Loading...
Resolution-PC 2020-014RESOLUTION NO. PC2020-014 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 2019-05129 TO EXCEED THE MAXIMUM SIGN AREA FOR AN EXISTING GROCERY STORE AND MAKING CERTAIN FINDINGS IN CONNECTION THEREWITH (DEV2019-00144) (3430 WEST LINCOLN AVENUE) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition to approve Variance No. 2019-01529 to exceed the maximum sign area for a grocery store located at 3430 West Lincoln Avenue, in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California. The existing large market is located within a large commercial retail center on real property generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, Variance No. 2019-05129 shall be referred to herein collectively as the "Proposed Project"; and WHEREAS, the Property located on a 2 -acre parcel is part of an integrated 6 -acre shopping center on five separate parcels, which is located within the "C -NC" Neighborhood Center land use designation of the Anaheim General Plan. The Property is located in the "C- G" General Commercial Zone and is subject to the zoning and development standards contained in Chapter 18.08 (Commercial Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code"); and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on April 27, 2020 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against proposed Variance. No. 2019-05129 and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing with respect to the request for Variance No. 2019-05129, does find and determine the following: SECTION NO. 18.44.110.010.0102 Maximum Wall Sign Area. (193 sq. ft. permitted; 294 sq. ft. proposed) 1. Strict application of the sign standards to the Property does not result in practical difficulties, unnecessary hardships or inconsistencies with the general intent of the Zoning Code. Although the Zoning Code allows a total of up to three wall signs, the existing wall sign utilizes nearly all of the Code permitted sign area. The need to identify the basic services found within can be redesigned into one wall sign that includes all the existing and proposed sign copy. Despite the building having a large setback, vehicular traffic traveling on Lincoln Avenue has adequare visibility of the store with no obstructions. The existing non -conforming pole sign, located along Lincoln Avenue, provides further advertising opportunities to traffic traveling both directions on - 1 - PC2020-014 Lincoln Avenue. There is opportunity to redesign the sign copy on the pole sign to include the various services provided within the store; and 2. That strict application of the sign standards does not prohibit the business owner from proposing reasonable alternatives to redesign existing signs to advertise all products and services within the grocery store. Additionally, no similar wall sign variances have been granted for other retail stores within the City. WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Planning Commission does hereby deny Variance No. 2019-05129, subject to the aforementioned findings. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of April 27, 2020. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 (Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal. CHAIRPERSON, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ATTEST: SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM - 2 - PC2020-014 STATE OF CALIFORNIA) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim held on April 27, 2020, by the following vote of the members thereof. AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARMSTRONG, KEYS, MEEKS, MULLEADY, VADODARIA, WHITE NOES: COMMISSIONERS: LIEBERMAN ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 27th day of April, 2020. SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM -3 - PC2020-014 APN: 135-331-24 EXHIBIT "A" DEV NO. 2019-00144 W Q N O BUENA PARK z .o...—..—.•—. W LINCOLN AVE L ..... 0....................0.-..-..-........... W LINCOLN AVE O F0 50 100 O Source: Recorded Tract Maps and/or City GIS. Please note the accuracy is +/- two to five feet. - 4 - PC2020-014