1982/11/16City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESEt:
~SE~:
PRESENT:
COUNCIL M~BERS: Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
COUNCIL M~MBERS: None
CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins
CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT: Norman J. Priest
CITY ENGINEER: William Devitt
ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF: Ronald Evans
ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR--ZONING: Annika Santalahti
Mayor Roth called the meeting to order and welcomed those in
attendance to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION: A Moment of Silence was observed in lieu of the Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Ben Bay led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
119: PROCLAMATION: The following proclamation was authorized by the City
Council:
Great American Smokeout Day in Anaheim, November 18, 1982
119: INTRODUCTION OF WINNERS OF THE THIRD ANNUAL BICYCLE RODEO: Mayor Roth
welcomed those members of the Anaheim Bicycle Rodeo Committee who were
present, as well as all of the winners of the Third Annual Bicycle Rodeo held
October 16, 1982. Mr. Lon Hurwitz, member of the Anaheim Bicycle Rodeo
Committee, and Secretary/Treasurer of the Anaheim Host Lions Club, assisted
the Mayor in presenting the award trophies to the winners, whose names and
schools were announced by City Clerk Linda Roberts. The Mayor and Council
Members personally congratulated all winners in the various categories.
119/153: RESOLUTIONS OF C(1MMENDATION: Resolutions of Commendation were
unanimously adopted by the City Council for presentation to Mr. Randy Collins
and Mr. Gil Travis for risking their lives to save Merrill McFarland who they
pulled from a burning truck on the Riverside Freeway. Mr. Collins accepted
the resolution ~rom Mayor Don Roth on behal~ o£ the Council and the City. Mr.
Travis was unable to be present. Assistant Fire Chief Ron Evans also
presented two certificates of appreciation on behalf of the Anaheim Firemen's
Association, commending both Messrs. Collins and Travis for their heroic
actions.
MINUTES: Approval of the minutes was deferred to the next regular meeting.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Roth moved to
waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions of the Agenda,
after reading of the title thereof by the City Clerk, and that consent to
waiver is hereby given by all Council Members, unless after reading of the
991
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such
ordinances or resolutions in regular order. Councilman Overholt seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of ~1,928,929.90, in
accordance with the 1982-83 Budget, were approved.
CITY MANAGER/DEPARI!MENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilman Pickler,
seconded by Councilman Bay, the following items were approved in accordance
with the reports, certifications and recommendations furnished each Council
Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar; Councilman Pickler offered
Resolution Nos. 82R-551, 82R-552 and 82R-554 for adoption. Refer to
Resolution Book.
1. 118: The following claims were filed against the City and action taken as
recommended:
A. Claims denied and referred to Risk Management:
1. Claim submitted by Angus Inn for property damages purportedly
sustained due to a low voltage problem at 940 South Brookhurst Street, on
or about August 6 and September 9, 1982.
2. Claim submitted by Shari McRae for personal injuries purportedly
sustained due to a concrete traffic pylon falling on claimant's foot at
Anaheim Stadium, on or about July 10, 1982.
3. Claim submitted by Harold W. Lang for personal property damages to car
purportedly sustained due to Stadium employee parking lot having been
freshly tarred, on or about August 14, 1982.
4. Claim submitted by Michael Petritz for personal injuries purportedly
sustained due to an accident caused by negligence in operating,
maintaining, repairing and designing roadway at the eastbound off-ramp of
the Riverside Freeway at Santa Ana Canyon Road, on or about July 4, 1982.
5. Claim submitted by Corrine J. O'Brien for personal injuries
purportedly sustained due to a slip-and-fall accident caused by debris
left on City sidewalk on Anaheim Boulevard at Wilhelmina, on or about
July 12, 1982.
6. Claim submitted by Starlight Travel Service for personal property
damages purportedly sustained due to a surge of electricity damaging
personally-owned phone equipment at 1047 North State College Boulevard, on
or about July 23, 1982.
B. Claims denied and referred to Governmental Programs Division, Markel
Services, Inc.
992
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
7. Claim submitted by Todd Schneider for personal injuries purportedly
sustained due to an incident at Anaheim Stadium in which claimant suffered
a severe trauma to his head and nervous system because of circumstances
not yet fully known to claimant, allegedly caused by acts and omissions of
the City of Anaheim, its employees and its ex-officio employees, on or
about July 17, 1982.
8. Claim submitted by Hal Wanier Smith for false arrest purportedly
sustained due to an incident at Anaheim Stadium, on or about July 17, 1982.
The following correspondence was ordered received and filed.
a. 107: Planning Department, Building Division--Monthly Report for
October 1982.
b. 156: Police Department--Monthly Report for September 1982 and Third
Quarter Crime Analysis, 1982.
Co 105: Youth Commission--Minutes of October 13, 1982.
3. 160: Authorizing a change order to Purchase Order 19750-M issued to
Western Counties Maintenance Co., Inc., in the amount of ~6,250, to include
the Fire Training Facility, 2400 East Orangewood Avenue, in the janitorial
services contract for 25 other City facilities for a term of one year, as
authorized under Bid No. 3892.
4. 160: Accepting the bid of Tennant Company in the amount of ~37,426.48 for
one self-propelled scrubbing machine in accordance with Bid No. 3909.
5. 160: Accepting the bid of Cushman Motor Sales, Inc., in the amount of
~75,368.23 for eight turf trucks and three refuse vehicles in accordance with
Bid No. 3916.
6. 160: Accepting the bid of Hardin Oldsmobile in the amount of $11,825.61
for one 1983 Oldsmobile Ciera Brougham in accordance with Bid No. 3920.
7. 160: Accepting the bids of Westinghouse Electric Corp., in the amount of
~18,444 for three each 225KVA three-phase padmount transformers, Item No. 1;
and McGraw-Edison in the amount of $21,002.84 for two each 750KVA three-phase
padmount transformers, Item Noo 2, in accordance with Bid No. 3914.
8. 107/174 (CDBG): RESOLUTION NO. 82R-551: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO
THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR,
SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION
INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFOM~ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO
CONSTRUCT AND CCMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: D~OLITION AND SITE
CLEARANCE FOR WORK TO BE DONE AT 225 EAST LA PAIMA STREET, IN THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM, CONTRACT NO. BG82-2, ACCOUNT NO. 25-214-6640. (Hintz Wrecking
Company, Inc., ~1,900)
993
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
9. 129: Approving an application for a Public Fireworks Display Permit
submitted by Pyro Spectaculars, on behalf of Cal State Long Beach - 49er
Athletic Foundation, to discharge fireworks at Anaheim Stadium, November 20,
1982, at approximately 8:30 p.m., in accordance with the recommendations of
the Fire Chief and Fire Marshal.
10. 153/174: Authorizing the Mayor to execute a letter to the State CETA
office requesting designation of Anaheim as a Service Delivery Area under the
Job Training Partnership Act.
11. 169: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-552: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AWARDING A CONTRACT FOR THE GROVE STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT,
E/O GROVE STREET, S/O LA PALMA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO.
24-792-6325-E2820. (American Construction, $8,909)
12. 158: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-554: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Crow
Anaheim; Barcelona Ltd.; John F. Bozek, et al.; Automobile Club of Southern
California)
13. 123: Authorizing the First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Lease
Agreement with Golden West Baseball Company in connection with the maintenance
of the playing field at Anaheim Stadium, and authorizing an agreement with
Golden West Baseball Company to implement the transfer of the four California
Angels grounds crew employees to City employment, effective November 22, 1982.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
MOTION CAllRIED. The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 82R-551, 82R-552 and
82R-554 duly passed and adopted.
174 (CDBG): CHANGE IN CCMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOCK GRANT (CDBG) MULTI-FAMILY
LOW INTEREST LOAN PROGRAM - RENTAL REHABILITATION PROGRAM DEMONSTRATION:
Submitted was a report dated November 5, 1982, from the Executive Director of
Community Development, Norman Priest, recommending the apprpval of a change in
the subject program.
Both the Executive Director of Community Development and Housing Manager Lisa
Stipkovich answered questions posed by Council Members Kaywood and Bay for
purposes of clarification.
MOTION: Councilman Bay moved to approve a change in the CDBG Multi-Family Low
Interest Loan Program for the Rental Rehabilitation Program Demonstration,
waiving the covenant placing rent limitations on said projects, as recommended
in report dated November 5, 1982. Councilman Roth seconded the motion.
MOTION CARRIED.
994
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
169: TERMINATING AND RESCINDING AN AGREEMENT WITH FIVE STATES PLUMBING~
INC./JAMES I. LANGFORD FOR THE LA PAIMA AVENUE SEWER: Submitted was a report
from the City Engineer, William Devitt, dated November 5, 1982, recommending
that the subject agreement be terminated (Account No. 43-790-6325-E0420), as
well as the termination and cancellation of all bonds posted therewith.
Councilwoman Kaywood asked, since the City was not at fault relative to the
situation as explained in report dated November 5, 1982, if a future bid was
received at a higher price, would the developer be responsible for the higher
price.
City Engineer William Devitt answered that they were advising the developer
that he may have that responsibility, but at this point in time, he did not
believe they could advise him that he would be required to pay thedifference
if there was a difference.
Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 82R-553 for adoption. Refer to
Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 82R-553: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AGREEING TO THE TERMINATION AND RESCISSION OF AN AGREEMENT FOR PUBLIC
WORK. (Five States Plumbing, Inc./James I. Langford, for the La Palma Avenue
Sewer, east of Weir Canyon Road, Account No. 43-790-6325-E0420)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL M~4BERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickier, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 82R-553 duly passed and adopted.
108: TRANSIENT OCCUPANCY TAX ORDINANCE: Submitted was a report dated
November 15, 1982, from the License Collector, Cordelia Short, giving
historical data on the Transient Occupancy Tax and a report dated November 15,
1982, from the City Attorney, discussing the ramifications of amending the
Transient Occupancy Tax to include the imposition of interest on penalties
assessed and the waiver of penalties in appropriate cases.
City Attorney William Hopkins referred to his report, specifically noting that
after reviewing the subject ordinance, it was determined that the addition of
interest through a penalty would pose a problem to the owners and operators of
small hotels and motels and, further, would require a considerable review of
the forms and computer programs used at present. They had prepared an
amendment to the ordinance (attached to the report) which would permit the
Council to hold a hearing on an appeal, and to waive the penalty in cases
where the Council felt and made a finding that the penalty was unjustified.
995
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
Councilman Overholt stated it was not to impose interest on penalties, but on
payments not made on time, so that there would be consideration for the loss
of monies; City Attorney Hopkins stated that either way, adding interest would
require a revision of the forms.
Mayor Roth felt that the interest concept was a good one and should be
implemented. He felt strongly, however, that the Council should have the
prerogative to waive the penalty in exceptional circumstances after due
consideration.
Councilwoman Kaywood did not agree and preferred to see the ordinance remain
as it was at present. She believed that the system worked because there was
no redress.
Councilman Overholt stated that the proposed amendment did not satisfy him
because it did not deal with the question of a charge for the use of monies,
namely interest. He asked that the City Attorney provide another amendment
for Council consideration, embracing the concept of the penalty which they
could waive, and also the charging of interest of an appropriate amount for
late payment, which would not be subject to waiver.
City Manager William Talley suggested that the Council retain the ability to
set the interest rate in the event they elected to waive the penalty. Since
it fluctuated so greatly at times, it might be advantageous for people to take
their chances by sending in a late payment.
At the conclusion of further discussion and input as to alternatives,
Councilman Overholt reiterated that he was suggesting that the penalty remain,
but he wanted to see an ordinance that would include an interest concept, so
that if they chose to waive the penalty, they would at least have the use of
the cost of the money to be received. He wanted to be able to look at it both
ways.
By general consent, the City Attorney was directed to amend the proposed
ordinance to include the concept of the penalty which the Council could waive,
and also charging an interest rate on the late payment portion which would not
be subject to a waiver.
175: APPOINTMENT OF A M~MBER TO THE AD HOC ELECTRIC AND WATER LIFELINE RATES
CfM}{ITTEE: (Continued from the meeting of November 2, 1982--see minutes that
date.)
Councilwoman Kaywood nominated Bette Wakamoto; Councilman Roth nominated Bill
Krebs.
Councilman Roth moved to close nominations. Councilman Pickler seconded the
motion. MOTION CARRIED.
996
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
A roll call vote was then taken on the names in the order of their nomination:
Bette Wakamoto
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt and Bay
Roth
None
Bette Wakamoto was thereupon appointed to serve on the ad hoc Committee to
Study Electric and Water Lifeline Rates.
105/149: JOINT MEETING WITH THE PLANNING COMMISSION ON PARKING REQUIPd~4ENTS:
On motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilman Roth, a joint meeting with
the Planning Commission regarding parking requirements in the City~ was set for
Tuesday, December 7, 1982, at 7:00 p.m. MOTION CARRIED.
153/150: DISCUSSION OF APPOINTMENT OF A DEPAR/MENT HEAD: Councilman Bay
moved that the Council approve the appointment of Chris Jarvi to the Exective
Management level.
Before any action was taken, Councilman Bay stated that they had not done so
in open session and he believed the Charter required it.
City Manager Talley requested a Closed Session to discuss the matter, but
under any circumstances, it would be a ratification of the City Manager's
appointment.
Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion if it were appropriate to do so at
this time. Otherwise, she would second the motion and continue it until after
Closed Session.
Councilman Overholt thereupon seconded Councilman Bay's motion.
City Manager Talley stated that he was unaware that the matter was going to
come up and reiterated that appointments and terminations were reviewed with
the City Council and ratified by the Council.
Councilman Overholt withdrew his second to the motion.
In answer to the Mayor, City Attorney Hopkins recommended that the matter be
discussed as a personnel matter in Closed Session.
Councilman Bay withdrew his motion until after Closed Session.
168: EUCALYPTUS DRIVE - STREET NAME CHANGE: Request of Mr. James Beach to
change the street name of Eucalyptus Drive to Eucalyptus Way, was submitted.
Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 82R-555 for adoption, approving the
street name change from "Eucalyptus Drive" to "Eucalyptus Way" for a private
drive, as recommended in memorandum dated November 8, 1982, from the Assistant
Planning Director--Zoning, Annika Santalahti. Refer to Resolution Book.
997
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 82R-555: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCILOF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM CHANGING THE NAME FOR EUCALYPTUS DRIVE TO EUCALYPTUS WAY.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL M~MBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 82R-555 duly passed and adopted.
134: SETTING A DATE AND TIME FOR A PUBLIC HEARING ON GENERAL PLAN AMENIMENT
NO. 179: After a brief discussion relative to an appropriate date for the
public hearing, Councilman Bay moved that the public hearing on General Plan
Amendment No. 179, to change the current general commercial designation to
medium density on approximately 9.8 acres located south and west of the
southwest intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Rio Vista Street, be set for
Tuesday, December 7, 1982, at 7:00 p.m., as requested by the petitioner.
Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 4376: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance no. 4376 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 4376: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (67-68-33(5), CO)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4376 duly passed and adopted.
179: ORDINANCE NO. 4377 - CODE CHANGE RELATING TO DEVELOPMENT AGREEMENTS:
City Attorney Hopkins answered questions for Councilman Bay clarifying the
features of the proposed Code change.
Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 4377 for first reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 4377: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADDING NEW SECTION
18.04 OF TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING.
(development agreements)
114: ACCESS TO IMPERIAL HIGHWAY FRCM THE CANYON PLAZA SHOPPING CENTER:
Councilwoman Kaywood reported on the liaison meeting she attended with
Councilman Pickler on November 15, 1982, also attended by staff members Norman
Priest, Ronald Thompson and Paul Singer. They met with Mr. Rinker, Mr. Shantz
and Attorney at Law Floyd Farano, relative to the subject and after
approximately two hours, it was determined that a traffic study would be
998
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
initiated to ascertain the cost of the proposed improvement and a report would
subsequently be submitted. The second of the required six-month reports was
due on November 22, 1982, which would be a report of the liaison meeting.
129: FIXED WING AND HELICOPTER WATER DROPS TO C~MBAT BRUSH FIRES: Mayor Roth
again referred to the October brush fire in the Anaheim Hills area and the
recent letter of commendation sent by the Orange County Fire Chief to the
Anaheim Firemen and Police for an outstanding job. He and his Council
colleagues had already commended the actions of both departments in that
crisis. What concerned him was a paragraph in the letter which indicated that
priority was given to Los Angeles County for fixed wing and helicopter water
drops, whereas weather conditions were equal in both Los Angeles and Orange
Counties. He requested that staff investigate who was responsible for setting
priorities for use of such aircraft when brush fires occurred to ensure that
Orange County received equal weight in the setting of those priorities.
RECESS - CLOSED SESSION: The City Manager requested a Closed Session to
discuss personnel and labor relations with no action anticipated; the City
Attorney requested a Closed Session on litigation and potential litigation
with no action anticipated.
Councilman Roth moved to recess into Closed Session, after which they would
reconvene for a joint meeting with the Library Board in the sixth-floor
conference room of the Civic Center to discuss the Bookmobile Program.
Councilman Overholt seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (11:28 a.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order in the sixth-floor
conference room of the Civic Center, all Council Members being present.
(12:06 p.m.)
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRE SENT:
LIBRARY BOARD MEMBERS: Elizabeth Schultz, Earl Dahl, LaFrance
Terrell, Michael Ambrosi
LIBRARY BOARD M~MBERS: Jean McClain
CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: James D. Ruth
CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins
CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts
CITY LIBRARIAN: William Griffith
PROGRAM DEVELOPMENT AND AUDIT MANAGER: Ronald Rothschild
LIBRARIAN: Bettie Vandiver
BOOKMOBILE LIBRARIAN: Rosemary Lynch
MANAGEMENT AUDITOR: Ken Stone
The Chairman of the Library Board, Elizabeth Schultz, called the Library Board
to order.
105/140: JOINT MEETING WITH THE LIBRARY BOARD TO DISCUSS THE CONTINUATION OF
THE LIBRARY BOOKMOBILE OUTREACH PROGRAM: Mayor Roth welcomed all those in
attendance. He noted that the Council had previously allocated an additional
~37,589 to operate the Bookmobile until November 30, 1982, and the purpose of
999
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
the meeting was to determine the future of the Bookmobile Program. He
recounted his previous suggestion that the service clubs in the City be given
a presentation so that they might sponsor the Bookmobile Program, thereby
providing a service to the community. He made a presentation last Friday to
the organization to which he belonged, the Anaheim Host Lions Club, which was
met with enthusiasm, and he suggested that those Council Members who were
members of similar organizations such as Kiwanis and Rotary do the same. The
presentation should be supplemented by slides showing the Bookmobile at its
scheduled stops, basically in minority areas of the City, statistics on its
use, etc.
City Librarian William Griffith stated he felt the suggestion was a good one
from the outset and he subsequently approached the Public Information Office
for assistance in putting together such a presentation, but at the time, their
schedule did not permit, and he subsequently solicited volunteers. Some high
school youngsters did the photography and Mr. Chuck Allee was working on the
production and script. Many hours had to be devoted to the project but when
complete, he felt they would have a superior product.
Mrs. Elizabeth Schultz, Chairman of the Library Board, stated that having read
a letter dated November 5, 1982, from the Library Board to the Council, she
was certain they were aware how necessary a program the Bookmobile was in the
community. She was happy to hear the Mayor speak of minorities in the
community because she felt there had been an insensitivity to that segment,
and that was something they were trying to take care of with the Bookmobile
Program.
At the request of Councilman Bay, Mr. Griffith gave an historical overview as
to why the Bookmobile Program was first initiated, starting in 1958. It was
basically to supplement the lack of branch libraries in certain areas of the
City. In the interim, staff became aware of the tremendous minority interest
in the Bookmobile and perceived a need. The Board then went to the Council
with the request that the Bookmobile be diverted from its original intention
into an outreach program, and it had been on a temporary basis ever since.
Councilman Bay stated the point he wanted to make was the original intent and
the fact that they now had library branches all over the City. It was now a
community-type service. He had no argument with the need, but questioned why
they had not looked at the possibility of Block Grant Funds to support the
program under Community Development Block Grant. Further, it was a service
provided to minority areas and should fall under the Community Services
Board. He suggested that the Library Board lobby the Community Services Board
to get a portion of those Block Grant Funds and to be a part of those hearings
in the future.
He continued that they were talking about approximately ~33,000 to continue
the program for the remainder of the fiscal year. The City was presently
facing a $900,000 loss in revenues due to the football strike, and ~640,000
had already been lost as of Sunday. They were also looking at possible short
falls of another ~900,000 in sales tax revenues. Although $33,000 or $34,000
did not seem like a large amount, they were going to be looking at amounts
like that to solve their budget balancing this year.
1000
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
Rosemary Lynch, Bookmobile Librarian, explained that the purpose of the
Bookmobile had changed, as well as the composite of those using the program.
There were now Hispanic and Vietnamese communities who could not or would not
frequent the library itself. She viewed it as an outreach program that was
very positive in nature. As a former probation and correction officer, she
could see the problems that existed.
Mr. LaFrance (Slim) Terrell, Library Board Member, then commented on his
observations watching the children who utilized the Bookmobile and the great
number that did so. He felt it was a tremendous community service.
Councilman Overholt noted that the ~33,700 would carry the program for seven
months, or the balance of the fiscal year. He did not believe that anybody
wanted to see the program stop. His inclination would be to find a way of
funding the Bookmobile through the end of the year.
City Manager Talley stated the issue was service to the community, and the
Bookmobile provided a good level of service; however, it represented an
additional level and if it was such a positive service, it should not be at
the bottom of priorities. At some point, they were going to have to address
the fact that as part of the Library budget, the Bookmobile had a definite
place. Most cities were not adding to library services and if it was that
valuable, other library services should be reduced a concurrent amount. The
Bookmobile was rendering a better service to the community on a cost basis,
than the libraries. He recommended that they decide the total Library
services they wanted to fund in the community and then fund it accordingly.
If the Bookmobile was in that group, then it should be funded on a permanent
basis. He suggested that perhaps some of the things they had not curtailed
needed to be looked at and that some time soon, they should address library
service in Anaheim. In the meantime, he suggested that funding be allocated
from the Council Contingency Fund until the Council made a final decision, and
then communicate that decision to staff.
MOTION: Councilwoman Kaywood moved that the Bookmobile Outreach Program be
funded at a cost of ~9,700 from the Council Contingency Fund, which would
allow continuance of the program for two additional months and, in the
interim, that alternative methods of funding the program be investigated to
ensure that the Bookmobile Program became permanent in the future. Councilman
Overholt seconded the motion, adding also inviting service groups to
participate.
Before a vote was taken, Mayor Roth stated he would like to see some
commitment as to when the slide presentation would be ready, and to set up
some type of program to schedule the presentations before the service groups,
which had to be done well in advance, with a further commitment from Council
Members to sell that program.
A vote was them taken on the foregoing motion. MOTION CARRIED.
1001
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
Mr. Talley stated that James Ruth, Assistant City Manager, and Dean Grose,
Public Information Officer, were immediately available to assist in finalizing
the presentation; Mayor Roth asked that it first be shown to the Council
before being presented to the service organizations.
By general consent, the Library Board adjourned. (1:30 p.m.)
RECESS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to recess for ten minutes to allow an
opportunity to reconvene the Council meeting in the Council Chambers.
Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (1:30 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (1:40 p.m.)
176: PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDO~I~ENT NO. 82-2A: In ~ccordance with application
filed by Donald H. Yoder, public hearing was held on abandonment of a public
utility easement located on the north side of La Palma Avenue, east of Kraemer
Boulevard, pursuant to Resolution No. 82R-514, duly published in the Anaheim
Bulletin and notices thereof posted in accordance with law. Report of the
City Engineer dated September 23, 1982, and a recommendation by the Planning
Commission, were submitted recommending approval of said abandonment.
Mayor Roth asked if anyone wished to address the Council; there being no
response, he closed the public hearing.
ENVIRORMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EX~tPTION: On motion by Councilman
Bay, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council ratified the
determination of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls within
the definition of Section 3.01, Class 5, of the City of Anaheim guidelines to
the requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the requirement to file an EIR. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilman Bay offered Resolution No. 82R-556 for adoption, approving
Abandonment No. 82-2A. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 82R-556: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM VACATING A PUBLIC UTILITY EASEMENT LOCATED ON THE NORTH SIDE OF LA
PAIMA AVENUE, EAST OF KRAI!MER BOULEVARD. (82-2A)
Roll Call Vote:
AYE S:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MMMBERS:
COUNCIL M~BERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 82R-556 duly passed and adopted.
108: HEARING - AMUSEMENT ARCADE APPLICATION NO. 82-31, SHANNON'S ALTA DENA
DAIRY: To consider an appeal of the decision of the Planning Director
approving an Amusement Arcade Application for Shannon's Alta Dena Dairy, 829
South Euclid Street, for 18 amusement devices. Submitted was a report from
the Zoning Division dated November 8, 1982.
1002
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
Mayor Roth asked to hear from the applicant.
Mrs. Diana Kay McCreery, 2206 East Bangor Way, stated that she was the owner
of Shannon's Alta Dena Dairy and she had applied to be permitted to have 18
amusement devices. She went above what she normally would be able to carry in
the event that they knock out another wall and added to the arcade. Their
facility was fenced on one side and they had it set up so that the children
would not be on the drive-through section of the dairy. She had worked with
children for many years and she had present today a character witness and a
resident who would speak on her behalf. At present, she had four amusement
devices.
Mr. Alex DeLao, 2i30 West Crescent, Apartment 1171, stated he was present on
Mrs. McCreery's behalf as a character witness. He was the band director at
Katella High School and Mrs. McCreery was their current Band Booster President
and had served in that capacity for two years. Before that, she was their
Hospitality Chairman. He had the opportunity of watching her work with the
students and her two twin boys had been in the band. She had been an
inspiration not only to the parents, but also for the young men and women who
served in their program. She also served as a member of the inspection team.
She was called '~om McCreery" by the students. He was present because he
believed in what she could do for kids. There were 160 in their program and
they knew and respected her. She had recently purchased the subject dairy
which was in the Loara High School area. He fully supported her and her
efforts in working with the local schools.
Mr. Joel Reichert, 828 South Falcon, stated he lived directly behind the dairy
and had three children of his own. He was not concerned about them "hanging
around" at the dairy. He had only known Mrs. McCreery since she purchased the
business, but had no doubts that she would take care of the responsibility of
the children who frequented the arcade.
The Mayor asked to hear from those who wished to speak in opposition.
Annette Stoddard, 631 South Adria, stated she was opposed to having more
amusement devices in the Alta Dena Dairy. She did not know Mrs. McCreery, but
she was concerned over groups of children frequenting the business, and if
they would be watched. Mrs. McCreery could not always be on the premises.
~h~ preferred to ~ amusement d~vic~ in ar@a~ ~uch a~ a ~hoppin~ mall wh~r~
there was a security guard. The subject corner at present was an eyesore and
had been for years. She also had a daughter working across the street from
the site and when she finished work at 7:00 p.m., she would not be able to
walk home anymore. She also could not imagine how Mrs. McCreery could knock
out a wail and install more machines. She had passed the petition in
opposition which had been previously submitted. In the course of answering
questions posed by Councilwoman Kaywood, Mrs. Stoddard also stated another
reason for opposition was the fact that the Roberts Room was directly adjacent
to the business.
1003
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
Mrs. Stoddard then clarified for Councilman Bay that she did not live within
300 feet of the business, and when she passed the petition, she did so across
Euclid where there were homeowners, not apartments.
Donna Stagner, 119 South Adams, Fullerton, explained that she was the Manager
of Allen's Tuxedo Rentals located across the street from the Dairy, and to the
rear. She felt the arcade would draw a bad crowd and would not be good for
her business. A lot of women worked in the Center by themselves.
Mayor Roth then gave Mrs. McCreery an opportunity to rebut.
Mrs. McCreery first confirmed that she did not have a beer license and did not
want one. She also explained that there was no crosswalk in front of her
business in order to be able to cross Euclid. There would be supervision and
more than one person would be there at all times. The arcade was inside the
fenced area and bicycles would be parked in that area. She would not tolerate
any misbehaving.
Mrs. McCreery then answered questions posed by Council Members wherein she
relayed the following information: hours of operation were from 7:00 a.m. to
9:00 p.m. and Sundays, 8:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m.. If there was a compromise that
needed to be made with the schools to work out a program, she was willing to
do that as well. She was also willing to stipulate that the arcade would
operate only when the dairy was in operation, and that no students would be
allowed in the arcade during school hours. When she was not present, her
husband would be on the premises, or her boys. They were installing a
scanning system where she would be able to see anyone in the game room when
she was on the parking lot. If they needed more game room space, they could
build a new wall and make the game room bigger.- She could handle 50 patrons
at one time easily.
There being no further persons who wished to speak, the Mayor closed the
public hearing.
Councilman Bay stated he was mostly concerned with precedent and was always
concerned when they received petitions from people anywhere in the City. He
recalled hearings on arcades where the vote was 51 percent and higher in
opposition of those within 300 feet where the owners appealed to the Council
to reverse the decision of denial of the Planning Director. He felt that the
matter had to be treated equally on both sides. In this case, after polling
those within 300 feet, the result was that only seven people were opposed, or
12 percent. If they reversed the Planning Director's approval today, they
would not have any rules for the future. He would, therefore, strongly
support the arcade being allowed on the basis of the rules they used in the
past. He urged the people who signed the petition in opposition that if they
concentrated within the 300-foot radius and brought in a change, that the
Council might likely reverse that decision. He could see no reason to break
those rules at this time and reverse the decision of the Planning Director.
1004
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16~ 1982, 10:00 A.M.
MOTION: Councilman Roth moved to uphold the decision of the Planning
Director, approving an Amusement Arcade Application for Shannon's Alta Dena
Dairy, 829 South Euclid Street, for 18 amusement devices. Councilman Bay
seconded the motion.
Councilman Overholt stated he was going to support the motion, since the
applicant stipulated that the arcade would only be open when the dairy was
open--hours 7:00 a.m. to 9:00 p.m. Monday through Saturday, and 8:00 a.m. to
7:00 p.m. on Sundays, and that no students would be allowed in the arcade
during school hours.
Councilwoman Kaywood stated that she was concerned over the neighbors'
concerns and asked Mrs. McCreery if she would be open to having the neighbors
call her directly if there were any problems; Mrs. McCreery answered "yes,"
and further stated that anything they felt was wrong, she would correct to the
best of her ability.
A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion, which was also subject to the
two stipulations made. MOTION CARRIED.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2371: Application by
B~M Limited Partnership, (Texaco Service Station), to retain auto sales in
conjunction with an existing auto rental agency and service station on
proposed C-R zoned property located at 231 West Katella Avenue, with a Code
waiver of prohibited signs.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC82-166, declared
that the subject project be exempt from the requirement to prepare an
Environmental Impact Report pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act, since there would be no significant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impact due to the approval of the negative
declaration, since the Anaheim General Plan designated the property for
commercial recreational land uses commensurate with the proposal, and that the
initial study submitted by the petitioner indicates no significant individual
or cumulative adverse environmental impact, and further, granted Conditional
Use Permit No. 2371 in part, subject to certain conditions.
The decision of the Planning Commission was appealed by Harold R. Stokes,
Attorney, and public hearing scheduled and continued ~rom the meeting o~
November 9, 1982, to this date.
City Clerk Roberts noted that a letter dated November 16, 1982, from Mr.
Stokes was submitted prior to the hearing and copies submitted to the Council.
The Mayor asked to hear from the applicant or applicant's agent.
Mr. Harold R. Stokes, Attorney, 3300 Irvine Avenue, Suite 100, Newport Beach,
and Mr. Dave Capelouto, (B(M Limited Partnership) 710 East Monroe Avenue,
Orange, were present.
1005
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
Mr. Stokes referred to the detailed five-page letter dated November 16, 1982
(made a part of the record), which he submitted and which offered a rebuttal
to the staff recommendations and subsequent approval by the Planning
Commission on the condition placed on the approval of Conditional Use Permit
No. 2371: Condition No. 1--"That the owner(s) shall irrevocably offer to
dedicate to the City of Anaheim a strip of land 45 feet in width from the
centerline of the street along Clementine Street for street widening
purposes." Such dedication would amount to a total of 1860 square feet of
land to the City, at some future date, when Clementine Street would be
widened. They were present to appeal that condition and, further, they were
opposing the Planning Commission's action denying the request for waiver of
the Code requirement relative to signs. Mr. Stokes then highlighted several
points in the letter, revolving around the placement of Condition No. 1 on the
approval, and why they felt it was not warranted. With the negative
declaration filed by staff and approved by the Planning Commission, as well as
approval of the previous conditional use permit on the property, they saw no
extended use or relationship between the required dedication and what was
taking place on the property. It was not a change of use, but a consistent
use. They were also concerned with reference to the signs on the property.
They were called ski rack signs and were not portable "A" frame types. He
thereupon submitted photographs depicting the signs and their placement. They
were located on top of cars that were angled so the only people who saw them
were the Hertz Rental Car Agency adjacent to the applicant's business. He
thereupon called upon Mr. Capelouto to give his presentation.
Mr. Capelouto stated first of all that there were several reasons he felt he
should not be denied the right to sell cars on his property. He did not
believe any retail car facility was denied that and his next-door neighbor
sold the cars on his property, the only thing dividing them being a chain-link
fence. Since 1977, the Department of Motor Vehicles required that car rental
and lease companies become automobile dealers, and thus it seemed inconsistent
that the State required him to become a dealer and the City would not allow
him to sell cars. He then elaborated on the reasons why he felt that
Condition No. 1 should be eliminated and a Code waiver granted with regard to
his signs, supplemented by a short film showing the site, the surrounding
businesses and different views while traveling the adjacent streets.
Mayor Roth asked if during the Planning Commission hearing, the applicant
stipulated to the required dedication and also to the removal of the ski rack
signs.
Assistant Planning Director--Zoning~ Annika Santalahti, answered that the
interpretation on the waiver was that the petitioner did agree to that. He
may not have so stipulated, but he did not object. On the dedication issue,
she did not recall that he agreed to anything like that, but such dedication
was a standard requirement.
After additional questions were posed to staff by Council Members for purposes
of clarification, Mayor Roth stated that one of the problems the Council was
having was due to the fact that in the City Attorney's opinion, the Council
1006
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
could not just revoke the one item. They were put in a position, if they
continued to dialogue, they were going to have to review the entire
Conditional Use Permit. They were wrestling not only with the problem of the
signs and the dedication, but also they would now have to have a full new
hearing on the entire CUP.
City Attorney Hopkins stated that the Council could review the entire CUP and
Condition No. 1 would be included.
Mr. Stokes stated their contention was that they had a use that was not
inconsistent to what had been happening on the premises and there had not been
any change. The staff report, negative declaration, as well as the CUP
findings indicated there had been no increased traffic flow, and there would
be no such increase. If there was a showing that the CUP application had a
direct relationship to a need established by the City, increased traffic flow
on Clementine Street or whatever it might be, then the City would have the
right to require a dedication. A similar 15-foot dedication was not required
when Hertz made the same request.
The Mayor asked if anyone wished to speak, either in favor or in opposition;
there was no response.
Councilwoman Kaywood asked if there were signs on the Hertz cars; Mr.
Capelouto answered, "no."
Councilwoman Kaywood stated that was one of the conditions on which they were
permitted to have a double use. The subject area was the gateway to the
Disneyland area and if there were signs, one after another, it was not an
enhancement in any way. Further, asking for relief from Condition No. 1 and
the intent to continue with the signs was not what the Planning Commission
approved. According to the hearing, the applicant agreed to removing the
signs.
Mr. Capelouto stated that he did not think the CUP would apply if they
eliminated the gas station portion, and he suggested that they meet with the
Planning Department to see if they could work something out under those
conditions.
Miss ~antalahtl ~alt, in that ease, the applicant would want a continuance go
that the application could be reviewed and in order to ascertain what might be
needed.
Mayor Roth suggested, if his colleagues agreed, that the matter be continued
for 30 days to give the applicant an opportunity to work with Planning staff.
Before concluding, Councilman Bay wanted to know the initial cause for the
applicant appearing before the Planning Commission; Mr. Capelouto explained
that they were cited for the sign violation and as Miss Santalahti advised,
their existing CUP did not authorize them to sell automobiles. She
subsequently gave him a form to amend the existing CUP.
1007
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
Councilman Bay surmised then that the initial cause was for a third use on the
site. He asked Mr. Capelouto if he agreed; Mr. Capelouto answered, "yes."
Councilwoman Kaywood explained if he were to remove the gas station and then
sell cars, he would not be entitled to anything more than what Hertz had, and
they did not use signs for the sale of cars.
MOTION: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Bay, public
hearing on Conditional Use Permit No. 2371 was continued to December 14, 1982,
at 1:30 p.m., with the applicant to work with the Planning staff in the
interim. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2382: Application by Atlantic
Richfield Company (Arco Service Station), to permit a convenience market with
gasoline sales on CL zoned property located at 700 South State College
Boulevard.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC82-192, declared
that the subject project be exempt from the requirement to prepare an
Environmental Impact Report pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act, since there would be no significant individual or
cumulative adverse environmental impact due to this project, since the Anaheim
General Plan designates the subject property for general commercial land uses
commensurate with the proposal; and that the Initial Study submitted by the
petitioner indicates no significant individual or cumulative adverse
environmental impacts; and further, denied Conditional Use Permit No. 2382.
The decision of the Planning Commission was appealed by the applicant and a
public hearing scheduled this date.
The City Clerk announced that a letter dated November 10, 1982, delivered via
messenger service, had been received from Arco Petroleum, C.T. Fulkerson,
Retail Facilities Manager, requesting a continuance to November 30, 1982.
The Mayor asked if anyone was present who wished to speak.
Mr. Charles Curtis, Cohen, Stokke and Davis, 540 North Golden Circle Drive,
Santa Ana, stated he was counsel for Arco, and they were respectfully
requesting a two-week continuance to give Arco an opportunity to fully present
its case.
MOTION: Councilman Pickler moved to continue the public hearing on
Conditional Use Permit No. 2382 to November 30, 1982, at 1:30 p.m., at the
request of the applicant. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. MOTION
CARRIED.
Councilman Pickler expressed concern, however, that if anyone was present to
testify they should be given the opportunity to do so; Mayor Roth felt it
would be wise to ask anyone present to return on November 30, 1982, when a
full hearing would take place.
1008
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
A gentleman in the Chambers audience indicated he was present for the public
hearing and he was in opposition; Councilwoman Kaywood suggested that he leave
his name and address with the City Clerk and state his opposition in the event
he was unable to be present at the next hearing.
Councilman Pickler reiterated that he should be given an opportunity to
testify today; the City Attorney recommended that the gentleman return on
November 30, 1982, so the public hearing could be conducted all at one time.
A bifurcated hearing could cause problems and require him to return in any
case.
Mr. William Beck, 709 South Plymouth Place, stated since it was more
convenient for the Council to defer the hearing to November 30, 1982, he would
return on that date.
RECESS - CLOSED SESSION: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to recess into Closed
session. Councilman Pickler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (2:56 p.m.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present. (5:20 p.m.)
112: KANTOR VS. AIR CALIFORNIA AND CITY OF ANAHEIM VS. AIR CALIFORNIA: On
motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Pickler, the City Attorney
was authorized to settle Orange County Superior Court Case No. 33-50-02,
Kantor vs. Air California and City of Anaheim vs. Air California, for the sum
of ~10,000, to be paid to the City of Anaheim. MOTION CARRIED.
112: CITY OF ANAHEIM VS. METROPOLITAN WATER DISTRICT: On motion by
Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Attorney was
authorized to settle Orange County Superior Court Case No. 34-63-67, City of
Anaheim vs. Metropolitan Water District, for the sum of ~65,833.83 to be paid
to the City. MOTION CARRIED.
153: ESTABLISHING RATES OF COMPENSATION FOR CLASSES REPRESENTED BY THE
ANAHEIM POLICE ASSOCIATION AND THE ANAHEIM FIRE ASSOCIATION AND AMENDING
RESOLUTION NO. 81R-502: Councilman Pickler offered Resolution Nos. 82R-557
through 82R-559, both inclusive, for adoption, the first amending Resolution
No. 82R-499 which established rates of compensation for classes represented by
the Anaheim Police Association, the second amending Resolution No. 82R-500
which established rates of compensation for classes represented by the Anaheim
Fire Association, and the third amending Resolution No. 82R-502 and amendments
thereto which established compensation for classifications designated as
Executive Management. Refer to Resolution Book.
153/156: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-557: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 82R-499 WHICH ESTABLISHED RATES OF
COMPENSATION FOR CLASSES REPRESENTED BY THE ANAHEIM POLICE ASSOCIATION.
(Police Counter Operations, Police Report Writer, Police Communications
Dispatcher and Police Communications Clerk)
1009
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - November 16, 1982, 10:00 A.M.
153/129: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-558: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 82R-500 WHICH ESTABLISHED RATES OF
C~MPENSATION FOR CLASSES REPRESENTED BY THE ANAHEIM FIRE ASSOCIATION. (Fire
Prevention Aide, Fire Staff Aide and Fire Training Aide)
153: RESOLUTION NO. 82R-559: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 81R-502 AND AMENI~ENTS THERETO WHICH
ESTABLISHED CCMPENSATION FOR CLASSIFICATIONS DESIGNATED AS EXECUTIVE
MANAGMMENT. (Police Consultant)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL M~MBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL M~BERS:
Kaywood, Pickler, Overholt, Bay and Roth
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 82R-557 through 82R-559, both inclusive,
duly passed and adopted.
153/150: RATIFICATION OF APPOIN/MENT OF DIRECTOR OF PARKS, RECREATION AND
COMMUNITY SERVICES: City Manager William Talley announced that in accordance
with the provisions of the City Charter, he was recommending the appointment
of Mr. Chris Jarvi as the Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services.
Councilman Bay moved to ratify the City Manager's appointment of Chris Jarvi
as Director of Parks, Recreation and Community Services. Councilwoman Kaywood
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pickler moved to adjourn. Councilman Overholt
seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (5:25 p.m.)
LINDA D. ROBERTS, CITY CLERK
1010