1982/10/26qi~y Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt, Bay and Roth
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins
CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts
PLANNING DIRECTOR: Ronald Thompson
SENIOR ASSISTANT CITY ATTORNEY: Frank Lowry
STADIUM OPERATIONS MANAGER: William I. Turner
FACILITY MAINTENANCE SUPERINTENDENT: John Roche
ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR--ZONING: Annika Santalahti
ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Robert Kelley
ZONING ENFORCEMENT SPECIALIST: Anthony Montoya
Mayor Roth called the meeting to order and welcomed those in
attendance to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION: The Reverend Ted Cleveland, Chaplain, Anaheim Memorial Hospital,
gave the Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilwoman Miriam Kaywood led the assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
119: PROCLAMATIONS: The following proclamations were issued by Mayor Roth
and authorized by the City Council:
Safe School Week in Anaheim, October 25-29, 1982.
Hug a Vending Machine Week in Anaheim, October 24-30, 1982.
The Hug a Vending Machine Week proclamation was accepted by Mr. Jerry Sneegas.
119: RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION: A Resolution of Commendation was
unanimously adopted by the City Council to be presented to Mrs. Mary Bonino
Jones at a fashion show to be held by the Helmsmen, a support group of
Goodwill Industries of Orange County, honoring Mrs. Jones. The resolution
extended the gratitude and commendation of the Council on behalf of the City's
226,500 residentm for the Dositive contributions which Mrs. Jones had made.
119: RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS: A Resolution of Congratulations to the
Ebell Club of Anaheim, on the occasion of their 75th birthday on November 1,
1982, was authorized, and would be presented at a later date.
MINUTES: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to approve the minutes of the regular
meetings held August 3, August 10 and August 17, 1982. Councilman Overholt
abstained on the minutes of August 17, since he was not present. Councilman
Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Bay moved to approve the minutes of the regular and adjourned
regular meetings of August 24, 1982, and the regular meeting of August 31,
1982. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was absent.
MOTION CARRIED.
915
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to
waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions of the Agenda,
after reading of the title thereof by the City Clerk, and that consent to
waiver is hereby given by all Council Members, unless after reading of the
title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such
ordinances or resolutions in regular order. Councilman Bay seconded the
motion. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $2,469,888.26 for the
period ending October 15, 1982, and $2,487,221.66 for the period ending
October 22, 1982, in accordance with the 1982-83 Budget, were approved.
CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilwoman
Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Overholt, the following items were approved in
accordance with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each
Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar; Councilwoman Kaywood
offered Resolution Nos. 82R-507 through 82R-518, both inclusive, for
adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
1. 118: The following claims were filed against the City and action taken as
recommended:
A. Claims denied and referred to Risk Management:
1. Claim submitted by Betty McCann for personal injuries purportedly
sustained due to a slip-and-fall accident at Anaheim Stadium, on or about
August 14, 1982.
2. Claim submitted by Mark Dann for personal injuries and property
damages purportedly sustained due to an accident between a bicycle and an
automobile at Anaheim Stadium, on or about July 17, 1982.
3. Claim submitted by Anaheim City School District for indemnity damages
purportedly sustained due to an accident on City-owned property adjacent
to John Marshall School involving Darlene Siebold, Orange County Superior
Court Case No. 37-94-10, on or about September 18, 1981.
4. Claim submitted by Warren J. Firmes for personal property damages
purportedly sustained due to the roots of a City tree growing into the
sewer line at 227 Shakespeare Street, on or about August 8, 1982.
5. Claim submitted by Ernest Slamanca and Pedro Alvarado for personal
injuries and property damages purportedly sustained due to an accident
caused by a City-owned vehicle at the intersection of City Drive South and
Medical Center Drive, Orange, on or about June 3, 1982.
6. Claim submitted by Linda Chew for personal injuries purportedly
sustained due to an accident in the Anaheim Stadium parking lot, on or
about July 18, 1982.
916
C.i.ty Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
7. Claim submitted by Orange County Steel Salvage and George Adams for
personal property damages purportedly sustained due to misinformation on
the part of the City at 3200 East Frontera Road, on or about May 26, 1982.
8. Claim submitted by Jacqueline Miranda for personal injuries
purportedly sustained due to excavation work in the City parkway in front
of 3137 West Parkview Circle, on or about July 23, 1982.
9. Claim submitted by Edward Patrick Whalen for personal injuries
purportedly sustained due to a slip-and-fall accident at Anaheim Stadium,
on or about July 27, 1982.
10. Claim submitted by James S. Austin for personal injuries purportedly
sustained due to a slip-and-fall accident at Anaheim Stadium, on or about
July 10, 1982.
11. Claim submitted by Dorothy L. Thielemann for personal injuries
purportedly sustained due to a slip-and-fall accident at Anaheim Stadium,
on or about June 28, 1982.
12. Claim submitted by State College Office Building General Partnership
for personal property damages purportedly sustained due to recommendation
of Stadium Management personnel to secure protection of their property at
1818 South State College, due to a rock concert, on or about July 16 -
July 18, 1982.
B. Claims denied and referred to Governmental Programs Division, Markel
Service, Inc.:
13. Claim submitted by Donald R. Peterson, dba Liberty Charter, for
damages purportedly sustained due to false arrest, malicious prosecution
and willful oppression under cover of law, at Harbor Boulevard and
Convention Way, on or about September 23, 1982.
14. Claim submitted by James E. Bond for personal property damages
purportedly sustained due to police having claimant's car towed away from
527 W. South Street, on or about September 13 through September 17, 1982.
l~. Claim submitted by D~nnis L~e Rogers for D~r~onal ~roD~r%y los~
purportedly sustained due to failure of Anaheim Police Department to
return claimant's property when he was released from the Orange County
Jail, on or about September 30, 1982.
2. The following correspondence was ordered received and filed:
a. 105: Park and Recreation Commission--Minutes of August 18, 1982.
b. 155: Planning Department, Building Division--Monthly Report for month
of September 1982.
917
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
3. 108: The following applications were approved in accordance with the
recommendations of the Chief of Police:
a. Pool Room Permit, George Thomas Katsampes, Games Plus, 3242 West
Lincoln Avenue, to permit 11 pool tables.
b. Dinner Dancing Place Permit, Gary A. McArthur, MacArthur's Restaurant
#7, aka Betsy Ross Restaurant #7, 444 North Lakeview Avenue, for dancing
Tuesday through Saturday, 10:00 p.m. to 1:30 a.m.
c. Public Dance Permits, Elaine A. Arana, E1 Torito's Who-Song and
Larry's Cantina, 2020 East Ball Road, for public dances to be held October
28 and 30, 1982, from 9:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m.
d. Private Patrol Permit, Mickey K. Bennet and Orville R. Lewis, Gold
Shield Enterprises, Inc., to provide security for special events and
school events, et~. within the City.
e. Private Patrol Permit, George William Saunders, Pedus Security
Services, Inc., to provide security guard services within the City.
4. 123: Authorizing the First Amendment to a Lease Agreement with Tennis
Concepts, Inc., consenting to the sale of Tennis Concepts, Inc.'s, interest in
the Anaheim Tennis Center to Forde/Boesel Partnership.
5. 160: Authorizing the Purchasing Agent to issue a purchase order, without
competitive bidding, to Sico Incorporated in the amount of $14,542.14 for a
dance floor and seven caddies for the Convention Center.
6. 160/135: Accepting the low bid of Yamaha Golf Car Center in the amount of
$88,018.56 for the lease/maintenance of forty-two 1982 model golf cars for the
H. G. "Dad" Miller Golf Course, for the term November 1, 1982 through June 30,
1985, in accordance with Bid No. 3980.
7. 160: Authorizing a change order to Purchase Order 17632-D issued to
Advanced Control Systems in the amount of $9,381 for an updated computer model
of MPM3020 Master Station for the Water and Electric Utilities.
8, 160/159: Accepting the bid of Arnold Equipment Company, Inc., in the
amount of $16,420 to repair Street Sweeper No. 915.
9. 160/124: Authorizing the Purchasing Agent to issue a purchase order,
without competitive bidding, to Casey-Wayne Journigan & Associates in the
amount of $97,842.50 for 1,750 new Clarin Chairs for the Convention Center.
10. 160/124: Accepting the low bid of N. T. Bailey Company in the amount of
$90,264.30 for 3,500 Virco Stacking Chairs for the Convention Center
Betterment II, in accordance with Bid No. 3910.
918
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
11. 160: Accepting the bid of Dardanella Electric Corporation in an amount
not to exceed $11,448 for 10,000 feet of wire, URD secondary wire, code name
"Concordia" cable, in accordance with Bid No. 3990.
12. 160: Accepting the low bid of Northrup King Company in the amount of
$11,025 for 63,000 lbs. of annual rye grass, in accordance with Bid No. 3913.
13. 160: Accepting the low bid of Cushman Motor Sales in the amount of
$42,707.40 for six 72-inch rotary mowers in accordance with Bid No. 3912.
14. 153: Accepting the proposed 1983 renewal rates for the employee group
medical and dental plans, to become effective January 1, 1983.
15. 123/144: Approving a Grant Agreement (H-801) with the OrangeCounty
Manpower Commission in the amount of of $417,500 to provide funds for
services, classroom training and work experience programs under CETA for the
term October 1, 1982 through March 31, 1983, and authorizing the City Manager
to execute said agreement and any modifications thereto, and approving a Grant
Agreement (H-801A) with the Orange County Manpower Commission in the amount of
$110,000 to provide funds for administrative funds under CETA for the term
October 1, 1982 through March 31, 1983, and authorizing the City Manager to
execute said agreement and any modifications thereto.
16. 151: Authorizing an Encroachment License with Group W. Cable to allow
encroachment of a two-inch diameter steel conduit to be installed under and
across a City storm drain easement located within the Pacific Electric
Railway, south of Savanna Street. (82-1E)
17. 123 (Convenience & Safety Corporation): Receiving and filing the
preliminary report on the status of the bus shelter program.
18. 123: Authorizing an agreement with National Railroad Passenger
Corporation for the construction, operation and maintenance of an Amtrak rail
passenger station and 405 parking spaces at Anaheim Stadium.
123: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-507: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE ANAHEIM STADIUM, AMTRAK PASSENGER STATION,
IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 61-722-6325. (Martin J. Jaska, Inc.,
$668,721)
169: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-508: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE CONVERSION OF EXISTING STREET LIGHTS FOR
HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LUMINAIRES, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO.
01-677-7121-1217A-37300. (General Electric Company, $12,738.50, contingent
upon the sale of Certificates of Participation)
169: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-509: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR THE CONVERSION OF EXISTING STREET LIGHTS FOR
HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LUMINAIRES, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO.
01-677-6328-1217B-37300. (Sierra Pacific Electrical, $245,575 for labor only,
and Hi-Sodium Conversion Company, $469,916.62 for labor and material,
contingent upon the sale of Certificates of Participation)
919
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
169: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-510: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AWARDING CONTRACTS FOR THE CONVERSION OF EXISTING STREET LIGHTS FOR
HIGH PRESSURE SODIUM LUMINAIRES, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO.
01-677-6328-1217C-37300. (Sierra Pacific Electrical, $8,155 for labor only,
and Hi-Sodium Conversion Company, $1,130,713.03 for labor and material,
contingent upon the sale of Certificates of Participation)
169: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-511: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE
THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: BARRIER FREE
ANAHEIM NO. 7 STREET IMPROVEMENT, AREA BOUND BY LINCOLN AVENUE, EUCLID STREET,
BALL ROAD AND SANTA ANA FREEWAY, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO.
24-793-6325-E3630; APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS, AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF
SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.;
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING
SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened
November 18, 1982, 2:00 p.m.)
164: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-512: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT,
LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION
INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO
CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: PATRICK
HENRY NEIGHBORHOOD STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENTS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT
NO. 25-791-6325-E1230. (Butch Engineering Construction, contractor)
167: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-513: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING A SERVICE AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FOR THE
MODIFICATION OF CERTAIN TRAFFIC SIGNALS ON KATELLA AVENUE AT CLAUDINA STREET
AND KATELLA WAY; AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID
AGREEMENT FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (State testing of traffic
signal controller in the amount of $1,550, City's share being $650 and Federal
Government's share being $900)
176: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-514: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS AND
SERVICE EASEMENTS. (82-2A, public utility easement located on the north side
of La Palma Avenue, east of Kraemer Boulevard, public hearing set November 16,
1982, 1:30 p.m.)
158: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-515: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (R/W
#2800-4, Anaheim Boulevard Widening)
158: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-516: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (R/W
#2800-34, Anaheim Boulevard Widening)
920
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10.:.~0 A.M.
158: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-517: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN
REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (R/W
#2800-35, Anaheim Boulevard Widening)
158: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-518: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Dresser
Industries, Inc.; La Palma Group Limited; Ralph B. Clark; Patricia H.
Chappell; Andrew D. Verburg; East Anaheim Shopping Center Associates; The
State of California)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
Pickler
Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED. The Mayor declared Resolution
Nos. 82R-507 through 82R-518, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
101/160: ACCEPTANCE OF BID FOR STADIUM CONCOURSE RESURFACING - BID NO. 3901:
City Manager William Talley briefed the Council on memorandum dated October
13, 1982, from the Purchasing Agent, Diane Hughart, recommending acceptance of
the bid of Edwin-Garrett, Inc., dba Interior Supply Co. of Los Alamitos, in
the amount of $228,782 (including tax) for the resurfacing of the Anaheim
Stadium Concourse, Phase I--Field Level, and Phase II--Club Level, in
accordance with Bid Proposal No. 3901, as publically advertised. He also
received a letter dated October 18, 1982, from Mr. James W. Panchisin,
President of Allstate Chemical Corporation protesting the bid'submitted under
Bid No. 3901 based on facts supporting their protest as outlined on Pages 1
through 4 of their letter, and requesting that their bid be considered along
with those submitted by other contractors. A Mr. Paul Irby, Vice President of
Allstate Chemical, had requested to speak today.
The Mayor asked to hear from Mr. Irby; Mr. Irby was not present.
Questions were then posed by Councilman Bay on the bid proposal which were
answered by Bill Turner, Stadium Operations, and John Roche, Facility
Maintenance Superintendent, who were members of the committee established to
review the bids. Mr. Paul Garrett Merrill, 5370 Katella Avenue, Los Alamitos,
Vice President of Edwin-Garrett Corporation, also answered questions for
Councilman Bay revolving around the reliability of the bond.
MOTION: Councilman Bay moved to accept the bid of Edwin-Garrett, Inc., dba
Interior Supply Company, in the amount of $228,782 for the resurfacing of the
Anaheim Stadium Concourse, Phase I, Field Level, and Phase II, Club Level, in
accordance with Bid Proposal No. 3901. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the
motion. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
921
~ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 198.27 10:00 A.M.
123/151: SECOND AMENDMENT TO THE GROUND LEASE WITH ANAHEIM STADIUM ASSOCIATES
(ASA) ON 90 ACRES OF LAND SURROUNDING ANANEIM STADIUM AND ENCROACHMENT LETTER
AGREEMENT: City Manager Talley briefed the Council on his detailed seven-page
memorandum dated September 29, 1982, recommending approval of the second
amendment to the ground lease between the City of Anaheim and Anaheim Stadium
Associates with Attachments A through C (memorandum on file in the City
Clerk's office). The memorandum discussed the key provisions of the original
lease document, the objectives achieved in the past fourteen months of
negotiations with ASA, the major provisions of the new lease document, the
proposed development schedule, revised rental rates and special ground fee
adjustments, the purchase option price, replacement parking, and the financial
impact to the City.
After his presentation, Mr. Talley stated that representatives from ASA were
present, as well as from Cabot, Cabot and Forbes. He called upon the latter
to review with the Council their plans for the first block development, known
as the Orangewood Block.
Mr. James Kenyon, Executive Vice President, Cabot, Cabot and Forbes, then
briefed the Council on their plans to build four high-rise office buildings on
the 20-acre parcel on Orangewood Avenue, working from three exhibits displayed
on the Chambers wall (Anaheim Stadium Center--Orangewood Site Master Plan and
Perspective View Looking North and Perspective View Looking East and an
Illustrative Framework Plan). In concluding his presentation, Mr. Kenyon
thanked the City for their cooperation.
Mr. Frank Lowry, Senior Assistant City Attorney, then noted two changes on
Page 11 of the Second Amendment to the Ground Lease--Section 3.01.02--the
correct figure for the number of parking stalls was 7,263 (not 7,352), and
under Section 3.01.03--Rams Events Stall, 7,737 (not 7,648).
Mayor Roth felt it important to emphasize the benefit that would accrue to the
citizens of the community who traveled the areas surrounding the Stadium; City
Manager Talley stated that for the initial mitigation for the first phase of
the development, they would be requiring the developer to spend $3.5 million
improving not only the immediate areas of the development, but also those
surrounding it.
Traffic Engineer Paul Singer explained that Cabot, Cabot and Forbes would be
spending nearly $2 a square foot of their building area for outside
improvements, not including replacement parking, which was a substantial
contribution to the City's circulation element in the Stadium area. At
present, they were improving the traffic signal system and signing in the
area, and the development would further enhance the circulation by widening a
portion of Orangewood Avenue, including the bridge over the river, which would
contribute significantly toward reducing congestion from the Stadium. It was
of great benefit to the City.
Council Members commended Mr. Kenyon, who had been involved in negotiations
from the outset. The Mayor also thanked members of staff for a job well done.
922
Cit¥ Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilwoman
Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City Council finds that current
project, Second Amendment to the Ground Lease with ASA affecting approximately
90 acres of land surrounding Anaheim Stadium, would not result in any
significant individual or cumulative adverse effect on the environment, since
the proposed amendment to the ground lease does not increase the scope of
future development of the property; Block Master Plans for future development
are subject to review and approval by the City of Anaheim; and a CEQA review
of Block Master Plans will be conducted to determine the environmental impact
and mitigation measures associated with development proposals; and is,
therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR. Councilman Pickler
was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 82R-519 for adoption, approving
the second amendment to the ground lease with Anaheim Stadium Associates (ASA)
affecting approximately 90 acres of land surrounding Anaheim Stadium, reducing
the leased acreage to 68.15 acres, and modifying rental rates, purchase option
price and replacement parking, as recommended in memorandum dated
September 29, 1982, from the City Manager. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 82R-519: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM APPROVING THE SECOND AMENDMENT TO GROUND LEASE BETWEEN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AND ANAHEIM STADIUM ASSOCIATES, AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT FOR AND ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 82R-519 duly passed and adopted.
MOTION: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to authorize a letter agreement with ASA
providing for encroachment of City theme tower on ASA leased ground adjacent
to Katella Avenue, as recommended in memorandum dated October 22, 1982.
Councilman Roth seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION
CARRIED.
103: CERRITOS-FREEWAY ANNEXATION: City Manager Talley briefed the Council on
memorandum received October 21, 1982, from the Planning Division, recommending
that the City request the Local Agency Formation Commission (LAFCO) to approve
the proposed Cerritos-Freeway annexation encompassing certain uninhabited
territory consisting of approximately 47.46 acres located along the 57 Freeway
between Ball Road and north of Katella Avenue, and that that area be
designated "Developed/Substantially Developed" in accordance with the terms of
the Master Property Tax Transfer Agreement. A Mr. Day was also present to
speak to the matter.
923
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
Mr. Donald 'Day, 30118 Lakeview Avenue, Nuevo, stated that he had owned the
property for over ten years (0.29 acres of the subject property). He applied
for a zone change of his property to increase its loan value, and he also
entered into an agreement with United Outdoor Advertising who wanted to build
their headquarters on the property and also install a billboard. The zone
change was being processed through the County, and it had been continued to
November 16, 1982. He was asking for a continuance of the subject annexation
procedure for 180 days. There were no other property owners requesting
annexation, and a continuance would not cause anybody any hardship. As well,
there was no controversy as far as his causing somebody any hardship. He
asked that the Council honor his request.
Mayor Roth asked for clarification by Mr. Day that he was asking for a delay
of action in order to proceed with the finalization of his zoning with the
County, which would permit him to develop the property under County standards,
but if Anaheim went forward with the annexation proceedings, it would preclude
him from utilizing his property as he wished; Mr. Day confirmed that was
correct.
Mr. Ron Thompson, Planning Director, explained that Mr. Day's property was
irregularly shaped. Along Cerritos, the City had a 50-foot setback, and the
County's setback was much less. Therefore, it would be easier to develop
under the County's M-1 zoning, rather than the City's. Further, the City
specifically prohibited billboards along freeways, whereas the County
permitted billboards, subject to the provisions of a conditional use permit.
If the property were annexed, given the size and shape of the property, Mr.
Day would probably have a good reason to request a variance which would allow
him to develop the property. They had indicated to Mr. Day that in order to
make the property buildable, they would be supportive of a variance.
Mr. Dennis Catron, consultant for United Outdoor Advertising, 1717 Orangewood
Avenue, Suite A, Orange, explained that they were going to build a two-story
building on the site and would be requesting permission from the County to put
a billboard on the site to show their product. They wanted to locate their
business in Anaheim and to do so under the present Code in the County,
providing that they could get a CUP. He later clarified for Councilwoman
Kaywood that if they could not build a billboard, they did not want to build
their offices where they could not show their product.
After further discussion between Council Members and staff, Councilwoman
Kaywood stated that she had a real problem in allowing billboards under the
County standards, and then annex under a "grandfather clause" when they would
not be permitted to do so in the City. She also had a problem in building to
County specifications and then annexing to the City, which she felt was a
back-door approach. She was going to deny the requested delay. There was a
hardship on the property itself and she believed with the control of City
standards, the City would benefit greater.
924
q~t¥ Hail, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 82R-520 for adoption, requesting
the commencement of proceedings for the annexation of certain uninhabited
territory consisting of approximately 47.46 acres located along the 57 Freeway
between Ball Road and north of Katella Avenue, designated as Cerritos-Freeway
Annexation. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 82R-520: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS CERRITOS-FREEWAY
ANNEXATION.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt and Bay
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Roth
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 82R-520 duly passed and adopted.
REQUEST FOR CLOSED SESSION: The City Manager requested a Closed Session to
discuss personnel matters and labor relations with action anticipated,
although not until sometime later in the day; the City Attorney requested a
Closed Session to discuss litigation and potential litigation with no action
anticipated.
By general consent, the Council recessed into Closed Session. (11:12 a.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present, with the exception of Councilman Pickler. (2:00 p.m.)
176: PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDONMENT NO. 81-29A: In accordance with the
application filed by Henry C. Vogt, public hearing was held on proposed
abandonment of a storm drain easement located approximately 187 feet northerly
of the intersection of Peregrine Street and Puritan Lane, at the northerly
terminus of Peregrine Street, pursuant to Resolution No. 82R-485, duly
published in the Anaheim Bulletin and notices thereof posted in accordance
with law.
Report of the City Engineer dated September 22, 1982, and a recommendation by
the Planning Commission were submitted, recommending approval of said
abandonment.
Mayor Roth asked if anyone wished to address the Council; there being no
response, he closed the public hearing.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: On motion by
Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Bay, the City Council ratified
the determination of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls
within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 5, of the City of Anaheim
925
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October. 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
guidelines to the requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an EIR.
Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Bay offered Resolution No. 82R-521, approving Abandonment No.
81-29A. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 82R-521: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE CERTAIN PUBLIC STREETS, HIGHWAYS AND
SERVICE EASEMENTS. (81-29A)
Roli Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 82R-521 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - PUBLIC NUISANCE - 1754 WEST CATALPA AVENUE: To determine the
existence of a public nuisance at 1754 West Catalpa Avenue, and to abate in
whole or part, Mr. and Mrs. Robert E. Lauder, owners.
Mayor Roth asked if staff had anything further to add at this time.
Mr. Anthony Montoya, Housing Enforcement Officer, reported that he checked the
subject property that morning and there was still parking on the lawn and
yard. In addition, there was a trailer stored in the yard full of flammable
items. Further, there was overgrown vegetation of a large bouganvilla and
someone had cut out the inside, and either children or vagrants had set up
shop inside. It contained a carpet, lawn chairs and pillows. The property
was still in violation.
The Mayor asked to hear from Mr. Lauder.
Mr. Robert E. Lauder, 1754 Catalpa Avenue, stated that the items requiring him
to be present today had now been abated. He clarified that children had
played under the bouganvilla and not vagrants. The materials that were in the
trailer were removed from his side yard next to a large apartment building
from which he obtained personal items, ms well as relics of vehicles. The
trailer was empty at the moment and its contents were in the City dump and not
on his property. The material was not all flammable and the picture that was
painted was somewhat distorted. He reiterated he was present for specific
reasons, and those reasons had been abated. If new things were being brought
up, he considered that harassment.
Mr. Lauder then answered questions posed by the Council, at the conclusion of
which, the Mayor asked to hear from those who were present to speak to the
matter.
926
Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26~ !982, 10:00 A.M.
The following people then gave testimony on the condition of Mr. Lauder's
property: Mr. Don yon Troths, 1812 West Catalpa; Debra Felix, 1808 West
Catalpa; Earl Tiegarden, 902 Iroquois. Some of the following concerns were
expressed through their personal observance of the property: It was a
continual eyesore, the bus parked on the property was filled with something
and it was just a storage area, it was a situation that was degrading the
whole area, there was trash between the Lauder home and his neighbors for
weeks, creating an environment for rats, vehicles were always parked on the
lawn and yard, there was an overgrowth of weeds in the back yard.
In summation, Mr. Lauder answered and/or refuted the testimony of his
neighbors, some of which he contented was a total fabrication and a smear.
Mayor Roth pointed out that the City had been corresponding with Mr. Lauder
since February 18, 1982, when he was given the first notice of violation under
the Nuisance Ordinance, and extensions of time had been granted since then to
give Mr. Lauder an opportunity to comply; Mr. Lauder maintained that he had
answered the complaints made and fulfilled his part and there were new
complaints raised today.
The Mayor stated he came to the conclusion that Mr. Lauder had too many
vehicles for the space available to park them, forcing him to use areas of his
yard; discussion then followed between Council, staff and Mr. Lauder relative
to some alternatives that might be feasible in accommodating some vehicles on
his property, but only if properly paved and/or screened.
Councilman Overholt, after having clarified the situation with the City
Attorney, then explained that this was the first time they had gone this far
on a complaint under the Nuisance Ordinance. He was convinced, because of the
conflict in statements, that there were still conditions existing on Mr.
Lauder's residential property that were within the definition of the Nuisance
Ordinance, and he wanted him (Lauder) to understand what was going to happen.
He would have a period of time to abate the nuisances and if he did not do so,
the City would take corrective action, but at Mr. Lauder's expense.
Mr. Lauder requested that he be provided with the information necessary in
order for him to comply; Mayor Roth stated that staff would provide him, in
writing, what it was necessary for him to do on each item.
City Attorney Hopkins stated that the Resolution that would be adopted
specified that the City Council would then be ordering the public nuisance to
be abated in 30 days, and if not accomplished in 30 days, that the City
Manager was authorized and directed to cause said public nuisance to be abated
by City forces or private contract, pursuant to the Anaheim Municipal Code.
The 30 days would be from the date of the resolution.
Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 82R-522 for adoption, determining the
existence of a public nuisance, and ordering abatement thereof. Refer to
Resolution Book.
927
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 829-522: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE EXISTENCE OF A PUBLIC NUISANCE AND ORDERING ABATEMENT
THEREOF. (1754 West Catalpa Avenue)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt, Bay and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 829-522 duly passed and adopted.
148/173: ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (OCTD) RAPID TRANSIT CONCEPT DESIGN:
City Manager Talley briefed the Council on memorandum dated October 19, 1982,
from Pam Lucado, Associate Planner, recommending that the Council determine
their policy on starter line options for OCTD's rapid transit concept design
serving Orange County. The OCTD had once again changed their mind on what the
City thought had been represented to them with regard to the starter line and
its termination in the downtown Anaheim area. They had now stopped at the
intersection of Katella Avenue and Harbor Boulevard and his impression was
that the Council, on February 17, 1981 (see minutes that date), adopted a
motion that the line would extend to central and downtown Anaheim, and
subsequently, OCTD had agreed to that. He would appreciate, on behalf of the
Planning Staff, Council direction to carry to the Joint Transit meeting to be
held on Thursday, October 28, 1982.
Pam Lucado, Associate Planner, clarified that the OCTD was trying to identify
several price structures for approaching a rapid transit line. They were not
only looking at the possibility of funding the entire route, but .also portions
of that route. They were looking primarily at the Pacific Electric
right-of-way because of the costs involved and portions of the north-south
corridor. The District's work that had been done to date showed the link from
the Anaheim Convention Center to the downtown area to be a marginal performer
when compared to some of the other links. One of the issues that appeared to
be forming was the Council's receptiveness as far as an opinion on starter
lines if the line did not come into the downtown area, but were to terminate
at the Stadium or Convention Center.
MOTION: Mayor Roth stated they wanted it to come into the downtown area.
They needed to reaffirm their position and give direction that they were
determined to have a starter line into the downtown area. He thereupon moved
that the Council reaffirm their position as stated in its motion of
February 17, 1981. Councilman Overholt seconded the motion.
Councilman Bay did not believe they should merely restate and reaffirm the
motion they passed on February 17, 1981, as stated in the subject staff
report, but instead change the wording that they were in opposition to the
Santa Aha Transportation Corridor Study as presently configurated until there
was a firm commitment to a two-mile link to the downtown center in Anaheim.
928
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, !982, 10:00 A.M.
Councilman Roth was amenable to amending his motion to that articulated by
Councilman Bay, as was Councilman Overholt in his second. Councilman Pickler
was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ITEMS: The following actions taken by the City
Planning Commission at their meeting held October 4, 1982, pertaining to the
following applications were submitted for City Council information.
1. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2322 (READVERTISED): Submitted by William P.
Draganza, et al (Regency Hotel), to permit a 12-story, 108-foot high, 488-room
hotel with accessory uses and on-sale alcoholic beverages on CL zoned property
located at 2045 South Harbor Boulevard, with the following Code waivers: (a)
permitted location of freestanding sign, (b) minimum distance between signs,
(c) maximum height of illuminated roof sign, and (d) minimum number of parking
spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC82-185, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 2322 (Readvertised). EIR No. 254 had been
previously approved by the City Council on May 11, 1982.
2. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2373: Submitted by Iberham Ali Ata, to permit
a convenience market with gasoline sales on CL zoned property located at 1725
South Brookhurst Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC82-186, denied
Conditional Use Permit No. 2373, and granted a negative declaration status.
The decision of the Planning Commission was appealed by Talat Ladwan, agent;
therefore, a public hearing would be scheduled before the City Council.
3. VARIANCE NO. 3298: Submitted by Eric Lederer, Coto De Caza, to construct
a single-family residence on RM-1200 zoned property located at 942 North
Claudina Street, with the following Code waivers: (a) maximum lot coverage,
(b) minimum landscaped setback, and (c) minimum number and type of parking
spaces.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC82-187. granted
Variance No. 3298, and granted a negative declaration status.
4. VARIANCE NO, 3295: Submitted by Robert B, and Shirley M. Ford, to
construct a room addition on RS-7200 zoned property located at 2761 East
Viking Avenue, with a Code waiver of minimum rear yard setback.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC82-188, granted
Variance No. 3295, and ratified the Planning Director's categorical exemption
determination.
5. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2381: Submitted by KEZY Radio, Inc. (KEZY), to
permit a 213-foot high radio transmitting tower addition to an existing radio
transmitting station on ML(SC) zoned property located at 1313 Hancock Street,
with a Code waiver of permitted antenna.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC82-189, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 2381, and granted a negative declaration status.
929
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
6. MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT INFORMATION PRESENTATION: A brief
informational presentation concerning development and application of a Master
Environmental Assessment.
No action was taken by Planning Commission.
7. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 78-79-5 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by J. H. H.
Consultants, requesting an extension of time to Reclassification No. 78-79-5,
proposed RS-HS-iO,000(SC) zoning, to establish a 152-1ot, 144-unit subdivision
on property located on the south side of Willowiek Drive, approximately 865
feet south of Nohl Ranch Road.
The City Planning Commission approved an extension of time to Reclassification
No. 78-79-5, to expire August 28, 1983.
8. PROPOSED AMENDMENT TO CHAPTER 18.41.050 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO OFFICE USES IN RESIDENTIAL STRUCTURES: To consider an amendment
to Chapter 18.41 of the Code, to allow office use of a residential structure
in the C-O Zone with the approval of a conditional use permit.
The City Planning Commission recommended adoption of Ordinance No. 4371 and
Councilman Roth offered it for first reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 4371: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING SUBSECTIONS
.130, 131, 132, 133 AND REPEALING SUBSECTIONS .134, 135, 136, 137 AND 138 OF
SECTION 18.41.050 OF CHAPTER 18.41 OF TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE
RELATING TO ZONING.
9. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2364 - RESOLUTION NO. PC82-161: Request by the
Planning Commission Secretary to amend Resolution No. PC82-161, nunc pro tune,
to correct the vote on said Conditional Use Permit.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC82-190, amended,
nunc pro tune, Resolution No. PC82-161 pertaining to Conditional Use Permit
No. 2364.
10. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO 2366 - RESOLUTION NO. PC82-162: Request by the
Planning Commission Secretary to amend Resolution No. PC82-162, nunc pro tune,
to amend the vote on said Conditional Use Permit.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC82-191, amended,
nunc pro tune, Resolution No. PC82-162 pertaining to Conditional Use Permit
No. 2366.
The following Tentative Tracts from the Planning Commission meeting of
October 18, 1982, were submitted:
930
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 267_1.982, !0:00 A.M.
11. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10409~ REV. NO. 3, (READVERTISED): Submitted by
Texaco Anaheim Hills, Inc., to re-establish a 44-1ot, 40-unit subdivision on
RS-HS-10,000(SC) zoned property located on the south side of Willowick Drive
and on the north side of Imperial Highway and south of Nohl Ranch Road.
The City Planning Commission, at their meeting of October 18, 1982, approved
Tentative Tract No. 10409, Rev. No. 3, (Readvertised). EIR No. 218 was
previously approved on August 28, 1978.
12. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 10617 (READVERTISED): Submitted by Texaco Anaheim
Hills, Inc., to re-establish a 27-1ot, 25-unit subdivision on RS-HS-IO,O00(SC)
zoned property located on the east side of Imperial Highway and south of Nohl
Ranch Road.
The City Planning Commission, at their meeting of October 18, 1982' approved
Tentative Tract No. 10617 (Readvertised). EIR No. 224 was previously approved
on January 29, 1978.
No action was taken by the City Council on the foregoing items; therefore, the
actions of the City Planning Commission became final.
108(TOT): ANAHEIM MARRIOTT HOTEL - REQUEST FOR ABATEMENT OF PENALTIES:
Marriott Corporation, Taxes Division, for abatement of the penalty assessed on
the late filing of the Transient Occupancy Tax due on the. Marriott
Hotel--Continued from the meetings of September 21 and October 12, 1982 (see
minutes those dates).
Mayor Roth noted that Mr. Joel Rothman, General Manager, Anaheim Marriott
Hotel was present. He asked if he had anything further to add to the
information provided at the meeting of September 21, 1982.
Mr. Rothman answered that he had nothing further to add, although another
payment had now been made by Marriott on the new adopted schedule.
Mayor Roth asked if he was saying they were back on track and there would be
no problems in the future; Mr. Rothman answered that was correct.
Mayor Roth recalled that one of the things he asked the City Attorney was to
find out some way that the City could assist the Marriott, although he
realized the governing ordinance did not have an escape clause.
City Attorney Hopkins referred to his memorandum dated October 8, 1982, in
response to the Council's request. At this point, they had not come up with
any solution to the problem, because the ordinance did not provide for the
requested waiver. He would be glad to discuss the matter with the Council in
Closed Session.
The Mayor asked that the matter be trailed until later in the meeting, after a
Closed Session.
Later in the meeting, it was determined that consideration of the subject
request for abatement of penalties be continued to October 28, 1982.
931
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
108: NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES FOR ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT APPLICATIONS:
Discussion relating to a notification procedure for Entertainment Permit
Applications (continued from the meetings of October 5 and 12, 1982).
MOTION: Councilman Roth moved to continue consideration of the subject
procedure for one week for full Council action, since it was Councilman
Pickler's request that an Entertainment Permit Application notification
procedure be considered. Councilman Bay seconded the motion. Councilman
Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
170: FINAL MAP TRACT NO. 11786: Developer, Kingslea Communities; tract is
located on the northwest side of Anaheim Hills Road, south of Nohl Ranch Road,
and contains a two-lot, 50-unit condominium subdivision (re-subdivision of
recorded Tract No. 10585).
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Overholt, the proposed
subdivision, together with its design and improvement, was found to be
consistent with the City's General Plan, and the City Council approved Final
Map, Tract No. 11786, as recommended by the City Engineer in his memorandum
dated October 15, 1982, subject to approval of the CC & R's by the City
Attorney's office and the Engineering Division. Councilman Pickler was
absent. MOTION CARRIED.
170: FINAL MAP TRACT NO. 11818: Developer, Fieldstone Company; tract is
located on the northwest corner of Romneya Drive and Coronet Avenue consisting
of a 7-lot, 105-unit condominium subdivision (re-subdivision of recorded Tract
No. 11637).
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Overholt, the proposed
subdivision, together with its design and improvement, was found to be
consistent with the City's General Plan, and the City Council approved Final
Map, Tract No. 11818, as recommended by the City Engineer in his memorandum
dated October 15, 1982, subject to approval of the CC & R's by the City
Attorney's office and the Engineering Division. Councilwoman Kaywood voted
"no." Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
108: NIPPON SHIATSU SPA: Benjamin T. Adachi, Attorney, requesting an
additional extension of time to the period of abatement for the Nippon Shiatsu
Spa, 3024 West Ball Road, and/or consideration of amendment of the ordinance
pertaining to Adult Entertainment. Submitted was a report from the Police
Department recommending denial of the extension of the abatement period.
The City Clerk announced that a request had been received from the petitioner
that the matter be continued for two weeks to November 9, 1982.
MOTION: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to continue the subject request for an
additional extension of time to the period of abatement for the Nippon Shiatsu
Spa, 3024 West Ball Road, to November 9, 1982. Councilman Overholt seconded
the motion. Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED.
932
Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, ..10:00 A.M.
142/149: ORDINANCE NO. 4367: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 4367 for
adoption° Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4367: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14,
CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.190, SUBSECTION .410 AND ADDING THERETO
SUBSECTIONS .2060 AND .2070 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO
PARKING. (parking restrictions, both sides of Brookhurst Street, from Pacific
Avenue to the South City Limits, both sides of Tustin Avenue, from the North
City Limits to Riverdale Avenue, and both sides of Scout Trail, from Camino
Pinzon to Nohl Ranch Road)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4367 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 4368: Councilman Overholt offered Ordinance No. 4368 for
adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4368: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (77-78-61, CL)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
Pickler
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4368 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 4~69: Councilman Bay offered Ordinance No. 4369 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4369: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (81-82-12, RM-3000)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt, Bay and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4369 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 4370: Councilman Overholt offered Ordinance No. 4370 for
adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book.
933
~_Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
ORDINANCE NO. 4370: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (81-82-18, RM-1200, 141 South
Dale Avenue)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt, Bay and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4370 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 4372: Councilman Overholt offered Ordinance No. 4372 for first
reading.
108/142: ORDINANCE NO. 4372: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING
SUBSECTION (a) OF SECTION 4.29.030 OF CHAPTER 4.29 OF TITLE 4 AND SUBSECTION G
OF SECTION 18.89.020 OF CHAPTER 18.89 OF TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL
CODE RELATING TO LICENSING AND ZONING. (Massage Establishment and Adult
Entertainment Business Ordinances)
131: NUCLEAR WASTE ROUTES HEARING: Councilwoman Kaywood noted that there was
a meeting to be held Thursday, October 28, 1982, at 10:00 a.m. in the Santa
Ana City Council Chambers regarding Nuclear Waste Routes.
The hearing was being conducted by the California Highway Patrol where
testimony was to be taken on route proposals. She requested that a staff
member be present at that meeting.
106(82-83): REQUEST FOR FINANCIAL FIGURES TO ASCERTAIN IMPACT ON THE RESOURCE
ALLOCATION PLAN: Councilman Bay requested of staff financial figures by next
week on the condition of the City budget relative to the potential impact of a
zero football season, and also, if there were new estimates and projections on
revenues from sales tax. He wanted to know if those were changing or any
other major changes or problems they might be facing in the budget area.
Secondly, he would like to have a listing of the executive management
positions and the current salaries and, if available, an across-the-state
comparison similar to that provided last year.
Mr. Talley stated he could provide the information on the National Football
League (NFL) now. The figures were the same as previously reported--if they
had a non-season, they would contemplate an approximate $1.5 million loss
partially offset by the $640,000 which was placed on contingency reserve. The
best guess at this time was $900,000, and if they worked on the figures a
week, they could not come up with a better guess.
Relative to the second question, they had no new information from the state on
sales tax, because they were only provided estimate advances for the October
and November payments. In December, they would get an estimate plus a
934
CitY Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
clean-up. He gave Council a report on the first quarter, and a report
published by the Board of Equalization on sales tax revenues in April, May and
June, and there had been nothing since then. He watched that on a daily
basis. On the executive management positions, he proposed that they discuss
that in Closed Session.
Councilman Bay stated he was concerned, looking at the potential impacts for
the whole year's budget as they talked about the negative possibilities of a
full-blown football strike and whatever their projections were on sales tax
revenues. He was also interested in seeing figures on the plus side relative
to attendance at Angels' games. If they were looking at taking actions to
balance the budget, he wanted to start setting up a time when they were going
to discuss what actions they were going to take to balance the budget due to
those impacts.
Mr. Talley stated if the Council wished, he could prepare a special report on
the state of the budget. He looked at it on a monthly basis and sent it to
the Council. He had warned departments that they should start thinking about
the fallout if there were no football season.
Councilman Bay suggested that they have some dialogue from the City Manager on
the timing to approach that problem. It would perhaps be better to look at it
in November or December; Mr. Talley explained he was told if the strike was
not settled in November, there would be no football season, and that would be
the time he would address it. There was no way they could miss eight weeks
and still create a season.
Councilman Bay suggested then that they should be thinking along the lines of
early December on that subject.
RECESS - CLOSED SESSION: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to recess into Closed
Session. Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. Councilman Pickler was
absent. MOTION CARRIED. (3:31 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present, with the exception of Councilman Pickler. (5:20 p.m.)
153: ESTABLISHING RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR CLASSES DESIGNATED AS SUPPORT AND
SUPERVISORY MANAGEMENT: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 82R-523 for
adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 82R-523: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 82R-506 WHICH ESTABLISHED RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR CLASSES
DESIGNATED AS SUPPORT AND SUPERVISORY MANAGEMENT. (Energy Manager)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt, Bay and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 82R-523 duly passed and adopted.
935
Ci~_Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 26, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
103: SANTA ANA CANYON NO. 11 ANNEXATION: Councilwoman Kaywood offered
Resolution No. 82R-524 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 82R-524: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, CALIFORNIA, REQUESTING THE COMMENCEMENT OF PROCEEDINGS FOR THE
ANNEXATION OF CERTAIN UNINHABITED TERRITORY DESIGNATED AS SANTA ANA CANYON NO.
11 ANNEXATION.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Overholt, Bay and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pickler
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 82R-524 duly passed and adopted.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Roth moved to adjourn to Thursday, October 28, 1982,
at 9:30 a.m., in the Civic Center Training Classroom for an Executive
Management Seminar on the budget. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion.
Councilman Pickler was absent. MOTION CARRIED. (5:22 p.m.)
LINDA D. ROBERTS, CITY CLERK
936