Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
PC 2019/09/04
City of Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda Wednesday, September 4, 2019 Council Chamber, City Hall 200 South Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, California • Chairperson: Michelle Lieberman • Chairperson Pro-Tempore: Kimberly Keys • Commissioners: John Armstrong, Natalie Meeks, Rosa Mulleady, Dave Vadodaria, Steve White • Call To Order - 5:00 p.m. • Pledge Of Allegiance • Public Comments • Public Hearing Items • Commission Updates • Discussion • Adjournment For record keeping purposes, if you wish to make a statement regarding any item on the agenda, please complete a speaker card in advance and submit it to the secretary. A copy of the staff report may be obtained at the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805. A copy of the staff report is also available on the City of Anaheim website www.anaheim.net/planning on Thursday, August 29, 2019, after 5:00 p.m. Any writings or documents provided to a majority of the Planning Commission regarding any item on this agenda (other than writings legally exempt from public disclosure) will be made available for public inspection in the Planning and Building Department located at City Hall, 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, during regular business hours. You may leave a message for the Planning Commission using the following e-mail address: planningcommission@anaheim.net 09-04-2019 Page 2 of 5 APPEAL OF PLANNING COMMISSION ACTIONS Any action taken by the Planning Commission this date regarding Reclassifications, Conditional Use Permits, Variances, Public Convenience or Necessity Determinations, Tentative Tract and Parcel Maps will be final 10 calendar days after Planning Commission action unless a timely appeal is filed during that time. This appeal shall be made in written form to the City Clerk, accompanied by an appeal fee in an amount determined by the City Clerk. The City Clerk, upon filing of said appeal in the Clerk's Office, shall set said petition for public hearing before the City Council at the earliest possible date. You will be notified by the City Clerk of said hearing. If you challenge any one of these City of Anaheim decisions in court, you may be limited to raising only those issues you or someone else raised at the public hearing described in this notice, or in a written correspondence delivered to the Planning Commission or City Council at, or prior to, the public hearing. Anaheim Planning Commission Agenda - 5:00 P.M. Public Comments This is an opportunity for members of the public to speak on any item under the jurisdiction of the Anaheim City Planning Commission or provide public comments on agenda items with the exception of public hearing items. 09-04-2019 Page 3 of 5 Public Hearing Items ITEM NO. 2 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-06006 VARIANCE NO. 2019-05121 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2019-00433 (DEV2019-00017) Location: 407 South State College Boulevard Request: The applicant requests approval of the following land use entitlements: (i) a conditional use permit to construct a new 4,162 sq. ft. express carwash with ancillary vacuums, (ii) a variance for reduced landscape setbacks, and (iii) an administrative adjustment for increased building height. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Wayne Carvalho wcarvalho@anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05984 TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2018-179 (DEV2017-00058) Location: 2157 West La Palma Avenue Request: The applicant requests approval of the following land use entitlements: (i) a conditional use permit to construct and operate a 3-story, 26,538 sq. ft., 47-room convalescent facility and exceed the maximum floor area ratio; and (ii) a tentative parcel map to subdivide a 1.57-acre parcel into 2 lots separating the proposed convalescent facility on its own 0.67-acre lot from the existing commercial center. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15332, Class 32 (Infill Development). Resolution No. ______ Project Planner: Wayne Carvalho wcarvalho@anaheim.net 09-04-2019 Page 4 of 5 ITEM NO. 4 ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2019-00162 (DEV2019-00061) Location: Citywide Request: A City-initiated amendment to Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code modifying Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelter and Recuperative Care/Medical Respite) of Chapter 18.38 (Supplemental Use Regulations) to allow transitional and supportive housing to co-locate with an Emergency Shelter, subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. Environmental Determination: The Planning Commission will consider whether the proposed action is exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15060(c)(2), in that the activity will not result in a direct or reasonably foreseeable indirect change in the environment. Request for continuance to September 30, 2019 Project Planner: Susan Kim skim@anaheim.net Adjourn to Monday, September 30, 2019 at 5:00 p.m. The scheduled meeting of September 16, 2019 was cancelled due to a lack of agenda items. 09-04-2019 Page 5 of 5 CERTIFICATION OF POSTING I hereby certify that a complete copy of this agenda was posted at: 1:00 p.m. August 28, 2019 (TIME) (DATE) LOCATION: COUNCIL CHAMBER DISPLAY CASE AND COUNCIL DISPLAY KIOSK SIGNED: ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION The City of Anaheim wishes to make all of its public meetings and hearings accessible to all members of the public. The City prohibits discrimination on the basis of race, color, or national origin in any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance. If requested, the agenda and backup materials will be made available in appropriate alternative formats to persons with a disability, as required by Section 202 of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), and the federal rules and regulations adopted in implementation thereof. Any person who requires a disability-related modification or accommodation, including auxiliary aids or services, in order to participate in the public meeting may request such modification, accommodation, aid or service by contacting the Planning and Building Department either in person at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, or by telephone at (714) 765-5139, no later than 10:00 a.m. one business day preceding the scheduled meeting. La ciudad de Anaheim desea hacer todas sus reuniones y audiencias públicas accesibles a todos los miembros del público. La Ciudad prohíbe la discriminación por motivos de raza , color u origen nacional en cualquier programa o actividad que reciba asistencia financiera federal. Si se solicita, la agenda y los materiales de copia estarán disponible en formatos alternativos apropiados a las personas con una discapacidad, según lo requiere la Sección 202 del Acta de Americanos con Discapacidades de 1990 (42 U.S.C. Sec. 12132), las normas federales y reglamentos adoptados en aplicación del mismo. Cualquier persona que requiera una modificación relativa a la discapacidad, incluyendo medios auxiliares o servicios, con el fin de participar en la reunión pública podrá solicitar dicha modificación, ayuda o servicio poniéndose en contacto con la Oficina de Secretaria de la Ciudad ya sea en persona en el 200 S Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, California, o por teléfono al (714) 765-5139, antes de las 10:00 de la mañana un día habil antes de la reunión programada. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 2 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2019 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-06006 VARIANCE 2019-05121 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. ADJ2019-00433 LOCATION: 407 South State College Boulevard (Fast5Xpress Carwash) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The agent is Amy Vazquez of Sagecrest Planning+Environmental representing Dan Vogel, the applicant of Fast5Xpress. The property owner is William Taormina of Colony Asset Management, L.P. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of the following land use entitlements: (i) a conditional use permit to construct a new 4,162 square foot express carwash with ancillary vacuums, (ii) a variance for reduced landscape setbacks, and (iii) an administrative adjustment to permit a building height increase adjacent to a single family residential zone. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission adopt the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 3, New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-06006, Variance No. 2019-05121 and Administrative Adjustment No. 2019-00433. BACKGROUND: The 0.77-acre property is developed with a 1-story, 4,300 square foot commercial building that was previously occupied with a restaurant. The property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial zone. The General Plan designates this property for Office-Low land uses. The property is surrounded by single family residences to the west, a shopping center across State College Boulevard to the east, retail uses to the south, and office uses to the north. PROPOSAL: The applicant proposes to construct and operate an express carwash with ancillary vacuum stalls with reduced landscape setbacks along State College Boulevard and along the rear property line adjacent to single family homes. The request also includes an Administrative Adjustment to permit a 22-foot high architectural roof element which exceeds the maximum structural building height of 20 feet within 150 feet of a single-family residential zone. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-06006, VARIANCE NO. 2019-05121, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2019-00433 September 4, 2019 Page 2 of 7 Access to the carwash facility would be provided from State College Boulevard with one-way on-site circulation through the project. Customers would enter the facility from the northerly driveway, proceed through two queuing lanes to the pay station, and enter the carwash tunnel in a single lane. The one-way traffic pattern would allow customers to either exit the site directly after the leaving the carwash tunnel, or make a U-turn to travel southerly to gain access to 13 vacuum stalls. An exit-only driveway is located at the south end of the site. With an existing raised median on State College Boulevard, all travel to and from the project site will require a right-turn in/right-turn out traffic movement for both driveways. A total of 16 parking spaces are proposed for the carwash facility, 13 of which are designed as vacuum stalls in front of the building. Three employee parking spaces would be provided at the rear of the site near the southwest corner of the lot. Proposed hours of operation for the carwash are from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. daily. There would be 3-4 staff present during business hours, depending on demand. The project layout encompasses a portion of an existing public alley at the northwest corner of the site; this alley would be vacated in order to incorporate the queueing lanes for the project. The alley is currently accessed from Broadway south of the subject property; the alley currently serves the single family residences and commercial properties to the north of the project site, as well as two homes that directly abut the project site. Access to these two homes would not be adversely affected because private access easements would be provided to these homes. The applicant/property owner has submitted an application to the Department of Public Works requesting City Council approval of the alley vacation. The proposed site plan layout is contingent on the City’s vacation of the alley. If granted, the alley would terminate at the north end of the project site. SITE PLAN CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-06006, VARIANCE NO. 2019-05121, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2019-00433 September 4, 2019 Page 3 of 7 The proposed 22-foot high carwash building is designed with stucco panels, a central glass storefront, metal parapets and a standing seam roof. A 10-foot high masonry sound wall is designed as part of the building near the tunnel exit to mitigate against any noise impacts resulting from the carwash. The applicant also proposes to construct an additional 10-foot high masonry wall along the west property line abutting the single family homes to further reduce sound impacts from the carwash building. EAST ELEVATION (State College Boulevard) FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by the Zoning Code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The Municipal Code permits carwash facilities in the C-G zone subject to the approval of a conditional use permit in order to determine compatibility with surrounding land uses. An analysis of on-site circulation, parking, noise and community outreach related to the carwash is described in more detail below. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-06006, VARIANCE NO. 2019-05121, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2019-00433 September 4, 2019 Page 4 of 7 On-Site Circulation/Queuing: A Trip Generation and Queuing Analysis (Attachment 7) was prepared for the proposed carwash facility. The carwash lanes would allow for up to 21 vehicles to queue on site. Based on a field survey of an existing Fast5Xpress carwash facility in Irvine, the study concluded that a maximum of 13 vehicles were observed in the queue peak hour period. The analysis concludes that based on the measured service rate of 90 vehicles per hour, the length of the carwash lanes would be able to accommodate on-site queuing to prevent vehicles from spilling over into the public street. The study also concludes an anticipated net increase of 842 daily trips generated by the project, of which 47 new trips would occur in the AM-peak hour and 83 new trips in the PM-peak hour. Both of these estimations did not warrant the preparation of a Traffic Impact Analysis based upon the City criteria of 100 trips during either the AM or PM peak hours. Parking: The Municipal Code does not specify parking standards for carwash facilities. The Code requires the submittal of a parking demand study/parking justification letter to determine the parking requirement. The submitted parking analysis (Attachment 6) contains information obtained from a similar Fast5Xpress carwash facility at the northwest corner of Orangethorpe Avenue and Lemon Street in the City of Fullerton. The field survey and parking data was obtained over a two-day period. The analysis concluded that the 16 parking spaces for the proposed express carwash, including 13 vacuum parking stalls, would be adequate, assuming that a percentage of customers do not utilize vacuum stalls. With the data presented, the average time a vacuum stall was occupied during the peak hour of the two-day study was approximately 18 minutes. The business operation does not involve walk-in facilities or on-site sales that would increase the demand for additional parking. During periods where no vacuum spaces are available, customers will be required to leave the site. Based on the parking justification letter provided by the applicant, staff believes that the number of on-site parking spaces is adequate to accommodate the proposed business without impact to the surrounding public streets or properties. Noise: A Noise Impact Analysis was prepared by Vista Environmental (Attachment 5) to address potential impacts resulting from the carwash. The Municipal Code limits noise at any point on residential properties to 60 dBA. As such, the analysis involved taking noise measurements from an existing Fast5Xpress carwash in Costa Mesa, along with utilizing a Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) noise model prepared by Caltrans. The data included an assumption of installing a 10-foot high masonry wall along the west property line abutting the residential properties. The analysis concluded that the noise generated by the carwash would not exceed 54 dBA at the residential property line, which is lower than the 60 dBA limit required in the Municipal Code. The analysis also identified existing noise levels on the project site which already exceed 60 dBA based on existing (ambient) noise from traffic on State College Boulevard. Existing noise levels were measured from two locations on the existing commercial property, including a power pole near the northwest corner of the property which averaged 59.7 dBA, and on a tree located in the middle of the project site approximately 140 feet west of State College Boulevard centerline which averaged 65.2 dBA. Although these figures do not represent the ambient noise levels at the existing residential property lines, it indicates ambient noise levels of approximately 60 dBA with the existing 6-foot high block wall. However, with installation of the 10-foot high masonry wall, noise levels at the residential properties would be reduced to 54 dBA. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-06006, VARIANCE NO. 2019-05121, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2019-00433 September 4, 2019 Page 5 of 7 Community Outreach. The applicant/property owner met with all of the residential property owners that abut the carwash site to the west to discuss their concerns over the proposed carwash. According to the applicant, the owners identified homeless, noise, and existing access to rear yards from the public alley as issues. They generally supported the proposal for the carwash provided that their existing 6-foot high wall be replaced with a new 10-foot high wall to mitigate noise, and that the owner provide additional security to prevent homeless trespassing in the area. Variance: Before the Planning Commission may approve a variance, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that the following conditions exist: 1) That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity; 2) That, because of the special circumstances, shown above, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. Landscape Setback Variance. The project includes a variance for a reduced 10-foot landscape setback along State College Boulevard where 15 feet is required, and a 3-foot landscape setback along the rear property line adjacent to single family homes in lieu of a 10-foot landscape setback. The proposed on-site improvements include paving a large area at the front and rear of the carwash building to accommodate queuing lanes, new driveways, and a drive aisle for vacuum stalls. A variance recognizes that there may be individual properties that, because of size, irregular shape, or unusual topography, cannot be reasonably developed if all the development standards for the zone are strictly applied. The subject property has a depth of 117 feet. The narrow depth of the lot, and the existing layout of the property, make it difficult to meet all the development standards while providing adequate setbacks. Given the existing layout of the property, only one-way traffic can be accommodated and new driveways and queuing lanes must be installed around the proposed carwash building. The proposed reduction of the interior landscape setback is to accommodate the required queuing lanes for vehicles on this new driveway, while maintaining enough space to install a new landscape planter along the front property line. Staff believes that the proposed layout of the project is designed in a manner that is sensitive to the adjacent residential properties, as a sufficient landscape setback would be provided adjacent to a new 10-foot high masonry wall. With this variance, the property owner would be allowed to develop the property in a manner that is compatible with other commercial uses in the vicinity. Because subject property’s lot depth is narrower than a typical C-G zoned property located along a major arterial highway, and the constraints resulting from the existing layout of the property, staff believes that there are special circumstances applicable to the property to justify the requested landscape setback variances. Therefore, staff recommends approval of this landscape setback variance request. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-06006, VARIANCE NO. 2019-05121, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2019-00433 September 4, 2019 Page 6 of 7 Administrative Adjustment: The applicant requests an administrative adjustment to exceed the maximum 20-foot building height in commercial zones adjacent to single family residential zones. The Planning Director has a review authority over Administrative Adjustments, but may refer any application to the Planning Commission for review. Since the conditional use permit must be approved by the Planning Commission, the Planning Director has referred the Administrative Adjustment to the Commission to provide a comprehensive evaluation of the project and to make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) The adjustment is consistent with the purposes and intent of the Zoning Code; 2) The same or similar result cannot be achieved by using provisions in the Zoning Code that do not require the adjustment; and 3) The adjustment will not produce a result that is out of character or detrimental to the neighborhood. The exception to the 20 foot height limit is requested specifically for a detached architectural feature at the entry of the carwash tunnel, and for a portion of the building’s angled standing seam metal roof toward the north end of the building. These two features exceed the maximum height by two feet for structures within 50 feet of a residential zone. These building features are standard design elements in Fast5Xpress Carwash facilities and would not negatively impact the surrounding properties. The additional two feet is negligible in massing as the roof element and architectural feature occurs gradually across the lateral plane of the building and is located on the eastern side of the property away from the existing residences. The adjustment will also allow for the screening of rooftop mechanical equipment in a manner architecturally compatible with the overall design of the building, and, it will not produce a project that is out of character or detrimental to the neighborhood. Staff supports the request for the minor adjustment to the building height to allow for these architectural roof elements. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-06006, VARIANCE NO. 2019-05121, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2019-00433 September 4, 2019 Page 7 of 7 Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15303, Class 3 (New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures). Class 3 consists of construction and location of limited numbers of new small structures or facilities. In urbanized areas, this exemption applies to up four commercial buildings that comprise a total of 10,000 square feet. The proposed project is for a 4,162 square foot express carwash. Pursuant to Section 15300.2 (c) and 15303 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: The express carwash use would be developed and operated in a manner that is compatible with the surrounding area. The proposed project is consistent with the General Commercial zoning for the property and with the requested exceptions to landscaping and building height, will be designed to ensure that the vehicular circulation, parking, and noise generated by the carwash operations do not impact surrounding properties. Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the request for the new carwash facility. Prepared by, Submitted by, Wayne Carvalho David See Contract Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution 2. Development Summary 3. Conceptual Site Plan, Floor Plans and Elevations 4. Conceptual Landscape Plan 5. Noise Impact Analysis 6. Parking Justification Letter 7. Trip Generation and Queuing Analysis 8. Project Narrative 9. Photographs C-G DEV 2019-0001 7 CARWASH RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE C-G ANAHEIM TOWN SQUARE C-G ANAHEIM TOWN SQUARE C-G RETAIL R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E C-G RETAIL RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R S - 2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E C-G RETAIL R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E C-G RETAIL C-G AUTO REPAIR/ SERVICE C-G RETAIL C-G ANAHEIM TOWN SQUARE RM-4 APTS 6 DU RM-4 FOURPLEX RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E C-G RETAIL C-G RETAIL RM-4 APTS 16 DU RM-4 APTS 8 DU RM-4 APTS 14 DU RM-4 APTS 7 DU RM-4 APTS 8 DU RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE C-G RETAIL RS-2 SFR C-G OFFICES C-G OFFICES R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E S S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D E B R O A D W A Y E E L M S T E S A N T A A N A S T S R E S E D A S T E W I L L O W S T E WESTPORT DR S A S H S T S R E V E R E S T S B E E C H W O O D S T S C L I F F R O S E S T S C O N I F E R S T S P L Y M O U T H P L S A S H S T E. LINCOLN AVE E. LA PALMA AVE S . E A S T S T E. SOUTH ST N . E A S T S T S . R I O V I S T A S T E. WAGNER AVE E . B R O A D W A Y N . S U N K I S T S T N . R I O V I S T A S T E . B R O A D W A Y 4 0 7 S o u t h S t a t e Co l le g e B o u l e va r d D E V N o . 2 0 1 9 -0 0 0 1 7 Subject Property APN: 037-222-05 037-222-36 037-222-37 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Ph oto : Ma y 2 01 8 S S T A T E C O L L E G E B L V D E B R O A D W A Y E E L M S T E S A N T A A N A S T S R E S E D A S T E W I L L O W S T E WESTPORT DR S A S H S T S R E V E R E S T S B E E C H W O O D S T S C L I F F R O S E S T S C O N I F E R S T S P L Y M O U T H P L S A S H S T E. LINCOLN AVE E. LA PALMA AVE S . E A S T S T E. SOUTH ST N . E A S T S T S . R I O V I S T A S T E. WAGNER AVE E . B R O A D W A Y N . S U N K I S T S T N . R I O V I S T A S T E . B R O A D W A Y 4 0 7 S o u t h S t a t e Co l le g e B o u l e va r d D E V N o . 2 0 1 9 -0 0 0 1 7 Subject Property APN: 037-222-05 037-222-36 037-222-37 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Ph oto : Ma y 2 01 8 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 -1- PC2019-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2019-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-06006, VARIANCE NO. 2019-05121, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2019-00433 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2019-00017) (407 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim ("Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-06006, Variance No. 2019- 05121 and Administrative Adjustment No. 2019-00433 to construct a new express carwash facility with reduced landscape setbacks and increased building height (herein referred to as the "Proposed Project") on that certain real property located at 407 South State College Boulevard in the City of Anaheim, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"), pursuant to Section 18.60.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code (“Code”); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 0.77- acres in size and is developed with a 4,300 square foot, 1-story commercial building. The Property is located in the C-G (General Commercial) zone and is, therefore, subject to the zoning and development standards described in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial zones) of the Code. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for Office-Low land uses; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on September 4, 2019 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-06006, Variance No. 2019-05121, and Administrative Adjustment No. 2019-00433, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission also finds and determines that the effects of the proposed construction of a new carwash facility are typical of those generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 3 – New Construction or Conversion of Small Structures) which consists of the construction and location of limited numbers of new, small facilities or structures. Section 15303 of the CEQA Guidelines provides examples of projects that qualify for an exemption from the provisions of CEQA, one of which being the construction of commercial buildings not - 2 - PC2019-*** exceeding 10,000 square feet in floor area on sites zoned for such use if not involving the use of significant amounts of hazardous substances where all necessary public services and facilities are available and the surrounding area is not environmentally sensitive. The Proposed Project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-06006, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The Proposed Project is an allowable use within the "C-G" Commercial Zone under subsection .010 of Section 18.08.030.010 (Uses) of Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Code, subject to a conditional use permit and the zoning and development standards of the "C-G" Commercial Zone; and 2. The request to permit the Proposed Project would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area because the conditions of approval contained herein will mitigate any potential impacts to surrounding residential properties. Furthermore, the Proposed Project will improve the aesthetics on the Property and the overall appearance of the project site, and would not have an adverse effect on adjacent residential and commercial uses; and 3. The size and shape of the site is adequate to allow the full development of the Proposed Project in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area nor to the health and safety of the public because the site can accommodate the parking, traffic flows, and circulation without creating detrimental effects on adjacent properties; and 4. The traffic generated by the Proposed Project would not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic generated by the Proposed Project will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic on the surrounding streets and adequate parking will be provided to accommodate the future uses; and 5. The granting of the conditional use permit will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim because the Proposed Project would significantly improve the overall appearance of the project site, and is compatible with the surrounding area, subject to compliance with the conditions contained herein; and WHEREAS, based upon the request letter submitted by the applicant and observations made by staff, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request for Variance No. 2019-05121 to permit landscape setbacks less than required by the Code should be approved for the following reasons: SECTION NO. 18.08.060.010.0101 Minimum Landscaped Setback. 15 feet required along any arterial highway 10 feet proposed 10 feet required along residential zone boundary 3 feet proposed - 3 - PC2019-*** 1. That there are special circumstances applicable to the Property, including size, shape, location and surroundings, which do not apply to other properties under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity of the Proposed Project. The subject property has a lot width of approximately 265 feet and a lot depth of approximately 117 feet and abuts residential property to the rear. Additional setback and building height restrictions apply to this project that do not apply to other properties that abut non-residential properties. 2. There are other sites with similar lot sizes and lot depths that are developed with commercial uses that do not have the same circulation constraints that a self-service express carwash has due to the area needed to accommodate queuing lanes, drive aisles for vacuum stalls, and the full landscape setback along the street frontage and residential property lines. 3. That, because of these special circumstances, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under the identical zoning classification in the vicinity because similar front landscape setback variances have previously been approved for other automotive service oriented uses throughout the City. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission does further find and determine that the request for Administrative Adjustment No. 2019-00433 may be approved for the following reasons: SECTION NO. 18.08.050 Maximum Structural Height. (20 feet permitted; 22 feet proposed) 1. The adjustment for a 10% increase in the allowable building height for structures within 150 feet of a single-family residential zone is consistent with the purposes and intent of the Zoning Code because the new express carwash facility includes a roof element and an architectural element specific to the business that will provide unique design features to the facility. The additional two feet is negligible in massing as the roof element and architectural feature occurs gradually across the lateral plane of the building and is located on the eastern side of the property away from the existing residences; and 2. The same or similar result cannot be achieved by using provisions in the Zoning Code that do not require the adjustment. The Zoning Code restricts structures over 20 feet in height within 50 feet of single-family residential zoned properties. The application of the 10% adjustment to the 50-foot setback would result in only a 5-foot reduction in the required setback, insufficient to allow the proposed 22-foot building height; and 3. The adjustment will allow for the screening of rooftop mechanical equipment in a manner architecturally compatible with the overall design of the building, and will not produce a result that is out of character or detrimental to the neighborhood as the carwash is designed to be a compatible use with the surrounding area; therefore, the Proposed Project would not negatively impact the surrounding neighborhood. and; - 4 - PC2019-*** WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-06006, Variance No. 2019-05121, and Administrative Adjustment No. 2019-00433 at the Property, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval described in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the Property in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. - 5 - PC2019-*** THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of September 4, 2019. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on September 4, 2019, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of September, 2019. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 6 - PC2019-*** - 7 - PC2019-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2019-06006 VARIANCE NO. 2019-05121 ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2019-00433 (DEV2019-00017) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS 1 Prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints, pad elevations, finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls, erosion control and other pertinent information in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California Building Code, latest edition. Public Works, Development Services 2 Prepare and submit a final drainage/hydrology study, including supporting hydraulic and hydrological data to the City of Anaheim for review and approval. The study shall confirm or recommend changes to the City's adopted Master Drainage Plan by identifying off-site and on-site storm water runoff impacts resulting from build-out of permitted General Plan land uses. In addition, the study shall identify the project's contribution and shall provide locations and sizes of catchments and system connection points and all downstream drainage-mitigating measures including but not limited to offsite storm drains and interim detention facilities. Public Works, Development Services 3 Submit a Geotechnical Report to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval. The report shall include any proposed infiltration features of the WQMP. Public Works, Development Services 4 The final Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) shall be submitted for review and approval to Public Works Development Services and comply with the most current requirements of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP). Public Works, Development Services 5 The legal property owner shall submit an abandonment application for the vacation of the existing alley on the project site. Such abandonment shall be approved by City Council prior to grading permit issuance. Public Works, Development Services 6 A signed and notarized Right-of-Entry shall be provided for all work that will be performed in the neighboring properties under different ownership. Public Works, Development Services - 8 - PC2019-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 7 The Owner/Developer shall submit a set of improvement plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval in determining the conditions necessary for providing water service to the project. Public Utilities, Water Engineering PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 8 The Civil Engineer shall survey and certify the design pad elevation and submit a line and grade certification. Public Works, Development Services 9 Prior to the issuance of the building permit, street improvement plans shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Development Services Division for review and approval. The improvements shall include but not limited to removal and reconstruction of alley, driveway approaches, curb and gutter, pavement, bust stop relocation with new bus pad, utility removals, installations, etc. as determined and approved by the City Engineer. The developer’s engineer shall submit to the City for review and approval an engineering cost estimate for the cost of the required improvements. Public Works, Development Services 10 The legal property owner shall submit an application for a Subdivision Map Act Certificate of Compliance to the Public Works Department, Development Services Division. A Certificate of Compliance or Conditional Certificate of Compliance shall be approved by the City Engineer and recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder prior to issuance of a building permit. Public Works, Development Services 11 The applicant shall submit to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval a Lot Line Adjustment document. The document shall be approved by the City Surveyor and recorded, along with conforming deed, in the office of the Orange County Recorder. Public Works, Development Services 12 The developer shall submit street improvement plans, obtain a right of way construction permit, and post a security (Performance and Labor & Materials Bonds) in an amount approved by the City Engineer and in a form approved by the City Attorney for the construction of all required public improvements along State College Blvd and any necessary improvements on the alley adjacent to the property. Public improvements shall conform to the applicable City Standards and as approved by the City Engineer. Public Works, Development Services - 9 - PC2019-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 13 The applicant shall coordinate with OCTA to relocate the bus stop and all other facilities. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 14 A private water system with separate water service for fire protection and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 15 All backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Any backflow assemblies currently installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 16 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 17 All existing water services and fire services shall conform to current Water Services Standards Specifications. Any water service and/or fire line that does not meet current standards shall be upgraded if continued use is necessary or abandoned if the existing service is no longer needed. The Owner/Developer shall be responsible for the costs to upgrade or to abandon any water service or fire line. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 18 The Car Wash shall comply with all state laws and local ordinances for Water Conservation Measures, including Chapter 10.18 of Anaheim Municipal Code and Ordinance relating to Water Reduction provisions. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 19 The Owner/Developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequacy of the existing water system to provide the estimated water demands. Any off-site water system improvements required to serve the project shall be done in Public Utilities, Water Engineering - 10 - PC2019-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT accordance with Rule No. 15A.1 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. 20 Water improvement plans shall be submitted to the Water Engineering Division for approval and a performance bond in the amount approved by the City Engineer and form approved by City Attorney shall be posted with the City of Anaheim. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 21 Applicant shall contact Water Engineering for recycled water system requirements and specific water conservation measures to be incorporated into the building and landscape construction plans. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 22 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish electrical service requirements and submit electric system plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related technical drawings and specifications. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 23 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with dimensions as shown on the approved utility service plan. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 24 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall submit payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 25 The managers and/or owners shall be responsible for maintaining the area adjacent to the premises over which they have control, in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular maintenance and removal of trash or debris. Any graffiti painted or marked upon the premises or on any adjacent area under the control of the licensee shall be removed or painted over within 24 hours of being applied. Planning and Building Code Enforcement Division PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTIONS 26 The Developer shall construct all improvements along State College Boulevard and on the adjacent alley. Said improvements shall be inspected and approved by the Public Works Inspector prior to the final building and zoning inspections. Public Works, Development Services 27 All remaining fees/deposits required by Public Works department must be paid in full. Public Works, Development Services - 11 - PC2019-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 28 All required on-site Water Quality Management Plan and public right of way improvements shall be completed, operational, and are subject to review and approval by the Public Works Inspector. Public Works, Development Services 29 Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the property, behind property line and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities, Water Engineering GENERAL CONDITIONS 30 The following minimum clearances shall be provided around all new and existing public water facilities (e.g. water mains, fire hydrants, service laterals, meters, meter boxes, backflow devices, etc.): • 10 feet from structures, footings, walls, stormwater BMPs, power poles, street lights, and trees. • 5 feet from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb returns, and all other utilities (e.g. storm drain, gas, electric, etc.) or above ground facilities. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 31 Hours of Operation for the carwash facility shall be restricted to 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. seven days a week. Any changes to the facility’s hours of operation shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning and Building, Planning Services Division 32 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Planning and Building, Planning Services Division 33 The Applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building, Planning Services Division - 12 - PC2019-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 34 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building, Planning Services Division 35 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building, Planning Services Division DEVELOPMENT SUMMARY FAST5XPRESS CAR WASH (DEV2019-00017) Development Standard CG Zone Standards Proposed Project Land Use 4,162 sq. ft. Carwash Site Area N/A 26,305 sq. ft. (0.61 ac) for 3 lots +abandoned alley Building Height 20’ S/B for 1 story (20’) from Res zone 51’ S/B for 2 stories (28’) from Res zone 22’ ** Landscape Setbacks 15’ from Arterial 10’ abutting residential w/trees 20’OC 0’ abutting non-residential 10’ (State College Blvd.)* 3’ to West (SFR)* 1’ to 8’ to South (1-story bike shop/dairy) 12’ to North (2-story office bldg.) Structural Setbacks 15’ from Arterial 20’ from Any Residential Boundary 0’ from Any Non-Residential Interior 10’ from Any Alley 50’ to front (State College Blvd.) 34’ to West (SFR) 72’ to South (1-story bike shop/dairy) 55’ to South (from S-Canopy) 50’ to North (2-story office bldg.) FAR 0.50 0.12 (4,162 sq. ft.) Parking Determined by Parking Demand Study 16 spaces total 13 vacuum stalls 3 employee spaces Walls 6’ block wall exists 10’ high block wall to replace existing *Variance Request **Administrative Adjustment Request ATTACHMENT NO. 2 ELEC. RM. WASH TUNNEL SALES OFFICE OFFICE EQUIPMENT RM. SOUTH STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD DATE: S H E E T N U M B E R : NOT FOR CONSTRUCTION FAST 5 XPRESS CARWASH 0 8 - 2 2 - 2 0 1 9 D a t e : 1 8 0 0 1 7 6 P r o j e c t N u m b e r : R L D r a w n B y : J P C h e c k e d B y : XX/XX/XX REVISION DESCRIPTION: A S S P E C I F I E D S c a l e : C O N S U L T A N T : S H E E T N A M E : 1 8 4 0 0 V o n K a r m a n A v e . , S u i t e 6 0 0 I r v i n e , C A 9 2 6 1 2 O : 9 4 9 . 2 5 2 . 1 0 2 2 F : 9 4 9 . 2 5 2 . 8 0 8 2 w w w . k p f f . c o m N O T F O R C O N S T R U C T I O N E X H B - 1 P R E L I M I N A R Y S I T E P L A N A T T A C H M E N T N O . 3 AREA TABULATION BUILDING DATA F L O O R P L A N JOB #: 18106 K e v i n L . C r o o k I n c R O O F P L A N JOB #: 18106 K e v i n L . C r o o k I n c 01/08/2019 ATTACHMENT NO. 4 NOISE IMPACT ANALYSIS Fast5Xpress Carwash Project City of Anaheim Lead Agency: City of Anaheim 200 S Anaheim Boulevard Anaheim, CA 92805 Prepared by: Vista Environmental 1021 Didrikson Way Laguna Beach, California 92651 949 510 5355 Marisa Jue Greg Tonkovich, INCE Project No. 18115 July 29, 2019 ATTACHMENT NO. 5 Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page i TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives ................................................................................. 1 1.2 Site Location and Study Area ..................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Proposed Project Description .................................................................................................... 1 1.4 Standard Noise Regulatory Conditions ...................................................................................... 1 1.5 Summary of Analysis Results ..................................................................................................... 2 1.6 Mitigation Measures for the Proposed Project ......................................................................... 3 2.0 Noise Fundamentals ................................................................................................................ 6 2.1 Noise Descriptors ....................................................................................................................... 6 2.2 Tone Noise ................................................................................................................................. 6 2.3 Noise Propagation ...................................................................................................................... 6 2.4 Ground Absorption .................................................................................................................... 7 3.0 Ground‐Borne Vibration Fundamentals ................................................................................... 8 3.1 Vibration Descriptors ................................................................................................................. 8 3.2 Vibration Perception .................................................................................................................. 8 3.3 Vibration Propagation ................................................................................................................ 8 4.0 Regulatory Setting ................................................................................................................... 9 4.1 Federal Regulations ................................................................................................................... 9 4.2 State Regulations ..................................................................................................................... 10 4.3 Local Regulations ..................................................................................................................... 11 5.0 Existing Noise Conditions ....................................................................................................... 14 5.1 Noise Measurement Equipment .............................................................................................. 14 5.2 Noise Measurement Results .................................................................................................... 14 6.0 Modeling Parameters and Assumptions ................................................................................. 17 6.1 Construction Noise ................................................................................................................... 17 6.2 Operational Noise .................................................................................................................... 18 6.3 Vibration .................................................................................................................................. 19 7.0 Impact Analysis ..................................................................................................................... 20 7.1 CEQA Thresholds of Significance.............................................................................................. 20 7.2 Generation of Noise Levels in Excess of Standards ................................................................. 20 7.3 Generation of Excessive Groundborne Vibration .................................................................... 23 7.4 Aircraft Noise ........................................................................................................................... 23 8.0 References ............................................................................................................................. 24 Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page ii TABLE OF CONTENTS CONTINUED APPENDIX Appendix A – Field Noise Measurements Photo Index Appendix B – Field Noise Measurements Printouts Appendix C – Reference Noise Measurements Printouts Appendix D ‐ RCNM Model Construction Noise Calculations Appendix E – Operational Noise Sound Wall Noise Reduction Calculations Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page iii LIST OF FIGURES Figure 1 – Project Location Map ................................................................................................................... 4 Figure 2 – Proposed Site Plan ....................................................................................................................... 5 Figure 3 – Field Noise Measurements Graph .............................................................................................. 16 LIST OF TABLES Table A – FTA Construction Noise Criteria .................................................................................................. 10 Table B – Existing (Ambient) Noise Level Measurements .......................................................................... 15 Table C – Construction Equipment Noise Emissions and Usage Factors .................................................... 17 Table D – Reference Noise Level Measurements ....................................................................................... 19 Table E – Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment ................................................................. 19 Table F – Construction Noise Levels at the Homes to the West ................................................................. 21 Table G – Operational Noise Levels at the Homes to the West .................................................................. 22 Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page iv ACRONYMS AND ABBREVIATIONS ANSI American National Standards Institute Caltrans California Department of Transportation CEQA California Environmental Quality Act cmu Concrete masonry unit CNEL Community Noise Equivalent Level dB Decibel dBA A‐weighted decibels DOT Department of Transportation FHWA Federal Highway Administration FTA Federal Transit Administration EPA Environmental Protection Agency Hz Hertz Ldn Day‐night average noise level Leq Equivalent sound level Lmax Maximum noise level ONAC Federal Office of Noise Abatement and Control OSB Oriented Strand Board OSHA Occupational Safety and Health Administration PPV Peak particle velocity RMS Root mean square SEL Single Event Level or Sound Exposure Level STC Sound Transmission Class UMTA Federal Urban Mass Transit Administration VdB Vibration velocity level in decibels Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 1 1.0 INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose of Analysis and Study Objectives This Noise Impact Analysis has been prepared to determine the noise impacts associated with the proposed Fast5Xpress Carwash project (proposed project). The following is provided in this report: A description of the study area and the proposed project; Information regarding the fundamentals of noise; Information regarding the fundamentals of vibration; A description of the local noise guidelines and standards; An evaluation of the current noise environment; An analysis of the potential short‐term construction‐related noise impacts from the proposed project; and, An analysis of long‐term operations‐related noise impacts from the proposed project. 1.2 Site Location and Study Area The project site is located in the central portion of the City of Anaheim (City) at 407 South State College Boulevard. The approximately 0.79‐acre project site is currently contains a banquet hall and parking lot. The project site is bounded by a public alleyway and an office building to the north, State College Boulevard and commercial uses to the east, commercial uses to the south, and single‐family residential uses to the west. The project study area is shown in Figure 1. Sensitive Receptors in Project Vicinity The nearest sensitive receptors to the project site are the single‐family homes located adjacent to the west side of the project site. The nearest school to the project site is South Junior High School, which is located as near as 0.4 mile southeast of the project site. 1.3 Proposed Project Description The proposed project would consist of the development of an automated carwash with two queue lanes, located on the west side of the proposed carwash structure, app roximately 13 vacuum stall parking spaces located on the east side of the proposed carwash structure to a llow for the customers to clean the interior of their vehicles, and three employee parking spaces on the south side of proposed carwash structure. The proposed project would also include construction of a 10‐foot high wall adjacent to the west property line. The proposed hours of operation will be seven days a week from 7:00 a.m. to 8:00 p.m. in the summer and 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. in the winter. The proposed site plan is shown in Figure 2. 1.4 Standard Noise Regulatory Conditions The proposed project will be required to comply with the following regulatory conditions from the City of Anaheim and State of California. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 2 City of Anaheim Municipal Code The following lists the City of Anaheim Municipal Code regulations that are applicable to all development projects in the City. Section 6.70.010 Sound Pressure Levels Section 6.70.010 of the City’s Municipal Code restricts noise levels to 60 dBA at any point on the property line. Section 6.70.010 exempts construction noise that occurs between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. from the 60 dBA stationary noise standard. Compliance with this regulation will reduce the construction‐related and operational‐related noise impacts to the nearby sensitive receptors. State of California Rules The following lists the State of California rules that are applicable to all industrial projects in the State. California Vehicle Code Section 27200‐27207 – On‐Road Vehicle Noise California Vehicle Code Section 27200‐27207 provides noise limits for vehicles operated in California. For vehicles over 10,000 pounds noise is limited to 88 dB for vehicles manufactured before 1973, 86 dB for vehicles manufactured before 1975, 83 dB for vehicles manufactured before 1988, and 80 dB for vehicles manufactured after 1987. All measurements are based at 50 feet from the vehicle. California Vehicle Section 38365‐38380 – Off‐Road Vehicle Noise California Vehicle Code Section 38365‐38380 provides noise limits for off‐highway motor vehicles operated in California. 92 dBA for vehicles manufactured before 1973, 88 dBA for vehicles manufactured before 1975, 86 dBA for vehicles manufactured before 1986, and 82 dBA for vehicles manufactured after December 31, 1985. All measurements are based at 50 feet from the vehicle. 1.5 Summary of Analysis Results The following is a summary of the proposed project’s impacts with regard to the State CEQA Guidelines noise checklist questions. Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies? Less than significant impact. Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels? Less than significant impact. For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels? No impact. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 3 1.6 Mitigation Measures for the Proposed Project This analysis found that through adherence to the noise and vibration regulations detailed in Section 1.4 above would limit all noise and vibration impacts to less than significant levels. No mitigation measures are required for the proposed project with respect to noise and vibration impacts. Figure 1 Project Location MapVISTA ENVIRONMENTAL SOURCE: Google Maps. N Project Site Figure 2 Proposed Site PlanVISTA ENVIRONMENTAL SOURCE: SMP N Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 6 2.0 NOISE FUNDAMENTALS Noise is defined as unwanted sound. Sound becomes unwanted when it interferes with normal activities, when it causes actual physical harm or when it has adverse effects on health. Sound is produced by the vibration of sound pressure waves in the air. Sound pressure levels are used to measure the intensity of sound and are described in terms of decibels. The decibel (dB) is a logarithmic unit which expresses the ratio of the sound pressure level being measured to a standard reference level. A‐weighted decibels (dBA) approximate the subjective response of the human ear to a broad frequency noise source by discriminating against very low and very high frequencies of the audible spectrum. They are adjusted to reflect only those frequencies which are audible to the human ear. 2.1 Noise Descriptors Noise Equivalent sound levels are not measured directly, but are calculated from sound pressure levels typically measured in A‐weighted decibels (dBA). The equivalent sound level (Leq) represents a steady state sound level containing the same total energy as a time varying signal over a given sample period. The peak traffic hour Leq is the noise metric used by California Department of Transportation (Caltrans) for all traffic noise impact analyses. The Day‐Night Average Level (Ldn) is the weighted average of the intensity of a sound, with corrections for time of day, and averaged over 24 hours. The time of day corrections require the addition of ten decibels to sound levels at night between 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. While the Community Noise Equivalent Level (CNEL) is similar to the Ldn, except that it has another addition of 4.77 decibels to sound levels during the evening hours between 7 p.m. and 10 p.m. These additions are made to the sound levels at these time periods because during the evening and nighttime hours, when compared to daytime hours, there is a decrease in the ambient noise levels, which creates an increased sensitivity to sounds. For this reason the sound appears louder in the evening and nighttime hours and is weighted accordingly. The City of Anaheim relies on the CNEL noise standard to assess transportation‐related impacts on noise sensitive land uses. 2.2 Tone Noise A pure tone noise is a noise produced at a single frequency and laboratory tests have shown that humans are more perceptible to changes in noise levels of a pure tone. For a noise source to contain a “pure tone,” there must be a significantly higher A‐weighted sound energy in a given frequency band than in the neighboring bands, thereby causing the noise source to “stand out” against other noise sources. A pure tone occurs if the sound pressure level in the one‐third octave band with the tone exceeds the average of the sound pressure levels of the two contiguous one‐third octave bands by: 5 dB for center frequencies of 500 hertz (Hz) and above 8 dB for center frequencies between 160 and 400 Hz 15 dB for center frequencies of 125 Hz or less 2.3 Noise Propagation From the noise source to the receiver, noise changes both in level and frequency spectrum. The most obvious is the decrease in noise as the distance from the source increases. The manner in which noise reduces with distance depends on whether the source is a point or line source as well as ground absorption, atmospheric effects and refraction, and shielding by natural and manmade features. Sound Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 7 from point sources, such as air conditioning condensers, radiate uniformly outward as it travels away from the source in a spherical pattern. The noise drop‐off rate associated with this geometric spreading is 6 dBA per each doubling of the distance (dBA/DD). Transportation noise sources such as roadways are typically analyzed as line sources, since at any given moment the receiver may be impacted by noise from multiple vehicles at various locations along the roadway. Because of the geometry of a line source, the noise drop‐off rate associated with the geometric spreading of a line source is 3 dBA/DD. 2.4 Ground Absorption The sound drop‐off rate is highly dependent on the conditions of the land between the noise source and receiver. To account for this ground‐effect attenuation (absorption), two types of site conditions are commonly used in traffic noise models, soft‐site and hard‐site conditions. Soft‐site conditions account for the sound propagation loss over natural surfaces such as normal earth and ground vegetation. For point sources, a drop‐off rate of 7.5 dBA/DD is typically observed over soft ground with landscaping, as compared with a 6.0 dBA/DD drop‐off rate over hard ground such as asphalt, concrete, stone and very hard packed earth. For line sources a 4.5 dBA/DD is typically observed for soft‐site conditions compared to the 3.0 dBA/DD drop‐off rate for hard‐site conditions. Calt rans research has shown that the use of soft‐ site conditions is more appropriate for the application of the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) traffic noise prediction model used in this analysis. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 8 3.0 GROUND‐BORNE VIBRATION FUNDAMENTALS Ground‐borne vibrations consist of rapidly fluctuating motions within the ground that have an average motion of zero. The effects of ground‐borne vibrations typically only cause a nuisance to people, but at extreme vibration levels damage to buildings may occur. Although ground‐borne vibration can be felt outdoors, it is typically only an annoyance to people indoors where the associated effects of the shaking of a building can be notable. Ground‐borne noise is an effect of ground‐borne vibration and only exists indoors, since it is produced from noise radiated from the motion of the walls and floors of a room and may also consist of the rattling of windows or dishes on shelves. 3.1 Vibration Descriptors There are several different methods that are used to quantify vibration amplitude such as the maximum instantaneous peak in the vibrations velocity, which is known as the peak particle velocity (PPV) or the root mean square (rms) amplitude of the vibration velocity. Due to the typically small amplitudes of vibrations, vibration velocity is often expressed in decibels and is denoted as (Lv) and is based on the rms velocity amplitude. A commonly used abbreviation is “VdB”, which in this text, is when Lv is based on the reference quantity of 1 micro inch per second. 3.2 Vibration Perception Typically, developed areas are continuously affected by vibration velocities of 50 VdB or lower. These continuous vibrations are not noticeable to humans whose threshold of perception is around 65 VdB. Off‐ site sources that may produce perceptible vibrations are usually caused by construction equipment, steel‐ wheeled trains, and traffic on rough roads, while smooth roads rarely produce perceptible ground‐borne noise or vibration. 3.3 Vibration Propagation The propagation of ground‐borne vibration is not as simple to model as airborne noise. This is due to the fact that noise in the air travels through a relatively uniform median, while ground‐borne vibrations travel through the earth which may contain significant geological differences. There are three main types of vibration propagation; surface, compression, and shear waves. Surface waves, or Rayleigh waves, travel along the ground’s surface. These waves carry most of their energy along an expanding circular wave front, similar to ripples produced by throwing a rock into a pool of water. P‐waves, or compression waves, are body waves that carry their energy along an expanding spherical wave front. The particle motion in these waves is longitudinal (i.e., in a “push‐pull” fashion). P‐waves are analogous to airborne sound waves. S‐waves, or shear waves, are also body waves that carry energy along an expanding spherical wave front. However, unlike P‐waves, the particle motion is transverse or “side‐to‐side and perpendicular to the direction of propagation.” As vibration waves propagate from a source, the vibration energy decreases in a logarithmic nature and the vibration levels typically decrease by 6 VdB per doubling of the distance from the vibration source. As stated above, this drop‐off rate can vary greatly depending on the soil but has been shown to be effective enough for screening purposes, in order to identify potential vibration impacts that may need to be studied through actual field tests. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 9 4.0 REGULATORY SETTING The project site is located in the City of Anaheim. Noise regulations are addressed through the efforts of various federal, state, and local government agencies. The agencies responsible for regulating noise are discussed below. 4.1 Federal Regulations The adverse impact of noise was officially recognized by the federal government in the Noise Control Act of 1972, which serves three purposes: Promulgating noise emission standards for interstate commerce Assisting state and local abatement efforts Promoting noise education and research The Federal Office of Noise Abatement and Control (ONAC) was initially tasked with implementing the Noise Control Act. However, the ONAC has since been eliminated, leaving the development of federal noise policies and programs to other federal agencies and interagency committees. For example, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) agency prohibits exposure of workers to excessive sound levels. The Department of Transportation (DOT) assumed a significant role in noise control through its various operating agencies. The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) regulates noise of aircraft and airports. Surface transportation system noise is regulated by a host of agencies, including the Federal Transit Administration (FTA). Transit noise is regulated by the federal Urban Mass Transit Administration (UMTA), while freeways that are part of the interstate highway system are regulated by the Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). Finally, the federal government actively advocates that local jurisdictions use their land use regulatory authority to arrange new development in such a way that “noise sensitive” uses are either prohibited from being sited adjacent to a highway or, alternately that the developments are planned and constructed in such a manner that potential noise impacts are minimized. Although the proposed project is not under the jurisdiction of the FTA, the FTA is the only agency that has defined what constitutes a significant noise impact from implementing a project. The FTA recommends developing construction noise criteria on a project‐specific basis that utilizes local noise ordinances if possible. However, local noise ordinances usually relates to nuisance and hours of allowed activity and sometimes specify limits in terms of maximum levels, but are generally not practical for assessing the noise impacts of a construction project. Project construction noise criteria should take into account the existing noise environment, the absolute noise levels during construction activities, the duration of the construction, and the adjacent land uses. The FTA standards are based on extensive studies by the FTA and other governmental agencies on the human effects and reaction to noise and a summary of the FTA findings for a detailed construction noise assessment are provided below in Table A. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 10 Table A – FTA Construction Noise Criteria Land Use Day (dBA Leq(8‐hour)) Night (dBA Leq(8‐hour)) 30‐day Average (dBA Ldn) Residential 80 70 75 (1) Commercial 85 85 80 (2) Industrial 90 90 85 (2) Notes: (1) In urban areas with very high ambient noise levels (Ldn > 65 dB), Ldn from construction operations should not exceed existing ambient +10 dB (2) 24‐hour Leq not Ldn. Source: Federal Transit Administration, 2006. Since the federal government has preempted the setting of standards for noise levels that can be emitted by the transportation sources, the City is restricted to regulating the noise generated by the transportation system through nuisance abatement ordinances and land use planning. 4.2 State Regulations Noise Standards California Department of Health Services Office of Noise Control Established in 1973, the California Department of Health Services Office of Noise Control (ONC) was instrumental in developing regularity tools to control and abate noise for use by local agencies. One significant model is the “Land Use Compatibility for Community Noise Environments Matrix,” which allows the local jurisdiction to clearly delineate compatibility of sensitive uses with various incremental levels of noise. California Noise Insulation Standards Title 24, Chapter 1, Article 4 of the California Administrative Code (California Noise Insulation Standards) requires noise insulation in new hotels, motels, apartment houses, and dwellings (other than single‐family detached housing) that provides an annual average noise level of no more than 45 dBA CNEL. When such structures are located within a 60‐dBA CNEL (or greater) noise contour, an acoustical analysis is required to ensure that interior levels do not exceed the 45‐dBA CNEL annual threshold. In addition, Title 21, Chapter 6, Article 1 of the California Administrative Code requires that all habitable rooms, hospitals, convalescent homes, and places of worship shall have an interior CNEL of 45 dB or less due to aircraft noise. Government Code Section 65302 Government Code Section 65302 mandates that the legislative body of each county and city in California adopt a noise element as part of its comprehensive general plan. The local noise element must recognize the land use compatibility guidelines published by the State Department of Health Services. The guidelines rank noise land use compatibility in terms of normally acceptable, conditionally acceptable, normally unacceptable, and clearly unacceptable. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 11 Vibration Standards Title 14 of the California Administrative Code Section 15000 requires that all state and local agencies implement the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, which requires the analysis of exposure of persons to excessive groundborne vibration. However, no statute has been adopted by the state that quantifies the level at which excessive groundborne vibration occurs. Caltrans issued the Transportation‐ and Construction‐Induced Vibration Guidance Manual in 2004. The manual provides practical guidance to Caltrans engineers, planners, and consultants who must address vibration issues associated with the construction, operation, and maintenance of Caltrans projects. However, this manual is also used as a reference point by many lead agencies and CEQA practitioners throughout California, as it provides numeric thresholds for vibration impacts. Thresholds are established for continuous (construction‐related) and transient (transportation‐related) sources of vibration, which found that the human response becomes distinctly perceptible at 0.25 inch per second PPV for transient sources and 0.04 inch per second PPV for continuous sources. 4.3 Local Regulations The City of Anaheim General Plan and Municipal Code establishes the following applicable policies related to noise and vibration. City of Anaheim General Plan The following applicable goals and policies to the proposed project are from the Noise Element of the General Plan. Goal 1.1: Protect sensitive land uses from excessive noise through diligent planning and regulation. Policies 2) Continue to enforce acceptable noise standards consistent with health and quality of life goals and employ effective techniques of noise abatement through such means as a noise ordinance, building codes, and subdivision and zoning regulations. 3) Consider the compatibility of proposed land uses with the noise environment when preparing, revising or reviewing development proposals. 4) Require mitigation where sensitive uses are to be placed along transportation routes to ensure that noise levels are minimized through appropriate means of mitigation thereby maintaining quality of life standards. 5) Encourage proper site planning and architecture to reduce noise impacts. 6) Discourage the siting of sensitive uses in areas in excess of 65 dBA CNEL without appropriate mitigation. 7) Require that site‐specific noise studies be conducted by a qualified acoustic consultant utilizing acceptable methodologies while reviewing the development of sensitive land uses or development that has the potential to impact sensitive land uses. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 12 Goal 2.1: Encourage the reduction of noise from transportation‐related noise sources such as motor vehicles, aircraft operations, and railroad movements. Policies 3) Require that development generating increased traffic and subsequent increases in the ambient noise level adjacent to noise‐sensitive land uses provide appropriate mitigation measures. Goal 3.1: Protect residents from the effects of “spill over” or nuisance noise emanating from the City’s activity centers. Policies 1) Discourage new projects located in commercial or entertainment areas from exceeding stationary‐source noise standards at the property line of proximate residential or commercial uses, as appropriate. 3) Enforce standards to regulate noise from construction activities. Particular emphasis shall be placed on the restriction of the hours in which work other than emergency work may occur. Discourage construction on weekends or holidays except in the case of construction proximate to schools where these operations could disturb the classroom environment. 4) Require that construction equipment operate with mufflers and intake silencers no less effective than originally equipped. 5) Encourage the use of portable noise barriers for heavy equipment operations performed within 100 feet of existing residences or make applicant provide evidence as to why the use of such barriers is infeasible. City of Anaheim Municipal Code The City of Anaheim Municipal Code establishes the following applicable standards related to noise. 6.70.010 Established. Sound produced in excess of the sound pressure levels permitted herein is hereby determined to be objectionable and constitute an infringement upon the right and quiet enjoyment of property in this City. No person shall within the City create any sound radiated for extended periods from any premises which produces a sound pressure level at any point on the property line in excess of sixty decibels (Re 0.0002 Microbar) read on the A‐scale of a sound level meter. Readings shall be taken in accordance with the instrument manufacturer’s instructions, using the slowest meter response. The sound level measuring microphone shall be placed at any point on the property line, but not closer than three (3) feet from any wa ll and not less than three (3) feet above the ground, where the above listed maximum sound pressure level shall apply. At any point the measured level shall be the average of not less than three (3) readings taken at two (2) minute intervals. To have valid readings, the levels must be five (5) decibels or more above the levels prevailing at the same point when the source’s of the alleged objectionable sound are not operating. Sound pressure levels shall be measured with a sound level meter manufactured according to American Standard S1.4‐1961 published by the American Standards Association, Inc., New York City, New York. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 13 Traffic sound created by emergency activities and sound created by governmental units or their contractors shall be exempt from the applications of this chapter. Sound created by construction or building repair of any premises within the City shall be exempt from the applications of this chapter during the hours of 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m. Additional work hours may be permitted if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works or Building Official. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 14 5.0 EXISTING NOISE CONDITIONS To determine the existing noise levels, noise measurements have been taken on the project site. The field survey noted that noise within the proposed project area is generally characterized by vehicle traffic on State College Boulevard, which is located adjacent to the east side of the project site. The following describes the measurement procedures, measurement locations, noise measurement results, and the modeling of the existing noise environment. 5.1 Noise Measurement Equipment The noise measurements were taken using two Extech Model 407780 Type 2 integrating sound level meters programmed in “slow” mode to record the sound pressure level at 3‐second intervals for approximately 24 hours in “A” weighted form. In addition, the Leq averaged over the entire measuring time and Lmax were recorded. The sound level meters and microphones were mounted approximately five to seven feet above the ground and were equipped with a windscreen. The sound level meters were calibrated before and after the monitoring using an Extech calibrator, Model 407766. The noise level measurement equipment meets American National Standards Institute specifications for sound level meters (S1.4‐1983 identified in Chapter 19.68.020.AA). Noise Measurement Location The noise monitoring locations were selected in order to obtain noise measurements of the current noise levels on the project site. The noise measurement sites were selected to provide a representative sampling of the existing noise levels on the project site. Descriptions of the noise monitoring sites are provided below in Table B. Appendix A includes a photo index of the study area and noise level measurement locations. Noise Measurement Timing and Climate The noise measurements were recorded between 10:02 a.m. on Thursday, December 13, 2018 and 10:06 a.m. on Friday, December 14, 2018. When the noise measurements were started the sky was clear, the temperature was 68 degrees Fahrenheit, the humidity was 25 percent, barometric pressure was 29.99 inches of mercury, and the wind was blowing around six miles per hour. Overnight, the sky was partly cloudy and the temperature dropped to 50 degrees Fahrenheit. At the conclusion of the noise measurements, the sky was cloudy, the temperature was 64 degrees Fahrenheit, the humidity was 32 percent, barometric pressure was 29.95 inches of mercury, and the wind was blowing around four miles per hour. 5.2 Noise Measurement Results The results of the noise level measurements are presented in Table B. The measured sound pressure levels in dBA have been used to calculate the minimum and maximum Leq averaged over 1‐hour intervals. Table B also shows the Leq, Lmax, and CNEL, based on the entire measurement time. The noise monitoring data printouts are included in Appendix B. Figure 3 shows a graph of the 24‐hour noise measurements. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 15 Table B – Existing (Ambient) Noise Level Measurements Site No. Site Description Average (dBA Leq) Maximum (dBA Lmax) (dBA Leq 1‐hour/Time) Average (dBA CNEL) Minimum Maximum A Located on a power pole that is located near the northwest corner of the project site. 59.7 89.7 53.2 1:47 a.m. 64.2 8:09 p.m. 65.2 B Located on a tree near the middle of the project site, approximately 140 feet west of State College Boulevard centerline 63.3 88.6 56.0 1:59 a.m. 68.1 8:07 p.m. 67.9 Source: Noise measurements were taken with two Extech Model 407780 Type 2 sound level meters between Thursday, December 13 and Friday, December 14, 2018. Fi g u r e 3 Fi e l d N o i s e M e a s u r e m e n t s G r a p h V IS T A E NV I R O N M E N T A L SO U R C E : T w o E x t e c h M o d e l 4 0 7 7 8 0 T y p e 2 S o u n d L e v e l M e t e r s . Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 17 6.0 MODELING PARAMETERS AND ASSUMPTIONS 6.1 Construction Noise The noise impacts from construction of the proposed project have been analyzed through use of the FHWA’s Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM). The FHWA compiled noise measurement data regarding the noise generating characteristics of several different types of construction equipment used during the Central Artery/Tunnel project in Boston. Table C below provides a list of the construction equipment anticipated to be used for each phase of construction that was calculated through use of the default equipment mixes provided by the CalEEMod model published by the South Coast Air Quality Management District for estimating air emissions from land use projects. Table C – Construction Equipment Noise Emissions and Usage Factors Equipment Description Number of Equipment Acoustical Use Factor1 (percent) Spec 721.560 Lmax at 50 feet2 (dBA, slow3) Actual Measured Lmax at 50 feet4 (dBA, slow3) Demolition Concrete/Industrial Saw 1 20 90 90 Rubber Tired Dozer 1 40 85 82 Tractor, Loader, or Backhoe 2 40 84 N/A Grading Grader 1 40 85 83 Rubber Tired Dozer 1 40 85 82 Tractor, Loader or Backhoe5 2 40 84 N/A Building Construction Crane 1 16 85 81 Forklift (Gradall) 1 40 85 83 Tractor, Loader or Backhoe5 2 40 84 N/A Paving Cement & Mortar Mixer6 4 50 80 80 Paver 1 50 85 77 Roller 2 20 85 80 Architectural Coating Air Compressor 1 40 80 78 Notes: 1 Acoustical use factor is the percentage of time each piece of equipment is operational during a typical workday. 2 Spec 721.560 is the equipment noise level utilized by the RCNM program. 3 The “slow” response averages sound levels over 1‐second increments. A “fast” response averages sound levels over 0.125‐second increments. 4 Actual Measured is the average noise level measured of each piece of equipment during the Central Artery/Tunnel project in Boston, Massachusetts primarily during the 1990s. 5 For the tractor/loader/backhoe, the tractor noise level was utilized, since it is the loudest of the three types of equipment. 6 For the cement & mortar mixer, the concrete mixer truck noise level was utilized. Source: Federal Highway Administration, 2006 and CalEEMod default equipment mix. Table C also shows the associated measured noise emissions for each piece of equipment from the RCNM model and measured percentage of typical equipment use per day. Construction noise impacts to the nearby sensitive receptors have been calculated according to the equipment noise levels and usage factors listed in Table C and through use of the RCNM. For each phase of construction, the equipment was placed at 80 feet from the nearest home, which was selected, since 80 feet is the approximate distance to the middle of the project site and due to the small size of the project site, it is anticipated that the off‐ Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 18 road equipment would operate on the entire project site over a typical 8‐hour construction day, which the FTA construction noise standard is based on. In addition, 5 dB of shielding was added to the RCNM model to account for the existing 6‐foot high concrete block wa ll located along the west side of the project site. 6.2 Operational Noise The proposed project would consist of the operation of a Fast5Xpress Carwash on the project site. In order to determine the anticipated noise created by the proposed carwash and vacuum stations, reference noise measurements were taken at the Fast5Xpress Carwash located at 481 E 17th Street, Costa Mesa that has a similar layout and utilizes similar carwash equipment to the proposed project. The following describes the measurement procedures and reference noise measurement results. Reference Noise Measurement Procedures The reference noise measurements were taken using a Larson‐Davis Model 831 Type 1 precision sound level meter programmed in “slow” mode to record noise levels in “A” weighted form as well as the frequency spectrum of the noise broken down into 1/3 octaves. The sound level meter and microphone were mounted on a tripod five feet above the ground and were equipped with a windscreen during all measurements. The sound level meter was calibrated before and after the monitoring using a Larson‐ Davis calibrator, Model CAL 200. The accuracy of the calibrator is maintained through a program established through the manufacturer and is traceable to the National Bureau of Standards. The unit meets the requirements of ANSI Standard S1.4‐1984 and IEC Standard 942: 1988 for Class 1 equipment. All noise level measurement equipment meets American National Standards Institute (ANSI) specifications for sound level meters (S1.4‐1983 identified in Chapter 19.68.020.AA). Each reference noise measurement was taken for a period of 10 minutes while the carwash was operational and in the process of washing cars. The reference noise measurements were recorded between 11:05 a.m. and 12:01 p.m. on Thursday, December 20, 2018. The reference noise measurement locations were selected in order to capture representative noise measurements in similar locations to where the nearby residential uses are located to the proposed carwash, which consists of on the side of the carwash with the vehicle queue lines to enter and pay for the carwash. Reference Noise Measurement Results The results of the reference noise level measurements are presented in Table D and the reference noise measurement data printouts are included in Appendix C. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 19 Table D – Reference Noise Level Measurements Site No. Location Primary Noise Source Noise Measurement (dBA) Leq Lmin Lmax R1 Located approximately 40 feet from carwash entrance, near pay station. At a 90 degree angle from carwash entrance. Carwash entrance 67.2 62.8 75.6 R2 Located approximately 25 feet from middle of carwash across from vent with air compressor located behind vent Vent on side of carwash 69.8 61.6 73.5 R3 Located approximately 40 feet from carwash exit, adjacent to the queue lanes. At a 90 degree angle from carwash exit. Carwash exit 73.0 64.8 74.8 R4 Located approximately 5 feet from the car vacuum stations. Vacuum Stations 70.6 64.1 81.3 Source: Noise measurements taken with a Larson Davis Model 831 Type 1 precision sound level meter on Thursday, December 20, 2018. 6.3 Vibration Construction activity can result in varying degrees of ground vibration, depending on the equipment used on the site. Operation of construction equipment causes ground vibrations that spread through the ground and diminish in strength with distance. Buildings in the vicinity of the construction site respond to these vibrations with varying results ranging from no perceptible effects at the low levels to slight damage at the highest levels. Table E gives approximate vibration levels for particular construction activities. The data in Table E provides a reasonable estimate for a wide range of soil conditions. Table E – Vibration Source Levels for Construction Equipment Equipment Peak Particle Velocity (inches/second) Approximate Vibration Level (Lv)at 25 feet Pile driver (impact) Upper range typical 1.518 0.644 112 104 Pile driver (sonic) Upper range typical 0.734 0.170 105 93 Clam shovel drop (slurry wall) 0.202 94 Vibratory Roller 0.210 94 Hoe Ram 0.089 87 Large bulldozer 0.089 87 Caisson drill 0.089 87 Loaded trucks 0.076 86 Jackhammer 0.035 79 Small bulldozer 0.003 58 Source: Federal Transit Administration, May 2006. The construction‐related vibration impacts have been calculated through the vibration levels shown above in Table E and through typical vibration propagation rates. The equipment assumptions were based on the equipment lists provided above in Table C. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 20 7.0 IMPACT ANALYSIS 7.1 CEQA Thresholds of Significance Consistent with the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and the State CEQA Guidelines, a significant impact related to noise would occur if a proposed project is determined to result in: Generation of a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies; Generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels; or For a project located within the vicinity of a private airstrip or an airport land use plan or, where such a plan has not been adopted, within two miles of a public airport or public use airport, would the project expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels. 7.2 Generation of Noise Levels in Excess of Standards The proposed project would not generate a substantial temporary or permanent increase in ambient noise levels in the vicinity of the project in excess of standards established in the local general plan or noise ordinance, or applicable standards of other agencies. The following section calculates the potential noise emissions associated with the temporary construction activities and long‐term operations of the proposed project and compares the noise levels to the City standards. Construction‐Related Noise The construction activities for the proposed project are anticipated to include demolition of the existing banquet hall and parking lot on the project site, grading of the 0.79‐acre project site, building construction of the proposed carwash, paving of the onsite driveways and parking areas, and application of architectural coatings. Noise impacts from construction activities associated with the proposed project would be a function of the noise generated by construction equipment, equipment location, sensitivity of nearby land uses, and the timing and duration of the construction activities. The nearest offsite sensitive receptors to the project site consist of residents at the single‐family homes located adjacent to the west side of the project site. Section 6.70.010 of the City’s Municipal Code exempts construction noise that occurs between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. from the stationary noise standard of 60 dB at the nearby residential property lines. All construction activities associated with the proposed project would occur during the allowable hours for construction activities as detailed in Section 6.70.010 of the Municipal Code. However, the City construction noise standards do not provide any limits to the noise levels that may be created from construction activities and even with adherence to the City standards, the resultant construction noise levels may result in a significant substantial temporary noise increase to the nearby residents. In order to determine if the proposed construction activities would create a significant substantial temporary noise increase, the FTA construction noise criteria thresholds detailed above in Section 4.1 have been utilized, which shows that a significant construction noise impact would occur if construction noise exceeds 80 dBA Leq over an eight hour period during the daytime at any of the nearby homes. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 21 Construction noise impacts to the nearby sensitive receptors have been calculated through use of the RCNM and the parameters and assumptions detailed in Section 6.1 of this report. The results are shown below in Table F and the RCNM printouts are provided in Appendix D. Table F – Construction Noise Levels at the Homes to the West Construction Phase Noise Level at Nearest Homes1 (dBA Leq) Demolition 77 Grading 77 Building Construction 77 Paving 75 Painting 65 FTA Construction Noise Threshold2 80 Exceed Threshold? No 1 In order to account for the approximately 6‐foot wall along the west property line, 5 dB of shielding was added to the RCNM model. Source: RCNM, Federal Highway Administration, 2006 Table F shows that the greatest noise impacts would occur during the demolition, grading, and building construction phases of construction, with a noise level as high as 77 dBA Leq at the homes to the west. Table F also shows that none of the construction phases would exceed the FTA construction noise standard of 80 dBA for residential uses. Therefore, through adherence to allowable construction times provided in Section 6.70.010 of the Municipal Code, the construction activities for the proposed project would not create a substantial temporary increase in ambient noise levels that are in excess of applicable noise standards. Impacts would be less than significant. Operational‐Related Noise The proposed project would consist of the development of an automated carwash with two queue lanes, located on the west side of the proposed carwash structure and approximately 13 vacuum stall parking spaces located on the east side of the proposed carwash structure to allow for the customers to clean the interior of their vehicles. Potential noise impacts associated with the operations of the proposed project would be from project‐generated vehicular traffic on the nearby roadways and from onsite activities, which have been analyzed separately below. Roadway Vehicular Noise Vehicle noise is a combination of the noise produced by the engine, exhaust and tires. The level of traffic noise depends on three primary factors (1) the volume of traffic, (2) the speed of traffic, and (3) the number of trucks in the flow of traffic. The proposed project does not propose any uses that would require a substantial number of truck trips and the proposed project would not alter the speed limit on any existing roadway so the proposed project’s potential offsite no ise impacts have been focused on the noise impacts associated with the change of volume of traffic that would occur with development of the proposed project. Policy 3 under Goal 2.I of the City’s General Plan Noise Element, requires new development that generates increased traffic and subsequent increases in noise to noise‐sensitive land uses to provide appropriate mitigation. However, since the General Plan does not define what increase in roadway noise would be considered significant, the noise increase thresholds detailed in the City’s General Plan EIR has been Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 22 utilized in this analysis. The General Plan EIR utilized a mobile‐source noise threshold of: A 5 dBA increase threshold where the without project roadway noise levels are below 65 dBA CNEL at the nearest homes; or A 3 dBA increase threshold where the without project roadway noise levels are 65 dBA CNEL or higher. The Trip Generation Memo (LSA, 2018) prepared for the proposed project found that the proposed project would generate 775 daily trips per day. According to the 2018 Traffic Flow Map, prepared by the Orange County Transportation Authority shows that daily traffic volume on State College Boulevard in the vicinity of the project site is approximately 26,000 vehicles per day. In order for project‐generated vehicular traffic to increase the noise level of State College Boulevard, which is the anticipated primary route to the project site, by 3 dB, the roadway traffic would have to double. Since the proposed project would only result in a maximum of a 3 percent increase in traffic volumes on State College Boulevard, the project‐ related roadway noise increase is anticipated to be negligible. Impacts would be less than significant. Onsite Noise Sources The operation of the proposed project may create an increase in onsite noise levels from noise impacts from the automated carwash and vacuum stall parking spaces. Section 6.70.010 of the City’s Municipal Code limits noise created on any properties to 60 dBA at any point on the adjacent residential properties. In order to determine the noise impacts from the proposed carwash, reference noise measurements were taken of the existing Fast5Xpress carwash in Costa Mesa, which have been detailed above in Section 6.2 and printouts of the reference noise measurements are provided in Appendix C. In order to account for the noise reduction provided by the proposed 10‐foot high sound wall that is depicted on the proposed site plan, the Federal Highway Administration’s (FHWA) FHWA‐RD‐77‐108 noise model was utilized as depicted in the Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analysis Protocol (TeNS), prepared by Caltrans, September 2013, and the noise calculation spreadsheet is provided in Appendix E. A summary of the reference noise measurements and calculated noise levels at the homes to the west from the operation of the carwash and vacuum stalls is shown in Table G. Table G – Operational Noise Levels at the Homes to the West Location Reference Noise Measurements Noise Levels at Homes to West Distance Monitor to Source (feet) Noise Level (dBA Leq) Distance ‐ Source to Property Line (feet) Noise Level1 (dBA Leq) Side of Carwash Entrance 40 67.2 48 52 Middle of Carwash 25 69.8 33 54 Side of Carwash Exit 40 73.0 60 54 Vacuum Stalls 5 70.6 70 39 City Noise Standard 60 Exceed City Noise Standard? No Notes: 1 The calculated noise levels account for the noise reduction provided by the proposed 10‐foot high wall along the west property line (see Appendix E). Source: Noise calculation methodology from Caltrans, 2013. Table G shows that the proposed project’s operational noise levels created from the proposed carwash and vacuum stalls at the homes to the west would be as high as 54 dBA, that would occur from the noise created from the carwash exit. The worst‐case operational noise level of 58 dBA would be within the City’s noise standard of 60 dBA. Impacts would be less than significant. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 23 Level of Significance Less than significant impact. 7.3 Generation of Excessive Groundborne Vibration The proposed project would not expose persons to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels. The following section analyzes the potential vibration impacts associated with the construction and operations of the proposed project. Construction‐Related Vibration Impacts The construction activities for the proposed project are anticipated to include demolition of the existing banquet hall and parking lot on the project site, grading of the 0.79‐acre project site, building construction of the proposed carwash, paving of the onsite driveways and parking areas, and application of architectural coatings. Vibration impacts from construction activities associated with the proposed project would typically be created from the operation of heavy off‐road equipment. The nearest offsite sensitive receptors to the project site consist of residents at the single‐family homes, where the nearest structure is located 10 feet west of the project site. Since neither the City’s Municipal Code nor the General Plan provides a quantifiable vibration threshold level, Caltrans guidance that is detailed above in Section 4.2 has been utilized, which defines the threshold of perception from transient sources at 0.25 inch per second PPV. The primary source of vibration during construction would be from the operation of a bulldozer. From Table E above a large bulldozer would create a vibration level of 0.089 inch per second PPV at 25 feet. Based on typical propagation rates, the vibration level at the nearest offsite residential structure (10 feet away) would be 0.24 inch per second PPV. The vibration level at the nearest offsite residential structure would be within the 0.25 inch per second PPV threshold detailed above. Impacts would be less than significant. Operations‐Related Vibration Impacts The proposed project would consist of the development of a carwash. The on‐going operation of the proposed project would not include the operation of any known v ibration sources. Therefore, a less than significant vibration impact is anticipated from the operation of the proposed project. Level of Significance Less than significant impact. 7.4 Aircraft Noise The proposed project would not expose people residing or working in the project area to excessive noise levels from aircraft. The nearest airport is the Fullerton Municipal Airport, located approximately 5.4 miles northwest of the project site. The project site is located outside of the 60 dBA CNEL noise contours of Fullerton Municipal Airport. No impacts would occur from aircraft noise. Level of Significance No impact. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Page 24 8.0 REFERENCES Breeze Software, California Emissions Estimator Model (CalEEMod) version 2016.3.2. California Department of Transportation, 2016 Annual Average Daily Truck Traffic on the California State Highway System, 2018. California Department of Transportation (Caltrans), Technical Noise Supplement to the Traffic Noise Analytics Protocol, September 2013. California Department of Transportation, Transportation‐ and Construction‐Induced Vibration Guidance Manual, September 2013. City of Anaheim, City of Anaheim General Plan, May 2004. City of Anaheim, City of Anaheim General Plan/Zoning Code Update, June 12, 2018. City of Anaheim, City of Anaheim Municipal Code, February 2018. Federal Transit Administration, Transit Noise and Vibration Impact Assessment, May 2006. LSA, Project Trip Generation Memo, 2018. Orange County Transportation Authority (OCTA), 2018 Traffic Flow Map. U.S. Department of Transportation, FHWA Roadway Construction Noise Model User’s Guide, January, 2006. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Appendix A APPENDIX A Field Noise Measurements Photo Index Noise Measurement Site A - looking north Noise Measurement Site A - looking northeast Noise Measurement Site A - looking east Noise Measurement Site A - looking southeast Noise Measurement Site A - looking south Noise Measurement Site A - looking southwest Noise Measurement Site A - looking west Noise Measurement Site A - looking northwest Noise Measurement Site B - looking north Noise Measurement Site B - looking northeast Noise Measurement Site B - looking east Noise Measurement Site B - looking southeast Noise Measurement Site B - looking south Noise Measurement Site B - looking southwest Noise Measurement Site B - looking west Noise Measurement Site B - looking northwest Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Appendix B APPENDIX B Field Noise Measurements Printouts Date Time=12/13/18 10:02:00 AM Date Time=12/13/18 10:07:00 AM Sampling Time=3 Weighting=A Sampling Time=3 Freq Weighting=A Record Num= 28800 Weighting=Slow CNEL(24hr)=65.2 Record Num= 28800 Weighting=Slow CNEL(24hr)=67.9 Leq 59.7 SEL Value=109.2 Ldn(24hr)= 64.7 Leq 63.3 SEL Value=112.7 Ldn(24hr)= 67.4 MAX 89.7 Min Leq1hr = 53.2 1:47 AM MAX 88.6 Min Leq1hr = 56.0 1:59 AM MIN 45.8 Max Leq1hr = 64.2 8:09 PM MIN 49.8 Max Leq1hr = 68.1 8:07 PM SPL Time Leq (1 hour Avg.) Ldn CNEL SPL Time Leq (1 hour Avg.) Ldn CNEL 58.7 10:02:00 58.7 58.7 66 10:07:00 66 66 56.3 10:02:03 56.3 56.3 61.4 10:07:03 61.4 61.4 56.4 10:02:06 56.4 56.4 64.7 10:07:06 64.7 64.7 64.4 10:02:09 64.4 64.4 59.3 10:07:09 59.3 59.3 62.3 10:02:12 62.3 62.3 59.9 10:07:12 59.9 59.9 57.5 10:02:15 57.5 57.5 58.6 10:07:15 58.6 58.6 58.5 10:02:18 58.5 58.5 60.5 10:07:18 60.5 60.5 66.6 10:02:21 66.6 66.6 67.9 10:07:21 67.9 67.9 60.6 10:02:24 60.6 60.6 63 10:07:24 63 63 56.8 10:02:27 56.8 56.8 59 10:07:27 59 59 60.7 10:02:30 60.7 60.7 60.2 10:07:30 60.2 60.2 56.8 10:02:33 56.8 56.8 66.1 10:07:33 66.1 66.1 56.6 10:02:36 56.6 56.6 64.6 10:07:36 64.6 64.6 59.2 10:02:39 59.2 59.2 63.8 10:07:39 63.8 63.8 59 10:02:42 59 59 62.9 10:07:42 62.9 62.9 58.5 10:02:45 58.5 58.5 57.1 10:07:45 57.1 57.1 64.8 10:02:48 64.8 64.8 60.7 10:07:48 60.7 60.7 59.6 10:02:51 59.6 59.6 63.1 10:07:51 63.1 63.1 63.3 10:02:54 63.3 63.3 66.3 10:07:54 66.3 66.3 60.8 10:02:57 60.8 60.8 59.1 10:07:57 59.1 59.1 60.8 10:03:00 60.8 60.8 57.1 10:08:00 57.1 57.1 56.7 10:03:03 56.7 56.7 65.3 10:08:03 65.3 65.3 54.6 10:03:06 54.6 54.6 61.4 10:08:06 61.4 61.4 57.6 10:03:09 57.6 57.6 63.8 10:08:09 63.8 63.8 61 10:03:12 61 61 62.4 10:08:12 62.4 62.4 58.7 10:03:15 58.7 58.7 66.9 10:08:15 66.9 66.9 65.1 10:03:18 65.1 65.1 60.8 10:08:18 60.8 60.8 57.4 10:03:21 57.4 57.4 59.7 10:08:21 59.7 59.7 62.7 10:03:24 62.7 62.7 66.6 10:08:24 66.6 66.6 66.2 10:03:27 66.2 66.2 59.8 10:08:27 59.8 59.8 64.6 10:03:30 64.6 64.6 58.1 10:08:30 58.1 58.1 61.5 10:03:33 61.5 61.5 58.8 10:08:33 58.8 58.8 62.6 10:03:36 62.6 62.6 58.6 10:08:36 58.6 58.6 58.3 10:03:39 58.3 58.3 64.9 10:08:39 64.9 64.9 58.5 10:03:42 58.5 58.5 62.6 10:08:42 62.6 62.6 60.4 10:03:45 60.4 60.4 62.5 10:08:45 62.5 62.5 64.5 10:03:48 64.5 64.5 64.2 10:08:48 64.2 64.2 63.3 10:03:51 63.3 63.3 66.4 10:08:51 66.4 66.4 64.8 10:03:54 64.8 64.8 66.4 10:08:54 66.4 66.4 57.7 10:03:57 57.7 57.7 62.6 10:08:57 62.6 62.6 61.7 10:04:00 61.7 61.7 62.2 10:09:00 62.2 62.2 63.4 10:04:03 63.4 63.4 62.5 10:09:03 62.5 62.5 59.5 10:04:06 59.5 59.5 57.1 10:09:06 57.1 57.1 62.2 10:04:09 62.2 62.2 59.2 10:09:09 59.2 59.2 61.5 10:04:12 61.5 61.5 65.9 10:09:12 65.9 65.9 57.9 10:04:15 57.9 57.9 64.7 10:09:15 64.7 64.7 60.3 10:04:18 60.3 60.3 63.4 10:09:18 63.4 63.4 60.3 10:04:21 60.3 60.3 61.1 10:09:21 61.1 61.1 60.8 10:04:24 60.8 60.8 62 10:09:24 62 62 58.6 10:04:27 58.6 58.6 61.4 10:09:27 61.4 61.4 60.3 10:04:30 60.3 60.3 61 10:09:30 61 61 61.3 10:04:33 61.3 61.3 62 10:09:33 62 62 56.4 10:04:36 56.4 56.4 62.1 10:09:36 62.1 62.1 54.4 10:04:39 54.4 54.4 60.4 10:09:39 60.4 60.4 53.4 10:04:42 53.4 53.4 60.2 10:09:42 60.2 60.2 52.8 10:04:45 52.8 52.8 59.8 10:09:45 59.8 59.8 61.7 10:04:48 61.7 61.7 60.7 10:09:48 60.7 60.7 61.6 10:04:51 61.6 61.6 59.4 10:09:51 59.4 59.4 54.8 10:04:54 54.8 54.8 59.3 10:09:54 59.3 59.3 53.6 10:04:57 53.6 53.6 60.8 10:09:57 60.8 60.8 54.5 10:05:00 54.5 54.5 63.4 10:10:00 63.4 63.4 56.8 10:05:03 56.8 56.8 66.1 10:10:03 66.1 66.1 53.3 10:05:06 53.3 53.3 65.7 10:10:06 65.7 65.7 52.3 10:05:09 52.3 52.3 62 10:10:09 62 62 53.3 10:05:12 53.3 53.3 61 10:10:12 61 61 53.6 10:05:15 53.6 53.6 60.6 10:10:15 60.6 60.6 53.8 10:05:18 53.8 53.8 60.5 10:10:18 60.5 60.5 56.3 10:05:21 56.3 56.3 59.9 10:10:21 59.9 59.9 57.1 10:05:24 57.1 57.1 59.6 10:10:24 59.6 59.6 56.7 10:05:27 56.7 56.7 59.5 10:10:27 59.5 59.5 53.9 10:05:30 53.9 53.9 61.9 10:10:30 61.9 61.9 52.6 10:05:33 52.6 52.6 67.7 10:10:33 67.7 67.7 56 10:05:36 56 56 66.3 10:10:36 66.3 66.3 56.4 10:05:39 56.4 56.4 61.5 10:10:39 61.5 61.5 56.4 10:05:42 56.4 56.4 67 10:10:42 67 67 55.5 10:05:45 55.5 55.5 64.8 10:10:45 64.8 64.8 53.2 10:05:48 53.2 53.2 63.2 10:10:48 63.2 63.2 Site A - On Power Pole at Northwest Corner of Project Site Site A - On Power Pole at Northwest Corner of Project Site Site B - On Tree at Middle Western Portion of Project Site Site B - On Tree at Middle Western Portion of Project Site SPL Time Leq (1 hour Avg.) Ldn CNEL SPL Time Leq (1 hour Avg.) Ldn CNEL Site A - On Power Pole at Northwest Corner of Project Site Site B - On Tree at Middle Western Portion of Project Site 53.4 10:05:51 53.4 53.4 64.9 10:10:51 64.9 64.9 56.9 10:05:54 56.9 56.9 65.7 10:10:54 65.7 65.7 59.3 10:05:57 59.3 59.3 69.9 10:10:57 69.9 69.9 59.8 10:06:00 59.8 59.8 60.7 10:11:00 60.7 60.7 58.4 10:06:03 58.4 58.4 67 10:11:03 67 67 60.8 10:06:06 60.8 60.8 67.5 10:11:06 67.5 67.5 64 10:06:09 64 64 62.8 10:11:09 62.8 62.8 61.8 10:06:12 61.8 61.8 68.6 10:11:12 68.6 68.6 62.6 10:06:15 62.6 62.6 66.1 10:11:15 66.1 66.1 60 10:06:18 60 60 64.8 10:11:18 64.8 64.8 57.6 10:06:21 57.6 57.6 62.6 10:11:21 62.6 62.6 64.4 10:06:24 64.4 64.4 63.2 10:11:24 63.2 63.2 61.7 10:06:27 61.7 61.7 61.1 10:11:27 61.1 61.1 59.2 10:06:30 59.2 59.2 61.8 10:11:30 61.8 61.8 58.4 10:06:33 58.4 58.4 61.1 10:11:33 61.1 61.1 59.7 10:06:36 59.7 59.7 61.2 10:11:36 61.2 61.2 61.2 10:06:39 61.2 61.2 65.4 10:11:39 65.4 65.4 62.4 10:06:42 62.4 62.4 68.3 10:11:42 68.3 68.3 60 10:06:45 60 60 66.9 10:11:45 66.9 66.9 58.5 10:06:48 58.5 58.5 62.8 10:11:48 62.8 62.8 57.7 10:06:51 57.7 57.7 68.4 10:11:51 68.4 68.4 58.2 10:06:54 58.2 58.2 64.6 10:11:54 64.6 64.6 58.7 10:06:57 58.7 58.7 64.6 10:11:57 64.6 64.6 58.2 10:07:00 58.2 58.2 62.4 10:12:00 62.4 62.4 56.8 10:07:03 56.8 56.8 61.1 10:12:03 61.1 61.1 53.8 10:07:06 53.8 53.8 62.3 10:12:06 62.3 62.3 56.6 10:07:09 56.6 56.6 68.6 10:12:09 68.6 68.6 59.1 10:07:12 59.1 59.1 63.2 10:12:12 63.2 63.2 59.2 10:07:15 59.2 59.2 64.9 10:12:15 64.9 64.9 58.4 10:07:18 58.4 58.4 69.1 10:12:18 69.1 69.1 57.4 10:07:21 57.4 57.4 69.8 10:12:21 69.8 69.8 55.8 10:07:24 55.8 55.8 65.9 10:12:24 65.9 65.9 63.7 10:07:27 63.7 63.7 61.9 10:12:27 61.9 61.9 69 10:07:30 69 69 62.1 10:12:30 62.1 62.1 59.3 10:07:33 59.3 59.3 63.2 10:12:33 63.2 63.2 63.7 10:07:36 63.7 63.7 60.7 10:12:36 60.7 60.7 61.7 10:07:39 61.7 61.7 63.5 10:12:39 63.5 63.5 59.8 10:07:42 59.8 59.8 68.6 10:12:42 68.6 68.6 61 10:07:45 61 61 67.4 10:12:45 67.4 67.4 61.7 10:07:48 61.7 61.7 65.1 10:12:48 65.1 65.1 63.9 10:07:51 63.9 63.9 69.5 10:12:51 69.5 69.5 58 10:07:54 58 58 66.9 10:12:54 66.9 66.9 62.3 10:07:57 62.3 62.3 67.7 10:12:57 67.7 67.7 65.7 10:08:00 65.7 65.7 67.8 10:13:00 67.8 67.8 65.1 10:08:03 65.1 65.1 68.2 10:13:03 68.2 68.2 60.7 10:08:06 60.7 60.7 63 10:13:06 63 63 64.6 10:08:09 64.6 64.6 62.5 10:13:09 62.5 62.5 62.9 10:08:12 62.9 62.9 66.5 10:13:12 66.5 66.5 62.8 10:08:15 62.8 62.8 66.6 10:13:15 66.6 66.6 65.5 10:08:18 65.5 65.5 61.3 10:13:18 61.3 61.3 59.4 10:08:21 59.4 59.4 62 10:13:21 62 62 58.3 10:08:24 58.3 58.3 62.6 10:13:24 62.6 62.6 58.4 10:08:27 58.4 58.4 59.4 10:13:27 59.4 59.4 59.6 10:08:30 59.6 59.6 58 10:13:30 58 58 61.7 10:08:33 61.7 61.7 59.6 10:13:33 59.6 59.6 61.4 10:08:36 61.4 61.4 60.6 10:13:36 60.6 60.6 58.2 10:08:39 58.2 58.2 60 10:13:39 60 60 58.1 10:08:42 58.1 58.1 61.3 10:13:42 61.3 61.3 58.9 10:08:45 58.9 58.9 59.8 10:13:45 59.8 59.8 63.2 10:08:48 63.2 63.2 58.1 10:13:48 58.1 58.1 63.2 10:08:51 63.2 63.2 60.4 10:13:51 60.4 60.4 60.8 10:08:54 60.8 60.8 60.8 10:13:54 60.8 60.8 60.4 10:08:57 60.4 60.4 60.8 10:13:57 60.8 60.8 57.4 10:09:00 57.4 57.4 65.7 10:14:00 65.7 65.7 55.4 10:09:03 55.4 55.4 64 10:14:03 64 64 56.5 10:09:06 56.5 56.5 60.2 10:14:06 60.2 60.2 56.2 10:09:09 56.2 56.2 59.6 10:14:09 59.6 59.6 59.5 10:09:12 59.5 59.5 63.3 10:14:12 63.3 63.3 56.9 10:09:15 56.9 56.9 65 10:14:15 65 65 57.2 10:09:18 57.2 57.2 63.2 10:14:18 63.2 63.2 58.3 10:09:21 58.3 58.3 62.1 10:14:21 62.1 62.1 62 10:09:24 62 62 61 10:14:24 61 61 57.1 10:09:27 57.1 57.1 59.4 10:14:27 59.4 59.4 56.8 10:09:30 56.8 56.8 57.9 10:14:30 57.9 57.9 55.3 10:09:33 55.3 55.3 56.6 10:14:33 56.6 56.6 54.3 10:09:36 54.3 54.3 57.3 10:14:36 57.3 57.3 55.4 10:09:39 55.4 55.4 58.9 10:14:39 58.9 58.9 59.2 10:09:42 59.2 59.2 62.3 10:14:42 62.3 62.3 59.8 10:09:45 59.8 59.8 57.5 10:14:45 57.5 57.5 58.7 10:09:48 58.7 58.7 57 10:14:48 57 57 56.8 10:09:51 56.8 56.8 57.8 10:14:51 57.8 57.8 55.8 10:09:54 55.8 55.8 65.6 10:14:54 65.6 65.6 55.2 10:09:57 55.2 55.2 65.9 10:14:57 65.9 65.9 55.4 10:10:00 55.4 55.4 68.4 10:15:00 68.4 68.4 54.6 10:10:03 54.6 54.6 66.8 10:15:03 66.8 66.8 54 10:10:06 54 54 63.2 10:15:06 63.2 63.2 55.4 10:10:09 55.4 55.4 63.9 10:15:09 63.9 63.9 58 10:10:12 58 58 67.5 10:15:12 67.5 67.5 61.9 10:10:15 61.9 61.9 67.1 10:15:15 67.1 67.1 SPL Time Leq (1 hour Avg.) Ldn CNEL SPL Time Leq (1 hour Avg.) Ldn CNEL Site A - On Power Pole at Northwest Corner of Project Site Site B - On Tree at Middle Western Portion of Project Site 61.4 10:10:18 61.4 61.4 67.1 10:15:18 67.1 67.1 65.5 10:10:21 65.5 65.5 73.9 10:15:21 73.9 73.9 61.9 10:10:24 61.9 61.9 71 10:15:24 71 71 59.7 10:10:27 59.7 59.7 65.1 10:15:27 65.1 65.1 58 10:10:30 58 58 62.7 10:15:30 62.7 62.7 58.6 10:10:33 58.6 58.6 60 10:15:33 60 60 60.9 10:10:36 60.9 60.9 59.2 10:15:36 59.2 59.2 64.9 10:10:39 64.9 64.9 59.9 10:15:39 59.9 59.9 65.4 10:10:42 65.4 65.4 62.7 10:15:42 62.7 62.7 62 10:10:45 62 62 58 10:15:45 58 58 62.1 10:10:48 62.1 62.1 57.4 10:15:48 57.4 57.4 69.6 10:10:51 69.6 69.6 57.2 10:15:51 57.2 57.2 63.1 10:10:54 63.1 63.1 58.8 10:15:54 58.8 58.8 63.2 10:10:57 63.2 63.2 58.6 10:15:57 58.6 58.6 63.8 10:11:00 63.8 63.8 59.6 10:16:00 59.6 59.6 57.6 10:11:03 57.6 57.6 59.8 10:16:03 59.8 59.8 58.8 10:11:06 58.8 58.8 59.5 10:16:06 59.5 59.5 57.1 10:11:09 57.1 57.1 57.4 10:16:09 57.4 57.4 55.6 10:11:12 55.6 55.6 58.1 10:16:12 58.1 58.1 55.5 10:11:15 55.5 55.5 58.3 10:16:15 58.3 58.3 56.8 10:11:18 56.8 56.8 59.2 10:16:18 59.2 59.2 62.3 10:11:21 62.3 62.3 61.6 10:16:21 61.6 61.6 68 10:11:24 68 68 70.2 10:16:24 70.2 70.2 59.8 10:11:27 59.8 59.8 71.7 10:16:27 71.7 71.7 58.3 10:11:30 58.3 58.3 66 10:16:30 66 66 66.1 10:11:33 66.1 66.1 63.2 10:16:33 63.2 63.2 56.7 10:11:36 56.7 56.7 60 10:16:36 60 60 58.1 10:11:39 58.1 58.1 59.5 10:16:39 59.5 59.5 57.7 10:11:42 57.7 57.7 58.9 10:16:42 58.9 58.9 56 10:11:45 56 56 61.6 10:16:45 61.6 61.6 56.1 10:11:48 56.1 56.1 62.5 10:16:48 62.5 62.5 62.5 10:11:51 62.5 62.5 61.8 10:16:51 61.8 61.8 57 10:11:54 57 57 62.1 10:16:54 62.1 62.1 60.5 10:11:57 60.5 60.5 61.9 10:16:57 61.9 61.9 66.3 10:12:00 66.3 66.3 67.3 10:17:00 67.3 67.3 68 10:12:03 68 68 68.4 10:17:03 68.4 68.4 59.3 10:12:06 59.3 59.3 69 10:17:06 69 69 57.8 10:12:09 57.8 57.8 71.5 10:17:09 71.5 71.5 56 10:12:12 56 56 73.6 10:17:12 73.6 73.6 60.3 10:12:15 60.3 60.3 70.5 10:17:15 70.5 70.5 55.5 10:12:18 55.5 55.5 63.6 10:17:18 63.6 63.6 58 10:12:21 58 58 60.2 10:17:21 60.2 60.2 65.6 10:12:24 65.6 65.6 63.8 10:17:24 63.8 63.8 63.9 10:12:27 63.9 63.9 63.9 10:17:27 63.9 63.9 60.2 10:12:30 60.2 60.2 60.8 10:17:30 60.8 60.8 66.5 10:12:33 66.5 66.5 60.1 10:17:33 60.1 60.1 61.1 10:12:36 61.1 61.1 59.9 10:17:36 59.9 59.9 60.7 10:12:39 60.7 60.7 61.6 10:17:39 61.6 61.6 62.4 10:12:42 62.4 62.4 63.6 10:17:42 63.6 63.6 62 10:12:45 62 62 62.9 10:17:45 62.9 62.9 57.9 10:12:48 57.9 57.9 64 10:17:48 64 64 57.9 10:12:51 57.9 57.9 63.7 10:17:51 63.7 63.7 60.1 10:12:54 60.1 60.1 62.2 10:17:54 62.2 62.2 59.7 10:12:57 59.7 59.7 59 10:17:57 59 59 56.3 10:13:00 56.3 56.3 58.2 10:18:00 58.2 58.2 56.7 10:13:03 56.7 56.7 57.3 10:18:03 57.3 57.3 56.6 10:13:06 56.6 56.6 58.3 10:18:06 58.3 58.3 56.5 10:13:09 56.5 56.5 59.5 10:18:09 59.5 59.5 53.9 10:13:12 53.9 53.9 60.2 10:18:12 60.2 60.2 55.8 10:13:15 55.8 55.8 58.7 10:18:15 58.7 58.7 54.3 10:13:18 54.3 54.3 58.8 10:18:18 58.8 58.8 56 10:13:21 56 56 58.7 10:18:21 58.7 58.7 57.7 10:13:24 57.7 57.7 58.9 10:18:24 58.9 58.9 58 10:13:27 58 58 58.5 10:18:27 58.5 58.5 54.1 10:13:30 54.1 54.1 57.5 10:18:30 57.5 57.5 55.3 10:13:33 55.3 55.3 58 10:18:33 58 58 55 10:13:36 55 55 58.6 10:18:36 58.6 58.6 57.2 10:13:39 57.2 57.2 58.8 10:18:39 58.8 58.8 59.2 10:13:42 59.2 59.2 60.3 10:18:42 60.3 60.3 58.3 10:13:45 58.3 58.3 58.2 10:18:45 58.2 58.2 56.1 10:13:48 56.1 56.1 59.3 10:18:48 59.3 59.3 57.6 10:13:51 57.6 57.6 63.4 10:18:51 63.4 63.4 57.9 10:13:54 57.9 57.9 67.6 10:18:54 67.6 67.6 58.3 10:13:57 58.3 58.3 70.3 10:18:57 70.3 70.3 61.2 10:14:00 61.2 61.2 65 10:19:00 65 65 59.6 10:14:03 59.6 59.6 62.4 10:19:03 62.4 62.4 58.5 10:14:06 58.5 58.5 59 10:19:06 59 59 56 10:14:09 56 56 57.2 10:19:09 57.2 57.2 54.2 10:14:12 54.2 54.2 59.8 10:19:12 59.8 59.8 53.3 10:14:15 53.3 53.3 66.8 10:19:15 66.8 66.8 53.2 10:14:18 53.2 53.2 68.1 10:19:18 68.1 68.1 54.7 10:14:21 54.7 54.7 66.1 10:19:21 66.1 66.1 55.1 10:14:24 55.1 55.1 65.5 10:19:24 65.5 65.5 54.5 10:14:27 54.5 54.5 65.1 10:19:27 65.1 65.1 55.1 10:14:30 55.1 55.1 60.6 10:19:30 60.6 60.6 55.5 10:14:33 55.5 55.5 62.8 10:19:33 62.8 62.8 61 10:14:36 61 61 66.9 10:19:36 66.9 66.9 61.5 10:14:39 61.5 61.5 65.7 10:19:39 65.7 65.7 62.5 10:14:42 62.5 62.5 69.6 10:19:42 69.6 69.6 SPL Time Leq (1 hour Avg.) Ldn CNEL SPL Time Leq (1 hour Avg.) Ldn CNEL Site A - On Power Pole at Northwest Corner of Project Site Site B - On Tree at Middle Western Portion of Project Site 61.5 10:14:45 61.5 61.5 67.4 10:19:45 67.4 67.4 57.8 10:14:48 57.8 57.8 59.8 10:19:48 59.8 59.8 59.3 10:14:51 59.3 59.3 62 10:19:51 62 62 60.9 10:14:54 60.9 60.9 63.4 10:19:54 63.4 63.4 60.7 10:14:57 60.7 60.7 63.9 10:19:57 63.9 63.9 64 10:15:00 64 64 64.9 10:20:00 64.9 64.9 67.6 10:15:03 67.6 67.6 63.9 10:20:03 63.9 63.9 68 10:15:06 68 68 61 10:20:06 61 61 60.5 10:15:09 60.5 60.5 57.5 10:20:09 57.5 57.5 59.5 10:15:12 59.5 59.5 57.2 10:20:12 57.2 57.2 55.9 10:15:15 55.9 55.9 58 10:20:15 58 58 55.4 10:15:18 55.4 55.4 59.1 10:20:18 59.1 59.1 55.6 10:15:21 55.6 55.6 60.7 10:20:21 60.7 60.7 56.3 10:15:24 56.3 56.3 60.9 10:20:24 60.9 60.9 53.7 10:15:27 53.7 53.7 61.8 10:20:27 61.8 61.8 52.9 10:15:30 52.9 52.9 61 10:20:30 61 61 52.9 10:15:33 52.9 52.9 58.9 10:20:33 58.9 58.9 53.4 10:15:36 53.4 53.4 61 10:20:36 61 61 54.5 10:15:39 54.5 54.5 59.2 10:20:39 59.2 59.2 55.8 10:15:42 55.8 55.8 58.2 10:20:42 58.2 58.2 54.8 10:15:45 54.8 54.8 62.4 10:20:45 62.4 62.4 54.7 10:15:48 54.7 54.7 58.9 10:20:48 58.9 58.9 54.6 10:15:51 54.6 54.6 59 10:20:51 59 59 54.3 10:15:54 54.3 54.3 59.4 10:20:54 59.4 59.4 54.5 10:15:57 54.5 54.5 60.1 10:20:57 60.1 60.1 53.4 10:16:00 53.4 53.4 64.8 10:21:00 64.8 64.8 58.3 10:16:03 58.3 58.3 68.6 10:21:03 68.6 68.6 65.8 10:16:06 65.8 65.8 67.4 10:21:06 67.4 67.4 64.2 10:16:09 64.2 64.2 70 10:21:09 70 70 60.5 10:16:12 60.5 60.5 66.8 10:21:12 66.8 66.8 57 10:16:15 57 57 62.4 10:21:15 62.4 62.4 55.2 10:16:18 55.2 55.2 64.3 10:21:18 64.3 64.3 54.6 10:16:21 54.6 54.6 63 10:21:21 63 63 54.5 10:16:24 54.5 54.5 64.3 10:21:24 64.3 64.3 58.1 10:16:27 58.1 58.1 64 10:21:27 64 64 58.8 10:16:30 58.8 58.8 65 10:21:30 65 65 58.1 10:16:33 58.1 58.1 65.3 10:21:33 65.3 65.3 58.1 10:16:36 58.1 58.1 63.9 10:21:36 63.9 63.9 58 10:16:39 58 58 65.4 10:21:39 65.4 65.4 62.2 10:16:42 62.2 62.2 65.6 10:21:42 65.6 65.6 65 10:16:45 65 65 65.8 10:21:45 65.8 65.8 65.6 10:16:48 65.6 65.6 65.6 10:21:48 65.6 65.6 67.5 10:16:51 67.5 67.5 66.9 10:21:51 66.9 66.9 69.3 10:16:54 69.3 69.3 65.3 10:21:54 65.3 65.3 67.1 10:16:57 67.1 67.1 70.9 10:21:57 70.9 70.9 58.9 10:17:00 58.9 58.9 67.7 10:22:00 67.7 67.7 56.1 10:17:03 56.1 56.1 64.7 10:22:03 64.7 64.7 57.7 10:17:06 57.7 57.7 64.7 10:22:06 64.7 64.7 59.1 10:17:09 59.1 59.1 63.4 10:22:09 63.4 63.4 56.6 10:17:12 56.6 56.6 61.7 10:22:12 61.7 61.7 56.8 10:17:15 56.8 56.8 61.3 10:22:15 61.3 61.3 55 10:17:18 55 55 63.7 10:22:18 63.7 63.7 59.6 10:17:21 59.6 59.6 64.8 10:22:21 64.8 64.8 59.5 10:17:24 59.5 59.5 60.8 10:22:24 60.8 60.8 58 10:17:27 58 58 62.4 10:22:27 62.4 62.4 60.6 10:17:30 60.6 60.6 62.3 10:22:30 62.3 62.3 60.2 10:17:33 60.2 60.2 63.2 10:22:33 63.2 63.2 57 10:17:36 57 57 60.8 10:22:36 60.8 60.8 56 10:17:39 56 56 60.8 10:22:39 60.8 60.8 56.6 10:17:42 56.6 56.6 59.8 10:22:42 59.8 59.8 52.9 10:17:45 52.9 52.9 60.4 10:22:45 60.4 60.4 54.8 10:17:48 54.8 54.8 59.8 10:22:48 59.8 59.8 54.4 10:17:51 54.4 54.4 58.5 10:22:51 58.5 58.5 55.1 10:17:54 55.1 55.1 59 10:22:54 59 59 54.4 10:17:57 54.4 54.4 58.7 10:22:57 58.7 58.7 55.8 10:18:00 55.8 55.8 62.4 10:23:00 62.4 62.4 53.8 10:18:03 53.8 53.8 62.3 10:23:03 62.3 62.3 54.5 10:18:06 54.5 54.5 61.3 10:23:06 61.3 61.3 53.5 10:18:09 53.5 53.5 62 10:23:09 62 62 53.2 10:18:12 53.2 53.2 61 10:23:12 61 61 54.5 10:18:15 54.5 54.5 70 10:23:15 70 70 53.4 10:18:18 53.4 53.4 66 10:23:18 66 66 54.9 10:18:21 54.9 54.9 62.1 10:23:21 62.1 62.1 55 10:18:24 55 55 63.9 10:23:24 63.9 63.9 54.6 10:18:27 54.6 54.6 64.6 10:23:27 64.6 64.6 55.6 10:18:30 55.6 55.6 66.9 10:23:30 66.9 66.9 61.4 10:18:33 61.4 61.4 67.6 10:23:33 67.6 67.6 61.9 10:18:36 61.9 61.9 69.4 10:23:36 69.4 69.4 62.8 10:18:39 62.8 62.8 66.9 10:23:39 66.9 66.9 59.1 10:18:42 59.1 59.1 63.4 10:23:42 63.4 63.4 56 10:18:45 56 56 63.3 10:23:45 63.3 63.3 54.6 10:18:48 54.6 54.6 63.6 10:23:48 63.6 63.6 53.1 10:18:51 53.1 53.1 61 10:23:51 61 61 55.9 10:18:54 55.9 55.9 66.2 10:23:54 66.2 66.2 60.2 10:18:57 60.2 60.2 69.8 10:23:57 69.8 69.8 62.5 10:19:00 62.5 62.5 65.5 10:24:00 65.5 65.5 59.9 10:19:03 59.9 59.9 66.1 10:24:03 66.1 66.1 59.8 10:19:06 59.8 59.8 62.1 10:24:06 62.1 62.1 58.4 10:19:09 58.4 58.4 60.7 10:24:09 60.7 60.7 SPL Time Leq (1 hour Avg.) Ldn CNEL SPL Time Leq (1 hour Avg.) Ldn CNEL Site A - On Power Pole at Northwest Corner of Project Site Site B - On Tree at Middle Western Portion of Project Site 56.9 10:19:12 56.9 56.9 64.6 10:24:12 64.6 64.6 58.8 10:19:15 58.8 58.8 61.7 10:24:15 61.7 61.7 61.7 10:19:18 61.7 61.7 61.2 10:24:18 61.2 61.2 61.3 10:19:21 61.3 61.3 58.2 10:24:21 58.2 58.2 63.9 10:19:24 63.9 63.9 58.8 10:24:24 58.8 58.8 60.2 10:19:27 60.2 60.2 58.6 10:24:27 58.6 58.6 55.5 10:19:30 55.5 55.5 58.2 10:24:30 58.2 58.2 56.6 10:19:33 56.6 56.6 58.4 10:24:33 58.4 58.4 59.7 10:19:36 59.7 59.7 59 10:24:36 59 59 60.9 10:19:39 60.9 60.9 61.1 10:24:39 61.1 61.1 60 10:19:42 60 60 62.8 10:24:42 62.8 62.8 58.6 10:19:45 58.6 58.6 61.4 10:24:45 61.4 61.4 54.1 10:19:48 54.1 54.1 61.8 10:24:48 61.8 61.8 52.7 10:19:51 52.7 52.7 59.5 10:24:51 59.5 59.5 51.5 10:19:54 51.5 51.5 59 10:24:54 59 59 53.3 10:19:57 53.3 53.3 59 10:24:57 59 59 54.5 10:20:00 54.5 54.5 58.3 10:25:00 58.3 58.3 54.5 10:20:03 54.5 54.5 59.5 10:25:03 59.5 59.5 55.7 10:20:06 55.7 55.7 60.3 10:25:06 60.3 60.3 57 10:20:09 57 57 64.2 10:25:09 64.2 64.2 56.2 10:20:12 56.2 56.2 62.3 10:25:12 62.3 62.3 55.1 10:20:15 55.1 55.1 60.7 10:25:15 60.7 60.7 56.5 10:20:18 56.5 56.5 59.3 10:25:18 59.3 59.3 55.3 10:20:21 55.3 55.3 59.7 10:25:21 59.7 59.7 54.3 10:20:24 54.3 54.3 62.6 10:25:24 62.6 62.6 59.6 10:20:27 59.6 59.6 60.6 10:25:27 60.6 60.6 54.8 10:20:30 54.8 54.8 59.2 10:25:30 59.2 59.2 54.7 10:20:33 54.7 54.7 62.4 10:25:33 62.4 62.4 55.3 10:20:36 55.3 55.3 63.4 10:25:36 63.4 63.4 56.8 10:20:39 56.8 56.8 61 10:25:39 61 61 60.4 10:20:42 60.4 60.4 60.6 10:25:42 60.6 60.6 63.8 10:20:45 63.8 63.8 63.2 10:25:45 63.2 63.2 61.5 10:20:48 61.5 61.5 64 10:25:48 64 64 66.4 10:20:51 66.4 66.4 65.7 10:25:51 65.7 65.7 61 10:20:54 61 61 65.2 10:25:54 65.2 65.2 56.3 10:20:57 56.3 56.3 64.8 10:25:57 64.8 64.8 56.5 10:21:00 56.5 56.5 63.3 10:26:00 63.3 63.3 57 10:21:03 57 57 65.7 10:26:03 65.7 65.7 58.5 10:21:06 58.5 58.5 65.2 10:26:06 65.2 65.2 59 10:21:09 59 59 65.7 10:26:09 65.7 65.7 59.4 10:21:12 59.4 59.4 69 10:26:12 69 69 62.8 10:21:15 62.8 62.8 69.7 10:26:15 69.7 69.7 59.7 10:21:18 59.7 59.7 63.2 10:26:18 63.2 63.2 60.6 10:21:21 60.6 60.6 61.6 10:26:21 61.6 61.6 60.4 10:21:24 60.4 60.4 65 10:26:24 65 65 60.1 10:21:27 60.1 60.1 66.5 10:26:27 66.5 66.5 60.9 10:21:30 60.9 60.9 66.6 10:26:30 66.6 66.6 61.2 10:21:33 61.2 61.2 64.1 10:26:33 64.1 64.1 61 10:21:36 61 61 62.1 10:26:36 62.1 62.1 66.6 10:21:39 66.6 66.6 60 10:26:39 60 60 62.1 10:21:42 62.1 62.1 59.3 10:26:42 59.3 59.3 59.6 10:21:45 59.6 59.6 59.1 10:26:45 59.1 59.1 59.5 10:21:48 59.5 59.5 60.3 10:26:48 60.3 60.3 58.7 10:21:51 58.7 58.7 62.7 10:26:51 62.7 62.7 57.5 10:21:54 57.5 57.5 64 10:26:54 64 64 55.3 10:21:57 55.3 55.3 60.8 10:26:57 60.8 60.8 57.8 10:22:00 57.8 57.8 60.6 10:27:00 60.6 60.6 62 10:22:03 62 62 62.2 10:27:03 62.2 62.2 56.5 10:22:06 56.5 56.5 62.1 10:27:06 62.1 62.1 57.5 10:22:09 57.5 57.5 60.3 10:27:09 60.3 60.3 56.7 10:22:12 56.7 56.7 59.3 10:27:12 59.3 59.3 55.4 10:22:15 55.4 55.4 60.4 10:27:15 60.4 60.4 54.2 10:22:18 54.2 54.2 61.5 10:27:18 61.5 61.5 54 10:22:21 54 54 60.2 10:27:21 60.2 60.2 54.2 10:22:24 54.2 54.2 61.7 10:27:24 61.7 61.7 55.3 10:22:27 55.3 55.3 61.7 10:27:27 61.7 61.7 54.4 10:22:30 54.4 54.4 59 10:27:30 59 59 53.8 10:22:33 53.8 53.8 60 10:27:33 60 60 53.7 10:22:36 53.7 53.7 59.5 10:27:36 59.5 59.5 53.7 10:22:39 53.7 53.7 60.8 10:27:39 60.8 60.8 57.5 10:22:42 57.5 57.5 58.8 10:27:42 58.8 58.8 57.4 10:22:45 57.4 57.4 59.9 10:27:45 59.9 59.9 57.1 10:22:48 57.1 57.1 61.2 10:27:48 61.2 61.2 57.3 10:22:51 57.3 57.3 62.8 10:27:51 62.8 62.8 56.8 10:22:54 56.8 56.8 68 10:27:54 68 68 64.1 10:22:57 64.1 64.1 66.7 10:27:57 66.7 66.7 59.2 10:23:00 59.2 59.2 64.4 10:28:00 64.4 64.4 56.2 10:23:03 56.2 56.2 67.8 10:28:03 67.8 67.8 58.5 10:23:06 58.5 58.5 66.9 10:28:06 66.9 66.9 58.9 10:23:09 58.9 58.9 64.7 10:28:09 64.7 64.7 61.1 10:23:12 61.1 61.1 64.8 10:28:12 64.8 64.8 63 10:23:15 63 63 63.2 10:28:15 63.2 63.2 63.3 10:23:18 63.3 63.3 62.1 10:28:18 62.1 62.1 61.5 10:23:21 61.5 61.5 63.2 10:28:21 63.2 63.2 58.3 10:23:24 58.3 58.3 63.8 10:28:24 63.8 63.8 58.3 10:23:27 58.3 58.3 63.2 10:28:27 63.2 63.2 57.9 10:23:30 57.9 57.9 64.5 10:28:30 64.5 64.5 57.4 10:23:33 57.4 57.4 62.7 10:28:33 62.7 62.7 61.6 10:23:36 61.6 61.6 63.2 10:28:36 63.2 63.2 SPL Time Leq (1 hour Avg.) Ldn CNEL SPL Time Leq (1 hour Avg.) Ldn CNEL Site A - On Power Pole at Northwest Corner of Project Site Site B - On Tree at Middle Western Portion of Project Site 63.4 10:23:39 63.4 63.4 61.2 10:28:39 61.2 61.2 60.6 10:23:42 60.6 60.6 60.3 10:28:42 60.3 60.3 59.9 10:23:45 59.9 59.9 57.6 10:28:45 57.6 57.6 58.3 10:23:48 58.3 58.3 57.5 10:28:48 57.5 57.5 55.2 10:23:51 55.2 55.2 59.8 10:28:51 59.8 59.8 57.7 10:23:54 57.7 57.7 59.9 10:28:54 59.9 59.9 56.5 10:23:57 56.5 56.5 64.4 10:28:57 64.4 64.4 53.4 10:24:00 53.4 53.4 64.4 10:29:00 64.4 64.4 54.7 10:24:03 54.7 54.7 60.6 10:29:03 60.6 60.6 53.4 10:24:06 53.4 53.4 56 10:29:06 56 56 53 10:24:09 53 53 56.6 10:29:09 56.6 56.6 52.9 10:24:12 52.9 52.9 56 10:29:12 56 56 53.7 10:24:15 53.7 53.7 55.7 10:29:15 55.7 55.7 54.6 10:24:18 54.6 54.6 56.7 10:29:18 56.7 56.7 54.7 10:24:21 54.7 54.7 58.1 10:29:21 58.1 58.1 59.7 10:24:24 59.7 59.7 58.6 10:29:24 58.6 58.6 58.1 10:24:27 58.1 58.1 62.9 10:29:27 62.9 62.9 58 10:24:30 58 58 64.7 10:29:30 64.7 64.7 55.3 10:24:33 55.3 55.3 66.2 10:29:33 66.2 66.2 54.7 10:24:36 54.7 54.7 63.3 10:29:36 63.3 63.3 53.7 10:24:39 53.7 53.7 59.6 10:29:39 59.6 59.6 53.9 10:24:42 53.9 53.9 59.9 10:29:42 59.9 59.9 54.2 10:24:45 54.2 54.2 59.5 10:29:45 59.5 59.5 54.8 10:24:48 54.8 54.8 62.8 10:29:48 62.8 62.8 58.3 10:24:51 58.3 58.3 65.4 10:29:51 65.4 65.4 56.4 10:24:54 56.4 56.4 64.9 10:29:54 64.9 64.9 54.5 10:24:57 54.5 54.5 63.6 10:29:57 63.6 63.6 53.8 10:25:00 53.8 53.8 64.1 10:30:00 64.1 64.1 55.7 10:25:03 55.7 55.7 66.6 10:30:03 66.6 66.6 57.6 10:25:06 57.6 57.6 69.4 10:30:06 69.4 69.4 56.2 10:25:09 56.2 56.2 70.4 10:30:09 70.4 70.4 54 10:25:12 54 54 71.2 10:30:12 71.2 71.2 57.6 10:25:15 57.6 57.6 71.5 10:30:15 71.5 71.5 58.2 10:25:18 58.2 58.2 70.8 10:30:18 70.8 70.8 56 10:25:21 56 56 66.1 10:30:21 66.1 66.1 56.3 10:25:24 56.3 56.3 63.9 10:30:24 63.9 63.9 58.1 10:25:27 58.1 58.1 64.8 10:30:27 64.8 64.8 58.5 10:25:30 58.5 58.5 64.5 10:30:30 64.5 64.5 60.5 10:25:33 60.5 60.5 62.4 10:30:33 62.4 62.4 59.3 10:25:36 59.3 59.3 63.1 10:30:36 63.1 63.1 57.3 10:25:39 57.3 57.3 64 10:30:39 64 64 57.5 10:25:42 57.5 57.5 63.1 10:30:42 63.1 63.1 61.6 10:25:45 61.6 61.6 61.4 10:30:45 61.4 61.4 60.4 10:25:48 60.4 60.4 61.7 10:30:48 61.7 61.7 61.3 10:25:51 61.3 61.3 61.2 10:30:51 61.2 61.2 63.7 10:25:54 63.7 63.7 62.5 10:30:54 62.5 62.5 63.3 10:25:57 63.3 63.3 61.1 10:30:57 61.1 61.1 60 10:26:00 60 60 61.8 10:31:00 61.8 61.8 61 10:26:03 61 61 60.4 10:31:03 60.4 60.4 64.1 10:26:06 64.1 64.1 61.3 10:31:06 61.3 61.3 62.8 10:26:09 62.8 62.8 63 10:31:09 63 63 65.3 10:26:12 65.3 65.3 62 10:31:12 62 62 64.7 10:26:15 64.7 64.7 62.8 10:31:15 62.8 62.8 59.3 10:26:18 59.3 59.3 61.6 10:31:18 61.6 61.6 56.5 10:26:21 56.5 56.5 61.8 10:31:21 61.8 61.8 56.9 10:26:24 56.9 56.9 61.2 10:31:24 61.2 61.2 56 10:26:27 56 56 61.3 10:31:27 61.3 61.3 57.7 10:26:30 57.7 57.7 62 10:31:30 62 62 58.4 10:26:33 58.4 58.4 63.2 10:31:33 63.2 63.2 57.2 10:26:36 57.2 57.2 69.8 10:31:36 69.8 69.8 56.1 10:26:39 56.1 56.1 77.8 10:31:39 77.8 77.8 56 10:26:42 56 56 72.2 10:31:42 72.2 72.2 56.3 10:26:45 56.3 56.3 70.6 10:31:45 70.6 70.6 56.3 10:26:48 56.3 56.3 67.2 10:31:48 67.2 67.2 55 10:26:51 55 55 67.2 10:31:51 67.2 67.2 53.9 10:26:54 53.9 53.9 65.4 10:31:54 65.4 65.4 55.6 10:26:57 55.6 55.6 63.8 10:31:57 63.8 63.8 55 10:27:00 55 55 62.7 10:32:00 62.7 62.7 55.6 10:27:03 55.6 55.6 64.3 10:32:03 64.3 64.3 57.8 10:27:06 57.8 57.8 64.4 10:32:06 64.4 64.4 55.8 10:27:09 55.8 55.8 61.8 10:32:09 61.8 61.8 54.2 10:27:12 54.2 54.2 66 10:32:12 66 66 54.2 10:27:15 54.2 54.2 66.8 10:32:15 66.8 66.8 54.6 10:27:18 54.6 54.6 66.3 10:32:18 66.3 66.3 53.6 10:27:21 53.6 53.6 66.1 10:32:21 66.1 66.1 53.3 10:27:24 53.3 53.3 64.3 10:32:24 64.3 64.3 56 10:27:27 56 56 65.2 10:32:27 65.2 65.2 56.4 10:27:30 56.4 56.4 65.3 10:32:30 65.3 65.3 58.4 10:27:33 58.4 58.4 60.8 10:32:33 60.8 60.8 61.4 10:27:36 61.4 61.4 64.2 10:32:36 64.2 64.2 61.4 10:27:39 61.4 61.4 65.3 10:32:39 65.3 65.3 60.8 10:27:42 60.8 60.8 65.3 10:32:42 65.3 65.3 63.5 10:27:45 63.5 63.5 66.2 10:32:45 66.2 66.2 61 10:27:48 61 61 65.1 10:32:48 65.1 65.1 60.1 10:27:51 60.1 60.1 65.5 10:32:51 65.5 65.5 58.1 10:27:54 58.1 58.1 65.3 10:32:54 65.3 65.3 58 10:27:57 58 58 65 10:32:57 65 65 59.3 10:28:00 59.3 59.3 65.8 10:33:00 65.8 65.8 59.6 10:28:03 59.6 59.6 63.6 10:33:03 63.6 63.6 60.3 10:28:06 60.3 60.3 61.5 10:33:06 61.5 61.5 58.6 10:28:09 58.6 58.6 61 10:33:09 61 61 61.5 10:28:12 61.5 61.5 61.1 10:33:12 61.1 61.1 59.4 10:28:15 59.4 59.4 59.8 10:33:15 59.8 59.8 57.5 10:28:18 57.5 57.5 62.8 10:33:18 62.8 62.8 56.2 10:28:21 56.2 56.2 64.8 10:33:21 64.8 64.8 SPL Time Leq (1 hour Avg.) Ldn CNEL SPL Time Leq (1 hour Avg.) Ldn CNEL Site A - On Power Pole at Northwest Corner of Project Site Site B - On Tree at Middle Western Portion of Project Site 54.3 10:28:24 54.3 54.3 62.8 10:33:24 62.8 62.8 53.2 10:28:27 53.2 53.2 60.9 10:33:27 60.9 60.9 51.8 10:28:30 51.8 51.8 59.5 10:33:30 59.5 59.5 52.5 10:28:33 52.5 52.5 62.9 10:33:33 62.9 62.9 54.2 10:28:36 54.2 54.2 65.4 10:33:36 65.4 65.4 59.1 10:28:39 59.1 59.1 60.5 10:33:39 60.5 60.5 58.5 10:28:42 58.5 58.5 60.1 10:33:42 60.1 60.1 56 10:28:45 56 56 60.4 10:33:45 60.4 60.4 52.5 10:28:48 52.5 52.5 61.1 10:33:48 61.1 61.1 54.8 10:28:51 54.8 54.8 62.7 10:33:51 62.7 62.7 52.6 10:28:54 52.6 52.6 63.8 10:33:54 63.8 63.8 51.6 10:28:57 51.6 51.6 62.2 10:33:57 62.2 62.2 52.4 10:29:00 52.4 52.4 61.5 10:34:00 61.5 61.5 52.1 10:29:03 52.1 52.1 62.1 10:34:03 62.1 62.1 54 10:29:06 54 54 63.1 10:34:06 63.1 63.1 58 10:29:09 58 58 65.6 10:34:09 65.6 65.6 60 10:29:12 60 60 65.4 10:34:12 65.4 65.4 61.2 10:29:15 61.2 61.2 64.4 10:34:15 64.4 64.4 57.4 10:29:18 57.4 57.4 63.4 10:34:18 63.4 63.4 55.5 10:29:21 55.5 55.5 64.6 10:34:21 64.6 64.6 56.4 10:29:24 56.4 56.4 63.2 10:34:24 63.2 63.2 55.8 10:29:27 55.8 55.8 64.2 10:34:27 64.2 64.2 59.1 10:29:30 59.1 59.1 69.6 10:34:30 69.6 69.6 59.9 10:29:33 59.9 59.9 71.9 10:34:33 71.9 71.9 61 10:29:36 61 61 65 10:34:36 65 65 57.8 10:29:39 57.8 57.8 64.4 10:34:39 64.4 64.4 57.8 10:29:42 57.8 57.8 66.8 10:34:42 66.8 66.8 61.4 10:29:45 61.4 61.4 67.9 10:34:45 67.9 67.9 64.9 10:29:48 64.9 64.9 68.9 10:34:48 68.9 68.9 64.2 10:29:51 64.2 64.2 67.2 10:34:51 67.2 67.2 63.9 10:29:54 63.9 63.9 64.4 10:34:54 64.4 64.4 67 10:29:57 67 67 62 10:34:57 62 62 64.7 10:30:00 64.7 64.7 63.3 10:35:00 63.3 63.3 61.2 10:30:03 61.2 61.2 62.8 10:35:03 62.8 62.8 59.4 10:30:06 59.4 59.4 60.3 10:35:06 60.3 60.3 58.7 10:30:09 58.7 58.7 57.4 10:35:09 57.4 57.4 59 10:30:12 59 59 58.8 10:35:12 58.8 58.8 59.4 10:30:15 59.4 59.4 58 10:35:15 58 58 58.2 10:30:18 58.2 58.2 56.8 10:35:18 56.8 56.8 58.6 10:30:21 58.6 58.6 57.6 10:35:21 57.6 57.6 58.9 10:30:24 58.9 58.9 60.1 10:35:24 60.1 60.1 58.3 10:30:27 58.3 58.3 60.5 10:35:27 60.5 60.5 57.2 10:30:30 57.2 57.2 60.8 10:35:30 60.8 60.8 58 10:30:33 58 58 60.2 10:35:33 60.2 60.2 60.2 10:30:36 60.2 60.2 60.2 10:35:36 60.2 60.2 58.2 10:30:39 58.2 58.2 59.2 10:35:39 59.2 59.2 57.8 10:30:42 57.8 57.8 58.4 10:35:42 58.4 58.4 57.2 10:30:45 57.2 57.2 57.3 10:35:45 57.3 57.3 58.2 10:30:48 58.2 58.2 58.2 10:35:48 58.2 58.2 59 10:30:51 59 59 56.7 10:35:51 56.7 56.7 58.2 10:30:54 58.2 58.2 59.1 10:35:54 59.1 59.1 59 10:30:57 59 59 62.5 10:35:57 62.5 62.5 59.2 10:31:00 59.2 59.2 63.7 10:36:00 63.7 63.7 57.6 10:31:03 57.6 57.6 63.1 10:36:03 63.1 63.1 57.7 10:31:06 57.7 57.7 61 10:36:06 61 61 61.4 10:31:09 61.4 61.4 65.5 10:36:09 65.5 65.5 63.3 10:31:12 63.3 63.3 59.8 10:36:12 59.8 59.8 61 10:31:15 61 61 57.6 10:36:15 57.6 57.6 67.8 10:31:18 67.8 67.8 58 10:36:18 58 58 68.8 10:31:21 68.8 68.8 59.8 10:36:21 59.8 59.8 68 10:31:24 68 68 61.7 10:36:24 61.7 61.7 63.6 10:31:27 63.6 63.6 65.5 10:36:27 65.5 65.5 62.3 10:31:30 62.3 62.3 66.5 10:36:30 66.5 66.5 62.3 10:31:33 62.3 62.3 62.3 10:36:33 62.3 62.3 60.7 10:31:36 60.7 60.7 61.7 10:36:36 61.7 61.7 58.6 10:31:39 58.6 58.6 58.5 10:36:39 58.5 58.5 58.2 10:31:42 58.2 58.2 60.4 10:36:42 60.4 60.4 59.1 10:31:45 59.1 59.1 60.8 10:36:45 60.8 60.8 59.6 10:31:48 59.6 59.6 60.2 10:36:48 60.2 60.2 58.6 10:31:51 58.6 58.6 59.9 10:36:51 59.9 59.9 61 10:31:54 61 61 63.5 10:36:54 63.5 63.5 62.9 10:31:57 62.9 62.9 62.8 10:36:57 62.8 62.8 60.7 10:32:00 59.3 60.7 60.7 64.4 10:37:00 63.9 64.4 64.4 59.9 10:32:03 59.3 59.9 59.9 66.2 10:37:03 63.9 66.2 66.2 58.4 10:32:06 59.3 58.4 58.4 61.4 10:37:06 63.9 61.4 61.4 60 10:32:09 59.3 60 60 60.2 10:37:09 63.9 60.2 60.2 58.9 10:32:12 59.3 58.9 58.9 65.6 10:37:12 63.9 65.6 65.6 56.9 10:32:15 59.3 56.9 56.9 65.4 10:37:15 64.0 65.4 65.4 58.4 10:32:18 59.3 58.4 58.4 58.6 10:37:18 64.0 58.6 58.6 59.6 10:32:21 59.3 59.6 59.6 58.9 10:37:21 64.0 58.9 58.9 60.1 10:32:24 59.2 60.1 60.1 60.3 10:37:24 64.0 60.3 60.3 61.6 10:32:27 59.2 61.6 61.6 56.8 10:37:27 64.0 56.8 56.8 58.8 10:32:30 59.2 58.8 58.8 56.5 10:37:30 64.0 56.5 56.5 56.5 10:32:33 59.2 56.5 56.5 56.5 10:37:33 64.0 56.5 56.5 57.4 10:32:36 59.2 57.4 57.4 56.8 10:37:36 64.0 56.8 56.8 59.2 10:32:39 59.2 59.2 59.2 59.4 10:37:39 64.0 59.4 59.4 61.7 10:32:42 59.2 61.7 61.7 59.6 10:37:42 64.0 59.6 59.6 57.7 10:32:45 59.2 57.7 57.7 59.8 10:37:45 64.0 59.8 59.8 56.3 10:32:48 59.2 56.3 56.3 59 10:37:48 64.0 59 59 54.8 10:32:51 59.2 54.8 54.8 57.3 10:37:51 64.0 57.3 57.3 54.7 10:32:54 59.2 54.7 54.7 59.1 10:37:54 64.0 59.1 59.1 54.6 10:32:57 59.2 54.6 54.6 63.3 10:37:57 63.9 63.3 63.3 55.8 10:33:00 59.2 55.8 55.8 63.4 10:38:00 63.9 63.4 63.4 59.5 10:33:03 59.2 59.5 59.5 63.4 10:38:03 63.9 63.4 63.4 57.6 10:33:06 59.2 57.6 57.6 64 10:38:06 63.9 64 64 54.7 10:33:09 59.2 54.7 54.7 63.4 10:38:09 63.9 63.4 63.4 54.3 10:33:12 59.2 54.3 54.3 58.8 10:38:12 63.9 58.8 58.8 58.2 10:33:15 59.2 58.2 58.2 58.9 10:38:15 63.9 58.9 58.9 59.9 10:33:18 59.2 59.9 59.9 59 10:38:18 63.9 59 59 56.1 10:33:21 59.2 56.1 56.1 57.9 10:38:21 63.9 57.9 57.9 55.1 10:33:24 59.2 55.1 55.1 56.8 10:38:24 63.9 56.8 56.8 55 10:33:27 59.2 55 55 56.7 10:38:27 63.9 56.7 56.7 55.6 10:33:30 59.2 55.6 55.6 56.7 10:38:30 63.9 56.7 56.7 Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Appendix C APPENDIX C Reference Noise Measurements Printouts General Information Serial Number 02509 Model 831 Firmware Version 2.314 Filename 831_Data.002 User GT Job Description Costa Mesa Fast5Express Carwash Location At Pay Station 90 degrees from Carwash Entrance Measurement Description Start Time Thursday, 2018 December 20 11:05:13 Stop Time Thursday, 2018 December 20 11:15:13 Duration 00:10:00.0 Run Time 00:10:00.0 Pause 00:00:00.0 Pre Calibration Thursday, 2018 December 20 10:51:31 Post Calibration None Calibration Deviation --- Note 66 F, 29.97 in Hg, 53% Hu, no wind, party cloudy Overall Data LAeq 67.2 dB LASmax 2018 Dec 20 11:11:58 75.6 dB LApeak (max) 2018 Dec 20 11:12:13 93.1 dB LASmin 2018 Dec 20 11:08:19 62.8 dB LCeq 75.8 dB LAeq 67.2 dB LCeq - LAeq 8.6 dB LAIeq 68.0 dB LAeq 67.2 dB LAIeq - LAeq 0.8 dB Ldn 67.2 dB LDay 07:00-22:00 67.2 dB LNight 22:00-07:00 --- dB Lden 67.2 dB LDay 07:00-19:00 67.2 dB LEvening 19:00-22:00 --- dB LNight 22:00-07:00 --- dB LAE 95.0 dB # Overloads 0 Overload Duration 0.0 s # OBA Overloads 0 OBA Overload Duration 0.0 s Statistics LAS5.00 68.9 dBA LAS10.00 68.7 dBA LAS33.30 67.7 dBA LAS50.00 67.0 dBA LAS66.60 66.5 dBA LAS90.00 64.9 dBA LAS > 65.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 2 / 587.2 s LAS > 85.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s LApeak > 135.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s LApeak > 137.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s LApeak > 140.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s Settings RMS Weight A Weighting Peak Weight A Weighting Detector Slow Preamp PRM831 Integration Method Linear OBA Range Low OBA Bandwidth 1/1 and 1/3 OBA Freq. Weighting Z Weighting OBA Max Spectrum Bin Max Gain +0 dB Under Range Limit 26.2 dB Under Range Peak 75.9 dB Noise Floor 17.1 dB Overload 143.5 dB 1/1 Spectra Freq. (Hz): 8.0 16.0 31.5 63.0 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k 16k LZeq 57.8 68.0 72.8 72.3 66.2 65.6 65.0 62.4 58.6 54.4 47.0 36.2 LZSmax 75.3 74.8 83.5 85.1 77.8 82.1 73.0 65.1 63.9 58.7 52.7 45.6 LZSmin 50.6 58.4 66.9 66.5 60.9 61.7 60.2 57.3 54.0 49.9 43.5 30.2 Approx 40 ft from Carwash Entrance 1/3 Spectra Freq. (Hz): 6.3 8.0 10.0 12.5 16.0 20.0 25.0 31.5 40.0 50.0 63.0 80.0 LZeq 52.0 50.3 55.3 54.2 60.5 67.0 68.6 68.8 66.3 67.0 69.5 65.1 LZSmax 73.2 72.5 65.6 67.0 68.5 75.1 76.5 79.6 82.5 80.8 82.5 82.0 LZSmin 40.1 42.4 46.2 46.9 46.3 54.4 60.0 62.4 58.5 60.7 61.0 57.2 Freq. (Hz): 100 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1k 1.25k LZeq 62.5 62.1 58.7 61.3 62.2 58.4 60.0 58.9 61.6 59.3 56.9 56.1 LZSmax 74.3 76.4 72.4 72.3 81.5 71.3 70.3 68.8 65.8 62.4 59.8 60.7 LZSmin 56.6 55.5 52.0 56.7 57.2 54.1 48.8 54.5 54.0 52.5 51.6 51.0 Freq. (Hz): 1.6k 2k 2.5k 3.15k 4k 5k 6.3k 8k 10k 12.5k 16k 20k LZeq 54.6 53.6 53.2 52.2 48.6 46.0 43.5 42.9 39.5 34.6 29.7 22.2 LZSmax 60.3 58.5 58.5 55.6 53.5 51.4 49.9 48.9 47.4 45.2 39.8 32.7 LZSmin 50.3 48.8 48.5 47.0 43.9 42.3 39.9 38.5 33.7 28.5 23.8 16.3 Calibration History Preamp Date dB re. 1V/Pa PRM831 20 Dec 2018 10:51:31 -26.0 PRM831 17 Dec 2018 14:56:06 -26.1 PRM831 04 Dec 2018 09:35:01 -25.5 PRM831 16 Nov 2018 13:58:18 -25.8 PRM831 24 Oct 2018 13:08:44 -26.1 PRM831 12 Oct 2018 09:55:27 -25.9 PRM831 26 Sep 2018 15:49:25 -26.2 PRM831 21 Sep 2018 08:51:56 -25.6 PRM831 05 Sep 2018 11:51:21 -25.9 PRM831 13 Jun 2018 13:02:21 -25.7 PRM831 30 Mar 2018 23:00:57 -25.2 General Information Serial Number 02509 Model 831 Firmware Version 2.314 Filename 831_Data.003 User GT Job Description Costa Mesa Fast5Express Carwash Location Approx 25 feet from middle of Carwash near vent with Air Compresso Measurement Description Start Time Thursday, 2018 December 20 11:17:13 Stop Time Thursday, 2018 December 20 11:27:13 Duration 00:10:00.0 Run Time 00:10:00.0 Pause 00:00:00.0 Pre Calibration Thursday, 2018 December 20 10:51:31 Post Calibration None Calibration Deviation --- Note 66F, 29.96 in Hg, 50% Hu, no wind, partly cloudy Overall Data LAeq 69.8 dB LASmax 2018 Dec 20 11:23:42 73.5 dB LApeak (max) 2018 Dec 20 11:18:56 91.6 dB LASmin 2018 Dec 20 11:27:11 61.6 dB LCeq 77.1 dB LAeq 69.8 dB LCeq - LAeq 7.4 dB LAIeq 70.4 dB LAeq 69.8 dB LAIeq - LAeq 0.7 dB Ldn 69.8 dB LDay 07:00-22:00 69.8 dB LNight 22:00-07:00 --- dB Lden 69.8 dB LDay 07:00-19:00 69.8 dB LEvening 19:00-22:00 --- dB LNight 22:00-07:00 --- dB LAE 97.5 dB # Overloads 0 Overload Duration 0.0 s # OBA Overloads 0 OBA Overload Duration 0.0 s Statistics LAS5.00 72.5 dBA LAS10.00 72.3 dBA LAS33.30 71.3 dBA LAS50.00 69.0 dBA LAS66.60 67.6 dBA LAS90.00 63.6 dBA LAS > 65.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 1 / 544.9 s LAS > 85.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s LApeak > 135.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s LApeak > 137.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s LApeak > 140.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s Settings RMS Weight A Weighting Peak Weight A Weighting Detector Slow Preamp PRM831 Integration Method Linear OBA Range Low OBA Bandwidth 1/1 and 1/3 OBA Freq. Weighting Z Weighting OBA Max Spectrum Bin Max Gain +0 dB Under Range Limit 26.2 dB Under Range Peak 75.9 dB Noise Floor 17.1 dB Overload 143.5 dB 1/1 Spectra Freq. (Hz): 8.0 16.0 31.5 63.0 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k 16k LZeq 63.1 72.8 76.4 69.5 66.9 67.9 66.3 65.4 61.8 57.9 51.4 43.7 LZSmax 80.0 78.3 82.2 77.0 73.4 72.9 70.6 69.5 66.5 62.2 70.9 62.3 LZSmin 54.1 62.3 68.6 64.5 61.1 63.2 56.8 56.0 52.9 47.3 38.7 27.3 1/3 Spectra Freq. (Hz): 6.3 8.0 10.0 12.5 16.0 20.0 25.0 31.5 40.0 50.0 63.0 80.0 LZeq 56.6 57.0 60.2 59.1 65.7 71.7 73.8 71.4 67.8 65.1 66.4 61.4 LZSmax 76.4 75.6 68.1 71.2 73.1 78.4 82.0 80.3 75.6 74.2 73.5 75.2 LZSmin 44.9 45.7 49.5 52.2 55.2 56.7 63.1 61.0 60.1 59.2 58.8 55.2 Freq. (Hz): 100 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1k 1.25k LZeq 61.9 62.4 62.2 63.3 64.9 60.0 59.6 60.3 63.7 61.6 61.1 58.5 LZSmax 73.1 69.9 70.3 67.3 71.9 66.3 68.2 65.3 68.7 67.0 65.5 65.8 LZSmin 54.4 54.2 56.6 59.7 57.2 40.0 52.3 51.0 51.6 51.8 50.5 46.1 Freq. (Hz): 1.6k 2k 2.5k 3.15k 4k 5k 6.3k 8k 10k 12.5k 16k 20k LZeq 57.2 57.3 56.3 55.7 52.4 49.1 47.6 44.8 46.8 37.7 36.9 41.1 LZSmax 61.5 62.2 61.0 60.2 57.1 53.7 55.1 61.0 70.2 45.4 44.8 62.5 LZSmin 49.3 47.6 46.5 44.3 42.0 39.9 36.2 33.4 29.8 25.0 21.9 15.8 Calibration History Preamp Date dB re. 1V/Pa PRM831 20 Dec 2018 10:51:31 -26.0 PRM831 17 Dec 2018 14:56:06 -26.1 PRM831 04 Dec 2018 09:35:01 -25.5 PRM831 16 Nov 2018 13:58:18 -25.8 PRM831 24 Oct 2018 13:08:44 -26.1 PRM831 12 Oct 2018 09:55:27 -25.9 PRM831 26 Sep 2018 15:49:25 -26.2 PRM831 21 Sep 2018 08:51:56 -25.6 PRM831 05 Sep 2018 11:51:21 -25.9 PRM831 13 Jun 2018 13:02:21 -25.7 PRM831 30 Mar 2018 23:00:57 -25.2 General Information Serial Number 02509 Model 831 Firmware Version 2.314 Filename 831_Data.004 User GT Job Description Costa Mesa Fast5Express Carwash Location Approx 40 feet from Carwash Exit on Side (90 degrees) Measurement Description Start Time Thursday, 2018 December 20 11:27:49 Stop Time Thursday, 2018 December 20 11:37:49 Duration 00:10:00.0 Run Time 00:10:00.0 Pause 00:00:00.0 Pre Calibration Thursday, 2018 December 20 10:51:31 Post Calibration None Calibration Deviation --- Note 66 F, 29.95 in Hg, 50% Hu, no wind, partly cloudy Overall Data LAeq 73.0 dB LASmax 2018 Dec 20 11:29:42 74.8 dB LApeak (max) 2018 Dec 20 11:28:45 91.4 dB LASmin 2018 Dec 20 11:27:49 64.8 dB LCeq 79.3 dB LAeq 73.0 dB LCeq - LAeq 6.3 dB LAIeq 73.5 dB LAeq 73.0 dB LAIeq - LAeq 0.5 dB Ldn 73.0 dB LDay 07:00-22:00 73.0 dB LNight 22:00-07:00 --- dB Lden 73.0 dB LDay 07:00-19:00 73.0 dB LEvening 19:00-22:00 --- dB LNight 22:00-07:00 --- dB LAE 100.8 dB # Overloads 0 Overload Duration 0.0 s # OBA Overloads 0 OBA Overload Duration 0.0 s Statistics LAS5.00 74.4 dBA LAS10.00 74.3 dBA LAS33.30 73.7 dBA LAS50.00 73.1 dBA LAS66.60 72.7 dBA LAS90.00 70.5 dBA LAS > 65.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 1 / 600.0 s LAS > 85.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s LApeak > 135.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s LApeak > 137.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s LApeak > 140.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s Settings RMS Weight A Weighting Peak Weight A Weighting Detector Slow Preamp PRM831 Integration Method Linear OBA Range Low OBA Bandwidth 1/1 and 1/3 OBA Freq. Weighting Z Weighting OBA Max Spectrum Bin Max Gain +0 dB Under Range Limit 26.2 dB Under Range Peak 75.9 dB Noise Floor 17.1 dB Overload 143.5 dB 1/1 Spectra Freq. (Hz): 8.0 16.0 31.5 63.0 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k 16k LZeq 61.0 68.7 77.1 72.6 69.8 70.8 70.1 68.9 64.7 60.9 52.9 40.0 LZSmax 82.7 74.4 83.7 82.7 81.6 76.3 72.4 71.0 66.7 65.2 60.8 53.8 LZSmin 52.8 60.2 72.8 66.9 63.9 67.1 61.7 62.3 57.6 50.6 42.3 31.1 1/3 Spectra Freq. (Hz): 6.3 8.0 10.0 12.5 16.0 20.0 25.0 31.5 40.0 50.0 63.0 80.0 LZeq 57.4 54.3 57.1 58.0 61.1 67.4 71.5 72.9 72.7 68.7 68.7 65.1 LZSmax 80.6 73.7 75.2 72.1 70.0 72.9 82.1 80.8 80.6 82.1 77.8 78.1 LZSmin 44.3 43.6 49.1 50.3 52.0 55.9 62.0 64.9 61.6 61.7 63.2 57.2 Freq. (Hz): 100 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1k 1.25k LZeq 64.5 65.4 65.2 68.0 65.7 63.3 63.7 65.3 66.5 64.8 63.9 63.2 LZSmax 80.8 75.1 76.8 74.9 70.3 69.4 67.9 67.9 69.8 67.4 66.5 65.5 LZSmin 56.4 58.7 60.7 64.9 58.5 48.6 55.2 58.1 59.7 57.8 56.7 55.6 Freq. (Hz): 1.6k 2k 2.5k 3.15k 4k 5k 6.3k 8k 10k 12.5k 16k 20k LZeq 60.9 59.5 58.9 57.3 55.9 54.7 51.4 46.1 41.7 37.9 34.6 27.8 LZSmax 62.9 61.6 61.3 60.0 61.1 60.0 57.9 55.4 54.3 51.9 48.7 42.5 LZSmin 54.2 50.9 51.1 45.8 43.5 43.1 39.9 36.1 33.8 28.9 25.4 17.3 Calibration History Preamp Date dB re. 1V/Pa PRM831 20 Dec 2018 10:51:31 -26.0 PRM831 17 Dec 2018 14:56:06 -26.1 PRM831 04 Dec 2018 09:35:01 -25.5 PRM831 16 Nov 2018 13:58:18 -25.8 PRM831 24 Oct 2018 13:08:44 -26.1 PRM831 12 Oct 2018 09:55:27 -25.9 PRM831 26 Sep 2018 15:49:25 -26.2 PRM831 21 Sep 2018 08:51:56 -25.6 PRM831 05 Sep 2018 11:51:21 -25.9 PRM831 13 Jun 2018 13:02:21 -25.7 PRM831 30 Mar 2018 23:00:57 -25.2 General Information Serial Number 02509 Model 831 Firmware Version 2.314 Filename 831_Data.006 User GT Job Description Costa Mesa Fast5Express Carwash Location Approx 5 feet from Car Vacuum Stations Measurement Description Start Time Thursday, 2018 December 20 11:49:50 Stop Time Thursday, 2018 December 20 12:01:00 Duration 00:10:07.7 Run Time 00:10:07.7 Pause 00:00:00.0 Pre Calibration Thursday, 2018 December 20 10:51:31 Post Calibration None Calibration Deviation --- Note 66 F, 29.95 in Hg, 48% Hu, no wind, partly cloudy Overall Data LAeq 70.6 dB LASmax 2018 Dec 20 11:58:55 81.3 dB LApeak (max) 2018 Dec 20 11:59:23 100.4 dB LASmin 2018 Dec 20 11:49:57 64.1 dB LCeq 77.0 dB LAeq 70.6 dB LCeq - LAeq 6.5 dB LAIeq 72.4 dB LAeq 70.6 dB LAIeq - LAeq 1.8 dB Ldn 70.6 dB LDay 07:00-22:00 70.6 dB LNight 22:00-07:00 --- dB Lden 70.6 dB LDay 07:00-19:00 70.6 dB LEvening 19:00-22:00 --- dB LNight 22:00-07:00 --- dB LAE 98.4 dB # Overloads 0 Overload Duration 0.0 s # OBA Overloads 1 OBA Overload Duration 2.1 s Statistics LAS5.00 75.4 dBA LAS10.00 74.8 dBA LAS33.30 68.6 dBA LAS50.00 66.8 dBA LAS66.60 66.3 dBA LAS90.00 65.2 dBA LAS > 65.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 2 / 607.7 s LAS > 85.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s LApeak > 135.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s LApeak > 137.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s LApeak > 140.0 dB (Exceedence Counts / Duration) 0 / 0.0 s Settings RMS Weight A Weighting Peak Weight A Weighting Detector Slow Preamp PRM831 Integration Method Linear OBA Range Low OBA Bandwidth 1/1 and 1/3 OBA Freq. Weighting Z Weighting OBA Max Spectrum Bin Max Gain +0 dB Under Range Limit 26.2 dB Under Range Peak 75.9 dB Noise Floor 17.1 dB Overload 143.5 dB 1/1 Spectra Freq. (Hz): 8.0 16.0 31.5 63.0 125 250 500 1k 2k 4k 8k 16k LZeq 60.6 68.1 76.6 71.9 65.4 62.8 64.9 62.9 65.1 62.5 61.0 56.7 LZSmax 80.2 85.6 92.7 85.2 77.6 71.2 77.0 75.9 75.8 72.5 73.9 75.2 LZSmin 51.4 60.7 70.0 62.1 60.0 58.7 60.7 57.5 55.9 53.0 49.3 45.3 1/3 Spectra Freq. (Hz): 6.3 8.0 10.0 12.5 16.0 20.0 25.0 31.5 40.0 50.0 63.0 80.0 LZeq 56.2 54.6 56.4 57.5 63.0 65.8 73.8 71.9 68.8 66.4 69.3 64.0 LZSmax 78.6 71.1 70.1 69.9 78.0 85.0 90.6 86.3 80.5 83.2 79.4 76.0 LZSmin 43.0 45.6 47.9 49.3 54.0 53.3 63.1 63.2 60.7 59.6 61.8 58.8 Freq. (Hz): 100 125 160 200 250 315 400 500 630 800 1k 1.25k LZeq 62.6 60.9 56.0 54.6 56.7 60.6 61.5 60.5 57.4 58.6 57.8 58.1 LZSmax 75.5 75.5 70.6 67.0 69.2 71.0 66.0 74.4 73.2 70.2 73.5 70.9 LZSmin 56.5 54.5 51.1 47.2 52.7 54.2 52.9 56.2 50.3 53.1 50.5 52.3 Freq. (Hz): 1.6k 2k 2.5k 3.15k 4k 5k 6.3k 8k 10k 12.5k 16k 20k LZeq 60.2 60.9 59.9 58.5 56.6 57.9 57.3 56.2 55.0 53.2 52.2 49.7 LZSmax 71.4 72.2 71.3 69.3 67.4 67.1 67.7 69.1 70.3 70.6 71.4 69.7 LZSmin 51.7 50.3 50.7 49.7 47.2 46.0 44.4 44.0 45.0 41.6 41.1 38.0 Calibration History Preamp Date dB re. 1V/Pa PRM831 20 Dec 2018 10:51:31 -26.0 PRM831 17 Dec 2018 14:56:06 -26.1 PRM831 04 Dec 2018 09:35:01 -25.5 PRM831 16 Nov 2018 13:58:18 -25.8 PRM831 24 Oct 2018 13:08:44 -26.1 PRM831 12 Oct 2018 09:55:27 -25.9 PRM831 26 Sep 2018 15:49:25 -26.2 PRM831 21 Sep 2018 08:51:56 -25.6 PRM831 05 Sep 2018 11:51:21 -25.9 PRM831 13 Jun 2018 13:02:21 -25.7 PRM831 30 Mar 2018 23:00:57 -25.2 Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Appendix D APPENDIX D RCNM Model Construction Noise Calculations Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 1/9/2019 Case Description: Anaheim Fast5Xpress Carwash - Demolition ---- Receptor #1 ---- Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night Homes to West Residential 59.7 59.7 59.7 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Concrete Saw No 20 89.6 80 5 Dozer No 40 81.7 80 5 Tractor No 40 84 80 5 Tractor No 40 84 80 5 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Concrete Saw 80.5 73.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 72.6 68.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.9 70.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.9 70.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 81 77 N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 1/9/2019 Case Description: Anaheim Fast5Xpress Carwash - Grading ---- Receptor #1 ---- Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night Homes to West Residential 59.7 59.7 59.7 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Grader No 40 85 80 5 Dozer No 40 81.7 80 5 Tractor No 40 84 80 5 Tractor No 40 84 80 5 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Grader 75.9 71.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A Dozer 72.6 68.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.9 70.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.9 70.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 76 77 N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 1/9/2019 Case Description: Anaheim Fast5Xpress Carwash - Building Construction ---- Receptor #1 ---- Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night Homes to West Residential 59.7 59.7 59.7 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Crane No 16 80.6 80 5 Gradall No 40 83.4 80 5 Gradall No 40 83.4 80 5 Tractor No 40 84 80 5 Tractor No 40 84 80 5 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Crane 71.5 63.5 N/A N/A N/A N/A Gradall 74.3 70.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A Gradall 74.3 70.3 N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.9 70.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.9 70.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75 77 N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 1/9/2019 Case Description: Anaheim Fast5Xpress Carwash - Paving ---- Receptor #1 ---- Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night Homes to West Residential 59.7 59.7 59.7 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 80 5 Paver No 50 77.2 80 5 Roller No 20 80 80 5 Tractor No 40 84 80 5 Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 80 5 Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 80 5 Concrete Mixer Truck No 40 78.8 80 5 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Concrete Mixer Truck 69.7 65.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A Paver 68.1 65.1 N/A N/A N/A N/A Roller 70.9 63.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A Tractor 74.9 70.9 N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Mixer Truck 69.7 65.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Mixer Truck 69.7 65.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A Concrete Mixer Truck 69.7 65.7 N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 75 75 N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Roadway Construction Noise Model (RCNM),Version 1.1 Report date: 1/9/2019 Case Description: Anaheim Fast5Xpress Carwash - Painting ---- Receptor #1 ---- Baselines (dBA) Description Land Use Daytime Evening Night Homes to West Residential 59.7 59.7 59.7 Equipment Spec Actual Receptor Estimated Impact Lmax Lmax Distance Shielding Description Device Usage(%) (dBA) (dBA) (feet) (dBA) Compressor (air) No 40 77.7 80 5 Results Calculated (dBA) Noise Limits (dBA) Day Evening Equipment *Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Lmax Leq Compressor (air) 68.6 64.6 N/A N/A N/A N/A Total 69 65 N/A N/A N/A N/A *Calculated Lmax is the Loudest value. Fast5Xpress Carwash Project, Noise Impact Analysis City of Anaheim Appendix E APPENDIX E Operational Noise Sound Wall Noise Reduction Calculations Ca r w a s h N o i s e C a l c u l a t i o n s - A t N e a r e s t P r o p e r t y L i n e s t o W e s t St a t i o n a r y R e f e r e n c e R e f e r e n At N e a r e s t P r o p e r t y L i n e No i s e S o u r c e s D i s t a n c e L e q D i s t a n c e L e q 1 ( L i n e S o u r c e : h a r d = 0 , s o f t = . 5 ; P o i n t S o u r c e : h a r d = 1 , s o f t = 1 . 5 ) Si d e o f C a r w a s h E n t r a n c e 4 0 6 7 . 2 4 8 6 6 ( e q . N - 2 1 4 1 . 2 o f T e N S ) Mi d d l e o f C a r w a s h S i d e 2 5 6 9 . 8 3 3 6 7 Si d e o f C a r w a s h E x i t 4 0 7 3 . 0 6 0 6 9 Va c u u m S t a t i o n s 5 7 0 . 6 7 0 4 8 St a t i o n a r y No i s e S o u r c e s Di s t an c e fr o m Re c e p t o r to W a l l Di s t an c e fr o m so u r c e t o W a l l He i g h t of W a l l (f e e t ) Wi t h ou t Wa l l N o i s e Le v e l a t Pr o p e r t y Wi t h W a ll No i s e Le v e l a t Pr o p e r t y So u r c e He i g h t (f e e t ) E x t er i or Ob s e r v e r He i g h t (f e e t ) So u r c e Fr e q u e n c y ( h z ) Le f t - R i g h t Ad j u s t m e n t ba r r i e r t o re c e i v e r - b (a l l ) so u r c e t o ba r r i e r - a so u r c e t o re c e i v e r - c pa t h di f f e r e n c e y = a + b - c (a u t o ) li n e o f si g h t (s l o p e ) f r e s n e l Ba r r i e r At t e n Si d e o f C a r w a s h E n 10 4 8 1 0 6 6 52 8 5 8 0 0 0 1 1 . 1 8 4 8 . 0 4 5 8 . 0 8 1 . 1 4 1 3 . 2 6 - 1 3 . 8 5 Mi d d l e o f C a r w a s h 1 0 3 3 1 0 6 7 54 8 5 8 0 0 0 1 1 . 1 8 3 3 . 0 6 4 3 . 1 0 1 . 1 4 1 3 . 2 3 - 1 3 . 8 3 Si d e o f C a r w a s h E x 60 1 0 1 0 6 9 54 4 5 8 0 0 0 6 0 . 2 1 1 1 . 6 6 7 0 . 0 1 1 . 8 6 1 5 . 3 0 - 1 5 . 4 7 4 Va c u u m S t a t i o n s 6 0 7 0 1 0 4 8 39 8 5 8 0 0 0 6 0 . 2 1 7 0 . 0 3 1 3 0 . 0 3 0 . 2 0 1 0 . 5 7 - 8 . 8 5 1 June 28, 2019 Wayne Carvalho, Contract Planner City of Anaheim 200 S. Anaheim Blvd Suite 162 wcarvalho@anaheim.net Subject: Parking Justification Letter Fast5Xpress Car Wash Development Anaheim, California Dear Mr. Carvalho: As requested, Sagecrest Planning + Environmental (Sagecrest) is pleased to submit the following Parking Justification Letter for the proposed Fast5Xpress Car Wash commercial development (Proposed Project) located at 407 South State College Boulevard, identified as Assessor’s Parcel Numbers: 037-222-37, 037- 222-36, & 037-222-05. Based on our understanding, a parking justification is required by the City of Anaheim to determine the parking demand for the proposed project, which includes a 4,162 square-foot express-service car wash with ancillary vacuums, and ensure that adequate parking is provided for the project and the cumulative project site. The purpose of this letter is to demonstrate that parking is adequate with the number of parking spaces proposed under Proposed Project. This letter evaluates the parking needs of the proposed use based on field study of existing peak parking demands at a similar site and application of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Methodology of collection, analysis, and recommended justification for required findings are detailed below. Project Location and Description The project site is .82 acres (35,858 sf), comprised of three existing lots and an abandoned alley. The Proposed Project is located on the west side of S. State College Boulevard, situated northwest of the E. Santa Ana Street and S. State College Boulevard intersection, and southwest of the E. Broadway and S. State College Boulevard intersection, in the City of Anaheim. The site is surrounded to the north, south, and east by general commercial properties, and single-family residential properties located to the west. ATTACHMENT NO. 6 2 The project site’s frontage is on the western side of a designated primary arterial per the General Plan’s Circulation Element, College State Boulevard. The project site is currently developed with a banquet hall and parking lot. Figure 1, located at the end of this letter, depicts a vicinity map showing the general location of the Proposed Project in the context of the surrounding neighborhood. The Proposed Project would demolish the existing improvements on-site, which include paved parking lot and banquet hall building, and construct a 4,162 square-foot, express-service car wash facility and accessory vacuum use. A total of 16 parking spaces are provided onsite, 13 vacuum spaces and three employee spaces in the rear. Figure 2 depicts the Proposed Project site plan, prepared by KPFF Consulting Engineers. Parking Assessment and Analysis A parking count was conducted to demonstrate the parking demand for the proposed car was use. The parking assessment evaluates a comparable site’s existing parking occupancy and evaluates the application of the comparable site’s data to the project site. Parking standards for the Proposed Project are set forth in Chapter 18.42 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, and stipulate the proposed use’s parking requirement as needing a parking justification letter per paragraph 18.42.040.010.0108, and does not state a required parking ratio for the car wash use. Therefore, the analysis below provides for the demand of a car wash use with similar characteristics. A parking assessment was conducted to determine the demand, time intervals, and occupancy of parking spaces at the Fast5Xpress located in Fullerton at 285 E. Orangethorpe Avenue, Fullerton, CA. This observed location is an existing Fast5Xpress carwash in full operation. The site provides two lane queuing, 20 vacuum stalls (two stalls are designated handicap accessible), and the same hours of operation, consistent with the proposed project. Parking counts were conducted on Tuesday, June 18th and Wednesday, June 19th for five-hour periods between the hours of 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. each day. Counts were based on hour increments, beginning at 10:00 a.m. The parking counts do not include the wash-only patrons who serviced their car during these timeframes. The time frame chosen is derived from an assessment of Fullerton Fast5Xpress staff who concluded that the 10:00 a.m. to 3:00 p.m. timeframe is the busiest time on weekdays. The parking count data can be found under Attachment 1 of this document. On Tuesday, June 18th, the Fast5Xpress observed a total of 236 vehicles park and utilize the vacuuming services provided. Fast5Xpress averaged 47.2 vehicles per hour on this date, with the most occupancy occurring during the 10:00 a.m. to 11:00 a.m. hour. Each parking stall had an average of 2.36 vehicles per hour during the observed time. On Wednesday, June 19th, the Fast5Xpress observed a total of 277 vehicles utilize parking and vacuum facilities. Fast5Xpress averaged 55.4 vehicles per hour on this date, with the most occupancy occurring during the 12:00 p.m. to 11:00 p.m. hour. Each parking stall had an average of 2.77 vehicles per hour during the observed time. Based on the resulting field data, the maximum number of parking spaces utilized during any one-hour interval throughout the duration of the study was 67 vehicles between 12:00 p.m. and 1:00 p.m. The surveyed site has the total parking capacity for 20 vehicles. While occupancy rates were more than 100% during each hour observed, actual utilization is best observed as time spent in the parking space. Based on vehicles per minute within the one-hour timeframe, the average time spent in each parking space 3 equates to 1.11 minutes per vehicle. The average number of vehicles utilizing each parking space is 3.35 vehicles within the busiest one-hour time frame. At this rate, the expected maximum occupancy for the proposed project is 44 vehicles (3.35 vehicles/stall x 13 total stalls). When the average time spent servicing from the observed site is applied to the proposed project, the maximum 44 vehicles expected results in a total time of stalls occupied as 49 minutes within one-hour, allowing for 11 minutes of surplus time. Summary of Findings and Conclusions The applicant proposes a 4,162 square-foot express-service car wash with ancillary vacuums, with a total of 16 spaces onsite, including three dedicated employee spaces. The required parking standard for the proposed use is determinant on the assessment of a parking justification letter pursuant to Chapter 18.42 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. Parking data collection was conducted at a similar site in the City of Fullerton on Tuesday 6/18 and Wednesday 6/19, for five-hour periods between 10:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. These time periods were chosen based on staff recommendation of busiest hours of operation for the Fullerton site. The peak parking demand at the surveyed site was 67 vehicles in one-hour. Based on the number of parking stalls provided on the Fullerton site, the 67 vehicles approximate to 3.35 vehicles servicing each stall and averaging a time spent of 1.11 minutes per vehicle in each stall. Applying the equivalent occupancy ratio to the proposed project results in an expected maximum occupancy of 44 vehicles in a one-hour timeframe. Based on the average timeframe spent by patrons at the observed location, it is expected that turnover rates will allow for sufficient parking at the proposed use. At the direction of City staff, the below findings are utilized as a baseline to determine support for the proposed parking of the Proposed Project. Based on these findings below and the propose d operations of the Proposed Project, the proposed parking will not result in inadequate parking. 1. That the modification to parking will not cause fewer off-street parking spaces to be provided for the proposed use than the number of such spaces necessary to accommodate all vehicles attributable to such use under the normal and reasonably foreseeable conditions of operation of such use, in that the proposed use is a car wash with no walk-in facilities that increase demand for alternative type services, thus the need for parking is based on the demand for vacuum services only. Based on the parking analysis provided in the Parking Justification Letter dated June 28, 2019, the expected patron servicing time of the vacuum facilities results in a value that allows for a projected maximum capacity to be served by the proposed 13 parking stalls; 2. That the modification to parking, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use, in that the proposed use is a car wash with no walk-in facilities that increase demand for alternative type services, thus the need for parking is based on the demand for vacuum services only. Based on the parking analysis provided in the Parking Justification Letter dated June 28, 2019, the expected patron servicing time of the vacuum facilities results in a value that allows for a projected maximum capacity to be served by the proposed 13 parking stalls; 3. That the modification to parking, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase the demand and competition for parking spaces upon adjacent private property in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use (which property is not expressly provided as parking for such use under an agreement in compliance with subsection .030 of Section 18.42.050 (Non-Residential 4 Uses- Shared Parking Arrangements)) in that the proposed use is a car wash with no walk-in facilities that increase demand for alternative type services, thus the need for parking is based on the demand for vacuum services only. Based on the parking analysis provided in the Parking Justification Letter dated June 28, 2019, the expected patron servicing time of the vacuum facilities results in a value that allows for a projected maximum capacity to be served by the proposed 13 parking stalls; 4. That the modification to parking, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not increase traffic congestion within the off-street parking areas or lots provided for the proposed use in that the proposed use is a car wash with no walk-in facilities that increase demand for alternative type services, thus the need for parking is based on the demand for vacuum services only. Based on the parking analysis provided in the Parking Justification Letter dated June 28, 2019, the expected patron servicing time of the vacuum facilities results in a value that allows for a projected maximum capacity to be served by the proposed 13 parking stalls; and 5. That the modification to parking, under the conditions imposed, if any, will not impede vehicular ingress to or egress from adjacent properties upon the public streets in the immediate vicinity of the proposed use in that the parking area, which can be served by the proposed 13 parking stalls based on the Parking Justification Letter dated June 28, 2019, is designed in a way that provides through access to a secondary egress point on the project site. Additionally, the ingress for the site does not directly access onto the proposed parking lot, and access to the parking stalls would be limited to actual patrons of the car wash. Amy Vazquez President Sagecrest Planning + Environmental Attachments: 1. Parking Counts 5 Figure 1: Vicinity Map 6 Figure 2: Proposed Site Plan Parking Analysis Fast 5 Express Wash Fullerton June 19, 2019 Time:10:00am- 11:00am Total Volume: 52 cars Stall East Parking Row West Parking Row 1 1 2 2 4 2 3 4 2 4 3 4 5 1 3 6 2 4 7 2 1 8 4 3 9 2 4 10 2 2 Total 25 27 Time :11:00am- 12:00pm Total Volume: 53 Stall East Parking Row West Parking Row 1 4 1 2 6 2 3 3 4 4 1 3 5 3 2 6 2 3 7 3 3 8 1 2 9 3 3 10 1 3 Total 29 26 Parking Analysis Fast 5 Express Wash Fullerton June 19, 2019 Time: 12:00pm- 1:00pm Total Volume: 67 Stall East Parking Row West Parking Row 1 3 1 2 3 4 3 8 4 4 5 1 5 3 5 6 3 3 7 2 5 8 2 4 9 4 3 10 0 4 Total 33 34 Time: 1:00pm- 2:00pm Total Volume: 54 Stall East Parking Row West Parking Row 1 2 4 2 4 2 3 3 2 4 1 2 5 3 3 6 3 2 7 3 4 8 3 4 9 3 4 10 0 4 Total 23 31 Parking Analysis Fast 5 Express Wash Fullerton June 19, 2019 Time: 2:00pm- 3:00pm Total Volume: 54 Stall East Parking Row West Parking Row 1 1 3 2 1 3 3 3 4 4 2 4 5 2 3 6 2 3 7 3 3 8 3 3 9 3 2 10 1 2 Total 24 30 After speaking with management and employees, it was concluded that the car was saw its busiest time of day between the hours of 10:00 am and 3:00 pm on weekdays. Based on this information the survey was conducted and the above information was collected. Based on the information, we were able to determine the following: Fast5Express saw a total of 277 cars park and utilize the vacuuming service provided. The parking count does not count patrons who only went through car wash service. Fast5Express averaged 55.4 cars per hour during the 5 hours parking study, with the most visitors between the hours of 12:00pm-1:00pm. Each parking stall saw an average of 2.77 cars per hour during the 5 hour study. Please note: parking stall 10 on the east row, and parking stall 1 on the west row, are both designated ADA. Parking Analysis Fast 5 Express Wash Fullerton June 18, 2019 10:00 am- 11:00am TOTAL VOLUME: 52 CARS Stall East Parking Row West Parking Row 1 2 2 2 2 3 3 3 4 4 4 2 5 2 2 6 4 3 7 3 3 8 2 4 9 3 2 10 0 1 Total 25 27 11:00am-12:00pm TOTAL VOLUME 48 CARS Stall East Parking Row West Parking Row 1 0 2 2 2 4 3 1 2 4 5 4 5 2 3 6 2 1 7 1 2 8 2 1 9 3 4 10 4 3 Total 22 26 Parking Analysis Fast 5 Express Wash Fullerton June 18, 2019 12:00pm-1:00pm TOTAL VOLUME: 44 CARS Stall East Parking Row West Parking Row 1 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 3 4 4 2 5 2 3 6 3 3 7 0 3 8 3 2 9 1 4 10 0 2 Total 19 25 1:00pm-2:00pm TOTAL VOLUME: 48 CARS Stall East Parking Row West Parking Row 1 3 1 2 3 3 3 1 4 4 3 4 5 3 1 6 2 2 7 3 3 8 2 3 9 2 2 10 1 2 Total :23 25 Parking Analysis Fast 5 Express Wash Fullerton June 18, 2019 2:00pm-3:00pm TOTAL VOLUME 44 CARS Stall East Parking Row West Parking Row 1 1 1 2 3 4 3 1 2 4 3 2 5 2 3 6 1 3 7 2 2 8 5 0 9 5 2 10 2 0 Total 25 19 After speaking with management and employees, it was concluded that the car wash saw its busiest time of day between the hours of 10:00 am and 3:00 pm on weekdays. Based on this information the survey was conducted and the above information was collected. Based on the information, we were able to determine the following: Fast5Express saw a total of 236 cars park and utilize the vacuuming service provided. The parking count does not count patrons who only went through car wash service. Fast5Express averaged 47.2 cars per hour during the 5 hours parking study, with the most visitors between the hours of 10:00am-11:00am. Each parking stall saw an average of 2.36 cars per hour during the 5 hour study. Please note: parking stall 10 on the east row, and parking stall 1 one the west row, are both designated ADA. CARLSBAD FRESNO IRVINE LOS ANGELES PALM SPRINGS POINT RICHMOND RIVERSIDE ROSEVILLE SAN LUIS OBISPO 20 Executive Park, Suite 200, Irvine, California 92614 949.553.0666 www.lsa.net July 29, 2019 Don Vogel Fast5Xpress 567 San Nicolas Drive, Suite 390 Newport Beach, CA 92660 Subject: Trip Generation and Queueing for 407 South State College Boulevard Dear Mr. Vogel: At your request, LSA has prepared this analysis of trip generation for the proposed Fast5Xpress car wash (project) at 407 South State College Boulevard in Anaheim. The purpose of this analysis is to determine the potential trip generation of the proposed project and whether the project would require a more detailed traffic analysis according to the City of Anaheim (City) Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies. This analysis also addresses potential queueing during peak use of the facility. The City’s Criteria for Preparation of Traffic Impact Studies states that a traffic impact analysis (TIA) would be needed for a project that would generate 100 or more a.m. or p.m. peak‐hour trips, would contribute 51 or more peak‐hour trips to any Congestion Management Program (CMP) monitored intersection, would generate 1,600 daily trips if located on the CMP highway system, or would generate 2,400 daily trips if adjacent to the CMP highway system. The Orange County CMP highway system does not include this section of State College Boulevard. The project will consist of one automated car wash tunnel with 13 self‐serve vacuum stations. The project is replacing the La Dame banquet facility. Fast5Xpress customers can purchase single car washes or can subscribe to a monthly membership with unlimited car washes. Trip Generation LSA examined the trip generation potential of the proposed project by referencing trip generation rates found in the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017). Trip generation rates for an automated car wash are shown in Table A. However, this land use has a small sample size, which affects the accuracy of the data presented. The ITE data are further limited by providing p.m. peak‐hour trip rates only. Instead of applying the limited ITE trip rate data, LSA requested that Fast5Xpress provide empirical data from a similar existing location. The location in Norwalk is designed similar to the proposed project and was selected for study. LSA was provided with data showing the number of car washes per hour. Each car wash would generate one inbound and one outbound trip. LSA averaged trip generation on two typical weekdays not affected by rain or the potential for rain. Table A displays the empirical data. Not all of the trips generated by the project will be new to State College Boulevard because some customers will stop at the proposed project as part of a trip chain (i.e., pass‐by trips) between work and home or between other commercial destinations. The ITE Trip Generation Handbook, Third Edition (2017) provides surveyed pass‐by rates for a selection of land uses, but not car washes. Consistent with the analysis prepared for the Anaheim Express Wash, a pass‐by rate of 25 percent was applied to the gross trip generation. ATTACHMENT NO. 7 7/29/19 «P:\FFX1801\Trip Generation3.docx» 2 Table A: Trip Generation Comparison Land Use Size Unit ADT AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour In Out Total In Out Total Trip Rates Automated Car Wash (948)1 – Tunnel ‐ ‐ ‐ ‐ 38.75 38.75 77.5 Fast5Xpress Norwalk2 1 Tunnel 1,174 33 34 67 56 57 113 Event Center3 – TSF 8.93 0.50 0.34 0.84 0.17 0.34 0.51 Trip Generation Proposed Project Fast5Xpress 1 Tunnel 1,174 33 34 67 56 57 113 Pass‐By4 (294) (8) (8) (16) (14) (14) (28) Subtotal 880 25 26 51 42 43 85 Existing Use La Dame Banquet Facility 4.3 TSF 38 2 2 4 1 1 2 Net New Trip Generation 842 23 24 47 41 42 83 1 Trip rates from the Institute of Transportation Engineers Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition (2017). 2 Empirical data from similar facility in Norwalk. 3 Empirical data from Colony House, Anaheim 4 Pass‐by reduction of 25% consistent with Anaheim Express Wash traffic analysis. ADT = average daily trips TSF = thousand square feet LSA had surveyed trip generation for a similar type of event center in Anaheim on a non‐event weekday and developed a trip generation rate for this type of use. Table A takes credit for the nominal trip generation anticipated for the existing use, and presents the anticipated trip generation for Fast5Xpress. The proposed project is anticipated to result in a net increase of 842 daily trips, of which 47 new trips would occur in the a.m. peak hour and 83 new trips would occur in the p.m. peak hour. Queuing LSA considered the potential queues resulting from vehicles waiting to enter the wash tunnel. As part of this exercise, LSA observed the operation at another Fast5Xpress location in Irvine. Data provided by Fast5Xpress showing cars washed by hour established that the weekday noon hour is the busiest hour for these facilities. Therefore, LSA observed conditions at the Irvine Fast5Xpress during the noon hour. Fast5Xpress is designed with multiple pay‐points (and queues behind those pay‐points) leading to the wash tunnel. The multiple pay‐points ensure that a vehicle is always ready to enter the wash tunnel as soon as the previous vehicle proceeds forward. When LSA observed operations of Fast5Xpress, delay between one vehicle entering the wash tunnel and the next vehicle entering was measured. For most vehicles, about 40 seconds’ delay was observed between vehicles. This equates to a maximum service rate of approximately 90 vehicles per hour (60 minutes/hour ÷ 0.67 vehicles/minute). LSA also observed the queue of vehicles waiting to enter the wash tunnel. This included the vehicle immediately in front of the wash tunnel entry, the vehicles completing payment at the pay‐points, and the vehicles queued to approach the pay‐points. The maximum number of queued vehicles observed was 13. The site plan for the proposed Fast5Xpress car wash at 407 South State College Boulevard shows that two pay‐points are planned at this new location. From the pay‐points to the wash tunnel entrance, vehicles would complete a horseshoe turn. Approximately 5 vehicles could be queued within this horseshoe. Between the pay‐points and the meeting of the proposed east‐west entry road with the May 16, 2019 Subject: Project Narrative Location: 407 South State College Boulevard; APNs: 037-222-37, 037-222-36, & 037-222-05 Applicant - Property Owner: Fast5Xpress, c/o: Don Vogel – Bill Taormina Request: A request to demolish existing development onsite and develop a 4,162 square-foot express- service car wash, with ancillary vacuums. The proposed project site is comprised of three separate parcels. Per Section 18.08.030, a CUP is required for the car wash use. Per Section 18.08.060, a Variance is requested for a reduction in required landscape setbacks. Per Section 18.62.050, an Administrative Adjustment is requested for the restriction on building height (20-foot maximum) when within 50-feet of single-family residential zones. Background: The project site is .82 acres (35,858 sf), comprised of three existing lots and an abandoned alley. The site is surrounded to the north, south, and east by general commercial properties, and single- family residential properties located to the west. The project site’s frontage is on the western side of a designated primary arterial per the General Plan’s Circulation Element, College State Boulevard. The project site is currently developed with a banquet hall and parking lot. The project site is zoned General Commercial (C-G). Proposal: The project proposes the demolition of the existing improvements onsite and construction of a 4,162 square-foot, express-service car wash facility and accessory vacuum use. The project architecture is proposed as contemporary, with elements that are idiosyncratic to the Fast5Xpress Car Wash model. Metal awnings, parapet, and glass storefront windows create a visual aesthetic signifying speed and efficiency, both qualities of the Fast5Xpress Car Wash brand. The maximum proposed height of the structure is 22-feet. Pursuant to the Anaheim Zoning Ordinance, buildings within 50-feet of single-family residential zones are limited to a maximum height of 20-feet. An Administrative Adjustment is requested to deviate by 10% of this required standard, per Section 18.62.050.0204, which would allow for the additional 2-feet of building height (20’-0” x .10 = 2’-0”). Fast5Xpress is a new generation of car wash: it’s fun, faster, and greener. Fast5Xpress is a leader and innovator in the car wash field by creating an inclusive experience for families and individuals, offering mascot stickers for kids, treats for pets, and free vacuum services as a part of our experience. In addition to your traditional purchase of a one-time car wash, patrons can purchase monthly passes that range in value and amenities, allowing for fast return and ease of service. Fast5Xpress reclaims 80-percent of its water, which is extremely important for our southern California locations, and uses non-toxic, biodegradable detergents. Fast5Xpress does not sell any petroleum products and ensures best management practices for storm water and preventing runoff are always maintained. ATTACHMENT NO. 8 The overall site proposes 16-percent landscaped area, including landscape buffers surrounding the entire site, with exception for curb breaks. A Variance is requested to allow for a reduction in the 15-foot required landscape setback from the highway right-of-way, to 10-feet; and a reduction in the 10-foot required landscape setback from the adjacent residential properties (rear property line) to 2.5-feet. The lot’s irregular orientation toward the only frontage results in constraints for development due to shallowness of depth. Trees are proposed on the southern side of the project site to buffer and shield the use from the adjacent commercial site. An existing 6-foot block wall is located on the western side of the property, shielding the residential uses from the commercially zoned site. In addition, an 8-foot high wall is proposed on the western side of the property to provide additional buffering to the residential uses and reduce potential adverse impacts from the commercial use adjacency. A covered trash enclosure is proposed in the rear half of the lot, on the northern side, located in a landscape island with vines on the exterior to soften the visual impact of the trash enclosure to both patrons and the right-of-way. The Fast5Xpress Car Wash facility proposes two-lane queuing providing space for approximately 20 vehicles. The queueing is mostly located behind the building, with drive aisles located on the northern side of the property for access. The rear location of the queuing shields the vehicle stacking from the right-of-way, and provides ample amount of stacking space for the car wash based on the LSA Trip Generation Memo (2018) provided as a part of this submittal. On the eastern side of the project, is the required parking with ancillary vacuum stalls as a part of the car wash use. A total of 16 parking spaces are provided onsite, 13 vacuum spaces and three employee spaces in the rear. The placement of the vacuums is located away from the residential properties located to the west of the lot, to aid in reducing potential noise impacts consistent with General Plan Policy 1.1.5 of the Noise Element. Ambient noise from the primary arterial street will additionally reduce any potential noise impacts, and overall noise impacts from the site are less than significant. Please refer to the Noise Impact Analysis (2019) provided as a part of this submittal. With the improvement of the site, a relocation of the existing bus stop and shelter is proposed, per required standards; any street reconstruction would be to City standards. The hours of operation are proposed from 7:00AM to 8:00PM, seven days a week. Three to four employees are proposed, depending on demand. The Fast5Xpress model involves a “greeter” to welcome each patron to the car wash; a “loader”, who helps the vehicle load properly into the wash tunnel; and between one and two managers onsite during operating hours. Managers are responsible for customer service, responding to any potential loitering issues, and ensure patrons comply with noise requirements while onsite. The average wash time for Fast 5 Express Car Wash facilities is less than 5-minutes per vehicle in the tunnel, and 10-minutes for patrons utilizing the vacuum facilities. It is important to note that the rate of utilization for the vacuum facilities is approximately 60-percent, per industry standard. Please refer to the LSA Trip Generation Memo (2018) for more detailed information. Additionally, Fast5Xpress utilizes a larger than average car wash tunnel, which allows for more than one vehicle to undergo a wash at one time. With this model, along with the average wash time, Fast5Xpress anticipates approximately 650 car washes per day. Additionally, Fast5Xpress utilizes new technology for each facility, with approximately 3.5 million dollars in investment into the development of the site alone (excludes land purchase cost). CUP Findings: 1. That the proposed use is properly one for a conditional use permit is authorized by this code, in that the Zoning Ordinance, Table 8-A of Section 18.08.030 (Uses) of Chapter 18.08, permits for car washing facilities through the obtainment of a Conditional Use Permit. 2. That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located, in that: a. The project site is zoned for General Commercial (C-G) and typical commercial uses associated with that include car washing facilities. The use complies with required setbacks for the zone with the granting of the variance and administrative adjustment requested. The project complies with the commercial building setbacks outlined in Section 18.08.060, which require a 20-foot residential setback where residential properties are adjacent, 15-foot arterial highway setback, and 10-foot setback from any alley; b. The complete redevelopment of the project site will improve the aesthetic of the property and provide for a more cohesive development pattern in this commercially zoned area; c. The project site is not anticipated to result in any adverse noise impacts, as outlined in the Noise Impact Analysis (2019), which conclude, “The worst-case operational noise level of 58 dBA, that would be within the City’s noise standard of 60 dBA” (2018)(p.21) and “The proposed project would not expose person to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels” (2019)(p. 22); and d. There are no adverse traffic impacts as a result of this project, as concluded in the LSA Trip Generation Memo (2018), which states, “The proposed project is anticipated to result in a net increase of 450 daily trips, of which 28 new trips would occur in the a.m. peak hour and 32 new trips would occur in the p.m. peak hour” which are less than a significant impact. 3. That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; in that: a. The project site is developed in accordance with City development standards, including Zoning Ordinance development standards, with the exception of the variance and administrative adjustment requested. The site can accommodate the parking, traffic flows, and circulation without creating a detrimental effect on the adjacent properties, as outlined in the LSA Trip Generation Memo (2018), which states, “The proposed project is anticipated to result in a net increase of 450 daily trips, of which 28 new trips would occur in the a.m. peak hour and 32 new trips would occur in the p.m. peak hour” which are less than a significant impact; and b. The requested Variance would allow for the site to be developed in a manner consistent with surrounding commercial development and allow for the car wash building to be located farther away from the adjacent residential properties to the west. 4. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area, in that the site can accommodate the parking, traffic flows, and circulation without creating a detrimental effect on the adjacent properties, as outlined in the LSA Trip Generation Memo (2018), which states, “The proposed project is anticipated to result in a net increase of 450 daily trips, of which 28 new trips would occur in the a.m. peak hour and 32 new trips would occur in the p.m. peak hour” which are less than a significant impact. 5. That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim, in that: a. The project site is zoned for General Commercial (C-G) and typical commercial uses associated with that include car washing facilities. The use complies with required setbacks for the zone with the granting of the variance and administrative adjustment requested. The project complies with the commercial building setbacks outlined in Section 18.08.060, which require a 20-foot residential setback where residential properties are adjacent, 15-foot arterial highway setback, and 10-foot setback from any alley; b. The complete redevelopment of the project site will improve the aesthetic of the property and provide for a more cohesive development pattern in this commercially zoned area; c. The project site is not anticipated to result in any adverse noise impacts, as outlined in the Noise Impact Analysis (2019), which conclude, “The worst-case operational noise level of 58 dBA, that would be within the City’s noise standard of 60 dBA” (2018)(p.21) and “The proposed project would not expose person to or generation of excessive groundborne vibration or groundborne noise levels” (2019)(p. 22); and d. There are no adverse traffic impacts as a result of this project, as concluded in the LSA Trip Generation Memo (2018), which states, “The proposed project is anticipated to result in a net increase of 450 daily trips, of which 28 new trips would occur in the a.m. peak hour and 32 new trips would occur in the p.m. peak hour” which are less than a significant impact. Variance Findings: Specific Description Required. No variance from any specific provision of this code shall be deemed to have been granted, unless the description of the specific waiver provisions are contained in the resolution or written decision, as appropriate, granting the variance. 1. Required Findings. Before the approval authority, or City Council on appeal, may approve a variance, other than as governed by subsection .030 below, it must make a finding of fact, by resolution or written decision, that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: a. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property, including size, shape, topography, location or surroundings, which do not apply to other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity, in that: i. The project site’s irregular orientation toward the only street frontage results in constraints for development due to shallowness of depth. This results in the project site being longer in width and shorter in depth. Typically, front and rear setbacks are the most restrictive for development, therefore the shallowness limits the amount of buildable area available between the front and rear lot lines; ii. The western adjacent residential development presents further constraints on the project site, as additional development standards are required for the rear of the lot’s landscaping in order to buffer the sensitive use from the proposed development; and iii. Similarly zoned properties in the vicinity exhibit more standard shaped lots, in which the primary or only street frontage is the narrowest portion of the lot, allowing for depth in the lot to establish and maintain the required setbacks. Additionally, similarly zoned lots in the vicinity are developed with an alley located between them and the western adjacent residential properties, creating an additional buffer between the uses, whereas the subject property is immediately adjacent with no such alley. b. That, because of special circumstances shown in subsection .0201, strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other property under identical zoning classification in the vicinity, in that: i. Similarly zoned properties in the vicinity exhibit more standard shaped lots, in which the primary or only street frontage is the narrowest portion of the lot, allowing for depth in the lot to establish and maintain the required setbacks. Additionally, similarly zoned lots in the vicinity are developed with an alley located between them and the western adjacent residential properties, creating an additional buffer between the uses, whereas the subject property is immediately adjacent with no such alley. Administrative Adjustment Findings (Nonconforming findings do not apply): 1. The adjustment is consistent with the purposes and intent of the Zoning Code, in that: a. The proposed 10-percent adjustment to the allowed building height within 50-feet of single-family residentially zoned property is located on the eastern portion of the proposed structure, farthest from the residentially zoned properties; b. The change in two-feet proposed above the 20-foot maximum height limit is negligible in massing and scale impacts, as the two-foot height change occurs gradually across the lateral plane of the proposed structure, resulting in a visual softening-effect; and c. The granting of the adjustment would allow for adequate shielding of any roof mounted equipment in a manner that is architecturally consistent with the overall design of the building and site, and create a product of higher architectural integrity therefore, creating a lesser overall impact to the residentially zoned properties located on the western adjacent parcels. 2. The same or similar result cannot be achieved by using provisions in the Zoning Code that do not require the adjustment, in that the Zoning Code restricts building height within 50-feet of single- family residential zoned properties. The application of the 10-percent adjustment in standard to the 50-feet setback would result in a 5-foot reduction in the required setback and be insufficient in allowing the proposed building to maintain the proposed 22-foot height. 3. The adjustment will not produce a result that is out of character or detrimental to the neighborhood, in that: a. The proposed building is single-story in design, consistent with the adjacent residential properties located to the west of the project site; b. There is a two-story building located at 321 S. State College Boulevard, which is in the vicinity of the project site. The proposed project’s single-story building is consistent with the commercial street-scene of S. State College Boulevard; c. The proposed 10-percent adjustment to the allowed building height within 50-feet of single-family residentially zoned property is located on the eastern portion of the proposed structure, farthest from the residentially zoned properties; d. The change two-feet proposed above the 20-foot maximum height limit is negligible in massing and scale impacts, as the two-foot height change occurs gradually across the lateral plane of the proposed structure, creating a visual softening-effect; and e. The granting of the adjustment would allow for adequate shielding of any roof mounted equipment in a manner that is architecturally consistent with the overall design of the building and site, and create a product of higher architectural integrity therefore, creating a lesser overall impact to the residentially zoned properties located on the western adjacent parcels. ATTACHMENT NO. 9 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 3 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2019 SUBJECT: CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05984 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2018-179 LOCATION: 2157 West La Palma Avenue (Convalescent Facility) APPLICANT/PROPERTY OWNER: The applicant is Shiv Talwar, representing Design Concepts. The property owner is Ronita LLC represented by Dr. Devadatt Mishal. REQUEST: The applicant requests approval of the following land use entitlements: (i) a conditional use permit to construct a 3-story, 26,538 square foot, 47-room convalescent facility and to exceed the maximum allowable floor area ratio; and (ii) a tentative parcel map to permit the subdivision of a 1.57-acre parcel lot into two lots to separate the proposed convalescent facility from the existing commercial center. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that the Planning Commission approve the attached resolution, determining that this request is categorically exempt from further environmental review under the California Environmental Quality Act (Class 32, Infill Development) and approving Conditional Use Permit No. 2018- 05984 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018-179. BACKGROUND: The subject 0.67-acre site is currently undeveloped and is part of a larger 1.57 acre parcel occupied by the Hanshaw Center, a small commercial center at the northeast corner of Brookhurst Street and La Palma Avenue. The General Plan designates the property for General Commercial land uses. The zoning for the property is “CG” General Commercial. The property is also within the Brookhurst Commercial Corridor Overlay Zone which conditionally permits a convalescent type of use. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05984 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2018-179 September 4, 2019 Page 2 of 6 Surrounding the vacant site is a commercial center to the west, a parking lot for a private university to the north, a single-family residence abutting the northeast corner of the property, an office building owned and occupied by Sa-Rang Community Church to the east, and an on-ramp for the I-5 freeway to the south across La Palma Avenue. PROPOSAL: The proposed convalescent facility would be provided with vehicular access from a single driveway on La Palma Avenue to parking spaces on the east and north sides of the building. The building footprint was designed at the southwest portion of the vacant site to comply with the required building setback from the residential property at the northeast corner of the site. Parking for the project is proposed in open parking stalls along the north and east property lines, as well as covered stalls on the north and east sides of the new building. The project would provide the Code required 38 parking spaces for the 47-room facility, including two disabled spaces and a loading space. Landscaping would be provided along the La Palma Avenue and interior property lines where required. Adequate turn-around area for Fire Department and trash pick-up service would be provided at the rear of the site. SITE PLAN The three-story facility would provide convalescent accommodations for up to 47 individuals, with nine bedrooms on the ground floor and 19 bedrooms on the second and third floors. Rooms range between 260 and 375 square feet in size and would include a full accessible bathrooms and storage areas. Four of the nine ground floor rooms are designed with a private patio. All upper floor rooms would be provided with a balcony. The remainder of the building would be comprised of administrative offices, a reception area with lounge, multi-purpose hall, a kitchen and dining area, laundry facilities and ancillary storage. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05984 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2018-179 September 4, 2019 Page 3 of 6 The facility would be staffed with 24-hour on-site managers working 8-hour shifts, and two housekeeping staff working 8-hour shifts during the day. There would be a chef and kitchen staff person preparing meals. Visiting hours would be from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. The applicant indicates that most residents would be over 80 years old and are unable to live independently, take care of their daily household needs, prepare meals, etc. The facility would offer room and board and a few recreational amenities (common entertainment areas, a small exercise room, access to computers, etc.). They do not anticipate anyone being able to drive or maintain a vehicle. All night activities would likely end by 9 p.m. when residents typically retire to their rooms. This facility is not classified, nor will it operate as an emergency shelter or transitional housing facility. There would be no individuals coming directly from acute care facilities needing medical treatments. The residents of this facility would be taking their own prescribed medications and would arrange for their own medical visits. There would be no nursing personnel on the premises, nor will any medical treatments be administered at the facility. Residents needing medical help will be taken to appropriate facilities by their families. The building elevations incorporate a contemporary architectural style with a variety of materials and colors, such as stucco siding, stone veneer bases and accents, and contrasting earth tone colors. The architecture along the La Palma Avenue elevation and east elevation (facing new parking lot) consists of vertical and horizontal offsets, which include balconies and a varied roof line with cornice treatment consistent with the Community Design Element of the General Plan. EAST ELEVATION FINDINGS AND ANALYSIS: Conditional Use Permit: Before the Planning Commission may approve a conditional use permit, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by this code; 2) That the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses, or the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located; CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05984 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2018-179 September 4, 2019 Page 4 of 6 3) That the size and shape of the site proposed for the use is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use, in a manner not detrimental to either the particular area or health and safety; 4) That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area; and 5) That the granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed, if any, will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. The Municipal Code permits “Convalescent and Rest Homes” in commercial zones subject to approval of a conditional use permit. The purpose of the conditional use permit is to ensure that the facility would be compatible with surrounding uses and not negatively affect adjacent properties. The proposed convalescent facility would provide short-term care and recovery for patients after surgeries and long-term illness on a 24-hour basis. Staff has evaluated the proposal and believes that, as designed, the proposed convalescent facility would not adversely affect surrounding properties. The project’s design and site layout account for the proximity to the single-family residential properties to the northeast of the site by providing the required landscaping and structural setbacks in this area. The operation of the proposed facility would be compatible with the surrounding residential and commercial uses. Staff does not anticipate that this use would impact traffic or the health and safety of adjoining land uses. The proposed facility would provide for much needed convalescent services for the elderly population. Parking: The Municipal Code specifies parking requirements for Convalescent and Rest Homes at 0.8 spaces for each bed proposed. The facility is designed with 47 single-occupancy bedrooms requiring a total of 38 parking spaces. The project will provide 38 spaces including two disabled spaces and a loading space in compliance with Code requirements. Maximum Floor Area Ratio (FAR): A conditional use permit to allow a higher floor area ratio may be approved for a project, provided that all potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed use have been duly analyzed and mitigated. The Code allows a maximum FAR of 0.5 and a FAR of 0.9 is proposed. The purpose of FAR limitation is to regulate development intensity in order to ensure that build-out of individual sites does not cause a burden to the local public infrastructure. Building intensities for non-residential land uses CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05984 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2018-179 September 4, 2019 Page 5 of 6 are measured by FAR, the ratio of total net floor area of a building to the total lot area. FAR describes the intensity of the use on a site and not necessarily the building height or site coverage. It does not include exterior patio or balcony areas, nor areas for parking and circulation. The images above, as shown in the Land Use Element of the General Plan, are examples of the different ways in which a building may be configured to achieve a 0.50 FAR. The proposed building would be three stories high with a total floor area of 26,538 square feet. The building footprint is approximately 9,750 square feet with the remaining area dedicated for parking, drive aisles, walkways, and outdoor patio and landscape areas. Based on the low intensity of the convalescent use, and the environmental analysis completed and referenced in the environmental checklist (Attachment 3), staff has determined that impacts to the surrounding infrastructure (traffic, sewer, and storm drain systems), and to utilities (water, electricity, and natural gas) will not have any significant impacts to the environment. As a result, staff believes that the proposed increase in the allowable FAR would be compatible with the surrounding area and recommends approval. Tentative Parcel Map: Before the Planning Commission may approve the tentative parcel map, it must make a finding of fact that the evidence presented shows that all of the following conditions exist: 1) That the proposed subdivision of the property, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the General Plan of the City of Anaheim. 2) That the proposed subdivision of the property, as shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018-179, including its design and improvements, is consistent with the zoning and development standards of the General Commercial Zone. 3) That the site is physically suitable for the type and density of the proposed project. 4) That the design of the subdivision, as shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018- 179, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat. 5) That the design of the subdivision, as shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018- 179 or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems. 6) That the design of the subdivision, as shown on Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018- 179, or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements acquired by the public, at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision. The proposed tentative parcel map would subdivide the existing 1.57-acre commercial parcel into two lots in order to create a separate 0.67-acre lot for the proposed convalescent facility. No physical modifications to the existing commercial property or buildings to the west of the vacant portion of the lot are included with this application. The proposed subdivision would not cause substantial environmental damage, serious public health problems, nor conflict with any existing easements, as the newly created lots would maintain a General Commercial General Plan land CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05984 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2018-179 September 4, 2019 Page 6 of 6 use designation and CG zoning classification. For these reasons, staff supports the requested two-lot subdivision. Environmental Impact Analysis: Staff recommends the Planning Commission find that the effects of the proposed project are Categorically Exempt from the requirements to prepare additional environmental documentation per California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) Guidelines, Section 15332, Class 32 (In-fill Development). Class 32 consists of projects characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions described in Section 15332. These conditions include that the proposed project is: a) Consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations, b) Occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, c) Has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species, d) Would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and e) Would be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The CEQA checklist, attached to this staff report as Attachment 3, provides evidence that the proposed project meets these conditions. Pursuant to Section 15300.02 (c) and Section 15332 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations, there are no unusual circumstances in respect to the proposed project for which staff would anticipate a significant effect on the environment and, therefore, the proposed project is categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA. CONCLUSION: Staff believes that the conditions exist for the Planning Commission to make the required findings to approve the conditional use permit and tentative parcel map. The proposed convalescent use is consistent with the General Commercial Zoning and General Plan Land Use designation and is designed to be compatible with existing land uses in the surrounding area. Additionally, the number of parking spaces being proposed would be adequate to accommodate the facility. Staff recommends approval of this request. Prepared by, Submitted by, Wayne Carvalho David See Contract Planner Principal Planner Attachments: 1. Draft Resolution 2. Development Summary 3. Class 32 Infill Exemption Environmental Checklist 4. Letter of Request 5. Site Plans, Floor Plans and Elevations 6. Photographs C-G (BCC) DEV 2017-0005 8 VACANT RS-2 VACANT RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE C-G (BCC) RELIGIOUS USE R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E RS-2 VACANT RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E C-G (BCC) AUTO REPAIR/ SERVICE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 VACANT C-G (BCC) RETAIL C-G (BCC) SERVICE STATION C-G (BCC) OFFICES C-G (BCC) RELIGIOUS USE C-G (BCC) MEDICAL OFFICE C-G (BCC) MEDICAL OFFICE C-G (BCC) RETAIL C-G (BCC) MEDICAL OFFICE R S -2 S I N G L E F A M I L Y R E S I D E N C E RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE RS-2 SINGLE FAMILY RESIDENCE 5 FREEWAY 5 FREEWAY W LA PALMA AVE N B R O O K H U R S T S T N L O T U S S T W FIR AV E N C O L U M B I N E S T W GLEN AVE N J A S M I N E S T W DO GW OOD AV E W FAL MO UT H AV E W FAL MO UT H AV E W. LA PALMA AVE N . E U C L I D S T N . M A G N O L I A A V E W. CRESCENT AVE W. ROMNEYA DR W. CRESCENT AVE 2 1 5 7 W e s t L a Pa l m a A ve n u e D E V N o . 2 0 1 7 -0 0 0 5 8 Subject Property APN: 072-415-50 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Ph oto : Ma y 2 01 8 5 FREEWAY 5 FREEWAY W LA PALMA AVE N B R O O K H U R S T S T N L O T U S S T W FIR AV E N C O L U M B I N E S T W GLEN AVE N J A S M I N E S T W DO GW OOD AV E W FAL MO UT H AV E W FAL MO UT H AV E W. LA PALMA AVE N . E U C L I D S T N . M A G N O L I A A V E W. CRESCENT AVE W. ROMNEYA DR W. CRESCENT AVE 2 1 5 7 W e s t L a Pa l m a A ve n u e D E V N o . 2 0 1 7 -0 0 0 5 8 Subject Property APN: 072-415-50 °0 50 100 Feet Aeria l Ph oto : Ma y 2 01 8 [DRAFT] ATTACHMENT NO. 1 - 1 - PC2019-*** RESOLUTION NO. PC2019-*** A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05984 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2018-179 AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2017-00058) (2157 WEST LA PALMA AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve (i) Conditional Use Permit No. 2018- 05984 and to construct and operate a three-story, 47-room convalescent facility and exceed the maximum floor area ratio, and (ii) Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018-179 to subdivide a 1.57-acre parcel into two lots separating the proposed convalescent facility on its own 0.67-acre lot from the existing commercial center (the "Proposed Project") on that real property located at 2157 West La Palma Avenue in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 1.57-acres in size and is currently developed with a one-story, commercial building on the west side and vacant on the easterly 0.67 acres. The Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for General Commercial land uses. The Property is located in the “C-G" General Commercial Zone, meaning that the Property is subject to the zoning and development standards contained in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on September 4, 2019 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05984 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018-179, and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith, and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission finds and determines that the Proposed Project is within that class of projects (i.e., Class 32 – In-fill Development projects) which consists of in-fill development meeting the conditions described in Section 15332 of the CEQA Guidelines; that is, (a) the project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations, (the proposed development occurs within city limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, (c) the project site has no value as habitat - 2 - PC2019-*** for endangered, rare or threatened species, (d) approval of the project would not result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality, and (e) the site can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services. The Planning Commission finds and determines that the Property is located within an "urbanized area", as that term is defined in Section 15387 of the CEQA Guidelines, and meets the aforementioned conditions and will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the provisions of CEQA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing pertaining to the request for Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05984, and in accordance with Section 18.08.045 (Floor Area Ratio) of this Code, does find and determine that all of the following conditions exist: 1. The Proposed Project is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized under the classes of allowable uses set forth in Section 18.08.030 "C-G" General Commercial Zone of the Code. 2. The Proposed Project would not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located to ensure that the facility is operated in a responsible manner and would not have an adverse effect on the surrounding residential and commercial land uses in the area, subject to compliance with the conditions of approval contained herein. 3. The size and shape of the site for the convalescent facility is adequate to allow the full development of the proposed use in a manner not detrimental either the particular area or health and safety because the site can accommodate the parking, traffic flows, and circulation without creating detrimental effects on adjacent properties. 4. The traffic generated by the facility will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area because the traffic generated by this use will not exceed the anticipated volumes of traffic on the surrounding streets and adequate parking and circulation will be provided to accommodate the use. 5. The granting of the conditional use permit under the conditions imposed will not be detrimental to the health and safety of the citizens of the City of Anaheim as the proposed land use will be compatible with the surrounding commercial, office and residential uses and would not pose a health or safety risk to the citizens of the City of Anaheim. and; WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018-179 to establish a 2-lot commercial subdivision, does find and determine the following facts: 1. The proposed subdivision, including its design and improvements, and with the conditions imposed herein is consistent with the General Commercial land use designation in the Anaheim General Plan and the development standards contained in the "C-G" General Commercial Zone. - 3 - PC2019-*** 2. The site is physically suitable for the type and size of the proposed commercial subdivision in that this flat lot is currently developed with a commercial center and a vacant portion of the lot which is of adequate size to subdivide into two parcels that can be developed in accordance with the C-G zone development standards. 3. The design of the subdivision, with the conditions imposed, is not likely to cause substantial environmental damage or substantially and avoidably injure fish or wildlife or their habitat because no sensitive environmental habitat has been identified on the site in that no environmental impacts are anticipated as part of the future development of a commercial use on this Property. 4. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements is not likely to cause serious public health problems, since any new structures and associated site improvements will be constructed on the property in compliance with the conditions imposed and other related Code requirements in that the future development of a commercial use will be subject to all Code requirements. 5. The design of the subdivision or the type of improvements will not conflict with easements, acquired by the public at large, for access through or use of property within the proposed subdivision in that the parcel map is conditioned to be submitted for review and approval to the City of Anaheim and the Orange County Surveyor and then shall be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder prior to issuance of building permits. and; WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. This Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, pursuant to the above findings, this Planning Commission does hereby approve Conditional Use Permit No. No. 2018-05984 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018-179, contingent upon and subject to the conditions of approval set forth in Exhibit B attached hereto and incorporated herein by this reference, which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of that portion of the Property for which Conditional Use Permit No. 2018-05984 and Tentative Parcel Map No. 2018-179 is applicable in order to preserve the health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. Extensions for further time to complete conditions of approval may be granted in accordance with Section 18.60.170 of the Code. Timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and purpose of the condition, (ii) the modification complies with the Code, and (iii) the applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved development. - 4 - PC2019-*** BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that any amendment, modification or revocation of this permit may be processed in accordance with Chapters 18.60.190 (Amendment to Permit Approval) and 18.60.200 (City-Initiated Revocation or Modification of Permits) of the Code. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicant's compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of September 4, 2019. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 5 - PC2019-*** STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on September 4, 2019, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: NOES: COMMISSIONERS: ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 4th day of September, 2019. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 6 - PC2019-*** - 7 - PC2019-*** EXHIBIT “B” CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05984 AND TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 2018-179 (DEV2017-00058) NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO RECORDATION OF THE PARCEL MAP 1 The developer shall pay all applicable development impact fees required under the Anaheim Municipal Code. Public Works, Development Services 2 The developer shall submit the final map to the City of Anaheim, Public Works Development Services Division and to the Orange County Surveyor for technical correctness review and approval. Public Works, Development Services 3 The vehicular access rights to La Palma Avenue shall be restricted and relinquished to the City of Anaheim. Public Works, Development Services 4 The developer shall submit improvement plans, for the construction of required public improvements, to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval, and to determine the bond amounts. Public Works, Development Services 5 Upon completion of the review of final engineering/civil plans, any discrepancies between the final engineering plans and the tentative parcel map shall be corrected. The final Parcel Map shall contain information based upon the final, approved engineering plans. Approval of the Parcel Map is contingent upon approval of the final engineering/civil plans. Public Works, Development Services 6 The developer shall execute a maintenance covenant with the City of Anaheim in a form that is approved by the City Engineer and the City Attorney for the private improvements including but not limited to private utilities, drainage devices, parkway landscaping and irrigation, private street lights, common walls, etc. in addition to maintenance requirements established in the Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) as applicable to the project. The covenant shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map. Public Works, Development Services 7 The applicant shall execute a Subdivision Agreement and submit security in an amount acceptable to the City Engineer to guarantee construction of the public improvements required herein. Security deposit shall be in accordance to City of Anaheim Municipal Code. The agreement shall be recorded concurrently with the Final Map. Public Works, Development Services - 8 - PC2019-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF GRADING PERMITS 8 Prepare and submit a final grading plan showing building footprints, pad elevations, finished grades, drainage routes, retaining walls, erosion control and other pertinent information in accordance with Anaheim Municipal Code and the California Building Code, latest edition. Public Works, Development Services 9 Prepare and submit a final drainage study, including supporting hydraulic and hydrologic calculations to the City of Anaheim for review and approval. The study shall confirm or recommend changes to the City's adopted Master Drainage Plan by identifying off-site and on-site storm water runoff impacts resulting from build-out of permitted General Plan land uses. In addition, the study shall identify the project's contribution and shall provide locations and sizes of catchments and system connection points and all downstream drainage-mitigating measures including but not limited to offsite storm drains and interim detention facilities. Public Works, Development Services 10 Prepare and submit a Water Quality Management Plan (WQMP) to the City for review and approval. The WQMP shall be consistent with the requirements of Section 7 and Exhibit 7.II of the Orange County Drainage Area Management Plan (DAMP) for New Development/Significant Redevelopment projects. The WQMP shall identify potential sources of pollutants during the long-term on-going maintenance and use of the proposed project that could affect the quality of the storm water runoff from the project site; define Source Control, Site Design, and Treatment Control best management practices (BMPs) to control or eliminate the discharge of pollutants into the surface water runoff; and provide a monitoring program to address the long-term implementation of and compliance with the defined BMPs. All BMP facilities and features shall be located entirely on site and out the public right-of-way. Public Works, Development Services 11 The owner shall obtain the required coverage under California’s General Permit for Stormwater Discharges associated with Construction Activity by providing a copy of the Notice of Intent (NOI) submitted to the State Water Resources Control Board and a copy of the subsequent notification of the issuance of a Waste Discharge Identification (WDID) number. Public Works, Development Services 12 The owner shall prepare a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP shall be kept at the project site and be available for Public Works Department’s review upon request. Public Works, Development Services - 9 - PC2019-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 13 Submit a Preliminary Geotechnical Report to the Public Works Development Services Division for review and approval. The report shall address the site’s liquefaction potential and any proposed infiltration features of the WQMP. Public Works, Development Services 14 All required plans and studies shall be prepared by a licensed Professional Engineer registered in the State of California. Public Works, Development Services PRIOR TO ISSUANCE OF BUILDING PERMITS 15 Record Parcel Map No. 2018-179 pursuant to the Subdivision Map Act and in accordance with City Municipal Code. Provide a duplicate photo Mylar of the recorded map to the City Engineer's office. Public Works, Development Services 16 Obtain a Right-of-Way Construction Permit (RCP) from the Development Services Division and post a security for construction of all required public improvements within street right-of-way. Public Works, Development Services 17 Provide a certificate from a Registered Civil Engineer certifying that the finished grading has been completed in accordance with the City approved grading plan. Public Works, Development Services 18 All site landscape plans shall comply with the City of Anaheim adopted Landscape Water Efficiency Guidelines. This ordinance is in compliance with the State of California Model Water Efficient Landscape Ordinance (AV 1881). Public Works, Development Services 19 The applicant shall coordinate with Caltrans for the freeway sign relocation and obtain Caltrans concurrence/approval of the disposition of the sign. Public Works, Traffic Engineering 20 The Owner/Developer shall submit a set of improvement plans for Public Utilities Water Engineering review and approval in determining the conditions necessar y for providing water service to the project. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 21 A private water s ystem with separate water service for fire protection and domestic water shall be provided and shown on plans submitted to the Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 22 All backflow equipment shall be located above ground outside of the street setback area in a manner fully screened from all public streets and alleys. An y backflow assemblies currentl y installed in a vault will have to be brought up to current standards. Any other large water system equipment shall be installed to the satisfaction of the Water Public Utilities, Water Engineering - 10 - PC2019-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT Engineerin g Division outside of the street setback area in a manner full y screened from all public streets and alleys. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans and approved by Water Engineering and Cross Connection Control Inspector. 23 All requests for new water services, backflow equipment, or fire lines, as well as any modifications, relocations, or abandonments of existing water services, backflow equipment, and fire lines, shall be coordinated and permitted through Water Engineering Division of the Anaheim Public Utilities Department. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 24 The Owner shall irrevocably offer to dedicate to the City of Anaheim (i) an easement for all large domestic above-ground water meters and fire h ydrants, including a five (5)-foot wide easement around the fire h ydrant and/or water meter pad. (ii) a twent y (20) foot wide easement for all water service mains and service laterals all to the satisfaction of the Water Engineering Division. The easements shall be granted on the Water Engineering Division of the Public Utilities Department’s standard water easement deed. The easement deeds shall include language that requires the Owner to be responsible for restoring any special surface improvements, other than asphalt paving, including but not limited to colored concrete, bricks, pavers, stamped concrete, decorative hardscape, walls or landscaping that becomes damaged during any excavation, repair or replacement of City owned water facilities. Provisions for the repair, replacement and maintenance of all surface improvements other than asphalt paving shall be the responsibility of the Owner and included and recorded in the Master CC&R’s for the project. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 25 The Owner/Developer shall submit to the Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division an estimate of the maximum fire flow rate and maximum day and peak hour water demands for the project. This information will be used to determine the adequac y of the existing water s ystem to provide the estimated water demands. An y off-site water s ystem improvements required to serve the project shall be done in accordance with Rule No. 15A.1 of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations. Public Utilities, Water Engineering 26 Prior to approval of permits for improvement plans, the property owner/developer shall coordinate with Electrical Engineering to establish electrical service requirements and submit electric syst em plans, electrical panel drawings, site plans, elevation plans, and related technical drawings and specifications. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering - 11 - PC2019-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 27 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall provide to the City of Anaheim a Public Utilities easement with dimensions as shown on the approved utility service plan. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering 28 Prior to connection of electrical service, the legal owner shall submit payment to the City of Anaheim for service connection fees. Public Utilities, Electrical Engineering PRIOR TO FINAL BUILDING AND ZONING INSPECTION 29 All required on-site Water Quality Management Plan and public right of way improvements shall be completed, operational, and are subject to review and approval by the Construction Services Inspector. Public Works, Development Services 30 All fees and deposits required by the Public Works Department shall be paid in full. Public Works, Development Services 31 Owner/Developer shall install an approved backflow prevention assembly on the water service connection(s) serving the propert y, behind property line and building setback in accordance with Public Utilities Department Water Engineering Division requirements. Public Utilities Water Engineering 32 All trash generated from the facility shall be properly contained in trash bins located within an approved trash enclosure(s). The number of bins shall be adequate and the trash pick-up shall be as frequent as necessary to ensure the sanitary handling and timely removal of refuse from the property. Planning and Building, Code Enforcement Division Public Works, Operations Division GENERAL CONDITIONS 33 The following minimum clearances shall be provided around all new and existing public water facilities (e.g. water mains, fire hydrants, service laterals, meters, meter boxes, backflow devices, etc.): 10 feet from structures, footings, walls, stormwater BMPs, power poles, street lights , and trees. 5 feet from driveways, BCR/ECR of curb returns, and all other utilities (e.g. storm drain, gas, electric, etc.) or above ground facilities. Public Utilities, Water Engineering - 12 - PC2019-*** NO. CONDITIONS OF APPROVAL RESPONSIBLE DEPARTMENT 34 All new landscaping shall be installed in conformance with Chapter 18.46 “Landscape and Screening” of the Anaheim Municipal Code and shall be maintained in perpetuity. Landscaping shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dead. Planning and Building Department Planning Services Division 35 The facility shall operate in accordance with the Letter of Operation submitted as part of the application. Any changes to the facility’s operation described in the Letter of Operation shall be subject to review and approval by the Planning Director to determine substantial conformance with said letter and to ensure compatibility with the surrounding uses. Planning and Building Department Planning Services Division 36 The property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the applicant and which plans are on file with the Planning Department and as conditioned herein. Planning and Building Department Planning Services Division 37 The Applicant shall defend, indemnify, and hold harmless the City and its officials, officers, employees and agents (collectively referred to individually and collectively as “Indemnitees”) from any and all claims, actions or proceedings brought against Indemnitees to attack, review, set aside, void, or annul the decision of the Indemnitees concerning this permit or any of the proceedings, acts or determinations taken, done, or made prior to the decision, or to determine the reasonableness, legality or validity of any condition attached thereto. The Applicant’s indemnification is intended to include, but not be limited to, damages, fees and/or costs awarded against or incurred by Indemnitees and costs of suit, claim or litigation, including without limitation attorneys’ fees and other costs, liabilities and expenses incurred by Indemnitees in connection with such proceeding. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division 38 The applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to the processing of this discretionary case application within 30 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in delays in the issuance of required permits or may result in the revocation of the approval of this application. Planning and Building Department, Planning Services Division PROJECT SUMMARY 47-BED CONVALESCENT FACILITY 2157 W. LA PALMA AVE. 07/18/19 (Plan dated Rec’d 6/20/19) Development Standards C-G Standards Proposed Project Site Area None 0.67 acres 29,387 sq. ft. Building Area N/A 26,538 sq. ft. Floor Area Ratio 0.50 maximum 14,694 sq. ft. 0.9 (CUP Request) 26,538 sq. ft. Building Height 75 feet 38 ft. (3 stories) within 76 ft. of single family residential zone 40’-0” Landscape Setbacks: Abutting any arterial highway Abutting non-residential interior Ab utting Residential interior 15 feet, as measured from the ultimate highway right-of-way 0’ 10’ w/trees 20’ O.C. for screening 15’-5” along La Palma 4’-0” (West) 3’-2” (North) 4’-3”(East) 10’-0” (northeast corner) Structural Setbacks: Abutting arterial highway Abutting non-residential interior Abutting Residential interior 15 feet, as measured from the ultimate highway right-of-way 0’ 76’ for 3 story building 15’-5” 10’-0” (West) 3’-10 to patios/balconies 68’-4” (North) 69’-3” (East) 78’ No building encroachment within the 76’ setback Parking 38 spaces 0.8 space/bed 38 spaces 35 standard spaces, 2 H/C spaces, 1 loading/unloading ATTACHMENT NO. 2 Page 1 of 16 CITY OF ANAHEIM ENVIRONMENTAL CHECKLIST FORM CLASS 32 CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION INFILL DEVELOPMENT PROJECTS CASE NUMBERS: DEVELOPMENT PROJECT NO. 2017-00058 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2018-05984 SUBDIVISION PARCEL MAP NO. 2018-179 PROJECT NAME: CONVALESCENT HOME PROPERTY OWNER/PROJECT APPLICANT: NAME: Mr. Ronita, LLC COMPANY: ADDRESS: 3728 E. Woodbine Road Canyon CITY/ST/ZIP: Orange, CA 92867 E-MAIL: PHONE: LEAD AGENCY AND STAFF CONTACT: LEAD AGENCY: City of Anaheim STAFF CONTACT: Wayne Carvalho ADDRESS: 200 S. Anaheim Boulevard CITY/ST/ZIP: Anaheim, CA 92805 E-MAIL:Wcarvalho@anaheim.net PHONE:(714) 765-4949 PROJECT SITE: The project site is located at 2157 W. La Palma Avenue (APN 072-415-50) in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, California (see Figure 1). The project site is located approximately 250 feet east of Brookhurst Street, and approximately 671 feet north of Interstate Highway (I) 5. The subject 0.67-acre site is currently undeveloped and is part of a larger 1.57 acre parcel occupied by the Hanshaw Center, a retail commercial center at the northeast corner of Brookhurst Street and La Palma Avenue. GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATION: General Commercial ZONING: “C-G” General Commercial Zone and Brookhurst Commercial Corridor (BCC) Overlay Zone ATTACHMENT NO. 3 Page 2 of 16 Figure 1: Aerial Map Page 3 of 16 SURROUNDING LAND USES: The project site is directly adjacent to a commercial center (Hanshaw Center) to the west, a parking lot for a private university to the north, single-family residences to the northeast, an office building occupied by Sa-Rang Community Church to the east, and the La Palma Avenue off-ramp from Interstate 5 (I-5) to the south, across La Palma Avenue. PROJECT DESCRIPTION: The applicant is requesting a Conditional Use Permit to construct and operate a new three-story convalescent facility with 47 rooms, all of which would be single occupancy. The request also includes exceeding the maximum 0.5 Floor Area Ratio (FAR) permitted for the C-G Zone to allow a 0.9 FAR. In addition, the applicant is requesting a Tentative Parcel Map to subdivide the existing lot to create a separate parcel for the convalescent facility. Currently, the 0.67-acre vacant parcel is part of a larger lot occupied by the Hanshaw Center to the east. The tentative parcel map will legally create a separate lot for the convalescent facility. The proposed facility would provide convalescent accommodations for up to 47 individuals, with 9 bedrooms on the ground floor, and 19 bedrooms on the second and third floors. Room size would range between 260 and 375 square feet and include a full accessible bathrooms and storage areas. Four of the nine ground floor rooms also include a private patio. All upper floor rooms have balconies. The remainder of the building is comprised of administrative offices, a reception area with lounge, multi-purpose hall, a kitchen and dining area, laundry facilities and ancillary storage. The building elevations incorporate a contemporary architectural style with a variety of materials and colors, such as stucco siding, stone veneer bases and accents, and earth tone colors. The architecture along the La Palma Avenue elevation and east elevation (facing new parking lot) consists of vertical and horizontal offsets, which include balconies and a varied roof-line with cornice treatment consistent with the Community Design Element of the General Plan. Figure 2: East Elevation Page 4 of 16 Vehicles would access the property from a single driveway on La Palma Avenue. The proposed project would provide the 38 parking spaces required by the Anaheim Municipal Code (the “Code”) for the 47-room facility, including two disabled spaces and a loading space. Figure 3: Site Plan Page 5 of 16 The facility would have on-site managers 24 hours a day. These managers would work 8-hour shifts. In addition, there will be two housekeeping staff working 8-hour shifts during the day. There will also be a chef and kitchen staff person preparing meals. Visiting hours would be from 10 a.m. to 8 p.m. The applicant indicates that most residents would be over 80 years old and are unable to live independently, taking care of their daily household needs, preparing meals, etc. The facility will offer room and board, and a few recreational amenities (common entertainment areas, a small exercise room, access to computers, etc.). They do not anticipate anyone being able to drive or maintaining a vehicle. All night activities would likely end by 9 p.m. when residents would likely retire to their rooms. INFORMATION DEMONSTRATING THAT THE PROJECT SATISFIES THE CONDITIONS DESCRIBED IN SECTION 15332 OF TITLE 14 OF THE CALIFORNIA CODE OF REGULATIONS: 1. Is the project consistent with the applicable general plan designation and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations? a. General Plan The General Plan designates the project site for General Commercial land use. The General Commercial land use designation includes a variety of land uses, including those identified in the Neighborhood Center designation. The Neighborhood Center designation is for land uses that serve the surrounding residential neighborhood or cluster of surrounding residential neighborhoods. For those serving the surrounding neighborhood, Neighborhood Center uses could provide uses such as neighborhood serving food markets, drug stores, restaurants, small hardware stores, childcare centers, health clubs, and other retail and professional uses. Neighborhood Center areas that serve a cluster of neighborhoods could incorporate a mix of commercial uses including the uses identified above plus large grocery stores, appliance stores, neighborhood-serving restaurants, bakeries, banks, specialty shops, and some low intensity civic uses. Areas designated for General Commercial land use may, but do not necessarily, serve the adjacent neighborhood or surrounding clusters of neighborhoods. In addition to some of the uses described for the Neighborhood Center land use designation, properties designated for General Commercial land use typically include highway-serving uses such as fast food restaurants, auto-oriented uses such as tire stores, service stations, auto parts stores, and other stand-alone retail uses. The proposed project is consistent with the General Commercial land use designation and all applicable goals and policies, including: • Goal 1.1, Policy 2: Ensure that new development is designed in a manner that preserves the quality of life in existing neighborhoods. • Goal 2.1: Continue to provide a variety of quality housing opportunities to address the City’s diverse housing needs. • Goal 2.1, Policy 1: Facilitate new residential development on vacant or underutilized infill parcels. Page 6 of 16 • Goal 2.1, Policy 5: Encourage a mix of quality housing opportunities in employment-rich and transit accessible locations. • Goal 4.1: Promote development that integrates with and minimizes impacts to surrounding land use. • Goal 4.1, Policy 1: Ensure that land uses develop in accordance with the Land Use Plan and Zoning Code in an effort to attain land use compatibility. • Goal 4.1, Policy 3: Ensure that developers consider and address project impacts upon surrounding neighborhoods during the design and development process. • Goal 6.1: Enhance the quality of life and economic vitality in Anaheim through strategic infill development and revitalization of existing development. • Goal 9.1: Establish and maintain a uniquely identifiable well-balanced community that is an attractive and safe place to live, work, visit, learn and retire, supported by quality, family-oriented neighborhoods and businesses. b. Zoning The proposed project is within the “C-G” General Commercial Zone and the Brookhurst Commercial Corridor (BCC) Overlay Zone. The purpose of the C-G Zone is to allow a variety of land uses, including some identified for the “C-NC” Neighborhood Center Commercial Zone. Areas designated as "C-G" General Commercial do not necessarily serve the adjacent neighborhood or surrounding clusters of neighborhoods. In addition to some of the uses described in the commercial centers zones, they typically include highway-serving uses such as fast food restaurants, auto-oriented uses such as tire stores and auto parts stores, and stand-alone retail uses. This zone implements the General Commercial land use designation in the General Plan. The Code permits convalescent facilities to locate within the C-G Zone, subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. In addition, although the proposed convalescent facility would exceed the maximum FAR permitted within the C-G Zone, the Code permits a FAR ratio that is greater than what the Code permits, subject to the approval of a conditional use permit. Approval of said CUP is dependent on the condition that all potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed use of the structure are duly analyzed and mitigated. The purpose of the Brookhurst Commercial Corridor (BCC) Overlay Zone is to provide a mechanism for the orderly development of property within the Brookhurst Sub-Area of the West Anaheim Commercial Corridors Redevelopment Project Area so as to assist in the elimination of blight and blighting influences. It is further intended to encourage suitable residential development at mid-block and other appropriate locations in the Brookhurst Sub-Area. The Code permits convalescent facilities to locate within the BCC Overlay Zone on properties that are also within the C-G Zone, subject to the approval of a conditional use permit.. As described above, the project is consistent with the applicable general plan designation Page 7 of 16 and all applicable general plan policies as well as with applicable zoning designation and regulations. 2. Is the proposed development located within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses? The project site is located at 2157 W. La Palma Avenue (APN 072-415-50) in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, California. The project site is located approximately 250 feet east of Brookhurst Street, and approximately 671 feet north of Interstate Highway (I) 5. The subject 0.67-acre site is currently undeveloped and is part of a larger 1.57 acre parcel occupied by the Hanshaw Center, a retail commercial center at the northeast corner of Brookhurst Street and La Palma Avenue. The project site is directly adjacent to the Hanshaw Center to the west, a parking lot for a private university to the north, single- family residences to the northeast, an office building occupied by Sa-Rang Community Church to the east, and the La Palma Avenue off-ramp from Interstate 5 (I-5) to the south, across La Palma Avenue. As described above the proposed development is located within the City limits on a project site of no more than five acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, 3. Does the project site have value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species? The project site is currently vacant and has no value as habitat for endangered, rare or threatened species. It does not contain suitable habitat for any candidate, sensitive, or special status plant or wildlife species. The project site does contain existing landscaping that migratory birds could potentially use for breeding and nesting. 4. Would approval of the project result in any significant effects relating to traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality? a. Traffic: Construction - There would be a temporary minor increase in traffic during project construction associated with construction vehicles driving to and from the project site during the construction phase, which the applicant plans to take place from the August 2019 to November 2020. However, this impact would be temporary and would cease upon project completion. Therefore, based on the anticipated temporary minor increase in traffic, no significant traffic impacts would occur during construction of the proposed project. Operation - The City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines state that a traffic study is required for a project that meets the following criteria: a) When the AM or PM peak hour trip generation is expected to exceed 100 vehicle trips from the proposed development. b) Projects on the Congestion Management Program (CMP) Highway System which generate 1,600 Average Daily Trips (ADT) or adjacent to CMP Highway System Page 8 of 16 which generate 2,400 ADT c) Projects that will add 51 or more trips during either AM or PM peak hours to any monitored CMP intersection. d) Any project where variations from the City of Anaheim Traffic Study Guidelines are being proposed. According to the Trip Generation Assessment described below, a traffic study was not required for the proposed project; and, therefore, the City has determined that the development would not result in any significant impact to nearby roadways and intersections. a) Trip Generation The amount of one-way vehicular movement, either entering or exiting the generating land use, referred to as “vehicle trip ends,” determines the number of trips generated for a proposed project. K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc. prepared the Trip Generation Assessment for the proposed project (April 22, 2019). Typically, traffic generation rates used in traffic forecasting procedures are found in the ITE Trip Generation Manual; the ITE Trip Generation Manual, 10th Edition published by the Institute of Transportation Engineers (ITE) [Washington, D.C., 2017], was utilized to forecast these results. The Trip Generation Assessment prepared by K2 Traffic Engineering, Inc. used the ITE Trip Generation Manual Codes for Nursing Home. As shown on the following table, based on the ITE trip generation rates, the proposed project would generate approximately 176 trips per day, which includes approximately 15 trips during the AM peak hour and approximately 16 trips during the PM peak hour. Since the proposed project would not exceed 100-vehicle trips during the AM or Peak Hours, the City does not require a traffic study. AM Peak Hour AM Peak Hour AM TOTAL PM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour PM TOTAL Daily Trips IN OUT TOTAL IN OUT TOTAL ITE Trip Generation Rates (per 1,000 sf gfa) 78% 22% 1 41% 59% 1 6.64 Trips associated with Proposed Project 12 3 15 7 9 16 176 b) Congestion Management Program (CMP) ADT The project’s 176 daily trips are less than the 1,600 daily trips threshold for projects located on the CMP highway system or the 2,400 daily trip threshold for projects located adjacent to the CMP highway system. In addition, the project site is not located on and/or adjacent to either CMP thresholds. As such, a traffic study was not required. c) CMP AM/PM Peak The proposed project would result in approximately 15 trips during the AM peak hour and approximately 16 trips during the PM peak hour; neither peak period meets the 51 or Page 9 of 16 more peak-hour trips threshold. In addition, the proposed project would be located on La Palma Avenue, approximately 250 feet east of Brookhurst Street. The intersection of La Palma Avenue and Brookhurst Street is not a CMP monitored intersection. As such, a traffic study was not required. b. Noise: Construction - The following construction-related noise analysis conservatively anticipates construction to last approximately six months and divides the construction period into three phases: site preparation, grading, and building construction (construction, paving, and architectural coating). The project would generate noise temporarily during these construction activities. Equipment used during construction, including site preparation and building construction would create noise impacts during the construction process. However, these construction noise impacts would be temporary and cease upon completion of construction. Construction activities occurring as part of the project will be subject to the limitations and requirements of AMC Section 6.70.010 (Sound Pressure Levels). This section limits noise generated from construction or building repair of any premise within the City during the hours between 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. Additional work hours may be permitted if deemed necessary by the Director of Public Works or a Building Official. In addition, construction equipment, fixed or mobile, will be equipped with properly operating and maintained noise mufflers consistent with manufacturer’s standards. Therefore, the proposed project would not have any significant noise impacts during construction. Operation – The area surrounding the project site is urbanized and developed with land uses with comparable or greater noise impact than the proposed project. Surrounding land uses include a commercial center, located directly adjacent west of the project site, with tenants that include restaurants, bars, and other commercial land uses; and, an existing Chevron service station with a convenience store. The project, when it is completed and occupied, would generate noise levels below the noise levels generated by these commercial land uses. Therefore, the project would not generate noise levels that are greater than or uncharacteristic of the noise levels that adjacent uses currently generate in the immediate project vicinity. Therefore, the proposed project would not have any significant noise impacts during operation. c. Air Quality: The project is located within the South Coast Air Basin, which is a Federal- and State- designated nonattainment area for ozone and particulates. The South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) has established significance thresholds for both construction and operational activities relative to these criteria pollutants. Based on the following analysis, implementation of the project would result in less than significant impacts relative to the daily significance thresholds for criteria air pollutant emissions established by the SCAQMD. Construction - The following construction-related air quality analysis conservatively Page 10 of 16 anticipates construction to last approximately six months and divides the construction period into three phases: site preparation, grading, and building construction (construction, paving, and architectural coating). General construction activities, such as site preparation, grading and commuting to the project site by construction workers and delivery of construction equipment and building materials would contribute to the emission of air pollutants. All construction activities would comply with SCAQMD Rule 403 regarding the control of fugitive dust emissions, and existing City dust suppression practices that minimize dust and other emissions. Such controls include: Frequent watering of the project site; Covering and/or wetting trucks hauling dirt, sand, soil or other loose materials off- site; Street sweeping, as needed, to remove dirt dropped by construction vehicles or mud that would otherwise be carried off by trucks departing the project site; Suspending grading and excavation activities in high winds (25 miles per hour [mph] or more); as well as, Implementation of a traffic control plan to minimize traffic flow interference from construction activities, etc., that would be incorporated into the construction plans. The CalEEMod 2016.3.2 computer model calculated the construction activities required to develop the project would generate pollutant emissions. This analysis considers conservative assumptions, which imply a default equipment mix and a worst-case construction schedule. As shown in the following table, the model calculates project construction emissions to be below SCAQMD significance thresholds for regional emissions. Based on the above analysis, construction of the proposed project would result in less than significant impacts relative to the daily significance thresholds for criteria air pollutant construction emissions established by the SCAQMD. Construction Activity Emissions Maximum Daily Emissions (pounds/day) Maximal Construction Emissions ROG NOx CO SO2 PM-10 PM-2.5 2019 0.9 8.9 8.0 0.0 1.4 0.9 2020 1.7 9.4 8.5 0.0 1.3 0.8 2021 1.7 1.5 2.0 3.6 0.1 0.1 Maximum 1.7 9.4 8.5 3.6 1.4 0.9 SCAQMD Thresholds 75.0 100.0 550.0 150.0 150.0 55.0 Operation – Calculations for mobile source emissions attributed to the proposed project utilized the vehicle miles traveled (VMT) rate that CalEEMod 2016.3.2 calculates based on the proposed land uses and intensity. The analysis determines the daily VMT rate based on the number of daily trips for each land use and applies a commute percentage and an average trip length, both of which are land use specific values derived from CalEEMod 2016.3.2. These values account for variations in trip frequency and length associated with commuting to and from the project. The analysis calculates the daily VMT rate using the number of daily trips for each land use (176 trips/day) and applies an average trip length Page 11 of 16 derived from CalEEMod 2016.3.2 for the Anaheim region. The analysis projects emission factors specific to the buildout year of 2019 based on specific fleet turnover rates and the impact of future emission standards and fuel efficiency standards. The increase in the consumption of fossil fuels to provide power, heat, and ventilation are part of the calculations as stationary point source emissions. The emission factors used in this analysis represent a statewide average of known power producing facilities, utilizing various technologies and emission control strategies. CalEEMod 2016.3.2 calculates area source emissions and includes emissions from natural gas and landscape fuel combustion, consumer products, and architectural coatings (future maintenance). The following table shows the project’s operational emissions, based on the CalEEMod 2016.3.2 model. As shown, the operational emissions of the project would not exceed any SCAQMD emission thresholds; and therefore would not have any significant air quality impacts during operation. Daily Operational Impacts (pounds/day) Source ROG NOx CO SO2 PM-10 PM-2.5 Area 0.6 0.0 3.8 2.1- 0.0 0.0 Energy 0.0 0.1 0.0 8.7- 0.0 0.0 Mobile 0.1 0.8 2.6 0.0 0.9 0.2 Total 0.7 0.9 6.4 0.0 0.9 0.2 SCAQMD Threshold 55.0 55.0 550.0 150.0 150.0 55.0 Exceeds Threshold? No No No No No No Source: CalEEMod2016.3.2 Output in Appendix d. Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emission Analysis In September 2010, the SCAQMD CEQA Significance Thresholds GHG Working Group released a recommended threshold of 3,000 MT CO2e for all land use projects. This analysis uses the 3,000 MT/year recommendation as a guideline for the GHG analysis for the project. Construction – The CalEEMod 2016.3.2 computer model calculated the construction activities required to develop the project that would generate the annual CO2e emissions. The SCAQMD policy for the analysis of GHG construction emissions is to amortize the emissions over a 30-year lifetime. The results are in the following table. Construction Emissions (Metric Tons CO2e) Years CO2e 2019 55.5 2020 151.6 2021 3.3 Maximum 151.6 Amortized 5.0 CalEEMod 2016.3.2 Output Page 12 of 16 As indicated in the table above, according to the model, the construction emissions would not exceed the SCAQMD threshold; and therefore, impacts during construction would not be significant. Operation –The table below shows the total operational and annualized construction emissions of the project. As shown, the operational GHG emissions are less than the SCAQMD’s 3,000 MT CO2e threshold and as a result would be less than significant. Operational Emissions Consumption Source Metric Tons CO2e Area Sources 0.8 Energy Utilization 160.5 Mobile Source 163.7 Solid Waste Generation 21.5 Water Consumption 47.1 Construction 5.0 Total 398.6 Guideline Threshold 3,000 Exceeds Threshold? No e. Water Quality: Grading and construction associated with site work on the project site would result in temporary disturbance of surface soils, which could potentially result in erosion and sedimentation on project site, which are major visible water quality impacts attributable to construction activities. Any stockpiles of excavated areas would be susceptible to high rates of erosion from wind and rain and, if not managed properly, could result in increased sedimentation in local drainage ways. The City would require the project to comply with the requirements of the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) MS4 Permit. The NPDES MS4 Permit Program, administered by the City of Anaheim and County of Orange and issued by the Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board (SARWQCB), helps control water pollution by regulating point sources that discharge pollutants into receiving waters. The project operation must also comply with the NPDES General Construction Permit. The project contractor would be required to comply with Chapter 10.09 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, which prohibits the active or passive discharge or disposal of soil or construction debris into the storm drain. Additionally, the project would be required to obtain coverage under the General Permit for Discharges of Storm Water Associated with Construction Activity (Construction General Permit Order 2009-0009-DWQ). Construction activities subject to the Construction General Permit includes clearing, grading, and disturbances to ground such as stockpiling or excavation. The Construction General Permit requires implementation of a Storm Water Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP). The SWPPP would generally contain a site map showing the construction perimeter, existing and proposed buildings, storm water collection and discharge points, Page 13 of 16 general pre- and post-construction topography, drainage patterns across the project site, and adjacent roadways. The SWPPP must also include project construction features designed to protect against stormwater runoff, known as Best Management Practices (BMPs). Additionally, the SWPPP must contain a visual monitoring program; a chemical monitoring program for “non-visible” pollutants, should the BMPs fail; and a sediment-monitoring plan, should the project site discharge directly into a water body listed on the 303(d) list for sediment. Section A of the Construction General Permit describes the elements that must be contained in the SWPPP. Incorporation of these policies and ordinances and the requirements contained within would reduce water quality impacts to less than significant. The applicant has submitted the Preliminary Water Quality Management Plan on August 3, 2017. Once the applicant receives approval of the proposed project, the applicant will submit a Final Water Quality Management Plan a future date. Project compliance with existing Codes and Regulations would result in less than significant impacts to water quality. 5. Can the project site be adequately served by all required utilities and public services? a. Fire Protection: The project would incrementally increase demands for fire protection services associated with service calls, inspections, etc. However, the increased demand for fire protection services would be minimal and met with existing fire resources. Additionally, the project would not result in the need for new or physically altered fire protection facilities. The City provides for additional fire personnel and associated facilities and through its annual Operating Budget and Capital Improvement Program review process. Annually, Fire Department needs would be assessed and budget allocations revised accordingly to ensure that adequate levels of service are maintained throughout the City. The proposed project would contribute to the funding of fire services over an extended period, through an increase in tax revenue relative to the project site’s increase in development intensity. Additionally, building plans submitted for new development on the project site would be required to comply with fire safety requirements. Project impacts to fire services would be less than significant. b. Police Protection: The project would incrementally increase demands for police protection services associated with service calls for burglaries, theft, etc. However, the increased demand for police protection services would be minimal and would not result in the need for new or physically altered police protection facilities. Impacts to police services would be less than significant. c. Schools: The project would not generate any new students that may require the attendance of the existing schools. Therefore, there would be no impacts to schools. Page 14 of 16 d. Parks: The residents of the project may utilize and increase the use of existing parks and recreational facilities in the City. According to the Green Element of the City’s General Plan (Goal 18.1, Policy 1), the City’s policy is to “Maintain a Citywide standard of at least two acres of parkland per thousand residents. In order to help achieve this standard, Code Section 17.34.010 requires that prior to the issuance of a building permit for any dwelling unit or units, the applicant shall irrevocably offer to dedicate a portion of the land on which said unit or units are located and pay a fee for the development thereof, or pay a fee in lieu of dedication and the development fee for the purpose of providing park and recreational facilities to serve the future residents of the unit or units. However, the Code considers a convalescent facility a commercial use; and therefore, it is not subject to this fee. Additionally, a convalescent facility is unlikely to create a significant impact on existing parks and recreational facilities; and, therefore the park impacts would be less than significant. e. Other Public Facilities: The project would generate new residents that may utilize library facilities in the City. The Anaheim Public Library consists of a Central Library six branch libraries, a Bookmobile, Books on the Go at ARTIC, plus the Anaheim Heritage Center and Founders’ Park. The Library system provides a total of 149,892 square feet of library space in variously sized facilities throughout Anaheim to serve 353,741 citizens. Additional population in the City reduces the per capita availability of physical collections, computers, programs, and space. Online resources are impacted by population growth because the licensing fees for these databases, eBooks, and other digital resources are generally linked to the population of the library’s service area. With additional residents to serve, the Proposed Project would reduce the overall availability per capita of books, media, computers, and space. Therefore, additional physical and virtual resources need to be added to the Anaheim library system. That said, impacts to library services would be less than significant. f. Wastewater/Sewer: The Anaheim Public Works Department would serve the project for wastewater (sanitary sewer) collection service. The Orange County Sanitation District (OCSD) treats the wastewater collected within City. The proposed sewer-connection point is on La Palma Avenue, near the proposed vehicular entrance to the project. The City has not identified existing wastewater facilities as deficient in either the “Existing” or “Build-out” conditions. Due to the size of the project, no significant impacts to the existing wastewater infrastructure would occur and the existing wastewater collection facilities have adequate capacity to serve the wastewater generated by the project; and therefore, the impacts would be less than significant. Additionally, due to the amount of wastewater that the project would generate, the impacts to the OCSD treatment facilities would be less than significant. Page 15 of 16 g. Storm Water Drainage: The proposed project would subdivide run-off onsite into three tributary areas. All drainage areas would flow toward the landscaping areas on the easterly and westerly sides of the property. The proposed project would install and connect all drainage areas to underground pipes. These pipes would outflow to the existing curb and gutter along La Palma Avenue. Street runoff from La Palma Avenue would flow towards an existing catch basin, which is located approximately 50 fee east of the project site. All downstream runoff would flow towards Coyote Creek and the San Gabriel River. On-site grading and drainage improvements proposed in conjunction with the proposed site work would be required to meet the City’s and Orange County Flood Control District’s (OCFCD) flood control criteria including design discharges, design/construction standards and maintenance features. All new development projects in the City are required to include specific design Best Management Practices to ensure that no storm water runoff generated on site would leave the site without pre-treatment for urban pollutants. The project would not alter any drainage pattern in a manner that would result in substantial erosion or siltation on or offsite. There are no streams or rivers on the site; and, therefore the project would not alter any streams or rivers on the project site. Erosion and siltation impacts potentially resulting from the project would primarily occur during the project’s site preparation and grading phase. Implementation of the NPDES permit requirements, as they apply to the site, would reduce potential erosion, siltation, and water quality impacts. The project would have less than significant storm drain impacts. h. Water Supplies: The City of Anaheim receives water from two main sources: the Orange County Groundwater Basin, managed by the Orange County Water District (OCWD), and imported water from the Metropolitan Water District of Southern California (MWD). The City pumps groundwater from 18 active wells located within the City, and MWD delivers imported water to the City through seven treated water connections and one untreated connection. According to the City of Anaheim 2015 Urban Water Management Plan (UWMP), local groundwater has been the least expensive and most reliable source of water supply for the City. The City depends heavily on groundwater from the Orange County Groundwater Basin each year. Based on a baseline demand projection under the 2015 UWMP, the supply of local water that would be required to serve the proposed project is adequate. The baseline scenario assumes the implementation of future passive measures affecting new developments, including the Model Water Efficient Landscape, plumbing code efficiencies for toilets, and expected plumbing code for high-efficiency clothes washers. Therefore, the project would not result in a significant deficit in the volume of the local aquifer volume or lower the local groundwater. The project would have less than significant impacts to groundwater supplies. Page 16 of 16 i. Solid Waste Disposal: Assembly Bill 939 requires local jurisdictions to divert at least 50 percent of their solid waste to recycling. As of 2018, the City is diverting approximately 60 percent of its solid waste to recycling. The City is currently diverting waste to the Olinda Alpha Landfill in the City of Brea, which permits the acceptance of approximately 8,000 tons of waste per day. In April 2016, Assembly Bill 1826 requires businesses in California to recycle their organic waste based on the amount generated per week. The project’s contribution of solid waste would be minimal and would not significantly affect current landfill operations. The project would not have any significant solid waste impacts. j. Electricity: k. Natural Gas: l. Telephone Service: m. Television Service: The project site is located in a built-out, urban setting. Various utility service providers serve the site and the surrounding properties. There are no anticipated significant service or system upgrades required to serve the project. Any increase in the demand for public utilities by the project would be less than significant. DETERMINATION: I find that I have adequately supported the answers given above by the information sources cited following each question. Based upon the analysis in this checklist, I have determined that the effects of the proposed project are typical of the effects generated within that class of projects (i.e., Class 32 – Infill Development Projects) characterized as in-fill development meeting the conditions of Section 15332 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations. Therefore, I recommend that the Planning Commission determine that the proposed project will not cause a significant effect on the environment and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement for the preparation of environmental documents under the California Environmental Quality Act. August 27, 2019 Signature of City of Anaheim Representative Date Susan Kim, Principal Planner (714) 765-4958 Printed Name, Title Phone Number Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 April 4, 2019 STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION FOR: Ronita LLC – Convalescent Facility CUP2018-05984/SUBPM2018-179/DEV2017-00058 2157 West La Palma Avenue Conditional Use Permit #l: Convalescent Facility use in a C-G Zone Background: Zoning Code Section 18.08.030, Table 8 -A: Describes Convalescent are allowed in the Commercial General (C -G) Zone subject to, "Conditional Use Permit Required". Proposal: Applicant proposed to construct and operate a new 3-story, 26,538 sq. ft., 47-bed convalescent facility and to permit a 2-lot subdivision for the purpose of constructing the convalescent facility on its own parcel at the above -referenced address. The proposed use is permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) by the Planning Commission. The Site is designated for Commercial land uses on the City of Anaheim, General Plan, Land Use Plan, latest revision date March 30, 2017, and is zoned for General Commercial "C-G" uses. The proposed project is depicted on the applicant's drawing submittal dated February 6, 2019. The southern portion of the site area is currently a public avenue by Caltrans with access Brookhurst St. and to freeway onramp to I-5. The City of Anaheim is processing as stated above approval of parceling of the property on its own. Applicant is seeking a Conditional Use Permit to allow the Convalescent Facility use on this site. Justification: A.Indicate how the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and development of the area. The immediately adjoining the property to the north is also zoned C-G. The properties across La Palma is a public property used as I-5 off ramp, and unzoned. These properties are arguably ATTACHMENT NO. 4 Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 developed and are already in a manner that is consistent with the Anaheim General Plan and aspirations for future improvements to West La Palma Avenue. As such, the proposed convalescent property will become a high-quality precedent and be catalytic to future improvements to these properties. The proposed facility use will immediately complement and support the large residential that lies directly to the northeast behind the property Properties to the west and south are retail block, gas station and dental clinic facing Brookhurst and are zoned Commercial (C- G). These properties use that will be both complemented and further supported by the proposed Convalescent Facility. B. Explain how the site proposed far the use is large enough to accommodate anticipated growth of the development and allow the continued operation without causing a detriment to the particular area or to health and safety. The 0.675-acre site can readily accommodate the proposed use and density when developed in an urban fashion as proposed. (See applicant's drawing submittal dated 0 2.06.2019). A vertical rise building form is critical to accomplishing the proposed densities while allowing enough land area to accommodate prescribed parking, landscaping, utility easements, and convalescent amenities. While all desired program elements can be accommodated within the physical constraints of the site, the project will need Conditional Use Permits for additional FAR to be processed concurrent to this request. (See Conditional Use Permit #'s 2.) Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 The site is currently vacant of any development, is unmonitored and has no continuing operations that will be compromised by the proposed development. Health and safety issues both on and in the vicinity of the site will be greatly improved via the active day and night time uses that will result from the proposed project. C. Indicate how the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the roads designed and constructed to handle the traffic in the area. La Palma Avenue is a primary arterial designed to accommodate the character of development envisioned in the Anaheim General Plan. It links the southern end of the La Palma corridor with I-5 freeway. It connects with and provides access to CA-91. The Trip Generation Memo conducted by K@ Traffic Engineering Inc. Submitted to the City Traffic Department that the project’s trip generation does not exceed the threshold of 50 trips in the AM and PM peak hours. The development should not result in any significant impact to near by roadways and intersections, and further traffic study is therefore not required. D. Indicate how approval if the Conditional Use permit with any conditions for approval, will not harm the health and safety if the citizens if the City if Anaheim. Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 This project will cater primarily to elderly due to its location to residential areas. As such, security will be a prominent element of ongoing operations as elderly friendly conditions will be paramount - both in perception and practice. A convalescent use on this site will ensure that active uses are prevalent both during the day and at night, serene activities at night will be a deterrent to adverse or criminal behavior. The uses engrained in the convalescent program are inherently healthy relative to fitness, recreation and nutrition. These conditions contribute to a strong sense of community, conditions that the citizens of Anaheim will benefit greatly from as Anaheim continues to grow. Accordingly, approval of this CUP will not harm the health and safety of the Citizens of Anaheim. E. Supporting information relevant to the Anaheim General Plan. The project as proposed is supportive and consistent with many elements of the Anaheim General Plan, including but not limited to: Land Use Element - Objectives • Revitalize neighborhood edges • Plan land uses that preserve and enhance Anaheim's economic assets. • Create dynamic, identifiable places Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 • Take advantage of existing and proposed corridors while minimizing traffic impacts. Land Use Element - Goals & Policies • Goal 3.1: Pursue land uses along major corridors that enhance the City's image and stimulate appropriate development at strategic locations. • Goal 3.2: Maximize development opportunities along transportation routes. • Goal 5.1: Create and enhance dynamic, identifiable places for the benefit of Anaheim residents, employees and visitors. • Goal 14.1: establish the West La Palma Corridor as a revitalized commercial and residential area that serves as a link to Elderly Healthcare Zone. Circulation Element - Roadway classifications • West La Palma is designated as a Primary Arterial that also happens to connect to a freeway (major arterial). These are typically six-lane divided facilities with no parking or four- lane divided with left turn pockets and two parking lanes, providing for major circulation within the City and adjacent communities. • Goal 5.1: Promote bus service and paratransit improvements. • Goal 7.1: Protect and encourage bicycle travel. (Anaheim Boulevard is a designated Class II Bike path.) • Goal 8.1: Protect and encourage pedestrian travel. • Goal 12.1: Ensure adequate parking is made available to City residents, visitors and businesses. Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 Safety Element - Goals • Minimize the risk to public health and safety and disruptions to vital services, economic vitality and social order resulting from seismic and geologic activities. Project involves Type 1 construction designed according to most current code criteria. Economic Development Element - major economic goals: • Continue to support and enhance tourism as a driving force in Anaheim's economy. • Retain, expand and diversify the economic base of the City. • Revitalize Anaheim's major corridors to provide an attractive setting for the business community. Economic Development Element- area-specific land Use Strategies: • Revitalize West La Palma Corridor as an important link between I-5 and CA-95 freeways with a mix of retail, office, employment and residential uses. This corridor is one of six redevelopment projects areas targeted by the City of Anaheim. Economic development - Goals & Policies: • Goal 2.1: Continue to implement the revitalization goals of the City's redevelopment project areas and other strategic locations. • Goal 2.2: Enhance the quality of commercial development along major corridors. • Goal 6.4: Promote the revitalization of La Palma as a pedestrian-oriented and bicycle-friendly civic town center, enhanced with diverse retail, residential and Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 cultural opportunities. Community Design Element-District level Design Features: It is important to note that the site is surrounded by several Community Design Districts (General Study Areas) as demonstrated on City of Anaheim, General Plan Program, Figure CD-1 including: a. the Anaheim Resort; b. the Platinum District; c. Anaheim Colony Historic District and Downtown and; d. East Anaheim. The property does not lie within any of these districts however. Nonetheless, one could readily argue that the site is transitional in nature in that it is in a position to link the two districts that are closest to the site, the Anaheim Resort District with the Platinum District, and therefore needs to complement and exhibit many of the community design standards and goals engrained in each district, including: • Create regional center of dramatic urban scale and stron g sense of place. • Integrate a variety of commercial and residential uses to create day and night activity. • Ensure high quality development through design guidelines and comprehensive property management. • Create strong entryways, gateways and edge treatments. • Goal 2.1: Attractively landscape and maintain Anaheim's major arterial corridors and prepare/implement distinctive streetscape improvement plans. • Goal 10.1: Anaheim sign guidelines address distinctive, appropriately scaled and/or coordinated signs throughout commercial, industrial and mixed-use areas. • Goal 11.1: Architecture in Anaheim has diversity and creativity of design and is consistent with the immediate Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 surroundings. • Goal 6.4: Promote the revitalization of Downtown Anaheim as a pedestrian-oriented and bicycle-friendly civic town center, enhanced with diverse retail, residential and cultural opportunities. Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 April 4, 2019 STATEMENT OF JUSTIFICATION FOR: Ronita LLC – Convalescent Facility CUP2018-05984/SUBPM2018-179/DEV2017-00058 2157 West La Palma Avenue Conditional Use Permit #2: FAR Greater than 0.50 Background: Zoning Code Section 18.08.045, Table 8-E: Describes that the maximum FAR in a C-G Zone is 0.50. An increase in the maximum Floor area is permitted subject to the approval of a conditional use permit in accordance with Chapter 18.66 and subject to the requirement that the evidence presented shows that all of the conditions set forth in Section 18.66.060 exist, as well as the condition that all potential environmental impacts associated with the proposed use of the structure have been duly analyzed and mitigated. Proposal: Applicant proposed to construct and operate a new 3-story, 26,538 sq. ft., 47-bed convalescent facility and to permit a 2-lot subdivision for the purpose of constructing the convalescent facility on its own parcel at the above -referenced address. The proposed use is permitted subject to approval of a conditional use permit (CUP) by the Planning Commission. The Site is designated for Commercial land uses on the City of Anaheim, General Plan, Land Use Plan, latest revision date March 30, 2017, and is zoned for General Commercial "C-G" uses. The proposed project is depicted on the applicant's drawing submittal dated February 6, 2019. The southern portion of the site area is currently a public avenue by Caltrans with access Brookhurst St. and to freeway onramp to I-5. The City of Anaheim is processing as stated above approval of parceling of the property on its own. Applicant is seeking a Conditional Use Permit to allow the Convalescent Facility use on this site. Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 Justification: A. Indicate how the proposed use will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses or the growth and development of the area. The immediately adjoining the property to the north is also zoned C-G. The properties across La Palma is a public property used as I-5 off ramp, and unzoned. These properties are arguably developed and are already in a manner that is consistent with the Anaheim General Plan and aspirations for future improvements to West La Palma Avenue. As such, the proposed convalescent property will become a high-quality precedent and be catalytic to future improvements to these properties. The proposed facility use will immediately complement and support the large residential that lies directly to the northeast behind the property Properties to the west and south are retail block, gas station and dental clinic facing Brookhurst and are zoned Commercial (C- G). These properties uses that will be both complemented and further supported by the proposed Convalescent Facility. Granting an FAR increase on this site will not prevent adjoining properties from seeking similar or greater development characteristics. The proposed use will enhance the development potential and value of adjoining properties and of the surrounding area, thereby having no adverse effect on adjoining land uses or the growth and development of the area B. Explain how the site proposed far the use is large enough to accommodate anticipated growth of the development and allow the continued operation without causing a detriment to the particular area or to health and safety. The 0.675-acre site can readily accommodate the proposed use and density when developed in an urban fashion as proposed. Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 (See applicant's drawing submittal dated 0 2.06.2019). A vertical rise building form is critical to accomplishing the proposed densities while allowing enough land area to accommodate prescribed parking, landscaping, utility easements, and convalescent amenities. While all desired program elements can be accommodated within the physical constraints of the site, the project will need Conditional Use Permits for additional FAR to be processed concurrent to this request. The site is currently vacant of any development, is unmonitored and has no continuing operations that will be compromised by the proposed development. He alth and safety issues both on and in the vicinity of the site will be greatly improved via the active day and night time uses that will result from the proposed project. C. Indicate how the trajfic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the roads designed and constructed to handle the traffic in the area. La Palma Avenue is a primary arterial designed to accommodate the character of development envisioned in the Anaheim General Plan. It links the southern end of the La Palma corridor with I-5 freeway. It connects with and provides access to CA-91. The Traffic Impact Analysis has been approved by the City Traffic Engineering Division and Caltrans, and no significant traffic impacts to the Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 Planned Roadway Network were identified and no mitigation was required. As part of the project, the Applicant will improve West La Palma to its ultimate condition as a six-lane Primary Arterial with a Class II Bike Lane. The implementation of the bike lane and interface with the onramp to the northbound I-5 would be finalized in the Street Improvement Plans to be approved by the City and Caltrans after entitlement. D. Indicate how approval if the Conditional Use permit with any conditions far approval, will not harm the health and safety if the citizens if the City if Anaheim. This project will cater primarily to elderly due to its location to residential areas. As such, security will be a prominent element of ongoing operations as elderly friendly conditions will be paramount - both in perception and practice. A convalescent use on this site will ensure that active uses are prevalent both during the day and at night, serene activities at night will be a deterrent to adverse or criminal behavior. The uses engrained in the convalescent program are inherently healthy relative to fitness, recreation and nutrition. These conditions contribute to a strong sense of community, conditions that the citizens of Anaheim will benefit greatly from as Anaheim continues to grow. Accordingly, approval of this Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 CUP will not harm the health and safe ty of the Citizens of Anaheim. E. Supporting information relevant to the Anaheim General Plan. The project as proposed is supportive and consistent with many elements of the Anaheim General Plan, including but not limited to: Land Use Element - Objectives • Revitalize neighborhood edges • Plan land uses that preserve and enhance Anaheim's economic assets. • Create dynamic, identifiable places • Take advantage of existing and proposed corridors while minimizing traffic impacts. Land Use Element - Goals & Policies • Goal 3.1: Pursue land uses along major corridors that enhance the City's image and stimulate appropriate development at strategic locations. • Goal 3.2: Maximize development opportunities along transportation routes. • Goal 5.1: Create and enhance dynamic, identifiable places for the benefit of Anaheim residents, employees and visitors. • Goal 14.1: establish the West La Palma Corridor as a revitalized commercial and residential area that serves as a link to Elderly Healthcare Zone. Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 Circulation Element - Roadway classifications • West La Palma is designated as a Primary Arterial that also happens to connect to a freeway (major arterial). These are typically six-lane divided facilities with no parking or four- lane divided with left turn pockets and two parking lanes, providing for major circulation within the City and adjacent communities. • Goal 5.1: Promote bus service and paratransit improvements. • Goal 7.1: Protect and encourage bicycle travel. (Anaheim Boulevard is a designated Class II Bike path.) • Goal 8.1: Protect and encourage pedestrian travel. • Goal 12.1: Ensure adequate parking is made available to City residents, visitors and businesses. Safety Element - Goals • Minimize the risk to public health and safety and disruptions to vital services, economic vitality and social order resulting from seismic and geologic activities. Project involves Type 1 construction designed according to most current code criteria. Economic Development Element - major economic goals: • Continue to support and enhance tourism as a driving force in Anaheim's economy. • Retain, expand and diversify the economic base of the City. • Revitalize Anaheim's major corridors to provide an attractive setting for the business community. Economic Development Element- area-specific land Use Strategies: • Revitalize West La Palma Corridor as an important link Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 between I-5 and CA-95 freeways with a mix of retail, office, employment and residential uses. This corridor is one of six redevelopment projects areas targeted by the City of Anaheim. Economic development - Goals & Policies: • Goal 2.1: Continue to implement the revitalization goals of the City's redevelopment project areas and other strategic locations. • Goal 2.2: Enhance the quality of commercial development along major corridors. • Goal 6.4: Promote the revitalization of La Palma as a pedestrian-oriented and bicycle-friendly civic town center, enhanced with diverse retail, residential and cultural opportunities. Community Design Element-District level Design Features: It is important to note that the site is surrounded by several Community Design Districts (General Study Areas) as demonstrated on City of Anaheim, General Plan Program, Figure CD-1 including: a. the Anaheim Resort; b. the Platinum District; c. Anaheim Colony Historic District and Downtown and; d. East Anaheim. The property does not lie within any of these districts however. Nonetheless, one could readily argue th at the site is transitional in nature in that it is in a position to link the two districts that are closest to the site, the Anaheim Resort District with the Platinum District, and therefore needs to complement and exhibit many of the community design standards and goals engrained in each district, including: • Create regional center of dramatic urban scale and strong sense of place. Design Concepts • ARCHITECTURE • ENGINEERING • PLANNING • CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT © Design Concepts: 4091 Riverside Drive, Suite 110, Chino, CA 91710 Tel: 909-591-2098 • Integrate a variety of commercial and residential uses to create day and night activity. • Ensure high quality development throu gh design guidelines and comprehensive property management. • Create strong entryways, gateways and edge treatments. • Goal 2.1: Attractively landscape and maintain Anaheim's major arterial corridors and prepare/implement distinctive streetscape improvement plans. • Goal 10.1: Anaheim sign guidelines address distinctive, appropriately scaled and/or coordinated signs throughout commercial, industrial and mixed-use areas. • Goal 11.1: Architecture in Anaheim has diversity and creativity of design and is consistent with the immediate surroundings. • Goal 6.4: Promote the revitalization of Downtown Anaheim as a pedestrian-oriented and bicycle-friendly civic town center, enhanced with diverse retail, residential and cultural opportunities. S 8 9 ° 4 6 ' 4 5 " W ( B A S I S O F B E A R I N G S ) 1 2 0 1 . 8 8 ' 1 5 3 E L E C B O X 3 . 8 X 2 . 7 N 8 9 ° 4 6 ' 4 5 " E 1 3 5 . 7 4 ' N 0° 21' 35" W 218.56' N 8 9 ° 4 6 ' 4 5 " E 1 7 0 . 8 4 ' N 0 ° 1 9 ' 4 4 " W 0 . 7 0 ' L = 9 2 . 0 8 ' , R = 1 4 8 0 . 0 0 ' D = 3 ° 3 3 ' 5 4 " 65.14' ( 1 2 0 ) ( 1 1 9 ) 1 1 9 ( 1 2 1 ) ( 1 2 0 ) ( 1 2 0 ) ( 1 2 0 ) ( 1 2 0 ) 1 1 9 ( 1 1 9 ) ( 1 1 9 ) 1 1 9 1 1 8 1 1 8 ( 1 2 1 ) ( 1 2 1 ) 1 2 0 R E V I S I O N N O . DRAWING TITLE JOB TITLE D W G . N O . J O B N O . JOB ADDRESS DATENO.ISSUED 2 0 1 9 - 5 3 DESIGN CONCEPTS SHIV TALWAR, ARCHITECT AIA 3340 RIVERSIDE DR. # M, CHINO, CA 91710 TEL: 909-591-3939 dsignconcepts@yahoo.com THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PREFERENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK PROPOSED CONVALESCENT HOME FOR RONITA LLC 2157 W PALMA AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92801 5/24/171 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6/07/182 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT TITLE SHEET T - 1 A.P.N. # 072-415-50TRACT: 2093LOT : 50P BK 072 PG 41 PAR 50 LEGAL DESCRIPTION OCCUPANCY (BUILDING USE) : R-3OCCUPANCY SEPARATION : 1 HOUR(BETWEEN S-2 AND B)CONSTRUCTION TYPE : TYPE V-B (NON RATED)-FULLY FIRE SPRINKLERNO. OF STORIES: 3 FLOORSREQUIRED EXITS: 1 (PER CBC- CH.10 - TABLE ....)PROPOSED EXITS: 1APPLICABLE BUILDING CODES: 2016 CBC2016 CEC2016 CMC2016 CPC2016 CFC.2016 TITLE 24 ENERGY REGULATIONSCITY OF ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODES BUILDING CODE ANALYSISZONING ANALYSISZONING.............. C-G (COMMERCIAL GENERAL)FAR (FLOOR AREA RATIO): 0.5ALLOWABLE HEIGHT: 75'PROPOSED HEIGHT: 29' 29'<75'TOTAL LOT AREA= 0.675 ACRE = 29,403 SQ.FT.ALLOWABLE BUILT-UP AREA = 29,403 X 0.5 = 14,701.5 SQ.FT.TOTAL LOT COVERAGE= 2,665 SQ.FT.PERCENTAGE OF COVERAGE=15.1 % < 45%PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR AREA= 7,360 SQ.FT.PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR AREA= 9,589 SQ.FT.PROPOSED THIRD FLOOR AREA =9,589 SQ. FT.-----------------------TOTAL FLOOR AREA= 26,538 SQ.FT.PROPOSED FLOOR AREA = 26,538 / 29,403 = 0.90NUMBER OF ROOM= 47 ROOMS ( 1 BED / RM.)PARKING ANALYSIS: E X I S T I N G S I T E P L A N K E Y N O T E S SITE PHOTOGRAPH S V I C I N I T Y M A P PROJECT SUMMARYCONCRETEPROPERTY LI N E DRAINAGE TO C O N N E C T T O ( E ) CENTER LINE LEGENDSEWERELECTRICACCESSIBLE P A T H O F T R A V E L E X I S T I N G S I T E P L A N SCOPE OF WORK1. PROPOSED 3-STORYCONVALESCENT HOME WITH A TOTALNUMBER OF 47 ROOM IN A BUILDING OFAPPROXIMATELY 26,538 SQ.FT ON AN EXISTING VACANT LOT. S C A L E : 1 " = 3 0 0 ' A E R I A L I M A G E D R A W I N G I N D E X A R C H I T E C T U R A L T - 1 T I T L E S H E E T & P R O P O S E D S I T E P L A N T - 1 . 1 E N L A R G E D S I T E P L A N T - 1 . 2 T R A F F I C S T A N D A R D D E T A I L S A - 0 1 P R O P O S E D F I R S T F L O O R P L A N A - 0 2 P R O P O S E D 2 N D F L O O R P L A N A - 0 3 P R O P O S E D 3 R D F L O O R P L A N A - 0 4 P R O P O S E D R O O F P L A N C I V I L E N G I N E E R I N G C - 1 G R A D I N G P L A N C - 2 G R A D I N G S E C T I O N S L A N D S C A P I N G L - 1 C O N C E P T U A L L A N D S C A P I N G P R O P O S E D S I T E O F 3 - S T O R Y C O N V A L E S C E N T H O M E C - G Z O N E C - G Z O N E R-S2 ZONE LANDSCAPE S I T E USENO. ROOMS PARKING RATIO REQUIRED PARKINGCONVALESCENTROOM470.8 SPACE / ROOM 47 X 0.8 SPACE = 37.6SAY 38 SPACESTOTAL PARKINGSPACE REQUIRED 38TOTAL PARKINGSPACE PROVIDED 38ADA PARKING2REQUIREDADA PARKING2PROVIDED D E S I G N T E A M A R C H I T E C T : D E S I G N C O N C E P T S S H I V T A L W A R , A I A 3 3 4 0 R I V E R S I D E D R I V E # M C H I N O , C A 9 1 7 1 0 T E L . 9 0 9 - 5 9 1 - 3 9 3 9 d s i g n c o n c e p t s @ y a h o o . c o m O W N E R : M R . R O N I T A L L C 3 7 2 8 E W O O D B I N E R O A D M S . O R A N G E , C A 9 2 8 6 7 CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT APPLIC A T I O N F O R PROPOSED CONVALESCENT HOMEFOR RONITA LLC2157 W LA PALMA AVENUE ANAH E I M , C A . 92801 S O I L S E N G I N E E R T R A F F I C E N G I N E E R C I V I L / W Q M P E N G I N E E R ( S E E P R O P O S E D S I T E P L A N S H E E T T - 1 . 1 ) LOADING / UNLOADINGPROVIDED C O N C R E T E P A V E R S 1 C - G Z O N E 1 . E X I S T I N G C U R B & G U T T E R 2 . E X I S T I N G S T R E E T L I G H T W I T H C A L T R A N S S I G N T O B E R E L O C A T E D @ ( 7 A ) . 3 . E X I S T I N G S I D E W A L K T O R E M A I N 4 . ( E ) D R I V E W A Y T O B E R E M O V E D A N D R E W O R K E D T O S I D E W A L K 5 . ( E ) T R E E B Y C A L T R A N S T O R E M A I N 6 . ( E ) C H A I N L I N K F E N C E T O B E R E M O V E D 7 . ( E ) T R E E S T O B E R E M O V E D G e o E n v i r o n E n g . C o n s u l t a n t s , I n c . 4 0 7 1 E . L a P a l m a A v e , S u i t e B A n a h e i m , C a 9 2 8 0 7 7 1 4 - 6 0 6 - 2 5 9 8 ( c e l l ) 7 1 4 - 6 3 2 - 3 1 9 0 ( o f f ) 7 1 4 - 6 3 2 - 3 1 9 1 ( f a x ) K 2 T r a f f i c E n g i n e e r i n g , I n c . 1 4 4 2 I r v i n e B l v d , S u i t e 2 1 0 T u s t i n , C A 9 2 7 8 0 7 1 4 - 8 3 2 - 2 1 1 6 D E S I G N C O N C E P T S S H I V T A L W A R , A I A 3 3 4 0 R I V E R S I D E D R I V E # M C H I N O , C A 9 1 7 1 0 T E L . 9 0 9 - 5 9 1 - 3 9 3 9 d s i g n c o n c e p t s @ y a h o o . c o m T - 1 . 3 T O P O G R A P H I C M A P T P M - 1 T E N T A T I V E P A R C E L M A P C - 2 G R A D I N G S E C T I O N S T P M - 1 T E N T A T I V E P A R C E L M A P A T T A C H M E N T N O . 5 1 7 1 2 ' X 2 0 ' L O A D I N G / U N L O A D I N G B A Y 813 P A T I O P A T I O P A T I O P A T I O P A T I O P A T I O OUT-DOOR DINING S I D E W A L K SIDEWALK 6 14 19 20 2 9 3 8 TRASHENCLOSURE R E V I S I O N N O . DRAWING TITLE JOB TITLE D W G . N O . J O B N O . JOB ADDRESS DATENO.ISSUED 2 0 1 9 - 5 3 DESIGN CONCEPTS SHIV TALWAR, ARCHITECT AIA 3340 RIVERSIDE DR. # M, CHINO, CA 91710 TEL: 909-591-3939 dsignconcepts@yahoo.com THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PREFERENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK PROPOSED CONVALESCENT HOME FOR RONITA LLC 2157 W PALMA AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92801 5/24/171 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6/07/182 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT T - 1 . 1 PROPOSED SITE PLAN S I T E P L A N K E Y N O T E S 1 . 6 ' - 0 0 " H I G H D E C O R A T I V E C M U F E N C E . C O L O R & F I N I S H T O M A T C H W I T H B U I L D I N G E X T E R I O R . 2 . L A N D S C A P E P L A N T E R S P E R L A N D S C A P E P L A N 3 . L I N E O F 2 N D F L O O R T Y P . 4 . A C C E S S I B L E P A T H O F T R A V E L . 5 . ( N ) 2 4 ' W I D E D R I V E W A Y A P P R O A C H , S I D E W A L K , C U R B S A N D G U T T E R 6 . E X I S T I N G C U R B & G U T T E R 7 . E X I S T I N G S T R E E T L I G H T W I T H C A L T R A N S S I G N T O B E R E L O C A T E D @ ( 7 A ) . 8 . P R O P O S E D M O N U M E N T S I G N 9 . 4 ' - 0 0 " W I D E C O N C R E T E W A L K W A Y - T Y P . 1 0 . E X I S T I N G S I D E W A L K T O R E M A I N 1 1 . A S P H A L T P A V I N G 1 2 . T R A S H E N C L O S U R E W / T R E L L I S 1 3 . H A M M E R H E A D T U R N A R E A ( A S P E R C I T Y S T A N D A R D S ) 1 4 . 7 ' x 5 0 ' S I T E D I S T A N C E T R I A N G L E ( C L E A R Z O N E ) P E R E S D E T A I L 1 1 5 - B 1 5 . P R O P O S E D D C D A V A L V E S A N D B A C K F L O W V A L V E S L O C A T I O N 1 6 . E N T R A N C E C A N O P Y L I N E 1 7 . P R O P O S E D O U T D O O R D I N I N G 1 8 . P R O P O S E D P A T I O 1 9 . A D A S I G N A S P E R C A M U T C D R 9 9 , R 9 9 B & R 7 - 8 B A N D C A L T R A N S S T D . A 9 0 A 2 0 . 9 ' X 1 8 ' P A R K I N G B A Y A S P E R A N A H E I M E S D E T A I L 4 7 0 2 1 . 1 2 ' X 2 0 ' L O A D I N G A N D U N L O A D I N G B A Y A S P E R C I T Y O F A N A H E I M M U N I C I P A L C O D E 2 2 . P A R K I N G S T R U C T U R E C O L U M N P L A C E M E N T S A S P E R E S D E T A I L S # 4 7 1 2 3 . ( E ) D R I V E W A Y A N D S I D E W A L K T O B E R E M O V E D 2 4 . ( E ) T R E E B Y C A L T R A N S T O R E M A I N 2 5 . ( N ) D O W N S P O U T S P R O P O S E D 3 - S T O R Y C O N V A L E S C E N T H O M E S C A L E : 1 : 1 0 PROPOSED SITE DEVELO P M E N T P L A N LA PALMA AVE. C - G Z O N E C-G ZONE C - G Z O N E 1 2 ' 1 2 ' 1 2 ' 1 2 ' 1 2 ' 1 2 ' LA PALMA AVE. CENTERLINE ℄ ℄ 1 7 1 2 ' X 2 0 ' L O A D I N G / U N L O A D I N G B A Y 913 M A I N E N T R A N C E M U L T I P U R P O S E H A L L L O U N G E A D M I N D I N I N G A R E A R E C E P T I O N C O R R I D O R 1 9 P A T I O E L E V . R E S T R O O M U P U P STOR. K I T C H E N S T O R A G E B U F F E T P A T I O P A T I O P A T I O P A T I O P A T I O O U T - D O O R D I N I N G S I D E W A L K A D M I N C O R R I D O R B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H EXI T E X I T E N T . E N T . S T O . S I D E W A L K C O M M O N A R E A C O M P A C T 1DCBA 2 3 5 6 7 4 0-A R E V I S I O N N O . DRAWING TITLE JOB TITLE D W G . N O . J O B N O . JOB ADDRESS DATENO.ISSUED 2 0 1 9 - 5 3 DESIGN CONCEPTS SHIV TALWAR, ARCHITECT AIA 3340 RIVERSIDE DR. # M, CHINO, CA 91710 TEL: 909-591-3939 dsignconcepts@yahoo.com THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PREFERENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK PROPOSED CONVALESCENT HOME FOR RONITA LLC 2157 W PALMA AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92801 5/24/171 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6/07/182 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A - 0 1 PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN 1 P R O P O S E D F I R S T F L O O R P L A N S C A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1.LINE OF 1ST FLOOR ABOVE2.CANTILEVER DECORATIVE METAL CANOPY OVER MAINENTRANCE3.LANDSCAPE AS PER LANDSCAPE PLAN4.CONCRETE WALKWAY5.COLUMN PLACEMENT AS PER ESD 4716.MONUMENT SIGN 1ST FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTEGENERAL NOTE:ALL UNITS ARE SINGLE BE D OCCUPANCIES. L O U N G E B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y C O R R I D O R 1 0 E L E V . B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y 2 8 B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y L O B B Y D N C O R R I D O R B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H BATH B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H BATH B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y BALCONY B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y A D M I N O F F I C E S D N L O B B Y CORRIDOR U P U P B A L C O N Y BALCONY L A U N D R Y / S T O R A G E 1DCBA 2 3 5 6 7 4 0-A R E V I S I O N N O . DRAWING TITLE JOB TITLE D W G . N O . J O B N O . JOB ADDRESS DATENO.ISSUED 2 0 1 9 - 5 3 DESIGN CONCEPTS SHIV TALWAR, ARCHITECT AIA 3340 RIVERSIDE DR. # M, CHINO, CA 91710 TEL: 909-591-3939 dsignconcepts@yahoo.com THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PREFERENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK PROPOSED CONVALESCENT HOME FOR RONITA LLC 2157 W PALMA AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92801 5/24/171 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6/07/182 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A - 0 2 PROPOSED SECOND FLOOR PLAN 1 P R O P O S E D S E C O N D F L O O R P L A N S C A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " 1. LINE OF HEIGHT LIMIT 75' RADIUS FROMPROPERTY CORNER FOR ADJACENT RESIDENTIALLOTS .2. LINE OF CANOPY BELOW 2ND FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTEGENERAL NOTE:ALL UNITS ARE SINGLE BEDOCCUPANCIES. 4 7 2 8 L O U N G E B A L C O N Y C O R R I D O R E L E V . B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y L O B B Y D N C O R R I D O R B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H BAT H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H B A T H BATH B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y BALCONY B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y A D M I N O F F I C E S D N L O B B Y CORRIDOR U P U P BALCONY L A U N D R Y / S T O R A G E B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A L C O N Y B A T H BATH 1DCBA 2 3 5 6 7 4 0-A R E V I S I O N N O . DRAWING TITLE JOB TITLE D W G . N O . J O B N O . JOB ADDRESS DATENO.ISSUED 2 0 1 9 - 5 3 DESIGN CONCEPTS SHIV TALWAR, ARCHITECT AIA 3340 RIVERSIDE DR. # M, CHINO, CA 91710 TEL: 909-591-3939 dsignconcepts@yahoo.com THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PREFERENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK PROPOSED CONVALESCENT HOME FOR RONITA LLC 2157 W PALMA AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92801 5/24/171 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6/07/182 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A - 0 3 PROPOSED THIRD FLOOR PLAN 1 P R O P O S E D T H I R D F L O O R P L A N S C A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " 2ND FLOOR PLAN KEYNOTEGENERAL NOTE:ALL UNITS ARE SINGLE BEDOCCUPANCIES.1. LINE OF HEIGHT LIMIT 75' RADIUS FROMPROPERTY CORNER FOR ADJACENT RESIDENTIALLOTS .2. LINE OF CANOPY BELOW3. LINE OF CANOPY ABOVE 1DCBA 2 3 5 6 7 4 0-A R E V I S I O N N O . DRAWING TITLE JOB TITLE D W G . N O . J O B N O . JOB ADDRESS DATENO.ISSUED 2 0 1 9 - 5 3 DESIGN CONCEPTS SHIV TALWAR, ARCHITECT AIA 3340 RIVERSIDE DR. # M, CHINO, CA 91710 TEL: 909-591-3939 dsignconcepts@yahoo.com THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PREFERENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK PROPOSED CONVALESCENT HOME FOR RONITA LLC 2157 W PALMA AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92801 5/24/171 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6/07/182 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A - 0 4 PROPOSED ROOF PLAN 1 P R O P O S E D R O O F P L A N S C A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ROOF PLAN KEYNOTEGENERAL NOTE:ALL UNITS ARE SINGLE BEDOCCUPANCIES.1. LINE OF HEIGHT LIMIT 75' RADIUS FROMPROPERTY CORNER FOR ADJACENT RESIDENTIALLOTS .2. LINE OF CANOPY BELOW3. DOWNSPOUTS P R O J E C T S I G N 1 2 3 5 67 4 2 1 7 3 B L D G . S I G N A G E D C B A R E V I S I O N N O . DRAWING TITLE JOB TITLE D W G . N O . J O B N O . JOB ADDRESS DATENO.ISSUED 2 0 1 9 - 5 3 DESIGN CONCEPTS SHIV TALWAR, ARCHITECT AIA 3340 RIVERSIDE DR. # M, CHINO, CA 91710 TEL: 909-591-3939 dsignconcepts@yahoo.com THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PREFERENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK PROPOSED CONVALESCENT HOME FOR RONITA LLC 2157 W PALMA AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92801 5/24/171 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6/07/182 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A - 2 . 0 0 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 1 E A S T E L E V A T I O N S C A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ELEVATION KEYNOTES 1. DECORATIVE ARCHITECTURE CORNICE MATCH W/BUILDING EXTERIOR. 2. EXTERIOR STUCCO ( DARK-LIGHT SHADE). 3. DECORATIVE WALL- MOUNTED FOAM MOLDING MATCH WITH BUILDING EXTERIOR FINISH. 4. 42'' HIGH DECORATIVE W.I. GUARDRAIL 5. DECORATIVE ARCHITECTURAL LIGHT FIXTURE 6. ENGINEERED TILE VENEER OVER FRAMED WALL. 7. PRE-FABRICATED WINDOW CROWN TO MATCH W/BUILDING EXTERIOR COLOR 8. DECORATIVE WINDOW SILL PROFILE PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING EXTERIOR. 9. PRE-FABRICATED WALL-MOUNTED MOLDING TO MATCH W/ BUILDING EXTERIOR FINISH.10. DECORATIVE ARCHITECTURAL METAL CANOPY PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING EXTERIOR.11. ENERGY EFFICIENT DOUBLE GLAZING TINTED WINDOW12. PROPERTY LINE13. EXTERIOR WALL LIGHT 2 S O U T H E L E V A T I O N ( L A P A L M A A V E . ) S C A L E : 3 / 1 6 " = 1 ' - 0 " C - G Z O N E LA PALMA AVE. C G Z O N E CG ZONE C G Z O N E P R O J E C T S I G N 1 2 3 5 6 7 4 D C B A R E V I S I O N N O . DRAWING TITLE JOB TITLE D W G . N O . J O B N O . JOB ADDRESS DATENO.ISSUED 2 0 1 9 - 5 3 DESIGN CONCEPTS SHIV TALWAR, ARCHITECT AIA 3340 RIVERSIDE DR. # M, CHINO, CA 91710 TEL: 909-591-3939 dsignconcepts@yahoo.com THESE DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS ARE THE PROPERTY AND COPYRIGHT OF THE ARCHITECT AND SHALL NOT BE USED ON ANY OTHER WORK EXCEPT BY AGREEMENT WITH THE ARCHITECT. WRITTEN DIMENSIONS SHALL TAKE PREFERENCE OVER SCALED DIMENSIONS AND SHALL BE VERIFIED ON THE JOB SITE. ANY DISCREPANCY SHALL BE BROUGHT TO THE NOTICE OF THE ARCHITECT PRIOR TO THE COMMENCEMENT OF ANY WORK PROPOSED CONVALESCENT HOME FOR RONITA LLC 2157 W PALMA AVE. ANAHEIM, CA 92801 5/24/171 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT 6/07/182 CUP CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT A - 2 . 0 1 PROPOSED ELEVATIONS 1 W E S T E L E V A T I O N S C A L E : 1 / 8 " = 1 ' - 0 " ELEVATION KEYNOTES 1. DECORATIVE ARCHITECTURE CORNICE MATCH W/BUILDING EXTERIOR. 2. EXTERIOR STUCCO ( DARK-LIGHT SHADE). 3. DECORATIVE WALL- MOUNTED FOAM MOLDING MATCH WITH BUILDING EXTERIOR FINISH. 4. 42'' HIGH DECORATIVE W.I. GUARDRAIL 5. DECORATIVE ARCHITECTURAL LIGHT FIXTURE 6. ENGINEERED TILE VENEER OVER FRAMED WALL. 7. PRE-FABRICATED WINDOW CROWN TO MATCH W/BUILDING EXTERIOR COLOR 8. DECORATIVE WINDOW SILL PROFILE PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING EXTERIOR. 9. PRE-FABRICATED WALL-MOUNTED MOLDING TO MATCH W/ BUILDING EXTERIOR FINISH.10. DECORATIVE ARCHITECTURAL METAL CANOPY PAINTED TO MATCH BUILDING EXTERIOR.11. ENERGY EFFICIENT DOUBLE GLAZING TINTED WINDOW12. PROPERTY LINE13. EXTERIOR WALL LIGHT 2 N O R T H E L E V A T I O N S C A L E : 3 / 1 6 " = 1 ' - 0 " C-G ZONE L A P A L M A A V E . C - G Z O N E C-G ZONE L A P A L M A A V E REVISION NO. DR A W I N G T I T L E JO B T I T L E DWG. NO. JOB NO. JO B A D D R E S S DA T E NO . IS S U E D 2019-53 DE S I G N C O N C E P T S SH I V T A L W A R , A R C H I T E C T A I A 33 4 0 R I V E R S I D E D R . # M , C H I N O , C A 9 1 7 1 0 TE L : 9 0 9 - 5 9 1 - 3 9 3 9 d s i g n c o n c e p t s @ y a h o o . c o m TH E S E D R A W I N G S A N D SP E C I F I C A T I O N S A R E T H E PR O P E R T Y A N D C O P Y R I G H T O F TH E A R C H I T E C T A N D S H A L L N O T BE U S E D O N A N Y O T H E R W O R K EX C E P T B Y A G R E E M E N T W I T H TH E A R C H I T E C T . W R I T T E N DI M E N S I O N S S H A L L T A K E PR E F E R E N C E O V E R S C A L E D DI M E N S I O N S A N D S H A L L B E VE R I F I E D O N T H E J O B S I T E . A N Y DI S C R E P A N C Y S H A L L B E BR O U G H T T O T H E N O T I C E O F T H E AR C H I T E C T P R I O R T O T H E CO M M E N C E M E N T O F A N Y W O R K PR O P O S E D C O N V A L E S C E N T H O M E F O R RO N I T A L L C 21 5 7 W P A L M A A V E . AN A H E I M , C A 9 2 8 0 1 5/ 2 4 / 1 7 1 CU P C O N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T 6/ 0 7 / 1 8 2 CU P C O N D I T I O N A L U S E P E R M I T 1 SITE SIDE WALK LA PALMA STREET VIEW SATELLITE IMAGE OF SITE ADJACENT RETAIL PARKING LOT VACANT PROJECT SITE VACANT PROJECT SITE SI T E P H O T O S AERIAL VIEW OF SITE 2ADJACENT PARKING LOT 3 6 9 4 5 87 VACANT PROJECT SITE IMG-1 SITE SITE ATTACHMENT NO. 6 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item. 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net ITEM NO. 4 PLANNING COMMISSION REPORT City of Anaheim PLANNING AND BUILDING DEPARTMENT DATE: SEPTEMBER 4, 2019 SUBJECT: ZONING CODE AMENDMENT NO. 2019-00162 LOCATION: Citywide APPLICANT: City of Anaheim REQUEST: This is a City-initiated request to amend Title 18 (Zoning) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (Code) to modify Section 18.38.125 (Emergency Shelter and Recuperative Care/Medical Respite) of Chapter 18.38 (Supplemental Use Regulations) to allow Transitional and Supportive Housing to co-locate with an Emergency Shelter, subject to the approval of a conditional use permit (CUP). BACKGROUND: In September 2017, City Council adopted Resolution No. 2018-118, declaring a public health and safety state of emergency related to the homeless, homelessness and homeless encampments. As part of its actions to address this emergency, Council amended the City’s Emergency Shelter regulations to facilitate the establishment of Emergency Shelters within Anaheim. In January 2018, Council approved a resolution embracing the “Housing First Model,” which outlines the necessary steps for people experiencing homelessness to move from Emergency Shelters to longer-term housing, including Transitional and Supportive Housing. In June 2019, Council adopted an ordinance to facilitate the conversion of existing motels and other commercial and office structures within the C-G Zone to Transitional and Supportive Housing, subject to approval of a CUP. Subsequent to the adoption of the ordinance, on August 5, 2019, Planning Commission approved a request for a CUP to allow the conversion of an existing 70- room motel (Econolodge) into a 70-unit Supportive Housing development. In addition to the above actions, staff has also been in discussion with, and recently received an application from, The Salvation Army for its “Center of Hope.” As currently proposed, this facility would include both an Emergency Shelter and Supportive Housing co-located together on the same property. The Anaheim Municipal Code does not currently allow these two uses to co-locate. In order to provide the opportunity for the Center of Hope and/or any other similar facility to be considered via a discretionary application and review process, the Planning Director gave direction to staff to prepare a draft ordinance to amend the Zoning Code to allow the co-location of these uses, subject to the approval of a CUP, in locations where the City would currently permit an Emergency Shelter. Planning staff is working on a draft ordinance in cooperation with various City departments and service providers. Staff is requesting additional time to complete its analysis and present a draft ordinance for the Planning Commission’s consideration. RECOMMENDATION: Staff recommends that Planning Commission continue the public hearing for Zoning Code Amendment No. 2019-00162 to the meeting of September 30, 2019. Prepared and submitted by, Susan Kim Principal Planner 200 S. Anaheim Blvd. Suite #162 Anaheim, CA 92805 Tel: (714) 765-5139 Fax: (714) 765-5280 www.anaheim.net City of Anaheim PLANNING DEPARTMENT There is no new correspondence regarding this item.