Loading...
PC 2015/06/01 City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Monday, June 1, 2015 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California • Chairman: John Seymour • Chairman Pro-Tempore: Michelle Lieberman • Commissioners: Peter Agarwal, Paul Bostwick, Mitchell Caldwell, Bill Dalati, Victoria Ramirez • Call To Order - 5:00 p.m. • Pledge Of Allegiance • Public Comments • Public Hearing Items • Commission Updates • Discussion • Adjournment For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary. A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, May 28, 2015, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the Planning Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, during regular business hours. You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net 06/01/15 Page 2 of 4 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. Public Comments: This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. 06/01/15 Page 3 of 4 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05794 VARIANCE NO. 2015-05015 (DEV2015-00038) Location: 2100 South Euclid Street Request: To permit an automotive sales agency office within an existing multi-tenant office complex with less parking than required by the Zoning Code. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption. Continued from the May 18, 2015 Planning Commission meeting. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: David See dsee@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05798 VARIANCE NO. 2014-04997 (DEV2014-00137) Location: 1701 South State College Boulevard Request: To permit and retain an outdoor storage yard with fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code for an existing retail and wholesale tile and building materials facility. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption. Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Vanessa Norwood vnorwood@anaheim.net Adjourn to Monday, June 15, 2015 at 5:00 p.m. 06/01/15 Page 4 of 4 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 10:45 a.m. May 28, 2015 (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: JUNE 1, 2015 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05794 AND VARIANCE NO. 2015-05015 LOCATION: 2100 South Euclid Street, Suite 102 APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Jonathan Shin, representing Embassy Motors and the property owner is James Shin. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting a conditional use permit to permit an automotive sales agency office within an existing multi-tenant office complex with fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05794 and Variance No. 2015-05015. BACKGROUND: This 0.5-acre property is located in the General Commercial (C-G) zone and is designated for General Commercial land uses by the General Plan. The property is developed with a single-story, 6,671 square foot office building with two tenant spaces. Surrounding uses include a neighborhood shopping center to the north across Orangewood Avenue, single family homes to the west across Euclid Street in the County of Orange, and apartments to the east and south. This item was continued from the May 18, 2015 Planning Commission meeting to allow additional time to re-notice this item to include a request for a parking variance. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to establish an automotive sales agency office within an existing office building. The auto dealer would occupy a 2,440 square foot tenant space and the adjacent 4,271 square foot tenant space would continue to operate as a medical office. The automotive sales agency space would contain offices, storage, a lobby, reception room, conference rooms, restrooms, and a kitchen. Two automotive display spaces would be located within the parking lot immediately in front of the business. The remaining 27 parking spaces would be available for customers and employees. Approximately three employees would be present during business hours. Automobiles would be sold to customers on an appointment basis only. No construction is proposed as part of this request. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05794 AND VARIANCE NO. 2015-05015 June 1, 2015 Page 2 of 3 FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission grants a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this code, or is an unlisted use as defined in subsection .030 (Unlisted Uses Permitted) of Section 18.66.040 (Approval Authority); 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. A conditional use permit is required for automotive sales agency offices in the C-G zone to determine compatibility with surrounding land uses. Since automotive sales would occur on an appointment basis, and because ample parking would be provided on site as described below in the variance analysis, staff believes the proposed automotive sales agency would be compatible with the surrounding residential and commercial land uses. Conditions of approval have been included in the draft resolution limiting the maximum number of automobiles displayed in the parking lot, prohibiting advertising on the cars, and prohibiting auto displays on the adjacent public streets. Staff received a letter of opposition from an adjacent residential property owner. The owner expressed concerns about the compatibility of the proposed automotive sales agency office with the character of the surrounding residential neighborhood. The letter is included as Attachment No. 3 to this report. Because the outdoor display area would be limited to two automobiles with no advertising, staff does not believe that the operation of this business would be detrimental to the adjacent community. Parking Variance: A variance shall be granted upon a finding by the Planning Commission or City Council that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05794 AND VARIANCE NO. 2015-05015 June 1, 2015 Page 3 of 3 2) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use; 3) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use; 4) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use; and 5) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. The Zoning Code states that parking requirements be calculated by combining the needs of the medical office and automotive sales agency office uses on the property. The businesses require a combined total of 35 parking spaces; 25 are required for the medical office and 10 spaces for the automotive sales agency. The property contains a total of 29 parking spaces (27 spaces for customers and employees, and two automotive display spaces). Staff has made several visits to this property since the submittal of this application and observed that there is adequate parking available on the property during regular business hours and there is no evidence of parking impacts from this site on adjacent streets or properties. The applicant has submitted a Parking Letter indicating that a maximum of 15 spaces were occupied on the site during the peak morning hours from 9:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. The medical office primarily operates Monday through Saturday during regular business hours. Because the proposed automotive sales agency would have only three employees, a maximum of two display spaces, and customers of the business would visit the property by appointment only, staff believes that the number of parking spaces on-site would be adequate to accommodate the proposed business and medical office without impact to the surrounding public streets or properties. CONCLUSION: The proposed automotive sales agency office within an existing multi-tenant office complex is consistent with the operational characteristics of the office complex and would be compatible with surrounding land uses. Parking is adequate to accommodate the proposed and existing uses on-site without detrimental impacts to surrounding streets or properties. Therefore, staff recommends approval of the conditional use permit and variance. Prepared by, Submitted by, David See Ted White Senior Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution 2. Applicant’s Letter of Operation and Parking Justification 3. Neighbor’s Letter of Opposition 4. Site and Floor Plans 5. Site Photographs R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E O-LSINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE C-GRETAIL RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E RS-2SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE C-GRETAIL C-GOFFICES RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4APTS21 DU RM-4FOURPLEX RM-4FOURPLEX RM-4FOURPLEX RM-4FOURPLEXRM-4FOURPLEX RM-4FOURPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX RM-4FOURPLEX RM-4FOURPLEX RM-4TRIPLEX RM-4TRIPLEX RM-4 FOURPLEX TVACANTS E U C L I D S T W ORANGEWOOD AVE S L I D A L N W CINDY LN S C I N D Y P L W. KATELLA AVE S . W E S T S T S . N I N T H S T 2100 South Euclid Street DEV No. 2015-00038 Subject Property APN: 090-631-15 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 S E U C L I D S T W ORANGEWOOD AVE S L I D A L N W CINDY LN S C I N D Y P L W. KATELLA AVE S . W E S T S T S . N I N T H S T 2100 South Euclid Street DEV No. 2015-00038 Subject Property APN: 090-631-15 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2015-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2015-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05794 AND VARIANCE NO. 2015-05015 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2015-00038) (2100 SOUTH EUCLID STREET, SUITE 102) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve (i) Conditional Use Permit No. 2015- 05794 to permit an automotive sales agency office within an existing multi-tenant office complex, and (ii) Variance No. 2015-05015 to allow fewer parking spaces than required by the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") (collectively referred to herein as the "Proposed Project") for premises located at that certain real property at 2100 South Euclid Street, Suite 102, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 0.5 acres in size and is currently developed with an office building. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for General Commercial land uses. The Property is located in the "C-G" General Commercial Zone and is subject to the zoning and development standards of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) and Section 18.38.065 (Automotive – Sales Agency Office) of the Zoning Code (the "Code"); WHEREAS, a duly noticed public hearing was scheduled before the Planning Commission at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on May 18, 2015 at 5:00 p.m., which was continued to June 1, 2015 to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and - 2 - PC2015-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2015- 05794, does find and determine the following: 1. The request for a conditional use permit to permit an "Automotive-Sales Agency Office" within an existing multi-tenant office complex in the "C-G" General Commercial Zone is an allowable primary use authorized by Subsection .010 of Section 18.08.030 (Uses) of the Code subject to a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of Section 18.38.065 (Automotive – Sales Agency Office) of the Code. 2. The conditional use permit, under the conditions imposed, will not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area because the Property is developed with an office building and there are a sufficient amount of spaces in the parking lot to accommodate the parking demand for both businesses. 3. The size and shape of the Property is adequate to allow the full operation of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health, safety and general welfare. 4. The traffic generated by the use would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the number of vehicles entering and exiting the site is consistent with typical office uses that would be permitted as a matter of right within the “C-G” zone. 5. The granting of Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05794 under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim and will provide a land use that is compatible with the surrounding area. WHEREAS, based upon the parking justification letter submitted by the applicant, and observations made by staff, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request for a variance for less parking than required by the Code should be approved for the following reasons: SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum number of parking spaces. (35 spaces required; 29 spaces proposed) 1. Based, in part, upon a review of the findings of a parking justification analysis submitted by the applicant and observations made by staff, the variance, under the conditions imposed, will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use because the studies and observations indicate that there are enough parking spaces to accommodate this request; 2. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the on-site parking will adequately accommodate the peak parking demands of the proposed automobile dealership office; - 3 - PC2015-*** 3. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the on-site parking for the office complex will adequately accommodate peak parking demands of the use on the site; 4. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use because the project site provides adequate ingress and egress points to the Property and are designed to allow for adequate on-site circulation; and 5. That the variance, under the conditions imposed, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the project site has existing ingress or egress access points that are designed to allow adequate on-site circulation and, therefore, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the commercial Property. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05794 and Variance No. 2015-05015, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property under Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05794 and Variance No. 2015-05015 in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. - 4 - PC2015-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of June 1, 2015. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRMAN, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on June 1, 2015 by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 1st day of June, 2015. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2015-*** - 6 - PC2015-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05794 AND VARIANCE NO. 2015-05015 (DEV2015-00038) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 1. A maximum of two (2) automobiles shall be permitted to be displayed for sale in the parking lot adjacent to the auto dealership business, and in the location as shown on approved exhibits. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 2. Signs, banners, balloons or other advertising devices shall only be permitted to the extent allowed by the Zoning Code. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 3. Automobiles shall not be stored, sold, or displayed on the adjacent public streets. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 4. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the business owner shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 5. Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all person, property, and vehicles on-site. Police Department, Planning & Research Unit GENERAL CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL 6. The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department, Planning Services Division - 7 - PC2015-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 7. The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 8. The subject Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department, and as conditioned herein. Planning Department, Planning Services Division PARKING LOT COUNT 2100 S EUCLID ST. ANAHEIM, CA 92802 Monday (05/11/15) - 15 cars from 9 -11 am; 12 cars from 11 - 2 pm; 8 cars from 2 - 6 pm. Tuesday (05/12/15) - 5 cars all day. Wednesday (05/13/15) - 13 cars from 9 -11 am; 12 cars from 11 - 2 pm; 9 cars from 2 - 6 pm. Thursday (05/14/15) - 7 cars all day. Friday (05/15/15) - 15 cars from 9 - 11 am; 11 cars from 11 - 2 pm; 8 cars from 2- 6 pm. Saturday (05/16/15) - 4 cars all day. Sunday (05/17/15) - Closed. ATTACHMENT NO. 2 From:Sylvia Bush To:David See Subject:conditional use permit 2015-05794 Date:Monday, May 11, 2015 3:24:47 PM Dear Mr. See, I am the trustee of the Droessler Family trust who owns our father's home at 2075 So. Lida Ln, Anaheim. I received the letter regarding the proposed car dealership and want to state my objections to this project. This is a low key residential neighborhood and I believe that the proposed business is not in keeping with the residential vibe of the area. The usage currently has been extremely low key and should remain so. Please lodge my objections to this proposal at the public meeting or however they may have the most impact. Sincerely, Sylvia A Bush 628 10th St Huntington Beach, Ca ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT DATE: JUNE 1, 2015 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015- 05798 AND VARIANCE NO. 2014-04997 LOCATION: 1701 South State College Boulevard (Stone Age Tile) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant and property owner is Hatem Hajali. The agent representing the applicant is Jack De Rosas with DRP Associates. REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to permit and retain an outdoor storage yard in conjunction with an existing retail and wholesale tile and building materials facility with fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05798 and Variance No. 2014-04997. BACKGROUND: This approximate 2.3-acre property is located in the Industrial (I) zone and the property is designated for Industrial land uses by the General Plan. The site is developed three industrial buildings utilized for showroom area and fabrication of building materials primarily related to stone and marble and an outdoor storage yard. The property is surrounded by industrial uses to the north, a fast food restaurant and industrial uses to the east across State College Boulevard, and railroad right-of-way to the west and south. This application was filed in response to a complaint received by Code Enforcement regarding the outdoor storage of tile within required parking spaces. PROPOSAL: The applicant is seeking to permit and retain an existing outdoor storage area containing tile and stone. The business provides retail and wholesale sales of tile, stone, flooring and cabinetry and related building materials. The applicant has indicated that approximately 15 percent of the business is retail sales. The outdoor storage area is located behind and on the side of the main showroom building. A total of 50 parking spaces are proposed, including 10 off-site spaces located immediately south side of the property through an existing license agreement with the Orange County Transit Authority. The hours of operation are as follows: 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday; 9:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. on Saturday; and, 11:00 a.m. to 4:00 p.m. on Sunday. There are a maximum of 19 employees per shift during typical weekday business hours. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05798 AND VARIANCE NO. 2014-04997 June 1, 2015 Page 2 of 3 FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The Zoning Code permits outdoor storage in the I zone as a permitted use, provided that the storage area is screened from view of the public right-of-way and is not located within required setbacks or required parking spaces. A conditional use permit is required if the storage area is not completely screened from public view. Although the majority of outdoor storage at this property is located behind the building and not visible to the public right-of-way, a portion of the storage area, located adjacent to the north property line, is visible from State College Boulevard. This area is partially screened by an existing ten foot high chain link fence with green slats facing State College Boulevard and a block wall along the north property line; however, the outdoor storage area is partially visible because the vehicular gate that secures the storage yard remains open during business hours. The gate remains open to provide vehicular access to existing accessible parking spaces located behind the fence adjacent to the building. Because there is limited visibility to the outdoor storage from State College Boulevard due to the existing fence and wall screening and because the location of the main building also serves to partially screen the storage area, staff believes that the visibility of the outdoor storage area would not be detrimental to the surrounding area. Parking Variance: A variance shall be granted upon a finding by the Planning Commission or City Council that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05798 AND VARIANCE NO. 2014-04997 June 1, 2015 Page 3 of 3 1) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use; 2) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use; 3) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use; 4) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use; and 5) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use. The property requires a total of 86 parking spaces and 50 spaces are provided. A parking analysis prepared by the applicant was submitted to justify the requested variance. The analysis observed the number of spaces occupied at the business over a period of seven days. A maximum of 20 spaces were occupied during the business day and an average of 17 spaces were occupied during the observation period. The business operates primarily as a wholesale business with limited parking needs for the general public. The majority of customers are contractors and designers. Staff conducted field observations and verified the availability of parking necessary to support the demands of the business. Based on the parking analysis and staff observations, staff recommends approval of the parking variance as the parking spaces are adequate to accommodate the parking demand. CONCLUSION: Staff believes that the request to permit and retain an outdoor storage yard that is partially visible to the public right-of-way is compatible with surrounding industrial uses and would not be detrimental to surrounding area. The submitted parking analysis, confirmed by staff observations, justifies the reduction in parking and demonstrates that there will be adequate parking for the business. Staff recommends approval of the requested conditional use permit and variance. Prepared by, Submitted by, Vanessa Norwood Ted White Associate Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit and Variance Resolution 2. Letter of Operation and Parking Variance Justification 3. Site Plans 4. Site Photographs I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BVACANT I (PTMU)OfficeINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)OfficeRESTAURANT I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BVACANT I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BINDUSTRIAL I (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area BSTADIUM LOFTS O-L (PTMU)Katella Sub-Area CTOWNPLACE SUITESBY MARRIOTT I (PTMU)Office SELF STORAGE FACILITY IINDUSTRIAL IFLOOR & TILESTORES IFLOOR & TILESTORESIINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL ITILE STORE IINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL IINDUSTRIAL S S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D E HOWELL AVE E WRIGHT CIR S C A M P T O N A V EE WRIGHT CIR S E. BALL RD E. KATELLA AVE S . L E W I S S T E. CERRITOS AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVE S .S U N K I S T S T S . A N A H E I M B L V D E. GENE AUTRY WAY S . H A S T E R S T S .D O U G L A S S R D S . C L E M E N T I N E S T 1701 South State College Boulevard DEV No. 2014-00137 Subject Property APN: 082-262-01 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 S S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D E HOWELL AVE E WRIGHT CIR S C A M P T O N A V EE WRIGHT CIR S R I G N E Y W A Y E. BALL RD E. KATELLA AVE S . L E W I S S T E. CERRITOS AVE E. ORANGEWOOD AVE S .S U N K I S T S T S . A N A H E I M B L V D E. GENE AUTRY WAY S . H A S T E R S T S .D O U G L A S S R D S . C L E M E N T I N E S T 1701 South State College Boulevard DEV No. 2014-00137 Subject Property APN: 082-262-01 °0 50 100 Feet Aerial Photo:May 2014 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2015-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2015-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05798 AND VARIANCE NO. 2014-04997 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2014-00137) (1701 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2015- 05798 to permit and retain an outdoor storage area, and Variance No. 2014-04997 to permit fewer off-street parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code (herein referred to collectively as the "Proposed Project") for certain real property located at 1701 South State College Boulevard in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the “Property”); and WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 2.3 acres, is currently developed with a single wholesale business operating within three buildings, including the outdoor storage of building materials. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Industrial land uses. The Property is located within the "I" Industrial Zone and is subject to the zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.10 (Industrial Zone) of the Zoning Code (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on May 18, 2015 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05798 and Variance No. 2014-04997, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and - 2 - PC2015-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05798, does find and determine the following: 1. The request for a conditional use permit to permit and retain an outdoor storage yard is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Section 18.10.030 (Uses) of the Code, subject to imposition of conditions of approval. 2. The conditional use permit, under the conditions imposed would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the property is currently developed with three industrial buildings and outdoor storage is an appropriate accessory use with the industrial use; and 3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the health, safety and general welfare of the public because the Property is currently improved with three industrial buildings and there is no proposed expansion; and 4. The traffic generated by the use would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the number of vehicles entering and exiting the site are consistent with the existing industrial use site and the permitted business; and 5. The granting of the Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05798 under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the subject site is developed with a retail and wholesale tile and building materials facility and the related outdoor storage area would continue to be compatible with the surrounding uses. WHEREAS, based upon the parking justification letter submitted by the applicant, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request for Variance No. 2014-04997 to permit less parking than required by the Code in conjunction with an outdoor storage area should be approved for the following reasons: SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum number of parking spaces. (86 spaces required; 50 spaces proposed, including 10 off-site spaces through a License Agreement with OCTA) 1. That the parking variance, under the conditions imposed, will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the Proposed Project than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use because the site has ample parking spaces to accommodate the use on the site. A parking justification letter and analysis was prepared by the applicant, determining that the current number of parking spacesis sufficient to accommodate the use. The site would continue to provide a total of 40 on-site parking spaces and 10 parking spaces by agreement with the adjacent property owner; and, these parking spaces have proven to be adequate for the use since 2001; and - 3 - PC2015-*** 2. That the parking variance, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the Proposed Project because the on-site parking on the Property will adequately accommodate the parking demands of the Proposed Project; and 3. That the parking variance, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the Proposed Project because the on-site parking on the Property will adequately accommodate parking demands of all uses on the site. The site will generate a parking demand of 20 parking spaces and 50 parking spaces will be provided; and 4. That the parking variance, under the conditions imposed, will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the Proposed Project because the project site provides adequate ingress and egress points to the Property and are designed to allow for adequate on-site circulation; and 5. That the parking variance, under the conditions imposed, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the Proposed Project because the project site has existing ingress or egress access points that are designed to allow adequate on-site circulation and therefore will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the center; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the Planning Commission, for the reasons hereinabove stated, that Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05798 and Variance No. 2014-04997, are hereby approved, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property under Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05798 and Variance No. 2014-04997 in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. - 4 - PC2015-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of June 1, 2015. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRMAN, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on June 1, 2015, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 1st day of June, 2015. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2015-*** - 6 - PC2015-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05798 VARIANCE NO. 2014-04997 (DEV2014-00137) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT WITHIN 60 DAYS OF APPROVAL OF THE PERMIT 1 A right-of-way construction permit shall be obtained for the closure and reconstruction of the middle driveway on State College Boulevard, as shown on Exhibit No. 1 (Site Plan). Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering 2 The parking areas shall be developed and maintained in conformance with Engineering Standard Details 436 and 470 pertaining to parking standards. Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering 3 An accessible path of travel from State College Boulevard shall be provided as shown on Exhibit No. 1 (Site Plan). Public Works Department, Traffic Engineering 4 A trash enclosure shall be constructed and maintained in in accordance with City Standard Details. The bin in the enclosure must be located within 25 feet of the trash truck circulation path. Public Works, Street and Sanitation/Operations 5 Remove barbed wire on the fence visible from State College Boulevard. Barbed wire where visible to public right-of-way is not permitted by Code. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 6 Permits shall be obtained for existing wall signs. Wall signs that are in excess of Code requirements shall be removed. Planning Department, Planning Division 7 Window signs shall not shall not obscure more than ten percent of the total transparent area of any window surface. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS 8 The gates shall remained open during business hours to allow vehicular access to handicap accessible parking spaces. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division 9 All materials shall be stored within the outdoor storage area depicted in Exhibit No. 1 (Site Plan). No storage shall be permitted outside of the designated storage area or within any required parking spaces. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division - 7 - PC2015-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 10 Granting of the variance shall be contingent upon operation of this facility in conformance with the assumptions and/or conclusions relating to the operation and intensity of this use as described in the parking analysis prepared by the applicant. Exceeding, violating, intensifying or otherwise deviating from any of said assumptions and/or conclusions, as contained in the letter, may subject this permit to termination pursuant to the provisions of Chapter 18.60 - Procedures of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Planning Department, Code Enforcement Division GENERAL 11 The subject Property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit No. 1 (Site Plan), and as conditioned herein. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 12 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning Department, Planning Services Division 13 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning Department, Planning Services Division ATTACHMENT NO. 2 CSVICINITY MAP REFERENCE SYMBOLS BUILDING INFORMATION PLANNING INFORMATION GENERAL INFORMATION SCOPE OF WORK SHEET INDEX APPLICABLE BUILDING STANDARDS: 2010 CALIFORNIA ELECTRICAL CODE (CEC) 2008 CALIFORNIA ENERGY CODE (TITLE 24, PART 6) 2010 CALIFORNIA BUILDING CODE (CBC) 2010 CALIFORNIA MECHANICAL CODE (CMC) 2010 CALIFORNIA FIRE CODE (CFC) 2010 CALGREEN STANDARDS DETAIL LETTER SHEET NUMBER DETAIL LETTER SHEET NUMBER WINDOW NUMBER DOOR NUMBER SHEET NUMBERCOVER SHEET GENERAL INFO SITE PLAN BUSINESS: OWNER: CS - GENERAL INFO & SITE PLAN - OUTDOOR STORAGE A.P.N. _____________ OCCUPANCY GROUP: A2 TYPE OF CONSTRUCTION: V, N NUMBER OF STORIES: 1 SPRINKLERS: NO ZONING: PD-30 DATE: SCALE: AS NOTED JOB #: DRAWN BY: JAD SITE PLAN - PROPOSED SCALE 1” = 20’ - ST A T E C O L L E G E D E S I G N E R: 2015-05-26 JACK DEROSAS 2404 E. KATELLA AVE. ORANGE, CA 92867 (714) 561-2059 BLDG(S) A, B & C AREA INFO: TOTAL OFFICE = 5,015 SF TOTAL MFG = 17,447 SF TOTAL WHSE = 14,172 SF TOTAL SHOWRM = 10,931 SF TOTAL BLDG(s) = 47,565 SF TOTAL OUTDOOR STORAGE = 5,860 SF PARKING DATA: TOTAL ADA = 2 TOTAL STALLS = 50 STONE AGE 1701 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. ANAHEIM, CA 92806 HATEM HAJALI 1701 S. STATE COLLEGE BLVD. ANAHEIM, CA 92806 REQUIRED PATH FOR CITY FIRE DEPARTMENT EMERGENCY VEHICLES AND TRUCKS 30º GATES TO REMAIN OPEN DURING BUSINESS HOURSSIGN 10’ HIGH CHAIN LINK FENCESCREENED WITH PVC SLATS PROPOSED DRIVEWAY CLOSURE TO MATCH EXISTING CURB AND SIDEWALK CONDITIONS FOR ADDTIONAL PARKING STALLS TEMP.CEMENT BARRIERS PROVIDED BY RAILWAY DOCUMENTED AGREEMENT/ PERMISSION TO GIVEN BY RAILWAY FOR ACCESS & PARKING USAGE 10’ HIGH CHAIN LINK GATESCREENED WITH PVC SLATS BLDG-A BLDG-C BLDGB 36 ’ 33 ’ 33’ 9’ 18’ 33’ EMPLOYEE PARKING EMPLOYEE PARKING EMPLOYEE PARKING ELECTRICAL PANEL/BOX ELECTRICAL PANEL/BOX 37’R 17’R 9 ’ 1 8 ’ 10’ 18’ THE OWNER OF “STONE AGE” IS PROPOSING A VARIANCE TO REDUCE THE NUMBER OF REQUIRED PARKING AS OUTLINED BY THE CITY OF ANAHEIM’S ZONING CODE. NO PARKINGLOADING AREATR A S H ATTACHMENT NO. 3 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item.