Loading...
PC 2009/03/02-Workshop SB 375City of Anaheim Planning Commission Workshop March 2, 2009 1 Introduction to GHG and Climate Change Legislation What this means in California -AB 32 Overview of SB 375 Intent How it works and what it does Impacts to the region Impacts to the City 2 Global –Kyoto Protocol. Commitment by certain nations to reduce GHG emissions. Federal –Pending Legislation. Likely new legislation will be introduced this year as this is an important platform for the current administration. Regional –Western Climate Initiative, a voluntary group of 7 Western states and 4 Canadian Provinces that are designing a cap and trade system. California is a member. State –AB 32 and various other laws and newly introduced legislation to implement AB 32. 3 Goal is to reduce State’s GHG emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 Administered by CARB Scoping Plan approved in December 2008 provides framework for emission reductions through measures and recommendations. Regulations to be developed over next two years based on Scoping Plan. 4 GHGs = Carbon Dioxide (CO2 ), Methane, Nitrous Oxide, Sulphur Hexafluoride, all hydrofluorocarbons and all perfluorocarbons. All GHG emissions measured in CO2 equivalents Measurement MMTCO2E = Million Metric Tons of CO2Equivalent. What does California need to do: 1990 Estimated Emissions = 427 MMTCO2E 2020 Projected Emissions = 596 MMTCO2E Reduce emissions by 169 MMTCO2E 5 Electricity 23% Transportation 38% Commercial and Residential 9% Industry 20% Other 10% 6 7 Industry 20 MMTCO2E 12% Comm. and Res. 6 MMTCO2E: 3% "Cap and Trade" 35 MMTCO2E 20% Other 7 MMTCO2E 4%Electricity 43 MMTCO2E 25%Light-Duty Vehicle Standards 32 MMTCO2E 18% Low Carbon Fuel 15 MMTCO2E 9% Other 11 MMTCO2E:6% Regional Transp. (SB 375) 5 MMTCO2E 3% Transportation 63 MMTCO2E 36% One mechanism to implement the Regional Transportation measure of the Scoping Plan Congestion pricing Pay-as-you-drive insurance Estimated target of 5 MMTCO2E Subject to change as a result of CARB actions in the next year 8 No mandated actions for the City -actions are strongly encouraged Adopt State goal of reducing GHG emissions of operations by 15% by 2020 GHG emissions inventory of the entire City Indirect impacts will result Costs and savings Potential legal actions by the State Attorney General 9 Effective January 1, 2009 Intended to reduce greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions resulting from vehicle miles traveled (VMT) by automobiles and light trucks through changes in land use patterns and transportation investment. 10 CARB to set statewide and regional GHG emission reduction targets VMT reductions are the only means to measure the reduction of GHG emissions. Changes in land use and transportation investment are the only measures to demonstrate reduced VMT. 11 Sustainable Communities Strategy (SCS) –A new element of the Regional Transportation Plan (RTP) Changes to the Regional Housing Needs Allocation (RHNA) process and alignment with the SCS Some CEQA relief for residential projects that develop consistent with the SCS 12 California Air Resources Board RTAC & Emissions methodology/targets MPO (SCAG) SCS, tools, public participation plan, RHNA Subregions (OCCOG) Option to prepare SCS and RHNA CTC (OCTA) Collaboration on SCS, transportation projects 13 Local Governments Participation, involvement, & collaboration Growth forecast input Sites for RHNA and housing element Rezoning sites to accommodate housing need Should, but are not required to: Ensure consistency of SCS with general plan & zoning Hold public hearings to identify areas/projects consistent with SCS Streamline permitting and CEQA process Adopt transportation mitigation measures 14 Growth projection Land use map with location, density and intensity Best available data on open space and farmland Must be internally consistent with the other parts of the RTP Identify whether the SCS land use pattern and transportation system can achieve the GHG targets 15 Region must prepare an Alternative Planning Scenario (APS) that: Identifies why SCS cannot meet the target and what is needed to achieve the target Identifies a land use and transportation scenario that would achieve the GHG emissions target 16 Increases the roles of regional and subregional organizations Promotes smart growth principles through legislation with some teeth Strengthens the mixing of transportation and land use decision-making Establishes goals for which success can only be measured through models 17 SCS will be prepared over the next 3 years and adopted with the Regional Transportation Plan in 2012 Shift of growth from the inland communities to coastal communities SCAG is half of state and may assume half of state target of 5 MMTCO2E or 2.5 MMTCO2E Transportation projects MAY be affected. Land uses may change. 18 SCAG is one of first regions to undertake implementation –no precedence Modeling will determine success Data and methodology –limited, untried, and in some cases non-existent No funding to implement it, yet future funding may be tied to it 19 Working on this now Participating in discussions and working groups to develop methodologies Coordinating with OCTA, OCCOG and SCAG to develop the City’s growth projection that will be incorporated into the SCS 20