Loading...
Resolution-PC 2021-003RESOLUTION NO. PC2021-003 A RESOLUTION OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM TO ADOPT A MITIGATED NEGATIVE DECLARATION FOR PROPOSED GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 2016-00510, RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2016-00297, AND ADMINISTRATIVE ADJUSTMENT NO. 2020-00444 (DEV2016-00074) (3175 WEST BALL ROAD) WHEREAS, the Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim (the "Planning Commission") did receive a verified petition for General Plan Amendment No. 2016-00510, Reclassification No. 2016-00297, and Administrative Adjustment No. 2020-00444 to construct an 11-unit apartment building with reduced street and interior setbacks (the "Proposed Project"), for that certain real property generally located at the northeast corner of Ball road and Western Avenue and commonly referred to as 3175 West Ball Road in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, as generally depicted on the map attached hereto as Exhibit A and incorporated herein by this reference (the "Property"); and WHEREAS, the Property is approximately 0.36 acres in size and is currently vacant. The Land Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan designates the Property for General Commercial land uses. The Property is located in the “C-G” General Commercial Zone. The development standards and regulations of Chapter 18.06(Multiple-Family Residential Zones) of the Anaheim Municipal Code (the "Code") shall applyto the Proposed Project, pursuant to approval of Reclassification No. 2016-00297, now pending; and WHEREAS, the Proposed Project is to construct an 11-unit apartment building with reduced street and interior setbacks subject to Administrative AdjustmentNo. 2019-05127by the Planning Commission pursuant to Sections 18.06.030 (Uses), of Chapter 18.06 (Multiple-Family Residential Zones) of the Code; and WHEREAS, General Plan Amendment No. 2016-00510isto amend the General Plan Land Use designation from General Commercial to Medium Density Residential; and WHEREAS, Reclassification No. 2016-00297isto reclassify the property from the “C-G” General CommercialZone to the “RM-4” Multiple-family Residential Zone; and WHEREAS, on March 4, 2020, Governor Newsom proclaimed a State of Emergency in California as a result of the threat of COVID-19. On March 17, 2020, Governor Newsom issued Executive Order N-29-20 (superseding the Brown Act-related provisions of Executive Order N- 25-20 issued on March 12, 2020), which allows a local legislative body to hold public meetings via teleconferencing and to make public meetings accessible telephonically or otherwise electronically to all members of the public seeking to observe and to address the local legislative body; and -1- PC2021-003 WHEREAS, pursuant to Executive Order N-29-20 the Planning Commission did hold a teleconferencing public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on August 31, and October 12, 2020, and continued the item without discussion; the Planning Commission did hold a teleconferencing public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on and January 20, 2021 at 5:00 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of Chapter 18.60 of the Code, to hear and consider evidence and testimony for and against the Proposed Project and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, pursuant to and in accordance with the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act (Public Resources Code Section 21000 et seq.; herein referred to as “CEQA”), the State of California Guidelines for the Implementation of the California Environmental Quality Act (commencing with Section 15000 of Title 14 of the California Code of Regulations; herein referred to as the "CEQA Guidelines"), and the City's Local CEQA Procedures, the City is the "lead agency" for the preparation and consideration of environmental documents for the Proposed Project; and WHEREAS, a draft Mitigated Negative Declaration was prepared in accordance with CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual to evaluate the physical environmental impacts of the Proposed Project. The Mitigated Negative Declaration was circulated for a 20-day public/responsible agency review on July 9, 2020, and was also made available for review on the City's website at www.anaheim.net. A complete copy of the Mitigated Negative Declaration is on file and can be viewed in the Planning and Building Department of the City located on the First Floor of City Hall at 200 South Anaheim Boulevard. Copies of said document were also available for purchase; and WHEREAS, the City gave notice of its intent to adopt the Mitigated Negative Declaration to (a) the public pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (b) those individuals and organizations, if any, that previously submitted written requests for notice pursuant to Section 15072(b) of the CEQA Guidelines, (c) responsible and trustee and other agencies with jurisdiction over resources that will be affected by the Proposed Project pursuant to Section 15073(c) of the CEQA Guidelines, and (d) the Clerk of the County of Orange pursuant to Section 15072(a) of the CEQA Guidelines; and WHEREAS, in conformance with CEQA and the CEQA Guidelines, a Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program has been prepared for the Proposed Project and includes mitigation measures that are specific to the Proposed Project (herein referred to as "MMRPNo. 371"). A complete copy of MMRP No. 371 is attached hereto as Exhibit B and incorporated herein by this reference; and WHEREAS, the City intends and desires to use the Mitigated Negative Declaration as the environmental documentation required by CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual for the Proposed Project; and -2- PC2021-003 WHEREAS, based upon a thorough review of the Proposed Project and the Mitigated Negative Declaration, including MMRPNo. 371 and the comments received to date and the responses prepared, the Planning Commission, based upon a thorough review of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and related documents and the evidence received concerning the Mitigated Negative Declaration, does find and determine as follows: 1. That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual and, together with MMRPNo. 371, serves as the appropriate environmental documentation for the Proposed Project; 2.That it has carefully reviewed and considered the information contained in the Mitigated Negative Declaration (including the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period) prior to acting upon the Proposed Project; 3. Based upon the record before it (including the Initial Study and any comments received), the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impactsupon the environment with the implementation of the mitigation measures contained in MMRP No. 371 and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission; and WHEREAS, this Planning Commission determines that the evidence in the record constitutes substantial evidence to support the actions taken and the findings made in this Resolution, that the facts stated in this Resolution are supported by substantial evidence in the record, including testimony received at the public hearing, the staff presentations, the staff report and all materials in the project files. There is no substantial evidence, nor are there other facts, that detract from the findings made in this Resolution. ThisPlanning Commission expressly declares that it considered all evidence presented and reached these findings after due consideration of all evidence presented to it. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that this Planning Commission, pursuant to the above findings and based upon a thorough review of the Mitigated Negative Declaration and the evidence received to date, does hereby adoptthe Mitigated Negative Declaration (including the Initial Study and any comments received during the public review period) and find and determine as follows: 1.That the Mitigated Negative Declaration has been prepared in compliance with the requirements of CEQA, the CEQA Guidelines, and the City's Local CEQA Procedure Manual and, together with MMRPNo. 371, serves as the appropriate environmental documentation for the Proposed Project; 2.Based upon the record before it (including the Initial Study and any comments received), that the Proposed Project will have a less than significant impact upon the environment with the implementation of the mitigation measures contained in MMRPNo. 371and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration reflects the independent judgment and analysis of the Planning Commission; -3- PC2021-003 -5- PC2021-003 EXHIBIT B Mitigation Monitoring and Reporting Program No. 371 Timing of Verification Completed Mitigation Method of Responsible Measure No. Verification Party Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Comments Prior to the issuance of a demolition, grading, and/or building permit for Submittal/ X City of Anaheim MM-BIO-1 activities during the avian nesting season (i.e., February 1 and September review of nesting Planning and 1), the property owner/developer shall submit a survey for active nests to bird survey Building the City of Anaheim Planning and Building Department conducted by a Department qualified biologist a maximum of 1 week prior to the activities to determine the presence/absence, location, and status of any active nests on or adjacent to the Project Site. The nesting bird survey shall consist of full coverage of the project footprint and an appropriate buffer, as determined by the biologist. If no active nests are discovered or identified, no further mitigation is required. In the event that active nests are discovered on site, a suitable buffer determined by the biologist (e.g., 30 to 50 feet for passerines) shall be established around any active nest. No ground-disturbing activities shall occur within this buffer until the biologist has confirmed that breeding/nesting is completed and the young have fledged the nest. Limits of construction to avoid a nest shall be established in the field by the biologist with flagging and stakes or construction fencing. Construction personnel shall be instructed regarding the ecological sensitivity of the fenced area. The results of the survey shall be documented and filed with the City of Anaheim within 5 days after the survey. If skeletal remains are uncovered during construction activities, all work N/A X City of Anaheim MM-CUL-1 shall stop immediately and the construction supervisor in charge at the Planning and Project Site shall notify the County Coroner of the find immediately, in Building conformance with the California Health and Safety Code, Section 7050.5. Department No further disturbance shall occur until the County Coroner makes a determination of origin and disposition pursuant to California Public Resources Code, Section 5097.98. If the human remains are determined to be prehistoric, the County Coroner shall notify the Native American Heritage Commission, which shall notify a most likely descendant. The most likely descendant shall complete the inspection of the site within 48 hours of notification and may recommend scientific removal and nondestructive analysis of human remains and items associated with Native American burials subject to City approval. -6- PC2021-003 Timing of Verification Completed Mitigation Method of Responsible Measure No. Verification Party Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Comments The property owner/developer shall implement all recommendations in Submittal/ X X City of Anaheim MM-GEO-1 the approved Geotechnical Investigation report for the Proposed Project review of Public Works during site preparation, grading, and construction, and compliance with statement of Department the approved Geotechnical Investigation shall be verified in the field by a verification by qualified representative. The property owner/developer shall demonstrate qualified to the City of Anaheim’s Planning & Building Department and/or Public representative Works Department staff that all or equivalent recommendations in the Preliminary Soil Investigation, Liquefaction Evaluation and Infiltration Test Report. Proposed Two-Story Apartment Complex with Partial Subterranean Parking, 3175 W. Ball Road, City of Anaheim, California, prepared by Soil Exploration Company, Inc. September 12, 2016, or any updates to that report have been incorporated into the Proposed Project’s design and grading plans. Prior to the issuance of Grading and Building Permits, the property Submittal/ X X City of Anaheim MM-HAZ-1 owner/developer shall prepare and submit a site-specific Health and review of site-Planning and Safety Plan to the Planning and Building Department. specific Health Building The site-specific Health and Safety Plan shall require that the property and Safety Plan Department owner/developer include the following instructions to its construction to the Planning contractor: “The construction contractor shall use a photoionization and Building detector (PID) to regularly inspect the exposed soil for evidence of any Department contamination.” These instructions shall be included on all plans pertaining to subsurface construction activities for the Proposed Project. The site-specific Health and Safety Plan shall identify air monitoring action levels based on the benzene Cal-OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL) to protect worker health and safety. The site-specific Health and Safety Plan shall note measures to be taken if air monitoring in the breathing zone of site workers indicates concentrations above the action levels. These measures could include the use of personal protective equipment, including air purifying respirators, or engineering controls, as well as site perimeter monitoring. Prior to issuance of Grading or Building Permits, the property Submittal/ X X City of Anaheim MM-HAZ-2 owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department review of plans; Planning and notes on plans that indicate that if potential contamination indicators are Submittal/ Building identified during excavation based on visual observations and/or air review of Department monitoring the soil will be segregated and evaluated. Soil impacted by statement petroleum hydrocarbons may be stained or odorous. Stained soil may indicating have bluish to dark gray discoloration. Discoloration may remain even whether after the product has naturally degraded. If suspect petroleum contamination hydrocarbon-impacted soils are observed during excavation, the soil will indicators were be segregated and evaluated. Evaluation will include collection of identified during -7- PC2021-003 Timing of Verification Completed Mitigation Method of Responsible Measure No. Verification Party Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Comments samples for total petroleum hydrocarbons (TPH) and volatile organic excavation and if compound (VOC) analysis. The number of samples to be collected will be so, submittal/ based on potential disposal facility requirements. If concentrations of TPH review of a and VOCs are below direct exposure human health soil screening levels memorandum or (Regional Water Quality Control Board Environmental Screening Levels), report then the soil may remain on-site. If the concentrations exceed the summarizing screening levels, then the soil will be removed from the Project Site and how soil was properly disposed of off-site in accordance with local, State, and Federal evaluated regulations. and/or removed Visually screening the soil will be accompanied by air monitoring using a from site. photoionization detector (PID) or other organic vapor analyzer. In accordance with South Coast Air Quality Management District (SCAQMD) regulations (specifically Rule 1166), VOC-contaminated soil, if identified at the Project Site during excavation activities, will be properly managed. VOC-contaminated soil, as defined in Rule 1166, consists of soil with concentrations of 50 parts per million or greater when measured within 3 inches of the soil using a PID calibrated with hexane. If volatile organics are measured at concentrations of 50 parts per million or greater when measured within 3 inches of the soil using a PID calibrated with hexane, then the excavation, stockpile management, and agency notification shall comply with SCAQMD Rule 1166. If identified, VOC-contaminated soil, as defined in Rule 1166, shall be removed from the Project Site and properly disposed of off-site in accordance with local, State, and Federal regulations. Prior to issuance of Grading or Building Permits, the property Submittal/ MM-HAZ-3 owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department review of a notes on plans that indicate that during construction, should groundwater memorandum or be encountered and require extraction, any extracted groundwater will be report indicating managed in accordance with the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination whether System (NPDES) permit for construction dewatering, in accordance with construction existing regulations. The NPDES permit will require monitoring of volatile dewatering was organic compound concentrations in the extracted groundwater per the requiring during Monitoring and Reporting Program developed at the time of issuance of a site preparation NPDES permit. Prior to the issuance of Building Permits, the property and grading. If owner/developer shall submit to the Planning and Building Department a construction memorandum or report indicating whether construction dewatering was dewatering is requiring during site preparation and grading. If construction dewatering is necessary, the necessary, the Monitoring and Reporting Program and memorandum or Monitoring and report shall identify whether effluent concentrations at the end of Reporting dewatering increased compared to the initial concentrations. The Program and Monitoring and Reporting Program and memorandum or report shall be memorandum or submitted to the Planning and Building Department. report shall identify whether -8- PC2021-003 Timing of Verification Completed Mitigation Method of Responsible Measure No. Verification Party Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Comments If the effluent concentrations at the end of dewatering increased effluent compared to the initial concentrations, the Planning and Building concentrations Department shall require that the property owner/developer retain a at the end of qualified environmental professional to reevaluate the potential human dewatering health risk under the residential scenario based on the effluent VOC increased concentrations at the end of dewatering. If the qualified environmental compared to the consultant determines that the potential human health risk under the initial residential scenario exceeds de minimis thresholds of one in a million for concentrations. cancer risk or the non-cancer hazard index risk value of 1.0, the property owner/developer shall be responsible for informing the Planning and Building Department and Santa Ana Regional Water Quality Control Board in writing of the discovery. The property owner/developer shall be responsible for coordinating with the qualified environmental consultant to ensure that the vapor mitigation noted in Mitigation Measure (MM-) HAZ-4 is designed to sufficiently mitigate vapor impacts to human health and safety of future occupants at the Project Site. Prior to the issuance of Grading and Building Permits, the property Submittal/ MM-HAZ-4 owner/developer shall submit plans to the Planning and Building review of Department, showing that the property owner/developer has incorporated statement of at least one of following options into the Proposed Project: plans to the Planning and Option A: Limiting vapor intrusion into future residences through use Building of a well-ventilated ground-level garage that is not intended for human Department occupation; or Option B: Installation of a sub-slab liner/passive ventilation to limit vapor intrusion to the future residences. Prior to issuance of Grading or Building Permits, the property Submittal/ X City of Anaheim MM-NOI-1 owner/developer and/or its construction contractor, shall submit plans to review of Planning and the Planning and Building Department with notes indicating compliance grading/ Building with the following measures during construction: construction Department 1.Construction activities shall be permitted only between the hours of plans 7:00 a.m. and 7:00 p.m. In the event that construction is required to extend beyond these times, extended hours permits shall be required. 2.Pumps and associated equipment (e.g., portable generators) shall be shielded from sensitive uses using local temporary noise barriers or enclosures, or shall otherwise be designed or configured so as to minimize noise at nearby noise-sensitive receivers. 3.Staging of construction equipment shall not occur within 20 feet of any noise- or vibration-sensitive land uses. 4.All noise-producing equipment and vehicles using internal combustion engines shall be equipped with mufflers; air-inlet -9- PC2021-003 Timing of Verification Completed Mitigation Method of Responsible Measure No. Verification Party Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Comments silencers where appropriate; and any other shrouds, shields, or other noise-reducing features in good operating condition that meet or exceed original factory specification. Mobile or fixed “package” equipment (e.g., arc-welders, air compressors) shall be equipped with shrouds and noise control features that are readily available for that type of equipment. 5.All mobile or fixed noise-producing equipment used for the Project that are regulated for noise output by a local, state, or federal agency shall be in compliance with regulations. 6.Idling equipment shall be kept to a minimum and moved as far as practicable from noise-sensitive land uses. 7.Electrically powered equipment shall be used instead of pneumatic or internal combustion powered equipment, where feasible. 8.Material stockpiles and mobile equipment staging, parking, and maintenance areas shall be located as far as practicable from noise- sensitive receptors. 9.The use of noise-producing signals, including horns, whistles, alarms, and bells, shall be used for safety warning purposes only. Prior to issuance of Grading and Building Permits, the property Submittal/ City of Anaheim MM-NOI-2 owner/developer shall submit evidence to the Planning and Building review of Planning and Department that effective communication with local residents will be evidence of Building maintained prior to and during construction. Specifically, the property compliance Department owner/developer or their representative shall inform local residents of the schedule, duration, and progress of the construction. Additionally, the property owner/developer shall provide residents contact information for noise- or vibration-related complaints. Evidence of compliance may include copies of letters and mailing lists for adjacent property owners and residents, photographs of posting of information on site, or any other such information as deemed compliant by the Planning and Building Director and/or his/her designee. Prior to issuance of a building permit, the property owner/developer shall Submittal/ City of Anaheim MM-NOI-3 submit final design plans, to the City of Anaheim Planning and Building review of final Planning and Department, specifying that windows in habitable rooms will have the design plans Building following minimum Sound Transmission Class (STC) ratings: Department Windows with northern and eastern-facing exposures: 19 STC or greater Windows with southern and western-facing exposures: 25 STC or greater Prior to the commencement of any grading and/or construction activity, X MM-TCR-1 Submittal/ City of Anaheim the property owner/developer shall retain a Native American Monitor and review of brief Planning and a copy of the executed contract shall be submitted to the City of Anaheim letter report of -10- PC2021-003 Timing of Verification Completed Mitigation Method of Responsible Measure No. Verification Party Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Comments Planning and Building Department. The Tribal monitor will only be present excavations and Building on-site during the construction phases that involve ground-disturbing findings Department activities. Ground disturbing activities are defined by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation as activities that may include, but are not limited to, pavement removal, potholing or auguring, grubbing, tree removals, boring, grading, excavation, drilling, and trenching, within the Project area. The Tribal Monitor will complete daily monitoring logs that will provide descriptions of the day’s activities, including construction activities, locations, soil, and any cultural materials identified. The on-site monitoring shall end when the Project Site grading and excavation activities are completed, or when the Tribal Representatives and monitor have indicated that the Project Site has a low potential for impacting Tribal Cultural Resources. Upon discovery of any archaeological resources, construction activities shall cease in the immediate vicinity of the find until the find can be assessed. All archaeological resources unearthed by project construction activities shall be evaluated by the qualified archaeologist and Tribal monitor approved by the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation. If the resources are Native American in origin, the Gabrieleño Band of Mission Indians-Kizh Nation shall coordinate with the property owner/developer regarding treatment and curation of these resources. Typically, the Tribe will request reburial or preservation for educational purposes. Work may continue on other parts of the Project Site while evaluation and, if necessary, mitigation takes place (CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5\[f\]). If a resource is determined by the qualified archaeologist to constitute a “historical resource” or “unique archaeological resource,” time allotment and funding sufficient to allow for implementation of avoidance measures, or appropriate mitigation, must be available. The treatment plan established for the resources shall be in accordance with CEQA Guidelines Section 15064.5(f) for historical resources and California Public Resources Code Sections 21083.2(b) for unique archaeological resources. Preservation in place (i.e., avoidance) is the preferred manner of treatment. If preservation in place is not feasible, treatment may include implementation of archaeological data recovery excavations to remove the resource along with subsequent laboratory processing and analysis. Any historic archaeological material that is not Native American in origin shall be curated at a public, non-profit institution with a research interest in the materials, such as the Natural History Museum of Los Angeles County or the Fowler Museum, if such an institution agrees to accept the material. If no institution accepts the archaeological material, it shall be offered to a local school or historical society in the area for educational purposes. -11- PC2021-003 Timing of Verification Completed Mitigation Method of Responsible Measure No. Verification Party Mitigation Measure/Project Design Feature Comments Prior to the final building and zoning inspections of each development, the MM-UTL-1 Submittal/ X City of Anaheim property owner/developer shall submit Project plans and a Solid Waste review of proof of Streets and Management Plan to the Streets and Sanitation Division of the Public Project Plans, Sanitation Works Department for review and approval to ensure that the plans Submission of Division of the comply with AB 939, and the Solid Waste Reduction Act of 1989, and the Solid Waste Public Works County of Orange and City of Anaheim Integrated Waste Management Management Department Plans as administered by the City of Anaheim to the maximum extent plan for approval feasible, which shall be determined by the Streets and Sanitation Division. Implementation of said plans shall commence upon occupancy and shall remain in full effect as required by the Street and Sanitation Division and may include, at its discretion, the following plan components: Detailing the locations and design of on-site recycling facilities. Participating in the City of Anaheim’s “Recycle Anaheim” program or other substitute program as may be developed by the City or governing agency. -12- PC2021-003