Loading...
1992/02/11City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Simpson, Ehrle, Pickler, Daly and Hunter ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None PRESENT: CITY M~NAGER: James Ruth CITY ATTORNEY: Jack White CITY CLERK: Leonora N. $ohl ASSISTANT CITY CLERK: Ann Sauvageau EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Lisa Stipkovich POLICE CHIEF: Joseph Molloy LABOR RELATIONS DIRECTOR: Garry McRae PROPERTY SERVICE MANAGER: Robert ZurSchmiede ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Annika $antalahti A complete copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim City Council was posted at 3:35 p.m. on February 7, 1992 at the Civic Center kiosk, containing all items as shown herein. Mayor Hunter called the workshop portion of the meeting of February 11, 1992 to order at 3:07 p.m. City Manager James Ruth. The first workshop presentation is regarding the Northeast Industrial Area to be presented by the Community Development Department. 161: NORTHEAST INDUSTRIAL AREA - STUDY~STATUS: Lisa Stipkovich, Executive Director of Community Development. This is the result of many months of study of the Northeast Industrial Area. The same presentation has been given to the Planning Commission and the Redevelopment Commission. Both Commissions are very supportive of what is being proposed for the area. Today staff is asking that the Council look at potential alternatives for land use in the Northeast Industrial Area and if given plan approval, staff will start the actual process of amending the Redevelopment plan as well as the General Plan. She introduced Scott Gregory of Sedway Cooke Associates, lead consultant on the project, to give the presentation. Mr. Scot% Gregory, Senior Associate, Sedway Cooke Associates. His presentation will give an update of the work they have done thus far. (Mr. Gregory's presentation was supplemented by slides.) He then briefed the Council on the program goals relative to the Northeast Industrial Area first showing a map of the area (Northeast Area Planning Study) which delineated the boundaries of the planning area as well as aerial photographs of the study area. He noted that 107 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. almost the entire area is presently designated M-L (industrial limited zone). The methodology for the study was to identify alternative land uses, select land use and subsequently develop the implementation plan. He noted that there are many types of industrial uses in the area as well as commercial and open space uses. This wide variety of uses tends to be spread out in a disjointed manner and there is no comprehensive plan. The remainder of his presentation covered the characteristics of the entire study area which contains 2,200 acres, an analysis of the traffic congestion in the study area, traffic congestion being the greatest problem to overcome as far as strategy, market conditions, various land use alternatives, the strategy for the area and finally the study conclusion which involved new development, infrastructure and transportation and subsequently the next steps to be taken relative to plan implementation. (He submitted in hard copy one of the maps depicted in the slide presentation - Northeast Area Land Use Study - which shows existing/proposed land use as well as possible transit rail and shuttle bus lines and the two proposed commuter rail stations which he had briefed in his presentation.) Lisa Stipkovich. She reiterated that the plan was presented to both the Planning and Redevelopment Commissions in a joint session. It was also presented to a community meeting in the northeast area where the business community, particularly the large property owners, were invited to attend and received their support. She is asking today for the Council's approval to go forward with the next steps as identified by Mr. Gregory, the first being starting the EIR process and looking at the commuter rail program along with the land uses as the preferred alternative they would be recOmmending in the EIR. Lisa Stipkovich and John Lower, Traffic and Transportation Manager then answered questions posed by Council Members relative to the time table for commuter rail. Mrs. Stipkovich then reported as the next step, staff would be bringing forward a contract to do the EIR if today the Council indicates they wish to proceed. Staff would get the EIR consulting firm on board to start looking at the alternatives. Everyone, the commissions and the community, are very supportive of the commuter rail link and much of what they are proposing does rely on that; however, she wants the Council to understand they are also going to look at other alternatives should that not occur. If they move forward, they would still be looking at some land use changes that they want to recommend and study in the EIR, at least to get that certified and have it as an alternative. It would change some of the land uses that are there now. Some of the areas are proposed to go to commercial from industrial but a lot would be identified as a different type of industrial, a more intensified use. Scott Gregory. They are preparing the long term twenty-year plan. Even if commuter rail is not in place within the two year time frame and it is more like five years, they are still beginning to put in place the steps necessary to make this work. In terms of long-term strategies to make the study area occur in a plan that makes the most sense, they recognize their strategy does rely a great deal on the transit being available as well as the station but by 108 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. beginning to initiate a long-term plan for that station is taking a good strong step in the direction for lobbying for that location. The new stations have not been determined. If the City can begin to place their strategy now, they can begin to plan for the long term future of where they would like to see new rail station locations occur. Council Member Pickler. They have been talking about the Northeast Industrial Area and structuring a plan for quite some time. It is now time to go forward and he concurs in starting the EIR process. It is something that is needed desperately. He feels commuter rail is something that is going to happen whether electrification or not. The potential for rail is a good one. After additional discussion and questioning, Mrs. Stipkovich confirmed for the Mayor that staff is looking for policy direction on whether they should move forward with the EIR process to use as a starting point as one of the alternatives that would be studied. It has been recommended as the preferred alternative but there will be other land use alternatives the Council can consider. If the decision is made tonight, she feels it will be two to three months to accomplish the EIR process before coming back to the Council and staff is indicating that it will be more like six months. Answering Council Member Daly, relative to projected cost of the Planning effort, what she prefers to do since she has not gotten any estimates of cost, is to place an item on the agenda which will give staff the authority to move forward and give cost estimates and time frames on the specific consultants they would have to hire, etc. At this time she wanted to make sure they are moving in the right direction and that the Council agrees. An extensive report is available but the Council will be provided with an executive summary at that time. She will bring it back to the Council as an agenda item on February 25, 1992. Council Member Ehrle asked that at least one copy of the entire report be provided in the City Clerk's Office for the Council to evaluate. Council Member Daly. He asked if there has been an evaluation of how much revenue will be gained versus how much it will cost to implement all the proposed changes; Mrs. Stipkovich answered yes. Part of the consulting team was an economist who worked with them on projections on how much growth could occur as well as other related factors. What they are trying to study as well as land uses is an investment strategy for the Agency. They wanted to see whether they are investing as wisely as they could that data is available as well. She also confirmed that they are not proposing to amend the Redevelopment Project ALPHA Plan at all, but had been looking at various parts of the City in terms of potential new project areas but not to amend this project area. Staff will get a complete package and staff report on the February 25, 1992 agenda. There was General Council Consensus that staff is to move forward with the proposed plan, the first step being the EIR process. This item will appear on the Council Agenda of February 25, 1992 for a formal Council decision. 109 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. City Manager Ruth introduced the second presentation to be given by Police Chief Molloy. 156: GANGS AND DRUGS UPDATE BY THE POLICE DEPARTMENT: Police Chief Joseph Molloy. He is representing the Gang and Drug Citizen Advisory Committee. Some of the Committee members are present in the Chamber audience today. He then briefed the purpose, background and activities of the task force (see Gang and Drugs Task Force Update report - January, 1992 which was previously submitted to the Council at their meeting of February 4, 1992 for receiving and filing). The Committee feels the first steps they have taken as a result of the three workshops held thus far will take them a long way in developing the final plan. The identification of eleven issues and actions through the input of the community in the three meetings held was only the first step in the development of a final plan to deal with the gang and drug problem in the City. Steps I through VI have thus far been completed as identified on Attachment "B" of the February 4, 1992 report. Chief Molloy then named those on the Citizens Advisory Committee asking those who were present in the audience today to stand: Keith Olesen, Leonard Spivak, Phil Aguilar, Lila Jagears, Father John Lenihan, Lee Lescano, Mitch Caldwell, Mike Sofia, Doug Gibson, Chris Whorton, Paul Kott, Jim Connell, Warren Johnson, Bill Taormina, Glenn Hellyer, Mike Larkin, Mary Hibbard, Jan Domene, Norman Guith, Robert Sloane, Allan Hughes, Amin David, John $chaffer, Cynthia Grennan, Ralph Kent, Bob Cashman, John Rodenbaur, Father Mario, Mark Logan, Mel Lopez He also named City staff support people to the Committee. A task force mission statement was also developed. "To validate the draft of the Gang/Drug Task Force report by receiving input from the community and to oversee the implementation of the comprehensive gang/drug strategy." He identified those people who will be a part of the Anaheim Gang/Drug Citizen Task Force and who will take the message out to the community, many already being members of the Advisory Committee. Council Member Pickler. He noted that in going through the membership of the Citizen Advisory Committee, the Orange County Congregation of Community Organizations (OCCCO) is not included whereas the largest amount of concern relative to gangs and drugs was expressed by this organization. Chief Molloy. At this time, that organization has not chosen to participate. They did not give a reason why; City Manager Ruth commented that there were three members of OCCCO on the original committee. Chief Molloy then outlined the forthcoming schedule of community meetings (see attachment page 1 of the February 4, 1992 report) after which they anticipate the final draft of the gang/drug task force report will be presented to the Council approximately March 17, 1992. At that time, they hope to identify not only all of the issues and actions but who will be responsible to develop the 110 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. cost and present a comprehensive report that can be considered by the Council for a policy decision. He then briefed the Council on what the Police Department has been doing during 1991 to combat drugs and gangs. Chief Molloy's presentation was followed by Council comments and questions. Before concluding, Council Member Daly stated that at one of County Supervisor, Don Roth's meetings with City officials, there was a presentation by the County Probation Department. They have a special gang enforcement detail that they share with various cities who contract for that service. He knows that Chief Molloy has looked at that before and he is in active involvement with the Probation Department. He would hope that that relationship with Probation will be looked at as part of the final report back to the Council. By all accounts, it is a very successful program, so successful that some of the cities in South County have put money up to bring in the Probation Department experts in gang prevention. He knows that the Anaheim Police Department has resources that some of the cities do not have and people on staff who are already doing some of those things. He hopes that one more look is taken at that Agency. The workshop presentation on Gangs and Drugs Update was thereupon concluded. RECESS - CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Jack White requested a Closed Session to consider the following items: a. To confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), to wit: Golden West Baseball Co. vs. City of Anaheim, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 40-92-46; Anaheim Stadium Associates vs. City of Anaheim, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 44-81-74. b. To meet with and give directions to its authorized representative regarding labor relations matters - Government Code Section 54957.6. c. To consider and take possible action upon personnel matters pursuant to Government Code Section 54957. d. To confer with its attorney regarding potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b) (1). e. To consider and take possible action upon such other matters as are orally announced by the City Attorney, City Manager or City Council prior to such recess unless the motion to recess indicates any of the matters will not be considered in closed session. Council Member Simpson moved to recess into Closed Session, Council Member Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:10 p.m.) AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members being present, and welcomed those in attendance to the Council meeting. (5:36 p.m.) INVOCATION: Pastor Greg Gibbs, Calvary Baptist Church, gave the invocation. 111 City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Tom Daly led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 119: PRESENTATION - UNITED WAY CAMPAIGN: Mayor Hunter and Ed Aghjayan, Public Utilities Director and the City of Anaheim's 1991 United Way Campaign Chairman presented a facsimile check in the amount of $91,889.50 to Mr. Dave Holden, representing the Orange County Regional Office of United Way. Mr. Dave Molden. Me accepted the check and commended the City, City Manager and City Employees for their outstanding support of the United Way program. The amount contributed this year was a 2 1/2 percent increase over last year's contribution despite difficult economic times. Last year he made the comment, which he can make again this year, that the City of Anaheim leads all other cities in Orange County in United Way donations. He then acknowledged the person responsible, Mr. Ed Aghjayan on behalf of the City and presented him with a Bronze Campaign Award to the City of Anaheim for outstanding service to the people of the community. Mr. Aghjayan accepted the award stating that credit is due to the people who devoted their time and effort to the campaign particularly Susan Stewart, Management Intern who coordinated the work for him, as well as individual coordinators in each department. He emphasized that the employees did an excellent job of giving even in difficult economic times; Mayor Hunter noted that it is a volunteer effort and he too commended all who contributed. 119: PRESENTATION - CERTIFICATE OF APPRECIATION - GANG/DRUG CITIZENS ADVISORY COMMITTEE: Police Chief, Joseph Molloy; Superintendent of Community Services, Steve Swaim; and Lieutenant Robert Baker presented Certificates of Appreciation to those members of the Gang/Drug Citizens Advisory Committee who were present in the Chamber audience. (See workshop portion of the meeting where a presentation was made by Chief Molloy on the work of the committee and wherein each of the Committee Members present were acknowledged.) Mayor Hunter and Council Members commended each of the members of the Committee for the time and effort given and still to be devoted to this vital community work. 119: PRESENTATION - D.A.R.E. PROCRAM~ Polie~ Chief Molloy ~tat~d Council Members actively participate in the D.A.R.E. Culmination Ceremonies. At those ceremonies, members of the Police Department always wear their black D.A.R.E jackets. He then introduced Captain Kantor, Sergeant Jerry King and Lieutenant Marc Hedgpeth who presented D.A.R.E. jackets to each Council Member with the Police Department Logo and the Council Member's name which they will be expected to wear as they continue to participate in the culmination ceremonies. 119: PRESENTATION- PHYLISS BOYDSTUN: Mayor Hunter and Council Members presented a plaque to Phyliss Boydstun, former City Planning Commissioner, for her years of service on the City Planning Commission. 119: PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were issued by Mayor Hunter and authorized by the City Council: Medical Assistants week in Anaheim, February 17-24, 1992 112 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992; 5:00 P.M. 119: DECLARATION OF RECOGNITION AND CONGRATULATIONS: A Declaration of Recognition and Congratulations was unanimously adopted by the City Council to be presented to Mary Anne Mang at a reception on February 29, 1992 at the Disneyland Hotel recognizing Mary Ann for being named for the Anaheim Citizen of the Year award for the City of Anaheim by the Cypress College Foundation and commending her for her many years of community service to the City of Anaheim. MINUTES: Council Member Pickler moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held January 28, 1992. Council Member Ehrle seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $3,068,972.76 for the period ending February 7, 1992, in accordance with the 1991-92 Budget, were approved. Mayor Hunter recessed the City Council meeting until after the Redevelopment Agency, Housing Authority and Public Financing Authority meetings. (5:52 p.m.) Mayor Hunter reconvened the City Council meeting. (5:57 p.m.) PUBLIC COMMENTS - AGENDA ITEMS: Mr. Jeff Kirsch spoke to Agenda Item Al7 (see discussion under that item). ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST: Steve White, 856 N. Clementine, Anaheim. He is present as Secretary of Anaheim HOME and spokesman for a loose coalition of homeowners groups to read a brief statement. Meetings were held January 31 and February 6, 1992 attended by leaders of many community organizations to consider the merits of the proposed charter change calling for election of City Council Members by districts rather than at large. While no decision was reached to endorse a proposal without more complete information, a consensus was reached to ask the Council to place the issue on the ballot. While they do not view districts as a panacea to all neighborhood problems, they see it as a step towards restoring a sense of representation to areas that presently feel isolated from the community decision making process. Debate over the measure alone will be a positive step in that direction. Mayor Hunter. Perhaps someplace down the line since there is an opportunity to Dlace item~ on th~ ballot for th~ N0v~mb~r ~l~eti0n th~r~ could b~ di~eu~i~n on whether or not they should have Councilmanic Districts. There was a court decision that came down just yesterday where the City of Stockton which had Councilmanic Districts and then went back to at-large elections and the court upheld that City going from districts to at-large elections once again. It is an issue that probably deserves a lot of discussion since there are people on both sides of the issue. Perhaps in the future they should put the item on the agenda and have the public give their input. Jeff Kirsch, 2661 W. Palais, Anaheim. He referred to an item passed by the Council at the last meeting regarding the Management Package. He asked if 113 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. anybody has assessed the situation for possible savings. If there are savings in going to a six minute or 1/10th hour time recording unit commonly used in industrial and the military, those savings would not cut people or services, but improve accuracy. Garry McRae, Labor Relations Director. There are a lot of people who are measuring hours in less than 1/4 hour increments. However, the 1/4 hour and 1/2 hour increments have their genesis in the collective bargaining agreements and have been in those agreements for as many years as he can recall. They are reflective of the way the City does business. They are unable or probably have not found a significant reason for addressing that issue in the collective bargaining agreements. It is the view that the City gains as much from that kind of policy as it loses. He reiterated those are found in the collective bargaining agreements and reflected in other documents as they come forward. Ben Bay, 2148 W. Grayson, Anaheim. He came to the meeting expecting to listen to a discussion changing the charter for district elections in the City as reported in the paper. He has not read a lot about people opposing. He does oppose districts in the City - any City or any County. It is his opinion if there were no districts in Orange County, the jail problem would have been solved ten years ago as well as the dump or landfill problem, and a lot of other problems would never have come up. It is a bad move for this Government to go to districts. He hears a lot of talk about putting the matter on the ballot. He recalls a lot of sincere people asking the Council while he was a Council Member to put rent control for mobile home parks on the ballot and the Council indicated if people wanted rent control on the ballot, to go out and get the signatures to put it there. He asked that they strongly consider answering whatever demands they are getting from this wave of popular appeal on districts, to answer the same way. If they want to put districts and a charter change in this City on the ballot and there is that much public opinion for it, the Council should let them go get the signatures to put it there. It should not so easily be put there before the people. He has nothing against people voting on the issue. He feels it would have the same fate as rent control and prays that it will. ~ just wanted to u~ ~h~ e~une£1 wi~hou% hearing a lo% of opinions pro and con on the subject, to not just put the matter on the ballot. City Manager Ruth. There is an additional item added to the Consent Calendar which has to be acted upon today which arose after the agenda was posted as a result of an emergency at the Convention Center necessitating the replacement of cable. It will be necessary to waive the posting requirement of the Brown Act (see Item A18a acted upon as part of the Consent Calendar after waiving the posting provisions of the Brown Act). 114 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Council Member Pickler, seconded by Council Member Simpson, the following items were approved in accordance with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar; Council Member Pickler offered Resolution Nos. 92R-25 through 92R-29, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTION: The titles of the following resolutions were read by the City Clerk. (Resolution Nos. 92R-25 through 92R-29, both inclusive, for adoption.) Council Member Pickler moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions. Council Member Simpson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Al. 118: The following claims were filed against the City and action taken as recommended: Claims rejected and referred to Risk Management: a. Claim submitted by Oshman's Sporting Goods for indemnity sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about June 26, 1991. b. Claim submitted by Pacific Bell for property damage sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about September 20, 1991. c. Claim submitted by Beatrice Enos for property damage sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about December 4, 1991. d. Claim submitted by Larry A. Carter for property damage sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about December 24, 1991. e. Claim submitted by George G. McKhann for property damage sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about January 17 through January 17, 1992. f. Claim submitted by Richard W. Phipps for property damage sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about January 5, 1992. g. Claim submitted by Hay-Khy Ith for property damage ~u~tained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about October 31, 1991. h. Claim submitted by L. Ray Chen for property damage sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about December 8, 1991. i. Claim submitted by Gerro P. Duer for bodily injury sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about August 16, 1991. j. Claim submitted by Rodeway Inn for property damage sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about July 19, 1991. A2. 107: Receiving and filing the Statistical Report Summary ending December 31, 1991, as submitted by the Building Division. 115 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. 105: Receiving and filing minutes of the Golf Advisory Commission meeting held November 20, 1991. 173: Receiving and filing a Notice of Filing regarding the request made by Pacific Bell to the California Public Utilities Commission, authorizing a temporary rate increase of $9.25 million to recover the cost of undergrounding telephone facilities in areas destroyed by the recent Oakland Hills fire. 148: Receiving and filing the 1991 Annual Report on AB2588 Air Toxics Hot Spots Risk Assessment and Notice of Public Workshop on Notification Procedures from South Coast Air Quality management District. A3. 167: Declaring Intersection Maintenance Service in default of their contract; terminating the contract with Intersection Maintenance Service; and authorizing the Mayor to sign a new contract with Safeco Insurance Companies of America (Safeco), a Washington corporation, to complete the Protected/Permissive Signals project. A4. 167: Declaring Intersection Maintenance Service in default of their contract; terminating the contract with Intersection Maintenance Service; and authorizing the Mayor to sign a new contract with Safeco Insurance Companies of America (Safeco), a Washington corporation, to complete the Traffic Signal Improvements project. A5. 128: Receiving and filing the Monthly Financial Analysis for five months ended November 30, 1991, as presented by the Director of Finance. A6. 158: RESOLUTION NO. 92R-25: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES OR INTERESTS THEREIN. A7. 123: Approving an Agreement with ENTEG, INC., at a cost not to exceed $54,424 for engineering, design, and preparation of construction plans, specification, contract documents, engineer's estimates, and an Electro-Magnetic Field Study, for the Commercial/Recreation Area-Phase I. A8. 123: Approving a Uranium Concentrates Sales Agreement with NUEXCO Trading ~0rD0rati0n, for the Durcha~ of 175,000 D0und~ of natural u~n~um (U308) for San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, at a price not to exceed $1,356,250 with City electing the uranium loan option; and authorizing the Mayor to execute said agreement. 123: Approving the loan option agreement substantially in the form set forth in the Uranium Concentrates Sales Agreements, and authorizing the Mayor to execute said loan option agreement. 106: Amending the RAP to increase expenditures $1,162,650 in Fund 41, Program 680, Object 5222. A9. 123: Approving the First Amendment to Agreement with Hughes Heiss & Associates, in an amount not to exceed $18,175 for professional audit services in the Utilities Department. 116 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. Al0. 123: Approving an Affordable Housing Agreement with Nutwood Park Apartments for two affordable apartment units (out of 30 units) on property located at 1663 $. Nutwood Street in connection with Variance No. 4111. Ail. 187: RESOLUTION NO. 92R-26: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS BY THE ANAHEIM PUBLIC FINANCING AUTHORITY, APPROVING THE BORROWING OF BOND PROCEEDS BY THE ANAHEIM REDEVELOPMENT AGENCY AND THE REFUNDING OF CERTAIN PRIOR OBLIGATIONS OF THE AGENCY. Al2. 123: Authorizing a Third Amendment to Lease Agreement with 198 Associates, for office space to accommodate the Data Processing Department on a month-to-month basis, in the Willdan Building, located at 290 S. Anaheim Boulevard, at a monthly cost of $37,709.87 (commencing February 16, 1992). Al3. 139: Supporting the Central Valley Project Fish and Wildlife Act of 1991 (S.2016) - water transfer legislation, and communicating this support to the appropriate Congressional and State representatives. Al4. 153: RESOLUTION NO. 92R-27: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION, GENERAL UNIT AND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Amending Article 41 - General Overtime, to add two classifications to the list of positions eligible for double-time pay between midnight and 8:00 a.m.) Al5. 153: RESOLUTION NO. 92R-28: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 91R-49 WHICH ESTABLISHED RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR CLASSES ASSIGNED TO THE GENERAL UNIT REPRESENTED BY THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION. (Creating the classifications of Skilled Crafts Worker, and Skilled Crafts Worker Trainee, effective February 14, 1992.) Al6. 153: RESOLUTION NO. 92R-29: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 89R-407 WHICH ESTABLISHED RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR CLASSES ASSIGNED TO THE INTERNATIONAL BROTHERHOOD OF ELECTRICAL WORKERS, LOCAL 47. (Creating the classification of Control Center Dispatcher, effective January 31, 1992.) Al7. 179: Approving the revision of allocation of proceeds from the sale of the Certificates of Participation for the Commercial Recreation Area; and amending the resource allocation plan to increase expenditure appropriations of the remaining proceeds of sale of the Certificates of Participation and interest income, in the amount of $1,675,000 for those projects and services. Jeff Kirsch, 2661 W. Palais Road, Anaheim. He asked relative to this item what the rationale was for reducing the critical intersection funding and diverting those funds to other areas in view of the fact that traffic is one of the major problems in the area. City Manager Ruth. Priorities have not changed. There are some immediate needs in order to continue with the continuity on the Disney project and they need additional funding now. It has been reviewed by the Visitor and 117 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. Convention Bureau. They have agreed this is a better utilization of the funding at this time. The City is going to continue to seek out State and Federal money to replace or replenish the money reallocated. It does not exist now but based upon appropriations from the State in the past, they will be able to get replacement funding in the near future. Al8. 177: Accepting the Emergency Shelter Grant award, in the amount of $56,000 and authorizing the Mayor and the Executive Director to sign the necessary documents for submission of the application for federal assistance to the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development. Approving Staff funding recommendations for disbursement of 1992 ESG funds to selected non-profit emergency shelter service providers. MOTION: Council Member Pickler moved to waive the 72-hour posting provision of the Brown Act due to the emergency nature of the following item which occurred after the agenda was posted. Council Member Simpson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. A18a. 160: Accepting the low bid of Continental Transformer Services, Inc., in the amount of $26,997 for removal and installation of high voltage cable at the Convention Center. Roll Call Vote on Resolution Nos. 92R-25 through 92R-29, both inclusive for adoption: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Simpson, Ehrle, Pickler, Daly and Hunter NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 92R-25 through 92R-29, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. End of Consent Calendar. MOTIONS CARRIED. BOARD AND COMMISSION ITEM: Al9. 105: APPOINTMENTS TO THE ANAHEIM PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL (APIC): Submitted was report dated F~bruary 11, 1992, rec0mmendinq reaDp0intment of four present members of the APIC for four-year terms. Council Member Ehrle moved to reappoint Fred Bercher, Bob Cashman, Ray Torres (private sector), and Bob Nelson (public sector) to the Anaheim Private Industry Council (PIC) for a four-year term, respectively, February 11, 1992 to February 11, 1996, as recommended. Council Member Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. A20. 101: CONTINUED HEARING (PREVIOUSLY CLOSED) ON DRAFT EXPANDED INITIAL STUDY PROPOSED KATELLA/DOUGLASS PUBLIC PARKING FACILITY; AND APPROVING A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR THE PROPOSED PROJECT PURSUANT TO THE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT: Approval relates to proposed 326 City-owned public parking spaces adjacent to the Anaheim Arena. 118 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. The hearing was open on January 7, 1992 and input received. Subsequently, the hearing was closed and continued to this date. (See minutes January 7, 1992.) Previously submitted was report dated January 7, 1992, from the Director of Public Works and City Engineer, Gary Johnson. City Attorney Jack White. This item was continued from the meeting of January 7, 1992 which has been closed. It would not be appropriate to take further public testimony at this time. However, as of today they have received a letter with comments and it would be appropriate at this time for staff to respond to those comments before taking action. Mr. Rob ZurSchmiede, Property Service Manager. He first reviewed what has taken place thus far relative to the subject. Comments were received at the meeting of January 7, 1992, and the public hearing closed. In the intervening period, those comments have been addressed and answered and a revised document circulated to the property owners and tenants. Written comments were solicited through the close of business yesterday. At approximately 2:45 p.m. today, they received a letter that contained comments relating primarily to traffic impacts of the proposed development project. There are a total of approximately four areas in the letter. They have asked Larry Greer, the Traffic Engineer who prepared the traffic study to respond. Subsequently, if there are any questions, staff would be prepared to answer those. If no questions, staff recommends the project be approved - that the initial study be approved and that they be given the direction to file a Notice of Determination with the County Clerk. Mayor Hunter. Relative to the letter, he asked who sent it. Rob ZurSchmiede. The letter was from Lanak & Hana, Mr. Bruce Osterstrom and directed to Gary Johnson, Director of Public Works and City Engineer with copies to the City Council, City Clerk and himself. Lanak & Hana represent Mr. & Mrs. Robert Rindt, the property owners at 1650 and 1654 South Douglass Road, Anaheim; City Clerk Sohl reported that the letter was faxed to her office late this afternoon. Rob ZurSchmiede. The letter was received after the expiration for written comments but staff has elected to resD0nd to the comments n0ntheless. Larry Greer, Traffic Engineer, Greer and Associates. There are four areas that require a response. The first has to do with a statement that the study relied on out-dated material. This is a new traffic study. They did use the Anaheim Sports Arena Project and that traffic study as a resource document, but did conduct an entirely new analysis using some of that data as base data. The second comment indicated because of the 326 parking spaces, this would generate what the respondant referred to as a mile of cars. During the peak hours, those 326 parking spaces would generate 37 trips which amounts to about 6 trips during each signal cycle at the intersection of Katella and Douglass. It is not a large impact. 119 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. The third comment has to do with the fact that relative to the Hillman properties project, there was one building that is or was in existence at the time of the study, but during the time when the Arena analysis was done and the period of time since then that that building has leased up or is at least partially leased up. That is specifically why they use a 1% ambient control factor. The fourth comment had to do with the Central Park project at the northeast corner of State College and Katella. That project was missed in the related projects list for this project. It was also not included in the Arena project. It came along after that. However, it is his understanding that project has been substantially delayed and may be scaled back along with other projects in the area, the IDM project being one. In addition, they checked current traffic counts. Traffic counts from 1988 to 1990 on this section of Katella and some adjacent sections, State College included, have decreased. In 1988, traffic volume per day on the Katella Section adjacent to the project was 38,000; in 1990 it dropped to 36,000. Similarly on State College traffic volumes north of Katella dropped from 28,000 to 26,000 and south of Katella from 28,000 to 24,000. The traffic study done for Central Park also indicates that it would have produced some 27 peak hour trips on the intersection that are affected in this traffic study for the parking lot. This is not a significant impact. This is a conservative traffic analysis and, in his opinion, still represents a worst-case condition even though that project was not included at the time. City Attorney White. That responds to the comments received belatedly this afternoon. The letter, which has been summarized in the response by Mr. Greer, is part of the record. If Council has any questions specifically about that or wish to see it before they act, it can be provided. MOTION.'. Council Member Hunter moved to approve the revised expanded initial study for the proposed Katella/Douglass public parking facility. Council Member Ehrle seconded the motion. Council Member Pickler voted no. MOTION CARRIED. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLAR3%TION: On motion by Council Member Hunter, seconded by Council Member Ehrle, the City Council does h~r~b~ aDDr0v~ a ~iti~at~d N~ativ~ D~elarati0n on th~ ~ubj~ct pr0j~et and accompanying Mitigation Monitoring Program pursuant to Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources Code on the basis that the Planning Commission/City Council has considered the proposal with the Mitigated Negative Declaration and accompanying Monitoring Program, together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the Initial Study that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. Council Member Pickler voted no. MOTION CARRIED. ITEMS Bi - B3 FROM THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MEETING OF JANUARY 23, 1992 - DECISION DATE: JANUARY 30, 1992, INFORMATION ONLY - APPEAL PERIOD ENDS FEBRUARY 14, 1992: 120 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. BI. 179: VARIANCE NO. 4167, TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 90-334 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION: OWNER: MILLER-LA PALMA LIMITED, 5775 Polaris Avenue, Las Vegas, Nevada 89118. AGENT: ROBERT MC CLENDON, 3158 Redhill Avenue #100, Costa Mesa, CA 92626. LOCATION: 3401 & 3407 East La Palma Avenue. Property is approximately 1.58 acres located on the northeast corner of La Palma Avenue and Miller Street with approximately 222 feet on the north side of La Palma Avenue approximately 280 feet on the east side of Miller Street. Waiver of minimum number of parking spaces to establish a three-lot subdivision. ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Variance No. 4167 APPROVED (ZA29-06). Approved Negative Declaration. NOTE: Tentative Parcel Map No. 90-334 had a 10-day appeal period and no action was taken by Council at their meeting of 2/4/92. B2. 179: VARIANCE NO. 4168, CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT, CLASS 5: OWNER: WILLIAM COSMO TAORMINA CYNTHIA LYNN TAORMINA, 721 North Helena Street, Anaheim, CA 92805. AGENT: ARTHUR D. HELM STETTER, 415 South Chathan Circle #F, Anaheim, CA 92806. LOCATION: 401 North Anaheim Boulevard. Property is approximately .18 acre and is located on the northwest corner of Anaheim Boulevard and Adele Street with approximately 62 feet on the west side of Anaheim Boulevard and approximately 130 feet on the north side of Adele Street. Waiver of minimum number of parking spaces to establish a fast food establishment (Gina's Restaurant). ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Variance No. 4168 APPROVED (ZA92-08). B3. 179: VARIANCE NO. 4169, CATERGORICAL EXEMPTION - CLASS 5: OWNER: OMP DEVELOPMENT, 1571 West Katella Avenue #A, Anaheim, CA 92802. AGENT: K. OSTOWARI, 1571 West Katella Avenue #A, Anaheim, CA 92802 LOCATION: 1571 West Katella Avenue. ?r0~erty is ap~r0ximately 2.21 acres having a frontage of approximately 340 on the north side of Katella Avenue, having a maximum depth of approximately 309 feet and being located approximately 314 feet east of the centerline of Carnelian Street. Waiver of permitted encroachment into required yard, to construct lO-balconies adjacent to Katella Avenue. ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Variance No. 4169 APPROVED (ZA92-09). Council Member Daly posed questions to staff relative to this item which were answered by the Zoning Administrator at the conclusion of which, Council Member 121 City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. Daly stated the bottom line for him is whether the balconies are going to be an intrusion view wise in terms of Katella Avenue - are they going to be well designed. Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator. She imposed a condition that would require the balconies to be well designed, in terms of color, construction material, dimensions, requiring that they not be a completely flat surface, that they have to be three dimensional, whatever the design of each balcony that the design increments on each one are to be a maximum 8-feet wide. She tried to think of everything. Staff will be reviewing this and she assumes if staff is even a bit concerned, they will be talking to her about it. If they are still concerned they can go back to hearing and she would say no, if not satisfied. Mayor Hunter left the Council Chamber. (6:25 p.m.) End of the Zoning Administrator Items. B4. 179: ORDINANCE NO. 5286 FOR ADOPTION: WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCE: The title of the following ordinance was read by the City Clerk. (Ordinance No. 5286) Council Member Simpson moved to waive the reading in full of the ordinance. Council Member Ehrle seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Council Member Simpson offered Ordinance No. 5286 for adoption, amending Sections 18.48.084 of Chapter 18.48 of Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to permitted encroachments into interior setback areas in the #CR# Commercial Recreation zone. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 5286: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTIONS 18.48.084 OF CHAPTER 18.48 OF TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PERMITTED ENCROACHMENTS INTO INTERIOR SETBACK AREAS IN THE #CR" COMMERCIAL RECREATION ZONE. Roll Call Vote on Ordinance No. 5286: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Simpson, Ehrle, Pickler and Daly TEMPORARILY ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Hunter ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 5286 duly passed and adopted. ITEMS B5 - Bll FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JANUARY 27, 1992, INFORMATION ONLY - APPEAL PERIOD ENDS FEBRUARY 18, 1992: 122 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. B5. 155: ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 298, GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 317 (PORTIONS 1 AND 2), AND CYPRESS CANYON SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 90-3 (INCLUDING ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS AND A PUBLIC FACILITIES PLAN): LOCATION: Subject property, which is described as the 1,546.5-acre Coal Canyon property (including the northerly 663-acre Cypress Canyon project area and the southerly 883.5-acre Tecate Cypress Preserve area), and is unincorporated land located within the County of Orange in the City of Anaheim's sphere-of-influence, and generally bordered on the north by the Riverside Freeway (SR-91) and the Coal Canyon Road interchange, on the west by the Gypsum Canyon property (Mountain Park development) recently approved by the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) for annexation to the City of Anaheim, on the south by unincorporated property within the County of Orange in the City of Orange's sphere-of-influence, and on the east by unincorporated property within the City of Anaheim's sphere-of-influence and by the Cleveland National Forest. ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: GPA NO. 317 (PORTIONS 1 AND 2) GRANTED (PC92-06) (6 yes votes, 1 absent). SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 90-3 GRANTED (PC92-07) SPECIFIC PLAN ZONING AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS GRANTED (PC92-08). No action taken on EIR NO. 298. This item is scheduled for a public hearing before the City Council on March 3, 1992, since a General Plan Amendment is involved. B6. 179: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3447 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION: OWNER: LEDERER-ANAHEIM, LIMITED, 1990 Westwood Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90025. AGENT: EDWARD KIM, 1440 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805 LOCATION: 1440 South Anaheim Boulevard. Property is approximately 14.7 acres located north and east of the northeast corner of Cerritos Avenue and Anaheim Boulevard. To permit on-premise sale and consumption of beer and wine within a commercial retail center (indoor swap meet). This item was withdrawn by the petitioner. B7. 134: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 324, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 91-92-10, WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3482 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION: OWNER: ELSIE MENUEY, 27681 Via Turina, Mission Viejo, CA 92692 LOCATION: 2260 West Orange Avenue. Property is approximately 0.9 acre located on the south side of Orange Avenue and approximately 715 feet west of the centerline of Brookhurst Street. Amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan redesignating subject property from the existing Low Density Residential designation to the Low-Medium Density Residential designation. To reclassify subject property from the RS-A-43,000 (Residential/Agricultural) Zone to the RM-2400 (Residential, Multiple-Family) or a less intense zone. 123 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. To permit a 16-unit condominium complex with waiver of maximum structural height. ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLAN~;ING COMMISSION: GPA NO. 324 GRANTED (PC92-09) (6 yes votes, 1 absent). Reclassification No. 91-92-10 GRANTED, modified to RS-5000 (PC92-10). Waiver of code requirement DENIED. CUP NO. 3482 DENIED (PC92-11). This item is scheduled for a public hearing on March 3, 1992, since a General Plan Amendment is involved. B8. 179: VARIANCE NO. 4160 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION: OWNER: DAVID AND SALLY J. STEENBERGEN, 5360 CUMBERLAND DRIVE, CYPRESS, CA 90630. LOCATION: 901 AND 903 N. Lemon Street. Property is approximately 0.13 acres located at the northwest corner of La Verne Street and Lemon Street. Waiver of minimum structural setback, minimum yard requirement, permitted encroachments into required yard, and minimum recreational/leisure area to construct a 1,101 square foot addition to an existing duplex. ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Variance No. 4160 DENIED (PC92-12) (6 yes votes, 1 absent). Approved Negative Declaration. B9. 179: WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3488 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION: OWNER: TONY and CONNIE ALVAREZ FAMILY TRUST, 360 S. Glassell Street, Orange, CA 92666 AGENT: YASER HABIBEH, 1189 N. Kraemer Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92807 LOCATION: 1189 North Kraemer Boulevard. Property is approximately 1.5 acres located at the southwest corner of Coronado Street and Kraemer Blvd. To retain an auto stereo and alarm installation facility with incidental retail sales with waiver of minimum number of parking ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: CUP NO. 3488 GRANTED (PC92-13) (6 yes votes, 1 absent). Waiver of code requirement APPROVED. Approved Negative Declaration. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: BI0. 134: ORANGE COUNTY GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY - REQUEST TO DETERMINE CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN: Property is located at 2100 South Haster Street. ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Approved. 124 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. Bll. 134: ORANGE COUNTY GENERAL SERVICES AGENCY - REQUEST TO DETERMINE CONFORMANCE WITH THE GENERAL PLAN: Property is located at 1633 South Jeffrey Drive. ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Approved. End of the Planning Commission Items. ITEMS B12- B13 FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF FEBRUARY 10, 1992, INFORMATION ONLY - APPEAL PERIOD ENDS FEBRUARY 20, 1992: B12. 170: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 12699 AND SITE PLAN AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION: OWNER: PRESLEY of SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, 19 Corporate Plaza, Newport Beach, CA 92660. LOCATION: Property consists of approximately 12.40 acres generally bounded by The Summit of Anaheim Hills Development Area 101 to the northeast, The Highlands at Anaheim Hills Development Area 8 to the northwest, The Highlands at Anaheim Hills Development Area 12 to the south and The Highlands at Anaheim Hills Development Area 10 to the west and further described as Development Area 11 of The Highlands at Anaheim Hills Specific Plan (SP87-1). To establish a 28-1ot (including 3 lettered lots), 162-unit, air space condominium subdivision and request for site plan review and approval. ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Tentative Tract Map No. 12699 and Site Plan APPROVED (7 yes votes). Approved Negative Declaration. B13. 170: TENTATIVE TRACT MAP NO. 14636 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION: OWNER: DHANSUKHLAL M. RATANJEE, 1235 Rosewood Dr., San Bernardino, CA 92408. LOCATION: 2865 West Lincoln Avenue. Property is approximately 0.6 acre located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue and approximately 220 feet east of the centerline of Bel Air Street. To establish a l-lot, 10-unit, air-space, RM-2400 condominium subdivision. ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION: Tentative Tract Map No. 14636 and Site Plan APPROVED (7 yes votes). Approved Negative Declaration. Mayor Hunter entered the Council Chamber. (6:28 p.m.) D1. 175: PUBLIC HEARING - CREATING UNDERGROUND DISTRICT NO. 2 - KATELLA/DOUGLASS: Underground District No. 2 is being created to provide for the undergrounding of all overhead utilities to take place in accordance with the Public Utilities Department's Underground Conversion Program Five-Year Plan which was approved for FY 1991-92 by the Public Utilities Board on December 5, 1991, and the City Council on January 7, 1992. 125 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - FEBRUARY 11, 1992, 5:00 P.M. UNDERGROUND DISTRICT NO. 2 - LOCATION: Douglass Road from 320 feet south of Katella Avenue, and Katella Avenue from 405 feet west of Douglass Road to 670 east of Douglass Road. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY: Publication in Anaheim Bulletin - January 30, 1992 Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - January 28, 1992 Posting of property- January 31, 1992 City Clerk Sohl announced that staff has requested that this public hearing be continued to February 25, 1992. Mayor Hunter asked if anyone was present to speak on this item; there was no response. MOTION: Council Member Pickler moved to continue the public hearing on Creating Underground District No. 2 to February 25, 1992. Council Member Ehrle seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Council Member Hunter moved to adjourn, Council Member Daly seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (6:31 p.m.) No meeting is scheduled for Tuesday, February 18, 1992 since no quorum is anticipated. LEONORA N. SOHL, CITY CLERK 126