Loading...
Resolution-PC 2015-039RESOLUTION NO. PC2015 -039 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015 -05798 AND VARIANCE NO. 2014 -04997 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2014- 00137) (1701 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as the "Planning Commission ") did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2015- 05798 to permit and retain an outdoor storage area, and Variance No. 2014 -04997 to permit fewer off - street parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code (herein referred to collectively as the "Proposed Project ") for certain real property located at 1701 South State College Boulevard in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property "); and WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 2.3 acres, is currently developed with a single wholesale business operating within three buildings, including the outdoor storage of building materials. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Industrial land uses. The Property is located within the "I" Industrial Zone and is subject to the zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.10 (Industrial Zone) of the Zoning Code (the "Code "); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on May 18, 2015 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. Conditional Use Permit No. 2015 -05798 and Variance No. 2014- 04997, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as "CEQA "), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines "), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 — Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and /or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and - 1 - PC2015 -039 WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2015- 05798, does find and determine the following: 1. The request for a conditional use permit to permit and retain an outdoor storage yard is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Section 18.10.030 (Uses) of the Code, subject to imposition of conditions of approval. 2. The conditional use permit, under the conditions imposed would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the property is currently developed with three industrial buildings and outdoor storage is an appropriate accessory use with the industrial use; and 3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health, safety and general welfare of the public because the Property is currently improved with three industrial buildings and there is no proposed expansion; and 4. The traffic generated by the use would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the number of vehicles entering and exiting the site are consistent with the existing industrial use site and the permitted business; and 5. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit No. 2015 -05798 under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the subject site is developed with a retail and wholesale tile and building materials facility and the related outdoor storage area would continue to be compatible with the surrounding uses. WHEREAS, based upon the parking justification letter submitted by the applicant, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request for Variance No. 2014 -04997 to permit less parking than required by the Code in conjunction with an outdoor storage area should be approved for the following reasons: SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum number of parking spaces. (86 spaces required; 50 spaces proposed, including 10 off -site spaces through a License Agreement with OCTA) 1. That the parking variance, under the conditions imposed, will not cause fewer off - street parking spaces to be provided for the Proposed Project than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use because the site has ample parking spaces to accommodate the use on the site. A parking justification letter and analysis was prepared by the applicant, determining that the current number of parking spacesis sufficient to accommodate the use. The site would continue to provide a total of 40 on -site parking spaces and 10 parking spaces by agreement with the adjacent property owner; and, these parking spaces have proven to be adequate for the use since 2001; and -2- PC2015 -039 2. That the parking variance, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the Proposed Project because the on -site parking on the Property will adequately accommodate the parking demands of the Proposed Project; and 3. That the parking variance, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the Proposed Project because the on -site parking on the Property will adequately accommodate parking demands of all uses on the site. The site will generate a parking demand of 20 parking spaces and 50 parking spaces will be provided; and 4. That the parking variance, under the conditions imposed, will not increase traffic congestion within the off - street parking areas or lots provided for the Proposed Project because the project site provides adequate ingress and egress points to the Property and are designed to allow for adequate on -site circulation; and 5. That the parking variance, under the conditions imposed, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the Proposed Project because the project site has existing ingress or egress access points that are designed to allow adequate on -site circulation and therefore will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the center; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission, for the reasons hereinabove stated, that Conditional Use Permit No. 2015 -05798 and Variance No. 2014 - 04997, are hereby approved, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property under Conditional Use Permit No. 2015 -05798 and Variance No. 2014 -04997 in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City- Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. -3 - PC2015 -039 BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of June 1, 2015. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CH IRMAN, PLANNIN COMMISSION _O THE CITY OF AtCSHMM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on June 1, 2015, by the following vote of the members thereof AYES: COMMISSIONERS: AGARWAL, BOSTWICK, CALDWELL, DALATI, LIEBERMAN, RAMIREZ, SEYMOUR NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 1 st day of June, 2015. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM -4- PC2015 -039 EXHIBIT "A" DEV NO. 2014 -00137 -5- PC2015 -039 0 11 c Source: Recorded Tract Maps and /or City GIS. Feet Please note the accuracy is +/- two to five feet. EXHIBIT "B" CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05798 VARIANCE NO. 2014-04997 (DEV2014- 00137) -6- PC2015 -039 RESPONSIBLE NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DEPARTMENT WITHIN 60 DAYS OF APPROVAL OF THE PERMIT 1 A right -of -way construction permit shall be obtained for the Public Works closure and reconstruction of the middle driveway on State Department, Traffic College Boulevard, as shown on Exhibit No. 1 (Site Plan). Engineering 2 The parking areas shall be developed and maintained in Public Works conformance with Engineering Standard Details 436 and 470 Department, Traffic pertaining to parking standards. Engineering 3 An accessible path of travel from State College Boulevard shall Public Works be provided as shown on Exhibit No. 1 (Site Plan). Department, Traffic Engineering 4 A trash enclosure shall be constructed and maintained in in accordance with City Standard Details. The bin in the enclosure Public Works, must be located within 25 feet of the trash truck circulation path. Street and Sanitation/Operations 5 Remove barbed wire on the fence visible from State College Planning Department, Boulevard. Barbed wire where visible to public right -of -way is Code Enforcement not permitted by Code. Division 6 Permits shall be obtained for existing wall signs. Wall signs that Planning Department, are in excess of Code requirements shall be removed. Planning Division 7 Window signs shall not shall not obscure more than ten percent Planning Department, of the total transparent area of any window surface. Code Enforcement Division OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 8 The gates shall remained open during business hours to allow Planning Department, vehicular access to handicap accessible parking spaces. Code Enforcement Division 9 All materials shall be stored within the outdoor storage area Planning Department, depicted in Exhibit No. 1 (Site Plan). No storage shall be Code Enforcement permitted outside of the designated storage area or within any Division required parking spaces. -6- PC2015 -039 -7- PC2015 -039 RESPONSIBLE NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL DEPARTMENT 10 Granting of the variance shall be contingent upon operation of Planning Department, this facility in conformance with the assumptions and /or Code Enforcement conclusions relating to the operation and intensity of this use as Division described in the parking analysis prepared by the applicant. Exceeding, violating, intensifying or otherwise deviating from any of said assumptions and/or conclusions, as contained in the letter, may subject this permit to termination pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 18.60 - Procedures of the Anaheim Municipal Code. GENERAL 11 The subject Property shall be developed substantially in Planning Department, accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Planning Services Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Division Planning Department marked Exhibit No. 1 (Site Plan), and as conditioned herein. 12 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the Planning Department, City and its officials, officers, employees and agents Planning Services (collectively referred to individually and collectively as Division "Indemnitees ") from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant's indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and /or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys' fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. 13 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the Planning Department, processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days Planning Services of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of Division building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. -7- PC2015 -039