RES-2012-154 RESOLUTION NO. 2012 -154
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT
NO. 2012-00486.
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Council did adopt the Anaheim General Plan by
Resolution No. 69R -644, showing the general description and extent of possible future
development within the City; and
WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council of the City of Anaheim (herein referred
to as the "City Council "), by its Resolution No. 2004 -95, adopted a comprehensive update to the
General Plan for the City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 18.68 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, provisions of
the General Plan may be amended whenever the public necessity and convenience and the
general welfare require such amendment when adopted by a resolution of the City Council in the
manner prescribed by law; and
WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle comprises approximately 820 acres located at the
confluence of the Interstate 5 and State Route 57 (herein referred to as the "SR -57 Freeway ")
freeways in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, generally east of the
Interstate 5 Freeway, west of the Santa Ana River channel and the SR -57 Freeway, south of the
Southern California Edison easement, and north of the Anaheim City limit. The Platinum
Triangle encompasses the Angel Stadium, the Honda Center, the City National Grove of
Anaheim, the Anaheim Amtrak/Metrolink Station, and surrounding residential and mixed use
development, light industrial buildings, industrial parks, distribution facilities, offices, hotels,
restaurants, and retail development; and
WHEREAS, since 1996, the City Council has approved several actions relating to the
area encompassed by the Platinum Triangle; and
WHEREAS, on May 30, 1996, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (herein
referred to as the "Planning Commission ") certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 320
and adopted Area Development Plan No. 120 for that portion of the Angel Stadium property
associated with the Sportstown Development. Area Development Plan No. 120 entitled a total of
119,543 seats for new and/or renovated stadiums, 750,000 square feet of urban
entertainment/retail uses, a 500 -room hotel (550,000 square feet), a 150,000- square -foot
exhibition center, 250,000 square feet of office development and 15,570 on -site parking spaces.
The Grove of Anaheim, the renovated Angel Stadium and the Stadium Gateway Office Building
were developed/renovated under Area Development Plan No. 120; and
WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium Area
Master Land Use Plan (herein referred to as the "MLUP "). The boundaries of the MLUP were
generally the same as those for the Platinum Triangle, with the exception that the MLUP
included 15 acres adjacent to the Interstate 5 freeway that are not a part of the current Platinum
Triangle boundaries. As part of the approval process for the MLUP, the City Council also
certified Final Environmental Impact Report No. 321 and adopted Mitigation Monitoring
Program No. 106. Development within the boundaries of the MLUP was implemented through
the Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone (herein referred to as the "SE Overlay Zone "), which
permitted current uses to continue or expand within the provisions of the existing zoning, while
providing those who may want to develop sports, entertainment, retail, and office uses with
standards appropriate to those uses, including increased land use intensity. Implementation of
the SE Overlay Zone was projected to result in a net loss of 491,303 square feet of industrial
space and increases of 1,871,285 square feet of new office space, 452,026 square feet of new
retail space, and 991,603 square feet of new hotel space. Projects that were developed under the
SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the Arena Corporate Center, and the Westwood
School of Technology; and
WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive citywide
General Plan and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum Triangle.
The General Plan Update changed the General Plan designations within the project area from
Commercial Recreation and Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed -Use, Office -High,
Office -Low, Industrial, Open Space and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing uses to
transition to mixed -use, residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan Update also
established the overall maximum development intensities for the Platinum Triangle, which
permitted up to 9,175 dwelling units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, 2,044,300 square feet
of commercial uses, industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio (FAR) of 0.50, and
institutional development at a maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square footage /seats
allocated to the existing Honda Center and all of the development intensity entitled by Area
Development Plan No. 120 was incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed -Use land use
designation. Final Environmental Impact Report No. 330, which was prepared for the General
Plan and Zoning Code Update and associated actions, analyzed the above development
intensities on a citywide impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring programs, including an
Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for the Platinum Triangle
(collectively referred to herein as "FEIR No. 330 "); and
WHEREAS, in order to provide the implementation tools necessary to realize the City's
new vision for the Platinum Triangle, on August 17, 2004, the City Council replaced the MLUP
with the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (herein referred to as the "PTMLUP "),
replaced the SE Overlay Zone with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone (herein
referred to as the "PTMU Overlay Zone "), approved the form of the Standardized Platinum
Triangle Development Agreement, and approved associated zoning reclassifications. Under
these updated zoning regulations, property owners desiring to develop under the PTMU Overlay
Zone provisions were thereafter required to enter into a standardized Development Agreement
with the City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council certified Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 332, adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of
Overriding Considerations and the updated and modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No.
106A (collectively referred to herein as "FSEIR No. 332 ") to provide for the implementation of
the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, and in conjunction with its consideration and
approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004 - 00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005- 00089,
2
Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004 -00036 and a series of related actions that, collectively,
allowed for an increase in the allowable development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to
9,500 residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office uses, and 2,254,400 square feet of
commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, following the certification of FSEIR No. 332, the City Council approved
two addendums to FSEIR No. 332 in conjunction with requests to increase the Platinum Triangle
intensity by 67 residential units, 55,550 square feet of office development, and 10,000 square
feet of commercial uses. A project Environmental Impact Report was also approved to increase
the allowable development intensities by an additional 699 residential units to bring the total
allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle to up to 10,266 residential units,
5,055,550 square feet of office uses, and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, on February 13, 2007, the City embarked upon a process to amend the
General Plan, the PTMLUP, the PTMU Overlay Zone, the Platinum Triangle Standardized
Development Agreement, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable
development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to up to 18,363 residential units, 5,657,847
square feet of commercial uses, 16,819,015 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000 square feet
of institutional uses (herein referred to as the "Platinum Triangle Expansion Project "); and
WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the City Council certified Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 334, adopting a Statement of Findings of Fact, a Statement of
Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No.
106A (collectively referred to herein as "FSEIR No. 334 ") in conjunction with its consideration
and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004 - 00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-
00089, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004 - 00036, and a series of other related actions in order
to provide for the implementation of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan and approval
of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and
WHEREAS, in response to the application of K/L Anaheim Properties I LLC and K/L
Anaheim Properties II LLC (collectively referred to herein as "K/L ") for entitlements allowing
for the development of a master planned mixed -use project comprised of, among other uses, a
320 -unit residential condominium project, a 209,419 square foot twelve -story office building,
including a 5,586 square foot full- service restaurant, 4,381 square feet of retail space, and a
104,604 square foot 138 -room hotel (herein referred to as the "Original Project ") on real property
consisting of approximately 7.01 acres commonly known as 905 through 917 East Katella
Avenue in the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as the "Property "), the City Council
determined on June 10, 2008 that FSEIR No. 334, including Updated and Modified Mitigation
Monitoring Plan No. 106B for the PTMLUP and Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 153, served as
the appropriate environmental documentation for the Original Project, including Conditional Use
Permit No. 2008 -05304 and Development Agreement No. 2008 -00002 (herein referred to as the
"Development Agreement "). The City Council then approved Conditional Use Permit No. 2008-
05304 and the Development Agreement to provide for development of the Original Project
(herein referred to collectively as the "Existing Entitlements "); and
WHEREAS, on June 24, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6106 approving
the Development Agreement. The Development Agreement was recorded in the Official
3
Records of the County of Orange (herein referred to as the "Official Records ") on July 23, 2008,
as Instrument No. 2008000351778; and
WHEREAS,, subsequent to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2008 -05304 and
the Development Agreement, a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of FSEIR No. 334.
In consideration of the City's exemplary historical record in avoiding litigation under the
California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as "CEQA ") and its commitment to
proper environmental review, the City Council repealed the approval of the Platinum Triangle
Expansion Project, including FSEIR No. 334 and various related actions, and directed staff to
prepare a new Subsequent Environmental Impact Report for the Platinum Triangle Expansion
Project; and
WHEREAS, on October 26, 2010, the City Council approved amendments to the General
Plan (herein referred to as the "General Plan Amendment No. 2008-00471"), the PTMLUP
(herein referred to as the "Miscellaneous Case No. 2007 - 00188 "), the PTMU Overlay Zone, and
related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development intensities within the
PTMU Overlay Zone to up to 18,909 residential units, 14,340,522 square feet of office uses,
4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses, and 1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Before
approving said amendments and zoning reclassifications, the City Council approved and certified
the "Revised Platinum Triangle Expansion Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339"
for the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project and Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring
Plan No. 106C (collectively referred to herein as "FSEIR No. 339 "); and
WHEREAS, Shopoff Advisors, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership (herein referred to
as "Shopoff'), has entered into an agreement with K/L to purchase the Property; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to the authority conferred upon Shopoff by K/L and in accordance
with Section 21 of the Development Agreement and Chapter 18.60 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code (the "Code "), Shopoff submitted to the City a request to modify the site design and product
type of the Original Project, consisting of an increase in the number of dwelling units from 320
to 399 residential apartment units, a reduction in the amount of office and commercial
development, the addition of a public park (herein referred to as the "Platinum Gateway
Project "). To that end, Shopoff has requested the following entitlements:
(a) that the Development Agreement be amended and restated in the form of the proposed
First Amended and Restated Development Agreement No. 2008 -00002 (Development
Agreement No. 2008- 00002D) (herein referred to as the "Amended and Restated
Development Agreement ") presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was
adopted;
(b) that the General Plan be amended to modify "Table LU -4: General Plan Density
Provisions for Specific Areas of the City" to increase the number of dwelling units and
reduce the amount of office and commercial development allowed within the Mixed -Use
land use designation of the Platinum Triangle Area and to amend various Elements of the
General Plan to include the addition of a public park (herein referred to as the "General
Plan Amendment No. 2012 - 00486 ");
4
(c) that the Zoning Code be amended to make the Zoning Code consistent with General
Plan Amendment No. 2012- 00486, as adopted (herein referred to as the "Zoning Code
Amendment No. 2012 - 00107 ");
(d) that the following tables, figures and maps of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use
Plan, together with any and all textual references to the content of said tables, figures and
maps appearing throughout the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, be amended: (i)
Chapter 1, Table 1: General Plan Development Intensities, (ii) Chapter 2, Figure 4: The
Platinum Triangle Urban Design Plan, (iii) Chapter 3, Table 3 - PTMU Overlay Zone
Development Intensities, (iv) Chapter 4, Figure 20: Landscape Concept Plan, and (v) the
Katella District Sub -Area A Map, set forth in Appendix G, PTMU Overlay Zone District
Sub -Area Development Intensity Maps (herein referred to interchangeably as
"Miscellaneous Case No. 2012 - 00559" or the "PTMLUP Amendments "); and
(e) that Tentative Tract Map No. 17494 be approved.
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2012 -00486 proposes to amend the Anaheim
General Plan as follows:
1. Table LU -4: General Plan Density Provisions For Specific Areas of the City
• Amend the total number of dwelling units, maximum Commercial and Office
square footages with the Platinum Triangle Area as shown on Exhibit A attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
2. Land Use Element
• Amend "Figure LU -4: Land Use Plan" of the Land Use Element of the General
Plan as shown on Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this
reference.
3. Circulation Element
• Amend "Figure C -5: Existing and Proposed Bicycle Facilities" of the Circulation
Element of the General Plan as shown on Exhibit C attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference.
4. Green Element
• Amend "Figure G -1: Green Plan" of the Green Element of the General Plan as
shown on Exhibit D attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference.
WHEREAS, the Amended and Restated Development Agreement, General Plan
Amendment No. 2012 - 00486, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012 - 00107, Miscellaneous Case
No. 2012 -00559 and Tentative Tract Map No. 17494 shall be referred to herein collectively as
the "Entitlements "; and,
WHEREAS, the Planning Director has heretofore approved Final Site Plan No. 2012-
00008 (herein referred to as the "Final Site Plan") to provide for the development of the Platinum
Gateway Project, contingent upon the approval of the proposed Entitlements; and,
5
WHEREAS, on December 3, 2012, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim
(herein referred to as the "Planning Commission ") conducted a public hearing for the proposed
Platinum Gateway Project and the Entitlements at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim,
notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with
the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony
concerning the contents and sufficiency of the previously certified Final Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report No. 339 (including Addendum No. 1 and Addendum No. 2
thereto) (collectively referred to herein as "FSEIR No. 339 ") and for and against the Platinum
Gateway Project and the Entitlements; and,
WHEREAS, by the adoption of its Resolution No. PC2012 -096 on December 3, 2012, the
Planning Commission recommended that the City Council approve and adopt proposed General
Plan Amendment 2012 -00486 in the form attached hereto as Exhibits A through D; and,
WHEREAS, upon receipt of said Resolution No. PC2012 -096, summary of evidence,
report of findings and recommendations of the Planning Commission, the City Council did fix
the 18th day of December, 2012, as the time, and the City Council Chamber in the Civic Center,
as the place, for a public hearing on the Platinum Gateway Project and the Entitlements, and for
the purpose of considering FSEIR No. 339, and did give notice thereof in the manner and as
provided by law; and,
WHEREAS, by the adoption of a resolution concurrently with but prior in time to the
adoption of this Resolution and pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental
Quality Act (herein referred to as "CEQA ") and the State of California Guidelines for
Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA
Guidelines "), this City Council, as the "lead agency" under CEQA, has found and determined
that (i) FSEIR No. 339, together with Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No.
106C for the Platinum Triangle and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 307, serve as the
appropriate environmental documentation for the Platinum Gateway Project and the Entitlements
and satisfy all the requirements of CEQA; (ii) none of the conditions described in Sections 15162
or 15163 of the CEQA Guidelines calling for the preparation of a subsequent or supplemental
EIR have occurred in connection with the proposed Platinum Gateway Project and the
Entitlements; and (iii) no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared under
CEQA for the Platinum Gateway Project and the Entitlements; and,
WHEREAS, this City Council, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and
study made by itself, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said
hearing, does hereby find and determine as follows:
1. That proposed General Plan Amendment 2012 -00486 maintains internal
consistency with the General Plan as the increase in the number of residential dwelling units;
reduction in the commercial and office square footages; and the implementation of an additional
public park is consistent with the goals and policies set forth in the General Plan for the Mixed
Use land use designation and The Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan.
6
2. That proposed General Plan Amendment 2012 -00486 would not be detrimental
to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City because the increase in
the number of dwelling units is negligible as it is off-set by the deletion of commercial and office
square footage. Further, public recreational amenities are enhanced by providing an additional
public park for the surrounding community;
3. That proposed General Plan Amendment 2012 -00486 continues to be consistent
with the intent of the General Plan and would maintain the balance of land uses within the City;
and
4. The proposed General Plan Amendment 2012 -00486 is physically suitable to
accommodate the proposed modifications, including but not limited to, access, physical
constraints, topography, provision of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding land uses
because the relocation of the public park will be easily accessible to the general public.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and
determinations, this City Council does hereby approve and adopt General Plan Amendment
2012 -00486 as shown in Exhibits A through D attached to this Resolution.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that General Plan Amendment 2012 -00486 is hereby
approved contingent upon and subject to the approval by the City Council of the balance of the
Entitlements, specifically, Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012 - 00107, Miscellaneous Case No.
2012- 00559, Tentative Tract Map No. 17494, and First Amended and Restated Development
Agreement No. 2008 -00002 (Development Agreement No. 2008- 00002D), now pending.
7
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the City Council of the
City of Anaheim this 18th day of December , 2012, by the following roll call vote:
AYES: Mayor Tait, Council Members Brandman, Eastman, Kring and Murray
NOES: None
ABSENT: None
ABSTAIN: None
CITY OF ANAHEIM
MA OR OF THE ITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF AN HEIM
92716
8
EXHIBIT "A"
TABLE LU-4: GENERAL PLAN DENSITY PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY
Location General Plan Land Use Designations Permitted Density
The Mountain Low Medium Hillside Density Residential 485
Park Area (Up to 6 du /ac)
Low Medium Density Residential 2,015
(Up to 16 du /ac) (Up to 2,500 dwelling units)
Area "A"
(Parcel Map Low - Medium Density Residential Up to 140 dwelling units
94 -205)
The Disneyland
Resort Specific Commercial Recreation See Note No. 1 on next page.
Plan (SP 92 -1)
Area
The Anaheim
Resort® Specific Commercial Recreation See Note No. 2 on next page.
Plan (SP 92 -2)
Area
Hotel Circle Commercial Recreation The Hotel Circle Specific Plan allows for a
Specific Plan master planned hotel project including up
(SP 93 -1) Area to 969 hotel rooms and integrated guest
oriented amenities including full - service
restaurants, conference room /banquet
facilities, pool and spa areas, tour
bus /shuttle facilities, and pedestrian
promenades and plaza areas with
comprehensive landscaping.
The Platinum Mixed -Use
Triangle Area Residential 18,988 dwelling units
Commercial 4,795,111 square feet
Office 9,652,747 square feet
Institutional 1,500,000 square feet
Office High and Office Low 4,478,356 square feet*
Institutional 3.0 FAR
Industrial 0.5 FAR
Open Space 0.1 FAR
* The maximum FAR for properties designated
Office -Low is 0.5; the maximum FAR for properties
designated Office -High is 2.0.
The Stonegate Low Density Residential Up to 35 dwelling units
Development
Area
TABLE LU-4: GENERAL PLAN DENSITY PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC AREAS OF THE CITY (CONTINUED)
Note No. 1: The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of an approximate 489.7 acre
international multi -day vacation designation resort including ongoing modifications to the Disneyland theme park, the
development of a new theme park, additional hotels and entertainment areas, administrative office facilities, new
public and private parking facilities, and an internal transportation system. This development is within five planning
Districts (Theme Park, Hotel, Parking, Future Expansion and District A) and a C -R Overlay, which allows
development within the Overlay to either be consistent with the underlying Resort District or subject to the same land
uses as in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92 -2 Zone. The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan also identifies
maximum development density designations for hotel /motel development in the Hotel District (up to 5,600 hotel
rooms for the entire District with up to 1,000 hotel rooms transferable to the Theme Park District), in District A (the
maximum number of units permitted would be 75 hotel /motel rooms per gross acre or 75 hotel /motel rooms per
parcel existing on June 29, 1993, whichever is greater) and the C -R Overlay (the maximum number of units
permitted on a parcel would be the following: 1) for parcels designated Low Density — up to 50 hotel rooms per gross
acre or 75 rooms, whichever is greater; and 2) for parcels designated Medium Density — up to 75 hotel rooms per
gross acre or 75 rooms, whichever is greater; provided that for those parcels that are developed with hotel /motel
rooms which exceeded the maximum density designation, the number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of
The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan Ordinance may be rebuilt or modified at their existing density.) It should be
noted that accessory uses may be developed as well as other visitor - serving commercial /retail and restaurant uses
along with these hotel /motel uses. The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan also provides for the development of the
Anaheim GardenWalk project pursuant to the Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay at the following density and subject to
the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 4078, as amended, to permit the following: up to 590,265 square feet of
specialty retail, restaurants, and entertainment uses, including movie theaters; 1,628 hotel rooms /suites (including up
to 500 vacation ownership units) and 278,817 square feet of hotel accessory uses; a transportation center, and 4,800
parking spaces. The Anaheim GardenWalk Overlay encompasses District A and the portion of the Parking District
(East Parking Area) /CR Overlay south of Disney Way.
Note No. 2: The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of approximately 582 acres within the
C -R (Commercial Recreation) District which allows for hotels, motels, convention and conference facilities, as well as
restaurants, retail shops and entertainment facilities; the PR (Public Recreation) District which encompasses the
Anaheim Convention Center and associated parking facilities and provides for the orderly use of City-owned property
as well as the existing Anaheim Hilton Hotel; the Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay which encompasses existing
mobilehome parks within the C -R District and provides development standards for mobilehome parks and regulations
and procedures to mitigate relocation concerns and adverse effects of displacement upon mobilehome owners when
a park is converted to another land use; and, the Anaheim Resort Residential Overlay, which applies to focused
areas of the Specific Plan and provides for the incorporation of residential uses into hotel developments when such
uses are fully integrated into a minimum 300 -room full -service hotel. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan also
identifies maximum development density designations in the C -R District. These designations are based upon
hotel /motel development and allow up to 20% of each hotel /motel project gross square footage, excluding parking
facilities, to be developed with integrated (i.e., included within the main hotel /motel complex) accessory uses. These
accessory uses will reduce the otherwise maximum permitted hotel /motel density at the rate of one hotel /motel room
per six hundred (600) gross square feet of accessory use. For properties proposed to be developed with permitted
and conditionally permitted uses other than hotels /motels with accessory uses, the traffic generation characteristics
of said uses shall not exceed those associated with the otherwise permitted hotel /motel (including accessory uses)
density as determined by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager prior to Final Site Plan review and approval.
The density designations are as follows: "Low Density," which has a maximum density of up to 50 rooms per gross
acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater; "Low- Medium Density," up to 75 rooms per gross acre or 75
rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater; "Low- Medium Density (Modified)," up to 252 rooms and 75,593 square
feet of accessory uses; "Medium Density," up to 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever
is greater; and, "Convention Center (CC) Medium Density," up to 125 rooms per gross acre with trip generation
characteristics mitigated to the equivalent of 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is
greater. For those parcels that are developed with hotel /motel rooms which exceed the maximum density
designation, the number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Ordinance
may be rebuilt or modified at their existing density. For projects that are developed in accordance with the Anaheim
Resort Residential Overlay, the maximum number of dwelling units allowed shall be less than the number of hotel
rooms proposed and such projects shall not create infrastructure impacts greater than the subject property's
permitted hotel /motel density, as permitted by the property's underlying C -R District density designation unless
otherwise mitigated through subsequent environmental analysis.
EXHIBIT "B"
FIGURE LU-4: LAND USE PLAN
OF THE LAND USE ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
r Ta ,.
c � .. 4W
IMMINNAII■VitligniiMMIIIii i pprr 'lig
41 11; I i A 1 el c . 410 milk r ftr-1° *Irk
lai
b girt -,441111a II - r opromaill.- _AI"
MI6. - 101)..11011100Mia 11-0 .., o ---- -;;;4
toopy. "-. jik ""' - 0
molecilL, ARK :,
MSS% MP . EMMA, _ ......
. A =1__4.....1 ...,...._...
11116k - �".. Q...r rr..+n Dar.
a A_ Qs.r..w.... ®4.i..
O- -. 1 ar•••■••
O. +rrro.r 111 ...r...u....
p -.. f.... Weil .a. .y.... r•wyar.arar.....
•. .`1 City of Anaheim
Gametal Pbs Program
Fie.. W-4 P4.14,.U_I1
EXHIBIT "C"
FIGURE C -5: EXISTING AND PROPOSED BICYCLE FACILITIES
OF THE CIRCULATION ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
Existing and Proposed
Bicycle Facilities
BaA Rd Lt;
Excerpt
� � ir r
.
..
11 \.,,.. „A, . .
.
.
' .... msµ•
'1i) AChslIIies� Aspi7.phimry *
— bier msIIBierq ..��II •?„,
k ,.,„ , 1 li,..,
Iii .4.
\ .„1
IL.; Pa�sd3ii . h SI1le mfIIl�f __
il ffirki, ' A �Yadrin Id o A �d c*II T3I — OesIIBisW ED Seleei
j Tap ] lit 9 CarfIIewde.S
""""` q:IBimj — alesZ y
1 Aap.dle isy Aq..d3dPrsg `' lioee
i (3sIAiewy OealHintay
— �l> c B
Adopted >hry S. 3004
Raised Nu 30. 20)D • . _ 6 " ' hi, City of Anaheim
Omni Plan Program
FigtieC5 hp C-33
EXHIBIT "D"
FIGURE G-1: GREEN PLAN
OF THE GREEN ELEMENT OF THE GENERAL PLAN
Green Plan Excerpt
Jr. I /
. ty
•
maw-
MI c
:
il ik \ 1 I /LAI/
_ ' - . iik
1 ® CPA= , GmUkiilsoe.
E I. 1 0 ,.... , OmooltdMl.nr
1 0 Mkla• . Oi oilY3.
1 ....)ti
0 0..ar..cias
a....r,
iiiilliiataidebligfitaliittit
a4.i>tin,aaa ri xt.,..ff-
City of Anaheim
General Plan Program
G-I Page G.5