1976/01/0676-1
City ital!~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MIIIUTES - January 6~ 1976~ 1:30 P.M.
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
]'?.ESENT:
ABSENT:
P ~,Eo ~dT:
COUNCIL ~iE:[L£RS: Kay~ood, Seymour, ?ebley, Sneegas and Thom
COU'.ICIL iW..HBERS: [~one
ASSISTAi~T CITY lb%~AGER: William O. Talley
CITY ATTOPC~EY: Alan ii. Watts
DEPUTY CITY CLE].~: Linda D. Roberts
PLANNING DIRECTOR: Ronald Thompson
PERSOiINEL DIRECTOR: Garry O. McRae
UTILITIES DIRECTOR: Gordon W. lloyt
CITY ENGIiIEER: Jm.~es P. Maddox
TP~XFFIC ENGIiIEER: Paul Singer
ASSISTAJ~T DIRECTOR, PLAJEIING: Don ,McDaniel
IIOUSING .~IRECTOR: Rosario :~ttessich
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Annika Santalahti
Hayor Tho~.~ called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance
to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION: Reverend Dennis Bailey of the :~elodyland iIotline Center gave the
Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilwoman Miriam Kaywood led the Assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
IqIESENTATiON: :'Ir. Neal Gibbons of the Assembly Council presented the City with
a Bicentennial Flag.
1076 I)ISNEYLAaND A'[BASSADRESS: Hrs. }iary Jones introduced Miss Christina
Schendel, the 1976 Disney!and ;~bassadress to the Anaheim City Council. l~yor
Thom presented l~iss Schcndel with an attache case, roses, and a symbol of the
~ig "A" Scoreboard as tokens of esteem from the City of Anaheim.
MIIIUTES: Approval of the :iinutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meetings
held December 2, December 9, December 16, December 23 and December 30, 1975,
was deferred to the next regular meeting.
'JAIVER OF 1LEADING - ORDI~WAi~CES Ai[D RESOLUTIO~4S: Councilman Pebley moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the
waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after reading
of the title, specific request is ~:mde by a Council Member for the reading of
such ordinance or resolution. Councilwoman Xaywood seconded the motion.
:~OTION ~t/C~L'~OUSLY CA2RIE').
IlEPORT - FI]IAi]CIAL DE~LA~DS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the
amount of ' 9
~734.,393.89, in accordance with the 1075-76 Budget, were approved.
PETITION REGARDING ROUTE 57 FiEEUAY: :Ir. Ben Bay, 2145 '.Jest Grayson Avenue,
Anaheim, presented a photocopy of petition to be submitted to Assemblyman John
i}riggs urgently requesting that the State install the sound barriers along both
sides of the Orange Freeway (Route 57) from its northern junction with the
Riverside Freeway, south to Katella Avenue. Mr. Bay advised that the petition
contains 1,186 signatures of concerned Anaheim residents, the greater majority
of whom live in the ir~aediate area of tile freeway.
Pit. Bay requested that the Anaheim City Council join the County of Orange
in a lawsuit against the State of California to cause them to complete this
freeway with the noise buffering and landscaping, tie reviewed the five
potential areas that such litigation might be based upon, as recmmnended by tile
County Counsel's Office. Mr. Bay further noted that the dedication and opening
ceremonies for this freeway are scheduled on Wednesday, January 7, 1976 and
urged that the Anaheim City Council boycott these to illustrat~ that the City
of Anaheim is not satisfied that the freeway is completa and there has been no
notice as to when it will be finished.
At the request of Councilwo~man Kaywood, Mr. Don McDaniel reported on a
meeting he attended this date with SCAG and CalTrans in an attempt to place
this project on the Transportation Improvement Program. He advised that they
were emphatically told that it would not be possible to place the Route 57
Freeway landscaping and sound mitigation project on this program since CalTrans
~ity Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 6~ 1976~ 1:3() P.M.
is in a critical financial state and now primarily concerned with maintenance
and highway patrol funding.
During brief discussion, Council Members Thom, Seymour and Sneegas voiced
support of the efforts being made to bring this matter to the attention of
CalTrans. Council ~'~embers Thom and Seymour indicated they would boycott the
freeway opening ceremonies. Councilwoman Kay~'ood stated that she felt she
could be more effective by attending and ~aaking it known that there is a very
real people problem associated with the Route 57 Freeway. She urged those
citizens opposed to the freeway opening to also attend the SCAG Transportation
Plan Hearing which is scheduled in Orange County on January 14, 1976 frogs l:3f~
p.m. to 4:00 p.m. and 7:Of) p.m. to 9:00 p.m. at the Garden Grove City Hall.
Councilman 'l'hom moved that the City Attorney be instructed to contact the
County Counsel's Office and explore the possibilities of a joint lawsuit
against the State of California to enjoin the:a to sound buffer and landscape
that segment of the Orange Freeway (Route 57) from its northern junction with
the Riverside Freeway south to Katella Avenue in the City of A~aheim. MOTIO~
CAR~ I ED.
1975 CITY OF A~AtiEIi! AFFIFd.[ATIVE ACTIOi~ R~POPJi~: ~tr. Garry l~lcRae presented
1!)75 Affir~ative Action Report, surm~arizing the progress which has been made in
achieving a balanced work force as eocr~oed in the City of Anaheim
Adrainistrative Regulation ~o. 2.~{.
~o Council action was taken as tills was submitted for infori~ation only.
NEW JOB CLASSIFICATIONS - NEIGii~OPd~OOD DEVELOi~iEi~T COOPu~Ii~ATOR AJ~D COI.~fUNITY
DEVELOPMENT SPECIALIST: The recon~nendation from the Personnel Director to create
t~o new job classifications in tile Co~nnunity Development Department to
administer the Co~.~maunity Development }ilock Grant Programs was submitted,
together with job descriptions for said positions and an organizational chart
for ~he Housing Section of the Co~m~unity Development Department. Said recom-
mendation had been reviewed and approved by both the Assistant City l~anager and
tile Coramunity Development Department.
Council~,,an Seymour questioned both the necessity and timing for hiring of
these ~wo additional personnel, noting that there was no urgent need for these
positions when the program was administered by the Planning Department and
further that these were not mentioned in the iq75-76 Budget. Further the
organizational chart submitted indicates a plan for much greater growth of tile
program than ever was anticipated by him.
llr. llattessich explained that the Co~amunity Development Block Grant
Program is expanding, that the City should receive 1.2 million dollars for tile
second year.and 1.8 million dollars for the third, lie advised that there is a
great deal more preparatory work required by the Federal Government to apply
for these second and third year funds and that his department is currently
behind schedule because of the fact that these positions had not been created
and filled. This is the reason for the request submitted for approval of the
hiring of a consultant to assist in preparation of the second year application
for the Colamunity Development Block Grant Program. Because of the time
necessary for recruitment for these two positions, consultant services are
required to fill in the gap and to have a s-bmittal completed by February 1,
1976. lie advised that IIUD will be much more critical of the application this
year and will also require that the City have tile planning management
administrative capabilities necessary to administer the funds.
Both Council Members Thom and Seymour strongly felt that the need for
these additional positions should have been set forth during the 1975-76 Budget
planning period and indicated that they disliked the idea of these additional
positions being requested half-way through the fiscal year.
Mr. Talley advised that this particular funding source has a large number
of personnel and anticipates an extraordinary amount of participation by the
administering agency. He advised that the budget for the forthcoming 1976-77
Fiscal Year will contain a work plan, indicate the f~nding sources and all per-
sonnel whether Federally funded or not. The preliminary budget docume~ts are
due in the City Manager's Office in 45 days, by which time the recruiting
period for these positions will just about be completed. He advised that at
76-3
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COU~CIL MI.~,~UTES - January 6~ 1976~ 1..'.30 P.M.
the time this budget and work plan are submitted to i~is office, he will also
review the two contemplated positions and if it is determined at that point
that a major program adjustment is appropriate and these positions cannot be
justified, then in fact, they will not be filled.
Councilm~n Seymour advised that he would vota in favor of the creation of
the two additional positions based on ~. Talley's statement that they will not
be filled unless substantiated. He further advised that if this Federal
program is one which mandates substantial numbers of people be employed to
administer it, then he for one could not support it.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-1: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 76R-1 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A ?~ESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF Tile CITY OF ANAI~I?-! ~[ENDING RESOLUTION NO.
74R-521 ESTABLISIIING NEW JOb CLASSIFICATIONS Ai~D R~kTES OF PAY.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL i-~'dBERS:
COUNCIL liEiiBERS:
COUNCIL llEI'~BERS:
Kaywood, Sey~nour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
None
i]one
The ~.tayor declared Resolution No. 76R-1 duly passed and adopted.
ILESOLUTION NO. 76R-2 - ~IINI~iUli WAGE P~kTES~ PART-TIME JOB CLASSES: On report and
recormaendation of the Personnel Director, Councilman Seymour offered Resolution
Uo. 761~-2 for adoption, adjusting the minimum wage rates for certain unrepre-
sented part-time job classes to comply with the Federal Minimum Wage estab-
lished at $2.30 per hour.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A tLESOLUTION OF THE CITY COU~CIL OF TIIE CITY OF AN~iEIM ESTABLISHING NE~ RATES
OF COMPENSATION FOR SELECTED PART-TI~'[E CLASSES, Ai4D Al'lENDING PORTIONS OF
~tESOLUTION NO. 75R-1~4.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSEUT:
COUNCIL I~UdlIBERS:
COUNCIL ..... '~
COUNCIL I~HC[BERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
None
None
The l~Myor declared Resolution No. 76R-2 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NOS. 76R-3 ~:D 76R-4: (Adjustment, vacation and sick leave accrual
rates - Fire Department.) On report and recommendation of the Personnel
Director, Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution Nos. 76R-3 and 76R-4 for
adoption, effective December 26, 1975.
Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-3 - VACATION LEAVE ACCRUAL RATES: A RESOLUTION OF TIIE CITY
COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF Ai~AHEIi,! Al.lENDING RESOLUTION NO. 63R-910, PERSONNEL RULE
16, VACATION, A~D RESCINDING RESOLUTION NOS. 66R-301, 68R-430, 73R-501, 73R-
540, 73R-607, AND 74R-622.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-4 - SICK LEAVE ACCR~JAL Ai~D INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT BENEFITS: A
RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAltEIi! ~,IENDIi:G RESOLUTION NO.
73R-608, PERSONNEL RULE 17, SICK LEAVE, SECTIOi~ 17.02 RELATING TO SICK LEAVE
ACCRUAL AND ADDING SECTION 17.04 RELATING TO INDUSTRIAL ACCIDENT BENEFITS.
Roll Call Vote:
76-4
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 6~ 1976~ 1:30 P.:~f.
AYES:
iIOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL iilZ,,liiEKS:
COUNCIL ~iEiIBERS:
COUNCIL r'[E~ ,1;M:~S:
Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
None
None
The Hayor declared Resolution Nos. 76R-3 and 76R-4 duly passed
and adopted.
PUBLIC IiEARING - OFFICE i. IOVE-O;.I: Application by George S. lianosh, for a permit
to move a structure from 1~3~00 tlawthorne Boulevard, Torrance, California, to
32./ North State College Boulevard, Anaheim, ~as submitted together with report
from the Zoning Division of the Planning Department.
Said report indicates that Planning Staff is of the opinion that when the
structure is located and the site landscaped, it will be equal to and
compatible with existing structures in the neighborhood.
Mayor Thom asked if anyone wished to address the Council either in favor
or in opposition to the proposed office move-on; there being no response, he
declared the hearing closed.
In response to Councilwoman Kaywood, }~. Thompson advised that all prop-
erty owners within 300 feet of the proposed office move-on site were sent legal
notices and, in addition, the applicant personally contacted those people
living adjacent to the proposed site. No complaints have been received.
t~SOLUTiON NO. 76R-5: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 76R-5 for
adoption, granting a per,air to move a structure.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTIOi~ OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF Tile CITY OF ANAaiEI:¥i GRAi'iTING A STRUCTURE
i.IOVING PEIC'IIT TO GEORGE S. tIA2~OSit TO MOVE A24 OFFICE BUILDING FROif 18800
IIA%JrlIORNE BOULEVARD, TORRAJqCE, TO 320 NORTii STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD, ANAiLEIM,
CALIFORNIA.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL :iEilBERS:
COUNCIL MEHBERS:
COUNCIL 1UCIIBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
None
None
The ~yor declared Resolution No. 76R-5 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC i~ARING - P~C~SIFICATION NO. 59-60-20 (READVERTISED) ~D CONDITIONAL USE
PE~IIT NO. 1583: Application of John Priem to consider amendment of conditions
to permit a business activity limited to 18 years of age or older on CL zoned
property located at 821 South Brookhurst Street, No. 3, was submitted together
with application for negative declaration status from the requirement to
prepare an environmental impact report.
The City Planning Co[maission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-250,
reported that the Planning Director has determined that the proposed activity
falls within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1 of the City of Anaheim
Guidelines to the requirements for an environmental impact report and is,
therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an environmental
impact report and further recommended that the City Council deny the proposed
deletion of Condition No. 1 Resolution No. 5555 and Ordin~me No. 1414.
The City Planning Comraission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-251, denied
Conditional Use Permit No. 1533.
Miss Santalahti noted the location of subject property, existing uses and
zoning in the immediate area and briefed the findings submitted to and con-
sidered by the City Planning Commission.
:-~yor Thom asked if the applicant or his agent were present and received
no response.
The :~yor asked if anyone wished to address the City Council either in
favor or in opposition.
76-5
City IIall~ Anaheim~ California- COUNCIL MINUTES- Januar~ 6~ lg76~ 1:30 P.M.
Mrs. Joy Lovethorpe, $21 South Brookharst, operator of an adjacent shop,
submitted a petition which she indicated contained 100 signatures in opposition
to the requested change in conditions to permit a modeling studio limited to
person 18 years of age and older. She stated that they were opposed to this
type of business as it would bring undesirable elements into the area and would
be detrimental to the other family-oriented businesses.
There being no further speakers, the public hearing was closed.
CATEGORICAL EXEP~TION - E~VIiION~LENTAL I:~AC'£ REPO~C£: On motion by Councilman
Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council ratified the
determination of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls within
the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1 of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to
the requirements for an environmental impact report and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the requirement to file an environmental impact
report. MOTION CARRIED.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-6: Council~n Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-6 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A I~SOLUTION OF Tile CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF ANAt~IM DENYING CONDITIOi~AL USE
PE~IT NO. 1583.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL bfE:,IBERS:
COUNCIL I~EiIBERS:
COUNCIL ~iEilBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
None
None
The llayor declared Resolution No. 76R-6 duly passed and adopted.
I~SOLUTION NO. 76R-7: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-7 for
adoption, denying the requested amendment to Condition No. 1 of Resolution No.
5555 and Ordinance No. 1414.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF TitE CITY COUNCIL OF T~iE CITY OF AH{A~iEIi~,I DE,ClING REQUESTED
A>~ENDMENT TO CONDITIONS OF RESOLUTION NO. 5555 A~D ORDINANCE NO. 1414.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL lfEiIBERS:
COUNCIL IIEi4BERS:
COUNCIL I~]'~{BERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
None
No ne
The ~yor declared Resolution No. 76R-7 duly passed and adopted.
PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 75-76-20~ CONDITIONAL USE PER,lIT NO. 1~84~
VARIANCE NO. 2766 ~]D EP~IROI~.~NTAL I~ACT REPORT NO. 159: Application by
Texaco-Anaheim Hills, Inc., for a change in zone from RS-A-43,000 (SC) to ~{-
4000 (SC) and the following Code waivers to establish a 25-unit R}~-4000 (SC)
subdivision and to permit construction of a model home complex on the east side
of Anaheim llills Road, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road, was submitted together
with Environmental Impact Report No. 159:
a. Minimum building setback.
b. ~inimum distance between buildings.
c. Minimum building setback from an arterial highway.
The City Planning Comraission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-252, recom-
zaended that E.I.R No. 159 (supplementary to :~ster E.I~R. No. 80) be certified
as in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act and further
recommended that Reclassification No. 75-76-20 be approved, subject to the
following conditions:
76-6
City ilall; Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 6~ 1976~ 1:30 P.~.
1. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to
con~aencement of structural framing.
2. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange
County Recorder.
3. That completion of these reclassification proceedings is contingent
upon the granting of Variance No. 2766.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-253, granted
Conditional Use Permit No. 15S4, subject to the follo~ing conditions:
1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works.
2. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to
commencement of structural framing.
3. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities.
4. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer.
5. That public utility easements shall be granted as required by the
Director of Public Utilities.
6. That this conditional use permit shall remain in full force and effect
for a period of two (2) years from the date hereof or until all of tile homes in
Tract No. 8905 are initially sold, ~hichever occurs first, or such further time
as tile Planning Commission and/or City Council may grant.
7. That a bond in an amount and form satisfactory to the City of Anaheim
shall be posted with the City to guarantee the removal of the models in the
event the final map of Tract No. 89~)5 is not recorded.
8. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
9. That Condition No. 7, above-mentioned, shall be complied with prior to
the commencement of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to
the time that the building permit is issued, or within a period of one year
from date hereof, whichever occurs first, or such further time as the Planning
Commission and/or City Council may grant.
10. That fire hydrants shall be installed and charged as required and
determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to
co~nencement of structural framing.
11. That the petitioner stipulated the driveways were not to be considered
as private streets.
12. That the petitioner stipulated no trees would be removed.
The City Planning Cor~nission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-254, granted
Variance ~o. 2766, subject to the following conditions:
1. That this Variance is granted subject to the completion of
Reclassification No. 75-76-20, now pending.
2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5.
3. That the petitioner stipulated the driveways were not to be considered
as private streets.
4. That the petitioner stipulated that no trees would be removed.
~fiss Santalahti noted the location of subject property and surrounding
land uses and zoning. She briefed the evidence submitted to and considered by
the City Planning Co~nission.
The ~yor asked if the applicant or his agent were present and wished to
address the Council.
Mr. Jim Barisic, Vice President, Anaheim Ilills, Inc., indicated he would
be happy to reply to any questions.
l-~yor Thom asked if anyone else wished to address the Council either in
favor or in opposition to the proposed project.
76-7
City ltall~ Anaheim; California - COUNCIL ~-~INUTES - January 6;, 1976~ 1:30 P.M.
I~s. I~ry Dinndorf, President of the Santa Ana Canyon Improvement
Association, 131 La Paz Street, reviewed the configuration of subject property
and existing and proposed street alignments and noted that with the approval
for the construction of 119 multiple-family units to the north and east of
subject parcel (Tentative Tract No. 8400) it would appear that there will be a
traffic circulation problem.
Brief discussion ensued during which Mr. Barisic described the realignment
of a roadway proposed by that particular developer to alleviate the situation.
Mr. Thompson explained that there is the possibility that the area proposed for
Tract No. 8409 would be developed into single-family residential units, rather
than multiple-family in accordance with the plans previously submitted; that
Tentative ~p, Tract No. ~409 was recently granted its second time extension,
which will expire on October 9, 1976.
~. Paul Singer stated that he has been in contact with a developer who is
interested in single-family residential construction on the proposed site of
Tract No. 8409, but is unable to co~mment on the impact of that traffic or the
circulation plan on the property under discussion, since no specific plan has
been submitted.
There being no further speakers, the public hearing was closed.
Ei~VIRONILENTAL Ii~IPACT P~EPORT NO. 159 - CERTIFICATIOi~: E.I.R. No. 159 (Supple-
mentary to i.~aster E.I.R. No. 80), having been reviewed by the City staff and
recommended by the City Planning Commission to be in corapliance with City and
State Guidelines and the State of California Environmental Quality Act, the
City Council acting upon such information and belief, does hereby certify on
motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Council,:mn Pebley, that E.I.R. No. 159,
(Supplementary to bhaster E.I.R. No. 80) is in compliance with the California
Environmental Quality Act and City and State Guidelines. MOTION CARRIED.
i{ESOLUTION NO. 76R-8: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 76R-8 for
adoption, authorizing the preparation of the necessary ordinance changing the
zone as requested, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning
Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANA/tEIbl FINDING Ai~D DETER}lINING
TI[AT TITLE 18 OF TIlE ANAHEI.'.{ :fUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONII{G SIIOULD BE
321ElmED A/ID TIIAT TIlE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SIIOULD BE CILA/~GED. (75-76-20,
m~-4000 (SC))
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL MEI~ERS:
COUNCIL ME~BERS:
COUNCIL ME:~BERS:
Kay~ood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
None
None
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-3 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-9: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 76R-9 for
adoption, granting Conditional Use Permit No. 1584, subject to the conditions
recor~mended by the City Planning Commission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY CO~;CIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEI:{ GRA~NTING CONDITIONAL
USE PE~[IT NO. 1584.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL :~ERS:
COUNCIL I~IBERS:
COUNCIL }~i~ERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
None
None
The I~yor declared Resolution No. 76R-9 duly passed and adopted.
76-G
City llall~ Anahetm~ California - COU~ICIL IIINUTES - January 6~ 1976~ 1:30 P.H.
KESOLUTION NO. 76R-10: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 76R-10 for
adoption, granting Variance No. 2766, subject to the conditions recommended by
the City Planning Cor~aission.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF ~iAIIEI~I G1LA2~TING VARIanCE
2766.
Roll Call Vote:
AYE S:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL b~[~ERS:
COUNCIL :~:~ERS:
COUNCIL i.~>IB£RS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
None
None
The i~yor declared Resolution No. 76R-10 duly passed and adopted.
TZi]TATIVE T!IACT~ i,L~P NO. ~905: (Reclassification No. 75-76-20, Conditional Use
Permit No. 1584, Variance No. 2766 and Environmental Impact Report ilo. 159.)
Developer, Adorado Villas Ltd.; tract located on the east side of Anaheim itills
Road, south of Santa ~a Canyon Road; containing 31 proposed ~l-4000 (SC) zoned
lots.
The City Planning Comraission at their meeting held Dec~aber 8, 1975,
approved Tentative Map, Tract No. 8905, subject to the following conditions:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 8905 is granted
subject to the approval of Reclassification No. 75-76-20 and Variance ilo. 2766.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one
subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
approval.
3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange
County Recorder.
5. That any proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be
submitted to and approved by tile City Attorney's Office prior to City Council
approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants,
conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract
I~m p,
6. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit
to tile City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed
functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the
articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of nmnagement, bonding to
insure maintenance of common property and buildings and such other information
as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the
purchasers of the project.
7. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner
satisfactory to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site
sufficient grading is required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on
grading will be permitted between October 15th and April 15th unless all
required off-site drainage facilities have been installed and are operative.
Positive assurance shall be provided the City that such drainage facilities
will be completed prior to October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site
drainage facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall
have initiated condemnation proceedings therefor (the costs of ~ich shall be
borne by the developer) prior to the commencement of grading operations. The
required drainage facilities shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry
runoff waters originating from higher properties through said property to
ultimate disposal as approved by the City Engineer. Said drainage facilities
shall be the first item of construction and shall be completed and be
functional throughout the tract and from the downstream boundary of the
property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuance of any final
building inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimbursement
agreements may be made available to tile developers of said property upon their
request.
U. That grading, excavation and all other construction activities shall
be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt
76-9
City llall~ Anaheim~ California - COUi]CIL MIi;UTES - January 6; 1976; 1:30 P.ll.
originating from this project being carried into the Santa Aha River by storm
water originating from or flowing through this project.
9. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
10. That the roofs shall be constructed of fireproof material and approved
by the Anaheim City Fire Department.
11. That a fire fuel break shall be provided at the perimeter of the tract
as required by the Anaheim City Fire Department.
12. That 38-foot radius turnarounds shall be provided for fire and trash
access as required by the Anaheim City Fire and Public Works Departments.
13. That a parcel map shall be filed and recorded in the Office of the
County Recorder prior to approval of the final tract map.
On ~aotion by Councilnmn Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Thom, Tentative
l~p, Tract No. ~3905, together with its design and improvement, was found to be
consistent with the City's General Plan and was approved by tile Gity Council
subject to the conditions recommended by tile City Planning Commission.
MOTION CARRIED.
REt~UEST FOR RE~"dND- PARADE PEFJIIx:' ~ ~ Request of tlr. Irwin Fried, 19795 Burleigh
Drive, Yorba Linda, 92686, on behalf of the Friends of the Yorba Linda District
Library for a refund of the $25 fee paid in connection with a parade permit for
a bike-a-thon held December 13, 1975, was submitted together with reports from
the City Attorney's Office and the Police Department.
It was noted that according to Anaheim Municipal Code Section 14.24.080,
the parade permit fee is for the purpose of covering tile cost of processing
such application and is not refundable.
Mr. Fried contended that the bike-a-thon event, which occurred primarily
on Santa Ana Canyon Road, generated ~o more than the usual weekend bicycle
traffic on that trail; that the group provided its own litter pickup, traffic
regulation and control and consequently imposed no additioual burden on the
resources of the City of Anaheim. lie advised that the only reason he notified
the City of the event was for safety purposes.
Council ~-~embers indicated that although they were sympathetic to the cause
and situation, they were unable to waive the provisions of that Code section.
During discussion, several Council i~iembers indicated they would desire to have
tile ability to absorb the processing costs for a parade permit at their discre-
tion in instances such as this. It was noted that tile original intent behind
requiring a parade permit was to secure the name of an individual or group
responsible for the event should any property damages ensue.
At the conclusion of discussion, the City Attorney was directed to review
the ordinance establishing the parade permit fee and to draft a provision
whereby the City Council might, at their discretion, absorb the cost of pro-
cessing the parade permit fee.
P~a)POSED CliARTER ~EN])~i~T - ELECTRIC UTILITY: I,~. tloyt presented the research
information requested by Councilman Seymour at the Council meeting of
December 30, 1975. Submitted were: A suumlary of cash transfers from the
~aheim electric utility to the Anaheim General Fund from Fiscal Year 1970-71
through 1975-76, expressed both on a cash basis in thousands of dollars, as a
percentage of prior years' revenue and as a percentage of current year's
revenue; a summary of expenditures of other City Departments allocated to
utility operating expenses for the Fiscal Periods 1971-72 through 1975-76;
summary of dividend rates of 27 privately owned utilities expressed as a per-
centage of gross revenue; contributions to the general fund of the 25 largest
municipal power departments in the United States. ~. iloyt reviewed this
information with Council ~embers.
At the conclusion of this presentation, Councilman Seymour stated that the
statistics presented have confim~ed his suspicion that the Charter Amendment as
proposed would not, in fact, accomplish what it was intended to do, i.e., to
insure that the electrical consumers would receive the savings promised them in
tile for~a of lower rates.
See City Council Minutes of February 10, 1976, Page No. 76- , "Minutes".
Each Council Member contributed $5.00 personally, thereby reimbursing
Mr. Fried. Councilwoman Kaywood stated that another solution to the problem
must be found.
76-10
City lIall~ Anaheim; California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 6~ 1976; 1:30 P.M.
l.lr. Watts observed that any attempt at a Charter Amendment to deal with
such a cor.~plex matter is going to be more rigid and not as satisfactory as
perhaps developing a method or procedure for setting rates which would include
a system of checks and balances.
Mr. lloyt advised that the Chamber of Con~nerce Task Force on utilities may
come forth with a recommendation for additional con, unity participation in
utility affairs through a board or commission. For this reason he had
suggested that the Council receive their recommendation prior to placing a pro-
posed Charter Amendment on the ballot.
Councilman Seymour agreed to the postponement of the Charter Amendment
beTond the April 13, 1976, :~nicipal Election, but still felt that this should
be considered for a special election ~ich could be consolidated with the
County for the June or November, 1076 election.
RECESS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved for a five-minute recess. Councilman Thom
seconded the motion. ~;OTION CARRIED. (3:50 P.i[.)
AFTER RECESS: ~yor Thom called the meeting to order, all Members of the City
Council being present, with the exception of Council Members Kaywood and
Pebley. (3:55 P.M.)
POLICY STATEMENT - ASSEiLBLY CO~ISTITUTIOi] AZIE~;D~.~ENT NO. 71: fir. Talley requested
an expression of policy fro~] the City Council regarding the proposed Assembly
Constitution ~nendment No. 71 which would basically freeze the amount of tax
which a resident would pay on his property in future years, lie briefed the
Council ~ierabers on some of the potential ramifications of such legislation and
advised that he has received a communication from the League of California
Cities requesting that the City of Anaheim strongly oppose the proposed
legislation, consequently he would require direction from the City Council.
Council Members Kay~,,ood and Pebley returned to the Council Chamber. (3:57
During brief discussion, Council~an Seymour stated that although the pro-
posed amendment has some flaws in it, he felt it to be a step in the right
direction, as it would require governments to begin to consider their sources
of revenue. He further voiced the opinion that the property tax, as a source
of government income is outmoded and requires revision since it does not in
many cases tax the users of the service provided, whereas he felt, to be
equitable, the tax responsibility should be shifted to the users of the govern-
ment services provided. !le further pointed out that it is not fair to state
that property taxes have not been raised because the rate of tax per $100
assessed valuation has remained the same when an individual's property has been
constantly assessed at a higher valuation and he consequently pays higher
taxes.
Councilman Sneegas was not in agreement with this viewpoint and pointed
out that the largest users of all public services are generally those who
contribute the least ~nount of tax money. Shifting any further portions of the
financial responsibility to business and industry, in his opinion, will only
ultimately result in an increased cost for goods and services in the market
place.
At the conclusion of discussion, by polling the Council, it was disclosed
Council l{embers ~a~ood, Pebley and Sneegas were not in favor of supporting
Assembly Constitution ~nendment No. 71 and Council l~mbers Se~aour and Thom
would support it. Therefore the majority opinion was to decline adoption of a
position of support for Asse~ably Constitution Amendment No. 71.
REGULATIONS - COST OF COUNCII~iAi~IC C~DIDATES STAT~[E1.;TS: ~. Watts reported
that pursuant to the last discussion on this matter held with the City Council,
when it was reported that the City cannot continue to collect a $500 deposit to
apply against the pro-rated cost of printing Candidates' Statements, he has
prepared a resolution to effect a change in this procedure. The revised pro-
cedure would call for the City Clerk to bill the candidates for their pro-rated
share of the cost, which bill would be due and payable upon receipt by said
candidates and overdue seven days after deposit of the bill in the mail. lie
reported that these bills would be mailed prior to the date of election.
76-11
City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 6~ 1976~ 1:30 P.li.
Council ~!embers suggested that thc procedure also require that these bills
be ~miled certified ~L~lil with return receipt requested.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-11: Councilman Thom offered Resolution ~o. 76R-11 for
adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUi~CIL OF Tile CiTY OF Af]AHEIi! DECLARING ITS INTENT TO
CiLARGE CANDIDATES FOIl THE COST OF PiIINTI]TG A]~D I{~{DLING CA2~{DIDATES STATE}~ENTS
OF QUALIFICATIONS AY~D ESTABLIS~iI~;G PROCEDUIiES IN CO]~NECTION TIlE1LE~JITiI.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
i~OES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL ,~,fE213ERS:
COUNCIL '
COUNCIL .=~,~N~o:
Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
:~one
None
The !~yor declared Resolution Uo. 76R-11 duly passed and adopted.
C~J~GE OIIDER 1.~O. 1~ SUi'.LiIST LI~IG'H',Y - CIiA~4GE ORDER NOS. 1 A~D 2~ EUCLID LIBRARY:
On report and recormnendation of tile City Engineer, Councilman Sneegas moved
that Change Order No. 1 to Worlc Order No. i011, increase of $600 to contract
amount, and Change Order ;~os ~ and '2 to ~ ~
· ~ ,'Yo=,~ Order liD. 1012, increase of
$1,830.~0 to contract amount, were approved. Councilman Seymour seconded the
motion. ;IOTION CARRIED.
Also submitted for Council information only was a listing of change orders
and claims dated November 19, 1975, submitted by Strauss Construction Company
Inc., in connection with their perfor,aance as prime contractor on Work Order
];os. lqll and 1012, Sunkist and Euclid Branca Libraries, respectively. In
addition, a detailed response to these claims dated December 5, 1975, prepared
by i)onald J. Fears, Architect for both Work Order ~os. was submitted.
The City Attorney advised that no Couucil action was necessary at this
time; that these items were submitted for infornmtion only; and that he would
report back in two to three weeks regarding a resolution of this matter.
COi;SULTAi~T SERVICES FOR PREPA~bNTION OF SECOND YEA?, COi,~FdNITY DEVELOPMENT BLOC1(
G?,AN~i' APPLICATION: Request of Mr. Rosario b$attessich, Deputy Director of Ilousing
aud Neighborhood Development, for authorization to employ a consultant to
prepare the second year application for the Co~muunity Development Block Grant
Program, was submitted together with reco~.m~endation that an agreement be
entered into with Alica ~'icCullough to perform such services in an amount not to
exceed $1,500. (Justification for hiring of consultant services was given and
discussed earlier in this ~teeting, see "l~ew Job Classifications - Neighborhood
Development Coordinator and Conmaunity Development Specialist".)
On notion by Councilnmn Se~aour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City
Attorney was instructed to prepare an agreement to e~ioy Alice McCullough to
assist in preparation of the second year Co~mnunity Development Block Grant
Program Application, in an amount not to exceed $1,500. MOTION CARRIED.
C~R~NITY DEVELOP;~NT BLOCX G~iNT PROGRAm. I: On report and recommendation of Mr.
].~ttessich, tile City Council, by general consent, set the proposed second year
Comraunity Development Block Grant Program for public hearing on January 27,
1976 at 2:30 P.~i. and February 1O, 1976 at 7:30 P.i{.
~UEST TO GRADE EASTRIDGE I~SERVOIR SITE AND TP~CT NO. 3520: (Continued from
the meeting of December 23, 1975.) Request of Horst J. Schor, Vice President,
Anaheim IIills, Inc., for waiver of Council Policy that do~stream drainage
facilities be provided to the ultimate point of disposal prior to the grading
of Tract No. 8520 (including the Eastridge Reservoir site and Tract No. 7587)
was submitted for Council consideration together with revised report (Revision
~o. 2) from the City Engineer dated January 6, 1976· The City Engineer recom-
mended in the latest report that said request be approved, subject to the
following conditions:
1. That the property owner of record enter into an agreement to:
76-12
City ttall~ Anaheim~ California - COUi4CIL ~iINUTES - January 6~ 1976~ 1:30 P.M.
a. reimburse the City for any dan~age to City-owned properties, ease-
ments or facilities caused by surface runoff,
b. hold the City of Ana]~eim harmless for dal~age to any do~g~stream
properties caused by surface runoff,
c. exonerate tile City of Anaheim from any liability as a result of
issuance of a grading permit prior to the construction of offsite drainage
facilities,
d. exonerate and hold the City of Anaheim harmless for damage or
liability as a result of grading caused surface runoff to the south of the
reservoir site including property located within the jurisdiction of the County
of Orange and other properties owned by The Irvine ?~anch Col~pany; along with
the installation of such desilting facilities as may be necessary to protect
the do~stream areas from siltation caused by grading or diversion of surface
runof f.
Said agreement shall be recorded against the property and be binding upon
any successors or heirs.
2. That prior to the co~.~mence~aent of any grading operations the developer
shall construct desilting facilities as required by the City Engineer.
On motion by Councilnmn Ses~,~our, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City
Council approved waiver of the policy regarding downstream drainage facilities
prior to the grading of Tract No. ~3520, including the Eastridge Reservoir site
and Tract No. 7587, subject to the conditions recommended by tile City Engineer
and set forth above and further pursuant to the agreement to be prepared by the
City Attorney. ~IOTION CARRIED.
CO.~SZi~T CALENDAR ITEiiS: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman
Sneegas, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports
and reco~,~aendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent
Calendar Agenda:
1. CLAIi£S AGAIi4ST THE CITY: The following claim was denied and referred to
the insurance carrier:
a. Claim submitted by Dale L. Cottingham for damages purportedly sus-
tained as a result of voltage supplied by City of Anaheim,s, on or about
December 20, 1975.
2. ENTERTAII.rbIENT PEPC[IT: The following permit was granted, subject to the
reco~amendations of the Chief of Police:
a. Entertainment Permit for Fat Fogarty's, 2221 West Ball Road to permit
a piano bar, Tuesday through Saturday, ~:30 p.m. to 1:30 a.m. (Alice M.
Rattenni, Applicant).
3. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and
filed:
a. City of Burbank - Resolution ~o. 17,390 - Establishing Policy Guide-
lines in connection with tile possible future acceptance of the ~aster Plan
Report of the ilollyx-~ood-Burl>ank Airport and the il:~pler:~entation of an
Environmental Impact Assessment Report in connection therewith.
b. Anaheim Golf Course Advisory Commission - }.Iinutes - December 11, 1975.
c. Canyon Area General Planning Task Force - blinutes -December 16, 1975.
d. Santa Ana River/Santiago Creek Greenbelt Corlm~ission - Greenbelt
Progress Report - December 1, 1975.
e. }lonthly Reports for the month of 14ovember, 1975 for the Utilities
Department: Electrical and :later Divisions.
i[OTiO[[ CARRIED.
· '~SOLUTIOi~ 1~O. 76R-12 - A~.,~A2D OF WOR~i OiUO£R NO. 765-A: In accordance with recom-
mendations of the City Engineer, Council~.,.~oman ilay~ood offered Resolution
76!1-12 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLL"iION OF TIlE CITY COU2ICIL OF THE CI~£Y OF ~.lAiiEI2-1 ACCEPTIiJG A SEALED PRO-
POSAL AilD AWARDING A CO;iTPutCT TO T1iE LOWEST RF. SPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR Tile FUR~4ISII-
iilG OF ALL PLAEJT, I.A~., SERVICES, 2b%r~RIALS A2~D EQUIP2IEi~T AUD ALL UTILITIES
76-13
City llall} Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 6~ 1976~ 1:30 P.M.
Ai~D TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, A~D PERFOR>~ING ALL WORK
.WECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AiID CO,'~'LETE T~E FOLLOWING PUBLIC II.~ROVE~IENT: W~BSTER
AVENUE STREET I~tPROVEitEJT, S/O O~GE AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF A~AI[EIi~, WOP~
Ot'.DER ~lO. 765-A. (Sully-:,iiller Contracting Company - $5,347.60)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUiICIL liEi[BERS:
COUNCIL iIZiI]~ERS:
COUNCIL MEI[BERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
None
None
The i~yor declared Resolution No. 76R-12 duly passed and adopted.
~,~.SOLUTIO~ ilO. 76R-13 - DEEDS OF EASEi~i~T: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution
Ilo. 76R-13 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTIO, I OF TiIE CITY COUNCIL OF TIiE CITY OF ANAtIEIi,i ACCEPTIiIG CERTAIN DEEDS
~ ORDERIIIG THEIR 1LECO?~ATION. (Al!so llones, Inc., and Sterling Homes, II;
Rio Vista Building Corporation; Bessie E. Brooke; American National llousing
Corporation; Elizabeth Redding, et al.; Irene ii. Chance, et al.; William P.
Hall, et al.; Alvin J. Hurley, et ux.; George R. Bice, et ux.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYE S:
NOES:
ABSENT:
COUNCIL ~{EiIBERS:
COUNCIL bfR. iLBERS:
COUIJCIL ICZI{BERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
i~one
None
The ~,~yor declared Resolution ~o. 76R-13 duly passed and adopted.
PURCILASE OF EQUIPmeNT - 24M TILT CAB ~;D CilASSIS: Informal bid quotations
received for the 241~ tilt cab and chassis were presented and the Assistant City
:~nager recommended acceptance of Alternate Bid No. 2 submitted by S & J
Chevrolet in the amount of $12,748.62, including tax. It was noted that this
was not the low bid, but the lowest bid which meets the City's specifications.
Councilman Sneegas requested that the reasons for which the bid frown
International l~rvester of Anaheim did not meet specifications be reviewed with
that company to determine whether or not they could supply the equipment as
specified, since their bid was lower and the firm is located in the City of
Anaheim. Consequently, the authorization to purchase one 241! tilt cab/chassis
was held over for one week pending additional information as to whether or not
the lowest bid firm can meet the City's specifications for full air brakes.
PUI'.CiLASE OF EqUIP~'-tEUT - SUB CO-'LPACT PICKUP: The Assistant City i.~nager reported
on informal bids received for the purchase of one sub compact pickup and recom-
mended acceptance of the low bid as follows:
Bid No. 3017 - }.{cCoy Ford, $4,079.02, including tax.
On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the low
bid of ~Coy Ford was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of
$4,079.02, including tax. I!OTIO~ CARRIED.
Olli)I~$A~ICE 2~0. 3493: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3493 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance
TM ~-
oO 0 ~.
~%I Ot',DINAilCE OF T2{£ CITY OF A~AiiEI:! AiLEiIDI2JG TITLE 17, CILAPTER 17.08 OF TIIE
Ai3AJiEIH I~NICIPAL CODE BY RCPEALI2,IG SECTIONS 17.05.240, 17.08.250, 17.08.260,
17.08.340, 17.08.350 AJ~D 17.0~.360, AiJD ADDING TI~RETO NEW SECTIONS. (Park in-
lieu fees)
Roll Call Vote:
76-14
City llall~ Anahei~a~ California - CObq~CIL .'IINUi'2'3 -January 6~ 1976~ 1:30 P.II.
AYES:
i~OES:
ABS]';i[T:
COU.WCIL AZ~ ~ ..... ~:
COUNCIL ~ ~E~ [~]~]RS:
liay~*ood, Pebley, Snecgas and Thola
S e y~no ur
2lone
The llayor declared Ordinance ~]o. ~'~}~ duly pas:~ed and adopted.
O]IDI.~A2~C£ 7~0. 3494: Cotmcilman ';
, ey,aour offered Ordinance :Io. 3494 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Zook.
Al; OI',DlllAi~CE OF l'ii;-: CITY OF A, LL2~;I;i A;.Hi,&)I~!G TITLL' 1,-5 OF Till; AiJAIiEi;[ ,'[Ui;ICIPAL
CODE IIELATIi~G TO ZO~i~:G. (73-7/,-'? (4), CL)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
COUNCIL 2iEiL;£RS:
COUi~CIL ilf].*iiSERS:
Kaywood, Sey~aour, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom
i~one
2~one
The ?~yor declared Ordinance ~o. 3494 duly passed and adopted.
il~TE:.[GOVEP~i.'.IEiITAL COORDIi~ATI~G COU],*CIL i~EETI~G: In response to Councilwo~aan
l[ayx~ood's request for clarification of the Anaimi~a City Council's position on
the Intergovernmental Coordinating Council, it was explained that the Anahei~a
City Council determined they would not support the Intergovern~,~ental
Coordinating Council as c~rrently structured, but would support it if
restructured along the lines of a ,aini-council of governments (Mini-Cog).
Council 14erabers Thom and Seymour both advised that they would attempt to attend
the January 7, 1976, 7:30 P.iI., raeetins to voice this position.
R;'.PLACE,'.iEi~T OF REFLECTIVE i,[ATERIAL O~ "~iO PAI{i2ING SIGi~S": Councilwoman l(aywood
questioned tile necessity for rcplacelaent of reflective t~mterial on "no parking
signs" every two years as reported in Council briefs.
The Assistant City i'[a,aager will report back with information on this item.
Ai~'~LEI?i BEAUTIFUL PROJ~;CT ([~E~CiIESTEi{ Ai~D BROADWAY): Councilman Seymour reported
that he had attended a meeting ~,ith Anaheim Beautiful regarding the proposal to
place a conuaemorative plaque at the site of the first railroad depot in
Anahei~n, tile northwest coruer of Broadway and i.i~nchester.
Council;~mn Sey~aour advised that the original cost estimates for this
project, which ~ere appro::iraately $i0,:')')!), included some roadwork to realign
and improve that intersection as well as irrigation and improvements on the
southwest corner. A ~nore accurate estimate for that portion of tile project
having to do ~ith the co:~emorativc plaque is $5,30q. /maheiia Beautiful is
~illing to purchase and install the plant materials in exchange for the City 1)
entering into a lease with the Soutimrn Pacific Railroad for $1.00 a year for
the property and 2) ~:~aintai,uing the area with the commet.,;orative plaque once
installed.
.'Ir. :~ddox reported that it would be possible to use gas tax funds for
portions of this work ~hich involves the street and that some of these ir~prove-
~]ents might be combined ¥;ith work currently planned in that area for a
potential cost savings.
On ~aotion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City
Council authorized a transfer of funds frora tile Council Contingency Account for
the Anaheim Beautiful Project at i~anchester and Broad~ay, not to exceed $5,1)OO
~-Jith street work to be performed with gas tax funds as applicable. MOTIOi~
CAR~Ii;D.
A2.~,~LCIi[ itILLS GOLF Ct)UiISE: Council::tan Sneegas questioned the current policy on
acceptance of personal cl~ecks at the Anaheih~ Hills Golf Course, pointing out
that a hardship is created on golfers who wish to write checks for gift
certificates from the pro shop or for a round of golf. :ir. Talley answered he
would investigate the r, tatter.
RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilman Pebley ;,loved to recess to Executive
Session. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion, i-iOTIO:I CARRIED. (4:45 P.H.)
76-15
City llall; Anaheim; California - COUNCIL HINUTES - January 6~ 1976~ 1:30 P.H.
AFTER RECESS: l.~yor Tho;~l called the meeting to order, all Hembers of the City
Council being present. (6:07 P.H.)
ADJOUR~-~E~: Councilman Sneegas moved to adjourn to Wednesday, January 7, 1976,
3:00 P.:L, Anaheim Public Library Multipurpose Room. Councilman Pebiey
seconded the motion. ~OTION CARRIED.
Adjourned: 6: 03 P.M.
ALOi;A H. I!OUGA~ID, CITY CLEPd~