öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×ÐèÍÈÛÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐ×Û êÈÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ×ËÇÛÐÉÈÍÈÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×ÏÓÎÇÉÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÛÊ×ÙÍÎÆ×ÊÈ×Ø ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ÚÛÙÑÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÇÉÓÎÕÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÉÌÐÓÈÛÏÍÎÕ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÅÛÐÑÈÊÓÌÉ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ìÛÉÉÚÃèÊÓÌê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ìÛÉÉÚÃèÊÓÌê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ ìÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉ ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÈÛÓÐÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÌÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÉÓÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉîÍÌÛÉÉÚÃÖÍÊÔÍÈ×Ð ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÈÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÓÉ×ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÆ×ÔÓÙÐ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÈÊÓÌÉÏÓÎÇÉÌÛÉÉÚÃ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕ èÊÓÌõ×Î×ÊÛÈÓÍÎùÍÏÌÛÊÓÉÍÎûÊ×Ûûúé×ÌÛÊÛÈ× ê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûûê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×ÛúóéïîøûÊ×Ûûú ûú ðÛÎØçÉ×õÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×Èî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×È ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûûê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×ÛúóéïîøûÊ×Ûûú ûú ðÛÎØçÉ×õÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×Èî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×È ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ Anaheim GardenWalk Repositioning Area A Trip Generation (Weekday 7-8 PM) (Used for 7-8 pm analysis) InboundOutboundITE 8th Edition Sq FtQuantityTotal Trips Land Use RateTrip EndsRateTrip EndsRate%In %Out Quality Restaurants9.02 123,372123,372Sq Ft6.047452.9836811136733 High-Turnover Restaurant18.49 24,81624,816Sq Ft10.912717.581884595941 6634 Night Club/Bars11.34 47,76947,769Sq Ft7.483573.86184541 Shopping Center3.68 133,683133,683Sq Ft1.802411.88251492 4951 Live Theater0.33 11,810900Seats0.332970.0002971000 Multiplex Movie Theater0.15 60,0002,165Seats0.071520.08173325 4951 Bowling4.22 47,66547,665Sq Ft1.48712.741312023565 R/D/E (Enclosed) 449,1154.752,1342.881,2953,429 7.64 Outdoor Restaurant11.34 11,00011,000Sq Ft7.48823.86421246634 Total R/D/E 460,1154.822,2162.911,3373,553 7.72 Hotel0.44 1,266Rooms0.192410.25317558 4357 Total Area A Trips 2,4571,6544,111 Area B Trip Generation (Weekday 7-8) PM InboundOutboundITE 8th Edition Land UseSq FtQuantityTotal Trips RateTrip EndsRateTrip EndsRate%In %Out Quality Restaurants9.02 10,90210,902Sq Ft6.04662.9832986733 High-Turnover Restaurant18.49 4,8984,898Sq Ft10.91537.583790 5941 Shopping Center3.68 114,350114,350Sq Ft1.802061.882154214951 Total R/D/E 130,150130,150Sq Ft2.503252.18284609 4.68 Hotel0.44 362Rooms0.19690.2591160 4357 Total Area B Trips 394375769 Notes: Quality Restaurant and High-Turnover Restaurant assumed to be peak hour of generator. Shopping Center rate developed by using M peak hour of generator rate multiplied by parking accumulation factor for 7-8 pm. Multiplex Movie Theater rate developed by applying ratio of peak hour of generator rate per ksf to peak hour of adjacent street traffic rate per ksf times peak hour of adjacent street traffic rate per seat. Nightclub/Bar and Outdoor Restaurant rates taken to be the same as pm peak hour of adjacent street traffic. Hotel and bowling rates developed by using PM peak hour of generator rate multiplied by parking accumulation factor for 7-8 pm. Live Theater rate taken to be 1 vehicle per 3 seats entering and zero exiting. 2/23/2011 èÊÓÌÉ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÉûÊ×Ûû ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊûõåÉÈÇØÓ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔíÙÙÇÌÛÎÙÃ ûæíÓÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊÎ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÙÛÌÈÇÊ×Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÚÛÉ×Ø ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉûæíÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ× ôÍÈ×Ð ÛÉÉÇÏÌÈÓÍÎÉ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíï èÔ×ÈÊÓÌÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÊÛÈ×ÉÛÊ×ÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ× ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÓÎÈÔ×ûÇÕÇÉÈ óè÷ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ òÍÇÊÎÛÐùÛÐÙÇÐÛÈ×ÔÍÅÏÛÎÃÈÊÓÌÉ×ÛÙÔ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÙÛÎÕÓÆ×ÍÊÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÈÍ×ÛÙÔ ôÍÈ×Ð ÍÈÔ×ÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÎØÈÛÑ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÅ×ÊÍÖ ×ÛÙÔÌÛÓÊÓÎÕûÉÎÍÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔÓÉÙÛÐÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÉØÍÎ×ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÓÎÈÔ×Î×Å öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ î×ÅÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÛÐÉÍÔÛÉÛÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÖÍÊÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÍÖÇÉ×ÉîÍ ôÍÈ×ÐÉÇÙÔÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÔÛÉÚ××ÎÈÛÑ×ÎÓÎÈÔÓÉÙÛÉ× Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÛÐÐÇÉ×ÉÛÊ×ÓÎÙÐÍÉ×ÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÛÉ ÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÉÓÎÕÐ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð öÓÎÛÐóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ× öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×ÐèÍÈÛÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ×ËÇÛÐÉÈÍÈÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×ÏÓÎÇÉÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÛÊ×ÙÍÎÆ×ÊÈ×Ø ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ÚÛÙÑÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÇÉÓÎÕÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÉÌÐÓÈÛÏÍÎÕ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÅÛÐÑÈÊÓÌÉ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÈÐ ìÛÉÉÚÃèÊÓÌê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ ìÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÌÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÉÓÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉîÍÌÛÉÉÚÃÖÍÊÔÍÈ×Ð ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈûÊ×Ûú ðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÈÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÓÉ×ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÆ×ÔÓÙÐ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÈÊÓÌÉÏÓÎÇÉÌÛÉÉÚÃ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÊÓÌÉ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÉûÊ×Ûú ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊûõåÉÈÇØÓ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔíÙÙÇÌÛÎÙÃ ûæíÓÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊÎ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÙÛÌÈÇÊ×Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÚÛÉ×Ø ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉûæíÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ× ôÍÈ×Ð ÛÉÉÇÏÌÈÓÍÎÉ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíï èÔ×ÈÊÓÌÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÊÛÈ×ÉÛÊ×ÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ× ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÓÎÈÔ×ûÇÕÇÉÈ óè÷ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ òÍÇÊÎÛÐùÛÐÙÇÐÛÈ×ÔÍÅÏÛÎÃÈÊÓÌÉ×ÛÙÔ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÙÛÎÕÓÆ×ÍÊÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÈÍ×ÛÙÔ ôÍÈ×Ð ÍÈÔ×ÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÎØÈÛÑ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÅ×ÊÍÖ ×ÛÙÔÌÛÓÊÓÎÕûÉÎÍÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔÓÉÙÛÐÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÉØÍÎ×ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÓÎÈÔ×Î×Å öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ î×ÅÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÛÐÉÍÔÛÉÛÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÖÍÊÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÍÖÇÉ×ÉîÍ ôÍÈ×ÐÉÇÙÔÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÔÛÉÚ××ÎÈÛÑ×ÎÓÎÈÔÓÉÙÛÉ× Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÛÐÐÇÉ×ÉÛÊ×ÓÎÙÐÍÉ×ÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÛÉ ÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÉÓÎÕÐ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð öÓÎÛÐóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ× öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×ÐèÍÈÛÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ×ËÇÛÐÉÈÍÈÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×ÏÓÎÇÉÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÛÊ×ÙÍÎÆ×ÊÈ×Ø ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ÚÛÙÑÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÇÉÓÎÕÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÉÌÐÓÈÛÏÍÎÕ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÅÛÐÑÈÊÓÌÉ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÈÐ ìÛÉÉÚÃèÊÓÌê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ ìÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÌÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÉÓÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉîÍÌÛÉÉÚÃÖÍÊÔÍÈ×Ð ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÈÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÓÉ×ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÆ×ÔÓÙÐ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐÈÊÓÌÉÏÓÎÇÉÌÛÉÉÚÃ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕ å××ÑØÛÃìïèÊÓÌõ×Î×ÊÛÈÓÍÎùÍÏÌÛÊÓÉÍÎûÊ×Ûûúé×ÌÛÊÛÈ× ê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûûê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûú ûú ðÛÎØçÉ× õÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×Èî×È ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûûê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûú ûú ðÛÎØçÉ× õÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×Èî×È ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ Anaheim GardenWalk Repositioning Area A Trip Generation (Weekday 10-11 PM) (Used for late night Disney Way analysis) InboundOutboundITE 8th Edition Sq FtQuantityTotal Trips Land Use RateTrip EndsRateTrip EndsRate%In %Out Quality Restaurants4.73 123,372123,372Sq Ft1.561923.173915833367 High-Turnover Restaurant7.04 24,81624,816Sq Ft2.89724.151031754159 6634 Night Club/Bars15.49 47,76947,769Sq Ft10.224885.27252740 Shopping Center0.81 133,683133,683Sq Ft0.40530.4155108 4951 Live Theater0.33 11,810900Seats0.0000.332972970100 Multiplex Movie Theater0.04 60,0002,165Seats0.01220.0487109 2080 Bowling1.48 47,66547,665Sq Ft0.0001.4871710100 R/D/E (Enclosed) 449,1151.848272.801,2562,083 Outdoor Restaurant15.49 11,00011,000Sq Ft10.221125.27581706634 Total R/D/E 460,1152.049392.861,3142,253 Hotel0.51 1,266Rooms0.222790.29367646 4357 Total Area A Trips 1,2181,6812,899 Area B Trip Generation (Weekday 10-11 PM) InboundOutboundITE 8th Edition Land UseSq FtQuantityTotal Trips RateTrip EndsRateTrip EndsRate%In %Out Quality Restaurants4.73 10,90210,902Sq Ft1.56173.1735523367 High-Turnover Restaurant7.04 4,8984,898Sq Ft2.89144.152034 4159 Shopping Center0.81 114,350114,350Sq Ft0.40460.4147934951 Total R/D/E 130,150130,150Sq Ft0.59770.78102179 Hotel0.51 362Rooms0.22800.29105185 4357 Total Area B Trips 157207364 Notes: Quality Restaurant, High-Turnover Restaurant, Shopping Center, Multiplex Movie Theater, and Hotel rates developed by using multiplied by PM peak hour of generator rate parking accumulation factor for 10-11 pm. Live Theater rate taken to be 1 vehicle per 3 seats exiting and zero entering. Bowling rate taken to have exiting rate equal to entering rate at 7-8 pm. Nightclub/Bar and Outdoor Restaurant rates taken to be the same as pm peak hour of generator. 2/23/2011 èÊÓÌÉ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÉûÊ×Ûû ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊûõåÉÈÇØÓ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔíÙÙÇÌÛÎÙÃ ûæíÓÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊÎ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÙÛÌÈÇÊ×Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÚÛÉ×Ø ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉûæíÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ× ôÍÈ×Ð ÛÉÉÇÏÌÈÓÍÎÉ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíï èÔ×ÈÊÓÌÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÊÛÈ×ÉÛÊ×ÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ× ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÓÎÈÔ×ûÇÕÇÉÈ óè÷ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ òÍÇÊÎÛÐùÛÐÙÇÐÛÈ×ÔÍÅÏÛÎÃÈÊÓÌÉ×ÛÙÔ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÙÛÎÕÓÆ×ÍÊÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÈÍ×ÛÙÔ ôÍÈ×Ð ÍÈÔ×ÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÎØÈÛÑ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÅ×ÊÍÖ ×ÛÙÔÌÛÓÊÓÎÕûÉÎÍÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔÓÉÙÛÐÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÉØÍÎ×ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÓÎÈÔ×Î×Å öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ î×ÅÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÛÐÉÍÔÛÉÛÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÖÍÊÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÍÖÇÉ×ÉîÍ ôÍÈ×ÐÉÇÙÔÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÔÛÉÚ××ÎÈÛÑ×ÎÓÎÈÔÓÉÙÛÉ× Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÛÐÐÇÉ×ÉÛÊ×ÓÎÙÐÍÉ×ÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÛÉ ÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÉÓÎÕÐ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð öÓÎÛÐóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ× öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×ÐèÍÈÛÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ×ËÇÛÐÉÈÍÈÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×ÏÓÎÇÉÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÛÊ×ÙÍÎÆ×ÊÈ×Ø ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ÚÛÙÑÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÇÉÓÎÕÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÉÌÐÓÈÛÏÍÎÕ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÅÛÐÑÈÊÓÌÉ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÈÐ ìÛÉÉÚÃèÊÓÌê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ ìÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÌÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÉÓÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉîÍÌÛÉÉÚÃÖÍÊÔÍÈ×Ð ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈûÊ×Ûú ðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÈÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÓÉ×ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÆ×ÔÓÙÐ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÈÊÓÌÉÏÓÎÇÉÌÛÉÉÚÃ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÊÓÌÉ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÉûÊ×Ûú ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊûõåÉÈÇØÓ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔíÙÙÇÌÛÎÙÃ ûæíÓÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊÎ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÙÛÌÈÇÊ×Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÚÛÉ×Ø ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉûæíÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ× ôÍÈ×Ð ÛÉÉÇÏÌÈÓÍÎÉ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíï èÔ×ÈÊÓÌÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÊÛÈ×ÉÛÊ×ÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ× ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÓÎÈÔ×ûÇÕÇÉÈ óè÷ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ òÍÇÊÎÛÐùÛÐÙÇÐÛÈ×ÔÍÅÏÛÎÃÈÊÓÌÉ×ÛÙÔ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÙÛÎÕÓÆ×ÍÊÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÈÍ×ÛÙÔ ôÍÈ×Ð ÍÈÔ×ÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÎØÈÛÑ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÅ×ÊÍÖ ×ÛÙÔÌÛÓÊÓÎÕûÉÎÍÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔÓÉÙÛÐÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÉØÍÎ×ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÓÎÈÔ×Î×Å öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ î×ÅÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÛÐÉÍÔÛÉÛÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÖÍÊÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÍÖÇÉ×ÉîÍ ôÍÈ×ÐÉÇÙÔÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÔÛÉÚ××ÎÈÛÑ×ÎÓÎÈÔÓÉÙÛÉ× Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÛÐÐÇÉ×ÉÛÊ×ÓÎÙÐÍÉ×ÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÛÉ ÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÉÓÎÕÐ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð öÓÎÛÐóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ× öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×ÐèÍÈÛÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ×ËÇÛÐÉÈÍÈÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×ÏÓÎÇÉÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÛÊ×ÙÍÎÆ×ÊÈ×Ø ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ÚÛÙÑÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÇÉÓÎÕÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÉÌÐÓÈÛÏÍÎÕ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÅÛÐÑÈÊÓÌÉ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÈÐ ìÛÉÉÚÃèÊÓÌê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ ìÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÌÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÉÓÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉîÍÌÛÉÉÚÃÖÍÊÔÍÈ×Ð ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÈÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÓÉ×ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÆ×ÔÓÙÐ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐÈÊÓÌÉÏÓÎÇÉÌÛÉÉÚÃ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕ å××ÑØÛÃ ìïèÊÓÌõ×Î×ÊÛÈÓÍÎùÍÏÌÛÊÓÉÍÎûÊ×Ûûúé×ÌÛÊÛÈ× ê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûûê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûú ûú ðÛÎØçÉ× õÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×Èî×È ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûûê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûú ûú ðÛÎØçÉ× õÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×Èî×È ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ Anaheim GardenWalk Repositioning Area A Trip Generation (Friday 7-8 PM) (For Peak Arrival Analysis) InboundOutboundITE 8th Edition Sq FtQuantityTotal Trips Land Use RateTrip EndsRateTrip EndsRate%In %Out Quality Restaurant9.70 123,372123,372Sq Ft5.727063.9849111975941 High-Turnover Restaurant19.88 24,81624,816Sq Ft10.532619.342324935347 6832 Night Club/Bars15.49 47,76947,769Sq Ft10.535034.96237740 Shopping Center4.90 133,683133,683Sq Ft2.783722.12283655 5743 Live Theater0.33 11,810900Seats0.332970.0002971000 Multiplex Movie Theater0.27 60,0002,165Seats0.163460.11238584 5941 Bowling4.50 47,66547,665Sq Ft3.741780.77372158317 R/D/E (Enclosed) 449,1155.932,6633.381,5184,181 9.31 Outdoor Restaurant15.49 11,00011,000Sq Ft10.531164.96551716832 Total R/D/E 460,1156.042,7793.421,5734,352 9.46 Hotel0.44 1,266Rooms0.192410.25317558 4357 Total Area A Trips 3,0201,8904,910 Area B Trip Generation (Friday 7-8 PM) InboundOutboundITE 8th Edition Land UseSq FtQuantityTotal Trips RateTrip EndsRateTrip EndsRate%In %Out Quality Restaurants9.70 10,90210,902Sq Ft5.72623.98431055941 High-Turnover Restaurant19.88 4,8984,898Sq Ft10.53529.344698 5347 Shopping Center4.90 114,350114,350Sq Ft2.783182.122425605743 Total R/D/E 130,150130,150Sq Ft3.324322.54331763 5.86 Hotel0.44 362Rooms0.19690.2591160 4357 Total Area B Trips 501422923 Notes: Quality Restaurant, High-Turnover Restaurant, and Multiplex Movie Theater rates developed by using PM peak hour of generator rate multiplied by parking accumulation factor for 7-8 pm. Live Theater and Hotel rates taken to be the same as rates for peak hour of adjacent street traffic. Shopping Center, Night Club/Bar, Bowling, and Outdoor Restaurant rates taken to be PM peak hour of generator. 2/23/2011 èÊÓÌÉ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÉûÊ×Ûû ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊûõåÉÈÇØÓ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔíÙÙÇÌÛÎÙÃ ûæíÓÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊÎ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÙÛÌÈÇÊ×Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÚÛÉ×Ø ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉûæíÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ× ôÍÈ×Ð ÛÉÉÇÏÌÈÓÍÎÉ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíï èÔ×ÈÊÓÌÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÊÛÈ×ÉÛÊ×ÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ× ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÓÎÈÔ×ûÇÕÇÉÈ óè÷ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ òÍÇÊÎÛÐùÛÐÙÇÐÛÈ×ÔÍÅÏÛÎÃÈÊÓÌÉ×ÛÙÔ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÙÛÎÕÓÆ×ÍÊÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÈÍ×ÛÙÔ ôÍÈ×Ð ÍÈÔ×ÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÎØÈÛÑ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÅ×ÊÍÖ ×ÛÙÔÌÛÓÊÓÎÕûÉÎÍÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔÓÉÙÛÐÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÉØÍÎ×ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÓÎÈÔ×Î×Å öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ î×ÅÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÛÐÉÍÔÛÉÛÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÖÍÊÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÍÖÇÉ×ÉîÍ ôÍÈ×ÐÉÇÙÔÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÔÛÉÚ××ÎÈÛÑ×ÎÓÎÈÔÓÉÙÛÉ× Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÛÐÐÇÉ×ÉÛÊ×ÓÎÙÐÍÉ×ÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÛÉ ÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÉÓÎÕÐ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð öÓÎÛÐóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ× öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×ÐèÍÈÛÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ×ËÇÛÐÉÈÍÈÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×ÏÓÎÇÉÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÛÊ×ÙÍÎÆ×ÊÈ×Ø ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ÚÛÙÑÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÇÉÓÎÕÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÉÌÐÓÈÛÏÍÎÕ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÅÛÐÑÈÊÓÌÉ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÈÐ ìÛÉÉÚÃèÊÓÌê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ ìÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÌÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÉÓÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉîÍÌÛÉÉÚÃÖÍÊÔÍÈ×Ð ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈûÊ×Ûú ðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÈÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÓÉ×ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÆ×ÔÓÙÐ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÈÊÓÌÉÏÓÎÇÉÌÛÉÉÚÃ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÊÓÌÉ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÉûÊ×Ûú ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊûõåÉÈÇØÓ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔíÙÙÇÌÛÎÙÃ ûæíÓÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊÎ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÙÛÌÈÇÊ×Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÚÛÉ×Ø ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉûæíÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ× ôÍÈ×Ð ÛÉÉÇÏÌÈÓÍÎÉ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíï èÔ×ÈÊÓÌÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÊÛÈ×ÉÛÊ×ÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ× ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÓÎÈÔ×ûÇÕÇÉÈ óè÷ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ òÍÇÊÎÛÐùÛÐÙÇÐÛÈ×ÔÍÅÏÛÎÃÈÊÓÌÉ×ÛÙÔ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÙÛÎÕÓÆ×ÍÊÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÈÍ×ÛÙÔ ôÍÈ×Ð ÍÈÔ×ÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÎØÈÛÑ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÅ×ÊÍÖ ×ÛÙÔÌÛÓÊÓÎÕûÉÎÍÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔÓÉÙÛÐÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÉØÍÎ×ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÓÎÈÔ×Î×Å öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ î×ÅÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÛÐÉÍÔÛÉÛÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÖÍÊÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÍÖÇÉ×ÉîÍ ôÍÈ×ÐÉÇÙÔÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÔÛÉÚ××ÎÈÛÑ×ÎÓÎÈÔÓÉÙÛÉ× Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÛÐÐÇÉ×ÉÛÊ×ÓÎÙÐÍÉ×ÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÛÉ ÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÉÓÎÕÐ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð öÓÎÛÐóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ× öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×ÐèÍÈÛÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ×ËÇÛÐÉÈÍÈÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×ÏÓÎÇÉÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÛÊ×ÙÍÎÆ×ÊÈ×Ø ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ÚÛÙÑÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÇÉÓÎÕÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÉÌÐÓÈÛÏÍÎÕ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÅÛÐÑÈÊÓÌÉ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÈÐ ìÛÉÉÚÃèÊÓÌê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ ìÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÌÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÉÓÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉîÍÌÛÉÉÚÃÖÍÊÔÍÈ×Ð ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÈÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÓÉ×ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÆ×ÔÓÙÐ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐÈÊÓÌÉÏÓÎÇÉÌÛÉÉÚÃ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕ öÊÓØÛÃìïèÊÓÌõ×Î×ÊÛÈÓÍÎùÍÏÌÛÊÓÉÍÎûÊ×Ûûúé×ÌÛÊÛÈ× ê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûûê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×ÛúóéïîøûÊ×Ûûú ûú ðÛÎØçÉ×õÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×Èî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×È ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûûê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×ÛúóéïîøûÊ×Ûûú ûú ðÛÎØçÉ×õÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×Èî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×È ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ Anaheim GardenWalk Repositioning Area A Trip Generation (Saturday 12-1 PM) (Used only to demonstrate that this is not peak arrival period.) InboundOutboundITE 8th Edition Land Use Sq FtQuantityTotal Trips RateTrip EndsRateTrip EndsRate%In %Out Quality Restaurants 123,372123,372Sq Ft5.947334.13510124310.065941 High-Turnover Restaurant 24,81624,816Sq Ft6.941726.1515332513.095347 6634 Night Club/Bars 47,76947,769Sq Ft0.0000.00000 Shopping Center 133,683133,683Sq Ft2.543402.353146544.895248 Live Theater 11,810900Seats0.0000.000005050 Multiplex Movie Theater 60,0002,165Seats0.061300.03651950.097228 Bowling 47,66547,665Sq Ft1.45690.96461152.416040 R/D/E (Enclosed) 449,1153.221,4442.421,0882,532 5.64 Outdoor Restaurant 11,00011,000Sq Ft4.19462.1624706.356634 Total R/D/E 460,1153.241,4902.421,1122,602 5.66 Hotel 1,266Rooms0.06760.182283040.25 2575 Total Area A Trips 1,5661,3402,906 Area B Trip Generation (Saturday 12-1 PM) InboundOutboundITE 8th Edition Land UseSq FtQuantityTotal Trips RateTrip EndsRateTrip EndsRate%In %Out Quality Restaurants 10,90210,902Sq Ft5.94654.134511010.065941 High-Turnover Restaurant 4,8984,898Sq Ft6.94346.15306413.095347 Shopping Center 114,350114,350Sq Ft2.542902.352695594.895248 Total R/D/E 130,150130,150Sq Ft2.993892.64344733 5.63 Hotel 362Rooms0.06220.1865870.25 2575 Total Area B Trips 411409820 Notes: Quality Restaurant, High-Turnover Restaurant, Shopping Center, Multiplex Movie Theater, Hotel, and Outdoor Restaurant rates developed by using PM peak hour of generator rate multiplied by parking accumulation factor for 12-1 pm. Live Theater and Nightclub/Bar rates assumed to be zero. 2/23/2011 èÊÓÌÉ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÉûÊ×Ûû ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊûõåÉÈÇØÓ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔíÙÙÇÌÛÎÙÃ ûæíÓÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊÎ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÙÛÌÈÇÊ×Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÚÛÉ×Ø ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉûæíÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ× ôÍÈ×Ð ÛÉÉÇÏÌÈÓÍÎÉ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíï èÔ×ÈÊÓÌÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÊÛÈ×ÉÛÊ×ÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ× ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÓÎÈÔ×ûÇÕÇÉÈ óè÷ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ òÍÇÊÎÛÐùÛÐÙÇÐÛÈ×ÔÍÅÏÛÎÃÈÊÓÌÉ×ÛÙÔ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÙÛÎÕÓÆ×ÍÊÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÈÍ×ÛÙÔ ôÍÈ×Ð ÍÈÔ×ÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÎØÈÛÑ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÅ×ÊÍÖ ×ÛÙÔÌÛÓÊÓÎÕûÉÎÍÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔÓÉÙÛÐÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÉØÍÎ×ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÓÎÈÔ×Î×Å öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ î×ÅÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÛÐÉÍÔÛÉÛÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÖÍÊÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÍÖÇÉ×ÉîÍ ôÍÈ×ÐÉÇÙÔÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÔÛÉÚ××ÎÈÛÑ×ÎÓÎÈÔÓÉÙÛÉ× Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÛÐÐÇÉ×ÉÛÊ×ÓÎÙÐÍÉ×ÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÛÉ ÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÉÓÎÕÐ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð öÓÎÛÐóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ× öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×ÐèÍÈÛÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ×ËÇÛÐÉÈÍÈÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×ÏÓÎÇÉÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÛÊ×ÙÍÎÆ×ÊÈ×Ø ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ÚÛÙÑÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÇÉÓÎÕÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÉÌÐÓÈÛÏÍÎÕ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÅÛÐÑÈÊÓÌÉ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÈÐ ìÛÉÉÚÃèÊÓÌê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ ìÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÌÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÉÓÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉîÍÌÛÉÉÚÃÖÍÊÔÍÈ×Ð ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈûÊ×Ûú ðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÈÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÓÉ×ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÆ×ÔÓÙÐ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÈÊÓÌÉÏÓÎÇÉÌÛÉÉÚÃ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÊÓÌÉ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÉûÊ×Ûú ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊûõåÉÈÇØÓ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔíÙÙÇÌÛÎÙÃ ûæíÓÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊÎ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÙÛÌÈÇÊ×Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÚÛÉ×Ø ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉûæíÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ× ôÍÈ×Ð ÛÉÉÇÏÌÈÓÍÎÉ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíï èÔ×ÈÊÓÌÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÊÛÈ×ÉÛÊ×ÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ× ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÓÎÈÔ×ûÇÕÇÉÈ óè÷ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ òÍÇÊÎÛÐùÛÐÙÇÐÛÈ×ÔÍÅÏÛÎÃÈÊÓÌÉ×ÛÙÔ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÙÛÎÕÓÆ×ÍÊÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÈÍ×ÛÙÔ ôÍÈ×Ð ÍÈÔ×ÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÎØÈÛÑ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÅ×ÊÍÖ ×ÛÙÔÌÛÓÊÓÎÕûÉÎÍÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔÓÉÙÛÐÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÉØÍÎ×ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÓÎÈÔ×Î×Å öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ î×ÅÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÛÐÉÍÔÛÉÛÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÖÍÊÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÍÖÇÉ×ÉîÍ ôÍÈ×ÐÉÇÙÔÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÔÛÉÚ××ÎÈÛÑ×ÎÓÎÈÔÓÉÙÛÉ× Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÛÐÐÇÉ×ÉÛÊ×ÓÎÙÐÍÉ×ÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÛÉ ÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÉÓÎÕÐ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð öÓÎÛÐóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ× öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×ÐèÍÈÛÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ×ËÇÛÐÉÈÍÈÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×ÏÓÎÇÉÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÛÊ×ÙÍÎÆ×ÊÈ×Ø ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ÚÛÙÑÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÇÉÓÎÕÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÉÌÐÓÈÛÏÍÎÕ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÅÛÐÑÈÊÓÌÉ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÈÐ ìÛÉÉÚÃèÊÓÌê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ ìÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÌÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÉÓÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉîÍÌÛÉÉÚÃÖÍÊÔÍÈ×Ð ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÈÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÓÉ×ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÆ×ÔÓÙÐ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÈÊÓÌÉÏÓÎÇÉÌÛÉÉÚÃ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕ éÛÈÇÊØÛÃ ìïèÊÓÌõ×Î×ÊÛÈÓÍÎùÍÏÌÛÊÓÉÍÎûÊ×Ûûúé×ÌÛÊÛÈ× ê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûûê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûú ûú ðÛÎØçÉ× õÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×Èî×È ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûûê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûú ûú ðÛÎØçÉ× õÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×Èî×È ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ Anaheim GardenWalk Repositioning Area A Trip Generation (Saturday 2-3 PM) (Used only to demonstrate that this is not peak arrival period.) InboundOutboundITE 8th Edition Land Use Sq FtQuantityTotal Trips RateTrip EndsRateTrip EndsRate%In %Out Quality Restaurant 123,372123,372Sq Ft4.024962.793448406.825941 High-Turnover Restaurant 24,81624,816Sq Ft4.701174.171032208.865347 6634 Night Club/Bar 47,76947,769Sq Ft0.0000.00000 Shopping Center 133,683133,683Sq Ft2.263022.092795814.355248 Live Theater 11,810900Seats0.0000.000005050 Multiplex Movie Theater 60,0002,165Seats0.01220.0122440.015050 Bowling 47,66547,665Sq Ft1.45690.96461152.416040 R/D/E (Enclosed) 449,1152.241,0061.777941,800 4.01 Outdoor Restaurant 11,00011,000Sq Ft4.70522.4227797.136634 Total R/D/E 460,1152.301,0581.788211,879 4.08 Hotel 1,266Rooms0.324050.111395440.42 7525 Total Area A Trips 1,4639602,423 Area B Trip Generation (Saturday 2-3 PM) InboundOutboundITE 8th Edition Land UseSq FtQuantityTotal Trips RateTrip EndsRateTrip EndsRate%In %Out Quality Restaurant 10,90210,902Sq Ft4.02442.7930746.825941 High-Turnover Restaurant 4,8984,898Sq Ft4.70234.1720438.865347 Shopping Center 114,350114,350Sq Ft2.262582.092394974.355248 Total R/D/E 130,150130,150Sq Ft2.503252.22289614 4.72 Hotel 362Rooms0.321160.11401560.42 7525 Total Area B Trips 441329770 Notes: Quality Restaurant, High-Turnover Restaurant, Shopping Center, Multiplex Movie Theater, Hotel, and Outdoor Restaurant rates developed by using PM peak hour of generator rate multiplied by parking accumulation factor for 2-3 pm. Live Theater and Nightclub/Bar rates assumed to be zero. 2/23/2011 èÊÓÌÉ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÉûÊ×Ûû ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊûõåÉÈÇØÓ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔíÙÙÇÌÛÎÙÃ ûæíÓÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊÎ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÙÛÌÈÇÊ×Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÚÛÉ×Ø ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉûæíÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ× ôÍÈ×Ð ÛÉÉÇÏÌÈÓÍÎÉ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíï èÔ×ÈÊÓÌÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÊÛÈ×ÉÛÊ×ÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ× ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÓÎÈÔ×ûÇÕÇÉÈ óè÷ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ òÍÇÊÎÛÐùÛÐÙÇÐÛÈ×ÔÍÅÏÛÎÃÈÊÓÌÉ×ÛÙÔ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÙÛÎÕÓÆ×ÍÊÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÈÍ×ÛÙÔ ôÍÈ×Ð ÍÈÔ×ÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÎØÈÛÑ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÅ×ÊÍÖ ×ÛÙÔÌÛÓÊÓÎÕûÉÎÍÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔÓÉÙÛÐÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÉØÍÎ×ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÓÎÈÔ×Î×Å öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ î×ÅÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÛÐÉÍÔÛÉÛÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÖÍÊÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÍÖÇÉ×ÉîÍ ôÍÈ×ÐÉÇÙÔÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÔÛÉÚ××ÎÈÛÑ×ÎÓÎÈÔÓÉÙÛÉ× Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÛÐÐÇÉ×ÉÛÊ×ÓÎÙÐÍÉ×ÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÛÉ ÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÉÓÎÕÐ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð öÓÎÛÐóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ× öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×ÐèÍÈÛÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ×ËÇÛÐÉÈÍÈÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×ÏÓÎÇÉÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÛÊ×ÙÍÎÆ×ÊÈ×Ø ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ÚÛÙÑÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÇÉÓÎÕÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÉÌÐÓÈÛÏÍÎÕ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÅÛÐÑÈÊÓÌÉ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÈÐ ìÛÉÉÚÃèÊÓÌê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ ìÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÌÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÉÓÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉîÍÌÛÉÉÚÃÖÍÊÔÍÈ×Ð ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈûÊ×Ûú ðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÈÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÓÉ×ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÆ×ÔÓÙÐ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÈÊÓÌÉÏÓÎÇÉÌÛÉÉÚÃ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÊÓÌÉ÷ÉÈÓÏÛÈ×ÉûÊ×Ûú ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ì×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×ÉÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊûõåÉÈÇØÓ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð æ×ÔÓÙÐ×åÛÐÑèÊÛÎÉÓÈ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ èÍÈÛÐ æ×ÔíÙÙÇÌÛÎÙÃ ûæíÓÉÎ××Ø×ØÖÍÊÎ×ÅÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÙÛÌÈÇÊ×Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÅÔÓÙÔÓÉÚÛÉ×Ø ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉûæíÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉÛÎØÊ×ÛÉÍÎÛÚÐ× ôÍÈ×Ð ÛÉÉÇÏÌÈÓÍÎÉ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíï èÔ×ÈÊÓÌÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÊÛÈ×ÉÛÊ×ÚÛÉ×ØÍÎÈÔ× ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÓÎÈÔ×ûÇÕÇÉÈ óè÷ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ òÍÇÊÎÛÐùÛÐÙÇÐÛÈ×ÔÍÅÏÛÎÃÈÊÓÌÉ×ÛÙÔ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÙÛÎÕÓÆ×ÍÊÊ×Ù×ÓÆ×ÈÍ×ÛÙÔ ôÍÈ×Ð ÍÈÔ×ÊÐÛÎØÇÉ×ÛÎØÈÛÑ×ÈÔ×ÐÍÅ×ÊÍÖ ×ÛÙÔÌÛÓÊÓÎÕûÉÎÍÈ×ØÛÚÍÆ×ÈÔÓÉÙÛÐÙÇÐÛÈÓÍÎ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ ÓÉØÍÎ×ÍÎÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÓÎÈÔ×Î×Å öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð Ï×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ î×ÅÏ×ÈÔÍØÍÐÍÕÃÛÐÉÍÔÛÉÛÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÓÎ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÙÛÌÈÇÊ×ÖÍÊÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÍÖÇÉ×ÉîÍ ôÍÈ×ÐÉÇÙÔÊ×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÔÛÉÚ××ÎÈÛÑ×ÎÓÎÈÔÓÉÙÛÉ× Ú×ÙÛÇÉ×ÛÐÐÇÉ×ÉÛÊ×ÓÎÙÐÍÉ×ÌÊÍÄÓÏÓÈÃÛÉ ÌÛÊÈÍÖÛÉÓÎÕÐ×Ø×Æ×ÐÍÌÏ×ÎÈ çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×íÊÓÕÓÎ öêíïê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð çÎÙÍÎÉÈÊÛÓÎ×ØóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ø×ÉÈÓÎÛÈÓÍÎ öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×Ð ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð öÓÎÛÐóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ× öêíï ê×ÈÛÓÐê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈôÍÈ×ÐèÍÈÛÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ óÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐùÛÌÈÇÊ×ì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐì×ÊÉÍÎèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ×ËÇÛÐÉÈÍÈÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ×ÏÓÎÇÉÓÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐÈÊÓÌÉ óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÌ×ÊÉÍÎÈÊÓÌÉÛÊ×ÙÍÎÆ×ÊÈ×Ø ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ÚÛÙÑÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÇÉÓÎÕÌ×ÊÙ×ÎÈÛÕ×É ê×ÈÛÓÐÈÍÏÛÓÎÈÛÓÎÈÔ×ÍÊÓÕÓÎÛÐÉÌÐÓÈÛÏÍÎÕ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ Æ×ÔÓÙÐ× ÈÊÛÎÉÓÈ ÅÛÐÑÈÊÓÌÉ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐåÛÐÑèÊÓÌÉ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐèÊÛÎÉÓÈèÊÓÌÉ ðÛÎØçÉ× óÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈóÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÈÐ ìÛÉÉÚÃèÊÓÌê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎ ðÛÎØçÉ×óÎíÇÈ ìÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÛÌÌÐÓ×ØÈÍÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÈÛÓÐÊ×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ×ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÌÛÉÉÚÃÓÉÈÔ×ÉÛÏ×ÛÉÓÎÌÊÓÍÊ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ûõåÉÈÇØÓ×ÉîÍÌÛÉÉÚÃÖÍÊÔÍÈ×Ð ôÍÈ×Ð ÷ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐæ×ÔÓÙÐ×èÊÓÌóÏÌÛÙÈ ðÛÎØçÉ×î×ÈÆ×ÔÓÙÐ×ÈÊÓÌÉÓÉ×ÄÈ×ÊÎÛÐÆ×ÔÓÙÐ× óÎíÇÈ ê×ÈÛÓÐ ÈÊÓÌÉÏÓÎÇÉÌÛÉÉÚÃ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕ éÛÈÇÊØÛÃ ìïèÊÓÌõ×Î×ÊÛÈÓÍÎùÍÏÌÛÊÓÉÍÎûÊ×Ûûúé×ÌÛÊÛÈ× ê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûûê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûú ûú ðÛÎØçÉ× õÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×Èî×È ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûûê×ÌÍÉÓÈÓÍÎÓÎÕìÊÍÌÍÉÛÐûÊ×Ûú ûú ðÛÎØçÉ× õÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×ÈõÊÍÉÉåÐÑ èÊÎÉÈóÎÈ×ÊÎÛÐìÛÉÉÚÃî×Èî×È ê×ÈÛÓÐ ê×ÉÈÛÇÊÛÎÈ ÷ÎÈ×ÊÈÛÓÎÏ×ÎÈ ôÍÈ×Ð èÍÈÛÐ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ óéúêÛÏÌÉñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ óîúêÛÏÌÉñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÊÅÃÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ óéúêÛÏÌÉñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ óîúêÛÏÌÉñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÊÅÃÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ óéúêÛÏÌÉñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ óîúêÛÏÌÉñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÊÅÃÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ óéúêÛÏÌÉñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ óîúêÛÏÌÉñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈøÊÅÃÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ éìå××ÑØÛÃìïì×ÛÑôÍÇÊ îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðìêíò÷ùèèêóìéóîíçèûÊ×ÛûûØØÎóó îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðìêíò÷ùèèêóìéóîíçèûÊ×ÛúûØØÎóó îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðìêíò÷ùèèêóìéóîíçèûÊ×Ûûúóéïîø îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðìêíò÷ùèèêóìéóîíçèûÊ×ÛûûØØÎóóó îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðìêíò÷ùèèêóìéóîíçèûÊ×ÛúûØØÎóóó îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðîíìêíò÷ùèæíðçï÷é îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðåóèôìêíò÷ùèæíðçï÷é îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ éìå××ÑØÛÃìïì×ÛÑôÍÇÊ ê×ØÇÙÈÓÍÎÈÍìïæÍÐÇÏ×É îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðìêíò÷ùèèêóìéóîíçèûÊ×ÛûûØØÎóó îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðìêíò÷ùèèêóìéóîíçèûÊ×ÛúûØØÎóó îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðìêíò÷ùèèêóìéóîíçèûÊ×Ûûúóéïîø îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðìêíò÷ùèèêóìéóîíçèûÊ×ÛûûØØÎóóó îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðìêíò÷ùèèêóìéóîíçèûÊ×ÛúûØØÎóóó îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðîíìêíò÷ùèæíðçï÷é îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðåóèôìêíò÷ùèæíðçï÷é îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃ ìïôíçêèíèûðìêíò÷ùèèêóìéóîíçèûÊ×ÛûûØØÎóóó îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃ ìïôíçêèíèûðìêíò÷ùèèêóìéóîíçèûÊ×ÛúûØØÎóóó îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ å××ÑØÛÃ ìïôíçêèíèûðåóèôìêíò÷ùèæíðçï÷é îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ öÊÓØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðìêíò÷ùèèêóìéóîíçèûÊ×ÛûûØØÎóóó îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ öÊÓØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðìêíò÷ùèèêóìéóîíçèûÊ×ÛúûØØÎóóó îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ôÛÊÚÍÊúÛÐÐ ôÛÊÚÍÊóéúêÛÏÌÉ ôÛÊÚÍÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÊÚÍÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ óéúêÛÏÌÉøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ôÛÉÈ×ÊøÓÉÎ×Ã ôÛÉÈ×ÊñÛÈ×ÐÐÛ ôÛÉÈ×ÊíÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛóîúêÛÏÌ ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏ ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ öÊÓØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðîíìêíò÷ùèæíðçï÷é îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ öÊÓØÛÃìïì÷ûñôíçêèíèûðåóèôìêíò÷ùèæíðçï÷é îíêèôúíçîø÷ûéèúíçîøéíçèôúíçîøå÷éèúíçîø óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ðèêðèêðèêðèê ùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×øÓÉÎ×Ã ìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ×ÍÎøÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíî÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ úÛÐÐêÍÛØ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéú ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíî÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ óîúêÛÏÌÉ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúêÖÊ×× éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíî÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ óéúêÛÏÌÉ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúêÖÊ×× ÷úð ÷úè ÷úêÖÊ×× åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíî÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíî÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíî÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈÊ××È øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíî÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈÊ××È ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíî÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîóéúíÖÖêÛÏÌ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê éÌÐÓÈìÔÛÉ×î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíî÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíî÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈÊ××È ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíî÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈÊ××È íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéú ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíî÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ïÛÎÙÔ×ÉÈ×ÊûÆ×ÎÇ× ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè øóæ îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíî÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏåÛÃ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíî÷ÄÓÉÈÓÎÕ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ× øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔÍÇÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ úÛÐÐêÍÛØ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéù ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔÍÇÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ óîúêÛÏÌÉ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúêÖÊ×× éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéú ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔÍÇÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ óéúêÛÏÌÉ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúêÖÊ×× ÷úð ÷úè ÷úêÖÊ×× åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔÍÇÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔÍÇÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéù ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔÍÇÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈÊ××È øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔÍÇÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈÊ××È ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéù ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔÍÇÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîóéúíÖÖêÛÏÌ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê éÌÐÓÈìÔÛÉ×î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔÍÇÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéú ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔÍÇÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈÊ××È ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéù ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔÍÇÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈÊ××È íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéø ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔÍÇÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ïÛÎÙÔ×ÉÈ×ÊûÆ×ÎÇ× ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè ê÷ö îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéú ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔÍÇÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏåÛÃ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéú ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔÍÇÈìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ× øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ úÛÐÐêÍÛØ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéù ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ óîúêÛÏÌÉ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúêÖÊ×× éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéú ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ óéúêÛÏÌÉ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúêÖÊ×× ÷úð ÷úè ÷úêÖÊ×× åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéù ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈÊ××È øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈÊ××È ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéù ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîóéúíÖÖêÛÏÌ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê éÌÐÓÈìÔÛÉ×î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈÊ××È ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéù ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈÊ××È íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéù ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ïÛÎÙÔ×ÉÈ×ÊûÆ×ÎÇ× ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè ê÷ö îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéú ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏåÛÃ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéú ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ× øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ìïì÷ûñôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ úÛÐÐêÍÛØ øÛÈ× ðûè÷÷æ÷îóîõôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ óîúêÛÏÌÉ øÛÈ× ðûè÷÷æ÷îóîõôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúêÖÊ×× éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ óéúêÛÏÌÉ øÛÈ× ðûè÷÷æ÷îóîõôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúêÖÊ×× ÷úð ÷úè ÷úêÖÊ×× åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ðûè÷÷æ÷îóîõôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÊÚÍÊúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ðûè÷÷æ÷îóîõôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéú ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈÊ××È øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ðûè÷÷æ÷îóîõôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈÊ××È ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ðûè÷÷æ÷îóîõôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéú ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîóéúíÖÖêÛÏÌ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ðûè÷÷æ÷îóîõôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê éÌÐÓÈìÔÛÉ×î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ðûè÷÷æ÷îóîõôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏúÍÇÐ×ÆÛÊØ ôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈÊ××È ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ðûè÷÷æ÷îóîõôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéú ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîôÛÉÈ×ÊéÈÊ××È íÊÛÎÕ×ÅÍÍØûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ðûè÷÷æ÷îóîõôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéú ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ïÛÎÙÔ×ÉÈ×ÊûÆ×ÎÇ× ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ðûè÷÷æ÷îóîõôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè ê÷ö îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíî ûÎÛÔ×ÓÏåÛÃ ñÛÈ×ÐÐÛûÆ×ÎÇ× øÛÈ× ðûè÷÷æ÷îóîõôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ× øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ðûè÷÷æ÷îóîõôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ å××ÑØÛÃ ìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ× øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ðûè÷îóõôèôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ öÊÓØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîùÐ×Ï×ÎÈÓÎ×éÈÊ××È øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ì÷ûñûêêóæûðôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû ìêíò÷ùèûÎÛÔ×ÓÏõÛÊØ×ÎåÛÐÑûØØ×ÎØÇÏóóó ûîûðãéóéùíîøóèóíîã×ÛÊ öÊÓØÛÃìïåÓÈÔìÊÍÒ×ÙÈéÙ×ÎÛÊÓÍ óîè÷êé÷ùèóíîìÊÍÒ×ÙÈ÷ÎÈÊÛÎÙ× øÓÉÎ×ÃåÛÃ øÛÈ× ì÷ûñûêêóæûðôíçê ïíæ÷ï÷îèðûî÷éùûìûùóèãæíðçï÷æ ù îúð îúè îúê éúð éúè éúê ÷úð ÷úè ÷úê åúð åúè åúê î éïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ ÷ åïÍÆ×Ï×ÎÈÉ êÈèÇÊÎùÍÏÌÍÎ×ÎÈ ã×ÐÐÍÅùÐ×ÛÊÛÎÙ× èíèûðùûìûùóèãçèóðóâûèóíî ð÷æ÷ðíöé÷êæóù÷ðíéû Anaheim GardenWalk Addendum IIIFriday 7-8 PM Hour (Peak Arrivals) 6: Disneyway & Clementine St Queues Lane GroupEBLEBTEBRWBLWBTNBLNBTSBLSBT Lane Group Flow (vph)111302189731117311180210 v/c Ratio0.620.130.230.520.050.280.100.380.24 Control Delay71.725.05.374.117.654.123.967.815.3 Queue Delay0.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.00.0 Total Delay71.725.05.374.117.654.123.967.815.3 Queue Length 50th (ft)99591651458253623 Queue Length 95th (ft)m141915511530107506459 Internal Link Dist (ft)755529565420 Turn Bay Length (ft)180250120125 Base Capacity (vph)405229081730320213031067368872 Starvation Cap Reductn000000000 Spillback Cap Reductn000000000 Storage Cap Reductn000000000 Reduced v/c Ratio0.270.130.230.240.050.240.100.220.24 Intersection Summary m Volume for 95th percentile queue is metered by upstream signal. 2/4/2011Synchro 7 - Report Anaheim GardenWalk Addendum IIIFriday 7-8 PM Hour (Peak Arrivals) 14: Disneyway & AGW Entrance Queues Lane GroupEBTWBLWBTNBLNBR Lane Group Flow (vph)679401421150552 v/c Ratio0.87dr0.500.130.330.68 Control Delay7.518.06.523.67.0 Queue Delay0.00.00.00.00.0 Total Delay7.518.06.523.67.0 Queue Length 50th (ft)1012832520 Queue Length 95th (ft)391893910074 Internal Link Dist (ft)365755407 Turn Bay Length (ft)230 Base Capacity (vph)14668033196455817 Starvation Cap Reductn00000 Spillback Cap Reductn00000 Storage Cap Reductn00000 Reduced v/c Ratio0.460.500.130.330.68 Intersection Summary dr Defacto Right Lane. Recode with 1 though lane as a right lane. 2/4/2011Synchro 7 - Report ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò è ATTACHMENT NO. 1 I (PTMU) STONE CENTER I (PTMU) VACANT SP 92-2SP 92-2 DA1DA1 PLANTATIONVACANT MOBILE ESTATES SP 92-2 (MHP) DA1SP 92-2 PLANTATION DA1 MOBILE ESTATESDEV 2011-00033 HOLIDAY INN / STAYBRIDGE SUITES ANAHEIM SP 92-2 DA1 VACANT RM-4 RM-4 RM-4 RM-4 APTS APTS APTS FOURPLEX 24 DU 24 DU 24 DU T (MHP) DEL RAY RM-4 RM-4 RM-4 RM-4 MOBILE ESTATES APTS APTS APTS FOURPLEX C-G 8 DU 8 DU 8 DU RETAIL RM-4 RM-4 RM-4 RM-4 APTS APTS APTS APTS 8 DU 5 DU 8 DU 8 DU 050100 p Aerial Photo: May 2010 Feet APN: Location A 137-321-92 (A) 137-321-33 (B) Location B 137-321-34 (B) APPEAL OF ADMINISTRATIVE AMENDMENT TO CUP NO. 4153 DEV2011-00033 1855 and 1915 South Manchester Avenue - Location A 1929 - 1937 South Manchester Avenue - Location B 11127 ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò ï ðëðïðð p ß»®·¿´ Ð¸±¬±æ Ó¿§ îðïð Ú»»¬ Ô±½¿¬·±² ß ßÐÒæ ïíéóíîïóçî øß÷ ïíéóíîïóíí øÞ÷ Ô±½¿¬·±² Þ ïíéóíîïóíì øÞ÷ ßÐÐÛßÔ ÑÚ ßÜÓ×Ò×ÍÌÎßÌ×ÊÛ ßÓÛÒÜÓÛÒÌ ÌÑ ÝËÐ ÒÑò ìïëí ÜÛÊîðïïóðððíí ïèëë ¿²¼ ïçïë Í±«¬¸ Ó¿²½¸»¬»® ßª»²«» ó Ô±½¿¬·±² ß ïçîç ó ïçíé Í±«¬¸ Ó¿²½¸»¬»® ßª»²«» ó Ô±½¿¬·±² Þ ïïïîé ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò î ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò í ßÌÌßÝØÓÛÒÌ ÒÑò ì