Loading...
1986/08/26City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26, 1986, 10:00 A.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt, Bay, Pickler and Roth COUNCIL MEMBERS: None CITY MANAGER: William 0. Talley CITY ATTORNEY: Jack White CITY CLERK: Leonora N. Sohl ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR ZONING: Annika Santalahti CODE ENFORCEMENT SUPERVISOR: John Poole ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER - MANAGEMENT SERVICES: Darrell Ament TRAFFIC ENGINEER: Paul Singer Mayor Roth called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance to the Council meeting. INVOCATION: Reverend Tim Van Heest, Anaheim Hills Community Church, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Miriam Kaywood led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 119: RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS: A Resolution of Congratulations was unanimously adopted by the City Council and presented to Police Explorer Post #174, for 23 years of service to Anaheim Police Department and residents. 119: RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS: A Resolution of Congratulations was unanimously adopted by the City Council and presented to Richard "Rick" Martinez, Post Advisor, Anaheim Police Explorers, for his outstanding commitment and accomplishments. MINUTES: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting ~eld August 5, 1986. Councilman Pickier seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions of the Agenda, after reading of the title thereof by the City Clerk, and that consent to waiver is hereby given by all Council Members, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such ordinances or resolutions in regular order. Councilman Bay seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $2,424,320.01, in accordance with the 1986-87 Budget, were approved. CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Pickler, the following items were approved in accordance with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar; Councilwoman Kaywood 713 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26~ 1986~ 10:00 A.M. offered Resolution Nos. 86R-378 through 86R-380, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. Councilwoman Kay~ood offered Ordinance Nos. 4755 and 4756 for first reading. 1. 118: The following claims were filed against the City and action taken as recommended: Claims rejected and referred to Risk Management: a. Claim submitted by Andy H. Grinstead for property damage sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about May 16, 1986. b. Claim submitted by Rauf Chammas for property damage sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about June 21, 1986. c. Claim submitted by Ray H. Phillips for bodily injury sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about June 16, 1986. d. Claim submitted by Greg Morton for bodily injury sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about April 18, 1986. e. Claim submitted by Michael W. Shoup for bodily injury sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about June 9, 1986. f. Claim submitted by Pacific Bell (H.A. Roach) for property damage sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about April 30, 1986. g. Claim submitted by Walter Jennings for property damage sustained purportedly due to actions of the City on or about July 5, 1986. 2. 177: Authorizing the Mayor to execute a letter of endorsement for 1,874 units under the Section 8 "Existing" Housing Assistance Payments Program. 3. 106/169: Authorizing the deletion of $377,000 SB 300 funds from Program No. 793, 1986-8'7 R.A.P. for Euclid Street rehabilitation; and adding $230,000 SB 300 funds to Program No. 793, 1986-87 R.A.P. for La Palma Avenue, Route 57 to Sunkist Street and $147,000 SB 300 funds to Program 793, 1986-87 R.A.P. for La PalmaAvenue, Magnolia Avenue to West City limit for rehabilitating and resurfacing the pavement. 4. 123: Authorizing an Amendment to Sublease Agreement with the Center for Employment Training for Orange County reducing the rental area at Trident Community Center and the rental charges by $6,921.66 for the period August 16, 1986 to January 14, 1987. 5. 160: Waiving Council Policy 306 and authorizing the Purchasing Agent to issue a purchase order to the Anaheim Public Improvement Corporation in the amount of $60,818.76 for Distribution System Engineering software and hardware. 6. 160: Waiving Council Policy 306 and authorizing the Purchasing Agent to issue a purchase order to the Anaheim Public Improvement Corporation in the amount of $63,811.76 for electronic radio equipment at Lewis Substation. 714 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26, 1986~ .10:00 A.M. 7. 175: RESOLUTION NO. 86R-378: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC WORK. (Sharp Substation Expansion, Account No. 55-655-6329-05952; and opening of bids on September 25, 1986, 2:00 p.m.) 8. 159: RESOLUTION NO. 86R-379: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTIONAND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC WORK. (Barrier Free Anaheim No. 11, barrier removal in area bound by East City Limit, Riverside Freeway, Orange Freeway and South Street, Account No. 17-793-6325-E3150; and opening of bids on September 25, 1986, 2:00 p.m.) 9. 158: RESOLUTION NO. 86R-380: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAItEIMACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTIES OR INTERESTS THEREIN. (R/W No. 3500-29) 10. 171/142: ORDINANCE NO. 4755: (URGENCY) AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FIXING AND LEVYING A PROPERTY TAX ON FULL CASH VALUE OF ALL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1986/87, DECLARING THAT THIS ORDINANCE SHAIJ, TAKE EFFECT IMMEDIATELY. 171/142: ORDINANCE NO. 4756: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FIXING AND LEVYING A PROPERTY TAX ON FULL CASH VALUE OF ALL PROPERTY WITHIN THE CORPORATE LIMITS OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR THE FISCAL YEAR 1986/87. Roll Call Vote on Resolution Nos. 86R-376 through 86R-380: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt, Bay, Pickler and Roth None None The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 86R-376 through 86R-380, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. Roll Call Vote on Ordinance No. 4755: AYES: NOES: ABSENT COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, 0verholt, Bay, Pickler and Roth None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4755 duly passed and adopted. End of Consent Calendar. MOTION CARRIED. 175: ELECTRIC RATES~ RULES AND REGULATIONS - REVISIONS: Public Utilities Board recommendation to amend the rates, rules and regulations for the sale and distribution of electric energy, as adopted by Resolution No. 7LR-478 and most recently amended by Resolution No. 86R-037, was submitted. At the request of Mayor Roth, Public Utilities Assistant General Manager Darrell L. Ament briefly highlighted the background of the recommendation. 715 He City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26~ 1986~ 10:00 A.M. reported that on August 27, 1986, the Public Utilities Board held a hearing and recommended that, in accordance with the City's Rate Stabilization Policy, the rate of transfer from the Rate Stabilization Account to the Electric Utilities Operating Fund be decreased from .4896 per kilowatt-hour to .3226 per kilowatt-hour. This was the essence of the recommendation. Mr. Ament explained for Councilman Bay that the City did have litigation for possible refunds pending; however, it could be one to two years, or more, before the amounts of potential refunds would be known. No increase in rates was anticipated at this time. Councilman Pickler offered Resolution No. 86R-381 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 86R-381: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE RATES, RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE SALE AND DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC ENERGY AS ADOPTED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 711{-478 AND MOST RECENTLY AMENDED BY CITY COUNCIL RESOLUTION NO. 86R-037. CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: The following actions taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held August 4, 1986, pertaining to the following applications were submitted for City Council information. 1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2805: Submitted by Richard G. and Barbara L. Saylor, to permit a bed and breakfast inn on RM-2400 zoned property located at 804 West Broadway. The applicant withdrew his application. 2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2820 (READV.): Submitted by Gutab and Laiwanti Kanal, to permit an animal hospital on CL zoned property located at 625 South Harbor Boulevard, with Code waivers of minimum dimension of vehicle accessways, minimum number of parking spaces and required trash enclosure. The applicant withdrew his application. 3. GENERAL pr,AN AMENDMENT NO. 213 (RFADV.), RECLASSIFICATION NO. 85-86-33 (READY.) AND VAi~ANCE NO. 3568 (READV.): Submitted by Claudia Kinne, et al, to consider amendment to the Land Use Element o~ the Ceneral Plan to conmider alternative proposal of land use from the current general industrial designations to the general commercial designation, a change in zone from ML to CL, to expand retail uses in an existing retail/warehouse building on property located at 509 East Katella, with Code waivers of minimum number of parking spaces and minimum landscaped area to expand retail uses in an existing retail/warehouse building. The City Planning Commission approved General Plan Amendment No. 213 (Ready.), Reclassification No. 85-86-33 and Variance No. 3568 (Ready.), and a public hearing is scheduled to be held by the City Council on September 9, 1986. 4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2767: Submitted by Robert C. and Lois Stovall, Stovall Inn/Best Western, to permit a non-ferrous metal recycling facility 716 Cit7 Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26, 1986, 10:00 A.M. with outdoor storage on RS-7200 zoned property located at 1160 North Tustin Avenue, with Code waiver of minimum number of required parking spaces. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-206, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 2767, to expire February 4, 1987, and granted a negative declaration status. 5. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 86-87-2: Submitted by Gene L. Felling, for a change in zone from RM-1200 to RS-7200, on property located at 2220 South Loara Street. The applicant withdrew his application. 6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2829: Submitted by Magnolia Baptist Church, to permit a pre-school elementary school in conjunction with an existing church on RS-A-43,000 zoned property located at 820 South Magnolia Avenue, with Code waivers of minimum number of parking spaces and maximum fence height. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-208, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 2829, and granted a negative declaration status. 7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2830: Submitted by Lonnie Dunn III, to permit industrially-related office uses in a proposed 3-story building on ML zoned property located at 2130 South State College Boulevard. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC85-209, granted Conditional Use Permit No. 2830, and granted a negative declaration status. 8. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2831: Submitted by Bradmore Realty Investment Company, to permit an automobile storage and wholesale sales lot with a temporary trailer and outdoor automobile repair and carwash on ML zoned property located at 280 East Palais Road, with the following Code waivers: (a) prohibited outdoor uses, (b) required enclosure of outdoor uses (in part), (c) required trash enclosure (denied). The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-210, granted in part, Conditional Use Permit No. 2831, to expire August 4, 1987, and granted a negative declaration status. 9. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 84-85-33--RESOLUTION NO. PC85-119: Submitted by Planning Commission Secretary, request to amend Resolution No. PC85-119, nunc pro tunc, granting Reclassification No. 84-85-33, deleting Condition No. 5. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-212, amended Reclassification No. 84-85-33 -- Resolution No. PC85-119. 10. CLAKIFICATION OF BOUNDARIES OF GENERAL PLAN STUDY: Submitted by Planning Staff, requesting clarification of the boundaries of the General Plan Study adjacent to the west side of Anaheim Hills Road between Nohl Ranch Road and Santa Ana Canyon Road. The City Planning Commission approved inclusion of Areas A, B and C in the Clarification of Boundaries of General Plan Study. 717 City H~!!, Anmheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26~ 1986, 10:00 A.M. 11. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2802: Submitted by Munkyo Cho and Hyon Sun Cho, to retain an auto towing, impound and repair facility on ML zoned property located at 806 North Brookhurst Street, with the following Code waivers: (a) minimum structural setback and minimum yard, (b) minimum dimensions of parking spaces (deleted), (c) minimum number and type of parking spaces. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC85-207, granted in part, Conditional Use Permit No. 2802, and granted a negative declaration status. A review of the Planning Commission's decision was requested by Councilwoman Kaywood and, therefore, a public hearing would be scheduled at a later date. 12. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2833: Submitted by Eric T. and Dolores Y. Erickson, to permit an automotive service facility on CL zoned property located on the southwest corner of Orange Avenue and WestermAvenue, with Code waivers of minimum number of required parking spaces (denied) and minimum landscaped setback. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC86-211, granted in part, Conditional Use Permit No. 2833, and granted a negative declaration status. A review of the Planning Commission's decision was requested by Councilman Pickler and, therefore, a public hearing would be scheduled at a later date. End of Planning Commission Information Items. MOTION CARRIED. 179: CODE AMENDMENT - ADDITIONAL USES FOR CONDITIONAL USES IN ML ZONE: Requested was submitted by Frank A. Lowry, Jr., of Farano & Kieviet, Attorneys, to consider amendment to the Anaheim Municipal Code for the inclusion of retail and wholesale carpet and petroleum-based floor coverings as a conditional use in the }fL Zone. The City Planning Commission recommended that the Zoning Code be amended to allow subject use as a conditional use in the Industrial Zone, excluding the Anaheim Canyon Industrial Area. Councilman Roth moved that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare the amendment as recommended. City Council discussion ensued, and Mr. Lowry came forward to answer questions. He stated that although carpet and other floor covering sales were a retail use by definition, these products were supplied in large bulk and were, therefore, extremely difficult to properly display and to store. The character of the business was not strictly a normal retail operation. Responding to additional questioning by Council Members, Mr. Lowry stated that his clients, West Coast Carpets, would not request permission to display flags and banners, nor paint signs on the windows, for advertising purposes. The facility would employ between ten and fifteen persons. 718 Cit7 Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26, 1986, 10:00 A.M. Annika Santalahti, Assistant Director for Zoning, pointed out that flags and banners are not allowed in the industrial zone. Councilwoman Kaywood expressed her concern that the industrial areas should remain for industrial usage, and not be infiltrated with commercial retail uses. Councilman Roth restated his motion directing the City Attorney to prepare the amendment as proposed. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. Councilwoman Kaywood voted no. MOTION CARRIED. 108/142: ORDINANCE NO. 4725 - PROPOSED RESOLUTION: Amending Section 14.32.310 of the Code relating to vending from vehicles. This matter was continued from June 17, July 1, 8 and 22, 1986, to this date. Also scheduled for consideration was a related resolution establishing Permit Application and appeal fees pursuant to Section 14.32.310 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Overholt, final adoption of Ordinance No. 4725 and consideration of the proposed resolution were continued to two weeks (September 9, 1986) for input from staff pertaining to recommendations recently submitted by the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce. MOTION CARRIED. 179: REHEARING REQUEST - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2756: Request for a rehearing submitted by Floyd L. Farano, Attorney for Orange County Steel Salvage, for Conditional Use Permit No. 2756, to permit temporary outdoor storage of shredder waste and dismantled automobiles on RS-A-43,000 zoned property located at 3200 East Frontera Road (denied by Council on July 15, 1986, Res. 86R-335) was submitted and continued from the meeting of August 5, 1986. Councilman Roth moved that subject request be continued one week (September 2, 1986), to be considered in conjunction with a scheduled public hearing on Conditional Use Permit Nos. 1703 and 2525. Floyd L. Farano, Attorney representing the petitioner, was present and indicated his concurrence with the one-week continuance. Councilman Bay seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 169/142: ORDINANCE NO. 4748: Councilman Pickler offered Ordinance No. 4748 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 4748: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADDING NEW SECTION 17.08.433 TO CHAPTER 17.08 OF TITLE 17 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO BENEFIT DISTRICTS. Roll Call Vote: 719 City Hall, AnAheim, C-l~fornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26~ 1986, 10:00 A.M. AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, 0verholt, Pickler and Roth NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Bay ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4748 duly passed and adopted. 132/142: ORDINANCE NO. 4749: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 4749 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 4749: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SUBSECTION .060 OF SECTION 10.10.10 AND SUBSECTION .030 OF SECTION 10.10.30 OF CHAPTER 10.10 OF TITLE 10 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE PERTAINING TO WASTE COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt, Bay, Pickler and Roth None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4749 duly passed and adopted. 132/142: ORDINANCE NO. 4750: Councilman Both offered Ordinance No. 4750 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 4750: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SECTION 10.10.020 OF CHAPTER 10.10 OF TITLE 10 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO COLLECTION AND DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt, Bay, Pickler and Roth None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4750 duly passed and adopted. 179: ORDINANCE NOS. 4751 THROUGH 4754: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance Nos. 4751 through 4754, both inclusive for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 4751: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Amending Title 18, Reclass. 67-68-68(6), RM-1200, 1224, 1228 and 1236 East La Palma Avenue) ORDINANCE NO. 4752: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Amending Title 18, Reclass. 67-68-68(5), RM-1200, 1280 East La Palma Avenue) ORDINANCE NO. 4753: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. 720 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26, 1986~ 10:00 A.M. (Amending Title 18, Reclass. 85-85-18, RM-1200, north side of Lincoln Avenue, east of Magnolia Avenue) ORDINANCE NO. 4754: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING MAP REFF2d~ED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Amending Title 18, Reclass. 65-66-24(33), ML, 4150 East La Palma Avenue) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt, Bay, Pickler and Roth None None The Mayor declared Ordinance Nos. 4751 through 4754, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. 179: ORDINANCE NO. 4757: Councilman Bay offered Ordinance No. 4757 for first reading. ORDINANCE NO. 4757: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Amending Title 18, Reclass. 73-74-28 RS-HS-22,000(SC)) 179: ORDINANCE NO. 4758: Councilman Bay offered Ordinance No. 4758 for first reading. ORDINANCE NO. 4758: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (Amending Title 18, Reclass. 84-85-28 CO(SC) commercial office and professional zone) 114/173: I.C.A.A. MEMBERSHIP - CITY OF IRVINE: Councilman Pickler moved that the Anaheim City Council take a position in favor of the City of Irvine's proposed membership and service on the Inter-County Airport Authority. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. 123: CANYON PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER ACCESS: Mayor Roth recalled that discussion had been held with Harry Rinker, property owner at Canyon Plaza Shopping Center, during a meeting approximately two years ago, and Mr. Rtnker was to work towards making improvements relative to ingress and egress to the shopping center, located at the northeast corner of Imperial Highway and Santa Ama Canyon Road. One of the major problems was that the deceleration lane on Santa Aha Canyon Road was not long enough and should be extended. The Mayor thereupon requested a report from the Traffic Engineer on the status of the proposed improvements. RECESS - CLOSED SESSION: Mayor Roth announced that a Closed Session would be held to confer with the City Attorney regarding: 721 City Hall, Amaheim} C-3ifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26} 1986~ 10:00 A.M. a. Pending litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9(a), to wit: Golden West Baseball Co. vs. City of Anaheim, Orange County Superior Court Case No 40-92-46; Ann Dominici vs. City of Anaheim, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 39-46-49; Jane Tipton vs. City of Anaheim, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 37-51-07; Ann Marie Vigil vs. City of Anaheim, Orange County Superior Court Case No. 39-38-61. b. To confer with its attorney regarding potential litigation pursuant to Government Code Section 54956.9 (b) (1). MOTION: Councilman Roth moved to recess into Closed Session and a lunch break. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (11:00 a.m.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Roth called the meeting to order, all Council Members being present. (1:30 p.m.). 179: PUBLIC WEAR~NG - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2821 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION: APPLICANT: Henry and Chantana Lew 2224 Spinnaker Street Anaheim, Ca. 92802 ZONING/LOCATION/REQUEST: RS-7200 zoned property located at 2224 Spinnaker Street/to permit a board and care facility for up to 12 adults. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Denied by the Planning Commission (PC86-183). HEARING SET ON: Appeal by the applicant. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY: Publication in Anaheim Bulletin August 15, 1986 Posting of property August 15, 1986 Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - August 15, 1986 PLANNING STAFF INPUT: See Staff Report dated July 7~ 1986. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT: Reverend Yeo, 1534 South Center Street, Santa Aha spoke on behalf of Mr. and Mrs. Lew. He noted that most of the neighbors did not agree with the second story construction originally proposed, consequently the Lew's have revised their plans to build a smaller ground floor addition of one bath and three bedrooms, which will allow them to accommodate two additional clients. Originally the CUP was requested to allow a total of 12 clients, they now propose, with the smaller expansion plans, a total of 8 clients. One of the new bedrooms would accommodate the new clients, a second bedroom is to be used for a relative (mother-in-law) moving from overseas and the third room will be used as an isolation space for any clients who become ill. 722 Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26~ 1986, 10:00 A.M. Reverend Yeo described the history of Mr. and Mrs. Lew's move to the United States and eventual citizenship. He also noted that the Quality Assurance Committee interviewed Mrs. Lew and observed her operation. She received a very high score (592.5 out of 625 perfect score) which indicates that the operation and maintenance of her facility is well beyond required standards. Keverend Yeo explained that the clients are not supervised at this facility for 24 hours, but attend handicrafts or go to work during the day. PUBLIC DISCUSSION: IN FAVOR: Bailey Fisher, 4215 West Chapman. He walks in this area often and has never seen anything out of the ordinary. Margaret Kaiserman, 2121 Mountain View Avenue, Anaheim. She indicated she has visited the home and was impressed with how quiet and well run the facility is. Noting that the neighbors objected to 12 clients, she was of the opinion that an additional two would not create a great impact. OPPOSED: Cliff Rothrock, 2161 South Spinnaker Street. Indicated that his opposition has nothing to do with Mrs. Lew, whom he feels is a fine lady who does an excellent Job on upkeep of the grounds and of her property, and has no problem with the way the home is operated at present. He objects to expanding the use as it is a commercial operation in a residential area. He pointed out that the area residents are concerned about additional traffic, especially coming from the north. He submitted a petition containing 83 signatures of area residents in opposition. Jack Pierce, 2130 South Spinnaker Street. Opposed on the grounds that (1) this is a single family residential community, prices of the homes exceed 3100,000, amd the homeowners purchased here to raise families and in anticipation of a certain lifestyle; (2) that this is a business in an area not zoned for business; (3) there is a profit for the owners at an inconvenience for others. He wants to feel secure in that his children can play in the front yards without risk to their health or safety. Carolyn Miller, 2151 South Spinnaker. Related that she circulated petitions and the majority of people think that the six clients are fine, but don't want it to go higher than that figure. Richard Lopez, 2140 South Nautical. Objected to this as it is a business in a residential neighborhood. The neighborhood is stable and he wishes it to 723 City Hal!, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26~ 1986, 10:00 A.M. remain that way. He stated these clients do walk through the neighborhood and do objectionable things. Fran Garrity, 2160 South Spinnaker Street. Noted that the neighbors have for many years strived to preserve the neighborhood as is. She is concerned that a CUP to allow 8 clients would Just be the beginning for further requests. She is not opposed to the revised one-story expansion if it does not increase the number of clients. William Niebala, 2218 So. Spinnaker. He voiced the opinion that the home and property are just not large enough for what Mrs. Lewwishes to accomplish. He further objects because Mrs. Lew's clients stare over the wall into his yard. EXHIBITS, MATERIALS SUBMITTED: Petitions in opposition (3 pages) containing approximately 83 signatures. Letter circulated by Creator Home Care indicating no opposition to the one-story extension with 8 clients (5 pages) and containing approximately 123 signatures. FINAL SUMMATION BY APPLICANT: Reverend Yeo summarized that Mrs. Lew would not add anymore than eight clients, that she is at a break-even point with six, and the two additional clients would give her some income. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Councilman Bay. State programs such as this which allow non-residential uses and encroach upon the rights of property owners are of concern to him. He views the requests to the City Council for protection from the area homeowners under the zoning code their right. Mayor Roth. Although home care facilities such as this one are necessary, he agreed that the citizens have the right to expect protection from the City Council. Councilwoman Kaywood. Agreed that there is a great need for such homes, but these should not be instituted at the expense of people who have bought their homes in the neighborhood. COUNCIL ACTION: Mayor Roth closed the public hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilman Overholt, the City Council approved the negative declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative declaration 724 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26~ 1986~ 10:00 A.M. together with any comments received during the public review process, and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Bay offered Resolution No. 86R-382 for adoption, upholding the findings of the City Planning Commission, and denying Conditional Use Permit No. 2821. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 86R-382: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2821. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, 0verholt, Bay, Pickler and Roth None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 86R-382 duly passed and adopted. RECESS: By general consensus, the City Council took a five minute break. (2:50 p.m.) AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members being present. (2:55 p.m.) 179: PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2818 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION: APPLICANT: Ramesh Patel (Crest Motel) 2650 W. Lincoln Avenue Anaheim, Ca. 92805 ZONING/LOCATION/REQUEST: RS-A-43,000 zoned property located at 2650 West Lincoln Avenue/to retain 4 kitchenettes in an existing 16 unit motel. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Granted by the Planning Commission (PC86-182). HEARING SET ON: Review requested by Councilwoman Kaywood at the meeting of July 29, 1986. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY: Publication in Anaheim Bulletin August 14, 1986. Posting of property August 15, 1986. Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - August 15, 1986. PLANNING STAFF INPUT: See Staff Report dated July 7, 1986. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT: Ramesh Patel, 2650 West Lincoln Avenue In response to Councilwoman Kaywood's questions, Mr. Patel advised that when he purchased the motel property in 1983 the 725 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26~ 1986~ 10:00 A.M. four kitchenette units were in place. These were subsequently removed and he is now seeking permission to install them once again. He advised that most of his guests lived in the hotel for 1-2 weeks up to a month. He noted that since apartments require the 1st and second month's rent, some people stay in motel units. PUBLIC DISCUSSION: IN FAVOR: None. OPPOSED: None. EXHIBITS MATERIALS SUBMITTED: No materials submitted. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Councilwoman Kaywood. One of her major concerns relative to this item is the fact that motels built with kitchen facilities have tended to become substandard apartments. To discourage this trend, it was determined to limit kitchen units to only 25% of the project. Further she was concerned whether this motel, which was built in 1956, 30 years ago, could meet current housing and development standards. FINAL SUMMATION BY APPLICANT: Mr. Patel in response to Councilwoman Kaywood's concerns noted that this motel has 16 units, of which they would like permission to install 4 kitchenettes. CHANGES TO PROPOSALAS A RESULT OF DISCUSSION/COUNCIL CONCERN: No changes. COUNCIL ACTION: Mayor Roth closed the public hearing. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: Om motion by Councilman Pickler, seconded by Councilman Bay, the City Council approved the negative declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative declaration together with any comments received during the public review process, and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received, that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. MOTION CARRIED. Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 86R-383 for adoption, upholding the findings of the City Planning Commission, and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2818. Roll Call Vote: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt, Bay, Pickler and Roth COUNCIL MEMBERS: None COUNCIL MEMBERS: None 726 The Mayor declared Resolution No. 86R-383 duly passed and adopted. City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26, 1986~ 10:00 A.M. 179: REHEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2777 (READV.) AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION: APPLICANT: Burnett-Ehline Properties 2050 South Santa Cruz, #100 Anaheim, Ca. 92805 ZONING/LOCATION/REQUEST: ML zoned property, located at 2100 South State College/To permit an industrially related office building. PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION: Granted in part by the Planning Commission (PC86-8o). HEARING SET ON: Review of the Planning Commission decision was requested by Councilwoman Kaywood. Public hearing held May 27, 1986, at which time the City Council denied the Conditional Use Permit. The applicant has requested a rehearing with readvertisement of revised plans, which was granted by the City Council and scheduled this date. PUBLIC NOTICE REQUIREMENTS MET BY: Publication in Anaheim Bulletin August 14, 1985 Posting of property August 15, 1986 Mailing to property owners within 300 feet - August 15, 1986. PLANNING STAFF INPUT: See Staff Report dated August 20, 1986. APPLICANT'S STATEMENT: Mr. Jack Harry, 14 Mountainview, Irvine, Agent for the Petitioner. He explained that they had redesigned the project and consequently waivers b, d and e, are no longer required. They have reduced the size of the building down to 8100 ft. and are no longer seeking a parking waiver. They are in accord with the Traffic Department's request for complete dedication for the critical intersection program, if that is adopted. Consequently what they are requesting is to be allowed to observe a 10 foot setback, after the dedication for the critical intersection, with berm and ~idewalk aB required. The plan is to have a brick perimeter wall along both 0rangewood and State College to screen the parking. The entrance for parking would be underneath a portal, and the driveway itself they are asking to be 23 feet in width rather than the 25 feet. The redesign has eliminated the double loading features. This will be a 2-story building with below-grade parking (3-1/2 feet below grade). The redesign concept was to still come up with an efficient land use consistent with what is being built around this property. It is their feeling that this screening will enhance the corner. Regarding setback, he advised that Planning Staff is considering a proposal for a 15 foot berm and sidewalk in this area, and this compounds their problem with this land parcel, since it is in addition to the dedication for the critical intersection program. 727 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26~ 1986, 10:00 A.M. They now have 32 parking spaces which is at code, and are asking for three additional spaces to be allowed to be compact in size. He voiced the opinion that the City would have a legitimate basis to distinguish this request from others, i.e. the traffic needs have placed an unusually heavy burden for dedication on this property. In concluding Mr. Harry noted the technical language in Condition No. 12 regarding the uses which would be allowed on the property, and was advised that these were the subject of much discussion between City Council, Planning Staff and Planning Commission with input from developers and are the end product of those extensive discussions, hence difficult to reconsider at this time. PUBLIC DISCUSSION: IN FAVOR: None. OPPOSED: None. EXHIBITS MATERIALS SUBMITTED: None. SPECIAL CONCERNS OF CITY COUNCIL MEMBERS: Councilman Pickler. Was concerned about the requested waiver from required landscaped setbacks. He felt even with the revised proposal, it would overbuild the property. Councilwoman Kaywood. Noted that lack of foresight on setbacks with respect to Anaheim Boulevard eventually cost the taxpayers millions to purchase property for widening. STAFF INPUT: Paul Singer, Traffic Engineer. Noted that this particular intersection (State College/Orangewood) is a critical one and in addition to that it is also rather critical due to the reverse curve on State College Boulevard which should be straightened out. It will also be necessary to widen State College on the east side and Orangewood will also have to be widened as well. It is recommended that if a waiver from setbacks is granted that a minimum 30' setback on both 0rangewood and State College be maintained in order to accommodate the need for critical intersections. Councilman Pickler noted that this developer is willing to dedicate the requirements for the critical intersection program, and questioned whether now the Traffic Engineer was saying this is not sufficient and more space is required. 728 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - August 26, 1986, 10:00 A.M. Mr. Singer responded yes, the City would have to acquire additional right of way in the future. Councilman Bay noted that may be 10 to 20 years in the future, and that the developer has agreed to dedicate what has been requested. COUNCIL ACTION: Councilman Bay offered Resolution No. 86R-384 for adoption approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2777, in accordance with Revised Plans labeled Revision No. 1 of Exhibit Nos. 1 through 3, and subject to Conditions 1 through 14 as set forth in Staff Report dated August 20, 1986. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 86R-384: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2777. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt, Bay and Roth Kaywood and Pickler None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 86R-384 duly passed and adopted. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Roth moved to adjourn to Thursday, August 28, 1986 at 1:30 p.m. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:47 p.m.) LEONORA N. SOHL, CITY CLERK 729