1987/09/08Cit7 Hall, Anaheim, Ca~ifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8, 1987, 10:00 A.M.
City Council of the City of Anaheim met adjourned in regular
~sion (of September 1, 1987 Joint meeting with the City Planning
Commission).
PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Pickier, Kaywood and Bay
ABSENT : COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
CITY MANAGER: Bob Simpson
CITY ATTORNEY: Jack White
CITY CLERK: Leonora N. Sohl
DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT & PLANNING: Norman J. Priest
ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR OF COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT:
Lisa Stipkovich
CITY ENGINEER: Gary Johnson
PLANNING DIRECTOR: Joel Fick
PRESENT: PIANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Herbst
ABSENT: PLANNING COMMISSIONERS:
Messe, Carusillo, Feldhaus, Bouas, Boydstun
McBurney
Mayor Bay called the Adjourned Regular Council Meeting of September 1, 1987 to
order at 10:05 a.m. on September 8, 1987.
155: INFRASTRUCTURE FUNDING SHOKTFAI.I. - ANAHEIM STADIUM BUSINESS CENTER:
Chairman Messe called the Planning Commission adjourned meeting of August 31,
1987 to order at 10:05 a.m. and announced that the immediate purpose for the
Planning Commission's request for this Joint work session was the proposed 1.2
million square foot Hanover/Katella Office Park scheduled for consideration on
the Planning Commission agenda of September 14, 1987. He noted that the City
Council had approved the "interim developer fee" in 1985 at ~4.12 per square
foot, '~' ~at the City Engineering and Planning Departments had now
ident~! 36 million dollar shortfall for the cost of infrastructure
improw ~ which will be required during the projected 20-year buildout of
the Anaheim Stadium Area.
The object of the meeting was to consider the fiscal impact of the
Hanover/Katella Project with the City Council and receive from them direction
to assist the Planning Commission in their deliberations on the development in
the Anaheim Stadium Business Area.
Chairman Messe noted that several alternative solutions have been discussed
and these were incorporated into the memorandum submitted to the Council from
Norman J. Priest and Gary Johnson, dated September 4, 1987 as follows:
1. Increasing the interim development fee (estimated to increase
approximately $3.55 per square foot to $7.67.)
combination of increasing the interim development fee and the
of Anaheim accepting part of the ~36 million shortfall.
8O9
City Hall, Anaheim, C~!ifor~- - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8~ 1987~ 10:00 A.M.
3. The City of Anaheim obligating itself for the balance of the $36
million shortfall over the 20-year period.
4. Developers installing improvements based upon fair share
participation above and beyond the payment of the interim development
fee.
5. Initiating a land use strategy plan/specific plan for the
Convention Center/Disneyland (CR) Area similar to that completed for
the Stadium Area; and establishing an interim fee program for the CE
Area. A portion of the monies collected could then be combined with
the Stadium Area fees to fund areawide improvements directly
benefitting both areas.
City Council discussion ensued during which Mayor Bay stated that one of the
alternatives previously discussed for a portion of the $36 million
infrastructure cost was incremental financing through redevelopment. He
stated that he personally had not given up on this vehicle for the
infrastructure improvements as he considered this an optimum opportunity for
this type of financing. He also indicated he was not convinced that all of
the noise and negative reaction heard recently by the Council concerning
redevelopment was indicative of the opinion of the majority of the people in
the City.
Mayor Bay noted that if redevelopment financing were not to be considered,
then perhaps an alternative of reducing the size, scope or number of
improvements which are planned should be undertaken, to reduce the overall
figure of $36 million.
Councilman Pickler voiced the opinion that transportation into and out of the
area is key to the success of the development. In planning for
transportation, the City needs to be aware of the impact of reductions to its
infrastructure improvements and how these would affect neighboring cities and
freeways.
Councilwoman Kaywood stressed the need to do sufficient planning in advance so
that all infrastructure requirements are taken care of to support the level of
development anticipated, as opposed to Just allowing things to happen.
Planning in advance is the least costly alternative.
Councilman Ehrle noted that later in today's meeting the City Council will be
appointing members to the Economic Development Board, who should be able to
assist the City in moving forward. He commented that he felt Anaheim is at a
crossroads whereby it will remain where it is now and allow others to tak~ the
leadership, or do it ourselves. Past Councils have approved the progressive
approach consistently, and he feels the City has to find a helping hand for
developers to come into Anaheim and to encourage commercial and industrial
developments. His concern was whether or not the City has committed monies in
the past which they do not have.
810
Cit7 Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8; 1987~ 10:00 A.M.
Councilman Hunter stated he would like to see the City go forward and not
backwards. He suggested that the Transpark idea be revived to assist in
resolving the parking problems.
Commissioner Herbst noted however that the Planning Commission has to make a
decision in a very short time. Raising the fees he fears will cause the
development to take place in other cities with lower fees; but on the other
hand Anah~'~ has reached saturation point with the last building approved.
The roa~ ~ not the only problem, the development also requires that the
City pr ...... water lines, sewers and electrical power. If the City has no
funds or means to provide the infrastructure then it needs to declare a
moratorium.
In response to Councilman Ehrle, Chairman Messe noted that water and power can
be taken care of by the additional utility fee it is the sewers and traffic
circulation which pose the problems.
Council Members discussed and compared charges made by other cities with
similar development such as Orange and Irvine, noting that Orange charges 2%
of the cost of construction, but has incremental redevelopment financing
available to them. The idea of a special assessment district was also
introduced and discussed.
City Engineer Gary Johnson estimated it would take close to one year to to put
an assessment district in place, and would require that the specific benefits
to the district be directly related to the improvements; that there would be
the ability of property owners to mount a majority protest; and it would be
very difficult to establish in areas which are already developed.
Joel Fick, Assistant Planning Director, noted that some of the improvements
contained in the matrix do not benefit Just the StadiumArea, there is a
larger area northerly up to Ball Road but not westerly of the freeway which
may stand to benefit, and is an alternative which has not been reviewed.
In response to Chairman Hesse, Mr. Fick estimated such a study to detemaine
the area of benefit could be conducted in a one-year time frame.
Mayor Bay offered an opportunity for public input:
Mr. Dennis Abramson of Hanover Real Estate Associates wished to make the point
that the requirements for 1.2 or 1.8 million are ten year programs and the
infrastructure requirements will be phased in slowly. Their application has
been in the City 2 years and he did not wish any delay.
At the conclusion of discussion, Mayor Bay reiterated that he still felt the
infrastructure requirements of the Anaheim Stadium areas to be a golden
opportunity for an appropriate use of redevelopment financing. Councilman
Ehrle was optimistic that the City would find a vehicle for bringing in more
revenue, and would not like to have a moratorium, nor would he want to
increase fees.
811
Cit~ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8~ 1987~ 10:00 A.M.
Councilwoman Kaywood voiced her concern that these improvements need to be
installed in order to support the development and that no real direction is
being given by the Council.
Commissioner Herbst noted that the two projects coming forward would amount,
to in fees at 34.12 per square foot, to about $1,236,000. He questioned how
far in the improvements the City would get with that sum of money, and whether
that would take care of the immediate shortfall. Staff needs to advise on
that.
Chairman Messe summarized then that the Council wishes the Planning Comm{ssion
to handle the next one or two of these applications by determining the fiscal
impact as best they can, and that long term the City staff should come up with
more funding study alternatives to be discussed.
Mayor Bay also felt it important to hear from the property owners in the
Stadium Business Area on this issue.
Commissioner Bouas concurred, noting that the Planning Commission has received
the answer they were seeking, that the City Council feels Anaheim should move
forward with development in the Stadium Business Area at the level which was
planned.
Mr. Lou Herz, 2081Margie Lane, Anaheim, advised that he was interested in the
discussion of use of redevelopment funds for these improvements. He advised
that the citizens involved in the recent redevelopment project were planning
to meet the coming Sunday in Stoddard Park. This is intended to be an
informational meeting to inform and educate the citizens as to what is going
By general consent, the City Council recessed for a 10 minute break.
(11:22 a.m.)
On motion by Commissioner Bouas, seconded by Commissioner Herbst the Planning
Commission adjourned. (11:22 a.m.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Bay called the City Council meeting to order, all Council
Members being present. (11;35 a.m.)
131: INTERSTATE ROUTE 5 (SANTA ANA FREEWAY) STATUS REPORT ON WIDENING
PROJECT: Mr. Gary Johnson, City Engineer, introduced Hubert Hlmes, Senior
Transportation Engineer, representing Caltrans, who reviewed the exhibits
posted throughout the City Council Chamber and gave a slide presentation
covering the background and scope of the I-5 widening project; the status of
the Environmental Impact Study; design alternatives; right of way impacts;
review of two design alternatives. The scope of the presentation concerned
that segment of Interstate 5 between State Route 22 (Garden Grove Freeway) and
State Route 91 (Riverside Freeway).
Present in addition to respond to Council questions were Paul Singer and
Donald Dey of the Traffic Engineering Division.
812
Cit[ Ball, An~hetm~ California - (~UNCIL MINtrfRS - September 8~ 1987~ 10:00 A.M.
At the conclusion of the presentation, Council reviewed the exhibits and
discussed the project briefly with Mr. Himes.
ADJOURNMENT: There bein~ no further business, Councilwoman Kaywood moved to
adjourn the meeting of September 1, 1987. Councilman Hunter seconded the
motion. HOTION CARRIED. (12:15 p.m.)
LEONORA N. SOHL, CITY CLERK
813
153
City Mall, Am~heim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8, 1987, 1:30 P.M.
PRESENT:
ABSEKT:
PRESENT:
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Ehrle, Hunter, Pickler, Kaywood and Bay
COUNCIL I,~EMBF, RS: None
CITY MANAGER: Bob Simpson
CITY ATTORNEY: Jack White
CITY CLERK: Leonora N. Sohl
CITY ENGINEER: Gary E. Johnson
ZONING ADMINISTRATOR: Annika Santalahti
CIVIL ENGINEER - OFFICE: Jay Titus
A complete copy of the agenda for the meeting of the Anaheim City Council was
posted at 4:20 p.m. on September 4, 1987 at the Civic Center kiosk, containing
all items as shown herein.
REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION: City Attorney Jack White requested a Closed
Session to consider the following items:
a. Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(a), to wit: Golden West Baseball Co. vs. City of Anaheim,
Orange County Superior Court Case No. 40-92-46; City of Anaheim vs.
Anaheim Hotel Partnership.
b. Labor relations matters - Government Code Section 54957.6.
c. Personnel matters - Government Code Section 54957.
d. Potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section
54956.9(c).
Councilman Bay moved to recess into Closed Session. Councilwoman Kaywood
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (12:16 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present, and welcomed those in attendance to the Council meeting.
(2:37 p.m.)
INVOCATION: Pastor David Bolton, Bethel Baptist Church, gave the Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Irv Pickler led the assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
119: PROCLAMATION: The following proclamation was issued by Mayor Bay and
authorized by the City Council:
P.O.W./M.I.A. Recognition Day in Anaheim, September 18, 1987.
The P.O.W./M.I.A. Recognition Day Proclamation was presented to Mr. Norris
Neumeyer, Benefit Counselor at the Veterans Administration Regional Office.
814
154
City Hall, ~n-heim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8~ 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
119: DECLARATION: The City Council unanimously declared September 27, 1987
at 1:00 p.m. as "Bells Across America -- A Ringing Tribute to the
Constitution" when simultaneous bell rtn~ing will take place all across
America for 200 seconds recognizing the 200th Anniversary of the signing of
the United States Constitution.
119: PKESENTATION - LA PAZ, MEXICO: Bob Hirst, President of the Anaheim
Firefighters Association, advised that a 100 foot aerial ladder fire truck
which had given 20 years of service to Anaheim had been donated to the City of
La Paz, Mexico; and he expected La Paz to realize another 20 years of service
with this equipment.
Fire Chief Martin tosco, City of La Paz, addressed the City Council expressing
their sincere thanks for the fire equipment, and presented the Council with a
certificate of appreciation. Anaheim Firefighter Ernest Badosa acted as
translator for Chief Cosco.
MINUTES: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Bay,
minutes of the regular meetings held June 23, July 14 and August 18, 1987, and
adjourned regular meeting held July 7, 1987, were approved. MOTION CARKIED.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $4,010,925.39, in
accordance with the 1987-88 Budget, were approved.
CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilwoman
Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Bay, the following items were approved in
accordance with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each
Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar; Councilwoman Kaywood
offered Resolution Nos. 87R-372 through 87R-376, both inclusive, for
adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Bay moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions of the Consent Calendar,
after reading of the title thereof by the City Manager, and that consent to
waiver is hereby given by all Council Members, unless after reading of the
title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such
ordinances or resolutions in regular order. Councilman Hunter seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
1. 118: The following claims were filed against the City and action taken as
recommended:
Claims rejected and referred to Risk Management:
a. Claim submitted by Katherine J. Frese for bodily injury sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about June 9, 1987.
b. Claim submitted by Angela Stecklein for bodily injury sustained
purportedly dut to actions of the City on or about June 9, 1987.
Claim filed against the City - recommended to be Accepted:
815
1..51
CitH H~ll~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8~ 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
c. Claim submitted by Carol Dupras for property damage sustained
purportedly due to actions of the City on or about May 18, 1987.
2. Receiving and filing the following correspondence: (on file)
a. 140; Public Library Monthly Statistical Report for July 1987 and
Public Library Board Minutes of July 22, 1987.
b. 105: Community Redevelopment Commission, Minutes of August 5, 1987.
c. 105: Community Redevelopment Commission, Minutes of August 12, 1987.
d. 105: Public Utilities Board, Minutes of July 31, 1987.
3. 123: Approving the First Amendment to Agreement with All City Management
Services, Inc., to provide crossing guards, reducing the amount of the
required performance bond from the full contract amount to $75,000.
4. 123: Authorizing the Library Director to execute a service contract with
Digital Equipment Corporation for the circulation control system.
5. 160: Waiving Council Policy 306 and authorizing the Purchasing Agent to
issue a purchase order to the Anaheim Public Improvement Corporation in the
amount of ~17,107.76 for 214 replacement seats required at the Stadium.
6. 175: RESOLUTION NO. 87R-372: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC WORK. (Twin Peaks
Reservoir, Account No. 59-630-6329-02962; and opening of bids on October 15,
1987, 2:00 p.m.)
7. 169: RESOLUTION NO. 87R-373: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC WORK. (Barrier Free
Anaheim No. 12 Barrier Removal in Area Bounded by Palais Road, Ninth
Street-SPRR Tracks, Katella Avenue and Euclid Street; Cris Avenue - Euclid
Street to Gary Street, Account No. 17-793-6325-EO220; and opening of bids on
October 15, 1987, 2:00 p.m.)
8. 153; RESOLUTION NO. 87g-374: A P. ESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 85R-428 WHICH ESTABLISHES RATES OF
COMPENSATION FOR CONFIDENTIAL JOB CLASSES. (creating the classification of
Telephone Operator Receptionist - Confidential, effective September 4, 1987)
9. 153; RESOLUTION NO. 87R-375: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
GITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 87R-365 WHICH ESTABLISHED RATES OF
COMPENSATION FOR CLASSES DESIGNATED AS PROFESSIONAL AND TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT.
(creating the classification of Public Utilities Personnel Services
Representative, effective September 4, 1987)
10. 158: RESOLUTION NO. 87R-376: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A CERTAIN DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES OR INTERESTS THEREIN.
816
152
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8, 1987, 1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
TEMPORARILY ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Kaywood and Bay
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 87R-372 through 87R-376, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
End ef Consent Calendar.
108: APPLICATIONS FOR PERMITS, PUBLIC DANCE HALL/POOL ROOM: At the request
of Councilwoman Kaywood, the following applications, recommended for approval
by the Chief of Police, were removed for discussion:
a. Public Dance Hall Permit submitted by Harvey Salem Owen for
Oscar's I, 1160 North Kraemer Boulevard, for dancing Monday through
Saturday, from 10:00 A.M. to 2:00 A.M.
b. Pool Room Permit submitted by Bobby Lee Baker for Mr. B's
Billiards, 951-959 South Knott Street, for 15 pool tables.
In response to question by Councilwoman Kaywood, Zoning Administrator Annika
Santalahti reported that an extension of time had recently been approved on
the Conditional Use Permit for the Public Dance Hall at Oscar's; and a
Conditional Use Permit was pending for on sale beer at Mr. B's Billiards. The
Pool Hall Permit approval would be for the billiards only.
On motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilman Ehrle, both applications
were approved in accordance with recommendations by the Chief of Police.
Councilman Pickler was temporarily absent. MOTION CARRIED.
123/106: AGREEMENT - CORPORATE CREATIVITY GROUP (CCC): At the request of Mr.
William Erickson, proposed agreement with Corporate Creativity Group (CCC) for
the development of a promotion/celebration of the 20th anniversary and
proposed expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center, and appropriating $25,000
from the Council Contingency Fund to cover said contract, was removed from the
Consent Calendar for separate consideration.
Mr. William Erickson, 301 East North Street~ addressed the Council takin&
exception to the use of the Council Contingency Fund for the purpose stated,
in the light of the announced shortfall in the City's Resource Allocation Plan
for 1987-1988. He suggested that the amount of funds allocated for the
Contingency Account might be reduced.
Mayor Bay explained that the Council Contingency Fund was established this
year to be larger than it normally was; the City Council at the time was still
working with the Budget and some revenues were placed in that fund, pending
completion of that work, in order to retain those funds under direct control
of the City Council.
817
149
Cit~ Hall~ ~-aheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8~ 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
On motion by Councilman Pickler, seconded by Councilman Hunter, the contract
with Corporate Creativity Group (CCG) and the appropriation of $25,000 from
the Council Contingency Fund were authorized, as recommended. MOTION CARRIED.
ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST:
No items of public interest were addressed.
RECESS: By general consent, the City Council recessed for five minutes.
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Bay reconvened the meeting, all members of the City
Council being present. (3:14 p.m.)
179: PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 87-88-02~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 2907ANDNEGATIVE DECLARATION:
APPLICANT: Jerald and Dortheal E. Stanley
236 South Ash Street
Anaheim, California 92805
ZONING/LOCATION/REQUEST: Change in zone from RS-7200 to CO to permit office
use of a residential structure; 236 South Ash Street. Code waiver of minimum
number of parking spaces.
PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Resolution No. PC87-134 denied Reclassification
No. 87-88-02; Resolution No. PC87-135 denied Conditional Use Permit No. 2907;
EI~ Negative Declaration recommended be granted.
HEARING SET ON:
Appeal by James P. Barone, Attorney for the applicants.
PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY:
Publication in Anaheim Bulletin August 27, 1987.
Posting of property August 27, 1987.
Mailing to property owners within 300 feet August 28, 1987.
PLANNING STAFF INPUT:
See Staff Report dated July 6, 1987.
APPLICANT'S STATEMENT/EXHIBITS SUBMITTED:
Mr. James P. Barone, of Morinello, Barone, Holden & Nardulli,
4695 MacArthur Court, Suite 1150, Newport Beach, Attorneys
representing the applicants, submitted for Council review
packets illustrating the appearance of subject property prior to
remodeling and rehabilitation (completed approximately 1981),
and the appearance of subject property today. He stated that
the property was located approximately 100 feet from the
intersection of State College Boulevard and Broadway, a
congested business area. The house was used primarily as a
rental before the applicants remodeled; the Stanleys were
involved in personal real estate investments, and had used the
structure as a private office (no sign in front, and no walk-in
traffic); they conducted private business and maintained their
files, Just as they would do in a den at home. The only people
818
150
City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8~ 1~87~ 1:30 P.M.
working there were the applicants and sometimes their two
children, plus occasionally a part-time secretary.
When the property owners were informed that this was a
non-conforming use of residential property, with insufficient
parking, applications were submitted for change of zone and
conditional use permit which were denied by the Planning
Commission. One cause of concern to neighbors seemed to be the
paving over of landscaping on the premises to provide some
parking. To alleviate those concerns, a petition was circulated
by petitioners in favor of the reclassification and variance so
long as there would be no reduction or removal of current
landscaping, and with the understanding that the applications
were necessary only to bring the property into conformity with
its current use. Forty-seven persons signed the petition,
representing properties on Ash, Elm and Beechwood Streets, and
State College Boulevard. Also included in the packet were
color-keyed maps of the area, depicting those properties in
favor, the tenants who were in favor, and those who expressed no
opinion.
Mr. Barone pointed out that there were never more than three or
four persons in the building; according to the Municipal Code,
thirteen parking spaces would be required for the use of subject
property. The Traffic Engineer's plan would allow six spaces at
an angle, and if some of the landscaping was removed, two more
spaces could be provided. The owners had a long-term lease
agreement (twenty years) with their neighbors which would
provide seven parking spaces next door; therefore, required
parking could be provided.
The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to speak in favor of
subject applications; there was no response.
PUBLIC DISCUSSION-
IN OPPOSITION:
Joseph Feinberg, representing Alma Keller, owner of property on
State College Boulevard (business center), stated that Hrs.
Keller had had a continuing problem with vehicle parking
generated by the real estate office at the corner of Broadway
and State College Boulevard. Her tenant parking area would be
across a very narrow alley from, and directly in line with, the
parking proposed for subject property. Mr. Feinberg pointed out
that during the hearing before the Planning Commission, the
applicant stated that the intended use for subject property was
as an escrow office as well as a continuation and extension of
the ERA Real Estate office on State College Boulevard. In
addition, the proposed change of zone would allow any other
development provided under the CO Zone, and he requested that
subject applications be denied.
819
147
City Hall~ Anahetm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8~ 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
Responding to questions by Council, Mr. Feinberg stated that
tenants of Mrs. Keller's property did not sig~ the petition in
favor of subject applications. Although there was parking at
the curb in front of subject property, it was a residential
street.
Charlene Hill, 222 South Ash Street, stated that she did not
receive a notice of the public hearing and had no knowledge of
the petition in favor which circulated through the
neighborhood. When she and the resident at 219 South Ash Street
circulated the petition in opposition, prior to the Planning
Commission hearing, virtually all of the neighbors were
opposed. She was of the opinion there was an abundance of
commercial properties nearby, and there was no reason to zone
this residential property for business.
Malcolm Jahr, 1262 E. Elm Street, owner of property at 219 South
Ash St., addressed the Council stating he was opposed to the
rezoning. It was his recollection that in 1970, Mr. Stanley had
advised that he was remodeling the structure as a residence for
his family; however he removed all except minor kitchen
facilities and left only one small bedroom and one bathroom.
Remodeling had continued, during which time the applicant
operated a business at subject property, with meetings being
held and people parking on both sides of Ash Street. State
College Boulevard and Broadway was an uncontrolled intersection,
with many accidents occurring. He felt that utilization of
adjoining property for additional parking would render that
residential property commercial, as well.
Dave Mallard addressed the Council advising that he was
acquainted with the applicant, Jerry Stanley, and wanted to
offer some input; he had visited the premises and found no
problem with parking. He pointed out that subject parcel was
almost separate from its neighbors, and was of the opinion that
the area was in transition.
STAFF INPUT:
Zoning Administrator Santalahti reported that according to the
staff report~ subject property would be used for real estate
offices, The parkin& next door was a separate matter, and would
require additional application. The lease agreement alone would
not satisfy Code requirements. No Home Occupation Permit had
ever been requested for the use of sub3ect property as an
office; if they had had such a permit, there would have been
some limitations.
FINAL SUMMATION BY APPLICANT:
Mr. Barone stated the applicant was not requesting further
expansion of the use; the parking lease was an attempt to
satisfy Code requirements for the CO use. There was a kitchen
and one and one-half baths on the premises, but no one lived
there. He reiterated that six of the tenants on State College
820
148
City Hall, A~heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8~ 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
Boulevard had consented to the requested use; that the business
would not be public, but a private use; and the ERA Real Estate
Office was on a separate parcel, with a different ownership.
H~. Stanley anticipated no association with that office to
provide escrow services. They are requesting to continue a
pre-existing use.
SPECIAL CONCERNS OF COUNCIL MEMBERS: Councilman Bay.
Subject parcel was in an entire block of residential properties
backed up to commercial; to grant subject petitions would be an
intrusion of commercial into the residential and could establish
a precedent.
Councilwoman Kaywood.
Parking problems on the residential street already had been
generated by meetings held on subject premises, and to use
property next door for parking would constitute commercial use
of that residential property as well. The request was for spot
zoning, and she felt the residential neighborhood should be
protected.
Councilman Ehrle.
People would not have signed petitions for the applicants if
they had been opposed to the reclassification; he favored
approving the change of zone if certain conditions were met,
such as changing the address of subject property to a Broadway
Street address; restricting parking on Ash Street and
restricting any additional uses that would cause more parking
problems.
Councilman Pickler.
The premises had been used as an office for approximately five
years, and he saw no problem with that, due to the close
proximity to commercial on State College Boulevard and Broadway.
COUNCIL ACTION.
Mayor Bay declared the public hearing closed.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman
Bays seconded by Councilman Hunter, the City Council approved the neiative
declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative declaration
together with any comments received during the public review process, and
further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received
that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant
effect on the environment. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Bay moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions of the Agenda, after
reading of the title thereof by the City Clerk, and that consent to waiver is
hereby given by all Council Members, unless after reading of the title,
specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such
821
145
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES -.September 8, 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
ordinances or resolutions in regular order. Councilman Pickler seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Pickler offered a resolution reversing the action taken by the City
Planning Commission and approving Reclassification No. 87-88-02 and
Conditional Use Permit No. 2907, subject to conditions recommended by the
Interdepartmental Committee.
The motion failed to carry by the following vote:
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Ehrle and Pickler
Hunter, Kaywood and Bay
None
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Bay moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions of the Agenda, after
reading of the title thereof by the City Clerk, and that consent to waiver is
hereby given by all Council Members, unless after reading of the title,
specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such
ordinances or resolutiOns in regular order. Councilman Hunter seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Bay offered Resolution Nos. 87R -378 and 87R-379 for adoption,
upholding the action taken by the City Planning Commission denying subject
applications. Refer to Resolution Book
RESOLUTION NO. 87R-378: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ..DENYING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 87-88-02.
RESOLUTION NO. 87R-379: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2907.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Hunter, Kaywood and Bay
Ehrle and Pickler
None
Mayor Bay declared Resolution Nos. 87R-378 and 87R-379 duly passed and adopted.
RECESS: By general consent, the City Council recessed for five minutes.
105: ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT BOARD APPOINTMENTS: The City Clerk reported that
all former members of the Industrial Development Board had been contacted as
to their interest in possibly serving on the newly formed Economic Development
Board, and all had responded with the one exception, Mr. Robert Risteen.
Councilman Bay nominated five former members of the Industrial Development
Board, as follows: Fred Bercher, Allan Hughes, William Taormina, John Flocken
and Robert Risteen; terms to expire June 30, 1988, 1989, 1990, 1991, and 1991,
822
146
Cit7 Hall~ A-~heim~ Ca!iforn~a - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8~ 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
respectively. He noted that there were four more positions remaining, and
asked for Council input.
Discussion followed, and Councilman Pickler concurred with the five nominated
by Councilman Bay. He was of the opinion that more nominees were needed, and
recommended that appointments to the four remaining positions be continued
pending receipt of more applications.
Councilman Ehrle placed the name of Stan Pawlowski in nomination, and noted
the Board should be activated as soon as possible. He had no objection to
continuing the three remaining nominations for up to four weeks.
Councilman Bay moved to appoint the five whose names he had placed in
nomination. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY
CAR/tIED.
Councilman Bay moved to delay any further appointments for three weeks in
order to encourage more applications. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the
motion.
Further discussion was held, and it was pointed out that a quorum for the
Board would be five, and if one member was absent, there would be no quorum to
take any actions. Councilman Bay withdrew his motion and Councilwoman Kaywood
withdrew her second.
Councilwoman Kaywood pointed out that those nominated to any board or
commission were responsible to the entire City Council membership. She
expressed some concern with the appointment of Mr. Start Pawlowski whose letter
of interest was addressed to only Council Members Bay, Hunter and Ehrle.
Councilman Hunter nominated Stan Pawloski to the Economic Development Board.
Councilman Pickler nominated Chuck Cooper to the Board, citing Mr. Cooper's
long-standing involvement in civic affairs.
On motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilman Hunter, Stan Pawlowski was
appointed to the Board, term to expire June 30, 1990. Councilwoman Kaywood
abstained. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Pickler moved that Chuck Cooper be appointed to the Board, term to
expire June 30, 1989. MOTION CAR/LIED.
On motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilman Pickler, the remaining two
appointments, terms to expire June 30 1988, were continued to September 29,
1987. MOTION CARRIED.
CITY PIANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: The following actions taken by the City
Planning Commission at their meeting held August 17, 1987, pertaining to the
following applications were submitted for City Council information.
1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2924: Submitted by Golden Grain Macaroni Co.,
to retain a road base materials process, storage and distribution operation on
property located at 920 East Cerritos Avenue, with the following Code
823
143
City Hall, An-h-{m, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8, 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
waivers: (a) Minimum landscaped setback, (b) permitted fence encroachment,
(c) required site screening.
The applicant withdrew his application.
2. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 87-88-08 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2905:
Submitted by Kaiser Development Company, for a change in zone from ML(SC) to
CL(SC), to permit a 40-foot high multi-screen indoor theatre complex on
property located at 5635 East La Palms Avenue, with Code waiver of minimum
number of parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC87-159 and 160,
granted Reclassification No. 87-88-08 and Conditional Use Permit no. 2905, and
granted a negative declaration status.
3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2937: Submitted by Kee Whan Ha and Kyung Hee
Ha, (Scooterville, U.S.A.), to permit the sales and repair of motor scooters
on ML zoned property located at 1709 North Orangethorpe Park, with Code waiver
of minimum number of parking spaces.
The City Plannim~ Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC87-161, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 2937, and granted a negative declaration status.
4. VARIANCE NO. 3684: Submitted by Monte Verano Court Associates, to
construct two entry monument signs for an apartment complex on RM-1200 zoned
property located at 610-700 West Broadway, with Code waiver of maximum number
and size of identification signs.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC87-163, granted
Variance No. 3684, and ratified the Planning Director's categorical exemption
determination (Class 11).
5. VARIANCE NO. 3687: Submitted by Ernest MarruJo, (Toys R Us Property), to
construct a 90 square-foot addition to a freestanding sign on CG zoned
property located at 2232 South Harbor Boulevard, with the following Code
waivers: (a) Business sign definition, (b) maximum area of freestanding sign,
(c) permitted location of freestanding sign.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC87-164, granted
Variance No. 3687, and ratified the Planning Director's categorical exemption
determination (Class 11).
6. CONDITIONAL USE PF~RMIT NO. 2741--EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by Andrew
W. Edwards, Anaheim Hills Saddle Club, requesting a one year extension of time
for Conditional Use Permit No. 2741, to permit expansion of an equestrian
center on property located at 6352 East Nohl Ranch Road.
The City Planning Commission approved an extension of time to Conditional Use
Permit No. 2741, to expire January 6, 1988.
7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2749--EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by Rauh and
Price Architects, (St. Paul's Presbyterian Church), requesting a one year
824
144
Cit~ Hall, A~heim, California - COUNCIL HINUTES - September 8~ 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 2749, to permit a 40-unit
senior citizens apartment complex on property located at 2580 West Orange
Avenue.
The City Planning Commission approved an extension of time to Conditional Use
Permit No. 2749, to expire January 20, 1988.
8. VARIANCE NO. 3384--EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by Ronald Lacher,
requesting an extension of time for Conditional use Permit No. 3384, to
construct a 14-unit apartment complex on property located at 3538 West Savanna
Street.
The City Planning Commission approved an extension of time to Variance No.
3384, to expire August 6, 1988.
9. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2938: Submitted by Raymond A. and Connie Y.
Masciel, to permit a 4-unit senior citizens apartment complex on RM-2400 zoned
property located at 1222 West Pearl Street, with Code waiver of minimum
building site area per dwelling unit.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC87-162, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 2938, and granted a negative declaration status.
A review of the Planning Commission's decision was requested by Councilwoman
Kaywood and, therefore, a public hearing would be scheduled at a later date.
End of Planning Commission Informational Items.
179: RECLASSIFICATION NO. 87-88-04 AND VARIANCE NO. 3680: Submitted by
Philip W. Ganong, et al, for a change in zone from RS-A-43,000(O) to
RS-5000(O), to establish a 25-1ot single-family residential subdivision on
property.located at 1770 No. Lakeview Avenue, with the following Code
waivers: (a) Required lot frontage, (b) maximum lot coverage, (c) maximum
number of bedrooms. (denied)
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC87-157 and 158,
granted in part, Reclassification No. 87-88-04 and Variance No. 3680, and
granted a negative declaration status.
MOTION: Brief discussion was held and Councilwoman Kaywood was concerned
about"'the possibility of £our bedroom homes being constructed on the 10t sizes
planned for subject property. At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman
Pickler moved that residences be permitted to be located within 150 feet of an
oil well, in accordance with Section 17.12.07.015 of the Anaheim Municipal
Code, upon a finding that special circumstances render such distance
requirements unnecessary or unreasonable. Councilman Bay seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
179: REVIEW OF THE ZONING ADMINISTRATOR'S DECISIONS:
825
141
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8, 1987, 1:30 P.M.
1. VAILIANCE NO. 3678: Submitted by Donald J. and Charlene Stolo, to
establish a 2-lot, RS-HS-22,000(SC) zoned single-family residential
subdivision on property located at 7581 Martella Lane, with the following Code
waivers: (a) Minimum lot area, (b) minimum lot width.
Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator, pursuant to Resolution No. ZA87-15,
approved Variance No. 3678, and granted a negative declaration status. The
decision date was September 2, 1987.
2. VARIANCE NO. 3689: Submitted by Vincent and Patrice Ann Califano, to
retain a storage shed on property located at 331 South Yorkshire Circle, with
Code waiver of minimum side yard setback.
Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator, pursuant to Resolution No. ZA87-16,
approved Variance No. 3689. The decision date was September 2, 1987.
3. VARIANCE NO. 3693: Submitted by James D. and JonMarie Baker, to
construct a 38-foot high, rtl-level, single-family residence on property
located at 563 Paseo Ganado, with Code waiver of maximum building height.
Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator, pursuant to Resolution No. ZA87-17,
approved Variance No. 3693, and granted a negative declaration status. The
decision date was September 2, 1987.
4. VARIANCE NO. 3698: Submitted by John A. and Sharon G. McCluckey, to
construct a two-story, 36-foot high single-family residence on property
located at 295 Chrisalta Way, with Code waiver of maximum structural height.
Annika Santalahti, Zoning Administrator, pursuant to Resolution No. ZAB7-18,
approved Variance No. 3698. The decision date was September 2, 1987.
End of Zoning Administrator Informational Items.
111/106/162: PRESENTATION - RE-DISCOVERANAHEIM, ANAHEIM CHAMBER OF
COMM~/~CE: Robert Kuznik, President, Anaheim Chamber of Commerce~ advised that
the intent of the Chamber's program, entitled "Rediscover Anaheim", was to
encourage residents to shop in Anaheim. The program had been under
development for several years. They were not seeking a grant from the City
for a Chamber program, nor reimbursement for expenditures already made; they
were recommending approval of a nominal expenditure which the City would
quickly recover. He thereupon introduced Pamela Whishaw and Bob Bee, Members
of the Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, who had contributed over 500
hours each of volunteer time to this project, utilizing their expertise in the
public relations and advertising fields.
Mr. Bob Bee stated he and Ms. Whishaw would be presenting the first portion of
the Rediscover Anaheim Program, as representatives of the Chamber of Commerce,
and suggested that a steering committee be formed to determine the best way of
implementing this part of the program. He thereupon showed a fifteen-minute
video presentation depicting many of the City's business, shopping, service
and entertainment features.
826
142
City Hall, Anaheimt California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8~ 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
At the conclusion of the video presentation, Pamela Whishaw came forward and
pointed out that sales tax provides one of the major revenues for Anaheim, and
initiation of the new program would greatly increase the amount realized. In
1985, the Chamber had adopted a program, "Shop Anaheim". In 1986, funds were
solicited to produce the video presented today, and a telephone survey of
adult residents was conducted to determine shopping preferences (report from
the Chamber of Commerce on file in the Office of the City Clerk). Ms. Whishaw
stated the objectives of the recommended program were to build community
identification, encourage residents to be actively involved and to spend their
money in Anaheim, as well as to promote and support the City's Vision 2000
Program. She noted Anaheim Plaza's new management which had plans for
expansion/improvement of that shopping center; and pointed out the need for a
shopping center in the eastern portion of the City.
Costs for the first part of the campaign would amount to an initial ~50,000 to
start generating a measurable increase in sales tax revenues within four
months (107 to 520% return on investment was anticipated). One method
suggested was a discount card for Anaheim residents at no charge and no risk
to the City, as retailers would cover the costs for initial sign-up and
mailing. Another $100,000 would be needed during the first year. It would
take an estimated two months to launch the initial campaign.
Councilwoman Kaywood suggested that something be considered to encourage
tourists to shop in Anaheim rather than other locations in Orange County.
Councilman Pickier was of the opinion that the City should work along with the
Chamber of Commerce on the proposal; that the revenues from sales taxes would
be increased, and he favored the concept as presented. He pointed out that
Anaheim Plaza was in need of some kind of rejuvenation.
Councilman Hunter concurred with Councilman Pickler's remarks, and felt the
proposal would give Anaheim an improved image. In his opinion, there was a
real need for a shopping Center in Weir Canyon, and for more auto parks.
Councilman Bay expressed concern as to how the increased sales revenues would
be measured.
Bob Bee advised that there were ways to monitor and measure signifiqant
increases to these revenues.
Councilman Bay noted that with a $150,000 investment (first year), and the
projected return in increased sales tax revenues, he failed to see why any
public funds would be necessary. This kind of increase in sales profits
should be motivation enough to the business community to make the investment.
Mr. Bee concurred with the point made by Councilman Pickler, that the proposed
discount cards would amount to a sizeable cost to merchants and service
businesses. He advised that the video presentation had been paid for by the
Chamber of Commerce, Anaheim Plaza, and East Anaheim Shopping Center, together
with volunteer time, all of which would amount to more than the amount the
City is being asked to contribute; and the City would be the single largest
benefactor.
827
139
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8~ 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
In response to question by Councilwoman Kaywood, Ms. Whishaw advised that if
the City made the commitment to support the program, the public relations
firm could commence work on the campaign in time for Christmas shopping; this
would be the fastest means by which the response could be measured.
Councilman Pickler requested that the City Manager investigate the possibility
of obtaining some funds from the Public Utilities Department to assist with
the program.
MOTION: Councilman Pickler moved that the City Council authorize 5150,000 to
be paid into the "Rediscover Anaheim" program, with the initial 550,000 to be
taken from the Council Contingency Account immediately, and the City Manager
to report back to the Council with a recommendation on the funding of the
program for the first year. Councilman Ehrle seconded the motion. Councilman
Bay and Councilwoman Kaywood voted "now. MOTION CARRIED.
170/170.123: TRACT NO. 11856 - FINAL MAP: Clyde B and Joan M. Schlund,
requesting approval of the Final Map of Tract No. 11856, consisting of a five
lot, RS-HS-43,000(SC) zoned subdivision, located between Cerro Vista Drive and
Peralta Hills Drive, 650 feet southeast of Santa Ana Canyon Road, and
authorizing the Mayor and City Clerk to execute a Subdivision Agreement.
The City Engineer recommended approval of said final map, subject to approval
of the CC~R's and Letters of Credit by the City Attorney's Office; further,
that the Hayor be authorized to sign the Subdivision Agreement.
On motion by Councilman Pickler, seconded by Councilman Hunter, Final Map of
Tract No. 11856 was approved, and the Mayor was authorized to sign the
Subdivision Agreement, as recommended by the City Engineer. MOTION CARRIED.
169/179: PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CODE - SECTION 18.04.080: On May 5, 1987,
Staff was requested to report on a possible amendment to Municipal Code
Section 18.04.080 relating to street dedications and improvements to public
streets, permitting developers to post a bond in lieu of cash payments
required to insure construction of necessary improvements at a future
undetermined date. The proposed ordinance was continued to allow time for
amendments and refinement, as discussed on July 21st. This matter was
continued from the meetings of July 21 and August 18, 1987, to this date.
The City Engineer and City Attorney recommended approval o~ dra£t ordinance
designated Exhibit A.
Joan Allen, of Farano and Kieviet, Attorneys, 100 South Anaheim Boulevard,
Suite 340, Anaheim, representing several clients/developers in the City,
recalled letter submitted to the Council on July 14, 1987, and reiterated that
their first preference to insure installation of improvements was the posting
of a bond; if the City felt that was not feasible, then their preference was a
lien on the property.
Responding to question posed by Councilman Pickler, Attorney White referred to
Staff Report from the City Engineer and City Attorney, dated August 31, 1987,
and stated that a lien on property could probably be enforced in the form of a
828
140
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8, 1987~ 1:30 P.M.
covenant, provided that it was unsubordinated to any other encumbrance on the
property. In the event a situation were to arise where it was impossible to
get lenders to subordinate to a lien by the City, Staff preferred to keep the
currently existing requirements.
Mr. W. Daniel O'Connor, President, Corniche Development Corporation, and owner
of property at 800 S. Harbor Boulevard, requested permission to address the
Council. He advised that in order to develop their property, they were
required to dedicate for the widening of Harbor Boulevard 3,000 square feet,
and for Helena Street (at the rear of the parcel), another 1,000 square feet.
During the process of planning for their development, they had submitted a
plan providing for development of public improvements on both South and Helena
Streets, together with replacement or repair of major portions of existing
improvements on Harbor Boulevard; this plan was approved by Council on May 5,
1987, along with permission to post a bond for the improvements. He noted
that in January of 1986 the Code was amended to provide for the payment of
fees for street widening, and questioned the validity of making payments for
street improvements which may or may not ever occur.
Mr. Frank Feldhaus, 612 So. Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, expressed the opinion
that the proposed amendment was not sufficient, as the latitude for making the
decision remained in the hands of the City Engineer; and if a developer did
not agree, he would have to go through an appeal process. The proposed
ordinance did not protect building permit applications for small projects.
Councilman Ehrle moved that first reading of the ordinance be delayed two
weeks to allow him additional time to study the issue in depth and perhaps
discuss questions with Staff. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion.
In response to question by Councilman Bay, City Engineer Johnson reported on
background information preceding the decision that, when determination was
made that in lieu of placing the improvements they could be deferred to a
later date subject to payment of a cash equivalent fee, which would meet the
developer's obligation. The fee would be placed in a trust fund reserved for
street widening. He pointed out that although Harbor Boulevard had Just been
rehabilitated through replacement of pavement, the street had not been widened
to its future width.
Mr. O'Connor returned to point out that they essentially were being charged
twice for street improvements, since they were required to repair existing
deficiencies on Harbor Boulevard. Not only did they dedicate $60,000 worth of
property in all, but they were required to ~mke major expenditures for curb,
Sutter, sidewalks and utilities on Helena Street, pay the cost of widening
Harbor Boulevard, a project which has no definite date.
Councilman Hunter pointed out that posting the cash for the improvements at
this time would allow the developer to pay for said improvements at today's
costs, rather than costs at some future date.
Councilman Ehrle amended his motion to continue the proposed amendment to
October 13, 1987, instead of September 22nd. Councilman Pickler seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
829
137
City Hall~ Anmheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 8, 1987, 1:30 P.M.
169/179: ORDINANCE NO. 4866: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 4866
for first reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 4866: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION
18.04.080 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO STREET DEDICATIONS AND
IMPROVEMENTS TO PUBLIC STREETS. (Exhibit A)
MOTION: The motion to continue this subject to the meeting of October 13,
1987 was re-stated. MOTION CARRIED.
108/142: ORDINANCES FOR ADOPTION: Councilman Pickler offered Ordinance
Nos. 4864 and 4865 for adoption, and further offered Resolution No. 87R-377
for adoption. Refer to Ordinance and Resolution Book.
WAIV~ OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: .Councilman Bay moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions of this section of the
Agenda, after reading of the title thereof by the City Clerk, and that consent
to waiver is hereby given by all Council,Members, unless after reading of the
title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such
ordinances or resolutions in regular order. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 4864: AN ORDINANCE OF THE OF ANAHEIM AMENDING CHAPTER 4.16 OF
TITLE 4 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO DANCES.
RESOLUTION NO. 87R-377: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ESTABLISHING FEES RRI.&TING TO APPLICATIONS FOR DANCE PERMITS.
ORDINANCE NO. 4865: AN ORDINANCE OF THE OF ANAHEIM REPEALING AND ADDING
SECTIONS TO CHAPTER 14.40 OF TITLE 14 OF THE ANAHEIMMUNICIPAL CODE TO
INCB/~ASE THE SPEED LIMITS ON LINCOLN AVENUE FROM ANAHEIM BOULEVARD TO EAST
STREET.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCILMEMBERS:
Ehrle, Hunter, Pickler, Kaywood and Bay
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance Nos.
passed and adopted.
4864, 4865 and Resolution No. 87R-377 duly
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Bay moved to adjourn.
motion. MOTION CARRIED. (7:03 p.m)
LEONORA N. SOKL, CITY CLERK
Councilman Hunter seconded the
830