Loading...
1979/06/1979-696 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1979~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour COUNCIL MEMBERS: Overholt CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts PLANNING DIRECTOR: Ronald L. Thompson EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, REDEVELOPMENT: Norman J. Priest PUBLIC WORKS EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR: Thornton E. Piersall RISK MANAGER: Jack Love CETA SERVICES MANAGER: Bill R. Hepburn ASSISTANT DIRECTOR FOR ZONING: Annika Santalahti ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER OF PUBLIC UTILITIES: Edward G. Alario ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Jay Tashiro PLANNING AIDE: Pam Lucado Mayor Seymour called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance to the Council meeting. INVOCATION: A moment of silence was observed in lieu of an Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Ben Bay led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. 119: RESOLUTION OF COMMENDATION: A resolution of commendation was adopted by the City Council to be presented to Mr. Allan Hughes, outgoing 1978-79 Chamber of Commerce President, on a most productive presidency with the Chamber. MINUTES: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to approve the minutes of the regular meeting held March 6, 1979 with typographical corrections as noted. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. Councilman Bay asbtained. Councilman Overholt was absent. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to waive the reading, in full, of all ordinances and resolutions and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the read- ing of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. Council- man Overholt was absent. MOTION CARRIED. FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $1,637,354.15, in accordance with the 1978-79 Budget, were approved. CITY MANAGER/DEPARTMENTAL CONSENT CALENDAR: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Roth, the following actions were authorized as recommended by the Purchasing Agent and the Public Works Executive Director: a. 160: Bid No. 3520 - Loader/Backhoe with trailer, award to The Tool Crib, Inc., $26,812.70. 79-697 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1979, 1:30 P.M. b. 175: Award of installation of Telephone System for the City of Anaheim (Account No. 48-984-6325-7115) was continued to July 10, 1979. MOTION CARRIED. CITY MANAGER RESOLUTION CONSENT CALENDAR: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 79R-350 through 79R-352, both inclusive, for adoption as recommneded. Refer to Resolution Book. 164: RESOLUTION NO. 79R-350: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST ?gESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORMING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT: TIMKEN ROAD SEWER IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 11-790-6325-0120. (Peter C. David Company, $19,376) 174: RESOLUTION NO. 79R-351: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT OF FUNDS UNDER THE LIBRARY SERVICES AND CONSTRUC- TION ACT FOR THE PURPOSE OF A LIBRARY OUTREACH PROGRAM. ($46,000) 140: RESOLUTION NO. 79R-352: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY ~nT~ .... . OV .... ]~ ~' ~¥ ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH SOUTH- ERN PACIFIC TRANSPORTATION COMPANY. (Lewis-Dowling Line, Mile Post 512.75C at Cerritos Avenue) (allow installation of a 69 KV circuit and authorize fee there- for) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None Overholt The Mayor declared Resolution No. 79R-350 through 79R-352, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. 174: FEE REIMBURSEMENT, SITE PREPARATION ASSISTANCE AND DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM FOR NEW RESIDENTIAL PROPERTY: To be funded with Community Development Block Grant (CDBG) funds for the purpose of encouraging the development of affordable rental housing and directing staff to proceed with necessary steps to implement such a program, was submitted. Councilman Roth pointed out that the subject was another alternative to rent control and the press should note that the City was doing something about the situation. Mayor Seymour stated he was hopeful that the proposal outlined in joint memorandum dated June 12, 1979 from the Community Development Department and Planning Depart- ment would come to early fulfillment. It was a great effort in devising a positive program, thereby increasing their supply of housing. 79-698 C_ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1979~ 1:30 P.M. Councilwoman Kaywood questioned the last paragraph of the memorandum relative to a bonus of higher density to builders. She wanted to know if that would be in perpetuity relative to low and moderate income housing. Planning Director Ronald Thompson stated that regarding the proposed bonus, it would be on the individual merit of a project and considered on the vacancy factor. It could also be tied in with covenants and conditions, and the Council could act when the vacancy factor dropped. Mayor Seymour stated in the event the vacancy was 5% or less, it would apply; if 5% or above, then the units would seek their own market. Executive Director of Community Development, Norm Priest stated another possi- bility would be dependent upon the amount of assistance negotiated. He wanted to see it apply for the longest time possible. On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Bay, a fee reimbursement and site preparation assistance was approved in concept, to be funded with CDBG funds for the purpose of encouraging the development of affordable rental housing and directing staff to proceed with necessary steps to implement such a program as recommended in memorandum dated June 12 1979 Councilman Overholt w~s a~sent. MOTION CARRIED. ' ' 123: TRANSFER OF COPYRIGHT AGREEMENT - AUTOMATIC TELEPHONE ANSWERING SYS'I'hlM: Approving a transfer of Copyright Agreement with Technical Publishing Company, for the right to use information presented by Mr. Ed Dumon, Utilities Operations Manager, in his presentation of March 16, 1979 to the American Public Power Association. ' Mayor Seymour first reported, as evidenced by a couple of hotline calls, some customers were not pleased with the present system of handling complaints regarding problems, such as low voltage which had recently occurred because of the hot weather. At that time, residents had a need to talk to a human being and not a recording. He was hopeful that they devise a way to set certain stand- ards for call backs, with calls being returned in a certain amount of time. City Manager William Talley agreed and asked the Assistant General Manager of Public Utilities, Ed Alario, if there were any standards at present and if they screened the validity of the call. Mr. Alario answered "yes", but in the case of a major heat wave, until all items were recorded, it could be a period of one to two hours before they would get any information on their data sheet which was then given to one of the dispatchers for review. Prior to the installation of the system, a customer would only get a busy signal. Although they realized the system was not the ultimate, it solved many other problems previously experienced. They also made every effort to return all calls within a two-hour period, but in a crisis situation, it could be longer; Mayor Seymour stated if a call was returned within two hours, that was satisfactory. 79-699 City, H~ll~, An,aheim~ C,alifornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1979~ 1:30 P.M. After a brief discussion relative to call back time, the Mayor requested that a report be submitted to the Council when power outages from a low voltage situation, etc. occurred, giving call back response time, i.e., when the customer would hear from a human being, rather than a recording. 123: SECURITY PATROL SERVICES FOR THE UTILITIES SERVICE CENTER: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 79R-353 for adoption as recommended in memorandum dated June 8, 1979 from the General Manager of Public Utilities, Gordon Hoyt, approving the Third Amendment to the agreement with Bonafide Security Services, for security patrol service at the Utilities Service Center, 901 East Vermont Street. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 79R-353: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A THIRD AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH BONA- FIDE SECURITY SERVICE BY INCREASING MONTHLY PAYMENT AND EXTENDING THE TERM THERE- OF AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID THIRD AMENDMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None Overholt The Mayor declared Resolution No. 79R-353 duly passed and adopted. 174: SAFER OFF-SYSTEM (SOS) ROADS PROGRAM: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 79R-354 for adoption as recommended in memorandum dated June 13, 1979 from the City Engineer. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 79R-354: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM SUPPORTING THE SAFER OFF-SYSTEM ROADS PROGRAM AND REQUESTING CONGRESS TO APPRO- PRIATE THE REMAINING FUNDS AUTHORIZED FOR THE 1978 FISCAL YEAR AND APPROPRIATE THE FULL AUTHORIZATION FOR THE 1979 FISCAL YEAR. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None Overholt The Mayor declared Resolution No. 79R-354 duly passed and adopted. 123: TEXACO-ANAHEIM HILLS - NOHL RANCH ROAD STREET IMPROVEMENT: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 79R-355 for adoption, as recommended in memorandum dated June 11, 1979 from the City Engineer approving an agreement with Texaco- Anaheim Hills for reimbursement of roadway improvement costs along Nohl Ranch Road between Villa Real and Royal Oak Road. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 79R-355: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPRPVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH TEXACO-ANAHEIM HILLS, INC., AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. 79-700 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1979~ 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None Overholt The Mayor declared Resolution No. 79R-355 duly passed and adopted. 174: SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 79R-356 through 79R-358, both inclusive, for adoption as recamended in memorandum dated June 13, 1979 from the Human Resources Director Garry McRae, approving a grant agreement with the Orange County Manpower Commission in the amount of $340,650 for the 1979 Anaheim Summer Youth Program: a subgrant agreement with the Orange County Neighborhood Youth Corps, in the amount of $364,847 to provide training and work for a minimum of 300 Anaheim youths; a subgrant agreement with North Orange County Regional Occupational Program, in the amount of $13,270 to provide Labor Market Orientation and Career Edu- cation for all participants in the 1979 Anaheim Surmner Youth Program. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 79R-356: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND TW~ O~GE C~T~M~f M~~ ~WER COMMISSION RELATING TO MANPOWER PROGRAMS AND AUTHORIZII~= l~ GIkY MANAGER TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT AND MODIFICATIONS THERETO ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. RESOLUTION NO. 79R-357: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE ORANGE COUNTY NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH CORPS, INC., RELATING TO A SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM. RESOLUTION NO. 79R-358: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEE~ THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE NORTH ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL OCCUPATIONAL PROGRAM RELATING TO A LABOR MARKET ORIENTATION AND CAREER EDUCATION COMPONENT FOR THE SUMMER YOUTH EMPLOYMENT PROGRAM. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None Overholt The Mayor declared Resolution No. 79R-356 through 79R-355, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. 123: LEASE AGREEMENT, CANAL-RANDOLPH ANAHEIM, INC.: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 79R-359 for adoption as recommended in memorandum dated June 7, 1979 from Police Chief George Tielsch, extending the term of the lease agreement with Canal-Randolph Anaheim, Inc. to June 30, 1980, for office space in Bank of America building, 300 South Harbor Boulevard, for Police Department use. Refer to Resolution Book. 79-701 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1979~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 79R-359: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A SECOND AMENDMENT TO LEASE BY AND BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND CANAL-RANDOLPH ANAHEIM, INC., AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AMENDMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None Overholt The Mayor declared Resolution No. 79R-359 duly passed and adopted. 123: MARSH AND McLENNAN, INCORPORATED AGREEMENT: A proposed agreement with Marsh and McLennan, Incorporated, to act as the City's exclusive insurance broker for a period of two years, commencing June 16, 1979, was submitted. Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 79R-360 for adoption as recommended in memorandum dated June 11, 1979 from Risk Manager Jack Love. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 79R-360: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIl, OF THE CItY OF Ar t~ITM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH MARSH & MC LENNAN, INCOR- PORATED, AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. Before a vote was taken, Mayor Seymour asked if the fees, as outlined in the agreement, of $30,000 for the first year and $25,000 for the second year, would be the total sum received by Marsh & McLennan. Mr. Jack Love, Risk Manager, stated that was correct with the exception of two other items with renewal dates prior to June 16, 1979, and a 5% commission would be received on those. He clarified for the Mayor that if any additional fees were involved, they would be brought before the Council for approval. Councilwoman Kaywood asked if in the first year where Alexander & Alexander was also going to bid, if theirs was lower, would the subject contract then be null and void. Mr. Love answered "yes", but it would be up to the Council to make that deter- mination. Later in the meeting, Mr. Love explained that there was a policy issued to Con- vention Center tenants, about which he was informed last September or October, was paid by the Convention Center administrator on behalf of the tenants. In turn, the tenants who wished to have the insurance through that policy were charged through that premium. He signed that out to Marsh & McLennan for re- newal about a month ago, and it was not his intent to bring that before the Council for consideration. A commission was going to be collected on that policy as well. The agreement with Marsh & McLennan called for all marketing of all policies on the City's insurance register. The premium on that policy was approximately $22,000 to $26,000, and he expected the commission to be approximately 5% to 7% of that amount. 79-702 City Hall,..Anaheim,.. California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1979, 1:30 P.M. A vote was then taken on the foregoing Resolution. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None Overholt The Mayor declared Resolution No. 79R-360 duly passed and adopted. 173: REPORT--ORANGE COUNTY TRANSIT DISTRICT (OCTD) COMMUNITY SERVICES MODI- FICATION: A report dated June 13, 1979 from the Planning Department relating to OCTD Community Service modifications (Dial-a-Ride Program), was submitted. Mr. Ron Thompson, Planning Director, stated the Mr. Hill Hornung, Staff Director of Development Services of the OCTD had been invited to the meeting to answer any inquiries the Council might have with respect to OCTD Community Service modi- fications. Councilwoman Kaywood expressed her concern over the fact that Dial-a-Ride (DAR) service was being dropped while having only been instituted in October of 1978. It was mixed mode system and there was confusion as to how it worked, and the residents were just beginning to understand the process anC the time frames involved. They were now enjoying the service, having become familiarized with it. With the modifications, Dial-a-Ride would only be available in the canyon area where ridership was 40 persons per day, whereas in west and central Anaheim there were approximately 450 persons a day utilizing the service. She wanted to know what OCTD had in mind for the west and central sectors of the City and the reason for phasing the service out of Anaheim first. Mr. Hill Hornung explained that the recommendation adopted by the OCTD Board was to proceed with a DAR service for senior citizens only in west and central Anaheim, beginning in September 1979. There were several factors why the service was being phased out in Anaheim, the key factor being the poor performance of the Anaheim system in terms of ridership. Anaheim was the first city where OCTD attempted mixed mode operations, and their conclusion was tbat it was not successful. Three alternatives were offered to the Board: (1) convert to either full or partial DAR in the three cities where they had Easy-Rider service-- Buena Park, Westminster and west and central Anaheim; (2) phase in implemen- tation of countywide DAR; (3) elimination of DAR entirely. The Board opted for the second alternative. Councilwoman Kaywood then broached the difficulty in stipulating the age of 65 since the Anaheim senior citizens group membership was open from the age of 50. Also, if seniors 65 years of age wished to have a companion accompany them, that person would be prevented from doing so if they did not qualify because of age. Mr. Hornung stated their recommendation was forthcoming on that matter to the Board. The precedent they had now with Dial-a-Lift was to allow two able bodied companions to accompany the handicapped passenger, which was perhaps a good precedent for DAR service. 79-703 City Ha, ll~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1979~ 1:30 P.M. Further discussion and questioning followed between Councilwoman Kaywood and Mr. Hornung relative to other aspects of OCTD's modifications and the sub- sequent ramifications, at the conclusion of which Councilwoman Kaywood asked if any thought was given to the political ramifications. Specifically, how elected officials were going to explain to their constituents that they could use Dial-a-Ride in the Canyon, but not in the rest of the City. Mr. Hornung stated that situation existed now at least partially and it was a problem for them as well as the City. However, the District was faced with a difficult choice and the alternative they chose seemed to be the best one; Councilwoman Kaywood expressed her concern that, in her opinion, the decision made by OCTD was not a good one for Anaheim. Mr. Hornung then answered addi- tional questions posed by Councilwoman Kaywood relating to the new system to be imposed. Mayor Seymour questioned Mr. Hornung relative to ridership on DAR in Anaheim last year and projections as to what annual ridership would have been in the coming year to offset the $1,627,600 cost of City-wide DAR outlined on page 2 of the staff report. Pam Lucado, Assistant Planner, instead answered that the ridership was projected to be 6.9 passengers per vehicle service hours. The actual reported was 2.v passengers per vehicle service hours which calculated to ~ ~ce ~.. ~f ~'2~6 per passenger vs the average cost of $4.71 per passenger. Mayor Seymour noted then that the decision was whether to continue at $12.46 per passenger or drop to $4.71 per passenger. Mr. Hornung stated the economics of the decision were not based on service in Anaheim or any specific community. They took the first option emcompassing the existing Easy-Rider services, converted that to full DAR and determined the cost. That led them to a cost per passenger of approximately $5.15. Anaheim would raise that figure and the other systems would lower it. With Alternative 2, that would drop to $4.62 and the third option, $10.40. The $12.46 figure was the system average for Easy-Rider service in Anaheim, not the fixed route system. Ms. Lucado stated that $4.71 was the average cost per passenger for the District to provide monthly services and the average cost for the system in Anaheim was prorated at $12.46 per passenger. Councilwoman Kaywood reiterated her concern that the mixed mode system had only been implemented for a short period of time and was confusing to begin with. She had some figures which she obtained from a meeting she attended the previous week and Robin Young, member of the Orange County Transportation Commission, stated, "It was now costing $4.1 million to serve 40%. You are talking about cutting a half million off. $3.6 million will then serve 8% which takes the average trip from $2.42 to $29.10 per patron." Councilwoman Kaywood continued that it would also displace 605,000 riders. Those 16 to 64 years of age were a much larger percentage than those 65 and older. She questioned what the 16 year olds were going to do. Public transportation for this group was an alternati to congestion and improved air quality by eliminating the necessity for an auto- mobile. 79-704 City Ha~l~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1979, 1:30 P.M. Mayor Seymour pointed out that they could utilize the fixed route system existing throughout the City. Councilwoman Kaywood was advocating a $12.46 cost per passenger on DAR even though a fixed route bus system was available. Councilman Bay then asked Mr. Hornung if he had any figures per rider on the fixed route so that he could compare that against the $12.46 per passenger for DAR. Mr. Hornung stated the approximate cost per passenger on local fixed route buses was approximately $1.30 per passenger. Councilman Bay then stated it appeared that they were cutting the cost from $1,627,600 down to $497,000 which was a $1.1 million cost in a specific type of service and they intended to continue expanding a fixed route at $1.30 per passenger; Mr. Hornung stated that was correct. Mayor Seymour stated that was a wise decision. He was certain they were all sensitive to the fact that DAR was an excellent service, but he was concerned over the cost figures of $1.30 per passenger on the fixed route as compared to $12.46 for DAR and that it would be totally irresponsible to make another decision. Councilman Roth stated he wanted to be sure an effort was being made to reroute or extend existing surface transportation to pick up the slack when DAR was curtailed. Mr. Hornung stated that the District did have a modest expansion program to improve local service. Councilman Roth also suggested, pinpointing the ridership on DAR, placing that on a grid and rerouting or extending fixed route system to accommodate those people. A further brief discussion then followed between Councilman Roth and Mr. Hornung wherein he (Hornung) explained that their rationale for recommending certain areas for retention of DAR was three-fold: (1) density, (2) topography and, (3) passenger displacement. MOTION: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Bay, report dated June 13, 1979 from the Planning Department relating to OCTD Community Service Modifications, Dial-a-Ride Program, was received and filed. MOTION CARRIED. 174: JAIL VIDEO-MONITORING SYSTEM: City Manager William Talley briefed the Council on memorandum dated June 11, 1979 from the Chief of Police recommending that the City Manager be authorized to submit a proposal to the Orange County Criminal Justice Council for the funding of a jail monitoring system in the amount of $11,400, also outlining the justification for such a system. The installation of the system was estimated to cost approximately $22,500, with the Grant share being $11,400. If the Grant was approved, Council would be asked to provide the remainder of the cost from the Council Contingency Fund. 79-705 City Hall, Anaheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES- June 19~ 1979, 1:30 P.M. Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 79R-361 for adoption as recommended in memorandum dated June 11, 1979, subject to a match from the Police Depart- ment budget. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 79R-361: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE SUBMISSION OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE OFFICE OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE PLANNING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE THE NECESSARY DOCUMENTS THEREFOR. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None Overholt The Mayor declared Resolution No. 79R-361 duly passed and adopted. 101: RELOCATION OF THE STADIUM BIG "A" SIGN: On motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the Mayor was authorized to sign the applica- tion for State Outdoor Advertising Structure Permit for submittal to Caltrans for relocation of the Stadium Big "A" sign, as recommended in memorandum dat~t June 18, 1979 from Thornton Piersall, Public Works Execu+~ve ~rec~ '~ .... ~]- man Overholt was absent. MOTION CARRIED. 123/135: FOOD AND BEVERAGE CONCESSION - H.G. "DAD" MILLER GOLF COURSE: City Manager Talley briefed the Council on memorandum dated June 18, 1979 from the Stadium, Convention Center, Golf Course General Manager, Tom Liegler (on file in the City Clerk's office) recommending that the City enter into an exclusive food and beverage agreement with Messrs. Harry McDermott and John Provenzano for food and beverage service at the H. G. "Dad" Miller Golf Course, effective July 1, 1979. Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 79R-362 for adoption as recommended in memorandum dated June 18, 1979. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 79R-362: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH JOHN PROVENZANO AND DARRY McDERMOTT IN CONNECTION WITH CONCESSION SERVICES OF ANAHEIM H. G. "DAD" MILLER GOLF COURSE AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None Overholt The Mayor declared Resolution No. 79R-362 duly passed and adopted .... 79-706 Cit~ Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1979~ 1:30 P.M. 123/180: SELF-INSURANCE LIABILITY PROGRAM - CLAIMS ADMINISTRATION SERVICE: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City Attorney was authorized to prepare an agreement with Carl Warren & Company for Claims Administration Service as recon~nended in memorandum dated June 18, 1979 from the City Attorney's office. Councilman Overholt was absent. MOTION CARRIED. 123/173: SB 283 GRANT OF FUNDS FOR RAILROAD PLATFORM CONSTRUCTION NEAR ANAHEIM STADIUM: Planning Director Ron Thompson briefed the Council on joint report dated June 18, 1979 from the City Attorney's office and Planning Director relative to the subject. They expected funds to be available July 1, 1979 and were recently notified by AMTRAK that they verbally approved the basic train station and with written confirmation to follow. There was additional legisla- tion pending which they were hoping would be implemented and funding from that legislation would be available in 1981. There was also additional emergency legislation that would make those funds available by the end of the summer or in September. AB 620 would provide $233,000 and that, coupled with the $79,000, would enable them to get underway on the project. Mayor Seymour asked when construction of the platform would begin. Mr. Thompson explained they could begin the basic train station in the very pear future, but that it would be cost effective to see whetb~ +~ ~~cy 1 ~!~ would provide the additional $233,000 and, if so, t~ey ~oo~u ~±~ t~e station all at one time. Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 79R-363 for adoption as recommended in memorandum dated June 18, 1979, rescinding Resolution No. 79R-169, and approv- ing an amended agreement with the State Business and Transportation Agency for SB 283 Grant of Funds for railroad platform construction. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 79R-363: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RESCINDING RESOLUTION NO. 79R-169, APPROVING AN AMENDED AGREEMENT WITH THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, BUSINESS AND TRANSPORTATION AGENCY AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO INITIAL MODIFICATIONS TO SAID AGREEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None Overholt The Mayor declared Resolution No. 79R-363 duly passed and adopted. 173: POSTING OF GASOLINE PRICES AT SERVICE STATIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood noted that many service stations were now not posting any price signs, whereas they normally had done so. Mayor Seymour stated that he talked to Whitey Walp, Zoning Enforcement Officer, relative to enforcement of the new Ordinance requiring the posting of prices and a couple of people from Business License Division were going to assist in enforcing that Ordinance. 79-707 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1979~ 1:30 P.M. 108: ENFORCEMENT OF NEWS RACK ORDINANCE: Councilman Roth referred to the subject Ordinance and noted that a large number of racks were still in evidence in front of Norm's Restaurant (Lincoln Avenue). He was more concerned over the enforcement of that Ordinance than the posting of gasoline price signs. 175: REQUEST FOR WATER AND SEWER SERVICES TO PROPERTY IN BUENA PARK: Request by Kennedy and Hause for water and sewer services from the City of Anaheim for a 76-unit condominium to be developed in the City of Buena Park on the south side of La Palma Avenue west of Magnolia Avenue. (continued from June 12, 1979) Councilman Roth stated, as he understood, the request now was only for water service, and they no longer required sewer service from Anaheim. Ms. Marie Gillman, VanDell & Associates, 2212 Dupont Drive, Irvine, stated that was correct. They also surveyed the area residents relative to the project as requested at the June 12, 1979 meeting. She thereupon submitted the survey results along with accompanying petitions (on file in the City Clerk's office). They called everybody within 300 feet of the property having surveyed 46 homes and received 31 signatures, representing 67% of the people. Of the 20 who did not answer or did not sign the petition, approximately 6 were not at home and only 3 were actually opposed. The reasons they gave wet~ ~ ..... th~v ~ ~ want anymore people in the neighborhoo~ but their opposztmo,~ was not related to the project itself. Six did not sign because they did not have enough infor- mation and another 5 did not want to get involved in signing a petition. Of the 46, 7 were renters and 39 were homeowners. Five renters signed and 21 homeowners signed. Councilman Roth asked how the sewer problem was solved. Ms. Gillman stated she did not think it had been solved but as she understood, Buena Park had made some concessions on their normal standards, although it would still be preferable to come from Anaheim. Mayor Seymour questioned the pricing of the units, since the Council asked for some type of assurance that affordable housing would be provided. Ms. Gillman stated that the price range was $67,000 to $78,000, and in addition, they were making arrangements for a financing program with a 5% down payment, which they felt would make the units more obtainable for a number of people. A graduated mortgage payment program would also be available. The Mayor asked how they could legally hold the developer to the $67,000 to $78,000 selling price; City Attorney Hopkins answered, by an agreement. The Mayor then asked if they were willing to sign such an agreement. Mr. Don Hause, Partner Kennedy & Hause, 504 West Chapman, Suite F, Orange, stated it would be difficult to enter into a hard and fast contractual arrangement at this time, since architectural plans were just being completed; however, he did feel comfortable with the figures given and also comfortable with the project itself since they had built similar projects. 79-708 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1979~ 1:30 P.M. Mayor Seymour asked Mr. Hause if he would be comfortable planning something stipulating, under $80,000; Mr. Hause stated he thought they could do that, but there were partners involved, and he did not believe he could sign such an agreement this week. MOTION: Mayor Seymour stated that the previous week they asked, (1) that they survey the neighborhood to obtain their feelings and (2) give some assurance that if the Council were to approve their request, it would be affordable housing. He was asking for reasonable assurance that the cost would be $80,000 and under, otherwise he would not vote approval on estimates. He thereupon moved to approve the request for water and sewer services for the project contingent upon the developer entering into a written agreement with the City that prices on the units would not exceed $80,000, first time sell. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, Councilwoman Kaywood stated she had some problem with the situation because of the three people who lived adjacent to the proposed project, one was opposed and the other two did not know enough about it. As well, it was higher density than allowed in Anahei~ with only a 50-foot setback, whereas Anaheim required 150 feet. Mayor Seymour pointed out that in counting those people '~' -"-e ~- .... of the residents approved of the development, which he considered remarkable. A number of people felt that they did not want the property to remain vacant for- ever and it was enough for him to approve the request. Ms. Gillman noted that even those opposed did not care anything about the project, but felt the entire area had enough people. They would much rather have a park next door to them, which was not realistic, but something which they encountered many times. Councilman Roth stated he was supportive of government loosening up some restric- tions, and he felt, in this case, it was an excellent trade-off. The developer was committing to affordable housing and was willing to engage in a contract, stating they would build at $80,000 or less. It was another alternative to rent control, providing a ways and means for trade-off between government and free enterprise to provide such affordable housing. Councilwoman Kaywood asked how many bedrooms the units contained and if the units would be for families. Ms. Gillman stated the units varied between 2 and 3 bedrooms although the majority were to be 2 bedrooms. Although they were projecting that young families would purchase the units, they did not expect a great number of children; however, they would not discourage children. She stated that there were no restrictions on the units. Additional discussion followed between the Mayor and Councilwoman Kaywood, at the conclusion of which, Councilwoman Kaywood asked if the City and the developer entered into a contract stipulating $80,000 and under per unit, what would happen if the developer found it was not possible to accomplish. 79-709 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1979, 1:30 P.M. Mayor Seymour stated that they then could not build the project; Councilwoman Kaywood stated she wanted that to be very clear. A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion. Councilman Overholt was absent. MOTION CARRIED. RECESS: By general consent the Council recessed for 10 minutes. (2:50 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Seymour called the meeting to order, all Council Members being present, with the exception of Councilman Overholt. (3:00 P.M.) 134: PUBLIC HEARING - GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 150 AND NEGATIVE DECLARATION: To consider a) alternate proposals of ultimate land uses including, but not limited to General Commercial Single and Multiple-Family residential development for approximately 11 acres on the east side of Harbor Boulevard, approximately 870 feet north of the centerline of Chapman Avenue, and b) amendment to the text of the General Plan to permit mobile home development in commercial areas and to update the current General Plan in this regard. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC79-85, approved Exhibit "A" (general commercial and low-medium density residential) for th~ approximate 17.1 acres located to the east side of Harb~ n~'~evar mately 870 feet north of the centerline of Chapman Avenue, and further recom- mended that a negative declaration from the requirement to prepare an EIR be approved on the basis that there would be no significant individual or cumula- tive environmental impacts due to the approval of the negative declaration. The City Planning Commission further approved an amendment to the text of the General Plan as follows: Pages 19 and 20 - Elements of the Plan - Planning Area A General Commercial "The General Con~nercial category provides for the development of mobilehome parks and wide variety of commercial uses permitteed in accordance with the standards contained in the CO, Commercial Office and Professional Zone; CL, Commercial, Limited Zone; CG, Commercial, General Zone; and CH~ Commercial Heavy Zone." Commercial-Recreation "This policy is implemented through the Commercial-Recreation Zone which provides for the development of commercial- recreation, tourist-convention, regional office facilities and standards 8overnin8 mobilehome parks development." Commer c ial-P ro fes s ional "Commercial-Professional uses and standards ~overnin~ mobilehome park development~ are implemented in accordance with standards contained in the Commercial Office Zone. 79- 710 City. Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCI.L. MINUTES - June 19, 1979~ 1:30 P.M. Page 68 - Planning Area B "The General Plan provides for standards governing mobilehome development and basically two types of shopping centers: a number of small neighborhood centers and a large community or regional center." Ultimate Land Uses: Mr. Jay Tashiro, Associate Planner, briefed the Council on the staff report dated April 23, 1979 relative to the subject General Plan Amendment Land Use. It was an owner-initiated amendment to change the current General Commercial, low and medium density residential designation to General Commercial, and low-medium density residential. It was the intent of the propety owner to use the RM-3000 zoning and construct a condominium complex should the General Plan be amended to relect low-medium density residential. In Exhibit '~" which was adopted, the commercial was increased from 4 acres, to 8.1 acres, elim- inating the medium density with a change of designation from low density to low- medium density. Part 2 of the General Plan Amendment was an amendment to the text of the General Plan to permit mobilehome park development in commercial areas and to update the current General Plan in that regard. It was initiated by the Council during consideration of the mobilehome subdivision, development processing time and rental assistance on February 20, 1979. The City Council d~cted ~ ~ ~end the General Plan text to permit mobilehome parks in conaueL~za± areas. Councilwoman Kaywood asked what the difference would be in return to the City between a commercial-recreation area and a mobilehome park. Mr. Joel Fick, Assistant Director for Planning stated as far as the Fiscal Impact of the specific proposal, the expansion of commercial by four acres in all studies they had done, would be much more positive than the existing General Plan. The ultimate cost revenue could only be addressed when a specific proposal was sub- mitted. If a mobilehome park were developed within the subject area, it would have a negative impact from standard commercial uses. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to speak either in favor or opposition. Mr. Charles Deerborn, 2241 South Oertley Drive, first asked if the amendment included the White Front Store, since his home backed up to the vacant building; Mr. Tashiro answered that the White Front Store property was involved. Mr. Deerborn then stated he understood low-medium density included apartment buildings and, if so, was there a 2-story maximum. He also asked if any plans had been submitted and what kind of buffer would be provided. Mayor Seymour answered they could go to 2-story but the second story had to be a minimum distance of 150 feet from any single family residence. Mr. Tashiro explained that at this time the petitioner did not have any plans prepared but indicated they were proposing to develop the property under RM-3000, a condominium zone. 79-711 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1979, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Jim Arden, Terra Firma Property, stated they were proposing to develop condominiums under RM-3000 and would comply with the Code. Plans would be submitted next week. The Mayor also noted for Mr. Deerborn that when the plans were submitted and the petitioner asked for specific zoning, another public hearing would be held, and Mr. Deerborn would be notified. There being no further persons who wished to speak on either the General Plan amendment land use or amendment to the text of the General Plan, the Mayor closed the public hearing. Councilwoman Kaywood stated that on portion (b) relative to the amendment to the text to the General Plan, she pointed out that it was not simply with ref- erence to the subject property. She was concerned over allowing mobile home parks in a commercial/recreation area and referred to two similar instances, next to the Phoenix Club and also the Stadiu~ where subsequent noise and traffic con- gestion problems developed. She believed they would be creating a worse problem than they would be solving, unless it involved a parcel located away from everything else and not usable for commercial/recreational. She wanted to see that portion struck from the proposed text amendment. Mayor Seymour stated it was in February when Councilwoman Kaywood voted for the concept along with the Council; Councilwoman Kaywood stated she did not recall commercial/recreation being a part of the concept. Councilwoman Kaywood maintained that they had to proceed with caution if they were going to cut out a source of high revenue for the City, substituting some- thing that would generate complaints. Councilman Roth was concerned over the housing aspect and stated they should encourage the developer. The development plan presented was the proper direction for the City to take and, further, the subject property had been on the market for years. Councilwoman Kaywood stated they had an Economic Development Corporation who was supposed to bring in sources of revenue to the City. Mayor Seymour answered they were not going to bring in such sources if working people did not have a place to live. In speaking with some of the largest industrialists in Orange County, the two questions most asked him were, (1) where would their employees live and (2) what was being Hone about the cost o~ elec- tricity. Councilwoman Kaywood countered that they also would not get economic development if they did not protect the integrity of the various zones. She saw a dichotomy in that, with Proposition 13, nothing was paying for itself in the way of housing. 79-712 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1979~ 1:30 P.M. The Mayor did not agree stating that the only time housing did not pay its own way was when the backbone structure first had to be provided. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City Council finds that this project would have no significant individual or cumulative adverse environmental impact and is, therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR. Councilman Overholt was absent. MOTION CARRIED. LAND USE ELEMENT: On motion by Councilman Bay, seconded by Councilman Roth, the Land Use Element Amendment of General Plan Amendment No. 150 was approved. Councilman Overholt was absent. MOTION CARRIED. AMENDMENT TO TEXT OF GENERAL PLAN: Councilman Bay moved to approve the amend- ment to the text of the General Plan. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. Before a vote was taken, Councilwoman Kaywood stated that she wanted to have CR taken out of mobile homes. Mayor Seymour stated that since that was not a part of the motion, she could appropriately vote against the motion. Councilwoman Kaywood stated she would then abstain on t~e amendment to the text of the General Plan. A vote was then taken on the foregoing motion. Councilwoman Kaywood abstained. Councilman Overholt was absent. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 79R-364 for adoption approving Amendment to General Plan designated as Amendment No. 150, Exhibit "AY, for the Land Use Element, as well as amendments to the text of the General Plan to permit mobile home development in commercial areas and to update the current General Plan in this regard. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 79R-364: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN AMENDMENT TO THE GENERAL PLAN DESIGNATED AS AMENDMENT NO. 150, EXHIBIT "A" FOR AREA I, AND AMENDING THE GENERAL PLAN TEXT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None Overholt The Mayor declared Resolution No. 79R-364 duly passed and adopted. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda: 79-713 City Ha~l,_Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MI .NUTES - June 19~ 1979~ 1:30 P.M. 1. 118: CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred to the City's self-insurance administrator: a. Claim submitted by Robert Eloy Romero for personal injuries sustained pur- portedly as a result of actions by Anaheim Police on or about January 25, 1979. b. Claim submitted by Levett Smith for vehicle damages purportedly sustained as a result of an accident with City-owned vehicle, on or about April 24, 1979. c. Claim submitted by Dennis D. Strickbine, Don Diego's Restaurant, for damages purportedly sustained as a result of exposed power lines or or about May 24, 1979. d. Claim submitted by Jo Ann E. Klus for damages purportedly sustained as a result of main sewer stopping up on or about May 11, 1979. e. Claim submitted by Geraldine Y. Adamson, Ed.D., for damages purportedly sustained as a result of inadequately marked street construction detour on Tustin Avenue between La Palma Avenue and Rose Street on or about March 8, 1979. f. Claim submitted by Michael Allen Davis for vehicle sustained as a result of an accident involving City-ow~Le~ ~eL~l~ie, on or about February 25, 1979. 2. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed: a. 105: Community Redevelopment Commission - Minutes of May 30, 1979. b. 156: Police Department - Monthly Report for May 1979. c. 175: Utilities Department, Electrical Engineering Division - Monthly Report for February 1979. d. 105: Public Utilities Board - Minutes of May 17, 1979. e. 173: Before the Civil Aeronautics Board, Docket 35576, application of Pacific Southwest Airlines, for Orange County-San Francisco authority; Docket 35440, Hughes Air Corp., dba Hughes Airwest, for amendment of its certificate of public convenience and necessity for Route 76 (Orange County-San Francisco nonstop authority), and Docket 35441, for temporary exemption authority (Orange County- San Francisco). 3. 108: APPLICATIONS: The following applications were approved in accordance with the recommendations of the Chief of Police. a. Public Dance Permit submitted by Anaheim Soccer Club for a public dance to be held June 23, 1979, from 6:00 P.M. to 1:30 A.M., at the Anaheim Convention Center. (Joel Aguirre Guerena, applicant) 79-714 City Ha~l, Anahe~.m~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19~ 1979~ 1:30 P.M. b. Dinner Dancing Place Permit for the E1 Conejo, 1750 West Lincoln Avenue, for dancing Friday through Sunday, from 9:00 P.M. to 2:00 A.M. (Jose Castellanos, applicant) Dubois Patrol Service~ c. Private Patrol Application submitted by~i-~-B~otc~-i~r+-Scrvi-c-+to provide security guard service at stationary posts only. (Josephine Ellen Dubois, applicant) 4. TENTATIVE TRACTS FROM THE PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING OF JUNE 4, 1979: a. Tentative Tract Nos. 10408, Rev. #4, and 10713 submitted by Texaco-Anaheim Hills, Inc., to permit an 8-lot single-family subdivision and a 53-unit condo- minium subdivision on RS-HS-10,O00 zoned property located on the west side of the proposed extension of Imperial Highway and south of Nohl Ranch Road. The City Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract Nos. 10408, Rev. #4, and 10713 and, certified EIR No. 218(5). b. Tentative Tract No. 10738 submitted by Brookhurst Shopping Center, to construct a l-lot 60-unit condominium subdivision on proposed RM-3000 zoned property located south of Vancouver Drive, we:st of Brookhurst Street. The City Planning Commission approved Tentative Tract No. Inv,8 an~ negative declaration status to the project. MOTION CARRIED. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution Nos. 79R-365 through 79R-366, both inclusive, for adoption in accordance with the reports, recommendations and certifications furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda. Refer to Resolution Book. 169: RESOLUTION NO. 79R-365: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: INSTALLATION OF REFLECTIVE AND NONREFLECTIVE RAISED PAVEMENT MARKERS AT VARIOUS LOCATIONS, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 17-4309-776-16-000 (1977-1978) AND ACCOUNT NO. 17-796-6325-6020 (1978- 1979). (Traffice Appliance Corporation) 167: RESOLUTION NO. 79R-366: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING TIlE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING AT THE INTERSECTION OF KATELLA AVENUE AND LEWIS STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, ACCOUNT NO. 13-794-6325-4060. (Steiny and Company) 79-715 City .Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1979~ 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None Overholt The Mayor declared Resolution No. 79R-365 through 79R-366, both inclusive duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 4020: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 4020 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 4020: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (78-79-39, RS-43,000) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None Overholt The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4020 duly passed and g .... ORDINANCE NO. 4021: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 4021 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. ORDINANCE NO. 4021: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (73-74-46(10), PC, Tract No. 10107) Roll Call Vote: AYES: NOES: ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Bay, Roth and Seymour None Overholt The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 4021 duly passed and adopted. 149: ORDINANCE NO. 4022: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 4022 for first reading. ORDINANCE NO. 4022: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO SUBSECTIONS .1060 AND .1070 RELATING TO PARKING RESTRICTIONS. (No parking any time on Lewis Street, both sides, from Ball Road to Katella Avenue, and Sunkist Street, both sides, from Ball Road to Howell Avenue) 148: SLATE OF NOMINEES - LEAGUE OF CALIFORNIA CITIES: Councilwoman Kaywood reported that at the Thursday, June 14, 1979 League of California Cities meeting, she gave __ the Nominating Committee report as Chairman of that Committee. Voting would not take place until August, but the slate proposed was as follows: 79-716 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - June 19, 1979, 1:30 P.M. President - Earl Roget, La Habra First Vice President - Norma Hertzog, Costa Mesa Second Vice President - Phil Schwartz, San Juan Capistrano; Marvin Adler, Fountain Valley; and Ralph Welch, Tustin, nominated from the floor. 108: POSITION ON BINGO - COUNCILMAN BAY: Councilman Bay stated that for some time now there had been a great deal of discussion relative to Bingo in the City. Since his appointment to the Council, he had not stated his position because nothing had come up officially regarding Bingo. He wanted to make his position clear that he favored reducing Bingo in the City to one night a week. His announcement now was so that the rest of the Council would be aware of his position on the subject. ADJOURNMENT: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to adjourn, Councilman Roth seconded the motion. Councilman Overholt was absent. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 3:22 P.M. LINDA D. ROBERTS, CITY CLERK