1991/09/10City Ha11~ Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10~ 1991, 5=00 P.M.
PRESENT=
ABSENT=
PRESENT=
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
COUNCIL MEMBERS= Simpson, Daly, Pickler, Ehrle and Hunter
COUNCIL MEMBERS= None
CITY MANAGER= James Ruth
CITY ATTORNEY= Jack White
CITY CLERK= Leonora N. Sohl
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR= Annika Santalahti
ZONING DIVISION MANAGER= Greg Hastings
A complete copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim City Council was
posted at 3=40 p.m. on September 6, 1991 at the Civic Center kiosk, containing
all items as shown herein.
Mayor Hunter called the meeting to order at 3=00 p.m.
REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION= City Attorney Jack White requested a Closed
Session to consider the following items=
a. To confer with its attorney regarding pending litigation pursuant
to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), to wit=
Golden West Baseball Co. vs. City of Anaheim, Orange County Superior
Court Case No. 40-92-46~ Anaheim Stadium Associates vs. City of
Anaheim, et al., Orange County Superior Court Case No. 44-81-74.
b. To meet with and give directions to its authorized representative
regarding labor relations matters - Government Code Section 54957.6.
c. To consider and take possible action upon personnel matters
pursuant to Government Code Section 54957.
d. To confer with its attorney regarding potential litigation
pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(b)(1).
e. To consider and take possible action upon such other matters as
are orally announced by the City Attorney, City Manager or City
Council prior to such recess unless the motion to recess indicates any
of the matters will not be considered in closed session.
By general Consent, the Council recessed into Closed Session. (3=00 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS= The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members being
present, and welcomed those in attendance to the Council meeting. (5=12 p.m.)
INVOCATION= Reverend Stanley Quebe, Zion Lutheran Church, gave the invocation.
601
City Hall. Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 1Or 1991r 5=00 P.M.
FLAG SALUTE= Mayor Pro Tem William Ehrle asked one of the Scouts present from
Troop 1123 to lead the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.
119= PRESENTATION - MUNICIPAL TREASURERS' ASSOCIATION AWARD=
Mayor Hunter presented Charlene Jung, Investment Officer in the City's
Treasurers Office with a plaque, an award from the Municipal Treasurers'
Association of the United States and Canada, awarding Charlene her certified
Municipal Finance Administration Credential. Ms. Jung accepted the plaque and
especially thanked Mary Turner, the City Treasurer, for being there as a role
model and an inspiration for all in the Treasury field.
119= PROCLAMATIONS= The following proclamations were issued by Mayor Hunter
and authorized by the City Council=
Constitution Week in Anaheim, September 17-23, 1991
Emergency Nurses Day in Anaheim, October 2, 1991
Marilyn Skinner accepted the Constitution Week proclamation.
119= DECLARATION OF RECOGNITION= A Declaration of Recognition was unanimously
adopted by the City Council to be presented to Jack Lindquist, President of
Disneyland, honoring Mr. Lindquist for his outstanding services to the
Disneyland and Anaheim community as well as Southern California and commending
him for his successful efforts to further promote the tourist industry. The
Declaration will be presented at a ceremony on September 17, 1991.
119= DECLARATION OF RECOGNITION= A Declaration of Recognition was unanimously
adopted by the City Council and presented to John P. Sanders, Parks Field
Supervisor, upon his retirement from the City after over 28 years of service.
Mayor Hunter and Council Members congratulated and co~nended Mr. Sanders and
thanked him for his dedicated service to the City and citizens of Anaheim.
119= DECLARATION OF RECOGNITION= A Declaration of Recognition was unanimously
adopted by the City Council and presented to George A. Kinney, Parks and
Recreation, upon his retirement from the City after over 30 years of service.
Mayor Hunter and Council Me~bers congratulated and commended Mr. Kinney and
thanked him for his dedicated service to the City and citizens of Anaheim.
119= DECLARATION OF RECOGNITION= A Declaration of Recognition was unanimously
adopted by the City Council to be presented to Mr. Ralph N. Tikker, Maintenance
Department, upon his retirement from the City following over 21 years of
service. Mayor Hunter and Council Members expressed their congratulations to
Mr. Tikker and commended him for his dedicated service to the City and citizens
of Anaheim.
119= DECLARATION OF RECOGNITION= A Declaration of Recognition was unanimously
adopted by the City Council to be presented to Mr. Malcolm D. Parrott,
Maintenance Department, upon his retirement from the City following over 22
years of service. Mayor Hunter and Council Members expressed their
congratulations to Mr. Parrott and commended him for his dedicated service to
the City and citizens of Anaheim.
602
City Hallt Anaheim~ California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1991r 5=00 P~M.
119= DECLARATION OF RECOGNITION= A Declaration of Recognition was unanimously
adopted by the City Council to be presented to Mr. Clifford W. Gamble, Fire
Department, upon his retirement after nearly 30 years of service. Mayor Hunter
and Council Members expressed their congratulations to Mr. Gamble and commended
him for his dedicated service to the City and citizens of Anaheim.
MINUTES~ Council Member Simpson moved to approve the minutes of the regular
meetings held July 9, 1991 and July 16, 1991. Council Member Pickler seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $6,745,281.31 for the
period ending August 30, 1991 and $3,679,893.21 for the period ending September
6, 1991, in accordance with the 1991-92 Budget, were approved.
Mayor Hunter recessed the City Council meeting until after the Redevelopment
Agency and Housing Authority meetings. (5=26 p.m.)
Mayor Hunter reconvened the City Council meeting. (5531 p.m.)
CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR=
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTION= The titles of the following resolutions were
read by the City Manager. (Resolution Nos. (91R-267 through 91R-271, both
inclusive).
Council Member Pickler moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions.
Council Member Simpson seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Council Member Pickler, seconded by Council Member Simpson, the
following items were approved in accordance with the reports, certifications
and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent
Calendar~ Council Member Pickler offered Resolution Nos. 91R-267 through
91R-271, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
Al. 118= The following claims were filed against the City and action taken as
recommended=
Claims rejected and referred to Risk Management=
a. Claim submitted by Harrell D. Pittman for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about April 10, 1991.
b. Claim submitted by Suzanne Ankerstar for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about March 16, 1991.
c. Claim submitted by Bolivar Pineda for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about July 19, 1991.
d. Claim submitted by Domenic & Dots Federico for property damage
sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about February 16,
1991.
603
City Hall. Anaheim. California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1991r 5~00 P.M.
e. Claim submitted by Michael C. Mann for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about July 16, 1991.
f. Claim submitted by Robert G. Williams for bodily injury sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about March 28, 1991.
g. Claim submitted by Gail I. Anderson for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about May 7, 1991.
h. Claim submitted by Jodie Hawkins for bodily injury sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about May 19, 1991.
i. Claim submitted by Anne Wiggens for bodily injury sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about May 14, 1991.
j. Claim submitted by Pam Jung for property damage sustained purportedly
due to actions of the City on or about May 3, 1991.
k. Claim submitted by Sergio Casas for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about July 2, 1991.
1. Claim submitted by Elaine Paolisso for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about August 1, 1991.
m. Claim submitted by Ursula Spano for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about August 23, 1990.
n. Claim submitted by Raymond C. Vanpraag for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about August 7, 1991.
A2. 105: Receiving and filing minutes of the Private Industry Council
meeting held May 23, 1991.
105~ Receiving and filing minutes of the Anaheim Public Library Board meeting
held July 24, 1991.
107= Receiving and filing the Statistical Report Summary ending July 31,
1991, as submitted by the Building Division.
114= Receiving and fil£ng Resolut£on No. 91-74 from the City of La Palma
supporting workers' compensation reform for stress-related injuries.
A3. 150= Authorizing an assessment of Welt Construction, Incorporated, in
the amount of $6,500 for liquidated damages, for not completing the John
Marshall and Eucalyptus Park Picnic Shelters project within the allotted time
for construction~ and approving a Notice of Completion of the construction of
said project by Welt Construction, Incorporated, and authorizing the Mayor to
sign and the City Clerk to file said Notice of Completion.
A4. 101~ Approving a Notice of Completion of the construction of Anaheim
Arena Phase II~ relocation of Phoenix Club Beer Garden, shooting & archery
ranges, and green belt area, and authorizing the Mayor to sign and the City
Clerk to file said Notice of Completion.
604
City Hall, Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1991, 5=00 P.M.
AS. 144= Approving the Right-of-Way Certification for Arterial Highway
Financing Program No. 1297 Lincoln Avenue (Rio Vista Street to Sunkist
Street), and authorizing the Mayor to execute said certification.
A6. 144: Approving the Right-of-Way Certification for Arterial Highway
Financing Program No. 1298 Magnolia Avenue (north City limits to La Palma
Avenue), and authorizing the Mayor to execute said certification.
A7. 144= Approving the Right-of-Way Certification for Arterial Highway
Financing Program No. 1299 Magnolia Avenue (Lincoln Avenue to Crescent
Avenue), and authorizing the Mayor to execute said certification.
A8. 158= Authorizing the payment of $55,200 to the owner, Canex Investments,
pursuant to agreement on file, for the cost of replacing the yard light
standards and barricade posts located at 619 North Anaheim Boulevard - North
Anaheim Boulevard Street Widening Project (R/W 3500-26).
Ag. 135= Approving Contract Change Order No. 2, in the amount of $235,477.60
(in favor of J.L. Etheridge Co.) for the N.G. 'Dad' Miller Clubhouse.
Al0. 123= Approving the First Amendment to Agreement with Terra Nova
Planning and Research, Inc., in the amount of $8,800 for the completion of
additional environmental assessment of Katella Avenue critical intersections
(Katella/Harbor, Katella/Haster and Katella/State College).
All. 155: Approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopting the
Mitigation Monitoring Program for Critical Intersection at Lakeview
Avenue/La Palma Avenue, pursuant to Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources
Code.
Submitted was report dated September 3, 1991, from the Public Works Director
and City Engineer.
Mr. David Chavez, 4420 E. La Palma, Anaheim. He owns the single-family home
in the area of the critical intersection. Under the procedure proposed the
Public Works Department would like to relocate or remove the house. He and
his wife have discussed the matter and would like to go on record that they
would prefer to have the house completely removed and rebuilt instead of
relocated. They would like to have a home and business combination at that
location. They would live in the present residence while the smaller building
is constructed. In that way it would not create a hardship. His wife has
multiple sclerosis and that is one of the reasons for their request. The new
residence would be no larger than 1200 square feet including the garage. In
the last 21 years, they have been in business at that location and they have
lived there for 30 years. They are expecting to be treated justly in this
matter.
Mayor Hunter. Ne assured Mr. Chavez he would be treated fairly. Staff will
be coming back with a recommendation and staff and the Council want to work
with him.
605
City Hall. Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10~ 1991~ 5=00 P.M.
A12. 155= Approving a Mitigated Negative Declaration and adopting the
Mitigation Monitoring Program for Modified Critical Intersection at Tustin
Avenue/La Palma Avenue, pursuant to Section 21081.6 of the Public Resources
Code.
A13. 123= Approving a Signal Maintenance Agreement with the Cities of
Fullerton and Placentia for traffic signal maintenance at the intersection of
Orangethorpe Avenue and Placentia Avenue. (Anaheim's share for 25% of the
maintenance cost per year is approximately $1250.)
A14. 123= RESOLUTION NO. 91R-267= A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT TO PURCHASE
PROPERTY AND ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED THERETO (Del Matio).
158= Authorizing the Real property Section to open an escrow with First
American Title Insurance Company not to exceed 60 days~ and authorizing the
Accounting Officer to issue a warrant in the amount of $104,500 (the purchase
price) to First American Title Insurance Company to be deposited into escrow
for payment to Alfred and Josephine Del Matio~ and authorizing the Senior Real
Property Agent to execute the escrow instruments and any related documents in
connection with the acquisition of two parcels of land required for the State
College/Orangewood Critical Intersection Project, located on the south side of
Orangewood, east of State College (R/W 6000-06 and R/W 6000-07).
A15. 160= Accepting the low bid of Computer Bay, in the amount of $34,002
for computer hardware equipment, in accordance with Bid ~497S.
A16. 160= Accepting the low bid of Pirelli Cable Corporation, in an amount
not to exceed $23,540 for 20,000 feet of 600-volt URD secondary wire, in
accordance with Bid ~4966.
A17. 153= RESOLUTION NO. 91R-268= A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AND THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION - GENERAL UNIT.
(Article 17 - Assistant Reprographics/Mail Supervisor.)
A18. 153= RESOLUTION NO. 91R-269= A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A LETTER OF UNDERSTANDING BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AND THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION - CLERICAL UNIT.
(Appendix A - Police Cormnunication8 Supervisor.)
A19. 175= Approving Anaheim's participation in a water conservation program
known as Best Management Practices, and authorizing the General Manager to
execute the Memorandum of Understanding (MOU).
A20. 155= Approving a Negative Declaration, pursuant to CEQA findings, for
the Fairmont Substation Power Equipment addition, (to upgrade existing
substation with power transformer, metal clad switchgear building, capacitor
bank and steel bus and switch structure) located at the southeast corner of
Fairmont Boulevard and Santa Aha Canyon Road.
606
City Hall, Anaheimr California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1991, 5:00 P.M.
A2%. 153: RESOLUTION NO. 91R~270~ A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 91R-49 WHICH ESTABLISHED RATES OF
COMPENSATION FOR CLASSES ASSIGNED TO THE GENERAL UNIT REPRESENTED BY THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES ASSOCIATION. (To create the two new
classifications of Community Development Specialist and Graphic Designer,
effective August 30, 1991.)
A22. 123: Approving the Sixth Amendment to Agreement with Eric W. Gruver,
Ph.D, to cover the period of August 1, 1991 through July 31, 1992, for
psychological evaluations of applicants for Police Officer, Police Officer
Reserve and Jailer.
A23. 123: Approving an agreement with Anaheim General Hospital to allow the
Police Department and the hospital to work together on the second annual
'Freedom Run' to be held on September 22, 1991.
A24. 123: Approving an agreement with Community Services Programs, Inc., in
an amount not to exceed $49,620 for the period of July 1, 1991 through June
30, 1992, to provide professional counseling services to the citizens of
Anaheim in specialized areas of juvenile delinquency prevention, family
crisis, child victimization (including child abuse) sexual molestation, and
rape trauma.
A25. 156: RESOLUTION NO. 91R-271: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM DESIGNATING THE CHIEF OF POLICE AS THE PERSON AUTHORIZED TO
RECEIVE, ON BEHALF OF THE CITY, FORFEITED MONEY AND OTHER PROPERTY IN
CONNECTION WITH ENFORCEMENT OF LAWS CONCERNING CONTROLLED SUBSTANCES.
A26. 123: Approving an Agreement with Orange County Council on Aging, Inc.,
for the provision of ombudsman services to elderly persons in long-term care
facilities, and authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute said
Agreement.
A27. 123: Approving the First Amendment to Agreement with Major League
Softball, Incorporated, in an annual amount not to exceed $122,550 for the
purpose of providing athletic umpiring service for the adult softball program.
123: Approving the First Amendment to Agreement with Major League Softball,
Incorporated, in an annual amount not to exceed $132,225 for the purpose of
providing athletic scorekeeping service for the adult softball program.
106: Increasing expenditure account 01-274-6340 and increasing revenue
account 01-274-3221 by $13,695 in connection with the Major League Softball
Inc. Agreement.
A28. 123: Approving the First Amendment to Lease Agreement with Anaheim
Chamber of Commerce Building Limited Partnership, from October 13, 1991
through March 13, 1993, for office space at 100 South Anaheim Boulevard -
Labor Relations.
A29. 106: Amending Fiscal Year 1991/92 Resource Allocation Plan revenues and
expenditures as shown on Schedule III, implementing the additional program
reductions necessary to balance the budget.
607
C£t¥ Ha~l. Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1991. 5:00 P.M.
A30. 178: Receiving and filing Resolution 8331 levying taxes for the fiscal
year commencing July 1, 1991 and ending June 30, 1992 for the purposes of the
Metropolitan Water District of Southern California.
Roll Call Vote on Resolutions Nos. 91R-267 through 91R-271:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Simpson, Daly, Pickler, Ehrle and Hunter
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 91R-267 through 91R-271, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
Motions Carried.
End of Consent Calendar.
BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - APPOINTMENTS/REAPPOINTMENTS TO VARIES TERMS:
A31. 105: MOTHER COLONY HOUSE ADVISORY BOARD:
Reappointing Advisory Board members to a three 4-year term, expiring
December 31, 1994, (Dahl, Mitchell and Smith).
Council Member Pickler nominated Earl Dahl, Florence Mitchell and Joy Smith
for reappointments~ there being no further nominations, nominations were
closed.
Earl Dahl, Florence Mitchell and Joy Smith were thereupon unanimously
reappointed to the Mother Colony House Advisory Board for the term ending
December 31, 1994.
A32. 105: ANAHEIM PRIVATE INDUSTRY COUNCIL CPIC~:
Appointing two new members to the Private Industry Council, private sector
category, from the list submitted by the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce
(Chart A).
Council Member Pickler nominated Tony Adams~ Council Member Daly nominated
Paul Bostwick~ there being no further nominations, nominations were closed.
Tony Adams and Paul Bostwick were thereupon unanlmously appointed to the
Anaheim Private Industry Council for the private sector category both for two
year terms.
Appointing two new members to the Private Industry Council, public sector
category educational agencies 'Chart B'.
Council Member Daly nominated Tom Harris and Tom Kurtz~ there being no further
nominations, nominations were closed.
Tom Harris and Tom Kurtz were thereupon unanimously appointed to the Private
Industry Council for the public sector educational categories, Mr. Harris for
a three-year term and Mr. Kurtz for a four-year term.
608
City Nallr Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1991. 5=00 P.M.
Reappointing Private Industry Council Member Doug Gibson, private sector
category for a four-year term.
Council Member Pickler nominated Doug Gibson for reappointment in the Private
Sector Category~ there being no further nominations, nominations were closed.
Doug Gibson was thereupon unanimously reappointed to the Private Industry
Council, Private Sector Category for a four-year term.
A33. 105= BOARDS AND COMMISSIONS - APPOINTMENT/REAPPOINTMENT TO TERMS ENDING
JUNE 30r 1991=
These appointments/reappointments were continued from the meeting of August 6,
1991, to this date.
Mayor Hunter stated he would first like to act on appointments to the Planning
Commission before the rest of the Boards and Commissions.
PLANNING COMMISSION FOR NEW TERMS EXPIRING JUNE 30~ 199§= (Boydstun,
Feldhaus) Council Member Ehrle nominated Steve Bristol (currently a member of
the Community Redevelopment Commission)~ Mayor Hunter nominated Bob Zemel~
Council Member Daly nominated Phyllis Boydstun.
There being no further nominations, nominations were closed.
A roll call vote was then taken on the nominees in the order in which the
nominations were made.
Steve Bristol - Ayes= Simpson, Daly, Pickler, Ehrle, Hunter
Bob Zemel - Ayes~ Simpson, Ehrle, Hunter
Noes= Daly, Pickler
Phyllis Boydstun - Ayes= Daly, Pickler,
Abstained= Simpson, Ehrle, Hunter
Steve Bristol and Bob Zemel were thereupon appointed to the Planning
Commission for terms ending June 30, 1995.
Council Member Pickler stated as he votes on these appointments/reappointments
he is looking to the following year which is an election year. At one time,
he believes the City had an ordinance or resolution stating that any person
appointed to City Boards or Commissions, if they decide to run for a City
Council seat, that the Council at that time ask for their resignation or by
motion remove that individual or if that person desires could submit his/her
resignation. He would like to follow through on that before continuing with
all of the appointments.
Mayor Hunter. He feels it is a separate issue. The Council was going to
allow each Council Member to appoint a member to the Planning Commission. As
the public is aware, for the last several years, he has not had an appointee
on the Commission. His last appointee was John Carusillo who was subsequently
removed from the Commission.
609
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1991, 5=00 P.M.
City Attorney Jack White. He clarified it would require a separate
ordinance. In 1972, the Council adopted such an ordinance that provided upon
filing nomination papers for the City Council, any member of a board or
commission would automatically be deemed to have vacated his/her position.
The rationale at that time was that since members of the City Council are not
allowed to serve on boards and commissions and in order to maintain the
independence and freedom from potential political decisions on boards and
commissions, that it would be appropriate that board and commission members
not be running for office at the same time as serving in those advisory
capacities to the Council. The ordinance was challenged in court by a
Planning Commissioner (John Seymour) and the ordinance was appealed by the
City Attorney's Office. It was later repealed by the Council in 1974, after
the ordinance repealing it was offered by then City Council Member Seymour.
There was such an ordinance in place at one time and could be again if the
Council wishes by adopting an ordinance.
Council Member Pickler. He asked the City Attorney to bring an ordinance back
to the Council at a future time. This issue is of concern to him and he
(Pickler) feels it would be appropriate to consider it once again.
Council Member Ehrle. With Mr. Bristol being appointed to the Planning
Commission, that leaves a vacancy on the Community Redevelopment Commission.
He asked if it would not then be appropriate to fill that position at this
time.
City Attorney White. By law when a vacancy occurs for any reason on boards
and commissions, it must be posted for a minimum of 10 days by the City Clerk
to allow people with interest to express that interest. The City Clerk will
post and then bring back the vacancy created by Mr. Bristol.
COMMUNITY REDEVELOPMENT COMMISSION FOR NEW TERMS EXPIRING JUNE 30. 1995=
(Doty, McMillan)
Council Member Daly nominated James Vanderbilt~ Council Member Ehrle nominated
Frank Feldhaus~ Council Member Hunter nominated Phyllis Boydstun~ Council
Member Daly nominated Paul McMillan.
There being no further nominations, nominations were closed.
A roll call vote was then taken on the nominees in the order in which the
nominations were made.
JAMES VANDERBILT - Ayes~ Daly, Pickler
Noes= Ehrle, Hunter
Abstained= .Simpson
FRANK FELDHAUS - Ayes= Simpson, Ehrle, Hunter
Noes= Daly
Abstained= Pickler
PHYLLIS BOYDSTUN - Ayes= Simpson, Pickler, Ehrle, Hunter
Noes= Daly
610
City Hall, Anaheim~ California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1991~ 5=00 P.M.
PAUL MCMILLIAN - Ayes= Daly, Pickler
Noes= Ehrle, Hunter
Abstained= Simpson
Frank Feldhaus and Phyllis Boydstun were thereupon appointed to the community
Redevelopment Commission for the terms expiring June 30, 1995.
COMMUNITy SERVICES BOARD FOR NEW TERMS EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1995= (Hibbard,
Ready, Sofia)
Council Member Ehrle nominated all three candidates - Mary Hibbard, Vance
Ready, Michael Sofia - for reappointment to the Community Services Board.
There being no further nominations, nominations were closed.
Mary Hibbard, Vance Ready and Michael Sofia were thereupon unanimously
reappointed to the Convnunity Services Board for the terms expiring June 30,
1995.
HOUSING COMMISSION FOR NEW TERMS EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1995= (Cook, Garda)
Mayor Hunter nominated Norman Cook and Edward Garda for reappointment to the
Housing Commission.
There being no further nominations, nominations were closed.
Norman Cook and Edward Garda were thereupon unanimously reappointed to the
Housing Commission for the terms expiring June 30, 1995.
ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD FOR NEW TERMS EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1995=
Risten)
(Flocken,
MOTION=. Council Member Hunter moved to rescind the Economic Development Board
and direct the City Attorney to draft an ordinance and submit it to the
Council which will abolish the board.
Before further action was taken, Council Member Ehrle stated that
approximately five years ago he made the motion to create the Economic
Development Board (EDB). Several meetings were held and the board was very
active for a while. He concurs in the Mayor's motion, the primary reason
being in the past few years there has been the emergence of the Private
Industry Council (PIC). PIC has done an outstanding job doing many of the
functions originally envisioned for the EDB.
Council Member Daly. He has no problem with an ordinance being submitted to
the Council but he would also like a staff report as to what the City has been
doing in the area of economic development in the last few years. He knows
there is at least one paid staff person involved. He thought it was a great
idea five years ago, but if it is no longer necessary, or for some reason does
not function, he would like to know the reasons and possibly fix it. There is
a need for stronger economic development in the City. It may be that PIC does
what the EDB does but he would like the staff report to address that.
611
City Hall, Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1991. 5:00 P.M.
Mayor Hunter. His understanding is the board has not met in months. There is
a board but it is not doing anything and it should be revised, abolished or
form something more conducive to what the Council wants to do.
City Manager Ruth. The responsibility has been transferred to the Community
Development Department through the budget process. Staff will come back with
a report and recommendation at the next Council meeting.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion, seconded by Council Member
Simpson clarified as follows: Directing the City Attorney to draft an
ordinance to abolish the EDB with a report and recommendation to be submitted
by staff. MOTION CARRIED.
LIBRARY ~O_~RD FOR NEW TERM EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1995: (Whorton)
Council Member Daly nominated Barbara Whorton for reappointment; there being
no further nominations, nominations were closed.
Barbara Whorton was thereupon unanimously reappointed to the Library Board for
the term ending June 30, 1995.
PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD FOR NEW TERMS EXPIRING JUNE 30, 1995: (Kiefer, White)
Council Member Ehrle. In the past four or five months, the City has faced a
number of public hearings on utility issues - water issues, water surcharge,
electric rate stabilization, utility undergrouding, etc. - many issues which
have been confronting the Public Utilities Board especially the drought
surcharge. There have been public hearings before the board and a number of
citizens have come forward expressing concern. The Public Utilities Board
consists of seven members who have done an excellent job~ however, he feels
there are many citizens in the community who want an opportunity to serve.
MOTION: Council Member Ehrle thereupon moved that the declare all seven
Public Utilities Board seats vacant at this time for a period of thirty days
and at that time each Council Member have the ability to appoint his own
member to the board and that the Council majority appoint the remaining two
members.
Before further action was taken, Council Member Ehrle stated he feel8 it is
time for a reorganization of the Public Utilities Board. There are many who
want to sit on the Board. It is in the best interest of the City to
reorganize the board to reflect the philosophy of the Council. Each Council
member should have the right to appoint a person. He would like to declare
all seats vacant and encourage current members to seek reappointment along
with the public in general.
Council Member Pickler. Before he seconds the motion, he would like to have
some discussion on the issue. If the Council is going to make any changes,
that they maintain the present Public Utilities Board until they decide what
they are going to do and at that time make the changes. If the board is
vacated at this time, there are too many things going on requiring action.
Mayor Hunter. He believes Mayor Pro Tem Ehrle is saying the same thing - that
612
City Hallm Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10r 1991r 5=00 P.M.
all Board members terms by motion of the Council would be up for expiration
and the Board members could ask for re-application instead of waiting for the
terms to cease. He asked if that was possible to do.
City Attorney White. If the Council desires to accomplish that result, the
appropriate way would be to, by motion, vacate all the existing positions
effective thirty days from now or four weeks from now so it will occur on a
meeting date. That would allow existing members to continue to serve during
that period so that there is no vacuum or gap. It would also give
instructions to the City Clerk that she has to post the vacancies to allow
those interested to be given the right to apply. With regard to the concept
that each individual Council Member appoint one member, he suggested that be
phrased in terms of nominating members with confirmation of the appointments
by the City Council. The Charter requires all appointments to board and
commissions be by the City Council as a whole allowing each member to nominate
but that the Council make the actual confirmation of the appointment.
Council Member Ehrle. He would like his motion to incorporate the City
Attorney's suggestions - that in thirty days declaring the positions open and
to have the City Clerk post the openings incorporating the City Attorney's
language of confirmation by the Council.
Council Member Daly. He is going to speak against the motion. What Council
Member Ehrle is saying implies the Board has not been doing a good job. He
feels it has been doing a good job under some trying times for the Utility
industry. Both water and power rates are very controversial right now. He
suggested if Council Member Ehrle wants to bring on new bodies he can nominate
them. A couple of members have only been on the board for the last couple of
years. The two people up for reappointments have served for quite some time.
To imply the board has not been doing a good job is wrong.
Mayor Hunter. He feels they are doing a good job as well as all boards and
cor~issions, but sometimes it is good to take a fresh look. He will second
Council Member Ehrle's motion.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion by Council Member Ehrle,
subsequently seconded by Council Member Hunter and failed to carry by the
following vote:
Ayes: Ehrle, Hunter
Noes: Simpson, Daly, Pickler
Council Member Ehrle then nominated Ian Skidmore; Mayor Hunter nominated Joe
White; Council Member Pickler nominated Carl Kiefer.
There being no further nominations, nominations were closed.
A roll call vote was then taken on the nominees in the order in which they
were nominated.
IAN SKIDMORE - Ayes:
Noes:
Abstained:
Daly, Ehrle, Hunter
Pickler
Simpson
613
City Hallt Anaheimt California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1991. 5~00 P.M.
JOE WHITE - Ayes= Simpson, Daly, Ehrle, Hunter
Abstained= Pickler
CARL KIEFER - Ayes=
Noes=
Abstained~
Simpson, Pickler
Daly
Ehrle, Hunter
Ian Skidmore was thereupon appointed to the Public Utilities Board for the
term ending June 30, 1995, and Joe White was reappointed to the Public
Utilities Board for the term ending June 30, 1995.
See further discussion on this subject later in the meeting.
SENIOR CITIZENS COMMISSION FOR NEW TERMS EXPIRINO JUNE 30. 1994= (Sullivan,
Nelson)
Mayor Hunter nominated Ernest Sullivan and Muriel Nelson for reappointment to
the Senior Citizens Commission.
City Clerk Sohl stated she believe that one did not wish to be reappointed -
Muriel Nelson. Council Member Daly moved that nominations be closed with
Ernest Sullivan being the only nominee at this time and further recommending
that the remaining two terms to be filled on the Senior Citizens Commission
(Nelson - term expiring June 30, 1994) and the unscheduled vacancy (Sherman)
for the term expiring June 30, 1993 be continued to the next regular Council
meeting.
Nominations were closed~ Ernest Sullivan was thereupon unanimously reappointed
to the Senior Citizens Commission for the term expiring June 30, 1994.
The remaining two vacancies (term ending June 30, 1994 and unscheduled vacancy
for the term ending June 30, 1993) were continued to Tuesday, September 24,
1991.
RE-OPENING - PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD APPOINTMENTS/REAPPOINTMENTS=
Council Member Pickler. He referred to Council Member Ehrle's previous motion
which failed to carry declaring the Beats on the Public Utilities Board (PUB)
vacant. That type of action is something he had discussed previously, that
each Council Member be able to appoint a member to the Board with the approval
of the Council on two of the commissions - the Planning Commission and the
Public Utilities Board. He had misinterpreted the motion and his vote was
wrong. He should have voted in favor. He asked what action the Council could
take to do so.
City Attorney White. Anyone who voted against the motion can move to
reconsider it. If seconded and adopted with a majority vote, the issue will
again be in front of the Council.
MOTION= Council Member Pickler moved to reconsider the previous motion.
Council Member Ehrle seconded the motion.
City Attorney White. The motion should be restated. It apparently failed and
is now again under discussion.
614
City Hallt Anaheimt California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1991, 5=00 P.M.
Council Member Ehrle. His original motion was to have the Council consider
all seats on the Public Utilities Board vacant in thirty days at which time
each member of the Council would bare the right to nominate a member with the
consensus of the Council and the two remaining members would be at large again
with the consensus of the Council and that the City Clerk post the vacancies
within the next thirty days.
City Attorney White. He would suggest a date of four weeks to make it
contemporaneous with a Council meeting and that would be October 8, 1991.
Council Member Ehrle. He asked if this would then supercede the appointments
of Mr. White and Mr. Skidmore~ City Attorney White. All the positions would
be vacant including theirs. Right now the Council is only considering
whether to reconsider the motion.
MOTION= Council Member Pickler moved that the previous motion by Council
Member Ehrle which failed to carry be reconsidered by the Council at this
time. Council Member Ehrle seconded the motion. Council Members Daly and
Simpson voted no. MOTION CARRIED.
MOTION= Council Member Ehrle again offered his motion to have the Council
consider all seats on the Public Utilities Board vacant in thirty days at
which time each member of the Council would have the opportunity to nominate a
member to the Board with the consensus of the Council and that the two
remaining members would be at large with the consensus of the Council and that
the City Clerk post the vacancies within the next thirty days. Council Member
Hunter seconded the motion. The motion carried by the following vote=
Ayes= Ehrle, Pickler, Hunter
Noes= Simpson, Daly
City Attorney White then stated so that everyone is clear, relative to the two
appointments made tonight of Mr. Skidmore and Mr. White - Mr. White is on the
commission already and Mr. Skidmore will serve until at least October 8, 1991
at which time all positions, including tonight's appointments, will be deemed
vacant. On the agenda of October 8, 1991, will be an item concerning
appointment of all seven Public Utilities Board members.
Council Member Simpson. He asked if that date could be changed because he will
not be present on October 8, 1991. He asked that it come back at the meeting
of October 22, 1991.
Council Member Ehrle added and incorporated that the current board be in
existence until that time~ City Attorney White concurred. That is the way he
understood it from the original offering of the motion.
MOTION= Council Member Simpson moved that any action to be taken on the motion
by Council Member Ehrle relative to the Public Utilities Board as previously
stated be continued to October 22, 1991. Council Member Hunter seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED UNANIMOUSLY.
City Attorney White added and that all current members continue to serve until
that date~ Mayor Hunter stated that is to be incorporated in the motion.
615
City Hallt Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1991, 5~00 P.M.
ITEM B1 FROM THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR MEETING OF AUGUST 22. 1991 - DECISION
DATE= AUGUST 29. 1991. INFORMATION ONLY - APPEAL pERIOD ~NUS SEPTEMBER 13,
1991=
B1.
179= VARIANCE NO. 4137t CATEGORICALLY EXEMPT, CLASS 5=
OWNER= O. RICHARD HABEGGER, 4932 Budlong Street, Anaheim, CA 92807.
LOCATION= 4932 E. Budlong Street. Property is approximately .11 acre
located on the south side of Budlong Street, approximately 100 feet
east of the centerline of Viola Street.
Waiver of maximum lot coverage to construct a 198 square foot room
addition.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR=
Variance No. 4137 APPROVED (ZA91-35).
End of the Zoning Administrator Items.
ITEMS B2 - B6 FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF AUGUST 26r 1991~
INFORMATION ONLY - APPEAL PERIOD ENDS SEPTEMBER 17~ 1991=
B2. 179= WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3446 AND
NEGATIVE DECLARATION=
OWNER= JOMO'S INC., 12459 Beach Blvd., Stanton, CA 90680
AGENT= J. H. JOHNSON, PRESIDENT, 12459 Beach Blvd., Stanton, CA
90680.
LOCATION= 3478 East Orangethorpe Avenue. Property is approximately
2.91 acres on the south side of Orangethorpe Avenue, approximately 900
feet east of the centerline of Miller Street.
To permit on-premise sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages in an
approximate 5,000 square-foot enclosed bar and grill with waiver of
minimum number of parking spaces.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION=
CUP NO. 3446 GRANTED (PC91-131) for one year, (5 yes votes, 2 no
votes).
Waiver of code requirement APPROVED.
Approved Negative Declaration
B3. 179= WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT, CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3441 AND
NEGATIVE DECLARATION, WAIVER OF COUNCIL POLICy NO. 543=
OWNER= JULIUS WILLIAMS, 1240 N. VAN BUREN, 2113, Anaheim, CA 92807.
AGENT= ROBERT F. TORRES, 1240 N. VAN BUREN, 2113, Anaheim, CA 92807.
LOCATION= 1024-1030 North Kemp Street. Property is approximately
0.31 acre located on the east side of Kemp Street and approximately
350 feet north of the centerline of La Palma Avenue.
To permit a l~-unit senior citizen's apartment complex with waiver of
maximum lot coverage, minimum building site area, minimum number of
open parking spaces and minimum structural setback.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION~
CUP NO. 3441 DENIED (PC91-132) (7 yes votes).
Waiver of code requirement DENIED.
Waiver of Council Policy No. 543 DENIED.
Denied Negative Declaration.
616
C~t¥ HalL, ~naheim, california -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1991. 5=00 P.M.
A letter of appeal was submitted by the Agent, Robert Torres. Public hearing
on today's agenda, see item D2.
~4. 179= WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENTm CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3434 AND
NEGATIVE DECLARATION=
OWNER= DORRY PLOTKIN, 11819 E. Firestone Blvd., Norwalk, CA 90650.
AGENT= LLOYD L. LOWRY, TRUSTEE, P.O. Box 25448, Anaheim, CA
92825-5448.
LOCATIONs 300 North Wilshire Avenue. Property is approximately 0.43
acre on the north side of Wilshire Avenue, approximately 660 feet
southeast of the centerline of Loara Street. To permit a church in an
existing office building with waivers of minimum number of parking
spaces and minimum dimensions of parking spaces (deleted).
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION=
CUP NO. 3434 GRANTED (PC91-133) for three years (7 yes votes).
Waiver of code requirement GRANTED.
Approved Negative Declaration.
Council Member Daly noted that there was some opposition at the Planning
Commission hearing. He asked what the concerns were.
Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator. There has always been citizen concern
with commercial activities on the property - after hour businesses and things
of that nature. They have shown up consistently on the project partially
related to the maintenance of some of the properties along that stretch.
Greg Hastings, Zoning Division Manager. He clarified that there were three
persons present in opposition. The concern revolved around lack of landscaping
and hours of operation of the church. The applicant did indicate there would
be no night activity.
Council Member Daly. He could not tell from the staff report if the Planning
Commission attempted to add conditions in response to citizen concerns. There
are some conditions that deal with landscaping but he did not see any regarding
hours of operation. It is stated that the congregation gathering shall be
limited to Sundays, holiday and evenings.
Annika Santalahti. Condition No. 7 limited the congregational gatherings to
Sundays, holidays and evenings only until 9=00 p.m. with a maximum of twenty
participants unless otherwise permitted by City staff and that related to
parking. Other conditions relative to landscaping are standard ones, Condition
Nos. 9 and 12.
Council Member Daly asked if there was a mechanism to make sure that the
landscaping is being maintained.
Annika Santalahti. They do not in the sense that staff does not go out and
look at it. If they receive complaints or it comes to somebody's attention,
they will do so. They rely on'the owner to do the maintenance unless there are
complaints or there is a code enforcement action.
617
City Hall, Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1991, 5=00 P.M.
Council Member Daly. Because there is a three-year time frame, the best thing
would be to review the situation in three years to see how they are doing.
BS. 179~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2090 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION ~PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED)=
OWNER= HARVEY S. OWEN, 11061 Huntinghorn, Santa Ana, CA 92705.
AGENT= KEVIN T. YOUNG, 1160 North Kraemer Blvd., Anaheim, CA 92806.
LOCATION= 1160 North Kraemer Blvd. Property is approximately 0.9
acre on the east side of Kraemer Boulevard approximately 242 feet
south of the centerline of Coronado Street.
Petitioner requests a retroactive extension of time or deletion of a
condition of approval requiring annual time extensions to retain a
public dance hall.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSIONs
CUP NO. 2090 GRANTED, to be reviewed once every three years (PC91-134)
(7 yes votes).
No action taken on previously approved Negative Declaration.
B6. 179= CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3025 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION ~PREVIOUSLY
APPROVED)=
OWNER= WINSTON INDUSTRIAL PROPERTIES, 2201 E. Winston, Suite A,
Anaheim, CA 92806.
AGENT= JEFFERY W. STOLPP, 2201 E. Winston Rd., Suite Q, Anaheim, CA
92805.
LOCATION= 2201 East Winston Rd., Suite Q. Property is approximately
4.7 acres located on the north side of Winston Road approximately 980
feet east of the centerline of State College Boulevard.
To permit continued operation of an existing church with waiver of
minimum number of parking spaces.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION=
CUP NO. 3025 GRANTED, for three years to expire 7/6/94 (PC91-135) (7
yes votes).
No action taken on previously approved Negative Declaration.
End of the Planning Commission items.
B7. 179= ORDINANCE NO. $255 - ¢INTRODUCTION)= Amending Title 18 to rezone
property under Reclassification No. 90-91-28, located at 300 North Anaheim
Boulevard, from the CG zone to the CL zone.
Council Member Hunter offered Ordinance No. 5255 for first reading. Refer to
Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 5255= AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
B8. 155= ORDINANCE NOS. 5253 AND 5254 FOR ADOPTION=
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES= The titles of the following ordinances were
read by the City Clerk. (Ordinance Nos. 5253 and 5254)
Council Member Pickler moved to waive the reading in full of the ordinances.
Council Member Hunter seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
618
City Hal~ Anaheim~ California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1991. 5:00 P.M.
Council Member Pickler offered Ordinance No. 5253 for adoption, adopting
Specific Plan No. 90-4 and Ordinance No. 5254 for adoption, adopting Zoning and
Development Standards. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 5253: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING
(SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 90-4, MOUNTAIN PARK).
ORDINANCE NO. 5254: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO CHAPTER 18.76 RELATING TO ZONING
AND DEVELOPMENT STANDARDS FOR SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 90-4 (SP 90-4) ZONE. (MOUNTAIN
PARK)°
Roll Call Votes
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Simpson, Daly, Pickler, Ehrle and Hunter
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance Nos. 5253 and 5254 duly passed and adopted.
ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST:
Dominic Tomaiulo, 116 W. Simmons Avenue, Anaheim. He spoke relative to the
recycling trash barrels where a citizen had the option of having two 60-gallon
containers or one 110-gallon container. At that time there was no indication
whether the person getting two barrels would have to pay more. He then briefed
the current fee structure for the two containers, ll0-gallon and 60-gallon. In
his calculations, it will cost $6.49 more a month to have two 60-gallon
containers than the 110-gallon container. Those using the 60-gallon containers
are the elderly, disabled and women living alone. He maintained that the fee
structure is out of line and it needs to be revised. He feels the proper fee
should be .10 a gallon for any type of barrel. The present system is not fair
and equitable. He would like to have it corrected before the new rate schedule
starts October 1, 1991.
Mayor Hunter. He asked staff to look into the matter and contact Mr.
Tomaiulo.
City Manager Ruth. They will investigate the matter through the Maintenance
Director and report back to the Council.
CHAIRS IN THE CUSTOMER SERVICE AREA CIVIC CENTER:
Council Member Ehrle. He has received a couple of phone calls and also it has
been brought to his attention by City staff that the chairs located in the
Utility Customer Service area on the 1st floor of the Civic Center are very low
creating difficulty for seniors and the public in general. Since there is no
money in the General Fund to buy new chairs, he suggested that the Public
Utilities Department may be able to assist.
City Manager Ruth. He will have staff check into the matter and determine what
can be done.
619
City Hal~ Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1991. 5=00 P.M.
C2. 106= ORDINANCE CREATING BUDGET ADVISORY COMMISSION/APPOINTMENTS= Adding
new Section 1.04.997 to Chapter 1.04 of Title I of the Anaheim Municipal Code
establishing a Budget Advisory. Commission.
Remaining appointments to the Budget Advisory Commission are to be made b~
Mayor Hunter and Council Member Daly.
Council Member Ehrle. Last week, he had appointed one of the premier
economists in Orange County or Southern California, Jim Doti to the
commission. Since that time, he has spoken to Mr. Doti who explained he does
not feel he would have the time necessary to devote to the position now that he
is president of Cha~xnan University (formerly Chapman College). However, he had
the opportunity to speak to Mrs. Lynne Doti and, after being apprised of her
extensive credentials, would like to appoint Mrs. Doti to the Budget Advisory
Commission. He thereupon gave her resume to the City Clerk for the record.
Mayor Hunter. His last appointee is to be Leon Alexander, an Anaheim resident,
a product of Anaheim's schools and Corporate Counsel for Discount Tires.
Council Member Daly.
resident of the City.
Clerk.
His last appointee is Shirley McCracken, a 20 year
Her resume had previously been submitted to the City
City Attorney White. If the ordinance establishing the commission is adopted
at the Council's next meeting .(September 24, 1991), also on the agenda at that
time staff would propose to have an item to confirm all of the nominations made
and slot each of the ten individuals into the staggered four-year terms created
under the ordinance. The ordinance as proposed is consistent with all other
City boards and commissions which creates staggered four-year terms. If the
Council slots those individuals into each of the terms, that would conclude the
business necessary to establish the commission.
Council Member Simpson offered Ordinance No. 5256 for first reading. Refer to
Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 5256= AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADDING NEW SECTION
1.04.997 TO CHAPTER 1.04 OF TITLE i OF THE ANA~IEIM MUNICIPAL CODE ESTABLISHING
A BUDGET ADVISORY COMMISSION.
D1. 1555 CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 308.
GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 320~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 90-91-26, WAIVER OF CODE
REQUIREMENTr CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3415=
OWNER= IDM Corporation, 5150 E. Pacific Coast Hwy., Long Beach, CA
90804
LOCATION/REQUEST= The property is located at the northeast corner of
Brookhurst Street and Gramercy Avenue and is approximately 7.5 acres.
The request is to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan to
redesignate subject property from the existing General Industrial
designation to the Medium Density Residential designation.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 90-91-26= To reclassify subject property from
the ML (Limited Industrial) zone to RM-1200 (Residential,
620
City Ha~, Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1991. 5~00 P.M.
Multiple-Family) or a less intense zone.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3415~ To permit a 338 unit, 3 and 4 story
deck-type 'affordable' housing apartment complex with waivers of
minimum building site area and permitted identification signage.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSIONs
GPA NO. 320 DENIED (PC91-101) (5 yes votes, i no vote, and I absent).
RECLASS NO. 90-91-26 DENIED (PC91-102).
CUP NO. 3415 DENIED (PC91-103).
Waiver of code requirement DENIED.
Approved EIR NO. 308.
Informational item at the meeting of August 6, 1991, Item B2.
HEARING SET ON=
A letter of appeal was submitted by the owner, IDM Corporation and a public
hearing scheduled and continued from the meeting of August 20, 1991 to this
date.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY~
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin August 8, 1991
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - August 6, 1991
Posting of property August 9, 1991
PLANNING STAFF INPUT=
See Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated July 15, 1991.
Mayor Hunter first asked for a show of hands of those people present on the
subject item~ there were approximately thirty people present on the issue.
Mayor Hunter. Speaking for himself, as this project is presented to the
Council this evening, he does not believe it is going to 'fly'. He has heard
that there may be some type of action to have this project go back to the
Planning Commission or IDM coming back with a different project rather than
going forward with the present plans and with the hearing.
Steve Nicholson, President, IDM. His presentation is approximately ten minutes
long. The last choice they would like to see is to be denied. They are
responsible developers and would like to have the opportunity to work with
staff to come up with an acceptable plan. One of the issues is residential as
opposed to some other type of use.
Mr. Nicholson then gave a presentation supplemented by slides showing the site,
surrounding land uses, the present structure on the site, artists renderings of
the project, slides of other similar IDM projects, etc. (See blue booklet
entitled - Grammercy, Villa's Apartments, 714 N. Brookhurst, Anaheim,
California - which contained hard copies of many of the slides shown as well as
additional extensive information on the project and related issues - made a
part of the record). He then briefed the site plan, gave details on the
project and the amenities contained therein. The site is identified in the
City's housing element as a potential site for residential. IDM feels it is
suited for that use. The project offers quality, liveability and it is
affordable. The total project is a quality project with all apartments in an
affordable range.
621
City Hallt Anaheimt California -COUNCIL MINUTES - SePtember 10. 1991. 5=00 P.M.
In concluding his presentation, Mr. Nicholson stated he feels the site is well
suited for the proposed project, it complements the project to the south and
fits the housing needs of the community. IDM would like the project approved
as submitted. If the Council cannot support the proposal as submitted, he
asked that they direct staff to work with him to modify the density and to come
back with an agreeable plan.
Council Member Daly. He asked if Mr. Nicholson has spent some time with
neighborhood groups since the last meeting and if it would be his intention to
return to the Planning Commission to reduce the density and make other
modifications to the project.
Steve Nicholson. They have met with the Orange Avenue Community Group and made
a presentation. IDM understands their concerns although they do not necessary
agree. The group does not want to see apartments on the site under any
circumstances. He would welcome input from the Council in terms of direction
to both IDM and staff - some clear guidance. He then clarified for Council
Member Ehrle that the property is owned by IDM and not in escrow contingent on
the project. There are time constraints but they do own the property.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION
IN FAVOR:
Amin David, 419 S. Koll, Anaheim and also on the Board of
Directors of the Orange County Community Housing Corporation, a
non-profit provider of affordable housing for very low-income
families. He is in support of the subject project. As a board
member of the Orange County Community Housing Corporation, if
they were to attempt the same number of affordable units in
Anaheim, it would cost approximately $50,000 per unit. For their
corporation to find the land and secure all the funds would take
two or three years. There is a need for safe and sanitary
housing. This project will allow the very Iow income to
stabilize their environment. IDM's reputation is well known and
documented. The start to provide affordable housing is
represented by this project.
Joseph Singh, 501 S. Indiana, Anaheim. He is an affordable
housing professional. He sees comprehensive affordable housing
studies, studies of housing elements and other studies, but no
affordable housing. Affordable housing is a great need of both
the County and the cities. There is also a need to have
political will. He challenged the Council to do something that
will be positive for the community. It is something that is
sorely needed and he feels IDM's project is sensitive to the
community. He urged the Council to see what can be done to
further the needs of the community in approving this project.
Before taking further input, Council Members wanted to know the prospective
price range of the proposed apartments.
Mr. Nicholson answered that the very low range on the singles
would be $466 per month up to two bedrooms which would be at $600
622
City Hallt Anaheimt California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10~ 1991~ 5;00 P.M.
per month. The affordable units are distributed throughout the
project.
Council Member Ehrle. He noted there are 41 affordable unite out of a total of
338 proposed. In this case, the definition of affordability is a price range
from $466 to $600 applied to only 41 units.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION
IN OPPOSITION;
Gary Hunneycutt, 418 S. Gain, Anaheim. The Council has supported
the residents for a number of years keeping the zoning as is and
has also down-zoned other residential areas. IDM did meet with
them. They have no problem with the quality of the project, but
they do not want the project in West Anaheim. The area ie over
built now with apartments. The present statistics show in the
last 20 years that they have gone from an area that has been
70-80% single family to what is now 20-30% single family
dwellings and the quality of the area has been substantially
reduced by the building of apartments. There are also many
apartments for rent. Adding another 300 plus units will increase
cars by 500 to 700 in an already extremely dangerous
intersection. Traffic will be horrendous. There are already
apartments to the south which are a problem area. Developers
should not buy property with the idea of getting everything
changed. Their main concern is the area west of Euclid, south of
La Palma, north of Katella to the City boundary. It will be
detrimental to add another 600 or 700 people to the area with an
already strained police and fire department. To say that crime
will not increase is not true - it will increase. Schools in the
area are already extremely overcrowded. Such projects will
reduce the quality of life in the area. He would like to see the
Council encourage businesses to come in. The Orange Avenue
Homeowners Association would like the Council to keep the area
zoned as it is and not to make any changes.
Steve Nicholeon. Answering Mr. Hunneycutt, everybody wants more
jobs but there has to be a balance of housing to go with it. The
City has already identified this region as jobs rich and the
housing is poor. This project will help the balance.
Sam Cho, Speaking for hie brother (1940 Windward, Anaheim) who ie
presently the owner and business operator of the property which
will be surrounded by the units proposed by IDM. Their main
concern is the fact that they operate a wrecking yard and the
proposed affordable housing unite will surround their business.
It will be a tremendous liability problem for them. There will
be children living in the apartments and because their business
will be right next to residential, it will present an environment
that will make it easier for crime to occur with increasing
liability in operating their business. Further with the
residential units, it will block their frontage view. Twenty to
thirty percent of their business depends on the traffic flow.
623
City Hall. Anaheim. California -COUNCIL MINUTES - SeDtAmber 10. 1991. 5t00 P.M.
With the residential units he believes there iea 50-foot
frontage - with industrial, there iea 100-foot frontage.
will decrease their business.
It
Business is declining. He reiterated hie concerns that the
project will block their view, cause a decrease in business,
increase in their liability, it will be a dangerous place for
children and it will also jeopardize the jobs of their 40-50
employees. He urged the Council to help the comraunity and not
approve the project.
COUNCIL ACTION=
Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing.
Council Member Pickler. Too much ie proposed for this piece of property. He
is personally concerned that the City is losing industrial land. He has a
problem with the density of the project. He would prefer that the opportunity
remain for developing industrial or perhaps even office space, something that
would stimulate job potential. The Council has stated they are going to try to
stick to the code and this project would be deviating quite a bit. The Council
has also said they would like to see more home ownership. He feels they are
inundated with apartments in that conununity. IDM would have to change the
project considerably before he could approve it.
Council Member Ehrle. He feels this is an excellent project, IDM is a good
company - but it is the wrong location. There is no question that the City
needs affordable housing. Reading from a recent article, he noted that the
Anaheim/Santa Ana area is ranked the 9th least affordable area to live in the
United States. The project is proposed in the wrong location. It is
industrial and it should remain industrial. He is not even sure reducing the
number of unite would be appropriate and he does not think condominiums are the
answer. He is not going to support the project. In concept, it is a good one,
but not in this location.
Council Member Daly. As he has stated, he feels the project should be referred
back to the Planning Commission. The Council unanimously approved an apartment
project right next door at about one-half the density. Something along those
lines is more in keeping with what the communtiy needs. It is zoned industrial
but there are boarded up warehouses on the property that have been there for
years, one reason for rezoning industrial land is because there are no
industrial takers. He would like to see them make the strongest possible push
to get and retain businesses. They have to give some due to the highest and
best use of the land. He maintained that the request should be referred back
to the Planning Commission and give the property owner direction to reduce the
density and consider ownership units on the site as well.
After additional discussion and comments by Council Members and questions to
Mr. Nicholeon, the following actions were taken=
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 308 -CERTIFICATION= Environmental Impact
Report No. 308 having been reviewed by the City staff and recommended by the
City Planning Commission to be in compliance with City and State guidelines and
the State of California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council acting upon
624
City Hall. Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10t 1991t 5=00 P.M.
such information and belief does hereby certify on motion by Council Member
Hunter, seconded by Council Member Pickler, that Environmental Impact Report
No. 308 is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and City
and State guidelines as reconvaended by the City Planning Commission. MOTION
CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTIONS= The title of the following resolutions were
read by the City Clerk. (Resolution Nos. 91R-272 through 91R-274, both
inclusive)
Council Member Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolutions.
Council Member Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Council Member Hunter offered Resolution No. 91R-272 for adoption, denying
General Plan Amendment No. 320, Resolution No. 91R-273 for adoption, denying
Reclassification No. 90-91-26 and Resolution No. 91R-274 for adoption, denying
Conditional Use Permit No. 3415 incorporating the findings made by the City
Planning Commission in each instance. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 91R-272= A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM DISAPPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT
NO. 320.
RESOLUTION NO. 91R-273= A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN
A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED.
RESOLUTION NO. 91R-274= A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3415.
Before a vote was taken, Council Member Daly instead moved that the project be
referred back to the Planning Commission with instructions that the project be
redesigned~ the motion died for lack of a second.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing resolutions 91R-272, 273 and 274=
Roll Call Vote=
AYES=
NOES=
ABSENT=
COUNCIL MEMBERS=
COUNCIL MEMBERS=
COUNCIL MEMBERS~
Simpson, Pickler, Ehrle and Hunter
Daly
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 91R-272, 273 and 274 duly passed and
adopted.
RECESS= By general consent the Council recessed for ten minutes. (7516 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS= The Mayor called the meeting to order all Council Members being
present. (7=34 p.m.)
D2. 179= PUBLIC HEARING - WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 3441 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION~ WAIVER OF COUNCIL POLICY NO. 543=
OWNER= JULIUS WILLIAMS, 1240 N. VAN BUREN, $113, Anaheim, CA 92807
625
City Hallr Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1991. 5:00 P.M.
AGENT= ROBERT F. TORRES, 1240 N. VAN BUREN, ~113, Anaheim, CA 92807
LOCATION/REQUEST= The property is located at 1024-1030 North Kemp
Street and is approximately 0.31 acre located on the east side of Kemp
Street and approximately 350 feet north of the centerline of La Palma
Avenue.
The request is to permit a 15-unit senior citizen's apartment complex
with waiver of maximum lot coverage, minimum building site area,
minimum number of open parking spaces and minimum structural setback.
ACTION TAKEN BY THE PLANNING COMMISSION=
CUP NO. 3441 DENIED (PC91-132) (7 yes votes).
Waiver of code requirement DENIED.
Waiver of Council Policy No. 543 DENIED.
Denied Negative Declaration.
HEARING SET ON=
A letter of appeal of the Planning Commission's decision was submitted by the
Agent, Robert Torres and public hearing scheduled this date.
PUBLIC NOTICE HEQUIHEMENTS MET BY=
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin August 30, 1991
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - August 28, 1991
PLANNING STAFF INPUT=
See Staff Report to the Planning Commission dated August 26, 1991.
APPLICANT'S
STATEMENT=
Bob Torres, 1240 N. VanBuren, Anaheim. He first clarified that
the address of the project is 1026-1030 North Kemp (not 1024).
Only two items are before the Council - minimum building site
area and minimum number of open parking spaces. The other two
items, waivers 'a' and 'd' - maximum lot coverage and minimum
structural setback have been deleted and this was presented to
the Planning Commission with those deleted items. His project
was continued from the first Planning Commission hearing in order
to address areas of concern expressed. On August 26, 1991, the
project was again heard by the Planning Commission. He had
reduced density to 53%~ provided I to i ratio parking per unit
thereby reducing the green scape in front of the project. The
project was denied unanimously by the Planning Commission. There
is also a matter of interpretation of the existing senior
ordinance, whether it requires open parking or a carport. If he
took the garage doors off, he would meet the requirement and
eliminate the waiver. In his opinion, he is before the Council
with only one waiver - minimum building site area. This project
versus a multi-family project since it is RM 1200 allows him to
build 11 family units. He could design it to code and not even
have to appear before the Commission or Council providing he met
all the requirements. It would require 28 parking spaces. Under
senior housing at .8 it would only be 12 spaces.
In concluding, Mr. Torres requested that the Council approve his
project - allow him to revert back to .8 spaces and go back to 12
626
City Hallt Anaheimt CalifoFnia -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10, 1991. 5=00 P.M.
spaces, 10 closed and 2 open~ the latter two will be a carport
without garage doors. By reverting to 12 spaces instead of 15,
it would allow him to provide more green scape at the front of
the project and to relocate the lounge area to the front where it
was located before. Relative to affordability, he has entered
into an agreement with the Housing Authority to provide seven
affordable units. He has mentioned to the Planning Commission
and staff at the'Housing Authority that he would make all units
available for affordable. He would make the remaining 8-units
available under the Project Based Assistance program. He would
be more than happy to enter into such an agreement if his project
is approved. He has discussed the matter with Housing staff
relative to the 8-units. If the Planning Commission was
concerned relative to affordability, he would automatically agree
to making the eight remaining units affordable as well.
Mayor Hunter. Seven (7) units are now affordable and Mr. Torres is saying he
is willing to make them all affordable~ Mr. Torres said the remainng 8-units
would be under the Project Based Assistance program.
Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator. That issue was discussed at the
Planning Commission but the site development standards were what concerned the
Commission and getting the additional affordable units did not counterbalance
their concerns with the site development density.
Mayor Hunter. If the Council agrees with the project and Mr. Torres offers all
fifteen, he asked what the process would be.
Annika Santalahti. A tentative agreement has already been reached with
Community Development. Condition No. 21 in the staff report identified the
percentage would be 12% of the code to be very iow income and an additional 25%
of the total number would be the lower income. The Council would be saying
that the remaining thirty odd percent would be at some level but she does not
know the specific answer to that - whether very low or Iow. Housing staff
would have to clarify that. Senior Citizen's affordability characteristics are
lower level than they are for the overall apartment project. She clarified for
the Mayor if the Council wanted to approve the project tonight with seven
affordable units and at a later date make the change they could do so with an
amendment to Condition No. 21 that the remaining units be affordable for senior
citizens.
Council Member Daly asked for clarification relative to the waivers. The
project that went to the Planning Co~nission had four waivers. After it went
to the Commission, he asked if the project changed.
Annika Santalahti answered yes. The project as originally submitted had four
waivers. Before it actually was reviewed or seen by the Planning Commission,
the applicant eliminated the fourth waiver, minimum structural setback. The
Planning Commission never did see that as a waiver. The Commission then sent
him back for revised plans. They were interested in reducing the density which
he did not do but they were also concerned about the garage parking and felt if
he had garage parking, it should be provided at a ratio of i space per unit
627
City Hall, Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1991. 5=00 P.M.
instead of .8. The reason under the code they do not allow senior parking to
be provided in garages, they want the parking to be available to everybody.
They do allow it to be covered wh£ch is a carport. When he came back he
increased the parking to have a i to i ratio unit to parking but 12 are still
garages and 3 are covered in a carport. The Com~ission was still concerned
about that along with the density which exceeds the 25% policy the Commission
has been adhering to in the past. This is about 36%.
Council Member Daly. This is a project that should be denied because of the
density. It is equivalent of 45-units to the acre and he does not feel it is
something the Council should allow or had ever allowed. He also had concerns
over the design of the project. The front yard is basically a series of
driveways which he does not believe would be a benefit to the neighborhood.
Mayor Hunter. He feels it is a good project. He commends Mr. Torres for
putting housing stock in an area most developers would not attempt. This
senior citizen complex will be an investment to the area. Not that there
should be any differentiation, but Mr. Torres is supplying housing for
Latino-Hispanic senior citizens.
Council Member Daly. The proposed project is 300-feet away from the
single-family site the Council recently downzoned.
Mayor Hunter. As Mr. Torres stated, he could bypass having to come before the
City and build ll-units on the parcels, but instead of building
11-two-bedroom-units, he is building affordable senior citizen housing and is
willing to make all 15-units available for affordable senior citizen housing.
Council Member Daly. He questioned if that was going to be an excuse from now
on - that any density goes. The density is too high and the Planning
Commission voted against the project because of that. The Mayor is saying
because it is an Hispanic neighborhood it is o.k., but yet it is only 300-feet
away from an area that was downzoned by the Council in the recent past. That
is being very inconsistent.
COUNCIL ACTION=
After additional discussion and questioning of Mr. Torres by Council Member
Simpson relative to the possibility of reducing the density along with input
from staff, Mayor Hunter closed the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION= On motion by Council
Member Hunter, seconded by Council Member Ehrle, the City Council approved the
negative declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative
declaration together with any co~ents received during the public review
process, and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments
received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a
significant effect on the environment. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - RESOLUTION= The title of the following resolution was read
by the City Clerk. (Resolution No. 91R-275)
Council Member Hunter moved to waive the reading in full of the resolution.
Council Member Ehrle seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
628
City Hal~, Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10~ 1991~ 5:00 P.M.
Council Member Hunter offered Resolution No. 91R-275 for adoption, granting
Conditional Use Permit No. 3441 subject to interdepartmental recommendations.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 91R-275= A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3441.
Before a vote was taken, Annika Santalahti asked for clarification on two
items. The exhibit posted on the Chamber wall is Revision No. i that includes
the greater number of parking spaces at a I to i parking to units. Mr. Torres
referred to the previous plan which had .8 spaces all in garages. The other
part of the question is the affordability issue and whether the Council wants
to include all the units in the affordability category.
Mayor Hunter asked Mr. Torres if his offer was still on the table.
Robert Torres. He will go with the agreement in place now which is for seven
affordable units, but he will work with the Housing Authority to make the
remaining units affordable - the reversion from 15 parking spaces to 12 would
go from i to i parking down to .8 and in doing so he will eliminate all of the
concrete in front of the project and provide more green scape/landscape as
initially proposed.
Council Member Pickler. He assumed that making all units affordable was a part
of the approval~ Mayor Hunter. He would like to add as an addendum that
Mr. Torres work with Housing to make the units affordable according to the
proper definition.
City Attorney White. The definition is contained in State law that is a
sliding scale depending upon the size of the unit and how many members are in
the household. If the Council wants to add a condition that states the other
units will comply with that requirement and the permit holder will work with
the Community Development Department to meet that requirement, that could be
done. He understood the permit applicant was agreeing to make the other units
meet that definition.
Mr. Torres answered that was correct under the project based assistance.
Mayor Hunter. He will add that to the conditions of approval. He asked if
Mr. Torres was stipulating that all 15-units be affordable~ Mr. Torres answered
yes ·
Annika Santalahti. Revision No. i posted on the Chamber wall shows the one
parking space per unit. Mr. Torres requested to go back to .8 spaces all in a
garage.
Mayor Hunter. He will incorporate that parking be at .8 - 10 covered, 2 open -
thereby giving more landscaping to the front portion.
Mr. Torres. In eliminating the three additional carports, he wants to be
allowed to relocate the lounge area where it was previously located.
629
City Hall, Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 10. 1991. 5~00 P.M.
Annika Santalahti. Staff has an exhibit that matches what Mr. Torres is
talking about.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing resolution offered by Mayor Hunter
granting Conditional Use Permit No. 3441, subject to interdepartmental
recommendations and including additional stipulation by the developer that all
units are to be affordable units, parking spaces at .8 each (10 covered, 2
o~en) in order to provide more landscaping, and the relocation of the lounge
area to be discussed with staff.
Roll Call Vote=
AYES=
NOES=
ABSENT=
COUNCIL MEMBERS=
COUNCIL MEMBERS=
COUNCIL MEMBERS=
Simpson, Pickler, Ehrle and Hunter
Daly
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 91R-275 duly passed and adopted.
ADJOURNMENT= Council Member Hunter moved to adjourn. Council Member Ehrle
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (8=02 p.m.)
LEONORA N. SOHL, CITY CLERK
63O