PC 2012/10/08
City of Anaheim
Planning Commission
Agenda
Monday, October 8, 2012
Council Chamber, City Hall
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, California
• Chair: Victoria Ramirez
• Chair Pro-Tempore: Harry Persaud
• Commissioners: Peter Agarwal, Paul Bostwick, Stephen Faessel,
Michelle Lieberman, John Seymour
• Call To Order - 5:00 p.m.
• Pledge Of Allegiance
• Public Comments
• Public Hearing Items
• Commission Updates
• Discussion
• Adjournment
For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the
agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary.
A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning Department,
200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also
available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday,
October 4, 2012, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the
Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally
exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the
Planning Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim,
California, during regular business hours.
You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following
e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net
10/08/12
Page 2 of 6
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS
Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications,
Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations,
Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission
action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written
form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City
Clerk.
The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for
public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by
the City Clerk of said hearing.
If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council
at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M.
Public Comments:
This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission or public comments on agenda items with the
exception of public hearing items.
10/08/12
Page 3 of 6
Public Hearing Items
ITEM NO. 2
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-04952D
(DEV2010-00050A)
Location: 401 North Anaheim Boulevard
The applicant requests to amend a previously-approved
conditional use permit to modify conditions of approval and
permit a Type 48 (On Sale General – Public Premises)
ABC alcoholic beverage license for an existing nightclub
(Ember Café and Music Club).
Environmental Determination: The proposed action is
Categorically Exempt from the requirement to prepare
additional environmental documentation per California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines - Class 1
(Existing Facilities).
Continued from the September 10, 2012 Planning
Commission meeting.
Staff Report
New Correspondence
Project Planner:
David See
dsee@anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 3
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05621
VARIANCE NO. 2012-04915
(DEV2012-00078)
Location: 230 South Euclid Street
The applicant requests to establish a church within an
existing shopping center with fewer parking spaces than
required by Code.
Environmental Determination: The proposed action is
Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare
additional environmental documentation per California
Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Class 1
(Existing Facilities).
Continued from the September 24, 2012 Planning
Commission meeting.
Staff Report
New Correspondence
Project Planner:
Andy Nogal
anogal@anaheim.net
10/08/12
Page 4 of 6
ITEM NO. 4
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2011-05550
VARIANCE NO. 2012-04914
FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2011-00001
(DEV2011-00011)
Location: 1640-1650 South Harbor Boulevard
The applicant requests to demolish 24 existing motel rooms
and construct 37 new motel rooms including the addition of
approximately 800 square feet of retail space with setbacks
that are less than required by Code and fewer parking
spaces than required by Code.
Environmental Determination: Mitigated Negative
Declaration.
Staff Report
New Correspondence
Project Planner:
Scott Koehm
skoehm@anaheim.net
Adjourn to Monday, October 22, 2012 at 5:00 p.m.
10/08/12
Page 5 of 6
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at:
4:00 p.m. October 3, 2012_
(TIME) (DATE)
LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK
SIGNED:
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to
all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or
national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate
alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the
Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and
regulations adopted in implementation thereof.
Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including
auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such
modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning Department either
in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at
(714) 765-5139, no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled
meeting.
La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a
todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza ,
color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera
federal.
Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos
alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección
202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las
normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo.
Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo
medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar
dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria
de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o
por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la
reunión programada.
10/08/12
Page 6 of 6
S C H E D U L E
2012
October 22
November 5
November 19
December 3
December 17
December 31
RS-3DUPLEX
R S -2SFR
RS-3SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
R S -2
T R IP L E X
R S -3
T R IP L E X
C -G
A U T O R E P A IR /S E R V IC E
R S -2SFR
R S -3
D U P L E X
R M -4APT S8 D U R S -3SFRRS-3DUPLEXC -G
R E S T A U R A N T
C -G
O F F IC E S
R S -2SFR
R S -2SFR
C -GRETA IL
T A P T S
2 0 D U
C -GAPT S5 D U
RS-3RELIGIOUS USE
R S -3SFR
C -G
R E L IG IO U S U S E
R S -36 D U
RS-3SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
R S -3
V A C A N T
C-GSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
RS-3DUPLEX
RM-3RETAIL
RS-3TRIPLEX
R S -3SFR
C -GRETA IL
R S -3
T R IP L E X
RS-3SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
R S -2SFR
R M -4PAR K
P R O M E N A D E
A P T S
2 4 D U RS-3SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCERS-3DUPLEX
C -G
O F F IC E S
R S -3SFR
R M -4
A P T S
1 0 D U
C -GSFR
RS-3DUPLEX
TVAC A N T
R S -3
F O U R P L E X
RS-3SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE
C -GRETA IL
C -G
R E L IG IO U S U S E
R S -3SFRRS-3SFR
T
R E L IG IO U S U S E
R M -4
A P T S
1 2 D U R M -4SFR
R S -2SFR
C -G
O F F IC E S
RS-3TRIPLEX
R M -4SFR
T
P E A R S O N P A R K
C -GVACA N TC-GVACA N T C-GAUTO SALESR M -4 T
C -G
P A R K IN G
C -G
N IG H T C L U B
C -G
R E L IG IO U S U S E
C -GRETA IL
C -GRETA IL
P A R K IN G L O T
C -G
R E L IG IO U S U S E
N ANAHEI
M BLVDS ANAHEI
M BL
VDN LEMON STW C Y P R E S S S T N CLAUDI
NA STW A L B E R T A S T
W S Y C A M O R E S T
W A D E L E S TN ZEYN STE A D E L E S T
E S Y C A M O R E S T
E C Y P R E S S S TN CLAUDI
NA STN.
EAST STW . LIN C O L N A V E
E. LA PALMA AVE
E . L I N C O L N A V E
S.
EAST STN.
HARBOR BLVDW. LA PALMA AVE
W . B R O A D W A Y
E . B R O A D W A Y
S.
ANAHEI
M BLVDW . B R O A D W A Y
E . B R O A D W A Y
4 0 1 North Anaheim Bo ulevard
D E V N o. 2010-00050A
Subject Property APN: 035-101-15035-101-14035-101-17035-101-16
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
N ANAHEI
M BLVDS ANAHEI
M BL
VDN LEMON STW C Y P R E S S S T N CLAUDI
NA STW A L B E R T A S T
W S Y C A M O R E S T
W A D E L E S TN ZEYN STE A D E L E S T
E S Y C A M O R E S T
E C Y P R E S S S TN CLAUDI
NA STN.
EAST STW . LIN C O L N A V E
E. LA PALMA AVE
E . L I N C O L N A V E
S.
EAST STN.
HARBOR BLVDW. LA PALMA AVE
W . B R O A D W A Y
E . B R O A D W A Y
S.
ANAHEI
M BLVDW . B R O A D W A Y
E . B R O A D W A Y
4 0 1 North Anaheim Bo ulevard
D E V N o. 2010-00050A
Subject Property APN: 035-101-15035-101-14035-101-17035-101-16
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2
- 1 - PC2012-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THAT A CLASS 1
CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION IS THE APPROPRIATE
ENVIRONMENTAL DOCUMENTATION AND APPROVING
AN AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-04952
AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2010-00050A)
(401 NORTH ANAHEIM BOULEVARD)
WHEREAS, on February 23, 2005 and subject to certain conditions of approval,
the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the “Planning
Commission”), by its Resolution No. PC2005-28, did approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-
04952 to permit a public dance hall, banquet hall and a community religious assembly facility
with on-premises sales and consumption of alcoholic beverages and an off-site parking lot for a
period of two (2) years, to expire on February 23, 2007 (herein referred to as the "Original
CUP") on that certain real property located at 401 North Anaheim Boulevard in the City of
Anaheim, as legally described on Exhibit A attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, on January 7, 2008, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No.
PC2008-5, approved an amendment to the Original CUP to reinstate the permit to retain a
previously-approved public dance hall, banquet hall, and community and religious assembly with
on-premises sales and consumption of alcoholic beverages and an off-site parking lot, amend
previously-approved plans, permit a cover charge, and amend conditions of approval to remove
the time limitation; and
WHEREAS, on May 10, 2010, the Planning Commission, by its Resolution No.
PC2010-031, approved another amendment to the Original CUP to add a patio to an existing
public dance hall/restaurant and modify conditions of approval regarding food service, age
restrictions, and the service of alcoholic beverages within the patio areas; and
WHEREAS, the Property is developed with an existing nightclub building. The
building is located in the C-G (General Commercial) zone. The adjacent parking lot to the west
is located in the T (Transition) and RM-4 (Multiple Family Residential) zones. Property is
designated for Mixed Use land uses in the City of Anaheim General Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for an
amendment to the Original CUP (herein referred to as "Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-
04952D") to modify conditions of approval and permit a Type 48 (On Sale General – Public
Premises) ABC alcoholic beverage license for an existing nightclub (collectively referred to
herein as the "proposed project"); and
- 2 - PC2012-***
WHEREAS, the conditions of approval which were the subject of the Original
CUP, as said conditions were subsequently amended by Resolutions No. PC2005-28, PC2008-5,
and PC2010-031, shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Previous Conditions of
Approval"; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic
Center in the City of Anaheim on September 10, 2012, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing
having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions Chapter 18.60
of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the proposed
project to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith, and the
item was continued by the Planning Commission to October 8, 2012 meeting; and
WHEREAS, as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act
(Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning
Commission finds and determines that the proposed project is within that class of projects which
consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures
or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this
determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and
study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for an amendment to the Original CUP to modify
conditions of approval and permit a Type 48 (On Sale General – Public Premises) ABC alcoholic
beverage license for an existing nightclub, does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed amendment to the Original CUP to permit a Type 48 (On Sale
General – Public Premises) ABC alcoholic beverage license for an existing nightclub is properly
one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Section
18.08.030.010 (Uses) of the Zoning Code.
2. The proposed amendment to the Original CUP to permit a Type 48 ABC
alcoholic beverage license for an existing nightclub would not adversely affect the surrounding
land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located, as
conditioned herein, and with the operational restrictions such as a complimentary valet parking
service, no outdoor amplified music, and security plan to ensure no disturbances occur in the
surrounding neighborhood.
3. The size and shape of the Property is adequate to allow the full development of
the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health, safety and
general welfare of the public because the Property currently contains adequate parking to
accommodate the nightclub and no increase in intensity is proposed.
- 3 - PC2012-***
4. The traffic generated by the amendment to the Original CUP to permit a a Type
48 ABC license for an existing nightclub would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and
highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the intensity of the use
and number of vehicles entering and exiting the Property will not increase as a result of this
proposal.
5. The granting of the amendment to the Original CUP under the conditions imposed
will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the
operational characteristics of the business will not be intensified.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does
hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-04952D, subject to the conditions of approval
described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated by this reference, which are hereby
found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the
health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further
time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be
amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing
is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s), (ii) the
modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and (iii) the applicant has
demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this permit is approved without limitations
on the hours of operation or the duration of the use. Amendments, modifications and revocations
of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Anaheim
Municipal Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find
and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's
compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition,
or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be
deemed null and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes
approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal
Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not
include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other
applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all
charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the
issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the
approval of this application.
- 4 - PC2012-***
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the conditions of approval attached to this
Resolution as Exhibit B amends the Previous Conditions of Approval and, except as specifically
amended hereby, the Previous Conditions of Approval shall remain in full force and effect. To
the extent that there is any conflict or inconsistency between the conditions of approval attached
to this Resolution as Exhibit B and the Previous Conditions of Approval, the conditions of
approval attached to this Resolution as Exhibit B shall control and govern the Property.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission
meeting of October 8, 2012. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in
Chapter 18.60 (“Zoning Provisions - General”) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to
appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim
City Planning Commission held on October 8, 2012, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of October, 2012.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 5 - PC2012-***
- 6 - PC2012-***
EXHIBIT “B”
AMENDMENT TO CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-04952
(CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2004-04952D)
(DEV2010-00050A)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW
BY
SIGNED
OFF BY
GENERAL
1 Subject property shall be developed, maintained and operated
substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted
to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file
with the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, and 3 and
as conditioned herein.
Planning
2 Any tree and/or landscaping planted on-site shall be replaced in a
timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased
and/or dead.
Code
Enforcement
3 Gates shall not be installed across any driveway in a manner which
may adversely affect vehicular traffic in the adjacent public streets.
Installation of any gates shall conform to Engineering Standard Plan
No. 475 and shall be subject to the review and approval of the City
Traffic and Transportation Manager.
Public Works
– Traffic
4 The business shall provide a loading zone for the valet parking
service.
Planning
5 No required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for
outdoor storage uses.
Planning
6 Roof-mounted equipment shall be screened from view in accordance
with the requirements of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to
the CG (General Commercial) Zone.
Planning
7 Trash storage areas shall be provided and maintained in a location
acceptable to the Public Works Department and in accordance with
approved plans on file with said Department. Said storage areas
shall be designed, located and screened so as not to be readily
identifiable from adjacent streets. The walls of the storage areas
shall be protected from graffiti opportunities by the use of plant
materials such as minimum one-gallon size clinging vines planted
on maximum three-foot centers or tall shrubbery.
Planning,
Public Works
-Sanitation
8 The use of any amplifying system or device shall be prohibited on
the patio and/or balcony areas, and the use of any such system or
device inside the premises shall not be audible at the property line.
Police,
Code
Enforcement
- 7 - PC2012-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW
BY
SIGNED
OFF BY
9 Any permitted event or activity under the control of the business
owner shall not create sound levels which violate any ordinance of
the City of Anaheim as described in Sections 6.70 and 6.72 of the
Anaheim Municipal Code. Moreover, there shall be no amplified,
D.J., acoustic, or any other such music permitted outside of the
building, including the outdoor patio and balcony areas.
Police,
Code
Enforcement
10 There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind or type,
including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting
or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior
displays of alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to
the exterior shall constitute a violation of this condition.
Police
11 A revised security plan shall be submitted to prevent loitering and
disturbances from occurring outside the building, secure the parking
lots, and monitor pedestrian traffic across Anaheim Boulevard,
subject to review and approval by the Anaheim Police Department
and Code Enforcement Division. Security on the property,
including the parking lot area, shall be provided to the satisfaction of
the Anaheim Police Department to deter unlawful conduct on the
part of employees or patrons, or to promote the safe and orderly
assembly and movement of persons and vehicles, and/or to prevent
disturbance of the neighborhood by excessive noise created by
patrons entering or leaving the premises. The security measures
implemented for each event, including the number of security
guards for each area of the premises shall be subject to review and
approval by the Police Department.
Police
12 Any and all security officers provided shall comply with all State
and Local ordinances regulating their services, including, without
limitation, Chapter 11.5 of Division 3 of the California Business and
Profession Code (Section 4.16.070 AMC).
Police
13 The business shall not be operated in such a way as to be detrimental
to the public health, safety or welfare.
Police,
Code
Enforcement
14 No person under the age of twenty-one (21) shall be allowed on the
premises any time it is open for business.
Police
15 There shall be no public telephones on the premises located outside
the building and within the control of the business owner.
Code
Enforcement
16 The business owner shall not employ or permit any persons to solicit
or encourage others, directly or indirectly, to buy them drinks in the
licensed premises under any commission, percentage, cover charge
or any other form of admission charge, salary, or other profit-
sharing plan, scheme or conspiracy.
Police
- 8 - PC2012-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW
BY
SIGNED
OFF BY
17 The property shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion
by providing regular landscape maintenance, removal of trash or
debris, and removal of graffiti within twenty-four (24) hours from
time of occurrence.
Code
Enforcement
18 The sale of alcoholic beverages for consumption off the premises
shall be prohibited.
Police
19 The rear doors of the facility shall be equipped on the inside with an
automatic locking device and shall be closed at all times, and shall
not be used as a means of access by patrons to and from the licensed
premises. Temporary use of these doors for delivery of supplies
does not constitute a violation.
Police
20 Trash shall not be emptied into outside trash containers between the
hours of 10 p.m. to 7 a.m. daily.
Police,
Code
Enforcement
21 The floor space provided for dancing shall be free of any furniture
or partitions and maintained in a smooth and safe condition.
Police
22 There shall be no outdoor special events allowed on the premises. Police,
Code
Enforcement
23 VIP/Hospitality alcoves provided on the premises shall have the
following characteristics:
(a) No physical obstruction shall be attached, fastened, or
connected in any manner to any section of the wall or ceiling at
the alcove openings.
(b) No physical obstruction, including but not limited to, planters,
partitions, or items of décor, shall be placed or attached to any
section of the floor at the alcove openings.
Police
24 Signs shall be posted at all exits of the premises, including out of the
patio area, notifying patrons of the prohibition of alcoholic
beverages from leaving the confines of the establishment.
Police
25 If valet service is provided, it shall be free of charge Adequate space
for self parking on the property shall be provided to prevent off-site
parking.
Police,
Code
Enforcement
26 Adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas, aisles,
passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be
provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate
illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or
about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe,
secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site.
Police
- 9 - PC2012-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW
BY
SIGNED
OFF BY
Said lighting shall be decorative and complementary to the
architecture of the building.
27 Code Enforcement staff shall conduct three unannounced
inspections over a one year period, ending on October 8, 2013, to
determine on-going compliance with conditions of approval. The
cost of these inspections shall be billed to and paid by the applicant.
Code
Enforcement
28 Loitering shall be prohibited on or around the premises. Police,
Code
Enforcement
29 The number of persons on the premises shall not exceed the
maximum occupancy load as determined by the Anaheim Fire
Department. Signs indicating the occupant load shall be posted in a
conspicuous place on an approved sign near the main exit from the
room.
Fire
30 Any amusement machines, video game devices, or pool tables
maintained upon the premises shall be in compliance with the
Anaheim Municipal Code.
Code
Enforcement
31 The business owner shall police the area under their control in an
effort to prevent the loitering of persons about the premises.
Police
32 The business owner is responsible for maintaining free of litter the
area on and adjacent to the premises over which they have control.
Police,
Code
Enforcement
33 The use of all pyrotechnical material, special effects and fireworks
shall be permitted only if, and to the extent, approved by the
Anaheim Fire Department prior to their use.
Fire
34 The business shall provide for bus/shuttle loading and unloading,
either on or off-site, subject to review and approval of the Planning
and Public Works Departments.
Planning,
Public
Works-
Traffic
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
401 North Anaheim Boulevard • Anaheim, CA 92805 • (714) 991-5101
October 1, 2012 Anaheim Planning Commission 200 S. Anaheim Blvd., 1st Floor Anaheim, CA 92803 Dear Planning Commission: This letter serves as a formal request to amend Conditional Use Permit No. 2004-04952 to establish a nightclub as defined in the Anaheim Municipal Code. The Planning Commission adopted Resolution No. PC2010-031 on May 10, 2010 to allow a patio and amending certain conditions of approval pertaining to food service, age restrictions, and serving alcohol within the patio area. Our goal with this prior amendment was to preserve the restaurant but allow for more operational flexibility to compensate for revenues that were not being realized on the restaurant side of the business during the ongoing recession. Our goal at the outset was to be a restaurant as reflected in the design of the building and kitchen facilities. We have recently explored food concepts that would work with the surrounding demographic and day time population. We spoke with restaurateurs and have shown them our establishment in an attempt to find the right menu and food service that could be successful at our location. In the end, the numbers do not justify the risk and expense to implement a new food concept for Ember, especially with the percentage of gross food sales mandated by the City’s zoning code. This is why we are requesting to amend the conditional use permit to allow a nightclub, which will also require us to have a Type 48 License. There are a number of conditions in Resolution No. PC2010-031 that we are requesting to modify or delete as they impact the operation of the business while providing little or no benefit to the public. We also understand that some of the restrictions and standard conditions of approval that applied to our prior conditional use permit will be removed should the nightclub be approved. The conditions requested for deletion are as follows: Condition No. 2: A menu shall be provided prior to final building and zoning inspections.
This condition would not apply to a nightclub. Condition No. 3: That at all times when the premises is open for business, the premises shall be maintained as a bona fide restaurant and shall provide a menu containing an assortment of foods normally offered in such restaurant.
This condition would not apply to a nightclub.
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
401 North Anaheim Boulevard • Anaheim, CA 92805 • (714) 991-5101
Condition No. 5: Subject alcoholic beverage license shall not be exchanged for a public premises (bar) type license nor shall the establishment be operated as a public premise as defined in Section 23039 of the California Business and Professions Code.
This condition would not apply to a nightclub. Condition No. 6: The gross sales of alcoholic beverages shall not exceed 40% of the gross sales of all retail sales during any three (3) month period. The applicant shall maintain records on a quarterly basis indicating the separate amounts of alcohol and other items. These records shall be made available for inspection by any City of Anaheim official during reasonable business hours.
This condition would not apply to a nightclub. Condition No. 13: The business shall provide complimentary valet service to prevent off-site parking. Information pertaining to the valet service shall be provided to potential customers holding private events at the facility.
This condition was intended to prevent patrons from parking off-site. After our original
approval we added additional parking, which was not required by the City, at substantial cost
to us on the north and west sides of the building. In addition to the free parking that we offer
across the street from Ember at the Landmark, we provide paid valet parking onsite.
The onsite valet parking allows us to move cars in and out of the parking lot efficiently
reducing the potential of disturbances to surrounding properties and clearing out the club
quickly at the end of the night. Allowing self parking in the Ember lot on the west side of
Anaheim Boulevard would likely result in more disturbances from patrons talking loudly,
slamming doors, cars alarms, etc. Moreover, paid valet parking allows us to provide extra
security in and around the lot to further minimize potential disturbances in the surrounding
neighborhood. Lastly, eliminating the 18 and over nights will dramatically reduce the
likelihood of patrons parking in the neighborhood as these were the nights when most of
disturbances occurred. Condition No. 23: During private events, no minor under the age of sixteen (16) years shall be allowed to attend the dance area, unless accompanied by a parent or guardian. During public dance hall events (when a cover charge is collected from the general public), minors under the age of eighteen (18) years shall not be allowed on the premises.
This condition would not apply to a nightclub, as minors would not be allowed. Condition No. 25: The business shall submit an updated security plan entitled “Security Protocol for Ember Café and Music Club” as stipulated in the applicant’s letter of request. Said plan shall address the wristband system and other measures necessary to ensure that alcohol consumption by underage patrons does not occur on the premises. This plan shall be reviewed and approved by the Police Department prior to any changes to the existing operation.
401 North Anaheim Boulevard • Anaheim, CA 92805 • (714) 991-5101
The condition for wristbands would not apply to a nightclub, as minors would not be allowed.
An updated security plan will be submitted for Police Department review and approval. Condition No. 41: There shall be no amplified music permitted outside the building, including the outdoor patio and balcony areas.
We understand the concern regarding noise disturbance to our neighbors. Other conditions of
approval contained in Resolution No. PC2010-031 already address this issue. The concern is
that “outside the building” may prevent us from obtaining a Special Event Permit. The Special
Event Permit has provisions to address amplified music associated with outdoor events. We
request that noise exclusive of the patio and balcony areas be addressed through this process.
Lastly, in consideration of these requested changes, we request that they become effective on
November 1, 2012. We have contractual commitments through the end of October 2012 and
we would be in breach of those commitments if we could not operate our club consistent with
the existing entitlement through the end of this month. In conclusion, we believe that the proposed modifications are necessary to address staff concerns and to operate the business in an efficient manner. We take pride in the immaculate condition and appearance of our property and our continued responsiveness to neighborhood concerns. Should you have any questions or concerns, please feel free to contact me at (949) 244-8789 or Greg McCafferty at (714) 606-7208. Sincerely, Steve Elkins Ember Café and Music Club
Security Protocol for Ember Café and Music Club
I. Hiring Requirements for Security Personnel
• Any applicant being hired for a position on the Ember security team will be
required to consent to a background search. This search will include a social
security trace, a check of department of motor vehicles, and a criminal history
search. These searches will be conducted by Ember’s Licensed and Bonded
security firm.
• All applicants must have extensive experience in the security service industry,
and be able to submit all references. Any discrepancies of information
submitted will automatically disqualify a candidate for employment.
• All applicants must have current guard card certification, and carry a current,
certified guard card.
II. Rule and Procedures
• Security staff will clock in and be on duty at least 30 minutes before, and 45
minutes after business hours.
• Security staff will report for duty in uniform and ready to work. This uniform will
consist of a black sport jacket, black button down shirt and black slacks. All
uniforms will be clean and presentable for duty.
• Upon clocking in security staff will report to their supervisor, or management, and
sign in for their nightly assignment. Each guard’s assignment will have specific
duties relative to his or her physical position in the venue. Certain assigned areas
will be subject to more intense oversight (hallways, stairways, entrances and exits,
patios, fire exits, etc.).
• Security must remain in full communication through venue issued radios at all
times. Radios will be used for official communication only, and will be provided
by the venue. During any incidents or emergencies the security team supervisor
will provide instructions for all security staff. Staff should remain off radio unless
pertinent information is being conveyed.
• Security will be monitoring the venue, its parking lots, and the surrounding
neighborhood during the entirety of any event. Duties will include; expediting
cars into the valet and parking areas, assisting with the guest line and entry of
guests, patrolling Sycamore Street, Adele Street, and the surrounding
neighborhood, looking for drinkers or suspicious activity, helping valet with
traffic control on the property, and assisting cars exiting the valet area on to
Anaheim Blvd.
• Security will maintain order inside and outside the premises, provide customer
assistance, and ensure that all rules and laws are abided by. ALL staff will be
responsible for helping security do this.
• Security personnel will be responsible for overseeing egress in all areas of venue.
All crash doors will unlocked but guarded during business hours.
• Security will assist valet staff with surveillance of the parking areas, especially at
the close of business.
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
• Security leads with extensive experience in identifying fake ID’s will be posted at
the entrance and be responsible for verifying the age of All guests by requiring a
legal form of identification. ALL patrons must be of legal age and carry a
valid form of identification. Identification will be visually checked by the leads
and with an ID scanning device.
• Specific dress code requirements will be enforced and may be subject to change
based on managements judgment. This will help dissuade any rough or
uncooperative people from attempting to gain entry.
• Security will enforce a no re-entry rule. Exceptions to this rule require that a
security guard must be with a guest, observing the guest at all times in order for
the guest to be aloud reentry.
• Door staff will be responsible for monitoring exact attendance. Attendance will be
recorded and communicated to management every quarter hour.
• All efforts will be made to ensure that all confrontations are kept to a minimum.
Ember’s security policy in confrontational situations is to protect the safety of all
guests and staff, to include the involved parties. Security policy regarding
confrontations between guests and other guests, or guests and staff is;
1. Engage in respectful dialogue with the involved parties.
2. Escort the involved parties outside for resolution and clarity if necessary.
3. Restrain aggressive or uncooperative violators with as little force as possible.
4. If need be, use reasonable force to protect other guests and staff from
aggressive or uncooperative violators and remove them from the premises.
5. ALL STAFF members (non security) are responsible for keeping their eyes
open and monitoring guest behavior. ALL STAFF will monitor guests
alcohol consumption, and help to maintain safe serving practices at all times.
6. Every effort will be made to identify any potential problems and peacefully
defuse them before the become confrontations. .
• The security lead and M.O.D will supervise the management of any situation and
be responsible for making sure security staff files an incident report. Incident
reports will consist of statements from all parities involved, time, location, and all
details of the incident. A recording from surveillance cameras will be copied and
included in the report. Video and incident report records will be available for law
enforcement agencies to assist in any investigations or inquiries.
• Security will manage last call and drink pick up enforcement. Fifteen minutes
before legal closing time (earlier if need be) music will be turned off, lights will
be turned on, and guests will be asked to put down their drinks and move towards
the exits. Security will monitor the crowd for intoxicated guests who may need
help.
• Security will be responsible for directing exiting cars onto Anaheim Blvd. in a
safe manor. ALL cars will be directed onto Anaheim Blvd only.
• After all guests have left the venue security will walk the surrounding area to
make sure all patrons have left the neighborhood clean. Any trash will be cleaned
up at this time.
• A final inspection of the property and the surrounding block will be done by the
owner or M.O.D to insure that no trash has been left behind on streets or private
propert y, and that all guests have left our neighborhood in a safe manor.
• All major decisions regarding changes in the security protocol will discussed with
ownership and management before implementation by the security company.
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
EMBER CAFÉ AND MUSIC CLUB
PHOTOS
View from Anaheim Blvd.
Auto sales lot to the south
Ember parking lot
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
View from Anaheim Blvd.
Auto Zone store to the north
View from Landmark parking lot
Landmark parking lot
Landmark banquet hall
Okuda body shop
ATTACHMENT NO. 9
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
C-GRETAIL
C-GSERVICESTATION
RM-4PARK PLACEAPTS20 DU
TLOARAELEMENTARY SCHOOL
C-GOFFICES
C-GRETAIL
C-GRETAIL
RM-4HAWAIIANAPTS30 DU
C-GSERVICESTATION
C-GRETAIL
RM-4PAMPASAPARTMENTS77 DU
RM-4LE CHATEAU APTS77 DU
C-GSERVICESTATION
C-GRETAIL
C-GRELIGIOUSUSE
C-G
C-GCAR WASH
RM-4BELAGE MANOR APARTMENTS180 DU
RM-4PAMPAS LANE APARTMENTS40 DU
C-GMEDICAL OFFICE
TNURSING HOME
RM-4PALM WESTAPTS20 DU
RM-4GEI LINGAPARTMENTS41 DU
C-GRETAIL
C-GRETAIL
RS-2SINGLE FAMILYRESIDENCE
RM-4LE CHATEAU APTS77 DU
C-GRETAIL
S EUCLID STW BROA DWAY
W PAM PAS LN
S FALCON ST
W. BROADWAY
W. LINCOLN AVE
S. EUCLID STS. BROOKHURST STN. EUCLID STS. WALNUT STS. M
A
N
C
H
E
S
T
E
R A
V
E
W. CRESCENT AVE
N. LOARA STW . LI N C O L N A V E
2 3 0 S o u t h E u cl id St r e e t
D E V N o . 2 0 1 2 -0 0 0 7 8
Subject Property APN: 250-101-03
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Ph ot o:Ma y 2 01 1
S EUCLID STW BROA DWAY
W PAM PA S LN
S FALCON ST
W. BROADWAY
W. LINCOLN AVE
S. EUCLID STS. BROOKHURST STN. EUCLID STS. WALNUT STS. M
A
N
C
H
E
S
T
E
R A
V
EN. BROOKHURST STW. CRESCENT AVE
N. LOARA STW . LI N C O L N A V E
2 3 0 Sou th Euclid Street
D E V N o. 2012-00078
Subject Property APN: 250-101-03
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2
- 1 - PC2012-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05621
AND VARIANCE NO. 2012-04915
AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2012-00078)
(230 SOUTH EUCLID STREET)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as
the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified Petition to approve Conditional Use Permit
No. 2012-05621 to establish a church facility in conjunction with a medical office and an
application for a variance, designated as Variance No. 2012-04915, from the following provision
of the Anaheim Municipal Code (herein referred to as the "Code") to permit less parking than
required for that certain real property located at 230 South Euclid Street in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as
Exhibit A, and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”); and
SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum number of parking spaces.
(242 spaces required for the entire commercial
center; 228 spaces provided)
WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately .39-acres, is developed with a
commercial retail building measuring approximately 6,300 square feet and is part of a larger
2.85-acre commercial retail center with six separate parcels. The Property is located in the C-G
(General Commercial) zone. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for
Commercial Neighborhood Center land uses; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on September 24, 2012, at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having
been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the
Code , to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and
variance and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith,
which public hearing was continued to the regular meeting of the Planning Commission held on
October 8, 2012; and
WHEREAS, as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public
Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning Commission
finds and determines that the proposed project is within that class of projects which consist of the
repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities,
involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this
determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
- 2 - PC2012-***
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing with respect to the request to establish a church facility in conjunction with a
medical office with less parking than required by the Code, does find and determine the
following facts:
1. The proposed request to establish a church facility in the General Commercial (C-G)
zone is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Section 18.10.030.010
(Community and Religious Assembly) of the Code.
2. The proposed conditional use permit to establish a church facility in an existing
commercial building, as conditioned herein, would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses
and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the
building is surrounded by and integrated with similar buildings and uses; and the peak operating
hours for the proposed church facility will occur during the lowest parking demand of the
adjacent businesses.
3. The size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full development of
the proposed church facility in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and
safety because the proposed church facility will be located within an existing commercial
building and is surrounded by compatible commercial uses.
4. The traffic generated by the proposed church facility will not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the
traffic generated by this use will occur after the highest peak evening hours and there will be no
simultaneous activities generating additional traffic on adjacent highways.
5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be
detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the proposed church
facility will be compatible with the surrounding area because the use is integrated with other uses
on within the commercial center and is not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request
for a variance to permit less parking than required by Code in conjunction with a church facility
and medical office should be approved for the following reasons:
1. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off-
street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces
necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably
foreseeable conditions of operation of such use because an operational plan/parking demand
analysis was prepared by the applicant dated July 22, 2012, determining that the current number
of parking spaces within the commercial center is sufficient to accommodate all of the uses on
- 3 - PC2012-***
the site including the new church facility and medical office. The operational plan/parking
demand analysis indicates that only 40 parking spaces will be required by the proposed use
during peak demand operating hours based on the number of church members and medical
patients proposed and since there are no simultaneous activities that will generate additional
parking demand. The other businesses on the property require a total of 182 parking spaces.
The church and medical office use would require 40 spaces during the highest peak demand for a
total of 222 spaces. The site currently provides a total of 228 spaces;
2. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the
demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of
the proposed use because the on-site parking within the commercial center will adequately
accommodate the peak parking demands of the proposed church facility, medical office and the
other uses on the site;
3. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the
demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate
vicinity of the proposed use because the on-site parking for the church facility and medical office
will adequately accommodate peak parking demands of all uses on the site. This church facility
and medical office generates a peak parking demand of 40 parking spaces;
4. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic
congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use because the
project site provides adequate ingress and egress points to the property and are designed to allow
for adequate on-site circulation; and
5. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede
vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate
vicinity of the proposed use because the project site has existing ingress or egress access points
that are designed to allow adequate on-site circulation and therefore will not impede vehicular
ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of
the church facility and medical office.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2012-05621 and Variance No. 2012-04915 subject to the
conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the
Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of
Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in
accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of
approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i)
equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition (s),
(ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant
progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this
permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
- 4 - PC2012-***
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of
the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Zoning Code of the City of
Anaheim and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not
include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other
applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges
related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of
the final invoice. Failure to pay all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this
application.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
October 8, 2012. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 of
the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in
the event of an appeal.
CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 5 - PC2012-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City
Planning Commission held on October 8, 2012, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of October 8, 2012.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 6 - PC2012-***
- 7 - PC2012-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2012-05621
AND VARIANCE NO. 2012-04915
(DEV2012-00078)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL REVIEW BY
SIGNED
OFF BY
PRIOR TO COMMENCEMENT OF THE USE
1 The business shall be equipped with an alarm system (silent or
audible).
Police
2 Address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily
readable from the street. Numbers should be visible during
hours of darkness. Rear entrance doors shall be numbered
with the same address numbers or suite number of the
business. Minimum height of 4” recommended.
Police
3 Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and
grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with
lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination
to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about
the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe,
secure environment for all person, property, and vehicles on-
site. All exterior doors shall have their own light source,
which shall adequately illuminate door areas at all hours to
make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the
premises and provide adequate illumination for persons exiting
the building. Said information shall be specifically shown on
plans submitted for Police Department, Community Services
Division approval.
Police
4 Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application, Form
APD 516, and return it to the Police Department prior to initial
alarm activation. This form is available at the Police
Department front counter, or it can be downloaded from the
following web site:
http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=678
Police
5 The rear doors of the premises shall be equipped on the inside
with an automatic locking device and shall be closed at all
times, and shall not be used as a means of access by patrons to
and from the licensed premises. Temporary use of these doors
for delivery of supplies does not constitute a violation.
Police
6 All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g.
deadbolt locks. Wide-angle peepholes or other viewing
device should be installed in solid doors where natural
surveillance is compromised. The locks shall be so
constructed that both the deadbolt and deadlocking latch can be
retracted by a single action of the inside doorknob/lever/turn
piece.
Police
- 8 - PC2012-***
7 The parking areas on the subject site shall be resurfaced and
re-striped per code requirements prior to final occupancy of the
church. Parking lot striping shall be provided, per City
Standard Detail No. 470, in areas where striping is
deteriorating. Disabled parking spaces shall be provided in
accordance with the Americans with Disabilities Act and City
Standard Detail No. 436-G.
Planning
8 The legal property owner shall submit an application for a
Subdivision Map Act Certificate of Compliance to the Public
Works Department, Development Services Division. A
Certificate of Compliance or Conditional Certificate of
Compliance shall be approved by the City Surveyor and
recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
Public Works,
Development
Services
GENERAL CONDITIONS
9 Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any
adjacent area under the control of the property owner shall be
removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied.
Code
Enforcement
10 No required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise
enclosed for outdoor storage. Planning/Code
Enforcement
11 No outdoor activities involving gathering of persons shall be
permitted on-site.
Planning/Code
Enforcement
12 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area
adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an
orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance
and removal of trash or debris.
Planning/Code
Enforcement
ONGOING DURING PROJECT OPERATIONS
13 The hours of operation for the church worship hall and social
hall/sunday school shall be limited to the hours and occupancy
outlined in the operational plan, except that the church will be
permitted to operate from 6:00 p.m. to 10:00 p.m. Monday
through Friday. Worship services and social hall activities
shall not operate simultaneously and these uses shall not
operate during the medical office’s business hours. Changes to
the operational plan are subject to review and approval by the
Planning Department and shall be based on the demonstrated
availability of an adequate number of parking spaces to
support any requested operational change.
Planning
14 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim
by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning
Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3 (Architectural
Plans), and as conditioned herein.
Planning
Grace Life Medical Center/Grace Mission Church International
230 South Euclid Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92802
OPERATIONAL PLAN
July 22, 2012
The intent of this Operational Plan is to summarize the usage of the proposed church and
medical office as it applies to the new site. This document describes the current and
proposed operational characteristics as it relates to operational hours and the associated
parking demand.
There are a total of 198 parking spaces available on the site of this facility.
CURRENT CHURCH OPERATION
The current 80 member church operates in an existing 3,009 square foot community
center multi-purpose hall in the City of Irvine and conducts various Sunday Church
activities consisting of the following:
Sunday (9:30PM-3:00PM)
• Adult Sunday school
• Church Service
• Children Sunday School
• After-Church Fellowship
Note: Church members who attend the worship service are the same members who
attend the other activities noted above.
FUTURE CHURCH OPERATION
The current Sunday church activities/hours of operation will vary slightly for the
proposed church from the current church operation. However, additional church
activities will be scheduled during weekday evening and Saturday evenings at the
proposed location that are not presently held at the current location.
Wednesday:
• Prayer meeting from 6:00PM-10:00PM
Friday:
• Church Bible Study from 6:00PM-10:00PM
Saturday:
• Church Fellowship from 6:00PM-10:00PM
Sunday:
• Worship Service from 8:00PM-12:00PM
• Choir Practice, Fellowship and other activities 12:00PM-6:00PM
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
CURRENT and FUTURE MEDICAL OFFICE OPERATION
The medical office operation is as follows:
• Hours and Days of Operation: Monday to Friday, 9:00AM-5:00PM
• Number of Patients: Maximum of 6 patient by appointment per hour.
• Number of Employees: 4 and 1 Doctor
Operation of the medical office at the proposed facility will remain consistent with the
current facility located in the City of Bellflower.
Proposed Parking Demand Matrix for Proposed Church and Medical Office Operations
There are no church activities on Monday, Tuesday, nor Thursday. On Wednesday
nights from 6:00-10:00p.m. there is a prayer meeting for about 10 people, on Friday from
nights 6:00PM-10:00PM there is a bible study group of up to 40 people.
MONDAY-FRIDAY
(MEDICAL OFFICE)
WEDNESDAY
(CHURCH)
FRIDAY
(CHURCH)
SATURDAY
(CHURCH)
SUNDAY
(CHURCH)
LOCATION USE 9:00AM-
12:00PM
12:00PM-
5:00PM
6:00PM-
10:00PM
6:00PM-
10:00PM
6:00PM-
10:00PM
8:00AM-
12:00PM
12:00PM-
6:00PM
Worship Hall Service - - - 40 members -
Bible study/2
=20 spaces -
- 80 members
– Worship
service /2=
40 spaces
-
Class - - - -
- - -
Activity - - - -
25 members –
Fellowship/2 =
spaces -12.5-
- -
Sunday School/
Social Hall
Service - - - -
-
- - -
Class - - - - - 10 Children
– Sunday
School/
(Concurrent
with worship
service)
-
Activity - - 10 member –
Payer
meeting/2=
5 spaces
-
25 members –
Fellowship/2 =
spaces -12.5-
- -
Sunday School/
Social Hall
Service - - - -
-
- - -
Class - - - -
-
- - -
Activity - - - - - - 20 members
- Choir
practice/2=
10 spaces
Medical Rooms Medical Office 6 patients
max/hour +
5 Office staff
/1=
11 spaces
6 patients
max/hour +
5 Office staff
/1=
11 spaces
- - - - -
Total Parking Demand
(198 Total Spaces)
11 11 5 20
25 40 10
Given the proposed parking demand based on the current church and medical office
situation, Grace Mission Church International and Grace Life Medical Center will
continue to operate and schedule events so as to prevent traffic/parking issues at the site
of this facility. Church events would not be scheduled during the medical office operation
hours. However, the parking spaces needed for events such as these would not exceed
the number of parking spaces available on site.
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
UP
UP
80' - 0"60' - 0"
29' - 9 1/2"28' - 2 1/2"29' - 11 1/2"48' - 0 1/2"205 SF
LOBBY
101
217 SF
OFFICE
102
89 SF
OFFICE
103
91 SF
OFFICE
104
1510 SF
WORSHIP
HALL
105
56 SF
ELECTRICAL
ROOM
106
181 SF
STORAGE
107
72 SF
PHONE
ROOM
108
1040 SF
SOCIAL
HALL/
SUNDAY
SCHOOL
109
546 SF
KITCHEN
110
140 SF
MEN'S
113
183 SF
WOMENS
114
1" = 10'-0"1 FIRST FLOOR PLAN
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
DN
60' - 0"29' - 0"162 SF
HALL
201
63 SF
HALL
202
159 SF
OFFICE
203
44 SF
STORAGE
204
73 SF
OFFICE
205
116 SF
OFFICE
206
324 SF
OFFICE
207
257 SF
OFFICE
209
71 SF
STORAGE
210
133 SF
STORAGE
211
173 SF
0FFICE
208
FIRST FLOOR ROF
1" = 10'-0"1 SECOND FLOOR PLAN
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
SP 92-1DA3APARKING LOT
SP 92-2DA1PARK VUE INN
SP 92-2DA1SYBRON DENTAL SPECIATIESSP 92-2DA1BEST WESTERNPARK PLACE HOTEL
SP 92-2DA1RESTAURANT
SP 92-1DA3ASOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON CO. EASEMENT
SP 92-1GardenWalkGARDENWALK
SP 92-1DA5ANAHEIM PLAZAHOTEL
SP 92-2DA1ANAHEIM INN
SP 92-2DA1ANAHEIMDEL SOL INN
SP 92-2DA1RESTAURANT
SP 92-2DA1ANAHEIM DESERT INN & SUITES
SP 92-2DA1SYBRON DENTAL SPECIATIES
SP 92-1DA1CALIFORNIA ADVENTURE
SP 92-1DA1CALIFORNIA ADVENTURE
SP 92-1DA1CALIFORNIA ADVENTURE
SP 92-1GardenWalkGARDENWALK
SP 92-2DA1RAMADA MAINGATE
S HARBOR BLVDW DISNEY WAY
W. BALL RD
S. LEWIS STW. KATELLA AVE
S. HARBOR BLVDE. BALL RD
S. WALNUT STS.
ANAHEIM BLVDE. KATELLA AVE
S. NINTH STS. HASTER STS. DISNEYLAND DRS. CLEMENTINE ST1 6 4 0 -1 650 South Harbor Boulevard
D E V N o. 2011-00011
Subject Property APN: 082-211-08082-211-09
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
S HARBOR BLVDW DISNEY WAY
W. BALL RD
S. LEWIS STW. KATELLA AVE
S. HARBOR BLVDE. BALL RD
S. WALNUT STS.
ANAHEIM BLVDE. KATELLA AVE
S. NINTH STS. HASTER STS. DISNEYLAND DRS. CLEMENTINE ST1 6 4 0 -1 650 South Harbor Boulevard
D E V N o. 2011-00011
Subject Property APN: 082-211-08082-211-09
ATTA CHMENT NO. 1
°0 50 100
Feet
Aeria l Pho to:May 20 11
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2
- 1 - PC2012-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2012-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2011-05550,
FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2011-00001 AND
VARIANCE NO. 2012-04914 AND MAKING CERTAIN
FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2011-00011)
(1640-1650 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as
the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2011-
05550, Final Site Plan No. 2011-00001 and Variance No. 2012-04914 to demolish 24 existing
motel rooms and construct 37 new motel rooms including the addition of approximately 800
square feet of retail space (the “Project”) with a variance from interior setback requirements and
fewer parking spaces than required by the Anaheim Municipal Code (herein referred to as the
"Code") for certain real property located at 1640-1650 South Harbor Boulevard in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as more particularly described on Exhibit A,
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”); and
WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 3.46-acres, is developed with the
Ramada Maingate Hotel. The Property is located in the SP92-2 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan
Zone. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Commercial Recreation land uses;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on October 8, 2012 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the
Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, a Mitigated Negative Declaration ("MND") was prepared to evaluate the
physical environmental impacts of the Project in conformance with the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein
referred to as “CEQA”) pursuant to State CEQA Guidelines Section 15070. The MND finds that
the project will have less than significant impacts to the environment, with the implementation of
mitigation measures; and
WHEREAS, the MND was circulated for a 20-day public review period from September
6, 2012, through September 26, 2012; and
WHEREAS, as the lead agency under the California Environmental Quality Act (Public
Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the Planning Commission
has reviewed and considered the MND and associated Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting
Program No. 0085c ("MMP"), together with written comment letters (if any) received during the
CEQA public review period along with any testimony received at the public hearing and, in
- 2 - PC2012-***
accordance with the requirements of CEQA, finds and determines that, with the imposition of
identified mitigation measures, the Project will not result in significant impacts to the
environment; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing with respect to the request to permit the Project on the Property does find and
determine the following facts:
1. The proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by
the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (SP92-2), subject to the approval of Variance No. 2012-04914
and the conditions of approval.
2. The proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and
development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the expansion of the
existing hotel will not create any additional impacts to the surrounding properties.
3. The size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or
health and safety because the expansion incremental and is similar to the existing building
footprint.
4. The traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the
incremental increase of 13 hotel rooms and 800 square feet of retail space is not significant
enough to create a noticeable increase in traffic.
5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be
detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the project is
an expansion of an existing hotel and Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared which
evaluated and provided mitigation for any potential impacts.
6. That the request to construct the Project complies with the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan (SP92-2), subject to the approval of Variance No. 2012-04890 and the conditions of
approval.
7. The design and layout of the proposed Project will not interfere with the use and
enjoyment of neighboring existing or future developments, and will not create traffic or
pedestrian hazards.
8. The architectural design of the proposed Project is compatible with the character of
the surrounding hotels and development located within the land area of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan.
- 3 - PC2012-***
9. The design of the proposed Project will provide a desirable environment for its
occupants, the visiting public, and its neighbors, through the appropriate use of materials, texture
and color, and will remain aesthetically appealing and be appropriately maintained.
10. The proposed Project will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or
materially injurious to the properties or improvements in the vicinity of the proposed Project.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the variance
request from setback requirements and fewer parking spaces than required by the Code should be
approved for the following reasons:
(a) SECTION NO. 18.116.090.040 Minimum building setbacks
(10 feet required; 2 feet proposed)
(b) SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum number of parking spaces.
(230 spaces required; 189 spaces proposed)
1. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off-
street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces
necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably
foreseeable conditions of operation of such use because a parking study was submitted by the
applicant determining that the proposed number of parking spaces for the project is sufficient to
accommodate the hotel property. The parking study indicates that 191 parking spaces will be
required by the hotel during the peak demand hours based on observations at the hotel and that a
parking management plan is required and included in the conditions of approval to accommodate
the deficiency of two parking spaces during this peak demand period;
2. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the
demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of
the proposed use because the on-site parking will adequately accommodate the parking demands
of the existing hotel;
3. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the demand and
competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the
proposed use because the on-site parking will adequately accommodate the parking demands of
the hotel;
4. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic
congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use because the
project site provides adequate ingress and egress points to the Property and are designed to allow
for adequate on-site circulation; and
5. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede vehicular
ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of
the proposed use because the project site has existing ingress or egress access points that are
- 4 - PC2012-***
designed to allow adequate on-site circulation and therefore will not impede vehicular ingress to
or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the hotel
uses.
6. That there are special circumstances applicable to the Property, including size,
shape, location and surroundings, which do not apply to other property under the identical zoning
classification in the vicinity of the proposed Project that result in limited and inefficient use of
the Property if it were developed in conformance with development standards. The Property is
comprised of two substandard parcels that have lot widths that are significantly less than the
Code required width.
7. That, because of these special circumstances, strict application of the Zoning
Code deprives the Property of privileges enjoyed by other property under the identical zoning
classification in the vicinity as there are many hotels in the vicinity that are developed with
buildings located in the interior setback area.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission of the City of
Anaheim as follows:
1. The Planning Commission hereby approves and adopts the MND and the MMP
in the form presented at this meeting.
2. The Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No.
2011-05550, Final Site Plan No. 2011-00001 and Variance No. 2012-04914, subject to the
conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the
Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of
Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in
accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of
approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i)
equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the conditions,
(ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant
progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
3. Any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in
accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-
Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
4. The adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's
compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition,
or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of
competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be
deemed null and void.
5. Approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to
the extent that it complies with the Zoning Code of the City of Anaheim and any other applicable
- 5 - PC2012-***
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
6. The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this
discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice. Failure to pay
all charges shall result in the revocation of the approval of this application.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
October 8, 2012. Said Resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 of
the Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in
the event of an appeal.
CHAIR, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Grace Medina, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim
City Planning Commission held on October 8, 2012, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 8th day of October, 2012.
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
- 6 - PC2012-***
- 7 - PC2012-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2011-05550
FINAL SITE PLAN NO. 2011-00001
AND VARIANCE NO. 2012-04914
(DEV2011-00011)
NO.
CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL
(NOTE: Mitigation Measures (“MM”), Project Design Features (“PDF”) and
Standard Conditions (“SC”) from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085c are
incorporated into these conditions of approval and are identified by the
mitigation measure number below applicable condition numbers.)
RESPONSIBLE
FOR
MONITORING
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS
1 Prior to approval of each grading plan (for Import/Export plan) and prior to
issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan the property
owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export plans. The plans
shall include identification of offsite locations for materials exported from the
project and options for disposal of excess materials. These options may include
recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project
in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts
made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall
offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or
removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other
projects, if not all can be reused on project site. MM III-4
Planning
Department,
Building
Division
2 Prior to and ongoing during grading and construction, the City shall ensure that
ornamental shrub and tree removal shall be conducted outside the nesting
bird/raptor season (March 15 to September 15 for nesting birds; February 1 to
June 30 for nesting raptors), to the extent practicable. If construction or
vegetation removal would occur between February 1 and September 15, the
Project Applicant shall conduct a pre-construction survey for active bird/raptor
nests within three days prior to commencement of construction
activities/vegetation removal. Should an active nest be identified, restrictions
may be placed on construction activities in the vicinity of the nest observed until
the nest is no longer active as determined by a qualified Biologist. The size of
the protective buffer will be determined by the Biologist based on the location of
the nest; the type of construction activities; the existing human activity in the
vicinity of the nest; and the sensitivity of the nesting species. Once the nest is no
longer active, construction can proceed within the buffer zone. MM IV-1
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services Division
3 The property owner/developer shall submit a letter to the Planning Department,
Planning Division, identifying the certified archaeologist that has been hired to
ensure that the following actions are implemented:
a. The archaeologist must be present at the pregrading conference in order to
establish procedures for temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit
the sampling, identification, and evaluation of artifacts if potentially
significant artifacts are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and
determined to be significant, the archaeological observer shall determine
appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for
exploration and/or salvage.
Planning
Department,
Building
Division
- 8 - PC2012-***
b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be
donated to an appropriate educational or research institution.
c. Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction
of the certified archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered during grading
operations when the archaeological monitor is not present, grading shall be
diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the area.
d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall
be submitted to the City Engineer. Upon completion of the grading, the
archaeologist shall notify the City to when the final report will be
submitted MM V-1
4 The property owner/developer shall submit a letter to the Planning Department,
Building Division, identifying the certified paleontologist that has been hired to
ensure that the following actions are implemented:
a. The paleontologist must be present at the pregrading conference in order
to establish procedures to temporarily halt or redirect work to permit the
sampling, identification, and evaluation of fossils if potentially significant
paleontological resources are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and
found to be significant, the paleontological observer shall determine
appropriate actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer for
exploration and/or salvage.
b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be
donated to an appropriate educational or research institution.
c. Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted under the
direction of the certified paleontologist. If any fossils are discovered
during grading operations when the paleontological monitor is not
present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can
survey the area.
d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the specimens shall
be submitted. Upon completion of the grading, the paleontologist shall
notify the City, as to when the final report will be submitted MM V-2
Planning
Department,
Building
Division
5 The property owner/developer shall submit to the City Engineer for review and
approval, a soils and geological report for the area to be graded, based on
proposed grading and prepared by an engineering geologist and geotechnical
engineer. All grading shall be in conformance with Title 17 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code. MM VI-2
Planning
Department,
Building
Division
6 The property owner/developer shall submit a plan for review and approval to the
Environmental Protection Section of the Fire Department which details
procedures that will be taken if a previously unknown USTs, or other unknown
hazardous material or waste, is discovered onsite. MM VII-2
Fire Department
7 The property owner/developer shall ensure compliance with all recommended
structural and non-structural Best Management Practices identified in the Water
Quality Management Plan. MM VIII-1
Planning
Department,
Building
Division
8 The property owner/developer shall obtain coverage under the NPDES Statewide
Industrial Stormwater Permit for General Construction Activities from the State
Water Resources Control Board. Evidence of attainment shall be submitted to the
City Engineer. MM MM VIII-2
Planning
Department,
Planning
Division
- 9 - PC2012-***
9 The property owner/developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Runoff
Management Plan (MDRMP) for review and approval by the Public
Works/Engineering Department, Development Services Division, and Orange
County Environmental Management Agency. The Master Plan shall include, but
not be limited to, the following items:
a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including supporting
hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storms up to and including the
100-year storm; and,
b. A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for control of
project-generated drainage and runoff. MM VIII-6
Planning
Department,
Building
Division; Public
Works/Engineeri
ng Department,
Development
Division
10 The property owner/developer shall submit grading and construction plans to the
Building Division incorporating the following conditions:
a. Contractors shall schedule construction activities to avoid simultaneous
use of several pieces of high noise level-emitting equipment, to the extent
practicable.
b. Construction equipment shall be fitted with manufacturer’s standard
(or better) noise shielding and muffling devices to reduce noise levels to
the maximum extent feasible.
c. Equipment maintenance and staging areas should be located as far away
from local residences and hotel uses as feasible. MM XII-3
Planning
Department,
Building
Division
11 The property owner/developer shall submit grading plans to the City of Anaheim
Building Division that prohibit the use of large bulldozers and large loaded trucks
within 45 feet of normally occupied buildings. MM XII-4
Planning
Department,
Building
Division
12 The projects shall be required to comply with requirements in effect at the time
building permits are issued (i.e., impact fees, etc.) MM XIV-1
Planning
Department,
Building
Division
13 The property owner/developer shall submit an emergency fire access plan to the
Fire Department for review and approval to ensure that service to the site is in
accordance with Fire Department service requirements. MM XIV-3
Fire Department
14 The Property Owner/Developer shall comply with Rule 15E of the Public Utilities
Department Water Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Rule 15E shall be amended to
include:
(1) Installation of a 16-inch pipe in Harbor Boulevard from
Orangewood Avenue to Chapman Avenue; and
(2) Provision for a new well to be constructed near the intersection of
Haster Street and orangewood Avenue.
Note: To implement this mitigation measure, the City has adopted the Anaheim
Resort Water Facilities Fee Program (Rule 15E of the Water Rates, Rules and
Regulations). Compliance with this Fee Program by the property owner/developer
(per Resolution No. 95R-140, effective September 1, 1995) shall satisfy the
requirement of this Mitigation Measure, or the City may enter into alternative
financing arrangements). MM XVII-3
Public Utilities
Department,
Water
Engineering
Division
- 10 - PC2012-***
15 The property owner/developer shall participate in the City’s Master
Plan of Sewers and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program
to assist in mitigating existing and future sanitary sewer system deficiencies as
follows:
The property owner/developer shall submit a report for review and approval of
the City Engineer to assist in determining the following:
a. If the development/redevelopment (1) does not discharge into a
sewer system that is currently deficient or will become deficient
because of that discharge and/or (2) does not increase flows or
change points of discharge, then the property owner’s/developer’s
responsibility shall be limited to participation in the Infrastructure
Improvement (Fee) Program.
If the development/redevelopment (1) discharges into a sewer system that is
currently deficient or will become deficient because of that discharge and/or (2)
increases flows or changes points of discharge, then the property
owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation to the satisfaction of
the City Engineer and the City Attorney’s office of the impact prior to approval
of a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building permit whichever
occurs first, pursuant to the improvements identified in the South Central Area
Sewer Deficiency Study. The property owner/developer shall be required to
install the sanitary sewer facilities, as recommended by the South Central Area
Sewer Deficiency Study, prior to acceptance for maintenance of public
improvements by the City or final building and zoning inspections for the
building/structure, whichever comes first. Additionally, the property
owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee)
Program, as determined by the City Engineer, which may include fees, credits,
reimbursements, or a combination thereof. As part of guaranteeing the
mitigation of impacts for the sanitary sewer system, the property
owner/developer shall submit a sanitary sewer system improvement phasing
plan for the project to the City Engineer for review and approval which shall
contain, at a minimum, (1) a layout of the complete system, (2) all facility sizes,
including support calculations, (3) construction phasing, and (4) construction
estimates. The study shall determine the impact of the project sewer flows for
total build out of the project and identify local deficiencies for each project
component (i.e., each hotel). MM XVII-6
Public Works
Department,
Development
Services Division
16 The property owner/developer shall participate in the City’s Master Plan of
Storm Drains and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to assist in
mitigating existing and future storm drainage system deficiencies as follows:
The property owner/developer shall submit a report for review and approval by
the City Engineer to assist with determining the following:
A. If the specific development/redevelopment does not increase or
redirect current or historic storm water quantities/flow, then the
property owner’s/developer’s responsibility shall be limited to
participation in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to
provide storm drainage facilities in 10- and 25-year storm frequencies
and to protect properties/structures for a 100-year storm frequency.
Public Works
Department,
Development
Services Division
- 11 - PC2012-***
B. If the specific development/redevelopment increases or redirects the
current or historic storm water quantity/flow, then the property
owner/developer shall be required to guarantee mitigation to the
satisfaction of the City Engineer and City Attorney’s Office of the
impact prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a
grading or building permit, whichever occurs first, pursuant to the
improvements identified in the Master Plan of Drainage for the South
Central Area. The property owner/developer shall be required to
install the storm drainage facilities as recommended by the Master
Plan of Drainage for the South Central Area to provide storm drainage
facilities for 10- and 25-year storm frequencies and to protect
properties/structures for a 100-year storm frequency prior to
acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by the City or
final building and zoning inspection for the building/structure,
whichever occurs first. Additionally, the property owner/developer
shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program as
determined by the City Engineer which could include fees, credits,
reimbursements, or a combination thereof. As part of guaranteeing the
mitigation of impacts on the storm drainage system, a storm drainage
system improvement phasing plan for the project shall be submitted
by the property owner/developer to the City Engineer for review and
approval and shall contain, at a minimum, (1) a layout of the complete
system; (2) all facility sizes, including support calculations;
(3) construction phasing; and, (4) construction estimates. MM XVII-
11
(Note: The City has adopted the Storm Drain Impact and Improvement Fee
Program for the South Central City Area. Compliance with this Fee Program by
the Property Owner/Developer [per Ordinance No. 5491 and Resolution
No. 95R-61 dated April 18, 1995] shall satisfy the requirements of this
mitigation measure.)
17 Prior to approval of each grading plan (for Import/Export plan) and prior to
issuance of demolition permit (for Demolition Plan), the property
owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export plans. The plans
shall include identification of offsite locations for materials exported from the
project and options for disposal of excess materials. These options may include
recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project
in the vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts
made to move it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall
offer recyclable building materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or
removal by private firms or public agencies for use in construction of other
projects, if not all can be reused on project site. MM III-4
Planning
Department,
Building
Division
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
18 Prior to issuance of a building permit, the property owner shall irrevocably offer
to dedicate to the City of Anaheim an easement 72- feet in width (12-feet total
dedication from existing r/w) from the centerline of Harbor Blvd for landscape
and irrigation improvements as required per the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan.
Public Works,
Development
Services
19 The developer shall submit street improvement plans to improve Harbor Blvd per
The Anaheim Resort standards, including storm drain improvements, planting and
Public Works,
Development
- 12 - PC2012-***
irrigation for the public parkway to the Public Works Department, Development
Services Division. The parkway landscaping strips, 8 feet behind curb and 8 feet
behind sidewalk, shall be constructed with the irrigation connected to the City
system, and maintained by City Resort Services Division. Prior to issuance of a
building permit, the developer shall submit a bond to guarantee that the
improvements are constructed prior to final building and zoning inspection.
Services
20 Prior to the issuance of a building permit for the project, the owner/developer
shall obtain and deliver to the City a Covenant and Agreement to Hold Property
as One Parcel for Building Requirements in a form acceptable to the City
Attorney, which Covenant and Agreement shall be executed in recordable form
by all owners of the subject property (1640-1650 South Harbor Blvd.).
Planning
Department,
Building
Division.
21 The property owner/developer shall submit plans which illustrate that all
mechanical equipment and trash areas for the subject building(s) will be screened
from adjacent public streets and adjacent residential areas. Screening shall be
installed prior to final building and zoning inspection. MM I-1
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services Division
22 The property owner/developer shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan which
shall be prepared and certified by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape
plan shall include a phasing plan for the installation and maintenance of
landscaping associated with that building permit and shall be in conformance with
the Water Efficiency Landscape Ordinance.
The irrigation plan shall specify methods for monitoring the irrigation system.
The system shall ensure that irrigation rates do not exceed the infiltration of local
soils, that the application of fertilizers and pesticides do not exceed appropriate
levels of frequencies, and that surface runoff and over-watering is minimized.
The landscape and irrigation plans shall include water-conserving features such as
low flow irrigation heads, automatic irrigation scheduling equipment, flow
sensing controls, rain sensors, soil moisture sensors, and other water-conserving
equipment. In addition, all irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will
function properly with reclaimed water, once a system is available. The landscape
and irrigation plans shall be reviewed by the Anaheim Resort Maintenance
District. MM I-2
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services Division
23 The property owner/developer shall submit evidence that low emission paints
and coatings are utilized in the design and construction of buildings, in
compliance with SCAQMD regulations. This information shall be denoted on the
project plans and specifications. The property owner/developer shall also
implement the following to limit emission from architectural coatings and
asphalt usage:
A. Use nonsolvent-based coatings on buildings, wherever appropriate.
B. Use solvent-based coatings, where they are necessary, in ways that
minimize solvent emissions.
C. Encourage use of high-solid or water-based coatings. MM III-2
Planning
Department,
Building
Division
24 The property owner/developer shall comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations
and implementation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) and Best
Available Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) for any new or modified
stationary source. Copies of permits shall be given to the Planning Department.
MM III-5
South Coast Air
Quality
Management
District (for
permit issuance);
Planning
- 13 - PC2012-***
Department,
Planning
Services Division
(for verification
of permit
application and
receipt)
25 The property owner/developer shall implement, and demonstrate to the City,
measures that are being taken to reduce operation-related air quality impacts.
The measures may include, but not limited to the following:
A. Improve thermal integrity of structures and reduced thermal load
through use of automated time clocks or occupant sensors.
B. Incorporate efficient heating and other appliances.
C. Incorporate energy conservation measures in site orientation and in
building design, such as appropriate passive solar design.
D. Use drought-resistant landscaping wherever feasible to reduce energy
used in pumping and transporting water.
E. To the extent feasible, provide daycare opportunities for employees or
participate in a joint development daycare center. MMM III-6
Public Utilities
Department,
Electric Services
Administration,
Resource
Efficiency
26 Implementation of energy conservation techniques (i.e., installation of energy
saving devices, construction of electrical vehicle charging stations, use of
sunlight filtering window coatings or double-paned windows, utilization of
light-colored roofing materials as opposed to dark-colored roofing materials,
and placement of shady trees next to habitable structures) shall be indicated on
plans. MM III-7
Public Utilities
Department,
Electric Services
Administration,
Resource
Efficiency
27 The property owner/developer shall submit plans showing that the proposed
structure has been analyzed for earthquake loading and designed according to the
most recent seismic standards in the Uniform Building Code adopted by the City
of Anaheim. MM VI-1
Planning
Department,
Building
Division
28 The property owner/developer shall submit for review and approval, detailed
foundation design information for the subject building(s), prepared by a civil
engineer, based on recommendations by a geotechnical engineer. MM VI-3
Planning
Department,
Building
Division
29 The property owner/developer shall submit a report prepared by a geotechnical
engineer for review and approval which shall investigate the subject foundation
excavations to determine if soft layers are present immediately beneath the
footing site and to ensure that compressibility does not underlie the footing.
Planning
Department,
Building
Division
30 On-site fire hydrants shall be installed and charged by the property
owner/developer as required and approved by the Fire Department. MM XIV-2
Fire Department
31 Plans shall indicate that all buildings shall have sprinklers installed by the
property owner/developer in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code. Said
sprinklers shall be installed prior to each final building and zoning inspection.
MIV-4
Planning
Department,
Building
Division; Fire
Department
32 Plans shall be submitted to ensure that development is in accordance with the
City of Anaheim Fire Department Standards, including:
A. Overhead clearance shall not be less than 14 feet for the full width of
Planning
Department,
Building
- 14 - PC2012-***
access roads.
B. Adequate off-site public fire hydrants contiguous to the Specific Plan
Area and onsite private fire hydrants shall be provided by the property
owner/developer. The precise number, types and locations of the
hydrants shall be determined during building permit review. Hydrants
are to be a maximum of 400 feet apart.
C. A minimum residual water pressure of 20 psi shall remain in the water
system. Flow rates for public parking facilities shall be set at 1,000 to
1,500 gpm. MM XIV-5.
Division; Fire
Department
33 The property owner/developer shall submit a Construction Fire Protection Plan to
the Fire Department for review and approval detailing accessibility of emergency
fire equipment, fire hydrant location, and any other construction features required
by the Fire Marshal. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for
securing facilities acceptable to the Fire Department and hydrants shall be
operational with required fire flow. MM XIV-6
Planning
Department,
Building
Division; Fire
Department
34 All water supply planning for the project will be closely coordinated with, and be
subject to the review and final approval of, the Public Utilities Department, Water
Engineering Division and Fire Department. MM XVII-4
Public Utilities
Department,
Water
Engineering, Fire
Department
35 Water pressure greater than 80 pounds per square inch (psi) shall be reduced to 80
psi or less by means of pressure reducing valves installed at the property
owner/developer’s service. MM XVII-5
Public Utilities
Department,
Water
Engineering, Fire
Department
36 Prior to issuance of each building permit (to be implemented prior to final
building and zoning inspections, and continuing on an on-going basis during
project operation)The property owner/ developer shall submit to the Public
Utilities Department plans for review and approval which shall ensure that
water conservation measures are incorporated. Among the water conservation
measures to be shown on the plans and implemented by the property
owner/developer, to the extent applicable include, but are not limited to, the
following:
• Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation systems.
• Use of waterway recirculation systems.
• Low-flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including
low flush toilets and urinals.
• Use of self-closing valves on drinking valves.
• Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation
and automatic systems which use moisture sensors.
• Use of low-flow shower heads in hotels.
• Water efficient ice-machines, dishwashers, clothes
washers and other water-using appliances.
• Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when
Public Utilities
Department,
Water
Engineering
Division
- 15 - PC2012-***
evaporation rates are lowest.
• Provide information to the public in conspicuous places
regarding water conservation.
Use of water conserving landscape plant materials wherever feasible. MM
XVII-7
37 The Property Owner/Developer for new development within the ARSP area shall
provide evidence to the Planning Director or Planning Services Manager that
separate irrigation lines for recycled water shall be constructed. All irrigation
systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with recycled water.
MM XVII-9
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services Division
38 The property owner/developer shall submit an irrigation plan in which all
irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with
reclaimed water, once a system is available. MM XVII-10
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services Division
39 The property owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Public Works
Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB
939, the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, as administered by the City of
Anaheim and the County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste
Management Plans. Prior to final building and zoning inspection,
implementation of said plan shall commence and shall remain in full effect.
Waste management mitigation measures that shall be taken to reduce solid waste
generation include, but are not limited to:
A. Detailing the location and design of on-site recycling facilities.
B. Providing on-site recycling receptacles to encourage recycling.
C. Complying with all Federal, State and City regulation for hazardous
material disposal.
D. Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program
or other substitute program as may be developed by the City.
In order to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989
(AB 939), the property owner/developer shall implement numerous solid waste
reduction programs, as required by the Public Works Department, including, but
not limited to:
A. Facilitating paper recycling by providing chutes or convenient
locations for sorting and recycling bins.
B. Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas) by
providing adequate space and centralized locations for collection and
bailing.
C. Facilitating glass recycling (especially from restaurants) by providing
adequate space for sorting and storing.
D. Providing trash compactors for nonrecyclable materials whenever
feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste and the number of
trips required for collection.
E. Prohibiting curbside pick-up. MM XVII-12
Public Works
Department,
Streets and
Sanitation
Division
40 The property owner/develop shall submit plans showing that each structure will Public Utilities
- 16 - PC2012-***
comply with the State Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential Buildings
(Title 24, Part 6, Article 2, California Code of Regulations) and will consult with
the City of Anaheim Public Utilities Resource Efficiency Division in order to
review above Title 24 measures to incorporate into the project design including
energy efficient designs. MM XVII-14
Department,
Resource
Efficiency
Division
41 The property owner/developer shall install an underground electrical service from
the Public Utilities Distribution System. The Underground Service will be
installed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical
Specifications for Underground Systems. Electrical Service Fees and other
applicable fees will be assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates,
Regulations and Electrical Specifications for Underground Systems. MM XVII-
16
Public Utilities
Department,
Electrical
Engineering
Division
42 The property owner/developer shall demonstrate on plans that fuel efficient
models of gas-powered building equipment have been incorporated into the
project, to the extent feasible. MM XVII-18
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services Division
43 Prior to commencement of structural framing on the project site, on-site fire
hydrants shall be installed and charged by the property owner/developer as
required and approved by the Fire Department. MM XIV-2
Fire Department
44 Prior to approval of water improvement plans, the water supply system shall be
designed by the property owner/developer to provide sufficient fire flow pressure
and storage for the proposed land use and fire protection in accordance with Fire
Department requirements. MM XIV-7
Fire Department
45 The project design shall include parking lots with controlled access points to limit
ingress and egress if determined to be necessary by the Police Department, and
shall be subject to the review and approval of the Police Department. MM XIV-
11
Police
Department
46 The property owner/developer shall provide proof of compliance with
Government Code Section 53080 (schools) to the Building Division of the
Planning Department. MM XIV-12
Planning
Department,
Building
Division
47 Ongoing during project construction and operation the City shall continue to
collaborate with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD),
its member agencies, and the Orange County Water District (OCWD) to ensure
that available water supplies meet anticipated demand. If it is forecasted that
water demand exceeds available supplies, the City shall trigger application of its
Water Conservation Ordinance (Anaheim Municipal Code, §10.18), as
prescribed, to require mandatory conservation measures as authorized by Sections
10.18.070 through 10.18.090, as appropriate. MM XVII-8
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services
Division; Public
Utilities
Department,
Water
Engineering
Division
48 The property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Police Department for
review and approval for the purpose of incorporating safety measures in the
project design including the concept of crime prevention through environmental
design (e.g., building design, circulation, site planning, and lighting of parking
structures and parking areas). MM XIV-9
Police
Department
49 The property owner/developer shall implement energy-saving practices in
compliance with Title 24, which may include the following:
Planning
Department,
- 17 - PC2012-***
A. Use of high-efficiency air conditioning systems controlled by a
computerized management system including features such as a variable
air volume system, a 100-percent outdoor air economizer cycle,
sequential operation of air conditioning equipment in accordance with
building demands, isolation of air conditioning to any selected floor or
floors.
B. Use of electric motors designed to conserve energy.
C. Use of special lighting fixtures such as motion sensing light switch
devices and compact fluorescent fixtures in place of incandescent lights.
D. Use of T8 lamps and electronic ballasts. Metal hallide or high-pressure
sodium for outdoor lighting and parking lots. MM XVII-15
Building
Division
50 The Southern California Gas Company has developed several programs which are
intended to assist in the selection of the most energy-efficient water heaters and
furnaces. The property owner/developer shall implement a program, as required,
to reduce the demand on natural gas supplies. MM XVII-17
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services Division
ONGOING DURING CONSTRUCTION
51 The property owner/developer shall implement measures to reduce
construction-related air quality impacts. These measures shall include, but are
not limited to:
A. Normal wetting procedures (at least twice daily) or other dust palliative
measures shall be followed during earth-moving operations to minimize
fugitive dust emissions, in compliance with the City of Anaheim
Municipal Code including application of chemical soil stabilizers to
exposed soils after grading is completed and replacing ground cover in
disturbed areas as quickly as practicable.
B. Enclosing, covering, watering twice daily, or applying approved soil
binders, according to manufacturer’s specification, to exposed stock
piles.
C. Roadways adjacent to the project shall be swept and cleared of any
spilled export materials at least twice a day to assist in minimizing
fugitive dust; and, haul routes shall be cleared as needed if spills of
materials exported from the project site occur.
D. Where practicable, heavy duty construction equipment shall be kept
onsite when not in operation to minimize exhaust emissions associated
with vehicles repetitiously entering and exiting the project site.
E. Trucks importing or exporting soil material and/or debris shall be
covered prior to entering public streets.
F. Taking preventive measures to ensure that trucks do not carry dirt on
tires onto public streets, including treating onsite roads and staging areas.
G. Preventing trucks from idling for longer than 2 minutes.
H. Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems necessary to water and
maintain the vegetation as soon as planting is completed.
I. Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15 miles per hour
or less.
South Coast Air
Quality
Management
District; Planning
Department,
Building
Division
(verification of
notes on plans);
Public Works
Department,
Development
Services Division
- 18 - PC2012-***
J. Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as instantaneous gust)
exceed 25 miles per hour and during first and second stage smog alerts.
K. Comply with the SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that no dust impacts
offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance, and SCAQMD Rule 403,
which restricts visible emissions from construction.
L. Use low emission mobile construction equipment (e.g., tractors, scrapers,
dozers) where practicable.
M. Utilize existing power sources (e.g. power poles) or clean-fuel generators
rather than temporary power generators, where practicable.
N. Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them properly
tuned.
O. Use low sulfur fuel for equipment, to the extent practicable. MM III-3
52 Ongoing during demolition and construction, in the event that hazardous waste,
including asbestos, is discovered during site preparation or construction, the
property owner/developer shall ensure that the identified hazardous waste and/or
hazardous material are handled and disposed of in the manner specified by the
State of California Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and Safety Code,
Division 20, Chapter 6.5) and according to the requirements of the California
Administrative Code, Title 30, Chapter 22. MM VII-1
Fire Department
53 The property owner/developer shall ensure that all internal combustion engines
on construction equipment and trucks are fitted with properly maintained
mufflers. MM XII-2
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services Division
PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTION
54 The property owner/developer shall participate in an assessment district for
landscape installation and maintenance if one is established for the Anaheim
Resort. MM I-3
Public Works
Department,
Resort Services
55 The property owner/developer shall submit a letter from a licensed landscape
architect to the City, certifying that the landscape installation and irrigation
systems have been installed as specified in the approved landscaping and
irrigation plans. MM VIII-4
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services Division
56 The property owner/developer shall submit a noise study prepared by a certified
acoustical engineer to the satisfaction of the Building Division identifying
whether noise attenuation is required and defining the attenuation measures and
specific performance requirements, if warranted, to comply with the Uniform
Building Code and Sound Pressure Level Ordinance. Ultimate noise attenuation
requirements, if any, shall depend on the final location of such buildings and
noise-sensitive uses inside and surrounding the buildings. Attenuation measures
shall be implemented by the property owner/developer prior to final building and
zoning inspections. MM XII-1
Planning
Department,
Building
Division
57 The property owner/developer shall place emergency telephone service numbers
in prominent locations as approved by the Fire Department. MM XIV-8
Fire Department
58 A parking management plan shall be submitted to the Planning Department,
Planning Services Division for review and approval to accommodate the peak
demand during the month of December as indicated in the parking study. The
parking management plan shall continue to be in place throughout the project
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services Division
- 19 - PC2012-***
operation. These options include:
• Encourage hotel staff to carpool during this time or provide off-site
shuttle service for employees to a commuter parking lot.
• Utilization of the two loading areas as parking spaces for employees.
Because the peak hour is late in the evening, the loading areas will not be
needed for deliveries.
• Valet or attendant assisted parking for employees which would utilize a
stacked parking scenario for employee vehicles.
ONGOING DURING PROJECT OPERATION
59 The property owner/developer shall implement measures to reduce emissions to
the extent practical, schedule goods movement for off-peak traffic hours, and use
clean fuel for vehicles and other equipment, as practicable. MM III-1
Public Works
Department,
Traffic and
Transportation
Division
60 The property owner/developer shall provide for the following: cleaning of all
paved areas not maintained by the City of Anaheim on a monthly basis, including,
but not limited to, private streets and parking lots. The use of water to clean
streets, paved areas, parking lots, and other areas and flushing the debris and
sediment down the storm drains shall be prohibited. MM VIII-3
Public Works
Department,
Development
Services Division
61 If and when is becomes available from the County Sanitation District of Orange
County, the property owner/developer shall install piping onsite with project
water mains so that reclaimed water may be used for landscape irrigation. MM
VIII-5
Planning
Department,
Building Division
62 The property owner/developer shall provide private security on the premises to
maintain adequate security for the entire project subject to review and approval of
the Police Department. The use of security patrols and electronic security devices
(i.e., video monitors) should be considered to reduce the potential for criminal
activity in the area. MM XIV-10
Police
Department
63 All landscaping for projects located within the Proposed Project shall utilize
drought tolerant plant materials within a plant factor of 0.5 or less pursuant to
the publication entitled “Water Use Classification of Landscape Species” by the
U.C. Cooperative Extension, August 2000. MM XVII-1
Planning
Department,
Planning Services
Division
64 All new development within the Proposed Project shall include water efficient
design features including, but not limited to (as applicable to the type of
development at issue) waterless water heaters, waterless urinals, automatic on
and off water facets, and water efficient appliances. MM XVII-2
Planning
Department,
Planning Services
Division
65 The following practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the property
owner/developer:
A. Usage of recycled paper products for stationary, letterhead, and
packaging.
B. Recovery of materials such as aluminum and cardboard.
C. Collection of office paper for recycling.
D. Collection of polystyrene (foam) cups for recycling.
E. Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer toner
cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling or recovery. MM
Public Works,
Streets and
Sanitation
Division
- 20 - PC2012-***
XVII-13
66 All entrances to parking areas shall be posted with appropriate signs per 22658(a)
C.V.C., to assist in removal of vehicles at the property owners/managers request.
Police
Department
67 “No Trespassing 602(k) P.C.” posted at the entrances of parking lots/structures
and located in other appropriate places. Signs must be at least 2’ x 1’ in overall
size, with white background and black 2” lettering.
Police
Department
68 Minimum recommended lighting level for covered portions of all parking
structures is 1 foot-candle maintained, measured at the parking surface, with a
maximum to minimum ratio no greater than 10:1.
Police
Department
69 Rooftop address numbers for the police helicopter. Minimum size 4’ in height and
2’ in width. The lines of the numbers are to be a minimum of 6” thick. Numbers
shall be spaced 12” to 18” apart. Numbers shall be painted or constructed in a
contrasting color to the roofing material. Numbers shall face the street to which
the structure is addressed. Numbers are not to be visible from ground level.
Police
Department
70 Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application, Form APD 516, and
return it to the Police Department prior to initial alarm activation. This form is
available at the Police Department front counter, or it can be downloaded from
the following web site: http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=678
Police
Department
71 The subject Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans
and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which
plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein.
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services
72 Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in
accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services
73 That timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the
Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is
established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the
modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and (iii) the applicant
has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or
approved development.
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services
74 Approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to
the extent that complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other
applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any
action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other
applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
Planning
Department,
Planning
Services
RPT30MAY2012-Final.doc
Walker Parking Consultants
606 S. Olive Street, Suite 1100
Los Angeles, CA 90014
Voice: 213.488.4911
Fax: 213.488.4983
www.walkerparking.com
May 30, 2012
Mr. Brandon Garr
Garr Properties Incorporated ---- Ramada Inn Maingate
1650 South Harbor Boulevard
Anaheim CA, 92802
Re: Ramada Inn Maingate ---- Site Improvements
Anaheim, California
Walker Project #37-8178.01
Dear Mr. Garr,
Walker Parking Consultants (‘‘Walker’’) appreciates the opportunity to present the following
update to our final parking demand/shared parking analysis for the Ramada Inn Maingate in
Anaheim, California. The following letter report outlines the project background, City of Anaheim
minimum parking requirements, and Walker’s shared parking demand projections for the
proposed site improvements.
PROJECT BACKGROUND
The site of the Ramada Inn Maingate is located on two individual land ownership parcels. Aside
from having two land owners, the site is also bifurcated in land lease. Land leases belong to
Garr Properties Incorporated (‘‘Garr Properties’’) and the neighboring Tony Roma’s. The lease for
Tony Roma’s is limited to the footprint of their building (7,300 SF) while the remainder of the site
is granted for Garr Properties use.
Garr Properties originally secured a lease for the site from the two land owners in 1974.
Improvements have been made to the site on an incremental basis; the last of which occurred in
the mid-1980s bringing the hotel unit total to 186 rooms. Aside from hotel space, Garr Properties
subleases to retail and take-out food service tenants which serve as amenities to guests and
passers-by. The sublease space consists of 3,004 SF of retail, and 767 SF of take-out food
service. The current layout of surface parking supply for the site is 177 spaces.
Garr Properties has contracted Terry Architecture and Planning to provide a site plan for
improvements to the Ramada Inn Maingate site. Although the majority of the site will go
untouched, these changes will require adjustments to parking related to the site. Per the direction
of the City of Anaheim (‘‘City’’) Planning Department staff the site plan submittal requires a
calculation of the minimum parking requirements per the City’s zoning code.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 2 of 20
Garr Properties believes that parking demand is generated differently by their site than others
within Anaheim due to the high volumes of foot traffic generated by the proximity to other hotels,
restaurants, and entertainment venues (specifically Disneyland). Therefore, Garr Properties
enlisted the aid of Walker to perform site observations and tailor a shared parking demand
model based on those observations in the hope that a parking variance may be granted by the
City.
Walker has been tasked with answering the following questions:
1. Once site improvements are completed, how much parking should be supplied according
to the City of Anaheim minimum parking requirements?
2. Once site improvements are completed, how much parking should be supplied to meet
projected parking demand under Walker/Urban Land Institute shared parking
methodology?
PROGRAM DATA
The site is located at 1650 South Harbor Boulevard. Figure 1 outlines the land ownership parcels
and land leases.
Figure 1: Project Site ---- Ramada Inn Maingate
Source: Google Earth and Terry Architecture & Planning, 2010.
Tony Roma’s
Ramada Inn Maingate
Land Ownership Boundaries
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 3 of 20
EXISTING SITE
As noted above, the existing site consists of the following land uses and quantities:
186 hotel units,
3,004 SF of retail space, and
767 SF of take-out food service.
The site contains 177 parking spaces. The layout of parking is currently as efficient as the site
will allow given zoning and fire lane regulations.
IMPROVED SITE
Improvements to the site have been provided by Terry Architecture and Planning. The improved
site consists of the following land uses and quantities:
199 hotel units,
3,786 SF of retail space, and
767 SF of take-out food service.
The location of these land uses is detailed in Figure 2 below.
Figure 2: Improved Site ---- Ramada Inn Maingate
Source: Terry Architecture & Planning.
The proposed site plan yields a total of 191 striped spaces. Of the 191 striped spaces two are
designated as loading spaces while the remaining 189 are designated solely for parking.
Adjustments to the site will be necessary (as shown) to accommodate the maximum amount of
parking possible and still meet zoning and fire lane regulations under the ‘improved site’
scenario.
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 4 of 20
CITY OF ANAHEIM MINIMUM PARKING REQUIREMENTS
The City of Anaheim planning code provides development requirements for proposed new and
redeveloped sites. Code Section 18.42.040 provides off-street parking requirements for non-
residential land uses. Table 42-A within the code section provides minimum parking requirements
detailed by land use and user group. The following is an excerpt of Table 42-A which pertains to
the Ramada Inn Maingate site:
Hotels & Motels: 0.8 space per guest room, plus 8 spaces per 1,000 square feet
of GFA for banquet/meeting room, plus 8 spaces per 1,000 square feet of GFA
for full-service, semi-enclosed, walk-up and fast-food restaurants, plus 5.5 spaces
per 1,000 square feet of GFA for take-out restaurants integrated into the hotel
complex, plus 1 space per 1,000 square feet of retail space plus 0.25 space for
each employee working the guest room areas.
The prescribed minimum parking requirements are applied to the program data for the improved
site scenario in Table 1 below.
Table 1: Minimum Parking Requirements ---- City of Anaheim
Land Use/User Group Metric Req't Spaces
Hotel 199 0.80/Unit 159
Employee 20 0.25/Employee 5
Retail 3,786 1.00/Ksf 4
Take-out 767 5.50/Ksf 4
Tony Roma's 7,300 8.00/Ksf 58
230
Source: Terry Architecture and Planning, City of Anaheim Planning Code, 2012.
The planning code also provides relief for sites that generate parking differently than those
suggested in Table 42-A. Code section 18.42.110 details the process and conditions for
obtaining parking variances. The code section has been provided below.
.010 General. Except as otherwise expressly provided herein, variances from any
of the requirements of this chapter relating to the minimum number of required
parking spaces shall be processed in accordance with the procedures set forth in
Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) and Chapter 18.74 (Variances); provided, however,
that any petition for a variance shall be accompanied by a parking study
prepared by an independent traffic engineer licensed by the State of California.
For variances which do not exceed ten percent (10%) of the requirements of this
chapter or for uses which require thirty (30) or fewer parking spaces or have off-
setting peak periods of parking demand, a study as approved by the Planning
Services Manager of the Planning Department and/or his or her designee, but
need not be completed by an independent licensed traffic engineer, shall be
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 5 of 20
provided at petitioner’s sole expense. Notwithstanding the requirements of
Chapter 18.74 (Variances), and variance shall be granted upon a finding by the
Planning Commission or City Council that the evidence presented shows that all of
the following conditions exist:
.0101 That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not
cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the
number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such
use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such
use;
.0102 That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not
increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in
the immediate vicinity of the proposed use;
.0103 That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not
increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private
property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use (which property is not
expressly provided as parking for such use under an agreement in compliance
with subsection 18.42.050.030 (Non-Residential Uses- Off-Site Parking
Arrangements)).
.0104 That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not
increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for
the proposed use; and
.0105 That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not
impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public
streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use.
.020 Compliance with Parking Demand Study. Unless conditions to the contrary
are expressly imposed upon the granting of any variance pursuant to this section,
the granting of the variance shall be deemed contingent upon operation of the
proposed use in conformance with the assumptions relating to the operation and
intensity of the use, as contained in the parking demand study that formed the
basis for approval of the variance. Exceeding, violating, intensifying or otherwise
deviating from any of the assumptions as contained in the parking demand study
shall be deemed a violation of the express conditions imposed upon the variance,
which shall subject the variance to revocation or modification pursuant to the
provisions of Section 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of
Permits).
Given these provisions, Walker prepared a shared parking analysis for the site which will take
into consideration any site- and market-specific parking characteristics to project parking demand
for the improved Ramada Inn Maingate. The remainder of this report provides detail pertaining
to shared parking concepts, methodology, site characteristics, and projected peak parking
demand. We provided our findings regarding compliance with planning code section
18.42.110 Parking Variances in the final section of the report.
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 6 of 20
SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS
The Urban Land Institute first published Shared Parking in 1983. This publication has been used
ever since to explain the concept of shared parking and to create models that forecast peak
parking conditions for mixed-use developments, and urban settings. Walker contributed to that
original publication and was also on the team that researched and wrote Shared Parking, 2nd
Edition, published in 2005. The shared parking analysis for the Ramada Inn Maingate utilizes
the most up-to-date information from the second edition of Shared Parking, and Walker’s shared
parking model (on which the ULI model is based).
SHARED PARKING PRIMER
Shared parking is the use of a parking space to serve two or more individual land uses without
conflict or encroachment. The ability to share parking spaces is the result of two conditions:
1) Variations in the accumulation of vehicles by hour, by day, or by season at the individual
land uses, and
2) Relationships among the land uses that result in visiting multiple land uses on the same
auto trip.
The key goal of a shared parking analysis is to find the balance between providing adequate
parking to support a development from a commercial standpoint while minimizing the negative
aspects of excessive land area or resources being devoted to parking.
The Ramada Inn Maingate is a prime example of shared parking in practice. While the hotel
itself generates parking demand, the ancillary (supporting or secondary) land uses on the site
serve mainly the hotel guests, or guests of other nearby hotels. Therefore, although the ancillary
land uses generate activity, they do not generate additional parking demand. The analysis that
follows will highlight the concepts of shared parking as they related to the Ramada Inn Maingate
currently, and under the improved site scenario.
Figure 3 provides an outline of the shared parking methodology as presented in the Shared
Parking publication. Walker will utilize the steps within this figure as an outline for the remainder
of this letter report.
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 7 of 20
Figure 3: Shared Parking Methodology
Gather and review project data
Type and quantity of land uses
Local zoning standards of practices
Existing conditions, parking pricing, local users, and facilities if appropriate
Local mode splits, transit, and transportation demand management programs
Physical relationships between uses
Parking management strategies acceptable to the various parties
Select parking ratios (space/unit land use)
Weekends and weekdays
Visitor/customer, employee/resident, and reserved
Select factors and analyze differences in activity patterns
Time of day
Monthly
Develop scenarios for critical parking need periods
Adjust ratios for modal split and persons per car for each scenario
Apply noncaptive adjustments for each scenario
Calculate required parking spaces for each scenario
NO
YES
Recommend a parking plan
Adequacy of parking for key scenarios
Evaluate potential facilities and allocation of spaces for key scenarios
Confirm physical relationships between uses to encourage shared parking
Recommend parking management plan to achieve projected shared parking
Do scenarios reflect all critical parking
needs and management concerns?
Source: Shared Parking 2nd Edition, 2005.
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 8 of 20
1. GATHER AND REVIEW PROJECT DATA
This step is the most critical for a site that already exists but will be shifting, reducing or adding
land use quantity. The site can be studied to calibrate an existing condition shared parking
model. Then, that same model can be used with new program data to provide peak parking
demand projections under a proposed future scenario.
Walker requested that hotel staff provide any prior studies related to parking. Although there is
no write-up, the hotel had performed parking occupancy counts from July 11, 2008 through July
31, 2009. Counts were performed at 12:30PM (midday), 6:30PM (evening), and 1:30AM (late
night). The data set also included the hotel room occupancy. These detailed counts are available
upon request, but have been summarized in the following tables.
Table 2: Average Hotel Occupancy 8/08 through 7/09
Avg Occ Wkdy Wknd TOTAL
August 82% 82% 82%
September 53% 62% 56%
October 68% 76% 70%
November 61% 77% 66%
December 66% 86% 71%
Late December 93% 92% 93%
January 49% 61% 53%
February 59% 75% 64%
March 80% 86% 82%
April 85% 83% 84%
May 77% 86% 80%
June 90% 94% 91%
July 91% 87% 90%
Source: Ramada Inn Maingate, 2009.
Table 3: Average Parking Occupancy 8/08 through 7/09
12:30PM Wkdy Wknd Max
August 113 113 149
September 71 83 143
October 92 115 155
November 86 108 162
December 93 116 164
Late December 130 131 154
January 55 67 94
February 78 111 144
March 100 105 142
April 107 108 155
May 92 89 131
June 127 126 158
July 121 119 149
Average
6:30PM Wkdy Wknd Max
August 133 145 170
September 83 116 146
October 108 129 147
November 103 133 180
December 115 133 176
Late December 168 160 179
January 73 80 121
February 91 126 178
March 120 146 174
April 120 133 188
May 105 115 169
June 143 154 176
July 151 133 195
Average
1:30AM Wkdy Wknd Max
August 116 123 161
September 61 82 114
October 97 110 145
November 80 113 151
December 87 118 161
Late December 131 124 175
January 54 71 104
February 70 94 148
March 85 98 146
April 102 108 151
May 86 90 150
June 124 137 149
July 129 119 151
Average
Source: Ramada Inn Maingate, 2009.
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 9 of 20
Walker also performed hourly occupancy counts on Saturday, June 19, 2010 and Thursday, June
24, 2010. The hotel occupancy for both of these days was 100%. Hourly counts were used to
calibrate the shared parking model and gain familiarity with the parking characteristics of this
unique market. The following table summarizes Walker’s hourly counts and modeled parking
demand for the observed periods (from a calibrated shared parking model).
Table 4: Parking Occupancy Counts ---- Walker 6/19/2010 and 6/24/2010
Saturday Observed Model Variance
10AM 149 134 -15
11AM 144 133 -11
12PM 140 165 25
1PM 136 165 29
2PM 136 145 9
3PM 144 132 -12
4PM 155 137 -18
5PM 167 147 -20
6PM 165 164 -1
7PM 170 166 -4
8PM 174 175 1
9PM 181 N/A
10PM 174 N/A
MAX 174 175 1
Thursday Observed Model Variance
10AM 152 132 -20
11AM 152 132 -20
12PM 139 165 26
1PM 127 165 38
2PM 138 144 6
3PM 147 132 -15
4PM 146 135 -11
5PM 150 142 -8
6PM 160 148 -12
7PM 158 141 -17
8PM 166 148 -18
9PM 170 153 -17
10PM 162 149 -13
MAX 170 165 -5
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2010.
Although there is some variance in the model, of primary concern is the peak period parking
demand which occurs on the weekend which is consistent with observed parking demand.
Walker requested that hotel staff record the number of registered vehicles of hotel guests for a two
week period beginning the night of June 23, 2010. This data was compared to hotel room
occupancy each night as well. The following table details the parking demand generation rate
for hotel guests over that two week period. Average modal split for hotel guests is roughly 65%
on weekdays and 73% on weekend days.
Table 5: Parking Demand Generation ---- Hotel Rooms (Observed)
Date Rm Occ Rm Occ % Reg Cars % Occ Rms With Cars
6/23/2010 186 100% 115 62%
6/24/2010 185 99% 118 64%
6/25/2010 181 97% 117 65%
6/26/2010 183 98% 134 73%
6/27/2010 163 88% 123 75%
6/28/2010 182 98% 126 69%
6/29/2010 181 97% 125 69%
6/30/2010 159 85% 110 69%
7/1/2010 167 90% 107 64%
7/2/2010 157 84% 108 69%
7/3/2010 178 96% 137 77%
7/4/2010 180 97% 120 67%
7/5/2010 117 63% 73 62%
7/6/2010 137 74% 79 58%
Averages 168 90% 114 67%
Source: Ramada Inn Maingate, 2010.
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 10 of 20
Aside from the site specific data, there are also considerations that impact the parking
characteristics of this site within the market area. The location of this property adjacent to the
Disneyland Main Gate is the primary factor in hotel occupancy and parking demand
characteristics. Hotel occupancies (as shown in Table 2 above) are heavily impacted by tourism
and therefore school schedules. Parking demand is also highly sensitive to that same timeline as
well as the means of transportation used to reach Anaheim. As evidenced in Table 3 and Table
5, many hotel guests do not arrive to their hotel using a self-driven automobile. Instead, they opt
for shuttle or taxi service from the airport.
Once in the market area, tourists may stay in one of the several hotels along South Harbor
Boulevard located directly across from the Disneyland Main Gate. Nearby hotels include:
Howard Johnson Plaza
Quality Inn & Suites
Fairfield Inn
Anaheim Camelot Inn & Suites
Carousel Inn & Suites
Tropicana Inn
Best Western Inn & Mini-suites
Desert Inn
Del Sol Inn
Park View Inn
Best Western Anaheim Inn
Anaheim Plaza
Castle Inn & Suites
Ramada Plaza Hotel
Desert Palm Suites
Alpine Inn
Portofino Inn & Suites
Holiday Inn Express
These hotels have similar patronage to that of the Ramada Inn Maingate (those travelling
regionally, nationally, and even internationally to visit Disneyland and other nearby amusement
parks). Many of these guests arrive to Anaheim via airport shuttle or taxi and have no need of a
rental vehicle during their stay. Therefore, although a room-night is generated, no parking space
is required for that room.
Many of the amenities located on-site are utilized by this type of guest (even from nearby hotels)
because they lack the mobility of an automobile. Much of the retail, restaurant, and takeout
restaurant activity is generated by on-site guests or walk-by visits. Therefore, these land uses
generate employee parking demand, but very little patron parking demand. Most patrons are
captive either to the site or to the market area and therefore generate no additional parking
demand for the Ramada Inn Maingate property.
Walker utilized the information collected from the current site and market to aid in calibrating a
shared parking model specific to the Ramada Inn Maingate. Once calibrated, the model was
used to project future peak parking demand for the improved site.
2. SELECT PARKING RATIOS
Based on the program data provided by Terry Architects and Planners we assign peak parking
ratios to each based on a given unit. These peak parking ratios are found in Shared Parking, 2nd
Edition. Ratios in Shared Parking are based on independent research and that of the Institute of
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 11 of 20
Traffic Engineers (ITE) as found in their publication, Parking Generation. ULI uses the 85th
percentile of their data. These ratios are assumed to originate from what is called a ‘cornfield
development’. Cornfield developments have ample parking, but little if no outside pedestrian
access or transit, and are single land uses with no opportunity for shared parking. Base ratios for
weekday and weekend differ for most user groups. We provide the peak parking ratios used for
this analysis in Table 6. Although this peak condition will never apply to the site, it is the starting
point of the shared parking analysis.
Table 6: Peak Parking Ratios
Unadjusted Parking Projections
Land Use/User Group Quantity Unadj Pkg Sp Unadj Pkg Sp
Convenience Retail 3,786 4.90 /ksf GLA 19 4.00 /ksf GLA 15
Employee 1.20 5 1.00 4
Fast Food 767 12.75 /ksf GLA 10 12.00 /ksf GLA 9
Employee 2.25 2 2.00 2
Hotel-Leisure 199 1.00 /room 199 1.00 /room 199
Restaurant/Lounge 7,300 10.00 /ksf GLA 73 10.00 /ksf GLA 73
Employee 199 0.25 /room 50 0.18 /room 36
Subtotal Customer/Guest Spaces 301 296
Subtotal Employee/Resident Spaces 57 42
Total Parking Spaces 358 338
Weekdays Weekends
Base Ratio Base Ratio
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2012.
The ‘Unadj Pkg Sp’ (or Unadjusted Parking Spaces) column in Table 6 shows the greatest number
of vehicles proposed to be generated by each land use at the Ramada Inn Maingate. This
considers a ‘cornfield development’, as defined earlier. With the knowledge that the ancillary
land uses at Ramada Inn Maingate will share a parking supply, and be proximate to a proposed
199-room hotel (and roughly 18 other nearby hotels) the number of spaces for restaurant and
retail parking shown in the ‘Unadj Pkg Sp’ row will never be needed to meet parking demand.
3. IDENTIFY ACTIVITY PATTERNS
The parking needs of individual land uses vary by time of year, day of week, and hour of day.
The fact that parking needs may peak at different times generally means that fewer parking
spaces are needed to serve a mixed-use project than if each land use had its own unshared
supply. An obvious example is that office parking demand peaks in the daytime on weekdays,
while cinema parking demand peaks in the evenings on weekends. A parking supply serving
both uses would not need to be big enough to accommodate the office peak and the cinema
peak simultaneously because the peak period would not overlap.
This portion of the analysis is also based on ULI data and existing site data. Each land use in this
analysis has a set of monthly factors and hourly factors that are multiplied by the ‘Unadj Pkg Sp’
numbers. Walker utilized site-specific data to adjust for monthly activity levels of the hotel.
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 12 of 20
Walker utilized ULI data for the remainder of land uses at the site. These data sets vary by
weekday and weekend, and by user group (i.e. employee vs. customer).
The following table provides hotel occupancy data and a comparison of activity levels for each
month versus to the peak month (Late December1).
Table 7: Activity Patterns ---- Existing Hotel
Avg Occ Wkdy Wknd TOTAL % of Peak Month
August 82% 82% 82% 88%
September 53% 62% 56% 60%
October 68% 76% 70% 76%
November 61% 77% 66% 72%
December 66% 86% 71% 77%
Late December 93% 92% 93% 100%
January 49% 61% 53% 57%
February 59% 75% 64% 69%
March 80% 86% 82% 88%
April 85% 83% 84% 91%
May 77% 86% 80% 86%
June 90% 94% 91% 99%
July 91% 87% 90% 97%
Source: Ramada Inn Maingate, 2009.
Walker replaced the monthly activity levels in the shared parking model with the ‘% of Peak
Month’ data to calibrate the model to hotels in the Disney Main Gate market area.
4. TEST CRITICAL PERIODS
When addressing critical periods we look at times when parking could be impacted by high
levels of activity for key land uses. For the Ramada Inn Maingate, that time period falls between
6PM and 10PM during the weekend. During this time period, many of the hotel guests are
returning from daily activities, and the Tony Roma’s is also serving dinner. Occupancy counts
suggest that even with hotel occupancy at 100% for both fieldwork days, there is adequate
parking on the site.
Critical periods are calculated automatically within the model, but this period was used
specifically to calibrate the model using existing program data and observed parking
occupancies.
1 Late December is defined as the period between Christmas Eve and New Years day; it is evaluated as a
separate period because of the significant change in activity levels for many land uses during this period versus
the remainder of December.
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 13 of 20
5. ADJUST FOR MODAL SPLIT
Modal split is the name given to the breakdown of different forms of transportation used to reach
a destination. Transportation options include single-occupant vehicle, carpool/vanpool vehicle,
train, bus, drop-off, bicycle, pedestrian, and others. Modal split is a major factor in projecting
parking demand for the Ramada Inn Maingate. The primary land use, hotel, is impacted heavily
by the means of transportation used to arrive there. If a guest does not arrive in an automobile, it
is highly unlikely that they will have one on-site during their stay at all (rented or vehicle of
visitors). As provided in Table 5, the modal split for hotel guests is roughly 65% on weekdays
and 73% on weekend days. The weekday versus weekend variance is likely due to local and
regional guests visiting Disneyland on weekends as opposed to during the work week. The
remainder of guests arrive to the hotel via shuttle or taxicab from regional airports (LAX, LGB,
SNA, or others). Once at the hotel, most guests will walk across South Harbor Boulevard to
Disneyland, Disney’s California Adventure, or Disney’s Splash Mountain.
The ancillary land uses on the site are frequented by Ramada Inn Maingate guests or pedestrians
either headed to or returning from one of the Disney theme parks. The pedestrians may be
staying at a nearby hotel (where they may or may not have a vehicle parked) or may be walking
back to a more remote parking lot. In either event, the retail and take-out restaurants generate
very little parking demand as a stand-alone land use. We assume that 50% of the retail and take-
out restaurant patrons who come from off-site will arrive in a vehicle parked on-site.
The Tony Roma’s restaurant has additional curb appeal based on the fact that it is both a sit-down
restaurant (with bar) and a national chain. The market area has other sit-down restaurants
(several located at the nearby Anaheim GardenWalk) that compete for dining patrons and
therefore much of the patronage comes from the nearby hotels. There is also another Tony
Roma’s located at 1300 South Harbor Boulevard in Fullerton (only 3 miles away) which would
likely compete for diners who would like to eat at Tony Roma’s specifically (and possibly avoid
any theme park traffic). We assume that 70% of the restaurant patrons who come from off-site
will arrive in a vehicle parked on-site.
Employees working at Ramada Inn Maingate may also arrive via transit or rideshare. We
assume that employees of the ancillary uses will arrive via single-occupant vehicle, but hotel
employees will generate three (3) vehicles for every four (4) employees (a 75% modal split).
6. APPLY NON-CAPTIVE ADJUSTMENT
The non-captive adjustment is where we account for efficiencies based on users who are already
parked on the site and are already accounted for within the analysis. Ramada Inn Maingate has
a large captive market in its hotel guests. Because this user group is accounted for once on the
site, they would not generate additional parking demand if they were to visit another ancillary use
on the site. Our assumptions regarding a non-captive adjustment for ancillary land uses are as
follows:
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 14 of 20
50% of Retail Patrons are captive to the site;
50% of Take-out Restaurant Patrons are captive to the site; and
15% of the Tony Roma’s Patrons are captive to the site.
Given the parking characteristics observed in this market, we believe that these reductions are
both reasonable and conservative.
7. CALCULATE REQUIRED PARKING
Walker first developed, tested, and calibrated a shared parking model for the existing site
utilizing current program data and observed parking occupancy. Once calibrated to the Ramada
Inn Maingate site and market, the proposed improved site program data was assessed utilizing
all of the same factors and adjustments.
Based on our analysis we find that timing (monthly and hourly adjustments), modal split, and non-
captive factors reduce the unadjusted parking demand (as provided in Table 6) for this site by
51% on weekdays and 42% on weekends. This reduction may seem high, but the Ramada Inn
Maingate is not a ‘cornfield development’. The information provided in Table 6 was a jumping-
off point to begin a shared parking analysis; the adjustments in steps 3 though 6 tailor the
analysis to the site and market.
Table 8 and Table 9 provide the calculated peak shared parking demand for weekdays and
weekend days, respectively.
Table 8: Peak Shared Parking Demand ---- Weekday
Weekday Demand Unadj Month Adj Pk Hr Adj Non Captive Drive Ratio Jul
Land Use/User Group Demand Jul 12:00 PM Daytime Daytime 12:00 PM
Convenience Retail 19 91% 90% 50% 50% 4
Employee 5 95% 100% 100% 100% 5
Fast Food 10 98% 100% 50% 50% 2
Employee 2 100% 100% 100% 100% 2
Hotel-Leisure 199 97% 65% 100% 65% 82
Restaurant/Lounge 73 98% 100% 85% 70% 43
Employee 50 100% 100% 100% 75% 38
Subtotal Customer/Guest Spaces 301 131
Subtotal Employee/Shared Resident Spaces 57 45
Total Parking Spaces 358 176
% reduction from Unadjusted 51%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2012.
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 15 of 20
Table 9: Peak Shared Parking Demand ---- Weekend
Weekend Demand Unadj Month Adj Pk Hr Adj Non Captive Drive Ratio Late Dec
Land Use/User Group Demand Late Dec 9:00 PM Evening Evening 9:00 PM
Convenience Retail 15 95% 100% 50% 50% 4
Employee 4 100% 100% 100% 100% 4
Fast Food 9 95% 30% 50% 50% 1
Employee 2 100% 40% 100% 100% 1
Hotel-Leisure 199 100% 95% 100% 73% 138
Restaurant/Lounge 73 95% 67% 85% 70% 28
Employee 36 100% 55% 100% 75% 15
Subtotal Customer/Guest Spaces 296 171
Subtotal Employee/Shared Resident Spaces 42 20
Total Parking Spaces 338 191
% reduction from Unadjusted 43%
Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2012.
8. ADDRESS CRITICAL PARKING NEEDS AND MANAGEMENT CONCERNS
Parking adequacy is a measure of whether the parking supply can adequately provide for the parking
demand generated at the development. According to the proposed site plan provided by Terry
Architecture and Planning on May 24, 2012, the existing parking supply of 177 spaces would be
increased by 22 spaces. Therefore, we tested for adequacy based on a 189-space parking supply.
Two more striped spaces are on the site, but are designated for loading. Given the parking supply of
189 spaces, and a projected peak parking demand of 191 spaces, the proposed improvements
would result in a parking shortfall of 2 spaces during the peak period.
Walker’s model also allows for an analysis of weekdays and weekend days throughout the entire
year. Upon review of the model there is only a single period identified which are projected to have
an on-site parking shortfall. Fridays and Saturdays in Late December (the period between Christmas
and New Year) are projected to have a shortfall at 9:00 PM (2 spaces). Parking demand increases
during this time based on increased activity at the hotel. There are a maximum of two Fridays and two
Saturdays in the period identified as Late December. Given these findings there are a total maximum
of four hours throughout the year when on-site parking is projected not to be adequate.
The tables found on the following two pages show a comparison of peak period for every month as
well as an hourly comparison for Late December when the on-site parking shortfall is projected to
occur.
Mr. Brandon Garr Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report May 30, 2012 Page 16 of 20 16 Table 10: Comparison of Peak Period for Each Month Weekday PeakJanuary Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov December Late DecLand Use/User Group 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 12:00 PMConvenience Retail 4444444444454 Employee5555555555555Quick-serve/Take-out 2222222222222 Employee2222222222222Hotel-Leisure48587477728382745064616584 Restaurant/Lounge 37374140424143434042404341 Employee38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38 38Customer91 101 121 123 120 130 131 123 96 112 107 115 131Employee45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45 45TOTAL DEMAND136 146 166 168 165 175 176 168 141 157 152 160 176Weekend PeakJanuary Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov December Late DecLand Use/User Group 12:00 PM 9:00 PM 9:00 PM 9:00 PM 9:00 PM 9:00 PM 9:00 PM 9:00 PM 12:00 PM 9:00 PM 9:00 PM 9:00 PM 9:00 PMConvenience Retail 2333333323344 Employee4444444444444Quick-serve/Take-out 2111111121111 Employee2111111121111Hotel-Leisure54 95 121 126 119 137 134 121 57 105 99 106 138 Restaurant/Lounge 37252827282829294028272928 Employee27 15 15 15 15 15 15 15 27 15 15 15 15Customer95 124 153 157 151 169 167 154 101 137 130 140 171Employee33 20 20 20 20 20 20 20 33 20 20 20 20TOTAL DEMAND128 144 173 177 171 189 187 174 134 157 150 160 191 Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2012.
Mr. Brandon Garr Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report May 30, 2012 Page 17 of 20 17 Table 11: Hourly Parking Accumulations for Late December Late December Weekday 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AMConvenience Retail 0012 3 4 4454543211 1 0 0 Employee 1234 5 5 5555554321 1 1 1Fast Food 0001 1 2 2221112211 0 0 0 Employee 0011 2 2 2221112211 1 0 0Hotel-Leisure 123 123 116 103 91 91 84 84 91 91 97 103 110 110 116 123 123 129 129 Restaurant/Lounge 0 4 12 4 4 2 41 41 14 4 4 12 23 25 29 28 25 17 12 Employee 2113434 38 38 38383838342615 8 8 8 8 4 2Customer Demand 123 127 129 110 99 99 131 131 112 100 107 120 138 139 147 153 149 146 141Employee Demand 3133839 45 45 45454544403221131110 10 5 3TOTAL DEMAND 126 140 167 149 144 144 176 176 157 144 147 152 159 152 158 163 159 151 144 Late December Weekend 6:00 AM 7:00 AM 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM 10:00 PM 11:00 PM 12:00 AMConvenience Retail 0012 2 3 2322223444 3 3 2 Employee 0012 4 4 4444434444 4 3 2Fast Food 0001 1 2 2221112211 0 0 0 Employee 0011 2 2 2221112211 1 0 0Hotel-Leisure 138 138 131 116 102 102 94 94 102 102 109 116 123 123 131 138 138 145 145 Restaurant/Lounge 0 4 12 4 4 2 41 41 14 4 4 12 23 25 29 28 25 17 12 Employee 1 8 24 24 27 27 27 27 27 27 24 20 16 15 15 15 12 12 8Customer Demand 138 142 144 123 109 109 139 140 120 109 116 131 151 154 165 171 166 165 159Employee Demand 1 8 26 27 33 33 33 33 33 32 29 24 22 21 20 20 17 15 10TOTAL DEMAND 139 150 170 150 142 142 172 173 153 141 145 155 173 175 185 191 183 180 169 Source: Walker Parking Consultants, 2012.
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 18 of 20
9. RECOMMEND A PARKING PLAN
The size of this site and minimal and brief parking shortfall does not necessitate a full parking
plan. In order to capitalize on the efficiencies inherent to shared parking, the site should be
managed under normal conditions in a way that does not protect any parking space on the site
for one user group. This avoids having any space protected for a specific user group sitting
vacant when another visitor to the site may need that/those parking space(s).
The findings of our quantitative analysis for Ramada Inn Maingate provide a basis for further
parking management recommendations that would impact efficient use of on-site parking.
Following are some points of interest and key findings that will guide our recommendations:
The scenario tested provides adequate parking for all weekday periods.
The scenario tested provides adequate parking for eleven and a half months during weekend
periods (Saturdays).
The scenario tested does not provide enough parking to meet peak parking demand projected
through a shared parking analysis. The projected parking shortfall for the site under this
scenario is 2 spaces at 9:00 PM on Fridays and Saturdays in Late December (Holiday period
from Christmas through New Year).
We reviewed the peak hour for other months to see how the peak month compared; no other
shortfall was projected.
Overall, these shortfall periods account for only 4 total hours throughout the year. Because the
shortfall is not projected to occur for extended period throughout the year the shortfalls may be
alleviated through the use of active parking management during those times.
RECOMMENDATIONS
Active parking management (off-site relocation, staff to direct patrons, and/or a staffed parking
operation) should be considered during periods when the parking shortfall is projected to occur;
passive parking management (directional signage, proper lighting, etc.) should be utilized for all other
periods. The following active management options could be utilized to ensure adequate on-site
parking:
Hotel management may request that employees carpool, utilize transit, or shuttle them to a
nearby commuter parking lot during this two-week period to reduce the on-site parking demand
(similar to retail centers during the same period).
If agreeable to the City, the striped loading spaces which would very likely be available at
9:00 PM on weekend nights in Late December could be utilized briefly by employees.
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 19 of 20
Another active management option would be staffed parking with valet or attendant assist
service. In this scenario a user group (likely employees, or Tony Roma’s patrons) could be
stack-parked during the peak period. Further study would need to take place to determine the
number of spaces that could be added through stacking, and a plan would need to be
developed, but this is a reasonable option considering the minimal cost to operate staffed
parking for only a few hours throughout the entire year.
It is therefore conceivable that the scenario presented above for Ramada Inn Maingate could provide
adequate parking to employees and patrons by utilizing active parking management techniques for the
few hours that a two-space parking shortfall is projected in Late December.
FINDINGS
Walker’s projections for the site indicate that it could support 199 hotel rooms and additional
retail square footage with 189 parking spaces if minimally managed during only four hours total
throughout the entire year. Code section 18.42.110 (Parking Variances) details provisions to
obtain a parking variance. Based on Walker’s study of the site and market, we believe that all
provisions are met for the Ramada Inn Maingate:
.0101 The variance will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be
provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to
accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and
reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use;
.0102 The variance will not increase the demand and competition for parking
spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use;
.0103 The variance will not increase the demand and competition for parking
spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the
proposed use;
.0104 The variance will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street
parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use; and
.0105 The variance will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from
adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the
proposed use.
Given these findings we believe that a parking variance for the Ramada Inn Maingate should be
granted to allow for a proposed site improvement to include:
199 hotel rooms,
3,786 SF (Gross Leasable Area) of retail space,
767 SF (Gross Leasable Area) of take-out restaurant,
7,300 SF (existing) full-service restaurant, and
189 On-site parking spaces to serve these land uses
Mr. Brandon Garr
Ramada Inn Maingate – Final Report
May 30, 2012
Page 20 of 20
Should you have any further questions or concerns regarding the shared parking methodology or
model utilized in this study please contact Walker.
Sincerely,
WALKER PARKING CONSULTANTS
Ezra D. Kramer, AICP, CPP
Parking Consultant/Project Manager
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
10' BUILDING SETBACKTRASHExisting Public Walk(N) SidewalkPath of Travelto Public WayExisting Parking Area to Remain+36" WallLs.(N)Lobby/ Registration5' Conc. Walk(N)(E) 6' Conc. WalkwayLs.(N)Ls.(N)Conc. Walk(N)(N) ExteriorStair.(N)(Re-Stripe)Above3 Story(N) SIGN(Replacement)UPAboveFace of3 StoryAboveFace of3 StoryCochere1 Sty Roof AbovePorte (N)15'-0" min. clearHCCurb Cut(N)HCCurb Cut(N)ColumnHCCurb Cut(E)Path of Travelto Public Way(N) SidewalkExisting Parking Area to Remain(Re-Stripe)Existing Parking Area to Remain(Re-Stripe)Existing Parking Area to Remain(Re-Stripe)Existing Parking Area to Remain(Re-Stripe)Existing Parking Area to Remain(Re-Stripe)Existing Parking Area to Remain(Re-Stripe)Existing Parking Area to Remain(Re-Stripe)Existing Parking Area to Remain(Re-Stripe)HC Path of TravelCatch BasinRelocate(High Power Electrical Transmission Line)Existing Pedestrian Walkway to Disney Parking Lot(N) SidewalkLs.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)HCVANHCVANHCHCVANSITE PLANNORTHCHAPMANKATELLADISNEY WAYINTERSTATE 5LOCATION MAPRAMADA INN MAINGATE1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.HARBOR BLVD.0 10 20 30 40 6010080BAR SCALE10' BUILDING SETBACK(E) 6' Conc. WalkwayAboveFace of3 StoryAboveFace of3 StoryHC(N)ENTRANCELs.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.Ls.Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.Ls.Ls.Ls.Ls.Ls.Ls.Ls.Ls.Ls.Ls.Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.Ls.(N)SUMMARYMOTEL UNITSRETAIL SPACESPARKING: CITY REQUIREDMOTEL UNITSRETAIL SPACES189 STALLS PROVIDEDPARKING PROVIDED RESTAURANT159 STALLS4 STALLS58 STALLS199 X .8=7,300 X 8/1000=230 STALLSEMPLOYEES 5 STALLS20 X .25=IBC TABLE 11B-6: 3,786 GSF (E) STANDARD ROOMS & SUITES -24TOTAL UNITS=6 HC STALLS REQ'D < 7 PROVIDED = OK(INCLUDES 7 HC STALLS)EXISTING RETAIL SPACES 3,708 GSF (TO BE DEMO'D)NEW RETAIL SPACESGIFT SHOP, COFFEE TAKE OUT, TICKET/TRAVEL SALESPHOTO SHOP & FOOD TAKEOUT* PARKING STUDYLAND AREA:NORTH PARCEL:2.37 NET ACRESSOUTH PARCEL1.09 NET ACRESTOTAL= 3.46 NET ACRES(N) STANDARD ROOMS & SUITES +37199*3,786 GSFX1/ Ksf=186(E) ROOMS to DEMOLISH* SEE WALKER PARKING ANALYSIS SUPPORTING A MAXIMUM OF 202 UNITSUNITS PER ACRE: LEGEND(E) Parking Areas(N) Site Improvements(E) Buildings to RemainLANDSCAPE AREA: 0.58 AC. (16%) 202/3.460 = 58.38to Remain(N) Buildings(N) Enriched Paved SidewalksLandscape Areas + 767 GSF TAKE-OUT FOOD SERVICETAKE-OUT FOOD SERV4 STALLS .767X5.5/Ksf=THE NORTH 81.00 FEET OF THE SOUTH 256.00 OF THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIPSOUTH PARCEL - PARCEL #1:LEGAL DESCRIPTIONS:4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST IN THE RANCHO SAN CAJON DE SANTA ANA AS PERMAP RECOR\DED IN BOOK 51, PAGE 10 OF MISCELLANEOUIS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OFTHE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.THE SOUTHWEST QUARTER OF THE NORTHWEST QUARTER OF THE SOUTHEAST NORTH PARCEL - QUARTER OF SECTION 22, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE AND MERIDIAN, IN THE COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA,EXCEPTING THEREFROM, THE SOUTHERLY 256 FEET THEREOF.COMMONLY KNOWN AS 1640 SOUTH HARBOR BLVD., ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA.(N)BFPLs.Ls.(N)ARCHITECTURAL SITE PLANSP92602IRVINE, CALIFORNIA949.929.1048ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTURETERRY60 ROCKPORT STREETENTITLEMENTSINTERIORSPLANNING& PLANNINGCONSULTINGARCHITECTURALDATEREVISIONS/SEALSITE PLANADDITIONS &PROPOSEDMAINGATERAMADAANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.949-772-0440ALTERATIONSBrandon GarrPresident, Garr Properties, Inc.1650 S. Harbor BoulevardRamada Maingate - At The ParkAnaheim, CaliforniaAPPLICANTExitStair(N)ColumnGlass Store FrontColumnAboveFace of3 Story26 ft. Setback Line
First FloorAboveFace of3 StoryFirst Floor RetailFirst Floor RetailStorage & LaundryThree Story Area(N)First Floor RetailStair15'-0" Min. Clear2nd and 3rdFloors Above(N)(Covered Area Under 2nd Floor)3 Story 2 StoryAboveFace of3 StoryLs.(N)72 FT. ULTIMATE R / W
(N) Path of Travelto Public WayLs.(N)(N) SidewalkRelocatedUp72 ft. Ultimate R / W26 ft. Setback Line(N) DRIVEWAYColumnColumnColumnLs.Ls.(N)Ls.Conc. Walk(N)Conc. Walk(E)Typ.Typ.Typ.Typ.Typ.Typ.Typ.Ls.(N)Typ.Typ.(N)Ls.Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Typ.PARCEL #2:12'X20'LOADINGAREATyp.Typ.Typ.Typ.to RoofHCLs.(N)12'X20'LOADINGAREALs.(N) BUS & ATNLOADING/ UNLOADINGR
E
T
A
U
R
A
N
TParking Stall CountENCLOSURE(3 BINS)PARKING
BI
C
Y
C
L
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
BICYC
LE3 Story 2 StoryLs.BLDG ABLDGBZero Curb36" Wide Detectible WarningLobbyEntranceAutomatic Door8.33%DNLs.(N)8.33%
DN (E) Walk8.33%
DN
Zero CurbZero CurbZero Curb8.33%DNZero CurbZero CurbZero CurbPARKINGBICYCLEZero CurbZero CurbZero CurbZero CurbZero CurbZero CurbZero CurbZero CurbZero CurbZero Curb8.33%
UP
8.33%
UPRESTAURANT
Ls.(N)(2 VAN STALLS INCLUDED)(N) Sidewalk(N) HOTELUp8.33%8
.
3
3%upup
(N)(N)EXISTING2 STORY RAMADA MAINGATE HOTEL1650 S. HARBOR BOULEVARDHC PATH-OF-TRAVEL TO MAIN ENTRANCEHC PATH-OF-TRAVEL TO SWIMMING POOLHC PATH-OF-TRAVEL TO FROM UNITS TO PUBLIC WAYAND FROM PUBLIC WAY TO RETAIL & HOTEL MAIN ENTRANCE HC PATH-OF-TRAVEL LEGENDElevatorEquip.RoomPHASE 2PHASE 1: Building B PHASE 2: Building A PHASE 1ATTACHMENT NO. 5
South ElevationProposed New 4 Story Wingto Match New WingsRe-Paint StuccoExisting2 Story(E) Lt. Wt. Conc. Roof Tiles, Typ.New Column Capitals Lt. Wt. Concrete Roof Tiles, Typ.New StairTowerNew StairTowerSouth ElevationProposed Alterations to Existing (N) WingLt. Wt. Concrete Roof Tiles, Typ.2nd Floor1st Floor3rd Floor4th FloorA2.2949.929.1048EXTERIORDATEREVISIONS/BUILDINGSEALELEVATIONSEXISITINGMAINGATERAMADAANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.949-772-0440PRESIDENT, GARR PROPERTIES, INC. BRANDON GARRAPPLICANT:RAMADA MAINGATE1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802714.772.0440FACADEBUILDINGS949.929.1048ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTURETERRYENTITLEMENTSINTERIORSPLANNING& PLANNINGCONSULTINGSEALIRVINE,92602CALIFORNIA60 ROCKPORTALTERATIONSofNorth ElevationProposed Alterations to 2 Storyon South Line of North ParcelNew Column Capitals New StairTower2nd Floor1st Floor(E) Lt. Wt. Conc. Roof Tiles, Typ.Remove (E) Tudor Trim &Patch & Paint Walls & Railings. Existing2 StoryCOLOR PALETTEMAIN STUCCO COLORATOWERS AND VERTICAL MASSING ELEMENTSBCORNICES, BANDS, BALLUSTRADES,CAWNINGSDW.I. RAILINGSECLEAR GLAZINGGALUMINUM WINDOWSHCOLUMNS, SILLS AND TRIM (PAINT COLORS: DUNN EDWARDS)EUREKA, SP252COYOTA PAW, DE SP2830CHAPARRAL, DE C745SEE SAMPLE BOARDSTORM WATCH DE 3013SEE SAMPLE BOARDSEE SAMPLE BOARDSEE SAMPLE BOARDROOF TILES (New to match existing)ISEE SAMPLE BOARD(New color finish to existing)KEY NOTESNEW TOWER STAIR ENCLOSURES 1NEW TUSCANY COLUMN COVERS, TYPICAL.2NEW WOUGHT IRON RAILINGS TO LATEST CODE.3ENTANCE DOORS TO UNITSFGARNETT EVENING DEA 147NEW EXTERIOR PAINTING THROUGHOUT.4NEW ROOF TILE COATING ON EXISTING CONC. TILES., 5SEE SAMPLE BOARD. NEW ROOF TILES AT NEW TOWERS.11112typ.2typ.3typ.4555552typ.3typ.4VIEWDVIEWECCCCCCHCHCCC375211C C C C C C61Ls.CC10610142571011Existing Public WalkExisting Public Walk Existing Public Walk
RESTAURANT25 FT. DRIVEWAY25 FT. DRIVEWAY25 FT. DRIVEWAY25 FT. DRIVEWAYEQUIP.ELEV.(E)STAIR(E)ELEVATOR(E)25 FT. DRIVEWAYTONY ROMAS(E) (E)(E)(N)25 FT. DRIVEWAYPatio(N)Drivewayto City Standards(N)Path
o
f T
rave
lto Public WayCatch BasinRelocated(E) 6' Conc. WalkwaySidewa
lk(N)14'-6" Clear2nd and 3rdFloors AboveUp2(N)ExitStair(N)ExitStair(N)HCHCVAN(N)57(E) Stair1 STORY (N) 1 STORY HCHCVANHC3HCVANZero CurbZero Curb5101HARBOR BOULEVARD
TrashEnclosureTrashEnclosure(E)Restrooms65(N)(N)6(N)(N)16(ER)5HCVANVANElev.Stair(ER)ExitExitExit(E) Conc. Walkway(E) Conc. Walkway(E) Conc. Walkway(E) Conc. Walkway(E) Conc. Walkway(E) Conc. Walkway(N) Conc. WalkwayDown (N)(N)(N)(N)Stair(N)(N)to (E) Bsmt(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(N)(N)Demo. (E) BuildingDemo. ExistingBuilding Future (N) StairArea ofImprovementsArea ofImprovements(E) Pool Deck(E) Pool Deck(E) Pool Deck4 STORYWING(N) 3 STORY 1 STORY (N) 3 STORY (N) 1 STORY (E) POOLStair(N)Ls.(N)Exit+36" Patio Wall(E) 4 STORY MOTEL WING (E) 2 STORY WING(N) Parcel LineParcel LineParcel Line(E) 10 ft. EasementVIEW(E) 2 STORY MOTEL(E) 4 STORY MOTEL WING (E) 2 STORY MOTELVIEWAEVIEWAVIEWB VIEWDVIEWC
SITE KEY PLANNORTH
A2.1949.929.1048EXTERIORDATEREVISIONS/BUILDINGSEALELEVATIONSEXISITINGMAINGATERAMADAANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.949-772-0440PRESIDENT, GARR PROPERTIES, INC. BRANDON GARRAPPLICANT:RAMADA MAINGATE1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802714.772.0440FACADEBUILDINGS949.929.1048ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTURETERRYENTITLEMENTSINTERIORSPLANNING& PLANNINGCONSULTINGSEALIRVINE,92602CALIFORNIA60 ROCKPORTLt. Wt. Concrete Roof Tiles, Typ.New StairTowerNew StairTowerNew Column Capitals New Column Capitals Remove (E) Tudor Trim &Patch & Paint Walls & Railings. Existing 2 Story2nd Floor1st FloorNorth ElevationProposed Alterations to 2 & 4 Storyon South Property LineNew StairTowerEXISTING 4 STORYEAST WINGNew Column Capitals EAST PARCEL LINE(E) MASONRY WALLExisting 4 Story3rd Floor2nd FloorRoof4th Floor1st FloorExisting 2 StoryMATCH LINE
COLOR PALETTEMAIN STUCCO COLORATOWERS AND VERTICAL MASSING ELEMENTSBCORNICES, BANDS, BALLUSTRADES,CAWNINGSDW.I. RAILINGSECLEAR GLAZINGFALUMINUM WINDOWSGCOLUMNS, SILLS AND TRIM (PAINT COLORS: DUNN EDWARDS)EUREKA, SP252COYOTA PAW, DE SP2830CHAPARRAL, DE C745SEE SAMPLE BOARDSTORM WATCH DE 3013SEE SAMPLE BOARDSEE SAMPLE BOARDSEE SAMPLE BOARDROOF TILES (New to match existing)HSEE SAMPLE BOARD(New color finish to existing)ALTERATIONSofLt. Wt. Conc. Roof Tiles, Typ.New Column Capitals New Tower(E) Building ExteriorNewRailings(E) Roof(Re-Finish)(E) Balcony& StairRemove (E) Tudor Trim &Patch & Paint, Including Railngs. Back Lit Glazed Arch.West ElevationProposed Alterations to (S) Wingat South Property LineKEY NOTESNEW TOWER STAIR ENCLOSURES 1NEW TUSCANY COLUMN COVERS, TYPICAL.2NEW WOUGHT IRON RAILINGS TO LATEST CODE.3NEW EXTERIOR PAINTING THROUGHOUT.4NEW ROOF TILE COATING ON EXISTING CONC. TILES., 5SEE SAMPLE BOARD. NEW ROOF TILES AT NEW TOWERS.North ElevationProposed Alterations to Existing 4 Story Wingat South Property Line1112typ.2typ.55553typ.4typ.2typ.3typ.4typ.typ.3typ.4typ.CCCCCCHCHCCC375211C C C C C C61Ls.CC10610142571011Existing Public WalkExisting Public Walk Existing Public Walk RESTAURANT25 FT. DRIVEWAY25 FT. DRIVEWAY25 FT. DRIVEWAY25 FT. DRIVEWAYEQUIP.ELEV.(E)STAIR(E)ELEVATOR(E)25 FT. DRIVEWAYTONY ROMAS(E) (E)(E)(N)25 FT. DRIVEWAYPatio(N)Drivewayto City Standards(N)Path of Travelto Public WayCatch BasinRelocated(E) 6' Conc. WalkwaySidewalk(N)14'-6" Clear2nd and 3rdFloors AboveUp2(N)ExitStair(N)ExitStair(N)HCHCVAN(N)57(E) Stair1 STORY (N) 1 STORY HCHCVANHC3HCVANZero CurbZero Curb5101HARBOR BOULEVARDTrashEnclosureTrashEnclosure
(E)Restrooms65(N)(N)6(N)(N)16(ER)5HCVANVANElev.Stair(ER)ExitExitExit(E) Conc. Walkway(E) Conc. Walkway(E) Conc. Walkway(E) Conc. Walkway(E) Conc. Walkway(E) Conc. Walkway(N) Conc. WalkwayDown (N)(N)(N)(N)Stair(N)(N)to (E) Bsmt(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(E)(N)(N)Demo. (E) BuildingDemo. ExistingBuilding Future (N) StairArea ofImprovementsArea ofImprovements(E) Pool Deck(E) Pool Deck(E) Pool Deck4 STORYWING(N) 3 STORY 1 STORY (N) 3 STORY (N) 1 STORY (E) POOLStair(N)Ls.(N)Exit+36" Patio Wall(E) 4 STORY MOTEL WING (E) 2 STORY WING(N) Parcel LineParcel LineParcel Line(E) 10 ft. EasementVIEW(E) 2 STORY MOTEL(E) 4 STORY MOTEL WING (E) 2 STORY MOTELVIEWVIEWAVIEWBVIEWCAEVIEWAVIEWB VIEWDVIEWC
SITE KEY PLANNORTH
A2.2949.929.1048ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTURETERRYENTITLEMENTSINTERIORSPLANNING& PLANNINGCONSULTINGEXTERIORDATEREVISIONS/BUILDINGSEALELEVATIONSMAINGATERAMADAANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.949-772-0440East ElevationProposed New 4 Story Wing3rd Floor2nd FloorParcel LineExistingRoof4th Floor2 StoryNorth Wingto Match New AdditionsRe-Paint Stucco(E) 8 FT. High Masonry Wallon adjoining Property @ P/LExterior WallsStucco FinishedWing Beyond.New 4 Story1st FloorNorth ElevationProposed New 4 Story WingLt. Wt. Concrete Roof Tiles, Typ.Stucco FinishedFascia MoldingGradeFinishedPRESIDENT, GARR PROPERTIES, INC. BRANDON GARRAPPLICANT:RAMADA MAINGATE1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802714.772.044011181345191213162KEY NOTESCORNICES, BANDS & MLDGS.STUCCO FINISHED EXTERIOR WALLS.1SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED DOOR TRIM, 2LT. WT CONC. TILE ROOFING.3TO MATCH (E) ROOF TILES.STUCCO FINISHED SOFFITS, TYP.442" HIGH W.I. RAILINGS.5EXTERIOR WALKWAYS.6798106 FT. CONC. WALK..11STUCCO FINISHED RELIEF.12STUCCO FINISHED MEDALLIONS.13FLOWER BOXES TO MATCH (E).14PAINTED 24 GA. G.I. CAP FLASHING.1516171819SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED CORBELS, TYP.SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED COLUMNS, TYP.BRONZE, LOW "E" GLAZING.BRONZE, LOW "E", OPAQUE(SPANDREL) GLAZING.OGEE RAIN GUTTERS WITH DOWNSPOUTS.PTACS, TYPICAL.FINISHED GRADEOPENING AT STAIR WALL1to Match New AdditionsRe-Paint Stucco2020New4 Story WingBeyond10IRVINE,92602CALIFORNIA60 ROCKPORT STREETADDITION4 STORYPROPOSEDBUILDING BBUILDING BRoofExisting4 Story4th FloorExisting2 StoryNorth Wing3rd Floor2nd Floor(E) 8 FT. High Masonry Wallon adjoining Property @ P/LParcel Lineto Match New AdditionsRe-Paint Stuccoto Match New AdditionsRe-Paint StuccoLt. Wt. Concrete Roof Tiles, Typ.Lt. Wt. Concrete Roof Tiles, Typ.Exterior WallsStucco FinishedJoint(N) ExpansionStucco ControlJoints Each FloorParcel LineGradeFinishedNew Expansion JointRoof4th FloorEXISTING CONSTRUCTIONEXISTING CONSTRUCTIONNEW CONSTRUCTION1118131616220Optional: Split Face Block PaintedNew4 Story Wing9-15-12
A2.1949.929.1048ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTURETERRYENTITLEMENTSINTERIORSPLANNING& PLANNINGCONSULTINGEXTERIORDATEREVISIONS/BUILDINGSEALELEVATIONSMAINGATERAMADAANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.949-772-0440PRESIDENT, GARR PROPERTIES, INC. BRANDON GARRAPPLICANT:RAMADA MAINGATE1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802714.772.0440KEY NOTESCORNICES, BANDS & MLDGS.STUCCO FINISHED EXTERIOR WALLS.1SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED DOOR TRIM, 2LT. WT CONC. TILE ROOFING.3TO MATCH (E) ROOF TILES.STUCCO FINISHED SOFFITS, TYP.442" HIGH W.I. RAILINGS.5EXTERIOR WALKWAYS.6798106 FT. CONC. WALK..11STUCCO FINISHED RELIEF.12STUCCO FINISHED MEDALLIONS.13FLOWER BOXES TO MATCH (E).14PAINTED 24 GA. G.I. CAP FLASHING.1516171819SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED CORBELS, TYP.SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED COLUMNS, TYP.BRONZE, LOW "E" GLAZING.BRONZE, LOW "E", OPAQUE(SPANDREL) GLAZING.OGEE RAIN GUTTERS WITH DOWNSPOUTS.PTACS, TYPICAL.FINISHED GRADEOPENING AT STAIR WALLSouth ElevationProposed New 4 Story Wing3rd Floor2nd FloorExisting 2 Story WingRoof4th Floor1st FloorGradeFinished241316New Stairs 10New 4 Story Wing112234567891010121318MATCH NEW ADDITIONSRe-PAINT STUCCO TO20IRVINE,92602CALIFORNIA60 ROCKPORT STREETADDITION4 STORYPROPOSEDBUILDING BBUILDING BWest ElevationExisting4 StoryProposed New 4 Story WingParcel Line1st Floor2nd Floor3rd Floor4th FloorRoofExisting2 StoryNorth Wing3rd Floor4th FloorRoof3rd Floor4th FloorLt. Wt. Concrete Roof Tiles, Typ.W.I. Railings, Typ.42" High (N) Tuscan Column Capitals W.I. Railings.New Stairs withExisting2 Story11111122233323564479101010101010101112121313141516161717185519191414to Match New AdditionsRe-Paint StuccoRoof2201010
A2.2949.929.1048ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTURETERRYENTITLEMENTSINTERIORSPLANNING& PLANNINGCONSULTINGEXTERIORDATEREVISIONS/BUILDINGSEALELEVATIONSMAINGATERAMADAANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.949-772-0440RoofEast ElevationExisting4 StoryProposed New 4 Story Wing4th FloorExisting2 StoryNorth Wing3rd Floor2nd Floor(E) 8 FT. High Masonry Wallon adjoining Property @ P/LParcel Lineto Match New AdditionsRe-Paint Stuccoto Match New AdditionsRe-Paint StuccoLt. Wt. Concrete Roof Tiles, Typ.Lt. Wt. Concrete Roof Tiles, Typ.Exterior WallsStucco FinishedJoint(N) ExpansionStucco ControlJoints Each FloorParcel LineGradeFinished3rd Floor2nd FloorParcel LineExistingRoof4th Floor2 StoryNorth Wingto Match New AdditionsRe-Paint Stucco(E) 8 FT. High Masonry Wallon adjoining Property @ P/LExterior WallsStucco FinishedWing Beyond.New 4 Story1st FloorNorth ElevationProposed New 4 Story WingLt. Wt. Concrete Roof Tiles, Typ.Stucco FinishedFascia MoldingGradeFinishedNew Expansion JointRoof4th FloorEXISTING CONSTRUCTIONEXISTING CONSTRUCTIONNEW CONSTRUCTIONPRESIDENT, GARR PROPERTIES, INC. BRANDON GARRAPPLICANT:RAMADA MAINGATE1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802714.772.04401111181811334519121316161622KEY NOTESCORNICES, BANDS & MLDGS.STUCCO FINISHED EXTERIOR WALLS.1SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED DOOR TRIM, 2LT. WT CONC. TILE ROOFING.3TO MATCH (E) ROOF TILES.STUCCO FINISHED SOFFITS, TYP.442" HIGH W.I. RAILINGS.5EXTERIOR WALKWAYS.6798106 FT. CONC. WALK..11STUCCO FINISHED RELIEF.12STUCCO FINISHED MEDALLIONS.13FLOWER BOXES TO MATCH (E).14PAINTED 24 GA. G.I. CAP FLASHING.1516171819SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED CORBELS, TYP.SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED COLUMNS, TYP.BRONZE, LOW "E" GLAZING.BRONZE, LOW "E", OPAQUE(SPANDREL) GLAZING.OGEE RAIN GUTTERS WITH DOWNSPOUTS.PTACS, TYPICAL.FINISHED GRADEOPENING AT STAIR WALL1to Match New AdditionsRe-Paint Stucco202020Optional: Split Face Block PaintedNew4 Story WingNew4 Story WingBeyond10IRVINE,92602CALIFORNIA60 ROCKPORT STREETADDITION4 STORYPROPOSEDBUILDING BBUILDING B
A2.1949.929.1048ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTURETERRYENTITLEMENTSINTERIORSPLANNING& PLANNINGCONSULTINGEXTERIORDATEREVISIONS/BUILDINGSEALELEVATIONSMAINGATERAMADAANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.949-772-0440West ElevationExisting4 StoryProposed New 4 Story WingParcel Line1st Floor2nd Floor3rd Floor4th FloorExisting2 StoryNorth Wing3rd Floor4th FloorLt. Wt. Concrete Roof Tiles, Typ.W.I. Railings, Typ.42" High (N) Tuscan Column Capitals W.I. Railings.New Stairs withExisting2 StoryPRESIDENT, GARR PROPERTIES, INC. BRANDON GARRAPPLICANT:RAMADA MAINGATE1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802714.772.0440KEY NOTESCORNICES, BANDS & MLDGS.STUCCO FINISHED EXTERIOR WALLS.1SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED DOOR TRIM, 2LT. WT CONC. TILE ROOFING.3TO MATCH (E) ROOF TILES.STUCCO FINISHED SOFFITS, TYP.442" HIGH W.I. RAILINGS.5EXTERIOR WALKWAYS.6798106 FT. CONC. WALK..11STUCCO FINISHED RELIEF.12STUCCO FINISHED MEDALLIONS.13FLOWER BOXES TO MATCH (E).14PAINTED 24 GA. G.I. CAP FLASHING.1516171819SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED CORBELS, TYP.SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED COLUMNS, TYP.11BRONZE, LOW "E" GLAZING.BRONZE, LOW "E", OPAQUE(SPANDREL) GLAZING.OGEE RAIN GUTTERS WITH DOWNSPOUTS.PTACS, TYPICAL.11112223332356447FINISHED GRADE91010101010101011121213131415161617171855OPENING AT STAIR WALL191914to Match New AdditionsRe-Paint StuccoRoofSouth ElevationProposed New 4 Story Wing3rd Floor2nd FloorExisting 2 Story WingRoof4th Floor1st FloorGradeFinished241316New Stairs 10New 4 Story Wing1122345678910101213182MATCH NEW ADDITIONSRe-PAINT STUCCO TO2020IRVINE,92602CALIFORNIA60 ROCKPORT STREETADDITION4 STORYPROPOSED1010BUILDING BBUILDING B
A1.2THIRD & FOURTHDATEREVISIONS/FLOOR PLANSANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.949-772-0440Existing4 StoryNORTHRoof PlanMansard RoofNew Expansion Joint48 " Parapet Wall48 " Parapet Wall
Built Up RoofNORTHThird & Fourth Floor PlansProposed New 4 Story WingExisting
1A3.2New Expansion JointROOF PLANEast Parcel LineExisting2 StoryBelowBOILER949.929.1048ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTURETERRYENTITLEMENTSINTERIORSPLANNING+ PLANNINGCONSULTINGSEALMAINGATERAMADAWING4 STORYPROPOSEDIRVINE,92602CALIFORNIA60 ROCKPORT STREETADDITIONBUILDING BBUILDING B48 " Parapet Wall
Parcel Line 8 ft. High Block Wall BelowExistingEast Parcel LineNew Expansion Joint2 Story North WingExisting
New Expansion JointElectricalTelephoneVending(3rd Floor)Existing2 Story1A3.2StairUp(E)TV
ClosetRefig
TV
ClosetRefig
TV
ClosetRefig
TV
ClosetRefigDQ1 ExpansionJointExpansionJoint1223456789101112WingNew 8" Expansion JointOpen Balcony 5 ft. Balcony Below
Hsekpg.DnTV
TV
TV
ClosetRefig
TV
TV
ClosetRefigGuest(4th Floor)BelowBelow BelowBelowExp. Jt.2234567891011122 Story North WingBelow
Existing4 StoryBDEACDbl. StudWallBDEACOpenNewElevNew UpStairOpen
Open6'-11" x 8'-6"Clear HoistwayDn3.13.92.31New UpStairOpen
OpenOpen11.110.212Dn(3rd Flr.Only)NewElevNewStairOpen
Open6'-11" x 8'-6"Clear HoistwayDn3.13.92.3111.110.212Mansard RoofBURBURNewElevatorNewStair3.13.92.3BURBURMansard RoofMansard RoofHip RoofProvide BUR withWhite Cap SheetProvide Taper Tile Foam1/4" Min./ Ft. SlopeProvide BUR withWhite Cap SheetProvide Taper Tile Foam1/4" Min./ Ft. SlopeBURProvide BUR withWhite Cap SheetProvide Taper Tile Foam1/4" Min./ Ft. SlopeBURBDACStair & ElevatorRoof PlanExpansionJointFDWASHERDRYERDQ2 SUITEDQ2 SUITEDQ2 SUITEC.1LaundryDRYER VENTTHRU ROOF305306307308309310312311301302303304315314316412411405406407408409410401402403404415414416FOLDING TABLE
R15R14See Mech.1/4" min. per ft.
1/4" min. per ft.
A1.1949.929.1048ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTUREENTITLEMENTSINTERIORSPLANNING+ PLANNINGCONSULTINGFLOORDATEREVISIONS/PLANSSEALMAINGATERAMADAANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.949-772-0440SidewalkExisting
NORTHFirst Floor PlanParcel Line
Proposed New 4 Story Wing8 ft. High Block WallExisting10 UnitsEast Parcel LineNew Expansion Joint2 Story North WingExisting
NewElevNewNew Stair Up Up(N) SidewalkExisting Parking
TypicalConnectingDoorTV
DQHCSHR ClosetRefig
TV
ClosetRefigStair
New ParkingNew Expansion JointLs.(N)Ls.(N)TV
ClosetRefig
1/8" = 1'-0"FIRST & SECONDWING4 STORYPROPOSEDExisting4 Story(N) 6 ft Conc. WalkExisting2 Story1A3.1IRVINE,92602CALIFORNIA60 ROCKPORT STREETADDITIONHCTyp.StairUp(E)TV
ClosetRefig
TV
ClosetRefig
TV
ClosetRefig
TV
ClosetRefig
TV
ClosetRefig
TV
ClosetRefig
TV
ClosetRefigNew UpStairLs.(N)Zero CurbLs.(N)Ls.(N)DQ1DQ1DQ1DQ1DQ1DQ1DQ1DQ1BUILDING BTERRY11.1BDE10.2AC3.13.92.3ExpansionJointExpansionJointOH Door 1223456789101112Open
Open
OpenOpenOpen WingNew 8" Expansion JointAboveOpenBalcony AboveZero Curb5 ft. Balcony Above
Parcel Line 8 ft. High Block WallExistingEast Parcel LineNew Expansion Joint2 Story North WingExistingNew Stair DnNew Expansion JointElectricalTelephoneExisting2 Story1A3.1StairUp(E)TV
ClosetRefig
TV
ClosetRefig
TV
ClosetRefig
TV
ClosetRefigDQ1DQ1DQ1 ExpansionJointExpansionJointOH Door 1223456789101112WingNew 8" Expansion JointOpen5'-2" ft. Balcony 5 ft. Balcony Hsekpg.StorageFitness CenterandTraining RoomBreak Room &ArcadeRoomGameDnSecond Floor PlanNORTHFace of StudFace of StudTVDbl. StudWallDbl. StudWallOH Door
Existing4 StoryBDEAC1126'-11" x 8'-6"Clear HoistwayNew UpStairOpen
OpenOpen11.110.212NewElevNew UpStairOpen
Open6'-11" x 8'-6"Clear HoistwayDnDn3.13.92.31Existing Basementto be demo'd.8'5'2'3'9'-10"7'-10"HC Roll-In Shr.30x60MW
MW
MW
MW
MW
MW
MW
DQ1(N)ElectricalTypicalConnectingDoorDQ2HC TV
ClosetRefig
HC Roll-In Shr.30x60MWSUITE
C.1C.1BUILDING BA
A3.2 VendingFD(3rd Flr)ICESODAStorageRoomVendingFD(3rd Flr)ICESODALs.(N)Ls.(N)Ls.(N)Elevator Equip.Room(N) SidewalkVANTyp.205206207208209210212211201202203204215214216101102103104105107108109110115114116112111Elev. Equip. Rm.Roof1A3.11A3.11
A3.22A3.21
A3.2 1A4.12A4.12A4.21A4.2
1
A4.3
3
A4.1
2
A4.3
4
A4.1
1A3.1A
A3.2
1A3.11A3.11
A3.22A3.21
A3.2 1A4.12A4.12A4.21A4.2
1
A4.3
3
A4.1
2
A4.3
4
A4.1
1
A5.1 2A5.13A5.14A5.1
1
A5.1 A5.13A5.14A5.1
A2.1IRVINE92602949.929.104860 ROCKPORT STREETEXTERIORDATEREVISIONS/BUILDINGSEALELEVATIONSADDITIONS &PROPOSEDMAINGATERAMADAANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.949-772-0440ALTERATIONSLOBBY ENTRANCEHARBOR BOULEVARD (WEST) ELEVATIONSOUTH ELEVATION KEY NOTESCORNICES, BANDS & MLDGS.STUCCO FINISHED EXTERIOR WALLS.1SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED DOOR TRIM, 2NOT USED.3STUCCO FINISHED SOFFITS, TYP.4STUCCO FINISHED BALUSTRADES, TYP.5EXTERIOR WALKWAYS.679810ENRICHED CONC. WALK.11121314PAINTED 24 GA. G.I. CAP FLASHING.1516SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED COLUMNS, TYP.BRONZE, LOW "E" GLAZING.BRONZE, LOW "E", OPAQUE(SPANDREL) GLAZING.PTACS, TYPICAL. (HIDDEN BY BALLUSTRADES).FINISHED GRADEOPENING AT STAIR WALLMATCH NEW ADDITIONSRe-PAINT STUCCO TOSTUCCO FINISHED MOLDED TRIM & SILL, TYPICAL.1122789917AWNINGS, TYP.221318STAIR TO ROOF.19CLEAR POLISHED PLATE GLAZING.2101616CALIFORNIA102PRESIDENT, GARR PROPERTIES, INC. BRANDON GARRAPPLICANT:RAMADA MAINGATE1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802714.772.0440COLOR PALETTEMAIN STUCCO COLORATOWERS AND VERTICAL MASSING ELEMENTSBCORNICES, BANDS, BALLUSTRADES,CAWNINGSDBRONZE GLAZINGECLEAR GLAZINGFALUMINUM WINDOWSGCOLUMNS, SILLS AND TRIM (PAINT COLORS: DUNN EDWARDS)EUREKA, SP252COYOTA PAW, DE SP2830CHAPARRAL, DE C745SEE SAMPLE BOARDSEE SAMPLE BOARDSEE SAMPLE BOARDSEE SAMPLE BOARDADDITIONS &PROPOSEDALTERATIONS4 STORY949.929.1048ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTURETERRYENTITLEMENTSINTERIORSPLANNING& PLANNINGCONSULTINGSEALIRVINE,92602CALIFORNIA60 ROCKPORT10(E) 2 STORY MOTEL WING TO REMAIN201571112 DrivewayHARBOR BOULEVARD (WEST) ELEVATION415'-0" min. clr.2C2210CAC11812C9CB121CB1A5779910161717913191912DDCCCFE1AF2C1B5101612EC1B1BCB1BCBCCB1A11A5CNEW EXTERIOR STAIRS FROM DECK.2121MAIN210CB1BUILDING ABUILDING A
A2.2EXTERIORDATEREVISIONS/BUILDINGELEVATIONSMAINGATERAMADAANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.949-772-0440EAST ELEVATION Porte CochereStair Tower(E) 2 STORY MOTEL WING TO REMAINNORTH ELEVATION 1st Floor2nd Floor3rd FloorStucco FinishedFalse Balcony,Typical.ServiceStucco FinishedDoor withTrim.(E) Stairto be Replaced.Existing ConstructionNew Construction2nd Floor2nd Floor3rd FloorPRESIDENT, GARR PROPERTIES, INC. BRANDON GARRAPPLICANT:RAMADA MAINGATE1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802714.772.0440KEY NOTESCORNICES, BANDS & MLDGS.STUCCO FINISHED EXTERIOR WALLS.1SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED DOOR TRIM, 2NOT USED.3STUCCO FINISHED SOFFITS, TYP.4STUCCO FINISHED FALSE BALCONIES, TYP.5EXTERIOR WALKWAYS.679810ENRICHED CONC. WALK.11STUCCO FINISHED CIRCULAR TRIM.12CIRCULAR WINDOW.1314PAINTED 24 GA. G.I. CAP FLASHING.15161718SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED COLUMNS, TYP.BRONZE, LOW "E" GLAZING.BRONZE, LOW "E", OPAQUE(SPANDREL) GLAZING.PTACS, TYPICAL.FINISHED GRADEOPENING AT STAIR WALLMATCH NEW ADDITIONSRe-PAINT STUCCO TO11112222222STUCCO FINISHED MOLDED TRIM & SILL, TYPICAL.77101010111414141515171719STAIR TO ROOF.Section Cut Thru New Laundry/Storage AreaADDITIONS &PROPOSEDALTERATIONS4 STORY1 Story Roof115215'-0" min. clr.949.929.1048ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTURETERRYENTITLEMENTSINTERIORSPLANNING& PLANNINGCONSULTINGSEALIRVINE,92602CALIFORNIA60 ROCKPORTCOLOR PALETTEMAIN STUCCO COLORATOWERS AND VERTICAL MASSING ELEMENTSBCORNICES, BANDS, BALLUSTRADES,CAWNINGSDBRONZE GLAZINGECLEAR GLAZINGFALUMINUM WINDOWSGCOLUMNS, SILLS AND TRIM (PAINT COLORS: DUNN EDWARDS)EUREKA, SP252COYOTA PAW, DE SP2830CHAPARRAL, DE C745SEE SAMPLE BOARDSEE SAMPLE BOARDSEE SAMPLE BOARDSEE SAMPLE BOARDBBBCCC1ASUN DECK RAILING21SUN DECK EXIT STAIR22typ.21CCtyp.BCCABCC1Ctyp.2CB111812C145145145145145141451B2189812CCCtyp.C98101BC21812192BCC1BCtyp.typ.1AC2C44B1BUILDING ABUILDING A1414145
A2.1IRVINE92602949.929.104860 ROCKPORT STREETEXTERIORDATEREVISIONS/BUILDINGSEALELEVATIONSADDITIONS &PROPOSEDMAINGATERAMADAANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.949-772-0440ALTERATIONSLOBBY ENTRANCEHARBOR BOULEVARD (WEST) ELEVATIONSOUTH ELEVATION KEY NOTESCORNICES, BANDS & MLDGS.STUCCO FINISHED EXTERIOR WALLS.1SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED DOOR TRIM, 2NOT USED.3STUCCO FINISHED SOFFITS, TYP.4STUCCO FINISHED BALUSTRADES, TYP.5EXTERIOR WALKWAYS.679810ENRICHED CONC. WALK.11121314PAINTED 24 GA. G.I. CAP FLASHING.1516SMOOTH STUCCO FINISHED COLUMNS, TYP.BRONZE, LOW "E" GLAZING.BRONZE, LOW "E", OPAQUE(SPANDREL) GLAZING.PTACS, TYPICAL. (HIDDEN BY BALLUSTRADES).FINISHED GRADEOPENING AT STAIR WALLMATCH NEW ADDITIONSRe-PAINT STUCCO TOSTUCCO FINISHED MOLDED TRIM & SILL, TYPICAL.1122789917AWNINGS, TYP.221318STAIR TO ROOF.19CLEAR POLISHED PLATE GLAZING.2101616CALIFORNIA102PRESIDENT, GARR PROPERTIES, INC. BRANDON GARRAPPLICANT:RAMADA MAINGATE1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA 92802714.772.0440COLOR PALETTEMAIN STUCCO COLORATOWERS AND VERTICAL MASSING ELEMENTSBCORNICES, BANDS, BALLUSTRADES,CAWNINGSDBRONZE GLAZINGECLEAR GLAZINGFALUMINUM WINDOWSGCOLUMNS, SILLS AND TRIM (PAINT COLORS: DUNN EDWARDS)EUREKA, SP252COYOTA PAW, DE SP2830CHAPARRAL, DE C745SEE SAMPLE BOARDSEE SAMPLE BOARDSEE SAMPLE BOARDSEE SAMPLE BOARDADDITIONS &PROPOSEDALTERATIONS4 STORY949.929.1048ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTURETERRYENTITLEMENTSINTERIORSPLANNING& PLANNINGCONSULTINGSEALIRVINE,92602CALIFORNIA60 ROCKPORT10(E) 2 STORY MOTEL WING TO REMAIN201571112 DrivewayHARBOR BOULEVARD (WEST) ELEVATION415'-0" min. clr.2C2210CAC11812C9CB121CB1A5779910161717913191912DDCCCFE1AF2C1B5101612EC1B1BCB1BCBCCB1A11A5CNEW EXTERIOR STAIRS FROM DECK.2121MAIN210CB1BUILDING ABUILDING A
A1.3IRVINE,92602CALIFORNIA949.929.1048ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTURETERRY60 ROCKPORTENTITLEMENTSINTERIORSPLANNING& PLANNINGCONSULTINGROOF/SUN DECKDATEREVISIONS/PLANSEALADDITIONS &4 STORYMAINGATERAMADAANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.949-772-0440ALTERATIONSParcel LineDownStair2"Elev(N)Dn 19 Risers @7" (7 + 12)HCToiletHCToiletSUN DECKBUILT UP ROOF(N)EDFAREAExpansion JointMENWOMENSUN DECK2,330 SF1,350 SFROOF & SUN DECK PLANNDownStair9 + 9 risers665 GSF3,718 GSFROOF FINISH FLOOR AREASUN DECK AREA6,920 GSFENTIRE ROOF AREAPROPOSEDParcel Line1'-2"
Parcel Line
3'1'-2"BUILDING ABUILDING AEXPANSION JOINT COVER4 FT. HIGH STUCCO DECK SURFACE ON 18" x18" x 3/8" DECK TILESOVER TAPERED CELLULARWITH STEPPED DENSE EPS OVER WP MEMBRANE12345678910BCDEABCDEFG24'-0"5'-3"CLR24'-0"17'-4"7'-7"5'-10"15'-1"14'-5"14'-7"14'-7"15'-5"15'-9"15'-2"15'-0"2"3'-0"24'-0"5'-3"24'-0"104321.81.113'-8"9'-8"1'-7"53'-3"79'-10"45'-11"
125'-8"56789SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1:1SLOPE 1:1SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT.18" x18" x 3/8" CERAMIC DECK TILESOVER TAPERED CELLULAR PERLITEWITH STEPPED DENSE EPS OVER WP MEMBRANESLOPE 1/4" / FT.SLOPE 1/4" / FT. FINISHED STUD WALLFDFDFDFDFDFDFDFD BUILT UP ROOF WITH GRAVEL SURFACING OVER TAPERED EPS SYSTEMO"O"O"+5"O"O"+5"+6"+6"+6"+6"+6"+6"+6"+6"+6"+6"+6"+6"+6"+6"+6"+6"+6"+6"+6"
A1.2949.929.1048ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTURETERRYENTITLEMENTSINTERIORSPLANNING& PLANNINGCONSULTING2ND & 3RDDATEREVISIONS/FLOORSEALPLANSADDITIONS &MAINGATERAMADAANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.949-772-0440ALTERATIONSIRVINE,92602CALIFORNIA60 ROCKPORT4 STORYPROPOSEDElev.Vest.5 FT Corridor3rd & 4th FLOOR PLANLineParcelTVTVTVTVTVTVTVTVStairRoof of Roof of (N) 2 Story HseKpg.CocherePorte (N)(E) 2 STORY MOTEL20 UnitsDownStairUpN(To Remain)(E) BalconyDownUpRoof(N) ExteriorStairTVElec./ Tele.& Low Voltage1'-2"BelowBelowHandrailDownStairUpVendingBelowBelowElev.Exercise5 FT CorridorHallElev(N)2nd FLOOR PLANStairDownUpfaux windowNVest.DownUp+42" RailingDown 37 Risers @ 6.54" (7+20+10)6"Up 19 Risers @7" (12 + 7)HandrailHandrailHandrailHandrailWomenMenSun Deck RoomBreakfast Room40'660 SF42" Railing42" Wall42" RailingExit Stair DownLandscape VendingStorageKitchenSidewalkBelowBelowSidewalkRoofSkylightsPorteCochereRoofColumn26 FT.DRIVEWAYBELOWExisting Parking Area to Remain(Re-Stripe)SidewalkBelow(15'-0" clearance required).17'-0"16'-0"faux window23'-0"12'-0"23'-0"1 StoryRoofBreakfast Room(E) 2 STORY MOTEL20 Units(To Remain)(N) ExteriorStairBelowBelowPARCEL LINETVDQ/K SUITETVTVDQ2 SUITETVDQ2 SUITEDQ1 SUITE5 FT CorridorCorridor(N) 1 Story Retail LineParcelTVTVTVTVElec./ Tele.DQ3 SUITEDQ1 SUITEKING1DQ1TVTVFOLDINGTABLELaundryGuestVent3rd Floor(Storage on 4th Floor)TABLEStorageTVDQ1TV23'-0"TVTVDQ1-HC SUITEDownStairUpBUILDING ABUILDING A12345678910BCDEABCDEFG24'-0"5'-3"CLR24'-0"17'-4"7'-7"5'-10"15'-1"14'-5"14'-7"14'-7"15'-5"15'-9"2"3'-0"24'-0"5'-3"24'-0"107.86.85.75.34321.81.114.5'14'-9"7'-7"7'-6"6'-10"19'-0"15'-9"15'-2"3'-7"9'-8"1'-7"53'-3"Parcel Line26 ft. Setback Line79'-10"45'-11"125'-8"8.814'-10"9'-5"
79'-10"
125'-8"
1'-2"12345678910BCDEABCDEFG24'-0"5'-3"CLR24'-0"17'-4"7'-7"5'-10"15'-1"14'-5"14'-7"14'-7"15'-5"15'-9"15'-2"15'-0"2"3'-0"24'-0"5'-3"24'-0"107.86.85.75.34321.81.114.5'14'-9"
7'-7"7'-6"6'-10"19'-0"16'-5"14'-6"3'-8"9'-8"53'-3"79'-10"45'-11"
125'-8"8.814'-10"9'-5"
79'-10"
125'-8"3'-0"TV53'-3"Curb
24'-0"53'-3"24'-0"53'-3"TVTVDQ2 SUITETV24'-0"53'-3"40'-0"14'-10"15'-2"
6'
to F.F.
6"
to F.F.
6"
to F.F.
6'
to F.F.
6"
to F.F.Elev(N)219206207208209210216217204201203218205205205215214213212Stair202221301/401201202302/402303/403304/404305/405305/405305/405306/406307/407308/408314/414309/409310/410311/411312/412313/41320' Serving Counter40'-0"16'6'-9"12'-4"Kitchen220TVKING1-HCTV310KING1-HCTHIRD FLOOR ONLY(SEE KING1-HC FOR 310 ABOVE)ADMIN. OFFICE211Rev.4-05-12 Serving Counter
FIRST FLOOR &PARTIAL SITE PLANNA1.1IRVINE,92602CALIFORNIA949.929.1048ARCHITECTUREARCHITECTURETERRY60 ROCKPORT STREETENTITLEMENTSINTERIORSPLANNING& PLANNINGCONSULTINGFIRST FLOORDATEREVISIONS/PLANADDITIONS &PROPOSEDMAINGATERAMADAANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA1650 S. HARBOR BLVD.949-772-0440ALTERATIONS02550BAR SCALE4.9'Existing Public WalkExisting Public Walk(E)Path of Travelto Public WayColumnExisting Parking Area to Remain+36" WallLs.(N)Lobby / Registration 5' Conc. Walk(N)(E) 6' Conc. WalkwayLs.(N)Ls.(N)(N) ExteriorStair.(N)2"Ls.(N)(Re-Stripe)1'-2"AboveFace of4 StoryAbove4 Story26 ft. Setback Line26 ft. Setback Line(N) SIGN(Replacement)UPAboveFace of4 StoryFirst Floor Retail15-0" Min. Clear2nd, 3rd and 4thFloors Above(N)(Covered Area Under 2nd Floor)8'3'5'1 StoryHCCurb Cut(N)HCCurb Cut(N)HCCurb Cut(E)8'-0"8'-0"53'-3"Path of Travelto Public Way(N) 8'5'-6"
30'-0"8'-0"8'-0"AboveFace of4 StoryExisting Parking Area to Remain(Re-Stripe)Catch BasinRelocate(High Power Electrical Transmission Line)Existing Pedestrian Walkway to Disney Parking Lot(N) 5'-6" SidewalkLs.(N)HCVANOne Story (N)First Floor RetailStorage & Laundry4 Story 1 Story2"AboveFace of4 Story8'Ls.Ls.(N)Ls.Ls.(N)Ls.53'-3"Elev.UpAdmin.Stair(N)8'-6" clr7'-5" clr4'-1"
CLR Stair4'-1"
CLR6"First Floor Retail(N)(N)First Floor Retail(N)Parcel Line38'-0"72 FT. ULTIMATE R / W
Cochere1 Sty Roof AbovePorte (N)15'-0" min. clear(N)First Floor RetailPath of Travelto Public WayUpLobbyEntrance12'X20'LOADINGAREA6,040+510 + 6,550 GSFREVISED 3-25-11126'8'-0"24'-11"+/-Face ofLs.BUILDING ABUILDING A12345678910BCDABCDEFG24'-0"5'-3"CLR24'-0"5'-10"15'-1"14'-5"14'-7"14'-7"15'-5"15'-9"15'-2"14'-10"2"3'-0"24'-0"5'-3"21.81.113'-8"9'-7"1'-7"
79'-10"45'-11"
125'-8"31'-9"4'-7"HI315'-2"8.26.311"13"9'-10"5'-3"
9'-5"5'-2"
6'-4"
15'-2"3'-8"9'-7"1'-7"Stair18'-6"
1'-2"SEAL13"2"24" Sq. Base18" Dia.Column24" Sq. Base18" Dia.Column24" Sq. Base18" Dia.Column24" Sq. Base18" Dia.18" Sq. Base14" Dia. Half ColumnTyp. U.N.O.FRP FiberglassFRP FiberglassFRP FiberglassFRP FiberglassFRP Fiberglass2"3'2"3'2"3'1'-5"18" Sq. Base14" Dia. Half ColumnTyp. U.N.O.FRP Fiberglass15'-7"16'-0"16'-0"16'-0"15'-11"(N) Sidewalk8'-1"1'-0"1'-0"712"9"1'-10"1'-2"Above ColumnsProjected Wall Sidewalk4'-0"4'-0"Up 36 Risers @ 6.72" (10+20+7)2 HR. RATED STAIR & ELEVATOR ENCLOSURES6"CLR6"CLR
6"CLR6"CLR
4'-1"CLRUpUpUp 36 Risers @ 6.72" (9+9+9+9)2 HR. RATED STAIR ENCLOSURE 4'-1"CLR17'-8"7'-3"2 HR. RATED WALL2 HR. RATED WALL2 HR. RATED WALL
4'-1"
CLR
4'-1"
CLR6"UpUp 36 Risers @ 6.72" (9+9+9+9)2 HR. RATED STAIR ENCLOSURE 9'-7"
9'-7"HCToiletHCToiletWomen'sMen'sPROVIDE A 4" SEWER LINEFOR FUTURE TENANT USE.11'-2"5'-2"1'-0"Exitway3'-4"6'-8"104105106107108109110First Floor Retail(N)First Floor Retail(N)101111112102103116101Automatic Door21' x 49'-6"49'-6"6' x 21'Path of Travelto Public Way21'Luggage HoldMedallionConc. SidewalkZero Curb5" CurbRetaining Curb(N) Expansion Joint(N) Expansion Joint(N) Expansion JointREVISED 3-30-12Conc. SidewalkConc. Sidewalk5" Curb5" Curb13'-9"4'-0"4'-0"9'-0"8'-0"9'-0"8'-6"5
"
C
u
r
bREVISED - 3/30/121'-7"8'-6"8'-6"4'-5"8'-3"
5'-0"8.33%8
.
3
3%upu
p
1
Terms and Definitions
1. Property Owner/Developer − Any owner or developer of real property within the Anaheim Report Specific Plan Area.
2. Environmental Equivalent/Timing − Any mitigation measure and timing thereof, subject to the approval of the City, which will have the same or superior
result and will have the same or superior effect on the environment. The Planning Department, in conjunction with any appropriate agencies or City
departments, shall determine the adequacy of any proposed “environmental equivalent timing” and, if determined necessary, may refer said determination to
the Planning Commission. Any costs associated with information required in order to make a determination of environmental equivalency/timing shall be
borne by the property owner/developer. Staff time for reviews will be charged on a time and materials basis at the rate in the City’s adopted Fee Schedule.
3. Timing − This is the point where a mitigation measure must be monitored for compliance. In the case where multiple action items are indicated, it is the first
point where compliance associated with the mitigation measure must be monitored. Once the initial action item has been complied with, no additional
monitoring pursuant to the Mitigation Monitoring Plan will occur, as routine City practices and procedures will ensure that the intent of the measure has been
complied with. For example, if the timing is “to be shown on approved building plans” subsequent to issuance of the building permit consistent with the
approved plans will be final building and zoning inspections pursuant to the building permit to ensure compliance.
4. Responsibility for Monitoring − Shall mean that compliance with the subject mitigation measure(s) shall be reviewed and determined adequate by all
departments listed for each mitigation measure. Outside public agency review is limited to those public agencies specified in the Mitigation Monitoring Plan
which have permit authority in conjunction with the mitigation measure.
5. Ongoing Mitigation Measures − The mitigation measures that are designated to occur on an ongoing basis as part of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan will be
monitored in the form of an annual letter from the property owner/developer in January of each year demonstrating how compliance with the subject
measure(s) has been achieved. When compliance with a measure has been demonstrated for a period of one year, monitoring of the measure will be deemed to
be satisfied and no further monitoring will occur. For measures that are to be monitored “Ongoing During Construction,” the annual letter will review those
measures only while construction is occurring; monitoring will be discontinued after construction is complete. A final annual letter will be provided at the
close of construction.
6. Building Permit − For purposes of this Mitigation Monitoring Plan, a building permit shall be defined as any permit issued for construction of a new building
or structural expansion or modification of any existing building, but shall not include any permits required for interior tenant improvements or minor additions
to an existing structure or building.
RAMADA MAINGATE
UPDATED AND MODIFIED MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 0085c
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
2
Ramada Maingate
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
AESTHETICS
MM I-1 Prior to issuance of a building
permit,
The property owner/developer shall submit plans which illustrate that all mechanical
equipment and trash areas for the subject building(s) will be screened from adjacent
public streets and adjacent residential areas. Screening shall be installed prior to final
building and zoning inspection. (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.11-1, MMP No. 0085a
MM 17-1).
Police Department (for
Police Department
Personnel); Public
Works Department,
Traffic and
Transportation Division
(for Anaheim TMC
personnel)
MM I-2 Prior to issuance of a building
permit,
The property owner/developer shall submit a landscape and irrigation plan which shall
be prepared and certified by a licensed landscape architect. The landscape plan shall
include a phasing plan for the installation and maintenance of landscaping associated
with that building permit and shall be in conformance with the Water Efficiency
Landscape Ordinance.
The irrigation plan shall specify methods for monitoring the irrigation system. The
system shall ensure that irrigation rates do not exceed the infiltration of local soils,
that the application of fertilizers and pesticides do not exceed appropriate levels of
frequencies, and that surface runoff and over-watering is minimized.
The landscape and irrigation plans shall include water-conserving features such as
low flow irrigation heads, automatic irrigation scheduling equipment, flow sensing
controls, rain sensors, soil moisture sensors, and other water-conserving equipment.
In addition, all irrigation systems shall be designed so that they will function properly
with reclaimed water, once a system is available. The landscape and irrigation plans
shall be reviewed by the Anaheim Resort Maintenance District (MMP No. 0085
MM 3.11-2, MMP No. 0085a MM 17-2).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public Utilities
Department, Water
Engineering Division
MM I-3 Prior to the final building and
zoning inspection or whenever
established; and on an
ongoing basis,
The property owner/developer shall participate in an assessment district for landscape
installation and maintenance if one is established for the Anaheim Resort
(MMP No. 0085 MM 3.11-4, MMP No. 0085a MM 17-4).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public Works
Department
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
3
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
AIR QUALITY
MM III-1 Ongoing during project
operation,
The property owner/developer shall implement measures to reduce emissions to the
extent practical, schedule goods movement for off-peak traffic hours, and use clean
fuel for vehicles and other equipment, as practicable (MMP 0085 MM 3.4-1,
MMP No. 0085a MM 3-1).
Public Works
Department, Traffic and
Transportation Division
MM III-2 Prior to the issuance of each
building permit,
The property owner/developer shall submit evidence that low emission paints and
coatings are utilized in the design and construction of buildings, in compliance with
SCAQMD regulations. This information shall be denoted on the project plans and
specifications. The property owner/developer shall also implement the following to limit
emission from architectural coatings and asphalt usage:
A Use nonsolvent-based coatings on buildings, wherever
appropriate.
B Use solvent-based coatings, where they are necessary, in
ways that minimize solvent emissions.
C Encourage use of high-solid or water-based coatings
(MMP 0085 MM 3.4-2, MMP No. 0085a MM 3-2).
Planning Department,
Building Division
MM III-3 Ongoing during construction, The property owner/developer shall implement measures to reduce construction-
related air quality impacts. These measures shall include, but are not limited to:
A Normal wetting procedures (at least twice daily) or other
dust palliative measures shall be followed during earth-
moving operations to minimize fugitive dust emissions, in
compliance with the City of Anaheim Municipal Code
including application of chemical soil stabilizers to exposed
soils after grading is completed and replacing ground cover
in disturbed areas as quickly as practicable.
B Enclosing, covering, watering twice daily, or applying
approved soil binders, according to manufacturer’s
specification, to exposed stock piles.
C Roadways adjacent to the project shall be swept and
cleared of any spilled export materials at least twice a day
to assist in minimizing fugitive dust; and, haul routes shall
be cleared as needed if spills of materials exported from
the project site occur.
D Where practicable, heavy duty construction equipment
shall be kept onsite when not in operation to minimize
exhaust emissions associated with vehicles repetitiously
South Coast Air Quality
Management District;
Planning Department,
Building Division
(verification of notes on
plans); Public Works
Department,
Development Services
Division (for annual
review)
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
4
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
entering and exiting the project site.
E Trucks importing or exporting soil material and/or debris
shall be covered prior to entering public streets.
F Taking preventive measures to ensure that trucks do not
carry dirt on tires onto public streets, including treating
onsite roads and staging areas.
G Preventing trucks from idling for longer than 2 minutes.
H Manually irrigate or activate irrigation systems necessary to
water and maintain the vegetation as soon as planting is
completed.
I Reduce traffic speeds on all unpaved road surfaces to 15
miles per hour or less.
J Suspend all grading operations when wind speeds (as
instantaneous gust) exceed 25 miles per hour and during
first and second stage smog alerts.
K Comply with the SCAQMD Rule 402, which states that no
dust impacts offsite are sufficient to be called a nuisance,
and SCAQMD Rule 403, which restricts visible emissions
from construction.
L Use low emission mobile construction equipment (e.g.,
tractors, scrapers, dozers) where practicable.
M Utilize existing power sources (e.g. power poles) or clean-
fuel generators rather than temporary power generators,
where practicable.
N Maintain construction equipment engines by keeping them
properly tuned.
O Use low sulfur fuel for equipment, to the extent practicable
(MMP 0085 MM 3.4-3, MMP No. 0085a MM 3-3).
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
5
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
MM III-4 Prior to approval of each
grading plan (for Import/Export
plan) and prior to issuance of
demolition permit (for
Demolition Plan),
The property owner/developer shall submit Demolition and Import/Export plans. The
plans shall include identification of offsite locations for materials exported from the
project and options for disposal of excess materials. These options may include
recycling of materials onsite, sale to a soil broker or contractor, sale to a project in the
vicinity or transport to an environmentally cleared landfill, with attempts made to move
it within Orange County. The property owner/developer shall offer recyclable building
materials, such as asphalt or concrete for sale or removal by private firms or public
agencies for use in construction of other projects, if not all can be reused on project
site (MMP 0085 MM 3.4-4, MMP No. 0085a MM 3-4).
Public Works
Department, Field
Engineering
MM III-5 Prior to the issuance of each
building permit,
The property owner/developer shall comply with all SCAQMD offset regulations and
implementation of Best Available Control Technology (BACT) and Best Available
Retrofit Control Technology (BARCT) for any new or modified stationary source.
Copies of permits shall be given to the Planning Department ((MMP 0085 MM 3.4-5,
MMP No. 0085a MM 3-5).
South Coast Air Quality
Management District
(for permit issuance);
Planning Department,
Planning Division (for
verification of permit
application and receipt)
MM III-6 Prior to the issuance of each
building permit,
The property owner/developer shall implement, and demonstrate to the City,
measures that are being taken to reduce operation-related air quality impacts. The
measures may include, but not limited to the following:
A. Improve thermal integrity of structures and reduced thermal load through
use of automated time clocks or occupant sensors.
B. Incorporate efficient heating and other appliances.
C. Incorporate energy conservation measures in site orientation and in
building design, such as appropriate passive solar design.
D. Use drought-resistant landscaping wherever feasible to reduce energy
used in pumping and transporting water.
E. To the extent feasible, provide daycare opportunities for employees or
participate in a joint development daycare center (MMP 0085 MM 3.4-6,
MMP No. 0085a MM 3-6).
Public Utilities
Department, Electric
Services
Administration,
Resource Efficiency
MM III-7 Prior to issuance of a building
permit,
Implementation of energy conservation techniques (i.e., installation of energy saving
devices, construction of electrical vehicle charging stations, use of sunlight filtering
window coatings or double-paned windows, utilization of light-colored roofing materials
as opposed to dark-colored roofing materials, and placement of shady trees next to
habitable structures) shall be indicated on plans (MMP 0085a MM 3-7).
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
6
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
MM IV-1 Prior to and ongoing during
grading and construction,
The City shall ensure that ornamental shrub and tree removal shall be conducted
outside the nesting bird/raptor season (March 15 to September 15 for nesting birds;
February 1 to June 30 for nesting raptors), to the extent practicable. If construction or
vegetation removal would occur between February 1 and September 15, the Project
Applicant shall conduct a pre-construction survey for active bird/raptor nests within
three days prior to commencement of construction activities/vegetation removal.
Should an active nest be identified, restrictions may be placed on construction
activities in the vicinity of the nest observed until the nest is no longer active as
determined by a qualified Biologist. The size of the protective buffer will be determined
by the Biologist based on the location of the nest; the type of construction activities;
the existing human activity in the vicinity of the nest; and the sensitivity of the nesting
species. Once the nest is no longer active, construction can proceed within the buffer
zone.
Planning Department,
Building Division
CULTURAL RESOURCES
MM V-1 Prior to approval of each
grading plan,
The property owner/developer shall submit a letter to the Public Works/Engineering
Department, Development Services Division, and the Planning Department, Planning
Division, identifying the certified archaeologist that has been hired to ensure that the
following actions are implemented:
a. The archaeologist must be present at the pregrading
conference in order to establish procedures for temporarily
halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling,
identification, and evaluation of artifacts if potentially
significant artifacts are uncovered. If artifacts are
uncovered and determined to be significant, the
archaeological observer shall determine appropriate
actions in cooperation with the property owner/developer
for exploration and/or salvage.
b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading
process will be donated to an appropriate educational or
research institution.
c. Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted
under the direction of the certified archaeologist. If any
artifacts are discovered during grading operations when
the archaeological monitor is not present, grading shall be
diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the
area.
d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the
Public
Works/Engineering
Department,
Development Division,
and the Planning
Department, Planning
Division
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
7
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
specimens shall be submitted to the City Engineer. Upon
completion of the grading, the archaeologist shall notify
the City to when the final report will be submitted (MMP
No. 0085, MM 3.12-1, MMP No. 0085a MM 18-1).
MM V-2 Prior to approval of each
grading plan,
The property owner/developer shall submit a letter to the Public Works/Engineering
Department, Development Division, and the Planning Department, Planning Division,
identifying the certified paleontologist that has been hired to ensure that the following
actions are implemented:
a. The paleontologist must be present at the pregrading
conference in order to establish procedures to temporarily
halt or redirect work to permit the sampling, identification,
and evaluation of fossils if potentially significant
paleontological resources are uncovered. If artifacts are
uncovered and found to be significant, the paleontological
observer shall determine appropriate actions in
cooperation with the property owner/developer for
exploration and/or salvage.
b. Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading
process will be donated to an appropriate educational or
research institution.
c. Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted
under the direction of the certified paleontologist. If any
fossils are discovered during grading operations when the
paleontological monitor is not present, grading shall be
diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the
area.
d. A final report detailing the findings and disposition of the
specimens shall be submitted. Upon completion of the
grading, the paleontologist shall notify the City, as to when
the final report will be submitted (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.12-
2, MMP No. 0085a MM 18-2).
Public
Works/Engineering
Department,
Development Division,
and the Planning
Department, Planning
Division
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
8
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
GEOLOGY AND SOILS
MM VI-1 Prior to issuance of each
building permit,
The property owner/developer shall submit plans showing that the proposed structure
has been analyzed for earthquake loading and designed according to the most recent
seismic standards in the Uniform Building Code adopted by the City of Anaheim (MMP
No. 0085 MM 3.64, MMP No. 0085a MM 5-4).
Planning Department,
Building Division
MM VI-2 Prior to approval of each
grading plan,
The property owner/developer shall submit to the City Engineer for review and
approval, a soils and geological report for the area to be graded, based on proposed
grading and prepared by an engineering geologist and geotechnical engineer. All
grading shall be in conformance with Title 17 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (MMP
No. 0085 MM 3.6-1, MMP No. 0085a MM 5.1).
Planning Department,
Building Division
MM VI-3 Prior to issuance of each
building permit,
The property owner/developer shall submit for review and approval, detailed
foundation design information for the subject building(s), prepared by a civil engineer,
based on recommendations by a geotechnical engineer (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.6-2,
MMP No. 0085a MM 5-2).
Planning Department,
Building Division
MM VI-4 Prior to issuance of each
foundation permit,
The property owner/developer shall submit a report prepared by a geotechnical
engineer for review and approval which shall investigate the subject foundation
excavations to determine if soft layers are present immediately beneath the footing
site and to ensure that compressibility does not underlie the footing (MMP No. 0085
MM 3.6-3, MMP No. 0085a MM 5-3).
Planning Department,
Building Division
HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
MM VII-1 Ongoing during demolition and
construction, in the event that
hazardous waste, including
asbestos, is discovered during
site preparation or
construction,
The property owner/developer shall ensure that the identified hazardous waste and/or
hazardous material are handled and disposed of in the manner specified by the State
of California Hazardous Substances Control Law (Health and Safety Code, Division
20, Chapter 6.5) and according to the requirements of the California Administrative
Code, Title 30, Chapter 22 (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.10-7, MMP No. 0085a MM 16-7).
Environmental
Protection Section of
the Fire Department
MM VII-2 Prior to approval of the first
grading plan or demolition
permit,
The property owner/developer shall submit a plan for review and approval to the
Environmental Protection Section of the Fire Department which details procedures
that will be taken if a previously unknown USTs, or other unknown hazardous material
or waste, is discovered onsite (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.10-4, MMP No. 0085a MM 16-4).
Environmental
Protection Section of
the Fire Department
HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
MM VIII-1 Prior to the initiation of
grading, and throughout the
duration of project
construction,
The property owner/developer shall ensure compliance with all recommended
structural and non-structural Best Management Practices identified in the Water
Quality Management Plan (WQMP) (Modified from MMP No. 0085 MM 3.7-2, MMP
No. 0085a MM 6-2).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public
Works/Engineering
Department,
Development Division,
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
9
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
MM VIII-2 Prior to approval of grading
plan; and, during clearing,
The property owner/developer shall obtain coverage under the NPDES Statewide
Industrial Stormwater Permit for General Construction Activities from the State Water
Resources Control Board. Evidence of attainment shall be submitted to the City
Engineer (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.7-3, MMP No. 0085a MM 6-3).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public
Works/Engineering
Department,
Development Division,
MM VIII-3 During project operations, The property owner/developer shall provide for the following: cleaning of all paved
areas not maintained by the City of Anaheim on a monthly basis, including, but not
limited to, private streets and parking lots. The use of water to clean streets, paved
areas, parking lots, and other areas and flushing the debris and sediment down the
storm drains shall be prohibited (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.7-4, MMP No. 0085a MM 6-4).
Planning Department,
Building Division;
Public
Works/Engineering
Department,
Development Division,
MM VIII-4 Prior to each final building and
zoning inspection,
The property owner/developer shall submit a letter from a licensed landscape architect
to the City, certifying that the landscape installation and irrigation systems have been
installed as specified in the approved landscaping and irrigation plans (MMP No. 0085
MM 3.7-5, MMP No. 0085a MM 6-5).
Planning Department,
Planning Division
MM VIII-5 If and when is becomes
available from the County
Sanitation District of Orange
County,
The property owner/developer shall install piping onsite with project water mains so
that reclaimed water may be used for landscape irrigation. (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.7-6,
MMP No. 0085a MM 6-6).
Planning Department,
Building Division;
Public
Works/Engineering
Department,
Development Division,
MM VIII-6 Prior to approval of the first
grading plan or issuance of the
first building permit, whichever
occurs first,
The property owner/developer shall submit a Master Drainage and Runoff
Management Plan (MDRMP) for review and approval by the Public Works/Engineering
Department, Development Services Division, and Orange County Environmental
Management Agency. The Master Plan shall include, but not be limited to, the
following items:
a. Backbone storm drain layout and pipe size, including
supporting hydrology and hydraulic calculations for storms up to
and including the 100-year storm; and,
b. A delineation of the improvements to be implemented for
control of project-generated drainage and runoff (MMP
No. 0085 MM 3.7-1, MMP No. 0085a MM 6-1).
Planning Department,
Building Division;
Public
Works/Engineering
Department,
Development Division,
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
10
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
NOISE
MM XII-1 Prior to approval of each final
site plan,
The property owner/developer shall submit a noise study prepared by a certified
acoustical engineer to the satisfaction of the Building Division identifying whether
noise attenuation is required and defining the attenuation measures and specific
performance requirements, if warranted, to comply with the Uniform Building Code
and Sound Pressure Level Ordinance. Ultimate noise attenuation requirements, if any,
shall depend on the final location of such buildings and noise-sensitive uses inside
and surrounding the buildings. Attenuation measures shall be implemented by the
property owner/developer prior to final building and zoning inspections (MEIR 313 MM
3.5-4, Noise).
Planning Department,
Planning Division
MM XII-2 Ongoing during construction, The property owner/developer shall ensure that all internal combustion engines on
construction equipment and trucks are fitted with properly maintained mufflers (MEIR
313 MM 3.5-3, Noise).
Planning Department,
Planning Division
MM XII-3 Prior to issuance of a grading
permit,
The property owner/developer shall submit grading and construction plans to the
Building Division incorporating the following conditions:
a. Contractors shall schedule construction activities to avoid
simultaneous use of several pieces of high noise level-emitting
equipment, to the extent practicable.
b. Construction equipment shall be fitted with manufacturer’s
standard (or better) noise shielding and muffling devices to
reduce noise levels to the maximum extent feasible.
c. Equipment maintenance and staging areas should be located
as far away from local residences and hotel uses as feasible.
Planning Department,
Building Division
MM XII-4 Prior to issuance of a grading
permit,
The property owner/developer shall submit grading plans to the City of Anaheim
Building Division that prohibit the use of large bulldozers and large loaded trucks
within 45 feet of normally occupied buildings.
Planning Department,
Building Division
PUBLIC SERVICES
MM XIV-1 Prior to issuance of a building
permit,
The projects shall be required to comply with requirements in effect at the time
building permits are issued (i.e., impact fees, etc.) (MMP No. 0085a MM 7-7).
Planning Department,
Building Division
MM XIV-2 Prior to commencement of
structural framing on the
project site,
On-site fire hydrants shall be installed and charged by the property owner/developer
as required and approved by the Fire Department (MMP No. 0085
MM 3.9.1-1, MMP No. 0085a MM 7-1).
Planning Department,
Building Division; Fire
Department
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
11
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
MM XIV-3 Prior to approval of each
grading plan,
The property owner/developer shall submit an emergency fire access plan to the Fire
Department for review and approval to ensure that service to the site is in accordance
with Fire Department service requirements (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.9.1-2, MMP No.
0085a MM 7-2).
Planning Department,
Building Division; Fire
Department
MM XIV-4 Prior to issuance of each
building permit and to be
implemented prior to final
building and zoning inspection,
Plans shall indicate that all buildings shall have sprinklers installed by the property
owner/developer in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code. Said sprinklers shall be
installed prior to each final building and zoning inspection (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.9.1-3,
MMP No. 0085a MM 7-3).
Planning Department,
Building Division; Fire
Department
MM XIV-5 Prior to issuance of each
building permit,
Plans shall be submitted to ensure that development is in accordance with the City of
Anaheim Fire Department Standards, including:
A Overhead clearance shall not be less than 14 feet for the
full width of access roads.
B Adequate off-site public fire hydrants contiguous to the
Specific Plan Area and onsite private fire hydrants shall be
provided by the property owner/developer. The precise
number, types and locations of the hydrants shall be
determined during building permit review. Hydrants are to
be a maximum of 400 feet apart.
C A minimum residual water pressure of 20 psi shall remain
in the water system. Flow rates for public parking facilities
shall be set at 1,000 to 1,500 gpm (MMP No. 0085
MM 3.9.1-4, MMP No. 0085a MM 7-4).
Planning Department,
Building Division; Fire
Department
MM XIV-6 Prior to issuance of a building
permit,
The property owner/developer shall submit a Construction Fire Protection Plan to the
Fire Department for review and approval detailing accessibility of emergency fire
equipment, fire hydrant location, and any other construction features required by the
Fire Marshal. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for securing facilities
acceptable to the Fire Department and hydrants shall be operational with required fire
flow (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.9.1-7, MMP No. 0085a MM 7-5).
Planning Department,
Building Division; Fire
Department
MM XIV-7 Prior to approval of water
improvement plans,
The water supply system shall be designed by the property owner/developer to
provide sufficient fire flow pressure and storage for the proposed land use and fire
protection in accordance with Fire Department requirements (MMP No. 0085a
MM 7-6).
Planning Department,
Building Division; Fire
Department
MM XIV-8 Prior to each final building and
zoning inspection,
The property owner/developer shall place emergency telephone service numbers in
prominent locations as approved by the Fire Department (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.9.1-6).
Planning Department,
Planning Division; Fire
Department
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
12
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
MM XIV-9 Prior to approval of each final
site plan and issuance of each
building permit,
The property owner/developer shall submit plans to the Police Department for review
and approval for the purpose of incorporating safety measures in the project design
including the concept of crime prevention through environmental design (e.g., building
design, circulation, site planning, and lighting of parking structures and parking areas)
(MMP No. 0085 MM 3.9.2-1, MMP No. 0085a MM 8-1).
Planning Department,
Planning Division; Fire
Department
MM XIV-10 Ongoing during project
operation,
The property owner/developer shall provide private security on the premises to
maintain adequate security for the entire project subject to review and approval of the
Police Department. The use of security patrols and electronic security devices (i.e.,
video monitors) should be considered to reduce the potential for criminal activity in the
area (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.9.2-3, MMP No. 0085a MM 8-3).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Police Department
MM XIV-11 Prior to issuance of each
building permit,
The project design shall include parking lots with controlled access points to limit
ingress and egress if determined to be necessary by the Police Department, and shall
be subject to the review and approval of the Police Department (MMP No. 0085 MM
3.9.2-4, MMP No. 0085a MM 8-4).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Police Department
MM XIV-12 Prior to issuance of each
building permit,
The property owner/developer shall provide proof of compliance with Government
Code Section 53080 (schools) to the Building Division of the Planning Department
(MMP No. 0085 MM 3.9.5-1, MMP No. 0085a MM 10-1).
Planning Department,
Building Division
UTILITIES AND SERVICE SYSTEMS
MM XVII-1 Ongoing during project
operation,
All landscaping for projects located within the Proposed Project shall utilize drought
tolerant plant materials within a plant factor of 0.5 or less pursuant to the publication
entitled “Water Use Classification of Landscape Species” by the U.C. Cooperative
Extension, August 2000.
Planning Department,
Planning Division
MM XVII-2 Ongoing during project
operation,
All new development within the Proposed Project shall include water efficient design
features including, but not limited to (as applicable to the type of development at
issue) waterless water heaters, waterless urinals, automatic on and off water facets,
and water efficient appliances.
Planning Department,
Planning Division
MM XVII-3 Prior to the issuance of the first
building permit or grading
permit, whichever occurs first,
The Property Owner/Developer shall comply with Rule 15E of the Public Utilities
Department Water Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Rule 15E shall be amended to
include:
(1) Installation of a 16-inch pipe in Harbor Boulevard from
Orangewood Avenue to Chapman Avenue; and
(2) Provision for a new well to be constructed near the intersection
of Haster Street and orangewood Avenue.
Note: To implement this mitigation measure, the City has adopted the Anaheim Resort
Water Facilities Fee Program (Rule 15E of the Water Rates, Rules and Regulations).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public Utilities
Department, Electrical
Engineering Division
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
13
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
Compliance with this Fee Program by the property owner/developer (per Resolution
No. 95R-140, effective September 1, 1995) shall satisfy the requirement of this
Mitigation Measure, or the City may enter into alternative financing arrangements)
(EIR 313 MM 3.9.6-2, Water Service).
MM XVII-4 Prior to issuance of each
building permit,
All water supply planning for the project will be closely coordinated with, and be
subject to the review and final approval of, the Utilities Department, Water Engineering
Division and Fire Department (EIR 313 MM 3.9.6-3, Water Service).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public Utilities
Department, Water
Engineering Division;
Fire Department
MM XVII-5 Prior to issuance of each
building permit,
Water pressure greater than 80 pounds per square inch (psi) shall be reduced to 80
psi or less by means of pressure reducing valves installed at the property
owner/developer’s service (EIR 313 MM 3.9.6-4, Water Service).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public Utilities
Department, Water
Engineering Division;
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
14
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
MM XVII-6 Prior to approval of a final
subdivision map or issuance of
a grading or building permit,
whichever occurs first,
The property owner/developer shall participate in the City’s Master Plan of Sewers
and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to assist in mitigating existing
and future sanitary sewer system deficiencies as follows:
The property owner/developer shall submit a report for review and approval of
the City Engineer to assist in determining the following:
a. If the development/redevelopment (1) does not discharge into
a sewer system that is currently deficient or will become
deficient because of that discharge and/or (2) does not increase
flows or change points of discharge, then the property
owner’s/developer’s responsibility shall be limited to
participation in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program.
If the development/redevelopment (1) discharges into a sewer system that is currently
deficient or will become deficient because of that discharge and/or (2) increases flows
or changes points of discharge, then the property owner/developer shall be required to
guarantee mitigation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer and the City Attorney’s
office of the impact prior to approval of a final subdivision map or issuance of a
grading or building permit whichever occurs first, pursuant to the improvements
identified in the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study. The property
owner/developer shall be required to install the sanitary sewer facilities, as
recommended by the South Central Area Sewer Deficiency Study, prior to acceptance
for maintenance of public improvements by the City or final building and zoning
inspections for the building/structure, whichever comes first. Additionally, the property
owner/developer shall participate in the Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program, as
determined by the City Engineer, which may include fees, credits, reimbursements, or
a combination thereof. As part of guaranteeing the mitigation of impacts for the
sanitary sewer system, the property owner/developer shall submit a sanitary sewer
system improvement phasing plan for the project to the City Engineer for review and
approval which shall contain, at a minimum, (1) a layout of the complete system, (2) all
facility sizes, including support calculations, (3) construction phasing, and
(4) construction estimates. The study shall determine the impact of the project sewer
flows for total build out of the project and identify local deficiencies for each project
component (i.e., each hotel) (EIR 313 Mitigation Measure 3.9.7-1, Public Services and
Utilities).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public
Works/Engineering
Department,
Development Division,
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
15
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
MM XVII-7 Prior to issuance of each
building permit (to be
implemented prior to final
building and zoning
inspections, and continuing on
an on-going basis during
project operation),
The property owner/ developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department plans for
review and approval which shall ensure that water conservation measures are
incorporated. Among the water conservation measures to be shown on the plans and
implemented by the property owner/developer, to the extent applicable include, but
are not limited to, the following:
• Use of low-flow sprinkler heads in irrigation systems.
• Use of waterway recirculation systems.
• Low-flow fittings, fixtures, and equipment, including low flush
toilets and urinals.
• Use of self-closing valves on drinking valves.
• Use of efficient irrigation systems such as drip irrigation and
automatic systems which use moisture sensors.
• Use of low-flow shower heads in hotels.
• Water efficient ice-machines, dishwashers, clothes washers
and other water-using appliances.
• Use of irrigation systems primarily at night when evaporation
rates are lowest.
• Provide information to the public in conspicuous places
regarding water conservation.
• Use of water conserving landscape plant materials wherever
feasible (MEIR 313 MM 3.9.6-1, Water Service).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public Utilities
Department, Water
Engineering Division
MM XVII-8 Ongoing during project
construction and operation
The City shall continue to collaborate with the Metropolitan Water District of Southern
California (MWD), its member agencies, and the Orange County Water District
(OCWD) to ensure that available water supplies meet anticipated demand. If it is
forecasted that water demand exceeds available supplies, the City shall trigger
application of its Water Conservation Ordinance (Anaheim Municipal Code, §10.18),
as prescribed, to require mandatory conservation measures as authorized by Sections
10.18.070 through 10.18.090, as appropriate.
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public Utilities
Department, Water
Engineering Division;
Public
Works/Engineering
Department,
Development Division,
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
16
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
MM XVII-9 Prior to approval of building
plans,
The Property Owner/Developer for new development within the ARSP area shall
provide evidence to the Planning Director or Planning Services Manager that separate
irrigation lines for recycled water shall be constructed. All irrigation systems shall be
designed so that they will function properly with recycled water.
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public Utilities
Department, Water
Engineering Division;
MM XVII-10 Prior to issuance of each
building permit,
The property owner/developer shall submit an irrigation plan in which all irrigation
systems shall be designed so that they will function properly with reclaimed water,
once a system is available (EIR 313 MM 3.11-2, Visual Resources and Aesthetics).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public Utilities
Department, Water
Engineering Division;
MM XVII-11 Prior to issuance of a grading
or building permit, whichever
occurs first,
The property owner/developer shall participate in the City’s Master Plan of Storm
Drains and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to assist in mitigating
existing and future storm drainage system deficiencies as follows:
The property owner/developer shall submit a report for review and approval
by the City Engineer to assist with determining the following:
A If the specific development/redevelopment does not
increase or redirect current or historic storm water
quantities/flow, then the property owner’s/developer’s
responsibility shall be limited to participation in the
Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program to provide storm
drainage facilities in 10- and 25-year storm frequencies
and to protect properties/structures for a 100-year storm
frequency.
B If the specific development/redevelopment increases or
redirects the current or historic storm water quantity/flow,
then the property owner/developer shall be required to
guarantee mitigation to the satisfaction of the City Engineer
and City Attorney’s Office of the impact prior to approval of
a final subdivision map or issuance of a grading or building
permit, whichever occurs first, pursuant to the
improvements identified in the Master Plan of Drainage for
the South Central Area. The property owner/developer
shall be required to install the storm drainage facilities as
recommended by the Master Plan of Drainage for the
South Central Area to provide storm drainage facilities for
10- and 25-year storm frequencies and to protect
properties/structures for a 100-year storm frequency prior
to acceptance for maintenance of public improvements by
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public
Works/Engineering
Department,
Development Division,
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
17
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
the City or final building and zoning inspection for the
building/structure, whichever occurs first. Additionally, the
property owner/developer shall participate in the
Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program as determined
by the City Engineer which could include fees, credits,
reimbursements, or a combination thereof. As part of
guaranteeing the mitigation of impacts on the storm
drainage system, a storm drainage system improvement
phasing plan for the project shall be submitted by the
property owner/developer to the City Engineer for review
and approval and shall contain, at a minimum, (1) a layout
of the complete system; (2) all facility sizes, including
support calculations; (3) construction phasing; and,
(4) construction estimates (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.9.8-1,
MMP No. 0085a MM 13-1.).
(Note: The City has adopted the Storm Drain Impact and Improvement Fee Program
for the South Central City Area. Compliance with this Fee Program by the Property
Owner/Developer [per Ordinance No. 5491 and Resolution No. 95R-61 dated April 18,
1995] shall satisfy the requirements of this mitigation measure.)
MM XVII-12 Prior to issuance of each
building permit; to be
implemented prior to final
building and zoning Inspection,
The property owner/developer shall submit project plans to the Public Works
Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans comply with AB 939, the
Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, as administered by the City of Anaheim and the
County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Plans. Prior to
final building and zoning inspection, implementation of said plan shall commence and
shall remain in full effect. Waste management mitigation measures that shall be taken
to reduce solid waste generation include, but are not limited to:
A Detailing the location and design of on-site recycling
facilities.
B Providing on-site recycling receptacles to encourage
recycling.
C Complying with all Federal, State and City regulation for
hazardous material disposal.
D Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim”
program or other substitute program as may be developed
by the City.
In order to meet the requirements of the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989 (AB 939),
the property owner/developer shall implement numerous solid waste reduction
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public
Works/Engineering
Department,
Development Division,
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
18
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
programs, as required by the Public Works Department, including, but not limited to:
A Facilitating paper recycling by providing chutes or
convenient locations for sorting and recycling bins.
B Facilitating cardboard recycling (especially in retail areas)
by providing adequate space and centralized locations for
collection and bailing.
C Facilitating glass recycling (especially from restaurants) by
providing adequate space for sorting and storing.
D Providing trash compactors for nonrecyclable materials
whenever feasible to reduce the total volume of solid waste
and the number of trips required for collection.
E Prohibiting curbside pick-up. (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.9.3-1,
MMP No. 0085a MM 9-1)
MM XVII-13 Ongoing during project
operation,
The following practices shall be implemented, as feasible, by the property
owner/developer:
A Usage of recycled paper products for stationary,
letterhead, and packaging.
B Recovery of materials such as aluminum and cardboard.
C Collection of office paper for recycling.
D Collection of polystyrene (foam) cups for recycling.
E Collection of glass, plastics, kitchen grease, laser printer
toner cartridges, oil, batteries, and scrap metal for recycling
or recovery. (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.9.3-2, MMP No. 0085a
MM 9-2)
Planning Department,
Planning Division
MM XVII-14 Prior to issuance of each
building permit,
The property owner/develop shall submit plans showing that each structure will
comply with the State Energy Efficiency Standards for Nonresidential Buildings (Title
24, Part 6, Article 2, California Code of Regulations) and will consult with the City of
Anaheim Public Utilities Resource Efficiency Division in order to review above Title 24
measures to incorporate into the project design including energy efficient designs
(MMP No. 0085 MM 3.9.9-1, MMP No. 0085a MM 14-1).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public Utilities
Department, Resource
Efficiency Division;
Ramada Maingate
(Continued)
19
Mitigation
Measure
Number Timing Measure
Responsible for
Monitoring
Completion
MM XVII-15 Prior to final building and
zoning inspections,
The property owner/developer shall implement energy-saving practices in compliance
with Title 24, which may include the following:
A Use of high-efficiency air conditioning systems controlled
by a computerized management system including features
such as a variable air volume system, a 100-percent
outdoor air economizer cycle, sequential operation of air
conditioning equipment in accordance with building
demands, isolation of air conditioning to any selected floor
or floors.
B Use of electric motors designed to conserve energy.
C Use of special lighting fixtures such as motion sensing light
switch devices and compact fluorescent fixtures in place of
incandescent lights.
D Use of T8 lamps and electronic ballasts. Metal hallide or
high-pressure sodium for outdoor lighting and parking lots
(MMP No. 0085 MM 3.9.9-2, MMP No. 0085a MM 14-2).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public Utilities
Department, Resource
Efficiency Division;
MM XVII-16 Prior to issuance of each
building permit for any
buildings requiring a change in
electrical service,
The property owner/developer shall install an underground electrical service from the
Public Utilities Distribution System. The Underground Service will be installed in
accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical Specifications
for Underground Systems. Electrical Service Fees and other applicable fees will be
assessed in accordance with the Electric Rules, Rates, Regulations and Electrical
Specifications for Underground Systems (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.9.9-3, MMP No. 0085a
MM 14-3).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public Utilities
Department, Resource
Efficiency Division;
MM XVII-17 Prior to each final building and
zoning inspection
The Southern California Gas Company has developed several programs which are
intended to assist in the selection of the most energy-efficient water heaters and
furnaces. The property owner/developer shall implement a program, as required, to
reduce the demand on natural gas supplies. (MMP No. 0085 MM 3.9.10-1, MMP No.
0085a MM 14-5).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public Utilities
Department, Resource
Efficiency Division;
MM XVII-18 Prior to issuance of each
building permit,
The property owner/developer shall demonstrate on plans that fuel efficient models of
gas-powered building equipment have been incorporated into the project, to the extent
feasible (MMP No. 0085a MM 19-1).
Planning Department,
Planning Division;
Public Utilities
Department, Resource
Efficiency Division;
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.