Loading...
2060ORDINANCE NO, 2060 AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXATION TO SAID CITY OF ANAHEIM OF CERTAIN INHABITED TERRI- TORY KNOWN AS WAGNER-RIO VISTA ANNEXATION. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DOES ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS-, SECTION 1. The City Council of the City of Anaheim Via) That the proceedings for the annexation to the City of Anaheim of the hereinafter inhabited territory were had in conformity with and pursuant to the provisions of an act of the Legislature of the State of California known as the "ANNEXA- TION ACT OF 1913�9 Title IV, Division 2, Part 2, Chapter 1, Articles 1 to 4 inclusive, of the,Government Code of California), and all ,acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto. ('b) That before any proceedings were commenced for the annexation of said territory, the proponents of said annexation filed a written request with the City Council of the City of Anaheim requesting the consent of the City Council to the com- mencement of proceedings for the annexation of said inhabited territory, more particularly hereinafter described, to the City of Anaheim; that the City Council did thereupon refer said appli- cation and request to the City Planning Commission; that on the 25th day of February, 19 64 the City Council did receive.from thCity Planning Commission its recommendation approving the proposed annexation of said territory to said City of Anaheim; that on the 19th day of May , 19 64 , after the receipt of the recommendation ot the City Planning Commission. the City Council did give its consent to the commence- ment of said proceedings for the annexation of said territory to the City of Anaheim. (c) That the proposal for the annexation of said territory to the City of Anaheim has been submitted to the Local Agency Annexation Commissions of the County of Orange and has been approved by said Local Agency Annexation Commission. (d) That the proposal for the annexation of the here- inafter described territory to the City of Anaheim has been sub- mitted to the County Boundary Commission of the County of Orange, State of California, for a report to the proponents with respect to the definiteness and certainty of the proposed boundary; that the report of the Boundary Commission was --- made within Twenty (20) days after said proposal for annexation was submitted to it. (e) That said proponents did, on the 25th day of May , 19 64 , publish a Notice of Intention o Circulate a Petition relating to the Annexation of said territory to the City of. -Anaheim, a Municipal. Corporation, and on the 3rd day of June, 1964 said proponents did file with the City Clerk oche City oheim a, copy of the said Notice of Inten- tion. to Circulate a Petition for the Annexation to the City of Anaheim of the territory hereinafter described, which notice con- tained the names of the proponents intending to circulate the petition and a. description of the specific boundaries of the -1- territory proposed to be annexed, accompanied by a printed statement, not exceeding Five Hundred K500) words in length, containing reasons for the petition, together with an affi- davit of the publication of said notice of intention to circu- late said petition, (f) That tbereafter, to wit® on the 3rd day of June 19_64 , said City Council adopted its—Resolution No. 6AF,_4k7in. which It acknowledged receipt of a copy of said notieFZY'intention to circulate said petition, in which it approved the in_tention of said proponents to circulate such petit3ion., (g) That thereafter, to wit.- on the 2nd day of JU 196A__, there was filed with the T-1-t—yCler-k of the I9 tv a written petition signed by not less than one- fourth K1/4) of the qualified electors residing within the terri- tory hereinafter described, as shown- by the County Registration of Voters, containing a description of new territory proposed to be annexed to the City of Anaheim, and asking that said territory be annexed to the City of Anaheim, and containing a request that the City Council of the City of Anaheim call a special election to be held in., said territory proposed to be annexed to said City, giving the notice thereof as required by law and submitting to the electors residing within said territory the question whether said new, territory sghoi�ild be annexed to, incorporated in, and made a part of the City of Anaheim, and the property therein be, after such a-111nexation, subject to taxes equally with the property with - irk said City, to pay its pro rata portion, based upon assessed - valuation, of all of bonded indebtedness of said City out- standing at the date of the filing of said petition. or'thereto- fore authorized. N That on, the 7th day of JR�, 19 64 _, the City Couracil, did duly in publicsession.and cZ—nsider said petition and did find that said petition was signed by not less than, one-fourth KI/4) of the qualified electors residing within. the territory hereinafter described, as shown by the County Registration of Voters, and contained a description of the territory proposed to be annexed to the City of Anaheim, and re- quested that said territory be annexed to the City, and the City Council did further find and determine that said proponents had done and performed the acts and things required to be done and performed h, the Annexation Act of 1913 at the time and in the Y I manner as required by the provisions of said act and that said petition was circulated more than twenty-one (21) days after the publication of notice of intention to circulate such petition and that it was signed by not less than one-fourth (1/4) of the qualified electors residing within the territory proposed to be annexed, as shown by the County Registration of Voters and as appears from. the certificate of the City Clerk of the City of Anaheim presented to the City Council at the time of considera- tion of said petition and prior to the adoption of its resolu- tion, and did further find that more than twelve (12) qualified electors resided within the boundaries of the territory pro- posed to be annexed at the time of the filing of said petition for said annexation, and did further find, from evidence and reports received and from said petition, that at the time of the filing and presentation of said petition that said new territory proposed to be annexed to said City of Anaheim did not form a part of any other city or municipal corporation and that said territory was, at the time of filing said petition, inhabited territory and was contiguous to the City of Anaheim. -2- (i) That on the 7th day of July ) 964 , its Reso said City Council adopted lution No® _64R_-4_7_8_ -wFe—rein it declared its intention to call a special election to submit thereat, to the electors residing within said territory, the question of whether said territory should be annexed to, incor- porated in and made a part of said City of Anaheim, and the property therein be, after such annexation, subject to taxation equally with the property within said City, to pay its pro rata portion, based upon assessed valuation, of all of the bonded in- debtedness of said City outstanding or authorized as of the date of the first publication of the notice of special election, or theretofore authorized; that in said resolution said City Council designated said territory as WAGNER-RIO VISTA ANNEXATION as the name andwords o identi- Fic t'on b s-a-i'd territory should be referred to, and in- dicated upon the ballots to be used at the election at which the question of annexation was to be submitted. That by said resolu- tion said City Council fixed August 4 , 1964 , at 7:00 ouclock P.M., at the Council Chamberof the- City Hall, East 20!� 4 Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California, as the day, hour and place when and where any person owning real property within said territory and having any objection to the proposed annexation, might appear before said City Council and show cause why such territory should not be so annexed, and gave notice thereby to all such persons owning such real property of such hearing. Said resolution described the boundaries of said territory so proposed .to be annexed. (j) That a copy of said Resolution No. 64R-478 was published once a: week for two successive weeks priorto saidhear- ing in the Anaheim Bulletin _ , a newspaper of general circula- tion, published in said City of Anaheim, there being no newspaper published within said territory. (k) That on August 4, 1964 -i T said Chamber of said, City - Hall 20 East Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, California, the City Council of the City of Anaheim did hold a public hearing -"-�4+nkg-s to hear all written protests theretofore filed objecting to the calling of said special election or the annexation of said territory hereinafter described, to the City of Anaheim. (1) That at the conclusion of said hearing said City Council found and determined that protests were not made by owners of one-half (1/2) of the value of the territory proposed to be annexed, as shown by the last equalized assessment roll, or otherwise, and did further find that the value of the territory proposed to be annexed does not equal one-half (1/2), or more, of that within the City, as: shown by the last equalized assessment rolls, nor does the number of qualified electors of the territory equal one-half (1/2) or more, of the number of qualified electors within the City, as shown by the County registration of voters, and thereupon, to wit, on August 4 -, 19 164 , adopted its Resolution No. 64R-576 calling a special election to be held on September 29 , 19 64 , and directing the City Clerk to give notice thereof by pu ishing notices thereof at least once a week for four (4) successive weeks prior to the _211h_ day of September , 19 kL1_, in the glacentia-Courier a newspaper of general circulation, printed and published outs! of the City of Anaheim, but in the County of Orange, in which the territory so proposed to be annexed to the City of Anaheim is -3- situated, directing that such notice distinctly state the date of such special election and the measure or proposition to be submitted at such special election. That in said resolution said City Council described the boundaries of said territory, establishing one voting precinct for such election, which it designated as WAGNER-RIO VISTA ANNEXATION VOTING PRECINCT, and w is precinct inc u ed all of said terri- tory proposed to be annexed. Ey said resolution said City Council also established a polling place within said territory and designated election officials for said election, which officials were qualified electors residing within said territory. Ey said resolution said City Council described the ballots to be used in said election.. (m) That on August 27, September 3 S tember 10 , �gptembe 1.7 August S tember 24 64 , the ity Clerk o te ity o A..heim gave notice • szid election by publishing notices thereof in the Placentia -Courier.., a newspaper of general circulation-,-p-r-3.n-t-eTand published outside of the City of Anaheim, but in the County of Orange, in -which the territory so proposed to be annexed to the City of Anaheim is situated. That in said published notices of election said City Clerk declared that said election would be held within said terri- tory on September 29 , 19 64 , for the purpose,of submitting to the electors residing therein the question of whether the ter- ritory hereinafter described should be annexed to, incorporated in and made a part of the City of Anaheim, and that after such annexation such territory should be subject to taxation equally with the property within said City of Anaheim to pay its pro rata portion, based upon assessed valuation, of all bonded indebted- ness of said Cit. of Anaheim outstandingon August 27 19_k4_,, or theretofore authorized. Sainotice containeda description of the boundaries of said territory and designated the same as WAGNER-RIO VISTA ANNEXATION Said notice set forth tFie.question E-79-e- place2 on t e ballot's to be submitted to the electors at'said election and gave instructions on the manner of voting. Said notice described the voting precinct theretofore established by said City Council for the purpose of said election, described the polling place as Sterlilag Homes II Sales Office. 52 Marian St., _ o n' gave the names o the election o cia, s and t e' time of opening and closing of the polls. Said notice set. forth the amounts of all bonded indebted- ness of said City of Anaheim already incurred and outstanding at the first publication of the notice of election and at the time of the filing of said petition for the annexation of said terri- tory to the City of Anaheim, the amounts of such bonded indebted- ness theretofore authorized and to be represented by bonds there- after to be issued, and the maximum rate of interest payable on, or to be payable on, such bonded indebtedness, together with the specifications of the improvements for which such bonded indebted- ness was incurred or authorized, the description of which is the same as that set forth in Section 3 hereof. (n) That said . elec tion was duly held on?..9 , 19-64 �. cri, within said territory at the polling place described, pursuant,to said Resolution No. 64R- and in accordance with the provisions of said Annexa Act of 1913, and all acts amendatory thereof and supplementary thereto, and the election laws applicable thereto and in accordance with the notices posted by said City Clerk -4- • (o) That upon the ballots used and submitted to the electors at said election, in addition to other 'natters required by law to appear thereon, was printed the following: Shall .WAGNER-RIO VISTA ANNEXATION be annexeU to t e zty of Kn-aFeim, California, and the property in said WAGNER-RIQ'(,7�STA ANNEXATION be, after such -annexation, subject to : YES taxation equally with the property within said City of Anaheim, to pay its pro rata portion, based upon : NO assessed valuation, of all bonded in- debtedness of said City of Anaheim outstanding on August 27, 1964 , or theretofore authorized? (p) That immediately on the closing of the polls, the judges and inspector of said voting precinct counted the ballots, made up, certified and sealed the ballots and tally sheet of the ballots cast at said polling place, and delivered said ballots, tally sheet and returns to and deposited the same with said City Clerk of the City of Anaheim. (q) That said City Council did, at its next regular meeting held not less than six (6) days nor more than seven (7) days from and after the date of the election, to wit, on the 6th day of October , 19 64 , meet and proceed to canvass said returns; anc upon the same day completed such canvass and immediately thereafter caused a record thereof to be made and entered upon its minutes. That from its canvass of said returns said City Council finds that the whole number of votes cast at said election was 55 , including -0- absentee ballots; that the number of votes cast in said election in favor of annexation of said territory to said City of Anaheim was 54 ; that the number of votes cast in said election against annexation was 1 SECTION 2. That the City Council of said City of Anaheim does hereby approve the annexation of said territory to said City of Anaheim, a municipal corporation; that said territory is hereby annexed to and incorporated in said City of Anaheim; that said territory is hereby accepted by said City of Anaheim as a part of said City of Anaheim. That said territory :heretofore referred to, and which has heretofore been designated by said City Council as WAGNER-RIO-VISTA ANNEXATION of Orange, State of California, is tiguous to said City of Anaheim and boundaries thereof are as follows: -5- is situated within the County unincorporated and is con - the description and specific WAGNER-RIO VISTA ANNEXATION Revised April 10, 1964 ►That parcel of land, located in the County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: Beginning at a point in the existing City Limit line of the City of Anaheim as established by the Wagner -Sunkist Annexation passed by Ordinance No. 1616, September 5, 1961 and filed with the Secretary of State October 5, 1961 and recorded in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California, October 9, 1961, said point of beginning being the most Southeasterly corner of the aforementioned Wagner -Sunkist Annexation, said Southeasterly corner being the intersection of the Southerly prolongation of the East line of the West half of the Southeast quarter of Section 13, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, S.B.B. & M., with a line parallel with and 30.00 feet Southerly as measured at right angles from the North line of the Northeast quarter of Section 24, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, S.B.B. & M., said parallel line also being the Southerly right of way line of Ball Road, 60.00 feet in width; thence 1. Following along a portion of the existing City of Anaheim City Limit line as established by said Wagner -Sunkist Annexation the following courses and distances: North 000 13' East 2,650 feet, more or less, along the said Southerly prolongation and along the said East line of the West half of the Southeast quarter of Section 13, to an intersection with a line parallel with and 20.00 feet Southerly as measured at right angles from the North line of the Southeast quarter of said Section 13; thence South 890 54' East 1,350 feet, more or less, along the last mentioned parallel line and the Easterly prolongation thereof to an intersection with a line parallel with and 30.00 feet easterly as measured at right angles from the West line of the Southwest quarter of Section 18, Township 4 South, Range 9 West, S.B.B. & M., in the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana, as shown on a Map recorded in Book 51, page 10 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California; thence I M. f 2. Leaving the said existing City of Anaheim City Limit line South 00 10' 44" West 322 feet, more or less, along the last mentioned parallel line to an intersection with the Northeasterly prolongation of the Southeasterly line of the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana Rancho line, as said Rancho line is shown on the Map of tract No. 4716 recorded in Book 171, pages 36 through 40 of Miscellaneous Maps, records of Orange County, California; thence 3. South 250 50' 34" West 402 feet, more or less, along the said Northeasterly prolongation and a portion of the Southeasterly line of the said Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana Rancho line to an intersection with the Easterly line of Tract No. 4716, as said inter- section is shown on the Map of said Tract No. 4716; thence 4. Following along a portion of the Easterly line of said Tract. No. 4716, also being a portion of the Southeasterly line of the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana Rancho line as shown on the Map of said Tract No. 4716, the following courses and distances: South 250 50' 34" West 1002.32 feet, South. 400 37' 08" West 437.41 feet to the most Northerly corner of Lot 42 of said Tract No. 4716; thence 5. South 00 04' 34" West 733.79 feet, leaving the said Southeasterly line of the Rancho San Juan Cajon de Santa Ana Rancho line and continuing along a portion of the Easterly line of said Tract No. 4716, and the Southerly prolongation thereof to an intersection with a line parallel with and 20.00 feet Southerly as measured at right angles from the center line of Ball Road; thence 6. South 890 34' 20" West 1.30 feet, more or less, along the last mentioned parallel line, being the Southerly right of way line of Ball Road, 40.00 feet in width, to an inter- section with the Easterly right of way line of Eaton Way, 40.00 feet in width; thence 7. South 00 02' 50" East 110.00 feet along the Easterly right of way line of said Eaton Way to an intersection with a line parallel with and 30.00 feet Southerly as measured at right angles from the center line of Ball Road; said point of intersection being the Easterly prolongation of the Southerly right of way line of Ball Road, now 60.00 feet in width; thence 8. South 890 34' 20" West 330 feet, more or less, along the last mentioned parallel line being the Southerly right of way line of said Ball Road, now 60.00 feet in width, and the Easterly prolongation thereof to the point of beginning. - 7 - SECTION 3, That all of the bonded indebtedness of said City of Anaheim outstanding on August 27 a 19 b4 8 or theretofore authorized, is as follows: 0-', That with respect to the assumption of bonded indebtedness and the taxation of the territory proposed to be annexed, equally with the property within the City of Anaheim to pay its pro rata portion, based upon the assessed valuation, of all bonded indebted- ness of said City of Anaheim outstanding on August 27, 1964 or theretofore authorized, the electors in said territory so proposed to be annexed are hereby notified that the amounts of such bonded indebtedness heretofore incurred or authorized outstanding as of August 27, 1964 are as follows.- 1.. 1951 Sewer Bonds, Series 20. - Amount outstanding,. $520,000,00 Maximum rate of interest.- 1-3/4% The improvezaexnt for which such bonds were issued and such indebtedness incurred was to do construction and improve - went work, on domestic: sewer system of the City of Anaheim and construction and improvement work on the Joint Outfall Sewer System. of Orange County. 2. 1.952 Waterworks Extension, Series 21. - Amount outstanding.- $2253,000.00 Maximum rate of interest.- 2-1/4% The improvement for which such bonds were issued and such indebtedness incurred was to extend and improve the water works system of the city, said facilities to include storage facilities, wells, pumps, works, structures and water mains (including replacement of present existing mains) and the acquisition of lands, rights-of-way, pipe, equipment, materials apparatus and property necessary for said improve - menu 3. 1952 Electric Works Extension, Series 22.- L Amount outstanding.- $2252000.00 Maximum rate of interest-, 2-1/47 The improvement for which such bonds were issued and such MOM indebtedness.incurred was to extend and improve the electric distribution system of the city, such facilities to include the ac4uisision and construction (including the reconstruction of electric lines) of transformer stations and distribution substations, including the acquisition of lands, rights-of-way, material, equipment, apparatus and property necessary for said improvements 4. 1954 Municipal Improvement Bonds, Series 23-, Amount outstanding.- $1,925,000.00 Maximum rate of interest.- 6% The improvement for which said bonds were issued and such indebtedness incurred was for the purpose of the acquisition and construction of certain municipal improvements. 5. 1960 Municipal Improvement Bonds, Series 24.- Amount outstanding.- $9,135,000.00 Maximum rate of interest.- 4-1/4% The improvement for which said bonds were issued and such indebtedness incurred was for the purpose of the acquisition and construction of certain municipal improvements 6. 1960 Park Site Acquisition and Improvement Bonds, Series 25.- Amount outstanding. $1,190,000.00 Maximum rate of interest-, 6% The improvement for which said bonds were authorized was for the purpose of acquisition and clearing of real property for park sites and the acquisition and construction of park improvements, 7. 1963 Municipal Improvement Bonds, Series 26 Amount authorized,-, $8,900,000.00 Amount issued and outstanding-,' $6,600,000.00 Maximum rate of interest-, 3.20% -10- The improvement for which said bonds were issued and such indebtedness incurred was for the purpose of the acquisi- tion and construction of certain municipal improvementso Site That the amount of bonded indebtedness above described and the description thereof is the same as that described in said notice of election and is the.bonded indebtedness for which said territory shall be subject to taxation equally with property within said City of Anaheim, to pay its pro rata portion, based upon assessed valua- tion, SECTION 4, The City Clerk of the City of Anaheim shall certify to the passage of this Ordinance and cause the same to be published in the Anaheim Bulletin , a newspaper of general eir- culation, printed, publiZed and circulated in the City of Anaheim, and thirty (30) days from and after its final passage it shall take effect and be in full force. SECTION 5, That immediately upon this. Ordinance becoming effective, the City Clerk of the City of Anaheim shall make, under the seal of said City, and transmit to the Secretary of State, a certified copy of this Ordinance, giving the date of its passage, THE FOREGOING ORDINANCE is approved and signed by me this 20th day of October , 19 64 CITY OF ANAHEIM I, DENE Ido WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do.hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a r meeting of the City Council of the city o Anaheim, heldon t ® 6th day of October , 19.k4 , and that the same was passedand adoptea at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 20th day of October , 19_§4U , by the following vote of the memere ereof o AYES o COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES o COUNCILMEN,* None ABSENT: COUNCILMENS None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said Ordinance on the 2Qth day o1' October , 19_(L4_. IN WITNESS WEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 20th day of October 40 19, DENE M. WILLIAMS, CITY CLERK Deputy (SEAL) -12- ATTEST, MAYOR OF T�= I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, CITY CLERK OF THE,CITY QF -ANAHEIM _ DENE BILL. II�ILLIAMS, CITY CLERK DO HEREBY CERTIFY 44 -IAT THE FOREGOING=-.bi-1�INANCE 'PUBLI�4ED r j%� �y i✓ yy Deputy NO. UG D - =WAS ONCE 7W CLERK OF TIM UITY IN THE ANAHEIM jULLETIN•- - ON T rzad4? STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss, CITY OF ANAHEIM I, DENE Ido WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do.hereby certify that the foregoing Ordinance was introduced at a r meeting of the City Council of the city o Anaheim, heldon t ® 6th day of October , 19.k4 , and that the same was passedand adoptea at a regular meeting of said City Council held on the 20th day of October , 19_§4U , by the following vote of the memere ereof o AYES o COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES o COUNCILMEN,* None ABSENT: COUNCILMENS None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said Ordinance on the 2Qth day o1' October , 19_(L4_. IN WITNESS WEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the seal of the City of Anaheim this 20th day of October 40 19, DENE M. WILLIAMS, CITY CLERK Deputy (SEAL) -12-