97-086RESOLUTION NO. 97R -86
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA,
ADOPTING THE COMMUNITY FACILITIES
DISTRICT NO. 1989 -3 (THE SUMMIT)
ANNUAL APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT FOR THE
FISCAL YEAR 1997/98.
WHEREAS, the voters of California on November 6, 1977,
added Article XIII B to the State Constitution placing various
limitations on the appropriations of the state and local
governments; and
WHEREAS, Article XIII B of the State Constitution
provides that the appropriations limit for fiscal year 1997/98 is
calculated by adjusting the 1996/97 fiscal appropriations limit
for changes in the cost of living and population except as
otherwise provided in said Article XIII B; and
WHEREAS, the information necessary for making these
adjustments is attached in Exhibits A through G; and
WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim has complied with all the
provisions of Article XIII B of the State Constitution in
determining the Community Facilities District No. 1989 -3 (The
Summit) appropriations limit for fiscal year 1997/98.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim that the Community Facilities District No.
1989 -3 (The Summit) appropriations limit for fiscal year 1997/98
be established in the amount of $157,630,091.00.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Anaheim, by recorded vote of the City Council adopting
this resolution, hereby determines and selects that, with regard
to fiscal year 1997/98 and the calculations specified herein for
such fiscal year, the term "change in the cost of living" for
purposes of Section 8(e) (2) of Article XIII B of the Constitution
of the State of California shall mean the percentage change in
the California per capita personal income from the preceding
year.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the City Council of the
City of Anaheim, by recorded vote of the City Council adopting
this resolution, hereby determines and chooses that, with regard
to fiscal year 1997/98 and the calculations specified herein for
such fiscal year, the term "change in population" for purposes of
Article XIII B of the Constitution of the State of California and
Division 9 of Article 1 of the Government Code of the State of
California shall mean the change in population within the City of
Anaheim.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that said appropriations limit
herein established may be changed as deemed necessary by
resolution of the City Council.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and adopted by the
City Council of the City of Anaheim this 17th day of
June 1997.
ATTEST:
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
0023053.01
2
MAYO12 OF THE CITY OF //ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA
COUNTY OF ORANGE ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing
Resolution No. 97R -86 was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of
the Anaheim City Council held on the 17th day of June, 1997, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: MAYOR /COUNCIL MEMBERS: McCracken, Tait, Zemel, Lopez, Daly
NOES: MAYOR /COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: MAYOR /COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim signed said Resolution
No. 97R -86 on the 17th day of June, 1997.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City
of Anaheim this 17th day of June, 1997.
(SEAL)
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
I, LEONORA N. SOHL, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing
is the original of Resolution No. 97R -86 was duly passed and adopted by the City Council of
the City of Anaheim on June 17th, 1997.
CITY CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
EXHIBIT A
1997 /98 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1989 -3 (THE SUMMIT)
CALCULATIONS COMPARISON OF APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMIT
FY 1996/97 Adopted Appropriations Limit
Adjustment Factor
FY 1997/98 Appropriations Limit
FY 1997/98 Appropriations Limit
FY 1997/98 Appropriations Subject To Limit
FY 1997/98 Appropriations Limit Margin
1.0519
$149,847,962
$157,630,091
$157,630,091
248,474
$157,381,617
FY 1997/98 Appropriations Limit Margin, As a Percent of Limit 99.8%
Population percent change pursuant
to Sections 2227 and 2228 of the
Revenue and Taxation Code
PRICE FACTOR Selected Factor
POPULATION AND PRICE FACTOR
CONVERTED TO AN ADJUSTMENT FACTOR
A) Population: Converted to a factor
B) Price Factor: Converted to a factor
Ratio of change: A x B
EXHIBIT B
1997/98 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1989 -3 (THE SUMMIT)
ADJUSTMENT FACTORS
POPULATION Selected Factor: City Population Growth
Population count provided by the
State Finance Department 295,452
California Per Capita Personal 4.67%
Income Growth
1.0050
1.0467
0.50%
1.0519
EXHIBIT C
1997/98 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1989 -3 (THE SUMMIT)
APPROPRIATIONS SUBJECT TO LIMIT CALCULATION
Total All Revenues $1,101,566
Reduce by Non- Proceeds of Taxes 0 51,101,566
Add User Fees in Excess of Costs 0 1,101,566
Add User Fees in Replacement of Taxes 0 1,101,566
Subtract Debt Service Appropriations 853,092 248,474
Total All Appropriations $1,101,566
Reduce by Non Proceeds of Taxes 0 $1,101,566
Subtract Debt Service Appropriations 853,092 248,474
Appropriations Subject to Limit $248.474
EXHIBIT D
1997/98 APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT
COMMUNITY FACILITIES DISTRICT NO. 1989 -3 (THE SUMMIT)
PROCEEDS OF TAXES CALCULATION
PROCEEDS NON- PROCEEDS
OF TAXES OF TAXES TOTAL
Taxes $1,101,566 0 $1,101,566
State Subventions 0 0 0
Service Charges 0 0 0
Permit Fees 0 0 0
Fines and Forfeitures 0 0 0
Rentals 0 0 0
Sales 0 0 0
Refunds and Reimbursements 0 0 0
Internal Service Charges 0 0 0
Federal and County Subventions 0 0 0
Contributions 0 0 0
Subtotal 51,101,566 50 $1,101,566
Interest 0 0 0
Total 51,101.566 50 51,101,566
N
w
ciN
F Z
P y
41
Z z o
G
V
F
F2 tx
CL G
Ld O
Q F N
R
a
z
O
J
Z
C
W
LTJ
CL
Z 4
2
2
i
cel
X
0
O
N
O
0
O
O
W.
N
0
N
0
d
O
N
b
r
TEXT OF GANN SPENDING-LIMITATION INITIATIVE EXHIBIT F
LIMITATION OF GOVERNMENT APPROPRIATIONS. INITIATIVE CONSTITUTIONAL.
AMENDMENT. Establishes and defines annual appropriation limits on state and loyal
governmental entities based on annual appropriations for prior fiscal year. Requires
adjustments for changes in cost of living, population and other specified factors.
Appropriation limits may be established or temporarily changed by electorate. Requires
revenues received in excess of appropriations permitted by this measure to be returned by
revision of tax rates or fee schedules within two fiscal years next following year excess
created. With exceptions, provides for reimbursement of local governments for new
programs or higher level of services mandated by state. Financial Impact:
Indeterminable.
ARTICLE XIII B.
Sec. 1. The total annual appropriations subject to limitation of the state and of each
local government shall not exceed the appropriations limit of such entity of government
for the prior year adjusted for changes in the cost of living and population except as
otherwise provided in this Article.
Sec. 2. Revenues received by any entity of government in excess of that amount
which is appropriated by such entity in compliance with this Article during the fiscal year
shall be returned by a revision of tax rates or fee schedules within the next two
subsequent fiscal years.
Sec. 3. The appropriations limit for any fiscal year pursuant to Sec. 1 shall be
adjusted as follows:
(a) In the event that the financial responsibility of providing services is
transferred, in whole or in part, whether by annexation, incorporation or otherwise, from
one entity of government to another, then for the year in which such transfer becomes
effective the appropriations limit of the transferee entity shall be increased by such
reasonable amount as the said entities shall mutually agree and the appropriations limit of
the transferor entity shall be decreased by the same amount.
(b) In the event that the financial responsibility of providing services is
transferred, in whole or in part, from an entity of government to a private entity, or the
financial source for the provision of services is transferred, in whole or in part, from other
revenues of an entity of government, to regulatory licenses, user charges or user fees,
then for the year of such transfer the appropriations limit of such entity of government
shall be decreased accordingly.
(e) In the event of an emergency, the appropriation limit may be exceeded
provided that the appropriation limits in the following three years are reduced accordingly
to prevent an aggregate increase in appropriations resulting from the emergency.
Sec. 4. The appropriations limit imposed on any new or existing entity of
governinent by this Article may be established or changed by the electors of such entity,
subject to and in conformity with constitutional and statutory voting requirements. The
duration of any such change shall he as determined by said electors, but shall in no event
exceed four years from the most recent vote of said electors creating or continuing such
change.
1 of 3
Sec. 5. Eacti entity of government may establish Such contingency, emergency,
unemployment, reserve. retirement, sinking fund, trust. or simlinr funds as it shall deem
reasonable and proper. Contributions to any such fund, to the extent that such
contributions are derived from the proceeds of taxes, shall for purposes of this Article
constitute appropriations subject to limitai ion in the year of contribution. Neither
withdrawals from any such fund, nor expenditures nt (or authorizations to emend) such
withdrawals, nor transfers between or among such funds, shall for purposes of this Article
constitute appropriations subject to limitation.
Sec. 6. Whenever the Legislature or any state agency mandates a new program or
higher level of service on any local government, the state shall provide u subvention of
funds to reimburse such local government for the costs of such program or increased level
of service, except that the Legislature may, bin need not, provide such subvention of
funds for the following mandates:
(a) Legislative mandates requested by the local agency affected;
(b) i egislation defining a new crime or changing an existing definition of a
crime; or
Al, elk EXHIBIT F
(c) Legislative mandates enacted prior to January 1, 1975, or executive orders
or regulations initially implementing legislation enacted prior to January 1, 1975.
Sec. 7. Nothing in this Article shall be construed to impair the ablility of the state
or of any local government to meet its obligations with respect to existing or future
bonded indebtedness.
Sec. 8. As used in this Article and except as otherwise expressly provided herein:
(a) "Appropriations subject to limitation" of the state shall mean any
authorization to expend during a fiscal year the proceeds of taxes levied by or for the
state, exclusive of state subventions for the use and operation of local government (other
than subventions made pursuant to Section 6 of this Article) and further exclusive of
refunds of taxes, benefit payments from retirement, unemployment insurance and
disability insurance funds;
(b) "Appropriations subject to limitation" of an entity of local government
shall mean any authorization to expend during a fiscal year the proceeds of taxes levied by
or for that entity and the proceeds of state subventions to that entity (other than
subventions made pursuant to Section 6 of this Article) exclusive of refunds of taxes;
(c) "Proceeds of taxes" shall include, but not he restricted to, all tax revenues
and the proceeds to an entity of government, from (1) regulatory licenses, user charges,
and user fees to the extent that such proceeds exceed the costs reasonably borne by such
entity in providing the regulation, product, or service, and (ii) the. investment of tax
revenues. With respect to any local government, "proceeds of taxes" shall include
Subventions received from the state, other than pursmnnt to Section 6 of this Article, and,
with respect to the state, proceeds of taxes shall exclude such subventions;
fd) "Local guvertunent" shall mean any city,, county, city and county, school
district, special district, authority, or other political subdivision of or within the state;
(c) "Cost of living" shall mean the Consumer Price Index for the United States
as reported by the United States Department or Labor, or successor agency of the United
states Government; provided, however, that for purposes of Section 1, the change in cost
of living front the preceding veer shall in no event exceed the change in California per
capita personal Meanie from said preceding year;
2 of 3
(a) Debt service.
EXHIBIT F
(f) "Population" of any entity of government, otLt•r than u school district, shall
be determined by a method prescribed by the Legislature, provided that such
determination shall be revised, as necessary, to reflect the periodic census eunducted by
the United States Department of Comineree, or successor agency of the United States
Government. The population of any school district shall be well school district's average
daily attendance as determined by a method prescribed by the Legislature;
(g) "Debt service" shall mean appropriations required to pay the cost of
interest and redemption charges, including the funding of any reserve or sinking fund
required in connection therewith, on indebtedness existing or legally authorized as of
January 1, 1979 or on bonded indebtedness thereafter approved according to law by a vote
of the electors of the issuing entity voting in an election for such purpose.
(h) The "appropriations limit" of each entity of government for each fiscal
year shall be that amount which total annual appropriations subject to limitation may not
exceed under Section 1 and Section 3; provided, however, that the "appropriations limit"
of each entity of government for fiscal year 1978 -79 shall be the total of the
appropriations subject to limitation of such entity for that fiscal year. For fiscal year
1978 -79, state subventions to local governments, exclusive of federal grants, shall be
deemed to have been derived from the proceeds of state taxes.
(0 Except as otherwise provided in Section 5, "appropriations subject to
limitation" shall not include local agency loan funds or indebtedness funds, investment (or
authorizations to invest) funds of the state, or of an entity of local government in
accounts at banks or savings and loan associations or in liquid securities.
Sec. 9. "Appropriations subject to limitation" for each entity of government shall
not include:
(b) Appropriations required for purposes of complying with mandates of the
courts or the federal government which, without discretion, require an expenditure for
additional services or which unavoidably make the providing of existing services more
costly.
(c) Appropriations of any special district which existed on January 1, 1978,
and which did not as of the 1977 -78 fiscal year levy an ad valorem tax on property in
excess of 121 cents per $100 of assessed value; or the appropriations of any special
district then existing or thereafter created by a vote of the people, which is totally funded
by other than the proceeds of taxes.
Sec. IU. This Article shall be effective commencing with the first day of the fiscal
year following its adoption.
See. II. If any appropriation category shall be added to or removed from
appropriations subject to limitation, pursuant to final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction and any appeal therefrom, the appropriations limit shall be adjusted
accordingly. If any section, part, clause or phrase in this Article is for any reason held
invalid or unconstitutional, the remaining portions of this Article shall not be affected but
shall remain in full force and effect.
3 of 3
05/13/19/ 14:29 916 327 -0222 DEMOGRAPHIC UNIT
STATE Q4JJJFOPNI■
DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE
OFFICE OF THE DIRECTOR
STATE CAPITOL ROOM 1145.
SACRAMENTO, CA 958144998
May 1, 1997
Dear Auditor /Controller/Fiscal Officer:
This letter contains PRICE ANDPOPULATION INFORMATION for FY 1997 -1998.
APPROPRIATIONS LIMIT: The Department of Finance is mandated to provide population and
California per capita personal income change data to local jurisdictions to use in calculating their
appropriations limits. The enclosures contain price and population factors for setting your 1997-
1998 appropriations limit. These factors are effective for January 1, 1997 and were calculated on a
base that excludes Federal, and state institutionalized populations noted Enclosure I provides the
change in California's per capita personal income. An example of how to utilize this price factor
and the population percentage change factor in calculating your 1997 -1998 limit is included.
Enclosures II and ILA provide population percentage change for cities and counties, and their
incorporated areas.
POPULATION FACTORS FOR SPECIAL DISTRICTS: Some special districts are required
to establish appropriations limits. These districts should consult the state code for the various
population factors that may be used for purposes pf assessing change in population. Other districts
are exempt under Article XIII B, Section 9(c). This letter may be received by such special districts.
However, it should not be construed as a Department of Finance requirement to establish an
appropriations limit.
POPULATION CERTIFICATION: The certification program applies only to cities and
counties. It is mandated that if a Department of Finance population estimate is greater than the
current certified population, the Department shall automatically file a certified copy with the
Controller not less than 25 days nor more than '30 days after completion of the estimate. The
Department will certify the higher estimate unless it receives a written request not to certify within
25 days of the completion of the estimate. A city or county requesting that their higher estimate not
be certified will remain at the current certified population. The Department of Finance will not
certify a population estimate that is lower than the current certified population unless requested to
do so by a city or a county. The request to not certify must be received by the Department on or
before June 1, 1997.
Questions about population should be addressed to the Demographic Research Unit at (916) 323-
4086.
Sincere
Enclosures
G L. BROWN
Director
Exhibit G
PAGE 01
PETE WILSON. pwpnr
05/13/1997 14:29 916 327 -0222
DEMOGRAPHIC UNIT
Enclosure II
Annual Percent Change in Population Minus Exclusion January 1, 1996
to January 1, 1997 and Total Population January 1, 1997
Total
County Percent Change Population Minus Exclusions Population
City 1996 -97 1 -1.88 1 -1.97 1 -147
ORANGE
ANAHEIM 0.50 293894 295452 295452
BREA 1.04 34892 35254 35254
BUENA PARK 0.25 72888 73072 73072
COSTA MESA 0.32 101529 101888 102574
CYPRESS 1.10 48517 47028 47026
DANA POINT 0,37 36077 36211 36211
FOUNTAIN VALLEY 0.64 54451 54797 54797
FULLERTON 0.35 122370 12 2804 122604
GARDEN GROVE 0.18 151764 152041 152041
HUNTINGTQN BEACH 0.46 18 188518 188518
IRVINE 1.42 126158 127949 129294
LAGUNA BEACH 0.97 23861 24083 24083
LAGUNA HILLS 18.41 25084 29954 29954
LACUNA NIGUEL 1.16 55706 56353 56353
LA HABRA .0.17 54257 54351 54351
LAKE FOREST 0.08 57779 57828 57828
LA PALMA 1.40 15544 15781 15761
LOS AIAMITOS 0.41 11539 11586 11861
MISSION VIEJO 1.88 90138 91922 91922
NEWPORT BEACH 1,13 69246 70030 70030
ORANGE 1.87 120043 122282 122282
PLACENTIA 0.98 45119 45550 45550
SAN CLEMENTE 1.23 '48728 47305 47305
SAN JUAN CAPISTRA 2.11 29023 28635 29635
SANTA ANA 0.13 306511 306981 306981
SEAL BEACH 0.14 25738 25773 26380
STANTON 3.19 31964 32984 32984
TUSTIN 2.83 59101 80776 65287
VILLA PARK 0.69 6382 6439 8439
WESTMINSTER 0.47 82749 83141 84141
YORBA LINDA 1.30 57782 58533 585331
UNINCORPORATED 2.53 178277 180738 185851 TOTAL 1.07 2818920 2646967 2659316
EXcluslens inelude residents in state mental institutions, federal military installations, and state and federal prisons.
Page 1
PAGE 03
06/13/1997 14:29 916- 327 -0222
May 1, 1997 Enclosure 1
Price Factor: Article XIII B specifies that local jurisdictions select their
cost -of- living factor to compute their appropriation limit by a vote of their
governing body. The cost of living factor provided here is per capita personal
income. If the percentage change in per, capita personal income is selected, the
percentage changes to be used in setting the 1997 -98 appropriation limit are:
1997 -98:
Per Capita Change 4.67 percent
Population Change 1.35 percent
Per Capita converted to a ratio:
Population converted to a ratio:
Per Capita Personal Income
Fiscal Percentage change
Year (FY) over prior year
1997 -98 4.67
DEMOGRAPHIC UNIT PAGE 02
Following is an example using sample population change and the change in
California per capita personal income as growth factors in computing a 1997 -98
appropriations limit.
4.67 100
1.0467
100
1.35 100
100 1.0135
Calculation of factor for FY 97 -98: 1.0467 x 1.0135 1.0608