PC 2016/03/21
City of Anaheim
Planning Commission
Agenda
Monday, March 21, 2016
Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, California
• Chairman: Michelle Lieberman
• Chairman Pro-Tempore: Mitchell Caldwell
• Commissioners: Paul Bostwick, Bill Dalati, Grant Henninger,
Victoria Ramirez, John Seymour
• Call To Order - 5:00 p.m.
• Pledge Of Allegiance
• Public Comments
• Public Hearing Items
• Commission Updates
• Discussion
• Adjournment
For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the
agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary.
A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning and Building
Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff
report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, March 17, 2016, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a
majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than
writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection
in the Planning and Building Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, during regular business hours.
You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net
03/21/2016 Page 2 of 5
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS
Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications,
Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations,
Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written
form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City
Clerk.
The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by
the City Clerk of said hearing.
If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council
at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M.
Public Comments
This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items.
03/21/2016 Page 3 of 5
Public Hearing Items
ITEM NO. 2
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05848 VARIANCE NO. 2016-05065 (DEV2015-00134)
Location: 401 West Lincoln Avenue
Request: To expand an existing barber’s college within an existing office complex with fewer parking spaces
than required by the Zoning Code (The Real Barber’s
College).
Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to
be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a
Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption.
Resolution No. ______
Project Planner: Wayne Carvalho
wcarvalho@anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05841
VARIANCE NO. 2016-05063
(DEV2015-00122)
Location: 2390 East Orangewood Avenue
Request: To establish a new restaurant and brewery
within an existing office building, to include the sales and
on-site consumption of beer and wine, a new outdoor patio and tasting area within the required front setback, and to allow fewer parking spaces than required by the
Zoning Code (Karl Strauss Brewing Company).
Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the
California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a
Class 32 (In-Fill Development Projects) Categorical
Exemption.
Resolution No. ______
Project Planner:
Amy Vazquez avazquez@anaheim.net
03/21/2016 Page 4 of 5
ITEM NO. 4
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05824
VARIANCE NO. 2016-05064
(DEV2015-00099) Location: 2390 East Orangewood Avenue
Request: To permit a private business school within an
existing office building with fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code (Bristol University).
Environmental Determination: The Planning
Commission will consider whether to find the project to
be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a Class 1 (Existing Facilities) Categorical Exemption.
Resolution No. ______
Project Planner:
Amy Vazquez avazquez@anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 5
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05849
(DEV2015-00006)
Location: 2390 East Orangewood Avenue and 2121, 2150, 2170 and 2190 South
Towne Centre Place
Request: To permit a coordinated sign program for an office complex within the Platinum Triangle (Axis-Anaheim Corporate Plaza).
Environmental Determination: The Planning
Commission will consider whether to find the project to be Categorically Exempt from the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act and Guidelines as a
Class 11 (Accessory Structures) Categorical Exemption.
Resolution No. ______
Project Planner: Amy Vazquez
avazquez@anaheim.net
Adjourn to Monday, April 18, 2016 at 5:00 p.m.
The scheduled meeting of April 4, 2016 was
cancelled due to a lack of agenda items.
03/21/2016 Page 5 of 5
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at:
4:00 p.m. March 16, 2016 (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK
SIGNED:
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all
members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative
formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof.
Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary
aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning and Building Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139,
no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting.
La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos
los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen
nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal.
Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos
apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de
Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y
reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios
auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha
modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad
ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: MARCH 21, 2016
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05848 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05065 LOCATION: 401 West Lincoln Avenue, Suite 100 (The Real Barber’s College)
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The agent representing the applicant is Ramon Baguio. The applicant is Michael Souza, President and CEO of The Real Barbers, Inc. The property owner is Harbor Lincoln, LLC, represented by Fariba Danesh.
REQUEST: The applicant requests a conditional use permit to expand an existing
barber’s college within an existing office complex with fewer on-site parking spaces
than required by the Zoning Code. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt under the
California Environmental Quality Act (Class 1, Existing Facilities), and approving
Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05848 and Variance No. 2016-05065.
BACKGROUND: This 2.1-acre property is developed with three, two-story office
buildings totaling 36,598 square feet. The property is located in the “O-L” Low
Intensity Office zone. The General Plan designates this property for Mixed-Use land uses. The property is surrounded by a medical office building to the east, the Harbor
Lofts mixed use project to the south across Lincoln Avenue, Saint Boniface Catholic
Church and a bank across Harbor Boulevard to the west, and an office building and
single family homes across Chartres Street to the north.
PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to expand the existing The Real Barber’s
College by occupying 4,763 sq. ft. of the ground floor at 401 West Lincoln Avenue.
The college currently operates at two locations: within the 4,583 square foot ground floor of the adjacent office building to the west at 451 West Lincoln Avenue, and at their original location at 528 West Lincoln Avenue. The college is relocating from
their original location where the college was originally established in 1996.
Other uses on the property include an adult education facility (Taller San Jose), an
existing mental health medical office (HOPE Center), both at 100 North Harbor
Boulevard, as well as an insurance business on the second floor at 451 West Lincoln
Avenue. The remaining office spaces in the complex are vacant.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05848 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05065
March 21, 2016 Page 2 of 6
The Real Barber’s College established their initial occupancy at 451 West Lincoln Avenue, #100
following the Planning Commission approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2010-05491 in June of 2010. That action also included Variance No. 2010-4814 to operate with fewer parking spaces
than required by code.
This proposed expansion involves interior tenant improvements to provide for classrooms, clinic
space, office and storage areas. The proposed expansion would include 912 square feet of classroom area, with the remaining 3,850 square feet designated for the clinic, ancillary offices
and storage areas. The clinic space consists of work stations typical of any barber shop and will
allow for haircuts by the general public, allowing students to work with live subjects. Instruction
would occur in the designated classrooms. No exterior alterations are proposed as part of this
request.
The hours of operation in the new space are proposed as follows: Monday-Friday 8:00 a.m.– 10:00 a.m.
Saturday 8:00 a.m.– 7:30 p.m.
Sunday Closed
The college employs 19 full-time staff, eight of which are instructors. The instructors provide
students with a high quality program in an environment conducive to acquiring real-world skills
by teaching the trade of barbering. No additional staff is anticipated with the exception of one
new janitorial position. Enrollment at the college is currently at 81 students. The highest
previous enrollment has been 125 students. The applicant indicates that Department of
Classroom
Office
Clinic Floor
Utility/Storage
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05848 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05065
March 21, 2016 Page 3 of 6
Education guidelines on student/instructor ratios would allow a maximum of 150 students.
However, their goal of reaching 150 students may not occur for several years. Although the
college can accommodate up to 150 students, only a limited percentage of the students attend
classes at any given time.
The college offers students flexible days and start times. Graduation occurs monthly, with new
students enrolling on an on-going basis. Classes are offered six days a week with various start
times noted below. According to the applicant, students can attend 24-32 hours per week utilizing the following schedules:
Schedule #1 8:00 a.m. – 2:30 p.m.
Schedule #2 8:00 a.m. – 4:30 p.m.
Schedule #3 1:30 p.m. – 10:00 p.m. Schedule #4 5:00 p.m. – 10:00 p.m. Schedule #5 11:00 a.m. – 7:30 p.m.
The applicant indicates that of the 81 students currently enrolled, only one class exceeds 30
students (48 students on Friday, 8:00 a.m. – 4:30 p.m.). Based on attendance figures (see Attachment No. 3), the college has an overall average class attendance of 13 students, Monday through Saturday, with an average class attendance of 15 students from Monday through Friday.
Using the three most common schedules (Schedules #1, #2 and #4 above) for Monday through
Friday, the average class size is 24 students.
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS:
Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use
permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following
conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is
authorized by this Zoning Code;
2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow
the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety;
4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the
traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions
imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05848 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05065
March 21, 2016 Page 4 of 6
A conditional use permit is required to permit an “Educational Institution” use in this zone in
order to ensure that the use is appropriate for the site, compatible with the surrounding area,
and in conformance with the Zoning Code. The Real Barber’s College was initially approved on this property in 2010. The Barber’s College expansion would continue to provide an
educational institution compatible with the surrounding uses, and would not limit the
operations of other businesses on the property. This barber’s college business has been
operating at this location for six years without any Code Enforcement complaints from adjacent businesses. Proposed conditions of approval would limit the number of students and require the school to operate as described in the attached Letter of Request, further minimizing
any potential impacts.
Parking Variance: A variance from the minimum number of on-site parking spaces required by the Zoning Code may be granted upon a finding by the Planning Commission that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist:
1) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer
off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such
use;
2) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use;
3) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the
demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use;
4) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase
traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the
proposed use; and 5) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede
vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets
in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05848 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05065
March 21, 2016 Page 5 of 6
The Zoning Code requires that parking demand be calculated by combining the needs of the
Barber’s College with the existing office and medical uses at the El Camino Business Center. A
total of 210 parking spaces are required for the entire complex and 141 spaces are provided, as
shown in the below table.
Code Requirement Floor
Area (s.f.)
Spaces
Required
Spaces
Provided
Offices 4 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 10,320 41
Medical
(HOPE Center)
6 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 7,189 43
Educational Institution
(Taller San Jose)
20 spaces per 1,000 s.f. or
.82 spaces per student for
classroom space, plus
1650 65
(per
VAR2015-
05027) 4 spaces per 1,000 s.f. of
office space
8021
Educational Institution
(Barber’s College – 451 W. Lincoln)
20 spaces per 1,000 s.f. or
.82 spaces per student for classroom space, plus
1200 28 (per
VAR2010-04814)
4 spaces per 1,000 s.f. of office space 3383
Educational Institution (Barber’s College expansion –
401 W. Lincoln)
20 spaces per 1,000 s.f. or .82 spaces per student for classroom space, plus
912 18
4 spaces per 1,000 s.f. of
office space
3,850 15
TOTAL 36,598 210 141
Based on previous parking variances approved on the property for the Real Barber’s College in
2010, and the Taller San Jose adult education facility in 2015, the property has been approved for
a total of 189 parking spaces. This request would grant a 210 space parking variance for the
property. Based on a 19 space parking requirement for the subject 4,762 sq. ft. office space, the Barber’s College use into that space would require 14 additional spaces.
The applicant submitted the attached Request for Parking variance letter indicating that their
current parking needs are met and that they have not increased staffing. The main parking lot
is usually 50% occupied, with the parking lot at 100 North Harbor Boulevard usually occupied with no more than 8-10 vehicles. The applicant indicates that the majority of students in the program either take public transportation, bike or carpool to the facility and that less than half
of the students enrolled in the program drive their own car. A parking survey was conducted
by the applicant on February 26, 2016 to document the number of parking spaces occupied on
a typical weekday, during peak morning and afternoon parking times. The survey results indicated that a maximum of 70 spaces were occupied on the site. A second survey was conducted on March 10, 2016 which resulted in a maximum number of 82 spaces occupied.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05848 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05065
March 21, 2016 Page 6 of 6
Staff has visited the site on several occasions and observed that adequate parking is available and
that there is no evidence of parking impacts from this site on adjacent streets or properties. Based
on the operation of the existing college, the parking surveys conducted by the applicant, and staff
observations, staff believes that the number of on-site parking spaces would be adequate to accommodate the proposed expansion without impact to adjacent businesses within the business
center or on the surrounding public streets or properties. In order to minimize any potential
parking impact resulting from the expansion and continued operation of the Barber’s College,
several conditions of approval have been included in the draft resolution. These conditions include a maximum enrollment of 150 students for the college, of which no more than 75 students would be permitted on campus at any given time.
Two e-mails (Attachment No. #7) were received from residents north of the project site as a result of the public notification. The residents expressed concerns over the proposed expansion citing increased traffic, lack of parking, as well as noise, drug use, and littering by the students. They
also referenced concerns over existing uses at the business complex and adjacent medical building.
Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects
of the proposed project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 –
Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing
public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that
existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on
the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA.
CONCLUSION: The proposed expansion of The Real Barber’s College would complement existing El Camino Business Center while minimizing any impacts to surrounding businesses. The
recommended conditions of approval would ensure that the continued operation of the college
would not adversely impact the surrounding land uses. Furthermore, the number of on-site parking
spaces is adequate to accommodate the expanded use and other businesses within the El Camino Business Center. Staff recommends approval of this request.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
Wayne Carvalho Jonathan E. Borrego Contract Planner Planning Services Manager
Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit and Variance Resolution
2. Letter of Request
3. Parking Variance Request, with Addendum
4. Parking Matrix
5. Plans 6. Photographs
7. Emails from Residents
C-G (DMU)ANAHEIM ICE
C-GBANK
C-GMEDICAL OFFICE
O-LOFFICES
C-G (DMU)HARBOR LOFTSC-GRETAIL
TST. CATHERINE'SMILITARY ACADEMY
RM-4ST. CATHERINE'SMILITARY ACADEMY
O-LOFFICES
R S -3
F O U R P L E X
R S -3
D U P L E X
R S -3SINGL E
F A M I L Y
R E S I D E N C E
R S -3
T R I P L E X
R S -3
F O U R P L E X
R S -3SFR
R S -3
T R I P L E X
R S -3
S I N G L E
F A M I L Y
R E S I D E N C E
N
H
E
L
E
N
A
S
T
W C H A R T R E S S T
W L I N C O L N A V E
N
H
A
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
S
H
A
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
S
.
E
A
S
T
S
T
W.LINCOL N A V E
E. L INC O LN AVE
N
.
E
A
S
T
S
T
N
.
H
A
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
W. B R OA D W AY
N
.
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
N . L O A R A S T
E . B R O A D W A Y
S
.
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
W. BROADWAY
401 West Lincoln Avenue
DEV No. 2015-00134
Subject Property APN: 255-064-17
°0 50 100
Feet
Aerial Photo:May 2014
N
H
E
L
E
N
A
S
T
W C H A R T R E S S T
W L I N C O L N A V E
N
H
A
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
S
H
A
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
S
.
E
A
S
T
S
T
W.LINCOL N A V E
E. L INC O LN AVE
N
.
E
A
S
T
S
T
N
.
H
A
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
W. B R OA D W AY
N
.
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
N . L O A R A S T
E . B R O A D W A Y
S
.
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
W. BROADWAY
401 West Lincoln Avenue
DEV No. 2015-00134
Subject Property APN: 255-064-17
°0 50 100
Feet
Aerial Photo:May 2014
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1
- 1 - PC2016-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05848 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05065 AND MAKING
CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2015-00134)
(401 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE, SUITE 100) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission")
did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05848 and Variance
No. 2016-05065 to permit the expansion of the existing Real Barber’s College educational
facility, and Variance No. 2016-05065 for fewer parking spaces than required by the Anaheim Municipal Code (the “Code”), (herein referred to collectively as the "Proposed Project") on a
portion of that certain real property located at 401 West Lincoln Avenue in the City of Anaheim,
County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as
Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 2.1 acres in size and is currently developed with the El Camino Business Center consisting of three (3), two-story office buildings. The
Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for “Mixed Use” land uses. The Property is
located within the "O-L" Low Intensity Office Zone. As such, the Property is subject to the
zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.08 (General Commercial Zone) of the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on March 21, 2016 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05848 and Variance No. 2016-05065 and to investigate and make findings
and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California
Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code
of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA
Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
- 2 - PC2016-***
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the
Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 –
Existing Facilities) which consist of, among other things, the repair, maintenance, or minor
alteration of existing public or private structures, facilities, mechanical equipment, or topographical features, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination. Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines provides
examples of projects that might qualify for an exemption from the provisions of CEQA. The one
example that is applicable to the Proposed Project is for:
“(a) Interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances;”
The Proposed Project meets the criteria of Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, and,
therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05848, does find and determine the following facts:
1. The proposed request to expand the existing Real Barber’s College “Educational
Institutions – Business” use at the Property is within that class of primary uses within the "O-L" Low Intensity Office Zone, which is subject to a conditional use permit as authorized under Table 8-A of Section 18.08.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code.
2. The proposed conditional use permit, as conditioned herein, would not adversely
affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located. The Proposed Project will complement the other office uses in the business center and will not operate in a manner that is detrimental to adjacent properties.
3. The size and shape of the site for the Barber’s College is adequate to allow the
full development of the Proposed Project in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and safety because the facilities on the Property will adhere to all required
development standards, with the exception of a parking variance as described below.
4. The traffic generated by the Proposed Project will not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the number of vehicles entering and exiting the site is consistent with Educational Institutions –
Business uses that are conditionally permitted in the "O-L" Low Intensity Office Zone.
5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not
be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the Proposed Project will be compatible with the surrounding area through conditions of approval for the use
and is not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
- 3 - PC2016-***
WHEREAS, the number of off-street parking spaces required under the Code for the
expanded Educational Institution - Business use, when added to the total number of such parking
spaces required by the Code and the total number of such spaces that exist at the Property,
represents a small or de minimis increase. Nevertheless, because the number of parking spaces required by the Code for all uses, including the Proposed Project, is less than the actual number of parking spaces that exist, a variance must be approved for the Property; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request to expand an existing Educational Institution - Business use with fewer parking spaces than required by Code, has determined that Variance No. 2016-05065
should be approved for the following reasons:
SECTION NO. 18.42.040.010 Minimum number of parking spaces. (210 spaces required; 141 spaces provided)
1. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not cause fewer
off-street parking spaces to be provided for the Property, including the proposed expansion of the
Educational Institution - Business use, than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to all uses at the Property under the normal and reasonably
foreseeable conditions of operation of such uses;
2. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the
demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the on-site parking will adequately accommodate the peak parking
demands of all combined uses on the site;
3. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the
demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the Property because the on-site parking for the expanded Educational Institution -
Business use will adequately accommodate peak parking demands of all uses on the site;
4. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not increase
traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the Property because the Property provides adequate ingress and egress points off of two arterial streets, which are
designed to allow for adequate on-site circulation; and
5. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not impede
vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the Property because the Property has existing ingress or egress access points that are
designed to allow adequate on-site circulation and, therefore, will not impede vehicular ingress
to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the
Property.
- 4 - PC2016-***
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05848 and Variance No. 2016-05065, contingent
upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to
the proposed use of the Property under Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05848 and Variance No. 2016-05065 in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted
in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of
approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i)
equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of
this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval
of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
- 5 - PC2016-***
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
March 21, 2016. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be
replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on March 21, 2016, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of March, 2016.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 6 - PC2016-***
- 7 - PC2016-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05848 AND
VARIANCE NO. 2016-05065 (DEV2015-00134)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT
OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS
1 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area adjacent
to the premises over which they have control, in an orderly fashion
through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed
or painted over within 24 hours of being applied.
Planning and Building
Department,
Code Enforcement Division
2 The Project shall be operated in accordance with the plans and operations letter submitted as part of this application. Any changes
to the business operation depicted in the floor plan or as described in
that document shall be subject to review and approval by the
Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with the
Letter of Request and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses.
Planning and Building Department,
Planning Services
Division
3 The maximum enrollment for the college shall not exceed 150
students. There shall be no more than 75 students permitted on campus at any given time.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services Division
GENERAL CONDITIONS
4 Conditions of approval related to each of the timing milestones above shall be prominently displayed on plans submitted for permits. For example, conditions of approval that are required to be complied with
prior to the issuance of building permits shall be provided on plans
submitted for building plan check. This requirement applies to
building permits, grading permits, street improvement plans, water and electrical plans, landscape irrigation plans, and fire and life safety
plans, etc.
Planning and Building Department,
Planning Services
Division
5 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the
processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building
permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all
charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or
may result in the revocation of the approval of this application.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
- 8 - PC2016-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
6 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City
and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively
referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any
and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the
Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts
or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to
determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition
attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded
against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or
litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other
costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection
with such proceeding.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
7 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the
applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department
and as conditioned herein.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
LETTER OF REQUEST
Case Number: CUP 2015-05848
DEV Number: DEV 2015-00134
DTF Number: DK97
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
Students & Staff of The Real Barbers College
Business Location
451 West Lincoln Ave Suite B100
Anaheim, CA 92805
Hours of Operation
Monday – Friday: 8:00AM – 10:00PM
Saturday: 8:00AM – 7:30PM
Sunday: Closed
January 8, 2016
The Real Barbers College has been granted accreditation by the National Accrediting
Commission of Career Arts and Sciences (NACCAS), an agency recognized by the United States
Department of Education for Barbering and Cosmetology accreditation. Our primary objective is to
provide each enrolled student with a high- quality program in an environment conducive to acquiring
real-world skills by adopting a straightforward, pragmatic methodology. Upon completion, graduate
students should be able to effectively work in one specialty area such as Barber, Hair Stylist, or Hair
Colorist, or as a Barber Shop/Beauty Salon Operator. Normal progression should move the student to
positions such as Barber Shop/Beauty Salon Manager, Barber Shop/Beauty Salon Owner, and
Barber/Cosmetology Teacher or School Owner.
We are currently enrolling for the following programs at our institution, Barbering program requiring
1500 clock hours of training, Barbering Crossover program requiring 400 clock hours of training and the
Barbering Instructor program requiring 600 clock hours of training. Our current number of staff, faculty
and employees is 23. Our institution has also acquired approval to operate by the following national and
California State agencies whom have set the minimum standards for our program of studies:
-Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) Consumer Information Division
-Board of Barbering and Cosmetology (BBC)
-Bureau for Private Postsecondary Education (BPPE)
-Department of Veteran Affairs
REQUEST TO EXPAND FACILITIES TO
401 W. LINCOLN AVE
Since 1996 The Real Barber’s College has been located at 528 W. Lincoln Ave in Anaheim. Augustine A.
Souza, Founder of our school, chose this location because he had a dream. As a licensed Barber he had
owed several Barbershops over the years, then as a Barber for the U.S. Navy, he started planning on
opening a Barber School. He was working in Camp Pendleton and started looking to find a home for his
dream. He was drawn to Anaheim and opened a Barbershop at 528 W. Lincoln. He occupied ½ of the
building and began to operate as a barbershop. He began small classes to teach the trade of Barbering.
When the other half of the building became available he expanded. In 2009, He again wanted to expand
and added 451 W. Lincoln Ave #B100. He started with about 1,000 sq/ft and grew to almost 7,000 sq/ft.
During his almost 19 years teaching his craft he gained the respect of the Anaheim community. He not
only assisted others to become Barber’s but was instrumental in giving them an opportunity to build a
future. He always gave back to the community. By keeping his price at $5.00 it benefited those who
wanted a nice haircut and it benefited the students so they could practice their craft. Mr. Souza was
always proud that our students would perform between 500-1000 haircuts on customers, before
graduating. We are one of a few schools in the nation that operates a working clinic floor. At other
schools they learn on doll heads, in a classroom, just enough to pass the state board exam. Our students
are “Shop Ready,” when they graduate. He was proud of our VA students and everyone who attended
the school. He was often visited by former students who would tell their stories and their successes. He
never turned away a haircut. He arranged through several outreach programs and Catholic Charities to
provide free haircuts to the needy. That tradition continues today.
On January 13, 2014 Augustine A. Souza passed away after a short illness. He still had dreams that he
entrusted to me. I am Michael A. Souza, his son. I promised him I would continue his dream and
maintain his legacy. Part of his legacy is the shop located at 528 W. Lincoln. I commissioned a mural to
my father and had an artist paint the side of the building in his honor. We tried to get approval to
remodel the shop and in the process environmental concerns were brought to light, along with other
requirements to receive permission from the City of Anaheim. The expense was beyond our means and
the property owner was not cooperating in making the required improvements. We have received our
Notice of 30 Days to vacate. We are in the process to vacate the building by January 31st, 2016. In
anticipation of not being able to stay in the original building I secured the vacate building next door to
our expanded campus. Secured the lease and have begun building a new clinic that my father would be
proud of. When we open our “Campus” we will have almost 10,000 sq/ft. Able to fulfill another dream I
shared with my father. We were both U.S. Army Veterans and had served in the same unit almost 30
years separated, we both wanted to have a room dedicated to the U.S. Military and be able to invite the
VA to setup and provide services to those who have served. We will extend to the VA an open invitation
to bring in their staff to meet with the local Vets.
My father was a proud man. Proud of his country, proud of his community and very proud of every
student that entrusted him to teach his craft to them and share his knowledge.
Please allow us to continue my father’s legacy and keep his dream alive.
Excerpts from Student Testimonials
“The Real Barbers College has allowed me to
expand my creativity, manifest my talents, and
improve my weaknesses. I have been here for a
little over two months, and I cannot imagine being
anywhere else.”
“I choose to attend the Real Barbers College
because it brings students from all over looking to
meet the same goal, and be the best barber one
can be.”
“Everyone here has different styles and tips that
help elevate my craft to a whole different
stratosphere. I love it here; the staff is helpful and
full of experience.”
Excerpts from Student Testimonials
“When I first enrolled into The Real Barbers College, I was
transferring from a big name school that cost a lot more to
attend. The other school was not providing me with any
knowledge or teaching that related to cutting hair or learning
my state board written or practical. Ever since I called The
Real Barbers College and enrolled, I have had the experience I
have been looking for in a barber school. The staff is very
helpful and you can really see that they care about their
students.
To conclude, I could not have made a better decision by
picking The Real Barbers College over the other school I
attended for seven wasted months. If I could go back and do
it all over again, I would’ve made RBC my first and last choice
for a barber school. Due to everything I have experienced, I
am glad I went through the chaos from my other school, the
bad experience has not only made me a stronger person but
it has also made me more appreciative for the RBC doing
their job to the best of their ability.”
The Real Barber's College
457 West Lincoln Ave. Suite B 100
Anaheim, CA 92805
Phone: 714.991.1222 Clinic Phone: 714.772.4423
Fax: 774.991.1441 Clinic Fax: 774.772.0412
Request for Parking Variance
In submitting our PUC application we need to request a parking Variance. We have been established at
our current location since 2009. The preexisting parking matrix on file with the city when the complex
was built addressed the needs at the time. We are submitting the updated parking matrix for the
current needs of the complex.
We are requesting approval for our CUP application to expand into to the adjoining building. We
currently occupy the bottom floor of 451 W. Lincoln Ave and have leased the bottom floor of 401 W.
Lincoln Ave. Our current parking needs are met as we have not increased staffing and we offer different
student schedules. The parking lot is usually 50% occupied and the adjoining parking lot for 100 Harbor
is usually empty with no more than 8-10 vehicles at any given time.
Our student body uses different forms of transportation to school. Carpooling, public transportation,
biking and walking, etc.
Students are required to attend 4 days a week; we offer classes 6 days a week. Typically 20-25% is not in
attendance and with different scheduled hours we never exceed 50% on campus.
Our anticipated growth is based on our enrollments. We offer one orientation day a month for new
enrollees. When needed, we offer a second orientation. Each orientation will typically have 10 new
students. During the month we will have students graduating. Some months we will have more students
graduate then enroll but with our new expanded space we will be able to increase each orientation size
to better accommodate our demand. We project a modest growth rate over the next two years.
Thank you for your consideration. My goal is to continue my father's legacy which he started in 1994.
We will continue to give anyone with the desire the opportunity to become a licensed Barber, serving
the local community with our $5.00 haircut program and continuing our outreach programs providing
services to the needy.
Respectfully,
-";:r.- -----------
Michael A. Souza .– --
President
'—
The Real Barber's Inc.
Dba/The Real Barbers College
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
MON TUE WED
Schedule
#1
8-2:30pm
22 24 23
Schedule
#2
8-4:30pm
12 27 27
Schedule
#3
1:30-10pm
0 2 2
Schedule
#4
540pm
23 25 25
Schedule
#5
11-7:30pm
0 0 0
TOTALS = 57 78 77
SAT
0
FRI
3
3
81 69 11
SUN THURS
24
2 3 0
25 0 18
0 9 0
This is an addendum to the request to expand our facilities to 401 W. Lincoln Ave.
Our current school hours of operation are Monday-Friday from 8:00am-10:00pm, Saturdays from
11:00am-7:30pm and Closed on Sundays. TRBC school days are closed in observance of the following
holidays New Year's Day, Easter Sunday, Memorial Day, Independence Day, Labor Day, Veteran's Day,
Thanksgiving Day and Christmas Day. We have designated parking areas for our students, staff and
public that conveniently allows for comfortable and safe parking for all. As we are able to offer various
schedules we rarely have an abundance of students in one time frame. We project to have 150 students
enrolled by the year 2018. Below is a chart presenting how many of our active students (81) are
attending our rotating class schedules throughout the day and week.
We offer the following class schedules to our prospective and current students:
Morning schedule (2 options):
Option 1: Attend 4 weekdays from 8:00 am-2:30 pm, plus 8 hours on Friday.
Option 2: Attend 3 weekdays from 8:00 am-4:30 pm, plus 8 hours on Friday.
Afternoon schedule:
Attend 3 weekdays from 1:30 pm-10:00 pm. Plus 8 hours on Friday.
Evening schedule:
Attend 4 weekdays from 5:00 pm to 10:00 pm, plus 8 hours on Friday.
OR
Attend 5 weekdays from 5:00pm to 10:00pm
*As of 02/23/2016
401 E. LINCOLN AVE SUITE 100 CUP 2015-05848 DEV2015-00134
Unit #Tenant Use
Floor Area
(sq. ft.)Ratio
Parking
Required Comments
PARKING MATRIX
NOT IN SCOPE OF CUP
100 N. HARBOR 1ST FL OFFICE 7189 7189 / 166 43 Medical
100 N. HARBOR 2ND FL OFFICE 9250 9250 / 250 65 Taller San Jose VAR
451 N, LINCOLN 2ND FL OFFICE 5212 5212 / 250 21
401 N. LINCOLN 2ND FL OFFICE 5108 5108 / 250 20
TOTAL NON CUP =149
SCOPE FOR CUP
451 N. LINCOLN 1ST FL OFFICE 3268 3268 / 250 13 Barber's College
BARBER SHOP 1696 1696 / 250 7 VAR for 28 spaces
STORAGE/UTLTY 401 401 /250 2
TOTAL FOR 451 VAR =28
SCOPE FOR CUP
401 N. LINCOLN 1ST FL OFFICE, CLINIC, STORAGE 3850 3850 / 250 15 Barber's College
CLASSROOM 912 912 / 50 18 Expansion
TOTAL FOR 401 CUP = 33
Totals 36886 204
Parking Provided 141
Address
Parking Analysis - THE REAL BARBER COLLEGE:
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
BA
R
B
E
R
S
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
A
L
U
S
E
P
E
R
M
I
T
40
1
W
E
S
T
L
I
C
O
L
N
A
V
E
,
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
,
9
2
8
0
5
AP
N
2
5
5
-
0
6
4
-
1
7
SI
T
E
A
P
P
R
O
X
4
0
,
0
0
0
S
F
BARBERS COLLEGE
CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT
401 WEST LICOLN
AVE, ANAHEIM,
92805
APN 255-064-17
SITE APPROX 40,000
SF
CUP 1NO NEW CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED
VICINITY MAP, NTS
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
BA
R
B
E
R
S
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
A
L
U
S
E
P
E
R
M
I
T
40
1
W
E
S
T
L
I
C
O
L
N
A
V
E
,
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
,
9
2
8
0
5
AP
N
2
5
5
-
0
6
4
-
1
7
SI
T
E
A
P
P
R
O
X
4
0
,
0
0
0
S
F
CUP 2NO NEW CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED
BA
R
B
E
R
S
C
O
L
L
E
G
E
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
A
L
U
S
E
P
E
R
M
I
T
40
1
W
E
S
T
L
I
C
O
L
N
A
V
E
,
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
,
9
2
8
0
5
AP
N
2
5
5
-
0
6
4
-
1
7
SI
T
E
A
P
P
R
O
X
4
0
,
0
0
0
S
F
CUP 3NO NEW CONSTRUCTION PROPOSED
feet
meters
400
100
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 3
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: MARCH 21, 2016
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05841 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05063 LOCATION: 2390 East Orangewood Avenue, Suite 100
(Karl Strauss Brewing Company)
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Karl Strauss Brewing
Company represented by Fred Glick. The property owner is Anaheim Corporate
Office Plaza.
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of the following entitlements to establish a new restaurant and brewery within an office complex:
1) A conditional use permit to allow on and off-premises sales and
consumption of beer and wine; and a building and outdoor patio area that
does not conform to the Platinum Triangle Special Area setback requirements.
2) A variance to allow fewer parking spaces than required by the Zoning
Code.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt under the
California Environmental Quality Act (Class 32, In-Fill Development Projects), and
approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05841 and Variance No. 2016-05063.
BACKGROUND: This 2.0-acre property is developed with a five-story office
building and is located in the Platinum Triangle within the “C-G” General Commercial
Zone and the “PTMU” Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone. The General Plan designates the property for Mixed Use land uses. Surrounding land uses include Angel Stadium across Orangewood Avenue to the north, a fire department training facility
across Rampart Street to the east, an office building to the south, and industrial
businesses to the west. The subject five story office building is one of five buildings
within the Anaheim Corporate Plaza.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05841 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05063
March 21, 2016
Page 2 of 7 PROPOSAL: The applicant is proposing to establish an 11,395-square foot restaurant and brewery within an existing tenant space. The 324-seat restaurant and brewery would include a
restaurant, bar, outdoor patio, brewery, keg cooling area, kitchen, private event dining rooms,
storage and offices. Hours of operation would be from 11:00 a.m. to 2:00 a.m., daily. A full
service menu would be available at all times. A Type 23 (Small Beer Manufacturer- Brew Pub or Micro-brewery) license, which authorizes a
brewery with a restaurant, would be required from the California Department of Alcoholic
Beverage Control (ABC). In addition, the City requires approval of a conditional use permit for
on and off-premises sales and consumption of beer and wine. All of the beer sold at this location would be brewed on-site.
The tenant space would be modified to accommodate the restaurant. The portion of the building
that faces Orangewood Avenue would be redesigned to include an outdoor patio. The existing
building and outdoor patio would encroach into the required setback area along Orangewood Avenue. The Code permits this encroachment, subject to the approval of a conditional use permit.
Parking would be accommodated in the parking lot adjacent to the restaurant and within the
surrounding parking lots that serve tenants in Anaheim Corporate Plaza. However, these areas cannot fully accommodate Code required parking; therefore, a parking variance has been requested.
Interior Rendering
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05841 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05063
March 21, 2016
Page 3 of 7
Patio Rendering
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS:
Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use
permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following
conditions exist:
1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this Zoning Code;
2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or
the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow
the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to
either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue
burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the
traffic in the area; and
5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05841 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05063
March 21, 2016
Page 4 of 7
On and Off-Premises Sales and Consumption of Beer and Wine The applicant is requesting approval of on and off-premises sales and consumption of beer and
wine. All of the beer sold at this location would be brewed on-site. A Type 23 (Small Beer
Manufacturer- Brew Pub or Micro-brewery) license, which authorizes a brewery with a restaurant,
would be required from the California Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control (ABC). The Zoning Code requires a conditional use permit in this zone to authorize the sale of beer and wine in order to ensure compatibility with surrounding uses.
The project site is within Police Reporting District No. 2128, which has a crime rate that is 165 percent above the citywide average. There have been no calls for service to this location in the last year. The crime rate within ¼ mile of this property is below the citywide average.
Staff does not anticipate that the addition of the beer and wine sales at this location would contribute to an increase in crime if the business is operated in a responsible manner and in
compliance with the recommended conditions of approval. These conditions include typical Police
Department conditions for similar uses, such as: prohibiting any exterior advertising of alcoholic
beverages; requiring ABC LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) training for
employees; and limiting the display area of alcoholic beverages, among others. Staff conducted an inspection of the property and found it to be well maintained. There are no outstanding Code
Enforcement violations associated with this tenant space.
The proposed restaurant and brewery is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan by adding to vitality of the Platinum Triangle as “a thriving economic center that provides
residents, visitors and employees with a variety of housing, employment, shopping and
entertainment opportunities.” Based on these factors, staff believes that the proposed use would be
compatible with the surrounding area and recommends approval of the conditional use permit. Platinum Triangle Special Area Setback Requirements
The project site is located within the Platinum Triangle and subject to the Platinum Triangle Special
Area Setback requirements. Structures that do not comply with the Platinum Triangle Special Area
Setback requirements may be permitted through the approval of a conditional use permit, subject to the findings listed above, as well as a finding that the use and/or structure will bring the property into greater conformity with the intent of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (PTMLUP).
The PTMLUP requires a minimum 15-foot wide fully-landscaped setback, measured from the ultimate right-of-way, along Orangewood Avenue. The ultimate half width of Orangewood Avenue
is 68 feet and the existing half-width is 45 feet. Due to the scale of tenant improvements, including
the new patio, a 23 foot right-of-way dedication is required. With this street dedication, the
building and the outdoor patio would be setback two to three feet from the new property line.
The ultimate right-of-way line for this property is identified in the public improvement plans that
were developed in conjunction with the adoption of the PTMLUP. Implementation of these plans
has occurred with major development projects or on a street-wide basis through improvements funded by the Platinum Triangle Community Facilities District. Katella Avenue was recently
improved to provide street widths, landscaping and sidewalks consistent with these plans.
Orangewood Avenue is anticipated to be improved in a later implementation phase. In the interim, a
21-foot wide landscaped area would exist between the patio and the sidewalk.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05841 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05063
March 21, 2016
Page 5 of 7
The proposed outdoor dining area has been designed to fill negative space that currently exists along the north façade of the building, between two building projections. The addition of the outdoor dining area would bring the property into greater conformance with the PTMLUP by
creating an activated street frontage that will contribute to the vibrant, walkable urban
environment envisioned for the Platinum Triangle, while accommodating future street improvement plans.
Existing Building adjacent to Orangewood Avenue
Parking Variance: A variance shall be granted upon a finding by the Planning Commission or
City Council that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist:
1) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer
off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such
use;
2) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use;
3) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the
demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use;
4) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic
congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed
use; and
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05841 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05063
March 21, 2016
Page 6 of 7
5) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use.
The Zoning Code requires that parking demand be calculated by combining the needs of the proposed restaurant and brewery with the educational uses, office, medical and financial services within the Anaheim Corporate Plaza. A total of 1,256 parking spaces are required, and 1,249
spaces are proposed, as shown in the table below.
Code Requirement Proposed Floor Area (s.f.) Spaces Required Spaces Proposed
Office
4 (per 1,000 s.f) for buildings 3
stories or lower 3 (per 1,000) for buildings more than 3 stories
97,706 345
Medical 6 (per 1,000 s.f.) 13,511 81
Educational Services
.82 spaces per student, or 20 per 1,000 s.f. plus 4 per 1,000 s.f.
of office
25,719 244
Financial
Services 5.5 (per 1,000 s.f.) 3,882 21
Restaurant 8 (per 1,000 s.f.) if integrated into a planned development complex 11,885 95
Vacant Office
4 (per 1,000 s.f) for buildings 3 stories or lower
3 (per 1,000) for buildings more than 3 stories
148,348 470
TOTAL 301,051 1,256 1,249
A parking study prepared by Linscott Law and Greenspan Engineers, dated January 12, 2016, was submitted in order to analyze the parking demand of Anaheim Corporate Plaza. The study
concluded that the peak weekday parking demand was for 1,099 spaces, which results in a
surplus of 150 spaces. The weekend peak parking demand was for 339 spaces, which results in a
surplus of 910 spaces. Staff believes that the number of parking spaces proposed would be adequate to accommodate the proposed restaurant and brewery without impact to the surrounding public streets or properties due to fact that there is a surplus of parking spaces
identified by the parking study. In addition, the peak operating time for the proposed use would
be during off-peak hours of the surrounding industrial and office uses.
A Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s) would be required under a condition of approval in the draft resolution (Attachment No. 1), to memorialize the vehicular
access and parking reciprocal rights for all the properties within the office complex.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05841 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05063
March 21, 2016
Page 7 of 7
Environmental Impact Analysis: The project’s potential environmental impacts have been evaluated and staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine that the development
qualifies for a Class 32 “Infill Development Projects” exemption allowed under California
Environmental Quality Act. In order to support this determination, staff prepared an
environmental checklist and determined that the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality. In reaching this conclusion, staff determined that the subject property is less than five acres in size and surrounded by urban
uses; has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species; and, can be adequately
served by all required utilities and public services. Based on these findings, the project does
not meet the minimum thresholds that would suggest the potential for the project to cause a significant effect on the environment. CONCLUSION: The proposed restaurant and brewery would complement existing nearby
businesses and entertainment venues and would bring the property into greater conformance with
the PTMLUP. The recommended conditions of approval would ensure that the sale and consumption of beer and wine would be compatible with surrounding land uses. In addition, an adequate supply of parking would be provided to serve the proposed use and the existing uses at
the Anaheim Corporate Plaza. Staff recommends approval of this request.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
Amy Vazquez Jonathan E. Borrego
Contract Planner, Lilley Planning Group Planning Services Manager
Attachments:
1. Draft Conditional Use Permit and Variance Resolution
2. Letter of Request 3. Parking Study
4. Police Memorandum
5. Photographs
6. Plans
7. Class 32 Environmental Checklist 8. E-Mail Correspondence
PR (PTMU)StadiumANGEL STADIUMOF ANAHEIM
PR (PTMU)OrangewoodNORTH NET FIRETRAINING CENTER
C-G (PTMU)OrangewoodOFFICES
I (PTMU)OrangewoodIND. FIRM
C-G (PTMU)OrangewoodOFFICES
O-L (PTMU)OrangewoodOFFICES
O-L (PTMU)OrangewoodOFFICES
I (PTMU)OrangewoodIND. FIRM
I (PTMU)OrangewoodIND. FIRM
S
D U P O N T
D R S
R
A
M
PA
RTST
S T O W N E C E N T R E P L
S TOWNE CENTRE PL
E ORANGEWOODAVE
E. KATELLA AVE
E. ORANGEWOOD AVE
E. CHAPMAN AVE
E. GENE AUTRY WAY
2390 East Orangewood Avenue
DEV No. 2015-00122
Subject Property APN: 232-011-32
°0 50 100
Feet
Aerial Photo:May 2014
S
D U P O N T
D R S
R
A
M
PA
RTST
S T O W N E C E N T R E P L
S TOWNE CENTRE PL
E ORANGEWOODAVE
E. KATELLA AVE
E. ORANGEWOOD AVE
E. CHAPMAN AVE
E. GENE AUTRY WAY
2390 East Orangewood Avenue
DEV No. 2015-00122
Subject Property APN: 232-011-32
°0 50 100
Feet
Aerial Photo:May 2014
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1
- 1 - PC2016-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05841 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05063 AND
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2015-00122)
(2390 EAST ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, SUITE 100) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission")
did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05841 and Variance
No. 2016-05063 to permit a restaurant and brewery within an office building to include the
following land use entitlements: (i) a conditional use permit to allow on- and off-premises sales and consumption of beer and wine and a building and outdoor patio area that does not conform to the Platinum Triangle Special Area Setback Requirements; and (ii) a variance to allow fewer
parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code (herein referred to collectively as the
"Proposed Project") at 2390 East Orangewood Avenue, Suite 100 in the City of Anaheim (the
"Premises"). The Premises will be located within an existing office complex on that certain real property generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 2.0 acres in size, developed with an office
building, and located at 2390 East Orangewood Avenue. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for “M-U” Mixed Use land uses. The Property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial Zone and the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay
Zone. Generally, the development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum
Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code")
supersede the regulations of the underlying zone, i.e., that of the “C-G” General Commercial Zone. However, the provisions of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) do not apply to parcels that have been, or are proposed to be, developed entirely
under the “C-G” General Commercial Zone, provided, however, that any structure or addition to
an existing structure, as is the case here, must comply with the Platinum Triangle Special Area
Setback requirements of Section 18.40.050 (Special Area Setbacks) of the Code, unless a conditional use permit is approved based upon the findings that the evidence presented shows that all of the conditions set forth in Section 18.66.060 of the Code exist, as well as the condition
that the use and/or structure will bring the Premises and the Property into greater conformity
with the intent of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on March 21, 2016 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional
Use Permit No. 2015-05841 and Variance No. 2016-05063, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
- 2 - PC2016-***
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission finds and determines that the Proposed Project is
within that class of projects which consist of in-fill development meeting the conditions described in Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines. Specifically, the Proposed Project (a) is consistent with the applicable General Plan designation and all applicable General Plan policies
and is consistent with the applicable zoning designation and regulations, (b) is no more than five
acres in size substantially surrounded by urban uses, (c) has no value as a habitat for endangered,
rare or threatened species, (d) would not result in significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (e) the Property can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. Accordingly, pursuant to Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines, the
Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05841, does find and
determine the following facts:
1. The proposed request to permit a restaurant and brewery with the sale and consumption of beer and wine in an existing office complex, with a building and outdoor patio
area that does not conform to the minimum setback requirements of Section 18.40.050 (Special
Area Setbacks) of the Code, is an allowable use within the "C-G" General Commercial Zone
under subsection .010 of Section 18.08.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the "C-G" General Commercial Zone and the findings required under paragraph .0104 of subsection .010 of
Section 18.40.050 (Special Area Setbacks) for structures that do not comply with the Platinum
Triangle Special Area Setback requirements.
2. The proposed request to permit a restaurant and brewery with the sale and
consumption of beer and wine and a building and outdoor patio area that does not conform to the
Platinum Triangle Special Area setback requirements for an existing office complex would not
adversely affect the surrounding land uses and the growth and development of the area in which
it is proposed to be located because the Property is currently developed with an office building and the proposed use of a portion of the Property as a restaurant and brewery is compatible with
the existing uses within the office complex and uses in the surrounding area.
3. The size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full development of
the proposed project in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and safety because the facilities on the Property will adhere to all required land use standards.
- 3 - PC2016-***
4. The traffic generated by the proposed project will not impose an undue burden upon
the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic
generated by this use will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic on the surrounding
streets. 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the proposed project
will be compatible with the surrounding area through conditions of approval for the use and is
not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. The use and/or structure will bring the Premises and the Property into greater conformity with the intent of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan.
WHEREAS, based upon the parking study submitted by the applicant and
observations made by staff, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request for Variance No. 2016-05063 for less parking than required by the Code should be approved for the following reasons:
SECTION NO. 18.42.040 Minimum number of parking spaces.
(1,256 spaces required; 1,249 spaces proposed)
1. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not cause fewer
off-street parking spaces to be provided for the Property, including the proposed restaurant and
brewery, than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to all uses at the Property under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of
such uses;
2. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the
demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use because the on-site parking will adequately accommodate the peak parking
demands of all combined uses on the site;
3. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the
demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the Property because the on-site parking for the office complex uses will adequately
accommodate peak parking demands of all uses on the site;
4. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the Property because the
Property provides adequate ingress and egress points, which are designed to allow for adequate
on-site circulation; and
5. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate
vicinity of the Property because the Property has existing ingress or egress access points that are
designed to allow adequate on-site circulation and, therefore, will not impede vehicular ingress
to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the
Property.
- 4 - PC2016-***
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05841 and Variance No. 2016-05063, contingent
upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to
the proposed use of the Property under Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05841 and Variance No. 2016-05063 in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted
in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of
approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i)
equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of
this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval
of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
- 5 - PC2016-***
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission
meeting of March 21, 2016. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in
Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on March 21, 2016, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of March, 2016.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 6 - PC2016-***
- 7 - PC2016-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05841 AND
VARIANCE NO. 2016-05063 (DEV2015-00122)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS
1 The applicant/property owner of the subject property shall enter
into a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, in a
form satisfactory to the City Attorney, which shall be recorded in
the Official Records of the County of Orange, to provide reciprocal vehicular access and parking agreements for all parcels
within the office complex.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
2 An encroachment license shall be executed by the owner and
recorded for any private facilities that encroach over the right-of-way line.
Public Works,
Development Services
PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS
3 The building shall be equipped with an alarm system (silent or
audible).
Police Department
4 The legal property owner shall enter into a sales and purchase agreement with City of Anaheim and execute a deed for dedication
of an easement of 68 feet in width from the street centerline of
Orangewood Avenue for road, public utilities and other public
purposes. In addition, the building set back shall be measured from
1.5 feet south of ultimate right of way.
Public Works, Development Services
5 Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application, Form
APD 516, and return it to the Police Department prior to initial
alarm activation. This form is available at the Police Department
front counter, or it can be downloaded from the following web site: http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=678
Police Department
6 All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g.
deadbolt locks.
Police Department
OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS
7 There shall be no admission fee, cover charge, nor minimum
purchase required.
Police Department
8 There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind or type,
including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting
or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages.
Police Department
- 8 - PC2016-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
9 That subject alcoholic beverage license shall not be exchanged for a
public premise (bar) type license nor shall the establishment be operated as a public premise as defined in Section 23039 of the Business and Professions Code.
Police Department
10 At all times when the premise is open for business, the premise shall
be maintained as a bona fide restaurant and shall provide a menu containing an assortment of foods normally offered in such restaurant.
Police Department
11 There shall be no entertainment, amplified music or dancing
permitted on the premise at any time unless the proper permits have been obtained from the City of Anaheim.
Police Department
12 Security measures shall be provided to the satisfaction of the
Anaheim Polices Department and to prevent disturbances to the neighborhood by excessive noise created by patrons entering or leaving the premises.
Police Department
13 The business shall not employ or permit any persons to solicit or
encourage others, directly or indirectly, to buy them drinks in the licensed premises under any commission, percentage, salary, or other profit-sharing plan, scheme or conspiracy. (Section 24200.5
Alcoholic Beverage Control Act)
Police Department
14 Managers/Owners need to call the Department of Alcoholic Beverage control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs Program) Training for themselves and service employees.
The number is 714-558-4101.
Police Department
15 Any Graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or
painted over within 24 hours of being applied.
Police Department
16 The petitioner shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, as depicted.
Police Department
17 The number of persons occupying the premises shall not exceed the
maximum occupancy load as determined by the Anaheim Fire Department. Signs indicating the occupant load shall be posted in a
conspicuous place on an approved sign near the main exit from the
room. (Section 25.114(a) Uniform Fire Code).
Police Department
- 9 - PC2016-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
18 The door(s) shall be kept closed at all times during the operation of
the business premises except in cases of emergency. Said door(s) shall not consist of a screen or ventilated security door.
Police Department
19 The petitioner(s) shall post and maintain a professional quality sign
facing the business premises parking lot(s) that reads as follows:
NO LOITERING, NO LITTERING NO DRINKING OF ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGES
VIOLATORS ARE SUBJECT TO ARREST
The sign shall be at least two feet square with two-inch block lettering. The sign shall be in English and Spanish.
Police Department
20 Petitioner(s) shall police the area under their control in an effort to
prevent the loitering of persons about the business premises.
Police Department
21 No required parking area shall be fenced-off or otherwise enclosed
for outdoor storage uses.
Planning and Building
Department,
Code Enforcement
Division
22 The restaurant and brewery shall be operated in accordance with
the Statement of Operations submitted as part of this application.
Any changes to the business operation as described in that
document shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with the Letter of
Request and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
23 Adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas, aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide
adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any
person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and
provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and vehicles on-site.
Police Department
24 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area
adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an
orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon
the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the
licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being
applied.
Planning and Building
Department,
Code Enforcement Division
- 10 - PC2016-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
GENERAL CONDITIONS
25 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the
processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of
the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building
permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all
charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
26 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City
and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively
referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against
Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the
decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the
proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to
the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s
indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to,
damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by
Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including
without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such
proceeding.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services Division
27 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning
Department and as conditioned herein.
Planning and Building Department,
Planning Services
Division
2390 E ORANGEWOOD AVE, SUITE 100
ANAHEIM, CA 92806
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
LOCATION
PROJECT
Karl Strauss Brewing Company, Anaheim
CUP 2015-05841
SITE
2390 E Orangewood Ave, Suite 100
Anaheim, CA 92806
ENTITLEMENT REQUEST
A conditional use to permit on-site and off-site sales of beer and wine only including beer brewed on-site; in
conjunction with a new 11,395 sq. ft. 324-seat restaurant/brewpub with a microbrewery, that will employ
more than 150 people, having hours of operation and alcohol sales between 11am and 2am, daily.
KARL STRAUSS BREWING COMPANY
Karl Strauss Brewing Company is a regional craft brewery based in San Diego, California. Founded in 1989, it
was the first brewery to open in San Diego in more than 50
years. Today, Karl Strauss Brewing Company is the 45th largest
craft brewery in the United States, with sole distribution in the
state of California.
Karl Strauss Brewing Company brews more than 30 different
styles of beer at its Main Brewery in San Diego’s Pacific Beach,
and eight satellite Brewery Restaurants across Southern Califor-
nia. Beer offerings include perennial favorites like the multi-
award-winning Red Trolley Ale and Tower 10 IPA, as well as in-
novative releases like Mosaic Session IPA, Wreck Alley Imperial
Stout and Big Barrel IIPA.
Our Karl Strauss Brewery Restaurant offer a unique dining ex-
perience inspired by our roots and driven by our beer. They
convey a pioneering yet laidback San Diego brewery atmos-
phere. The brewery is the heart of our company. This is where
we work and play; where we share our craft. The interior is in-
spired by our original brewery in Downtown San Diego; it has a
lofty, metro feel with brick, high ceilings, and metal work. The
concrete floors and reclaimed wood details create an industrial, brewery vibe, while maintaining a comforta-
ble atmosphere that encourages people to enjoy our craft.
At Karl Strauss Brewing Company we create craft beer fans and culinary enthusiasts one pairing at a time. Us-
ing our “drink beer, think food” approach; our chefs are reclaiming beer’s place at the table with West Coast
Pub Fare featuring locally grown and sustainable ingredients. Drawing inspiration from our diverse range of
handcrafted beers and the fresh flavors and influences of the West Coast, we’ve crafted our beer inspired
menu to pair perfectly with our beers.
Karl Strauss Brewery Restaurants allow us to promote awareness and appreciation for the craft brewing in-
dustry and local businesses. Every day we strive to educate our guests in the art of beer and food pairings as
they sample our craft beer with such diverse foods from Red Trolley-Brined Pork Chops to Wreck Alley Impe-
rial Stout Beeramisu. Each Pairing is meant to enhance the simple pleasure of enjoying quality beer and food
with friends. Year Round our eight locations host nearly 2 million people in a relaxed atmosphere that en-
courages entertainment and socializing.
FLOOR PLAN
GALLERY
RENDERINGS
January 12, 2016
Mr. Parke Miller
Lincoln Property Company
5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 120
Santa Ana, CA 92707
LLG Reference No. 2.15.3571.1
Subject: Revised Parking Demand Analysis for Anaheim Corporate Plaza
Anaheim, California
Dear Mr. Miller:
As requested, Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this
Revised Parking Demand Analysis associated with Anaheim Corporate Plaza (herein
referred to as Project). The existing office park is located on south of Orangewood
Avenue and west of Rampart Street, and addressed at 2121, 2150, 2170, and 2190
Towne Centre Place and 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue in the City of Anaheim,
California.
Anaheim Corporate Plaza consists of five (5) buildings with a total floor area of
301,051 square-feet (SF). The current tenant mix, which occupies 140,818 SF,
includes a mixture of office, medical office, educational services and financial
services uses. The remaining floor area at Anaheim Corporate Plaza totals 160,233
SF, of which 148,348 SF is vacant office-designated floor area that will remain as
office. The Project is proposing to occupy 11,885 SF of vacant space within Suite
100 of building 2390 with a sit-down restaurant use. The proposed parking supply
on-site totals 1,249 spaces.
A parking study has been required by the City of Anaheim to evaluate the parking
requirements and operational needs of the office park at future full occupancy. This
report evaluates those needs based on application of City code and further application
of the Urban Land Institute’s (ULI) Shared Parking methodology.
Our method of analysis, findings, and recommendations are detailed in the following
sections of this report. Briefly, we find the following:
The proposed parking supply on the site totals 1,249 spaces.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 2
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
A “code” calculation for full occupancy of the existing plaza with occupancy
of 11,885 SF of vacant floor area within Suite 100 of Building 2390 with food
use and the remaining tenant mix requires 1,256 spaces, resulting in a parking
shortfall of 7 spaces.
A shared parking analysis using city code ratios along with ULI parking
profiles yields a peak weekday parking demand of 1,099 spaces that when
compared to the 1,249 provided spaces results in a surplus of 150 spaces; the
weekend peak parking demand totals 339 spaces, which results in a surplus of
910 spaces.
PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
Anaheim Corporate Plaza is located on the southwest corner of Orangewood Avenue
and Rampart Street, and addressed at 2121, 2150, 2170, and 2190 Town Centre Place
and 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue in the City of Anaheim, California. Figure 1,
located at the rear of this letter report, presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the
general location of the Project site in the context of the surrounding street system.
Figure 2 presents the existing aerial photograph of the site that illustrates the existing
buildings and parking areas. Anaheim Corporate Plaza consists of the following five
(5) buildings with a total floor area of 301,051 SF.
2121 Towne Centre Place – 48,445 SF
2150 Towne Centre Place – 48,575 SF
2170 Towne Centre Place – 50,055 SF
2190 Towne Centre Place – 47,955 SF
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue – 106,021 SF
Table 1, located at the end of this letter report, following the figures, summarizes the
existing land uses/tenants and associated floor areas for Anaheim Corporate Plaza,
and identified the proposed mix of uses for the vacancies. A review of Table 1
indicates that the current tenant mix, which occupies 140,818 SF, includes a mixture
of office, medical office, educational services and financial services uses.
The educational services includes Real Estate Trainers, Inc. (Suite 100 of Building
100), Bristol University (which will occupy Suite 105, 470, 475 and 485 of Building
2390 that was formerly occupied by Kensington Colleges) and US Colleges (which
will occupy Suite 200 of Building 2390 that was formerly occupied by Medtech
Educational). The following table summarizes the operational characteristics of the
above-mentioned educational uses:
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 3
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
2170-100 14
2390-105 3
2390-470
2390-475
2390-485
2390-200 4
Suite Tenant Classrooms # of Students/classroom # of teachers AdministrationTime
1/classroom
Library 10
US Colleges Monday - Friday 8:00 am - 6: 00 pm Total 2 10/classroom
1
Classroom 6 12 1
Classroom 7 18
1
Classroom 4 6 1
overall hours 8:00 am - 10:00 pm Classroom 5 12
1
1:00 pm - 5:00 pm Classroom 2 10 1
5:30 pm - 9:30 pm Classroom 3 10
1Bristol University Monday - Friday 8:30 am - 12:30 pm Classroom 1 12
Class schedule
1/classroom
Days
RET (Testing only)Monday-Friday 6:00 pm - 10:30 pm Total 2 25/classroom
Saturday-Sunday 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Total 2 60/classroom
The operational characteristics of these educational uses are utilized in the forecast of
the parking demand for each of the uses.
The remaining floor area at Anaheim Corporate Plaza totals 160,233 SF, of which
148,348 SF is vacant office space to remain as office. The Project is proposing to
occupy 11,885 SF of vacant space within Suite 100 of building 2390 with a sit-down
restaurant. The proposed parking supply on-site totals 1,249 spaces.
PARKING SUPPLY-DEMAND ANALYSIS
This parking analysis for the Anaheim Corporate Plaza involves determining the
expected parking needs, based on the size and type of proposed development
components, versus the parking supply. Typically, there are two methods that can be
used to estimate the site’s peak parking needs. These methods have been used in this
analysis and include:
Application of City code requirements (which typically treats each tenancy
type as a “stand alone” use at maximum demand).
Application of shared parking usage patterns by time-of-day (which
recognizes that the parking demand for each tenancy type varies by time of
day and day of week). The shared parking analysis starts with a code
calculation for each tenancy type.
The shared parking methodology is concluded to be applicable to a development such
as the Anaheim Corporate Plaza because the individual land use types (i.e., office,
medical office, educational services, financial services, office storage, restaurant, etc.)
experience peak demands at different times of the day.
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 4
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
CODE PARKING REQUIREMENTS
The code parking calculation for Anaheim Corporate Plaza with the proposed Project
is based on the City’s requirements as outlined in Chapter 18.42.040 – Non-
Residential Parking Requirements of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. The
City’s Municipal Code specifies the following parking requirements:
Office: 4 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA for buildings 3 stories or lower; 3
spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA for buildings of more than 3 stories.
Medical/Dental: 6 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA.
Educational Services: 0.82 spaces per student, or 20 spaces per 1,000 SF of
GFA for instruction area, whichever results in a greater number of spaces plus
4 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA for office area.
Financial Services: 5.5 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA.
Eating Establishments: 8 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA if integrated into a
planned development complex.
Table 2 presents the existing code parking requirements for only occupied floor areas
at the plaza, then for the proposed Project, and then combined for the entire plaza. As
shown, direct application of City parking codes to the existing and proposed mix of uses
of Anaheim Corporate Plaza results in a total parking requirement of 1,256 parking
spaces. With a parking supply of 1,249 spaces, a theoretical code shortfall of 7 spaces is
indicated.
However, the specific tenancy mix of Anaheim Corporate Plaza provides an opportunity
to share parking spaces based on the utilization profile of each included land use
component. The following section calculates the parking requirements for Anaheim
Corporate Plaza based on the shared parking methodology approach.
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
Shared Parking Methodology
Accumulated experience in parking demand characteristics indicates that a mixing of
land uses results in an overall parking need that is less than the sum of the individual
peak requirements for each land use. Due to the existing and proposed mixed-use
characteristics of Anaheim Corporate Plaza, opportunities to share parking now occur
and can be expected to continue with full occupancy. The objective of this shared
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 5
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
parking analysis is to forecast the peak parking requirements for the project based on
the combined demand patterns of different tenancy types at the site.
Shared parking calculations recognize that different uses often experience individual
peak parking demands at different times of day, or days of the week. When uses
share common parking footprints, the total number of spaces needed to support the
collective whole is determined by adding parking profiles (by time of day for
weekdays versus weekend days), rather than individual peak ratios as represented in
the City of Anaheim Zoning Code. In that way, the shared parking approach starts
from the City’s own code ratios and results in the “design level” parking supply needs
of a site.
It should be noted that the “demand” results of the shared parking calculation are
intended to be used directly for comparison to site supply. No further adjustments or
contingency additions are needed because such contingencies are already built into
the peak parking ratios and time of day profiles used in the calculation.
There is an important common element between the traditional "code" and the shared
parking calculation methodologies; the peak parking ratios or "highpoint" for each
land use's parking profile typically equals the "code" parking ratio for that use. The
analytical procedures for shared parking analyses are well documented in the Shared
Parking, 2nd Edition publication by the Urban Land Institute (ULI).
Shared parking calculations for the analysis utilize hourly parking accumulations
developed from field studies of single developments in free-standing settings, where
travel by private auto is maximized. These characteristics permit the means for
calculating peak parking needs when land use types are combined. Further, the
shared parking approach illustrates how, at other than peak parking demand times, an
increasing surplus of spaces will service the overall needs of the plaza.
Key inputs in the shared parking analysis for each land use include:
Peak parking demand by land use for visitors and employees.
Adjustments for alternative modes of transportation, if applicable.
Adjustment for internal capture (captive versus non-captive parking demand),
if applicable.
Hourly variations of parking demand.
Weekday versus weekend adjustment factors.
Monthly adjustment factors to account for variations of parking demand over
the year.
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 6
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
City of Anaheim Parking Ratios outlined in Chapter 18.42.040 – Non-
Residential Parking Requirements of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Please note that for this analysis, no monthly adjustment factors to account for variations
of parking demand over the year and no alternative modes of transportation or internal
capture adjustment factors were applied to provide a conservative parking demand
forecast.
Shared Parking Ratios and Profiles
The hourly parking demand profiles (expressed in percent of peak demand) utilized in
this analysis and applied to the Anaheim Corporate Plaza are based on profiles
developed by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and published in Shared Parking, 2nd
Edition. The ULI publication presents hourly parking demand profiles for four (4)
general land use categories: office, medical/dental, bank and family restaurant.
For general office uses, inclusive of the floor area now allocated to storage use in
Building 2390, the parking profile in the ULI publication was used directly applied to
the City’s Code ratio. Based on the ULI profiles, an office use peak demand occurs
between 10:00 AM–11:00 AM and 2:00 PM–3:00 PM on weekdays, and 11:00 AM–
12:00 PM on weekends.
The medical/dental office profiles were also directly derived from ULI. For
medical/dental office uses, the parking profile in the ULI publication was used
directly applied to the City’s Code ratio of 6 spaces per 1,000 SF. Based on the ULI
profiles, a medical/dental use peak demand occurs between 10:00 AM–12:00 PM and
2:00 PM–4:00 PM on weekdays, and 10:00 AM–12:00 PM on weekends.
The ULI Shared Parking publication does not have a category for educational uses.
Therefore, the parking requirements are derived based on operational characteristics
for each of the individual educational uses, which were identified earlier in this
report. LPC has provided teacher/staffing information along with student and class
schedules for RET, Bristol University and US Colleges. This information was then
tracked by each educational facility by time of day and day of week. The highest
weekday and weekend parking demand was used directly along with the
corresponding profile. Detailed hourly profile information for the educational uses is
provided in Appendix A. Please note that Bristol University currently does not have
classes which operate during evening hours, however, to be conservative all
classrooms were assumed to be fully utilized from 5:30 PM to 9:30 PM consistent
with their proposed hours of operation. According to the peak operations for the
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 7
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
educational facilities the peak demand occurs between 6:00 PM–10:00 PM on
weekdays, and 8:00 AM–5:00 PM weekends.
For bank uses, the parking profile in the ULI publication was used directly applied to
the City’s Code ratio 5.5 spaces per 1,000 SF. Based on the ULI profiles, an office
use peak demand occurs between 10:00 AM–11:00 AM and 5:00 PM–6:00 PM on
weekdays, and 11:00 AM–12:00 PM on weekends.
The family restaurant profiles were also directly derived from ULI. For family
restaurant uses, the parking profile in the ULI publication was used directly applied to
the City’s Code ratio of 8 spaces per 1,000 SF. Based on the ULI profiles, a family
restaurant use peak demand occurs between 12:00 PM–1:00 PM on weekdays and
weekends.
Application of Shared Parking Methodology
Tables 3 and 4 present the weekday and weekend parking demand profiles for
Anaheim Corporate Plaza based on the shared parking methodology, assuming the
proposed tenant mix.
Columns (1) through (6) of Tables 3 and 4 present the parking accumulation
characteristics and parking demand of Anaheim Corporate Plaza for the hours of 6:00
AM to midnight. Column (7) presents the expected joint-use parking demand for the
entire site on an hourly basis, while Column (8) summarizes the hourly parking
surplus/deficiency for the plaza compared to a shared parking supply of 1,249 spaces.
Note that the sizing (floor area) of each land use, and recommended parking rates are
included in the tabular headings of each type. Appendix B contains the weekday and
weekend day shared parking analysis calculation worksheets.
Based on our experience, the shared parking approach summarized in theses tables
are believed to be the most appropriate in evaluating the parking supply-demand
relationships for the Anaheim Corporate Plaza with the proposed Project. The results
in these tables are the focus of this parking investigation and recommendations.
Shared Parking Analysis Results and Conclusions
Review of Tables 3 and 4 indicates that the future full occupancy weekday and
weekend peak parking demands will occur at 2:00 PM and 11:00 AM with peak
demands of 1,099 and 339 spaces, respectively. Based on the parking supply of 1,249
spaces, the peak demand hours on a weekday and weekend will have a surplus of 150
space and 910 spaces, respectively.
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 8
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
Figures 4 and 5 graphically illustrate the weekday and weekend hourly parking
demand forecast for the Project, respectively. Each land use component and its
corresponding hourly Shared Parking demand for various mixes of uses, which were
presented in Tables 3 and 4, are depicted in these two figures relative to a shared
parking supply of 1,249 spaces. A review of these figures indicate that the plaza’s
available parking supply of 1,249 spaces will adequately accommodate the Anaheim
Corporate Plaza’s weekday and weekend hourly shared parking demand of all
existing and future uses, including the proposed Project, for all morning, midday,
afternoon and evening hours.
Given these results, we conclude that there is adequate parking on site to
accommodate full occupancy of the plaza along with re-occupancy of 11,885 SF of
vacant space within Suite 100 of building 2390 with a sit-down restaurant.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
1. Anaheim Corporate Plaza is an existing 301,051 square-foot (SF) corporate plaza
located in Anaheim, California and has a proposed parking supply of 1,249
spaces. At the time of our parking demand field study, the plaza had a current
occupancy of 140,818 SF and a vacancy of 160,233 SF.
2. This parking demand analysis evaluates the existing tenancy condition as well as
with full occupancy of the plaza and a proposed tenant mix.
3. Direct application of City parking codes to the existing mix of uses at Anaheim
Corporate Plaza and the proposed Project results in a total parking requirement of
1,256 parking spaces. With an existing and proposed parking supply of 1,249
spaces, a code shortfall of 7 spaces is calculated.
4. Given the tenancy mix, a shared parking analysis has been prepared and indicates
that the proposed parking supply at Anaheim Corporate Plaza will be sufficient to
meet the projected peak parking demands of existing mix of uses and the proposed
tenant mix. The weekday and weekend scenario results in a minimum surplus of
150 spaces.
* * * * * * * * * *
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 9
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this analysis for Anaheim Corporate Plaza.
Should you have any questions or need additional assistance, please do not hesitate to
call Shane Green or me at (949) 825-6175.
Very truly yours,
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
Richard E. Barretto, P.E.
Principal
cc: Shane S. Green, P.E., Transportation Engineer III
Attachments
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
TABLE 1
EXISTING AND PROPOSED TENANT/LAND USE SUMMARY1
ANAHEIM CORPORATE PLAZA, ANAHEIM
Address & Suite Tenant Land Use Building Size (SF)
2121 Towne Centre Place
2121-300 Vacant General Office 5,598 SF
2121-310 Vacant General Office 1,868 SF
2121-320 Leasing Office General Office 1,317 SF
2121-330 Easter Seals General Office 1,222 SF
2121-350 Mercury Insurance Services General Office 4,582 SF
2121-370 Easter Seals General Office 2,968 SF
2121-200 Mercury Insurance Services General Office 17,557 SF
2121-100 Concentra Health Services Medical Office 6,998 SF
2121-102 Vacant General Office 214 SF
2121-112 Vacant General Office 1,277 SF
2121-120 Concentra Health Services Medical Office 2,038 SF
2121-130 Geodesign, Inc General Office 2,806 SF
Subtotal 48,445 SF
2150 Towne Centre Place
2150-300 Vacant General Office 17,589 SF
2150-200 Vacant General Office 5,952 SF
2150-210 Vacant General Office 11,779 SF
2150-100 Vacant General Office 2,084 SF
2105-105 DDRM INC General Office 1,398 SF
2150-110 Astiaj Entertainment General Office 603 SF
2150-120 Cystic Fibrosis General Office 3,386 SF
2150-140 Vacant General Office 3,389 SF
2150-150 Vacant General Office 2,395 SF
Subtotal 48,575 SF
2170 Towne Centre Drive
2170-300 Vacant General Office 6,458 SF
2170-320 Vacant General Office 3,316 SF
2170-350 Workforce Outsourcing, Inc General Office 6,922 SF
2170-200 Vacant General Office 17,088 SF
2170-100 Real Estate Trainers, Inc Educational Services 11,250 SF
2170-101 Vacant General Office 5,021 SF
Subtotal 50,055 SF
2190 Towne Centre Drive
2190-300 NCS Pearson, Inc General Office 3,391 SF
2190-303 Vacant General Office 2,247 SF
2190-306 Vacant General Office 2,045 SF
2190-308 Vacant General Office 2,241 SF
2190-310 ECA General Office 3,357 SF
2190-312 Vacant General Office 1,609 SF
2190-314 Management Office General Office 1,999 SF
2190-200 Vacant General Office 9,677 SF
2190-210 Vacant General Office 3,734 SF
2190-292 Vacant General Office 4,307 SF
2190-100 Vacant General Office 13,348 SF
Subtotal 47,955 SF
1 Source: Lincoln Property Company as of March 2015.
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
TABLE 1 (CONTINUED)
EXISTING AND PROPOSED TENANT/LAND USE SUMMARY2
ANAHEIM CORPORATE PLAZA, ANAHEIM
Address & Suite Tenant Land Use Building Size (SF)
2390 Orangewood Avenue
2390-500 Vacant General Office 1,790 SF
2390-510 Ebro Accounting General Office 1,221 SF
2390-515 Vacant General Office 1,323 SF
2390-520 Upland Security General Office 1,459 SF
2390-530 Vacant General Office 2,215 SF
2390-540 Vacant General Office 1,549 SF
2390-550 CDC Small Business General Office 1,439 SF
2390-560 CDC Small Business General Office 1,973 SF
2390-570 Vacant General Office 1,208 SF
2390-575 Vacant General Office 1,872 SF
2390-585 James B. Smith General Office 1,777 SF
2390-595 Cal Net Enterprises General Office 1,302 SF
2390-400 Sein Chiropractic Corp Medical Office 1,771 SF
2390-410 Sein Chiropractic Corp Medical Office 1,221 SF
2390-415 Medcor General Office 1,304 SF
2390-420 Medcor General Office 1,781 SF
2390-430 Vacant General Office 2,206 SF
2390-440 Vacant General Office 1,478 SF
2390-450 Vacant General Office 1,475 SF
2390-460 Fred Loya Insurance General Office 1,973 SF
2390-470 Bristol University Educational Services 1,190 SF
2390-475 Bristol University Educational Services 1,794 SF
2390-485 Bristol University Educational Services 1,777 SF
2390-495 Sein Chiropractic Corp Medical Office 1,483 SF
2390-300 CAPC General Office 11,543 SF
2390-325 State of Florida Department of Revenue General office 5,316 SF
2390-350 Vacant General Office 2,276 SF
2390-200 US Colleges Educational Services 4,849 SF
2390-225 Vacant General Office 2,686 SF
2390-230 Vacant General Office 2,008 SF
2390-250 Nations Insurance Co General Office 8,373 SF
2390-299 Vacant General Office 1,688 SF
2390-100 Vacant/Proposed Food Use Restaurant 11,885 SF
2390-105 Bristol University Educational Services 4,859 SF
2390-106 Orange County's C.U. Financial 3,882 SF
2390-110 CAPC General Office 2,173 SF
2390-120 Vacant General Office 1,338 SF
2390-B01 Storage General Office 2,614 SF
2390-B02 Storage General Office 1,628 SF
2390-B03 Storage General Office 322 SF
Subtotal 106,021 SF
Summary:
Total Occupied General Office Square Footage 97,706 SF
Total Occupied Medical Office Square Footage 13,511 SF
Total Occupied Educational Services Square Footage 25,719 SF
Total Occupied Financial Square Footage 3,882 SF
Total Vacant General Office Square Footage 148,348 SF
Total Vacant/Proposed Eating Establishment Square Footage 11,885 SF
TOTAL SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE 301,051 SF
2 Source: Lincoln Property Company as of March 2015.
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
TABLE 2
CITY CODE PARKING REQUIREMENT
ANAHEIM CORPORATE PLAZA, ANAHEIM
City of Anaheim Spaces
Land Use Size Code Parking Ratio3 Required
Existing Tenant Mix
Office 97,7064 SF
4 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA for buildings
3 stories or lower; 3 spaces per 1,000 SF of
GFA for buildings of more than 3 stories
345
Medical/Dental 13,511 SF 6 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA 81
Educational Services 2985 Students
0.82 spaces per student, or 20 spaces per
1,000 SF of GFA for instruction area,
whichever results in a greater number of
spaces plus 4 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA
for office area
244
Financial Services 3,882 SF 5.5 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA 21
Vacant Suites/Proposed Project
Vacant Office 148,3486 SF
4 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA for buildings
3 stories or lower; 3 spaces per 1,000 SF of
GFA for buildings of more than 3 stories
470
Proposed Eating Establishments 11,885 SF 8 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA 95
TOTAL: 1,256
A. TOTAL OCCUPIED PARKING CODE REQUIREMENT 691
B. TOTAL VACANT/PROPOSED PARKING CODE REQUIREMENT 565
C. TOTAL PARKING CODE REQUIREMENT BASED ON FULL OCCUPANCY 1,256
D. TOTAL PROPOSED PARKING SUPPLY 1,249
E. PARKING SURPLUS/DEFICIENCY (+/-) BASED ON FULL OCCUPANCY (D – C) -7
3 Source: City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.42.040 – Non-Residential Parking Requirements.
4 A parking ratio of 3 spaces per 1,000 SF was applied to 46,198 SF of office use which is within a five story building; this floor
area includes 4,564 SF that is used as storage, but is parked at the “office rate”. The remaining 51,508 SF has a parking ratio of 4
spaces per 1,000 SF.
5 The student total of 298 students is based on 190 students at RET, 93 students at Bristol University and 15 students at US
Colleges. The classroom square footage for all schools totals 5,668 SF. The student requirement exceeds the square footage
requirement, therefore 298 students was used to calculate the parking requirement.
6 A parking ratio of 3 spaces per 1,000 SF was applied to 123,236 SF of office use which is within a five story building. The
remaining 25,112 SF has a parking ratio of 4 spaces per 1,000 SF.
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
TABLE 3
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS7
ANAHEIM CORPORATE PLAZA, ANAHEIM
Land Use Office Medical/Dental
Office
Educational
Services Bank Vacant Office Fine/Casual
Dining
Size 97.706 KSF 13.511 KSF 25.719 KSF 3.882 KSF 148.348 KSF 11.885 KSF
Pkg Rate[1]--/KSF 6 /KSF [2]/KSF 5.5 /KSF --/KSF 8 /KSF Comparison w/
Gross 345 Spc.81 Spc.132 Spc.21 Spc.470 Spc.95 Spc.Parking Supply
Spaces Shared 1249 Spaces
Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Parking Surplus
Time of Day Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Demand (Deficiency)
6:00 AM 10 0 0 0 13 0 23 1,226
7:00 AM 95 0 7 0 130 3 235 1,014
8:00 AM 244 65 90 11 332 7 749 500
9:00 AM 318 76 90 20 433 10 947 302
10:00 AM 345 81 90 21 470 23 1,030 219
11:00 AM 330 81 90 14 450 41 1,006 243
12:00 PM 290 43 90 14 396 66 899 350
1:00 PM 298 76 127 14 407 66 988 261
2:00 PM 345 81 127 17 470 59 1,099 150
3:00 PM 330 81 127 14 450 39 1,041 208
4:00 PM 290 76 127 18 396 46 953 296
5:00 PM 162 70 127 21 221 68 669 580
6:00 PM 81 54 163 0 110 83 491 758
7:00 PM 33 24 163 0 44 86 350 899
8:00 PM 22 12 163 0 30 86 313 936
9:00 PM 10 0 163 0 13 86 272 977
10:00 PM 3 0 62 0 4 83 152 1,097
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 66 66 1,183
12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 23 23 1,226
Notes:
[1] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim parking ratios.
[2] Total parking requirements for educational services are based on class schedules and staffing information provided by LPC.
See Appendix A for detailed hourly parking demand forecasts for the educational uses.
7 Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
TABLE 4
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS8
ANAHEIM CORPORATE PLAZA, ANAHEIM
Land Use Office Medical/Dental
Office
Educational
Services Bank Vacant Office Fine/Casual
Dining
Size 97.706 KSF 13.511 KSF 25.719 KSF 3.882 KSF 148.348 KSF 11.885 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]--/KSF 6 /KSF [2]/KSF 5.5 /KSF --/KSF 8 /KSF Comparison w/
Gross 345 Spc.81 Spc.132 Spc.21 Spc.470 Spc.95 Spc.Parking Supply
Spaces Shared 1249 Spaces
Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Parking Surplus
Time of Day Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Demand (Deficiency)
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,249
7:00 AM 7 0 0 0 10 3 20 1,229
8:00 AM 21 65 132 10 28 4 260 989
9:00 AM 27 76 132 13 38 8 294 955
10:00 AM 31 81 132 18 42 11 315 934
11:00 AM 35 81 132 21 47 23 339 910
12:00 PM 31 43 132 20 42 52 320 929
1:00 PM 27 0 132 0 38 56 253 996
2:00 PM 21 0 132 0 28 47 228 1,021
3:00 PM 14 0 132 0 18 47 211 1,038
4:00 PM 7 0 132 0 10 47 196 1,053
5:00 PM 3 0 0 0 4 63 70 1,179
6:00 PM 3 0 0 0 4 87 94 1,155
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 91 91 1,158
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 95 95 1,154
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 87 87 1,162
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 87 87 1,162
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 85 85 1,164
12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 48 48 1,201
Notes:
[1] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim parking ratios.
[2] Total parking requirements for educational services are based on class schedules and staffing information provided by LPC.
See Appendix A for detailed hourly parking demand forecasts for the educational uses.
8 Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
21
7
0
-
1
0
0
14
23
9
0
-
1
0
5
3
23
9
0
-
2
0
0
4
Cl
a
s
s
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
1/
c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
Da
y
s
RE
T
(
T
e
s
t
i
n
g
o
n
l
y
)
M
o
n
d
a
y
-
F
r
i
d
a
y
6
:
0
0
p
m
-
1
0
:
3
0
p
m
T
o
t
a
l
2
2
5
/
c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
Sa
t
u
r
d
a
y
-
S
u
n
d
a
y
8
:
0
0
a
m
-
5
:
0
0
p
m
T
o
t
a
l
2
6
0
/
c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
1
Br
i
s
t
o
l
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
M
o
n
d
a
y
-
F
r
i
d
a
y
8
:
3
0
a
m
-
1
2
:
3
0
p
m
C
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
1
1
2
1
1:
0
0
p
m
-
5
:
0
0
p
m
Cl
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
2
1
0
1
5:
3
0
p
m
-
9
:
3
0
p
m
Cl
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
3
1
0
1
Cl
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
4
6
1
Cl
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
5
1
2
1
Cl
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
6
1
2
1
Cl
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
7
1
8
1/
c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
Li
b
r
a
r
y
1
0
US
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
s
M
o
n
d
a
y
-
F
r
i
d
a
y
8
:
0
0
a
m
-
6
:
0
0
p
m
T
o
t
a
l
2
1
0
/
c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
Ta
b
l
e
A
-
1
Em
p
l
o
y
e
e
/
S
t
u
d
e
n
t
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
23
9
0
E
.
O
r
a
n
g
e
w
o
o
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
Su
i
t
e
T
e
n
a
n
t
C
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
s
#
o
f
S
t
u
d
e
n
t
s
/
c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
#
o
f
t
e
a
c
h
e
r
s
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
Ti
m
e
RET Bristol University US Colleges
7:00 AM 0 3 4 7
7:30 AM 0 3 4 7
8:00 AM 0 3 26 29
8:30 AM 0 64 26 90
9:00 AM 0 64 26 90
9:30 AM 0 64 26 90
10:00 AM 0 64 26 90
10:30 AM 0 64 26 90
11:00 AM 0 64 26 90
11:30 AM 0 64 26 90
12:00 PM 0 64 26 90
12:30 PM 0 3 26 29
1:00 PM 0 101 26 127
1:30 PM 0 101 26 127
2:00 PM 0 101 26 127
2:30 PM 0 101 26 127
3:00 PM 0 101 26 127
3:30 PM 0 101 26 127
4:00 PM 0 101 26 127
4:30 PM 0 101 26 127
5:00 PM 0 3 26 29
5:30 PM 0 101 26 127
6:00 PM 62 101 0 163
6:30 PM 62 101 0 163
7:00 PM 62 101 0 163
7:30 PM 62 101 0 163
8:00 PM 62 101 0 163
8:30 PM 62 101 0 163
9:00 PM 62 101 0 163
9:30 PM 62 101 0 163
10:00 PM 62 0 0 62
163
163
163
TABLE A-2
Empirical Educational Parking Demand - Monday
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim
Time
Parked Vehicles
Total Vehicles
127
127
127
127
127
163
7
90
90
90
90
90
Max
Vehicles/Hour
RET Bristol University US Colleges
7:00 AM 0 3 4 7
7:30 AM 0 3 4 7
8:00 AM 0 3 26 29
8:30 AM 0 36 26 62
9:00 AM 0 36 26 62
9:30 AM 0 36 26 62
10:00 AM 0 36 26 62
10:30 AM 0 36 26 62
11:00 AM 0 36 26 62
11:30 AM 0 36 26 62
12:00 PM 0 36 26 62
12:30 PM 0 3 26 29
1:00 PM 0 75 26 101
1:30 PM 0 75 26 101
2:00 PM 0 75 26 101
2:30 PM 0 75 26 101
3:00 PM 0 75 26 101
3:30 PM 0 75 26 101
4:00 PM 0 75 26 101
4:30 PM 0 75 26 101
5:00 PM 0 3 26 29
5:30 PM 0 101 26 127
6:00 PM 62 101 0 163
6:30 PM 62 101 0 163
7:00 PM 62 101 0 163
7:30 PM 62 101 0 163
8:00 PM 62 101 0 163
8:30 PM 62 101 0 163
9:00 PM 62 101 0 163
9:30 PM 62 101 0 163
10:00 PM 62 0 0 62
163
163
163
163
7
62
62
62
62
62
101
101
101
101
127
TABLE A-3
Empirical Educational Parking Demand - Tuesday
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim
Time
Parked Vehicles
Total Vehicles
Max
Vehicles/Hour
RET Bristol University US Colleges
7:00 AM 0 3 4 7
7:30 AM 0 3 4 7
8:00 AM 0 3 26 29
8:30 AM 0 51 26 77
9:00 AM 0 51 26 77
9:30 AM 0 51 26 77
10:00 AM 0 51 26 77
10:30 AM 0 51 26 77
11:00 AM 0 51 26 77
11:30 AM 0 51 26 77
12:00 PM 0 51 26 77
12:30 PM 0 3 26 29
1:00 PM 0 77 26 103
1:30 PM 0 77 26 103
2:00 PM 0 77 26 103
2:30 PM 0 77 26 103
3:00 PM 0 77 26 103
3:30 PM 0 77 26 103
4:00 PM 0 77 26 103
4:30 PM 0 77 26 103
5:00 PM 0 3 26 29
5:30 PM 0 101 26 127
6:00 PM 62 101 0 163
6:30 PM 62 101 0 163
7:00 PM 62 101 0 163
7:30 PM 62 101 0 163
8:00 PM 62 101 0 163
8:30 PM 62 101 0 163
9:00 PM 62 101 0 163
9:30 PM 62 101 0 163
10:00 PM 62 0 0 62
TABLE A-4
Empirical Educational Parking Demand - Wednesday
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim
Time
Parked Vehicles
Total Vehicles
Max
Vehicles/Hour
163
163
163
103
103
103
103
127
163
7
77
77
77
77
77
RET Bristol University US Colleges
7:00 AM 0 3 4 7
7:30 AM 0 3 4 7
8:00 AM 0 3 26 29
8:30 AM 0 36 26 62
9:00 AM 0 36 26 62
9:30 AM 0 36 26 62
10:00 AM 0 36 26 62
10:30 AM 0 36 26 62
11:00 AM 0 36 26 62
11:30 AM 0 36 26 62
12:00 PM 0 36 26 62
12:30 PM 0 3 26 29
1:00 PM 0 75 26 101
1:30 PM 0 75 26 101
2:00 PM 0 75 26 101
2:30 PM 0 75 26 101
3:00 PM 0 75 26 101
3:30 PM 0 75 26 101
4:00 PM 0 75 26 101
4:30 PM 0 75 26 101
5:00 PM 0 3 26 29
5:30 PM 0 101 26 127
6:00 PM 62 101 0 163
6:30 PM 62 101 0 163
7:00 PM 62 101 0 163
7:30 PM 62 101 0 163
8:00 PM 62 101 0 163
8:30 PM 62 101 0 163
9:00 PM 62 101 0 163
9:30 PM 62 101 0 163
10:00 PM 62 0 0 62
TABLE A-5
Empirical Educational Parking Demand - Thursday
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim
Time
Parked Vehicles
Total Vehicles
Max
Vehicles/Hour
7
62
62
62
62
62
101
163
163
101
101
101
127
163
163
RET Bristol University US Colleges
7:00 AM 0 0 4 4
7:30 AM 0 0 4 4
8:00 AM 0 0 26 26
8:30 AM 0 0 26 26
9:00 AM 0 0 26 26
9:30 AM 0 0 26 26
10:00 AM 0 0 26 26
10:30 AM 0 0 26 26
11:00 AM 0 0 26 26
11:30 AM 0 0 26 26
12:00 PM 0 0 26 26
12:30 PM 0 0 26 26
1:00 PM 0 0 26 26
1:30 PM 0 0 26 26
2:00 PM 0 0 26 26
2:30 PM 0 0 26 26
3:00 PM 0 0 26 26
3:30 PM 0 0 26 26
4:00 PM 0 0 26 26
4:30 PM 0 0 26 26
5:00 PM 0 0 26 26
5:30 PM 0 0 26 26
6:00 PM 62 0 0 62
6:30 PM 62 0 0 62
7:00 PM 62 0 0 62
7:30 PM 62 0 0 62
8:00 PM 62 0 0 62
8:30 PM 62 0 0 62
9:00 PM 62 0 0 62
9:30 PM 62 0 0 62
10:00 PM 62 0 0 62
TABLE A-6
Empirical Educational Parking Demand - Friday
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim
Time
Parked Vehicles
Total Vehicles
Max
Vehicles/Hour
4
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
62
26
26
26
62
62
62
RET Bristol University US Colleges
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 132 0 0 132
8:30 AM 132 0 0 132
9:00 AM 132 0 0 132
9:30 AM 132 0 0 132
10:00 AM 132 0 0 132
10:30 AM 132 0 0 132
11:00 AM 132 0 0 132
11:30 AM 132 0 0 132
12:00 PM 132 0 0 132
12:30 PM 132 0 0 132
1:00 PM 132 0 0 132
1:30 PM 132 0 0 132
2:00 PM 132 0 0 132
2:30 PM 132 0 0 132
3:00 PM 132 0 0 132
3:30 PM 132 0 0 132
4:00 PM 132 0 0 132
4:30 PM 132 0 0 132
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0
6:30 PM 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0
7:30 PM 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0
8:30 PM 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0
9:30 PM 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0
TABLE A-7
Empirical Educational Parking Demand - Saturday
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim
Time
Parked Vehicles
Total Vehicles
Max
Vehicles/Hour
0
0
0
132
0
0
0
132
132
132
132
132
132
132
132
RET Bristol University US Colleges
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 132 0 0 132
8:30 AM 132 0 0 132
9:00 AM 132 0 0 132
9:30 AM 132 0 0 132
10:00 AM 132 0 0 132
10:30 AM 132 0 0 132
11:00 AM 132 0 0 132
11:30 AM 132 0 0 132
12:00 PM 132 0 0 132
12:30 PM 132 0 0 132
1:00 PM 132 0 0 132
1:30 PM 132 0 0 132
2:00 PM 132 0 0 132
2:30 PM 132 0 0 132
3:00 PM 132 0 0 132
3:30 PM 132 0 0 132
4:00 PM 132 0 0 132
4:30 PM 132 0 0 132
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0
6:30 PM 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0
7:30 PM 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0
8:30 PM 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0
9:30 PM 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0
TABLE A-8
Empirical Educational Parking Demand - Sunday
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim
Time
Parked Vehicles
Total Vehicles
Max
Vehicles/Hour
0
132
132
132
132
132
0
0
0
132
132
132
132
0
0
Appendix Table B1
OFFICE
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Office
Size 97.706 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]--/KSF
Gross 345 Spaces
Spaces 27 Visitor Spc.318 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 3%10 10
7:00 AM 1%0 30%95 95
8:00 AM 20%5 75%239 244
9:00 AM 60%16 95%302 318
10:00 AM 100%27 100%318 345
11:00 AM 45%12 100%318 330
12:00 PM 15%4 90%286 290
1:00 PM 45%12 90%286 298
2:00 PM 100%27 100%318 345
3:00 PM 45%12 100%318 330
4:00 PM 15%4 90%286 290
5:00 PM 10%3 50%159 162
6:00 PM 5%1 25%80 81
7:00 PM 2%1 10%32 33
8:00 PM 1%0 7%22 22
9:00 PM 0%0 3%10 10
10:00 PM 0%0 1%3 3
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B2
OFFICE
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Office
Size 97.706 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]--/KSF
Gross 345 Spaces
Spaces 27 Visitor Spc.318 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 2%1 2%6 7
8:00 AM 6%2 6%19 21
9:00 AM 8%2 8%25 27
10:00 AM 9%2 9%29 31
11:00 AM 10%3 10%32 35
12:00 PM 9%2 9%29 31
1:00 PM 8%2 8%25 27
2:00 PM 6%2 6%19 21
3:00 PM 4%1 4%13 14
4:00 PM 2%1 2%6 7
5:00 PM 1%0 1%3 3
6:00 PM 1%0 1%3 3
7:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
9:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
10:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B3
MEDICAL/DENTAL OFFICE
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Medical/Dental Office
Size 13.511 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]6 /KSF
Gross 81 Spaces
Spaces 54 Visitor Spc.27 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 AM 90%49 60%16 65
9:00 AM 90%49 100%27 76
10:00 AM 100%54 100%27 81
11:00 AM 100%54 100%27 81
12:00 PM 30%16 100%27 43
1:00 PM 90%49 100%27 76
2:00 PM 100%54 100%27 81
3:00 PM 100%54 100%27 81
4:00 PM 90%49 100%27 76
5:00 PM 80%43 100%27 70
6:00 PM 67%36 67%18 54
7:00 PM 30%16 30%8 24
8:00 PM 15%8 15%4 12
9:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
10:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B4
MEDICAL/DENTAL OFFICE
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Medical/Dental Office
Size 13.511 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]6 /KSF
Gross 81 Spaces
Spaces 54 Visitor Spc.27 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 AM 90%49 60%16 65
9:00 AM 90%49 100%27 76
10:00 AM 100%54 100%27 81
11:00 AM 100%54 100%27 81
12:00 PM 30%16 100%27 43
1:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
2:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
3:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
4:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
5:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
6:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
9:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
10:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B5
BANK
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Bank
Size 3.882 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]5.5 /KSF
Gross 21 Spaces
Spaces 14 Visitor Spc.7 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 AM 50%7 60%4 11
9:00 AM 90%13 100%7 20
10:00 AM 100%14 100%7 21
11:00 AM 50%7 100%7 14
12:00 PM 50%7 100%7 14
1:00 PM 50%7 100%7 14
2:00 PM 70%10 100%7 17
3:00 PM 50%7 100%7 14
4:00 PM 80%11 100%7 18
5:00 PM 100%14 100%7 21
6:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
9:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
10:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B6
BANK
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Bank
Size 3.882 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]5.5 /KSF
Gross 21 Spaces
Spaces 14 Visitor Spc.7 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 AM 25%4 90%6 10
9:00 AM 40%6 100%7 13
10:00 AM 75%11 100%7 18
11:00 AM 100%14 100%7 21
12:00 PM 90%13 100%7 20
1:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
2:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
3:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
4:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
5:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
6:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
9:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
10:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B7
VACANT OFFICE
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Vacant Office
Size 148.348 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]--/KSF
Gross 470 Spaces
Spaces 37 Visitor Spc.433 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 3%13 13
7:00 AM 1%0 30%130 130
8:00 AM 20%7 75%325 332
9:00 AM 60%22 95%411 433
10:00 AM 100%37 100%433 470
11:00 AM 45%17 100%433 450
12:00 PM 15%6 90%390 396
1:00 PM 45%17 90%390 407
2:00 PM 100%37 100%433 470
3:00 PM 45%17 100%433 450
4:00 PM 15%6 90%390 396
5:00 PM 10%4 50%217 221
6:00 PM 5%2 25%108 110
7:00 PM 2%1 10%43 44
8:00 PM 1%0 7%30 30
9:00 PM 0%0 3%13 13
10:00 PM 0%0 1%4 4
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B8
VACANT OFFICE
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Vacant Office
Size 148.348 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]--/KSF
Gross 470 Spaces
Spaces 37 Visitor Spc.433 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 2%1 2%9 10
8:00 AM 6%2 6%26 28
9:00 AM 8%3 8%35 38
10:00 AM 9%3 9%39 42
11:00 AM 10%4 10%43 47
12:00 PM 9%3 9%39 42
1:00 PM 8%3 8%35 38
2:00 PM 6%2 6%26 28
3:00 PM 4%1 4%17 18
4:00 PM 2%1 2%9 10
5:00 PM 1%0 1%4 4
6:00 PM 1%0 1%4 4
7:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
9:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
10:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B9
FINE/CASUAL DINING
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Fine/Casual Dining
Size 11.885 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]8 /KSF
Gross 95 Spaces
Spaces 80 Guest Spc.15 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 0%0 18%3 3
8:00 AM 0%0 45%7 7
9:00 AM 0%0 68%10 10
10:00 AM 14%11 81%12 23
11:00 AM 36%29 81%12 41
12:00 PM 68%54 81%12 66
1:00 PM 68%54 81%12 66
2:00 PM 59%47 81%12 59
3:00 PM 36%29 68%10 39
4:00 PM 45%36 68%10 46
5:00 PM 68%54 90%14 68
6:00 PM 86%69 90%14 83
7:00 PM 90%72 90%14 86
8:00 PM 90%72 90%14 86
9:00 PM 90%72 90%14 86
10:00 PM 86%69 90%14 83
11:00 PM 68%54 77%12 66
12:00 AM 23%18 32%5 23
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B10
FINE/CASUAL DINING
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Fine/Casual Dining
Size 11.885 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]8 /KSF
Gross 95 Spaces
Spaces 81 Guest Spc.14 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 0%0 20%3 3
8:00 AM 0%0 30%4 4
9:00 AM 0%0 60%8 8
10:00 AM 0%0 75%11 11
11:00 AM 15%12 75%11 23
12:00 PM 50%41 75%11 52
1:00 PM 55%45 75%11 56
2:00 PM 45%36 75%11 47
3:00 PM 45%36 75%11 47
4:00 PM 45%36 75%11 47
5:00 PM 60%49 100%14 63
6:00 PM 90%73 100%14 87
7:00 PM 95%77 100%14 91
8:00 PM 100%81 100%14 95
9:00 PM 90%73 100%14 87
10:00 PM 90%73 100%14 87
11:00 PM 90%73 85%12 85
12:00 AM 50%41 50%7 48
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
PHOTOGRAPHS OF 2390 E. ORANGEWOOD, ANAHEIM CA (“Building”)
RE: KARL STRAUSS RESTAURANT & BREWERY CUP APPLICATION
View of Building looking southwest to northeast
View of south side of Building
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
View of southwest corner of Building
View of west side of Building
View of east side of Building (from Rampart St)
View of west side of Building
View of northwest corner of Building (from Orangewood)
View of northwest corner of Building (future Applicant entrance/ storefront area)
View from Orangewood Ave to Building
Aerial view of Building
View of northeast corner of Building (from Rampart St.)
View of southeast corner of Building (from Rampart St.)
View of property to east of Building (Fire Training Academy)
View of property to north of Building (Angel Stadium of Anaheim)
View of property to west of Building (Karcher)
View of property to south of Building (low rise multi-tenant office buildings)
DN
C
O
N
C
6
8
.
0
'
GB
GB
4
5
.
0
'
O
R
A
N
G
E
W
O
O
D
A
V
E
1
1
.
1
'
1
1
.
0
'
1
1
.
0
'
1
1
.
0
'
1
1
.
0
'
1
3
.
0
'
8
.
0
'
6
0
.
0
'
4
9
.
0
'
5
9
.
0
'
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
R
I
G
H
T
OF
W
A
Y
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
C
U
R
B
LI
N
E
R A M P A R T S T .
(E
)
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
LI
N
E
Checker Author2390 - KARL STRAUSS 2390 E. ORANGEWOOD AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92801 KARL STRAUSS - ANAHEIM Job No:Drawn:Check:Owner Approval:Scale:CUP - SUBMITTAL 2390 E. ORANGEWOOD AVE ANAHEIM, CA 92806 Job No:Drawn:Check:Owner Approval:Scale:Delta
I
s
s
u
e
N
r
.
D
a
t
e
Title:Sheet:Description 3/64" = 1'-0"
2
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
6
1
2
:
4
5
:
5
5
P
M
00SITE PLANCheckerAuthor13LIPC.0009.000CUP SUBMITTAL 02/25/2016PARKING SUMMARY TOTAL PARKING PROVIDED 1249 TOTAL ACCESSIBLE PROVIDED 8ATTACHMENT NO. 6
G BGB
1
1
1
.
0
'
1
3
.
0
'
8
.
0
'
6
F
I
R
E
P
I
T
DN
HO
S
T
E
S
S
S
E
R
V
E
R
SE
R
V
.
S
E
R
V
E
R
BA
R
A
R
E
A
BA
R
KA
R
L
'
S
R
O
O
M
1
BR
E
W
E
R
Y
KE
G
C
O
O
L
E
R
WO
M
E
N
'
S
ME
N
'
S
OF
F
I
C
E
EM
P
L
O
Y
E
E
R.R
.
TR
A
S
H
10
3
10
7
11
3
10
6
11
7
CA
S
U
A
L
D
I
N
I
N
G
CO
O
L
E
R
10
9
BR
E
A
K
R
O
O
M
11
1
12
0
11
9
10
1
10
2
10
5
11
2
PA
T
I
O
11
8
KIT
C
H
E
N
10
8
FR
E
E
Z
E
R
11
6
11
4
SE
R
V
.
H
A
L
L
W
A
Y
HA
L
L
W
A
Y
11
5
10
4
DR
Y
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
KA
R
L
'
S
R
O
O
M
2
GR
O
W
L
E
R
ST
A
T
I
O
N
12
1
DE
L
I
V
E
R
Y
HA
L
L
W
A
Y
SE
R
V
.
R
M
.
11
0
BA
D
C
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9 10
1.
5
A
B C D E F G
F.
2
1
1.
1
033
14
'
-
3
"
27
'
-
5
"
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
RI
G
H
T
O
F
WA
Y
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
CU
R
B
L
I
N
E
(E
)
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
LI
N
E
Checker Author2390 - KARL STRAUSS 2390 E. ORANGEWOOD AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92801 KARL STRAUSS - ANAHEIM Job No:Drawn:Check:Owner Approval:Scale:CUP - SUBMITTAL 2390 E. ORANGEWOOD AVE ANAHEIM, CA 92806 Job No:Drawn:Check:Owner Approval:Scale:Delta
I
s
s
u
e
N
r
.
D
a
t
e
Title:Sheet:Description 1/8" = 1'-0"
2
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
6
1
1
:
3
8
:
0
4
A
M
021ST FLOOR PLANCheckerAuthor13LIPC.0009.000CUP SUBMITTAL
0
2
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
6
1
1
.
0
'
1
3
.
0
'
8
.
0
'
1
1
1
1
.
0
'
1
3
.
0
'
8
.
0
'
6
0
1ST FLOOR 0"2ND FLOOR 16' - 0"1
1.
5
PATIO -2' - 6"T.O. (N)PARAPET 19' - 6"DEMOLISH PORTION OF (E) RAILING (E) EXTERIOR WALL TO BE DEMOLISHED FOR ADDITION OF NEW GLASS ENCLOSURE. REFER TO PLANS,ELEVATIONS AND STRUCTURAL DRAWINGS.DEMOLISH EXISTING GLAZING SYSTEM.REFER TO DEMO PLAN, ELEVATIONS AND STRUCTRUAL DRAWINGS.PROPOSED RIGHT OF WAY
1
2
1.
5
B C D E F G
1.
1
4
A-
7
.
0
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
4 03
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
RI
G
H
T
O
F
WA
Y
LI
N
E
O
F
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
CU
R
B
(E
)
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
LI
N
E
1
2
1.
5
B C D E F G
1.
1
2 03
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
RI
G
H
T
O
F
WA
Y
LI
N
E
O
F
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
CU
R
B
(E
)
PR
O
P
E
R
T
Y
LI
N
E
1S
T
F
L
O
O
R
0"
2N
D
F
L
O
O
R
16
'
-
0
"
1
1.
5
PA
T
I
O
-2
'
-
6
"
1.
1
T.
O
.
(
N
)
P
A
R
A
P
E
T
19
'
-
6
"
ST
E
E
L
E
Y
E
B
R
O
W
,
R
E
F
E
R
T
O
ST
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
.
SIG
N
A
G
E
EX
T
E
R
I
O
R
P
L
A
S
T
E
R
O
V
E
R
M
E
T
A
L
L
A
T
H
OV
E
R
W
A
T
E
R
P
R
O
O
F
I
N
G
M
E
M
B
R
A
N
E
OV
E
R
S
H
E
A
T
H
I
N
G
B
O
A
R
D
NE
W
M
E
T
A
L
S
T
U
D
P
E
R
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
.
RE
F
E
R
T
O
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
F
O
R
AL
L
A
T
T
C
H
M
E
N
T
S
A
N
D
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
.
GA
L
V
A
N
I
Z
E
D
M
E
T
A
L
C
O
P
I
N
G
WI
T
H
F
A
S
T
E
N
E
R
ST
O
R
E
F
R
O
N
T
B
E
Y
O
N
D
NE
W
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
M
A
S
O
N
R
Y
W
A
L
L
.
RE
F
E
R
T
O
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
.
EX
I
S
T
I
N
G
P
A
R
A
P
E
T
T
O
R
E
M
A
I
N
J-
M
O
L
D
RE
I
N
F
O
R
C
E
D
P
V
C
M
E
M
B
R
A
N
E
O
V
E
R
B
O
N
D
I
N
G
AD
H
E
S
I
V
E
O
V
E
R
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
S
H
E
A
T
H
I
N
G
ME
T
A
L
F
L
A
S
H
I
N
G
A
T
T
A
C
H
T
O
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
FL
A
S
H
I
N
G
RO
L
L
-
U
P
D
O
O
R
.
S
E
E
DO
O
R
S
C
H
E
D
U
L
E
.
GL
A
S
S
R
A
I
L
I
N
G
LI
N
E
O
F
(
E
)
M
E
T
A
L
S
T
U
D
S
B
E
T
W
E
E
N
.
RE
F
E
R
T
O
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
.
LA
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
R
I
G
H
T
O
F
W
A
Y
HS
S
T
U
B
E
S
T
E
E
L
C
O
L
U
M
N
,
TU
B
E
S
T
E
E
L
T
R
U
S
S
S
U
P
P
O
R
Checker Author2390 - KARL STRAUSS 2390 E. ORANGEWOOD AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92801 KARL STRAUSS - ANAHEIM Job No:Drawn:Check:Owner Approval:Scale:CUP - SUBMITTAL 2390 E. ORANGEWOOD AVE ANAHEIM, CA 92806 Job No:Drawn:Check:Owner Approval:Scale:Delta
I
s
s
u
e
N
r
.
D
a
t
e
Title:Sheet:Description As indicated
2
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
6
1
1
:
3
8
:
0
7
A
M
03ENLARGEDPROPOSED PATIOCheckerAuthor13LIPC.0009.000
3
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
2
SE
C
T
I
O
N
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
G
L
A
S
S
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
3
01
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
P
L
A
N
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
01
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
P
L
A
N
3
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
4
SE
C
T
I
O
N
O
F
G
A
R
A
G
E
D
O
O
R
-
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
CUP SUBMITTAL
0
2
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
6
1ST FLOOR 0"2ND FLOOR 16' - 0"
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1.
5
PATIO -2' - 6"
1.
1
T.O. (N)PARAPET 19' - 6"1ST FLOOR 0"2ND FLOOR 16' - 0"
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
PATIO -2' - 6"T.O. (N)PARAPET 19' - 6"
4 03
__
_
_
_
_
_
_
Checker Author2390 - KARL STRAUSS 2390 E. ORANGEWOOD AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92801 KARL STRAUSS - ANAHEIM Job No:Drawn:Check:Owner Approval:Scale:CUP - SUBMITTAL 2390 E. ORANGEWOOD AVE ANAHEIM, CA 92806 Job No:Drawn:Check:Owner Approval:Scale:Delta
I
s
s
u
e
N
r
.
D
a
t
e
Title:Sheet:Description 1/8" = 1'-0"
2
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
6
1
1
:
3
8
:
0
9
A
M
04EXTERIORELEVATIONS13LIPC.0009.000
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
E
A
S
T
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
S
O
U
T
H
CUP SUBMITTAL
0
2
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
6
1ST FLOOR 0"2ND FLOOR 16' - 0"1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1.5 PATIO -2' - 6"1.1 T.O. (N)PARAPET 19' - 6"1ST FLOOR 0"2ND FLOOR 16' - 0"
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
T.O. (N)PARAPET 19' - 6"Checker Author2390 - KARL STRAUSS 2390 E. ORANGEWOOD AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92801 KARL STRAUSS - ANAHEIM Job No:Drawn:Check:Owner Approval:Scale:CUP - SUBMITTAL 2390 E. ORANGEWOOD AVE ANAHEIM, CA 92806 Job No:Drawn:Check:Owner Approval:Scale:Delta
I
s
s
u
e
N
r
.
D
a
t
e
Title:Sheet:Description 1/8" = 1'-0"
2
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
6
1
1
:
3
8
:
1
1
A
M
05EXTERIORELEVATIONSCheckerJW13LIPC.0009.000
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
1
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
W
E
S
T
1
/
8
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
2
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
-
N
O
R
T
H
CUP SUBMITTAL
0
2
/
2
5
/
2
0
1
6
CITY OF ANAHEIM
ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM
CLASS 32 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION
INFILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS**
CASE NO.: DEV2015-00122 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05841 VARIANCE NO. 2016-05063
PROJECT APPLICANT: Matthew Rattner
Associated Microbreweries, LTD 5985 Santa Fe Street
San Diego, CA 92109
Matt.rattner@karlstrauss.com
PROJECT ADDRESS: 2390 East Orangewood Avenue
APN(s): 232-011-32
PROJECT LOCATION:
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
SURROUNDING LAND USES AND SETTING: This 2.0-acre property is developed with a five-story
office building and is located in the “C-G” General Commercial and the “PTMU” Platinum Triangle
Mixed Use Overlay zones. The General Plan designates the property for Mixed Use land uses. Surrounding land uses include Anaheim Stadium across Orangewood Avenue to the north, a fire
department training facility across Rampart Street to the east, an office building to the south, and
industrial businesses to the west. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant proposes the sale and on-site consumption of beer and wine at a new restaurant and brewery. Karl Strauss Brewing Company would be located in an 11,285 square foot tenant space within the Anaheim Corporate Office Plaza. The restaurant would be 10,155 square feet
with a 1,130 square foot outdoor patio. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: Mixed Use
ZONING: “C-G” General Commercial and the “PTMU” Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zones
INFORMATION DEMONSTRATING THAT THE PROJECT SATISFIES THE CONDITIONS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 15332 OF TITLE 14 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF
REGULATIONS:
1. Is the project consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general
plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations?
The proposed restaurant and brewery is consistent with the goals and objectives of the General Plan by adding to vitality of the Platinum Triangle as “a thriving economic center that provides residents, visitors and employees with a variety of housing, employment, shopping and
entertainment opportunities”. 2. Is the proposed development located within the City limits on a project site of no more than five
acres substantially surrounded by urban uses?
The 2.0-acre property is located in the City of Anaheim and is currently developed with a
commercial office building. Surrounding land uses include Anaheim Stadium across Orangewood Avenue to the north, a fire department training facility across Rampart Street to the
east, an office building to the south, and industrial businesses to the west.
3. Does the project site have value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species?
The project site is currently developed with commercial uses and has no habitat value for endangered, rare or threatened species.
4. Would approval of the project result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality?
a. Traffic:
Construction - There would be a temporary minor increase in traffic due to construction vehicles during the construction phase. However, this impact would be temporary. No significant impacts
would occur.
Operation - The proposed project consists of the establishment of a new restaurant and brewery
in a commercial office building. The City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines state that a traffic
study is required when a project is expected to generate 100 or more new vehicle trips in the AM or PM peak hour. Based on a Trip Generation Study prepared by Linscott, Law & Greenspan,
Engineers (LLG), dated February 11, 2016, the new restaurant and brewery is estimated to
generate a maximum of 57 new peak hour trips. As such, a traffic study was not required nor prepared. Neither roadway segments nor immediately surrounding intersections are anticipated to
be significantly impacted as a result of the additional trips from the Proposed Project. b. Noise:
Construction The Project would generate temporary noise during construction activities. Equipment used during construction could create noise impacts through the duration of the
construction process. However, these impacts are temporary and would cease upon completion of construction. Chapter 6.70 of the City’s noise ordinance exempts construction noise between the hours of 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m., Monday through Saturday. Adherence to the City Noise
ordinance would result in no significant impacts.
Operation The Project is a commercial development that, when constructed, would generate noise
impacts consistent with those of surrounding land uses. No significant impacts would occur.
c. Air Quality:
The Project site is located within SoCAB which is characterized by relatively poor air quality and
is a Federal- and State-designated nonattainment area for O3, PM10 and PM2.5 (US EPA 2012). SCAQMD has established significance thresholds for both construction and operational activities relative to these criteria pollutants. Based on the following analysis, implementation of the
Project would result in less than significant impacts relative to the daily significance thresholds for criteria air pollutant construction emissions established by the SCAQMD.
Construction - The proposal consists of the construction of a 400 square foot expansion of the building for the patio, and associated tenant improvements to construct a 10,155 square feet restaurant with a 1,130 square foot outdoor patio on a 2.0-acre parcel. General construction
activities, can contribute to air pollutants. All construction activities would comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 (SCAQMD 2005) regarding the control of fugitive dust emissions, and
existing City dust suppression practices that minimize dust and other emissions. Such controls
include frequent watering of the site, the covering and/or wetting of trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil or other loose materials off-site, street sweeping, as needed, to remove dirt dropped by
construction vehicles or mud that would otherwise be carried off by trucks departing the site,
suspending grading and excavation activities in high winds (25 miles per hour [mph] or more) as well as implementation of a traffic control plan to minimize traffic flow interference from
construction activities, etc., that would be incorporated into the construction plans. Construction is conservatively anticipated to last 4 months and construction would be broken into
three phases: demolition, grading, and building construction (which consists of building construction, paving, and architectural coating).
Pollutant emissions resulting from Project construction activities were calculated using the CalEEMod model. Construction emissions are based on conservative assumptions, which imply a default equipment mix and a worst-case construction schedule. As shown in Table 1, entitled
“Project-Related Construction and Operational Emissions,” the incremental increase in emissions
from Project construction activities fall well below SCAQMD significance thresholds for regional
emissions.
Operation - The Project’s incremental increase in regional emissions resulting from operation of
the Project would not exceed any SCAQMD thresholds. Mobile source emission calculations
utilize the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) rate calculated by CalEEMod, based on the specific proposed land use and intensity. The daily VMT rate is based on the number of daily trips for
each land use and applied to a commute percentage and an average trip length, both of which are land use specific values derived from CalEEMod. These values account for variations in trip frequency and length associated with commuting to and from the Project. Emission factors
specific to the buildout year are projected based on SoCAB-specific fleet turnover rates and the impact of future emission standards and fuel efficiency standards. The increase in the consumption of fossil fuels to provide power, heat, and ventilation was considered in the
calculations as stationary point source emissions. Future fuel consumption rates are estimated based on land use specific energy consumption rates. The emission factors used in this analysis represent a State-wide average of known power producing facilities, utilizing various
technologies and emission control strategies, and do not take into account any unique emissions profile. At this time, these emission factors are considered conservative and representative. Area
source emissions were calculated by CalEEMod and include emissions from natural gas and
landscape fuel combustion, consumer products, and architectural coatings (future maintenance). As shown in Table 1, the operational emissions pollutant concentrations resulting from Project
operation would not exceed SCAQMD thresholds. Therefore, air quality impacts would be less
than significant.
Table 1 Project-Related Construction and Operational Emissions
Mass Daily Thresholds (pounds per day)
VOC NOx CO SO2 PM10 PM2.5 Construction Emissions SCAQMD Threshold 75 100 550 150 150 55
2016 Project Emissions 9 3 2.5 4.17 0.28 0.22 Exceed Threshold? NO NO NO NO NO NO Operational Emissions
SCAQMD Threshold 55 55 550 150 150 55 Project Emissions 0.4 0.8 0.7 4.79 .06 .06
Exceed Threshold? NO NO NO NO NO NO
Source of emissions: CalEEMod 2013.2.2 Source of thresholds: SCAQMD
Regional emissions refer to the ambient conditions surrounding the site. Therefore, pollutant
emissions associated with construction of the Project would be less than significant. Operational related impacts are typically associated with emissions produced from Project-
generated vehicle trips. Based on the Project’s anticipated compliance with SCAQMD Rule
403 and the scale of development, it is anticipated that no significant impacts would occur to existing air quality standards.
d. Water Quality:
Grading and construction associated with site work on the project site would result in temporary
disturbance of surface soils, which could potentially result in erosion and sedimentation on site, which are major visible water quality impacts attributable to construction activities. Any
stockpiles of excavated areas would be susceptible to high rates of erosion from wind and rain
and, if not manage properly, could result in increased sedimentation in local drainage ways.
The Project must comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination
System (NPDES) MS4 Permit. The NPDES MS4 Permit Program, which is administered in the
project area by the City of Anaheim and County of Orange, issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB), helps control water pollution by regulating point
sources that discharge pollutants into receiving waters. Project operation must also comply with the NPDES General Construction Permit.
The contractor would be required to comply with Chapter 10.09 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, which prohibits the active or passive discharge or disposal of soil or construction debris into the storm drain. Additionally, the Project would be required to obtain coverage under the General
Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ). Construction activities subject to the Construction General Permit includes clearing, grading, and disturbances to ground such as stockpiling or
excavation. The Construction General Permit requires implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would generally contain a site map showing
the construction perimeter, existing and proposed buildings, storm water collection and discharge
points, general pre- and post-construction topography, drainage patterns across the site, and adjacent roadways.
The SWPPP must also include project construction features designed to protect against stormwater runoff, known as Best Management Practices (BMPs). Additionally, the SWPPP
must contain a visual monitoring program; a chemical monitoring program for “non-visible” pollutants, should the BMPs fail; and a sediment monitoring plan, should the site discharge directly into a water body listed on the 303(d) list for sediment. Section A of the Construction
General Permit describes the elements that must be contained in the SWPPP. Incorporation of these policies and ordinances and the requirements contained within would reduce project impacts to less than significant.
5. Can the project site be adequately served by all required utilities and public services?
a. Fire Protection, b. Police Protection:
The construction of the new restaurant and brewery would not generate additional demand on police or fire services. Building plans submitted for new development on the project site would
be required to comply with fire safety requirements. Additionally, development of the project site
would not result in the need for new or physically altered police or fire protection facilities. Impacts to police and fire services would be less than significant.
c. Schools, d. Parks, e. Other Public Facilities:
The Proposed Project would include the construction of a new restaurant and brewery. The commercial use will not have an impact on school services, park services or other public
facilities, including the Anaheim Public Library system.
e. Wastewater/Sewer:
The Project would be served by the Anaheim Public Works Department for wastewater (Sanitary Sewer) collection service. The Project is located within a developed area and there is an existing
Public wastewater (Sanitary Sewer) main in Rampart, adjacent to the Project. The project would
be required to connect to this existing wastewater (Sanitary Sewer) line. The existing wastewater facilities are not identified as deficient in the “Existing” condition in the latest Combined Central
Anaheim Area Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers. However, it is identified as deficient in the Platinum Triangle Build-Out Plan “Buildout”. Due to the small size of the project, there is no reasonable possibility that this project will result in that deficiency being triggered, and no
significant impacts on existing wastewater infrastructure would occur. Existing facilities would be adequate to serve the wastewater collection requirements of the Project. Impacts to wastewater treatment facilities (OCSD) would be less than significant.
f. Storm Water Drainage:
On-site grading and drainage improvements proposed in conjunction with the proposed site work would be required to meet the City’s and Orange County Flood Control District’s flood control
criteria including design discharges, design/construction standards and maintenance features. All
new development projects in the City are also required to include specific design Best Management Practices to ensure that no stormwater runoff generated on site would be allowed to
leave the site without pre-treatment for urban pollutants. The Project would not alter any
drainage pattern in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite. The Project would not involve an alteration of the course of a stream or river. Erosion and siltation
impacts potentially resulting from the project would, for the most part, occur during the Project’s site preparation phase. Implementation of the NPDES permit requirements, as they apply to the site, would reduce potential erosion, siltation, and water quality impacts. Less than significant
impacts would occur. g. Water Supplies:
The City of Anaheim receives water from two main sources: the Orange County Groundwater Basin, which is managed by the Orange County Water District (OCWD), and imported water
from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). Groundwater is pumped from 18 active wells located within the City, and imported water is delivered to the City through
seven treated water connections and one untreated connection.
According to the City of Anaheim 2010 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), local
groundwater has been the least expensive and most reliable source of water supply for the City.
The City depends heavily on the groundwater from the Orange County Groundwater Basin each year. The Project includes the construction of a new restaurant and brewery in an existing
commercial tenant space. Due to the similar size of the project, the supply of local water needed to support the use is not substantial. Therefore, the production rates of local wells would not be significantly impacted. The Project would also result in similar amounts of impervious surfaces
than what currently exist on the site. Therefore, the development would not result in a significant deficit in aquifer volume or a lowering of the local groundwater table. Less than significant
impacts to groundwater supplies would occur.
i. Solid Waste Disposal:
Assembly Bill 939 requires local jurisdictions to divert at least 50 percent of their solid waste into recycling. As of 2012, the City is diverting approximately 65 percent of its waste into recycling.
Waste from the City is currently being diverted to the Olinda Alpha Landfill in the City of Brea
and the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill in the City of Irvine. Combined, the two landfills accept approximately 23,500 tons of waste per day, or over seven million tons annually. The project’s
contribution of solid waste would be minimal and would not significantly impact landfill operations. No significant impacts would occur.
j. Electricity: k. Natural Gas: l. Telephone Service: m. Television Service: The Project site is located in a built-out, urban setting. The site and the surrounding commercial
properties are fully served by various utility service providers. There are no anticipated significant service or system upgrades needed to serve the proposed commercial use. Any increase in demand for these services would be considered to be less than significant.
** Authority: See Public Resources Code Section 21083 and Section 15332 of Title 14 of the California
Code of Regulations.
DETERMINATION:
I find that the answers given above are adequately supported by the information sources cited following each question and that the effects of the Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects
(i.e., Class 32 – Infill Development Projects) characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions
of Section 15332 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. The Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement for the
preparation of environmental documents under the California Environmental Quality Act.
3/10/16 Signature of City of Anaheim Representative Date
Christine Saunders, Associate Planner (714) 765-5238 Printed Name, Title Phone Number
From:Avery Robinson
To:Amy K. Vazquez
Cc:John Tierney; Eleanor Heng; Lynda Savoit
Subject:Comment on Projects Affecting Parking Near 2390 E. Orangewood Ave, Anaheim for Public Hearing on March21
Date:Tuesday, March 15, 2016 12:51:39 PM
Attachments:image003.png
Good afternoon Amy,
While Orange County’s Credit Union is not opposed to the proposed parking zoning exception, we
would like to offer the following comment:
Attention Planning Commission:
Orange County’s Credit Union has been a tenant of 2390 Orangewood since 2004 and has recently
signed a lease amendment for an additional five years. Our members (customers), who are mostly
nearby residents or employees of local businesses, require short term parking to be able to conduct
their financial transactions at our establishment in Suite 106. With the establishment of the private
business school (Bristol University), parking has already become more difficult for our members. The
introduction of a restaurant into the space will create even more parking issues. While the Credit
Union will enjoy the benefits of these tenant neighbors, we offer the following suggestions to assist
with parking for our membership, who are members of the community. Solutions for consideration
are:
· Designate 15 spaces for short term parking of 20-30 minutes near the Credit Union’s
entrance
· Utilize valet parking, if possible, at the restaurant and park patrons’ vehicles in a nearby lot
· Students at Bristol University, who are usually at class for longer periods of time, could
utilize designated parking in other areas of the campus
We appreciate the opportunity to comment.
Sincerely,
Avery Robinson
Vice President Organizational Development
Orange County’s Credit Union
(714) 755-5900 ext. 7470
www.orangecountyscu.org
Notice: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may containconfidential information. Unless stated otherwise, any opinions or comments are personal to the writerand may not reflect the official view of the Credit Union. If you are not the intended recipient or believethat you have received this e-mail in error, please do not print, copy, disseminate, or otherwise use it
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 4
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: MARCH 21, 2016
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05824 AND
VARIANCE NO. 2016-05064
LOCATION: 2390 East Orangewood Avenue, Suite 105 (Bristol University)
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Lourdes Cruz, representing Bristol University. The property owner is the Anaheim Corporate Office Plaza.
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to
retain a private business school within an existing office building with fewer parking
spaces than required by the Zoning Code. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from
further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act
(Class 1, Existing Facilities) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05824 and Variance No. 2016-05064.
BACKGROUND: This 2.0-acre property is developed with a five-story office
building and is located in the “C-G” General Commercial Zone and the “PTMU”
Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone. The General Plan designates the property for Mixed Use land uses. Surrounding land uses include Angel Stadium across Orangewood Avenue to the north, a fire department training facility across
Rampart Street to the east, an office building to the south, and industrial businesses
to the west. The subject five story office building is one of five buildings within the
Anaheim Corporate Plaza. This application was filed in response to a Code Enforcement complaint received regarding this business school operating without the proper permits.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05824 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05064
March 21, 2016 Page 2 of 5
PROPOSAL: The applicant requests approval of a conditional use permit to continue to operate a
business school on the first floor of an existing five-story office building. Bristol University offers
associate, bachelor and master level academic programs that are designed for working and non-
working adults and are conducted at an accelerated pace. Classes are provided on-campus and on-line. The facility would have up to eight instructors teaching classes from 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. or from 1:00 p.m. to 5:00 p.m., four days a week. The maximum number of students on-site at one time would
be 40. In addition, there would be two administrative staff members at the school from 8:00 a.m. to
5:00 p.m., Monday through Friday.
The floor plan indicates that the 4,300 square foot tenant space would include seven classrooms, a library, a student lounge, a faculty room, and an area for student services. No changes are
proposed to the exterior of the building or the property.
Parking would be accommodated in the parking lot adjacent to the office building and within the surrounding parking lots that serve tenants in Anaheim Corporate Plaza. However, these areas cannot fully accommodate Code required parking; and, therefore, a parking variance has been
requested.
FLOOR PLAN
LIBRARY
ROOM
1
ROOM
2 and 3 ROOM 4
ROOM 5
ROOM
6
ROOM 7
STUDENT
LOUNGE
STUDENT
SERVICES
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05824 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05064
March 21, 2016 Page 3 of 5
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS:
Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit,
it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist:
1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is
authorized by this code;
2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the
full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the
particular area or health and safety;
4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and
5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if
any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of
Anaheim.
The Zoning Code requires approval of a conditional use permit for “Educational Uses-Business” to ensure that the uses are appropriate for the site, compatible with surrounding land
uses, and in compliance with Zoning Code requirements. The school blends in seamlessly with
the other office uses in the building and has not had an impact to surrounding businesses. There
are a maximum of 40 students at the facility at one time and many of the students participate in on-line education. The tenant space for the business school is 4,300 square feet, which is more than adequate to accommodate up to eight instructors and 40 students in a manner that is not
detrimental to the area. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this request.
Parking Variance: Before the Planning Commission may approve a parking variance, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that the following conditions exist:
1) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not cause fewer off-
street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of
such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under
the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use;
2) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the
immediate vicinity of the proposed use;
3) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the
demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the
immediate vicinity of the proposed use;
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05824 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05064
March 21, 2016 Page 4 of 5
4) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic
congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed
use; and
5) That the variance, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use.
The Zoning Code requires that parking demand be calculated by combining the needs of the
educational uses, office, medical, financial services and restaurant uses within the Anaheim
Corporate Plaza. A total of 1,256 parking spaces are required, and 1,249 spaces are proposed, as shown in the below table.
Code Requirement Floor Area (s.f.) Spaces Required Proposed Spaces
Office
4 spaces per 1,000 s.f. for buildings 3 stories or lower
3 spaces per 1,000 s.f. for buildings more than 3 stories
97,706 345
Medical 6 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 13,511 81
Educational
Services
.82 spaces per student, or 20 spaces per 1,000 s.f. plus 4 spaces per 1,000 s.f. of office 25,719 244
Financial
Services 5.5 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 3,882 21
Restaurant
(proposed Karl Strauss) 8 spaces per 1,000 s.f. 11,885 95
Vacant Office
4 spaces per 1,000 s.f for buildings 3 stories or lower
3 spaces per 1,000 s.f. for buildings more than 3 stories
148,348 470
TOTAL 301,051 1,256 1,249
A parking study (Attachment No. 3), prepared by Linscott Law and Greenspan Engineers, dated January 12, 2016, was submitted in order to analyze the parking demand of the entire Anaheim
Corporate Plaza office complex. The current tenant mix and the vacant office space were
analyzed for the five buildings with a total of 301,051 square feet. The study concluded that
peak weekday parking demand was for 1,099 spaces that when compared to the 1,249 provided space results in a surplus of 150 spaces. The weekend peak parking demand is 339 spaces, which results in a surplus of 910 spaces. The study also indicates that the uses within the office
complex experience peak parking demands at different times of the day. Staff believes that the
number of parking spaces proposed would be adequate to accommodate the proposed business
school without impact to the surrounding public streets or properties due to fact that class times are staggered and the surplus of parking spaces identified by the parking study during the peak hours of the office complex.
A Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions (CC&R’s) would be required under a
condition of approval in the draft resolution (Attachment No. 1), to memorialize the vehicular access and parking reciprocal rights for all the properties within the Anaheim Corporate Plaza.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05824 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05064
March 21, 2016 Page 5 of 5
Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the
effects of the proposed project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e.,
Class 1 – Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration
of existing public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15301 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a
significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the
provisions of CEQA.
CONCLUSION: Staff believes that the conditions exist for Planning Commission to make the required findings to approve this request. The business school would be compatible with the
land uses in the surrounding area. Additionally, the number of parking spaces being proposed
would be adequate to accommodate all of the businesses within the office complex, including the
proposed use. Staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by,
Amy Vazquez Jonathan E. Borrego Contract Planner, Lilley Planning Group Planning Services Manager
Attachments: 1. Draft Conditional Use Permit and Variance Resolution
2. Letter of Request
3. Parking Study
4. Plans 5. Photographs
PR (PTMU)StadiumANGEL STADIUMOF ANAHEIM
PR (PTMU)OrangewoodNORTH NET FIRETRAINING CENTER
C-G (PTMU)OrangewoodOFFICES
I (PTMU)OrangewoodIND. FIRM
C-G (PTMU)OrangewoodOFFICES
O-L (PTMU)OrangewoodOFFICES
O-L (PTMU)OrangewoodOFFICES
I (PTMU)OrangewoodIND. FIRM
I (PTMU)OrangewoodIND. FIRM
S
D U P O N T
D R S
R
A
M
PA
RTST
S T O W N E C E N T R E P L
S TOWNE CENTRE PL
E ORANGEWOODAVE
E. KATELLA AVE
E. ORANGEWOOD AVE
E. CHAPMAN AVE
E. GENE AUTRY WAY
2390 East Orangewood Avenue
DEV No. 2015-00099
Subject Property APN: 232-011-32
°0 50 100
Feet
Aerial Photo:May 2014
S
D U P O N T
D R S
R
A
M
PA
RTST
S T O W N E C E N T R E P L
S TOWNE CENTRE PL
E ORANGEWOODAVE
E. KATELLA AVE
E. ORANGEWOOD AVE
E. CHAPMAN AVE
E. GENE AUTRY WAY
2390 East Orangewood Avenue
DEV No. 2015-00099
Subject Property APN: 232-011-32
°0 50 100
Feet
Aerial Photo:May 2014
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1
- 1 - PC2016-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05824 AND VARIANCE NO. 2016-05064 AND
MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2015-00099)
(2390 EAST ORANGEWOOD AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission")
did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05824 and Variance
No. 2016-05064 to permit a private business school within an office building to include the
following land use entitlements: (i) a conditional use permit to permit a private business school within an existing office building; and (ii) a variance to permit less parking spaces than required by the Zoning Code (herein referred to collectively as the "Proposed Project") at 2390 East
Orangewood Avenue, Suite 105 in the City of Anaheim (the "Premises"). The Premises is
located on the first floor within an existing office building on that certain real property generally
depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 2.0 acres in size, developed with an office
building and is located at 2390 East Orangewood Avenue. The Land Use Element of the
Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for “M-U” Mixed Use land uses. The Property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial Zone and the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU)
Overlay Zone. Generally, the development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.20
(Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the
"Code") supersede the regulations of the underlying zone, i.e., that of the “C-G” General
Commercial Zone. However, the provisions of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) do not apply to parcels that have been, or are proposed to be, developed
entirely under the “C-G” General Commercial Zone. Therefore, the Premises is subject to the
zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code;
and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on March 21, 2016 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional
Use Permit No. 2015-05824 and Variance No. 2016-05064, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA
Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the
preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
- 2 - PC2016-***
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the
Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 1 –
Existing Facilities) which consist of the repair, maintenance, and/or minor alteration of existing
public or private structures or facilities, involving negligible or no expansion of use beyond that existing at the time of this determination. Section 15301 (Existing Facilities) of the CEQA Guidelines provides examples of projects that might qualify for an exemption from the
provisions of CEQA. The one example that is applicable to the Proposed Project is for:
“(a) Interior or exterior alterations involving such things as interior partitions, plumbing, and electrical conveyances;”
The Proposed Project meets the criteria of Section 15301 of the CEQA Guidelines, and will not
cause a significant effect on the environment. The Proposed Project is, therefore, categorically
exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05824, does find and
determine the following facts: 1. The proposed request to permit a private business school at the Premises is within
that class of primary uses, i.e., Educational Institutions- Business, which is subject to a
conditional use permit authorized under Table 8-A of Section 18.08.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.08
(Commercial Zones) of the Code. 2. The proposed conditional use permit, as conditioned herein, would not adversely
affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed
to be located because the school would be fully contained within the existing office building with
no outdoor activities proposed. No expansion or other physical changes to the exterior of the building are proposed.
3. The size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full development
of the proposed project in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and
safety because the facilities on the Property will adhere to all required land use standards.
4. The traffic generated by the proposed project will not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the
traffic generated by this use will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic on the surrounding
streets. 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not
be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the proposed
project will be compatible with the surrounding area through conditions of approval for the use
and is not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
- 3 - PC2016-***
WHEREAS, based upon the parking study submitted by the applicant and
observations made by staff, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the
request for Variance No. 2016-05064 for less parking than required by the Code should be
approved for the following reasons: SECTION NO. 18.42.040 Minimum number of parking spaces.
(1,256 spaces required; 1,249 spaces proposed)
1. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not cause fewer
off-street parking spaces to be provided for the Property, including the proposed business school,
than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to all uses at
the Property under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such uses;
2. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the
demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of
the proposed use because the on-site parking will adequately accommodate the peak parking
demands of all combined uses on the site;
3. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not increase the
demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate
vicinity of the Property because the on-site parking for the office complex uses, will adequately
accommodate peak parking demands of all uses on the site;
4. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not increase
traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the Property because the
Property provides adequate ingress and egress points, which are designed to allow for adequate
on-site circulation; and
5. The variance for the Property, under the conditions imposed, will not impede
vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate
vicinity of the Property because the Property has existing ingress or egress access points that are
designed to allow adequate on-site circulation and, therefore, will not impede vehicular ingress
to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the Property.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it.
- 4 - PC2016-***
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05824 and Variance No. 2016-05064, contingent
upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property under Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05824 and Variance No. 2016-05064 in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the
City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted
in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of
approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant
progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of March 21, 2016. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in
Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and
may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 5 - PC2016-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on March 21, 2016, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of March, 2016.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 6 - PC2016-***
- 7 - PC2016-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05824 AND
VARIANCE NO. 2016-05064 (DEV2015-00099)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
WITHIN 60 DAYS OF PLANNING COMMISSION APPROVAL
1 The applicant/property owner of the subject property shall enter
into a Declaration of Covenants, Conditions and Restrictions, in a
form satisfactory to the City Attorney, which shall be recorded in
the Official Records of the County of Orange, to provide reciprocal vehicular access and parking agreements for all parcels
within the office complex.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS
2 The building shall be equipped with an alarm system (silent or
audible).
Police Department
3 Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application, Form APD 516, and return it to the Police Department prior to initial alarm activation. This form is available at the Police Department
front counter, or it can be downloaded from the following web
site: http://www.anaheim.net/article.asp?id=678
Police Department
4 All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g.
deadbolt locks.
Police Department
OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS
5 No required parking area shall be fenced-off or otherwise enclosed
for outdoor storage uses.
Planning and Building
Department,
Code Enforcement
Division
6 The business school shall be operated in accordance with the
Statement of Operations submitted as part of this application. Any
changes to the business operation as described in that document
shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with the Letter of Request and
to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
7 Adequate lighting of parking lots, driveway, circulation areas,
aisles, passageways, recesses and grounds contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient wattage to provide
adequate illumination to make clearly visible the presence of any
person on or about the premises during the hours of darkness and
provide a safe, secure environment for all persons, property, and
vehicles on-site.
Police Department
- 8 - PC2016-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
8 The applicant shall be responsible for maintaining the area
adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon
the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the
licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being
applied.
Planning and Building
Department,
Code Enforcement Division
GENERAL CONDITIONS
9 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the
processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building
permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all
charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or
may result in the revocation of the approval of this application.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
10 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City
and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively
referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from
any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the
proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to
the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or
validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by
Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including
without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and
expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
11 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the
applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services Division
City of Anaheim, Planning Division
200 S. Anaheim Blvd, Suite 162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Letter of Operations
2130 N. Orangewood Ave Suite 105
Anaheim, CA 92806
Dear Sir,
Bristol University began teaching courses in Paralegal and Hospitality as Kensington College in 1991. As the
need to for students to pursue a degree was requested, Kensington College began doing business as Bristol
University in 2003.
Bristol University (BU) offers an Associate Degree in Business Administration, Bachelors of Science Degree
and an MBA. We are an accredited institution who is VA approved along with approval with SEVIS. Sixty
percent of the student body are international students who are here to study for their MBA.
Bristol University offers classes in a traditional classroom setting at 2390 E. Orangewood Suite 105, Anaheim
and offers classes online. Classes are taught in Suite 105 four days a week from 8:30 a.m to 12:30 or from 1:00
p.m to 5:00 pm. There are a total of eight faculty members the 4 days a week teaching either in the morning or
afternoon. No eight instructors are in the building in each session. There are over 4,300 sq feet in space to
accomodate 36 students in the morning from 8:30 a.m. to 12:30 p.m. and 40 in the afternoon from 1:00 p.m. to
5:00 p.m.. The hours of operation are from 8:00 a.m through 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday. There are two
administrative staff members working from 8:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. Monday through Friday.
If the City of Anaheim requires additional information, please contact the undersigned.
Thank you for your consideration.
Lourdes Cruz
Director of Campus Operations
Bristol Universtiy
2390 E. Orangewood Suite 485 & 105
Anaheim, CA 92806
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
January 12, 2016
Mr. Parke Miller
Lincoln Property Company
5 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 120
Santa Ana, CA 92707
LLG Reference No. 2.15.3571.1
Subject: Revised Parking Demand Analysis for Anaheim Corporate Plaza
Anaheim, California
Dear Mr. Miller:
As requested, Linscott, Law, & Greenspan, Engineers (LLG) is pleased to submit this
Revised Parking Demand Analysis associated with Anaheim Corporate Plaza (herein
referred to as Project). The existing office park is located on south of Orangewood
Avenue and west of Rampart Street, and addressed at 2121, 2150, 2170, and 2190
Towne Centre Place and 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue in the City of Anaheim,
California.
Anaheim Corporate Plaza consists of five (5) buildings with a total floor area of
301,051 square-feet (SF). The current tenant mix, which occupies 140,818 SF,
includes a mixture of office, medical office, educational services and financial
services uses. The remaining floor area at Anaheim Corporate Plaza totals 160,233
SF, of which 148,348 SF is vacant office-designated floor area that will remain as
office. The Project is proposing to occupy 11,885 SF of vacant space within Suite
100 of building 2390 with a sit-down restaurant use. The proposed parking supply
on-site totals 1,249 spaces.
A parking study has been required by the City of Anaheim to evaluate the parking
requirements and operational needs of the office park at future full occupancy. This
report evaluates those needs based on application of City code and further application
of the Urban Land Institute’s (ULI) Shared Parking methodology.
Our method of analysis, findings, and recommendations are detailed in the following
sections of this report. Briefly, we find the following:
The proposed parking supply on the site totals 1,249 spaces.
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 2
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
A “code” calculation for full occupancy of the existing plaza with occupancy
of 11,885 SF of vacant floor area within Suite 100 of Building 2390 with food
use and the remaining tenant mix requires 1,256 spaces, resulting in a parking
shortfall of 7 spaces.
A shared parking analysis using city code ratios along with ULI parking
profiles yields a peak weekday parking demand of 1,099 spaces that when
compared to the 1,249 provided spaces results in a surplus of 150 spaces; the
weekend peak parking demand totals 339 spaces, which results in a surplus of
910 spaces.
PROJECT LOCATION AND DESCRIPTION
Anaheim Corporate Plaza is located on the southwest corner of Orangewood Avenue
and Rampart Street, and addressed at 2121, 2150, 2170, and 2190 Town Centre Place
and 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue in the City of Anaheim, California. Figure 1,
located at the rear of this letter report, presents a Vicinity Map, which illustrates the
general location of the Project site in the context of the surrounding street system.
Figure 2 presents the existing aerial photograph of the site that illustrates the existing
buildings and parking areas. Anaheim Corporate Plaza consists of the following five
(5) buildings with a total floor area of 301,051 SF.
2121 Towne Centre Place – 48,445 SF
2150 Towne Centre Place – 48,575 SF
2170 Towne Centre Place – 50,055 SF
2190 Towne Centre Place – 47,955 SF
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue – 106,021 SF
Table 1, located at the end of this letter report, following the figures, summarizes the
existing land uses/tenants and associated floor areas for Anaheim Corporate Plaza,
and identified the proposed mix of uses for the vacancies. A review of Table 1
indicates that the current tenant mix, which occupies 140,818 SF, includes a mixture
of office, medical office, educational services and financial services uses.
The educational services includes Real Estate Trainers, Inc. (Suite 100 of Building
100), Bristol University (which will occupy Suite 105, 470, 475 and 485 of Building
2390 that was formerly occupied by Kensington Colleges) and US Colleges (which
will occupy Suite 200 of Building 2390 that was formerly occupied by Medtech
Educational). The following table summarizes the operational characteristics of the
above-mentioned educational uses:
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 3
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
2170-100 14
2390-105 3
2390-470
2390-475
2390-485
2390-200 4
Suite Tenant Classrooms # of Students/classroom # of teachers AdministrationTime
1/classroom
Library 10
US Colleges Monday - Friday 8:00 am - 6: 00 pm Total 2 10/classroom
1
Classroom 6 12 1
Classroom 7 18
1
Classroom 4 6 1
overall hours 8:00 am - 10:00 pm Classroom 5 12
1
1:00 pm - 5:00 pm Classroom 2 10 1
5:30 pm - 9:30 pm Classroom 3 10
1Bristol University Monday - Friday 8:30 am - 12:30 pm Classroom 1 12
Class schedule
1/classroom
Days
RET (Testing only)Monday-Friday 6:00 pm - 10:30 pm Total 2 25/classroom
Saturday-Sunday 8:00 am - 5:00 pm Total 2 60/classroom
The operational characteristics of these educational uses are utilized in the forecast of
the parking demand for each of the uses.
The remaining floor area at Anaheim Corporate Plaza totals 160,233 SF, of which
148,348 SF is vacant office space to remain as office. The Project is proposing to
occupy 11,885 SF of vacant space within Suite 100 of building 2390 with a sit-down
restaurant. The proposed parking supply on-site totals 1,249 spaces.
PARKING SUPPLY-DEMAND ANALYSIS
This parking analysis for the Anaheim Corporate Plaza involves determining the
expected parking needs, based on the size and type of proposed development
components, versus the parking supply. Typically, there are two methods that can be
used to estimate the site’s peak parking needs. These methods have been used in this
analysis and include:
Application of City code requirements (which typically treats each tenancy
type as a “stand alone” use at maximum demand).
Application of shared parking usage patterns by time-of-day (which
recognizes that the parking demand for each tenancy type varies by time of
day and day of week). The shared parking analysis starts with a code
calculation for each tenancy type.
The shared parking methodology is concluded to be applicable to a development such
as the Anaheim Corporate Plaza because the individual land use types (i.e., office,
medical office, educational services, financial services, office storage, restaurant, etc.)
experience peak demands at different times of the day.
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 4
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
CODE PARKING REQUIREMENTS
The code parking calculation for Anaheim Corporate Plaza with the proposed Project
is based on the City’s requirements as outlined in Chapter 18.42.040 – Non-
Residential Parking Requirements of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code. The
City’s Municipal Code specifies the following parking requirements:
Office: 4 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA for buildings 3 stories or lower; 3
spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA for buildings of more than 3 stories.
Medical/Dental: 6 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA.
Educational Services: 0.82 spaces per student, or 20 spaces per 1,000 SF of
GFA for instruction area, whichever results in a greater number of spaces plus
4 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA for office area.
Financial Services: 5.5 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA.
Eating Establishments: 8 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA if integrated into a
planned development complex.
Table 2 presents the existing code parking requirements for only occupied floor areas
at the plaza, then for the proposed Project, and then combined for the entire plaza. As
shown, direct application of City parking codes to the existing and proposed mix of uses
of Anaheim Corporate Plaza results in a total parking requirement of 1,256 parking
spaces. With a parking supply of 1,249 spaces, a theoretical code shortfall of 7 spaces is
indicated.
However, the specific tenancy mix of Anaheim Corporate Plaza provides an opportunity
to share parking spaces based on the utilization profile of each included land use
component. The following section calculates the parking requirements for Anaheim
Corporate Plaza based on the shared parking methodology approach.
SHARED PARKING ANALYSIS
Shared Parking Methodology
Accumulated experience in parking demand characteristics indicates that a mixing of
land uses results in an overall parking need that is less than the sum of the individual
peak requirements for each land use. Due to the existing and proposed mixed-use
characteristics of Anaheim Corporate Plaza, opportunities to share parking now occur
and can be expected to continue with full occupancy. The objective of this shared
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 5
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
parking analysis is to forecast the peak parking requirements for the project based on
the combined demand patterns of different tenancy types at the site.
Shared parking calculations recognize that different uses often experience individual
peak parking demands at different times of day, or days of the week. When uses
share common parking footprints, the total number of spaces needed to support the
collective whole is determined by adding parking profiles (by time of day for
weekdays versus weekend days), rather than individual peak ratios as represented in
the City of Anaheim Zoning Code. In that way, the shared parking approach starts
from the City’s own code ratios and results in the “design level” parking supply needs
of a site.
It should be noted that the “demand” results of the shared parking calculation are
intended to be used directly for comparison to site supply. No further adjustments or
contingency additions are needed because such contingencies are already built into
the peak parking ratios and time of day profiles used in the calculation.
There is an important common element between the traditional "code" and the shared
parking calculation methodologies; the peak parking ratios or "highpoint" for each
land use's parking profile typically equals the "code" parking ratio for that use. The
analytical procedures for shared parking analyses are well documented in the Shared
Parking, 2nd Edition publication by the Urban Land Institute (ULI).
Shared parking calculations for the analysis utilize hourly parking accumulations
developed from field studies of single developments in free-standing settings, where
travel by private auto is maximized. These characteristics permit the means for
calculating peak parking needs when land use types are combined. Further, the
shared parking approach illustrates how, at other than peak parking demand times, an
increasing surplus of spaces will service the overall needs of the plaza.
Key inputs in the shared parking analysis for each land use include:
Peak parking demand by land use for visitors and employees.
Adjustments for alternative modes of transportation, if applicable.
Adjustment for internal capture (captive versus non-captive parking demand),
if applicable.
Hourly variations of parking demand.
Weekday versus weekend adjustment factors.
Monthly adjustment factors to account for variations of parking demand over
the year.
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 6
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
City of Anaheim Parking Ratios outlined in Chapter 18.42.040 – Non-
Residential Parking Requirements of the City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Please note that for this analysis, no monthly adjustment factors to account for variations
of parking demand over the year and no alternative modes of transportation or internal
capture adjustment factors were applied to provide a conservative parking demand
forecast.
Shared Parking Ratios and Profiles
The hourly parking demand profiles (expressed in percent of peak demand) utilized in
this analysis and applied to the Anaheim Corporate Plaza are based on profiles
developed by the Urban Land Institute (ULI) and published in Shared Parking, 2nd
Edition. The ULI publication presents hourly parking demand profiles for four (4)
general land use categories: office, medical/dental, bank and family restaurant.
For general office uses, inclusive of the floor area now allocated to storage use in
Building 2390, the parking profile in the ULI publication was used directly applied to
the City’s Code ratio. Based on the ULI profiles, an office use peak demand occurs
between 10:00 AM–11:00 AM and 2:00 PM–3:00 PM on weekdays, and 11:00 AM–
12:00 PM on weekends.
The medical/dental office profiles were also directly derived from ULI. For
medical/dental office uses, the parking profile in the ULI publication was used
directly applied to the City’s Code ratio of 6 spaces per 1,000 SF. Based on the ULI
profiles, a medical/dental use peak demand occurs between 10:00 AM–12:00 PM and
2:00 PM–4:00 PM on weekdays, and 10:00 AM–12:00 PM on weekends.
The ULI Shared Parking publication does not have a category for educational uses.
Therefore, the parking requirements are derived based on operational characteristics
for each of the individual educational uses, which were identified earlier in this
report. LPC has provided teacher/staffing information along with student and class
schedules for RET, Bristol University and US Colleges. This information was then
tracked by each educational facility by time of day and day of week. The highest
weekday and weekend parking demand was used directly along with the
corresponding profile. Detailed hourly profile information for the educational uses is
provided in Appendix A. Please note that Bristol University currently does not have
classes which operate during evening hours, however, to be conservative all
classrooms were assumed to be fully utilized from 5:30 PM to 9:30 PM consistent
with their proposed hours of operation. According to the peak operations for the
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 7
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
educational facilities the peak demand occurs between 6:00 PM–10:00 PM on
weekdays, and 8:00 AM–5:00 PM weekends.
For bank uses, the parking profile in the ULI publication was used directly applied to
the City’s Code ratio 5.5 spaces per 1,000 SF. Based on the ULI profiles, an office
use peak demand occurs between 10:00 AM–11:00 AM and 5:00 PM–6:00 PM on
weekdays, and 11:00 AM–12:00 PM on weekends.
The family restaurant profiles were also directly derived from ULI. For family
restaurant uses, the parking profile in the ULI publication was used directly applied to
the City’s Code ratio of 8 spaces per 1,000 SF. Based on the ULI profiles, a family
restaurant use peak demand occurs between 12:00 PM–1:00 PM on weekdays and
weekends.
Application of Shared Parking Methodology
Tables 3 and 4 present the weekday and weekend parking demand profiles for
Anaheim Corporate Plaza based on the shared parking methodology, assuming the
proposed tenant mix.
Columns (1) through (6) of Tables 3 and 4 present the parking accumulation
characteristics and parking demand of Anaheim Corporate Plaza for the hours of 6:00
AM to midnight. Column (7) presents the expected joint-use parking demand for the
entire site on an hourly basis, while Column (8) summarizes the hourly parking
surplus/deficiency for the plaza compared to a shared parking supply of 1,249 spaces.
Note that the sizing (floor area) of each land use, and recommended parking rates are
included in the tabular headings of each type. Appendix B contains the weekday and
weekend day shared parking analysis calculation worksheets.
Based on our experience, the shared parking approach summarized in theses tables
are believed to be the most appropriate in evaluating the parking supply-demand
relationships for the Anaheim Corporate Plaza with the proposed Project. The results
in these tables are the focus of this parking investigation and recommendations.
Shared Parking Analysis Results and Conclusions
Review of Tables 3 and 4 indicates that the future full occupancy weekday and
weekend peak parking demands will occur at 2:00 PM and 11:00 AM with peak
demands of 1,099 and 339 spaces, respectively. Based on the parking supply of 1,249
spaces, the peak demand hours on a weekday and weekend will have a surplus of 150
space and 910 spaces, respectively.
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 8
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
Figures 4 and 5 graphically illustrate the weekday and weekend hourly parking
demand forecast for the Project, respectively. Each land use component and its
corresponding hourly Shared Parking demand for various mixes of uses, which were
presented in Tables 3 and 4, are depicted in these two figures relative to a shared
parking supply of 1,249 spaces. A review of these figures indicate that the plaza’s
available parking supply of 1,249 spaces will adequately accommodate the Anaheim
Corporate Plaza’s weekday and weekend hourly shared parking demand of all
existing and future uses, including the proposed Project, for all morning, midday,
afternoon and evening hours.
Given these results, we conclude that there is adequate parking on site to
accommodate full occupancy of the plaza along with re-occupancy of 11,885 SF of
vacant space within Suite 100 of building 2390 with a sit-down restaurant.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS AND CONCLUSIONS
1. Anaheim Corporate Plaza is an existing 301,051 square-foot (SF) corporate plaza
located in Anaheim, California and has a proposed parking supply of 1,249
spaces. At the time of our parking demand field study, the plaza had a current
occupancy of 140,818 SF and a vacancy of 160,233 SF.
2. This parking demand analysis evaluates the existing tenancy condition as well as
with full occupancy of the plaza and a proposed tenant mix.
3. Direct application of City parking codes to the existing mix of uses at Anaheim
Corporate Plaza and the proposed Project results in a total parking requirement of
1,256 parking spaces. With an existing and proposed parking supply of 1,249
spaces, a code shortfall of 7 spaces is calculated.
4. Given the tenancy mix, a shared parking analysis has been prepared and indicates
that the proposed parking supply at Anaheim Corporate Plaza will be sufficient to
meet the projected peak parking demands of existing mix of uses and the proposed
tenant mix. The weekday and weekend scenario results in a minimum surplus of
150 spaces.
* * * * * * * * * *
Mr. Parke Miller
January 12, 2016
Page 9
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
We appreciate the opportunity to prepare this analysis for Anaheim Corporate Plaza.
Should you have any questions or need additional assistance, please do not hesitate to
call Shane Green or me at (949) 825-6175.
Very truly yours,
Linscott, Law & Greenspan, Engineers
Richard E. Barretto, P.E.
Principal
cc: Shane S. Green, P.E., Transportation Engineer III
Attachments
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
TABLE 1
EXISTING AND PROPOSED TENANT/LAND USE SUMMARY1
ANAHEIM CORPORATE PLAZA, ANAHEIM
Address & Suite Tenant Land Use Building Size (SF)
2121 Towne Centre Place
2121-300 Vacant General Office 5,598 SF
2121-310 Vacant General Office 1,868 SF
2121-320 Leasing Office General Office 1,317 SF
2121-330 Easter Seals General Office 1,222 SF
2121-350 Mercury Insurance Services General Office 4,582 SF
2121-370 Easter Seals General Office 2,968 SF
2121-200 Mercury Insurance Services General Office 17,557 SF
2121-100 Concentra Health Services Medical Office 6,998 SF
2121-102 Vacant General Office 214 SF
2121-112 Vacant General Office 1,277 SF
2121-120 Concentra Health Services Medical Office 2,038 SF
2121-130 Geodesign, Inc General Office 2,806 SF
Subtotal 48,445 SF
2150 Towne Centre Place
2150-300 Vacant General Office 17,589 SF
2150-200 Vacant General Office 5,952 SF
2150-210 Vacant General Office 11,779 SF
2150-100 Vacant General Office 2,084 SF
2105-105 DDRM INC General Office 1,398 SF
2150-110 Astiaj Entertainment General Office 603 SF
2150-120 Cystic Fibrosis General Office 3,386 SF
2150-140 Vacant General Office 3,389 SF
2150-150 Vacant General Office 2,395 SF
Subtotal 48,575 SF
2170 Towne Centre Drive
2170-300 Vacant General Office 6,458 SF
2170-320 Vacant General Office 3,316 SF
2170-350 Workforce Outsourcing, Inc General Office 6,922 SF
2170-200 Vacant General Office 17,088 SF
2170-100 Real Estate Trainers, Inc Educational Services 11,250 SF
2170-101 Vacant General Office 5,021 SF
Subtotal 50,055 SF
2190 Towne Centre Drive
2190-300 NCS Pearson, Inc General Office 3,391 SF
2190-303 Vacant General Office 2,247 SF
2190-306 Vacant General Office 2,045 SF
2190-308 Vacant General Office 2,241 SF
2190-310 ECA General Office 3,357 SF
2190-312 Vacant General Office 1,609 SF
2190-314 Management Office General Office 1,999 SF
2190-200 Vacant General Office 9,677 SF
2190-210 Vacant General Office 3,734 SF
2190-292 Vacant General Office 4,307 SF
2190-100 Vacant General Office 13,348 SF
Subtotal 47,955 SF
1 Source: Lincoln Property Company as of March 2015.
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
TABLE 1 (CONTINUED)
EXISTING AND PROPOSED TENANT/LAND USE SUMMARY2
ANAHEIM CORPORATE PLAZA, ANAHEIM
Address & Suite Tenant Land Use Building Size (SF)
2390 Orangewood Avenue
2390-500 Vacant General Office 1,790 SF
2390-510 Ebro Accounting General Office 1,221 SF
2390-515 Vacant General Office 1,323 SF
2390-520 Upland Security General Office 1,459 SF
2390-530 Vacant General Office 2,215 SF
2390-540 Vacant General Office 1,549 SF
2390-550 CDC Small Business General Office 1,439 SF
2390-560 CDC Small Business General Office 1,973 SF
2390-570 Vacant General Office 1,208 SF
2390-575 Vacant General Office 1,872 SF
2390-585 James B. Smith General Office 1,777 SF
2390-595 Cal Net Enterprises General Office 1,302 SF
2390-400 Sein Chiropractic Corp Medical Office 1,771 SF
2390-410 Sein Chiropractic Corp Medical Office 1,221 SF
2390-415 Medcor General Office 1,304 SF
2390-420 Medcor General Office 1,781 SF
2390-430 Vacant General Office 2,206 SF
2390-440 Vacant General Office 1,478 SF
2390-450 Vacant General Office 1,475 SF
2390-460 Fred Loya Insurance General Office 1,973 SF
2390-470 Bristol University Educational Services 1,190 SF
2390-475 Bristol University Educational Services 1,794 SF
2390-485 Bristol University Educational Services 1,777 SF
2390-495 Sein Chiropractic Corp Medical Office 1,483 SF
2390-300 CAPC General Office 11,543 SF
2390-325 State of Florida Department of Revenue General office 5,316 SF
2390-350 Vacant General Office 2,276 SF
2390-200 US Colleges Educational Services 4,849 SF
2390-225 Vacant General Office 2,686 SF
2390-230 Vacant General Office 2,008 SF
2390-250 Nations Insurance Co General Office 8,373 SF
2390-299 Vacant General Office 1,688 SF
2390-100 Vacant/Proposed Food Use Restaurant 11,885 SF
2390-105 Bristol University Educational Services 4,859 SF
2390-106 Orange County's C.U. Financial 3,882 SF
2390-110 CAPC General Office 2,173 SF
2390-120 Vacant General Office 1,338 SF
2390-B01 Storage General Office 2,614 SF
2390-B02 Storage General Office 1,628 SF
2390-B03 Storage General Office 322 SF
Subtotal 106,021 SF
Summary:
Total Occupied General Office Square Footage 97,706 SF
Total Occupied Medical Office Square Footage 13,511 SF
Total Occupied Educational Services Square Footage 25,719 SF
Total Occupied Financial Square Footage 3,882 SF
Total Vacant General Office Square Footage 148,348 SF
Total Vacant/Proposed Eating Establishment Square Footage 11,885 SF
TOTAL SITE SQUARE FOOTAGE 301,051 SF
2 Source: Lincoln Property Company as of March 2015.
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
TABLE 2
CITY CODE PARKING REQUIREMENT
ANAHEIM CORPORATE PLAZA, ANAHEIM
City of Anaheim Spaces
Land Use Size Code Parking Ratio3 Required
Existing Tenant Mix
Office 97,7064 SF
4 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA for buildings
3 stories or lower; 3 spaces per 1,000 SF of
GFA for buildings of more than 3 stories
345
Medical/Dental 13,511 SF 6 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA 81
Educational Services 2985 Students
0.82 spaces per student, or 20 spaces per
1,000 SF of GFA for instruction area,
whichever results in a greater number of
spaces plus 4 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA
for office area
244
Financial Services 3,882 SF 5.5 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA 21
Vacant Suites/Proposed Project
Vacant Office 148,3486 SF
4 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA for buildings
3 stories or lower; 3 spaces per 1,000 SF of
GFA for buildings of more than 3 stories
470
Proposed Eating Establishments 11,885 SF 8 spaces per 1,000 SF of GFA 95
TOTAL: 1,256
A. TOTAL OCCUPIED PARKING CODE REQUIREMENT 691
B. TOTAL VACANT/PROPOSED PARKING CODE REQUIREMENT 565
C. TOTAL PARKING CODE REQUIREMENT BASED ON FULL OCCUPANCY 1,256
D. TOTAL PROPOSED PARKING SUPPLY 1,249
E. PARKING SURPLUS/DEFICIENCY (+/-) BASED ON FULL OCCUPANCY (D – C) -7
3 Source: City of Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.42.040 – Non-Residential Parking Requirements.
4 A parking ratio of 3 spaces per 1,000 SF was applied to 46,198 SF of office use which is within a five story building; this floor
area includes 4,564 SF that is used as storage, but is parked at the “office rate”. The remaining 51,508 SF has a parking ratio of 4
spaces per 1,000 SF.
5 The student total of 298 students is based on 190 students at RET, 93 students at Bristol University and 15 students at US
Colleges. The classroom square footage for all schools totals 5,668 SF. The student requirement exceeds the square footage
requirement, therefore 298 students was used to calculate the parking requirement.
6 A parking ratio of 3 spaces per 1,000 SF was applied to 123,236 SF of office use which is within a five story building. The
remaining 25,112 SF has a parking ratio of 4 spaces per 1,000 SF.
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
TABLE 3
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS7
ANAHEIM CORPORATE PLAZA, ANAHEIM
Land Use Office Medical/Dental
Office
Educational
Services Bank Vacant Office Fine/Casual
Dining
Size 97.706 KSF 13.511 KSF 25.719 KSF 3.882 KSF 148.348 KSF 11.885 KSF
Pkg Rate[1]--/KSF 6 /KSF [2]/KSF 5.5 /KSF --/KSF 8 /KSF Comparison w/
Gross 345 Spc.81 Spc.132 Spc.21 Spc.470 Spc.95 Spc.Parking Supply
Spaces Shared 1249 Spaces
Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Parking Surplus
Time of Day Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Demand (Deficiency)
6:00 AM 10 0 0 0 13 0 23 1,226
7:00 AM 95 0 7 0 130 3 235 1,014
8:00 AM 244 65 90 11 332 7 749 500
9:00 AM 318 76 90 20 433 10 947 302
10:00 AM 345 81 90 21 470 23 1,030 219
11:00 AM 330 81 90 14 450 41 1,006 243
12:00 PM 290 43 90 14 396 66 899 350
1:00 PM 298 76 127 14 407 66 988 261
2:00 PM 345 81 127 17 470 59 1,099 150
3:00 PM 330 81 127 14 450 39 1,041 208
4:00 PM 290 76 127 18 396 46 953 296
5:00 PM 162 70 127 21 221 68 669 580
6:00 PM 81 54 163 0 110 83 491 758
7:00 PM 33 24 163 0 44 86 350 899
8:00 PM 22 12 163 0 30 86 313 936
9:00 PM 10 0 163 0 13 86 272 977
10:00 PM 3 0 62 0 4 83 152 1,097
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 66 66 1,183
12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 23 23 1,226
Notes:
[1] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim parking ratios.
[2] Total parking requirements for educational services are based on class schedules and staffing information provided by LPC.
See Appendix A for detailed hourly parking demand forecasts for the educational uses.
7 Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
N:\3500\2153571 - 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim\Report\3571 2390 E. Orangewood Avenue 1-12-16.doc
TABLE 4
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS8
ANAHEIM CORPORATE PLAZA, ANAHEIM
Land Use Office Medical/Dental
Office
Educational
Services Bank Vacant Office Fine/Casual
Dining
Size 97.706 KSF 13.511 KSF 25.719 KSF 3.882 KSF 148.348 KSF 11.885 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]--/KSF 6 /KSF [2]/KSF 5.5 /KSF --/KSF 8 /KSF Comparison w/
Gross 345 Spc.81 Spc.132 Spc.21 Spc.470 Spc.95 Spc.Parking Supply
Spaces Shared 1249 Spaces
Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Number of Parking Surplus
Time of Day Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Spaces Demand (Deficiency)
6:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1,249
7:00 AM 7 0 0 0 10 3 20 1,229
8:00 AM 21 65 132 10 28 4 260 989
9:00 AM 27 76 132 13 38 8 294 955
10:00 AM 31 81 132 18 42 11 315 934
11:00 AM 35 81 132 21 47 23 339 910
12:00 PM 31 43 132 20 42 52 320 929
1:00 PM 27 0 132 0 38 56 253 996
2:00 PM 21 0 132 0 28 47 228 1,021
3:00 PM 14 0 132 0 18 47 211 1,038
4:00 PM 7 0 132 0 10 47 196 1,053
5:00 PM 3 0 0 0 4 63 70 1,179
6:00 PM 3 0 0 0 4 87 94 1,155
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 91 91 1,158
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 95 95 1,154
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 87 87 1,162
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 87 87 1,162
11:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 85 85 1,164
12:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 48 48 1,201
Notes:
[1] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim parking ratios.
[2] Total parking requirements for educational services are based on class schedules and staffing information provided by LPC.
See Appendix A for detailed hourly parking demand forecasts for the educational uses.
8 Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
21
7
0
-
1
0
0
14
23
9
0
-
1
0
5
3
23
9
0
-
2
0
0
4
Cl
a
s
s
s
c
h
e
d
u
l
e
1/
c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
Da
y
s
RE
T
(
T
e
s
t
i
n
g
o
n
l
y
)
M
o
n
d
a
y
-
F
r
i
d
a
y
6
:
0
0
p
m
-
1
0
:
3
0
p
m
T
o
t
a
l
2
2
5
/
c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
Sa
t
u
r
d
a
y
-
S
u
n
d
a
y
8
:
0
0
a
m
-
5
:
0
0
p
m
T
o
t
a
l
2
6
0
/
c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
1
Br
i
s
t
o
l
U
n
i
v
e
r
s
i
t
y
M
o
n
d
a
y
-
F
r
i
d
a
y
8
:
3
0
a
m
-
1
2
:
3
0
p
m
C
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
1
1
2
1
1:
0
0
p
m
-
5
:
0
0
p
m
Cl
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
2
1
0
1
5:
3
0
p
m
-
9
:
3
0
p
m
Cl
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
3
1
0
1
Cl
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
4
6
1
Cl
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
5
1
2
1
Cl
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
6
1
2
1
Cl
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
7
1
8
1/
c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
Li
b
r
a
r
y
1
0
US
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
s
M
o
n
d
a
y
-
F
r
i
d
a
y
8
:
0
0
a
m
-
6
:
0
0
p
m
T
o
t
a
l
2
1
0
/
c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
Ta
b
l
e
A
-
1
Em
p
l
o
y
e
e
/
S
t
u
d
e
n
t
I
n
f
o
r
m
a
t
i
o
n
23
9
0
E
.
O
r
a
n
g
e
w
o
o
d
A
v
e
n
u
e
,
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
Su
i
t
e
T
e
n
a
n
t
C
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
s
#
o
f
S
t
u
d
e
n
t
s
/
c
l
a
s
s
r
o
o
m
#
o
f
t
e
a
c
h
e
r
s
A
d
m
i
n
i
s
t
r
a
t
i
o
n
Ti
m
e
RET Bristol University US Colleges
7:00 AM 0 3 4 7
7:30 AM 0 3 4 7
8:00 AM 0 3 26 29
8:30 AM 0 64 26 90
9:00 AM 0 64 26 90
9:30 AM 0 64 26 90
10:00 AM 0 64 26 90
10:30 AM 0 64 26 90
11:00 AM 0 64 26 90
11:30 AM 0 64 26 90
12:00 PM 0 64 26 90
12:30 PM 0 3 26 29
1:00 PM 0 101 26 127
1:30 PM 0 101 26 127
2:00 PM 0 101 26 127
2:30 PM 0 101 26 127
3:00 PM 0 101 26 127
3:30 PM 0 101 26 127
4:00 PM 0 101 26 127
4:30 PM 0 101 26 127
5:00 PM 0 3 26 29
5:30 PM 0 101 26 127
6:00 PM 62 101 0 163
6:30 PM 62 101 0 163
7:00 PM 62 101 0 163
7:30 PM 62 101 0 163
8:00 PM 62 101 0 163
8:30 PM 62 101 0 163
9:00 PM 62 101 0 163
9:30 PM 62 101 0 163
10:00 PM 62 0 0 62
163
163
163
TABLE A-2
Empirical Educational Parking Demand - Monday
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim
Time
Parked Vehicles
Total Vehicles
127
127
127
127
127
163
7
90
90
90
90
90
Max
Vehicles/Hour
RET Bristol University US Colleges
7:00 AM 0 3 4 7
7:30 AM 0 3 4 7
8:00 AM 0 3 26 29
8:30 AM 0 36 26 62
9:00 AM 0 36 26 62
9:30 AM 0 36 26 62
10:00 AM 0 36 26 62
10:30 AM 0 36 26 62
11:00 AM 0 36 26 62
11:30 AM 0 36 26 62
12:00 PM 0 36 26 62
12:30 PM 0 3 26 29
1:00 PM 0 75 26 101
1:30 PM 0 75 26 101
2:00 PM 0 75 26 101
2:30 PM 0 75 26 101
3:00 PM 0 75 26 101
3:30 PM 0 75 26 101
4:00 PM 0 75 26 101
4:30 PM 0 75 26 101
5:00 PM 0 3 26 29
5:30 PM 0 101 26 127
6:00 PM 62 101 0 163
6:30 PM 62 101 0 163
7:00 PM 62 101 0 163
7:30 PM 62 101 0 163
8:00 PM 62 101 0 163
8:30 PM 62 101 0 163
9:00 PM 62 101 0 163
9:30 PM 62 101 0 163
10:00 PM 62 0 0 62
163
163
163
163
7
62
62
62
62
62
101
101
101
101
127
TABLE A-3
Empirical Educational Parking Demand - Tuesday
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim
Time
Parked Vehicles
Total Vehicles
Max
Vehicles/Hour
RET Bristol University US Colleges
7:00 AM 0 3 4 7
7:30 AM 0 3 4 7
8:00 AM 0 3 26 29
8:30 AM 0 51 26 77
9:00 AM 0 51 26 77
9:30 AM 0 51 26 77
10:00 AM 0 51 26 77
10:30 AM 0 51 26 77
11:00 AM 0 51 26 77
11:30 AM 0 51 26 77
12:00 PM 0 51 26 77
12:30 PM 0 3 26 29
1:00 PM 0 77 26 103
1:30 PM 0 77 26 103
2:00 PM 0 77 26 103
2:30 PM 0 77 26 103
3:00 PM 0 77 26 103
3:30 PM 0 77 26 103
4:00 PM 0 77 26 103
4:30 PM 0 77 26 103
5:00 PM 0 3 26 29
5:30 PM 0 101 26 127
6:00 PM 62 101 0 163
6:30 PM 62 101 0 163
7:00 PM 62 101 0 163
7:30 PM 62 101 0 163
8:00 PM 62 101 0 163
8:30 PM 62 101 0 163
9:00 PM 62 101 0 163
9:30 PM 62 101 0 163
10:00 PM 62 0 0 62
TABLE A-4
Empirical Educational Parking Demand - Wednesday
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim
Time
Parked Vehicles
Total Vehicles
Max
Vehicles/Hour
163
163
163
103
103
103
103
127
163
7
77
77
77
77
77
RET Bristol University US Colleges
7:00 AM 0 3 4 7
7:30 AM 0 3 4 7
8:00 AM 0 3 26 29
8:30 AM 0 36 26 62
9:00 AM 0 36 26 62
9:30 AM 0 36 26 62
10:00 AM 0 36 26 62
10:30 AM 0 36 26 62
11:00 AM 0 36 26 62
11:30 AM 0 36 26 62
12:00 PM 0 36 26 62
12:30 PM 0 3 26 29
1:00 PM 0 75 26 101
1:30 PM 0 75 26 101
2:00 PM 0 75 26 101
2:30 PM 0 75 26 101
3:00 PM 0 75 26 101
3:30 PM 0 75 26 101
4:00 PM 0 75 26 101
4:30 PM 0 75 26 101
5:00 PM 0 3 26 29
5:30 PM 0 101 26 127
6:00 PM 62 101 0 163
6:30 PM 62 101 0 163
7:00 PM 62 101 0 163
7:30 PM 62 101 0 163
8:00 PM 62 101 0 163
8:30 PM 62 101 0 163
9:00 PM 62 101 0 163
9:30 PM 62 101 0 163
10:00 PM 62 0 0 62
TABLE A-5
Empirical Educational Parking Demand - Thursday
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim
Time
Parked Vehicles
Total Vehicles
Max
Vehicles/Hour
7
62
62
62
62
62
101
163
163
101
101
101
127
163
163
RET Bristol University US Colleges
7:00 AM 0 0 4 4
7:30 AM 0 0 4 4
8:00 AM 0 0 26 26
8:30 AM 0 0 26 26
9:00 AM 0 0 26 26
9:30 AM 0 0 26 26
10:00 AM 0 0 26 26
10:30 AM 0 0 26 26
11:00 AM 0 0 26 26
11:30 AM 0 0 26 26
12:00 PM 0 0 26 26
12:30 PM 0 0 26 26
1:00 PM 0 0 26 26
1:30 PM 0 0 26 26
2:00 PM 0 0 26 26
2:30 PM 0 0 26 26
3:00 PM 0 0 26 26
3:30 PM 0 0 26 26
4:00 PM 0 0 26 26
4:30 PM 0 0 26 26
5:00 PM 0 0 26 26
5:30 PM 0 0 26 26
6:00 PM 62 0 0 62
6:30 PM 62 0 0 62
7:00 PM 62 0 0 62
7:30 PM 62 0 0 62
8:00 PM 62 0 0 62
8:30 PM 62 0 0 62
9:00 PM 62 0 0 62
9:30 PM 62 0 0 62
10:00 PM 62 0 0 62
TABLE A-6
Empirical Educational Parking Demand - Friday
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim
Time
Parked Vehicles
Total Vehicles
Max
Vehicles/Hour
4
26
26
26
26
26
26
26
62
26
26
26
62
62
62
RET Bristol University US Colleges
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 132 0 0 132
8:30 AM 132 0 0 132
9:00 AM 132 0 0 132
9:30 AM 132 0 0 132
10:00 AM 132 0 0 132
10:30 AM 132 0 0 132
11:00 AM 132 0 0 132
11:30 AM 132 0 0 132
12:00 PM 132 0 0 132
12:30 PM 132 0 0 132
1:00 PM 132 0 0 132
1:30 PM 132 0 0 132
2:00 PM 132 0 0 132
2:30 PM 132 0 0 132
3:00 PM 132 0 0 132
3:30 PM 132 0 0 132
4:00 PM 132 0 0 132
4:30 PM 132 0 0 132
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0
6:30 PM 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0
7:30 PM 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0
8:30 PM 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0
9:30 PM 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0
TABLE A-7
Empirical Educational Parking Demand - Saturday
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim
Time
Parked Vehicles
Total Vehicles
Max
Vehicles/Hour
0
0
0
132
0
0
0
132
132
132
132
132
132
132
132
RET Bristol University US Colleges
7:00 AM 0 0 0 0
7:30 AM 0 0 0 0
8:00 AM 132 0 0 132
8:30 AM 132 0 0 132
9:00 AM 132 0 0 132
9:30 AM 132 0 0 132
10:00 AM 132 0 0 132
10:30 AM 132 0 0 132
11:00 AM 132 0 0 132
11:30 AM 132 0 0 132
12:00 PM 132 0 0 132
12:30 PM 132 0 0 132
1:00 PM 132 0 0 132
1:30 PM 132 0 0 132
2:00 PM 132 0 0 132
2:30 PM 132 0 0 132
3:00 PM 132 0 0 132
3:30 PM 132 0 0 132
4:00 PM 132 0 0 132
4:30 PM 132 0 0 132
5:00 PM 0 0 0 0
5:30 PM 0 0 0 0
6:00 PM 0 0 0 0
6:30 PM 0 0 0 0
7:00 PM 0 0 0 0
7:30 PM 0 0 0 0
8:00 PM 0 0 0 0
8:30 PM 0 0 0 0
9:00 PM 0 0 0 0
9:30 PM 0 0 0 0
10:00 PM 0 0 0 0
TABLE A-8
Empirical Educational Parking Demand - Sunday
2390 E. Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim
Time
Parked Vehicles
Total Vehicles
Max
Vehicles/Hour
0
132
132
132
132
132
0
0
0
132
132
132
132
0
0
Appendix Table B1
OFFICE
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Office
Size 97.706 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]--/KSF
Gross 345 Spaces
Spaces 27 Visitor Spc.318 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 3%10 10
7:00 AM 1%0 30%95 95
8:00 AM 20%5 75%239 244
9:00 AM 60%16 95%302 318
10:00 AM 100%27 100%318 345
11:00 AM 45%12 100%318 330
12:00 PM 15%4 90%286 290
1:00 PM 45%12 90%286 298
2:00 PM 100%27 100%318 345
3:00 PM 45%12 100%318 330
4:00 PM 15%4 90%286 290
5:00 PM 10%3 50%159 162
6:00 PM 5%1 25%80 81
7:00 PM 2%1 10%32 33
8:00 PM 1%0 7%22 22
9:00 PM 0%0 3%10 10
10:00 PM 0%0 1%3 3
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B2
OFFICE
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Office
Size 97.706 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]--/KSF
Gross 345 Spaces
Spaces 27 Visitor Spc.318 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 2%1 2%6 7
8:00 AM 6%2 6%19 21
9:00 AM 8%2 8%25 27
10:00 AM 9%2 9%29 31
11:00 AM 10%3 10%32 35
12:00 PM 9%2 9%29 31
1:00 PM 8%2 8%25 27
2:00 PM 6%2 6%19 21
3:00 PM 4%1 4%13 14
4:00 PM 2%1 2%6 7
5:00 PM 1%0 1%3 3
6:00 PM 1%0 1%3 3
7:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
9:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
10:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B3
MEDICAL/DENTAL OFFICE
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Medical/Dental Office
Size 13.511 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]6 /KSF
Gross 81 Spaces
Spaces 54 Visitor Spc.27 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 AM 90%49 60%16 65
9:00 AM 90%49 100%27 76
10:00 AM 100%54 100%27 81
11:00 AM 100%54 100%27 81
12:00 PM 30%16 100%27 43
1:00 PM 90%49 100%27 76
2:00 PM 100%54 100%27 81
3:00 PM 100%54 100%27 81
4:00 PM 90%49 100%27 76
5:00 PM 80%43 100%27 70
6:00 PM 67%36 67%18 54
7:00 PM 30%16 30%8 24
8:00 PM 15%8 15%4 12
9:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
10:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B4
MEDICAL/DENTAL OFFICE
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Medical/Dental Office
Size 13.511 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]6 /KSF
Gross 81 Spaces
Spaces 54 Visitor Spc.27 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 AM 90%49 60%16 65
9:00 AM 90%49 100%27 76
10:00 AM 100%54 100%27 81
11:00 AM 100%54 100%27 81
12:00 PM 30%16 100%27 43
1:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
2:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
3:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
4:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
5:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
6:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
9:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
10:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B5
BANK
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Bank
Size 3.882 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]5.5 /KSF
Gross 21 Spaces
Spaces 14 Visitor Spc.7 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 AM 50%7 60%4 11
9:00 AM 90%13 100%7 20
10:00 AM 100%14 100%7 21
11:00 AM 50%7 100%7 14
12:00 PM 50%7 100%7 14
1:00 PM 50%7 100%7 14
2:00 PM 70%10 100%7 17
3:00 PM 50%7 100%7 14
4:00 PM 80%11 100%7 18
5:00 PM 100%14 100%7 21
6:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
9:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
10:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B6
BANK
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Bank
Size 3.882 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]5.5 /KSF
Gross 21 Spaces
Spaces 14 Visitor Spc.7 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 AM 25%4 90%6 10
9:00 AM 40%6 100%7 13
10:00 AM 75%11 100%7 18
11:00 AM 100%14 100%7 21
12:00 PM 90%13 100%7 20
1:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
2:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
3:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
4:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
5:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
6:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
9:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
10:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B7
VACANT OFFICE
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Vacant Office
Size 148.348 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]--/KSF
Gross 470 Spaces
Spaces 37 Visitor Spc.433 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 3%13 13
7:00 AM 1%0 30%130 130
8:00 AM 20%7 75%325 332
9:00 AM 60%22 95%411 433
10:00 AM 100%37 100%433 470
11:00 AM 45%17 100%433 450
12:00 PM 15%6 90%390 396
1:00 PM 45%17 90%390 407
2:00 PM 100%37 100%433 470
3:00 PM 45%17 100%433 450
4:00 PM 15%6 90%390 396
5:00 PM 10%4 50%217 221
6:00 PM 5%2 25%108 110
7:00 PM 2%1 10%43 44
8:00 PM 1%0 7%30 30
9:00 PM 0%0 3%13 13
10:00 PM 0%0 1%4 4
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B8
VACANT OFFICE
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Vacant Office
Size 148.348 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]--/KSF
Gross 470 Spaces
Spaces 37 Visitor Spc.433 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 2%1 2%9 10
8:00 AM 6%2 6%26 28
9:00 AM 8%3 8%35 38
10:00 AM 9%3 9%39 42
11:00 AM 10%4 10%43 47
12:00 PM 9%3 9%39 42
1:00 PM 8%3 8%35 38
2:00 PM 6%2 6%26 28
3:00 PM 4%1 4%17 18
4:00 PM 2%1 2%9 10
5:00 PM 1%0 1%4 4
6:00 PM 1%0 1%4 4
7:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
8:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
9:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
10:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
11:00 PM 0%0 0%0 0
12:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B9
FINE/CASUAL DINING
WEEKDAY SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Fine/Casual Dining
Size 11.885 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]8 /KSF
Gross 95 Spaces
Spaces 80 Guest Spc.15 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 0%0 18%3 3
8:00 AM 0%0 45%7 7
9:00 AM 0%0 68%10 10
10:00 AM 14%11 81%12 23
11:00 AM 36%29 81%12 41
12:00 PM 68%54 81%12 66
1:00 PM 68%54 81%12 66
2:00 PM 59%47 81%12 59
3:00 PM 36%29 68%10 39
4:00 PM 45%36 68%10 46
5:00 PM 68%54 90%14 68
6:00 PM 86%69 90%14 83
7:00 PM 90%72 90%14 86
8:00 PM 90%72 90%14 86
9:00 PM 90%72 90%14 86
10:00 PM 86%69 90%14 83
11:00 PM 68%54 77%12 66
12:00 AM 23%18 32%5 23
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
Appendix Table B10
FINE/CASUAL DINING
WEEKEND SHARED PARKING DEMAND ANALYSIS [1]
Month:
Land Use Fine/Casual Dining
Size 11.885 KSF
Pkg Rate[2]8 /KSF
Gross 95 Spaces
Spaces 81 Guest Spc.14 Emp. Spc.Shared
Time % Of # Of % Of # Of Parking
of Day Peak [3]Spaces Peak [3]Spaces Demand
6:00 AM 0%0 0%0 0
7:00 AM 0%0 20%3 3
8:00 AM 0%0 30%4 4
9:00 AM 0%0 60%8 8
10:00 AM 0%0 75%11 11
11:00 AM 15%12 75%11 23
12:00 PM 50%41 75%11 52
1:00 PM 55%45 75%11 56
2:00 PM 45%36 75%11 47
3:00 PM 45%36 75%11 47
4:00 PM 45%36 75%11 47
5:00 PM 60%49 100%14 63
6:00 PM 90%73 100%14 87
7:00 PM 95%77 100%14 91
8:00 PM 100%81 100%14 95
9:00 PM 90%73 100%14 87
10:00 PM 90%73 100%14 87
11:00 PM 90%73 85%12 85
12:00 AM 50%41 50%7 48
Notes:
[1] Source: ULI - Urban Land Institute "Shared Parking," Second Edition, 2005.
[2] Parking rates are based on City of Anaheim Municipal Code.
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
4
Parking Lot
BRISTOL UNIVERSITY PROJECT SITE & SURROUNDINGS
Angels Stadium
N
o
r
t
h
R
a
m
p
a
r
t
S
t
.
Side A
SIDE D Bristol University Side B
Side C
Oranange County
Credit Union
Parking Lot
Panoramic View of 2390 E.Orangewood Ave building
Photographs of 4 sides Bristol University
Main Enterance to Building 2390 (view from side D)Orange County Credit Union ATM - Next Door to Bristol University (view from Side C)Orange County Credit Union - Next Door to Bristol University (view from North Rampart st)Angels Stadium -Across from Bristol University (view from side A)
Side A Pictures
Bristol University (view from side A)Orange County Credit Union - Next Door to Bristol University (view from North Rampart st)Orange County Credit Union ATM - Next Door to Bristol University (view from Side C)Main Enterance to Building 2390 (view from side D)
Side D PicturesSide C PicturesSide B Pictures
Bristol University is Located at 2390 E.Orangewood Ave, Ste.#105 & #485 Across
from Angels Stadium.
East Orangewood Avenue
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
From:Avery Robinson
To:Amy K. Vazquez
Cc:John Tierney; Eleanor Heng; Lynda Savoit
Subject:Comment on Projects Affecting Parking Near 2390 E. Orangewood Ave, Anaheim for Public Hearing on March21
Date:Tuesday, March 15, 2016 12:51:39 PM
Attachments:image003.png
Good afternoon Amy,
While Orange County’s Credit Union is not opposed to the proposed parking zoning exception, we
would like to offer the following comment:
Attention Planning Commission:
Orange County’s Credit Union has been a tenant of 2390 Orangewood since 2004 and has recently
signed a lease amendment for an additional five years. Our members (customers), who are mostly
nearby residents or employees of local businesses, require short term parking to be able to conduct
their financial transactions at our establishment in Suite 106. With the establishment of the private
business school (Bristol University), parking has already become more difficult for our members. The
introduction of a restaurant into the space will create even more parking issues. While the Credit
Union will enjoy the benefits of these tenant neighbors, we offer the following suggestions to assist
with parking for our membership, who are members of the community. Solutions for consideration
are:
· Designate 15 spaces for short term parking of 20-30 minutes near the Credit Union’s
entrance
· Utilize valet parking, if possible, at the restaurant and park patrons’ vehicles in a nearby lot
· Students at Bristol University, who are usually at class for longer periods of time, could
utilize designated parking in other areas of the campus
We appreciate the opportunity to comment.
Sincerely,
Avery Robinson
Vice President Organizational Development
Orange County’s Credit Union
(714) 755-5900 ext. 7470
www.orangecountyscu.org
Notice: This e-mail is only intended for the person(s) to whom it is addressed and may containconfidential information. Unless stated otherwise, any opinions or comments are personal to the writerand may not reflect the official view of the Credit Union. If you are not the intended recipient or believethat you have received this e-mail in error, please do not print, copy, disseminate, or otherwise use it
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 5
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: MARCH 21, 2016
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05849 LOCATION: 2390 East Orangewood Avenue and 2121, 2150, 2170, and
2190 South Towne Centre Place (Anaheim Corporate Plaza)
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Lisa Kelly with Interior Architects and the property owner is Anaheim Corporate Office Plaza.
REQUEST: The applicant is requesting approval of a conditional use permit to
establish a coordinated sign program for an office complex within the Platinum
Triangle.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve
the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from
further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class
11, Accessory Structures) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05849.
BACKGROUND: This 13.9-acre project site, which includes seven lots, is developed
with the Anaheim Corporate Plaza office complex. The property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial Zone and the “PTMU” Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone. The General Plan designates the property for Mixed Use land uses. Surrounding
land uses include Angel Stadium across Orangewood Avenue to the north, a fire
department training facility across Rampart Street to the east, an office building to the
south, and industrial businesses to the west. PROPOSAL: The applicant is requesting approval of a coordinated sign program for
an office complex located within the Platinum Triangle. The five-building complex is
being renovated to create an interactive campus environment with cohesive
architectural elements and landscape design. The intent of the coordinated sign program is to unify the campus, by bringing the existing buildings together with consistent signage design, lighting and materials. Six monument signs are proposed
are part of the coordinated program. They would be located near Orangewood Avenue,
Rampart Street and along Towne Centre Place. The signs would replace the existing
monument signs and would be located within landscaped planters. The signs are identified in the site plan below.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05849
March 21, 2016
Page 2 of 4
Sign Locations
The height, width and total square footage of the proposed monument signs is indicated in the table below:
Sign # Height Width Square
Footage
1 16 feet 8 feet 128
2 8 feet 10 feet 80
3 8 feet 8 feet 64
4 8 feet 10 feet 80
5 8 feet 8 feet 64
6 8 feet 8 feet 64
All of the signs would be designed with the same exterior finishes and colors. They would have a
concrete base, white acrylic cut out numbers and letters and metal finishes. The sign cabinets
would contain an interior light for backlighting. The signs below are illustrative of the sign materials and show the signs proposed along Rampart Street. The entire sign program is provided as an exhibit to the attached draft resolution.
In addition to the six monument signs described above, amenity and wall signs for individual
tenants would be included in the coordinated sign program on an as need basis. The size and locations of these additional signs would comply with the code. Staff is recommending a condition of approval in the attached resolution requiring any additional signs to be designed in substantial
conformance with the coordinated sign program and subject to staff approval.
Sign #1
Sign #2
Sign #3
Sign #4
Sign #5
Sign #6
Orangewood Ave.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05849
March 21, 2016
Page 3 of 4
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS:
Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit for
a coordinated sign program, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that
all of the following conditions exist:
1) Signs shall complement the architecture of the buildings on the same property and provide a
unifying element along the streetscape; and
2) The size, scale and style of signs shall be internally consistent and consistent with the scale
of the buildings located on the same property and the surrounding land uses.
The PTMLUP has a provision that allows coordinated sign programs for unique applications that don’t comply with typical sign standards. These standards may be modified with a conditional use
permit.
The proposed signs complement the architecture of the existing office buildings. The signs are
designed with high quality materials and a contemporary style that is consistent with the glass
buildings within the complex. The signs are designed with the same exterior colors and finishes and would provide a unifying element along the streetscape. The size of the signs is consistent with
the scale of the buildings within the complex, which are three to five stories in height. The complex
is currently being renovated to create an interactive campus environment with cohesive
architectural elements and landscape design. The implementation of a coordinated sign program
would enhance the office complex by providing project identification, improved visibility and cohesive design elements. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this request.
Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects
of the proposed project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 11 –
Accessory Structures) which consist of construction, or replacement of minor structures accessory
to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities, including but not limited to on-premises signs, and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15311 of Title 14 of the
California Code of Regulations, the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the
environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05849
March 21, 2016
Page 4 of 4
CONCLUSION: The proposed signs complement the office complex’s architecture and are internally consistent and consistent with the scale of the surrounding buildings. Therefore, staff
recommends approval of this request.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
Amy Vazquez Jonathan E. Borrego Contract Planner, Lilley Planning Group Planning Services Manager
Attachments:
1. Draft Conditional Use Permit Resolution
2. Request Letter 3. Sign Program Plans
4. Photographs
PR (PTMU)OrangewoodNORTH NET FIRETRAINING CENTER
PR (PTMU)StadiumANGEL STADIUMOF ANAHEIM
C-G (PTMU)OrangewoodOFFICES
C-G (PTMU)OrangewoodOFFICES
O-L (PTMU)OrangewoodOFFICES
O-L (PTMU)OrangewoodOFFICES
I (PTMU)OrangewoodIND. FIRM
I (PTMU)OrangewoodIND. FIRM
I (PTMU)OrangewoodIND. FIRM
I (PTMU)OrangewoodIND. FIRM
I (PTMU)OrangewoodIND. FIRM
I (PTMU)OrangewoodIND. FIRM S
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T
S D U P O N T
D R
S T O W N E C E N T R E P L
S TOWNE CENTRE PL
E ORANGEWOOD AVE
E. KATELLA AVE
E. ORANGEWOOD AVE
E. CHAPMAN AVE
E. GENE AUTRY WAY
2390 East Orangewood Avenue
DEV No. 2015-00006
Subject Property APN: 232-011-46232-011-28232-011-33232-011-32232-011-26232-011-25232-011-30
°0 50 100
Feet
Aerial Photo:May 2014
S
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T
S D U P O N T
D R
S T O W N E C E N T R E P L
S TOWNE CENTRE PL
E ORANGEWOOD AVE
E. KATELLA AVE
E. ORANGEWOOD AVE
E. CHAPMAN AVE
E. GENE AUTRY WAY
2390 East Orangewood Avenue
DEV No. 2015-00006
Subject Property APN: 232-011-46232-011-28232-011-33232-011-32232-011-26232-011-25232-011-30
°0 50 100
Feet
Aerial Photo:May 2014
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1
- 1 - PC2016-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT
NO. 2015-05849 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS
IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2015-00006)
(2390 EAST ORANGEWOOD AVENUE AND
2121, 2150, 2170 AND 2190 SOUTH TOWNE CENTRE PLACE)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05849 to establish a coordinated sign program (herein referred to collectively as the "Proposed Project") on that
certain real property located at 2390 East Orangewood Avenue and 2121, 2150, 2170, and 2190
South Towne Centre Place in the City of Anaheim, as generally depicted on the map attached
hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 13.9 acres in size and developed with an
office complex. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for
“M-U” Mixed Use land uses. The Property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial Zone
and the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone. Generally, the development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay
Zone) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") supersede the regulations of the underlying
zone, i.e., that of the “C-G” General Commercial Zone. Subsection .010 of Section 18.20.150
(Signs) of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay Zone) of the Code
requires that a "coordinated sign program" be submitted to the Planning Department and must address the following:
(1) Signs shall complement the architecture of the building and provide a unifying
element along the streetscape;
(2) The size, scale, and style of signs shall be internally consistent, and consistent with
the scale of the buildings of which they are a part; and
(3) Wall signs for ground floor uses shall be placed between the doorway and the upper
façade, and shall be located at approximately the same height as all other ground floor wall signs to create a unifying, horizontal pattern.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on March 21, 2016 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional
Use Permit No. 2015-05849 and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in
connection therewith; and
- 2 - PC2016-***
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA
Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the
preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the
Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 11 –
Accessory Structures) which consists of the "construction, or replacement of minor structures
accessory to (appurtenant to) existing commercial, industrial, or institutional facilities. Section
15311 of the CEQA Guidelines provides examples of projects that qualify for an exemption from the provisions of CEQA. The example that is applicable to the Proposed Project is for on-
premise signs The Proposed Project fits within that example and, pursuant to Section 15311 of
the CEQA Guidelines, will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05849, does find and
determine the following facts:
1) That the signs complement the architecture of the buildings on the same
property and provide a unifying element along the streetscape; and
2) The size, scale and style of signs shall be internally consistent, and consistent
with the scale of the buildings located on the same property and the
surrounding land uses.
3) Wall signs for ground floor uses shall be placed between the doorway and the
upper façade, and shall be located at approximately the same height as all
other ground floor wall signs to create a unifying, horizontal pattern.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05849, does find and
determine the following facts:
1. The proposed request to permit a coordinated sign program at the Premises is
subject to a conditional use permit authorized under Section No. 18.44.055.040 of Chapter 18.44 (Signs) of the Code.
2. The proposed conditional use permit, as conditioned herein, would not adversely
affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed
to be located because the signs a will be a quality design that is internally consistent and complement the architecture of the buildings within the complex;
- 3 - PC2016-***
3. The size and shape of the site for the use is adequate to allow the full development
of the proposed project in a manner not detrimental to the particular area or to the health and safety because the proposed signs will be internally consistent and located out of any line-of-
sight areas.
4. The traffic generated by the proposed project will not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area there will be no traffic generated by this use.
5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not
be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the proposed
project will be compatible with the surrounding area through conditions of approval for the use and is not a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby
approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05849, contingent upon and subject to the conditions
of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference,
which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property under Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05849 in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete
conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code.
Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director
upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or
approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
- 4 - PC2016-***
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval
of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission
meeting of March 21, 2016. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in
Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on March 21, 2016, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 21st day of March, 2016.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 5 - PC2016-***
- 6 - PC2016-***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05849
(DEV2015-00006)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF SIGN PERMITS
1 A Sign Relocation Covenant shall be executed by the legal property owner and
recorded for all the signs located within the ultimate right-of-way or within the line-of-sight clear zone as measured from the ultimate right-of-way.
Public Works,
Development Services
2 Prior to issuance of building permits, an encroachment license shall be executed
by the owner and recorded for all the signs located within the ultimate right-of-
way or within the line of sight clear zone measure from the ultimate right-of-way.
Public Works,
Development Services
3 Any future signage for the office complex or individual tenants must be in
substantial conformance with the coordinated sign program. All new signs must be reviewed and approved by Planning Department staff.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services Division
4 Any future signage for the office complex that does not comply with the code
may be reviewed and approved by the Planning Director, provided that the signs are in substantial conformance with the coordinated sign program.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services Division
GENERAL CONDITIONS
5 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of
this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final
invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever
occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of
required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
6 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its
officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or
annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the
proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision,
or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by
Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation
attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees
in connection with such proceeding.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services Division
7 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which
plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
- 7 - PC2016-***
“EXHIBIT C” COORDINATED SIGN PROGRAM
E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
G
R
A
P
H
I
C
S
EXHIBIT "C"
2
EXTERIOR FINISHES
MTL-1 METAL FINISH
PANELS ON 3 FACES OVER BACKER BOARD
A) WESTERN STATES WEATHERED METALLIC
B) RUSTWALL
C)FRESH RUST
MTL-2 METAL BLACK FINISH
MATTE BLACK FINISH.
METAL CABINET WITH LED LIGHT INSIDE FOR
BACKLIGHTING.
MTL-3 METAL FINISH
ALUMINUM PANEL
ACR-1 WHITE ACRYLIC
CUT OUT LOGO, LETTERS AND NUMBERS.
HEIGHT VARIES.
C-1 CONCRETE
BRAND ELEMENTS
LETTER FONT: CALIBRI LIGHT
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z
NUMERIC FONT: LEVENIM MT REGULAR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
BODY FONT
SITE SIGNAGE AND WAYFINDING
4
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1
P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0
P A R C E L 1
P A R C E L 2
5
5
5
6
6
10
177.74'
44 8 .66 '
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUE
L
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
C
R
A
M
P
A
R
T S
T
R
E
E
T
L
C RA M P A R T S T RE
E T
L
GRA
T E C O VER I NG
UND E RGR OUN D EQ U I PME NT
S I N G L E S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
1 5,1 0 3 S Q. F T . (B ASE D ON BU I LDI N G
F OOT P RIN T AT GROUND LEV EL)
BUI L DIN G HE I GHT = 4 1.5'
2 1 50 TOW NE C ENT R E P LAC E
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIM I T S O F GR OUN D FL O OR
2 3 90 O RA N GEW OOD AVE NUE
BUIL D ING HEI G HT = 7 1 '
F O OTP RINT AT GROU ND LEV E L)
2 5,6 9 0 S Q. F T . (B ASE D ON BU I LDIN G
4 5 '
30'
32'
3 2 '
64'
10'
3 5 '
24'6'
2 0 '
1 2 '
32'
20'12'
32'
32'
2 0 '
12'
30'
6'24'
2 0 '
1 2 '
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4
4'
10
4'
5'
5'
P MB 3 0 / 3 4
5'
5'
5 '
12'12'
2 '
P MB
3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512&513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3
P A R C E L 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(P UB L I C DED I CA T ED ST R EE T )
PM NO 79-251
6
G
B
GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T.
ORANGEWOODAVE
68.0'
U
SIGN TYPE A
SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390
32'-0"45'-0"
10 1/8"
PROPERTY LINE
CENTERLINE
LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
ORANGEWOO
D
A
V
E
TOWNE CENTRE PL
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T
N
2390
2150
2121
2170
2190
Monument Signage: Type A
Tenant Signage: Type C1
Tenant Signage: Type C3
Tenant Signage: Type C2
Street Signage: Type B1
Amenity Signage
Street Signage: Type B2
SITE SIGNAGE LOCATION
5
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1
P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0
P A R C E L 1
P A R C E L 2
5
5
5
6
6
10
177.74'
448 .66'
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUE
L
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
C
R
A
M
P
A
R
T S
T
R
E
E
T
L
C RA M P A R T S T RE
E T
L
G R ATE COV E RIN G
U NDE R GRO U ND E QUIPMEN T
S I N G L E S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
15,1 0 3 S Q. F T . (B ASE D ON B U I LDI N G
F OOT P RIN T AT GR OUND LE V EL)
BU I L DIN G HE I GHT = 4 1.5 '
2 150 TOW NE C ENT RE P LAC E
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING
2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIM I TS O F G R OUN D F L OOR
239 0 OR ANG E WOO D A VENU E
B U I LDI N G H EIGH T = 71'
FOOT PR I N T AT G R OUN D L E VEL )
25 ,690 SQ. FT. (BA S ED ON B UIL D I NG
45'
30'
3 2 '
3 2 '
6 4 '
10 '
35'
24'6'
20'
12'
32'
20'12'
3 2 '
3 2 '
20'
12'
30'
6'24'
20'
12'
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4
4'
104'
5'
5'
P MB
3 0 / 3 4
5'
5'
5'
12'12'
2'
P MB 3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512&513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3
P A R C E L 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PU
BLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(P UB L IC DED I CA TED ST REE T )
PM NO 79-251
6
GB
GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T.
ORANGEWOODAVE
68.0'
U
SIGN TYPE A
SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390
32'-0"45'-0"
10 1/8"
PROPERTY LINE
CENTERLINE
LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
ORANGEWOOD AVE.
Front Elevation (Back Similar)Side Elevation
MTL-1 Sign cabinet with LED
light inside for backlighting
ACR-1 Cut out logo
4’-9”H x 3’-9”W
17.81 sq. ft.
ACR-1 End panel with LED light
inside sign cabinet for backlighting.4’
-
9
”
16
’
-
0
”
16
’
-
0
”
3’
-
6
”
8’-0”1’-6”
Enlarged Site Plan
Signage Permitted per Anaheim Municipal cope = 55 sq. ft.
Signage Provided= 17.81 sq.ft.
MONUMENT SIGN: TYPE A
6
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x
x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1
P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0
P A R C E L 1
P A R C E L 2
5
5
5
6
6
10
177.74'
4 48.6 6'
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUEL
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
C
R
A
M
P
A
R
T S
T
R
E
E
T
L
C RA M P A R T S T RE
E T
L
GR A TE C OVE R ING
U N DER G ROU N D E Q UIPM ENT
S I N G L E S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
1 5,10 3 SQ . FT . (B ASED ON BU I L DIN G
F O OTP RINT AT GROU ND LEV E L)
BUIL D ING HEI G HT = 4 1 .5'
2 1 50 T OWN E C E NTR E P L ACE
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMI T S O F GR O UND FLO OR
2 390 ORA NGE WOO D AV ENU E
BU I L DIN G HE I GHT = 7 1'
F OOT P RIN T AT GR OUN D LE V EL)
25,6 90 S Q. F T. (BAS E D ON B U ILD I NG
4 5'
30'
3 2 '
32'
64'
10'3 5'
24'6'
20'
12'
32'
20'12'
3 2 '
3 2 '
20'
1 2 '
30'
6'24'
20'
12'
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4
4'
104'
5'
5'
P MB
3 0 / 3 4
5'
5'
5 '
12'12'
2'
P MB 3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512&513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3
P A R C E L 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(P U BL I C D EDI CAT ED STR EET )
PM NO 79-251
6
GB
GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T.
ORANGEWOODAVE68.0'
U
SIGN TYPE A
SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390
32'-0"45'-0"
10 1/8"
PROPERTY LINE
CENTERLINE
LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
North Elevation South Elevation Side Elevation
Enlarged Site Plan
Signage Permitted per Anaheim Municipal cope = 55 sq. ft.
Signage Provided= 16.45 sq.ft.
* See ‘Brand Elements’ for finishes specifications
ACR-1 3” tall cut out letters, typ.
ACR-1 9” tall cut out numbers, typ.
ACR-1 Cut out logo backed with
white acrylic. LED light inside sign
cabinet for backlighting
MTL-1
MTL-2
C-1
8’
-
0
”
6’-6”
10’-0”
5’-10”4’-2”1’-0”
1’-6”
1’-6”
7’-4”
1’
-
0
”
1’
-
4
”
4’-5”H x 3’-0”W
13.40 sq. ft.
1’4”H x 2’-3”W
3.05 sq. ft.
ACR-1 Cut out stripes backed
with white acrylic, typ.
STREET SIGN: TYPE B1
7
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x
x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1 P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0 P A R C E L 1PARCEL 255
5
6 610 177.74'
44 8 .66 '
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUEL
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE C RAMPART STREETL
C RA M P A R T S T RE E T
L
GRAT E CO V ERI N GUNDERGR O UND EQU I PME N TSINGLE S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U PCOMMERCIAL B U I L D I N G 5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C KOFFICE B U I L D I N GSINGLE S T O R YCONCR E T E T I L T -U PCOMMER C I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N GCONCRETE T I L T -U PSINGLE S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
15 ,1 03 SQ. F T. (BAS ED ON B UILD I NG
FOOT PRI N T AT G R OUN D L E VEL )
B U I LDI N G H EIGH T = 41.5 '
215 0 TOW NE CENTRE PLACE
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
L I M ITS OF G ROU ND F L OO R
23 9 0 O RAN G EWOOD AVE NUEB UILD I NG HEIG HT = 71 'FO OTPR I NT AT G ROU ND L EVE L )2 5 ,69 0 SQ. FT . (B A SED ON BUI L DIN G45'30'32'3 2 '6 4 '10 '35 '24'6'2 0 '1 2 '
32'
20'12'
32'
32'
2 0 '
12'
30'
6'
24'
2 0 '
1 2 '
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4 4'104'5'5'
P MB 3 0 / 3 4
5 '
5'
5'
12'12'
2'
P MB
3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512&513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3PARCEL 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUB LIC DE DIC A TE D S T RE E T)
PM NO 79-251 6 GB GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T.
ORANGEWOODAVE68.0'USIGN TYPE A SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390 32'-0"45'-0"10 1/8"PROPERTY LINECENTERLINELINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
1’4”H x 2’-3”W3.05 sq. ft.
6’-6”
1’-0”
1’-6”
1’-6”
8’
-
0
”
10’-0”
5’-10”4’-2”
1’
-
0
”
1’
-
4
”
3” tall cut out letters, typ.
9” tall cut out numbers, typ.
Cut out logo backed with white
acrylic. LED light inside sign
cabinet for backlighting
4’-5”H x 3’-0”W
13.40 sq. ft.
Cut out stripes backed with
white acrylic, typ.
Signage Permitted per Anaheim Municipal cope = 55 sq. ft.
Signage Provided= 16.45 sq.ft.
* See ‘Brand Elements’ for finishes specifications
Enlarged Site Plan
North Elevation South Elevation Side Elevation
STREET SIGN: TYPE B2
8
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x
x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1
P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0
P A R C E L 1
P A R C E L 2
5
5
5
6
6
10
177.74'
448 .66'
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUEL
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
C
R
A
M
P
A
R
T S
T
R
E
E
T
L
C RA M P A R T S T RE E T
L
G R ATE COV E RIN G
U NDE R GRO U ND E QUIPMEN T
S I N G L E S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
15,1 0 3 S Q. F T . (B ASE D ON B U I LDI N G
F OOT P RIN T AT GR OUND LE V EL)
BU I L DIN G HE I GHT = 4 1.5 '
2 150 TOW NE C ENT RE P LAC E
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIM I TS O F G R OUN D F L OOR
239 0 OR ANG E WOO D A VENU E
B U I LDI N G H EIGH T = 71'
FOOT PR I N T AT G R OUN D L E VEL )
25 ,690 SQ. FT. (BA S ED ON B UIL D I NG
45'
30'
3 2 '
3 2 '
6 4 '
10 '35'
24'6'
20'
12'
32'
20'12'
3 2 '
3 2 '
20'
12'
30'
6'
24'
20'
12'
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4
4'
104'
5'
5'
P MB 3 0 / 3 4
5'
5'
5'
12'12'
2'
P MB
3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512&513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3
P A R C E L 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(P UB L IC DED I CA TED ST REE T )
PM NO 79-251
6
G
B
GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T.
ORANGEWOODAVE68.0'
U
SIGN TYPE A
SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390
32'-0"45'-0"
10 1/8"
PROPERTY LINE
CENTERLINE
LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
2 1/2” tall Tenant names on 5”H
removable face plate, typ.
8’
-
0
”
8’-0”
4’-5 1/2”3’-6 1/2”
0’
-
9
”
1’
-
0
”
6’-6”
1’-0”
1’-6”
1’-6”5’-11 1/2”
East Elevation Side Elevation
1’-0”H x 1’-8”W
1.75 sq. ft.
3’-9”H x 3’-9”W
14.06 sq. ft.
9” tall cut out numbers, typ.
Cut out stripes backed with
white acrylic, typ.
Enlarged Site Plan
Signage Permitted per Anaheim Municipal cope = 55 sq. ft.
Signage Provided= 15.81 sq.ft.
* See ‘Brand Elements’ for finishes specifications
West Elevation
TENANT SIGN: TYPE C1
9
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1 P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0 P A R C E L 1PARCEL 2
5
5
5
6
6
10
177.74'
4 48.6 6'
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUEL
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
C RA
M
P
A
R
T S
T
R
E
E
T
L
C RA M P A R T S T RE
E T
L
GR A TE C OVE R INGUNDER G ROU N D E Q UIPM ENTSINGLE S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U PCOMMERCIAL B U I L D I N G 5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C KOFFICE B U I L D I N GSINGLE S T O R YCON C R E T E T I L T -U PCOMMERC I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
1 5,10 3 SQ . FT . (B ASE D ON BU I L DIN G
F O OTP RINT AT GROU ND LEV E L)
BUIL D ING HEI G HT = 4 1 .5'
2 1 50 T OWN E C E NTR E P L ACE
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING
2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMI T S O F GR O UND FLO OR
2 390 ORA NGE WOO D AV ENU E BU I L DIN G H E I GHT = 7 1'F OOT P RIN T AT GR OUN D LE V EL)25,6 90 S Q. F T. (BAS E D ON B U ILD I NG45'30'
3 2 '
32'
64'
10'3 5'24'6'
20'
12'
32'
20'12'
3 2 '
3 2 '
20'
1 2 '
30'
6'24'
20'
12'
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4 4'104'5'
5'
P MB
3 0 / 3 4
5'
5'
5 '
12'12'
2'
P MB 3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512&513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3PARCEL 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(P U BL I C D EDI CAT ED STR EET )
PM NO 79-251
6
GB GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T.
ORANGEWOODAVE68.0'USIGN TYPE A
SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390
32'-0"45'-0"
10 1/8"
PROPERTY LINECENTERLINELINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
6’-6”
1’-0”
1’-6”
1’-6”
East Elevation West Elevation Side Elevation
Enlarged Site Plan
Signage Permitted per Anaheim Municipal cope = 55 sq. ft.
Signage Provided= 9.25 sq.ft.
* See ‘Brand Elements’ for finishes specifications
2 1/2” tall Tenant names on 5”H
removable face plate, typ.
8’
-
0
”
8’-0”
4’-5 1/2”3’-6 1/2”
0’
-
9
”
1’
-
0
”
5’-11 1/2”
1’-0”H x 1’-8”W
1.75 sq. ft.
2’-0”H x 3’-9”W
7.5 sq. ft.
9” tall cut out numbers, typ.
Cut out stripes backed with
white acrylic, typ.
TENANT SIGN: TYPE C2
10
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1 P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0 P A R C E L 1PARCEL 2
5
5
5
6
6
10
177.74'
44 8 .66 '
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUEL
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
C RA
M
P
A
R
T S
T
R
E
E
T
L
C RA M P A R T S T RE
E T
L
G RAT E CO V ERI N GUNDERGR O UND EQU I PME N TSINGLE S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U PCOMMERCIAL B U I L D I N G 5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C KOFFICE B U I L D I N GSINGLE S T O R YCONCR E T E T I L T -U PCOMMER C I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
15 ,1 03 SQ. F T. (BAS ED ON B UILD I NG
FOOT PRI N T AT G R OUN D L E VEL )
B U I LDI N G H EIGH T = 41.5 '
215 0 TOW NE CENTRE PLACE
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING
2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
L I M ITS OF G ROU ND F L OO R
23 9 0 O RAN G EWOOD AVE NUEB UILD I NG HEIG HT = 71 'FO OTPR I NT AT G ROU ND L EVE L )2 5 ,69 0 SQ. FT . (B A SED ON BUI L DIN G45'30'
32'
3 2 '
6 4 '
10 '35 '24'6'
2 0 '
1 2 '
32'
20'12'
32'
32'
2 0 '
12'
30'
6'24'
2 0 '
1 2 '
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4 4'104'5'
5'
P MB
3 0 / 3 4
5 '
5'
5'
12'12'
2'
P MB 3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512&513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3PARCEL 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUB LIC DE DIC A TE D S T RE E T)
PM NO 79-251
6
GB GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T.
ORANGEWOODAVE68.0'USIGN TYPE A
SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390
32'-0"45'-0"
10 1/8"
PROPERTY LINECENTERLINELINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
6’-6”
1’-0”
1’-6”
1’-6”
North Elevation Side Elevation
Enlarged Site Plan
Signage Permitted per Anaheim Municipal cope = 55 sq. ft.
Signage Provided= 15.81 sq.ft.
* See ‘Brand Elements’ for finishes specifications
South Elevation
8’
-
0
”
8’-0”
4’-5 1/2”3’-6 1/2”
0’
-
9
”
1’
-
0
”
5’-11 1/2”
1’-0”H x 1’-8”W
1.75 sq. ft.
9” tall cut out numbers, typ.
Cut out stripes backed with
white acrylic, typ.
2 1/2” tall Tenant names on 5”H
removable face plate, typ.
3’-9”H x 3’-9”W
14.06 sq. ft.
TENANT SIGN: TYPE C3
BUILDING GRAPHICS
12
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x
x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1 P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0 P A R C E L 1PARCEL 2
5
5
5
6
6
10
177.74'
4 48.6 6'
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUEL
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
C
R
A
M
P
A
R
T S
T
R
E
E
T
L
C RA
M P A R T S T RE E T
L
GRA TE C OVE R I NGUNDERG R OU N D E Q UIPM E NTSINGLE S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U PCOMMERCIAL B U I L D I N G 5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C KOFFICE B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
1 5 ,10 3 SQ . FT . (B ASED ON BU I L DIN G
FO OTP R INT AT G ROU ND L EVE L )
B UIL D I NG HEI G HT = 4 1 .5'
21 5 0 T OWN E C E NTR E PL ACE
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
L IMIT S OF GR O UND FLO O R
2 3 90 ORA NGE W OO D AV E NU E BUI L DIN G HE I GHT = 7 1'F OOT P RIN T AT GROUND LEV EL)2 5,6 9 0 S Q. F T. (B AS E D ON B U ILD I N G45'30'
32'
32'
64'
10'3 5 '24'6'
20'
1 2 '
32'
20'12'
3 2 '
3 2 '
20'
1 2 '
30'
6'
24'
20'
12'
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4
4'
104'5'
5'
P MB
3 0 / 3 4
5'
5'
5 '
12'12'
2'
P MB
3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512 &513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3
P A R C E L 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PU BLI C D EDI CAT E D STR E ET )
PM NO 79-251
6
GB GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T
.
ORANGEWOODAVE68.0'USIGN TYPE A
SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390
32'-0"
45'-0"
10 1/8"
PROPERTY LINE
CENTERLINE
LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
Existing column
BUILDING 2121, EAST ELEVATION
BUILDING 2121, NORTH ELEVATION
N.T.S.
N.T.S.
1
2
MTL-3 3/8” alumnium panel with letters coutout.
2’-0”
Amenity Signage
Amenity Signage
Enlarged Site Plan
B
I
K
E
S
H
O
P
AMENITY SIGNAGE
13
197’-0”
97’-1”
36” tall numbers (29 sq ft)
36” tall numbers (29 sf ft)
BUILDING 2121, WEST ELEVATION (EAST SIMILAR)
BUILDING 2121, NORTH ELEVATION (SOUTH SIMILAR)
N.T.S.
N.T.S.
1
2
Tenant Signage 2’-6” x 27’-3”(max. length)
(68.125 sq. ft.)
Tenant Signage
2’-6” x 27’-6”
(68.75 sq. ft.)
Eyebrow Signage
2’-0” x 24’-6”(max. length)
(49 sq. ft.)
BUILDING 2121 GRAPHICS
14
200’-0”
100’-0”
36” tall numbers (29 sq ft)
36” tall numbers (29 sq ft)
BUILDING 2150, NORTH ELEVATION (EAST SIMILAR)
BUILDING 2150, EAST ELEVATION (SOUTH SIMILAR)
N.T.S.
N.T.S.
1
2
Eyebrow Signage2’-0” x 10’-6”(max. length)
(21 sq. ft.)
Tenant Signage
2’-6” x 28’-0”(max. length)
(70 sq. ft.)
Eyebrow Signage2’-0” x 20”(max. length)
(21 sq. ft.)
BUILDING 2150 GRAPHICS
15
36” tall numbers (29 sq ft)
36” tall numbers (29 sq ft)
200’-0”
100’-0”
BUILDING 2190, WEST ELEVATION (EAST SIMILAR)
BUILDING 2190, NORTH ELEVATION (SOUTH SIMILAR)
N.T.S.
N.T.S.
1
2
Eyebrow Signage
2’-0” x 10’-6”(max. lenght)
(21 sq. ft.)
Eyebrow Signage
2’-0” x 20”(max. length)
(21 sq. ft.)
Tenant Signage
2’-6” x 28’-0”(max. length)
(70 sq. ft.)
BUILDING 2190 GRAPHICS
16
199’-10”
141’-2”
36” tall numbers (29s sq ft)
BUILDING 2390, NORTH ELEVATION (SOUTH SIMILAR)
BUILDING 2390, WEST ELEVATION (EAST SIMILAR)
N.T.S.
N.T.S.
1
2
36” tall numbers (29 sq ft)
BUILDING 2390 GRAPHICS
ATLANTA
BOSTON
CHICAGO
DALLAS
DENVER
LONDON
LOS ANGELES
NEW DELHI
NEW YORK
ORANGE COUNTY
SAN FRANCISCO
SEATTLE
SILICON VALLEY
WASHINGTON, DC
18100 VON KARMAN AVENUE SUITE 100
IRVINE, CA 92612
949.798.7300
949.798.7301 FAX www.interiorarchitects.com IA INTERIOR ARCHITECTS GLOBAL ALLIANCE
Project Name: Anaheim Corporate Plaza Sign
Project No: DEV2015-00006, VAR2015-0518
Location: 2121-2190 S. Towne Centre Pl.
2390 E. Orangewood Ave.
February 29th, 2016
To Whom It May Concern,
This letter is to request conditional use permit for a coordinated sign
program to the Axis campus at the Platinum Triangle.
The campus is being renovated for a progressive office environment
encompassing workplace wellness, creativity and campus branding. The
signage is part of the new environmental graphics planned throughout the
property and is an important element to unify the campus. The goal is to bring all
existing five buildings together, creating a cohesive landscape and architectural
design that speaks to a creative office workplace, utilizing both interior and
exterior amenities. The signage celebrates this new campus feel with the
materials and creative lighting features used throughout the overall design.
Sincerely,
Lisa Kelly
18100 Von Karman Ave, Suite 100 | Irvine, CA 92612
p +1.949.798.7303
interiorarchitects.com
IA Interior Architects Global Alliance
ATTACHMENT NO. 2
E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
A
L
G
R
A
P
H
I
C
S
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
2
EXTERIOR FINISHES
MTL-1 METAL FINISH
PANELS ON 3 FACES OVER BACKER BOARD
A) WESTERN STATES WEATHERED METALLIC
B) RUSTWALL
C)FRESH RUST
MTL-2 METAL BLACK FINISH
MATTE BLACK FINISH.
METAL CABINET WITH LED LIGHT INSIDE FOR
BACKLIGHTING.
MTL-3 METAL FINISH
ALUMINUM PANEL
ACR-1 WHITE ACRYLIC
CUT OUT LOGO, LETTERS AND NUMBERS.
HEIGHT VARIES.
C-1 CONCRETE
BRAND ELEMENTS
LETTER FONT: CALIBRI LIGHT
A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
a b c d e f g h i j k l m n o p q r s t u v w x y z
NUMERIC FONT: LEVENIM MT REGULAR
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0
BODY FONT
SITE SIGNAGE AND WAYFINDING
4
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1
P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0
P A R C E L 1
P A R C E L 2
5
5
5
6
6
10
177.74'
44 8 .66 '
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUE
L
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
C
R
A
M
P
A
R
T S
T
R
E
E
T
L
C RA M P A R T S T RE
E T
L
GRA
T E C O VER I NG
UND E RGR OUN D EQ U I PME NT
S I N G L E S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
1 5,1 0 3 S Q. F T . (B ASE D ON BU I LDI N G
F OOT P RIN T AT GROUND LEV EL)
BUI L DIN G HE I GHT = 4 1.5'
2 1 50 TOW NE C ENT R E P LAC E
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIM I T S O F GR OUN D FL O OR
2 3 90 O RA N GEW OOD AVE NUE
BUIL D ING HEI G HT = 7 1 '
F O OTP RINT AT GROU ND LEV E L)
2 5,6 9 0 S Q. F T . (B ASE D ON BU I LDIN G
4 5 '
30'
32'
3 2 '
64'
10'
3 5 '
24'6'
2 0 '
1 2 '
32'
20'12'
32'
32'
2 0 '
12'
30'
6'24'
2 0 '
1 2 '
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4
4'
10
4'
5'
5'
P MB 3 0 / 3 4
5'
5'
5 '
12'12'
2 '
P MB
3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512&513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3
P A R C E L 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(P UB L I C DED I CA T ED ST R EE T )
PM NO 79-251
6
G
B
GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T.
ORANGEWOODAVE
68.0'
U
SIGN TYPE A
SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390
32'-0"45'-0"
10 1/8"
PROPERTY LINE
CENTERLINE
LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
ORANGEWOO
D
A
V
E
TOWNE CENTRE PL
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T
N
2390
2150
2121
2170
2190
Monument Signage: Type A
Tenant Signage: Type C1
Tenant Signage: Type C3
Tenant Signage: Type C2
Street Signage: Type B1
Amenity Signage
Street Signage: Type B2
SITE SIGNAGE LOCATION
5
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1
P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0
P A R C E L 1
P A R C E L 2
5
5
5
6
6
10
177.74'
448 .66'
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUE
L
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
C
R
A
M
P
A
R
T S
T
R
E
E
T
L
C RA M P A R T S T RE
E T
L
G R ATE COV E RIN G
U NDE R GRO U ND E QUIPMEN T
S I N G L E S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
15,1 0 3 S Q. F T . (B ASE D ON B U I LDI N G
F OOT P RIN T AT GR OUND LE V EL)
BU I L DIN G HE I GHT = 4 1.5 '
2 150 TOW NE C ENT RE P LAC E
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING
2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIM I TS O F G R OUN D F L OOR
239 0 OR ANG E WOO D A VENU E
B U I LDI N G H EIGH T = 71'
FOOT PR I N T AT G R OUN D L E VEL )
25 ,690 SQ. FT. (BA S ED ON B UIL D I NG
45'
30'
3 2 '
3 2 '
6 4 '
10 '
35'
24'6'
20'
12'
32'
20'12'
3 2 '
3 2 '
20'
12'
30'
6'24'
20'
12'
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4
4'
104'
5'
5'
P MB
3 0 / 3 4
5'
5'
5'
12'12'
2'
P MB 3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512&513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3
P A R C E L 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PU
BLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(P UB L IC DED I CA TED ST REE T )
PM NO 79-251
6
GB
GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T.
ORANGEWOODAVE
68.0'
U
SIGN TYPE A
SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390
32'-0"45'-0"
10 1/8"
PROPERTY LINE
CENTERLINE
LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
ORANGEWOOD AVE.
Front Elevation (Back Similar)Side Elevation
MTL-1 Sign cabinet with LED
light inside for backlighting
ACR-1 Cut out logo
4’-9”H x 3’-9”W
17.81 sq. ft.
ACR-1 End panel with LED light
inside sign cabinet for backlighting.4’
-
9
”
16
’
-
0
”
16
’
-
0
”
3’
-
6
”
8’-0”1’-6”
Enlarged Site Plan
Signage Permitted per Anaheim Municipal cope = 55 sq. ft.
Signage Provided= 17.81 sq.ft.
MONUMENT SIGN: TYPE A
6
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x
x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1
P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0
P A R C E L 1
P A R C E L 2
5
5
5
6
6
10
177.74'
4 48.6 6'
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUEL
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
C
R
A
M
P
A
R
T S
T
R
E
E
T
L
C RA M P A R T S T RE
E T
L
GR A TE C OVE R ING
U N DER G ROU N D E Q UIPM ENT
S I N G L E S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
1 5,10 3 SQ . FT . (B ASED ON BU I L DIN G
F O OTP RINT AT GROU ND LEV E L)
BUIL D ING HEI G HT = 4 1 .5'
2 1 50 T OWN E C E NTR E P L ACE
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMI T S O F GR O UND FLO OR
2 390 ORA NGE WOO D AV ENU E
BU I L DIN G HE I GHT = 7 1'
F OOT P RIN T AT GR OUN D LE V EL)
25,6 90 S Q. F T. (BAS E D ON B U ILD I NG
4 5'
30'
3 2 '
32'
64'
10'3 5'
24'6'
20'
12'
32'
20'12'
3 2 '
3 2 '
20'
1 2 '
30'
6'24'
20'
12'
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4
4'
104'
5'
5'
P MB
3 0 / 3 4
5'
5'
5 '
12'12'
2'
P MB 3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512&513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3
P A R C E L 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(P U BL I C D EDI CAT ED STR EET )
PM NO 79-251
6
GB
GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T.
ORANGEWOODAVE68.0'
U
SIGN TYPE A
SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390
32'-0"45'-0"
10 1/8"
PROPERTY LINE
CENTERLINE
LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
North Elevation South Elevation Side Elevation
Enlarged Site Plan
Signage Permitted per Anaheim Municipal cope = 55 sq. ft.
Signage Provided= 16.45 sq.ft.
* See ‘Brand Elements’ for finishes specifications
ACR-1 3” tall cut out letters, typ.
ACR-1 9” tall cut out numbers, typ.
ACR-1 Cut out logo backed with
white acrylic. LED light inside sign
cabinet for backlighting
MTL-1
MTL-2
C-1
8’
-
0
”
6’-6”
10’-0”
5’-10”4’-2”1’-0”
1’-6”
1’-6”
7’-4”
1’
-
0
”
1’
-
4
”
4’-5”H x 3’-0”W
13.40 sq. ft.
1’4”H x 2’-3”W
3.05 sq. ft.
ACR-1 Cut out stripes backed
with white acrylic, typ.
STREET SIGN: TYPE B1
7
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x
x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1 P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0 P A R C E L 1PARCEL 255
5
6 610 177.74'
44 8 .66 '
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUEL
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE C RAMPART STREETL
C RA M P A R T S T RE E T
L
GRAT E CO V ERI N GUNDERGR O UND EQU I PME N TSINGLE S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U PCOMMERCIAL B U I L D I N G 5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C KOFFICE B U I L D I N GSINGLE S T O R YCONCR E T E T I L T -U PCOMMER C I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N GCONCRETE T I L T -U PSINGLE S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
15 ,1 03 SQ. F T. (BAS ED ON B UILD I NG
FOOT PRI N T AT G R OUN D L E VEL )
B U I LDI N G H EIGH T = 41.5 '
215 0 TOW NE CENTRE PLACE
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
L I M ITS OF G ROU ND F L OO R
23 9 0 O RAN G EWOOD AVE NUEB UILD I NG HEIG HT = 71 'FO OTPR I NT AT G ROU ND L EVE L )2 5 ,69 0 SQ. FT . (B A SED ON BUI L DIN G45'30'32'3 2 '6 4 '10 '35 '24'6'2 0 '1 2 '
32'
20'12'
32'
32'
2 0 '
12'
30'
6'
24'
2 0 '
1 2 '
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4 4'104'5'5'
P MB 3 0 / 3 4
5 '
5'
5'
12'12'
2'
P MB
3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512&513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3PARCEL 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUB LIC DE DIC A TE D S T RE E T)
PM NO 79-251 6 GB GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T.
ORANGEWOODAVE68.0'USIGN TYPE A SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390 32'-0"45'-0"10 1/8"PROPERTY LINECENTERLINELINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
1’4”H x 2’-3”W3.05 sq. ft.
6’-6”
1’-0”
1’-6”
1’-6”
8’
-
0
”
10’-0”
5’-10”4’-2”
1’
-
0
”
1’
-
4
”
3” tall cut out letters, typ.
9” tall cut out numbers, typ.
Cut out logo backed with white
acrylic. LED light inside sign
cabinet for backlighting
4’-5”H x 3’-0”W
13.40 sq. ft.
Cut out stripes backed with
white acrylic, typ.
Signage Permitted per Anaheim Municipal cope = 55 sq. ft.
Signage Provided= 16.45 sq.ft.
* See ‘Brand Elements’ for finishes specifications
Enlarged Site Plan
North Elevation South Elevation Side Elevation
STREET SIGN: TYPE B2
8
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x
x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1
P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0
P A R C E L 1
P A R C E L 2
5
5
5
6
6
10
177.74'
448 .66'
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUEL
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
C
R
A
M
P
A
R
T S
T
R
E
E
T
L
C RA M P A R T S T RE E T
L
G R ATE COV E RIN G
U NDE R GRO U ND E QUIPMEN T
S I N G L E S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
15,1 0 3 S Q. F T . (B ASE D ON B U I LDI N G
F OOT P RIN T AT GR OUND LE V EL)
BU I L DIN G HE I GHT = 4 1.5 '
2 150 TOW NE C ENT RE P LAC E
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIM I TS O F G R OUN D F L OOR
239 0 OR ANG E WOO D A VENU E
B U I LDI N G H EIGH T = 71'
FOOT PR I N T AT G R OUN D L E VEL )
25 ,690 SQ. FT. (BA S ED ON B UIL D I NG
45'
30'
3 2 '
3 2 '
6 4 '
10 '35'
24'6'
20'
12'
32'
20'12'
3 2 '
3 2 '
20'
12'
30'
6'
24'
20'
12'
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4
4'
104'
5'
5'
P MB 3 0 / 3 4
5'
5'
5'
12'12'
2'
P MB
3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512&513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3
P A R C E L 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(P UB L IC DED I CA TED ST REE T )
PM NO 79-251
6
G
B
GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T.
ORANGEWOODAVE68.0'
U
SIGN TYPE A
SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390
32'-0"45'-0"
10 1/8"
PROPERTY LINE
CENTERLINE
LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
2 1/2” tall Tenant names on 5”H
removable face plate, typ.
8’
-
0
”
8’-0”
4’-5 1/2”3’-6 1/2”
0’
-
9
”
1’
-
0
”
6’-6”
1’-0”
1’-6”
1’-6”5’-11 1/2”
East Elevation Side Elevation
1’-0”H x 1’-8”W
1.75 sq. ft.
3’-9”H x 3’-9”W
14.06 sq. ft.
9” tall cut out numbers, typ.
Cut out stripes backed with
white acrylic, typ.
Enlarged Site Plan
Signage Permitted per Anaheim Municipal cope = 55 sq. ft.
Signage Provided= 15.81 sq.ft.
* See ‘Brand Elements’ for finishes specifications
West Elevation
TENANT SIGN: TYPE C1
9
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1 P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0 P A R C E L 1PARCEL 2
5
5
5
6
6
10
177.74'
4 48.6 6'
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUEL
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
C RA
M
P
A
R
T S
T
R
E
E
T
L
C RA M P A R T S T RE
E T
L
GR A TE C OVE R INGUNDER G ROU N D E Q UIPM ENTSINGLE S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U PCOMMERCIAL B U I L D I N G 5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C KOFFICE B U I L D I N GSINGLE S T O R YCON C R E T E T I L T -U PCOMMERC I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
1 5,10 3 SQ . FT . (B ASE D ON BU I L DIN G
F O OTP RINT AT GROU ND LEV E L)
BUIL D ING HEI G HT = 4 1 .5'
2 1 50 T OWN E C E NTR E P L ACE
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING
2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMI T S O F GR O UND FLO OR
2 390 ORA NGE WOO D AV ENU E BU I L DIN G H E I GHT = 7 1'F OOT P RIN T AT GR OUN D LE V EL)25,6 90 S Q. F T. (BAS E D ON B U ILD I NG45'30'
3 2 '
32'
64'
10'3 5'24'6'
20'
12'
32'
20'12'
3 2 '
3 2 '
20'
1 2 '
30'
6'24'
20'
12'
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4 4'104'5'
5'
P MB
3 0 / 3 4
5'
5'
5 '
12'12'
2'
P MB 3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512&513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3PARCEL 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(P U BL I C D EDI CAT ED STR EET )
PM NO 79-251
6
GB GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T.
ORANGEWOODAVE68.0'USIGN TYPE A
SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390
32'-0"45'-0"
10 1/8"
PROPERTY LINECENTERLINELINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
6’-6”
1’-0”
1’-6”
1’-6”
East Elevation West Elevation Side Elevation
Enlarged Site Plan
Signage Permitted per Anaheim Municipal cope = 55 sq. ft.
Signage Provided= 9.25 sq.ft.
* See ‘Brand Elements’ for finishes specifications
2 1/2” tall Tenant names on 5”H
removable face plate, typ.
8’
-
0
”
8’-0”
4’-5 1/2”3’-6 1/2”
0’
-
9
”
1’
-
0
”
5’-11 1/2”
1’-0”H x 1’-8”W
1.75 sq. ft.
2’-0”H x 3’-9”W
7.5 sq. ft.
9” tall cut out numbers, typ.
Cut out stripes backed with
white acrylic, typ.
TENANT SIGN: TYPE C2
10
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1 P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0 P A R C E L 1PARCEL 2
5
5
5
6
6
10
177.74'
44 8 .66 '
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUEL
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
C RA
M
P
A
R
T S
T
R
E
E
T
L
C RA M P A R T S T RE
E T
L
G RAT E CO V ERI N GUNDERGR O UND EQU I PME N TSINGLE S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U PCOMMERCIAL B U I L D I N G 5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C KOFFICE B U I L D I N GSINGLE S T O R YCONCR E T E T I L T -U PCOMMER C I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
15 ,1 03 SQ. F T. (BAS ED ON B UILD I NG
FOOT PRI N T AT G R OUN D L E VEL )
B U I LDI N G H EIGH T = 41.5 '
215 0 TOW NE CENTRE PLACE
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING
2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
L I M ITS OF G ROU ND F L OO R
23 9 0 O RAN G EWOOD AVE NUEB UILD I NG HEIG HT = 71 'FO OTPR I NT AT G ROU ND L EVE L )2 5 ,69 0 SQ. FT . (B A SED ON BUI L DIN G45'30'
32'
3 2 '
6 4 '
10 '35 '24'6'
2 0 '
1 2 '
32'
20'12'
32'
32'
2 0 '
12'
30'
6'24'
2 0 '
1 2 '
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4 4'104'5'
5'
P MB
3 0 / 3 4
5 '
5'
5'
12'12'
2'
P MB 3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512&513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3PARCEL 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUB LIC DE DIC A TE D S T RE E T)
PM NO 79-251
6
GB GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T.
ORANGEWOODAVE68.0'USIGN TYPE A
SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390
32'-0"45'-0"
10 1/8"
PROPERTY LINECENTERLINELINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
6’-6”
1’-0”
1’-6”
1’-6”
North Elevation Side Elevation
Enlarged Site Plan
Signage Permitted per Anaheim Municipal cope = 55 sq. ft.
Signage Provided= 15.81 sq.ft.
* See ‘Brand Elements’ for finishes specifications
South Elevation
8’
-
0
”
8’-0”
4’-5 1/2”3’-6 1/2”
0’
-
9
”
1’
-
0
”
5’-11 1/2”
1’-0”H x 1’-8”W
1.75 sq. ft.
9” tall cut out numbers, typ.
Cut out stripes backed with
white acrylic, typ.
2 1/2” tall Tenant names on 5”H
removable face plate, typ.
3’-9”H x 3’-9”W
14.06 sq. ft.
TENANT SIGN: TYPE C3
BUILDING GRAPHICS
12
VAN
S
T
O
P
STOP
xx
x
x
x
x
PM NO. 79-251 PMB 137/18-19
PARCEL 1
PARCEL 2
PARCEL 3
P M B 1 2 3 /3 6 -3 7
P A R C E L 2
P A R C E L 3
P M N O . 8 2 -2 4 1 P M B 1 7 3 /3 9 -4 0 P A R C E L 1PARCEL 2
5
5
5
6
6
10
177.74'
4 48.6 6'
C ORANGEWOOD AVENUEL
C TOWNE CENTRE PLACEL
LC TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
C
R
A
M
P
A
R
T S
T
R
E
E
T
L
C RA
M P A R T S T RE E T
L
GRA TE C OVE R I NGUNDERG R OU N D E Q UIPM E NTSINGLE S T O R Y C O N C R E T E T I L T -U PCOMMERCIAL B U I L D I N G 5 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C KOFFICE B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
3 S T O R Y G L A S S A N D B R I C K
O F F I C E B U I L D I N G
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
S I N G L E S T O R Y
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O N C R E T E T I L T -U P
C O M M E R C I A L B U I L D I N G
S I N G L E S T O R Y
RESIDENTIALAREA(TRAILERPARK)
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS
3 STORY GLASS AND BRICKOFFICE BUILDING
OFFICE BUILDING3 STORY GLASS AND BRICK
2121 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE14, 764 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 41'
1 5 ,10 3 SQ . FT . (B ASED ON BU I L DIN G
FO OTP R INT AT G ROU ND L EVE L )
B UIL D I NG HEI G HT = 4 1 .5'
21 5 0 T OWN E C E NTR E PL ACE
16,987 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDINGFOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)BUILDING HEIGHT = 43.5'
2170 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
BUILDING HEIGHT = 42.5'FOOTPRINT AT GROUND LEVEL)15,074 SQ. FT. (BASED ON BUILDING2190 TOWNE CENTRE PLACE
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
LIMITS OF GROUND FLOOR
L IMIT S OF GR O UND FLO O R
2 3 90 ORA NGE W OO D AV E NU E BUI L DIN G HE I GHT = 7 1'F OOT P RIN T AT GROUND LEV EL)2 5,6 9 0 S Q. F T. (B AS E D ON B U ILD I N G45'30'
32'
32'
64'
10'3 5 '24'6'
20'
1 2 '
32'
20'12'
3 2 '
3 2 '
20'
1 2 '
30'
6'
24'
20'
12'
30'
6'24'
P M B 3 0 / 3 4
4'
104'5'
5'
P MB
3 0 / 3 4
5'
5'
5 '
12'12'
2'
P MB
3 0 /3 4
LOCKHARTTRACTM.R.LACO 4/512 &513
5'
P A R C E L 1 3
P A R C E L 1 2
P A R C E L 1 0
P A R C E L 8
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 9
P A R C E L 1 1
5'
5'
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PUBLIC DEDICATED STREET)
(PU BLI C D EDI CAT E D STR E ET )
PM NO 79-251
6
GB GB
TOWNE CENTREPLACE
R
A
M
P
A
R
T
S
T
.
ORANGEWOODAVE68.0'USIGN TYPE A
SIGNTYPE B1
SIGNTYPE B2
SIGNTYPE C1
SIGNTYPE C2
SIGNTYPE C3
CL
2190
2170
2121
2390
32'-0"
45'-0"
10 1/8"
PROPERTY LINE
CENTERLINE
LINE OF SIGHT TRIANGLE
Existing column
BUILDING 2121, EAST ELEVATION
BUILDING 2121, NORTH ELEVATION
N.T.S.
N.T.S.
1
2
MTL-3 3/8” alumnium panel with letters coutout.
2’-0”
Amenity Signage
Amenity Signage
Enlarged Site Plan
B
I
K
E
S
H
O
P
AMENITY SIGNAGE
13
197’-0”
97’-1”
36” tall numbers (29 sq ft)
36” tall numbers (29 sf ft)
BUILDING 2121, WEST ELEVATION (EAST SIMILAR)
BUILDING 2121, NORTH ELEVATION (SOUTH SIMILAR)
N.T.S.
N.T.S.
1
2
Tenant Signage 2’-6” x 27’-3”(max. length)
(68.125 sq. ft.)
Tenant Signage
2’-6” x 27’-6”
(68.75 sq. ft.)
Eyebrow Signage
2’-0” x 24’-6”(max. length)
(49 sq. ft.)
BUILDING 2121 GRAPHICS
14
200’-0”
100’-0”
36” tall numbers (29 sq ft)
36” tall numbers (29 sq ft)
BUILDING 2150, NORTH ELEVATION (EAST SIMILAR)
BUILDING 2150, EAST ELEVATION (SOUTH SIMILAR)
N.T.S.
N.T.S.
1
2
Eyebrow Signage2’-0” x 10’-6”(max. length)
(21 sq. ft.)
Tenant Signage
2’-6” x 28’-0”(max. length)
(70 sq. ft.)
Eyebrow Signage2’-0” x 20”(max. length)
(21 sq. ft.)
BUILDING 2150 GRAPHICS
15
36” tall numbers (29 sq ft)
36” tall numbers (29 sq ft)
200’-0”
100’-0”
BUILDING 2190, WEST ELEVATION (EAST SIMILAR)
BUILDING 2190, NORTH ELEVATION (SOUTH SIMILAR)
N.T.S.
N.T.S.
1
2
Eyebrow Signage
2’-0” x 10’-6”(max. lenght)
(21 sq. ft.)
Eyebrow Signage
2’-0” x 20”(max. length)
(21 sq. ft.)
Tenant Signage
2’-6” x 28’-0”(max. length)
(70 sq. ft.)
BUILDING 2190 GRAPHICS
16
199’-10”
141’-2”
36” tall numbers (29s sq ft)
BUILDING 2390, NORTH ELEVATION (SOUTH SIMILAR)
BUILDING 2390, WEST ELEVATION (EAST SIMILAR)
N.T.S.
N.T.S.
1
2
36” tall numbers (29 sq ft)
BUILDING 2390 GRAPHICS
2121
2150
ATTACHMENT NO. 4
2150 Sign
2150
2170 Sign
2170
2170/2150 Sign
2170/2150
2190
2170/2150/2390
Building
Directional Sign
Towne Centre
2190
2190
2390
2190 Sign
2390
2390
2390 Sign
Monument Sign
Orangewood
2121/2190/2390
Building Directional Sign
Corner of Orangewood & Rampart
200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.