PC 2019/04/01
City of Anaheim
Planning Commission
Agenda
Monday, April 1, 2019
Council Chamber, City Hall
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, California
• Chairperson: Jess Carbajal
• Chairperson Pro-Tempore: John Gillespie
• Commissioners: John Armstrong, Bill Dalati, Kimberly Keys,
Michelle Lieberman, Steve White
• Call To Order - 5:00 p.m.
• Pledge Of Allegiance
• Appreciation Plaque presented to Commissioners Carbajal, Dalati, and Gillespie
• Public Comments
• Consent Calendar
• Public Hearing Items
• Commission Updates
• Discussion
• Adjournment
For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the
agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary.
A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning and Building
Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff
report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on
Thursday, March 28, 2019, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a
majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings
legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the
Planning and Building Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard,
Anaheim, California, during regular business hours.
You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following
e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net
04-01-2019
Page 2 of 5
APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS
Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications,
Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations,
Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission
action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written
form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City
Clerk.
The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public
hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City
Clerk of said hearing.
If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to
raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this
notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council
at, or prior to, the public hearing.
Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M.
Public Comments
This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of
the Anaheim City Planning Commission or provide public comments on agenda items with the
exception of public hearing items.
04-01-2019
Page 3 of 5
Consent Calendar
There will be no separate discussion on the item prior to the time of the voting on the
motion unless members of the Planning Commission, staff, or the public request the
item to be discussed and/or removed from the Consent Calendar for separate action.
Reports and Recommendations
ITEM NO. 1A
2019 VALIDATION REPORT FOR THE ANAHEIM
RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN MASTER
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT (EIR) NO. 313
AND SUPPLEMENTAL EIR NO. 340
(DEV2017-00072)
Location: Anaheim Resort Specific Plan
Request: To approve a validation report for the Master
EIR and Supplemental EIR prepared for the Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan pursuant to Section 15179(b) of the
California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines.
Motion
Project Planner:
Elaine Thienprasiddhi
ethien@anaheim.net
04-01-2019
Page 4 of 5
Public Hearing Item
ITEM NO. 2
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05835
VARIANCE NO. 2017-05091
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00144
(DEV2015-00116)
Location: 5706 East La Palma Avenue
Request: The applicant requests approval of the following
land use entitlements: (i) a Conditional Use Permit to
permit the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises
consumption in conjunction with a new convenience store
and automobile service station; (ii) a Variance to permit
reduced front and interior structural and landscaping
setbacks; (iii) an associated Determination of Public
Convenience or Necessity to permit the off-premises sales
and consumption of alcoholic beverages at a new
convenience market; (iv) and a Shared Parking
Agreement.
Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission
will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically
Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional
environmental documentation per California Environmental
Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15332, Class 32
(Infill Development Projects).
Resolution No. ______
Resolution No. ______
Project Planner:
Lucita Tong
LTong@anaheim.net
Adjourn to Monday, April 15, 2019 at 5:00 p.m.
04-01-2019
Page 5 of 5
CERTIFICATION OF POSTING
I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at:
1:00 p.m. March 27, 2019 (TIME) (DATE)
LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK
SIGNED:
ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all
members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin
in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.
If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative
formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities
Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation
thereof.
Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids
or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification,
accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning and Building Department either in person
at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later
than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting.
La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos
los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen
nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal.
Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos
apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de
Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y
reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo.
Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios
auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación,
ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en
persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139,
antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 1-A
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: APRIL 1, 2019
SUBJECT: 2019 VALIDATION REPORT FOR THE ANAHEIM
RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT NO. 313 AND SUPPLEMENTAL
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 340
LOCATION: The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (ARSP) pertains to
approximately 581 acres, generally located west of the Interstate 5 (I-5) Freeway,
south of Vermont Avenue, east of Walnut Street, and north of Chapman Avenue.
REQUEST: Staff requests approval of the 2019 Validation Report for the ARSP
Master Environmental Impact Report No. 313 (EIR 313) and Supplemental
Environmental Impact Report No. 340 (EIR 340), referred to as the “2019 Validation
Report,” pursuant to California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines
Section 15179.
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission, by
resolution, approve the 2019 Validation Report:
(a) Determining that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the
circumstances under which EIR 313 and EIR 340 were certified;
(b) Determining that there is no new available material information, which was
not known and could have been known at the time EIR 313 and EIR 340 were
certified; and,
(c) Allowing the continued use of EIR 313, as supplemented by EIR 340, for
projects implementing the ARSP.
BACKGROUND: On September 20, 1994, the Anaheim City Council adopted the
ARSP to provide a long-range comprehensive plan for future development of
approximately 549.5 acres within the 1,078-acre Anaheim Resort. Attachment No. 1
depicts the area subject to the ARSP, which encompasses the Anaheim Convention
Center and privately owned properties surrounding the Disneyland Resort. The
ARSP includes specific zoning and development standards, design guidelines, a
streetscape program, and a public facilities plan, intended to maximize the area’s
potential, guide future development, and ensure a balance between growth and
infrastructure. The ARSP permits the development of hotel, convention, retail, and
other visitor-serving uses and identifies the necessary infrastructure improvements to
support future development. In connection with the adoption of the ARSP, the City
Council, acting as the Lead Agency under CEQA, certified EIR 313.
2019 VALIDATION REPORT FOR THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT
April 1, 2019
Page 2 of 3
Since the approval of the ARSP, the City Council has approved modifications to the document
through its approval of 14 amendments and eight adjustments, which have increased the area
subject to the ARSP to 581.3 acres. The attached 2019 Validation Report provides a summary
description of each of these actions.
In December 2012, City Council certified EIR 340 in support of Amendment No. 14 to the
ARSP. EIR 340 reevaluated all the environmental changes that have occurred in and around The
Anaheim Resort since certification of EIR 313 and evaluated a 200,000 square foot expansion of
the Anaheim Convention Center, streamlining of development standards, and an update to the
specific plan documents to reflect current conditions in The Anaheim Resort.
EIR 313 and EIR 340 are Master EIRs, which take into consideration the reasonably anticipated
scope of development under the ARSP and serve as the base documents for any future
environmental review necessary for development on properties subject to the ARSP that conform
to the parameters and assumptions addressed in the EIRs. Article 11.5 (Master Environmental
Impact Report) of the CEQA Guidelines dictates the use and contents of a Master EIR. Section
15179 (Limitations on the use of the Master EIR) of Article 11.5 sets the requirements for the
continued use of a Master EIR for subsequent projects described in the Master EIR. The
continued use of the Master EIR requires a determination that:
(a) No substantial changes have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the
Master EIR was certified; or that,
(b) There is no new available information, which was not known and could not have been
known at the time the Master EIR was certified.
In 1999, and subsequently in 2004, the City prepared validation reports for EIR 313 to show that
EIR 313 continued to meet the criteria of Section 15179 for its continued use. In both instances,
the Planning Commission determined that no substantial changes occurred with respect to the
circumstances and which EIR 313 was certified, and that there was no new available material
information which was not known and could have been known at the time EIR 313 was certified.
In 2008, staff made a preliminary determination that it could not recommend that the Planning
Commission could continue to make these findings for EIR 313 and subsequently prepared EIR
340, described above, to supplement EIR 313. As described above, the City Council certified
EIR 340 in 2012.
ANALYSIS: The purpose of the 2019 Validation Report is to verify that data in EIR 313, as
supplemented by EIR 340, is accurate and current to allow the continued use of the document for
environmental compliance, consistent with CEQA Statutes and Guidelines. CEQA Guidelines,
Section 15179 states that, if a Lead Agency certified the Master EIR more than five years prior to
the filing of an application for a subsequent project described in the Master EIR, the Lead
Agency must comply with one of the following:
(a) Review the adequacy of the Master EIR and make a finding that there are no substantial
changes which have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Master
EIR was certified; or that there was no new available information which was not known
and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was certified; or
2019 VALIDATION REPORT FOR THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL
IMPACT REPORT
April 1, 2019
Page 3 of 3
(b) Prepare and certify a subsequent or supplemental EIR that updates the Master EIR, if
necessary.
The intent of the requirement is to ensure that the Lead Agency periodically reviews a Master
EIR to determine if it still represents an accurate assessment of the significant environmental
effects of the project for which it was prepared. If any of the significant effects have changed, an
update of the Master EIR would be required; this was the case in 2012 and resulted in the
preparation and certification of EIR 340.
The City’s on-call environmental consultant, Bonterra Psomas, prepared the 2019 Validation
Report for EIR 313 and EIR 340, dated January 2019. The 2019 Validation Report reviews the
environmental analyses included in EIR 313, as supplemented by EIR 340, and compares it to
the current setting and projected development.
The 2019 Validation Report identifies the major related projects that have occurred or that the
report anticipates will occur in the near future outside of the ARSP. These projects have included
primarily residential uses. Although these projects will generate additional vehicle trips that
would result in increased congestion and traffic on major arterial roads and freeways, the City
has required each of the projects to be subject to independent environmental review including a
consideration of cumulative impacts. Therefore, none of these projects affects the continued use
of EIR 313 and EIR 340.
The 2019 Validation Report also identifies projects occurring within The Anaheim Resort. The
report concludes that the pace of hotel development has continued to be slower than what
EIR 313 or EIR 340 anticipated, such that over 50 percent of allowable development intensity
remains unbuilt. Impacts associated with the ARSP implementation are unchanged or
comparable to projections.
The 2019 Validation Report concludes that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to
circumstances under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is
available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified. Accordingly, EIR 313, as supplemented by EIR 340, is still valid and the City, as the
Lead Agency, may continue to use these documents for subsequent projects in accordance with
CEQA. Staff has reviewed the validation report and concurred with its findings.
CONCLUSION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission determine, based on the
information contained in the 2019 Validation Report, that EIR 313 and EIR 340 should continue
to serve as the base documents for any future environmental review necessary for applicable
development that is subject to and conforms with the ARSP.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
Elaine Thienprasiddhi Susan Kim
Senior Planner Principal Planner
Attachments:
1. Location Map
2. Draft Resolution
3. 2019 Validation Report
§¨5
BALL RD
KATELLA AVE
HA
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
LE
W
I
S
S
T
WA
L
N
U
T
S
T
WE
S
T
S
T
ORANGEWOOD AVE
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
B
L
V
D
HA
S
T
E
R
S
T
CHAPMAN AVE
DI
S
N
E
Y
L
A
N
D
D
R
CERRITOS AVE
M
A
N
C
H
E
S
T
E
R
A
V
E
DISNEY WAY
DI
S
N
E
Y
L
A
N
D
D
R
H
A
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
DI
S
N
E
Y
L
A
N
D
D
R
DISNEYLAND DR
LE
W
I
S
S
T
CHAPMAN AVE
CERRITOS AVE
3923
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan 92-2
Map Location
°0 500 1,000
Feet
The Anaheim Resort ®
ARSP No. 92-2
City Bou ndary
City of AnaheimGIS CentralFebruary 01, 2017
1 inch = 1,000 feet
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2
- 1 - PC2019-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2019-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM VALIDATING THE CONTINUED USE OF
MASTER ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 313 AND
SUPPLEMENTAL ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO.
340 AND MITIGATION MONITORING PROGRAM NO. 85C
(DEV2017-00072)
(THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-2)
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA
Guidelines"), on September 24, 1999 the City Council of the City of Anaheim, by its Resolution
No. 94R-234, certified Master Environmental Impact Report No. 313, adopted a Statement of
Findings and Facts and a Statement of Overriding Considerations and adopted Mitigation
Monitoring Program No. 0085 to serve as the required environmental documentation for certain
discretionary action described therein (the “discretionary actions”); and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15179, of the CEQA Guidelines, on August 30, 1999
the Planning Commission reviewed the first Validation Report for Master EIR No. 313 and
adopted Resolution No. PC99-158 determining that no substantial changes had occurred with
respect to the circumstances under which Master EIR No. 313 was certified, and that there was no
new available material information which was not known and could not have been known at the
time Master EIR No. 313 was certified, thereby validating Master EIR No. 313 and the associated
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085 for continued use as the environmental documentation
required by CEQA for projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area for a period of five
years or until circumstances, changed, whichever occurred first; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15179, of the CEQA Guidelines, on September 20,
2004 the Planning Commission reviewed the second Validation Report for Master EIR No. 313
and adopted Resolution No. PC2004-104 determining that no substantial changes had occurred
with respect to the circumstances under which Master EIR No. 313 was certified, and that there
was no new available material information which was not known and could not have been known
at the time Master EIR No. 313 was certified, thereby validating Master EIR No. 313 and the
associated Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085 for continued use as the environmental
documentation required by CEQA for projects within the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area for a
period of five years or until circumstances, changed, whichever occurred first; and
WHEREAS, in conformance with Sections 15132 and 15362(b) of the CEQA
Guidelines, on December 18, 2012, the City Council, by its Resolution No. 2012-158, certified
Supplemental EIR No. 340 in support of the approval of the Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP
Project. The Anaheim City Council adopted findings and a statement of overriding considerations;
Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C; and, a water supply assessment
in conjunction with the certification of EIR 340. Approvals associated with EIR 340 included an
increase in the permitted development intensity within the ARSP Area to allow for expansion of
- 2 - PC2019-***
the Anaheim Convention Center; streamlining of development standards, guidelines and
requirements to reduce redundancy within and between documents; and, an update to the above
documents to reflect current conditions within the Anaheim Resort.
WHEREAS, pursuant to Section 15179, of the CEQA Guidelines, Master EIR No. 313
and Supplemental EIR No. 340 were reviewed in the 2019 Validation Report for the Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan Master Environmental Impact Report No. 313 and Supplemental EIR No. 340
(“2019 Validation Report”), a copy of which is on file in the Planning Department and incorporated
herein by this reference; and
WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim desi res and intends to continue the use of Master EIR
No. 313 and Supplemental EIR No. 340 as the environmental documentation required by CEQA
and the State Guidelines for projects (as defined by CEQA) within the Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan area and for related discretionary actions that are within the scope of Master EIR No. 313 and
Supplemental EIR No. 340; and
WHEREAS, the 2019 Validation Report has been provided to the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim for review and consideration prior to the continued use of
Master EIR No. 313 and Supplemental EIR No. 340; and
WHERAS, the Planning Commission concurs with the conclusion of the 2019
Validation Report that the impact analyses and mitigation measures provided in Master EIR No.
313 and Supplemental EIR No. 340 are adequate to address continuing growth and development
in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area for the foreseeable future; and, consequently, a
subsequent/supplemental EIR is not required; and,
WHEREAS, based upon its review of the 2019 Validation Report and consideration of
information and evidence provided, the Planning Commission finds that no substantial changes
have occurred with respect to the circumstances under which the Master EIR No. 313 and
Supplemental EIR No. 340 were certified, and that there is no new available material information
which was not known and could not have been known at the time Master EIR No. 313 and
Supplemental EIR No. 340 were certified.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, this
Planning Commission does hereby validate the continued use of Master EIR No. 313 and
Supplemental EIR No. 340, in compliance with CEQA and that CEQA Guidelines.
- 3 - PC2019-***
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting
of April 1, 2019.
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 1, 2019 by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 1st day of April, 2019.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan
Master Environmental Impact Report No. 313 and
Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 340
2019 Validation Report
Prepared for The City of Anaheim
200 South Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, California 92805
Prepared by BonTerra Psomas
3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200
Santa Ana, California 92707-8794
T: (714) 751-7373
January 2019
ATTACHMENT NO. 3
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan MEIR 313 and SEIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx ii Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section Page
Section 1.0 Introduction ...................................................................................................... 1-1
1.1 Introduction ............................................................................................. 1-1
1.2 Background............................................................................................. 1-1
Section 2.0 Review of ARSP Development ........................................................................ 2-1
Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan EIR 340 .................................. 3-1
3.1 Aesthetics ............................................................................................... 3-1
3.2 Agriculture & Forest Resources .............................................................. 3-2
3.3 Air Quality ............................................................................................... 3-3
3.4 Biological Resources .............................................................................. 3-5
3.5 Cultural Resources ............................................................................... 3-19
3.6 Geology ................................................................................................ 3-19
3.7 Greenhouse Gas Emissions ................................................................. 3-20
3.8 Hazards and Hazardous Materials ....................................................... 3-21
3.9 Hydrology and Water Quality ................................................................ 3-23
3.10 Land Use .............................................................................................. 3-24
3.11 Mineral Resources ................................................................................ 3-24
3.12 Noise .................................................................................................... 3-25
3.13 Population and Housing ........................................................................ 3-25
3.14 Public Services ..................................................................................... 3-26
3.15 Recreation ............................................................................................ 3-29
3.16 Transportation/Traffic ............................................................................ 3-30
3.17 Water .................................................................................................... 3-31
3.18 Sewer ................................................................................................... 3-31
3.19 Electricity .............................................................................................. 3-32
3.20 Stormwater ........................................................................................... 3-33
3.21 Public Utilities ....................................................................................... 3-34
Section 4.0 Conclusion ........................................................................................................ 4-1
Section 5.0 References ........................................................................................................ 5-1
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan MEIR 313 and SEIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx iii Table of Contents
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page
1 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Land Use Summary ....................................................... 2-1
2 Projects Within Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Area Since Certification of EIR 340 ...... 2-3
3 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Land Use Summary ....................................................... 2-6
4 Current and Completed Related Projects Outside of the ARSP Not Addressed in
EIR 340 .......................................................................................................................... 2-7
5 Summary of Air Quality Data .......................................................................................... 3-4
6 Special Status Plants Species Reported for the ARSP .................................................. 3-5
7 Special Status Wildlife Species Reported for the ARSP .............................................. 3-11
8 Updated Hazardous Materials Sites Within One-Quarter Mile of the ARSP ................ 3-22
LIST OF EXHIBITS
Exhibit Follows Page
1 Regional Location Map .................................................................................................. 1-1
2 Local Vicinity Map .......................................................................................................... 1-1
3 Aerial Photograph .......................................................................................................... 1-1
APPENDICES
Appendix
A Cultural and Paleontological Resources Records Searches for the 2018 EIR 340
Validation Report
B Climate Change & Traffic Congestion Mitigation Benefits
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan MEIR 313 and SEIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 1-1 Section 1.0 Introduction
SECTION 1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 INTRODUCTION
In September 1994, the Anaheim City Council certified Master Environmental Impact Report
Number 313 (MEIR 313, State Clearinghouse No. 91091062) in connection with the adoption of
the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-1 (hereinafter referred to as the “ARSP”). MEIR 313
evaluated the environmental impacts associated with the establishment and implementation of
the ARSP which is a part of the approximate 1,078-acre Anaheim Resort located in the City of
Anaheim. At the time the ARSP was adopted in 1994, the Specific Plan area encompassed
approximately 549.5 acres. Since the approval of the ARSP, the City Council has approved
modifications to the document through its approval of 14 amendments and 8 adjustments, which
have increased the total ARSP area to 581.3 acres. Two validation reports were prepared (1999
and 2004) to evaluate the continued relevance and accuracy of MEIR 313.
In December 2012, the Anaheim City Council certified Supplemental Environmental Impact
Report No. 340 (SEIR 340) in support of the approval of Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Project.
SEIR 340 is a supplemental EIR to MEIR 313. SEIR 340 reevaluated all the environmental
changes that have occurred in and around The Anaheim Resort since certification of MEIR 313.
SEIR 340 also evaluated an expansion of the Anaheim Convention Center and an update of the
ARSP document.
This Validation Report has been prepared to ensure that MEIR 313 and SEIR 340, together, as a
Master EIR, are still valid and represent an accurate assessment of the significant environmental
effects associated with buildout of the ARSP.
1.1.1 LOCATION
The 581.3-acre ARSP Area is located in Anaheim, California, and is located in the City of Anaheim
generally west of the Interstate 5 (I-5) corridor, south of Vermont Avenue, east of Walnut Street,
and north of Chapman Avenue (see Exhibit 1, Regional Location Map). Exhibit 2, Local Vicinity
Map, shows the ARSP Area and surrounding area. Regional access to the ARSP Area is provided
by I-5 via Disneyland Drive/Ball Road, Harbor Boulevard, and Katella Avenue/Disney Way. Local
access is provided via Ball Road, Disney Way, West Street, Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim
Boulevard/Haster Street, Katella Avenue, Walnut Street, Harbor Boulevard, and Vermont Avenue.
Exhibit 3, Aerial Photograph, shows the ARSP’s relationship with existing land uses.
1.2 BACKGROUND
1.2.1 ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN
Section 65450 et seq. of the California Government Code (Planning and Zoning Law) allows and
regulates the establishment of Specific Plans. The ARSP Area was adopted in 1994 to provide
for the development of hotels, motels, convention and conference facilities, including the Anaheim
Convention Center, and restaurants, retail shops, and entertainment uses. The ARSP is divided
into two development areas: the Public Recreation (PR) District, which includes the Anaheim
Convention Center and the Anaheim Hilton; and the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District, which
includes the remainder of the ARSP. The ARSP Area is designated by the Anaheim General Plan
for recreation and tourist/convention-related land uses. The Specific Plan sets forth land uses,
design guidelines, zoning, development standards, and public facilities requirements for the
ARSP Area.
Regional Location Map
2019 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Validation Report
Exhibit 1
(Rev: 12-07-2018 CJS) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Graphics\Validation_Report\2019\ex_RL.pdf
A N G E L E S N A T I O N A L F O R E S T
C A M P
P E N D L E T O N
CLEVELAND
LakeMathews
CastaicLake
L O S P A D R E S N A T I O N A L F O R E S T
Santa Clara R i v e r
P
A
C
I
F
I
C
O
C
E
A
N
LakeElsinore
San GabrielReservoirChatsworthReservoir
NATIONAL
FOREST
Project Location
San BernardinoRiverside
§¨5
ST72§¨405
§¨15
§¨210
§¨105
§¨10
§¨5
§¨710§¨110
§¨215
§¨605
§¨5
§¨210
§¨15
§¨10
ST14
ST1
ST138
ST73
ST118
ST22
ST91
ST27
ST2
ST18
ST30
ST19
ST241
ST74
ST90
ST261
ST170
ST142
ST39
ST107
ST134
ST110
ST60
ST213
ST71
ST55
ST133
ST57
ST187
ST710
ST241
ST1
ST2
ST91
£¤395
£¤101
RiversideSan Diego
Los AngelesOrange
Los Angeles
Santa
Viejo
Beach
Santa
Rancho
Rialto
Rancho
Corona
Downey
Irvine
Carson
Ontario
Mission
Clarita
San Juan
Whittier
Palmdale
Lakewood
Pasadena
Glendale
Riverside
Cucamonga
Margarita
Santa Ana
Hawthorne
Capistrano
Huntington Costa Mesa
Buena Park
Seal Beach
Long Beach
Victorville
Westminster
Yorba Linda
West Covina
San Clemente
Laguna Beach
Palos Verdes
Santa Monica
Lake Elsinore
West Hollywood
D:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
\
J
0
0
9
1
0
7
\
M
X
D
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
_
R
e
p
o
r
t
\
e
x
_
R
L
_
2
0
1
8
0
3
1
4
.
m
x
d
10 0 105Miles²
Local Vicinity Map
2019 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Validation Report
Exhibit 2
(Rev: 12-07-2018 CJS) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Graphics\Validation_Report\2019\ex_LV.pdf
§¨¦5
Ball Rd
E
a
s
t
S
t
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
Lincoln Ave
E
u
c
l
i
d
S
t
Lincoln Ave
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
S
t
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
B
l
v
d
Katella Ave
Chapman Ave
Le
w
i
s
S
t
H
a
s
t
e
r
S
t
UV22
§¨¦5
Cerritos Ave
Crone Ave
L
e
w
i
s
S
t
D
i
s
n
e
y
l
a
n
d
D
r
W
a
l
n
u
t
S
t
N
i
n
t
h
S
t
Lampson Ave
South St
Cerritos Ave
Orangewood Ave
Santa Ana S
t
Vermont Ave
We
s
t
S
t
Magic Way
D
a
n
a
S
t
D:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
\
J
0
0
9
1
0
7
\
M
X
D
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
_
R
e
p
o
r
t
\
e
x
_
L
V
_
2
0
1
8
0
3
1
9
.
m
x
d
²
Disneyland Resort Specific Plan (SP92-1)
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (SP92-2)
Hotel Circle Specific Plan (SP93-1)
0.5 0 0.50.25 Miles
H a r b o r
B l v d Chapman Ave
S
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
E Katella AveW Katella Ave
S
anta
A
na
F
w
y
Disney Way
E Ball Rd
S
D
i
s
n
e
y
l
a
n
d
D
r
W Ball Rd
D i s n e y l a n d D r
Cerritos Ave
Anaheim
WayAnaheim
B o u l v a r d
W Orangewood Ave
S
L
e
w
i
s
S
t
We
s
t
S
t
Gene Autry Way
W a l n u t
S t
Magic Way
S C l e m e n t i n e
S t
Le
w
i
s
S
t
Ha
s
t
e
r
S
t
S
W
a
l
n
u
t
S
t
S
E
a
s
t
S
t
W Orangewood Ave
S
M
a
n
c
h
e
s
t
e
r
A
v
e
§¨5
D:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
\
J
0
0
9
1
0
7
\
M
X
D
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
_
R
e
p
o
r
t
\
e
x
_
A
e
r
i
a
l
_
2
0
1
8
0
3
1
4
.
m
x
d
²
Aerial Photograph
2019 Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Validation Report
Exhibit 3
(Rev: 12-07-2018 CJS) R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Graphics\Validation_Report\2019\ex_Aerial.pdf
Aerial Source: ESRI 2016
1,500 0 1,500750Feet
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (SP92-2)
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan MEIR 313 and SEIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 1-2 Section 1.0 Introduction
As discussed above, the ARSP has been modified with 14 amendments and 8 adjustments, which
are described below.
Specific Plan Amendments
ARSP Amendment No. 1
In June 1997, the City approved ARSP, Amendment No. 1 which incorporated 4.67 acres into the
ARSP Area. The site, located on the north side of Orangewood Avenue, east of Harbor Boulevard,
was immediately adjacent to The Anaheim Resort. Two other actions were taken in conjunction
with the Specific Plan Amendment: an amendment to the Land Use Element of the City of
Anaheim General Plan (General Plan Amendment No. 344) was adopted, and Conditional Use
Permit No. 3917 was approved.
Incorporation of this acreage increased the 1,046-acre Anaheim Resort area and 549.5-acre
ARSP Area by 4.67 acres. The amendment to the Land Use Element of the Anaheim General
Plan redesignated the 4.67 acres from Medium Density Residential to Commercial Recreation
land uses. The density range for the 4.67 acres is Low-Medium, with a maximum of up to 350
hotel/motel rooms (based on 0 to 75 hotel or motel rooms per gross acre).
Amendment No. 1 also reclassified the subject property to the SP92-2 Zone, C-R District.
Conditional Use Permit No. 3917 approved the conversion of an existing 139-unit, 2-story,
8-building apartment complex into a 136-unit Vacation Ownership Resort (known as “Dolphin
Cove”).
An Initial Study was prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts of the Specific Plan
Amendment, General Plan Amendment, and the Conditional Use Permit. The Initial Study
determined that with implementation of the mitigation measures in Mitigation Monitoring Program
No. 0085, there would not be a significant impact associated with the actions, and a Mitigated
Negative Declaration was approved. Mitigation Monitoring Plan No. 096 was also approved
incorporating applicable measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085.
ARSP Amendment No. 2
In October 1998, Amendment No. 2 to the ARSP, was proposed to add “coffee house” as a
Conditionally Permitted Accessory Use in conjunction with an Automotive Service Station as part
of the ARSP No. 92-2 Zoning and Development Standards (Section 7.0). The Planning
Commission denied the amendment and the applicant subsequently withdrew their petition at the
January 26, 1999 City Council meeting.
ARSP Amendment No. 3
Approved in July 1999, Amendment No. 3 to the ARSP incorporated an approximately 0.73-acre
site into the ARSP Area. The site is located at the northwest corner of Casa Grande Avenue and
Casa Vista Street.
The 0.73-acre site is developed with 44 guest rooms (part of an existing 100-room motel). The
subject property was designated in the Anaheim General Plan for Medium Density Residential
land uses, while the balance of the motel (lobby and 56 guest rooms) was included in the ARSP
Area and designated for Commercial Recreation land uses.
The amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan (General Plan Amendment
No. 364) redesignated the 0.73-acre site for Commercial Recreation land uses with a Low-
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan MEIR 313 and SEIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 1-3 Section 1.0 Introduction
Medium density allowing a maximum of up to 54 hotel/motel rooms for the partial acre.
Amendment No. 3 to the ARSP reclassified the 0.73-acre site from RM-1200 to the SP92-2
(ARSP) Zone, C-R District.
An Initial Study was prepared to evaluate the environmental impacts associated with the proposed
actions. The Initial Study found that with the incorporation of applicable mitigation measures from
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085 (adopted in connection with EIR 313), no additional
significant adverse environmental impacts would be created with the proposed actions. A
Mitigated Negative Declaration was approved and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0108 was
adopted, incorporating applicable mitigation measures from Mitigation Monitoring Program
No. 0085.
ARSP Amendment No. 4
Amendment No. 4 was never approved as a stand-alone amendment. The text of Amendment
No. 4 provided for adjustments to the ARSP Zoning Code including refinements, clarifications and
provisions to streamline the project review process. These adjustments were included in the
citywide Zoning Code Update which was addressed in EIR 330 and approved in June 2004.
ARSP Amendment No. 5
Approved in June 2004, Amendment No. 5 to the ARSP incorporates approximately 26.4 acres
into the ARSP Area. The subject expansion area is located along Harbor Boulevard, south of
Orangewood Avenue to the City limits. The expansion area is developed with a mix of commercial
uses including hotels, restaurants, retail, and professional offices.
The potential environmental impacts related to Amendment No. 5 were included in the overall
evaluation in EIR 330. EIR 330 was subsequently certified and applicable mitigation was
incorporated into Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085a.
ARSP Amendment No. 6
City Council approved Amendment No. 6 to the ARSP in connection with a zone change
(Reclassification No. 2004-00135) to remove the Mobile Home Park (MHP) Overlay from a
property within the ARSP. Amendment No 6 pertained to the establishment of mini-
market/convenience markets as accessory uses in conjunction with a relocated service station
and prohibition of tow truck operations in conjunction with service station facilities. Amendment
No 6 and Reclassification No. 2004-00135 were approved by Ordinance Nos. 5954 and 5955,
adopted on February 8, 2005, including a finding that the previously-certified EIR 313 and
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 067 incorporating measures from Mitigation Monitoring
Program No. 0085 are adequate to serve as required environmental documentation for this
request.
ARSP Amendment No. 7
City Council approved Amendment No. 7 to the ARSP in connection with an amendment to the
Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan to amend Chapter 18.116 pertaining to the
establishment of an ARR (Anaheim Resort Residential) Overlay to provide the opportunity to
develop residential units in conjunction with high-quality, luxury hotels within two targeted areas
by Resolution No. 2006-205 and 2006-206 adopted on August 22, 2006 and by Ordinance No.
6036 adopted on September 12, 2006. Prior to approving Amendment No. 7, the City Council, by
motion, on August 22, 2006, determined that the Anaheim Resort Residential Overlay Initial
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan MEIR 313 and SEIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 1-4 Section 1.0 Introduction
Study/Mitigated Negative Declaration and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085b are
adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for this request.
ARSP Amendment No. 8
City Council approved Amendment No. 8 to the ARSP in connection with an amendment to the
Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan to amend Chapter 18.116 pertaining to development
criteria for wholly-residential development within the ARR Overlay on a designated 26.7-acre site
within the ARSP Zone by Resolution No. 2007-052 and 2007-053 adopted on April 24, 2007 and
by Ordinance No. 6058 adopted on May 8, 2007. Prior to approving Amendment No. 8, the City
Council, by Resolution No. 2007-052, determined that an Addendum (dated May 23, 2006) to the
previously approved Mitigated Negative Declaration for Amendment No. 7 is adequate to serve
as the required environmental documentation for this request.
ARSP Amendment No. 9
City Council approved Amendment No. 9 to the ARSP to repeal modifications to the Zoning and
Development Standards, previously approved by Amendment No. 8 to the ARSP and an
amendment to the Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan by Resolution Nos. 2007-224,
2077-225, 2007-226, 2007-227 adopted on November 27, 2007 and by Ordinance No. 6099
adopted on March 4, 2008, finding that the City’s Actions, either individually or collectively, did
not constitute a “project” under Public Resources Code Sections 21065 and 21080, and
alternatively, (2) even assuming the City Actions could be deemed a “project,” that the City
Actions, individually and collectively, were exempt from the requirements of CEQA under State
CEQA Guideline Section 15061(b)(3).
ARSP Amendment No. 10
[Amendment No. 10 was withdrawn by the applicant]
ARSP Amendment No. 11
City Council approved Amendment No. 11 to the ARSP, an initiative measure pursuant to the
provisions of Section 1303 of the Anaheim City Charter and Section 9214 of the Elections Code
of the State of California, to generally prohibit residential development within The Anaheim Resort
unless such a project included environmental and economic analysis, city council approval and
voter approval at a city election by Ordinance No. 6098 adopted on March 4, 2008. Prior to
introducing Ordinance No. 6098, the City Council, by Resolution No. 2008-016, on February 26,
2008, determined that the amendment did not constitute a "Project" subject to, and within the
meaning of, the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA"), and that said proposed action is
exempt from CEQA, and that no further environmental review is therefore required.
ARSP Amendment No. 12
City Council approved Amendment No. 12 to the ARSP to redesignate a 5.9-acre, “L”-shaped
property at Ball Road and Walnut Street from Low-Density to Medium Density to develop a 120-
room hotel and approving a Variance, Final Site Plan and Tentative Parcel Map by Resolution
Nos. 2008-168, 2008-169, and 2008-170 adopted on September 30, 2008 and by Ordinance No.
6117 adopted on October 14, 2008. Prior to approving Amendment No. 12, the City Council, by
motion, on September 30, 2008, determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration and the
associated Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 000003 is adequate for the required environmental
documentation for this request.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan MEIR 313 and SEIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 1-5 Section 1.0 Introduction
ARSP Amendment No. 13
City Council approved Amendment No. 13 to the ARSP in connection with an amendment to the
Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan to create a new density category called “Low
Medium Density (Modified)” and redesignate approximately 2.45 acres in the ARSP to Low
Medium Density (Modified), amend the Central Core and Special Intersection Landscape
Treatment at the corner of Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue and amend the sign code to
allow a greater number and larger signs than permitted for hotels and accessory retail, allowed
changeable copy signs for hotels when not visible from any public right-of-way, murals, and
building integrated multi-tenant signs subject to approval of a conditional use permit, amendment
to the Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program, a Conditional Use Permit, a Variance,
a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity and Final Site Plan approval to construct a
252-room hotel with supporting accessory uses by Resolution Nos. 2009-053, 2009-054, 2009-
055, 2009-056, 2009-057, 2009-058 and 2009-059 adopted on March 31, 2009 and by Ordinance
No. 6141 adopted on April 14, 2009. Prior to approving Amendment No. 13, the City Council, by
motion, on March 31, 2009, determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated
Monitoring Program No. 156 are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation
for the request.
ARSP Amendment No. 14
City Council approved Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP in connection with an amendment to the
Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan amending portions of Chapter 18.116 of Title 18 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code, amendments to the Anaheim Resort Identity Program, and
amendments to the Anaheim Resort Public Realm Landscape Program by Resolution Nos. 2012-
158, 2012-159, 2012-160, 2012-161 and 2012-162 adopted on December 18, 2012, and by
Ordinance No. 6265 adopted on January 15, 2013. Subsequently, City Council adopted
Ordinance No. 6266 on January 29, 2013 pertaining to Specific Plan conditions of approval. Prior
to approving Amendment No. 14, the City Council, by Resolution No. 2012-158, on December
18, 2012, certified Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2008-00340 (EIR 340),
adopting Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, adopting Mitigation Monitoring
Program 85C, and a Water Supply Assessment to serve as the required environmental
documentation for this request.
ARSP Amendment No. 15
City Council approved Amendment No. 15 to the ARSP in connection with an amendment to the
Land Use Element of the City’s General Plan to create a new density category called “Medium
Density (Modified)” and redesignate approximately 2.5 acres in the ARSP to Medium Density
(Modified) to construct a 223-room hotel with supporting accessory uses. The Council approved
Resolution No. 2018-104 on July 31, 2018 and adopted Ordinance No. 6443 on August 14, 2018.
The City Council determined that a Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigated Monitoring
Program No. 350 are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the
request.
Specific Plan Adjustments
ARSP Adjustment No. 1
In May 1999, the City approved Adjustment No. 1 to the ARSP, which amended the setback and
yard requirements to reflect the local street status of Convention Way. No environmental impacts
are associated with this action. The City determined that the action was Categorically Exempt per
CEQA Guidelines Section 15301.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan MEIR 313 and SEIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 1-6 Section 1.0 Introduction
ARSP Adjustment No. 2
In September 1999, the City approved Adjustment No. 2 to the ARSP, which amended the
minimum landscape setback requirement for properties adjacent to Manchester Avenue between
Katella Avenue and the southern boundary of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area. No
environmental impacts are associated with this action. The City determined that the action was
Categorically Exempt per CEQA Guidelines Section 15301.
ARSP Adjustment No. 3
In May 2001, the City approved Adjustment No. 3 to the ARSP, which amended the ARSP
temporary parking requirements. No environmental impacts are associated with this action. The
City determined that the action was Categorically Exempt per CEQA Guidelines Section 15301.
ARSP Adjustment No. 4
In April 2004, the City approved Adjustment No. 4 to the ARSP, which amended the ARSP to
permit office uses in legal nonconforming buildings subject to the approval of a conditional use
permit. The City determined that the previously-certified EIR 313 and Mitigation Monitoring
Program No. 0085 were the appropriate environmental documentation for the request.
Environmental impacts associated with a specific office use in a legal nonconforming building are
evaluated in connection with the Conditional Use Permit application.
ARSP Adjustment No. 5
City Council approved Adjustment No. 5 to the ARSP to amend Chapter 18.116 in its entirety to
provide consistent formatting with Title 18 (Zoning Code) along with minor modifications and
clarifications by Ordinance No. 6031 adopted on August 22, 2006. The Planning Commission
determined, on July 10, 2006 that the Previously-Certified Environmental Impact Report No. 330
is adequate to serve as required environmental documentation for this request.
ARSP Adjustment No. 6
City Council approved Adjustment No. 6 to the ARSP to amend Chapter 18.116 to modify the
code references and terminology for various uses to be consistent with Chapters 18.16
(Regulatory Permits) and 18.92 (Definitions) of Title 18 (Zoning Code) by Ordinance No. 6245
adopted on June 5, 2012. The Planning Commission determined, by motion, on March 26, 2012
that this action is exempt from the California Environmental Quality Act under Section 21080 of
the Public Resources Code.
ARSP Adjustment No. 7
City Council approved Adjustment No. 7 to the ARSP to amend Chapter 18.116, Table 116-C
(Primary Uses and Structures: C-R District (Development Area 1) of Section 18.116.070 (Uses –
Commercial Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1)) to prohibit “Computer Internet and
Amusement Facilities,” in conjunction with a City-wide prohibition by Ordinance No. 6317 adopted
on March 3, 2015. The Planning Commission determined, by motion, on January 12, 2015 that
this action is not subject to the California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Sections
15060(C)(2) and 15060(C)(3) of the State CEQA Guidelines.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan MEIR 313 and SEIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 1-7 Section 1.0 Introduction
ARSP Adjustment No. 8
City Council approved Adjustment No. 8 to the ARSP to amend Chapter 18.116.030 (Definitions)
to include a definition for “Concierge Lounge,” Table 116-C (Primary Uses and Structures: C-R
District (Development Area 1), Table 116-D (Accessory Uses and Structures Integrated With a
Permitted Primary Use: C-R District (Development Area 1)) and Table 116-E (Accessory Uses
Incidental to and Integrated Within a Hotel or Motel Including Suite-Type Hotels, and Otherwise
Limited Herein: C-R District (Development Area 1)) of Section 18.116.070 (Uses – Commercial
Recreation (C-R) District (Development Area 1)) of Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific
Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-2) Zoning and Development Standards) of Title 18 (Zoning) to include
(1) “Concierge Lounges” as a permitted accessory use; (2) “Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing”
as a permitted and conditionally permitted use subject to the requirements of Section 18.38.025;
and (3) “Transitional and Supportive Housing” as a prohibited use in conjunction with a City-wide
Zoning Code Update by Ordinance No. 6382 adopted on October 18, 2016. The Planning
Commission determined, by motion, on August 8, 2016 that this action is not subject to the
California Environmental Quality Act pursuant to Section 15060(C)(2) of the State CEQA
Guidelines.
ARSP Adjustment No. 9
City Council approved Adjustment No. 9 to the ARSP to amend Table 116-D (Accessory Uses
and Structures Integrated with a Permitted Primary Use: C-R District (Development Area 1)) to
permit Valet Parking as an accessory use, subject to approval of a minor conditional use
permit. The Council adopted Ordinance No. 6432 on April 10, 2018, and determined that the
request was exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality
Act Guidelines Section 15061 (b)(3).
1.2.2 OTHER SPECIFIC PLANS
Two other Specific Plans exist within The Anaheim Resort: The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan
No. 92-1 and the Hotel Circle Specific Plan No. 93-1 (see Exhibit 2 for the boundaries of these
Specific Plans). The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan encompasses approximately 489.7 acres
of The Anaheim Resort. The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan, which was approved in June 1993
and subsequently amended, provides for the development of an international vacation destination
resort including the development of a new theme park, additional hotel and entertainment areas,
administrative office facilities, back-of-house facilities, new public and private parking facilities, an
internal transportation system and the on-going modification of the Disneyland Theme Park.
Additionally, certain parcels designated “C-R Overlay” or “District A” may be developed as part of
the overall resort development, or with permitted hotel or restaurant uses or other conditionally
permitted visitor-serving uses. Parcels designated “Pointe Anaheim Overlay” may be developed
in accordance with the overall resort development, per the “District A” or “C-R Overlay” underlying
zone requirements, or with those uses specifically set forth in the “Pointe Anaheim Overlay.” The
third Specific Plan in the area is the Hotel Circle Specific Plan which encompasses approximately
6.8 acres and provides for the development of a total of 969 hotel rooms. The Hotel Circle Specific
Plan was adopted in August 1994. Together, the three Specific Plans encompass the entire 1,078-
acre Anaheim Resort. In conjunction with the approval of the ARSP, the City Council also
approved The Anaheim Resort Identity Program and The Anaheim Resort Public Realm
Landscape Program to create a uniform identity and landscape program to improve the visual
quality of the entire Anaheim Resort. These plans addressed the Public Realm (the area within
the public right-of-way) and the Setback Realm (the area between the public right-of-way and the
private buildings). EIR 340 analyzed the cumulative impacts associated with the entire Anaheim
Resort and surrounding area, including the development of all three Specific Plans and the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan MEIR 313 and SEIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 1-8 Section 1.0 Introduction
implementation of The Anaheim Resort Identity Program and The Anaheim Resort Public Realm
Landscape Program mentioned herein.
1.2.3 EIR 340
As discussed previously, EIR 313 was certified in 1994. In December 2012, the Anaheim City
Council certified EIR 340 in support of the approval of the Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP Project.
The Anaheim City Council adopted findings and a statement of overriding considerations;
Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 85C; and, a water supply assessment
in conjunction with the certification of EIR 340. Approvals associated with EIR 340 included an
increase in the permitted development intensity within the ARSP Area to allow for expansion of
the Anaheim Convention Center; streamlining of development standards, guidelines and
requirements to reduce redundancy within and between documents; and, an update to the above
documents to reflect current conditions within the Anaheim Resort.
EIR 340 is a Master EIR, as defined in Section 21157(a) of the California Public Resources Code,
prepared to assess the impacts of the ARSP. The Master EIR approach was appropriate for this
project because it allows a comprehensive consideration of the reasonably anticipated scope of
development under the project and serves as the base document for any future environmental
review necessary for development within the ARSP Area which conforms to the parameters and
assumptions addressed in the EIR. EIR 340 assumed continued development over time and
looked at near term development, denoted “Year 2015", and full buildout, denoted “Year 2030".
EIR 340 was prepared in accordance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
(California Public Resources Code §§ 21000 et seq.), California CEQA Guidelines (California
Code of Regulations, Title 14, §§ 15000 et seq.), and the City of Anaheim CEQA Guidelines.
According to Section 15175 of the California CEQA Guidelines, periodic reviews of a Master EIR
are required to ensure that it continues to adequately represent the environmental setting and
analysis of the significant environmental effects of the project for which it was prepared. The
relevant sections include Article 11.5, Master Environmental Impact Reports and sections: 15175,
Master EIR; 15178, Subsequent Projects Identified in the MEIR; and, 15179, Limitations on the
Use of the Master EIR. Section 15179 states:
(a) The certified Master EIR shall not be used for a subsequent project described
in the Master EIR in accordance with this article if either:
(1) The Master EIR was certified more than five years prior to the filing of
an application for a subsequent project except as set forth in subsection
(b) below, or
(2) After the certification of the Master EIR, a project not described in the
certified Master EIR as an anticipated subsequent project is approved
and the approved project may affect the adequacy of the Master EIR
for any subsequent project that was described in the Master EIR.
(b) A Master EIR that was certified more than five years prior to the filing of an
application for a subsequent project described in the Master EIR may be
used in accordance with this article to review such a subsequent project if
the lead agency reviews the adequacy of the Master EIR and takes either of
the following steps:
(1) Finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the
circumstances under which the Master EIR was certified; or that there
is no new available information which was not known and could not
have been known at the time the Master EIR was certified; or
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan MEIR 313 and SEIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 1-9 Section 1.0 Introduction
(2) Prepares an initial study, and, pursuant to the findings of the initial study
does either (A) or (B) below:
(A) certifies a subsequent or supplemental EIR that updates or
revises the Master EIR and which either:
1. is incorporated into the previously-certified Master EIR, or
2. references any deletions, additions or other modifications to
the previously-certified Master EIR;
(B) approves a mitigated negative declaration that addresses
substantial changes that have occurred with respect to the
circumstances under which the Master EIR was certified or the
new information that was not known and could not have been
known at the time the Master EIR was certified.”
In addition to being a Master EIR, EIR 340 was also prepared at a level of specificity appropriate
for the document to be used as a project EIR for all projected development within the boundaries
of the ARSP Area and all of the associated public improvements and project mitigation measures.
Ongoing Use of Master EIR 340
EIR 340 is used for environmental compliance for projects proposed within the ARSP Area, in
compliance with CEQA. An Environmental Compliance Form is filled out by the project applicant
detailing the specifics of the proposed project. City Staff reviews the Environmental Compliance
Form and makes a determination as to whether the project’s environmental effects fall within the
parameters of what was addressed in EIR 340. If the proposed project is found to be within the
parameters of what was addressed in EIR 340, then EIR 340 serves as the required
documentation for CEQA compliance. If not, new environmental documentation is required. The
purpose of this Validation Report is to verify that data in EIR 340 is accurate and current to allow
the continued use of the document for environmental compliance, consistent with CEQA Statutes
and Guidelines.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan MEIR 313 and SEIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 2-1 Section 2.0 Review of ARSP Development
SECTION 2.0 REVIEW OF ARSP DEVELOPMENT
This Validation Report, the 2019 Master EIR 340 Validation Report, has been prepared in
compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and Guidelines and reports on
the continued relevance and accuracy of EIR 340 since its certification in 2012. The first part of
the validation process for EIR 340 is based on the status of buildout within the ARSP Area.
Table 1, ARSP Land Use Summary, indicates the total amount of development in place within the
ARSP Area at the time when EIR 340 was certified (2012) and the total allowable development
as analyzed by EIR 340.
TABLE 1
ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN LAND USE SUMMARY1
District 2012 Development Total Allowable Development
C-R District 11,587 hotel rooms2 32,500 hotel rooms
PR District 1,600 hotel rooms
1,712,004 sf convention center
2,500 hotel rooms
2,118,363 sf convention center
180,000 sf commercial development
40,000 sf hotel meeting/ballroom space
100,000 sf outdoor programmable space
Total 13,187 hotel rooms
1,712,004 sf convention center
35,000 hotel rooms
2,118,363 sf convention center
180,000 sf commercial development
40,000 sf hotel meeting/ballroom space
100,000 sf outdoor programmable space
sf: square feet
1 At the time EIR 340 was being prepared, as of 2012.
2 Commercial uses are converted to hotel room equivalents on a ratio of 600 square feet of commercial development = one
hotel room
Source: Anaheim 2012.
Table 2 is a list of projects within the ARSP Area that have been approved, constructed, or have
the potential for approval in the near future, since certification of EIR 340. The projects’ statuses
are listed and range from “application submitted” to “completed”.
Table 3, ARSP Land Use Summary, provides a comparison between the total amount of
development that has occurred within the ARSP Area (including development that has occurred
since 2012), and the total allowable development for the ARSP Area. As shown, total
development continues to remain within the allowable maximum development potential as
analyzed in EIR 340, with 48 percent of the maximum allowable hotel rooms currently developed.
It is noted that the Hilton Garden Inn and Home2Suites Hotel Project (Development Project No.
2016-00114) was approved by the Anaheim City Council for development in July 2018. This
project involves demolition of a 108-room hotel at 1441 South Manchester Avenue and
construction of a 223-room dual-branded hotel with 1,516 square feet of accessory retail space
and 975 square feet of meeting space. The project site was previously comprised of a single
parcel, which was identified in EIR 340 as APN 082-170-35; the site was analyzed in EIR 340 for
the development of up to 220 rooms, or 75 rooms per gross acre per the Low-Medium Density
designation, on 2.94 gross acres. The project involves a General Plan Amendment and Specific
Plan Amendment to create a new density category, “Medium Density (Modified)” for the project
site, including an increase in the allowable density to up to 345 rooms. This project, including the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan MEIR 313 and SEIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 2-2 Section 2.0 Review of ARSP Development
amendments to the General Plan and Specific Plan, was subject to a full CEQA evaluation through
preparation and approval of an Initial Study and Mitigated Negative Declaration. As part of this
process, it was concluded that the project, including the amendments to the General Plan and
Specific Plan, would not result in any significant impacts that could not be avoided.
In addition to projects within the ARSP, EIR 340 used the City of Anaheim General Plan as well
as the City of Garden Grove General Plan and the City of Orange General Plan Update for
cumulative analyses related to land use compatibility and traffic/circulation. The cumulative
analysis in EIR 340 also took into consideration the demographic projections and land use build
out assumptions outlined in the General Plan and Final EIR that were approved by the City of
Anaheim in 2004 (EIR 330) as well as projected build out of the Platinum Triangle Master Land
Use Plan. In addition to the City of Anaheim General Plan study area, the cumulative analyses
for individual topical issues were based on specific cumulative study areas designated by
respective agencies for regional or area wide conditions as well as cumulative projects associated
with full build out of the City of Anaheim General Plan as well as general plans of adjacent
jurisdictions (City of Garden Grove and City of Orange), as applicable.
For purposes of this Validation Report and to provide a context for the cumulative project
environment surrounding the ARSP Area, Table 4 provides an overview of related projects located
outside of the ARSP Area that have been constructed or approved for development since
certification of EIR 340. Each of the related projects identified in Table 4 has been subject to some
level of environmental analysis to ensure that impacts would be adequately mitigated.
As shown, the majority of cumulative projects approved and/or constructed in the City of Anaheim
since certification of EIR 340 are residential in nature and are located within Platinum Triangle
Master Land Use Plan area. It should also be noted that the Beach Boulevard Specific Plan
project, currently proposed as a large specific plan project that proposes development of a
1.5 mile stretch of Beach Boulevard with commercial and housing uses and is not identified on
Table 4.
An
a
h
e
i
m
R
e
s
o
r
t
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
M
a
s
t
e
r
E
I
R
3
4
0
2019 Validation Report
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
N
A
\
3
A
N
A
0
0
9
1
0
7
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
0
1
1
7
1
9
.
do
c
x
2-
3
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
.
0
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
A
R
S
P
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
TA
B
L
E
2
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
W
I
T
H
I
N
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
R
E
S
O
R
T
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
P
L
A
N
A
R
E
A
SI
N
C
E
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
E
I
R
3
4
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Re
t
a
i
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Ho
t
e
l
(R
o
o
m
s
)
Mi
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
Status
Sp
r
i
n
g
h
i
l
l
S
u
i
t
e
s
M
a
r
r
i
o
t
t
11
6
0
W
e
s
t
B
a
l
l
R
o
a
d
1
2
0
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Bo
u
t
i
q
u
e
H
o
t
e
l
/
R
3
L
o
d
g
i
n
g
11
0
0
W
e
s
t
B
a
l
l
R
o
a
d
7
5
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
St
a
y
b
r
i
d
g
e
S
u
i
t
e
s
10
5
0
W
e
s
t
B
a
l
l
R
o
a
d
1
2
6
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Di
s
n
e
y
H
a
r
b
o
r
C
a
s
t
M
e
m
b
e
r
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
/
P
u
m
b
a
Di
s
n
e
y
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
33
3
W
e
s
t
B
a
l
l
R
o
a
d
Su
r
f
a
c
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
Lo
t
E
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
Completed
Co
u
r
t
y
a
r
d
b
y
M
a
r
r
i
o
t
t
14
1
5
S
o
u
t
h
M
a
n
c
h
e
s
t
e
r
A
v
e
n
u
e
2
2
1
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Ho
l
i
d
a
y
I
n
n
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
14
1
1
S
o
u
t
h
M
a
n
c
h
e
s
t
e
r
A
v
e
n
u
e
9
6
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Hi
l
t
o
n
G
a
r
d
e
n
I
n
n
/
H
o
m
e
2
S
u
i
t
e
s
b
y
H
i
l
t
o
n
14
4
1
S
o
u
t
h
M
a
n
c
h
e
s
t
e
r
A
v
e
n
u
e
4,
8
0
0
2
2
3
U
n
d
e
r
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Pa
n
e
r
a
B
r
e
a
d
14
8
0
S
o
u
t
h
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
5,
2
9
0
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Pa
r
k
V
u
e
I
n
n
15
7
0
S
o
u
t
h
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
De
m
o
l
i
s
h
6
,
0
0
0
s
f
re
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
a
n
d
co
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
1
0
,
6
5
4
s
f
re
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
/
r
e
t
a
i
l
De
m
o
l
i
s
h
8
6
r
o
o
m
s
an
d
c
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
1
8
0
ro
o
m
s
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
b
y
P
l
a
n
n
i
n
g
C
o
m
m
i
s
s
i
o
n
Gr
a
n
d
L
e
g
a
c
y
a
t
t
h
e
P
a
r
k
16
5
0
S
o
u
t
h
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
Re
m
o
d
e
l
;
a
d
d
i
t
i
o
n
o
f
13
r
o
o
m
s
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
El
e
m
e
n
t
H
o
t
e
l
20
0
W
e
s
t
A
l
r
o
W
a
y
1
7
4
U
n
d
e
r
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Co
u
n
t
r
y
I
n
n
a
n
d
S
u
i
t
e
s
16
4
0
S
o
u
t
h
C
l
e
m
en
t
i
n
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
1
7
4
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
Ro
a
d
h
o
u
s
e
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
17
3
0
S
o
u
t
h
C
l
e
m
en
t
i
n
e
S
t
r
e
e
t
1
2
5
A
p
p
l
i
c
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
b
m
i
t
t
e
d
Ca
m
b
r
i
a
S
u
i
t
e
s
17
2
1
S
o
u
t
h
M
a
n
c
h
e
s
t
e
r
A
v
e
n
u
e
15
,
0
0
0
s
f
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
3
5
2
U
n
d
e
r
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
We
s
t
i
n
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
R
e
s
o
r
t
/
A
n
n
a
b
e
l
l
a
H
o
t
e
l
1
0
3
0
We
s
t
K
a
t
e
l
l
a
A
v
e
n
u
e
6
1
3
U
n
d
e
r
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
An
a
h
e
i
m
R
e
s
o
r
t
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
M
a
s
t
e
r
E
I
R
3
4
0
2019 Validation Report
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
N
A
\
3
A
N
A
0
0
9
1
0
7
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
0
1
1
7
1
9
.
do
c
x
2-
4
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
.
0
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
A
R
S
P
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
TA
B
L
E
2
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
W
I
T
H
I
N
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
R
E
S
O
R
T
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
P
L
A
N
A
R
E
A
SI
N
C
E
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
E
I
R
3
4
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Re
t
a
i
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Ho
t
e
l
(R
o
o
m
s
)
Mi
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
Status
Re
s
i
d
e
n
c
e
I
n
n
M
a
r
r
i
o
t
t
64
0
W
e
s
t
K
a
t
e
l
l
a
A
v
e
n
u
e
7,
5
2
5
2
9
4
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Sp
r
i
n
g
h
i
l
l
S
u
i
t
e
s
M
a
r
r
i
o
t
t
18
0
1
S
o
u
t
h
H
a
r bo
r
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
16
,
0
0
0
p
h
a
r
m
a
c
y
1
7
2
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Hy
a
t
t
H
o
u
s
e
18
0
0
S
o
u
t
h
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
2
5
2
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Ha
m
p
t
o
n
I
n
n
&
S
u
i
t
e
s
10
0
W
e
s
t
K
a
t
e
l
l
a
A
v
e
n
u
e
1
7
8
U
n
d
e
r
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Di
s
n
e
y
T
o
y
S
t
o
r
y
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
L
o
t
E
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
Su
r
f
a
c
e
P
a
r
k
i
n
g
Lo
t
E
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
Completed
Hy
a
t
t
P
l
a
c
e
20
3
5
S
o
u
t
h
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
1
7
8
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Ho
m
e
w
o
o
d
S
u
i
t
e
s
20
1
0
S
o
u
t
h
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
2
1
5
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Ga
r
d
e
n
W
a
l
k
W
e
s
t
g
a
t
e
T
i
m
e
s
h
a
r
e
50
0
S
D
i
s
n
e
y
W
a
y
3
9
9
P
l
a
n
C
h
e
c
k
An
a
h
e
i
m
C
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
Ce
n
t
e
r
E
x
p
a
n
s
i
o
n
80
0
W
K
a
t
e
l
l
a
2
0
0
,
0
0
0
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ga
r
d
e
n
W
a
l
k
J
W
M
a
r
r
i
o
t
t
17
7
5
S
C
l
e
m
e
n
t
i
n
e
4
6
6
73
,
5
0
4
S
F
T
o
t
a
l
Ac
c
e
s
s
o
r
y
U
s
e
s
:
23
,
9
5
8
S
F
Ba
l
l
r
o
o
m
s
a
n
d
Me
e
t
i
n
g
R
o
o
m
s
1,
5
1
8
S
F
E
v
e
n
t
Hu
b
87
4
S
F
C
o
f
f
e
e
Ba
r
a
n
d
C
a
f
é
Se
a
t
i
n
g
37
,
7
5
6
S
F
Ex
p
r
e
s
s
S
p
a
Construction
An
a
h
e
i
m
R
e
s
o
r
t
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
M
a
s
t
e
r
E
I
R
3
4
0
2019 Validation Report
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
N
A
\
3
A
N
A
0
0
9
1
0
7
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
0
1
1
7
1
9
.
do
c
x
2-
5
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
.
0
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
A
R
S
P
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
TA
B
L
E
2
PR
O
J
E
C
T
S
W
I
T
H
I
N
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
R
E
S
O
R
T
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
P
L
A
N
A
R
E
A
SI
N
C
E
C
E
R
T
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
E
I
R
3
4
0
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Re
t
a
i
l
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Ho
t
e
l
(R
o
o
m
s
)
Mi
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
Status
1,
4
2
9
S
F
C
e
n
t
r
a
l
Ba
r
45
4
S
F
Re
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
B
a
r
96
4
S
F
O
u
t
d
o
o
r
Di
n
i
n
g
2,
9
2
4
S
F
P
o
o
l
Ba
r
An
a
h
e
i
m
P
l
a
z
a
/
L
u
x
u
r
y
H
o
t
e
l
17
0
0
S
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
25
,
6
0
0
5
8
0
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
In
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
B
u
i
l
d
i
n
g
17
1
0
-
1
7
3
0
S
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
1
4
3
,
0
0
0
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
To
t
a
l
s
78
,
8
6
9
(e
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
t
o
1
3
2
ho
t
e
l
r
o
o
m
s
b
a
s
e
d
up
o
n
6
0
0
s
q
.
f
t
.
p
e
r
ho
t
e
l
r
o
o
m
)
5,
1
4
0
n
e
w
h
o
t
e
l
ro
o
m
s
1
48
6
,
3
8
1
1
O
f
t
h
e
h
o
t
e
l
r
o
o
m
s
,
4
,
5
4
1
a
r
e
a
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
f
o
r
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
.
An
a
h
e
i
m
R
e
s
o
r
t
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
M
a
s
t
e
r
E
I
R
3
4
0
2019 Validation Report
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
N
A
\
3
A
N
A
0
0
9
1
0
7
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
0
1
1
7
1
9
.
do
c
x
2-
6
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
.
0
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
A
R
S
P
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
TA
B
L
E
3
AN
A
H
E
I
M
R
E
S
O
R
T
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
P
L
A
N
L
A
N
D
U
S
E
S
U
M
M
A
R
Y
1
Di
s
t
r
i
c
t
To
t
a
l
A
l
l
o
w
a
b
l
e
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Cu
r
r
e
n
t
E
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
Re
m
a
i
n
i
n
g
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
P
o
t
e
n
t
i
a
l
C-
R
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
3
2
,
5
0
0
h
o
t
e
l
r
o
o
m
s
1
5
,
2
2
5
h
o
t
e
l
r
o
o
m
s
2
1
7
,
2
7
5
h
o
t
e
l
r
o
o
m
s
PR
D
i
s
t
r
i
c
t
2
,
5
0
0
h
o
t
e
l
r
o
o
m
s
2
,
1
1
8
,
3
6
3
s
f
c
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
c
e
n
t
e
r
1
8
0
,
0
0
0
s
f
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
4
0
,
0
0
0
s
f
h
o
t
e
l
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
/
b
a
l
l
r
o
o
m
sp
a
c
e
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
s
f
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
a
b
l
e
sp
a
c
e
1
,
6
0
0
h
o
t
e
l
r
o
o
m
s
1
,
7
1
2
,
0
0
4
s
f
c
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
c
e
n
t
e
r
9
0
0
h
o
t
e
l
r
o
o
m
s
4
0
6
,
3
5
9
s
f
c
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
c
e
n
t
e
r
1
8
0
,
0
0
0
s
f
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
4
0
,
0
0
0
s
f
h
o
t
e
l
m
e
e
t
ing/ballroom space
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
s
f
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
p
rogrammable space
To
t
a
l
3
5
,
0
0
0
h
o
t
e
l
r
o
o
m
s
2
,
1
1
8
,
3
6
3
s
f
c
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
c
e
n
t
e
r
1
8
0
,
0
0
0
s
f
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
4
0
,
0
0
0
s
f
h
o
t
e
l
m
e
e
t
i
n
g
/
b
a
l
l
r
o
o
m
sp
a
c
e
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
s
f
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
p
r
o
g
r
a
m
m
a
b
l
e
sp
a
c
e
1
6
,
8
2
5
h
o
t
e
l
r
o
o
m
s
1
,
7
1
2
,
0
0
4
s
f
c
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
c
e
n
t
e
r
1
8
,
1
7
5
h
o
t
e
l
r
o
o
m
s
4
0
6
,
3
5
9
s
f
c
o
n
v
e
n
t
i
o
n
c
e
n
t
e
r
1
8
0
,
0
0
0
s
f
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
4
0
,
0
0
0
s
f
h
o
t
e
l
m
e
e
t
ing/ballroom space
1
0
0
,
0
0
0
s
f
o
u
t
d
o
o
r
p
rogrammable space
sf
:
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
1
A
t
t
h
e
t
i
m
e
E
I
R
3
4
0
w
a
s
b
e
i
n
g
p
r
e
p
a
r
e
d
,
a
s
o
f
2
0
1
2
.
2
C
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
u
s
e
s
a
r
e
c
o
n
v
e
r
t
e
d
to
h
o
t
e
l
r
o
o
m
e
q
u
i
v
a
l
e
n
t
s
o
n
a
r
at
i
o
o
f
6
0
0
s
q
u
a
r
e
f
e
e
t
o
f
c
o
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
d
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
=
o
n
e
h
o
t
e
l
r
oo
m
So
u
r
c
e
:
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
2
0
1
2
.
An
a
h
e
i
m
R
e
s
o
r
t
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
M
a
s
t
e
r
E
I
R
3
4
0
2019 Validation Report
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
N
A
\
3
A
N
A
0
0
9
1
0
7
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
0
1
1
7
1
9
.
do
c
x
2-
7
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
.
0
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
A
R
S
P
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
TA
B
L
E
4
CU
R
R
E
N
T
A
N
D
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
D
R
E
L
A
T
E
D
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
O
F
T
H
E
A
R
S
P
NO
T
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
E
D
I
N
E
I
R
3
4
0
1
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Of
f
i
c
e
(s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
R
e
t
a
i
l
/
Di
n
i
n
g
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Ho
t
e
l
(R
o
o
m
s
)
Re
s
i
d
.
(U
n
i
t
)
Mi
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
Status
Ci
t
y
o
f
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
1
Co
l
o
n
y
P
a
r
k
S/
o
S
a
n
t
a
A
n
a
,
N
/
o
S
o
u
t
h
S
t
,
W
/
o
Ol
i
v
e
A
v
e
,
E
/
o
R
a
i
l
r
o
a
d
T
r
a
c
k
s
6
7
0
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Je
f
f
e
r
s
o
n
P
l
a
t
i
n
u
m
T
r
i
a
n
g
l
e
17
8
1
S
C
a
m
p
t
o
n
4
0
0
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Pl
a
t
i
n
u
m
G
a
t
e
w
a
y
A
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
/
Ka
t
e
l
l
a
G
r
a
n
d
91
5
E
K
a
t
e
l
l
a
A
v
e
3
9
9
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Ga
t
e
w
a
y
A
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
H
o
m
e
s
P
h
a
s
e
2
21
2
0
S
S
t
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
3
9
5
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Do
m
a
i
n
N
o
r
t
h
42
1
S
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
6
0
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Cr
o
s
s
i
n
g
s
a
t
C
h
e
r
r
y
O
r
c
h
a
r
d
27
3
8
W
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
4
5
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
MB
K
/
A
n
a
c
a
s
a
22
3
7
A
n
a
c
a
s
a
W
a
y
4
4
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Ci
r
c
a
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
80
1
S
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
B
l
v
d
4
2
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Do
m
a
i
n
S
o
u
t
h
51
0
S
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
4
0
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Co
l
l
a
g
e
I
I
18
3
2
W
W
i
l
l
o
w
3
7
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Ca
l
e
n
d
u
l
a
C
o
u
r
t
A
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
92
8
S
W
e
b
s
t
e
r
3
2
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Da
l
e
V
i
l
l
a
s
12
1
S
D
a
l
e
1
4
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
La
V
u
e
L
L
C
–
K
a
t
e
l
l
a
15
5
6
W
K
a
t
e
l
l
a
1
4
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Co
l
l
a
g
e
A
t
C
e
r
r
i
t
o
s
16
0
9
W
C
e
r
r
i
t
o
s
1
1
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Je
f
f
e
r
s
o
n
P
l
a
t
i
n
u
m
I
&
I
I
17
8
1
S
C
a
m
p
t
o
n
A
v
e
4
0
0
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
An
a
h
e
i
m
R
e
s
o
r
t
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
M
a
s
t
e
r
E
I
R
3
4
0
2019 Validation Report
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
N
A
\
3
A
N
A
0
0
9
1
0
7
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
0
1
1
7
1
9
.
do
c
x
2-
8
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
.
0
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
A
R
S
P
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
TA
B
L
E
4
CU
R
R
E
N
T
A
N
D
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
D
R
E
L
A
T
E
D
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
O
F
T
H
E
A
R
S
P
NO
T
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
E
D
I
N
E
I
R
3
4
0
1
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Of
f
i
c
e
(s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
R
e
t
a
i
l
/
Di
n
i
n
g
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Ho
t
e
l
(R
o
o
m
s
)
Re
s
i
d
.
(U
n
i
t
)
Mi
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
Status
Th
e
G
e
o
r
g
e
22
1
1
E
O
r
a
n
g
e
w
o
o
d
3
4
0
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Vi
v
e
r
e
A
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
/
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
Ap
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
C
o
m
m
u
n
i
t
i
e
s
2
4
4
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
Pl
a
t
i
n
u
m
V
i
s
t
a
11
0
5
E
K
a
t
e
l
l
a
A
v
e
3
8
6
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
d
A-
T
o
w
n
M
e
t
r
o
3
8
,
0
0
0
t
o
5
0
,
0
0
0
11
1
8
Approved
A-
T
o
w
n
18
7
1
S
G
r
a
n
v
i
l
l
e
D
r
4
0
0
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
A-
T
o
w
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
G
15
8
9
E
G
e
n
e
A
u
t
r
y
W
a
y
1
4
3
U
n
d
e
r
R
e
v
i
e
w
A-
T
o
w
n
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
A
r
e
a
H
14
3
0
E
T
r
i
a
d
S
t
8
5
U
n
d
e
r
R
e
v
i
e
w
Je
f
f
e
r
s
o
n
S
t
a
d
i
u
m
P
a
r
k
18
0
0
E
G
e
n
e
A
u
t
r
y
W
a
y
1
4
,
6
0
0
1
0
7
9
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Fr
e
e
m
a
n
S
i
t
e
90
1
E
S
o
u
t
h
S
t
5
4
6
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
LT
G
P
l
a
t
i
n
u
m
C
e
n
t
e
r
20
4
0
S
S
t
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
77
,
0
0
0
4
3
3
,
3
3
3
2
0
0
4
0
5
U
n
d
e
r
R
e
v
i
e
w
16
0
0
W
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
A
v
e
.
A
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
16
0
0
W
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
A
v
e
3
1
5
U
n
d
e
r
R
e
v
i
e
w
Av
a
n
t
i
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
To
w
n
h
o
m
e
s
10
0
W
C
e
r
r
i
t
o
s
A
v
e
2
9
2
U
n
d
e
r
R
e
v
i
e
w
17
0
0
L
e
w
i
s
17
0
0
S
L
e
w
i
s
S
t
1
5
3
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ol
s
o
n
M
a
n
c
h
e
s
t
e
r
T
o
w
n
h
o
m
e
s
23
3
7
-
2
4
1
5
S
M
a
n
c
h
e
s
t
e
r
A
v
e
1
2
0
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ho
m
e
m
a
d
e
72
Conceptual
Ba
r
n
35
0
W
C
e
n
t
e
r
S
t
r
e
e
t
P
r
o
m
e
n
a
d
e
1
6
,
5
0
0
5
7
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
An
a
h
e
i
m
S
e
n
i
o
r
A
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
12
4
8
E
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
A
v
e
5
4
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
An
a
h
e
i
m
R
e
s
o
r
t
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
M
a
s
t
e
r
E
I
R
3
4
0
2019 Validation Report
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
N
A
\
3
A
N
A
0
0
9
1
0
7
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
0
1
1
7
1
9
.
do
c
x
2-
9
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
.
0
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
A
R
S
P
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
TA
B
L
E
4
CU
R
R
E
N
T
A
N
D
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
D
R
E
L
A
T
E
D
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
O
F
T
H
E
A
R
S
P
NO
T
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
E
D
I
N
E
I
R
3
4
0
1
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Of
f
i
c
e
(s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
R
e
t
a
i
l
/
Di
n
i
n
g
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Ho
t
e
l
(R
o
o
m
s
)
Re
s
i
d
.
(U
n
i
t
)
Mi
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
Status
Ol
s
o
n
S
E
a
s
t
S
t
T
o
w
n
h
o
m
e
s
63
3
-
7
1
1
S
E
a
s
t
S
t
4
2
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Ba
l
l
R
o
a
d
T
o
w
n
h
o
m
e
s
-
B
o
n
a
n
n
i
27
3
0
W
B
a
l
l
R
d
4
1
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
KB
H
o
m
e
s
31
2
S
E
u
c
l
i
d
S
t
3
9
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Li
n
c
o
l
n
T
o
w
n
h
o
m
e
s
A
M
G
27
2
6
W
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
A
v
e
3
4
P
l
a
n
C
h
e
c
k
18
-
U
n
i
t
s
O
n
E
u
c
l
i
d
15
2
5
S
E
u
c
l
i
d
S
t
1
8
P
l
a
n
C
h
e
c
k
Li
n
b
r
o
o
k
V
i
l
l
a
s
97
0
0
W
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
1
2
U
n
d
e
r
R
e
v
i
e
w
Ce
r
r
i
t
o
s
16
0
9
W
C
e
r
r
i
t
o
s
A
v
e
1
1
P
l
a
n
C
h
e
c
k
Ad
d
i
t
i
o
n
a
l
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
40
Pending
Wh
e
e
l
S
e
r
v
i
c
e
T
e
x
a
c
o
26
0
0
W
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
1
,
2
1
3
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
Au
t
o
z
o
n
e
29
5
2
W
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
6
,
2
1
8
P
l
a
n
C
h
e
c
k
St
o
r
q
u
e
s
t
S
e
l
f
S
t
o
r
a
g
e
50
0
S
W
a
l
n
u
t
1
2
0
,
3
1
9
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
G
&
M
O
i
l
#
6
5
98
4
B
e
a
c
h
B
l
v
d
2
,
2
5
3
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
In
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
S
u
b
d
i
v
i
s
i
o
n
13
6
9
S
S
t
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
43
,
1
4
0
In
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
S
F
Approved
Le
m
o
n
S
t
r
e
e
t
I
n
d
u
s
t
r
i
a
l
40
0
S
L
e
m
o
n
7
,
2
3
9
P
l
a
n
C
h
e
c
k
An
a
h
e
i
m
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
H
o
t
e
l
/
Ra
d
i
s
o
n
B
l
u
e
H
o
t
e
l
16
0
1
S
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
B
l
v
d
Up
t
o
1
2
,
0
0
0
S
F
Re
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
S
p
a
c
e
33
0
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
TM
B
#
1
E
u
c
l
i
d
7
E
l
e
v
e
n
26
0
S
E
u
c
l
i
d
2
,
4
0
0
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
An
a
h
e
i
m
Y
M
C
A
14
0
6
-
1
4
2
2
W
B
r
o
a
d
w
a
y
1
6
,
8
0
0
U
n
d
e
r
R
e
v
i
e
w
An
a
h
e
i
m
R
e
s
o
r
t
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
M
a
s
t
e
r
E
I
R
3
4
0
2019 Validation Report
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
N
A
\
3
A
N
A
0
0
9
1
0
7
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
0
1
1
7
1
9
.
do
c
x
2-
1
0
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
.
0
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
A
R
S
P
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
TA
B
L
E
4
CU
R
R
E
N
T
A
N
D
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
D
R
E
L
A
T
E
D
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
O
F
T
H
E
A
R
S
P
NO
T
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
E
D
I
N
E
I
R
3
4
0
1
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Of
f
i
c
e
(s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
R
e
t
a
i
l
/
Di
n
i
n
g
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Ho
t
e
l
(R
o
o
m
s
)
Re
s
i
d
.
(U
n
i
t
)
Mi
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
Status
St
a
r
b
u
c
k
s
20
1
3
E
B
a
l
l
R
d
8
9
0
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
St
a
d
i
u
m
T
o
w
e
r
s
I
I
24
0
0
E
K
a
t
e
l
l
a
29
2
,
9
5
8
4
0
,
0
0
0
U
n
d
e
r
R
e
v
i
e
w
Fa
r
m
h
o
u
s
e
43
0
S
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
3
,
6
0
0
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Gr
e
e
n
h
o
u
s
e
35
0
S
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
B
l
v
d
2
,
3
3
5
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
St
a
r
b
u
c
k
s
14
7
5
S
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
B
l
v
d
9
0
0
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
Ba
l
l
a
n
d
E
u
c
l
i
d
P
l
a
z
a
90
1
-
9
5
1
E
u
c
l
i
d
S
t
2
,
8
0
0
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
Go
l
d
e
n
R
o
a
d
B
r
e
w
i
n
g
22
1
0
-
2
2
2
0
E
O
r
a
n
g
e
w
o
o
d
5
8
,
5
0
0
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Br
e
w
h
e
i
m
19
2
1
-
1
9
3
1
E
W
r
i
g
h
t
C
i
r
2
3
,
9
4
5
A
p
p
r
o
v
e
d
Ra
i
s
i
n
g
C
a
n
e
’
s
E
u
c
l
i
d
10
1
S
E
u
c
l
i
d
3
,
2
3
3
P
l
a
n
C
h
e
c
k
An
a
h
e
i
m
E
x
p
r
e
s
s
C
a
r
W
a
s
h
82
1
S
S
t
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
2
,
5
0
7
U
n
d
e
r
R
e
v
i
e
w
7
E
l
e
v
e
n
18
1
8
L
e
w
i
s
S
t
3
,
0
6
0
U
n
d
e
r
R
e
v
i
e
w
OC
T
A
T
r
a
n
s
i
t
S
O
C
15
1
2
-
1
5
3
0
W
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
26
,
0
0
0
C
o
n
c
e
p
t
u
a
l
Ba
l
l
M
e
d
i
c
a
l
O
f
f
i
c
e
25
5
1
W
B
a
l
l
R
d
4
,
6
0
0
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
Se
l
f
-
S
t
o
r
a
g
e
17
0
5
S
S
t
a
t
e
C
o
l
l
e
g
e
B
l
v
d
3
1
,
8
1
2
U
n
d
e
r
R
e
v
i
e
w
An
a
h
e
i
m
T
o
w
n
S
q
u
a
r
e
–
C
o
r
n
e
r
S
h
o
p
23
1
0
E
L
i
n
c
o
l
n
7
,
5
9
0
U
n
d
e
r
R
e
v
i
e
w
An
a
h
e
i
m
R
e
s
o
r
t
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
M
a
s
t
e
r
E
I
R
3
4
0
2019 Validation Report
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
N
A
\
3
A
N
A
0
0
9
1
0
7
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
0
1
1
7
1
9
.
do
c
x
2-
1
1
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
.
0
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
A
R
S
P
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
TA
B
L
E
4
CU
R
R
E
N
T
A
N
D
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
D
R
E
L
A
T
E
D
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
O
F
T
H
E
A
R
S
P
NO
T
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
E
D
I
N
E
I
R
3
4
0
1
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Of
f
i
c
e
(s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
R
e
t
a
i
l
/
Di
n
i
n
g
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Ho
t
e
l
(R
o
o
m
s
)
Re
s
i
d
.
(U
n
i
t
)
Mi
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
Status
Ci
t
y
o
f
O
r
a
n
g
e
2
Br
a
n
c
h
W
e
s
t
94
m
u
l
t
i
-
fa
m
i
l
y
u
n
i
t
s
Approved and in plan check; Consistent with 2010 General Plan, density exceeds allowable density under GP, application includes a development agreement involving the transfer of development rights from portion of adjacent City property.
99
9
T
o
w
n
a
n
d
C
o
u
n
t
r
y
M
i
x
e
d
U
s
e
2,
6
8
4
s
f
(l
e
a
s
i
n
g
of
f
i
c
e
)
(9
8
,
5
5
1
s
q
.
ft
.
e
x
i
s
t
i
n
g
of
f
i
c
e
)
26
2
m
u
l
t
i
-
fa
m
i
l
y
u
n
i
t
s
Approved and under construction; Consistent with 2010 General Plan
Th
e
O
r
a
n
g
e
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
–
C
i
t
y
P
l
a
z
a
Ho
t
e
l
Th
e
O
r
a
n
g
e
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
C
i
t
y
P
l
a
z
a
Ap
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
no
t
ex
c
e
e
d
i
n
g
16
5
r
o
o
m
s
33
1
m
u
l
t
i
-
fa
m
i
l
y
u
n
i
t
s
Application deemed complete, under review; Consistent with 2010 General Plan
Th
e
O
r
a
n
g
e
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
–
C
i
t
y
P
a
r
k
w
a
y
Ap
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
21
3
m
u
l
t
i
-
fa
m
i
l
y
u
n
i
t
s
Application deemed complete, under review; Consistent with 2010 General Plan
Th
e
O
r
a
n
g
e
C
o
l
l
e
c
t
i
o
n
–
C
h
a
p
m
a
n
Ap
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
27
7
m
u
l
t
i
-
fa
m
i
l
y
u
n
i
t
s
Application deemed complete, under review; Consistent with 2010 General Plan
Wi
m
b
l
e
d
o
n
C
o
u
r
t
/
J
e
e
r
a
h
S
i
n
g
l
e
Fa
m
i
l
y
R
e
s
i
d
e
n
t
i
a
l
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
8
s
i
n
g
l
e
-
fa
m
i
l
y
u
n
i
t
s
Approved; Consistent with 2010 General Plan, located in northeaster portion of the City of Orange
An
a
h
e
i
m
R
e
s
o
r
t
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
M
a
s
t
e
r
E
I
R
3
4
0
2019 Validation Report
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
N
A
\
3
A
N
A
0
0
9
1
0
7
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
0
1
1
7
1
9
.
do
c
x
2-
1
2
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
.
0
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
A
R
S
P
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
TA
B
L
E
4
CU
R
R
E
N
T
A
N
D
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
D
R
E
L
A
T
E
D
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
O
F
T
H
E
A
R
S
P
NO
T
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
E
D
I
N
E
I
R
3
4
0
1
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Of
f
i
c
e
(s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
R
e
t
a
i
l
/
Di
n
i
n
g
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Ho
t
e
l
(R
o
o
m
s
)
Re
s
i
d
.
(U
n
i
t
)
Mi
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
Status
Se
r
r
a
n
o
W
o
o
d
s
A
p
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
G
P
A
20
1
0
-
0
0
0
2
63
ap
a
r
t
m
e
n
t
s
Complete; GPA from Low Medium Residential 6-15 dwelling units/acre (LMDR) to Medium Density Residential (15-24 dwelling units/acre (MDR)
Ci
t
y
o
f
G
a
r
d
e
n
G
r
o
v
e
3
CU
P
-
0
6
1
-
2
0
1
6
97
3
7
C
h
a
p
m
a
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
2
,
5
0
0
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
CU
P
-
0
6
3
-
2
0
1
6
12
8
2
7
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
#
G
2
9
,
4
5
4
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
CU
P
-
0
6
6
-
2
0
1
6
12
7
5
5
B
r
o
o
k
h
u
r
s
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
1
,
8
5
0
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
CU
P
-
0
7
1
-
2
0
1
6
98
0
2
K
a
t
e
l
l
a
A
v
e
n
u
e
9
,
1
2
0
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
CU
P
-
0
7
7
-
2
0
1
6
97
3
7
C
h
a
p
m
a
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
2
,
2
0
0
R
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
CU
P
-
0
8
1
-
2
0
1
6
12
8
2
7
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
9
,
4
5
4
U
F
C
G
y
m
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
CU
P
-
0
8
5
-
2
0
1
6
10
8
7
0
K
a
t
e
l
l
a
A
v
e
n
u
e
4
4
,
0
0
7
G
o
l
d
’
s
G
y
m
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
CU
P
-
0
9
2
-
2
0
1
7
10
8
7
0
K
a
t
e
l
l
a
A
v
e
n
u
e
2
9
,
0
1
0
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
CU
P
-
0
9
5
-
2
0
1
7
12
2
5
2
W
e
s
t
S
t
8
,
3
0
8
s
f
f
i
r
e
s
t
a
t
i
o
n
E
n
t
i
t
l
e
d
CU
P
-
1
0
2
-
2
0
1
7
98
2
2
K
a
t
e
l
l
a
A
v
e
4
0
,
7
0
4
C
r
u
n
c
h
F
i
t
n
e
s
s
U
n
d
e
r
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
DR
-
0
2
5
-
2
0
1
7
13
8
8
2
A
n
i
t
a
P
l
a
c
e
2
U
n
d
e
r
C
o
n
s
t
r
u
c
t
i
o
n
DR
-
0
3
3
-
2
0
1
7
12
7
8
3
9
t
h
S
t
r
e
e
t
2
E
n
t
i
t
l
e
d
An
a
h
e
i
m
R
e
s
o
r
t
S
p
e
c
i
f
i
c
P
l
a
n
M
a
s
t
e
r
E
I
R
3
4
0
2019 Validation Report
R:
\
P
r
o
j
e
c
t
s
\
A
N
A
\
3
A
N
A
0
0
9
1
0
7
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
\
V
a
l
i
d
a
t
i
o
n
R
e
p
o
r
t
-
0
1
1
7
1
9
.
do
c
x
2-
1
3
Se
c
t
i
o
n
2
.
0
R
e
v
i
e
w
o
f
A
R
S
P
D
e
v
e
l
o
p
m
e
n
t
TA
B
L
E
4
CU
R
R
E
N
T
A
N
D
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
D
R
E
L
A
T
E
D
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
S
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
O
F
T
H
E
A
R
S
P
NO
T
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
E
D
I
N
E
I
R
3
4
0
1
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
N
a
m
e
Of
f
i
c
e
(s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Co
m
m
e
r
c
i
a
l
/
R
e
t
a
i
l
/
Di
n
i
n
g
(
s
q
.
f
t
.
)
Ho
t
e
l
(R
o
o
m
s
)
Re
s
i
d
.
(U
n
i
t
)
Mi
s
c
e
l
l
a
n
e
o
u
s
Status
SP
-
0
2
2
-
2
0
1
6
,
L
L
A
-
0
1
1
-
2
0
1
6
,
D
A
-
0
0
2
-
20
1
6
,
C
U
P
-
0
6
5
-
2
0
1
6
10
6
4
1
G
a
r
d
e
n
G
r
o
v
e
B
l
v
d
.
,
1
0
6
6
1
Ga
r
d
e
n
G
r
o
v
e
B
l
v
d
.
,
1
0
6
6
2
P
e
a
r
l
St
r
e
e
t
1
0
W
o
r
k
-
L
i
v
e
M
i
x
e
d
U
s
e
E
n
t
i
t
l
e
d
SP
-
0
2
5
-
2
0
1
6
,
C
U
P
-
0
7
9
-
2
0
1
6
,
V
-
0
1
2
-
20
1
6
11
1
6
2
G
a
r
d
e
n
G
r
o
v
e
B
l
v
d
9
4
0
C
o
m
p
l
e
t
e
SP
-
0
3
3
-
2
0
1
7
13
2
0
0
-
1
3
2
2
0
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
o
u
l
e
v
a
r
d
4
,
9
5
4
E
n
t
i
t
l
e
d
SP
-
0
5
6
-
2
0
1
8
,
C
U
P
-
1
3
4
-
2
0
1
8
,
G
P
A
-
00
2
-
2
0
1
8
,
L
L
A
-
0
1
8
-
2
0
1
8
,
A
-
0
2
4
-
2
0
1
8
-
1
3
6
5
0
H
A
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
1
2
4
BN
G
r
o
u
p
–
H
i
l
t
o
n
Ho
t
e
l
Entitled
SP
-
0
5
0
-
2
0
1
8
,
C
U
P
-
1
2
8
-
2
0
1
8
-
1
3
7
3
1
HA
R
B
O
R
B
L
V
D
5
,
4
8
5
K
i
a
D
e
a
l
e
r
s
h
i
p
E
n
t
i
t
l
e
d
Te
n
t
a
t
i
v
e
T
r
a
c
t
M
a
p
N
o
1
7
4
5
5
,
S
P
-
04
3
-
2
0
1
7
,
C
U
P
-
1
1
1
-
2
0
1
7
,
C
U
P
-
1
1
2
-
20
1
7
,
C
U
P
-
1
1
3
-
2
0
1
7
,
C
U
P
-
1
1
4
-
2
0
1
7
,
CU
P
-
1
1
5
-
2
0
1
7
,
D
A
-
0
0
8
-
2
0
1
7
,
P
U
D
-
12
8
-
1
2
R
e
v
2
0
1
7
-
1
2
2
2
2
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
12
2
5
2
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
1
2
26
2
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
12
2
7
2
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
1
2
29
2
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
12
3
0
2
H
a
r
b
o
r
B
l
v
d
1
2
51
1
T
w
i
n
t
r
e
e
L
n
12
5
3
1
T
w
i
n
t
r
e
e
L
n
1
2
5
5
1
T
w
i
n
t
r
e
e
L
n
12
5
7
1
T
w
i
n
t
r
e
e
L
n
1
2
2
3
3
C
h
o
i
s
s
e
r
R
d
12
2
3
9
C
h
o
i
s
s
e
r
R
d
1
2
2
3
7
C
h
o
i
s
s
e
r
Rd
1
2
2
3
5
C
h
o
i
s
s
e
r
R
d
36
,
8
8
5
(
r
e
s
t
a
u
r
a
n
t
)
39
,
8
6
7
(b
a
n
q
u
e
t
/
e
v
e
n
t
sp
a
c
e
)
76
9
G
a
r
d
e
n
G
r
o
v
e
S
i
t
e
C
E
n
t
i
t
l
e
d
To
t
a
l
s
(n
e
w
s
q
.
f
t
.
/
r
o
o
m
s
/
d
u
’
s
)
39
8
,
6
4
2
1
,
0
9
7
,
8
3
8
1
,
5
8
8
9
,
9
1
1
58
,
6
8
7
1
A
n
a
h
e
i
m
2
0
1
7
2
O
r
a
n
g
e
2
0
1
8
3
G
a
r
d
e
n
G
r
o
v
e
2
0
1
8
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 2-14 Section 2.0 Review of ARSP Development
The second part of the validation process for EIR 340 is a review of each environmental section
of EIR 340 to determine whether or not the environmental data is current or if significant changes
have taken place that need to be addressed.
This report concludes that EIR 340 remains valid for continued use as the Master EIR for the
ARSP Area. Development within the Specific Plan Area, including projects under construction, is
occurring at a slower pace than originally anticipated in EIR 340, with over 50 percent of the
additional maximum allowable development remaining undeveloped. Consequently, the impact
analyses and mitigation measures provided in EIR 340 are more than adequate to address
continuing growth and development in the ARSP Area for the foreseeable future. Accordingly,
EIR 340 is still valid and may continue to be used for an additional five years, or until a significant
unforeseen change in the environment occurs, whichever takes place first.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-1 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
SECTION 3.0 REVIEW OF THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN EIR 340
This portion of the Validation Report examines each environmental topical issue analyzed in EIR
340 including aesthetics, agriculture and forest resources, air quality, biological resources, cultural
resources, geology, greenhouse gas emissions, hazards and hazardous materials, hydrology and
water quality, land use, mineral resources, noise, population and housing, public services,
recreation, transportation/traffic, water, sewer, electricity, stormwater, and public utilities.
Mitigation measures were required to reduce the impact from development of the ARSP on the
environment. For each of the above-mentioned topical issues, a summary of the previous
environmental analysis from EIR 340 is provided, followed by a current review explaining what, if
any, changes have occurred since adoption, particularly during the past five years since the
adoption of EIR 340.
3.1 AESTHETICS
3.1.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to EIR 340, the ARSP Area does not contain any scenic resources, nor are any scenic
vistas visible from the ARSP Area; therefore, no impact would occur. Future development and
redevelopment associated with buildout of the ARSP Area would change the existing visual
character of individual areas; however, buildout of the ARSP Area would create a more visually
cohesive and appealing environment and impacts would be less than significant with
implementation of MM 5.1-1 through MM 5.1-14. MM 5.1-1 requires projects under EIR 340 to
avoid created significant shade and shadow impacts. MM 5.1-2, MM 5.1-4, MM 5.1-5, and
MM 5.1-12 regulate plumbing and lighting fixtures and roof- and ground-mounted equipment.
MM 5.1-3 requires removal of all on-site graffiti throughout project operation. MM 5.1-6 through
MM 5.1-11 relate to trees, landscaping, and irrigation. MM 5.1-13 and MM 5.1-14 set
requirements for rear building elevations and vehicular drop-off areas.
Buildout of the C-R District could result in potential shade and shadow impacts on properties
immediately adjacent to the ARSP Area that would be considered significant and unavoidable.
The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this
potential impact. Shade and shadow impacts associated with the specific development proposed
for the PR District as evaluated in EIR 340 would be less than significant.
3.1.2 CURRENT REVIEW
Since adoption of EIR 340, the visual character of the ARSP Area has been undergoing changes
to create a more uniform visual appearance characteristic of the Anaheim Resort through
continued development of visitor-serving uses. All uses that have been developed or proposed
for development within the ARSP are consistent with specifications set forth by the Specific Plan
Design Plan. Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to
visual and shade shadow conditions under which the Master EIR was certified and no new
substantial information is available which was not known and could not have been known at the
time the Master EIR was certified. The shade/shadow issue analyzed in EIR 340 continues to be
addressed through the mitigation measures provided to address such issues as set forth in
EIR 340 and the Statement of Overriding Considerations. All development within the ARSP is
required to be consistent with the Specific Plan Design Plan criteria. As development proposals
are considered by the City, they are reviewed to ensure compliance with the Specific Plan Design
Plan criteria. As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land use within The Anaheim
Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a recently approved density
increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden Inn /
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-2 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that there
were no new impacts related to aesthetics.
Review of the EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to aesthetics
under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is available which
was not known or could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was certified.
3.2 AGRICULTURE & FOREST RESOURCES
3.2.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
As disclosed in the Initial Study for EIR 340, in 1994 the ARSP Area contained an approximate
56-acre site located southeast of Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue which was designated as
“Prime Farmland” and which was under a Williamson Act contract set to expire on March 1, 2000.
EIR 313 evaluated the loss of the prime agricultural land and identified the impact as significant
and unavoidable. Because the impact related to the loss of agricultural land was fully analyzed
as part of EIR 313, the Initial Study for EIR 340 identified that a new significant impact related to
agricultural resources would not occur. Additionally, no land within the ARSP Area was found to
be under a Williamson Act contract; therefore, implementation of the ARSP would not conflict with
a standing Williamson Act contract.
In addition, the Initial Study for EIR 340 states that there are no zoned or existing forest lands or
timberland as defined in Public Resources Code (Section 12220[g] and 4526, respectively), in the
ARSP Area. Therefore, the project evaluated in EIR 340 would not result in the conversion of
forest land or timberland. Additionally, forest resources were not identified on the Initial Study
checklist prepared for EIR 340, as the checklist was updated by the State after circulation of the
Initial Study.
3.2.2 CURRENT REVIEW
According to the State of California Department of Conservation, Farmland Mapping and
Monitoring Program (2016), the ARSP Area does not contain any land designated as Prime
Farmland, Farmland of Statewide Importance, Unique Farmland or Farmland of Local Importance,
nor is it zoned for agricultural use. The entirety of the ARSP Area is designated as “Urban and
Built Up Land”. No other designated farmland exists in the vicinity of the ARSP Area, and no
portion of the ARSP Area is subject to any California Land Conservation Act (Williamson Act)
contracts. No current agricultural operations exist in the vicinity of the ARSP Area.
Additionally and consistent with the Initial Study for EIR 340, the ARSP Area is not defined as
forest land according to Section 12220(g) of the California Public Resources Code, which defines
forest land as “land that can support 10 percent native tree cover of any species, including
hardwoods, under natural conditions, and that allows for management of one or more forest
resources, including timber, aesthetics, fish and wildlife, biodiversity, water quality, recreation,
and other public benefits”, nor is it zoned for Timberland Production as defined by
Section 51104(g) of the California Government Code. As discussed in Section 2, there are no
changes in land use within The Anaheim Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study,
except for a recently approved density increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the
construction of the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed
for this hotel site concluded that there were no new impacts related to agriculture and forest
resources.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-3 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
Review of the EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to agriculture
and forest resources under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information
is available which was not known or could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified.
3.3 AIR QUALITY
3.3.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
EIR 340 concluded that, with implementation of MM 5.2-1 through MM 5.2-7, mass emissions
resulting from construction-related activities would be less than significant. These mitigation
measures require proof of compliance with SCAQMD regulations; submission of Demolition and
Import/Export plans; implementation of measures to reduce emissions and construction- and
operation-related air quality impacts; and preparation of a human health risk assessment.
However, because of uncertainties in the timing and magnitude of emissions for possible projects,
it was concluded that cumulative emissions from construction would be significant and
unavoidable. It was also concluded that local concentrations of particulate matter with a diameter
of ten microns or less (PM10) and fine particulate matter with a diameter of 2.5 microns or less
(PM2.5) would exceed the South Coast Air Quality Management District’s (SCAQMD’s) CEQA
significance thresholds for short-term periods when excavation would occur near sensitive
receptors; the impact would be significant and unavoidable. The Anaheim City Council adopted a
Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact.
Emissions of criteria pollutants resulting from operation of the full buildout of the ARSP would
exceed the SCAQMD applicable thresholds for volatile organic compounds (VOC), nitrogen
oxides (NOx), carbon monoxide (CO), PM10, and PM2.5. Operation would result in direct and
cumulative significant and unavoidable impacts. The Anaheim City Council adopted a Statement
of Overriding Considerations with regard to these potential impacts. Because implementation of
the ARSP could result in an increase in the frequency or severity of existing air quality violations,
EIR 340 concluded that the ARSP could conflict with or obstruct implementation of the
2007 AQMP, thereby resulting in a significant and unavoidable impact. The Anaheim City Council
adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact.
Construction and operation of the ARSP would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial
pollutant toxic air contaminants (TACs); would not expose sensitive receptors to substantial CO
local concentrations; and would not create objectionable odors. These impacts would be less than
significant.
3.3.2 CURRENT REVIEW
The South Coast Air Basin remains a federal non-attainment area for the national ambient air
standards. The most recent data from the SCAQMD air monitoring station in Anaheim is from
2018 and is detailed in the table below. As shown in Table 5, carbon monoxide has not exceeded
the state or federal standards in the last 5 years. Nitrogen dioxide has not exceeded the state
standards since 2012. Concentrations of suspended particles (particulate matter increased from
2012 to 2014, then significantly dropped in 2015 and increased once more in 2016. However, the
federal standards for particulate matter have not been exceeded in the last 5 years. Ozone
concentrations have slightly increased from 2012 and State and federal standards were both
exceeded four times in 2016. According to this information, the overall air quality within the region
has improved over the last 12 years.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-4 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
TABLE 5
SUMMARY OF AIR QUALITY DATA
Air Emission 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016
Ozone (O2)
Maximum Concentration 0.670 0.700 0.081 0.080 0.074
No. of days state standard exceeded 0 0 6 1 4
No. of days federal standard exceeded 0 0 4 1 4
Carbon Monoxide (CO)
Maximum concentration (ppm) – 1-hour
period 2.9 3.4 3.1 3.1 2.6
Maximum concentration (ppm) – 8-hour
concentration 2.3 2.6 2.1 2.2 2.1
No. of days 1-hour standard exceeded 0 0 0 0 0
No. of days 8-hour standard exceeded 0 0 0 0 0
Nitrogen Dioxide (NO2)
Maximum 1-hour concentration (ppm) 0.067 0.081 0.075 0.059 0.064
No. of days states standard exceeded 0 0 0 0 0
Suspended Particles (PM10)
Maximum 24-hour concentration (ug/m3) 48 77 84 59 74
No. of days state standard exceeded 0 6 12 12 --
No. of days federal standard exceeded 0 0 0 0 0
Note: Measurements taken at Anaheim-Pampas Monitoring Station, (1630 W. Pampas Lane).
-- Data not available on the ARB website.
Source: California Air Resources Board, March 2018
Impacts related to development of the ARSP Area will continue to create temporary, significant
air quality impacts. However, due to implementation of recommendations identified in the most
recently amended State Implementation Plan (2016) and the 2016 Air Quality Management Plan,
improved overall air quality within the SCAB, and the fact that development within the ARSP Area
is not occurring as rapidly as first anticipated, projected air quality impacts have not been as
severe as originally anticipated in EIR 340. No additional significant adverse impacts are
projected beyond those addressed in EIR 340 and described in the Statement of Overriding
Considerations. As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land use within The Anaheim
Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a recently approved density
increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden Inn /
Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that there
were no new impacts related to air quality.
Review of the EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the air
quality circumstances under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial
information is available which was not known or could not have been known at the time the Master
EIR was certified.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-5 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
3.4 BIOLOGICAL RESOURCES
3.4.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
EIR 340 identified that the ARSP Area is located within an urbanized area of the City with no
candidate, sensitive, or special status species as listed in local regional plans, policies, or
regulations, or as designated by the California Department of Fish and Wildlife1 (CDFW) or the
U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (USFWS). However, MM 5.3-1 and MM 5.3-2 were identified to
reduce potential impacts to nesting birds and raptors to less than significant levels. MM 5.3.-1
requires raptor nest surveys and MM 5.3-2 requires a letter detailing the proposed schedule for
vegetation removal. Further, EIR 340 concluded that the ARSP Area does not function as a
migratory corridor or a native wildlife nursery site and no impact would occur.
3.4.2 CURRENT REVIEW
Consistent with EIR 340, the ARSP Area continues to be developed and existing vegetation is
limited to areas of ornamental landscaping. Development within the ARSP since certification of
EIR 340 has been confined to the defined ARSP footprint as analyzed in EIR 340 and shown in
Exhibits 2 and 3 of this Validation Report. According to the California Native Plant Society (CNPS),
as shown in Table 6, Special Status Plants Species Report for the ARSP, and the California
Natural Diversity Database (CNDDB), as shown in Table 7, Special Status Wildlife Species Report
for the ARSP, no special status species are expected to occur within the ARSP Area due to the
lack of suitable habitat, which is consistent with the findings of EIR 340. However, implementation
of mitigation measures presented in EIR 340 would continue to limit impacts related to nesting
birds and raptors to a level considered less than significant. As discussed in Section 2, there are
no changes in land use within The Anaheim Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study,
except for a recently approved density increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the
construction of the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed
for this hotel site concluded that there were no new impacts related to biological resources.
TABLE 6
SPECIAL STATUS PLANTS SPECIES REPORTED FOR THE ARSP
Species
General Habitats/Range
Description
Status Potential to Occur
In the Study Area;
Results of Surveys USFWS CDFW CRPR
Abronia villosa var. aurita
chaparral sand-verbena
Chaparral, Coastal scrub,
Desert dunes – – 1B.1
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Aphanisma blitoides
aphanisma
Coastal bluff scrub, Coastal
dunes, Coastal scrub – – 1B.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
1 California Department of Fish and Wildlife (CDFW) is previously known, and referred to in EIR 340, as the California
Department of Fish and Game (CDFG).
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-6 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
TABLE 6
SPECIAL STATUS PLANTS SPECIES REPORTED FOR THE ARSP
Species
General Habitats/Range
Description
Status Potential to Occur
In the Study Area;
Results of Surveys USFWS CDFW CRPR
Astragalus pycnostachyus
var. lanosissimus
Ventura Marsh milk-vetch
Coastal dunes, Coastal
scrub, Marsh & swamp, Salt
marsh, Wetland
FE SE 1B.1
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Atriplex coulteri
Coulter's saltbush
Coastal bluff scrub, Coastal
dunes, Coastal scrub, Valley
& foothill grassland
– – 1B.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Atriplex pacifica
south coast saltscale
Alkali playa, Coastal bluff
scrub, Coastal dunes,
Coastal scrub
– – 1B.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Atriplex parishii
Parish's brittlescale
Alkali playa, Chenopod
scrub, Meadow & seep,
Vernal pool, Wetland
– – 1B.1
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Atriplex serenana var.
davidsonii
Davidson's saltscale
Coastal bluff scrub, Coastal
scrub – – 1B.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Calochortus plummerae
Plummer's mariposa-lily
Chaparral, Cismontane
woodland, Coastal scrub,
Lower montane coniferous
forest, Valley & foothill
grassland
– – 4.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Calochortus weedii var.
intermedius
intermediate mariposa-lily
Chaparral, Coastal scrub,
Valley & foothill grassland – – 1B.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Calystegia felix
lucky morning-glory
Meadow & seep, Riparian
scrub – – 1B.1
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-7 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
TABLE 6
SPECIAL STATUS PLANTS SPECIES REPORTED FOR THE ARSP
Species
General Habitats/Range
Description
Status Potential to Occur
In the Study Area;
Results of Surveys USFWS CDFW CRPR
Camissoniopsis lewisii
Lewis' evening-primrose
Coastal bluff scrub,
Cismontane woodland,
Coastal dunes, Coastal
scrub, and Valley and foothill
grassland
– – 3
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Centromadia parryi ssp.
australis
southern tarplant
Marsh & swamp, Salt marsh,
Valley & foothill grassland,
Vernal pool, Wetland
– – 1B.1
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Chloropyron maritimum ssp.
maritimum
salt marsh bird's-beak
Coastal dunes, Marsh &
swamp, Salt marsh, Wetland FE SE 1B.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Dudleya multicaulis
many-stemmed dudleya
Chaparral, Coastal scrub,
Valley & foothill grassland – – 1B.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Dudleya stolonifera
Laguna Beach dudleya
Chaparral, Cismontane
Woodland, Coastal scrub,
Valley & foothill grassland
– – 1B.1
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Eriastrum densifolium ssp.
sanctorum
Santa Ana River
woollystar
Chaparral, Coastal scrub FE SE 1B.1
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Eryngium aristulatum var.
parishii
San Diego button-celery
Coastal scrub, Valley &
foothill grassland, Vernal
pool, Wetland
FE SE 1B.1
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Helianthus nuttallii ssp.
parishii
Los Angeles sunflower
Freshwater marsh, Marsh &
swamp, Salt marsh, Wetland – – 1A
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-8 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
TABLE 6
SPECIAL STATUS PLANTS SPECIES REPORTED FOR THE ARSP
Species
General Habitats/Range
Description
Status Potential to Occur
In the Study Area;
Results of Surveys USFWS CDFW CRPR
Hordeum intercedens
Vernal barley
Coastal dunes, Coastal
scrub, Valley & foothill
grassland, vernal pools
– – 3.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Isocoma menziesii var.
decumbens
decumbent goldenbush
Chaparral, Coastal scrub – – 1B.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Lasthenia glabrata ssp.
coulteri
Coulter's goldfields
Alkali playa, Marsh &
swamp, Salt marsh, Vernal
pool, Wetland
– – 1B.1
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Lepidium virginicum var.
robinsonii
Robinson's pepper-grass
Chaparral, Coastal scrub – – 4.3
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Nama stenocarpa
mud nama Marsh & swamp, Wetland – – 2B.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Nasturtium gambeli
Gambel's water cress
Brackish marsh, Freshwater
marsh, Marsh & swamp,
Wetland
FE ST 1B.1
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Navarretia prostrata
prostrate vernal pool
navarretia
Coastal scrub, Meadow &
seep, Valley & foothill
grassland, Vernal pool,
Wetland
– – 1B.1
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Nemacaulis denudata var.
denudate
coast woolly-heads
Coastal dunes – – 1B.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-9 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
TABLE 6
SPECIAL STATUS PLANTS SPECIES REPORTED FOR THE ARSP
Species
General Habitats/Range
Description
Status Potential to Occur
In the Study Area;
Results of Surveys USFWS CDFW CRPR
Orcuttia californica
California Orcutt grass Vernal pool, Wetland FE SE 1B.1
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Pentachaeta aurea ssp.
allenii
Allen's pentachaeta
Coastal scrub, Valley &
foothill grassland – – 1B.1
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Phacelia ramosissima var.
austrolitoralis
south coast branching
phacelia
Chaparral, Coastal dunes,
Coastal scrub, marshes and
swamps
– – 3.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Phacelia stellaris
Brand's star phacelia
Coastal dunes, Coastal
scrub – – 1B.1
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Ribes divaricatum var.
parishii
Parish's gooseberry
Riparian woodland – – 1A
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Sagittaria sanfordii
Sanford's arrowhead Marshes and swamps – – 1B.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Senecio aphanactis
chaparral ragwort
Chaparral, Cismontane
woodland, Coastal scrub – – 2B.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Sidalcea neomexicana
salt spring checkerbloom
Alkali playa, Chaparral,
Coastal scrub, Lower
montane coniferous forest,
Mojavean desert scrub,
Wetland
– – 2B.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-10 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
TABLE 6
SPECIAL STATUS PLANTS SPECIES REPORTED FOR THE ARSP
Species
General Habitats/Range
Description
Status Potential to Occur
In the Study Area;
Results of Surveys USFWS CDFW CRPR
Suaeda esteroa
estuary seablite
Marsh & swamp, Salt marsh,
Wetland – – 1B.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Symphyotrichum defoliatum
San Bernardino aster
Cismontane woodland,
Coastal scrub, Lower
montane coniferous forest,
Marsh & swamp, Meadow &
seep, Valley & foothill
grassland
– – 1B.2
Not expected to
occur due to distance
to known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
USFWS: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; CDFW: California Department of Fish and Wildlife; CRPR: California Rare Plant Rank.
LEGEND
Federal (USFWS) State (CDFW)
FE Endangered SE Endangered
FC Candidate Species
CRPR
1A Plants Presumed Extirpated in California and Either Rare or Extinct Elsewhere
1B Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered Throughout Their Range
2B Plants Rare, Threatened, or Endangered in California But More Common Elsewhere
3 Plants of About Which We Need More Information – A Review List
4 Plants of Limited Distribution – A Watch List
CRPR Threat Rank Extensions
.1 Seriously Endangered in California (over 80% of occurrences threatened; high degree and immediacy of threat)
.2 Fairly Endangered in California (20–80% of occurrences threatened)
.3 Not Very Threatened in California (low degree/immediacy of threat or no current threats known)
Source: California Native Plant Society 2018.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-11 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
TABLE 7
SPECIAL STATUS WILDLIFE SPECIES REPORTED FOR THE ARSP
Species
General Habitat/Range
Description USFWS CDFW USFS
Critical
Habitat
Present in the
Study Areaa
Potential for
Occurrenceb
Invertebrates
Branchinecta
sandiegonensis
San Diego fairy
shrimp
Chaparral, Coastal scrub,
Vernal pool, Wetland FE – – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat as
no water is
present.
Fish
Catostomus
santaanae
Santa Ana sucker
Occurs in shallow
streams with flows that
run from slow to swift.
Stream substrates
consist of boulders,
gravel, and cobble where
there are growths of
filamentous algae. This
species is occasionally
found on sandy or muddy
substrates.
FT SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat as
no water is
present.
Amphibians
Spea hammondii
Western
Spadefoot
Occurs in a wide range of
habitats; lowlands to
foothills, grasslands,
open chaparral, pine-oak
woodlands. It prefers
shortgrass plains, sandy
or gravelly soil (e.g.,
alkali flats, washes,
alluvial fans). It is
fossorial and breeds in
temporary rain pools and
slow-moving streams
(e.g., areas flooded by
intermittent streams).
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat as
no water is
present.
Reptiles
Chelonia mydas
green sea turtle
Inhabits the shallow
waters of lagoons, bays,
estuaries, mangroves,
eelgrass and seaweed
beds. Prefers areas with
abundant aquatic
vegetation, such as
pastures of sea grasses
and algae, in shallow,
protected water.
FT SSC
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat as
no water is
present.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-12 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
TABLE 7
SPECIAL STATUS WILDLIFE SPECIES REPORTED FOR THE ARSP
Species
General Habitat/Range
Description USFWS CDFW USFS
Critical
Habitat
Present in the
Study Areaa
Potential for
Occurrenceb
Emys marmorata
western pond
turtle
Occurs in ponds, lakes,
marshes, rivers, streams,
and irrigation ditches with
a rocky or muddy bottom
and aquatic vegetation at
elevations from sea level
to approximately 6,696
feet above msl.
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat as
no water is
present.
Phrynosoma
blainvillii
coast horned
lizard
Occurs in scrubland,
grassland, coniferous
forests, and broadleaf
woodland vegetation
types.
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Aspidoscelis tigris
stejnegeri
coastal whiptail
Occurs in hot and dry
areas with sparse foliage
and open areas. Found in
forests, woodland,
chaparral, and riparian
areas.
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Salvadora hexalepis
virgultea
coast patch-nosed
snake
Coastal scrub – SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Crotalus ruber
red-diamond
rattlesnake
Chaparral, Mojavean
desert scrub, Sonoran
desert scrub
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Birds
Coccyzus
americanus
occidentalis
western yellow-billed
cuckoo (nesting)
Uncommon to rare
summer resident of valley
foothill and desert
riparian habitats in
scattered locations in
California. Requires
broad areas of old-growth
riparian habitats
dominated by willows and
cottonwoods with dense
understory vegetation.
FT SE FSS –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable nesting
habitat is present;
may occur onsite
as a rare migrant.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-13 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
TABLE 7
SPECIAL STATUS WILDLIFE SPECIES REPORTED FOR THE ARSP
Species
General Habitat/Range
Description USFWS CDFW USFS
Critical
Habitat
Present in the
Study Areaa
Potential for
Occurrenceb
Coturnicops
noveboracensis
yellow rail
Freshwater marsh,
meadow & seep – SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Laterallus
jamaicensis
coturniculus
California black
rail
Brackish marsh,
Freshwater marsh, Marsh
& swamp, Salt marsh,
Wetland
– ST,
FP
– – Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Rallus obsoletus
levipes
light-footed
Ridgway's rail
Marsh & swamp, Salt
marsh, Wetland FE ST,
FP
– – Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Charadrius
alexandrinus
nivosus
western snowy
plover (nesting)
Great Basin standing
waters, Sand shore,
Wetland
FT SSC
– – Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable nesting
habitat is present.
Sternula antillarum
browni
California least
tern (nesting
colony)
Alkali playa, Wetland FE SE,
FP
– – Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable nesting
habitat is present.
Rynchops niger
black skimmer
(nesting colony)
Alkali playa, Sand shore – SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable nesting
habitat is present.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-14 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
TABLE 7
SPECIAL STATUS WILDLIFE SPECIES REPORTED FOR THE ARSP
Species
General Habitat/Range
Description USFWS CDFW USFS
Critical
Habitat
Present in the
Study Areaa
Potential for
Occurrenceb
Buteo swainsoni
Swainson’s hawk
(nesting)
Breeds in stands with few
trees in juniper-sage
flats, riparian areas, and
in oak savannah in the
Central Valley. Forages
in adjacent grasslands or
suitable grain or alfalfa
fields, or livestock
pastures. In southern
California, now mostly
limited to spring and fall
transient.
– ST – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable nesting
habitat; may occur
as a migrant fly-
over.
Athene cunicularia
burrowing owl
(burrow and
wintering sites)
Breeds and forages in
grasslands and prefers
flat to low, rolling hills in
treeless terrain. Nests in
burrows, typically in open
habitats, most often
along banks and
roadsides.
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur for
burrowing or
overwintering due
to distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Asio otus
long-eared owl
Cismontane woodland,
Great Basin scrub,
Riparian forest, Riparian
woodland, Upper
montane coniferous
forest
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Vireo bellii pusillus
least Bell’s vireo
(nesting)
Riparian habitats
dominated by willows
with dense understory
vegetation between sea
level and 1,500 feet
above msl.
FE SE – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences and
known range
limits; no suitable
habitat is present.
Riparia riparia
bank swallow
(nesting)
Riparian scrub, Riparian
woodland FE SE – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable nesting
habitat is present.
Campylorhynchus
brunneicapillus
sandiegensis
coastal cactus
wren
Coastal scrub – SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences and
known range
limits; no suitable
habitat is present.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-15 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
TABLE 7
SPECIAL STATUS WILDLIFE SPECIES REPORTED FOR THE ARSP
Species
General Habitat/Range
Description USFWS CDFW USFS
Critical
Habitat
Present in the
Study Areaa
Potential for
Occurrenceb
Polioptila californica
californica
coastal California
gnatcatcher
Coastal sage scrub
between sea level and
2,000 feet above msl.
FT SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences and
known range
limits; no suitable
habitat is present.
Passerculus
sandwichensis
beldingi
Belding's
savannah sparrow
Marsh & swamp, Wetland – SE – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences and
known range
limits; no suitable
habitat is present.
Ammodramus
savannarum
grasshopper
sparrow (nesting)
An uncommon and local,
summer resident and
breeder in foothills and
lowlands west of the
Cascade-Sierra Nevada
crest from Mendocino and
Trinity cos. south to San
Diego Co.
Occurs in dry, dense
grasslands, especially
those with a variety of
grasses and tall forbs
and scattered shrubs for
singing perches. In
southern California
occurs mainly on hillsides
and mesas in coastal
districts, but has bred up
to 1500 m (5000 ft) in
San Jacinto Mts. Also
has been found in Shasta
Valley, Siskiyou Co.
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable nesting
habitat.
Icteria virens
yellow-breasted
chat (nesting)
Riparian forest, Riparian
scrub, Riparian woodland – SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable nesting
habitat is present.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-16 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
TABLE 7
SPECIAL STATUS WILDLIFE SPECIES REPORTED FOR THE ARSP
Species
General Habitat/Range
Description USFWS CDFW USFS
Critical
Habitat
Present in the
Study Areaa
Potential for
Occurrenceb
Agelaius tricolor
tricolored
blackbird (nesting)
This colonial nesting
species prefers to breed
in freshwater marshes
dominated by cattails
(Typha spp.) and
bulrushes (Scirpus or
Schoenoplectus spp.),
with willows (Salix spp.)
and nettles (Urtica spp.)
also common. The
introduced mustards
(Brassica spp.),
blackberries (Rubus
spp.), thistles (Circium
spp.), and mallows
(Malva spp.) have been
commonly used for
several decades.
– SCE,
SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable nesting
habitat is present.
Setophaga petechia
yellow warbler
Riparian habitats
dominated by willows
with dense understory
vegetation between sea
level and 9,000 feet
above msl.
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Mammals
Perognathus
longimembris
pacificus
Pacific little pocket
mouse
Coastal scrub FE SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Microtus californicus
stephensi
south coast marsh
vole
Occurs in a wide variety
of habitats, but most
abundant in early seral
stages of montane
riparian, dense annual
grassland, and wet
meadow.
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Sorex ornatus
salicornicus
southern
California
saltmarsh shrew
Salt marsh – SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-17 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
TABLE 7
SPECIAL STATUS WILDLIFE SPECIES REPORTED FOR THE ARSP
Species
General Habitat/Range
Description USFWS CDFW USFS
Critical
Habitat
Present in the
Study Areaa
Potential for
Occurrenceb
Choeronycteris
mexicana
Mexican long-
tongued bat
Pinon & juniper
woodlands, Riparian
scrub, Sonoran thorn
woodland
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Eumops perotis
californicus
western mastiff bat
Found in many open
semi-arid to arid habitats,
including conifer and
deciduous woodlands,
coastal scrub,
grasslands, palm oases,
chaparral, desert scrub,
and urban areas.
Typically forages in open
areas with high cliffs and
roosts in crevices on cliff
faces and occasionally in
man-made structures
with at least 15 feet of
unobstructed space
below roost.
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Nyctinomops
femorosaccus
pocketed free-
tailed bat
Joshua tree woodland,
Pinon & juniper
woodlands, Riparian
scrub, Sonoran desert
scrub
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Nyctinomops
macrotis
big free-tailed bat
This migratory species
prefers rugged, rocky
terrain and roosts in
crevices in high cliffs or
rocky outcrops.
Uncommon in Southern
California. Feeds on
moths caught over water
open water sources
within suitable habitat.
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Lasiurus cinereus
hoary bat
Occurs in open habitats
or habitat mosaics with
access to trees for cover
and roosts in dense
foliage of medium to
large trees. Also uses
trees in urban areas
several miles away from
undeveloped habitat.
– SA – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-18 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
TABLE 7
SPECIAL STATUS WILDLIFE SPECIES REPORTED FOR THE ARSP
Species
General Habitat/Range
Description USFWS CDFW USFS
Critical
Habitat
Present in the
Study Areaa
Potential for
Occurrenceb
Lasiurus xanthinus
western yellow bat
Usually found in riparian
woodlands in arid
regions; they also occur
in oak or pinyon-juniper
woodland and
urban/suburban areas.
Preferentially roost in
trees, often among the
dead fronds of fan palms
in the southern United
States; sometimes they
roost in hackberry,
sycamore, cottonwood,
giant dagger yucca,
vines, or other sites.
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Taxidea taxus
American badger
Most abundant in the
drier open stages of most
shrub, forest, and
herbaceous habitats, with
friable soils. When
inactive, occupies
underground burrow.
– SSC – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
Bassariscus astutus
Ringtail
Occurs in various riparian
habitats, and in brush
stands of most forest and
shrub habitats, at low to
middle elevations. Nests
in rock recesses, hollow
trees, logs, snags,
abandoned burrows, or
woodrat nests.
– FP – –
Not expected to
occur due to
distance from
known
occurrences; no
suitable habitat is
present.
USFWS: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service; CDFW: California Department of Fish and Wildlife; USFS: U.S. Forest Service; msl: mean
sea level
Status Definitions
Federal (USFWS) Status State (CDFW) Status USFS Status
FE Endangered SE Endangered FSS Forest Service Sensitive Species
FT Threatened ST Threatened
FC Candidate SC Candidate
SSC Species of Special Concern
FP California Fully Protected
WL Watch List
SA Special Animal
Notes: Scientific and common names for wildlife species follow the most current list of Special Animals (February 2018) available
from the CDFW (https://www.wildlife.ca.gov/Data/CNDDB/Plants-and-Animals).
a Critical Habitat only applies to USFWS-listed species. As such, any species without a USFWS listing, will have a “–”.
b All previous biological documentation for the study area including various focused survey reports (Psomas 2017a, 2017b,
2018a, and 2018b) were reviewed to compile this table. Results of previous surveys are only listed for species for which the
respective report specifically mentioned that species. It should be noted that while the survey areas for previous surveys partially
overlapped with the study area for this report, the boundaries varied from project to project. Repeated negative survey results
contribute to increasing the strength of an absence finding.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-19 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to biological
resources under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is
available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified.
3.5 CULTURAL RESOURCES
3.5.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to EIR 340, no designated historical resources exist within the ARSP Area; however,
implementation of MM 5.4-3, which requires evidence that any structures aged 45 years or older
are not eligible for historical designation would preclude any impacts to unknown historical
resources. Further, no resources are anticipated to be discovered in the ARSP Area; however,
implementation of MM 5.4-1 and MM 5.4-2, which require evidence that an archaeologist and a
paleontologist have been hired for project development within the ARSP, would mitigate the
potential for disturbing unidentified significant cultural resources. EIR 340 concluded that there is
no evidence of Native American human remains in the ARSP Area and that adherence to Section
5097.98 of the California Public Resources Code and California Health and Section 7050.5 of the
California Health and Safety Code would ensure that a significant impact would not occur.
3.5.2 CURRENT REVIEW
Development within the ARSP since certification of EIR 340 has been confined to the defined
ARSP footprint as analyzed in EIR 340 and shown in Exhibits 2 and 3 of this Validation Report.
According to Appendix A, Cultural and Paleontological Resources Records Searches for the 2018
EIR 340 Validation Report, Anaheim, Orange County, California, a cultural resources records
search conducted for the ARSP Area revealed that no known cultural or paleontological resources
sites exist within the boundaries of the ARSP. However, if any cultural resources are discovered
during development of individual projects, the mitigation measures in place for the ARSP Area
will continue to ensure that potential impacts are mitigated to a level considered less than
significant. As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land use within The Anaheim
Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a recently approved density
increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden Inn /
Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that there
were no new impacts related to cultural resources.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to cultural
resources under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is
available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified.
3.6 GEOLOGY
3.6.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
EIR 340 identified active and potentially active faults in the region that could result in seismic-
related impacts to future development projects associated with the buildout of the ARSP. Seismic
events along these faults have the potential to result in strong ground motion. EIR 340 concluded
that potential impacts related to seismic ground shaking would be reduced to less than significant
levels with implementation of the MM 5.5-1 through MM 5.5-6; conformance with the applicable
requirements listed in the Anaheim Municipal Code; and conformance to the California Building
Code. MM 5.5-1 through MM 5.5-4 and MM 5.5-6 replicate the requirements under MM 3.6-1
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-20 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
through MM 3.6-5 in EIR 311. MM 5.5-5 requires the implementation of standard practices under
all applicable codes and ordinances.
As noted in EIR 340, the ARSP Area is located in a relatively flat area with minimal potential for
erosion impacts due to the high amount of urban development and low amount of bare ground.
However, during demolition and construction activities when areas are exposed to erosion and
loss of topsoil, adherence to the following Standard Conditions would ensure that impacts would
be less than significant: local and State codes and requirements for erosion control and grading;
compliance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit and the
subsequent development of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP).
Additionally, expansive soils are known to exist in the ARSP Area; however, implementation of
mitigation requiring adherence to measures requiring detailed foundation design and preparation
of a report to analyze foundation excavations would reduce potential impacts to less than
significant levels.
3.6.2 CURRENT REVIEW
Development within the ARSP since certification of EIR 340 has been confined to the defined
ARSP footprint as analyzed in EIR 340 and shown in Exhibits 2 and 3 of this Validation Report.
The geologic make-up of the ARSP Area remains the same as previously described in EIR 340.
Implementation of the mitigation measures presented in EIR 340 would continue to limit the
potential earth resources impacts from development to a level considered less than significant.
As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land use within The Anaheim Resort between
the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a recently approved density increase at a hotel
site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites
(DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that there were no new
impacts related to geology.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to earth
resources conditions under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information
is available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified.
3.7 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS
3.7.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
EIR 340 concluded that although the Proposed Project would not conflict with applicable
regulations and policies adopted for the purpose of reducing greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions
and although feasible mitigation measures would be incorporated into the Proposed Project, the
magnitude of the increase in GHG emissions would remain cumulatively considerable and the
impact to GHG emissions would be significant and unavoidable. The Anaheim City Council
adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to these potential impacts.
3.7.2 CURRENT REVIEW
Since certification of EIR 340 in 2012, Executive Order (EO) B-30-15 was issued on April 29, 2015
which orders “A new interim statewide greenhouse gas emission reduction target to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 . . . to ensure California
meets its target of reducing greenhouse gas emissions to 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050”.
Additionally, in September 2016, Senate Bill (SB) 32 was signed which requires California to
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-21 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
reduce GHG emissions 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030 and Assembly Bill (AB) 197 which
give the Legislature greater authority over the California Air Resources Board to ensure strategies
to lower emissions favor those most impacted by climate change.
Despite the additional plans and policies that have been enacted, development in the ARSP has
stayed within the maximum development potential as analyzed in EIR 340, except for a recently
approved density increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton
Garden Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site
concluded that there were no new impacts related to GHG emissions.; therefore, the associated
GHG emissions associated with vehicle miles traveled, electricity use, natural gas use, and water
use would be within the emissions forecast. As noted, EIR 340 found that buildout of the ARSP
would result in a significant and unavoidable cumulative GHG impact.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to GHG
emissions under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is
available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified.
3.8 HAZARDS AND HAZARDOUS MATERIALS
3.8.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to EIR 340, buildout of the ARSP would have the potential to disturb lead-based paints
(LBP) and asbestos-containing materials (ACM) depending on the age of existing structures in
the ARSP Area. Additionally, given the presence of underground storage tanks (USTs), including
ones which have been identified as having leaked, buildout of the ARSP would have the potential
to disturb hazardous materials. MM 5.7-1 through MM 5.7-5 relate to USTs; MM 5.7-6 requires
compliance with the State of California Hazardous Substances Control Law; and MM 5.7-7
requires a Phase I Environmental Site Assessment. With implementation of these mitigation
measures, potential impacts related to hazardous material on or near the ARSP Area would be
reduced to less than significant levels.
3.8.2 CURRENT REVIEW
Table 8 updates the status of hazardous materials sites from EIR 340, as well as listing sites that
have been added since certification of the EIR in 2012. According to the table, two new leaking
storage tank sites have been identified since certification of EIR 340; however, both of these sites
are located outside of the ARSP.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-22 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
TABLE 8
UPDATED HAZARDOUS MATERIALS SITES
WITHIN ONE-QUARTER MILE OF THE ARSP
No. Name/Address Identified By a Status b
Original Sites Reported in EIR 340
Cortese List (hazardous materials sites pursuant to Section 65962.5 of the California
Government Code)
1. Avis Rent-a-Car System
1400 S. Harbor Blvd. LUST Closed – 03/13/1986
2. Sheraton Anaheim Hotel
1015 West Ball Road LUST Closed – 01/31/1991
3. Arco Service Station #0072
1037 W. Ball Road LUST Closed – 04/01/1991
4. Exxon Service Station #3724
1100 Ball Road LUST Closed – 09/15/1994
State and Tribal Leaking Storage Tank Lists
6. Texaco Service Station
100 W. Katella Way LUST Open
7. Holiday Station (USPS)1180
Ball Road LUST Closed – 09/05/1995
8. Shell Oil Products
601 Ball Road LUST Closed – 09/21/2011
9. Thrift’s (Arco) Station
2101 S. Harbor Blvd. LUST Open
Additional Sites Added Since Certification of EIR 340
State and Tribal Leaking Storage Tank Lists
10. Disneyland
1313 S. Harbor Blvd. LUST Open
11. GO CAL, Inc. (Stop ‘N Shop)
1198 W Ball Road LUST Open
a LUST = Leaking Underground Storage Tank (LUST) Sites included in GeoTracker.
(GeoTracker is the Water Boards data management system for sites that impact, or have
the potential to impact, water quality in California, with emphasis on groundwater).
b Closed = Evidence of case closure has been reported. Site has been cleaned up and
subsequently cleared as safe for public health.
Source: ARSP North (Inquiry No. 5216980.2s) and ARSP South (Inquiry No. 5216980.6S) EDR
Radius Map Report with GeoCheck, March 13, 2018.
Implementation of applicable mitigation measures in EIR 340 will continue to ensure that no
significant adverse impacts related to hazardous materials will occur. As discussed in Section 2,
there are no changes in land use within The Anaheim Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the
current study, except for a recently approved density increase at a hotel site on Manchester
Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The
IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that there were no new impacts related to hazards
and hazardous materials.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to hazardous
materials under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is available
which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was certified.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-23 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
3.9 HYDROLOGY AND WATER QUALITY
3.9.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to EIR 340, implementation of the ARSP project would result in the potential for
short-term construction-related and long-term operational water quality impacts. However,
implementation of MM 5.8-1 through MM 5.8-6 and compliance with the standard requirements
reduces these impacts to a level considered less than significant. Although direct impacts to the
underlying groundwater resources would not occur, indirect impacts associated with the
anticipated increase in long-term demand for domestic water, landscape irrigation, and
maintenance activities would be significant. Implementation of the proposed mitigation would
reduce demand for groundwater resources, and potential impacts would be mitigated to less than
significant levels.
As identified in EIR 340, implementation of the ARSP project would result in site-specific changes
to drainage patterns on development sites, but would not adversely impact regional hydrology or
drainage flows in the surrounding area. It was found that potential increases in impervious
surfaces could increase runoff rates and volumes. Additionally, the ARSP project has the potential
to increase runoff volumes and rates to exacerbate existing deficiencies, potentially leading to
localized street flooding. However, implementation of the mitigation measures and compliance
with standard requirements would reduce impacts to less than significant levels.
3.9.2 CURRENT REVIEW
No changes with respect to groundwater or surface hydrology have taken place in the ARSP Area
since adoption of EIR 340. Development of the ARSP has been confined to the footprint defined
in EIR 340 and graphically depicted in Exhibits 2 and 3 of this Validation Report.
As indicated in the mitigation program for EIR 340, project development within the ARSP would
have to comply with requirements set forth in the applicable Drainage Area Management Plan
(DAMP) and National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. Consistent with
EIR 340, development within the ARSP continues to be subject to the requirements set forth in
the current Municipal Separate Storm Sewer System Permit (Order No. R8-2009-0030, Amended
by R8-2010-0062) governing the public storm drain system discharges. Project development
would also have to comply with applicable existing codes and regulations, as identified in EIR
340, which would reduce the potential for any significant impacts to less than significant.
Implementation of mitigation measures from EIR 340 will continue to limit groundwater and
surface hydrology impacts to a level considered less than significant. As discussed in Section 2,
there are no changes in land use within The Anaheim Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the
current study, except for a recently approved density increase at a hotel site on Manchester
Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The
IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that there were no new impacts related to
hydrology and water quality.
Review of the ARSP Master EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect
to groundwater and surface hydrology conditions under which the Master EIR was certified and
no new substantial information is available which was not known and could not have been known
at the time the Master EIR was certified.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-24 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
3.10 LAND USE
3.10.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
As identified in EIR 340, implementation of the ARSP project would have the potential to divide
or eliminate an established community; however, compliance with the Anaheim Municipal Code
would mitigate impacts associated with the division of an established community to less than
significant. EIR 340 concluded that build out of the ARSP would be consistent with the respective
goals and policies of local and regional regulatory and planning documents. Specifically, the
ARSP build out was found to be consistent with and supportive of the three key principles set
forth in the 2012–2035 Regional Transportation Plan/Sustainable Communities Strategy: mobility,
economy, and sustainability. Additionally, EIR 340 provided a consistency analysis with all
relevant goals and policies identified in the City of Anaheim General Plan.
3.10.2 CURRENT REVIEW
As discussed in Section 1.2.3 of this Validation Report, all development proposals are subject to
City Staff review, which includes a review to ensure substantial conformance with the ARSP. To
date, there have been no projects proposed within the ARSP Area that have required an
amendment to the ARSP since certification of EIR 340. Although there have been approved
variances and conditional use permits associated with development, each of these requests has
been evaluated to ensure that a new significant impact would not occur beyond what was
identified in EIR 340. As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land use within The
Anaheim Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a recently approved
density increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden
Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that
there were no new impacts related to land use.
Review of the ARSP Master EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect
to land use under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is
available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified.
3.11 MINERAL RESOURCES
3.11.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to the Initial Study for EIR 340, the ARSP Area is not located in an area designated as
a Mineral Resource Zone (MRZ) or Regionally Significant Aggregate Resources Area. Because
no additional excavation beyond what was previously evaluated would occur, the Proposed
Project would not result in the loss of any mineral resource.
3.11.2 CURRENT REVIEW
Development within the ARSP since certification of EIR 340 has been confined to the defined
ARSP footprint as analyzed in EIR 340 and shown in Exhibits 2 and 3 of this Validation Report.
There have been no changes to mineral resource designations within the ARSP Area; therefore,
future development pursuant to the ARSP would continue to not result in the loss of any mineral
resources. As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land use within The Anaheim
Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a recently approved density
increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden Inn /
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-25 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that there
were no new impacts related to mineral resources.
Review of the ARSP Master EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect
to mineral resources under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information
is available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified.
3.12 NOISE
3.12.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
EIR 340 determined that construction activities associated with the ARSP have the potential to
significantly impact noise-sensitive receptors. Adherence to the standard requirements and
implementation of the MMs 5.10-1 through 5.10-12 would reduce potential impacts; however,
these impacts may remain significant and unavoidable. The Anaheim City Council adopted a
Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to these potential short-term, construction-
related deficiencies. Construction in the ARSP Area would have the potential to cause vibration
levels that would be noticeable for short periods. With implementation of recommended mitigation
measures, vibration impacts during construction would be less than significant.
Development associated with the ARSP would create long-term land use compatibility issues
related to noise and would expose receptors to noise levels in excess of established standards,
thereby resulting in potentially significant impacts. However, it was determined that adherence to
the standard requirements and implementation of MMs 5.10-4 through 5.10-7 would reduce long-
term, operational impacts to less than significant levels.
3.12.2 CURRENT REVIEW
The ambient noise environment of the ARSP remains unchanged from the previously analyzed
conditions in EIR 340. The noise environment continues to be dominated by traffic noise with
additional sources of noise including aircraft overflights and uses within the Disneyland Resort.
The levels of noise as well as the types of noise related to existing and future development within
the ARSP remains consistent with the analysis presented in EIR 340. As discussed in Section 2,
there are no changes in land use within The Anaheim Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the
current study, except for a recently approved density increase at a hotel site on Manchester
Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The
IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that there were no new impacts related to noise.
No new significant and/or unavoidable adverse impacts are projected from noise beyond those
projected in EIR 340 and the Statement of Overriding Considerations.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to noise impacts
under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is available which
was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was certified.
3.13 POPULATION AND HOUSING
3.13.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to EIR 340, buildout of the ARSP has the potential to increase population by
approximately 9,099 residents and result in a demand for 2,757 housing units in the City of
Anaheim. However, it was identified that the increases related to population and housing would
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-26 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
be well within City of Anaheim projections and represent a less than significant impact. The
creation of 2,757 new households was assumed in the Regional Housing Needs Assessment
(RHNA) prepared by the Southern California Association of Governments (SCAG); therefore, no
impact related to RHNA compliance would occur. Additionally, implementation of the ARSP has
the potential to displace housing units and residents associated with the Mobile Home Park (MHP)
overlay zone; however, compliance with State law and the Anaheim Municipal Code would result
in less than significant impacts related to the displacement of housing or people.
3.13.2 CURRENT REVIEW
According to Orange County Projections (OCP) 2014 Modified Data, population, housing, and
employment figures for the City of Anaheim are forecast to continue to increase, but the rate of
increase will slow in the future. Population was forecast to increase by 2.7 percent between 2015
and the rate of increase is forecast to decline to 1.6 percent between 2025 and 2030. Similarly,
the employment and housing figure are also forecast to continue to increase but as a declining
rate. Consistent with EIR 340, the ARSP project will not directly contribute to either the forecasted
population or housing supply for the City of Anaheim and surrounding areas since residential
development is not included in the Specific Plan Area.
The projected employment in the ARSP is based on the number of hotel rooms approved for the
Specific Plan. EIR 340 anticipated a total of 18,822 new employees based on a maximum of
20,913 new hotel rooms (at a generation rate of 0.9). However, these employment figures
represent a small fraction of anticipated employment associated with buildout of the Specific Plan
project area as analyzed in EIR 340. Employment will continue to increase in the ARSP Area as
development continues but would be consistent with what was analyzed in EIR 340. No new
significant impacts are projected to occur related to employment, population, and housing with
continued implementation of the ARSP. As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land
use within The Anaheim Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a
recently approved density increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of
the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site
concluded that there were no new impacts related to population and housing.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to employment,
population, and housing conditions under which the Master EIR was certified and no new
substantial information is available which was not known and could not have been known at the
time the Master EIR was certified.
3.14 PUBLIC SERVICES
3.14.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to EIR 340, buildout of the ARSP would create additional demand for police services
and fire and/or emergency rescue services. Additionally, buildout of the ARSP would generate
new school-aged students. Potential impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels
through implementation of MMs 5.12-1 through 5.12-19.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-27 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
3.14.2 CURRENT REVIEW
Fire Protection
Fire protection services required for the ARSP Area remain consistent with those evaluated in
EIR 340. The project site continues to be served by the City of Anaheim Fire Department. While
overall demand for fire protection services would increase as development occurs within the
ARSP, the Fire Department will continue to require compliance with the mitigation measures
identified in EIR 340, as the same may be updated to comply with current applicable regulatory
standards. As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land use within The Anaheim
Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a recently approved density
increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden Inn /
Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site indicated concluded
that there were no new impacts related to fire protection.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to impacts to fire
protection service under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information
is available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified.
Mitigation Measures
Modification of the mitigation measures identified below is necessary to adequately implement
current regulatory standards. The modified mitigation measures do not change the intent of the
original mitigation measures and the modified mitigation measures will have the same or superior
result as the original measure. Therefore, the City has made a determination of environmental
equivalency/timing consistent with the Updated and Modified Mitigation Monitoring Program No.
85C. The revisions are shown as strikeout for deleted text and bold, underline for new text.
MM 5.12-8 Prior to issuance of each building permit, plans shall be submitted to ensure that
development is in accordance with the City of Anaheim Fire Department
Standards, including:
a. Overhead clearance shall not be less than 14 feet for the full width of
access roads.
b. Bridges and underground structures to be used for Fire Department
access shall be designed to support Fire Department vehicles weighing
75,000 70,000 pounds.
c. All underground tunnels shall have sprinklers. Water supplies are required
at all entrances. Standpipes shall also be provided when determined to be
necessary by the Fire Department.
d. Adequate off-site public fire hydrants contiguous to the Specific Plan area
and onsite private fire hydrants shall be provided by the property
owner/developer. The precise number, types, and locations of the hydrants
shall be determined during building permit review. Hydrants are to be a
maximum of 400 feet apart.
e. A minimum residual water pressure of 20 psi shall remain in the water
system. Flow rates for public parking facilities shall be set at 1,000 to
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-28 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
1,500 gpm Minimum residual water pressure and flow rates shall
comply with the California Fire Code Appendix B.
MM 5.12-13 Prior to the placement of building materials on a building site, an all-weather road
shall be provided from the roadway system to and on the construction site and for
fire hydrants at all times, as required by the Fire Department. Such routes shall be
paved or, subject to the approval of the Fire Department, shall otherwise provide
adequate emergency access. Every building constructed must be accessible to
Fire Department apparatus. The width and radius of the driving surface must meet
the specification and requirements of Section 10.204 of the Uniform Fire Code,
as adopted by the City of Anaheim for access for newly constructed residential,
commercial, and industrial developments.
Police Protection
Police protection services required for the ARSP Area remain consistent with those evaluated in
EIR 340. Typical crime problems in the project area continue to be those associated with a high
transient visitor population. Consistent with what was evaluated in EIR 340, the demand for
service would increase incrementally as the areas are developed with uses proposed by the
ARSP. Implementation of mitigation set forth in EIR 340 would ensure that no significant adverse
impacts related to police protection service will occur. As discussed in Section 2, there are no
changes in land use within The Anaheim Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study,
except for a recently approved density increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the
construction of the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed
for this hotel site concluded that there were no new impacts related to police protection.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to impacts to
police protection service under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial
information is available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the
Master EIR was certified.
Parks
The Specific Plan continues to provide a beneficial impact for parks and recreation by providing
opportunities for increased pedestrian-friendly uses and amenities throughout the Anaheim
Resort area. Because the ARSP area primarily exists, and is intended to continue, as a visitor-
serving area with limited residential uses, the amount of public parklands in the area is limited.
However, no new residential development has occurred, or is proposed for development, within
the ARSP since certification of EIR 340; therefore, there have been no substantial changes
related to an increased need for parklands. As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in
land use within The Anaheim Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a
recently approved density increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of
the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site
concluded that there were no new impacts related to parklands.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to park conditions
under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is available which
was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was certified.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-29 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
Schools
Implementation of the ARSP continues to have no direct impact on the local school districts,
Anaheim Union High School District (AUHSD) or Anaheim City School District (ACSD). No new
residential development has occurred, or is proposed for development, within the ARSP since
certification of EIR 340; therefore, there have been no substantial changes related to school
impacts. As mandated by Senate Bill 50, all future projects within the ARSP would be subject to
payment of fees which would reduce the potential impacts to the ACSD and the AUHSD. As
discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land use within The Anaheim Resort between the
2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a recently approved density increase at a hotel site
on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-
00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that there were no new impacts
related to schools.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the school
district conditions under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is
available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified.
3.15 RECREATION
3.15.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to EIR 340, full buildout or implementation of the ARSP would indirectly increase
population by approximately 9,099 residents (8,264 associated with buildout of the C-R District
and 835 associated with the convention center expansion within the PR District). Because this
increase was identified to take place over the next 20 years and because the ARSP Area is not
located in a designated Park Deficiency Area, impacts related to the construction or expansion of
recreational uses were identified as less than significant. Additionally, EIR 340 concluded that any
residential development project within the Residential Overlay Zone would be subject to the
Quimby Act, which requires the provision of parkland and/or the payment of fees, thereby
ensuring that a significant impact would not occur.
EIR 340 also indicated that the increased visitation at any off-site park facilities because of the
increased population generated by the Proposed Project would not be large enough to cause
substantial physical deterioration, and no physical impacts to park and recreational facilities would
occur.
3.15.2 CURRENT REVIEW
As discussed above in Section 3.14.2, under Parks, the Specific Plan continues to provide a
beneficial impact for parks and recreation by providing opportunities for increased pedestrian-
friendly uses and amenities throughout the Anaheim Resort area. Because the ARSP Area
primarily exists, and is intended to continue, as a visitor-serving area with limited residential uses,
the amount of recreation uses in the area is limited. However, no new residential development
has occurred, or is proposed for development, within the ARSP since certification of EIR 340;
therefore, there have been no substantial changes related to an increased need for recreational
uses. As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land use within The Anaheim Resort
between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a recently approved density increase at
a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites
(DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that there were no new
impacts related to recreation.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-30 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to recreation
facilities under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is available
which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was certified.
3.16 TRANSPORTATION/TRAFFIC
3.16.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
As evaluated in EIR 340, traffic impacts associated with buildout of the ARSP would result in
significant impacts at 21 area intersections, 1 arterial segment, and 3 freeway ramp termini
intersections. However, after implementation of the identified MMs 5.14-1 through 5.14-22, these
impacts would be reduced to less than significant levels for all but eight intersections (Euclid
Street/Katella Avenue, Disneyland Drive/Ball Road, Disneyland Drive/West Street/Katella
Avenue, Harbor Boulevard/Ball Road, Anaheim Boulevard/Haster Street/Katella Avenue, State
College Boulevard/Katella Avenue, State College Boulevard/Orangewood Avenue, Orangewood
Avenue/State Route [SR] 57 Southbound Ramps) and one ramp termini intersection
(Orangewood Avenue/SR-57 Southbound Ramps). It was identified that these intersections would
remain significant and unavoidable because of the infeasibility of mitigation measures due to high
project cost or the inability to undertake right-of-way acquisitions as a matter of policy to preserve
existing businesses, environmental constraints, or jurisdictional considerations. The Anaheim City
Council adopted a Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to these potential
deficiencies.
Additionally, EIR 340 indicated no impacts would occur on intersections identified in the
Congestion Management Program (CMP) for Orange County.
3.16.2 CURRENT REVIEW
EIR 340 utilized the Anaheim Traffic Analysis Model (ATAM) to develop future year traffic
volumes. This traffic model utilizes land use data to determine the traffic that each analysis area
would generate if each parcel was built out. Since SEIR 340, there have been changes to land
use outside of the ARSP. However, it should be noted that there are no changes in land use
within The Anaheim Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a recently
approved density increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton
Garden Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The study performed for this hotel site concluded
that there were no new impacts to the transportation infrastructure. In regards to changes outside
of the ARSP, these changes have undergone General Plan Amendments and associated
environmental review, which required the analysis of potential impacts within Anaheim and, the
determination whether mitigation measures were required. Resulting changes in traffic volumes
and levels of service within the ARSP are due to the incremental changes to the General Plan.
Additionally, ATAM was updated to reflect changes in regional and background socio-economic
data in order to maintain consistency with the regional traffic models used to forecast future traffic
conditions. These updates are mandatory to allow the City of Anaheim to continue to use ATAM
to provide future traffic forecasts. However, the traffic generation within the ARSP has not
changed with these traffic model updates, as the land uses have not changed except for the one
hotel site on Manchester Avenue. Since there has not been any changes to the ARSP that has
not been analyzed, and since all land use changes to the General Plan since 2012 have been
analyzed and potential impacts disclosed, the findings of SEIR 340 in regards to Traffic and
Transportation are still considered valid, as there has been no significant changes to the buildout
land use densities in the ARSP. It should also be noted that in the future, ATAM will need to be
updated every four to eight years in order to maintain consistency with regional transportation
models. Therefore, the background future forecast volumes will continue to change over time.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-31 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
However, the future forecast traffic generation for the ARSP area will not change since the land
uses are not projected to change, and all future land use changes will be analyzed independently.
Additionally, the ARSP continues to be served by Anaheim Resort Transportation which,
according to the paper Climate Change & Traffic Congestion Mitigation Benefits (ART), included
as Appendix B, is key in reducing impacts related to traffic congestion and, relatedly, GHG
emissions.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to traffic and
transportation under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is
available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified.
3.17 WATER
3.17.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
EIR 340 identified that buildout of the ARSP would exceed capacities of existing water facilities;
however, this impact would be mitigated to less than significant level. Further, the projected water
demand associated with buildout of the ARSP would be accommodated through existing and
projected supplies. Implementation of MMs 5.15-1 through 5.15-9 would ensure water
conservation measures would be incorporated into future development to ensure that water
supplies remain reliable into the future.
3.17.2 CURRENT REVIEW
As discussed in EIR 340, Senate Bills (SB) 610 and 221 were amended by state law and became
effective as a mandate to improve the link between land use decisions and water supply
availability. On June 14, 2016, the City of Anaheim adopted the 2015 Urban Water Management
Plan (UWMP) which is based on the land uses allowed by the City’s General Plan and considers
the maximum buildout of the ARSP pursuant to EIR 340. As discussed in Section 2, there are no
changes in land use within The Anaheim Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study,
except for a recently approved density increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the
construction of the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed
for this hotel site concluded that there were no new impacts related to water supply or water
infrastructure. According to the UWMP, a sufficient and reliable water supply is available for the
City, now and into the future, including a sufficient water supply for the ARSP. Implementation of
the applicable mitigation measures in EIR 340 will continue to ensure that no significant adverse
impacts to water service will occur.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the water
service conditions under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information
is available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified.
3.18 SEWER
3.18.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to EIR 340, the sewer treatment requirements of the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality
Control Board (RWQCB) would not be exceeded by buildout of the ARSP. EIR 340 identified that
buildout of the ARSP would increase sewage flows in existing sewer lines and trunks serving the
area, resulting in several sewer lines becoming deficient; however, this impact would be mitigated
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-32 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
to a less than significant level through implementation of MM 5.16-1. Additionally, it was
determined that buildout of the ARSP evaluated in EIR 340 would increase sewage flows by
approximately 323,656 gallons per day (gpd) in the PR District and 2.1 million gallons per day
(mgd) in the C-R District and that these increases in sewage flow would be accommodated by
available capacity at Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) Treatment Plant No. 1.
3.18.2 CURRENT REVIEW
Anticipated daily sewage flow and sewer system capacity impacts associated with development
of the ARSP Area remain similar to those analyzed in EIR 340. According to the Central Anaheim
Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers First Revision (Psomas 2017) which considers the maximum
buildout of the ARSP pursuant to EIR 340 as well as other cumulative projects proximate to the
ARSP Area, there are a number of existing and buildout sewer improvements that are required
within the ARSP Area or surrounding areas. Implementation of the mitigation in EIR 340, including
participation in the City’s Master Plan of Sewers and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee)
Program, will continue to ensure that no significant adverse impacts to sewer service or systems
will occur. As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land use within The Anaheim Resort
between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a recently approved density increase at
a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites
(DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that there were no new
impacts related to sewer system capacity.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the wastewater
service conditions under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information
is available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified.
3.19 ELECTRICITY
3.19.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to EIR 340, buildout of the ARSP Area would result in an increased demand for
electricity. Compliance with the standard requirements and implementation of MMs 5.17-1
through 5.17-4 would reduce anticipated demand through conservation efforts. It is expected that
the existing electrical distribution system and future planned improvements would adequately
accommodate the anticipated demand, thus resulting in a less than significant impact with
mitigation.
3.19.2 CURRENT REVIEW
As discussed in Section 2, development within the ARSP since certification of EIR 340 has been
consistent with what was analyzed in EIR 340; therefore, no new demand for energy has occurred
beyond the demand projections identified in EIR 340. The projected demand for electrical service
continues to be consistent with approved plans and policies as set forth in EIR 340. The mitigation
program identified in EIR 340 would continue to apply to future development within the ARSP and
implementation of these mitigation measures would continue to ensure that no significant adverse
impacts related to electricity would occur. As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land
use within The Anaheim Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a
recently approved density increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of
the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site
concluded that there were no new impacts related to electricity supply or electrical infrastructure.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-33 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to electrical
service under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is available
which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was certified.
3.20 STORMWATER
3.20.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
According to EIR 340, buildout of the ARSP has the potential to worsen several existing
deficiencies in the City’s storm drain system. However, participation in the City’s Master Plan of
Storm Drains and related Infrastructure Improvement (Fee) Program would assist in mitigating
existing and future storm drainage system deficiencies. Additionally, implementation of the
MMs 5.18-1 through 5.18-3 would ensure that impacts to regional flood control facilities
associated with buildout of the ARSP would be reduced to less than significant levels.
As discussed in EIR 340, although all new growth within the ARSP Area would occur in
compliance with identified mitigation, the City has no control over the growth and storm water
contributions of areas outside of its jurisdiction. It was determined that any addition of storm water
to the regional storm water system may be cumulatively considerable when combined with
potential storm water flow increases from surrounding jurisdictions and the potential cumulative
impact could be significant and unavoidable if development in the surrounding jurisdictions occurs
without upgrades to the storm water infrastructure. The Anaheim City Council adopted a
Statement of Overriding Considerations with regard to this potential impact.
3.20.2 CURRENT REVIEW
Storm water within the ARSP continues to drain into the public storm drain system detailed in EIR
340. The ARSP Area is tributary to both the Anaheim-Barber City Channel and the East Garden
Grove-Wintersburg Channel. As previously discussed, development within the ARSP since
certification of EIR 340 has been consistent with what was analyzed in EIR 340. Consistent with
the analysis in EIR 340, the mitigation program identified in EIR 340 would continue to apply to
future development within the ARSP and implementation of these mitigation measures would
continue to ensure that no significant adverse impacts related to regional flood control facilities
would occur. Additionally, as noted in EIR 340 and discussed above in Section 3.20.1, future
development of the ARSP would continue to contribute to potentially significant cumulative
impacts to regional storm water facilities. As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land
use within The Anaheim Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a
recently approved density increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of
the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site
concluded that there were no new impacts related to stormwater.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to the condition
of storm drains under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is
available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-34 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
3.21 PUBLIC UTILITIES
3.21.1 SUMMARY OF PREVIOUS ENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS
Natural Gas
According to EIR 340, Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) indicated that natural gas
service to the ARSP can be provided from an existing gas main that is accessible from various
locations in the ARSP Area. The service would be provided in accordance with the SCGC’s
policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities Commission. Therefore, the
ARSP would be served by existing facilities, and no new systems or substantial alterations would
be required.
Solid Waste
Buildout of the ARSP would generate an estimated 109,514 pounds of solid waste per day or
approximately 19,986 tons of solid waste annually. Buildout of the ARSP would add approximately
19,986 tons of solid waste annually to existing solid waste facilities and capacity, which would
impact the landfill system. However, the buildout of the ARSP could be accommodated within the
permitted capacity of the County’s landfill capacity. In addition, once the Alpha Olinda Landfill
closes in 2021, capacity would exist for buildout of the ARSP in the Frank R. Bowerman Landfill.
No significant impacts would occur, and no mitigation is required; however, implementation of
MM 5.19-1 through 5.19-5 would further ensure that adequate solid waste services are provided
and that solid waste generation would be minimized.
Telephone and Cable Television
According to EIR 340, AT&T would serve the ARSP Area. It was determined that AT&T can
provide telephone, digital cable, and high-speed internet services and that the ARSP Area can be
served by Time Warner Cable with the existing cable resources available to the site. The
infrastructure capacity for telephone service typically expands with new development. Facilities
needed to connect the Proposed Project to the existing telephone system may include new
conduit, fiber and copper facilities. These improvements would be implemented in accordance
with applicable State and local regulations. According to EIR 340, there would be no impact
related to provision of telephone, television, or cable services.
3.21.2 CURRENT REVIEW
Natural Gas
The Southern California Gas Company (SCGC) currently provides natural gas service to the City
of Anaheim, including the Project Site (SCGC 2018). The service would be provided in
accordance with SCGC’s policies and extension rules on file with the California Public Utilities
Commission. As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land use within The Anaheim
Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a recently approved density
increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden Inn /
Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that there
were no new impacts related to natural gas.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-35 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to natural gas
service under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is available
which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was certified.
Solid Waste
Waste generation from development in the ARSP Area is disposed of at OC Waste & Recycling
Facilities, including the Frank R. Bowerman (FRB) Landfill located at the Olinda/Olinda-Alpha
landfill 11002 Bee Canyon Access Road in Irvine. However, refuse may be disposed of at any
active landfills in the County to ensure that maximum daily tonnage is not exceeded at the FRB
facility. The rate of solid waste generation for the ARSP Area would be consistent with the rate
identified in EIR 340 and adequate capacity is available within the Orange County landfill system
to serve the continued development of the ARSP (Arnau 2018). Continued implementation of
mitigation identified in EIR 340 will ensure that no additional significant adverse impacts will occur
related to solid waste. As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land use within The
Anaheim Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a recently approved
density increase at a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden
Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that
there were no new impacts related to solid waste.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to solid waste
conditions under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is
available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified.
Telephone and Cable Television
Telephone
Telephone service is currently provided to the ARSP Area by AT&T. Consistent with EIR 340,
demand for telephone service would continue to increase with buildout of the ARSP. However,
this demand will continue to be met by AT&T or another service provider through connection into
existing infrastructure. These actions would not result in disruption of service to current
subscribers nor would they result in significant environmental impacts. As discussed in Section 2,
there are no changes in land use within The Anaheim Resort between the 2012 SEIR and the
current study, except for a recently approved density increase at a hotel site on Manchester
Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites (DEV2016-00114). The
IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that there were no new impacts related to
telephone.
Review of EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to telephone
service under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is available
which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was certified.
Cable Television
Cable television service is currently provided to the ARSP Area by Spectrum (Charter 2018).
Consistent with EIR 340, demand for cable television service would continue to increase with
buildout of the ARSP. However, this demand will continue to be met by Spectrum or another
service provider through connection into existing infrastructure. These actions would not result in
disruption of service to current subscribers nor would they result in significant environmental
impacts. As discussed in Section 2, there are no changes in land use within The Anaheim Resort
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 3-36 Section 3.0 Review of the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan EIR
between the 2012 SEIR and the current study, except for a recently approved density increase at
a hotel site on Manchester Avenue, for the construction of the Hilton Garden Inn / Home2Suites
(DEV2016-00114). The IS/MND performed for this hotel site concluded that there were no new
impacts related to cable television.
Review of the EIR 340 finds that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to cable
television service under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is
available which was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was
certified.
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 4-1 Section 5.0 Preparers
SECTION 4.0 CONCLUSION
EIR 340 is a Master EIR that comprehensively addresses the scope of development proposed
within the ARSP Area. In accordance with the California CEQA Guidelines (California Code of
Regulations, Title 14, §§15000 et seq.), EIR 340 must be validated in order to be used for
subsequent projects. This validation process was carried out to ensure that EIR 340 continues to
adequately represent the current environmental setting and analysis of the significant
environmental effects associated with implementation of the ARSP. The Validation Report also
provides information relative to the anticipated development density and growth within the ARSP
Area.
The analysis of development in EIR 340 looked at two stages: Year 2015 and Year 2030. For
study purposes, full buildout of the Specific Plan area was anticipated for the Year 2030. As
Section 2 of this report indicates, land uses associated with related projects in the cumulative
analysis areas have included primarily residential uses, which generate additional vehicle trips
and results in increased congestion and traffic on major arterial roads and freeways. However,
each of the cumulative projects have been subject to independent environmental review including
a consideration of cumulative impacts. The pace of hotel development has continued to be slower
than what was anticipated in either EIR 313 or EIR 340 (e.g., over 50 percent of allowable
development intensity remains unbuilt). The additional development permitted within the ARSP is
equal to 18,175 hotel rooms plus additional square footage related to convention center,
commercial uses, hotel meeting/banquet uses, and outdoor programmable space.
The Mitigation Monitoring Program for the ARSP is being implemented, enforced, and monitored.
Inclusion of minor modifications noted in this Validation Report will further ensure all impacts
would be adequately mitigated. Impacts associated with the ARSP implementation are
unchanged or comparable to projections. All of the environmental analyses for EIR 340 were
reviewed and compared to the current setting and projected development. A determination was
made based on the data that no substantial changes have occurred with respect to circumstances
under which the Master EIR was certified and no new substantial information is available which
was not known and could not have been known at the time the Master EIR was certified, with the
exception of the items noted throughout the report. Accordingly, EIR 340 is still valid and may be
used for subsequent projects in accordance with CEQA and the California CEQA Guidelines.
Preparers
City of Anaheim
Principal Planner ................................................................................................ Susan Kim
Senior Planner ................................................................................ Elaine Thienprasiddhi
Public Utilities Environmental Services Manager ..................................... Jonathan Sanks
Public Utilities, Water ................................................................................. Aladdin Shaikh
Fire and Rescue, Fire Marshal ....................................................................... Allen Hogue
Police .................................................................................................. Officer Mark Berger
BonTerra Psomas (Environmental Document Preparation)
Principal-in-Charge .................................................................. Joan Patronite Kelly, AICP
Project Manager .......................................................................................... Jennifer Marks
Environmental Analyst ............................................................................... Aimee Frappied
Air Quality/Noise/Greenhouse Gas Analysis ................................................. Joza Bautista
GIS/Graphics .................................................................................................... Mike Deseo
Technical Editor ........................................................................................... Linda St. John
Word Processor ............................................................................................. Sheryl Kristal
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 5-1 Section 6.0 References
SECTION 5.0 REFERENCES
Anaheim, City of. 2017 (July 29, date accessed). Parks & Facilities. Anaheim, CA:
http://www.anaheim.net/916/Parks-Facilities.
———. 2012 (September 14). Draft Environmental Impact Report 340 Amendment No. 14 to the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan. Anaheim, CA: the City.
———. 2011 (November 15, last update). City of Anaheim Municipal Code. Anaheim, CA: the
City.
———. 2004a (May). City of Anaheim General Plan. Anaheim, CA: the City.
———. 2004b (May). Final Anaheim General Plan and Zoning Code Update – EIR No. 330.
Anaheim, CA: the City.
Anaheim Resort Transit (ART). Climate Change & Traffic Congestion Mitigation Benefits.
Anaheim, CA: ART.
Arnau, J. 2018. (March 19). Personal Communication. Email correspondence between J. Arnau
(OC Waste & Recycling) and J. Marks (BonTerra Psomas).
AT&T. 2018. AT&T Coverage Viewer. San Antonio, TX: AT&T.
https://www.att.com/maps/wireless-coverage.html.
Berger, M. 2018. (March 13). Personal Communication. Email correspondence between M.
Berger (Anaheim Police Department) and J. Marks (BonTerra Psomas).
California Department of Conservation, Division of Land Resources Protection. 2016. Farmland
Mapping and Monitoring Program (FMMP) Farmland Map: Orange County, California.
Sacramento, CA: FMMP.
California Department of Transportation (Caltrans). 2018 (Accessed July 28). California Scenic
Highway Mapping System. Sacramento, CA: Caltrans.
http://www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LandArch/scenic_highways/ index.htm.
CNC Engineering. 2009 (June). Master Plan of Storm Drainage for Anaheim Barber City Channel
Tributary Area. Irvine, CA.
———. 2006 (January). Master Plan of Drainage for East Garden Grove-Wintersburg Channel
Tributary Area. Irvine, CA
Environmental Data Resources (EDR). 2018 (March 13) Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Inquiry
Number 5216980.2s. EDR: Shelton, CT.
Garden Grove, City of. 2018 (December 3). Personal Communication. Email correspondence
between P. Kaskla (City of Garden Grove) and J. Marks (BonTerra Psomas).
Hogue, A. 2018 (March 15). Personal Communication. Email correspondence between A. Hogue
(Fire Marshal, Anaheim Fire and Rescue) and J. Marks (BonTerra Psomas).
Orange, City of. 2018 (December 6). Personal Communication. Email correspondence between
A. Brodkin (City of Orange) and J. Marks (BonTerra Psomas).
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Master EIR 340
2019 Validation Report
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Validation\Validation Report-011719.docx 5-2 Section 6.0 References
Psomas. 2018 (March 13). Cultural Resources Records Search for the Hilton Garden Inn and
Home2 Suites Project, Anaheim, Orange County, California. Santa Ana, CA.
———. 2017 (December). Central Anaheim Master Plan of Sanitary Sewers First Revision. Santa
Ana, CA.
Southern California Gas Company (SCGC). 2018 (March 3). Company Profile.
http://www.socalgas.com/about-us/company-info.shtml. San Diego, CA: Sempra Energy.
APPENDIX A
CULTURAL AND PALEONTOLOGICAL RESOURCES RECORDS SEARCHES
FOR THE 2018 EIR 340 VALIDATION REPORT
225 South Lake Avenue
Suite 1000
Pasadena, CA 91101
Tel 626.351.2000
Fax 626.351.2030
www.Psomas.com
December 4, 2018
Elaine Thienprasiddhi, AICP VIA EMAIL
Senior Planner ethien@anaheim.net
Anaheim Planning and Building Department
200 South Anaheim Boulevard, 1st Floor
Anaheim, California 92805
Subject: Cultural and Paleontological Resources Records Searches for the 2018 EIR 340 Validation
Report, Anaheim, Orange County, California
Dear Ms. Thienprasiddhi:
This Technical Memo summarizes the Cultural and Paleontological Resources Records Searches that was
conducted for the 2018 EIR 340 Validation Report for the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Project
(hereinafter referred to as Project).
PROJECT UNDERSTANDING
The Project involves preparing a Validation Report for EIR 340 for Amendment No. 14 to the Anaheim
Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2. BonTerra Psomas reviewed each environmental section of EIR 340,
including cultural resources. As noted in EIR 340, there are no designated or eligible historical resources
in the Proposed Project area. Additionally, Project site is not located on any of the City’s local historic
districts or National Register Districts (City of Anaheim 2016). Therefore, no impacts related to historical
resources would occur; however, a revised Archaeological and Paleontological Records Search was
required for the Amendment to EIR 340. The results of the revised records searches are below.
SOUTH CENTRAL COASTAL INFORMATION CENTER RECORDS SEARCH
A cultural resources records search was conducted by BonTerra Psomas Senior Archaeologist Charles
Cisneros on July 19, 2017 and February 9, 2018, at the South Central Coastal Information Center
(SCCIC) at California State University, Fullerton. The SCCIC is a designated branch of the California
Historical Resources Information System and houses records regarding archaeological and historic
resources recorded in San Bernardino, Los Angeles, Orange, and Ventura Counties. The 2017 and 2018
review consisted of an examination of the U.S. Geological Survey’s 7.5-minute Anaheim Quadrangle to
determine if any sites are recorded or if any cultural resources studies have been conducted on or within a
1-mile radius of the Project site. Data sources consulted at the SCCIC include archaeological records,
Archaeological Determinations of Eligibility (DOE), historic maps, and the Historic Property
Data File (HPDF) maintained by the Office of Historic Preservation (OHP). The HPDF
contains listings for the California Register of Historical Resources (CRHR) and/or the
National Register of Historic Places (NRHP), California Historical Landmarks (CHL), and
California Points of Historical Interest (CPHI).
Elaine Thienprasiddhi, AICP
December 4, 2018
Page 2
The records search and literature review conducted for the proposed Project revealed that 38 cultural
resource studies (Table 1) have been conducted within 1-mile of the Project site; none of the studies
included the Project site. The studies consisted primarily of block archaeological surveys and several
linear surveys. The closest study was conducted a short distance west of the Project site. The remaining
37 cultural resources studies were located to the south, southeast, southwest, north, northeast and
northwest of the Project area and are all within 1-mile of the Project boundaries.
TABLE 1
CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA
Report No. Author(s) (Year) Type of Study (Resources Identified)
OR-00814 Romani (1982)
Historic Property Survey Route I-5 Santa Ana Transportation
Corridor, Route 405 in Orange County to Route 605 in Los
Angeles County PM 21.30/44.38; 0.00/6.85
OR-01801 Bonner (1998)
Cultural Resources Records Search and Literature Review
Report for a pacific Bell Mobile Services Telecommunications
Facility: Cm 132-21 City of Gardena Grove, California
OR-01898 Anonymous (1990)
Finding of Effect Widening of Interstate 5 and Reconstruction
of Interchanges Between State Routes 22/57 and 91 in the
Cities of Santa Ana, Orange, Anaheim, Fullerton and Buena
Park
OR-01949 Padon, McLean, and
Strudwick (1995) Cultural Resource Assessment for the City of Garden Grove
OR-02076 Lapin (2000) Cultural Resource Assessment for AT&T Wireless Services
Facility Number C751, County of Orange, California
OR-02095 Breece (1979) Historical and Archaeological Investigations of the Proposed
Anaheim Transportation Center Sites
OR-02097 Lapin (2000) Cultural Resource Assessment for Pacific Bell Wireless Facility
Cm 560-01, County of Orange
OR-02188 Demcak (1999) Report of Archaeological Assessment of Assessor’s Parcels
234-171-01 and 234-171-03, City of Anaheim
OR-02213 Maxon (2000)
Archaeological and Paleontological Monitoring for the Hotel
Circle Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0079,
Anaheim, California
OR-02353 McKenna (2001) Review of Cultural Resource Assessment/Evaluation for
Cingular Wireless Site Sm-082-02, Orange County, California
OR-02355 Duke (2001) Cultural Resource Assessment: Cingular Wireless Facility No.
Sm 077-01, Orange County, California
OR-02506 Webb and Huey (1978) Historic Property Survey, Haster Street Overcrossing
OR-02514 McKenna (2002) Historic Property Survey Report – Highway Project
OR-02561 McKenna (2002)
Highway Project Located in the City of Anaheim, Orange
County, on Ball Rd. Between Flore (West Place) and Walnut
St.
OR-02566 Delu (2000) Results of Archaeological Monitoring Blue Sky Properties, City
of San Juan Capistrano Orange County, California
OR-02751 Duke (2002) Cultural Resource Assessment at AT&T Wireless Services
Facility No. D473a Orange County, California
OR-02824 Gagnem (1996) Replacement Facility for Anaheim, CA-Anaheim Stadium
Station IGN
OR-02889 Bonner (2005)
Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for
Nextel Communications Candidate Ca8760a (cris Ave.) 1621
Euclid Street, Anaheim, Orange County, California
Elaine Thienprasiddhi, AICP
December 4, 2018
Page 3
TABLE 1
CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA
Report No. Author(s) (Year) Type of Study (Resources Identified)
OR-02904 Kyle (2002) Cultural Resource Assessment for Cingular Wireless Facility
Sm 189-01, City of Anaheim, Orange County, California
OR-02908 Fulton (2005) Verizon Wireless, Rose Place Facility, City of Anaheim, County
of Orange, California
OR-02913 Carmack and Marvin
(2005) Verizon Wireless Falcon Saxons Facility
OR-03351 Carmack and Marvin
(2005)
Cultural Resource Assessment Verizon Wireless Falcon
Saxons Facility, City of Anaheim, Orange County, California
OR-03373 Arrington and Sikes (2006)
Cultural Resources Final Report of Monitoring an Findings for
the Qwest Network Construction Project State of California:
Volumes I and II
OR-03521 Bonner (2009)
Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for
T-Mobile USA Candidate LA33402B (Beth Emet Temple),
1770 West Cerritos Avenue, Anaheim, Orange County,
California
OR-03670 Bonner (2007)
Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for
Royal Street Communications, LLC Candidate LA0672C
(Monika’s Payback), Near Intersection of Nutwood Street and
Folsom Street, Anaheim, Orange County, California
OR-03671 Bonner (2007)
Direct APE Historic Architectural Assessment for Royal Street
Communications, LLC Candidate LA0672C (Monika’s
Payback), near Intersection of Nutwood Street and Folsom
Street, Anaheim, Orange County, California
OR-03776 Padon (2000)
Historic Property Survey Report for Harbor Boulevard Smart
Street Improvements, City of Garden Grove, Orange County,
California
OR-03779 Bonner and Arabesque
(2009)
Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for
T-Mobile USA Candidate LA33822B (Anaheim First Christian
Church), 520 West South Street, Anaheim, orange County,
California
OR-03782 Bonner, Arabesque, and
Crawford (2009)
Cultural Resource Records Search and Site Visit Results for T-
Mobile USA Candidate LA33821D (Ramada Inn), 2141 South
Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, orange County, California
OR-03788 Bonner (2008)
Cultural Resource Records Search and Site Visit Results for T-
Mobile USA Candidate LA33823A (Prince of Peace), 1421
West Ball Road, Anaheim, Orange County, California
OR-03936 Glover and Gust (2010)
Archaeological and Paleontological Resources Monitoring
Compliance Report for the Disney’s California Adventure
Expansion, Cars Land Project, City of Anaheim, California
OR-04116 Fulton (2011) Cultural Resource Assessment Verizon Wireless Services
Sallie Facility, City of Anaheim, orange County, California
OR-04138 Godat (2011) BTS Native American United Methodist/LA5500A, 800 Katella
Avenue, Anaheim, Orange County, California
OR-04173 Bonner (2011)
Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for
T-Mobile USA Candidate LA33402-A (Loara High School),
1765 West Cerritos Avenue, Anaheim, Orange County
OR-04474 Bonner and Crawford
(2013)
Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for
T-Mobile West, LLC Candidate LA33821D (Ramada Limited)
2141 Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, Orange County, California
Elaine Thienprasiddhi, AICP
December 4, 2018
Page 4
TABLE 1
CULTURAL RESOURCE STUDIES WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA
Report No. Author(s) (Year) Type of Study (Resources Identified)
OR-04474A Bonner and Crawford
(2014)
Direct APE Historic Architectural Assessment for T-Mobile
West, LLC Candidate LA33821D (Ramada Limited) 2141
Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, orange County, California
OR-04475 Bonner and Crawford
(2013)
Cultural Resources Records Search and Site Visit Results for
T-Mobile West, LLC Candidate LA02856G (Anaheim
Convention Center) 800 Katella Avenue, Anaheim, Orange
County, California
OR-4475A Bonner and Crawford
(2014)
Direct APE Historic Architectural Assessment for T-Mobile
West, LLC Candidate LA02856G (Anaheim Convention
Center) 800 West Katella Avenue, Anaheim, Orange County,
California
Source: SCCIC 2017 and 2018.
Ten cultural resources were identified within the 1-mile search radius of the proposed Project (Table 2).
Three of the cultural resources (P-30-161718, P-30-161816 and P-30-176767) have been determined to
be eligible for listing on the National Register of Historic Places (NRHP). However, none of these
properties, including the three eligible properties, are located within the proposed Project area.
TABLE 2
CULTURAL RESOURCE SITES WITHIN ONE MILE OF THE PROJECT AREA
Trinomial/
Primary Number Recorder (Year) Description
P-30-161718 Marsh (1982) Resource Name – Truxaw Gervais House
P-30-161816 Heumann (1989) Resource Name – Anaheim Public Utility District
P-30-176483 McLean and Duke (1998) Resource Name – 1010 South Harbor Blvd
P-30-176610 Marsh (1987) Resource Name – 1842 Mountain View
P-30-176663
Ballester (2002), Tang and
Smallwood (2002), McCormick
(2007), and Meisser (2012 and
2016)
Resource Name – Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe RR,
and Burlington Northern Santa Fe
P-30-176762 Marvin (2005) Resource Name – Loara High School Gymnasium
P-30-176767 Davis and Wollan (2004) Resource Name – St. Michael’s Episcopal Church
P-30-177039 Glover (2010) Resource Name – Mauerhan Ranch Standpipe
P-30-177545 Crawford (2014) Resource Name – T-Mobile West LLC
LA02856G/Anaheim Convention Center
P-30-177546 Crawford (2014) Resource Name – T-Mobile West LLC
LA33821D/Ramada Limited Hotel
Source: SCCIC 2017 and 2018.
The closest property (P-30-177039) is a historic-era circular brick structure identified as a standpipe used
for flood irrigation. The structure was observed during the compliance monitoring for Disney’s California
Adventure Expansion, Cars land. The next closest property (P-30-176483) is located north at 314
Vermont Avenue and is described as a home with a garage and ancillary building built in 1948. The
defining attributes for the property, as identified by the OHP, are HP02 (single family property) and HP04
Elaine Thienprasiddhi, AICP
December 4, 2018
Page 5
(ancillary building). The next closest property is the historic Truxaw-Gervais House (P-30-16178) located
at 887 South Anaheim Boulevard. This property was built in 1909 and is described as a single-family
property (AP02) and a one to three story commercial building (HP06). The property has been determined
eligible for listing on the NRHP.
Immediately east of the proposed project area is a segment (P-30-176663) of the Santa Fe Railroad
(HP37). The segment of the railroad was evaluated in 2002 and found to be ineligible for listing on the
NRHP. Immediately south of the railroad is the Southern California Edison Katella Substation
(P-30-161816). Constructed in 1917, the substation attributes are defined as HP08 (Industrial Building)
and HP09 (Public Utility Building). The property has been determined eligible for listing on the NRHP.
Southwest of the Katella Substation is a home built in 1925 and is described as a California bungalow.
The property (P-30-176610) is located on 1842 Mountain View and is designated as a single-family
property (AP02).
The most western property identified within the search radius is the Loara High School Gymnasium
(P-30-176762) and is located at 1765 West Cerritos Boulevard. Constructed in 1969, the defining
attributes for this property are listed as HP15 (educational building). Loara High School Gymnasium has
been determined ineligible for listing on the NRHP. The next closest property is the Ramada Limited
Hotel (P-30-177546) located at 2141 Harbor Boulevard. This is described as a hotel/motel property
(HP5).
The most northern property identified within the search radius is St. Michael’s Episcopal Church
(P-30-176767) and is located at 311 West South Street. Constructed in 1876, the defining attributes for
this property are listed as HP16 (religious building). St. Michael’s Episcopal Church has been determined
eligible for listing on the NRHP. The remaining property (P-30-177545) is located at the southernmost
edge of the search radius. The building is the Anaheim Convention Center and it was evaluated in 2014.
The evaluation efforts determined the building as ineligible for listing on the NRHP. The defining
attributes for the Convention Center are HP12 (civic auditorium). No other historic resources are located
within 1-mile of the proposed project area.
Historic plat maps for the area were also reviewed to determine the potential for historic archaeological
sites to underlie the Project site. A review of the 1896 and 1942 maps indicated that, although the site was
in a developed portion of the City of Anaheim during those time periods, there is no indication of historic
structures or features at the location of the project site.
NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY PALEONTOLOGICAL
RECORDS SEARCH
The paleontological records search was conducted by Dr. Samuel McLeod from the Natural History
Museum (LACM) of Los Angeles County on February 22, 2018. The paleontological records search for
the LACM of Los Angeles County revealed that the Project area is comprised of younger terrestrial
Quaternary Alluvium, with older terrestrial Quaternary sediments occurring at various depths, as part of
the general floodplain of the Santa Ana River that flows just east of the proposed Project site. The
younger Quaternary alluvial deposits are not likely to contain significant vertebrate fossils, however,
deeper excavations at the proposed Project site may encounter significant fossils. There were no fossil
localities found during the LACM records search that lie within the Project site, although many have been
recorded nearby from older Quaternary sediments. Los Angeles County Museum (LACM) 1652, along
Rio Vista Avenue south of Lincoln Avenue just north-northeast of the Project site, produced a fossil
specimen of Ovis (sheep). The closest fossil locality is LACM 4943, situated almost due east of locality
LACM 1652 along Fletcher Avenue east of Glassell Street east of the Santa Ana River.
Elaine Thienprasiddhi, AICP
December 4, 2018
Page 6
Grading or very shallow excavations in the uppermost few feet of the younger Quaternary alluvial
sediments in the proposed project area are unlikely to uncover significant fossil vertebrate remains.
Deeper excavations at the proposed project site that extend down into older deposits, however, may
encounter significant vertebrate fossils.
CONCLUSION
Overall, based on the 2017 and 2018 records searches, the Proposed Project would be consistent with the
project as analyzed in EIR 340. The Proposed Project would not create a new significant impact or a
substantial increase in the severity of previously identified effects. In regard to Section 15162 of the State
CEQA Guidelines, the Proposed Project (1) would not propose substantial changes; (2) would not have
circumstantial changes under which the project is undertaken; and (3) would bring about no new
information of substantial importance that would (a) create new significant impacts, (b) increase the
severity of previously examined effects, (c) determine that mitigation measures or alternatives previously
found not to be feasible would, in fact, be feasible, or (d) introduce mitigation measures (MM) that are
considerably different from those analyzed in the previous documents. For these reasons, there are no
major revisions required to the cultural resources analysis provided in EIR 340.
MITIGATION MEASURES FROM EIR 340
The following mitigation measures from EIR 340 are still applicable.
MM 5.4-1
Prior to issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying the
certified archaeologist has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented:
a) The archaeologist must be present at the pre-grade conference in order to establish procedures for
temporarily halting or redirecting work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of
artifacts if potentially significant artifacts are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered and
determined to be significant, the archaeological observer shall determine appropriate actions in
cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage.
b) Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to an
appropriate education or research institution.
c) Any archaeological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified
archaeologist. If any artifacts are discovered during grading operations when the archaeological
monitor Is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the
area.
d) A final report detailing the findings and dispositions of the specimens shall be submitted to the
City Engineer. Upon completion of the grading, the archaeologist shall notify the City as to when
the final report will be submitted. (MEIR 313 MM 3.12-1, Cultural Resources).
MM 5.4-2
Prior to the issuance of each grading permit, the property owner/developer shall submit a letter identifying
the certified paleontologist that has been hired to ensure that the following actions are implemented.
a) The paleontologist must be present at the pre-grading conference in order to establish procedures
to temporarily halt or redirect work to permit the sampling, identification, and evaluation of
fossils if potentially significant paleontological resources are uncovered. If artifacts are uncovered
Elaine Thienprasiddhi, AICP
December 4, 2018
Page 7
and found to be significant, the paleontological observer shall determine appropriate actions in
cooperation with the property owner/developer for exploration and/or salvage.
b) Specimens that are collected prior to or during the grading process will be donated to an
appropriate educational or research institution.
c) Any paleontological work at the site shall be conducted under the direction of the certified
paleontologist. If any fossils are discovered during grading operations when the paleontological
monitor is not present, grading shall be diverted around the area until the monitor can survey the
area (MEIR 313 MM 3.12-2, Cultural Resources).
MM 5.4-3
Prior to approval of a final site plan for properties that contain a structure over 45 years old, property
owners/developers shall submit to the Planning Department, Planning Services Division documentation to
verify the presence/absence of historic resources. On properties where resources are identified, such
documentation shall provide a detailed mitigation plan, including a monitoring program and recovery
and/or in situ preservation plan, based on the recommendations of a qualified specialist (EIR MM 5.4-1,
Cultural Resources)
If you have any questions, you can reach me at (626) 204-6520 or Charles.Cisneros@Psomas.com.
Sincerely,
BonTerra Psomas
Charles Cisneros, RPA
Senior Project Manager, Senior Archaeologist
Attachments: SCCIC Results
LACM Results
R:\Projects\ANA\3ANA009107\Cultural\Cultural Resources Tech Memo-120418.docx
SOUTH CENTRAL COASTAL INFORMATION CENTER
SEARCH RESULTS
Report List
Report No.Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s)ResourcesOther IDs
OR-01898 1990 Finding of Effect Widening of Interstate 5 and
Reconstruction of Interchanges Between
State Routes 22/57 and 91 in the Cities of
Santa Ana, Orange, Anaheim, Fullerton and
Buena Park
CaltransAnonymous 30-161815, 30-161816
OR-02076 2000 Cultural Resource Assessment for At&t
Wireless Services Facility Number C751,
County of Orange, California
LSA Associates, Inc.Lapin, Philippe
OR-02095 1979 Historical and Archaeological Investigations
of the Proposed Anaheim Transportation
Center Sites
Westec Services, Inc.Breece, William H.
OR-02188 1999 Report of Archaeological Assessment of
Assessor's Parcels 234-171-01 and 234-171-
03, City of Anaheim
Archaeological Resource
Management Corp.
Demcak, Carol R.
OR-02213 2000 Archaeological and Paleontological
Monitoring for the Hotel Circle Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0079,
Anaheim, Ca
RMW Paleo Associates, Inc.Maxon, Patrick O.Paleo -
OR-02355 2001 Cultural Resource Assessment: Cingular
Wireless Facility No. Sm 077-01, Orange
County, California
LSA Associates, Inc.Duke, Curt
OR-02506 1978 Historic Property Survey, Haster Street
Overcrossing
Caltrans District 7Webb, Lois M. and Gene
Huey
OR-02514 2002 Historic Property Survey Report - Highway
Project
McKenna et al.McKenna, Jeanette A.
OR-02566 2000 Results of Archaeological Monitoring Blue
Sky Properties, City of San Juan Capistrano
Orange County, California
LSA Associates, Inc.Delu, Antonina 30-001107
OR-02751 2002 Cultural Resource Assessment at & T
Wireless Services Faciltity No. D473a
Orange County, California
LSA Associates, Inc.Duke, Curt
OR-02824 1996 Replacement Facility for Anaheim, CA-
anaheim Stadium Station Ign
United States Postal
Service San Bruno Office
Gagnem, Marni
OR-02904 2002 Cultural Resource Assessment for Cingular
Wireless Facility Sm189-01, City of Anaheim,
Orange County, California
Kyle ConsultingKyle, Carolyn E.
OR-02908 2005 Verizon Wireless, Rose Place Facility, City of
Anaheim, County of Orange, California
LSA Associates, Inc.Fulton, Terri
Page 1 of 2 SCCIC 7/19/2017 1:42:49 PM
Report List
Report No.Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s)ResourcesOther IDs
OR-03373 2006 Cultural Resources Final Report of Monitoring
and Findings for the Qwest Network
Construction Project State of California:
Volumes I and Ii
SWCA Environmental
Consultants, Inc.
Arrington, Cindy and
Nancy Sikes
OR-03779 2009 Cultural Resource Records Search and Site
Visit Results for T-Mobile USA Canidadte
LA33822B (Anaheim First Christian Church),
520 West South Street, Anaheim, Orange
County, California
MBABonner, Wayne, Said,
Arabesque, Bonner,
Wayne, and Said,
Arabesque
30-176483
OR-03936 2010 Archaeological and Paleontological
Resources Monitoring Compliance Report for
the Disney's California Adventure Expansion,
Cars Land Project, City of Anaheim, California
CogstoneGlover, Amy and Sherri
Gust
30-177039Paleo -
OR-04138 2011 BTS Native American United Methodist /
LA5500A, 800 South Lemon Street,
Anaheim, Orange County, CA 92805
EBI ConsultingGodat, Alexis 30-176767
OR-04475 2013 Cultural Resources Records Search and Site
Visit Results for T-Mobile West, LLC
Candidate LA02856G (Anaheim Convention
Center) 800 Katella Avenue, Anaheim,
Orange County, California
EASBonner, Wayne and
Crawford, Kathleen
30-177545
OR-04475A 2014 Direct APE Historic Architectural Assessment
for T-Mobile West, LLC Candidate LA02856G
(Anaheim Convention Center) 800 West
Katella Avenue, Anaheim, Orange County,
California
Environmental Assessment
Specialists, Inc.
Bonner, Wayne H. and
Kathleen A. Crawford
Page 2 of 2 SCCIC 7/19/2017 1:42:50 PM
Report List
Report No.Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s)ResourcesOther IDs
OR-00814 1982 ARCHAEOLOGICAL SURVEY REPORT for
the Route I-5 Santa Ana Transportation
Corridor, Route 405 in Orange County to
Route 605 in Los Angeles County Pm
21.30/44.38; 0.00/6.85
CaltransRomani, John F.
OR-01801 1998 Cultural Resources Records Search and
Literature Review Report for a Pacific Bell
Mobile Services Telecommunications Facility:
Cm 132-21 City of Garden Grove, California
Chambers Group, Inc.Bonner, Wayne H.
OR-01949 1995 Cultural Resource Assessment for the City of
Garden Grove
LSA Associates, Inc.Padon, Beth, McLean,
Deborah, and Strudwick,
Ivan
30-000392, 30-001260, 30-001261,
30-001262, 30-001263, 30-001264,
30-001265, 30-001266, 30-001267,
30-001268, 30-001269, 30-001270,
30-001307
OR-02076 2000 Cultural Resource Assessment for At&t
Wireless Services Facility Number C751,
County of Orange, California
LSA Associates, Inc.Lapin, Philippe
OR-02095 1979 Historical and Archaeological Investigations
of the Proposed Anaheim Transportation
Center Sites
Westec Services, Inc.Breece, William H.
OR-02097 2000 Cultural Resource Assessment for Pacific
Bell Wireless Facility Cm 560-01, County of
Orange
LSA Associates, Inc.Lapin, Philippe
OR-02213 2000 Archaeological and Paleontological
Monitoring for the Hotel Circle Specific Plan
Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0079,
Anaheim, Ca
RMW Paleo Associates, Inc.Maxon, Patrick O.Paleo -
OR-02353 2001 Review of Cultural Resource
Assessment/evaluation for Cingular Wireless
Site Sm-082-02, Orange County, California
McKenna et al.McKenna, Jeanette A.
OR-02506 1978 Historic Property Survey, Haster Street
Overcrossing
Caltrans District 7Webb, Lois M. and Gene
Huey
OR-02561 2002 Highway Project Located in the City of
Anaheim, Orange County, on Ball Rd.
Between Flore (west Place) and Walnut St.
McKenna et al.McKenna, Jeanette A.
OR-02889 2005 Cultural Resources Records Search and Site
Visit Results for Nextel Communications
Candidate Ca8760a (cris Ave.) 1621 Euclid
Street, Anaheim, Orange County, California
Michael Brandman
Associates
Bonner, Wayne H.
Page 1 of 4 SCCIC 2/8/2018 11:44:17 AM
Report List
Report No.Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s)ResourcesOther IDs
OR-02904 2002 Cultural Resource Assessment for Cingular
Wireless Facility Sm189-01, City of Anaheim,
Orange County, California
Kyle ConsultingKyle, Carolyn E.
OR-02913 2005 Verizon Wireless Falcon Saxons Facility LSA Associates, Inc.Carmack, Shannon and
Judith Marvin
30-176762
OR-03351 2005 Cultural Resource Assessment Verizon
Wireless Falcon Saxons Facility, City of
Anaheim, Orange County, California
LSA Associates, Inc.Carmack, Shannon and
Judith Marvin
OR-03373 2006 Cultural Resources Final Report of Monitoring
and Findings for the Qwest Network
Construction Project State of California:
Volumes I and Ii
SWCA Environmental
Consultants, Inc.
Arrington, Cindy and
Nancy Sikes
OR-03521 2009 Cultural Resources Records Search and Site
Visit Results for T-Mobile USA Candidate
LA33402B (Beth Emet Temple), 1770 West
Cerritos Avenue, Anaheim, Orange County,
California
Michael Brandman
Associates
Bonner, Wayne H.30-176762
OR-03670 2007 Cultural Resources Records Search and Site
Visit Results for Royal Street
Communications, LLC Candidate LA0672C
(Monika's Payback), Near Intersection of
Nutwood Street and Folsom Street, Anaheim,
Orange County, California
Michael Brandman
Associates
Bonner, Wayne H.
OR-03671 2007 Direct APE Historic Architectural Assessment
for Royal Street Communications, LLC
Cadidate LA0672C (Monika's Payback), near
Intersdection of Nutwood Street and Folsom
Street, Anaheim, Orange County, California
Michael Brandman
Associates
Bonner, Wayne H.
Page 2 of 4 SCCIC 2/8/2018 11:44:18 AM
Report List
Report No.Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s)ResourcesOther IDs
OR-03776 2000 Historic Property Survey Report for Harbor
Boulevard Smart Street Improvements, City
of Garden Grove, Orange County, California.
Discovery Works, Inc.Padon, Beth 30-157376, 30-176876, 30-176877,
30-176878, 30-176879, 30-176880,
30-176881, 30-176882, 30-176883,
30-176884, 30-176885, 30-176886,
30-176887, 30-176888, 30-176889,
30-176890, 30-176891, 30-176892,
30-176893, 30-176894, 30-176895,
30-176896, 30-176897, 30-176898,
30-176899, 30-176900, 30-176901,
30-176902, 30-176903, 30-176904,
30-176905, 30-176906, 30-176907,
30-176908, 30-176909, 30-176910,
30-176911, 30-176912, 30-176913,
30-176914, 30-176915, 30-176916,
30-176917, 30-176918, 30-176919,
30-176920, 30-176921, 30-176922,
30-176923, 30-176924, 30-176925,
30-176926, 30-176927, 30-176928,
30-176929, 30-176930, 30-176931,
30-176932, 30-176933, 30-176934,
30-176935, 30-176936, 30-176937,
30-176938, 30-176939, 30-176940,
30-176941, 30-176942, 30-176943
OR-03779 2009 Cultural Resource Records Search and Site
Visit Results for T-Mobile USA Canidadte
LA33822B (Anaheim First Christian Church),
520 West South Street, Anaheim, Orange
County, California
MBABonner, Wayne, Said,
Arabesque, Bonner,
Wayne, and Said,
Arabesque
30-176483
OR-03782 2009 Cultural Resource Records Search and Site
Visit Results for T-Moblie USA Candidate
LA33821D (Ramada Inn), 2141 South Harbor
Boulevard, Anaheim, Orange County,
California
MBABonner, Wayne, Said,
Arabesque, and
Crawford, Kathleen
OR-03788 2008 Cultural Resources Records Search and Site
Visit Results for T-Mobile USA Candidate
LA33823A (Prince of Peace), 1421 West Ball
Road, Anaheim, Orange County, California
MBABonner, Wayne
OR-03936 2010 Archaeological and Paleontological
Resources Monitoring Compliance Report for
the Disney's California Adventure Expansion,
Cars Land Project, City of Anaheim, California
CogstoneGlover, Amy and Sherri
Gust
30-177039Paleo -
Page 3 of 4 SCCIC 2/8/2018 11:44:18 AM
Report List
Report No.Year Title AffiliationAuthor(s)ResourcesOther IDs
OR-04116 2011 Cultural resource Assessment Verizon
Wireless Services Sallie Facility, City of
Anaheim, Orange County, Cailfornia
LSA AssociatesFulton, Phil
OR-04173 2011 Cultural Resources Records Search and Site
Visit Results for T-Mobile USA Candidate
LA33402-A (Loara High School), 1765 West
Cerritos Avenue, Anaheim, Orange County,
California
Michael Brandman
Associates
Bonner, Wayne 30-176762
OR-04474 2013 Cultural Resources Records Search and Site
Visit Results for T-Mobile West, LLC
Candidate LA33821D (Ramada Limited) 2141
Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim, Orange County,
California
EASBonner, Wayne and
Crawford, Kathleen
30-177546
OR-04474A 2014 Direct APE Historic Architectural Assessment
for T-Mobile West, LLC Candidate LA33821D
(Ramada Limited) 2141 Harbor Boulevard,
Anaheim, Orange County, California
EASBonner, Wayne H. and
Kathleen A. Crawford
Page 4 of 4 SCCIC 2/8/2018 11:44:19 AM
Primary No.Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs ReportsTypeAgeAttribute codes Recorded by
P-30-161718 OHP Property Number - 041105;
Resource Name - Truxaw-
Gervais House;
Other - Truxaw House;
Other - White House Restaurant;
Other - zip 92805
Building Historic HP02 (Single family
property); HP06 (1-3
story commercial
building)
1982 (Diann Marsh, Anaheim
Historical Society)
P-30-161816 OHP Property Number - 065760;
Resource Name - Anaheim
Public Utility District;
Other - Katella Substation;
Other - SCE;
Other - zip 92702
OR-00980, OR-
01898, OR-01961
Building Historic HP08 (Industrial
building); HP09 (Public
utility building)
1989 (J. Heumann, LSA)
P-30-176483 Resource Name - 314 Vermont
Ave;
Other - LSA-AC-S-1;
Other - zip 92802
OR-03779BuildingHistoricHP02 (Single family
property); HP04
(Ancillary building)
1998 (C. Duke, LSA)
P-30-176610 Resource Name - 1842 Mountain
View
LA-10430, OR-
00980, OR-01961,
OR-03861
Building Historic HP02 (Single family
property)
1987 (D. Marsh, LSA Associates,
Inc)
Page 1 of 2 SCCIC 7/19/2017 1:41:41 PM
Primary No.Trinomial
Resource List
Other IDs ReportsTypeAgeAttribute codes Recorded by
P-30-176663 OHP Property Number - 144278;
Resource Name - Atchison,
Topeka & Santa Fe RR,
Burlington Northern Santa Fe RR;
Other - Burlington Northern Santa
Fe;
Other - Metrolink Railroad;
Voided - 30-176664;
Other - CRM TECH 789-50H &
951-1H;
Other - California Southern
Railroad
LA-07871, LA-
08158, OR-03383,
OR-03517, OR-
03519, OR-03551,
OR-03555, OR-
03573, OR-03747,
OR-03797, OR-
03822, OR-03835,
OR-03864, OR-
03866, OR-03905,
OR-03910, OR-
03916, OR-03919,
OR-03929, OR-
03942, OR-03983,
OR-04020, OR-
04045, OR-04058,
OR-04074, OR-
04096, OR-04131,
OR-04154, OR-
04156, OR-04169,
OR-04182, OR-
04186, OR-04217,
OR-04229, OR-
04257, OR-04290,
OR-04292, OR-
04331, OR-04367,
OR-04374, OR-
04385, OR-04404,
OR-04457
Structure Historic HP37 (Highway/trail) -
Railroad; HP39 (Other)
2002 (D. Ballester, CRM Tech);
2002 ( Bai Tang and Josh
Smallwood, CRM Tech);
2007 (S. McCormick);
2012 (MK Meiser, AECOM);
2016
P-30-176767 OHP Property Number - 130243;
Resource Name - St Michael's
Episcopal Church;
Other - zip 92805
OR-04138BuildingHistoricHP14 (Government
building)
2004 (C. Davis, K. Wollan, St.
Michael's Episcopal Church Historic
Committee)
P-30-177545 Resource Name - Anaheim
Convention Center;
Other - T-Mobile West LLC
LA02856G/Anaheim Convention
Center
OR-04475BuildingHistoricHP12 (Civic
auditorium)
2014 (K.A. Crawford, Crawford
Historic Services)
Page 2 of 2 SCCIC 7/19/2017 1:41:42 PM
NATURAL HISTORY MUSEUM OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY
SEARCH RESULTS
Vertebrate Paleontology Section
Telephone: (213) 763-3325
e-mail: smcleod@nhm.org
22 February 2018
Psomas
3 Hutton Centre Drive, Suite 200
Santa Ana, CA 92707-8794
Attn: Charles Cisneros, Senior Archaeologist / Project Manager
re: Paleontological Resources for the proposed Disney Resorts Addendum Project, in the City of
Anaheim, Orange County, project area
Dear Charles:
I have conducted a thorough search of our Vertebrate Paleontology records for the
proposed Disney Resorts Addendum Project, in the City of Anaheim, Orange County, project
area as outlined on the portion of the Anaheim USGS topographic quadrangle map that you sent
to me via e-mail on 7 February 2018. We do not have any vertebrate fossil localities that lie
within the project boundaries, but we do have localities nearby from the same sedimentary units
that occur in the proposed project area, either at the surface or at depth..
At the proposed project area and in the surrounding vicinity the surface deposits consist
of younger terrestrial Quaternary Alluvium, with older terrestrial Quaternary sediments occurring
at various depths, as part of the general floodplain of the Santa Ana River that flows just east of
the proposed project area. These younger Quaternary deposits typically do not contain
significant vertebrate fossils in the uppermost layers, but we have a vertebrate fossil locality,
LACM 1652, along Rio Vista Avenue south of Lincoln Avenue just north-northeast of the
proposed project area, that produced a fossil specimen of sheep, Ovis. Our closest vertebrate
fossil locality in older Quaternary sediments is LACM 4943, situated almost due east of locality
LACM 1652 along Fletcher Avenue east of Glassell Street east of the Santa Ana River, that
produced a specimen of fossil horse, Equus, at a depth of 8-10 feet below the surface.
Surface grading or very shallow excavations in the uppermost few feet of the younger
Quaternary alluvial sediments in the proposed project site area are unlikely to uncover significant
fossil vertebrate remains. Deeper excavations at the proposed project site area that extend down
into older deposits, however, may well encounter significant vertebrate fossils. Any substantial
excavations below the uppermost layers, therefore, should be closely monitored to quickly and
professionally collect any specimens without impeding development. Sediment samples should
also be collected and processed to determine the small fossil potential in the proposed project
area. Any fossils recovered during mitigation should be deposited in an accredited and
permanent scientific institution for the benefit of current and future generations.
This records search covers only the vertebrate paleontology records of the Natural History
Museum of Los Angeles County. It is not intended to be a thorough paleontological survey of
the proposed project area covering other institutional records, a literature survey, or any potential
on-site survey.
Sincerely,
Samuel A. McLeod, Ph.D.
Vertebrate Paleontology
enclosure: invoice
APPENDIX B
CLIMATE CHANGE & TRAFFIC CONGESTION MITIGATION BENEFITS
CLIMATE CHANGE & TRAFFIC
CONGESTION MITIGATION BENEFITS
Imagine how much worse Anaheim’s congestion would be
with an additional 10,000 cars each day, especially
considering that 10,000 vehicles -- lined up end-to-end –
represent a line of traffic 32 miles long. It is arguable that
this additional number of vehicles on Anaheim city streets,
each day, would overwhelm existing available parking,
resulting in endless roaming and perpetual gridlock.
1 | Page
Climate Change & Traffic Congestion Mitigation Benefits
Anaheim Resort Transportation
Introduction – The purpose of this paper is to describe, using quantitative measures of effectiveness to
the extent feasible, the air quality and traffic congestion mitigation benefits of Anaheim Resort
Transportation (ART). ART is the public transportation system operating within The Anaheim Resort™
District and surrounding areas. Every year, over 9.5 million residents, visitors, and employees use ART to
connect with local destinations, job centers, theme parks, sport venues, shopping centers, hotels,
restaurants and the ARTIC regional transportation center. As described herein, ART not only offers visitors,
employees and residents a convenient, low-cost transportation option, but delivers important
environmental and quality of life co-benefits.
Summary of Environmental Benefits – The following sections of this paper discuss in greater detail the
environmental benefits of ART public transit service. It will be shown that ART achieves – on an annual
basis – a reduction in Greenhouse Gas Emissions (GHG) on the order of 7,325 metric tons. That’s greater
than 16 million pounds of carbon dioxide air pollution that doesn’t enter the atmosphere. This reduction
is based on 9.5 million riders who use the ART network to access major resorts and venues in The Anaheim
Resort® area in lieu of using automobiles. As discussed below, ART eliminates, or reduces vehicle miles
traveled, on the order of 3.7 million automobile trips annually. That equates to over 10,000 automobiles
each day that aren’t contributing to traffic congestion in-and-around Anaheim’s numerous high demand
locations and employment centers. Those automobile trips – the one’s that don’t occur – avoid the air
pollution emissions equivalent of greater than 26 million automobile miles, or approximately 72,000
automobile miles that are not driven in Anaheim each and every day. Given that 100% of the ART fleet
operates exclusively on alternative fuel, including zero-emission electric, the use of ART displaces over
807,000 gallons of gasoline fuel each year.
Technical Approach – The methodologies used to quantify the GHG benefits of ART are those approved
by the California Air Resources Board (ARB) for the assessment of public transit systems. The technical
approach used in this analysis is comprised of the following tasks:
§ Characterize the ART alternative fuel public transit service and bus fleet, including tabulation of
the annual miles operated for each vehicle in the ART revenue fleet;
§ Compute the emissions generated for each vehicle in the ART revenue fleet using the most current
ARB methodologies and emissions factors;
§ Analyze the most and complete ART ridership demographic data to establish the automobile
usage that is avoided and/or reduced vehicle miles traveled by the availability of the ART transit
system. This includes a quantification of automobile trips avoided as well as the miles associated
with each avoided trip;
§ Using the most current ARB model, EMFAC 2014, calculate the automobile air pollutant emissions
that are avoided by using ART.
2 | Page
Climate Change & Traffic Congestion Mitigation Benefits
The difference in automobile GHG emissions that would have occurred if not for the availability of ART,
minus the emissions generated by the ART alternative fuel transit fleet, yield the net GHG emissions
reduced.
Characterization of the ART Revenue Vehicle Fleet – Operations data for the current fiscal year was
analyzed to determine the GHG footprint of the ATN fleet. The ART revenue fleet is comprised of 82
vehicles. Of these, 27 are cut-away vehicles, three are mid-size transit-style buses, and 52 are full-size
urban transit buses. 100% of the ART fleet operates on low-carbon alternative fuel, including compressed
natural gas (CNG), liquefied natural gas (LNG), liquefied petroleum gas, (LPG, i.e., propane), and zero
emission battery electric. The illustration below shows the composition of the ART revenue transit fleet.
Composition of the ART Transit Vehicle Fleet
Fuel Type Number of
Vehicles
Compressed Natural Gas 21
Liquified Natural Gas 43
Liquified Propane Gas 9
Zero Emission Pure Electric 4
Total Fleet 77
The ART transit fleet accrues on the order of 1.65 million miles annually. To calculate the GHG emissions
generated by the ART fleet, the emissions contribution by each individual bus was assessed and then
summed to determine ART’s total transit service GHG footprint.
The emission rates corresponding to each bus engine in the ART fleet was determined by querying the
ARB Executive Order database of engine emissions certifications. Total annual GHG emissions per transit
vehicle are calculated based on the annual miles each bus travels. Overall, the ART revenue fleet emitted
approximately 2,103 metric tons, or approximately 4.6 million pounds of GHG emissions in the most
recently completed fiscal year.
Quantification of Automobile Emissions Avoided by Using ART Transit – To determine the GHGs that
would have been emitted had ART riders used their personal or rental automobiles in lieu of ART transit
service, ART conducted a comprehensive survey of rider demographics and travel behavior. This survey
was used to derive the estimated number of automobile trips avoided, vehicle miles traveled reduced and
substituted with ART transportation services.
ART is unique amongst public transit agencies in Southern California, especially when viewed in the
context of two key metrics – overall ridership trends and transit dependency. In Southern California,
traditional public transit bus ridership is declining. This decline can be attributed to several factors;
however, most relevant is the improvement in the overall economy since the Great Recession of 2008.
3 | Page
Climate Change & Traffic Congestion Mitigation Benefits
In contrast, ART ridership has experienced a steady increase in demand during the same economic
recovery period. Interestingly, ART enjoys an inverse relationship to a growing economy as compared to
traditional public transit. As the economy improves, more families have the ability to visit the destinations
ART serves - resorts, theme parks, major sports venues, etc. And because parking is often limited or
increasingly expensive at these attractions, the direct, cost conscience service offered by ART is
increasingly the preferred transportation solution for visitors and residents alike. Even though transit
ridership shows a decreasing trend, nationwide, Anaheim’s local economy continues to experience
growth, thus expanding its job market, which in turn is the sources for the increase in ART ridership.
A second unique characteristic of ART compared to traditional public transit bus service is that ART riders
have a very low rate of transit dependency. Transit dependent riders do not own or have limited access
to private automobiles; as such, their mobility is dependent on the availability of public transportation.
For transit dependent individuals, public transportation provides an essential mobility benefit; however,
it should be understood that mobility and air quality are at times conflicted – there can be no air quality
benefit assigned to transit trips that do not eliminate the use of a higher polluting transportation mode.
Whereas traditional public transit in southern California has an adult ridership transit dependency on the
order of 40% or greater - meaning that 4 out of ten riders do not have regular access to a car – ART’s adult
transit dependency is on the order of 3% - 9%. ART riders typically either own a car or, if visitors, can
afford to rent a car while vacationing in the Anaheim Resort. Although they have access to an automobile,
for convenience a growing number of Anaheim residents and visitors are choosing ART to get them to and
from their destinations.
How many automobile trips does ART eliminate and/or reduces vehicle miles traveled? According to the
ART demographic study, approximately 65% of 9.5 million annual ART riders are adults. Approximately
94% have access to a car – either as an Anaheim resident or visitor to the destination with the means to
access a rental car, but due to the design characteristics of ART service, with focus on passenger needs,
frequency, convenience and affordability, ART patrons choose to use ART instead of their personal
automobile.
The ART ridership demographic analysis further breaks down ridership into “parties”, i.e., individual riders,
families with children, or groups of adult riders. The availability of ART transportation services eliminates
and/or reduces vehicle miles traveled from over 3.7 million automobile trips from Anaheim roadways
each year. These trips account for over 26 million annual automobile miles not driven in the City of
Anaheim.
ART’s impact on reducing Anaheim’s carbon footprint is significant. The trips and automobile miles that
were avoided reduced Anaheim’s GHG emissions – according to ARB’s EMFAC 2014 emissions model – by
over 9,427 metric tons. This is partially offset by the GHG emissions generated by ART’s fleet of low carbon
4 | Page
Climate Change & Traffic Congestion Mitigation Benefits
fuel buses; however, the net GHG reduction that can be attributed to ART is over 7,325 metric tons, or
over 16 million pounds of GHG emissions avoided annually.
In addition to direct reductions in GHG emission, the amount of gasoline that is displaced – not burned –
is over 807,000 gallons annual.
It is important to note that ART also serves the Anaheim
Regional Transportation Intermodal Center, or ARTIC. In
this way, ART provides essential connectivity between
other forms or public transit, including Metrolink and
Amtrak rail service as well as the Orange County
Transportation Authority’s regional bus service. This
connectivity to other forms of public transit allows riders to use whatever form is most convenient and
then use ART to provide “last mile” connectivity to their Anaheim destination. This not only serves tourists
but also the significant number of riders who are employed by Anaheim attractions. First mile/last mile
connectivity is an essential element for public transit agencies that want to attract non-transit dependent
rider. As such, ART supports the other transit agencies by making their traditional transit and rail services
a more attractive mode as riders can depend on ART to get them to their ultimate destination.
Reduction in Local Traffic Congestion – In addition to the direct benefits of reduced GHG emissions and
gasoline fuel consumption, ART provides other transportation-related benefits to the City of Anaheim,
specifically as it pertains to traffic congestion.
Los Angeles-Long Beach-Anaheim, CA
- Annual hours lost per commuter: 80
- Total annual hours of delay: 622.5 million
- Annual cost per commuter: $1,711
- Total congestion cost: $13.3 billion
The 2015 Urban Mobility Scorecard1, a report released jointly by the Texas A&M Transportation Institute,
and Inrix, a traffic data collection company, identified the Los Angeles – Long Beach - Anaheim urban area
as having the second worst traffic congestion in the nation – a close second behind the Washington DC
region. Half of the 20 worst roads for traffic in the country are located here, and this three-city region
has the distinction of having the nation’s longest rush hour – nearly eight (8) hours on a typical day.
Imagine Anaheim’s traffic congestion would be with an additional 10,000 cars each day, especially
considering that 10,000 vehicles - lined end-to-end - represents a line of traffic 32 miles long. The
availability of ART service, further indicates that regional growth can be sustained through managed
mobility needs. With the projected increase of visitor attendance by 20,000 and employment growth of
1 https://static.tti.tamu.edu/tti.tamu.edu/documents/ums/congestion-data/los-angeles.pdf
“ART provides a direct benefit in
reducing Anaheim’s carbon
footprint, eliminating over 16
million pounds of CO2 based GHG
emissions each year”.
5 | Page
Climate Change & Traffic Congestion Mitigation Benefits
6,000 jobs by year 2019, a unique partnership between the City of Anaheim planning efforts and long-
term environmental impacts of the Specific Plan Mitigation Monitoring Program and ART system, ensure
that Anaheim, as a major destination city, can continue to develop as a robust, major destination,
employment center and an epicenter of tourism and hospitality industry for the State of California.
Author/Prepared By:
ATN retained services of Ray Gorski to prepare this analysis. Mr. Gorski spent over 22 years working as an engineer
on transportation emissions reduction technologies and policy analysis. He currently consults on air quality and
transportation-related issues to the South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) and the Mobile Source
Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee (MSRC), and several other transportation agencies in Southern California.
As the Technical Advisor to the MSRC, an organization formed under Assembly Bill 2766 responsible for developing
and implementing air pollution reduction strategies in Southern California, Mr. Gorski serves as the principal
engineer and analyst for membership from Los Angeles, Orange, Riverside, and San Bernardino Counties. To date,
Mr. Gorski has developed and implemented programs targeting mobile source emission reductions valued at over
$300 million.
Since 1995, Mr. Gorski has been a successful independent consultant, serving numerous government agencies and
private companies in the areas of engineering analysis, independent technical evaluation, including independent
validation and verification (IV&V), and program implementation and management.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.
200 S. Anaheim Blvd.
Suite #162
Anaheim, CA 92805
Tel: (714) 765-5139
Fax: (714) 765-5280
www.anaheim.net
ITEM NO. 2
PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT
City of Anaheim
PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT
DATE: APRIL 1, 2019
SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05835
VARIANCE NO. 2017-05091
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00144
LOCATION: 5706 East La Palma Avenue (ARCO Gas Station and Convenience
Store)
APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The agent is Gregory S. Hann with Empire
Design Group, Inc., representing the owner and applicant, Isa Bahu.
REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of the following land use entitlements:
1) A Conditional Use Permit to permit the construction of a new service
station and convenience market with the sale of beer and wine for off-site
consumption and a Shared Parking Agreement with an adjacent property
owner;
2) A Variance to permit (a) reduced landscape setbacks adjacent to arterial
highways; and (b) structural and landscape setbacks along interior
property lines less than required by the Municipal Code;
3) An associated Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity to
permit the sale of beer and wine for off-site consumption within a new
service station and convenience market; and
RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt
the attached resolutions, determining that this request is categorically exempt from
further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class
32, Infill Development) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05835,
Variance No. 2017-05091, and Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2019-00144.
BACKGROUND: This 0.5-acre property is located at the southeast corner of La
Palma Avenue and Imperial Highway (which is a state highway). In 1981, the
project site was entitled and developed with an ARCO service station and an
AM/PM mini market under CUP 2148. In 2002, a portion of La Palma Avenue
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05835, VARIANCE NO. 2017-05091, AND
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00144
April 1, 2019
Page 2 of 7
and Imperial Highway were dedicated to the City of Anaheim for the purpose of street widening
and improvements, including street landscaping and public utilities, as shown in Figure 1. The
service station was subsequently demolished in 2004.
The property is located in the “SP
2015-1” Anaheim Canyon Specific
Plan, Development Area 5 (General
Commercial) zone. The property has
a General Plan land use designation
for General Commercial land uses.
Surrounding land uses include
Canyon Village Shopping Center to
the north across La Palma Avenue,
Anaheim Hills Inn and Suites to the
south and east, and a service station
to the west across Imperial Highway.
PROPOSAL: The applicant
proposes to construct a new service
station and a two-story convenience
store with beer and wine sales for
off-site consumption. The 4,799
square foot convenience market would
have a total first floor area of 2,458
square feet, with a 2,341 square foot
second floor used solely for inventory
storage for the market and service
station. The proposal also includes a
new 3,499 square foot canopy
structure with six fuel dispenser
islands. The service station and
convenience market would be open 24
hours a day with 2-3 employees on
duty at any time. As mentioned
above, an existing public utilities
easement (measuring 15 feet wide at
the south end to 28 feet wide at the
north end) is located along the entire
westerly property line, so no structures
or driveways are permitted within the
easement area. As a result, the project
is designed with one driveway
approach on La Palma Avenue measuring 25 feet wide. In order to accommodate on-site
circulation for cars and petroleum trucks to maneuver on the property with one driveway
approach, the applicant is requesting to reduce the required landscaping setbacks from 15 feet to
Figure 2. Proposed Site Plan
Figure 1. Site Plan in 2004
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05835, VARIANCE NO. 2017-05091, AND
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00144
April 1, 2019
Page 3 of 7
5 feet along the two arterial highways, and from 10 feet to 1.5 feet for the side and rear (interior)
property lines.
The convenience store building is designed with red brick veneer walls on each of the elevations,
earth-tone colors, smooth stucco trim, aluminum doors and windows, and metal awnings with
goose neck lights along the street-facing elevation. The market would have a retail sales area for
prepackaged food, sales counter, coolers for beverages, and an area for hot food items. Staff
believes the proposed design will be an attractive enhancement to the area.
Figure 3. North Elevation on La Palma Avenue
The Anaheim Municipal Code requires a total of 16 parking spaces for the service station and
convenience store. The applicant proposes to provide 12 on-site parking spaces, including the six
parking spaces provided at the pump islands. The Code permits 50% of the pump island spaces to
be counted towards the required parking. The applicant has negotiated a Shared Parking
Agreement with Keno’s Restaurant at 5750 East La Palma Avenue for four additional spaces that
will be used for employee parking. Staff completed a parking analysis of Keno’s Restaurant and
determined that the site has a surplus of eight parking spaces. This property is located two
properties to the east of the subject site, approximately 170 feet away. The Shared Parking
Agreement was reviewed and approved as to form by the City Attorney and a condition of
approval has been included in the draft resolution to ensure that the four additional spaces are
provided off-site in perpetuity.
FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS:
Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use
permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following
conditions exist:
1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized
by the Zoning Code;
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05835, VARIANCE NO. 2017-05091, AND
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00144
April 1, 2019
Page 4 of 7
2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth
and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located;
3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular
area or health and safety;
4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon
the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and
5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any,
will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
The Municipal Code allows the construction of a service station and convenience market in the
Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan (SP-2015-1 zone) by right. However, the Code requires a
conditional use permit to permit any beer and wine sales for off-premises consumption. The
purpose of the conditional use permit is to ensure that the beer and wine sales are compatible with
surrounding uses. The gas pump islands, canopy, and underground storage tanks have been
designed to minimize the probability of vehicles, including delivery trucks, from queueing onto
the adjacent streets. Delivery trucks would access the site from La Palma Avenue to the north,
continue around the canopy island, and then exit back onto La Palma Avenue. The applicant
submitted the project to CalTrans staff, who has jurisdiction over Imperial Highway, and staff
received a written response that there was no comment about the project. Staff believes the
proposed use is compatible with other uses in the area and would not have an adverse impact on
surrounding businesses.
The new convenience market would provide a range of products with approximately 20% of the
total cooler space designated for the sale of beer and wine. Staff believes that the proposed off-
sale of beer and wine at the convenience store would not adversely affect the surrounding land
uses or the growth and development of the area if the business is operated in a responsible
manner, and in compliance with the recommended conditions of approval. These include typical
Police Department conditions for similar uses, such as: prohibiting any exterior advertising of
alcoholic beverages; requiring ABC LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs) training
for employees; limiting the display area of alcoholic beverages, and prohibiting open containers
and the consumption of alcoholic beverages on-site, among others. The Police Department also
recommends that the cashier face the store entrance in order to see customers entering the store.
However, the business owner indicated that the limited site characteristics do not allow for the
cashier counter to be relocated without losing some of the sales area. The project is designed
with two cashier stations, including one employee’s side facing the entrance. To address this
issue, staff has included conditions of approval which requires that the cashier closest to the
entrance be occupied if there is only one employee on duty. The applicant also plans to install
indoor cameras, a 60 inch television screen at the store entrance, and monitors at the cashier
counter to enable employees to view patrons at the entrance, inside the store, and the canopy
area.
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05835, VARIANCE NO. 2017-05091, AND
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00144
April 1, 2019
Page 5 of 7
Variance: Before the Planning Commission may approve the landscape and structural setback
variance requests, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that the
following conditions exist:
1) That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size,
shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other
property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; and
2) That, because of the special circumstances, shown above, strict application of
the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property
under identical zoning classification in the vicinity.
A variance recognizes that there may be individual properties that, because of size, irregular
shape, or unusual topography, cannot be reasonably developed if all the development standards
for the zone are strictly applied. The applicant is requesting reduced front landscaping setbacks
along the La Palma Avenue and Imperial Highway street frontages where 15 feet is required and
5 to 10 feet is proposed. The applicant also requests a setback reduction along the interior
property lines adjacent to a hotel where 10 feet is required and 1.5 to 20 feet is proposed. The
small size of the lot (due to the dedications and utility easement mentioned above), as compared
to other SP-2015-1 zoned properties in the vicinity, makes it difficult to meet all of the
development standards while providing adequate setbacks for the proposed service station and
convenience store. Most service stations located at an intersection of two arterial highways are
permitted to have two driveways; however, this site is only proposing one entry point along La
Palma Avenue
because no driveway
is allowed along
Imperial Highway
due to Caltrans
restrictions. Required
improvements
including on-site
parking spaces,
accommodating
maneuverability on-
site for customer
vehicles and large
trucks, and standards
for the placement of
fuel tanks restrict the
ability to provide the
Code-required
structural and
landscaping setbacks
at interior property
lines.
Figure 4. Landscape and Structural Setback Map
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05835, VARIANCE NO. 2017-05091, AND
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00144
April 1, 2019
Page 6 of 7
The blue dashed lines in Figure 4 below identifies the setbacks required under the Municipal
Code. Granting the requested variances would allow the property to be developed in a manner
that is compatible with the adjacent properties and other service stations in the vicinity. Because
the useable lot size is smaller than surrounding properties, and due to the development
constraints for this property, staff believes that there are special circumstances applicable to the
property to justify the setback variances. In addition, similar landscaping setback variances were
previously-approved for the service stations located at the corner of La Palma Avenue and
Magnolia Avenue and Euclid Street and Broadway. Staff believes that strict application of the
Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties under identical
zoning classification in the vicinity; therefore, staff recommends approval of the requested
setback variances.
Public Convenience or Necessity: State law requires a determination of public convenience
or necessity when an alcoholic beverage license is requested for a property located in a police
reporting district with a crime rate above the City average or when there is an
overconcentration in the number of ABC licenses within a census tract. The Anaheim Police
Department indicates that this property is located within Police Reporting District No. 1239,
which has a crime rate that is below the citywide average; however, the crime rate within ¼
mile of this property is 48% above the citywide average based upon calls for service.
The Police Department also indicates that this property is located within Census Tract No.
218.07 which has a population of 4,131. This census tract allows for two off-sale licenses and
the proposed off-sale license would be the third license in the tract. As shown in Attachment
No. 7, the existing off-sale licenses currently belong to the nearby CVS pharmacy and
Wholesome Choice Foods Inc. The proposed use requires such a determination as a result of
an overconcentration in the number of licenses and above average crime rate.
The attached statement of operation for determination of public convenience or necessity by
the applicant indicates that the sale of beer and wine would be incidental relative to the range
of products offered in the convenience store. The standard condition of approval in the draft
resolution would permit the beer and wine display area to be up to 25 percent of the total
display area in the building. In addition, the beer and wine will be sold within a
convenience market located on major arterial highways adjacent to a neighborhood
shopping center. The beer and wine sales are intended to be a convenience to the consumer
who visits this location to purchase gasoline and/or other general merchandise within the
convenience store. The recommended conditions of approval require monitoring of the site to
prevent on-site consumption. The sale of beer and wine is anticipated to be a minor accessory
component of the store. Based upon these reasons, staff recommends approval of this
application.
Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the
effects of the proposed project are Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare
additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA)
Guidelines, Section 15332, Class 32 (In-fill Development). Class 32 consists of projects
characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions described in Section 15332. These
conditions include that the proposed project is (a) consistent with the applicable general plan
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05835, VARIANCE NO. 2017-05091, AND
PUBLIC CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00144
April 1, 2019
Page 7 of 7
designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation
and regulations; (b) occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres
substantially surrounded by urban uses; (c) the project site has no value as habitat for
endangered, rare or threatened species; (d) approval of the project would not result in any
significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality; and, (e) the site can be
adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The CEQA checklist, attached to
this staff report as Attachment 9, provides evidence that the proposed project meets these
conditions. Pursuant to Section 15300.02 (c) and Section 15332 of Title 14 of the California
Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for
which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed
project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA.
CONCLUSION: Staff believes that the proposed service station and convenience market would
be compatible with the surrounding commercial land uses. Given the special development
constraints of the site, the project has unusual circumstances that prevent it from adhering to the
strict application of the Municipal Code. The project also will provide a convenience to
customers visiting the service station to purchase fuel and everyday necessities. The conditions
of approval relating to restrictions on beer and wine packaging, displays, signage, property
maintenance and on-site consumption, for the requested license will assure that the use would
not be detrimental to the area. The proposed number of parking spaces with the off-site Shared
Parking Agreement would be adequate to serve the proposed business. Based upon these
reasons, staff recommends approval of this request.
Prepared by, Submitted by,
Lucita Y. Tong David See
Contract Planner Principal Planner
Attachments:
1. Development Standards Analysis
2. Draft Resolution for CUP and Variance
3. Draft Resolution for PCN
4. Site Plan, Floor Plan and Colored Elevations
5. Statement of Operation and Public Convenience or Necessity
6. Variance Request Letter
7. Police Department Memorandum & Public Convenience or Necessity Map of Existing Licenses
8. Site Photos
9. CEQA Environmental Checklist - Class 32 Exemption - Infill Development
10. Master Sign Program (reference only)
SP 2015-1DEV 2015-00116VACANT
SP 2015-1DA5RETAIL
SP 2015-1DA5RETAIL
SP 2015-1DA5ANAHEIM HILLSINN & SUITES
SP 2015-1DA5RESTAURANT
SP 2015-1DA5NURSERY
SP 2015-1DA6SANTA ANA RIVER
SP 2015-1DA6SANTA ANA RIVERSP 2015-1DA6SANTA ANA RIVER
SP 2015-1DA6SANTA ANA RIVER
SP 2015-1DA5SERVICE STATION
SP 2015-1DA5RETAIL
SP 2015-1DA5RETAIL
SP 2015-1DA5CINEMACITYTHEATER
SP 2015-1DA5RETAIL
SP 2015-1DA5BANK SP 2015-1DA5RETAIL
SP 2015-1DA5RETAIL
E LA PALMA AVE
N I M P E R I A L H W Y
E. LA PALMA AVE
N.IMPERIA
L
H
W
Y
E .S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D
E. ORANGETHORPE AVE
E. S A NTA A NA C A N Y ON R D
E .L A P A L M A A V E
5 7 0 6 Ea st L a P a lm a Ave
D E V N o . 2 0 1 5 -0 0 11 6
Subject Property APN: 349-081-68
°0 50 100
Feet
Aerial Pho to:May 20 18
E LA PALMA AVE
N I M P E R I A L H W Y
E. LA PALMA AVE
N.IMPERIA
L
H
W
Y
E .S A N T A A N A C A N Y O N R D
E. ORANGETHORPE AVE
E. S A NTA A NA C A N Y ON R D
E .L A P A L M A A V E
5 7 0 6 Ea st L a P a lm a Ave
D E V N o . 2 0 1 5 -0 0 11 6
Subject Property APN: 349-081-68
°0 50 100
Feet
Aerial Pho to:May 20 18
ATTACHMENT NO. 1
Analysis of Development Standards
Project Address: 5706 East La Palma Avenue
Case Nos. CUP2015‐05835, VAR2017‐05091, & PCN2019‐00144 (DEV2015‐00116)
Development Standard:
Municipal Code Requirement (SP‐
2015‐1, Area D‐5):
Project Provided:
FAR 50% FAR 32% FAR
Structural Height 60 feet 34 feet
Structural and Landscape
Setbacks
Major Arterial: 15 feet
Primary Arterial: 15 feet
Interior Property Line: 10 feet
Major Arterial: 5 feet
Primary Arterial: 5 feet
Interior Property Line:
Less than 5 feet
Parking
Automotive Service‐Stations: Stand‐
Alone: 2 spaces
Note: 50% of pump island spaces
can be used for parking
6 spaces at pump island
(50%)
Convenience Stores: 4 spaces per
1,000 square feet of GFA (10 spaces)
Attic /Storage: 1.55 per 1,000
square feet of GFA (4 spaces)
6 onsite spaces plus 4
offsite share parking
spaces
Note: The project’s Master Sign Program meets all Municipal Code requirements and is included
as reference only.
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 2
- 1 - PC2019 -***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2019-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE
PERMIT NO. 2015-05835 AND VARIANCE NO. 2017-05091
AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION
THEREWITH
(DEV2015-00116)
(5706 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (herein referred to as
the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve (i) Conditional Use Permit
No. 2015-05835 to permit the sale beer and wine for off-premises consumption (Type 20 Off Sale
Beer and Wine License) in association with a new convenience store and automobile service
station and a Shared Parking Agreement with an adjacent property owner, and (ii) Variance No.
2017-05091 to allow (a) landscape setbacks adjacent to arterial highways; and (b) landscape and
structural setbacks adjacent to interior property lines less than required by the Anaheim Municipal
Code (the "Code") (the “Proposed Project”) on a property located at 5706 East La Palma Avenue
in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on Exhibit A
attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and
WHEREAS, Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05835 and Variance 2017-05091 is
proposed in conjunction with a request for Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2019-00144, now
pending, which together with the Project, shall be referred to herein collectively as the “Proposed
Project”; and
WHEREAS, the Property, approximately 0.43-acres in size. The Property is located
within the General Commercial land use designation of the Anaheim General Plan. The Property
is also located in the Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1 "SP 2015-1", Development Area
5 (General Commercial) Zone and is subject to the zoning and development standards contained
in Chapter 18.120 (Commercial Zones) of the Code; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on April 1, 2019 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly
given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of
the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No.
2015-05835 and Variance No. 2017-05091, and to investigate and make findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA
Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the
preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
- 2 - PC2019 -***
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the
Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 32– In-Fill
Development) which consists of in-fill projects that are consistent with applicable general plan
designation and all applicable general plan polices as well as with applicable zoning designation
and regulations, that the project occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five
acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, the project site has no value as habitat for
endangered, rare or threatened species, the project will not result in any significant effects relating
to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality, and the site can be adequately served by all required
utilities and public service; and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines,
the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing with respect to the request for Conditional Use Permit 2015-05835, does find and
determine the following:
1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is
authorized by the Municipal Code in that the Municipal Code allows a service station and
convenience market to be constructed with off-site beer and wine sales in the Anaheim Canyon
Specific Plan No.2015-1 (SP 2015-1) Zone subject to approval of a conditional use permit pursuant
to Section 18.08.030 of the Code; and
2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the
growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located in that the Proposed
Project will be compatible with the scale, mass, bulk, and orientation of existing buildings and
commercial uses in the surrounding area; and
3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full
development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health
and safety in that the Proposed Project is designed to ensure that vehicular and truck circulation
would not adversely affect development of the area; and
4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden
upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the
traffic generated by this use will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic on the surrounding
streets as determined by the Trip Generation Memo submitted for the project and reviewed by the
City’s Traffic Engineer; and
5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if
any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim in that
the impact upon the surrounding area has been mitigated to the maximum extent practicable in that
the Proposed Project will be consistent with the development standards of the Anaheim Canyon
Specific Plan No. 2015-1 "SP 2015-1" zone, with the exception of the variances described below.
- 3 - PC2019 -***
WHEREAS, based upon the request letter submitted by the applicant and observations
made by staff, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request for
Variance No. 2017-05091 for (a) reduced landscape setbacks adjacent to arterial highways; and
(b) reduced landscape and structural setbacks adjacent to interior property lines, should be
approved for the following reasons:
SECTION NO. 18.120.070.010 Minimum landscape setbacks adjacent to
arterial highways. (15 feet required; 5 feet to 10
feet proposed)
SECTION NO. 18.120.070.010 Minimum landscape and structural setbacks
adjacent to interior property lines. (10 feet
required; 0 to 20 feet proposed)
1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the Property, including size, shape,
location and surroundings, which do not apply to other property under the identical zoning
classification in the vicinity of the Proposed Project. The subject property has a width and depth
of about 148 by 119 feet and a lot area of 0.43 acres. While other corner lots in the immediate
vicinity have similar lot widths and sizes that are developed with commercial uses, those lots do
not have the same circulation constraints as compared to the Proposed Project due to the area
needed to accommodate the turning radius for fuel tanker trucks, standards for placement of fuel
tanks, and the need to accommodate vehicles maneuvering on-site with one access driveway on
La Palma Avenue. The site was reduced in size as a result of street dedications along La Palma
Avenue and Imperial Highway for street widening and improvements in 2007. In addition, a public
utilities easement, measuring about 2,260 square feet in size, is located along the west property
line, which further constrains the development potential of the site. Granting the requested
variances would allow the property to be developed in a manner that is compatible with the
adjacent properties and other service stations in the vicinity because of the special circumstances
applicable to the property.
2. That, because of these special circumstances, strict application of the Zoning Code
deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under the identical zoning
classification in the vicinity because a similar landscape setback variances were previously-
approved the service stations located at the northeast corner of La Palma Avenue and Magnolia
Avenue, and at the northeast corner of Euclid Street and Broadway.
and;
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that
detract from the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly declares
that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all
evidence presented to it.
- 4 - PC2019 -***
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, this
Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05835 and Variance
No. 2017-05091 contingent upon and subject to (i) approval of Public Convenience or Necessity
No. 2019-00144, now pending, and (ii) the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached
hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary
prerequisite to the proposed use of that portion of the Property for which Conditional Use Permit
No. 2015-05835 and Variance No. 2017-05091 is applicable in order to preserve the health, safety
and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete
conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing
for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a
showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent
and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant
has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this
permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval)
and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of
the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
April 1, 2019. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced
by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 5 - PC2019 -***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 1, 2019, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 1st day of April, 2019.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 6 - PC2019 -***
- 7 - PC2019 -***
EXHIBIT “B”
CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2015-05835 AND
VARIANCE NO. 2017-05091
(DEV2015-00116)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A GRADING PERMIT
1 Prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints, pad
elevations, finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls, erosion
control, slope easements and other pertinent information in accordance
with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California Building Code, latest
edition. The report shall address any proposed infiltration features of the
WQMP.
Public Works,
Development Services
2 Prepare and submit a final drainage study, including supporting hydraulic
and hydrological data to the City of Anaheim for review and approval.
The study shall confirm or recommend changes to the City's adopted
Master Drainage Plan by identifying off-site and on-site storm water
runoff impacts resulting from build-out of permitted General Plan land
uses. In addition, the study shall identify the project's contribution and
shall provide locations and sizes of catchments and system connection
points and all downstream drainage-mitigating measures including but not
limited to offsite storm drains and interim detention facilities.
Public Works,
Development Services
3 Submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the City for review
and approval. The WQMP shall be consistent with the requirements of
Section 7 and Exhibit 7.II of the Orange County Drainage Area
Management Plan (DAMP) for New Development/ Significant
Redevelopment projects. identify potential sources of pollutants during the
long-term on-going maintenance and use of the proposed project that
could affect the quality of the stormwater runoff from the project site;
define Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment Control (if applicable)
best management practices (BMPs) to control or eliminate the discharge
of pollutants into the surface water runoff; and provide a monitoring
program to address the long-term implementation of and compliance with
the defined BMPs. Submit three (3) copies and a plan checking deposit to
the Public Works/Development Services for consideration and approval.
Public Works,
Development Services
4 Submit a Geotechnical Report to the Public Works Development Services
Division for review and approval. The report shall include any proposed
infiltration features of the WQMP.
Public Works,
Development Services
- 8 - PC2019 -***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
5 All required plans shall be prepared by a registered Professional Engineer in
State of California.
Public Works,
Development Services
6 Any work in CalTrans Property must be permitted by CalTrans. Provide
the City of Anaheim with approval from CalTrans for the work in
CalTrans property prior to approval from the City of Anaheim for any
work in Anaheim Right of Way. Provide the City with a copy of the permit
and the plans for work within Caltrans permit.
Public Works,
Development Services
7 The Owner/Developer shall submit a set of improvement plans for Public
Utilities Water Engineering review and approval in determining the
conditions necessary for providing water service to the project.
Public Utilities
Water Engineering
PRIOR TO THE ISSUANCE OF A BUILDING PERMIT
8 Provide a certificate, from a Registered Civil Engineer, certifying that the
finished grading has been completed in accordance with the City approved
grading plan.
Public Works,
Development Services
9 That unless proof of exemption is submitted in compliance with City
Council Resolution No. 89R-440, at the issuance of a building permit, the
appropriate major thoroughfare and bridge fee shall be paid to the City of
Anaheim in an amount as specified in the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge
Fee Program for the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor, as
established by City Council resolution.
Public Works,
Development Services
10 Prior to issuance of a monument sign permit, approval from Caltrans shall
be obtained and proof shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim to permit
said sign.
Public Works,
Development Services
11 A Right of Way Construction Permit shall be obtained from the
Development Services Division for all work performed in the public right-
of-way.
Public Works,
Development Services
12 Developer shall construct all footings within the property, and no footings
shall be constructed on the adjacent properties. Public Works,
Development Services
13 Install London Plane Sycamore trees in the tree wells on La Palma Avenue.
The irrigation system and meter shall be connected to on-site private
irrigation system and maintained by the property owner. The street trees shall
conform to the City of Anaheim Master Street Tree Plan for Arterial
Corridors http://www.anaheim.net/594/Master-Street-Tree-Plan.
Public Works,
Development Services
- 9 - PC2019 -***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
14 All Landscape plans shall comply with the City of Anaheim adopted
Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance
with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance
(AV 1881). An Efficiency Certificate to verify installation and signed by
the licensed landscape architect shall be submitted prior to issuance of
Certificate of Occupancy.
Public Works,
Development Services
15 The developer shall post bonds for improvements in the public right of way
as approved by the City of Anaheim. Public Works,
Development Services
16 That a private water system with separate water service for fire protection
and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans submitted to the
Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
17 That all backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the
street setback area where possible in a manner fully screened from all
public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a
vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water
system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water
Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully
screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be
specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross
Connection Control Inspector.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
18 That all requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines,
as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing
water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated
and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public
Utilities Department.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
19 That all existing water services and fire services shall conform to current
Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or fire
line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if continued
use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed.
The owner/developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to
abandon any water service or fire line.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
20 That the developer/owner shall submit to the Public Utilities Department
Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate
and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This
information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water
system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-site water system
improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance
with Rule No. 15A.6 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
- 10 - PC2019 -***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
21 Individual water service and/or fire line connections will be required for
each parcel or residential, commercial, industrial unit per Rule 18 of the
City of Anaheim’s Water Rates, Rules and Regulations.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
22 Proposed water services for this address shall be connected to the existing
16-inch CCP water main in La Palma Avenue.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
23 The applicable Citywide Traffic Impact Fee, based on the Trip Generation
provided in the TIA and the Public Works Peak Hour Trip End rate, shall
be paid to the City of Anaheim, in an amount established by the City
Council Ordinance/Resolution at the issuance of a building permit. This
fee will be used to fund traffic and transportation improvements within the
area impacted by this project. Said fee shall be subject to adjustment by
the City Council.
Public Works,
Traffic Engineering
24 That unless proof of exemption is submitted in compliance with City
Council Resolution No. 89R-440, at the issuance of a building permit, the
appropriate major thoroughfare and bridge fee shall be paid to the City of
Anaheim in an amount as specified in the Major Thoroughfare and Bridge
Fee Program for the Foothill/Eastern Transportation Corridor, as
established by City Council resolution.
Public Works,
Traffic Engineering
25 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property
owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish
electrical service requirements and submit electric system plans, electrical
panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related technical drawings
and specifications.
Public Utilities,
Electrical Engineering
26 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to
the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with dimensions as shown
on the approved utility service plan.
Public Utilities,
Electrical Engineering
27 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall submit
payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees.
Public Utilities,
Electrical Engineering
28 Remove the 6 inch curb at the entrance of the man door at the trash
enclosure.
Public Works,
Streets and Sanitation
Division
- 11 - PC2019 -***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
29 Final landscape plans in compliance with all Code requirements shall be
submitted for review and approval by the Planning Director or his/her
designee. Landscaping shall be installed prior to the issuance of a
Certificate of Occupancy for the business and shall be maintained on an
on-going basis.
Planning & Building
Department,
Planning Services
30 A Shared Parking Agreement with the property at 5750 East La Palma
Avenue shall be submitted to the Planning Department, approved by the
City Attorney, and recorded at the Office of the County Recorder. A copy
of said agreement shall be filed with the Planning Department. The
agreement shall include provisions to ensure that a minimum of four off-
site parking spaces will be provided in perpetuity.
Planning & Building
Department,
Planning Services
OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS
31 Building shall be equipped with a comprehensive security alarm system
(silent or audible) for the following coverage areas:
Perimeter of building and access route protection.
High valued storage areas.
Robbery Panic Alarm at Cashier register(s)
Police Department
32 Complete a Burglary/Robbery Alarm Permit application, Form APD 516,
and return it to the Police Department prior to initial alarm activation. This
form is available at the Police Department front counter, or it can be
downloaded from the following web site:
http://www.anaheim.net/260/Alarm-Permits
Police Department
33 Rooftop address numbers for the police helicopter. Minimum size 4’ in
height and 2’ in width. The lines of the numbers are to be a minimum of
6” thick. Numbers should be spaced 12” to 18” apart. Numbers should be
painted or constructed in a contrasting color to the roofing material.
Numbers should face the street to which the structure is addressed.
Numbers are not to be visible from ground level.
Police Department
34 “No Trespassing 602(k) P.C.” posted at the entrances of parking
lots/structures and located in other appropriate places. Signs must be at
least 2’ x 1’ in overall size, with white background and black 2” lettering.
Police Department
35 All entrances to parking areas shall be posted with appropriate signs per
22658(a) C.V.C., to assist in removal of vehicles at the property
owners/managers request.
Police Department
- 12 - PC2019 -***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
36 Closed circuit television (CCTV) security camera system, with the
following coverage areas:
• Interior entrance to store
• Exterior entrance to store
• Parking areas
• Fuel pumps
• Cashier’s area
Police Department
37 If security cameras are not monitored, signs indicating so should be placed
at each camera.
Police Department
38 CCTV monitors and recorders should be secured in a separate locked
compartment to prevent theft of, or tampering with, the recording.
Police Department
39 With advances in technology, digital and wireless CCTV security systems
are readily available and highly recommended over older VHS or “Tape”
recording systems.
Police Department
40 CCTV recordings should be kept for a minimum of 30 days before being
deleted or recorded over.
Police Department
41 If used, CCTV videotapes should not be recorded over more than 10 items
per tape.
Police Department
42 Address numbers shall be positioned so as to be readily readable from the
street. Number should be illuminated during hours of darkness.
Police Department
43 Doors: All exterior doors to have adequate security hardware, e.g.
deadbolt locks.
Wide-angle peepholes or other viewing device should be installed in solid
doors where natural surveillance is compromised.
The locks shall be so constructed that both the deadbolt and deadlocking
latch can be retracted by a single action of the inside doorknob/lever/turn
piece.
Police Department
44 Monument signs and addresses shall be well lighted during hours of
darkness.
Police Department
45 Adequate lighting of parking lots, passageways, recesses, and grounds
contiguous to buildings shall be provided with lighting of sufficient
wattage to provide adequate illumination to make clearly visible the
presence of any person on or about the premises during the hours of
darkness and provide a safe, secure environment for all person, property,
and vehicles on-site.
Police Department
- 13 - PC2019 -***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
46 All exterior doors shall have their own light source, which shall adequately
illuminate door areas at all hours to make clearly visible the presence of
any person on or about the premises and provide adequate illumination for
persons exiting the building.
Police Department
47 Landscaping shall be of the type and situated in locations to maximize
observation while providing the desired degree of aesthetics. Security
planting materials are encouraged along fence and property lines and under
vulnerable windows.
Police Department
48 Trees should not be planted close enough to the structure to allow easy
access to the roof, or should be kept trimmed to make climbing difficult.
Police Department
49 Trash enclosures should not block visibility of doors or windows or be
located close enough to the structure to provide access to the roof.
Police Department
50 Minimum recommended lighting level in all parking lots is .5 foot-candle,
measured at the parking surface, with a maximum to minimum ratio no
greater than 15:1.
Police Department
51 Whenever possible, open fencing design, such as wrought iron or tubular
steel, should be utilized to maximize natural surveillance while enhancing
territorial reinforcement.
Police Department
52 The following installations should be considered:
Traffic bollards capable of stopping a moving vehicle shall be evenly
spaced the front of the convenience store between the structure and
parking area.
Locked cages, rooms, or safes (if any).
Police Department
PRIOR TO THE FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS
53 That fire lanes or no parking zones shall be posted with “No Parking Any
Time.” Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted
for building permits.
Public Works,
Development Services
54 All required Public Improvements shall be completed and operational and
submitted for approval to the Construction Services Division Inspector.
Public Works,
Development Services
55 All required WQMP improvements shall be operational and verified by the
Construction Services Division Inspector and the Development Services
Division.
Public Works,
Development Services
- 14 - PC2019 -***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
56 All remaining fees/deposits required by Public Works Department must
be paid in full.
Public Works,
Development Services
57 Curbs adjacent to the drive aisles shall be painted red to prohibit parallel
parking in the drive aisles. Red curb locations shall be clearly labeled on
building plans.
Public Works,
Traffic Engineering
58 Ongoing during project operation, refueling tanker trailers shall not block
any portion of the public right of way.
Public Works,
Traffic Engineering
59 Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly
on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property
line and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department
Water Engineering Division requirements.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
GENERAL
60 The following minimum clearances shall be provided around all new and
existing public water facilities (e.g. water mains, fire hydrants, service
laterals, meters, meter boxes, backflow devices, etc.):
10 feet from structures, footings, walls, stormwater BMPs,
power poles, street lights, and trees.
5 feet from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb returns, and all
other utilities (e.g. storm drain, gas, electric, etc.) or above
ground facilities.
Public Utilities Water
Engineering
61 No public water mains or laterals allowed under parking stalls or parking
lots.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
62 All fire services 2-inch and smaller shall be metered with a UL listed meter,
Hersey Residential Fire Meter with Translator Register, no equals.
Public Utilities,
Water Engineering
- 15 - PC2019 -***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
63 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its
officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to
individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims,
actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set
aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit
or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior
to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of
any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is
intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs
awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or
litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs,
liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such
proceeding.
Planning & Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
64 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing
of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the
final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project,
whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the
issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval
of this application.
Planning & Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
65 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and
specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which
plans are on file with the Planning Department.
Planning & Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
66 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46
“Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be
maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely
manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead.
Planning & Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
[DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 3
- 1 - PC2019-***
RESOLUTION NO. PC2019-***
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING PUBLIC
CONVENIENCE OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00144 TO PERMIT
A TYPE 20 (OFF SALE BEER AND WINE) ALCOHOLIC
BEVERAGE CONTROL LICENSE AND MAKING CERTAIN
FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH
(DEV2015-00116)
(5706 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE)
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (hereinafter referred to as
the “Planning Commission”) did receive a verified petition for Public Convenience or Necessity
No. 2019-00144 for a new “Type 20” Off-Sale Beer and Wine Alcoholic Beverage Control
(ABC) license to permit the sale of beer and wine for off-premise consumption within a
proposed service station convenience store (“Project”) for certain real property located at 5706
East La Palma Avenue, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as
generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this
reference (the “Property”); and
WHEREAS, Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2019-00144 is proposed in
conjunction with a request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05835 and Variance 2017-
05091, now pending, which together with the Project, shall be referred to herein collectively as
the “Proposed Project”; and
WHEREAS, the Property, consisting of approximately 0.43 acres, is vacant. The
Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for General Commercial land uses. The Property
is located within the “SP-2015-1” Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan, Development Area 5 (General
Commercial) Zone. As such, the Property is subject to the zoning and development standards
described in Chapter 18.120 (Anaheim Canyon Specific Plan No. 2015-1) of the Anaheim
Municipal Code (the "Code"); and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in
the City of Anaheim on April 1, 2019 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been
duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and
to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
“CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA
Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the
preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and
- 2 - PC2019-***
WHEREAS, this Planning Commission finds and determines that the effects of the
Proposed Project are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 32 – In-
Fill Development) which consists of in-fill projects that are consistent with applicable general
plan designation and all applicable general plan polices as well as with applicable zoning
designation and regulations, that the project occurs within city limits on a project site of no more
than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, the project site has no value as habitat for
endangered, rare or threatened species, the project will not result in any significant effects
relating to traffic, noise, air quality or water quality, and the site can be adequately served by all
required utilities and public service; and that, therefore, pursuant to Section 15303 of the CEQA
Guidelines, the Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study
made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at
said hearing with respect to the request for a Determination of Public Convenience or Necessity
No. 2019-00144, does find and determine the following facts:
1. On July 11, 1995, the City Council adopted Resolution No. 95R-134
establishing procedures and delegating certain responsibilities to the Planning Commission
relating to the determination of "Public Convenience or Necessity" on those certain applications
requiring that such determination be made by the local governing body pursuant to applicable
provisions of the Business and Professions Code, and prior to the issuance of a license by the
Department of Alcoholic Beverage Control ("ABC").
2. Section 23958 of the Business and Professions Code provides that the ABC
shall deny an application for a license if issuance of that license would tend to create a law
enforcement problem, or if issuance would result in or add to an "undue concentration" of
licenses, except when an applicant has demonstrated that "public convenience or necessity"
would be served by the issuance of a license. For purposes of Section 23958.4, "undue
concentration" means the case in which the Property is located in an area where any of the
following conditions exist:
(a) The Property is located in a crime reporting district that has below the
number of reported crimes than the average number of “reported
crimes” (as defined in Section 23958.4), as determined from all crime
reporting districts within the City of Anaheim.
(b) As to on-sale retail license applications, the ratio of on-sale retail
licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the
Property is located is below the ratio of on-sale retail licenses to
population in the county in which the applicant premises are located.
(c) As to off-sale retail license applications, the ratio of off-sale retail
licenses to population in the census tract or census division in which the
Property is located exceeds the ratio of off-sale retail licenses to
population in the county.
- 3 - PC2019-***
3. Notwithstanding the existence of the above-referenced conditions, ABC may
issue a license if the Planning Commission determines that the "public convenience or necessity"
would be served by the issuance.
4. Resolution No. 95R-134 authorizes the City of Anaheim Police Department to
make recommendations related to "public convenience or necessity" determinations; and, when
the sale of alcoholic beverages for off-premises consumption is permitted by the Code, said
recommendations shall take the form of conditions of approval to be imposed on the
determination in order to ensure that the sale and consumption of alcoholic beverages does not
adversely affect any adjoining land use or the growth and development of the surrounding area.
5. The Property is located within Census Tract No. 218.07 with a population of
4,131 that allows for two off-sale ABC licenses. There are presently two off-sale ABC licenses
in the tract. The Property is located in Police Reporting District No. 1239, which has a crime
rate that is below the City-wide average. The Police Department evaluates these requests based
on the crime rate within a one-quarter mile radius of the Property for the subject site. The crime
rate within ¼ mile of this Property is forty-eight percent above the City-wide average based upon
calls for service. Since there would be an overconcentration of off-sale licenses in the census
tract (inclusive of the proposed license) and the crime rate is above the city-wide average, a
determination of "public convenience or necessity" is required for this ABC license request.
6. The request to permit beer and wine sales for off-premises consumption in
conjunction with a convenience store would not adversely affect the surrounding land uses and
the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located because the
Proposed Project is compatible with the nearby commercial developments and is intended to
serve the area residents, businesses, and customers visiting the establishment to purchase fuel;
and
7. The determination of "Public Convenience or Necessity" can be made based on
the finding that the license requested is consistent with the Planning Commission guideline for
such determinations and further that the granting of the determination of Public Convenience or
Necessity, under the conditions imposed, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim
and;
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record
constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this
Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the
record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report
and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts,
that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly
declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due
consideration of all evidence presented to it.
- 4 - PC2019-***
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby
approve Public Convenience or Necessity No. 2019-00144, contingent upon and subject to (i)
approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2015-05835 and Variance No. 2017-05091, now
pending, and (ii) the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and
incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to
the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the
citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval
may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with
conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause
provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the
condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has
demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of this
permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit
Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part
thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent
jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and
void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of
the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable
City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to
compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or
requirement.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
April 1, 2019. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be
replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 5 - PC2019-***
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do
hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 1, 2019, by the following vote of the members
thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS:
NOES: COMMISSIONERS:
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS:
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 1st day of April, 2019.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
- 6 - PC2019-***
- 7 - PC2019-***
EXHIBIT “B”
DETERMINATION OF PUBLIC CONVENIENCE
OR NECESSITY NO. 2019-00144
(DEV2015-00116)
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
OPERATIONAL CONDITIONS
1 No display of alcoholic beverages shall be located outside of a
building or within five (5) feet of any public entrance to the building.
Police Department
2 The cashier register closest to the entrance doors shall be always be
functional and operational by employees, especially if there is only
one cashier on duty.
Police Department
3 The Applicant shall install and maintain television screens and
cameras so that all cashiers will have adequate visibility of the
convenience store entrance.
Police Department
4 There shall be no exterior advertising or sign of any kind or type,
including advertising directed to the exterior from within, promoting
or indicating the availability of alcoholic beverages. Interior displays
of alcoholic beverages or signs which are clearly visible to the exterior
shall constitute a violation of this condition.
Police Department
5 The area of alcoholic beverage displays shall not exceed 25% of the
total display area in a building.
Police Department
6 Sales of alcoholic beverages shall be made to customers only when
the customer is in the building.
Police Department
7 The possession of alcoholic beverages in open containers and the
consumption of alcoholic beverages are prohibited on or around these
premises.
Police Department
8 Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent
area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over
within 24 hours of being applied.
Police Department
9 Petitioner(s) shall police the area under their control in an effort to
prevent the loitering of persons around the premises.
Police Department
10 There shall be no amusement machines or video game devices
maintained upon the premises at any time.
Police Department
- 8 - PC2019-***
NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE
DEPARTMENT
11 The petitioner(s) shall be responsible for maintaining free of litter the
area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, as
depicted.
Police Department
12 Managers/Owners need to call the Department of Alcoholic Beverage
Control and obtain LEAD (Licensee Education on Alcohol and Drugs
Program) Training for themselves and register employees. The
contact number is 714-558-4101.
Police Department
13 The parking lot of the premises shall be equipped with lighting of
sufficient power to illuminate and make easily discernible the
appearance and conduct of all persons on or about the parking lot.
Additionally, the position of such lighting shall not disturb the normal
privacy and use of any neighboring residences.
Police Department
GENERAL CONDITIONS
14 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the
processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the
issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building
permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all
charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or
may result in the revocation of the approval of this application.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
15 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City
and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred
to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all
claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack,
review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees
concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or
determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to
determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition
attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to
include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded
against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or
litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs,
liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with
such proceeding.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
16 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with
plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the
applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department
and as conditioned herein.
Planning and Building
Department,
Planning Services
Division
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
6
M
P
D
C
A
N
O
P
Y
3
,
4
9
9
S
.
F
.
1
3
2
4
7
8
5
6
1
1
1
2
9
1
0
T
R
A
S
H
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
1
0
1
S
.
F
.
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
M
S
B
CP
I
4
7
"
P
A
N
E
L
SE
C
T
I
O
N
1
CP
I
4
7
"
P
A
N
E
L
SE
C
T
I
O
N
2
SE
E
D
S
N
U
T
S
SE
E
D
S
N
U
T
S
SA
L
T
Y
S
N
A
C
K
S
SA
L
T
Y
S
N
A
C
K
S
-2-1BE
E
R
20
BE
E
R
19
BE
E
R
18
BE
E
R
17
-16
-15
-14
-13
-12
-11
-10
-9
-8
-7
-6
-5
BE
E
R
21
18
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
18
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
18
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
18
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
18
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
18
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
18
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
WA
L
K
-
I
N
CO
O
L
E
R
WA
L
K
-
I
N
FR
E
E
Z
E
R
EL
E
V
A
T
O
R
PR
E
P
A
R
E
A
-
2
4
-
-
3
1 -
B
R
E
A
K
F
A
S
T
/
C
O
N
D
I
M
E
N
T
S
P
A
P
E
R
/
P
E
T
/
C
L
E
A
N
I
N
G
H
E
A
T
&
E
A
T
P
A
P
E
R
/
P
E
T
/
C
L
E
A
N
I
N
G
P
A
P
E
R
/
P
E
T
/
C
L
E
A
N
I
N
G
10
'
I
C
E
T
A
B
L
E
B
R
E
A
K
F
A
S
T
/
C
O
N
D
I
M
E
N
T
S
(3
)
3
H
E
A
D
I
C
E
E
6
'
X
4
'
B
A
R
OV
E
N
18
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
PA
S
S
T
H
R
U
SA
L
E
S
A
R
E
A
IC
E
M
A
K
E
R
T
H
E
A
T
E
R
C
A
N
D
Y
K
I
N
G
H
E
N
R
Y
C
A
N
D
Y
T
A
K
E
H
O
M
E
8'
-
6
"
C
I
G
A
R
E
T
T
E
S
E
N
E
R
G
Y
B
A
R
S
W
A
T
E
R
G
A
L
L
O
N
S
M
E
A
T
S
N
A
C
K
S
C
O
O
K
I
E
/
C
R
A
C
K
E
R
C
A
N
D
Y
T
A
K
E
H
O
M
E
T
H
E
A
T
E
R
C
A
N
D
Y
K
I
N
G
H
E
N
R
Y
C
A
N
D
Y
T
A
K
E
H
O
M
E
C
A
N
D
Y
T
A
K
E
H
O
M
E
A
U
T
O
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
M
E
R
C
H
A
U
T
O
H
B
A
G
U
M
/
M
I
N
T
S
T
A
K
E
H
O
M
E
2'
-
0
"
O
T
P
HO
T
D
O
G
RO
L
L
E
R
BU
N
WA
R
M
E
R
CA
S
H
I
E
R
32
F
L
A
V
'
R
F
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
O
A
T
M
E
A
L
CA
P
P
U
C
C
I
N
O
IC
E
D
L
A
T
T
E
LA
T
T
E
TE
A
HO
T
HO
T
HO
T
IM
P
U
L
S
E
HO
T
DI
S
P
L
A
Y
CO
N
D
I
M
E
N
T
C
O
N
D
I
M
E
N
T
CH
I
P
S
NA
C
H
O
IC
E
D
C
U
P
M
I
R
C
O
W
A
V
E
4'
O
P
E
N
A
I
R
CO
O
L
E
D
D
E
L
I
CA
S
E
HA
T
C
O
H
O
T
DI
S
P
L
A
Y
PR
E
P
T
A
B
L
E
LO
C
K
E
R
S
2-
D
O
O
R
R
E
A
C
H
IN
F
R
E
E
Z
E
R
IM
P
U
L
S
E
HO
T
DI
S
P
L
A
Y
UN
I
S
E
X
SE
E
D
S
N
U
T
S
SA
L
T
Y
S
N
A
C
K
S
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
PR
O
P
O
S
E
D
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
BE
E
R
C
O
O
L
E
R
S
(
M
A
X
I
M
U
M
5
P
E
R
2
5
%
O
F
T
H
E
2
1
T
O
T
A
L
)
C0
2
UN
I
S
E
X
P
R
O
P
O
S
E
D
C
-
S
T
O
R
E
2
,
4
5
8
S
.
F
.
(
T
W
O
S
T
O
R
Y
)
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
L
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
A
S
1
C
O
N
C
E
P
T
U
A
L
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
S
C
A
L
E
:
1
'
=
1
0
'
-
0
"
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
:
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
:
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
T
Y
P
E
:
O
C
C
U
P
A
N
C
Y
:
A
.
P
.
N
.
:
C
O
U
N
T
Y
:
O
R
A
N
G
E
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
L
A
N
D
U
S
E
:
V
A
C
A
N
T
H
O
U
R
S
O
F
O
P
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
:
2
4
H
O
U
R
S
1
8
,
9
1
0
S
.
F
.
(
.
4
3
A
C
R
E
S
)
L
O
T
S
I
Z
E
:
G
H
G
H
A
H
E
M
P
I
R
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
G
R
O
U
P
I
n
c
.
5706 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE
ANAHEIM, CA 92807
ARCO FAC # 42868
A
R
C
O
DEV2015-00116
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
Z
O
N
E
:
C
O
M
M
E
R
C
I
A
L
L
O
T
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
:
P
A
R
C
E
L
1
O
F
P
A
R
C
E
L
M
A
P
,
I
N
T
H
E
C
I
T
Y
O
F
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
,
C
O
U
N
T
Y
O
F
O
R
A
N
G
E
,
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
,
A
S
P
E
R
M
A
P
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
D
I
N
B
O
O
K
4
0
,
P
A
G
E
3
9
O
F
P
A
R
C
E
L
M
A
P
S
,
I
N
T
H
E
O
F
F
I
C
E
O
F
T
H
E
C
O
U
N
T
Y
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
R
O
F
S
A
I
D
C
O
U
N
T
Y
.
E
X
C
E
P
T
T
H
E
R
E
F
R
O
M
T
H
A
T
P
O
R
T
I
O
N
O
F
S
A
I
D
L
A
N
D
C
O
N
V
E
Y
E
D
T
O
T
H
E
S
T
A
T
E
O
F
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
A
S
S
E
T
F
O
R
T
H
A
N
D
D
E
S
C
R
I
B
E
D
I
N
T
H
A
T
C
E
R
T
A
I
N
D
O
C
U
M
E
N
T
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
D
J
U
N
E
2
5
,
2
0
1
3
A
S
I
N
S
T
R
U
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
2
0
1
3
0
0
0
3
8
3
4
1
3
O
F
O
F
F
I
C
I
A
L
R
E
C
O
R
D
S
.
5
7
0
0
E
A
S
T
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
,
C
A
9
2
8
0
7
3
4
9
-
0
8
1
-
6
8
C
O
N
V
E
N
I
E
N
C
E
S
T
O
R
E
:
2
,
4
5
8
S
.
F
.
(
1
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
)
A
T
T
I
C
S
P
A
C
E
:
1
,
7
6
8
S
.
F
.
(
2
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
)
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
S
P
A
C
E
:
4
0
6
S
.
F
.
(
2
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
)
S
T
A
I
R
C
A
S
E
:
1
0
4
S
.
F
.
(
2
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
)
E
L
E
V
A
T
O
R
S
P
A
C
E
:
6
3
S
.
F
.
(
2
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
)
T
O
T
A
L
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
:
4
,
7
9
9
S
.
F
.
(
1
S
T
&
2
N
D
)
C
A
N
O
P
Y
:
3
,
4
9
9
S
.
F
.
T
R
A
S
H
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
:
1
0
1
S
.
F
.
C
O
N
V
E
N
I
E
N
C
E
S
T
O
R
E
:
V
-
B
/
S
P
R
I
N
K
L
E
R
E
D
C
A
N
O
P
Y
:
T
Y
P
E
3
T
R
A
S
H
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
:
T
Y
P
E
3
C
O
N
V
E
N
I
E
N
C
E
S
T
O
R
E
:
B
C
A
N
O
P
Y
:
S
1
T
R
A
S
H
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
:
S
1
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
:
6
,
0
5
8
S
.
F
.
3
2
%
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
A
R
E
A
:
1
,
8
3
1
S
.
F
.
1
0
%
I
M
P
E
R
V
I
O
U
S
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
:
1
1
,
0
2
1
S
.
F
.
5
8
%
T
O
T
A
L
S
I
T
E
A
R
E
A
:
1
8
,
9
1
0
S
.
F
.
1
0
0
%
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
:
1
S
T
F
L
O
O
R
:
2
,
4
5
8
S
.
F
.
(
1
0
0
0
/
4
S
.
F
.
)
=
1
0
S
P
A
C
E
S
2
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
:
2
,
3
4
1
S
.
F
.
(
1
0
0
0
/
1
.
5
5
S
.
F
.
)
=
4
S
P
A
C
E
S
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
S
P
A
C
E
S
=
1
4
S
P
A
C
E
S
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
S
P
A
C
E
=
6
O
N
S
I
T
E
S
P
A
C
E
S
(
I
N
C
L
U
D
I
N
G
1
H
.
C
.
)
6
C
A
N
O
P
Y
S
P
A
C
E
S
4
O
F
F
S
I
T
E
S
P
A
C
E
S
1
6
S
P
A
C
E
S
T
O
T
A
L
S
I
T
E
D
A
T
A
L
E
G
A
L
D
E
S
C
R
I
P
T
I
O
N
V
I
C
I
N
I
T
Y
M
A
P
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
S
E
W
E
R
A
N
D
S
T
O
R
M
D
R
A
I
N
:
P
U
B
L
I
C
W
O
R
K
S
O
P
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
S
(
7
1
4
)
7
6
5
-
6
8
6
0
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
A
N
D
W
A
T
E
R
:
A
N
A
H
E
I
M
P
U
B
L
I
C
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
(
7
1
4
)
7
6
5
-
3
3
0
0
G
A
S
:
S
O
U
T
H
E
R
N
C
A
L
I
F
O
R
N
I
A
G
A
S
C
O
M
P
A
N
Y
(
8
0
0
)
4
2
7
-
2
2
0
0
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
/
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
S
R
E
P
.
E
M
P
I
R
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
G
R
O
U
P
,
I
N
C
.
P
O
B
O
X
9
4
4
M
U
R
R
I
E
T
A
,
C
A
9
2
5
6
4
P
H
O
N
E
:
(
9
5
1
)
6
9
6
-
1
4
9
0
F
A
X
:
(
9
5
1
)
6
9
6
-
1
4
4
3
C
E
L
L
P
H
O
N
E
:
(
9
5
1
)
8
0
9
-
7
6
0
1
E
-
M
A
I
L
:
g
h
a
n
n
@
e
m
p
i
r
e
g
r
.
b
i
z
C
O
N
T
A
C
T
:
G
R
E
G
O
R
Y
H
A
N
N
,
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
P
R
O
J
E
C
T
O
W
N
E
R
/
A
P
P
L
I
C
A
N
T
I
S
A
A
.
B
A
H
U
2
3
7
6
0
T
E
M
E
S
C
A
L
C
A
N
Y
O
N
R
O
A
D
C
O
R
O
N
A
,
C
A
9
2
8
8
3
P
H
O
N
E
:
(
7
1
4
)
6
0
9
-
9
6
6
9
O
F
F
I
C
E
:
(
9
5
1
)
2
7
7
-
1
6
5
2
E
-
M
A
I
L
:
t
h
e
g
a
s
k
i
n
g
@
c
a
.
r
r
.
c
o
m
P
H
Y
S
I
C
A
L
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
:
2
4
8
6
1
W
A
S
H
I
N
G
T
O
N
A
V
E
.
M
U
R
R
I
E
T
A
,
C
A
9
2
5
6
2
S
C
O
P
E
O
F
W
O
R
K
1
.
N
E
W
T
O
I
N
D
U
S
T
R
Y
4
,
7
9
9
S
.
F
.
T
W
O
S
T
O
R
Y
U
N
B
R
A
N
D
E
D
C
O
N
V
E
N
I
E
N
C
E
S
T
O
R
E
.
2
.
N
E
W
T
O
I
N
D
U
S
T
R
Y
3
,
4
9
9
S
.
F
.
6
M
P
D
C
A
N
O
P
Y
W
I
T
H
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
D
U
N
D
E
R
G
R
O
U
N
D
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
T
A
N
K
S
,
H
E
A
L
Y
T
A
N
K
,
A
N
D
V
E
N
T
R
I
S
E
R
S
.
3
.
N
E
W
S
I
T
E
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
,
W
Q
M
P
,
U
T
I
L
I
T
I
E
S
,
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
,
H
A
R
D
S
C
A
P
E
,
A
N
D
1
0
1
S
.
F
.
T
R
A
S
H
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
.
I
N
D
E
X
O
F
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
L
A
S
1
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
U
R
A
L
S
I
T
E
P
L
A
N
/
C
O
V
E
R
S
H
E
E
T
A
1
.
0
C
-
S
T
O
R
E
1
S
T
A
N
D
2
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
A
1
.
1
C
-
S
T
O
R
E
R
O
O
F
P
L
A
N
A
2
.
0
C
-
S
T
O
R
E
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
2
.
1
C
-
S
T
O
R
E
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
A
3
.
0
C
-
S
T
O
R
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
C
A
1
.
0
C
A
N
O
P
Y
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
C
A
2
.
0
C
A
N
O
P
Y
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
T
E
2
.
0
T
R
A
S
H
E
N
C
L
O
S
U
R
E
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
A
N
D
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
C
I
V
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
1
T
I
T
L
E
S
H
E
E
T
S
H
E
E
T
2
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
P
L
A
N
S
H
E
E
T
3
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
G
R
A
D
I
N
G
P
L
A
N
S
H
E
E
T
4
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
H
E
E
T
5
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
S
H
E
E
T
6
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
H
E
E
T
L
A
N
D
S
C
A
P
E
L
-
1
P
R
E
L
I
M
I
N
A
R
Y
P
L
A
N
T
I
N
G
P
L
A
N
P
H
O
T
O
M
E
T
R
I
C
S
H
E
E
T
1
S
I
T
E
P
H
O
T
O
M
E
T
R
I
C
P
L
A
N
S
I
T
E
3
2
3
3
2
4
2
2
2
4
4
4
4
5
A
T
T
A
C
H
M
E
N
T
N
O
.
4
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
1848
5 TIER
1848
5 TIER
ELECTRICAL MSB
C
P
I
4
7
"
P
A
N
E
L
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
1
C
P
I
4
7
"
P
A
N
E
L
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
2
SEEDS NUTSSEEDS NUTSSALTY SNACKSSALTY SNACKS-2 -1 BEER 20 BEER 19 BEER 18 BEER 17 -16-15-14-13-12-11-10-9-8-7-6
-
5
BEER 21 1848 5 TIER18485 TIER18485 TIER18485 TIER 1848 5 TIER18485 TIER18485 TIER18485 TIERWALK-INCOOLERWALK-INFREEZER
E
L
E
V
A
T
O
R
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
A
-
2
4
-
-
3
1
-
BREAKFAST /
CONDIMENTS
PAPER / PET /
CLEANING
HEAT & EAT
PAPER / PET /
CLEANING
PAPER / PET /
CLEANING
1
0
'
I
C
E
T
A
B
L
E
BREAKFAST /
CONDIMENTS
(
3
)
3
H
E
A
D
I
C
E
E
6' X 4' BAR
O
V
E
N
1848 5 TIER
P
A
S
S
T
H
R
U
S
A
L
E
S
A
R
E
A
I
C
E
M
A
K
E
R
THEATERCANDYKING HENRYCANDYTAKE HOME8'-6" CIGARETTES ENERGY BARSWATERGALLONSMEATSNACKSCOOKIE /CRACKER CANDYTAKE HOME
THEATER
CANDY
KING HENRY
CANDY
TAKE HOME
CANDY
TAKE HOME
AUTOGENERALMERCHAUTOHBAGUM / MINTSTAKE HOME2'-0" OTP HOT DOGROLLERBUNWARMERCASHIER
3
2
F
L
A
V
'
R
F
O
U
N
T
A
I
N
OATMEAL
C
A
P
P
U
C
C
I
N
O
I
C
E
D
L
A
T
T
E
L
A
T
T
E
T
E
A
H
O
T
H
O
T
H
O
T
I
M
P
U
L
S
E
H
O
T
D
I
S
P
L
A
Y
C
O
N
D
I
M
E
N
T
CONDIMENT
C
H
I
P
S
N
A
C
H
O
I
C
E
D
C
U
P
MIRCOWAVE
4
'
O
P
E
N
A
I
R
C
O
O
L
E
D
D
E
L
I
C
A
S
E
H
A
T
C
O
H
O
T
D
I
S
P
L
A
Y
P
R
E
P
T
A
B
L
E
L
O
C
K
E
R
S
2
-
D
O
O
R
R
E
A
C
H
I
N
F
R
E
E
Z
E
R
IMPULSEHOTDISPLAY
U
N
I
S
E
X
SEEDS NUTSSALTY SNACKS18485 TIER PROPOSED LOCATION OFBEER COOLERS (MAXIMUM5 PER 25% OF THE 21 TOTAL)
C
0
2
U
N
I
S
E
X
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
E
L
E
V
A
T
O
R
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
ATTIC SPACE
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
B
A
G
I
N
B
O
X
B
A
G
I
N
B
O
X
B
A
G
I
N
B
O
X
R
E
S
T
R
O
O
M
R
O
O
F
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
1
8
4
8
5
T
I
E
R
N
O
N
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
E
D
E
L
E
C
T
R
I
C
A
L
R
O
O
M
29'-6"
15'-5"14'-1"
75'-
1
0
"
A3.0 1
A
3
.
0
1
A3.0 1
A
3
.
0
1
3A3.03A3.03A3.03A3.0
C
A
2
.
2
DA 2.1AA 2.0
B
A
2
.
1
C
A
2
.
2
DA 2.1
A
A
2
.
0
B
A
2
.
1
6
8
2
'
-
7
"
1
3
'
-
1
1
"
9
6
'
-
6
"
5'-5"
5
'
-
0
"
C
O
N
C
E
P
T
U
A
L
C
-
S
T
O
R
E
F
I
R
S
T
&
S
E
C
O
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
S
A
1
.
0
A
.
D
I
M
E
N
S
I
O
N
L
I
N
E
S
A
R
E
F
R
O
M
F
A
C
E
O
F
F
R
A
M
I
N
G
O
R
F
O
U
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
U
N
L
E
S
S
N
O
T
E
D
O
T
H
E
R
W
I
S
E
.
B
.
T
H
E
E
N
T
I
R
E
S
E
C
O
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
U
T
I
L
I
Z
E
D
,
I
N
P
E
R
P
E
T
U
I
T
Y
,
A
S
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
.
T
H
E
E
N
T
I
R
E
S
E
C
O
N
D
F
L
O
O
R
S
H
A
L
L
N
E
V
E
R
B
E
U
T
I
L
I
Z
E
D
A
S
R
E
T
A
I
L
O
R
O
F
F
I
C
E
S
P
A
C
E
.
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLANSCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN
W
A
L
L
L
E
D
G
E
D
:
P
R
E
F
A
B
R
I
C
A
T
E
D
C
O
O
L
E
R
U
N
I
T
2
X
6
I
N
S
U
L
A
T
E
D
W
O
O
D
F
R
A
M
E
D
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
L
2
X
4
I
N
S
U
L
A
T
E
D
W
O
O
D
F
R
A
M
E
D
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
L
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
N
O
T
E
S
:
G
H
G
H
A
H
E
M
P
I
R
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
G
R
O
U
P
I
n
c
.
5706 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE
ANAHEIM, CA 92807
ARCO FAC # 42868
A
R
C
O
DEV2015-00116
2
A
.
N
O
D
I
S
P
L
A
Y
O
F
A
L
C
O
H
O
L
I
C
B
E
V
E
R
A
G
E
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
L
O
C
A
T
E
D
O
U
T
S
I
D
E
O
F
A
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
O
R
W
I
T
H
I
N
F
I
V
E
(
5
)
F
E
E
T
O
F
A
N
Y
P
U
B
L
I
C
E
N
T
R
A
N
C
E
T
O
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
.
B
.
T
H
E
R
E
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
N
O
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
A
D
V
E
R
T
I
S
I
N
G
O
R
S
I
G
N
O
F
A
N
Y
K
I
N
D
O
R
T
Y
P
E
,
I
N
C
L
U
D
I
N
G
A
D
V
E
R
T
I
S
I
N
G
D
I
R
E
C
T
E
D
T
O
T
H
E
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
F
R
O
M
W
I
T
H
I
N
,
P
R
O
M
O
T
I
N
G
O
R
I
N
D
I
C
A
T
I
N
G
T
H
E
A
V
A
I
L
A
B
I
L
I
T
Y
O
F
A
L
C
O
H
O
L
I
C
B
E
V
E
R
A
G
E
S
.
I
N
T
E
R
I
O
R
D
I
S
P
L
A
Y
S
O
F
A
L
C
O
H
O
L
I
C
B
E
V
E
R
A
G
E
S
O
R
S
I
G
N
S
W
H
I
C
H
A
R
E
C
L
E
A
R
L
Y
V
I
S
I
B
L
E
T
O
T
H
E
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
S
H
A
L
L
C
O
N
S
T
I
T
U
T
E
A
V
I
O
L
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
T
H
I
S
C
O
N
D
I
T
I
O
N
.
C
.
T
H
E
A
R
E
A
O
F
A
L
C
O
H
O
L
I
C
B
E
V
E
R
A
G
E
D
I
S
P
L
A
Y
S
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
E
X
C
E
E
D
2
5
%
O
F
T
H
E
T
O
T
A
L
D
I
S
P
L
A
Y
A
R
E
A
I
N
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
.
D
.
S
A
L
E
S
O
F
A
L
C
O
H
O
L
I
C
B
E
V
E
R
A
G
E
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
M
A
D
E
T
O
C
U
S
T
O
M
E
R
S
O
N
L
Y
W
H
E
N
T
H
E
C
U
S
T
O
M
E
R
I
S
I
N
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
.
E
.
T
H
E
P
O
S
S
E
S
S
I
O
N
O
F
A
L
C
O
H
O
L
I
C
B
E
V
E
R
A
G
E
S
I
N
O
P
E
N
C
O
N
T
A
I
N
E
R
S
A
N
D
T
H
E
C
O
N
S
U
M
P
T
I
O
N
O
F
A
L
C
O
H
O
L
I
C
B
E
V
E
R
A
G
E
S
A
R
E
P
R
O
H
I
B
I
T
E
D
O
N
O
R
A
R
O
U
N
D
T
H
E
S
E
P
R
E
M
I
S
E
S
.
F
.
A
N
Y
G
R
A
F
F
I
T
I
P
A
I
N
T
E
D
O
R
M
A
R
K
E
D
U
P
O
N
T
H
E
P
R
E
M
I
S
E
S
O
R
O
N
A
N
Y
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
T
A
R
E
A
U
N
D
E
R
T
H
E
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
O
F
T
H
E
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
E
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
R
E
M
O
V
E
D
O
R
P
A
I
N
T
E
D
O
V
E
R
W
I
T
H
I
N
2
4
H
O
U
R
S
O
F
B
E
I
N
G
A
P
P
L
I
E
D
.
G
.
P
E
T
I
O
R
N
E
R
(
S
)
S
H
A
L
L
P
O
L
I
C
E
T
H
E
A
R
E
A
U
N
D
E
R
T
H
E
I
R
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
I
N
A
N
E
F
F
O
R
T
T
O
P
R
E
V
E
N
T
T
H
E
L
O
I
T
E
R
I
N
G
O
F
P
E
R
S
O
N
S
A
R
O
U
N
D
T
H
E
P
R
E
M
I
S
E
S
.
H
.
T
H
E
R
E
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
N
O
A
M
U
S
E
M
E
N
T
M
A
C
H
I
N
E
S
O
R
V
I
D
E
O
G
A
M
E
D
E
V
I
C
E
S
M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
E
D
U
P
O
N
T
H
E
P
R
E
M
I
S
E
S
A
T
A
N
Y
T
I
M
E
.
I
.
T
H
E
P
E
T
I
T
I
O
N
E
R
(
S
)
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
R
E
S
P
O
N
S
I
B
L
E
F
O
R
M
A
I
N
T
A
I
N
I
N
G
F
R
E
E
O
F
L
I
T
T
E
R
T
H
E
A
R
E
A
A
D
J
A
C
E
N
T
T
O
T
H
E
P
R
E
M
I
S
E
S
O
V
E
R
W
H
I
C
H
T
H
E
Y
H
A
V
E
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
,
A
S
D
E
P
I
C
T
E
D
.
J
.
M
A
N
A
G
E
R
S
/
O
W
N
E
R
S
N
E
E
D
T
O
C
A
L
L
T
H
E
D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
O
F
A
L
C
O
H
O
L
I
C
B
E
V
E
R
A
G
E
C
O
N
T
R
O
L
A
N
D
O
B
T
A
I
N
L
E
A
D
(
L
I
C
E
N
S
E
E
E
D
U
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
N
A
L
C
O
H
O
L
A
N
D
D
R
U
G
S
P
R
O
G
R
A
M
)
T
R
A
I
N
I
N
G
F
O
R
T
H
E
M
S
E
L
V
E
S
A
N
D
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
E
M
P
L
O
Y
E
E
S
.
T
H
E
C
O
N
T
A
C
T
N
U
M
B
E
R
I
S
7
1
4
-
5
5
8
-
4
1
0
1
.
K
.
T
H
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
O
F
T
H
E
P
R
E
M
I
S
E
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
E
Q
U
I
P
P
E
D
W
I
T
H
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
O
F
S
U
F
F
I
C
I
E
N
T
P
O
W
E
R
T
O
I
L
L
U
M
I
N
A
T
E
A
N
D
M
A
K
E
E
A
S
I
L
Y
D
I
S
C
E
R
N
I
B
L
E
T
H
E
A
P
P
E
A
R
A
N
C
E
A
N
D
C
O
N
D
U
C
T
O
F
A
L
L
P
E
R
S
O
N
S
O
N
O
R
A
B
O
U
T
T
H
E
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
.
A
D
D
I
T
I
O
N
A
L
L
Y
,
T
H
E
P
O
S
I
T
I
O
N
O
F
S
U
C
H
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
S
H
A
L
L
N
O
T
D
I
S
T
U
R
B
T
H
E
N
O
R
M
A
L
P
R
I
V
A
C
Y
A
N
D
U
S
E
O
F
A
N
Y
N
E
I
G
H
B
O
R
I
N
G
R
E
S
I
D
E
N
C
E
S
.
C
.
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
E
Q
U
I
P
P
E
D
W
I
T
H
A
C
O
M
P
R
E
H
E
N
S
I
V
E
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
Y
A
L
A
R
M
S
Y
S
T
E
M
(
S
I
L
E
N
T
O
R
A
U
D
I
B
L
E
)
F
O
R
T
H
E
F
O
L
L
O
W
I
N
G
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
A
R
E
A
S
:
P
E
R
I
M
E
T
E
R
O
F
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
N
D
A
C
C
E
S
S
R
O
U
T
E
P
R
O
T
E
C
T
I
O
N
.
H
I
G
H
V
A
L
U
E
D
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
A
R
E
A
S
.
R
O
B
B
E
R
Y
P
A
N
I
C
A
L
A
R
M
A
T
C
A
S
H
I
E
R
R
E
G
I
S
T
E
R
(
S
)
.
D
.
C
L
O
S
E
D
C
I
R
C
U
I
T
T
E
L
E
V
I
S
I
O
N
(
C
C
T
V
)
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
Y
C
A
M
E
R
A
S
Y
S
T
E
M
,
W
I
T
H
T
H
E
F
O
L
L
O
W
I
N
G
C
O
V
E
R
A
G
E
A
R
E
A
S
:
I
N
F
E
R
I
O
R
E
N
T
R
A
N
C
E
T
O
S
T
O
R
E
.
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
E
N
T
R
A
N
C
E
T
O
S
T
O
R
E
.
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
A
R
E
A
S
.
F
U
E
L
P
U
M
P
S
.
C
A
S
H
I
E
R
'
S
A
R
E
A
.
E
.
I
F
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
Y
C
A
M
E
R
A
S
A
R
E
N
O
T
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
E
D
,
S
I
G
N
S
I
N
D
I
C
A
T
I
N
G
S
O
S
H
O
U
L
D
B
E
P
L
A
C
E
D
A
T
E
A
C
H
C
A
M
E
R
A
.
F
.
C
C
T
V
M
O
N
I
T
O
R
S
A
N
D
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
R
S
S
H
O
U
L
D
B
E
S
E
C
U
R
E
D
I
N
A
S
E
P
A
R
A
T
E
L
O
C
K
E
D
C
O
M
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
T
O
P
R
E
V
E
N
T
T
H
E
F
T
O
F
,
O
R
T
A
M
P
E
R
I
N
G
W
I
T
H
,
T
H
E
R
E
C
O
D
I
N
G
.
G
.
W
I
T
H
A
D
V
A
N
C
E
S
I
N
T
E
C
H
N
O
L
O
G
Y
,
D
I
G
I
T
A
L
A
N
D
W
I
R
E
L
E
S
S
C
C
T
V
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
Y
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
A
R
E
R
E
A
D
I
L
Y
A
V
A
I
L
A
B
L
E
A
N
D
H
I
G
H
L
Y
R
E
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
E
D
O
V
E
R
H
O
L
D
E
R
V
H
S
O
R
"
T
A
P
E
"
R
E
C
O
R
D
I
N
G
S
Y
S
T
E
M
S
.
H
.
C
C
T
V
R
E
C
O
R
D
I
N
G
S
S
H
O
U
L
D
B
E
K
E
P
T
F
O
R
A
M
I
N
I
M
U
M
O
F
3
0
D
A
Y
S
B
E
F
O
R
E
B
E
I
N
G
D
E
L
E
T
E
D
O
R
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
D
O
V
E
R
.
I
.
I
F
U
S
E
D
,
C
C
T
V
V
I
D
E
O
T
A
P
E
S
S
H
O
U
L
D
N
O
T
B
E
R
E
C
O
R
D
E
D
O
V
E
R
M
O
R
E
T
H
A
N
1
0
I
T
E
M
S
P
E
R
T
A
P
E
.
J
.
A
L
L
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
D
O
O
R
S
T
O
H
A
V
E
A
D
E
Q
U
A
T
E
S
E
C
U
R
I
T
Y
H
A
R
D
W
A
R
E
,
E
.
G
.
D
E
A
D
B
O
L
T
L
O
C
K
S
.
K
.
W
I
D
E
-
A
N
G
L
E
P
E
E
P
H
O
L
E
S
O
R
O
T
H
E
R
V
I
E
W
I
N
G
D
E
V
I
C
E
S
H
O
U
L
D
B
E
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
E
D
I
N
S
O
L
I
D
D
O
O
R
S
W
H
E
R
E
N
A
T
U
R
A
L
S
U
R
V
E
I
L
L
A
N
C
E
I
S
C
O
M
P
R
O
M
I
S
E
D
.
L
.
T
H
E
L
O
C
K
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
S
O
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
E
D
T
H
A
T
B
O
T
H
T
H
E
D
E
A
D
B
O
L
T
A
N
D
D
E
A
D
L
O
C
K
I
N
G
L
A
T
C
H
C
A
N
B
E
R
E
T
R
A
C
T
E
D
B
Y
A
S
I
N
G
L
E
A
C
T
I
O
N
O
F
T
H
E
I
N
S
I
D
E
D
O
O
R
K
N
O
O
B
/
L
E
V
E
R
/
T
U
R
N
P
I
E
C
E
.
M
.
M
O
N
U
M
E
N
T
S
I
G
N
S
A
N
D
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
E
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
W
E
L
L
L
I
G
H
T
E
D
D
U
R
I
N
G
H
O
U
R
S
O
F
D
A
R
K
N
E
S
S
.
N
.
A
D
E
Q
U
A
T
E
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
O
F
P
A
R
K
I
N
G
L
O
T
S
,
P
A
S
S
A
G
E
W
A
Y
S
,
R
E
C
E
S
S
E
S
,
A
N
D
G
R
O
U
N
D
C
O
N
T
I
G
U
O
U
S
T
O
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
W
I
T
H
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
O
F
S
U
F
F
I
C
I
E
N
T
W
A
T
T
A
G
E
T
O
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
A
D
E
Q
U
A
T
E
I
L
L
U
M
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
T
O
M
A
K
E
C
L
E
A
R
L
Y
V
I
S
I
B
L
E
T
H
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
C
E
O
F
A
N
Y
P
E
R
S
O
N
O
N
O
R
A
B
O
U
T
T
H
E
P
R
E
M
I
S
E
S
D
U
R
I
N
G
T
H
E
H
O
U
R
S
O
F
D
A
R
K
N
E
S
S
A
N
D
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
A
S
A
F
E
,
S
E
C
U
R
E
E
N
V
I
R
O
N
M
E
N
T
F
O
R
A
L
L
P
E
R
S
O
N
,
P
R
O
P
E
R
T
Y
,
A
N
D
V
E
H
I
C
L
E
S
O
N
-
S
I
T
E
.
O
.
A
L
L
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
D
O
O
R
S
S
H
A
L
L
H
A
V
E
T
H
E
I
R
O
W
N
L
I
G
H
T
S
O
U
R
C
E
,
W
H
I
C
H
S
H
A
L
L
A
D
E
Q
U
A
T
E
L
Y
I
L
L
U
M
I
N
A
T
E
D
O
O
R
A
R
E
A
S
A
T
A
L
L
H
O
U
R
S
T
O
M
A
K
E
C
L
E
A
R
L
Y
V
I
S
I
B
L
E
T
H
E
P
R
E
S
E
N
C
E
O
F
A
N
Y
P
E
R
S
O
N
O
N
O
R
A
B
O
U
T
T
H
E
P
R
E
M
I
S
E
S
A
N
D
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
A
D
E
Q
U
A
T
E
I
L
L
U
M
I
N
A
T
I
O
N
F
O
R
P
E
R
S
O
N
S
E
X
I
T
I
N
G
T
H
E
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
.
P
O
L
I
C
E
D
E
P
A
R
T
M
E
N
T
N
O
T
E
S
:
5
1CF-1
D
R
-
1
3
SLOPE
SLOPE
1/4" PER 12" TYP.
SLOPE
1/4" PER 12" TYP.
SLOPE1/4" PER 12" TYP.
C
F
-
1
C
F
-
1
S
L
O
P
E
1
/
4
"
P
E
R
1
2
"
T
Y
P
.
1
1
4
3
0
'
-
7
"
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
A
P
E
T
1
5
'
-
6
"
D
E
C
K
6
30'-7"T.O.PARAPET
3
4
'
-
0
"
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
A
P
E
T
3
4
'
-
0
"
T
.
O
.
P
A
R
A
P
E
T
C
F
-
1
1
SLOPE
1/2" PER 12" TYP.
3
3
'
-
6
"
T
.
O
.
R
O
O
F
V
A
L
L
E
Y
7
75 7 0 68
V
A
L
L
E
Y
VALLEYVALLEY
V
A
L
L
E
Y
V
A
L
L
E
Y
V
A
L
L
E
Y
R
O
O
F
P
L
A
N
A
1
.
1
R
O
O
F
I
N
G
:
1
2
C
R
-
1
C
O
O
L
R
O
O
F
I
N
G
6
0
M
I
L
T
P
O
S
I
N
G
L
E
P
L
Y
R
O
O
F
B
Y
F
I
R
E
S
T
O
N
E
O
R
E
Q
U
A
L
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
N
O
T
E
S
:
A
.
R
E
F
E
R
T
O
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
F
O
R
R
O
O
F
S
Y
S
T
E
M
,
I
N
C
L
U
D
I
N
G
G
U
A
R
A
N
T
E
E
S
,
C
U
R
B
S
,
F
L
A
S
H
I
N
G
,
A
N
D
E
T
C
.
B
.
R
E
F
E
R
T
O
R
O
O
F
I
N
G
M
A
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
S
W
R
I
T
T
E
N
I
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
A
N
D
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
F
O
R
R
O
O
F
I
N
G
S
Y
S
T
E
M
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
.
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
T
O
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
C
O
M
P
L
E
T
E
R
O
O
F
I
N
G
P
A
C
K
A
G
E
P
E
R
M
A
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
R
'
S
R
E
C
O
M
M
E
N
D
A
T
I
O
N
S
.
C
.
R
O
O
F
A
S
S
E
M
B
L
Y
S
H
A
L
L
C
O
M
P
L
Y
W
/
U
L
-
I
9
-
A
N
D
F
M
C
L
A
S
S
"
B
"
R
A
T
I
N
G
S
I
N
C
L
U
D
I
N
G
C
O
P
I
N
G
S
,
F
L
A
S
H
I
N
G
,
P
A
R
A
P
E
T
W
A
L
L
,
A
N
D
R
O
O
F
S
Y
S
T
E
M
.
D
.
D
O
N
O
T
S
T
O
C
K
P
I
L
E
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
O
R
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
O
N
T
H
E
R
O
O
F
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
U
N
L
E
S
S
A
P
P
R
O
V
E
D
I
N
W
R
I
T
I
N
G
B
Y
T
H
E
A
R
C
H
I
T
E
C
T
,
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
E
N
G
I
N
E
E
R
,
A
N
D
T
H
E
J
O
I
S
T
M
A
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
R
.
E
.
G
E
N
E
R
A
L
C
O
N
T
R
A
C
T
O
R
I
S
T
O
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
T
E
M
P
O
R
A
R
Y
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
P
E
R
I
M
E
T
E
R
G
U
A
R
D
R
A
I
L
T
O
C
O
M
P
L
Y
W
I
T
H
C
O
D
E
O
F
F
E
D
E
R
A
L
R
E
G
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
S
2
9
C
F
R
1
9
2
6
,
S
U
B
P
A
R
T
M
(
O
S
C
A
)
.
G
U
A
R
D
R
A
I
L
T
O
B
E
4
2
"
H
E
I
G
H
T
A
N
D
B
E
A
B
L
E
T
O
W
I
T
H
S
T
A
N
D
2
0
0
P
O
U
N
D
S
A
T
T
O
P
E
D
G
E
.
F
.
C
O
M
P
L
Y
W
I
T
H
C
B
C
S
E
C
.
1
0
1
3
.
5
A
N
D
S
E
C
.
1
0
1
3
.
6
F
O
R
G
U
A
R
D
R
A
I
L
S
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
D
W
H
E
R
E
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
R
E
Q
U
I
R
I
N
G
S
E
R
V
I
C
E
,
A
N
D
/
O
R
,
R
O
O
F
A
C
C
E
S
S
H
A
T
C
H
O
P
E
N
I
N
G
S
A
R
E
W
I
T
H
I
N
1
0
F
E
E
T
O
F
A
R
O
O
F
E
D
G
E
.
G
.
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
F
I
R
E
B
L
O
C
K
I
N
G
I
N
C
O
N
C
E
A
L
E
D
S
P
A
C
E
S
P
E
R
S
E
C
.
7
1
7
.
2
.
H
.
R
O
O
F
D
R
A
I
N
S
H
A
L
L
C
O
M
P
L
Y
W
I
T
H
S
E
C
.
1
5
0
3
.
T
H
E
R
A
I
N
F
A
L
L
I
N
T
E
N
S
I
T
Y
T
O
B
E
O
F
2
"
P
E
R
H
O
U
R
.
S
E
C
O
N
D
A
R
Y
R
O
O
F
D
R
A
I
N
S
O
R
S
C
U
P
P
E
R
S
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
D
W
H
E
R
E
T
H
E
R
O
O
F
P
E
R
I
M
E
T
E
R
C
O
N
S
T
R
U
C
T
I
O
N
E
X
T
E
N
D
S
A
B
O
V
E
T
H
E
R
O
O
F
I
N
S
U
C
H
A
M
A
N
N
E
R
T
H
A
T
W
A
T
E
R
W
I
L
L
B
E
E
N
T
R
A
P
P
E
D
I
F
T
H
E
P
R
I
M
A
R
Y
D
R
A
I
N
S
A
L
L
O
W
B
U
I
L
D
U
P
F
O
R
A
N
Y
R
E
A
S
O
N
.
3
D
R
-
1
L
I
F
E
D
E
C
K
I
C
C
-
E
S
E
S
R
#
2
7
0
1
W
A
T
E
R
P
R
O
O
F
D
E
C
K
I
N
G
4
C
O
O
L
R
O
O
F
I
N
G
6
0
M
I
L
T
P
O
S
I
N
G
L
E
P
L
Y
R
O
O
F
B
Y
F
I
R
E
S
T
O
N
E
O
R
E
Q
U
A
L
I
S
S
-
E
S
R
3
1
7
4
.
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
R
O
O
F
I
N
G
S
H
A
L
L
B
E
I
N
A
C
C
O
R
D
A
N
C
E
W
I
T
H
M
A
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
S
S
P
E
C
I
F
I
C
A
T
I
O
N
S
.
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
R
O
O
F
C
U
R
B
S
A
T
A
L
L
M
E
C
H
A
N
I
C
A
L
E
Q
U
I
P
M
E
N
T
,
R
E
F
E
R
T
O
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
D
E
T
A
I
L
S
(
T
Y
P
.
)
W
A
T
E
R
P
R
O
O
F
D
E
C
K
I
N
G
L
O
C
A
T
I
O
N
O
F
R
O
O
F
A
C
C
E
S
S
H
A
T
C
H
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"PROPOSED ROOF PLAN
5
N
O
T
U
S
E
D
6
4
2
"
G
U
A
R
D
R
A
I
L
.
S
E
E
D
E
T
A
I
L
X
O
N
A
X
.
X
F
O
R
M
I
N
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
7
L
I
N
E
O
F
W
A
L
L
B
E
L
O
W
8
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
M
I
N
I
M
U
M
4
'
H
I
G
H
A
N
D
2
'
I
N
W
I
D
T
H
.
N
U
M
E
R
A
L
S
T
O
B
E
6
"
T
H
I
C
K
N
U
M
B
E
R
S
S
H
O
U
L
D
B
E
S
P
A
C
E
D
B
E
T
W
E
E
N
1
2
"
T
O
1
8
"
A
P
A
R
T
.
N
U
M
B
E
R
S
S
H
O
U
L
D
B
E
P
A
I
N
T
E
D
I
N
C
O
N
T
R
A
S
T
I
N
G
C
O
L
O
R
T
O
R
O
O
F
I
N
G
M
A
T
E
R
I
A
L
S
.
N
U
M
B
E
R
S
S
H
O
U
L
D
F
A
C
E
S
T
R
E
E
T
T
O
W
H
I
C
H
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
I
S
A
D
D
R
E
S
S
E
D
G
H
G
H
A
H
E
M
P
I
R
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
G
R
O
U
P
I
n
c
.
5706 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE
ANAHEIM, CA 92807
ARCO FAC # 42868
A
R
C
O
DEV2015-00116
K
E
Y
E
D
N
O
T
E
S
:
2
5
24861 Washington Ave,
Murrieta CA 92562
Tel 951-696-1490 Fax 951-696-1443
E M P I R E
D E S I G N
G R O U P INC.
All ideas, designs and layouts shown on
these drawings, including all documents on
electronic media are the property of empire
design group, and are intended to be used in
connection with this specific project only and
shall not otherwise be used for any purpose
whatsoever without the written consent. and
may not be reproduced or used without the
written permission of empire design group.
All rights reserved
CLIENT:
BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS,
LLC
GREGORY S. HANN, AIA
24861 WASHINGTON AVE.
MURRIETA, CA 92562
TEL: 951-696-1490
CEL: 951-809-7601
FAX: 951-696-1443
E-MAIL: ghann@empiregr.biz
DE
V
2
0
1
5
-
0
0
1
1
6
AR
C
O
F
A
C
#
4
2
8
6
8
57
0
6
E
A
S
T
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
AN
A
H
E
I
M
,
C
A
9
2
8
0
7
ARCHITECT OF RECORD:
DESIGNED BY:
JUNE 23, 2016
PROJ. NUMBER:EDG# 04138
DATE:
DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DRAWING TITLE:
GH
GH
AH
NO.
3-9-16 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING1
2-1-17 2ND CUP COMMENTS2
7-24-17 3RD CUP COMMENTS3
7-12-18 4TH CUP COMMENTS4
10-22-18 5TH CUP COMMENTS5
ISA A BAHU
EXTERIOR
ELEVATION
A 2.0
A
-
(FRONT) EXTERIOR ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
KEYED NOTES:
01 SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH
02 FOAM SHAPED CORNICE TRIM W/ SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH
03 RED BRICK VENEER
04 METAL ACCENTS
05 EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE
06 EXTERIOR DOOR / WINDOW
07 LOUVERED WINDOW (TYP.)
08 SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPERATE PERMIT)
09 STOREFRONT WINDOW AND SLIDING DOOR SYSTEM
0'-0"
BLDG SLAB
01
10 CUSTOM METAL RAILING.
11 LOUVERED WALL @ ELECTRICAL ROOM
12 NOT USED
02
02
03
03
10
04
04
05
09 06
13 STAINED WOOD TRIM
08
12'-6"
TOP OF PLATE
14'-0"
FINISHED FLOOR
25'-6"
TOP OF PLATE
26'-9"
TOP OF ROOF
30'-7"
TOP OF PARAPET
34'-0"
TOP OF PARAPET
3'
-
4
"
6'-0"
EXTERIOR PAINT
COLOR: BP DARK PEARL
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SW6121 WHOLE WHEAT
BRICK.MTL.STUCCO FINISH
DIRECT APPLIED FINISH SYSTEM-
SMOOTH TROWEL
3 PART 7/8" STUCCO (PORTLAND
CEMENT PLASTER)
OVER METAL LATH PROVIDE
CONTROL JOINTS AS SHOWN
COLOR: SPECIFY #30YY52/207
(BP DARK PEARL)
STUCCO PAINT BRICK VENEER
4" WIDE BRICK VEENER
BY McNEAR. MODEL: STRATFORD OR
EQUAL
METAL RAILING, ACCENT CLADDING,
TUBE STEEL @ LANDSCAPE WALL
PANELS, SIGNAGE SHADE STRUCTURE,
TRASH ENCLOSURE GATES, METAL
HARDWARE
COLOR: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SW7053 ADAPTIVE SHADE
WOODSTAINED WOOD FINISH
WOOD TIMBERS TO BE
STAINED
B
-
(REAR) EXTERIOR ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
0'-0"
BLDG SLAB
01
02
03
10
12'-6"
TOP OF PLATE
14'-0"
FINISHED FLOOR
24'-0"
TOP OF PLATE
26'-9"
TOP OF ROOF
30'-7"
TOP OF PARAPET
34'-0"
TOP OF PARAPET
01
03
02
07
07
09
13
11
06 06
24861 Washington Ave,
Murrieta CA 92562
Tel 951-696-1490 Fax 951-696-1443
E M P I R E
D E S I G N
G R O U P INC.
All ideas, designs and layouts shown on
these drawings, including all documents on
electronic media are the property of empire
design group, and are intended to be used in
connection with this specific project only and
shall not otherwise be used for any purpose
whatsoever without the written consent. and
may not be reproduced or used without the
written permission of empire design group.
All rights reserved
CLIENT:
BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS,
LLC
GREGORY S. HANN, AIA
24861 WASHINGTON AVE.
MURRIETA, CA 92562
TEL: 951-696-1490
CEL: 951-809-7601
FAX: 951-696-1443
E-MAIL: ghann@empiregr.biz
ARCHITECT OF RECORD:
DESIGNED BY:
PROJ. NUMBER:
DATE:
DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION
CHECKED BY:
DRAWN BY:
DRAWING TITLE:
GH
GH
AH
7-12-18 4TH CUP COMMENTS4
10-22-18 5TH CUP COMMENTS5
EXTERIOR
ELEVATION
A 2.1
B
-
(RIGHT) EXTERIOR ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
KEYED NOTES:
01 SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH
02 FOAM SHAPED CORNICE W/ SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH
03 RED BRICK VENEER
04 METAL ACCENTS
05 EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURE
06 EXTERIOR DOOR / WINDOW
07 LOUVERED WINDOW (TYP.)
08 SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPERATE PERMIT)
09 STOREFRONT WINDOW AND SLIDING DOOR SYSTEM
10 CUSTOM METAL RAILING
11 NOT USED
12 NOT USED
13 STAINED WOOD TRIM
0'-0"
BLDG SLAB
12'-6"
TOP OF PLATE
14'-0"
FINISHED FLOOR
24'-0"
TOP OF PLATE
26'-9"
TOP OF ROOF
30'-7"
TOP OF PARAPET
34'-0"
TOP OF PARAPET
D
-
(LEFT) EXTERIOR ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
01
03
02
05
04
07
08
01
02
01
03
02
05
04
02
08
06
06
08
0'-0"
BLDG SLAB
12'-6"
TOP OF PLATE
14'-0"
FINISHED FLOOR
24'-0"
TOP OF PLATE
26'-9"
TOP OF ROOF
30'-7"
TOP OF PARAPET
34'-0"
TOP OF PARAPET
EXTERIOR PAINT
COLOR: BP DARK PEARL
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SW6121 WHOLE WHEAT
BRICK.MTL.STUCCO FINISH
DIRECT APPLIED FINISH SYSTEM-
SMOOTH TROWEL
3 PART 7/8" STUCCO (PORTLAND
CEMENT PLASTER)
OVER METAL LATH PROVIDE
CONTROL JOINTS AS SHOWN
COLOR: SPECIFY #30YY52/207
(BP DARK PEARL)
STUCCO PAINT BRICK VENEER
4" WIDE BRICK VEENER
BY McNEAR. MODEL: STRATFORD OR
EQUAL
METAL RAILING, ACCENT CLADDING,
TUBE STEEL @ LANDSCAPE WALL
PANELS, SIGNAGE SHADE STRUCTURE,
TRASH ENCLOSURE GATES, METAL
HARDWARE
COLOR: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SW7053 ADAPTIVE SHADE
WOODSTAINED WOOD FINISH
WOOD TIMBERS TO BE
STAINED
DE
V
2
0
1
5
-
0
0
1
1
6
AR
C
O
F
A
C
#
4
2
8
6
8
57
0
6
E
A
S
T
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
AN
A
H
E
I
M
,
C
A
9
2
8
0
7
JUNE 23, 2016
EDG# 04138
3-9-16 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING1
2-1-17 2ND CUP COMMENTS2
7-24-17 3RD CUP COMMENTS3
ISA A BAHU
07
10
UNDER CROSSHEAD
MIN. ROUGH OPENING
CLEAR OPENING
CEILING HEIGHT
0'-8"
9'-5"
7'-4"
7'-0"
8'-3"
PIT DEPTH CLEAR OPENING
MIN. ROUGH OPENING
3"
7'-0"
8'-3"
4'- 0"
B
L
D
G
.
S
L
A
B
0
'
-
0
"
T
O
P
O
F
P
L
A
T
E
1
2
'
-
6
"
F
I
N
I
S
H
E
D
F
L
O
O
R
1
4
'
-
0
"
2
4
'
-
0
"
3
4
'
-
0
"
T
O
P
O
F
P
A
R
A
P
E
T
3
0
'
-
7
"
T
O
P
O
F
P
L
A
T
E
T
O
P
O
F
P
A
R
A
P
E
T
2
6
'
-
9
"
T
O
P
O
F
R
O
O
F
WALK IN COOLER
E
L
E
V
A
T
O
R
P
R
E
P
A
R
E
A
W
O
M
E
N
S
R
E
S
T
R
O
O
M
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
ATTICE SPACET-BAR CEILING SEE REFL
E
C
T
E
D
CEILING PLANS 3'-10"10'-0"2'-6"1'-6"10'-0"
5'-5"
3'-6"
FLOOR JOISTS SEESTRUCTURAL PLANS FORTYPE AND SPACING2 - 2x TOP PLATE EXTERIOR WALLINSULATION.R-13 TYP2x FIRE BLK2x STUD. SEESTRUCTURALDRAWINGS FORSPACING2x P.T. SILLPLATE BRICK VENEERFINISH FOAM SHAPEDTRIM. SEEELEVATIONSCONCRETEFOOTING. SEESTRUCTURALDRAWINGS FORDIMENSIONS CONCRETE SLAB.SEE STRUCTURALDRAWINGS BRICK VENEERFINISH FOAM SHAPEDCORNICE. SEEELEVATIONS MANUFACTURED ROOFTRUSSES
M
A
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
D
R
O
O
F
T
R
U
S
S
E
S
F
L
O
O
R
J
O
I
S
T
S
S
E
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
P
L
A
N
S
F
O
R
T
Y
P
E
A
N
D
S
P
A
C
I
N
G
T
-
B
A
R
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
S
E
E
R
E
F
L
E
C
T
E
D
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
P
L
A
N
S
SLOPED ROOF. SEEROOF PLAN FOR SLOPEAND ROOF TYPE2x RIM JOIST ATTIC SPACEINSULATION.R-30 TYP
F
O
A
M
S
H
A
P
E
D
C
O
R
N
I
C
E
.
S
E
E
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
R
O
O
F
A
C
C
E
S
S
L
A
D
D
E
R
A
N
D
H
A
T
C
H
R
O
O
F
D
E
C
K
.
S
L
O
P
E
R
O
O
F
A
T
M
I
N
.
O
F
1
4
"
/
1
2
"
4
2
"
M
I
N
.
G
U
A
R
D
R
A
I
L
M
A
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
D
R
O
O
F
T
R
U
S
S
E
S
S
E
E
E
L
E
V
A
T
O
R
M
A
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
R
R
E
Q
U
I
R
E
M
E
N
T
S
F
O
R
I
N
S
T
A
L
L
A
T
I
O
N
A
T
T
I
C
E
S
P
A
C
E
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
S
A
L
E
S
A
R
E
A
2
-
2
x
T
O
P
P
L
A
T
E
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
W
A
L
L
I
N
S
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
.
R
-
1
3
T
Y
P
2
x
F
I
R
E
B
L
K
2
x
S
T
U
D
.
S
E
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
F
O
R
S
P
A
C
I
N
G
2
x
P
.
T
.
S
I
L
L
P
L
A
T
E
B
R
I
C
K
V
E
N
E
E
R
F
I
N
I
S
H
F
O
A
M
S
H
A
P
E
D
T
R
I
M
.
S
E
E
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
B
R
I
C
K
V
E
N
E
E
R
F
I
N
I
S
H
F
O
A
M
S
H
A
P
E
D
C
O
R
N
I
C
E
.
S
E
E
E
L
E
V
A
T
I
O
N
S
2
x
R
I
M
J
O
I
S
T
M
E
T
A
L
F
R
A
M
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
E
F
O
R
S
I
G
N
A
G
E
E
X
T
E
R
I
O
R
L
I
G
H
T
F
I
X
T
U
R
E
T
-
B
A
R
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
S
E
E
R
E
F
L
E
C
T
E
D
C
E
I
L
I
N
G
P
L
A
N
S
F
L
O
O
R
J
O
I
S
T
S
S
E
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
P
L
A
N
S
F
O
R
T
Y
P
E
A
N
D
S
P
A
C
I
N
G
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
F
O
O
T
I
N
G
.
S
E
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
F
O
R
D
I
M
E
N
S
I
O
N
S
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
S
L
A
B
.
S
E
E
S
T
R
U
C
T
U
R
A
L
D
R
A
W
I
N
G
S
B
L
D
G
.
S
L
A
B
0
'
-
0
"
T
O
P
O
F
P
L
A
T
E
1
2
'
-
6
"
F
I
N
I
S
H
E
D
F
L
O
O
R
1
4
'
-
0
"
2
4
'
-
0
"
T
O
P
O
F
P
A
R
A
P
E
T
3
0
'
-
7
"
T
O
P
O
F
P
L
A
T
E
2
6
'
-
9
"
T
O
P
O
F
R
O
O
F
5'-1"
10'-0"1'-6"2'-6"10'-0"
M
A
N
U
F
A
C
T
U
R
E
D
R
O
O
F
T
R
U
S
S
E
S
S
L
O
P
E
D
R
O
O
F
.
S
E
E
R
O
O
F
P
L
A
N
F
O
R
S
L
O
P
E
A
N
D
R
O
O
F
T
Y
P
E
2
-
2
x
T
O
P
P
L
A
T
E
A
T
T
I
C
S
P
A
C
E
I
N
S
U
L
A
T
I
O
N
.
R
-
3
0
T
Y
P
B
U
I
L
D
I
N
G
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
S
A
3
.
0
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"SECTION 1SCALE
:
1
/
4
"
=
1
'
-
0
"
S
E
C
T
I
O
N
3
G
H
G
H
A
H
E
M
P
I
R
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
G
R
O
U
P
I
n
c
.
5706 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE
ANAHEIM, CA 92807
ARCO FAC # 42868
A
R
C
O
DEV2015-00116
2'-6"
TYP
2
'
-
6
"
T
Y
P
24
5
7
9
1
0
41'-0"
15'-0"
A
C
A
2
.
0
B
C
A
2
.
0
D
C
A
2
.
0
CCA 2.0
6'-10"8'-0"11'-4"8'-0"6'-10"
3'-8"
TYP.
3'-10"
TYP.
22'-8"9'-2"9'-2"
1
3
2'-0"
8
'
-
0
"
3
'
-
0
"
3
0
'
-
2
"
3
'
-
0
"
3
0
'
-
2
"
3'-0"8'-0"
8
5
'
-
4
"
8
C
A
N
O
P
Y
F
L
O
O
R
P
L
A
N
C
A
1
.
0
SCALE: 3/16"=1'-0"A CANOPY FLOOR PLAN
G
H
G
H
A
H
E
M
P
I
R
E
D
E
S
I
G
N
G
R
O
U
P
I
n
c
.
5706 EAST LA PALMA AVENUE
ANAHEIM, CA 92807
ARCO FAC # 42868
A
R
C
O
DEV2015-00116
K
E
Y
E
D
N
O
T
E
S
:
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
1
0
L
I
N
E
O
F
N
E
W
G
A
S
O
L
I
N
E
C
A
N
O
P
Y
R
O
O
F
O
V
E
R
H
A
N
G
C
A
N
O
P
Y
C
O
L
U
M
N
S
A
N
D
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
D
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
F
O
O
T
I
N
G
L
I
N
E
O
F
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
S
L
A
B
M
U
L
T
I
P
R
O
D
U
C
T
D
I
S
P
E
N
S
E
R
A
N
D
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
A
S
S
O
C
I
A
T
E
D
I
S
L
A
N
D
S
(
T
Y
P
.
O
F
6
)
P
R
O
V
I
D
E
F
I
R
E
E
X
T
I
N
G
U
I
S
H
E
R
F
O
R
E
A
C
H
P
U
M
P
A
T
C
A
N
O
P
Y
U
N
D
E
R
G
R
O
U
N
D
S
T
O
R
A
G
E
T
A
N
K
S
,
S
E
E
T
A
N
K
P
L
A
N
S
C
A
N
O
P
Y
R
O
O
F
D
R
A
I
N
A
G
E
T
H
R
O
U
G
H
C
A
N
O
P
Y
C
O
L
U
M
N
S
T
O
B
E
C
O
N
N
E
C
T
E
D
T
O
U
N
D
E
R
G
R
O
U
N
D
S
T
O
R
M
W
A
T
E
R
S
Y
S
T
E
M
.
S
E
E
C
I
V
I
L
O
V
E
R
H
E
A
D
C
A
N
O
P
Y
L
I
G
H
T
I
N
G
(
T
Y
P
.
)
N
O
T
U
S
E
D
X
"
T
H
I
C
K
R
E
I
N
F
O
R
C
E
D
C
O
N
C
R
E
T
E
D
R
I
V
E
S
L
A
B
W
/
#
4
B
A
R
S
@
1
2
"
O
.
C
.
E
A
C
H
W
A
Y
A
T
S
L
A
B
(
T
Y
P
.
O
F
6
)
C
O
L
U
M
N
(
T
Y
P
.
O
F
6
)
24861 Washington Ave,
Murrieta CA 92562
Tel 951-696-1490 Fax 951-696-1443
E M P I R E
D E S I G N
G R O U P INC.
All ideas, designs and layouts shown on
these drawings, including all documents on
electronic media are the property of empire
design group, and are intended to be used in
connection with this specific project only and
shall not otherwise be used for any purpose
whatsoever without the written consent. and
may not be reproduced or used without the
written permission of empire design group.
All rights reserved
CLIENT:
BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS,
LLC
GREGORY S. HANN, AIA
24861 WASHINGTON AVE.
MURRIETA, CA 92562
TEL: 951-696-1490
CEL: 951-809-7601
FAX: 951-696-1443
E-MAIL: ghann@empiregr.biz
ARCHITECT OF RECORD:
DESIGNED BY:
PROJ. NUMBER:
DATE:
DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION
GH
CHECKED BY:GH
DRAWN BY:AH
DRAWING TITLE:
BRICK.
DE
V
2
0
1
5
-
0
0
1
1
6
AR
C
O
F
A
C
#
4
2
8
6
8
57
0
6
E
A
S
T
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
AN
A
H
E
I
M
,
C
A
9
2
8
0
7
JUNE 23, 2016
EDG# 04138
3-9-16 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING1
2-1-17 2ND CUP COMMENTS2
7-24-17 3RD CUP COMMENTS3
ISA A BAHU
7-12-18 4TH CUP COMMENTS4
CANOPY
ELEVATIONS
CA 2.0
A
-
NORTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
KEYED NOTES:
01 SMOOTH STUCCO FINISH
02 NOT USED
03 RED BRICK VENEER
04 METAL COLUMNS (TYP.)
05 EXTERIOR LIGHT FIXTURES (TYP.)
06 SIGNAGE (UNDER SEPERATE PERMIT)
01
05
B
-
SOUTH ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
C
-
WEST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"D
-
EAST ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/4"=1'-0"
0'-0"
BLDG SLAB
03
06 05
03
06
04 05
03
16'-0"
BOTTOM OF FASCIA
19'-0"
TOP OF FASCIA
05
01
04
03
01
01
EXTERIOR PAINT
COLOR: BP PEARL
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SW6119 ANTIQUE
WHITE
19'-0"
TOP OF FASCIA
16'-0"
BOTTOM OF FASCIA
0'-0"
BLDG SLAB
0'-0"
BLDG SLAB
19'-0"
TOP OF FASCIA
16'-0"
BOTTOM OF FASCIA
0'-0"
BLDG SLAB
19'-0"
TOP OF FASCIA
16'-0"
BOTTOM OF FASCIA
EXTERIOR PAINT
COLOR: BP DARK PEARL
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SW6121 WHOLE WHEAT
PAINTSTUCCO FINISH
DIRECT APPLIED FINISH SYSTEM-
SMOOTH TROWEL
3 PART 7/8" STUCCO (PORTLAND
CEMENT PLASTER)
OVER METAL LATH PROVIDE
CONTROL JOINTS AS SHOWN
COLOR: SPECIFY #30YY52/207
(BP DARK PEARL)
STUCCO PAINT EXTERIOR PAINT
COLOR: ARCO BLUE
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
HYDROGLOSS B65T184
PAINTBRICK.BRICK VENEER
4" WIDE BRICK VEENER
BY McNEAR. MODEL: STRATFORD OR
EQUAL
06
06
24861 Washington Ave,
Murrieta CA 92562
Tel 951-696-1490 Fax 951-696-1443
E M P I R E
D E S I G N
G R O U P INC.
All ideas, designs and layouts shown on
these drawings, including all documents on
electronic media are the property of empire
design group, and are intended to be used in
connection with this specific project only and
shall not otherwise be used for any purpose
whatsoever without the written consent. and
may not be reproduced or used without the
written permission of empire design group.
All rights reserved
CLIENT:
BP WEST COAST PRODUCTS,
LLC
GREGORY S. HANN, AIA
24861 WASHINGTON AVE.
MURRIETA, CA 92562
TEL: 951-696-1490
CEL: 951-809-7601
FAX: 951-696-1443
E-MAIL: ghann@empiregr.biz
ARCHITECT OF RECORD:
DESIGNED BY:
PROJ. NUMBER:
DATE:
DATE REVISION DESCRIPTION
GH;
JS
CHECKED BY:GH
DRAWN BY:JS
DRAWING TITLE:
7-12-18 4TH CUP COMMENTS4
10-22-18 5TH CUP COMMENTS5
7'
-
0
"
10
'
-
3
"
TRASH
ENCLOSURE
ELEVATIONS
TE 2.0
A
-
FRONT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"
KEYED NOTES:
01 STUCCO FINISH. SEE STUCCO NOTES PROVIDED FOR SPECIFICATIONS.
02 CMU WALL (TYP.)
03 RED BRICK VENEER
04 METAL CLAD
05 METAL STRUCTURAL MEMBERS
06 DOUBLE GATES @ 6'-0" HIGH X 5'-0" WIDE
07 6" STEEL POST @ 6'-0" (TYP. OF 2)
08 CANE BOLT AND SLEEVE @ EACH GATE PER LEAF @ BOTTOM OF
DOORS
01
03
D
-
REAR ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"
C
-
LEFT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"
06
04
05
7'
-
0
"
3'
-
3
"
04
05
06
07
01
6"
08
B
-
RIGHT ELEVATION
SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"
7'
-
0
"
3'
-
3
"
04
05
01
03
6"
12'-2"
11'-10"2'
-
0
"
1'
-
3
"
7'
-
0
"
1" PER FOOT
EXTERIOR PAINT
COLOR: BP DARK PEARL
SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SW6121 WHOLE WHEAT
BRICK.MTL.STUCCO FINISH
DIRECT APPLIED FINISH SYSTEM-
SMOOTH TROWEL
3 PART 7/8" STUCCO (PORTLAND
CEMENT PLASTER)
OVER METAL LATH PROVIDE
CONTROL JOINTS AS SHOWN
COLOR: SPECIFY #30YY52/207
(BP DARK PEARL)
STUCCO PAINT BRICK VENEER
4" WIDE BRICK VEENER
BY McNEAR. MODEL: STRATFORD OR
EQUAL
METAL RAILING, ACCENT CLADDING,
TUBE STEEL @ LANDSCAPE WALL
PANELS, SIGNAGE SHADE STRUCTURE,
TRASH ENCLOSURE GATES, METAL
HARDWARE
COLOR: SHERWIN WILLIAMS
SW7053 ADAPTIVE SHADE
WOODSTAINED WOOD FINISH
WOOD TIMBERS TO BE
STAINED
E
-
FLOOR PLAN
SCALE: 1/2"=1'-0"
8'
-
8
"
11'-8"
07
02
06
IMPORTANT NOTE: ENCLOSURE SHALL CONFORM WITH ANAHIEM STANDARDS
1. REFUSE CONTAINER ENCLOSURE TO BE LOCATED CLEAR OF OTHER STRUCTURES WHERE
POSSIBLE, BUT ACCESSIBLE TO BOTH DEPOSIT AND PICKUP.
2. SLAB TO MEET FINISH GRADE. IF SLAB DOES NOT MEET FINISHED GRADE, PROVIDE RAMP
SLOPED AT 1/4" PER FOOT MAXIMUM.
3. LOCATION, SIZE AND NUMBER OF STRUCTURES WILL BE DETERMINED BY THE SANITATION
INSPECTOR PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMIT. FOR INFORMATION CALL 765-6836.
4. ALL HARDWARE TO BE COOROSION RESISTANT.
5. PLANS MUST SHOW REFUSE AREAS IN DETAIL.
DE
V
2
0
1
5
-
0
0
1
1
6
AR
C
O
F
A
C
#
4
2
8
6
8
57
0
6
E
A
S
T
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
AN
A
H
E
I
M
,
C
A
9
2
8
0
7
JUNE 23, 2016
EDG# 04138
3-9-16 TRAFFIC ENGINEERING1
2-1-17 2ND CUP COMMENTS2
7-24-17 3RD CUP COMMENTS3
ISA A BAHU
07
09 6"X6" CONCRETE CURB SURROUNDING TRASH ENCLOSURE
(BUMPER GAURD)
09
3'-0"
ATTACHMENT NO. 5
Empire Design Group, Inc.
24861 Washington Ave, Murrieta CA 92562
MAILING ADDRESS: P.O. Box 944 Murrieta CA, 92564
Ph (951) 696-1490 Fax (951) 696-1443
ghann@empiregr.biz
June 7, 2016
Nick Taylor
Associate Planner
City of Anaheim
Planning Department
200 S. Anaheim Boulevard
Anaheim, CA 92805
Phone: 714-765-4323
Re: CUP2015-05835 (DEV2015-00116) and Landscape Setback Variance for a new ARCO and new
convenience store at 5706 E. La Palma Venue. EDG#04138
Subject: Findings for landscape setback requirement variance for the proposed ARCO and convenience store
Nick Taylor,
On behalf of Isa Bahu (Client), Empire Design Group, Inc. is requesting a variance for a reduction of the
Landscape Setback requirements along Imperial Highway and East La Palma Avenue.
The following is presented to substantiate the variance request:
1. Along East La Palma Avenue, a proposed 5 foot landscape setback is being proposed in lieu of the required
15 foot landscape setback.
a) Request is made due to the “Right of Way Take” and “Access Rights Relinquishment” completed by
the City of Anaheim in 2008. This project reduced the overall site area and potential use of site. This
change affected the site in reducing the area allowable for the proposed truck turn path. For site to be
accessed by fuel truck, landscape setback was reduced to accommodate proposed truck turn path.
2) Along Imperial Highway, 15 foot Landscape Setback is encroached by the proposed site parking spaces.
a) Request is made due to the “Right of Way Take” and “Access Rights Relinquishment” completed by
the City of Anaheim in 2008. This project reduced the overall site area and potential use of site. In the
efforts to accommodate parking requirements, ADA access and handicap parking spaces requirements,
the landscape setback along Imperial Highway has been encroached. The handicap parking space
requires a parallel access area that has been proposed in conceptual site plan. This is the only area that
parking encroaches the 15 foot landscape setback.
Sincerely,
Gregory S. Hann, A.I.A. Principal
Empire Design Group, Inc.
Physical Address: Mailing Address: Phone: 951-696-1490 Fax: 951-696-1443
24861 Washington Ave P.O. Box 944 Cell: 951-809-7601 E-Mail: ghann@empiregr.biz
Murrieta, CA 92562 Murrieta, CA 92564
ATTACHMENT NO. 6
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
ATTACHMENT NO. 7
MA
P
O
F
E
X
I
S
T
I
N
G
A
L
C
O
H
O
L
L
I
C
E
N
S
ES
W
I
T
H
I
N
C
E
N
S
U
S
T
R
A
C
T
2
1
8
.
0
7
TO
D
E
T
E
R
M
I
N
E
P
U
B
L
I
C
C
O
N
V
EN
I
E
N
C
E
O
R
N
E
C
E
S
S
I
T
Y
A
T
57
0
6
E
A
S
T
L
A
P
A
L
M
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
SITE PHOTOS
Project Address: 5706 East La Palma Avenue
Case Nos. CUP2015‐05835, VAR2017‐05091, & PCN2019‐00144 (DEV2015‐00116)
Northwest Elevation of Subject Property
North Elevation of Subject Property
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
Northwest Adjacent Property
West Adjacent Property
ATTACHMENT NO. 8
East Adjacent Property
ATTACHMENT NO. 10
200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net
City of Anaheim
PLANNING DEPARTMENT
There is no new correspondence
regarding this item.