Resolution-PC 2016-041RESOLUTION NO. PC2016-041
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE CITY
COUNCIL AMEND THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE MASTER
LAND USE PLAN, AND MAKING FINDINGS IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH.
(MISCELLANEOUS CASE NO. 2015-00621)
(DEV2015-00078)
WHEREAS, the Platinum Triangle comprises approximately 820 acres located at the
confluence of the Interstate 5 and State Route 57 ("SR -57 Freeway") freeways in the City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, generally east of the Interstate 5 Freeway, west
of the Santa Ana River channel and the SR -57 Freeway, south of the Southern California Edison
easement, and north of the Anaheim City limit. The Platinum Triangle encompasses the Angel
Stadium, the Honda Center, the City National Grove of Anaheim, the Anaheim Regional
Transportation Intermodal Center ("ARTIC"), and surrounding residential and mixed use
development, light industrial buildings, industrial parks, distribution facilities, offices, hotels,
restaurants, and retail development; and
WHEREAS, since 1996, the City Council of the City of Anaheim ("City Council") has
approved several actions relating to the area encompassed by the Platinum Triangle; and
WHEREAS, on May 30, 1996, the City Council certified Final Environmental Impact
Report No. 320 and adopted Area Development Plan No. 120 for that portion of the Angel
Stadium property associated with the Sportstown Development. Area Development Plan No.
120 entitled a total of 119,543 seats for new and/or renovated stadiums, 750,000 square feet of
urban entertainment/retail uses, a 500 -room hotel (550,000 square feet), a 150,000 -square -foot
exhibition center, 250,000 square feet of office development, and 15,570 on-site parking spaces.
The Grove of Anaheim, the Angel Stadium and the Stadium Gateway Office Building were
either developed or renovated under Area Development Plan No. 120; and
WHEREAS, on March 2, 1999, the City Council adopted the Anaheim Stadium Area
Master Land Use Plan ("MLUP"). The boundaries of the MLUP were generally the same as
those for the Platinum Triangle, with the exception that the MLUP included 15 acres adjacent to
the Interstate 5 freeway that are not a part of the current Platinum Triangle boundaries. As part
of the approval process for the MLUP, the City Council also certified Final Environmental
Impact Report No. 321 and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 106. Development
within the boundaries of the MLUP was implemented through the Sports Entertainment Overlay
Zone ("SE Overlay Zone"), which permitted current uses to continue or expand within the
provisions of the existing zoning, while providing those who may want to develop sports,
entertainment, retail, and office uses with standards appropriate to those uses, including
increased land use intensity. Implementation of the SE Overlay Zone was projected to result in a
net loss of 491,303 square feet of industrial space and increases of 1,871,285 square feet of new
office space, 452,026 square feet of new retail space, and 991,603 square feet of new hotel space.
- I - PC2016-041
Projects that were developed under the SE Overlay Zone included the Ayers Hotel, the Arena
Corporate Center, and the Westwood School of Technology; and
WHEREAS, on May 25, 2004, the City Council approved a comprehensive citywide
General Plan and Zoning Code Update, which included a new vision for the Platinum Triangle.
The General Plan Update (known as "General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00419") changed the
General Plan designations within the Platinum Triangle from Commercial Recreation and
Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial to Mixed -Use, Office -High, Office -Low, Industrial, Open
Space and Institutional to provide opportunities for existing uses to transition to mixed-use,
residential, office, and commercial uses. The General Plan Update also established the overall
maximum development intensities for the Platinum Triangle, which permitted up to 9,175
dwelling units, 5,000,000 square feet of office space, 2,044,300 square feet of commercial uses,
industrial development at a maximum floor area ratio ("FAR") of 0.50, and institutional
development at a maximum FAR of 3.0. In addition, the square footage/seats allocated to the
existing Honda Center and all of the development intensity entitled by Area Development Plan
No. 120 was incorporated into the Platinum Triangle Mixed -Use land use designation. Final
Environmental Impact Report No. 330 ("FEIR No. 330"), which was prepared for the General
Plan and Zoning Code Update and associated actions, analyzed the aforementioned development
intensities on a City-wide impact level and adopted mitigation monitoring programs, including
that certain Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 106 for the Platinum
Triangle; and
WHEREAS, on August 17, 2004 and in order to provide the implementation tools
necessary to realize the City's new vision for the Platinum Triangle, the City Council replaced
the MLUP with the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan (the "PTMLUP"), replaced the SE
Overlay Zone with the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone ("PTMU Overlay Zone"),
approved the form of a Standardized Platinum Triangle Development Agreement, and approved
associated zoning reclassifications. Under those updated zoning regulations, property owners
desiring to develop under the PTMU Overlay Zone provisions were thereafter required to enter
into a standardized Development Agreement with the City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, on October 25, 2005, the City Council certified Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 332 ("FSEIR No. 332"), adopted a Statement of Findings of
Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation
Monitoring Program No. 106A to provide for the implementation of the PTMLUP, in
conjunction with its consideration and approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420,
Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089 and Zoning Code Amendment No. 2004-00036, which
collectively allowed for an increase in the allowable development intensities within the Platinum
Triangle to 9,500 residential units, 5,000,000 square feet of office uses, and 2,254,400 square
feet of commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, on August 21, 2007 and in response to the application of AMB Property, LP
("Original Owner") for entitlements allowing for the development of a mixed-use master planned
community consisting of up to 1,208 residential units, up to 100,000 square feet of office uses,
up to 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, a 1.7 -acre public park, and related improvements
(the "Original Project") on certain real property consisting of approximately 17.5 acres and
bounded by State College Boulevard on the east, Gene Autry Way on the north, and Artisan
-2- PC2016-041
Court on the south (the "Property"), the City Council determined that FSEIR No. 335, a
Statement of Overriding Considerations, together with Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 143,
were, collectively, adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the
Original Project and that no further environmental documentation needed to be prepared for the
Original Project and the "Original Development Approvals" (as defined below) for the Original
Project; and
WHEREAS, the entitlements for the Original Project consisted of (1) General Plan
Amendment No. 2006-00446, to increase the maximum number of dwelling units permitted in
The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (2) Miscellaneous Case No. 2006-00162 to amend
the PTMLUP to increase the maximum number of dwelling units in the Gene Autry District from
1,000 to 1,699 and the total number of dwelling units in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling
units; (3) Zoning Code Amendment No. 2007-00054 to amend The PTMU Overlay Zone to
increase the maximum number of dwelling units in the Gene Autry District from 1,000 to 1,699
and the total number of dwelling units in The Platinum Triangle by 699 dwelling units; (4)
Conditional Use Permit No. 2006-05134 to permit building heights over 100 feet (up to 300 feet
proposed) for the proposed Gene Autry Experience project; (5) Development Agreement No.
2006-00004; and (6) Tentative Tract Map No. 17089 to establish a 21 -lot, mixed use subdivision
with 1,208 residential units; 100,000 square feet of office uses; and, 50,000 square feet of
commercial uses (collectively, the "Original Development Approvals"); and
WHEREAS, on August 21, 2007, the City Council approved the Original Development
Approvals for the Original Project; thereafter, the City and the Original Owner entered into the
Original Development Agreement on or about September 11, 2007, which was recorded in the
Official Records of the County of Orange on November 16, 2007 as Instrument No.
2007000687363 (the "Original Development Agreement"); and
WHEREAS, following the certification of FSEIR No. 332, the City Council approved
two addenda to FSEIR No. 332 in conjunction with requests to increase the Platinum Triangle
intensity by 67 residential units, 55,550 square feet of office development, and 10,000 square
feet of commercial uses. A project Environmental Impact Report was also approved to increase
the allowable development intensities by an additional 699 residential units to bring the total
allowable development intensity within the Platinum Triangle up to 10,266 residential units,
5,055,550 square feet of office uses, and 2,264,400 square feet of commercial uses; and
WHEREAS, on February 13, 2007, the City embarked upon a process to amend the
General Plan, the PTMLUP, the PTMU Overlay Zone, the Platinum Triangle Standardized
Development Agreement, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable
development intensities within the Platinum Triangle to up to 18,363 residential units, 5,657,847
square feet of commercial uses, 16,819,015 square feet of office uses, and 1,500,000 square feet
of institutional uses (the "Platinum Triangle Expansion Project"); and
WHEREAS, on December 11, 2007, the City Council certified Final Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report No. 334 ("FSEIR No. 334") adopting a Statement of Findings of
Fact, a Statement of Overriding Considerations, and the Updated and Modified Mitigation
Monitoring Program No. 106A in conjunction with its consideration and approval of General
Plan Amendment No. 2004-00420, Miscellaneous Case No. 2005-00089, Zoning Code
-3- PC2016-041
Amendment No. 2004-00036, and a series of other related actions in order to provide for the
implementation of the PTMLUP and approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and
WHEREAS, a lawsuit was filed challenging the adequacy of FSEIR No. 334. The City
Council thereafter repealed the approval of the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, including
FSEIR No. 334 and various related actions, and directed staff to prepare a new Subsequent
Environmental Impact Report for the Platinum Triangle Expansion Project; and
WHEREAS, the Original Owner's request for an amendment to the Original
Development Agreement to extend the term for an initial period of five (5) years to an initial
period of ten (10) years was approved by the City Council on September 25, 2012. Accordingly,
on or about October 2, 2012, the City and Original Owner entered into that certain Amendment
No. 1 to the Original Development Agreement, which was recorded in the Official Records on
October 25, 2012 as Instrument No. 652444 ("Amendment No. F); and
WHEREAS, the Original Development Agreement and Amendment No. 1 shall be
referred to herein collectively as the "Existing Development Agreement"; and
WHEREAS, the Existing Development Agreement and the Original Development
Approvals shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Existing Entitlements"; and
WHEREAS, on or about October 26, 2010, the City Council approved the Revised
Platinum Triangle Expansion Project, which included amendments to the General Plan ("General
Plan Amendment No. 2008-00471 "), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case No. 2007-00188"), the
PTMU Overlay Zone, and related zoning reclassifications to increase the allowable development
intensities within the PTMU Overlay Zone from 10,266 residential units up to 18,909 residential
units, 14,340,522 square feet of office uses, 4,909,682 square feet of commercial uses, and
1,500,000 square feet of institutional uses. Before approving said amendments and zoning
reclassifications, the City Council approved and certified the "Revised Platinum Triangle
Expansion Project Subsequent Environmental Impact Report No. 339" for the Revised Platinum
Triangle Expansion Project, including Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Plan No.
106C (collectively referred to herein as "FSEIR No. 339"); and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 1 to FSEIR No. 339, dated April 17, 2012 ("Addendum No.
1 "), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with the Katella Avenue/I-5
Undercrossing Improvements project because none of the conditions described in Section 15162
of the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality
Act ("State CEQA Guidelines") calling for the preparation of a subsequent environmental impact
report had occurred; and
WHEREAS, on December 18, 2012, the City Council approved amendments to the
General Plan ("General Plan Amendment No. 2012-00486"), the PTMLUP ("Miscellaneous Case
No. 2012-00559"), and the PTMU Overlay Zone ("Zoning Code Amendment No. 2012-00107")
to increase the number of dwelling units and reduce the amount of office and commercial
development allowed within the "Mixed -Use" land use designation of the Platinum Triangle and
to amend various Elements of the General Plan to include the addition of a public park; and
-4- PC2016-041
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 2 to FSEIR No. 339, dated December 3, 2012 ("Addendum
No. 2"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions
to a master planned mixed-use project on a 7.01 -acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as
905-917 East Katella Avenue to allow the development of 399 dwelling units (the "Platinum
Gateway Project"); and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 3 to FSEIR No. 339, dated August 2014 ("Addendum No.
3"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a
master planned mixed-use project on a 4.13 -acre (approximate) parcel commonly known as
1005-11105 East Katella Avenue to increase the allowable number of residential dwelling units
from 350 to 389 (the "Platinum Vista Project"). On October 21, 2014, the Anaheim City Council
adopted General Plan Amendment No. 2014-00495 to permit the increase in the number of
dwelling units for the Platinum Vista Project. Thereafter, to be consistent with General Plan
Amendment No. 2014-00495, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6309 on
November 18, 2014, which had the effect of increasing the maximum square footage for
commercial uses within the Katella District of the PTMU Overlay Zone to 634,643 square feet,
resulting in an aggregate increase in the square footage for commercial uses within the PTMU
Overlay Zone to 4,795,111. Ordinance No. 6309 also had the effect of increasing the maximum
number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone to 18,999. However, to correct clerical
errors subsequently discovered in the tabulation of those density numbers in Ordinance No.
6309, the Anaheim City Council adopted its Ordinance No. 6319 on April 7, 2015. Ordinance
No. 6319 had the effect of establishing (1) the maximum square footage for commercial uses
within the Katella District as 658,043 square feet, (2) the maximum square footage for
commercial uses within the PTMU Overlay Zone, as a whole, as 4,735,111, and (3) the
maximum number of housing units within the PTMU Overlay Zone as 19,027; and
WHEREAS, Addendum No. 4 to FSEIR No. 339, dated October 2015 ("Addendum No.
4"), was prepared and considered by the City Council in connection with proposed revisions to a
master planned mixed-use project on a 43.1 -acre (approximate) property commonly known as
1404 East Katella Avenue to permit between 1,400 and 1,746 residential units, between 38,000
and 50,000 square feet of commercial uses, two public parks and a network of local streets (the
"A -Town Project"). On October 6, 2015 the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6344 to amend
the Platinum Triangle Mixed Use Overlay Zone to (1) modify the requirement for ground floor
commercial uses on Market Street, (2) clarify that ground floor commercial uses are required on
Gene Autry Way east of Union Street, and (3) expand the size of the Gene Autry District from 33
acres to 43 acres as part of a revised project design for the "A -Town" Project located at State
College Boulevard immediately north of Gene Autry Way; and
WHEREAS, subsequent to recordation of Amendment No. 1, fee title interest in the
Property was transferred, and the Existing Development Agreement was assigned, to Jefferson at
Stadium Park, L.P. (hereinafter referred to as the "Owner"); and
WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim received a verified petition from the Owner to approve
a proposed amendment to the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan, designated as
Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621, to, among other things, remove one public park and
relocate another public park as well as reconfigure the Property's circulation system, street types
and street -section design based on a new Tentative Parcel Map for the "Project" (as defined
-5- PC2016-041
below). Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621 is proposed in conjunction with the Owner's
application for the following additional entitlements, which, together with Miscellaneous Case
No. 2015-00621, are intended to permit the development of approximately, but not to exceed,
1,079 residential dwelling units inclusive of 12 live/work units, a public park consisting of
approximately 1.1 acres, and approximately, but not to exceed, 98,000 square feet of
commercial/retail uses, and a network of local streets (the "Project"):
1. An amendment to the General Plan to reflect the relocation and
combination of the two proposed park sites shown in the City of Anaheim
General Plan Land Use Element into one site, and designate the former park
location as mixed-use ("General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506");
2. Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, in the form presented at the
meeting at which this Resolution was adopted, to provide for the development of
the Project and certain vested development rights in connection therewith;
3. Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174 to subdivide the site into three
numbered lots that correspond with the proposed apartment buildings and one
lettered lot for the proposed park. The tentative parcel map also establishes the
new alignment and configuration of internal public streets and public
recreation/park areas to be dedicated to the City of Anaheim; and
WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-
00621, Tentative Parcel Map No. 2015-174, and Development Agreement No. 2015-00002 shall
be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed New Entitlements"; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the Proposed New Entitlements, Addendum No. 5 to
FSEIR No. 339, dated May 2016 ("Addendum No. 5"), a copy of which is on file in the Planning
Department and incorporated herein by this reference as though fully set forth, has been prepared
in order to determine whether any significant environmental impacts which were not identified in
the previously -approved FSEIR No. 339 would result or whether previously identified significant
impacts would be substantially more severe. FSEIR No. 339, Addendum No. 1, Addendum No.
2, Addendum No. 3, Addendum No. 4, and Addendum No. 5, together with Mitigation
Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339, and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 for the proposed Project collectively constitute the
environmental documentation under and pursuant to the California Environmental Quality Act of
1970, as amended ("CEQA"), and the State CEQA Guidelines relating to the Proposed New
Entitlements and the Project and shall be referred to herein collectively as the "CEQA
Documents"; and
WHEREAS, on May 16, 2016, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing,
notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with
the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony
concerning the contents and sufficiency of Addendum No. 5 and for and against the Proposed
New Entitlements and the Project and to investigate and make findings in connection therewith;
and
-6- PC2016-041
WHEREAS, by the adoption of a resolution concurrently with, but prior in time to, the
adoption of this Resolution and pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines,
and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, this Planning Commission has found and
determined and has recommended that the City Council so find and determine the following:
1. That Addendum No. 5 together with the other CEQA Documents
collectively constitute the environmental documentation under and pursuant to
CEQA relating to the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project; and
2. That, pursuant to the findings contained in said concurrent resolution,
the CEQA Documents satisfy all of the requirements of CEQA and are adequate
to serve as the required environmental documentation for the Proposed New
Entitlements and the Project and, together with Mitigation Monitoring and
Reporting Program No. 330 for the Project, should be approved and adopted; and
3. That no further environmental documentation needs to be prepared
under CEQA for the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project.
WHEREAS, the Property consists of 1 parcel currently designated for use as "Mixed Use
and Open Space" on the land use map of the General Plan. This parcel is zoned "I" Industrial
and is located within the Gene Autry District of the Platinum Triangle Master Land Use Plan
and, as such, is subject to and must comply with the land use intensities and the development
standards and regulations of Chapter 18.20 (Platinum Triangle Mixed Use (PTMU) Overlay
Zone) of the Code; and
WHEREAS, proposed Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621, in the form presented at the
meeting at which this Resolution was adopted, would amend the PTMLUP to make it consistent
with General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, as adopted; and
WHEREAS, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf,
and after due consideration of and based upon all of the testimony, evidence and reports offered
at said hearing relating to the Proposed New Entitlements and the Project, including Addendum
No. 5, together with the other CEQA Documents, this Planning Commission has heretofore
adopted its Resolution recommending that the City Council amend the General Plan by
approving and adopting General Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506; and
WHEREAS, in order to make the PTMLUP consistent with General Plan Amendment
No. 2015-00506, as adopted, this Planning Commission desires to recommend that the City
Council approve and adopt proposed Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621 in the form presented
at the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentation, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
-7- PC2016-041
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, pursuant to the above findings and based
upon a thorough review of proposed Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-00621, Addendum No. 5, the
other CEQA Documents, and the evidence received to date, the Planning Commission does
hereby approve and recommends that the City Council approve Miscellaneous Case No. 2015-
00621, in the form presented at the meeting at which this Resolution was adopted, contingent
upon and subject to (1) approval of the other Proposed New Entitlements, specifically, General
Plan Amendment No. 2015-00506, Development Agreement No. 2015-00002, and Tentative
Parcel Map No. 2015-174, now pending; and (2) the mitigation measures set forth in Mitigation
Monitoring Program 106C approved in conjunction with FSEIR No. 339 and Mitigation
Monitoring and Reporting Plan No. 330 for the proposed Project.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon compliance with each
and all of the conditions set forth in a separate resolution of this Planning Commission adopted
substantially concurrently with this Resolution relating to the proposed Development Agreement
No. 2015-00002. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or
unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution,
and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
May 16, 2016.
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CHAIR, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
-8- PC2016-041
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on May 16, 2016, by the following vote of the
members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, CALDWELL, DALATI, HENNINGER,
LIEBERMAN, RAMIREZ, SEYMOUR
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 16th day of May, 2016.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
-9- PC2016-041
r HOWELL AVE
■
■ d
■ j fn
I �
W�Z4
General Plan Designation
Mixed Use
Office - Low
Office - High
Industrial
Institutional
Open Space
Market Street
Lewis Street Realignment
Connector Street
os gve
• l ff
Q
__.r■r.r�r-P- -- UU O
Z �
10� A, L4 AN 'T
1
--�-+ Railroad
Figure 3: General Plan Designations
0 250 500 1,000
Feet
•......_.._.._..
h HOWELL"E t
o•■■,i■... Z 7r
I, ■ j �Q7
NATELIA AVE
�r z
a /
'♦ ' W
k
.II y
`GENE AUTRT WAY '
■
■ r
t
... mow... .. ♦AN'EWOOO AVE
0 iso 500 1.000Feet
r �♦ /
9�
r
i
Figure 4: The Platinum Triangle Urban Design Plan
LEGEND
(_ ]
Mixed Use General Plan Designation
•■
Approved Mini -Park Location
The Platinum Triangle
potential Mini -Park Location
•�•••
Conceptual Market Street Location
• • • ■
Conceptual Connector Street Location
ARTIC Station Location
Lewis Street Realignment
ttttttt�
Required Ground Floor Commercial
Approved Linear Park Location
O
Potential Signalized Intersection
J L
-i r
Landmark Architecture
Figure 4: The Platinum Triangle Urban Design Plan
Figure 5: Mixed Use and Office Districts
+ ►
h
Office I
District
►�-+
��.
y
► J ►
I
o I
r Office
HOWELLAVEQy
Arena
District
District
o
Office
II
District
Katella
I
I I I I I
Office II 11 Katella l�
District
KATELLA AV E
�%Dist. it jl II District 11
I
1 I n
,`
s Gene m
Autry W
AJ
yy GENE AUTRY I-1-Dist
Distr��t °
Stadium District
/
Office 1
District 11 ii
'
Gateway
District 11
w •
ORANGEWQODAVE
r
Market Street
4ti
��
11
I
Connector Street
Ingewood1i istrict '
Lewis Street Realignment
Figure 5: Mixed Use and Office Districts
0 19
•"'� i i Ag• r° e° a in
• 1 eere tae a • o
• •e+peeraeeaa a •o
L,
a
1 • �A�A HOWELLAVE rr4ara Q *4;. Sin
W•• a� ®`' v j
`ye•a•d'II r F fA�� #!r�•• • 1p
� < • . ¢�Y
��� KATE VE .�A 7yD�• _
oe
SO
�• GENE AUTRY WAY K •� i
�• ; ■ • "" I
■
■
�•• b• ORANGEWOOD AVE I
�••�•�•'+•�•�'A•1.A• 11•.1•
'aaaaaar�.!�sa�ssses,. naaaf as�aeaa�raa • "�• /
AlyF : ■ '
o zso soo ,.000
■
NO Arlo_
Feet
JL
F
Figure 20: Landscape Concept Flan
LEGEND
d° Date Palm
Mixed Use General Plan Designation
Approved Mini -Park Location
• Mexican Fan Palm
--� The Platinum Triangle
Potential Mini -Park Location
swung Conceptual Connector Street Location
Green Canopy Tree
(Variety of Tree Species Permitted)
� Flowering Canopy Tree
— — — — Lewis Street Realignment
ARTIC Station Location
Citrus Tree
Required Ground Floor Commercial
Approved Linear Park Location
Q Potential Signalized Intersection
00000 Conceptual Market Street Location
Figure 20: Landscape Concept Flan
.................. .............;
•fir
38 H
• -
28 a�
.rF � O t
H 33 '
( 36 HOWELLAVE V '
♦ V
O
I Qrrrr•a s■r■;r*rr ■ 37 A7
I 24 ! �,
:40 w 22 f 27 m • ��
• ' ` r o m ! P
� KATELLAAVET �
.• t, m 23 Q
.35W 3 W
c
v
t t °�
�. 26
GENE AUTRY WAY
' 34
29
f + r40
S
■ rnrsaaQrra■ ■■a �
0 250 500 1.000
Z�
Feef
25 32
♦ _ 30�
_ V i
ORANGEWOOOAVE -�
9 i 31 : 41:
Qy
y9'�.p �q (..�..� wr'�7■ray �
�t
r
J
Legend
® Potential Signalized Intersection
Lewis Street Realignment
000*0 Market Street Location
• ■ ■ • , Conceptual Collector Street Location
owns, Conceptual Connector Street Location
0660, Connector Street Location
L The Platinum Triangle
Mixed Use General Plan Designation
See Figure 38 for Secondary Streets
See Figure 39 for Market Street
See Figure 40 for Connector Streets
See Figure 41 for Collector Streets
Figure 21: Cross Section Key Map
�•r
" f r
.+
------------ iunM i i nvi
■
* 3
' z ~
� o �
General Plan Designation
Mixed Use
Office -Low
Office - High
Industrial
�I Institutional
Open Space
===:: Market Street
Lewis Street Realignment
-�- Connector Street
"rte•+� i:.� ���� Z
r•�+• -2
F `y
w Z
J
aa y r
HOWELLAVE
r r KATELL
m9 /
• °9
• ST, A
�`. . 0
s
J
�—� Railroad
Figure 3: General Plan Designations
0 250 500 1,000
O
Feet
.r-
.
I y
� y
or■ *a% JESSE
■
■ ■ ■ J L
♦ KATELLA7"E
I
I
• \, m
♦ t1 � f
•♦ I'�LIv a I
}
■
GENE At TR1f WAY
MAN ..
J L
-�--�_--�' �•1 ORAR-EW000 AVE
r '.
0 250 500 1.000 29 �*b ■ ■ '
Feet
ago
Figure 4: The Platinum Triangle Urban Design Plan
LEGEND
Mixed Use General Plan Designation
Approved Mini -Park Location
b„—P
The Platinum Triangle
Sn2
7�
Potential Mini -Park Location
410080
Conceptual Market Street Location
■ ■■ ■ @
Conceptual Connector Street Location
ARTIC Station Location
— — — -
Lewis Street Realignment
Approved Linear Park Location
�
Required Ground Floor Commercial
O
Potential Signalized Intersection
J L
mir
Landmark Architecture
Figure 4: The Platinum Triangle Urban Design Plan
Figure 5: Mixed Use and Office Districts
Office
District
f
-�
yJ2
(j� p
Office
HOWELL AVE
Arena
District
, ��-
District
Office
oQ4'
'
----�
j______t Ij
District
Katella
II I I If
District
Office 11 11Katella l
KATELLA AVE
�%Dist.1I jl IjDistrict 11
y1 II II
II Gene
J
,
Autry
J Stadium District
GENE AUTRYAY
0
Office �I Distgpt
I
°
,
'pF % District II II
II
a
F
'
y� -- — 11_-
_ -- =;
II
Gateway
District 1
- - - - -
• ORANGE WgODAVE
II I�
'
Market Street 929
11 Ot�ngewood
/
Connector Street
II 1 District
'
Lewis Street Realignment
I ,
— - - — - - — -
Figure 5: Mixed Use and Office Districts
MA
-�• .y O a •
-�-•�� w e a° a a /
-�,.�-" �'� a- `baa �:� e° s a as /•
1afea4e4 eee° e° o ��
,J y�a4pddeee °e a ao �•
1�.'� HOWELL AVE a4ee ° ° q a� � ��� •
a
/
iI o a ■ . o .a o 44 0 o° ° P
KATELLTE
A
1 7�
•Q O\�y0 � 'v � a a �a � �
O :wm ao
\ 41 1 .1 w
Q� c�
o
10 a 00 �a a
� GENE AUTRY WAY ■ .1 y
�`aa ■ �■ 1 ;1 �
■ I
•• a , A , S .1e ORANGEWOODAVE
0 250 500 1.000
0
Feet
\•a�a�s s s�194�e'1s'Is '4s� _
'N.MNecf17r1Af. A,y,y .wy w����,?M,?!_+y s 41e /
�s�s�e
92 qy � ■ : O � e/ -
9 cci ,1 ■: + r
TPS • r--•• VI
i
Figure 20: Landscape Concept Plan
LEGEND
Date Palm
Mixed Use General Plan Designation
Approved Mini -Park Location
Mexican Fan Palm
'
`'"""' The Platinum Triangle
�
Potential Mini -Park Location
111111111e@ Conceptual Connector Street Location
Green Canopy Tree
(Variety of Tree Species Permitted)
ARTIC Station Location
Flowering Canopy Tree
— — — = Lewis Street Realignment
Citrus Tree
Required Ground Floor Commercial
,—
Approved Linear Park Location
O Potential Signalized Intersection
00000 Conceptual Market Street Location
Figure 20: Landscape Concept Plan
.-.-----. --- ---
—• 38 ;
—" 28 5 '
~ ?� 33
# HOWELL AVE
36 i
• u O
0-ovova] &ooXn%Nj12NjLjI37
24
:40 22 27
♦ KATELLAAVEy • Q
I W 23 / Q
♦35W 3 W N
W
� I
GENE AUTRY WAY 26 /
34■ '
29 ■ 40 !
■ r �
�.n.r■■Qrrr■ ■r• ,
• r
0 250 500 1,000
♦. 25 32 /
'♦ 30�_ IJ :
ORANGEWOOD
w ■
9 V .1k i 31 : 41 i
� S i
J
Legend
Potential Signalized Intersection
____: Lewis Street Realignment
000*0 Market Street Location
owns, Conceptual Collector Street Location
soma, Conceptual Connector Street Location
■ ■ ■ ■ 1 Connector Street Location
The Platinum Triangle
Mixed Use General Plan Designation
See Figure 38 for Secondary Streets
See Figure 39 for Market Street
See Figure 40 for Connector Streets
See Figure 41 for Collector Streets
Figure 21: Cross Section Key Map