1984/12/18199,
City Ha11~ An~hetm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEHBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
P~S~T:
~SENT:
P~S~T:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, 0verholt and Roth
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
CITY MANAGER: William 0. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins
ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR ZONING: Annika Santalahti
NEIGHBORHOOD RESTORATION SPECIALIST: Pat Whitaker
PLANNING DIRECTOR: Ron Thompson
Mayor Roth called the meeting to order and welcomed those in
attendance to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION: Reverend Joseph Huttenlocker, The Salvation Army, gave the
Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Council Member Irv Pickler led the assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
119: PROCLAMATION: The following proclamation was issued by Mayor Roth and
authorized by the City Council:
"Veterans of Foreign Wars Month" in Anaheim, December 1984.
The Veterans of Foreign Wars proclamation was accepted by Les McAulay, VFW
Chaplain.
119: PRESENTATION - GLADHANDERS OF ANAHEIM: Bill Schwinn explained that each
year the Gladhanders honored one of its members who typified the spirit of the
organization bestowing upon that member the Gladhander of the Year title. The
unanimous choice of the Selection Committee this year was going to a member
who had one of the best attendance records, attended mostly all special events
and one who was ready and available to participate in special activities. It
was the first time in the two-year history of the organization that an
honorable member was selected due to the outstanding participation of that
member. It was with great pleasure, on behalf of the Gladhanders to present
the Gladhander of the Year Award to Mayor Don Roth.
Mayor Roth accepted the award and expressed his great pleasure and pride in
having been chosen for the honor. He commended the organizat~on who had done
so much for the City acting as the official greeter as well as bringing much
business to the City of Anaheim.
MINUTES: Approval of the minutes was deferred to the next regular meeting.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Bay moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions of the Agenda, after
reading of the title thereof by the City Clerk, and that consent to waiver is
hereby given by all Council Members, unless after reading of the title,
specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such
ordinances or resolutions in regular order. Councilman Pickler seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
1188
200
City Ha!]~ An~heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $2,077,600.56, in
accordance with the 1984-85 Budget, were approved.
CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilman Pickler,
seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the following items were approved in
accordance with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each
Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar; Councilman Pickler
offered Resolution Nos. 84R-488 through 84R-502, both inclusive, for
adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
1. 118: The following claims were filed against the City and action taken as
recommended:
Claims rejected and referred to Risk Management:
a. Claim submitted by Mr. Akbar Namdarkhan for personal property damages
sustained purportedly due to malfunctioning transformer at 6871 East Rutgers
Drive, on or about September 9, 1984.
b. Claim submitted by Jackie Feenstra for personal injury damages
sustained purportedly due to a slip-and-fall accident at the Stadium, Club
Deck, on or about September 15, 1984.
c. Claim submitted by Jose II and Vanessa Cano for personal injury
damages sustained purportedly due to an accident at the Stadium, on or about
October 14, 1984.
d. Claim submitted by E. Michael Keating for personal property damages
due to an accident in which a City-owned vehicle and City driver were involved
in the parking lot of the Stadium in the area reserved for
"Anything-Goes-A-Thon," on or about October 20, 1984.
e. Claim submitted by Clyde F. Shultz for personal property damages
sustained purportedly due to failure of transformer at 829 South Reseda, on or
about August 24, 1984.
f. Claim submitted by Michael Roy DePalma for personal property damages
sustained purportedly due to fall while in pursuit of suspect at the Stadium,
Gate #2, on or about October 7, 1984.
g. Claim submitted by Timothy John Gallant for indemnity based on
Superior Court Case No. 43-08-83, De La Torte vs. Gallant, on or about
October 5, 1984.
h. Claim submitted by Madeline Rubin for personal injury damages
sustained purportedly due to a slip-and-fall accident at the Stadium, Aisle,
Row HH, on or about September 23, 1984.
i. Claim submitted by Craig C. Stevens for personal injury damages
sustained purportedly due to actions of Anaheim Police Officers, on or about
August 17, 1984.
1189
197
City Ha11~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
J. Claim submitted by Greg Guy Page for personal injury damages sustained
purportedly due to actions of Anaheim Police Officers at the Stadium, 2000
South State College, on or about August 20, 1984.
k. Claim submitted by Paul S. Robbins for false arrest, false
imprisonment, conversion of property, battery, violation of civil rights,
intentional infliction of emotional distress, sustained purportedly due to
actions of Anaheim Police Officers at the Stadium, near Entrance Gate 3, on or
about September 23, 1984.
Application for Leave to Present a Late Claim - recommended to be denied:
1. Claim submitted by Mahendrabhai Ratanbhai Goswami for personal injury
damages sustained purportedly due to an accident caused by negligent design
and maintenance of street on La Palma Avenue, on or about May 27, 1984.
m. Claim submitted by Carl Karcher Enterprises Corporation Headquarters
for property damages sustained purportedly due to a power outage at 1200 North
Harbor Boulevard, on or about December 25, 1983.
®
Receiving and filing the following correspondence: (on file)
a. 156: Police Department--Crime and Clearance Analysis for the month of
November, 1984.
b. 105: Golf Advisory Commission--Minutes of November 15, 1984.
c. 107: Planning Department, Building Division--Report for November 1984.
d. 105: Community Redevelopment Commission--Minutes of November 21
and 29, 1984.
e. 173: City of Oceanside, Resolution No. 84-267, Calling for the
Establishment of the Southwest Coast Corridor and the Southwest Coast
Corridor Intercity Rail Passenger Management and Development Commission
and Supporting the Improvement of Certain Amtrak Intercity Passenger Train
Services in Southern California across the Southwest Corridor.
Councilwoman Kayw00d asked for staff comments on whether there would be
merit in having Anaheim join; City Manager William Talley stated that a
staff report would be prepared for Council's consideration.
3. 108: Approving an application for Public Dance Permit submitted by Nick
Estrella Ramirez, for New Generation Productions, to hold a dance at the
Anaheim Convention Center on December 29, 1984, from 7:00 p.m. to 1:00 a.m.,
in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Police.
4. 144: Approving the proposed development of The Stratham Group, to be
located at 1235 East Lincoln Avenue, for inclusion in the Orange County
Multi-family Revenue Bond Program.
1190
198
City Hall~ An-heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
5. 123/129: Authorizing the Fire Chief to enter into an agreement with
William D. Ross, Attorney-at-Law, in an amount not to exceed ~1,552 for
representation in the appeal of the Carmel Valley Fire Protection District Et
Al., v. State of California, et al., IASC No. C437471, 2d No. 2 Civ. B006078
to recover certain state mandated costs.
6. 123/140: Waiving Council Policy No. 401 and authorizing an agreement with
the San Diego State University Foundation to develop a microcomputer software
system for the cooperative library project, for the period October 1, 1984
through September 30, 1985.
7. 123/140: Waiving Council Policy No. 401, and authorizing an agreement
with Transworld Systems, Inc. in the amount of $11,000, for collection agency
services for recovery of an estimated 550,000 worth of unreturned library
materials per year.
8. 153/152: Authorizing a form of agreement to be used in contracting with
certain organizations for temporary personnel services for the period ending
December 31, 1985, and authorizing the Human Resources Director to execute
said agreements.
9. 123/153: Authorizing 1985 renewal agreements withKaiser Foundation
Health Plan, CIGNA Health Plan, General Medical Centers, Family Health
Program, Vision Service Plan, Dental Health Services and California
Psychological Health Plan; premium rates therefor; and authorizing the Human
Resources Director to execute same.
10. 123/153: Authorizing the Human Resources Director to execute a letter
agreement with Mercer-Meidinger, Inc., at a total estimated cost of 513,000,
to provide consulting services for the City health and welfare benefit plans
for 1985.
11. 123/153: Authorizing an agreement with Inland Health Plan, a federally
qualified HMO, to provide prepaid health care services to eligible City
employees, effective January 1, 1985.
12. 155: Approving an EIRNegative Declaration and construction plans for a
helistop at 5340 East La Palma Avenue, (Canyon West Ltd.), subject to certain
conditions; and approving the helistop at subject location.
13. 155: Approving an ELR Negative Declaration and construction plans for a
helistop at 5505 East La Palma Avenue, (Canyon Corporate Center, Ltd.),
subject to certain conditions; and approving the helistop at subject location.
14. 123: Authorizing an agreement with Michael J. Arnold and Associates,
Inc., at a cost 52,666.67 per month, as legislative representative and
advocate in Sacramento, to commence January 1, 1985, and continue from year to
year unless terminated by either party.
15. 123: Authorizing an agreement with Nelson Behrend, in the amount of
~91,575 to provide architectural design services for the construction of Fire
Stations Nos. 2 and 3.
1191
195
City Nall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
16. 123: Authorizing an agreement with Los Angeles & Salt Lake Railroad
Company and its lessee, Union Pacific Railroad, at a cost not to exceed
$10,000, to perform engineering studies in conjunction with the Lincoln Avenue
underpass, within 6 months of execution of agreement.
17. 150: Approving the substitution of Mayberry Plumbing Company for Atlas
Plumbing, the listed subcontractor for the La Palma Park Restroom Project, as
requested by Gotham Company, Inc., prime contractor.
20. 160: Waiving Council Policy No. 306 and authorizing the Purchasing Agent
to issue a purchase order to R. J. Noble Company in the amount of $26,240.38
for the repair of the H. G. "Dad" Miller Golf Course pond.
21. 160: Accepting the bid of Woody Chevrolet in the amount of $315,835.91
for twenty-nine 1985 Chevrolet Impala police patrol vehicles, in accordance
with Bid No. 4160.
22. 160: Accepting the bid of Mills Ford in the amount of $104,549.31 for
fourteen compact sedans, in accordance with Bid No. 4162.
23. 160: Accepting the low bid of Systems Source Incorporated in the amount
of ~18,801.04 for purchase and installation of Pleon Modular Acoustic Panels,
in accordance with Bid No. 4164.
24. 169: RESOLUTION NO. 84R-488: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: LA
PALMA AVENUE STREET IMPROVEMENT 530' EAST OF TO 58' EAST OF KRAEMER BOULEVARD
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 46-792-6325-E2080. (opening of bids on
January 17, 1985, 2:00 p.m.)
25. 169: RESOLUTION NO. 84R-489: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED UP TO THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON THE
1st DAY OF NOVEMBE~ 1984, FOR THE IMPROVEMENT OF VINTAGE LANE - CYPRESS STREET
TO 500' S/O CYPRESS STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO.
46-792-6325-E2840.
169: RESOLUTION NO. 84R-490: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINDINGAND DETERMIN~G THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCEAND NECESSITY REQUIRE
THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: VINTAGE LANE
- CYPRESS STREET TO 500' S/0 CYPRESS STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT
NO. 46-792-6325-E2840. (opening of bids on January 17, 1985, 2:00 p.m.)
26. 164: RESOLUTION NO. 84R-491: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY
REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT:
COUNTRY HILL ROAD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT 2734 FEET SOUTH OF MOHLER DRIVE TO
2889 FEET SOUTH OF MOHLER DRIVE TO 2889 FEET SOUTH OF MOHLER DRIVE IN THE CITY
OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 24-792-6325-E2050. (opening of bids on January 17,
1985, 2:00 p.m.)
1192
196
City Ha]l~ Anahelm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
27. 150: RESOLUTION NO. 84R-492: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE TWILAREID GROUP PICNIC AREA
ACCOUNT NOS. 24-825-7103-25110 AND 16-825-7103-25160. (Awarding a contract to
the lowest and best responsible bidder, Leonard South and Sons, Inc.,
contractor, in the amount of 580,813, for Twila Reid Group Picnic Facility)
28. 169: RESOLUTION NO. 84R-493: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM REJECTING ALL BIDS RECEIVED UP TO THE HOUR OF 2:00 P.M. ON THE
29th DAY OF NOVEMBER 1984, FOR BALL ROAD-SUNKIST STREET TO STATE COLLEGE
BOULEVARD; SUNKIST STREET-HILDA STREET TO BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT, ACCOUNT NOS. 12-792-6325-E2750 AND
51-484-6993-00713-FEDERALAIDURBAN PROJECT NO. L060(4).
169: RESOLUTION NO. 84R-494: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE
THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: BALL
ROAD-SUNKIST STREET TO STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD; SUNKIST STREET-HILDA STREET TO
BALL ROAD, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, STREET AND STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT, ACCOUNT
NOS. 12-792-6325-E2750AND 51-484-6993-00713 - FEDERAL AID URBAN PROJECT NO.
LOC0(4). (opening of bids on January 24, 1985, 2:00 p.m.)
27. 153: RESOLUTION NO. 84R-495: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 84R-243 WHICH ESTABLISHES RATES OF
COMPENSATION FOR CLASSES DESIGNATED AS PROFESSIONALAND TECHNICAL MANAGEMENT.
(changing the title of Industrial Engineer to Industrial Engineering
Supervisor, effective December 28, 1984)
153: RESOLUTION NO. 84R-496: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 84R-242 WHICH ESTABLISHES RATES OF
COMPENSATION FOR CLASSES DESIGNATED AS MIDDLE MANAGEMENT/SUPERVISORY.
(changing the job title and reallocation of salary ranges to Meter Reading
Supervisor--XU SR03, New Business Supervisor--XU SR04, and Police Records
Manager--XU SR06, effective December 28, 1984)
153: RESOLUTION NO. 84R-497: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 84R-57 WHICH ESTABLISHED RATES OF COMPENSATION
FOR CLASSES DESIGNATED AS CONFIDENTIAL. (creating the classification of
Customer Service Office Supervisor, U1048A-E, effective December 28, 1984)
28. 183: Filing the application of Russ Berrie for construction of a 45,000
square foot warehouse and distribution facility, southeast corner of Industry
Drive and Hancock Street as certified by the Secretary of the Industrial
Development Authority.
183: RESOLUTION NO. 84R-498: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING PROJECT OF RUSS BERRIE FOR INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BOND
FINANCING, THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS THEREFOR, AND ALLOCATING A PORTION OF THE
CITY'S PRIVATE ACTIVITY BOND LIMIT. (Authorizing the Industrial Bond
financing for Russ Berrie, in an amount not to exceed 52,500,000; the issuance
of bonds therefor; and allocating a portion of the City's private activity
bond limit)
1193
193
City N~11~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
183: RESOLUTION NO. 84R-499: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM CALLING HEARING ON ISSUANCE OF INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY OF
ANAHEIM INDUSTRIAL REVENUE BONDS AND PROVIDING FOR NOTICE THEREOF. (Setting a
date and time for a public hearing on the issuance of Industrial Development
Authority of Anaheim Industrial Revenue Bonds to provide financing to Russ
Berrie for the development of a warehouse facility to be located near
Industrial Avenue and Hancock Street and providing for notice thereof,
suggested date: January 22, 1985, 1:30 p.m.)
29. 130: RESOLUTION NO. 84R-500: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO CONSIDER CHANGES IN THE RATES TO BE
CHARGED BY STORER CABLE TV, INC. AND GIVING NOTICE OF A PUBLIC HEARING
THEREON. (Declaring intent to conduct a hearing in connection with the
request of Storer Cable TV, Inc., to restructure their Basic Service Package,
suggested date: January 22, 1985, 1:30 p.m.)
30. 144: RESOLUTION NO. 84R-501: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM REQUESTING THE COUNTY OF ORANGE TO INCLUDE WITHIN THE ARTERIAL
HIGHWAY FINANCING PROGRAM CERTAIN HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS (1985-1986).
Requesting the County of Orange to include the following City of Anaheim
projects in the 1985-86 Arterial Highway Financing Program:
144: Lakeview Avenue--Oraugethorpe Avenue to La Palma Avenue, at a
cost of $167,500.
144: Anaheim Boulevard--Lemon Street to Cypress Street, at a cost of
$900,000.
31. 158: RESOLUTION NO. 84R-502: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION.
32. 123: Authorizing an agreement with Berryman & Stephenson, Inc., in the
amount of $20,000 to provide Sign Maintenance and Installation Program, to be
completed within 120 days, and appropriating said funds from the Council
Contingency fund into Account No. 01-263-6310.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution Nos. 84R-488 through 84R-494:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, 0verholt and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 84R-488 through 84R-494, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution Nos. 84R-495 through 84R-497:
AYES: COUNCIL MF2iBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt and Roth
Bay
None
1194
194
City H~I~ An-heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
The Mayor declared Resolutions No. 84R-495 through 84R-497, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
Roll Call Vote on Resolution Nos. 84R-498 through 84R-502:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, Overholt and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 84R-498 through 84R-502, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
End of Consent Calendar. MOTION CARRIED.
147: DISCHARGE OF PRETREATED GROUND WATER FROM STRINGFELLOW HAZARDOUS WASTE
DISPOSAL SITE: City of Huntington Beach, Resolution No. 5465, Requesting the
Orange County Sanitation District to reconsider its action in approving the
Discharge of Pretreated Ground Water from the Stringfellow Hazardous Waste
Disposal Site into the Pacific Ocean at Huntington Beach.
Councilwoman Kaywood asked the Mayor to comment as a member of the Orange
County Sanitation District.
Mayor Roth then gave an overview of the situation, the essence being that
everyone except Orange County Supervisor Stanton, sitting on the Special
Committee of the subject study voted to proceed with the EIR and the work
simultaneously to preclude the toxic material from the dump site getting into
the underground water supply in Orange County. Otherwise, it would take 18
months to two years to complete preliminary examinations.
Councilman Pickler asked for a staff report on the issue; City Manager Talley
stated staff could prepare a report, but the experts would be the Sanitation
District staff. City staff would contact the Sanitation District staff and
request them to forward a report to the Council.
Councilwoman Kaywood stated she would like a summary report from the staff at
the Sanitation District; Mayor Roth stated that the Orange County Sanitation
District would be happy to provide such report.
173: PACIFIC COAST SIGHTSEEING TOUR~ LTD. - AMENDMENT TO APPLICATION
84-10-028: Before the Public Utilities Commission, Amendment to Application
84-10-028 of Pacific Coast Sightseeing Tours, Ltd., for certificate of public
convenience and necessity to operate a passenger service between the City of
Anaheim and the City of Buena Park.
Councilwoman Kaywood noted that the type of service involved was exempt from
Commission regulation at the present time but on January 1, 1985, all carriers
conducting round-trip sightseeing tours would be required to obtain a permit
pursuant to new Section 5384(c) of the Public Utilities Code (see letter dated
November 16, 1984 from the Public Utilities Commission to Pacific Coast
Sightseeing Tours and Charters). She felt the request was a duplication of
the Fun Bus route and a case of other such services coming into the City to
take the "cream" of the business in the Convention Center/Dtsneyland area.
1195
19]
City Ha!!~ An~heim~ C.l~fornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
City Manager Talley stated the City Attorney's Office would contact the Public
Utilities Commission to see if the application could be delayed.
150: YOUTH NEEDS AND BEHAVIOR STUDY - DEVELOPMENT OF COMMUNITY YOUTH TASK
FORCE: The City Council was being asked to approve in concept the development
%f a Community Youth Task Force, and authorize staff to proceed with the
formulation of such group. Submitted was Joint Report dated November 27, 1984
from Christopher Jarvi, Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services
and Police Chief Jimmie Kennedy, recommending approval of a Community Youth
Task Force.
Councilman Bay explained the reason he removed the item from the Consent
Calendar was to move to continue action to a convenient meeting in February,
1985. He felt before the Council took action to form a Task Force, it should
be clear in their minds what they wanted that Task Force to do. It was not
clear to him at this time.
MOTION: Councilman Bay moved to continue approving the development of a
Community Youth Task Force to Tuesday, February 19, 1985. Councilman Overholt
seconded the motion.
Before a vote was taken, Councilman Overholt stated he felt there were some
gaps in the proposed representation on the Task Force and secondly, he agreed
with Councilman Bay that given the need, the Council should be sure that need
was met in order not to create problems that were not now existing. There was
no representation from the Youth Commission, from the Church Community or the
Board of Realtors on the proposed Task Force.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion to continue. MOTION CARRIED.
103: ORANGEWOOD - STATE COLLEGE ANNEXATION: Designating the Orangewood/State
College Annexation as "developed/substantially developed" property pursuant to
the Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement with the County of Orange.
Submitted was report dated December 6, 1984 from the Planning Director,
recommending the subject designation.
City Manager William Talley briefed the Council on the subject report noting
that the property was currently within the sphere of influence of the City of
Orange. He also announced that the City Manager of Orange, Bill Little was
present to address the Council on the issue.
Mr. William Little, City Manager City of Orange, speaking on behalf of Mayor
Jim Beam and the Orange City Council, stated his purpose was to request that
the Anaheim City Council give serious consideration to not adopting the
proposed resolution. Orange realized it was a ministerial act and Anaheim had
been requested by the developer to have the property annexed. However, the
property was in the sphere of influence of the City of Orange and Orange had
annexed the greater portion of area between I-5, Orangewood and State College
Boulevard. Orange was prepared to serve the developer without any significant
problems. The City of Orange and Anaheim had worked together for years
adjusting boundary lines in the sphere of influence where it made sense to
both cities. Orange was asking in order to avoid any misinterpretation of the
1196
192
City Hall~ Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
City of Anaheim's position in the matter and inasmuch as the property was in
their sphere of influence, that the resolution be rejected and Orange could
then enter into serious discussions with the developer.
Mayor Roth asked City Manager Talley if the action today would have any
influence on LAFCO should they approve the resolution.
City Manager Talley explained that the City had not taken any steps in the
matter and were not going to represent to LAFCO at the hearings that Anaheim
was in any way soliciting the annexation. If the Council did not pass the
resolution and if LAFC0 agreed to change the sphere of influence from Orange
to Anaheim, the City would be on record saying it would not accept the
traditional tax distribution between the County and the City and, therefore,
the County would have problems and would have to go into separate
negotiations. If the Council wanted to do that, Staff had no problem but it
would put the City in an awkward position with the County. It had nothing to
do with LAFCO approving the annexation. He agreed with the Mayor that he did
not want to quarrel with Orange since Orange had been exemplary in
relationships along the entire border. If the Council rejected the
resolution, he felt it was building a problem between the County and the City
as opposed to relationships between the City of Orange and Anaheim.
Mr. Little felt by adopting the resolution, it would indicate to LAFCO that
Anaheim was willing to take the property from the Orange sphere of influence
and annex it to Anaheim. They were taking the position with LAFC0 that there
should be no change in the sphere of influence.
City Manager Tailey stated staff had no problem with that. Perhaps Council
should pass the resolution today and instruct staff to appear at the hearing
before LAFCO to advise them that the oniy reason the resolution was passed was
to keep from creating a problem between the County of Orange and Anaheim in
the event that LAFCO decided to change the sphere and that the action was not
in any way designed to influence and change that sphere of influence.
Councilman Bay suggested a motion stating that the City of Anaheim agreed with
the City of Orange and would not support a change in the sphere of influence
as long as the City of Orange was not condoning it; Councilman Overholt stated
he would prefer if the resolution were withdrawn or for the Council to vote no.
City Manager Talley then withdrew the resolution from the agenda. No further
action was taken by the Council on the matter.
105: PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION APPOINTEE: Councilman Overholt moved to
approve the recommendation of the Anaheim Union High School District in their
letter of December 4, 1984 to appoint Mrs. JoAnn Barnett to represent the
District on the Park and Recreation Commission for the term ending June
30, 1985. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
108: NFARING - ANGELINA HOTEL - APPEALING THE DECISION OF THE HEAILING
OFFICER: Councilman Roth moved that Tuesday, January 15, 1985, at 10:00 a.m.
be the date and time set for a hearing in connection with the appeal of
Chandulal K. Patel, Angelina Hotel, appealing the decision of the Hearing
ii97
189
City ~,ll~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
Officer denying abatement of the tax assessment due on the Angelina Hotel, as
defined under Section 2.12.070 of the Code. Councilman Overholt seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
108: HEARING - GRANADA INN - APPEALING THE DECISION OF THE HEARING OFFICER:
Councilman Roth moved that January 22, 1985 at 10:00 a.m. be the date and time
set for a hearing in connection with the appeal of Steven C. Nock, Attorney,
for Granada Inn, appealing the decision of the Hearing Officer denying
abatement of the tax assessment due per Audit No. 84252 on the Transient
Occupancy Tax due on the Granada Inn as defined under Section 2.12.070 of the
Code. Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
108: APPLICATION FOR A PUBLIC DANCE PERMIT - EL TORITO: Councilman Roth
moved to approve an application for a Public Dance Permit submitted by Adrian
Cano Romero for the E1 Torito, 2020 East Ball Road, to hold a dance on
December 31, 1984, from 9:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. in accordance with the
recommendations of the Chief of Police. Councilman Overholt seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: The following actions taken by the City
Planning Commission at their meeting held November 26, 1985, pertaining to the
following applications were submitted for City Council information.
1. VARIANCE NO. 3440: Application submitted by Fannie Ahrens, to establish a
9-lot subdivision on RS-A-43,000(SC) zoned property located at 6110 East Santa
Aha Canyon Road, with Code waiver of minimum lot width.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-242, granted
Variance No. 3440, and granted a negative declaration status.
2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2637: Application submitted by Stewart, Green
Associates, Inc., (East Anaheim Center), to permit a drive-through restaurant
with an outdoor play area on CL zoned property located at 2210 East Lincoln
Avenue, with Code waiver of minimum number of parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-249, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 2637, and granted a negative declaration status.
3. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2640: Application submitted by Redondo
Investment Company, to permit on-saie beer and wine in a proposed restaurant
on CL zoned property located at 5358 East Santa Aha Canyon Road.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-250, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 2640, and granted a negative declaration status.
4. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2638: Application submitted by Nathan Oginis,
et al, to permit a recreational vehicle sales and repair facility on CL zoned
property located at 1221 South Anaheim Boulevard, with the following Code
waivers: (a) minimum landscaped setback, (deleted) (b) required fence height
and location. (deleted), (c) maximum fence height. (denied)
1198
190
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-252, granted, in
part, Conditional Use Permit No. 2638, and granted a negative declaration
status.
5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2635: Application submitted by County Of
Orange, GSA/Real Estate Division, to permit a temporary outdoor storage of
scrap steel on RS-A-43,000 zoned property located south of Frontera Street,
east of Glassell Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-254, granted,
for one year, Conditional Use Permit No. 2635, and granted a negative
declaration status.
6. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 81-82-13 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO.
2292--EXTENSIONS OF TIME: Application submitted by Jim Bianco, requesting
extensions of time to Reclassification No. 81-82-13 and Conditional Use Permit
No. 2292, a proposed change in zone from RS-A-43,000 to RM-3000, to permit a
1-lot, 39-unit, 45-foot high condominium subdivision on property located on
the south side of Crescent Avenue, west of Brookhurst Street.
The City Planning Commission approved an extension of time to Reclassification
No. 81-82-13 and Conditional Use Permit No. 2292, to expire March 8, 1986.
7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2339--TERMINATION: Application submitted by
Juanita Sanchez, requesting termination of Conditional Use Permit No. 2339, to
permit on-sale beer and wine in a proposed restaurant with Code waiver of
minimum number of parking spaces on property located at 1086 North State
College Boulevard, Unit B, as a condition of approval of Conditional Use
Permit No. 2608.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-255, terminated
Conditional Use Permit No. 2339.
8. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 84-85-11--AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. PC 84-220~ NUNC PRO
TUNG: Submitted by the Planning Commission Secretary, requesting amendment o~
Resolution No. PC84-220, nunc pro tunc, modifying Condition No. 4, on property
located at the southeast corner of Broadway and Citron Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-256, amended
Resolution No. PC84-220 nunc pro tunc.
9. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 198~ RECLASSIFICATION NO. 84-85-13~ AND
VARIANCE NO. 3442: Application submitted by Donald M. And Aleene E. Wiley,
requesting amendment to the Land Use Element, alternate proposals of ultimate
land uses including, but not limited to medium density residential, proposed
change in zone from CL to RM-1200, to construct a 24-unit apartment complex on
property located at 134 South Western Avenue, with the following Code waivers:
(a) maximum structural height, (b) minimum landscaped setback.
The General Plan Amendment was withdrawn by applicant. The City Planning
Commission, pursuant to Resolution Nos. PC84-243 and 244, granted
Reclassification No. 84-85-13 and Variance No. 3442, and granted a negative
declaration status.
1199
187
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
Councilwoman Kaywood requested a review of the Planning Commission's decision
and, therefore, a public hearing would be scheduled at a later date.
10. VARIANCE NO. 3441: Application submitted by Charles F. And Vivian Eleene
Mass, to construct a 21-unit apartment complex on RM-1200 zoned property
located at 514-516 E. South Street, with the following Code waivers: (a)
permitted encroachment into side yards, (b) permitted location of open parking
spaces, (c) maximum site coverage, (d) maximum number of bachelor units, (e)
minimum front landscaped setback, (f) minimum structural setback.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-247, granted
Variance No. 3441, and granted a negative declaration status.
Councilwoman Kaywood requested a review of the Planning Commission's decision
and, therefore, a public hearing would be scheduled at a later date.
11. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2607 (READVERTISED): Application submitted by
Anaheim City School District, requesting approval of revised plans (Revision
No. 1) to construct a church facility on RM-1200 zoned property located at 412
East Broadway, with Code waiver of minimum landscaped setback.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-248, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 2607 (Readvertised). Negative Declaration was
previously approved.
The Planning Commission's decision was appealed by the applicant and,
therefore, a public hearing would be scheduled at a later date.
12. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2639: Application submitted by Brookhurst
Street Associates, to permit an automotive service center on CL zoned property
located at 1237 South Brookhurst Street, with Code waiver of maximum
structural height adjacent to sin~le-family zoning.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-251, denied
Conditional Use Permit No. 2639, and granted a negative declaration status.
The Planning Commission's decision was appealed by the applicant and,
therefore, a public hearing would be scheduled at a later date.
13. VARIANCE NO. 3444: Application submitted by British Motor Car
Distributors, LTD., (Anaheim Toyota), to construct an electronic freestanding
sign on CL zoned property located at 1601 South Anaheim Boulevard, with the
following Code waivers: (a) maximum height of a flashing sign, (b) maximum
area of a freestanding sign.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-253, granted
Variance No. 3444, and ratified the Planning Director's categorical exemption
determination (Class 11).
Councilwoman Kaywood requested a review of the Planning Commission's decision
and, therefore, a public hearing would be scheduled at a later date.
1200
188
City R, 11; Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984; 10:00 A.M.
14. RECTA$SIFICATION NO. 84-85-14; AND VARIANCE NO. 3443: ELMER AND VIVIAN
WEBBER, for a change in zone from RS-7200 to RM-1200, to construct a 7-unit
apartment complex on property located at 406 E. South Street, with Code
waivers of maximum structural height and permitted location of open parking
spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution Nos. PC84-245 and 246,
granted Reclassification No. 84-85-14 and Variance No. 3443, and granted a
negative declaration status.
Councilwoman Kaywood requested a review of the Planning Commission's decision
and, therefore, a public hearing would be scheduled at a later date.
Councilwoman Kaywood noted that the proposed project was a three-story,
seven-unit apartment complex only 95 feet away from railroad tracks. She
questioned the amount of vibration that would be experienced with a third
story that close.
Annika Santalahti, Assistant Director for Zoning, explained the Council Policy
Waiver requested pertaining to the location of the building within a specified
distance of the railroad tracks. Presumably there would be some impact. The
only provisions staff could require if the waiver was granted was that the
sound be attenuated.
Councilwoman Kaywood noted that the subject item and the next item, Waiver of
Council Policy No. 542-Variance No. 3443, were related. (See below).
179: WAIVER OF COUNCIL POLICY NO. 542-VARIANCE NO. 3443: Application
submitted by Elmer and Vivian Webber, requesting waiver of Council Policy No.
542 pertaining to sound attenuation in connection with Variance No. 3443, to
construct a 7-unit apartment complex on property located at 406 East South
Street with certain Code waivers.
Miss Santalahti stated that the Council would have to take specific action on
the foregoing item, Reclassification No. 84-85-14 and Variance No. 3443. If
the Council denied the subject item, Waiver of Council Policy No. 542, the
applicant could not build the 7-unit apartment complex even if the Variance
and Reclassification were approved.
Council Members Kaywood and Bay then posed questions to staff relative to
possible Council alternatives and the r,m~fications of either setting or not
setting the Reclassification and Variance for a public hearing or not
approving the Waiver of Council Policy No. 542. Councilwoman Kaywood, in
concluding, stated if the Council did not set the Reclassification and
Variance for a public hearing, those two items would stand approved and she
did not want that to happen even if the waiver of Council Policy were denied.
City Clerk, Lee Sohl, stated that both items could be set to be heard together.
Councilwoman Kaywood thereupon reiterated her request to review the Planning
Commission's decision on Reclassification No. 84-85-14 and Variance No. 3443
and that waiver of Council Policy No. 542 pertaining to Variance No. 3443 be
heard as well at that public hearing.
1201
185
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984, 10:00 A.M.
MOTION: Councilman 0verholt moved to continue waiver of Council Policy No.
542-Variance No. 3443 to be heard with Reclassification No. 84-85-14 and
Variance No. 3443. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
179/142: PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT--SENIOR CITIZENS' APARTMENT PROJECTS:
Amending Chapter 18.94, and amending and repealing various subsections and
sections of Title 18 of the Code, pertaining to the development of Senior
Citizens' apartment projects.
The City Planning Commission recommended approval with a change in the parking
requirements in projects of 150 units or more.
Councilwoman Kaywood stated in trying to be helpful, the State had taken a
backwards move which she felt would be devastating by allowing one senior in a
senior citizens' complex unit to be 55 years of age and the other to be any
age, no minimum.
Mayor Roth stated that he talked with Mr. John Shanahan of the Senior
Citizens' Commission and the Commission was concerned; however, after much
discussion, the Commission was satisfied with the ordinance as presented.
Councilwoman Kaywood stated the size of the units were going to have to be
considered as well. The Council had been amenable to much smaller units for
senior housing but now one person could be 55, and the other could be a child.
179: ORDINANCE NO. 4567: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 4567 for
first reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 4567: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OFANAHEIMADDING CHAPTER 18.94
TO, AND AMENDING AND REPEALING VARIOUS SUBSECTIONS AND SECTIONS OF CERTAIN
SPECIFIED CHAPTERS OF, TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
ZONING. (Senior Citizen Housing)
173: PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT--HELISTOPS AND HELIPORTS: Amending Subsection
.030 of Section 18.61.028 and adding new Subsection .218 to Section 18.61.050
of Chapter 18.61, amending Subsection .060 of Section 18.63.028 and adding new
subsection .165 to Section 18.63.050 of Chapter 18.63, and amending Section
18.01.090 of Title 18, pertaining to helistops and heliports.
The City Planning Commission recommended approval.
173: ORDINANCE NO. 4568: Councilman Pickler offered Ordinance No. 4568 for
first reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 4568: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SUBSECTION
.030 OF SECTION 18.61.028 AND ADDING NEW SUBSECTION .218 TO SECTION 18.61.050
OF CHAPTER 18.61, AMENDING SUBSECTION .060 OF SECTION 18.63.028AND ADDING NEW
SUBSECTION .165 TO SECTION 18.63.050 OF CHAPTER 18.63, AND AMENDING SECTION
18.01.090 OF CHAPTER 18.01, ~T~. OF TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO ZONING. (Helistops and Heliports)
1202
].86
City Hall~ A~sh-~m~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECE~BEA 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.N.
166/179: PROPOSED CODE AMENDMENT--DISPLAY OF FLAGS AND BANNERS: Repealing
Subsection .050 of Section 18.05.085 of Title 18 of the Code to permit
temporary flags and banners to be displayed seven days a week in new
residential projects, subject to certain limitations.
The City Planning Commission recommended approval.
156/179: ORDINANCE NO. 4569: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 4569 for
first reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 4569: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING SUBSECTION
.050 OF SECTION 18.05.085 OF CHAPTER 18.05 OF TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO TEMPORARY DISPLAY OF FLAGS AND BANNERS IN
RESIDENTIAL ZONES.
134: GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 187: Richard A. Wallace, et.al., requesting
an amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan, alternate proposals
of ultimate land uses including, but not limited to, Hillside Estate Density
Residential, Hillside Low Density Residential, Hillside Medium Density
Residential, General Commercial, and General Open Space on approximately 325
acres bounded on the north by the Bauer Ranch and Santa Aha Canyon Road, east
by the Irvine Company property, south by the Oak Hills Ranch, and west by the
Anaheim Hills Development Corporation property and the Bauer Ranch.
The City Planning Commission recommended approval of Exhibit B and EIR No. 264
was prepared in conjunction with General Plan Amendment No. 187.
MOTION: Councilman Roth moved that Tuesday, January 15, 1985 at 1:30 p.m. be
set as the date and time certain for a public hearing on General Plan
Amendment No. 187. Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
170: TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 11210: Submitted by Ocean-Wood Construction
Corporation, to establish a 9-lot, 9-unit condominium subdivision on
approximately 3.4 acres located at 6110 East Santa Aha Canyon Road.
The City Planning Commission at their meeting of December 10, 1984, approved
Tentative Tract No. 11210, (10-day appeal period expiring December 20, 1984).
This item was submitted for informational purposes only. No action was taken
by the City Council.
149/142: ORDINANCE NO. 4561: Councilman Pickler offered Ordinance No. 4561
for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4561: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ADDING NEW SUBSECTION .050 TO SECTION 14.32.153, AND ADDING NEW SUBSECTIONS
.2170, .2180 AND .2190 TO SECTION 14.32.190, OF CHAPTER 14.32 OF TITLE 14 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING AND STOPPING. (Halliday
Street, Sinclair Street and Stadium View)
1203
183
City Hall~ An-heim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18} 1984} 10:00 A.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Bay,
None
None
Pickler, Overholt and Roth
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4561 duly passed and adopted.
179: ORDINANCE NOS. 4562~ 4563~ 4564, 4565 AND 4566: Councilwoman Kaywood
offered Ordinance Nos. 4562 through 4566, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer
to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4562: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
(Reclassification No. 70-71-47(33), ML, south side of Coronado Street, west of
Kraemer Place, from RS-A-43,000)
ORDINANCE NO. 4563: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
(Reclassification No. 79-80-25(1), OS(SC), south of the intersection of Nohl
Ranch Road and Anaheim Hills Road, from RS-A-43,000)
ORDINANCE NO. 4564: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
(Reclassification 72-73-48(3), RS-7200(SC), 6110 East Santa Ama Canyon Road,
from RS-A-43,000)
ORDINANCE NO. 4565: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
(Reclassification No. 70-71-47(34), ML(SC), 5426 East Orangethorpe Avenue,
from RS-A-43,000)
ORDINANCE NO. 4566: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
(Reclassification No. 70-71-47(35), ML(SC), east side of Lakeview Avenue,
north of La Palma Avenue, from RS-A-43,000)
The Mayor declared Ordinance Nos. 4562 through 4566, both inclusive, duly
passed and adopted.
179: ORDINANCE NOS. 4570 AND 4571: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No.
4570 and 4571 for first reading. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4570: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE B~TATING TO ZONING.
(Reclassification No. 83-84-21, RM-1200, 2566-2570 West Lincoln Avenue, from
RS-A-43,000 and CL)
ORDINANCE NO. 4571: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING THE ZONING
MAP REFERRED TO IN TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
(Reclassification 82-83-27, RM-3000, west side of Knott Street, south of Ball
Road, from RS-A-43,000)
1204
184
Cit7 Hall~ A~aheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
144: MAJOR THOROUGHFARE AND BRIDGE FEE PROGRAM: Councilman Bay announced
that he and Councilman Pickler would be attending a meeting on Friday,
December 21, 1984 on the subject program and asked for any direction Council
Members wanted to give to take to that meeting. One of the things he was
going to express was the fact that he felt there should be a very definitive
form of incentive for the cities who agreed to participate as well as
continuing to voice the Council's acceptance of the concept and encourage that
there be as many cities as possible to participate in the setting up of a
Memorandum of Understanding, Joint Powers Agreement or the like so that all
cities could have a voice and to decide who was going to be the lead agency.
There had been meetings since the last reports and he wanted to see a report
of those meetings before the Friday, December 21, 1984 meeting. He also felt
that the issue should be on the Council weekly agenda starting with the first
meeting in January, 1985 so that the Council could start a dialogue going.
After Council Members commented on the matter, Councilman 0verholt stated when
Councilman Bay and Councilman Pickler were appointed as the liaison team, it
was with the thought that they would participate in the Committee but would
not be in a position to bind the Council to a position. Until they went to
the meetings and found out what was going on, if a preconceived agenda for
action was brought into those meetings that the liaison committee would know
how to "stonewall" that because he felt that was one of the biggest risks. In
the formative stages, however, he felt it was premature for the Council to
take any action.
REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION: The City Attorney requested a Closed Session to
discuss litigation and potential litigation with action anticipated.
The Mayor announced that a Closed Session would be held to consult with the
City Attorney concerning pending and potential litigation.
RECESS-CLOSED SESSION: Councilman Roth moved to recess into a Closed Session
and a lunch break. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED. (11:37 a.m.)
AFTER CLOSED SESSION: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council
Members being present. (1:55 p.m.)
112~ gHORT VS. CITY OF ANAHEIM: Councilman R0th moved to authorize the City
Attorney to settle Orange County Superior Court Case No. 34-69-65, Short vs.
City of Anaheim, for a sum not to exceed $12,000. Councilman Pickler seconded
the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
112/152: AUTHORIZING SPECIALIZED LEGAL SERVICES: Councilman Roth moved to
authorize the City Attorney to employ Robert F. Waldron, Inc. for specialized
legal services. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
129/142: CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - 1982 EDITION OF UNIFORM FIRE CODE: To
consider adoption of the 1982 Edition of the Uniform Fire Code with amendments
thereto, and amending Chapter 16.08 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. (continued
from the meeting of December 4, 1984) Submitted was a report dated November
15, 1984 from the Fire Department recommending adoption of the Uniform Fire
1205
18]
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
Code, 1982 edition. Attached to the report was a list reflecting the changes
before the 1979 and 1982 Edition of the Code along with a brief synopsis
stating the changes for each article.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to speak to the Uniform Fire Code, 1982
Edition; there was no response.
The Mayor asked a representative from the Fire Department if there were any
major changes in the new proposed Code.
Garth Menges, Deputy Fire Marshal, answered that there were no major changes
but changes within the Code itself. Two new chapters were added relating to
covered malls and dry cleaning establishments.
The Mayor closed the Public Hearing.
129/142: ORDINANCE NO. 4560: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 4560
for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4560: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING CHAPTER
16.08 OF TITLE 16 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING NEW CHAPTER 16.08
IN ITS PLACE AND STEAD ADOPTING THE UNIFORM FIRE CODE, 1982 EDITION, WITH
AMENDMENTS THERETO.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, Overholt and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4560 duly passed and adopted.
176: PUBLIC HEARING -ABANDONMENT NO. 84-5A: In accordance with application
submitted by O'Melveny and Myers, a public hearing was held on proposed
abandonment of a former easement for road and public utility purposes located
within the East Anaheim Center on the southeast corner of State College
Boulevard and Lincoln Avenue, pursuant to Resolution No. 84R-461 duly
published in the Anaheim Bulletin and notices thereof posted in accordance
with law.
Report of the City Engineer dated November 5, 1984 was submitted recommending
approval of said abandonment.
Mayor Roth asked if anyone wished to address the Council; there being no
response he closed the Public Heaing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL FDCEMPTION: The City Engineer also
determined that the proposed activity falls within the definition of Section
3.01, Class 5, of the City of Anaheim guidelines to the requirements for an
Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the
requirement to file an ELR.
1206
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 84R-503 for adoption approving
Abandonment No. 84R-SA. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 84R-503: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM VACATING THAT UNNAMED STREET LOCATED SOUTH OF LINCOLN AVENUE, EAST OF
STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD. (84-5A)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Bay, Pickler, Overholt and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 84R-503 duly passed and adopted.
179: PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 84-85-11~ VARIANCE NO. 3436 AND
NEGATIVE DECLARATION: Application submitted by Pacesetter Homes, Inc.,
proposed change in zone from RM-1200 to RM-3000, to construct a 72-unit
affordable condominium complex under the authority of State Government Code
Section No. 65915 on property located on the southeast corner of Broadway and
Citron Street, (former Fremont Junior High School playfield), with Code waiver
of minimum building site area per dwelling unit.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution Nos. PC84-220 and 222
approved a negative declaration upon finding that it has considered the
negative declaration together with any comments received during the public
review process, and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any
comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment, and further, granted Reclassi-
fication No. 84-85-11 and Variance No. 3436, subject to the conditions listed
in Planning Commission Resolution Nos. PC84-220 and 222.
A review of the Planning Commission's decision was requested by Mayor Roth at
the meeting of November 20, 1984 and a public hearing was scheduled this date.
Mayor Roth explained he requested the review because of calls he received from
citizens living around the perimeter of the subject property and he asked that
they select spokesmen to speak to the issue when it was heard before the
Council.
Before proceeding, Councilman Pickler stated he requested a review of the
Planning Commission's decision approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2631, to
permit a 196-unit Senior Citizen's apartment complex on the property located
on the northeast corner of Santa Aha Street and Citron Street which was the
property adjacent to the subject property, both having been part of the former
Fremont Junior High School playfield. (Next item on agenda - see below.) In
considering the issues, he was looking at the possible future expansion of the
Police Department and parking that would be needed as well as for the
Library. He also felt that the City was in dire need of open space and park
facilities in the south central City area. Once the property was used, it
would be lost forever.
1207
179
City Hallt A-mheimt California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
Mayor Roth asked the City Manager to state where the funding would come from
in the event the Council felt inclined to purchase the subject property.
City Manager Talley stated that he had not given that question enough
consideration and further would be reluctant to discuss it in open session
because it would involve what he would perceive to be the value of the
property.
Councilman Pickler stated he could not make any decision on the matter today,
and would prefer that it be continued so that he could look at it in more
depth.
City Manager Talley urged the Council if they had any thoughts along the line
mentioned by Councilman Pickler to take no action which would in any way add
value to the property. He urged the Council to solicit the advice of the City
Attorney.
Councilman Bay stated he did not understand how the City could lose property
it did not own in the first place. He did not agree that there was a dire
need for open space in the Central City. Also, the staff report did not
indicate that there was any planned expansion of the Library. The possibility
of need for expansion of the Police Department was true, but there were
alternatives to that. He did not come prepared to discuss the City acquiring
the subject property and reiterated he would not be party to jumping to
conclusions that there was a dire need for new park land in the Central City
nor did he see that as a top priority for spending City money when there was
still a great need for fixing streets and storm drains, priorities that would
take precedence over park land, in his opinion.
The Mayor asked to hear from those who wished to speak.
Mr. Joe White, 809 West Broadway expressed the following concerns: The
proposal showed only a 15-foot setback on Broadway and Citron Streets with no
berm, wall or anything except grass. The two-story units would be built right
to the border. Residents would park in the street because it would be more
convenient. Too many units were being squeezed onto the property. None of
the neighbors he spoke with were in favor. Before concluding, Mr. White also
spoke to the project built by Pacesetter Homes on the other portion of the
Fremont School site (Citron Street and Lincoln Avenue) and the problems that
had occurred as he saw them regarding setbacks on Citron and what he called
administrative changes that had taken place relative to those setbacks, the
units were now being rented instead of sold, Citron Street had dirt on it all
su~er, etc.
At the conclusion of Mr. White's presentation, Annika Santalahti, Assistant
Director for Zoning, answered some of the concerns posed by Mr. White relative
to the Pacesetter project.
Mr. Alan Watts, 529 Hilda Court, speaking in his capacity as Chairman of the
Board of Administration, First Presbyterian Church, 701 West Broadway
(intersection of Broadway and Citron) stated the Church's concern was not with
the developer, but with respect to the improvement of Broadway, specifically
1208
180
City Na!l~ Anaheim~ C-l~fornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
the widening of the southerly side from Citron Street to the City Library
parking lot and the fact that no parking was going to be allowed. Taking away
that parking was going to be a problem for the Church. They were trying to
resolve some of those problems but did not feel they could do so entirely.
They were buying properties to the east of the Church for parking purposes but
did not feel that would be adequate. If the Council could help the Church out
with parking, the Church would be most appreciative. Before concluding, he
also stated he felt Mr. White was correct in his assessment of the Pacesetter
Development, particularly the dirt. Citron Street had been in bad shape for a
period of time. The Church was also concerned about the status of the fence
constructed on the Pacesetter property. The Church did not want either a
block wall or a wooden fence that was going to be left there for any length of
time.
Mr. Sergio Alvarez, representing the applicant, CALMARK Development, 2121
Cloverfield, Santa Monica, explained at the time the project went through
staff processing, they made the proper contacts with the homeowners' groups,
specifically Mr. John Stope, President of the Homeowners Association,
presented their program and project and asked if any of the homeowners had
contacted him and whether they needed to set a special meeting. No one came
forward and they were given cooperation and approval of the project. As well,
there were two public hearings before the Planning Commission and Mr. White
was present at both where he discussed the same items brought forth today.
Subsequently, they met with Mr. White for over one hour and went through
everything. Their homes were well designed, the concept being that the units
were a transition between single family detached homes and condominiums. The
setback was the same as everywhere else. They tried to shield the existing
neighborhood by providing all circulation and parking internally. Two covered
parking spaces for each unit were also provided and they encouraged the use of
those spaces. The City allowed a minimum setback of 15 feet and in some
instances they were at 15 feet or greater. The orientation was to enhance the
neighborhood, not to detract from it. They had met every requirement made of
them and were perhaps making the largest investment in this neighborhood.
They were going to be the owners and operators of the project and if they did
not feel that it was something that was going to be successful and in harmony
with the City and with the neighborhood, they would be at risk financially not
to be present and cooperating with everyone else.
A line of questioning was then posed to Mr. Alvarez by Council Members
relative to parking, the number and breakdown of units, setbacks, etc.
Mr. Neil Singer, CALMARK, stated he was the Project Manager for the Senior
Project proposed on the adjacent property. ~ was the developer and
owner of the entire parcel. He stated he was sensitive to Councilman
Pickler's concern for the need for open space but he felt there was also a
great need for senior housing in the City of Anaheim.
Mr. Mel Aguilar, 719 South Olive, stated he was concerned over the property as
a whole. He agreed with Councilman Pickler and felt the property could be
used more for the community such as for a stadium or perhaps Anaheim could get
together with the City of Fullerton to build a stadium that the University
could use. The City needed a heart, something to make the community come back
to the area.
1209
177
Cit~ ~a!l~ A~_~heim, C. ltfornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
Mayor Roth then gave an overview relative to what had taken place concerning
the entire Fremont School site after the Anaheim Union High School District
decided that Fremont should be closed and declared the property surplus. The
City bid on the site but was not successful. The property was then purchased
by the private sector.
Councilman 0verholt then questioned Mr. Alvarez regarding the selling price
for the condominiums.
Mr. Alvarez explained that they requested a 10 percent density bonus or seven
units. For that, they agreed to sell 25 percent of the units at the
calculated affordable housing price. They met with staff and signed a
memorandum in which they agreed to what the prices of the units would be. The
prices would be calculated at the time of sale. If done today, the prices
would vary. The affordable two-bedroom units would sell for a little over
$92,000 and the three-bedrooms for ~112,000. The others would sell for
considerably more or a minimum of ~115,000 to $135,000 to make the project
barely feasible. He then clarified for Councilwoman Kaywood that relative to
Mr. White's comments that there be a berm or landscaping on Citron and
Broadway, that was not their concept. Their concept was that the units face
on to the street Just the same as single f~mfly detached homes. The front
door and street address was right on the street just as with single family
homes. The type of product they were providing was a transition from single
family to condominiums. They wanted to be compatible with the neighborhood
and that was the rationale for the design.
MOTION: Councilman Pickler moved that public hearing on Reclassification
No. 84-85-11, Variance No. 3436 and Negative Declaration be trailed until the
Council discussed the next and related item, Conditional Use Permit No. 2631.
Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
179: PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2631: Application submitted
by Pacesetter Homes, Inc., to permit a 196-unit senior citizens apartment
complex on RM-1200 zoned property located on the northeast corner of Santa Ana
Street and Citron Street (portion of former Fremont Junior High School
Playfield), with Code waiver of required type of parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-233 approved a
negative declaration upon finding that it has considered the negative
declaration together with any comments received during the public review
process, and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any
comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment, and further, granted Conditional
Use Permit No. 2631, subject to the conditions listed in Planning Commission
Resolution No. PC84-233.
A review of the Planning Commission's decision was requested by Councilman
Pickler at the meeting of December 4, 1984 and public hearing scheduled this
date.
The Mayor asked if the applicant or applicant's agent was present.
1210
178
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
Mr. Neil Singer, CALMARK, was present to answer questions. He first clarified
for Councilwoman Kaywood that their project at Gilbert and Ball in the City of
Anaheim had an age limit of 60 years or older and was being built at .8
parking spaces. The project anticipated occupancy the beginning of April,
1985. Councilwoman Kaywood noted that new State law provided an age limit of
55 or older for one of the residents in a unit with no age stipulation for the
other resident. That law created an entirely different situation as far as
she was concerned. The recommendation from the Senior Citizens Commission and
Planning Commission was that the parking requirements be the same as any other
apartments which would be 2.5 spaces per unit.
Mr. Singer stated that CALMARK had been building senior housing since 1977
with 16 projects either built or approved for construction. Of those, 10
projects had age covenants of 57 years old or less. They did a survey of
their tenants and found the average age to be 68 even in projects in which
there were no age covenants at all. That was the market they were trying to
address regardless of the State law.
Councilwoman Kaywood stated she personally was not prepared to take that risk
if there was no covenant with regard to age, no deed restriction and anyone
could move in. For anyone of driving age with a vehicle or two with only .8
parking spaces for each, to her, was unthinkable.
Mr. Singer explained that the project as proposed provided for .8 spaces for
one bedroom and 1.6 for two bedrooms. The average parking density was .9 and
in their survey of parking requirements, they found that less than 50 percent
of senior citizen residents possessed a valid driver's license and car
ownership was 54 percent. By providing a .9 parking ratio, they were giving
themselves a cushion of 67 percent.
Discussion followed between Council Members, staff and Mr. Singer clarifying
the number of units involved in the project and the number of parking spaces
provided. Councilwoman Kaywood emphasized that since there were 179 parking
spaces proposed for 196 units, there was no way with an age limit of only 55
for one of the residents and no minimum age for the second person that the
City could possibly get into such a situation. The City could not take such a
chance and then suffer the consequences. Even if the State law provided that
both people living in a unit had to be 55 would give some limitation.
Otherwise, they were looking at two cars per unit and in all good conscience
she could not approve such a project even though her concern was for more
senior housing.
They Mayor asked if anyone else wished to speak.
Mr. Joe White commented on the fact that there were not covered parking spaces
being provided and he also understood the development was going to have a wall
around it. He was opposed to both proposed projects, the project on Broadway
and Citron Streets and the senior housing proposal on the other portion of the
property.
Councilwoman Kaywood explained that the Senior Citizen Commission favored open
parking spaces for seniors because they were safer. Also, enclosed spaces
were often used for storage rather than for parking.
1211
175
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984; 10:00 A.M.
Discussion then followed on certain aspects of the project specifically
relative to whether or not the project was subsidized under Section 8, the
number of affordable units in the project, rental rates, etc. Pat Whittaker,
Neighborhood Restoration Specialist, confirmed that the project was not
subsidized through any of the existing Section 8 rental assistance programs.
She also clarified that the affordable rates would under no circumstances
exceed the market rates. If the market rate was at 3404 a month, affordable
would be no greater than market and that rent would hold for one year and was
also based on square footage of the unit; Mr. Singer reported that they were
committed to making 49 of the units affordable.
At the conclusion of discussion and questioning of Mr. Singer by Council
Members, Mr. Sergio Alvarez stated that he was originally involved in the
development of the concept in 1974. They were the number one, nonsubsidized
senior housing builder in the State and pioneers in discussing parking and
adequacy of spaces. The studies they were quoting from were their own. The
national average for occupancy of senior citizens projects was 1.1 persons per
unit. In their projects the average was 1.2. The location and income level
of the senior, proximity to shopping, etc. had no direct correlation to
ownership of automobiles. In their projects they found that once a senior
citizen moved in the only way they left was because of death. They had a
proven track record. Regarding the Senate Bill, they were committed to senior
citizen housing, they had been faced with obstacles before, but they still
provided senior citizen housing. The key issue was the quality of management.
Councilwoman Kaywood asked if on the senior housing any action was taken on
the proposal of the Commission that it be one parking space per unit or if the
parking requirement was still to be .8 spaces.
Miss Santalahti answered that the Planning Commission recommendation was that
for the 150-unit projects and larger that the parking be the same as for
apartment projects. For 150 units the parking requirement would be .8 spaces
per unit. The Commission did not take any action on one space per unit. The
proposed ordinance had first reading today and adoption was scheduled for
January 8, 1985 and would be effective 30 days thereafter. The waiver the
developer was asking for in the subject project dealt with covered spaces,
and they were proposing only to have open spaces. When the ordinance was in
effect, that type of requirement would no longer exist and there would be no
waivers at all; however, i~ the ordinance were in e~fect, the project would
have to have three times as many parking spaces as currently proposed or 490
spaces.
Councilman Bay asked for clarification that the newly proposed senior housing
ordinance introduced today was going to require 2.5 spaces per dwelling unit;
Miss Santahlati answered yes, for projects over 150 units. For 150 units or
less, it would be .8 for one bedroom for seniors and 1.6 spaces for two
bedrooms. The 2.5 spaces was the regulation for apartments at this time and,
therefore, 2.5 spaces per unit would be required for senior citizen projects
over 150 units.
Councilman Pickler stated he would like to ask for a continuance of both of
the foregoing projects to approximately January 22 or January 29, 1985 with
1212
176
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
the idea of pursuing the feasibility of acquisition of the property and
looking at the situation closer.
Councilman Overholt moved to continue the public hearings on Reclassification
84-85-11, Variance 3436 and negative declaration, and Conditional Use Permit
No. 2631 to January 22, 1985 at 1:30 p.m. for the purpose of obtaining
clarification from staff on some of the issues discussed today. Councilman
Pickler seconded the motion.
Before action was taken, Councilman Overholt clarified that the motion did not
include pursuing the possibility or feasibility of acquiring the property.
The issue was one of land use and he had concerns about the impact of the
projects on the neighborhood. The purpose of his motion was to further
consider the applications and not related in any way to acquisition of the
property by the City.
Councilwoman Kaywood asked for more information relative to the legalities
involved in Conditional Use Permit No. 2631 (Senior Citizens' Project) whether
it would be called discrimination if someone 55 years of age wanted to rent a
unit and if the date they called and said they were interested meant that they
must be accepted and their partner of any age must be rented to as well. If
so, the entire project could end up being rented to younger people with
vehicles. There was no way she would approve the project under those
circumstances.
Councilman Bay stated he was going to oppose the motion to continue the
matters. Ail he had heard was a crying need for senior citizen housing in the
City in the last six months. The track record of the developer was a good
one. The land was bought by them, and to start thinking about acquiring the
land after the City's offers were not successful at the time the School
District put the property up for sale to start considering acquisition again,
he considered to be ridiculous. Secondly, the adoption of the Senior
Ordinance after what he heard today would take a lot of dialogue, discussion
and changes along with considering the impact of the State law. He thought
the State's intent was to promote the construction and development of senior
citizen housing. He did not have a problem with either project and was ready
to vote on them today.
A vote was then taken on the f0regoln~ motion, continuing both public hearings
to January 22, 1985 at 1:30 p.m. Councilmen Bay and Roth voted no. MOTION
CARRIED.
179: CONTINUED REHEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2461: Application
submitted by Riviera Mobilehome Parks, to amend conditions of approval of
Conditional Use Permit No. 2461, to permit two 14-story, 200-foot high office
complexes on RS-A-43,000 zoned property located at 300 West Katella Avenue.
Environmental Impact Report No. 262 was certified by Council at the meeting of
January 24, 1984 as being in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act along with the statement of Overriding Considerations.
1213
173
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-18, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 2461 subject to certain conditions and the City
Council at their meeting of March 27, 1984, granted Conditional Use Permit
No. 2461 subject to all City Planning Commission conditions including
additional conditions as stipulated in Resolution No. 84R-124 (see minutes of
March 27, 1984). A rehearing was requested by the Attorney for the applicant
relating to the imposition of certain conditions and the request for a
rehearing was granted by the Council at their meeting of April 3, 1984 and
continued from the meetings of May 15, June 5, July 14, October 9, and
November 27, 1984 to this date (see minutes those dates).
179: CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 2460 AND 2462:
Application submitted by Riviera Mobilehome Parks, to consider amendments to
Condition No. 23 to Resolution No. 84R-35, Conditional Use Permit No. 2460 and
Condition No. 18 to Resolution No. 84R-37, Conditional Use Permit No. 2462, as
conditions of approval, that the owner(s) of subject property shall pay its
proportionate share, and shall execute and record an agreement in a form
approved by the City Attorney's Office obligating owner(s) to pay its
proportionate share, of the cost of certain off-site public improvements and
services pursuant to that certain assessment district or benefit area to be
hereinafter established by the City of Anaheim, pursuant to the requirement of
Development Agreement No. 83-01 between the City of Anaheim and Anaheim
Stadium Associates, for Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2460 and 2462, to permit a
17-story, 171-foot high, 852-room hotel with accessory uses and on-sale
alcoholic beverages on proposed C-R zoned property and two 234-foot high,
180-unit condominium towers with various Code waivers on proposed RM-1000
zoned property, respectively, on property located at 300 West Katella Avenue.
Environmental Impact Report No. 262 was certified by Council at the meeting of
January 24, 1984 as being in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act along with the statement of Overriding Considerations.
This matter was continued from the meetings of July 24, October 9 and November
27, 1984, to this date (see minutes those dates).
City Clerk, Lee Sohl, announced that Mr. Floyd Farano, attorney for the
applicant, was present to speak to his request for a continuance of the
foregoing matters to February 12, 1985.
Mr. Floyd L. Farano representing the applicant stated the applicant had
retained the services of a consultant and were requesting that the subject
matters be rescheduled for hearing on Tuesday, February 12, 1985 and that
Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2460 and 2462 be readvertised at the petitioner's
expense. At that time, the Council would be asked to consider the question as
to whether it would exercise its right of condemnation for the extension of
Clementine and Convention Way, i.e., condemnation for the purpose of acquiring
the property. It would be with the understanding that if it was done and
requested that it would be at the expense of the petitioner both as to the
cost of the condemnation and to acquisition of the property. He also stated
that pursuant to discussions with staff in the last 48 hours, staff requested
that the report to be submitted and discussed with the Council be submitted to
staff at least two to three weeks prior to the Council hearing and they
intended to honor that.
1214
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
The Mayor asked if anyone was present to speak to the issues; there was no
response.
MOTION: Councilman Overholt moved to continue the Continued Rehearing on
~onditional Use Permit No. 2461 and the Continued Public Hearing on
Conditional Use Perm~.t No. 2460 and 2462 to Tuesday, February 12, 1985 at
1:30 p.m. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
Before concluding Ron Thompson, Planning Director, stated that staff would
like a three-week lead time to analyze Mr. Farano's report in order to be able
to prepare a comprehensive report for the Council at the time of the
February 12, 1985 meeting; Mr. Farano stated he would provide the report as
requested.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: The following actions taken by the City
Planning Commission at their meeting held December 10, 1985, pertaining to the
following applications were submitted for City Council information.
NOTE: City Clerk, Lee Sob.l, noted the items submitted to the Council from the
Planning Commission meeting of December 10, 1984 (see Addendum to the agenda
of City Council meeting of December 18, 1984 - Items 1 through 9) stating that
the appeal period would expire JANUARY 2, 1985 at 5:00 P.M.
1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2619: Application submitted by Sconony Mobile
Oil Company, Inc., (Mobil Oil), to permit convenience retail sales in an
existing service station on CL zoned property located at 2800 East Lincoln
Avenue.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-256, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 2619, and granted a negative declaration status.
2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2634: Application submitted by Douglas E.
Jones, et al, (Regency Hotel), to permit a 318-room hotel with accessory uses
including a restaurant, outdoor eating area and on-sale alcoholic beverages on
CL zoned property located at 2045 South Harbor Boulevard, with Code waiver of
minimum number of parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-258, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 2634, with approval of an addendum to EIR No. 254
which had been previously certified.
3. VARIANCE NO. 3446: Application submitted by Rafael and Esther Fernandez,
to construct a detached single-family dwelling and to expand an existing
single-f-m~ly dwelling on Re-2400 zoned property located at 737 North Pauline
Street, with the following Code waivers: (a) minimum building site area, (b)
minimum floor area, (c) minimum side yard setback, (d) minimum number and type
of parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-259, granted
Variance No. 3446, and granted a negative declaration status.
1215
157
City H~ll~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
4. VAKIANCE NO. 3439: Application submitted by George T. Radoumis, et al, to
convert an existing recreation room to a security guard residence on RM-1200
zoned property located at 2176 West Brownwood Avenue, with Code waiver of
minimum number and type of parking spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-260, granted
Variance No. 3439, and granted a negative declaration status.
5. CONDITIONAL USE PER~IT NO. 2263--EXTENSION OF TIME: Application submitted
by Melville J. Mc Lean, (Bedard Automotive), requesting a one year extension
of time to Conditional Use Permit No. 2263 and/or deletion of Condition No. 5
of Resolution No. PC81-205, pertaining to required extensions of time, to
retain an automobile repair facility on ML zoned property located at 1310
North Miller Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-261, approved
deletion of Condition No. 5. Negative declaration status previously approved.
6. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT STUDY: Request for direction concerning General
Plan amendment study area boundaries - - areas are on the south side of
Vermont Avenue between Harbor Boulevard and Lemon Street.
A Staff Study was directed by the Planning Commission.
7. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 79-80-25 AND VARIANCE NO. 3136--EXTENSION OF TIME:
Application submitted by The Gunston Hall Company, Inc., requesting extensions
of time to Reclassification No. 79-80-25 and Variance No. 3136, proposed
RM-2400(SC), RM-3000(SC), RS-HS-22,000(SC) and OS zones, with various Code
waivers, on property located southwesterly of Nohl Ranch Road between the
intersection of Nohl Ranch Road with Canyon Rim Road and Serrano.
The City Planning Commission approved an extension of time, to expire February
11, 1986.
8. VARIANCE NO. 3429: Application submitted by the Planning Commission
Secretary, requesting a nunc pro tunc resolution amending the legal
description in Resolution No. PC84-207 in connection with Variance No. 3429,
to permit a 24-unit affordable apartment complex on property located at
205-211 South Ohio Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC84-262 granted a
request for a nunc-pro-tunc resolution amending the legal description in
Resolution No. PC84-207.
9. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 74-75-26 - AMENDMENT OF CONDITION OF APPROVAL:
Application submitted by Arthur P. Garcia, requesting amendment to Condition
No. 12 of Council Resolution No. 75R-134 and Condition No. 8 of Ordinance No.
3435, pertaining to Commercial Office Use in an Existing Retail Supermarket,
for Reclassification No. 74-75-26, for a change in zone from RS-A-43,000 to CL
on property located on the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Sunkist
Street.
1216
158
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - DECEMBER 18~ 1984~ 10:00 A.M.
The City Planning Commission recommended approval to the requests for
amendment to Condition No. 12 of Council Resolution No. 75R-134 and Condition
No. 8 of Ordinance No. 3435.
This matter is to be set for public hearing before the City Council and will
be scheduled at a later date.
RECESS - CLOSED SESSION: Councilman Roth moved to recess into Closed
Session. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
(4:09 p.m.)
AFTER CLOSED SESSION: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council
Members being present. (4:32 p.m.)
ADJO~T: Councilman 0verholt moved to adjourn. Councilman Pickler
seconded the motion. Councilman Roth was absent. MOTION CARRIED. (4:33 p.m.)
LEONORA N. SOHL, CITY CLERK
1217