1977/01/2577-68
City Hal!, Anaheim, .C.~a~lifor.nia - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25, 19.77~ 1,;~0.,P,M..
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PRESENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
CITY MANAGER: William O. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY: William P. Hopkins
CITY CLERK: Linda D. Roberts
STADIUM~CONVENTION CENTER-GOLF COURSE DIRECTOR: Tom Liegler
PARKS, RECREATION AND THE ARTS DIRECTOR: James Ruth
ASSISTANT PLANNING DIRECTOR - ZONING: Annika Santalahti
Mayor Thom called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance
to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION: Reverend Ragon T. Flannery of the First Christian Church gave the
invocation.
F~&G SALUTE:. Councilwoman Miriam Kaywood led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance
to the Flag.
ANAHEIM EAST ROTARY CLUB pAYMENT - HANDICAPPED BUS: Mr. Gordon Jones of the Anaheim
East Rotary Club presented a check in the amount of $1500, which represents the third
annual payment for the bus purchased through an agreement with this organization to
be used to transport the handicapped in the City's therapeutic recreation program.
Mayor Thom accepted the check with thanks on behalf of the City.
PROCLAMATION: The following proclamation was issued by Mayor Thom and unanimously
approved by the City Council:
"Helicopter Week in Anaheim" - week of February 6, 1977.
RESOLUTION OF HOPE: A Resolution of Hope to be placed in the Westminster Park Time
Capsule project for the Country's tri-centennial celebration was unanimously approved
by the City Council.
MINUTES: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Kott, Minutes of
the Anaheim City Council regular meeting held November 9, 1976 were approved, subject
to corrections. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING ~ ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Kott moved to waive the
reading, in full, of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver
of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after reading of the title,
specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such ordinance or
resolution. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY in the amount of $388,~54.94, in accordance with
the 1976-77 Budget, were approved.
SALE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY - HERITAGE BANK: Mayor Thom commended Council Members
Kott and Seymour, as well as the City Manager, for their tenacity and astute economic
analysis in recent negotiations regarding the sale of city-owned property at 721
North Euclid, which has led to the successful conclusion of Heritage Bank agreeing
to purchase this property for the full price the City paid for i~ plus the past-due
rent.
77-69
~ity Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25,.1977~ 1:30 P.M.
Because of Councilman Kott's persistence and the economic research and deliberation
which followed, Mayor Thom felt his own viewpoint of the matter was changed.
YOI~H PAINTANDPICK-UP PROGRAM AGREEMENT: Councilman Kott offered Resolution No.,
77R-54 for adoption authorizing an agr~ement with the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency
to provide supplemental redevelopment funds to extend the Youth Paint and Pick-Up
Program in Project Alpha areas. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO.. .77~-.54: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
AUTHORIZING EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ANAHEIM P~DEVELOPMENT AGENCY FOR
PARTICIPATION IN THE YOUTH PAINT AND PICK-UP PROGRAM.
· Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-54 duly passed and adopted.
FIRE BATTALION ~HIEF._A.SSESSMENT CENTER - MACRAE AND ASSOCIATES- In accordance with
the joint recommendation of the Fi~e Chief and Personnel Director, Councilman Kott
offered Resolution No. 77R-36 for adoption authorizing an agreement with MacRae
and Associates to operate an assessment center for the position of Fire Battalion
Chief. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLb~rION NO. 77R-3.6: A RESOLUTION OF Tt~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APFROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND
MACRAE AND ASSOCIATES FOR DEVELOPMENT AND ADMINISTRATION OF AN ASSESSMENT CENTER
FOR THE POSITION OF FIRE BATTALION CHIEF. ($1500 total fee)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-36 duly passed and adopted.
ENGINEERING SERVICES - ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECT - McQANIEL AND ASSOCIATES:
Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 77R-37 for adoption authorizing an agreement
with McDaniel and Associates for engineering services in connection with ~he alley
reconstruction project under the local Public Works and Capital Investment Program.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-37: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING THE' TE~MS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH McDANIEL AND ASSOCIATES
FOR ENGINEERING SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH ALLEY RECONSTRUCTION PROJECTS. (North-
South alleys within the boundaries of Water Street and South Street, from Olive Street
to Anaheim Boulevard - total estimated cost $5,400.)
77-70
Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL blINUTES , January 25~ 1977, 1:30 P.M.
Call Vote:
,lYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
%he Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-37 duly passed and adopted.
VIA COPALA - EASEb~NT...DEED. AND PILOT ROAD - CLASSIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: '
Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 77R-38 for adoption accepting an easement
deed from and authorizing an agreementwith Classic Development Corporation regarding
construation of Via Copala, a two-lane pilot roadway within Tract No. 7733, thereby
providing additional access for Tract Nos. 7730, 7731, 7732 and 7733 to Santa An&
Canyon Road. (In exchange for dedication of the roadway easement, the City will pay
the cost of constructing the pilot roadway from gas tax funds) Refer to Resolution
Book.
RESOLUTIOM~.NO.~ 77R-38: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED; APPROVING THE TER~ AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT
WITH CLASSIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION IN CONNECTION WITH THECONSTRUCTION OF A
PUBLIC STREET AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT
01~ BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
Roll Call Vote: ~
AI~S: COUNCIL 'MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEb~ERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The l-~yor declared Resolution No. 77R-38 duly passed and adopted.
ORTuNGE COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution
No. 77R-39 for adoption indicating the City of Anaheim's concurrence in the addendum
to the Orange County Solid Waste Mmnagement Plan with removal of the statement
indicating approval of the procedures for financing the recommended Solid Waste
b~nagement Program, as recommended by the Public Works Director. Refer to Resolution
Book~
~E__SOLUTION NO. 77R-39: A RESOLUTION OF .THE CITY COUNCIL OF .THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
CONCURRING IN TH~ ADDENDUM TO THE ORANGE COUNTY SOLID WASTE MANAGEMENT PLAN.
Roll Call Vote:
AYEo:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL PfEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-39 duly passed and adopted.
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES - CITY GOLF COURSES - DONALD M. BROWN: Councilwoman Kaywood
offered Resolution No. 77R-40 for adoption authorizing an agreement with Donald M.
Bro~ to provide architectural services, as previously proposed and approved by the
City Council at their October 26, 1976 meeting. Refer to Resolution Book.
77-7]
City Hall, Aqaheim, galifprnia - CpUN¢IL MI.NL~.ES.- .,Ja.n~.ar¥ .25,j ~!..977, 1.:..3.0. e..M..
RESOLb~fION NO. 77R-40: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APLROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH DONALD M. BROWN FOR
ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES IN CONNECTION WITH CITY GOLF COURSES AND AUTHORIZING AND
DIRECTING THE ~%YOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE
CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Anah. eim Hills Golf Cart Storage, Anaheim Hills Maintenance Yard
amd H. G. Dad Miller Driving Range) '
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour
ABSEMT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-40'duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Seymour explained that he abstained from voting on the afore-mentioned
resolution because of past business dealings with Mr. Brown and because he may
have occasion toengage his professional services in the future.
AMENDMENT TO SPECIAL FACI~IT!E$ AGREEMENT - TRACT NO. 9465: In accordance with
recommendation of the Utilities Directpr~'Cou~Cil~n"$eYm°ur offered Resolution
No. 77R-41 for adoption authorizing an amendment to the agreement with Texaco
Anaheim Hills, Inc. for reimbursement of an adVance toward special facilities
pertaining to Tract No. 9465. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO.. 77R-41: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH TEXACO ANAHEIM
HILLS, INC., IN CONNECTION WITH REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR SPECIAL WATER FACILITIES,
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AMENDMENT TO
AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. (Amends due date for advancement of fees
by the company toward costs of special facilities from January 31, 1977 to March 30,
1977, or until applicant applies for building permits, whichever date shall come
first.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-41 duly passed and adopted.
PACIFIC TELEPHONE AND TELEGRAPH COMPANY - COM KEY 718 AND 1434 SYSTEMS: Report request-
ed by Councilman Kott on the Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company's applications
for a permanent tariff on Com Key 718 and 1434 systems was submitted by the City Manager.
Mr. Talley explained that the two systems are optional to customers and, therefore, the
application for permanent tariff would not increase any rates to the general public. He
further noted that the City of Anaheim does not make use of either system in its tele-
phone network.
In response to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Talley estimated that the cost involved
in preparatio~ of this report was less than $50.00,
77-72
Hall. Anaheim. California - COUNCIL MINUTES ,- January 25, 1977. 1:30 P.M.
On motion by Councilman Kott, seconded by Councilman Roth. the report on Pacific
Telephone and Telegraph Company applications for permanent tariff on Com Key 718 and
141~ systems was ordered received and filed. MOTION CARRIED.
nEASE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY - b~IVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT IRvINE: A proposal to
lease city-owned pr0pe'r-ty l~Cated on the south side of Romneya Drive, between Har~bor
Boulevard and Lemon Street, to the University of California at Irvine for development
of a community medical clinic (Clinic No. 4) was submitted for City Council considera-
tion.
Correspondence from Charles Allee, Anaheim Memorial Hospital, requesting that Council
postpone negotiations with University of California at Irvine until such clinic
could be discussed and planned with the existing health care agencies and institutions
in the community was also submitted.
Vice-Chancellor L. E. Cox stated that he did not think their plans for a health
clinic would interfere with any of the existing health agencies in the Anaheim
community. They expect this clinic would reach and provide care for those indivi-
duals not presently covered. Furthermore, the clinic is necessary to their academic
program and would assist to produce more physicians trained in the area of
primary care and family medicine. He noted that the University is anxious to proceed
with this program and has the support of the Governor by approval of budgeted funds
for same. With the approval of the Cityfor use of their property, the University
would move in modular units and be prepared to open the facility in the early fall.
Mayor Thom noted that the concept of using such a clinic as a teaching facility
was first set forth about four years ago, but the development of the clinic was
postponed until the disposition of the Orange County Medical Center was settled.
Dr. Mahnke advised that there is an operational example of a community clinic
currently functioning in South Santa And. This clinic was begun five to six years
ago and is now operated as part of the Department of Family Medicine. As such, it
currently provides 30,000 patient visits per year and has had a negligible impact
on private sector medicine in Santa And.
In response to Councilman Kott's inquiry as to the Orange County MedicaI Association
opinion on the family practice teaching clinic concept, it was noted that cOPies of
the argument forwarded to the Anaheim City Council were also sent to that board and
no specific response was elicited.
Mr. Charles Allee advised that he represents the Anaheim Memorial Hospital which,
in turn, is representative of private practice physicians in the co~m~anity. He
defined their concern as being unaware of what the impact of the proposed clinic
would be in the medical community. They feel that this impact should be recognized
and evaluated jointly by the community and the University.
Ymyor Thom stated that the decision before the Council at this time is whether or
not to authorize the City stafftonegotiate a document for lease of City-owned
property. If staff is so authorized, the document itself would be brought back to
the Council for final approval. This would, in his opinion, allow a period of time
within which the local medical community could become familiar with the University's
plans and the lease agreement. Councilman Thom thereupon moved that the Council
authorize staff to begin negotiations with the University of California at Irvine to
lease City-owned property for $1 per year. Said motion died for lack of a second.
Cit~~ Hall~ Anaheim,~Ca~fprn.ia -..COb~...~IL MINUTES -.JanuaKY 25, !~77~ !:30 P-M-
Councilman Seymour moved that the decision be continued to the meeting of
February 8, 1977, to provide Mr. Allee and other members of the medical profession
and the University of Irvine an opportunity to meet and discuss this proposal.
Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
b~O PROGRAM ~_UDGET .AND'COS~,.ACCO~!NG TgCHN. I~UES .FOR 1977-78: Report from the
City b~nager was submitted recommending that the City Council authorize the continua-
tion of development of a program budget including management by objectives (MBO) and
cost accounting techniques for fiscal year 1977-78; and adopt resolutions authoriz-
ing the execution of agreements to accomplish modifications to the City's current
accounting system which are necessary to supply the fiscal information requirements
of program budgeting operations. %hese modifications would require some additional
computer memory. The City Manager recalled that part of the Arthur Young and
Company assignment was to review the current status of Data Processing and the
inzp!ementation plan for inst&llation of a financial management information system.
Mr. Mike Ancis of Arthur Young and Company reported that their review of Data
Processing Dmpartment revealed that the previous Arthur Young and Company recommenda-
tions have been either totally or substantially implemented. He noted the follow-
ing accomplishments: elevation of Data Processing to departmental status; updating
of position descriptions; merging of City and MDS staff; installation of a job
accounting system; improvement of performance evaluation; establishment of a training
program; installation of project reporting and control procedures; and use of
alternative vendors for peripheral equipment. He called attention to the fact that
the recommended fire protection equipment was deleted from the budget and stressed
that the recommended comprehensive EDP master plan is yet to be developed.
Mr. Ancis concluded that the Data Processing Department had improved significantly;
that major controls are now in place, and increased emphasis can now be devoted to
e>~anding services to users. He commented that the Department should continue to
complete feasibility studies in an effort to consider all alternatives in developing
new projects. Emphasis should be concentrated on City of Anaheim users, and the
City should continue to improve its cost allocation system.
In response to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Talley explained that the fire protection
equipment previously recommended by Arthur Young and Company was deleted from the
budget to make up the reduction necessary to lower the City's tax rate by $.10 per
$100 valuation. He advised that the Data Processiz~g Director has recently been
instructed to solicit new bids for the fire protection system which will be presented
to Council for consideration.
Following an inquiry from Councilman Kott, discussion ensued as to the dollar amount
of savings realized by the City in its Data Processing Division as a result of
Arthur Young and Company recommendations. Mr. Tim Haidinger of Arthur Young and
Company estimated that approximately $20,000to $25,000 were realized predicated
primarily on the use of non-IBM peripheral equipment.
Councilwoman Kaywood questioned the recommendation that MDS activities be de-emphasized,
particularly in view of the comment that these services are now operating more smoothly
than before, and it was explained that it was felt by Arthur Young and Company that
77-74
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January._25 1977, 1:30 P.M,
these services currently are taking up some excess capacity in the computer. How-
ever, in the not-too-distant future,' when the financial management system is
installed, the full capacity may be reached and, at that time, new applications by
City of Anaheim users should be given priority over MDS services.
Councilman Roth questioned the cost for Arthur Young and Company in the current ,
fiscal year and Mr. Talley replied that the Council has authorized projects with
that fi. mn this year totaling approximately $60,000, one of which is the City's
annual financial report.
Discussion ensued during which Councilman Roth pointed out that the total cost
for Arthur Young and Company services o'~er the last four years comes close to
$400,000. Mr. Talley confirmed that the current total is $475,000, and at the end
of this fiscal year will be $525,000 paid to Arthur Young and Company for professional
services.
Councilman Seymour felt it equally important to point out the savings which the City
has realized as a result of this expenditure. Mayor Thom and Mr. Haidinger recalled
that half-way through the review performed to determine whether or not savings were
actually being realized, it was determined there were savings amounting to between
$2.5 to $3 million dollars.
With respect to the City's approach to a financial management system, Mr. Ancis
explained that they reviewed the plans to utilize some programs currently running
in Sunnyval% California, evaluated the City's plans to implement that system and
the estimated budget and time schedule. They conclude that the budget figures of
$325,000 are reasonable; that the technical approach is sound with the stipulation
that the City's computer capacity will be completely utilized once the system is
installed. The project schedule appears sound; however, they would recommend that
a more detailed plan be outlined with specific tasks, manpower assigned, and this be
extrapolated to show the costs associated with specific tasks to verify budgeted
amounts.
Mayor Thom asked if the City could develop .and implement accounting inventory and
equipment modules similar to those being adapted from the Sunnyvale system for a
similar amount of money and whether programs might be developed which would take up
less capacity on the computer.
Mr. Ancis replied to the latter portion of the question that the City has adopted an
on-line approach giving the users immediate and direct access to 'the computer with
terminals. Given that as the approach, the City could not proceed with such a pro-
gram with any less computer power. In further response to the Mayor, Mr. Ancis
explained that he could not compare costs of developing a financial management
system, as it depends upon how these are allocated. However, he allowed it would be
difficult to formulate and implement a new system at this price.
in direct response to comments from a member of the audience as to how many employees
would lose jobs because of the computerized system, it was explained that no layoffs
are intended as a result of the establishment of this computer program, but that it
would most likely lead to fewer additional hirings in the future, as the program
would supply better financial information.
77-75
(,i~'.' Hal!., A~naheim,. C. alifoT~La - COUNCIL MINUTES - J.an..u.a.ry. 25, 1977, 1:~.0 ,P...M.
M0['iON: Councilman Seymour moved to approve development of the financial management
and cost accounting program budget for fiscal year 1977-78, as recommended by the
City }~nager, with the further stipulations that a master plan be prepared within
~ix to eight weeks delineating, specificall~ the 9,000 man hours included in th.~
bt~dgeted cost of $325,000. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. To this
motion, Council Members Kott and Thom voted "No". MOTION CARRIED. ,
Mayor Thom explained that his "No" vote reflects the fact that he would feel more
comfortable if the City were to design their own system with the help of a consultadt
such as Arthur Young and Company. Admittedly, he recognized that this would probably
cost more and that he has no better alternative, but still could not accept the
adopted Sunnyvale system for the City of Anaheim.
Councilman Seymour stated that he understands the reluctance to accept the Sunnyvale
system expressed by Mayor Thom, but commented that the City of Anaheim has for too
long been run without adequate financial 'information, and that because the City's
management team is familiar with the Sunnyvale system and should be able to work out
any problem in same, he supports the installation and use of that system.
Councilman Seymour offered Resolution Nos. 77R-42 through 77R-44, both inclusive,
for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 7.7.R~42: A RESOLUTION OF. THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH INTERNATIONAL MANAGEMENT
SYSTEMS CORPORATION FOR COP~UTER PROGRAMMING SERVICES ~ND AUTHORIZING THE }~YOR
TH~ CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-43: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AMENDMENT TO AGREEMENT WITH RAYTHEON
SERVICE COM]PANY.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-44: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH SECURITY PACIFIC NATIONAL
BANK PERTAINING TO THE LEASE OF CERTAIN EQUIPMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND
CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEI~ENT. (CMI Storage Unit 145-384K)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COLrNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour and Roth
Kott and Thom
None
The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 77R-42 through 77R-44, both inclusive, duly
passed and adopted.
CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 76-77-23. VARIANCE NO. 2871, TENTATIVE,
TRACT NO. 9482: Application of Jack and Dorothy D. Hall, et al, for change in zone
from RS-A-43,000(SC) to RM-2400(SC) and the following code waivers to establish a
14-lot subdivision on property located at the southwest corner of Riverdale Avenue
and Lakeview Avenue was submitted, together with application for negative declaration
status on the requirement to prepare an EIR:
~ity Hal!,.Anabeim,..California - COUNCIL MINUTES...J~nuary 25,.!97.7~ 1;30 ?,~.
a) Minimum number of parking spaces.
b) Minimum structural setback.
c) Permitted encroachment into required yard.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-241, recommended
disapproval of Reclassification No. 76-77-23, pursuant to Resolution No. PC76-24~
denied Variance No. 2871, and recommended that these projects be declared exempt
tom the requirement to prepare an EIR.
Public hearing was continued from the meetings of December 21, 1976 and January 11,
1977 to allow resubmittal of revised plans to the City's Planning Cormr~ssion. for
review.
The City Clerk advised that a request for a continuance of this item had been
received from the applicant, and Miss Santalahti explained that the Planning Commission
review of revised plans concluded in a tie vote, both for recommendations of approval
and denial. She advised that the seventh Planning Commission member would be present
next week, and if the Council wished a recommendation from the Planning Commission, it
would be appropriate to continue the matter to a Council meeting subsequent to the
forthcoming Planning Commission meeting.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Kott, the Council continued
the public hearing on Reclassification No. 76-77-23, Variance No. 2871 and Tentative
Tract No. 9482 to the meeting of February 1, 1977. MOTION CARRIED.
A number of people in the audience indicated they were present for the public hearing
and felt it unfair to grant a continuance when they had been inconvenienced and had to
take time from work to attend this meeting.
Tha City Council reconsidered the motion to continue, and Councilman Seymour pointed
out that although he would normally prefer to have a standing recommendation from the
City Planning Commission prior to considering these matters, in this instance it
appears that the only recommendation forthcoming from the Planning Commission stale-
mate would be on a 4-3 vote, and he would be reluctant to continue the matter over
the objections of the citizens present to obtain that kind of clarification.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Kott, the foregoing motion
to continue the public hearing on Reclassification No. 76-77-23, Vsriance No. 2871
and Tentative Tract No. 9482 was rescinded. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: Prior to.proceeding with this public hearing, by general consent, the Council
recessed for fifteen minutes. (3:10 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Thom called the meeting to order, all Council Members being
present. (3:25 P.M.)
Miss Santalahti described the location, zoning and land uses of surrounding property.
She briefed the staff report submitted to and considered by the City Planning
Com~_ission.
77-77
City Ha_ll, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUS, E.S - January 25, 19.7~., 1:.30 P..M.
Mayor Thom opened the public hearing.
One of the applicants and agent, Mr. Jack Hall, civil engineer, 2530 North Grand
Avenue, Santa Aha, presented a brief slide show containing photographs of the sub-
ject property and its present street configuration.
Mr. Hall summarized that he has eliminated the need for the requested waivers in his
revised plan; that the proposal is in accordance with the City's general pla~ inasmuch
as he feels it would produce a low density development; th~ his proposal to establish
duplex units on the property would insure a better maiotenance situation; that loca-
tion of the property next to a freeway, as well as on primary and secondary streets,
be:ret suits a duplex-type Cevelopment than it does single-family residential.
Mr. Hall concluded that he feels his development would provide affordable housing ami
~nvestment opportunities with a tingle-family atmosphere. He requested, should C~',uncil
deny his zoning and variance applications, that they continue the tentative map, as he
would most likely proceed with an application to rezone the property to RS-7200 and
could revise Tentative Map 9482 to reflect the situation in a more expeditious manner
than applying for a new tract map.
In response to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Hall advised that he does have plans for
development in the RS-7200 zone, but this would require the same treatment as afforded
the tract to the west, i.e., variances to establish side-on lots and waiver of Council
Policy No. 538 to permit building setbacks 40 feet from arterial highways. He
advised that he could not assure her as to whether all one or two-story homes would
be constructed with an RS-7200 tract, as they had not planned the structures them-
selves, but just completed the proposed lots for a tract map.
Mr. James Buskirk presented a petition in opposition to the ~M-2400 zoning proposal,
containing signatures of at least one adult occupant in 38 of the 41 homes occupied
in the existing single-family tract immediately to the wes~ of subject property.
Mr. Buskirk stated that he believes single-family homes would fit into the subject
area with the least impact on the environment and would sell at a profit to the
builder. He cited that traffic statistics indicate 16 single-family homes would
generate 164 trips per day, whereas 28 occupancies in a duplex development would
generate 238 trips per day, whick'is a considerable difference. In conclusion., he
stated tha~ there would not be an appreciable difference in profits realized by
the developer, whether he builds duplexes or single-family homes.
Ann Newberry, resident in the adjacent neighborhood, stressed the already over-
crowded school situation in the Canyon area and the extremely heavy and rapid moving
traffic in their neighborhood as factors which should be considered against approval
of the proposal. In addition, she felt that approval of this proposal adjacent to
the freeway would set a precedent for similar developments throughout the Canyon area.
In rebuttal, Mr. Hall agreed with the majority of the comments made by those in
opposition; however, he indicated that he never felt the singl~-family homes would
not sell, just that he personally was of the opinion that a duplex would be a better
project for that location and would prove to be better maintained in that location
than would a single-family development.
77-78
City Hall~ .A. naheim., .Ca!ifo. rni.~ - C0UN..CIL MINUTES - January 25, !9.77, l:30~p..,M.
There being no further persons who wished to speak, Mayor Thom closed the public
hearing.
ENVIRONb~NTAL IMPAC.T - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman Kott, seconded
by Councilman Roth, the City Council finds that this project will have no significant
effect on the environment and is, therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare
an environmental impact report. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 77R-45 for adoption sustaining the
recommendation of the City Planning Commission denying Reclassification No. 76-77-23.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-45: A RESOLUTIOMOF TH~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
DENYING RECLASSIFICATION NO. 76-77-23.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-45 duly passed and adopted.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 77R-46 for adoption denying Variance
No. 2871, as recommended by the City Planning Commission. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NQ. 77R-46: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
DENYING VARIANCE NO. 2871.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
MOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kavwood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-46 duly passed and adopted.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9482: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman
R~th, the City Council referred Tentative Tract No. 9482 for a 14-lot P~M-2400(SC)
subdivision at the southwest corner of Riverdale Avenue and Lakeview Avenue back to
the City Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 2874: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, ~econded by
Councilman Roth, the public hearing on Variance No. 2874 submitted by Bernardo M. and
P~rgaret Yorba to construct self-service gasoline pumps and an office building with
certain code waivers on RS-A-43,000(SC) zoned property located at the southeast corner
of Santa Aha Canyon Road and Imperial Highway was continued to the meeting of
February 8, 1977, in accordance with the applicants' request. Councilman Seymour
abstained from voting on the motion. MOTION C~RRIED. ~
77-7'9
City Hall., An~e£~, California - COUNC!L..MINUTE~.~.- January 25,..~9.77,
PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE ~0- 2879: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by
Councilman Kott, the City Council accepted the request for termination submitted
by the applicant, Title Insurance and Trust Company, and thereby terminated all
proceedings in connection with Variance No. 2879 to permit construction of a flower
skop on CL zoned property located at 1691 West Katella Avenue with certain code
waivers. MOTION CARRIED.
ADDITIONAL PUBLIC MEETING - MODJESKA PARK COMM~I%Y BUILDING: Mayor Thom recognized
Mr. 3ohn Turanitza who had requested, on behalf of 'those homeowners in opposition 'to
the: Modjeska Park Community Building, another publJ, c meeting wi'th the City. Council to
discuss the project in three week's time.
Council Members were fearful that a meeting three weeks hence might jeopardize the
City's ability to comply with the requirements of the EDA grant, 'which is that they
be under construction within a specified time frame..
Mr. Ruth stated that the Parks, Recreation and the Arts Department is working on a
very tight schedulg and if it is the desire of the Council ~hat an additional public
meeting be held, even two weeks would be stretching the point.
Mr. Turanitza stated that.he had originally requested a meeting im four week's time
and stressed that his committee had been working on information 'they feel should be
presented to the Council since JanUary 18, 1977 and Should be afforded the time in
which to complete this material. Furthermore, they have requested copies of the
City's application, as it was forwarded to EDA and these might not be received in
tine for a meeting in less than three to four weeks. He advised that'he had per-
sonally been in touch with EDA administration and had been told that the ~ty
would have until April 4, 1977 to break ground without jeopardizing the grant money.
Councilwoman Kaywood questioned whether it would be all right with Mr. TuranitZa if
by delaying the City were to lose the grant money.
Mr. Turanitza replied negatively and reiterated that the City~has 90 days in which to
break ground and that he has been informed that half of the line of credit was already
received by the City.
Mr. Talley explained that in order to expend any of those funds a Council action
would be required awarding a contract.
In addition, Mr. Turanitza requested that there be no ground breaking in Modjeska
Park for two weeks and, further, that the meeting be held at some "impartial' location
other than the Chartres Recreation Center.
The City Council advised Mr. Turanitza that there are no City-owned facilities large
enough to acco~,odate the attendance anticipated which would be available other than
the Chartres Recreation Center.
Mrs. Shirley Modiano stressed, that the City parks are paid for by citizens from all
areas of the City and are not intended for the exclusive use of residents immediately
surrounding them.
77-80
City }~a!l, .Anahei.m.~ Califq.rnia - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25, 1977
Mrs. Betty J. Marquardt, 1665 South Nutwood Street, Anaheim, advised Council that
Mr. Turanitza is not speaking for all of the people im that end of town; that there
are some people who have been living there 20 years and more who desperately want
the community building in Modjeska Park.
MOTION: At the conclusiom of discussion, on motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded
by Councilman Seymour, the City Council determined they would hold a public meeting
for discussion of the Modjeska Park Community Building on February 8, 1977 at 7:30
P.M. at the Chartres Recreation Center, 222 East Chartres Street, Anaheim. MOTION .CARRIED.
OPPOSITION TO REDISTRIBUTION OF SALES TAX REVENUES: Councilwoman Kaywood offered
Resolution No. 77R-47 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTI.ON NO. 77R-47: A RESOLUTIOI~ OF THE CITY COU~CIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM,
CALIFORNIA, OPPOSING THE REDISTRIBUTION OF SALES TAX REVENUES ON THE BASIS OF POPUI~-
TION.
Roll Call Vote:
A.YBS:
NOES:
ABSE~.~:
COTjNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL ~MBEP~S:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The b~yor declared Resolution No. 77R-47 duly passed and adopted.
FALMS RESTAURANT ELECTRIC BILL: In response to Councilman Kott, Mr. Hopkins advised
that he anticipates a complaint will be filed in Superior Court within the next ten
days regarding the Palms Restaurant electric bill.
TELEPHONE COMPANY LITIGATION: In response to Councilman Kott, Mr. Hopkins explained
that the City Attorney's Office had forwarded an offer of support to the City of Los
Angeles in connection with Pacific Telephone Company litigation but were informed that
the p~pers were already prepared. The City Attorney's Office then asked to be advised
when the next phase comes about, and have not yet received a report.
APPEAL FROM DENIAL OF AN ANIb~L LICENSE APPLICATION: Letter of appeal from the denial
for an animal license application from the County of Orange to keep a chimpanzee at
7445 East Peralta Hills Drive, Anaheim, was submitted by Nancy I. Abbott. Also sub-
mitted was communication from her attorney, Mr. Coont~ advising that this action is
no longer necessary inasmuch as a variance (scheduled later on this agenda - Variance
No. 2884) was approved by the City Planning Commission to permit the chimpanzee to
remain.
Mr. Hopkins advised, however, that it would be necessary to amend sections of Title 18
and 8 of the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to the prohibition against keeping wild
animals in order to alleviate conflict.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council directed
the City Attorney to prepare an ordinance amending Section, s of the Anaheim Municipal ~
Code pertaining to wild or exotic animals which would permit exceptions thereto.
77-81
.City Hall, A~aheim, ca%i~0rn~a.._ ~OUNC!L ,Mi,NUTES _ January 55, !977.. 1:3~0 P,~,
To this motion, Councilwoman Kaywood voted "No" indicating she had concerns regard-
ing the safety of keeping a full-grown chimpanzee, which have not been answered.
MOTION CARRIED.
AWARD OF WORK ORDER NO 799-A: In accordance with recommendations of the City Engineer,
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 77R-48 for adoption. Refer to Resolution
Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-48: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE
BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT
AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT:
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LIGHTING INSTALLATION AT THE INTERSECTION OF SANTA ANA
CANYON ROAD AND VIA CORTEZ, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO, 799-A. (Steiny
and Company, Inc., $39,750.00)
Roll Call Vote:
At~S: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSTAINED: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
Seymour
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-48 duly passed and adopted.
PURC}~SE OF EQUIPMENT - 32-FOOT AERIAL DEVICE AND TRUCK BODY,. BID NO. 31~5: On motion
by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the Iow bid of' C. C. Douglas
Manufacturing was accepted, and purchase authorized in the amount of $9,974.23,
including tax, aa recommended by the Purchasing Agent in his memorandum dated
January 12, 1977. MOTION CARRIED.
PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT. - INDUSTRIAL LOADER TRACTOR, BID NO. 318/~: Onmotion by
Councilnmn Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, th~ iow bid of McCoy Tractor Company
was accepted, and purchase authorized in the amount of $13,375.08, including tax, as
recommended by the Purchasing Agent in his memorandum dated January 17 1977 MOTION
CARRIED. · ~ -
APPEAL - FIGURE MODEL STUDIO PERMIT,.. SUNSHINE COMPANY: Appeal from Council's denial
of a permit for a figure model studio establishment was submitted by Mr. William
Engle for the Sunshine Company, 212 North State College Boulevard, Anaheim. Also
submitted was a request from Mr. Engle that consideration of his appeal by the Council
be continued for a period of 45 to 60 days.
Mr. Hopkins reported that the appeal was originally scheduled this date by the City
Clerk, pursuant to Mr. Engle's request, and that the figure modeling studio in
question is presently operating without a permit. He advised that he would recommend
no more than a one-week continuance on the basis that Mr. Engle's attorney is engaged
elsewhere this date.
77-82
Hall, Anaheim,. California - COUNCIL MINUTE~ - January 2.5, !977.,..1.:30 ~M-
MOT[ON: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Kott, the appeal
from denial of a figure model studio establishment permit submitted by Mr. William
Engle for the Sunshine Company was continued to the meeting of February 1, 1977.
MOTION CARRIED.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilmam
Thom, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports and
reconnnendations furnished each Council Member, and as listed on the Consent Calendar
Agenda:
1. CLAIMS AGA. IN~.T THE CITY: .The following claims were denied and referred to the
City's self-insurance administrator:-
a. Claim submitted by Margaret Hunter for damages purportedly sustained as a result
of power failure on or about November 27, 1976.
b. Claim submitted by James S. Huarte for damages purportedly sustained as a result
of toppled traffic light at the southeast corner of East and La Palma Streets on or
about November 27, 1976.
c. Claim submitted by Edward Schmutzler on behalf of Alvin Schmutzler for damages
purportedly sustained as a result of the negligent condition of the slide at
Manzanita Park on or about November 12, 1976.
2. DINNER-DANCEAND AMUSEME~ DEVICES PERMITS: The following permits were granted
subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Police:
a. Dinner Dance Permit to allow dancing Tuesday through Sunday, from 9:00 P.M. to
1:00 A.M. at the Don Jose Restaurant #7, 2681 West La Palma Avenue (Michael Joseph
Genovese, applicant).
b. Amusement Devices Permit for 8 billiard tables, 10 pinball machines and 4
video games at the Great Gatsby Inc. arcade, 951 South Knott Avenue (Leonard Coleby,
applicant).
c. Amusement Devices Permit for 1 shuffleboard at the Alibi, 821 South Brookhurst,
(Raymond Robert Humphrys and John Earl Morgan, applicants).
d. Amusement Devices Permit for 1 remote control baseball game at the Chug-A-Lug
Beer Bar, 3456 West Orange Avenue (Raymon~ Robert Humphrys and John Earl Morgan,
applicants).
e. Amusement Devices Permit for 1 bowliqg machine and 1 pinball machine at Duffe~s
Too, 845 South Knott Avenue (Raymond Robert Humphrys and John Earl Morgan, applicants).
f. Amusement Devices Permit for 1 pinball machine at Mimi's Beer Bar, 3148~ West
Lincoln (Raymond Robert Humphrys and John Earl Morgan, applicants).
g' Amusement Devices Permit for 1 pinball machine at the Safari Lounge, 2240 West ~
Lincoln Avenue (Raymond Robert Humphrys and John Earl Morgan, applicants).
77-83
Cits' H~ll,_.ADaheim, California - ~OUNCIL MINUTES - January 25,' 19.77, .I:~0.P.,M,
3. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed:
a. Federal Power Commission regarding Southern California Edison Company Docket
No. ER76-205, rulings and order on discovery motion and issuance of a subpoena of
January 5, 1977.
b. California State Transportation Board second report regarding revisions to the
draft Policy Element of the California Transportation Plan.
c. Orange County Vector ContrOl District - Minutes of December 16, 1976.
d. Community Redevelopment Commission'- Minutes of January 5, 1977.
e. Public Library Board - Minutes of December 20, 1976.
f. Parks and Recreation Commission - Minutes of November 24, 1976.
g. Project Area Committee (Alpha) - Minutes of December 14, 1976.
h. Monthly reports for December, 1976 - Library, Police, Customer Service and
Treasurer.
MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NOS.. 77R-49 THROUGH 77R-52: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution
Nos. 77R-49 through 77R-52, both inclusive, for adoption, in accordance with the
reports, recommendations and certifications furnished each Council Member and as
listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-49 - DEEDS.OF EASEMENT: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY.
OF ~aNAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Texaco Anaheim
Hills, Inc.; James R. Iverson & Joyce Iverson; Charle P. Barnes; Andrew and Rochelle
Carrano; Vantel Corp.; Herbert E. and Elizabeth Christensen; John B. McElheny, et
RESOLUTION NO....~7R-50: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION
~ND CO~LETION OF A PUBLIC IM]PROVEMENT, TO WIT: GAYMONT STORM DRAIN, BALL ROAD TO
RO~ AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 899, EDA PROJECT NO. 075101051,
APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUC-
TiON OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.;
AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED
PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened February 17 1977 -
2:00 P.M.) ·
RESOLb~ION NO. 77R-5l: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
FINDING AND DETERP[INING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUC-
TIO1~ ~ND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: LINCOLN AVENUE MEDIAN ISLAND
IMPROVEMENT, EUCLID STREET TO KNOTT STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO.
900, EDA PROJECT NO. 075101059, APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS
AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID
City Ha~l, AnaheimL. California - COUNCIL MINUTES -....~anuary ~5, .1.~77., !~30 P-M,
PUBLIC IP~ROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND
AUTHORIZING ~D DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISh A NOTICE INVITING SEALED
PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION T~REOF. (Bids to be opened February 17, 1977 -
2:00 P.M.)
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-52:. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI~
FINDING A~ DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUC-
TION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: HANCOCK PLACE, NORTH OF LA
PALMA AVENUE, WATER SYSTEM I~ROVEMENT, IN T~IE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 9226,
APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS? PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CON-
STRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING
THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION
THEREOF. (Bids to be opened February 17, 1977, 2:00 P.M.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The blayor declared Resolution Nos. 77R-49 through 77R-52, both inclusive, duly passed
and adopted.
CITY PLA~INING COMMISSION ITEMS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at
their~meeting held January 3, 1977, pertaining to the following applications were
submitted for City Council information and consideration.
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council author-
ized the actions pertaining to the following environmental impaCt requirements as
recommended by the City Planning Commission and took no further action on the following
applications (Item Nos. 1 through 13):
1. E~IRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: The Planning Director has
determined that the proposed activities in the following listed zoning applications
fall within the definitions of Section 3.01, Class 1, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines
to the requirements for an Environmental Impact Report and are, therefore, categorically
exempt from the requirement to 'file an EIR:
Conditional Use Permit No. 1678
Variance No. 2884
Variance No. 2892
Variance No. 2893
2. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: The Planning Commission recom-
mends to the City Council that the subject projects and the following lis~ed zoning
applications be declared exempt from the requirement to prepare an Environmental Impact
Report, pursuant to the provisions of the California Environmental Quality Act:
Conditional Use Permit No. 1677
3. VARIANCE NO. 2884: Application of Roger T. and Nancy Abbott, for waiver of prohib ed
animals, to permit a pet chimpanzee on RS-HS-43,000(SC) zoned property located at
745 East PeraltaHills Drive.
77-85
C__ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25~ 1977, 1:30 P.M.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC77-1 granted Variance No. 2884 for a
period of three years.
4. VARIANCE NO. 2892: Submitted by Robert and Donna Hostetter, to establish a
real estate office in an existing single-family structure with certain code waivers
on RS-7200 zoned property located at 1792 Tiara Street. ,
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC77-4 granted Variance No. 2892 in part.
5. VARIANCE NO. 2893: Submitted by Dunn Business Parks, to establish dental and
optometry offices with code waiver of permitted uses on ML zoned property located
at 1168 and 1170 Knollwood Circle.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC77-5 granted Variance No. 2893 for a period
of 18-months.
6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1677: Submitted by Lana Corporation, to permit a drive-
through restaurant oh CL zoned property located on the southwest corner of La Palma
Avenue and Harbor Boulevard.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC77-6 granted Conditional Use'Permit No. 1677.
7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1678: Submitted by Chien Shah Wang, to permit an auto
rental agency with certain code waivers on CL zoned property located at 619 West
Katella Avenue.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC77-7 denied Conditional Use Permit No. 1678.
8. VARIANCE NO. 2546 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by D. A. Hankins, MCCoy Ford, for
a two-year extension of time to Variance No. 2546 for outdoor storage of automobile
and recreational vehicles on ML zoned property located at the northeast corner of
Broadway and Loara Street.
The City Planning Commission by
September 5, 1978.
motion granted the extension of time to expire
9. VARIANCE NO. 2643 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by Timothy W. Wallace for a
two-year extension of time to Variance No. 2643 for outdoor storage of used auto-
mobile supplied and parts on CG zoned property located on the northeast corner of
Center Street and Manchester Avenue.
The City Planning Commission by motion, granted an extension of time expiring
October 30, 1978.
10. VARIANCE NO. 2705 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by John L. Curci, Curci-Turner
Company, for an extension of time for Variance No. 2705 permitting outdoor storage
of trucks and equipment on property located on the southside of Cypress and west of
Vine Street.
The City Planning Commission by motion, approved a conditional 60-day extension of
time, expiring March 4, 1977.
77-86
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES 7 January 25, !977,. 1:30 p,.M.
11. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1359 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by Dan L. Rowland
Agent, for an extension of time for Conditional Use Permit No. 1359 permitting estab-
lishment of a 10-story hotel on CR zoned property located at 1700 South Harbor Boule-
vard.
The City Planning Commission by motion, granted an extension of time to expire
December 27, 1977.
12. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1570 - EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by Curt Boswor~h
for an extension of time to Conditional Use Permit No. 1570 to permit the use of a
trailer as a temporary office structure on CG zoned property located on the north
side of Lincoln and west of Magnolia.
The City Planning Commission, by motion, approved a conditional 60-day extension of
time expiring March 4, 1977.
13. TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 8142 (REVISION NO. 1) - SPECIFIC PLANS: Specific plans sub-
mitted by Texaco-Anaheim Hills , Inc., for Tract No. 8142 containing 33 RS-5,000(SC)
zoned lots located on the east side of Nohl Ranch Road, south of Walnut Canyon Road
were approved by the City Planning Commission.
MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 73-74725~ PRECISE 'PLANS~ ~REE REMOVAL: Precise Plans and a
removal plan for specimen trees submitted by Bren Development Company, Santa Ana
Valley Irrigation Company and Edna, Bernardo and Jack Yorba, in conjunction with
Reclassification No. 73-74-25, for proposed CL zoned property located at the north-
west corner of Santa Ana Canyon Road and Imperial, were approved as recommended by
the City Planning Co~mission, on motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman
Thom. Councilman Seymour abstained from voting on the motion. MOTION CARRIED.
VARIANCE NO. 2890 AND TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9685: Submitted by Weinrow Enterprises
(Home Construction, Inc., developer) to establish 20 RS-7200 lots with certain code
waivers on property located north of Orange Avenue and west of Brookhurst Street.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC77-3~granted Variance No. 2890 and recom-
mended that the City Council declare subject project exempt from the requirement to
prepare an EIR.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: On motion by Councilman Thom,
seconded by Councilman Roth, the City Council finds that this project will have no
significant effect on the environment and is exempt from the requirement to prepare
an EIR. MOTION CARRIED.
The City Council took no further action on Variance No. 2890.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9685: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Roth,
the proposed subdivision, Tentative Tract Map No. 9685, together with its design and
improvement was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the City Counc~.
approved said Tentative Map with waiver of Council Policy No. 542 as it pertains to
Lot No. 20 as recormmended by the City Planning Commission and subject to the following
conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission:
77-87
C~ity Hall? Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25, 1977, 1:30 P.M.
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 9685 is granted subject to the
approval of Variance No. 2890.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each
subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. ,
3. That all lots within this tract shalll be served by underground utilities.
4.. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved hy
the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
5. That street names shall be approved by the City Planning Department prior to
approval of a final tract map.
6. That drainage of said property shall, be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to
the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site, sufficient grading is required to
necessitate a grading permit, no work on grading will be permitted between October i5th
and April 15th unless all required off-site drainage facilities have been installed and
are operative. Positive assurance shall be provided the City that Such drainage
facilities will be completed prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site
drainage facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall have
initiated condemnation proceedings therefor (the costs of which shall be borne by the
developer) prior to the commencement of grading operations. The required drainage
facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from
higher properties through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the City
Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction and shall be
completed and be functional throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary of the
property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final building
inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimbursement agreements may be
made available to the developers of said property upon their request.
7. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate
park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council,
said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued.
8. That in accordance with City Council policy, a 6-foot masonry wall Shall be con-
structed on the south property line separating Lot No. 1 from Orange Avenue. Reason-
able landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be 'installed in the uncemented
portion of the arterial highway parkway the f~ll distance of said wall~ plans for said
landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of
Parkway :'[aintenance; and following installation and acceptance, the ~City of Anaheim
shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping.
9. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to
be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement of structural
framing.
10. That the centerline of the proposed street shall align with the centerline of
Greenwich Street across Orange Avenue to the south.
77-88
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL blINUTES - January 25, 1977~ 1:30 P.M.
I1. That deed restrictions shall be submitted to the City Attorney's Office for
approval and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange Councy Recorder, said deed
restrictions to prohibit any fencing exceeding forty-two (42) inches in height along
the panhandle portions of Lot Nos. 13, 16 and 17, except that said panhandles may be
bordered by !andscapin~, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT NO. 9616 AND ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO~ 193: Developer, Parkview
Homes; tract located on the south side of Santa Ana Canyon Road, east of Royal Oak
Road; containing 25 RS-HS-iO,000(SC) zoned lots.
ENVIRO~YMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 193 - CERTIFICATION: EIR No. 193 having been reviewed
by the City staff and recommended by the City Planning Commission to be in compliance
with City and State Guidelines, and the State of California Environmental Quality Act,
the City Council acting upon such information and belief, does hereby certify on motion
by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, that EIR No. 193 is in compliance
with the California Environmental Quality Act and City and State Guidelines. MOTION
CARRIED.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the proposed subdivision,
Tentative Map Tract No. 9616, together with its design and improvement was found to be
consistent with the City's General Plan and the City Council approved said Tentative
Map. together with the Tree Removal Plan submitted, as recommended by the City Plannin,~
Commission and, further, subject to the following conditions recommended by the City
Planning Commission:
1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each
subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval.
2. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities.
3. .That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by
the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder.
4. That any.proposed covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final
tract map and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall
be recorded concurrently with the final tract map.
5. That street names shall be approved by the City Planning Department prior to
approval of a final tract map.
6. That draingae of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to
the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site, sufficient grading is required
:o necessitate a grading permit, no work on grading will be permitted between October 15th
and April 15th unless all required off-site drainage facilities have been installed and
~are operative. Positive assurance shall be provided the City that such drainage
facilities will be completed prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-s~-'
drainage facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall have
initiated condemnation proceedings therefor (the costs of which shall be borne by the
developer) prior to the commencement of grading operations. The required drainage
7 7-8'9
C_ity Hall~ Ansheim, California - COUNCIL bIINUTES - January 25~ 1977, 1:30 P.M.
facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry runnoff waters originating
from higher properties through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the
City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction and
shall be completed and be functional throughout the tract and from the downstream
boundary of the property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuanc~ of any
final building inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimbursement
agreements may be made available to the developers of said property upon their request.
7. That sound-attenuation measures adjacent to Santa Aha Canyon Road shall be complied
with as required by Council Policy No. 542.
8. That reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed
in the uncemented portion of the median island and south side of Santa Aha Canyon Road
right-of-way in accordance with the requirements of the Superintendent of Parkway
Maintenance. Following installation and' acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume
the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping.
9. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary street name
signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
10. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropri-
ate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the .City Council,
said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued.
11. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and determined to be
necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to commencement of structural framing.
12. That all structures shall be constructed in accordance with the requirements of
Fire Zone 4, as required by the City of Anaheim Fire Department.
13. In accordance with the.requirements of Section 18.02.047 pertaining-to the initial
sale of residential homes in the City of Anaheim Planning Area "B", the seller shall
provide each buyer with written information concerning the Anaheim General Plan and
the existing zoning within 300 feet of the boundaries of subject tract.
14. That prior to the approval of the final tract map, the petitioner shall submit
final specific plot plans, floor plans, and elevations (including 'building materials)
to the City Council for approval.
15. That the proposed removal of a maximum of sixty-three (63) specimen trees, as
defined in the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone standards pertaining to Tree Preservation,
shall be replaced on a 1:1 ratio with 15-gallon minimum size trees from the replacement
list specified in the Tree Preservation Ordinance and as indicated on the tree removal
plan submitted by the developer.
MOTION CARRIED.
RECLASSIFICATION NO. 73-74-37 AND CO~ITIONAL USE PERMIT NOS. 1445 AND 1446 - EXTENSION
OF TIME: Request by George W. Riley, Architect, for a one-year extension of time to
Reclassification No. 73-74-37 and Conditional Use Permit Nos. 1445 and 1446, in con-
junction with proposed CL zoned property located at the northeast corner of McKinnon
Drive and Lakeview Avenue, was submitted together with report from the Planning Depart-
ment recommending that one-year extensions of time be granted on ail three zoning
applications expiring February 5, 1978.
77-90
C_ity Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES January 25, 197~, 1:~0 P.M.
Councilman Seymour left the Council Chamber (4:45 P.M.).
Councilman Kott stated that he has received input from residents in the area, indicating
that they would not be satisfied with having a service station and a facility for
psychiatric patients adjacent to their homes. Since there have been a number of
requests for extensions of time on this proposal and the conditions of approval Rave
not yet been met, Councilman Kott was of the opinion that this time extension should
not be granted.
MOTION: Councilman Kott moved that the request for extension of time to Reclassification
No. 73-74-37 and Conditional Use Permit Nos. 1445 and 1446 be denied. Councilman Thom
seconded the motion.
Under discussion, Mrs. Mary Dinndorf, 131 La Paz Street, stated that she has no objection
to this extension of time and neither did those homeowners who were present earlier at
the meeting.
Fir. Howard Rosenberg, one of the owners of subject property, advised that they had
purchased same from Canyon General Hospital at the end of October, 1976, and therefore,
should not be held responsible for promises made and not kept in the past by the
previous owners. He indicated that his partnership seeks to develop this property on
a long range basis, with a child care health center' and not a psychiatric hospital.
Mr. Rosenberg stated that they plan to proceed with their development within six mont~-,
and would be happy to accept a shorter extension of time than the one year originally
requested. In addition, he stipulated that he would be happy to review his plans wit?
local resident homeowner groups and the City Planning Commission and City Council.
Mr. Rosenberg also requested a continuance of the decision on the extension of time
to enable him to present a tentative layout of the project as his group plans it, since
chis is essentially a new application.
Mayor Thom called for the vote on the foregoing motion. Councilman Seymour temporarily
absent. Councilwoman Kaywood voted "No". MOTION CARRIED.
ORDINANCE NO. 3643: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3643 for adoption. Refer
to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 3643: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE
AN.~EIM F~NICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (66-67-61(76), CR)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
TEF~. ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3643 duly passed and adopted.
77-91
~ity Hall, AnaheiM, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25, !9~7, i:.3Q~P..M.
ORDINANCE NO. 3644: Councilwo~n Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3644 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 3644: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE.RELATING TO ZONING. (73-74-46(1) and (2), RS-HS-iO,O00(SC)
&
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
TEMP. ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour
Ad, SENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3644 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3645: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3645 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 3645: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING TITLE 14, CHAPTER
14.32, SECTION 14.32.190, SUBSECTIONS 14.32.190.850 AND 14.32.190.860 OF THE ANAHEIM
MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
TEb~. ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3645 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3646: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3646 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 3646: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 14, CHAPTER
14.32, SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO PARKING.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
TEMP. ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3646 duly passed and adopted.
ORDINANCE NO. 3647: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3647 for adoption. Refer
to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 3647: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AME~ING TITLE 14, CHAPTER
14.32 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 14.32.156 RE~TING TO
PARKING RESTRICTIONS.
77-92
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 25~ 1~77~.1:30 P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Kott, Roth and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL MLMBERS: None
TEMP. ABSENT: COUNCIL ~EMBERS: Seymour
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3647 duly passed and adopted.
Councilman Seymour returned to the Council Chamber (4:55 P.M.).
MINUTES: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City
Manager was requested to work with the City Clerk and provide additional part-time or
full-time help as she feels required to assist in preparation of Council minutes so as
to reduce the time in which these are presented for approval. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: By general consent, the Council recessed to Executive
Session. (4:56 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Thom called the meeting to order, all Council Members being
present. (5:49 P.M.)
SALE OF CITY-OWNED PROPERTY, 721 NORTH EUCLID STREET: Councilman Kott offered Res-
olution No. 77R-53 for adoption, authorizing the Mayor and the City Clerk to sign
an agreement between the City and Heritage Bank for purchase of property west of
Euclid, north of Crescent (721 North Euclid Street); and authorizing execution of
deed and escrow instructions in accordance with the terms outlined in the letter
dated January 19, 1977, from Mr. William O. Talley and accepted by Stanley J. Pawlowski,
President and Chairman of the Board, Heritage Bank. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 77R-53: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT RELATING TO THE SALE OF CERTAIN
CITY-OWNED PROPERTY AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF A DEED TO SAID REAL PROPERTY.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 77R-53 duly passed and adopted.
ADJOURNMENT: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the
Anaheim City Council adjourned to Thursday, January 27, 1977, at 1:30 p.m. MOTION
CARRIED.
Adjourned: 5:50 P.M.
LINDA D. ROBERTS, CITY CLERK