Resolution-PC 2020-032RESOLUTION NO. PC2020-032
A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RECOMMENDING THAT THE
CITY COUNCIL APPROVE AND ADOPT AMENDMENT NO. 16 TO
THE ANAHEIM RESORT SPECIFIC PLAN NO. 92-2
(DEV2019-00148)
(1730 SOUTH CLEMENTINE STREET)
WHEREAS, on April 29, 1986, City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted Ordinance
No. 4709 to establish uniform procedures for the adoption and implementation of Specific Plans for
the coordination of future development within the City, and "Zoning and Development Standards"
when the Specific Plan includes zoning regulations and development standards to be substituted for
existing zoning under the Zoning Code, which "Zoning and Development Standards" shall be
adopted by ordinance independent of the rest of the Specific Plan; and
WHEREAS, the City Council of the City of Anaheim adopted the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan No. 92-2 ("ARSP No. 92-2" or "Anaheim Resort Specific Plan") on September 27,
1994, to provide a long range, comprehensive plan for future development of approximately 549 -
acres within The Anaheim Resort. The Specific Plan includes zoning and development standards,
design guidelines and a public facilities plan, and permits the development of hotel/motel,
convention, retail and other visitor -serving uses; and
WHEREAS, in connection with the adoption of ARSP No. 92-2, the City Council certified
Environmental Impact Report No. 313, with a Statement of Findings and a Statement of Overriding
Consideration, and adopted Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 0085; and
WHEREAS, on June 3, 1997, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5599 amending
Ordinance No. 5454 relating to ARSP No. 92-2, Amendment No. 1, which amendment revised the
legal description and boundaries of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan by reclassifying and
incorporating a 4.67 -acre parcel into the ARSP No. 92-2 Zone; and
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 2 to the ARSP No. 92-2, a request to amend the zoning and
development standards to add "Coffee House" as a conditionally permitted accessory use in
conjunction with an automobile service station, was denied by the Anaheim City Planning
Commission on October 12, 1998, and the petition was subsequently withdrawn by the applicant at
the January 26, 1999, City Council meeting; and
WHEREAS, on May 18, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5685 amending
Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Adjustment No. 1 to the ARSP No. 92-2, which adjustment amended
the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code
relating to structural setbacks and yard requirements to reflect the local street status of Convention
Way; and
WHEREAS, on July 27, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5964 amending
Ordinance Nos. 5454 relating to Amendment No. 3 to ARSP No. 92-2, which amendment revised
the legal description and boundaries of the ARSP by reclassifying and incorporating a 0.73 -acre
parcel into the ARSP No. 92-2 Zone; and
-1- PC2020-032
WHEREAS, on September 21, 1999, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5703
relating to Adjustment No. 2 to the ARSP No. 92-2, which adjustment amended the Zoning and
Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to the
minimum landscape setback requirement for properties adjacent to Manchester Avenue between
Katella Avenue and the southern boundary of the ARSP Area; and
WHEREAS, on May 1, 2001, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5769 relating to
Adjustment No. 3 to the ARSP No. 92-2, which adjustment amended the Zoning and Development
Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code relating to temporary parking
requirements; and
WHEREAS, on April 26, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5910 amending
Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Adjustment No. 4 to the ARSP No. 92-2, which adjustment amended
the Zoning and Development Standards set forth in Chapter 18.48 of the Anaheim Municipal Code
relating to office uses in a legal non -conforming building; and
WHEREAS, on June 8, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5920, amending
Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code in its entirety. Said amendment included Amendment No.
4 to the ARSP No. 92-2, which renumbered the codification of the Zoning Development Standards
set forth in Chapter 18.48 to Chapter 18.116 and made modifications to said chapter intended to
streamline the project review process; and
WHEREAS, on June 8, 2004, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5922 amending
Ordinance No. 5454 relating to Amendment No. 5 to the ARSP No. 92-2, which amendment revised
the legal description and boundaries of the ARSP by reclassifying and incorporating 27 acres into
the ARSP No. 92-2 Zone; and
WHEREAS, on February 8, 2005, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 5954
amending Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Amendment No. 6 to the ARSP No. 92-2, which
amendment modified the Zoning and Development Standards pertaining to the establishment of
mini-market/convenience markets as accessory uses in conjunction with a relocated service station
and prohibition of tow truck operations in conjunction with service station facilities; and
WHEREAS, on August 22, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6031,
amending Ordinance No. 5453, relating to Adjustment No. 5 to the ARSP No. 92-2, which amended
the Zoning Development Standards in its entirety to provide consistent formatting with Title 18 of
the Anaheim Municipal Code along with minor modifications and clarifications; and
WHEREAS, on September 12, 2006, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6036
amending Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Amendment No. 7 to the ARSP No. 92-2, which
amendment modified the Zoning and Development Standards pertaining to the establishment of an
ARR (Anaheim Resort Residential) Overlay to provide the opportunity to develop residential units
in conjunction with high-quality, luxury hotels within targeted areas; and
WHEREAS, on May 8, 2007, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6058 amending
Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Amendment No. 8 to the ARSP No. 92-2, which amendment relates
to modifications to the Zoning and Development Standards pertaining to development criteria for
wholly -residential development within the ARR Overlay on a designated 26.7 acre site within the
ARSP Area; and
-2- PC2020-032
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2008, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6099 amending
Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Amendment No. 9 to the ARSP No. 92-2, to repeal modifications to
the Zoning and Development Standards, previously approved by Amendment No. 8 to the ARSP
No. 92-2; and
WHEREAS, on February 20, 2008, Anaheim City Planning Commission approved
Specific Plan Amendment No. 10 to the ARSP No. 92-2 to construct a mixed use project consisting
of a 105 -room hotel on the western 1.5 -acre portion of the project site adjacent to Harbor Boulevard,
and a 191 -unit, condominium complex, including nine live/work units, on the eastern 3.3 -acre
portion of the project site and the petition was subsequently withdrawn by the applicant; and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2008, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6098 amending
Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Amendment No. 11 to the ARSP No. 92-2 and to amend the General
Plan to generally prohibit residential development within The Anaheim Resort unless such a project
included environmental and economic analysis, city council approval and voter approval at a city
election; and
WHEREAS, on October 14, 2008, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6117 amending
Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Amendment No. 12 to the ARSP No. 92-2 to redesignate a 5.9 acre,
"L" -shaped property at Ball Road and Walnut Street from Low -Density to Medium Density to
develop a 120 -room hotel; and
WHEREAS, on April 14, 2009, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6141 amending
Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Amendment No. 13 to the ARSP No. 92-2 to create a new density
category for the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District, called "Low Medium Density (Modified),
modified Central Core and Special Intersection Landscape Treatment to allow special landscape and
hardscape treatments at the corner of Harbor Boulevard and Katella Avenue; modified the sign code
to allow a greater number and larger signs than currently permitted for hotels and accessory retail;
allowed changeable copy signs for hotels when not visible from any public right-of-way, murals,
and building integrated multi -tenant signs subject to approval of a conditional use permit; and
WHEREAS, on June 5, 2012, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6245 amending
Ordinance No. 5453 relating to Adjustment No. 6 to the ARSP No. 92-2 to modify Code references
and terminology for Restaurants with Outdoor Dining, Restaurants with Accessory Entertainment,
Dance Venues, Massage Establishments, Amusement Devices, Amusement Arcades and Health
Clubs to be consistent with Chapters 18.16 (Regulatory Permits) and 18.92 (Definitions) of Title 18
(Zoning Code); and,
WHEREAS, on January 15, 2013, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6265 approving
Amendment No. 14 to the ARSP, amending portions of Chapter 18.116 of Title 18 of the Anaheim
Municipal Code, in order to permit the maximum buildout of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan area
by up to 406,359 square feet of convention center space, 180,000 square feet of commercial
development, 900 hotel rooms, and 40,000 square feet of hotel meeting/ballroom space. Prior to
approving Amendment No. 14, the City Council, by Resolution No. 2012-158, on December 18,
2012, certified Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Report No. 2008-00340 ("FSEIR No.
340"), adopting Findings and a Statement of Overriding Considerations, adopting Mitigation
Monitoring Program 85C, and a Water Supply Assessment to serve as the required environmental
documentation for this request; and
-3- PC2020-032
WHEREAS, on March 3, 2015, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6317, approving
Adjustment No. 7 to the ARSP to amend Chapter 18.116, Table 116-C (Primary Uses and Structures:
C-R District (Development Area 1) of Section 18.116.070 (Uses — Commercial Recreation (C-R)
District (Development Area 1)) to prohibit "Computer Internet and Amusement Facilities," in
conjunction with a City-wide prohibition; and.
WHEREAS, on October 18, 2016, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6382,
approving Adjustment No. 8 to the ARSP to amend Chapter 18.116.030 (Definitions) to include a
definition for "Concierge Lounge," Table 116-C (Primary Uses and Structures: C-R District
(Development Area 1), Table 116-D (Accessory Uses and Structures Integrated With a Permitted
Primary Use: C-R District (Development Area 1)) and Table 116-E (Accessory Uses Incidental to
and Integrated Within a Hotel or Motel Including Suite -Type Hotels, and Otherwise Limited Herein:
C-R District (Development Area 1)) of Section 18.116.070 (Uses — Commercial Recreation (C-R)
District (Development Area 1)) of Chapter 18.116 (Anaheim Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 (SP 92-
2) Zoning and Development Standards) of Title 18 (Zoning) to include (1) "Concierge Lounges" as
a permitted accessory use; (2) "Alcoholic Beverage Manufacturing" as a permitted and conditionally
permitted use subject to the requirements of Section 18.38.025; and (3) "Transitional and Supportive
Housing" as a prohibited use in conjunction with a City-wide Zoning Code Update; and
WHEREAS, on April 10, 2018, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6432, approving
Adjustment No. 9 to the ARSP to amend Table 116-D (Accessory Uses and Structures Integrated
with a Permitted Primary Use: C-R District (Development Area 1)) to permit Valet Parking as an
accessory use, subject to approval of a minor conditional use permit; and
WHEREAS, on August 14, 2018, City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6443 relating to
Amendment No. 15 to the ARSP No. 92-2 to create a new density category for the Commercial
Recreation (C-R) District, called "Medium Density (Modified)"; and
WHEREAS, on December 3, 2019, the City Council adopted Ordinance No. 6473,
approving Adjustment No. 10 to the ARSP to assign review authority of Final Site Plans in the
Anaheim Resort Specific Plan to the Planning Director; to allow Day Care Centers as a primary use,
subject to approval of a Conditional Use Permit; and consolidate Boat & RV Sales with Automotive
— Vehicle Sales, Lease, and Rentals; and
WHEREAS, the Proposed Project identified as Amendment No. 16 to the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan, would create a new density category for the Commercial Recreation (C-R) District,
called "Medium Density (Modified A)" to redesignate certain real property situated in The Anaheim
Resort area of the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California as more particularly
described in Exhibit "A" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference from the Medium
Density to Medium Density (Modified A); and
WHEREAS, Exhibits "B," "C" and "D" attached hereto and incorporated by this reference
depict the proposes Medium Density (Modified A) designation on the certain real property and the
text of the ARSP proposed for amendment; and
WHEREAS, the proposed Amendment No. 16 to the ARSP No. 92-2 would amend the
specific plan document in its entirety, said proposed document is on file with the City of Anaheim
Planning Department and incorporated by this reference; and
4- PC2020-032
WHEREAS, Amendment No. 16 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (Specific Plan
Amendment No. 92-2Y) is proposed in conjunction with General Plan Amendment No. 2019-00529;
Minor Conditional Use Permit No. 2019-06041, Variance No. 2020-05132, Final Site Plan No. 2019-
00001, and Administrative Adjustment No. 2019-00437 to construct a 125 -room, with 870 square
feet of accessory commercial space; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as
"CEQA"), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental
Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations;
herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, the
City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the
Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA,
the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual to evaluate the physical
environmental impacts of the Proposed Project; and
WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation
Monitoring Plan has been prepared for the Proposed Project and includes mitigation measures that
are specific to the Proposed Project (herein referred to as "MMP No. 372"). A complete copy of
MMP No. 372 is on file and can be viewed in the Planning Services Division of the City; and
WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency in
California as a result of the threat of COVID-19. On March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued
Executive Order N-29-20 (superseding the Brown Act -related provisions of Executive Order N-25-
20 issued on March 12, 2020), which allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings via
teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically
to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body; and
WHEREAS, pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 the Planning Commission did hold a
teleconferencing public hearing in the City of Anaheim on August 17, 2020, at 5:00 p.m., notice of
said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions
of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to consider the Mitigated Negative Declaration and to hear and
consider evidence for and against the Proposed Project and related actions, and to investigate and
make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, by the adoption of a resolution concurrently with, but prior in time to, the
adoption of this Resolution and pursuant to the provisions of CEQA, the State CEQA Guidelines,
and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual, this Planning Commission found and determined
and recommended that the City Council also find and determine that the Proposed Project will have
a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the conditions of
approval and the mitigation measures attached to that concurrent Resolution and contained in MMP
No. 372 and that the City Council approve and adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration and MMP
No. 372; and
-5- PC2020-032
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation
and study made by itself, and after due consideration of, and based upon, all evidence and reports
offered at said hearing, does hereby find:
1. The property proposed for the specific plan amendment and redesignation of the
property to the Medium Density (Modified A) density category has unique site characteristics and
surroundings as it is located in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, an area of the City that is
designated for tourist and visitor -serving uses. The proposed amendment would not change the
boundaries of the existing Anaheim Resort Specific Plan. The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan is one
of three specific plans that implement the General Plan's Commercial -Recreation land use
designation. The proposed amendment will not make any changes to the development standards
that implement this designation.
2. The proposed amendment is consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan,
subject to, and depending upon the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2019-00529, now
pending, to redesignate the property located 1730 South Clementine Street to the "Medium Density
(Modified A) density category. The specific plan amendment is also consistent with the purposes,
standards and land use guidelines of the General Plan, as amended, in that the subject properties
located in the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan are designated by the General Plan for Commercial
Recreation land uses and the proposed project is for hotel development.
3. The proposed amendment would increase the development intensity permitted for the
property for hotel use and allow continued development in accordance with the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan. The proposed amendment maintains the balance of land uses within the City by
encouraging tourist and entertainment related industries in an area of the City specifically designated
for this type of development.
4. The proposed amendment contributes to a balance of land uses throughout the City by
increasing the development opportunity of a property designated for tourist -oriented uses within The
Anaheim Resort, thereby encouraging commercial land uses at a location identified as such by the
General Plan.
5. The proposed amendment respects environmental and aesthetic, and historic resources
consistent with economic realities since all potential environmental impacts associated with the
proposed project and the increase in density were analyzed, the proposed hotel would be an
improvement upon the vacant industrial building currently located on the site, and the existing
building is not identified as a historic resource; and
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes
substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the
facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including
testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in
the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the
findings made in this Resolution. The Planning Commission expressly declares that it considered
all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented
to it.
-6- PC2020-032
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that, based upon the aforesaid findings and
determinations, the Planning Commission does hereby recommend that the City Council of the City
of Anaheim approve Amendment No. 16 to the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan as described above
and contained in the attached Exhibits "13,""C" and "D."
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that approval of Amendment No. 16 to the Anaheim Resort
Specific Plan is subject to the approval of General Plan Amendment No. 2019-00529.
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
August 17, 2020. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60
(Procedures) of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replaced
by a City Council Resolution in the event of an appeal.
- wto'.,
OF I OF 1
ATTEST:
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Secretary of the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Planning
Commission of the City of Anaheim held on August 17, 2020, by the following vote of the members
thereof
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARMSTRONG, KEYS, LIEBERMAN, MEEKS,
MULLEADY, VADODARIA
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: WHITE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this 176' day of August, 2020.
SECRETARY, PLANNING COMMISSION
OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
-7- PC2020-032
EXHIBIT "A"
I Exhibit 3.3-2 Commercial Recreation (C-R) District Development Density Plan I
1
V-1 V. -T
Commercial Recreation (C-R) District Development Density Plan
-8- PC2020-032
Low Density: Up to 50 Hotel Rooms/Gross Acre
or 75 rooms per parcel, whichever is greater
Designated for Future Extension In
Low -Medium Density: Up to 75 Hotel Rooms/
General Plan Circulation Element
Gross Acre or 75 rooms per parcel, whichever is greater
1 Anaheim City Boundary
Low -Medium Density (Modified): Up to 252 Hotel
• •
.... The Anaheim Resort- BoundaryMedium
Rooms with 75,593 square feet of accessory uses.
Density: Up to 100 Hotel Rooms/Gross Acre
or 75 rooms per parcel, whichever is greater
m With trip generation characteristics
mitigated to the equivalent
Medium Densityto 345 Hotel Rooms
(Modified):
)� U p
of 100 rooms per gross acre.
Medium Density (Modified d): Up to 127 Hotel Rooms
Convention Center Medium: Up to
125 Hotel Rooms/Gross Acre or 75
rooms per parcel, whichever is greater**
-8- PC2020-032
EXHIBIT "B"
NOTE: New words are shown in bold underline.
3.3.2 Commercial Recreation (C-R) District Development Density
The ARSP establishes five density designations in the C-R District (Development Area 1) that will
help assure that development of the area will be compatible with proposed infrastructure and with
the goal to protect surrounding residential uses. These density designations are based upon
hotel/motel development and allow up to 20% of each hotel/motel project gross square footage,
excluding parking facilities, to be developed with integrated (i.e., included within the main
hotel/motel complex) accessory uses. These accessory uses will reduce the otherwise maximum
permitted hotel/motel density at the rate of one hotel/motel room per six hundred (600) gross
square feet of accessory use. For properties proposed to be developed with permitted and
conditionally permitted uses other than hotels/motels with accessory uses, the traffic generation
characteristics of said uses shall not exceed those associated with the other -wise permitted
hotel/motel (including accessory uses) density as determined by the Planning Director or
designee prior to Final Site Plan review and approval.
The five density categories established by the plan are:
• Low Density (up to 50 hotel rooms/acre)
• Low- Medium Density (up to 75 hotel rooms/acre)
• Low -Medium Density (Modified) (up to 252 rooms and 75,593 square feet of accessory uses)
• Medium Density (up to 100 hotel rooms/acre)
• Medium Density (Modified) (up to 345 rooms)
• Medium Density (Modified A) (up to 127 rooms)
• Convention Center Medium Density (up to 125 hotel rooms/acre provided the trip generation
characteristics are equivalent to 100 hotel rooms/acre)
Exhibit 3.3-2, the C-R District Development Density Plan, identifies the location of each density
designation within the C-R District.
The areas with the Low Density designation are generally located where planned future
infrastructure improvements will not support more intense development, or which are located
further from the area's attractions. Areas with the Low -Medium and Medium Density designations
are located where planned future infrastructure will be sufficient to accommodate these more
intense levels of development, and which are located closer to the main attractions of The
Anaheim Resort. Areas immediately adjacent to the Anaheim Convention Center have the
Convention Center Medium designation in recognition that guests at these hotels typically do not
have automobiles and, therefore, place fewer demands on area streets, one of the most important
infrastructure factors that tend to limit development density. In addition, the Low Medium
(Modified) density designation allows 252 hotel rooms and 75,593 square feet of commercial
uses, which is equivalent to 378 hotel rooms, at the southeast corner of Katella Avenue and
Harbor Boulevard; and the Medium Density (Modified) density designation allows up to 345
rooms or its equivalent on South Manchester Avenue; and the Medium Density (Modified A)
density designation allows up to 127 rooms or its equivalent on South Clementine Street
-9- PC2020-032
EXHIBIT "C"
Existing Exhibit 3.3-2
Exhibit 3..3-2 Cofnrnercial Recreation (C-R) District Developrrrerrt Density Plan
i.�.."a"
Fm
.-1
Commercial Recreation (C-R) District Development Density Plan
Designated for future Extension in
General Plan Circulation Element
Anaheim City Boundary
�...+ The Anaheim Resat'" Boundary
"Wirth trip generation characteristic;
m Ligated to the equivalent
of 100 rooms per grm acre.
Low Density: Up to SO Hotel Roorns/Gross Aare
_.._ or 75 rooms per parcel, whichever is greeter
T7 Low -Medium Density: Up to 75 Hotel Rooms/
r Gross Acre or 7S roans per parcel, whichever is greater
Low -Medium Density (Modified): Up to 352 Hotel
Roans with 75,543 square feet of accessory uses.
® Medium Density: Up to loo Hotel RoomgGrass Aare
or 75 roans per parcel, whichever is greater
- Medium Density (Modified): Up to 345 Hotel Rains
Conve>U m Center Medium: Up to
12S Hotel Roans/Gross Acre or 7S
MOMS per parcel, whichever is greater"
-10- PC2020-032
Proposed Exhibit 3.3-2
-11- PC2020-032
EXHIBIT "D"
NOTE: New words are shown in bold underline.
TABLE 116-B
HOTEL/MOTEL ROOM DENSITY
Density Category
Maximum Density
Up to 50 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel existing on the date of
Low Density
adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan (or for amended areas, the date of the
adoption of the specific plan amendment), whichever is greater.
Up to 75 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel existing on the date of
Low -Medium
adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, whichever is greater, except that for
Density
that area identified in Ordinance No. 5694 as Area 8, the maximum density shall be
75 rooms per gross acre.
Low -Medium
Density (Modified)
Up to 252 rooms and 75,593 square feet of accessory uses.
Medium Density
Up to 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel existing on the date of
adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, whichever is greater.
Medium Density
(Modified)
Up to 345 rooms
Medium Density
(Modified A)
Up to 127 rooms
Convention Center
Up to 125 rooms per gross acre (with trip generation characteristics mitigated to the
(CC) Medium
equivalent of 100 rooms per gross) or 75 rooms per lot or parcel existing on the date
Density
of adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan, whichever is greater.
-12- PC2020-032