1976/02/2476-145
C~ity Hallt Anaheiml ,California - COU, NCIL MINUTES - Flebruar~l 24m, 1976, ,I:30,,.,,iP.M,
The City Council o£ the City o£ Anaheim met in regular session.
PRES~T: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
ABSENT: COUNCIL ~SMBERS: Pebley
PRESENT: ASSISTA~NT CITY },~NAGER: William O. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Malcolm Slaughter
DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Llnda D. Roberts
PERSONNEL DIRECTOR; Garry O. McRae
PARKS, RECREATION AND THE ARTS DIRECTOR: 3ames D. Ruth
ZONING SUPERVISOR; Annika Santalahtl
HOUSING DIRECTOR: Rosario )~attessich
CITY ENGINEER; James P. Maddox
Mayor Thom called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendamce
to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION: Reverend Harold Wayman of the Anaheim United Methodist Church gave
the Invocation.
.FLAG SALUTE; Councilwoman Miriam Kaywood led the Assembly .in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
M~.]UTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Regular Meeting held January 20,
1976 were approved as corrected (typographical errors), on motion by
Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour. Councilma~ Sneegas
abstained from voting. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINAiICES ~,~]D, RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to
waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent
to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, &ftmr
reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the
reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Sneegas seconded the
motion. Councilman Pebley absent. }~OTION U~JAI~I'~4OUSLY CARRIED.
.,REPORT - F~-I,,A~,NCIAL DE ,NAiaDS ,AGAINST TIlE CITY: Demands against the City in the
amount of $609,061.22, in accordance with the 1975-76 BudFet, were approved.
RESOLUTION NO~ 76R-78, -i,i,,~cquISITION OF PROPERTY FOR FAIRMONT BOULEVARD: (Ualnut
Canyon )lutual Water Company) Councilman Seymour of'fered Resoiutllion No. 76R-7~
for adopt ion.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTIOiI OF THE CITY CO~CIL OF T%IE CITY OF A}IAIiEIM ACCEPTING ~iE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF AN OFFER TO SELL CERTAIN PdiAL PROPERTY. (Walnut Canyon I,.!utual
Water Company) (Not to exceed $25,000)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL 1.0~ERS; i%aywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: CO~CIL ~,'.~MBERS: i~one
ABSI~T: COb/qCIL M~MBERS; Pebley
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-78 duly passed and adopted.
L~TTEIRI A~Gm~EE~V~'~T .--i ACQUISITION O.F ?ROPERT~ F0.R FAI~ONT BOULEVA~
O{ENRY D~ G~ORq~Q~: Mr. Watts reported that in connection with the Del Giorgio
property to be acquired for the right-of~ay of Fairmont Boulevard, there is a
severance of that property a~unting to just over five acres. The propos~ is
that the City acquire this property for the sum of 883,426.85 and use same as a
park site to be developed in conjunction with some adjoining acreage already
o~ed by the City.
Mr. Watts advised that a letter agreement has been prepared outlining the
terms and conditions for acquisition of right-of-way and slope easements for
Fairmont Boulevard as well as the fee title for the park site acreage. He
reviewed some of the conditions set forth in the letter agreement, specifically
that Mr. Del Giorgio would be responsible for taxes up to the time of transfer,
and for the title policy. The City agrees to provide access to Fairmont
76-146
~ity tlallt AnaheimI California _ COUNCIL MINUTES - February 24t 1976, 1:30 P.M.
Boulevard from l{r. Del Giorgio's property, as well as sewer and water line stub
outs. In addition, the City would be obligated to put the irrigation system in
working order as a portion of it would be included in the severance.
Mr. Maddox advised that the price quoted is in accordance with an
appraisal performed by Cedric !~ite.
l'~r. Gary Johnson, Agent for Mr. Henry Del Giorgio, was present in the
audience and advised that they were in concurrence With the terms of the letter
agreement.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the letter
agreement dated February 13, 1976, containing terms and conditions in con-
nection with acquisition of property for Fairmont lloulevard and a park site
(Parcel l';os. 1 through 7) to be acquired by the City from },!r. Del Giorgio was
approved. Councilman Pebley absent. }~OTION CARRIED.
P~SOLUTIO}f ,~0. 76R-79 - ORA/~GZ COUNTY AIR TRA~{SPORTATION ~7EEDS - ONTARIO AIRPORT:
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 7gR-79 for adoption, which was Pre-
pared in accordance with Council direction given February 3, 1976.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CObq~CIL OF THE CITY OF ;~"~A]iEI,'! URGING THE DRfC]GE
CO~TY BOARD OF SUPERVISORS TO GIVE ~qERIOUS CONSIDERATIO?~ TO ONTARIO
INTEP~ATIONAL AIRPORT AS ~E SOLUTION TO TIiE FUTURE ~IR TRA~'~SPORTATIO~ '~,~EEDS IN
ORJJ.~GE COb~4TY.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: CO~;CIL I~MBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
~OES: COUNCIL ?~:[BERS: None
;JS~'~T: CO~CIL >%MBERS: Pebley
The ~layor declared Resolution No. 76R-79 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTION ~;0. 76R-~0 - FLOOD CONTROL CONSTRUCTION - F~A~.[O~'?D ?,ETARDING BASI!-~:
Upon being apprised that the license agreement with the orange County Flood
Control District previously authorized is not necessary for construction to be
performed at the Raymond Retarding Basin (curb cuts which would defer floo4
waters from La Palma Avenue; this approval having been obtained
administratively by permit from the District), Councilwoman ilaywood offered
Resolution No. 76R-80 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTIOW OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A~AHEIM RESCINDING RESOLUTION
NO. 75R-648 TO PROVIDE FOR FLOOD CONTROL CONSTRUCTION AT TIIE RAYMOND RETARDING
BAS I~'~.
Roll Call Vote;
AYES; COUNCIL }~MBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
NOES: COUNCIL ~MBERS: None
ABS .IE{T; COUNCIL i'~MBERS: Pebley
The Mayor declared Resolution Uo. 76R-80 duly passed and adopted.
ALLEGED CONFLICT OF INTEREST CHARGES - COUNCILM~N SNEEGAS: Mrs. Mary Dinndorf,
131 La Paz Street, Anaheim, presented Councilman Sneegas with a petition signed
by six interested citizens and a packet containing copies of materials which
they are forwarding to the Attorney General's Office together with a request
for a ruling regarding the legality of Councilman Sneesas' candidacy for office
of Councilman and Mayor in the forthcoming Municipal Election.
Councilman Sneegas remarked that he too is interested in this matter being
cleared up as soon as possible. ]lc referred to the statement's he had made on
several occasions at public meetings indicating that he did have a lease-hold
interest in property in the project area and requesting an opinion from the
City Attorney as to whether or not that constituted a conflict of interest. On
City ~iall, Anaheimm California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 24, 1976, 1:.3.0 P,M.
i ii ~ ,~ml,~ _.
each occasion he was advised by representatives of the City Attorney's Office
that this interest did not constitute a conflict and that he could participate
in discussion and voting on the matter.
Councilman Sneezes concluded that he favored the forwarding of this
material to the Attorney General for decision but that he hoped all of the
facts of the situation including his statements and the City Attorney's opinion
would be included.
Councilman Sneegas requested that the copies of information submitted to
the Attorney General and presented to him this date be placed on file in the
Office of the City Clerk as these should be a part of the public record.
REQUEST FOR REiiEARING - RECLASSIFICATION I!0. 54-55-12 (READVERTISED~: P~equ~st of
Robert E. Bentley for rehearing in connection with Heclassif'icati0~' ~.,~o.
54-55-12, Readvertised, dated February 23, 1976, was subr.~itted for Council con-
sideration. (Property located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue, between
L~ Plaza and Cemetery Xoad.)
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman !laywood, the
City Council granted the requested rehearing and directed the City Clerk to
schedule same as an advertised public hearing, subject to payment of the $50
fee by the applicant. Councilman Pebley absent. ~.',OTIO~I CARRIED.
STATUS RigPORT - SU:~XCIST ;C.~D EUCLID BRA~C)~ LIBF~RIES: ~ joint report from the
City Attorney and Public !7orks Director on the status of construction at the
Sunkist and Euclid Branch Libraries was submitted for Council information only.
(Report dated February 9, 1976 on file in the Office of the City Clerk.)
NEU JOB CLASSIFI.CATION - >~A2~AGEMENT SERVICES ;2~ALYST: Ifr. McRae reported on the
establishment of a job clasSi~ication of ~'~anagement Services /~alyst (formerly
proposed as Senior Systems Analyst) as was reco~ended in the Arthur Young &
Company evaluation of the Utilities Department.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-81: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-8! for
adopt ion.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A P,E~OLUTIO:) OF ~{E CITY COUNCIL OF %qIE CITY OF A~NAHEIM ~2~I-)DING Pd~SOLUTION NO.
74R-521 ESTABLISHING A NEW JOB CLASSIFICATION. (Management Services Analyst,
Schedule X1043 - .$1,487.20 to $1,807.87)
Roll Call Vote:
k"ES ·
·-~ . COUNCIL b~MBERS: Xaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
~)OES: COUNCIL )~EMBERS: ?~one
ABS~';T: COUNCIL i',~MBERS: Pebley
The Hayor declared Resolution No. 76H-81 duly passed and adopted.
CONTRACT - STATE PERSONNEL BOARD: Mr. McRae advised that the City has for many
years used the test services provided by the State of California and renewal of
the contract for purchase of these services, is required at this time.
t~iSOLUTION NO. 76R-82: Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution No. 76R-82 for
adopt ion.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A 5ESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING A Co?TrRACT
BETWE~,! THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE STATE PERSOi,~EL EOAP. D, ?.ELATING TO
TECHI~ICAL PERSONNEL SERVICES INCIDENT TO I~RITTEN EXAMINATION DEVELOPMENT ~ND
AUI/IORIZING THE EXECUTIO~; %q.tEREOF BY T~IE CITY PERSONNEL DIRECTOR.
Roll Call Vote:
76-148
City II~11; Anaheimt California - COUNCIL bIINUTES - February 24~ 1976~ 1:30 I' ~'
, ' ,, ~
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: ~iaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
[~OES: COUi~CIL I~Z~PJERS: l~one
ABSi2~T: COUNCIL :'~MBERS: Pebley
?i~e '~'~ayor declared Resolution :~o. 76R-g2 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTIOi~ :lOS. 76R-83 AND 76R-~4: Councilman Seymour offered P. esolution :los,
76R-83 and 76ti-84 for adoption, adjusting rates of compensation and working
conditions in accordance with the agreement reached with Service and iiospital
l~mployees Union, Local Uo. 3~9.
Refer to Resolution Book.
%EZOLUTIOj i~O. 767,-83: A ?.ESOLUTION OF /]IE CITY COUNCIL OF ~E CITY OF ~%~;AI{EIM
5L~PERSEDING PJ]SOLUTIO:~ :~O. 74R-134 ~D ESTABLISHING :~EW FATES OF COMPENSATION
A~ WO~iL'~G CONDITIONS FOR EVEi~T ~D OTHER PERSOi~'U]L AT TiIE A~AHilI~,f STADIUM.
(Effective February 16, 1976)
Ri]SOLUTION :~O. 76R-g4: A P~ESOLUTION OF /lie CITY COLV~CIL ~F THE CITY OF Ai~AHEIM
SUPE!~.SEDIi~G ~SOLUTION NO. 74R-g9 .~.~NDINC P~TES OF CD~SATION FOR FVE~T
~--~.u ~..i~T AT ~tE ~J~iEIII CO:.~VE:~TION CEi'JTZR. (Effective ~ebruary 16, 1976)
qoll Call Vote
COID,.ICIL ?%I-~ERS: 71aywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
COUNCIL ,~,,~woc
Tt~e >~ayor declared Resolution :los. 76,~-83 and 76~-84, duly passed
and adopt ed.
CO,!SULT.~d~T SERVICES - PATT STREET BREA (URBAJl PROJECTS t IiIC.): ?'r. ;~alcolm
Slaughter reported that the original proposal received from this firm was in
letter form and did not contain any clear description of what would be accom-
plished for the lump sum fee indicated. In view of the difficulties in
defining the proposal, it was determined that a not to exceed contract for
$7,000 with a contingency for duplicating services would be a better arrange-
ment.
Mr. l~attessich reported that the selected firm was reviewed by a steering
committee composed of individuals from the Patt Street area; that a general
meeting was held to which all were invited and given the opportunity to ask
questions. At the conclusion of this process, Urban Projects, Inc., was the
unanimous choice.
!%_ESOLUTION '~O. 76R-85: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-85 for
adopt ion.
llefer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION OF ~IE CITY COUNCIL OF ~tE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING TIiE TERMS OF
AGREEmeNT FOR CONSULTING SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING 2]{E EXECUTION ~{EREOF.
(URB;J~ PROJECTS, INC., PATT STREET)
Roll Call Vote:
;~YES: COUNCIL }~MBERS: iiaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
,~OES: COUNCIL ~MBERS: :~one
A]~SEi~: COUNCIL ~-%MBERS: Pebley
Tl,e l. Iayor declared Resolution No. 76P.-85 duly passed and adopted.
TOURLAb~ZNT SCiiEDULING - GLOVER STADIUM; Councilman Seymour reported that as a
result o"f a recent de'~i~'ion by the Parks and Recreation commission and Sports
Council to deny the North Anaheim Pony League the use of Clover Stadium for a
tournament, he has met with representatives of the Sports Council to discuss
the situation and :,~r. Ruth, Parks, Xecreation and [he Arts Director, wishes to
discuss his recommendation with the City Council.
II
76-149
City tiall~ Anaheim, California -,...COU~CIL ............. MINUTES - February 24, 19761, ..1..: 3.0..
~.~r. Ruth explained that the basis for denial was that this tournament
would require some modification to the field and that this type of use would
establish a precedent. ~'?ir. Ruth advised that it is his position that since the
tournament was per]witted last year and no permanent damage was done to the
facility and this use could be accommodated without conflict in coordination
wi:h other activl:ies, that this tournament could be scheduled at Glover
Stadium with the provisions that the :~orth Anaheim Pony League would; ]) pay
for refurbishing of the field within ten days after the completion of their
tournament; 2) that in the event any problems should occur, the Parks~
Recreation and the Arts Department would reevaluate this proposal annually. On
this basis ~.~r. Ruth s~ated he felt the City could provide the use of tile
facility, t{e pointed out that one of the problems this organization has in
scheduling their tournament is the need for a controlled facility so that they
can charge for admission to defray the cost of the program. This type of event
could not be accommodated at any other facility in the City, and he therefore
reco~mends the Council approve this use.
Councilman Seymour added that subsequent to the discussion held on this
matter with the Chairman of the Sports Council, himself and :'~r. Ruth, the
misunderstanding as to the intent of the City Council has been cleared up;
i.c.~ that the u~ilization of Glover Stadium for a multiplicity of uses is
encoura~ed, when in fact the cost of making it a multiple use stadium, as well
as the restoration of the facility to its original condition, is borne by the
user. Councilman Seymour remarked that these facilities have been paid for by
the :axpayers and should be available for use by the citizenry to the fullest
extent possible. The conclusion of the discussion was that a joint meeting
between the City Council, Sports Council and ?arks and Recreation Commission
should be arranged to communicate these philosophies which underlie the deci-
sions of granting or not granting uses of specific facilities, as well as
priorities for same.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City
Council approved the use of Glover Stadium by the ?iorth Anaheim Pony League for
their tournament subject to the conditions recommended by the Parks, Recreation
and the Arts Director; and further directed that staff arrange a joint meeting
between the ~oports Council, Parks and Recreation Commission and City Council to
discuss scheduling for use of City-owned facilities. Councilman Pebley absent.
· ~0~ IO~ CARRIED.
R~oOLUTIO~ HO. 76R-86 - MOTORCYCLE TRAINING~ CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL FACILITY:
Councilwoman iiaywood offered .Resolution i~.~o. 76R-~q6 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A ?d~SOLUTION DF THE CITY COL~CIL OF THE CITY OF ~AHEI~{ APPROVING AND
AU%/{ORIZING T~'IE EXECUTION OF ~2~ AGREEmeNT BET~,CEEN THE CITY OF A~NAI~IEIM AND ~"~{E
STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF iIIG}B4AY PATROL, RELATING TO ~iOTORCYCLE
TRAINING CLASSES FOR ~AHEIM POLICE OFFICERS AT ~!E CALIFOPC.IIA }iIGI-~AY PATROL
ACADEMY. (POST reimbursable)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: CO~'~CIL ~'~MBERS: ~iaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
i.~OES: CO~'~CIL ~.~EMBERS: !~one
ABSENT: CO~CIL MEMBERS: Pebley
Tl~e Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-86 duly passed and adopted.
_RAb~ED ..CROSSWALKS FOR iIA~NDICAPPED: In accordance with request submitted by
and .'.frs. Bailey",' because of a recent accident involving a handicapped person
with tragic consequences, Mayor Thom requested that an announcement be placed
in the local news media and also in the Anaheim City ~-~ewsletter indicating that
the handicapped in the City of Anaheim should contact the Public l.,:orks Depart-
sent or the City Council directly regarding any intersection which they use
frequently and which is not ramped. These intersections would then be
entertained by the City Council for assignment to a higher priority for con-
struction of the ramps.
7g-15~
City_.ilall, Anaheim~ California - CO~CIL~.~.fINUTES - F.ebruar~ 24~ 1976! 1;.30 ISM.
t~RO]~[)~iAL - STOP LOSS 7~D LIFE INSURA2~CE: Consideration of proposals for stop
loss and life insurance was continued to the meeting of ~arch 2, 1976 by
~;eneral consent, as recommended by staff.
?ROLRCSS IIEPORT - PA~ING! SA.NITATION ;2~D STOPJ~GE ?ROF~LE~,i,q Iii VICINITY ~F
SLU%JAY A2~D CHEVY CHASE: (Tract ~fos. 2242 and 2972) Prior to presentation of
t]~e report or discussion of the matter, Councilman ~eynour advised that it has
been brought to his attention that ti~e Property ?:anager~ent Departnent of
firm, ,qeymour ~ealty and Investments, manages some of the four-ple~.-, properties
in this neighborhood and requested a ruling from tl,e City Attorney as to
whether or not this would constitute a conflict of interest.
on advice of the City Attorney, Councilman ~;aymour abstained from
participation in discussion or voting on the following matter.
:!iss Santalahti advised that as a result of the January 29,. 1976 meeting
~t which four tenants, one manager and various City staff members were present,
it was determined to send out a voluntary questionnaire in order to receive in-
put from the area on the neighborhood problems. Si~e reviewed the content of
the questionnaire for Council .*~embers and advised that this proposed
~uesgionnaire was also given to area residents for their review. The
questiomnaire has since been distributed and an anlysis of the information is
anticipated by March 30, 1976.
RESOLUTIOi~ UO. 76R-87 - COM}~J[-~ITY DEVELOt~ENT ?,LOCK GRA~,~T PROPOSAL~ SECO!~D YEAR:
Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution i~o. 76R-87 for adoption, authorizing the
staff to submit the application for the Second Year Cor. anunity Development Block
Grant Proposal which is in accordance with the programs and budgets as outlined
at the public hearing held January 27, and February 10, 1976 (Plan "D" as
modi fie d) .
Refer to Kesolution Book.
A P. ESOLUTIOi~ OF TilE CII~f COUNCIL OF 25iE CITY OF /~fdtEII! APPROVING 2qiE SUB-
~.~ISSIO~i OF ~I]{E SECOND YEAR APPLICATION FOR ~]LOCi~i GRANT FIre,DS TO SOUI]iERN
CALIFORiiIA ASSOCIATION OF C~]VEPG~P~NTS. (SCAG)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES; COUi~CIL **%MBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
i~OES: COUNCIL b~MBERS.' :~one
A~S~.~T: COUNCIL ~I~ERS: Pebley
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-g7 duly passed and adopted.
CONSENT C -~ :
~AL~.~DAR IT~IS On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman
Seymour, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports
and recommendations furnished each Council }Iember and as listed on the Consent
Calendar Agenda;
1. CLAIMS AGAINST ~tE CITY: Fl~e following claims were denied and referred to
the insurance carrier:
a. Claim submitted by Arthur F. and June S. liuston for damages pur-
portedly sustained as a result of construction of storm drain at Route 57 and
Chantilly Street from May 1975 to the present.
b. Claim submitted by the Automobile Club of Southern California on
behalf of Larry X. and Jo Betty ilatt for damages sustained (death of son) pur-
portedly as a result of failure of the City of Anaheim to establish proper
traffic control, on or about .'{ovember 10, 1975.
c. Claim submitted by Southern California Cas Company for damage sus-
tained to gas main at the southwest corner of ~iraloma and Blue Gum purportedly
as a result of subcontractor for the City of Anaheim performing work in that
area, on or about ,~ovember 25, 1975.
d. Claim submitted by Russ Clark for loss purportedly sustained as a
result of improper cut-off of electric service by the City of Anaheim, on or
about January 26 to January 2.g, 1976.
e. Claim submitted by ?~onald ?.. SbuerF. er for damages purportedly sus-
tained as a result of condition of street at railroad tracks on grookhurst
,qtrect betwee~ Cerritos and ilatella, on or about February g, lq7(,.
76-151
Cit_y ,'..~11, Anahe..im~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Feb_ruary 241 19761 1.:30 P.Yl.
f. Claim submitted by Jim Alter for damages purportedly sustained as a
result of City of Anaheim Street ~aintenance Division spraying tar which becal~e
embedded in the paint of his car, on or about February 12, 1976.
g. Claim submitted by Uilla Jean Iiarmon for injuries, damages, and losses
purportedly sustained as a result of action of personnel of Anaheim Police
Department, on or about December 11, 1975.
h. Claim submitted by Michael G. Adams for damages purportedly sustained
as a result of actions of Anaheim Parks, Recreation and the Arts Department in
preparation of Rio Vista Park Site, on and between ~:ovember 12 and I)ecember 14,
1975.
2--. AMUS.E..M~VNT DEV.I...C,ES PER~I~T; The following permit was granted, subject to the
recommendations of the Chief of Police:
a. Amusement Devices Permit for various assorted amusement device
machines to be located at Vonderland Amusement Arcade, ll~qo° lqest i~atella Avenue
(Victor Armen ~'~ghrouni, Applicant).
3 C~ORRE.~.SPO~N~DF2~CE.! The following correspondence was ordered received and
flled:
a. Anaheim Arts Council - P~nutes - January 13, 1976.
b. Cultural Arts Commission - Minutes - January ~, 1976.
c. Financial and operating reports for the month of January 1976 for the
Customer Service Division, Police Department and the City Treasurer.
d. LAFCO - Minutes - January 28, 1976.
e. Parks and Recreation Commission - ,~Iinutes - January 15, 1976.
f. Parks and Recreation Commission - Special I'forkshop ?~tinutes -
January 20, 1976.
Councilman Pebley absent. MOTIO~ CARRIED.
RESOLUTI..O.~..I~;OS..76~R-88.,...~{RoU. GH... 76..R-90: councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution
~,;os. 76P.-88 through 76R-90, both inclusive, for adoption in accordance with the
reports, recommendations and certifications furnished each Council Member amd
as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda:
Refer to Re~olution hook.
~SOLU,T_~,ON .,:.~.0.. 76R-..~o.$ -DEEDS QF ~ASE-X{ENT: A RESOLUTIOI; OF TIlE CITY CO~;CIL OF
TIlE CITY OF ~A~IF. IM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS ;.~.~D ORDERING THEIR ~ECOPd3ATIOM.
(James A. Dye, et ux.; Timothy U. Wallace, et ux.; Jessie :,~. Bonkosky; Eva
Niehouse; Earl ii. French, et ux.; Iona Riutcel)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-89 - WORK ORDER !~0. 773-B: A ILESOLUTION OF THE CITY COL%]CIL
OF TIlE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AI~D DETER,WINING T~[AT PUBLIC CONVENIEi~CE .~D
HECESSITY REQUIRE %]IE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IS~ROVE.,~i,~T TO
UIT: TIlE LAF. EVIE,'..7 AVt~UE STREET IMPROVE,X{ENT, IN I~tE CITY OF ;C~AHEIM, WORK
ORDER .~;O. 773-B; APPROVING Tile DESI~S, PL;2~S, PROFILES, DRAI.~I~GS
SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION TttEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTIO?,] OF
SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEmeNT IN ACCORDANCE VI~A SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIO!~S, ETC.
A~D AUI~[ORIZING /~'~D DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A I~:OTICE INVITING
SEALED PROPOSALS FOR I~{E CONSTRUCTION TtlEREOF. (Bids to be Opened - ?.~arch 25,
1976, 2:00 P.H.)
RESOLUTION ?'~0. 76R-90 - ENCROACI~Ei{T PER'lIT ~0. 75-~E: A PgSOLUTIO.~ OF ~IE
CITY COU?';CIL ,~F I~tE CITY ~F A~.IAI[EIM APPROVIMG ~IE TER?.IS ;C~D CO::DITIO:qS OF ~
Ei;CROACII,'-~i.;T PEF3IIT Ai'ID AUTHOR!ZI:IG TEE ~YOR AiID CITY CLEPdl TO EXECUTE SAID
E~CROACID'~NT PEP~IT ~.7Ii?:t CE',.~EP, AL A.~{ERICAi~ LIFE I~SUPJ%'IC!] CO,~PAi:Y, A ~ISSOURI
CORPORATION. (75-4E) (James J. Erennan to construct an lC--inch R.C.P. drain
across public right-of-way at the north side of ilowell Avenue, east of Page
Court)
Roll Call Vote:
76-152
City l~all; Anaheim, California - COUNCIL ~'INUTES - February 2_4~ !976~ 1:30P.:{.__
AYES - COUNCIL ~JMBERS: Aaywood, Seymour, ~,neegas and Thom
i~OES: COUi:CIL ~,~2MBERS; l;one
A~S~;:.;:T: COU!~CIL '..~£M~ERS: ?ebley
iq~e :iayor declared !lesolution ]~os. 76R-gg through 7(~i',-90, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
CITY iLA,rlllNG COb~ISSIO:4 ITLilS; Actions taken by thc City Planning Commission at
their netting held February 2, 1976, pertaining to the following applications,
were subr'it~ed for City Council information and consideration.
~n motion by Councilwoman llaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City
Council authorized the actSons pertaining to the following, environmental impact
requirements as recemmended 0y the City Planning and took no further action on
ti~e following applications: (Item i'los. 1 through 9)
.~. . ,vIRO,CtE,~rAL I!IPACT 7'RJ?ORT - JEGATIVE DECLARATIOi,;S: The Planning
Commission recommends to the City Council that the subject projects in the
following listed zoning applications be declared exempt from the requirement to
prepare an environmental impact report pursuant to the provisions of the
C,ql. if~nrnia Environmental Quality Act:
(Conditional Use Permit ~Io. 1595
Conditional Use Permit ~o. 1597
Conditional use Permit Ilo. 1577
Conditional Use Permit l'lo. 1599
2. ~2,~VIRON,'52'~TAL IMPACT ?~PORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS: The Planning
Director has determined that the proposed activities in the following listed
zoning applications fall within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 11 of the
City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements for an environmental impact
report and are, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an
envirom~ental impact report:
Variance Jo. 2774
Variance ;;o. 2775
3. CONDITIONAL USE PEP2!IT >~O. 1595: Submitted by Herman l,~ehn to permit a dog
and cat kennel in the >fL Zone on property located at 3010 East Coronado Street.
'£he City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution :;o. PC76-18, granted
said conditional use permit for a period of five years, with hours of operation
from 7:00 a.m. to 7:00 p.m., subject to conditions.
4. COi'IDITIO'~AL USE PE~{IT I~10. 1577: Submitted by Hr. and Mrs. Aaron Swain to
permit an apartment complex for the elderly on CL zoned property located on the
east side of Dale Avenue, north of Lincoln ?,venue with COde waiver of:
a. l!inimum required parking.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution ,'?o. PC76-19, granted
said conditional use permit, subject to conditions.
5. COi~ITIOi~AL USE PEP3{IT UO. 1597: Submitted by Allen A. Edmonson to permit
a contractor's storage yard on RS-A-43,000 zoned property located at 1381 ~Iorth
i[iller ~:treet, with Code waivers of:
a. ?[inimum required setback.
b. ?,equired land~caping.
Ti~e City ?lanninc Cor. anission, pursuant to 2esolution ':o. PC7~-20, granted
~-~aid conditional use permit for a period of two years, subject to conditions.
VARIANCE ~1.0. 2775: Submitted by Bank of America Trust Department to permit
tt~ree free-standing signs on CG zoned property located at 3~0 South ~aheim
ooulevard, with Code waivers of:
a. ~iaximum sign area.
b. llaximum number of signs.
c. ~iinimum distance between signs.
d. Permitted sign location.
e. ','linimum ground clearance.
City i~,all, Anaheim, Califor~.ia - CO~.)CIL MIiJUTEiS - F~bruary 24, 1..9..76! 1:30
Tt~e City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution i~Io. PC76-23, denied
Variance No. 2775.
7. E.i.F,,- PARCEL ~k~P: On recommendation of the City Planning Commission,
the City Council determined that the filing of a parcel map for property
located southeast of tile intersection of Country iiill Road and Vista Del Sol,
filed by Joseph and Josephine ~,Tilcox will have no significant effect on the
environment and is, therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare an
environtmntal impact report.
3. ii.I..R.; - i~EGATIVE DECLARATIO~I - GRADING PEP~fIT; 225 Calle Dana; On recom-
mendation of the City Planning Commission, the City Council determined that
application for a ~radin8 permit for a single-family home site at 225 Calle
Dana, subr, litted by Arthur Howe will have no significant effect on the environ-
ment and is~ therefore~ exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental
impact report.
9. I~ENTATIVE %RACT NOS. 9143 .~2~D 9144: Submitted by Criterion Development,
Inc., for property located southwest of the intersection of Santa Ana Canyon
Road and Fairmont Boulevard, to be subdivided into: Tract ]~o. 9143, 17
RS-llS-10,O00 (SC) zoned lots; Tract ~;o. 9144, 26 KS-iiS-10,90O (SC) zoned lots
and one CL (SC) lot.
Tentative Tract i~os. 9143 and 9144 were continued to be considered in
conjunction with L.I.R. No. 167.
Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
CITY PL;R~NING COF~ISSION ITEMS: The following actions taken by the City Planning
Commission at their meeting held February 2, 1976, pertaining to the following
applications were removed from the above Consent Calendar for discussion and
separate action by the City Council.
1... COiIDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1599: Submitted by Uorthroad Realty Corporation
to permit' ~ d'~ive-"~rough restaurant in the t-Z Zone on property located at the
southeast corner of La Palma Avenue and i%raemer Boulevard.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to P. esolution i~o. FC76-21, granted
said conditional use permit, subject to conditions.
Councilwoman ~aywood questioned whether the circulation problems mentioned
in Item i;os. 15 and 16 of the staff report to the Planning Commission have been
resolved.
i,!r. Paul Singer responded that the circulation for drive-through vehicles
l~as been handled with a mid-point driveway on both approaches to the
restaurant, which are located well away from the intersection.
further action was taken by the City Council.
2. VAP~IAi~CE :[0. 2774: Submitted by ~he ~'Tarmington Company to permit two on-
site 't~ac""t 'signS'""~n .KM-1200 zoned property located at 134 South l~.agnolia
Avenue, with Code waivers of:
a. Maximum number of tract signs.
b. Maximum area of tract signs.
c. Maximum height of tract signs.
'flee City Flanning Commission, pursuant to Resolution 7~o. PC76-22, granted
said variance for a period of six months, subject to conditions.
Councilwoman ilaywood commented that it appeared from the request for addi-
tional signing on this property that the need for this type of housing in the
community is not as dire as was indicated when the application for conversion
of these units to condominiums was considered.
further action was taken by the City Council.
3. VARIA~CE iiO. 2609 - EXT,~_S.ION OF TIME: Submitted by Mr. Derek !,~ite, for
an extension of time to meet the conditions of approval for construction of a
76-154
~i~ tiall; Anaheim; California - CO0i~CIL MINUTES - February 24 1976 1'30 P M.
two-story conm~ercial building at the northwest corner of :~agnolia Avenue and
Ball Road.
The City Planning Commission, by motion, granted an extension of time
retroactive to July 8, 1975 and expiring July .q, ]976.
Councilwoman ilaywood suggested that the applicant, "ir. r~ite~ be notified
of the availability of the property adjacent to this site, even though his
plans are drawn, inasmuch as these are arterial highway front-on residential
properties which pose some problems in conversion to other uses.
l.[iss Santalahti advised that this could be included in the letter
forwarded to }fr. l./hite advisin$ him of the Council and Planning Commission
action on the requested extension of time·
~o further action was taken by the City Council.
4. COi'~DITIONAL USE PE?~MIT i/O ~3~ - TERMINATION: .ubmitted by Douglas E.
Patty, Patty Enterprises, Inc.~ requesting termination of Conditional Use
Permit ilo. 232 to develop subject property with apartments in accordance with
the standards specified in the Anaheim ~funicipal Coda. 'file property is zoned
f~{-120,q and located at the southwest corner of Gramercy ;,venue and [foraga
Street.
The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution i'~o. PC76-24,
terminated Conditional Use Permit i~o. 232.
IiESOLUTION NO. 76R-91: Councilman Seymour offered Pesolution i:o. 76]~-91 for
adopt ion.
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF I!tE CITY COUNCIL OF ~IE CITY OF AI,'AHEIM TERMINATIi]G ALL PRO-
CEEDINGS IN ~ON~,~CTIO~ WI~-i CGNDITIOIi;~L USE ]"~ERMIT NO. 232, ;C'~D DECLARING
RESOLUTION ~:-~O. 5791 I~LL ;2qD VOID.
iioll Call Vote;
AYES; COUNCIL b%I.~3ERS: Kaywood, Seymour, ~qneegas and Thom
i~OES: CO~CIL',,~.~MBERS~: i,~one
;~SEIiT: COUNCIL bflZMBERS: Pebley
The ~fayor declared Resolution ~o. 76R-91 duly passed and adopted.
'~Z?~TATIVE ~[AP;. TF~ACT NO. 9206: Developer, Grant !7armington Builders; tract
located southeasterly of Quintana Drive and the S.A.V.I. Canal; containing 13
proposed RS-7200 (SC) zoned lots.
The City Planning Commission at their meeting l,cld I'ebruary 15, 1976, by
motion, approved Tentative l.'~ap, Tract i.~o. 9206, subject to the following
cond it ions:
1. That P. eclassification ilo. 72-73-40, reclassifying the subject property
to the RS-7200 (SC) Zone, shall be finalized, prior to recordation of the final
tract map.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as ;~ore than one sub-
division, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted ir: tentative for~., for
approval.
3. %'hat all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
ut ilit les.
4. That a final tract map of subject property shall l~e submitted to and
approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange
County tlecorder.
5. That the covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be submitted to
and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of
the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions and
restrictions small be recorded concurrently with the final tract map.
6. That prior to filing the final tract map, tI~e applicant shall submit
to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed
functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the
City iiall! Znaheim~ California - (;OUNCIL MINUTES - February 24;~_ 1976~ 1: 30 P.,~.~.
articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to
insure maintenance of common property and buildings, and such other information
as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the
purchasers of the project.
7. That street names shall be approved by the City of ;~aheim prior to
approval o£ a final tract map.
3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be
appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building
permit is issued.
3. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner
that is satisfactory to the City Engineer.
10. That ~rading, excavation and all other construction ac~ivlties shall
be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt
originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm
water originating from or flowing through this project.
11. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary
street name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
12. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay appropriate drainage
assessment fees to the City of Anaheim, as determined by the City Engineer
prior to approval of a final tract map.
13. What the location of the sidewalks in relation to the existing trees
shall be approved by the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance.
14. ihat the right-of-way as required for the future extension of Quintana
Drive, as determined by the City Engineer, shall be conditionally dedicated to
the City of Anaheim. Said condition shall be based upon the need, as
determined by the City of Anaheim, for the extension of Quintana Drive.
15. That an improvement bond satisfactory to the City Attorney shall be
posted with the City of Anaheim for the future construction of Quintana Drive
through the limits of subject property.
16. That the roofs of~all buildings constructed within subject tract shall
be of noncombustible material, as approved by the Anaheim City Fire Department.
17. That the developer shall purchase that portion of the S.A.V.I. canal
shown as part of Lot 7~'o. 13, prior to approval of the final tract map.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the proposed
subdivision, Tentative :.4ap, Tract ~o. 92'~6, together with its design and
improvement was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the
City Council approved said tentative map, subject to the conditions recommended
by the City Planning Commission. Councilman Pebley absent. :'?OTION CARRIED.
PUBLIC iiEARING - VARIANCE ilO. 2769: Application of David and Lillian Dow for the
following Code waiver to construct a fotomat facility on CL zoned property
located southeast of the intersection of Lincoln Avenue and Brookhurst Street,
was submitted together with application for exemption status from the require-
ment to prepare an environmental impact report:
a. Hinimum building setback.
Tl~e City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution ]~o. PC76-6, reported
that the Planning Director has determined that the proposed activity falls
within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 3, of the City of Anaheim Guide-
lines to the requirements for an environmental impact report and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the requirement to file an environmental impact
report and further granted Variance No. 2769 for a period of five years,
subject to the following conditions:
1. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance
with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim marked Exhibit
>~os. 1 through 7.
2. That this variance is granted for a time limitation of five (5) years,
subject to review and consideration for an extension of time by the Planning
Co~ission and/or City Council, upon written request from the petitioner.
Review of action taken by the City Planning Commission was requested by
Councilwoman Kaywood at the meeting of January 27, 1976 and public hearing
scheduled February 17, 1976. Said public hearing was continued to this date at
the request of the applicant.
Hiss Santalahti described the surrounding zoning and land uses and briefed
the Council on the findings submitted to and considered by the City Planning
76-150
City ii.911~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - t?ebruary 24~ 1976~ 1:39 F.~.[.
_
Commission. She reported that the ?lanning Commission ;~Iranted this variance
for a five-year period as an interim use and that this was stipulated to by the
petitioner.
~'layor Thom asked if the applicant or his agent was present and wished to
address the Council.
>Ir. Pete Fogarty, Agent for Fotomat Corporation, advised that they intend
to place the fotomat facility on that portion of the subject six-acre parcel
which is paved, for an interim period and have agreed that should this property
be developed before the end of the five-year period of the variance, riley would
move. Their building is prefabricated but r, eets buildJn;'~' standards and is easy
to relocate.
Councilwoman !iaywood advised that one of the reasons she called for a
public hearing on this variance was because of thc heavy and fast-moving
traffic at the intersection of Lincoln and ]'.rookhurst. In !',er opinion, this is
one of the worst intersections in the City and she was concerned that this
particular installation uight compound that problem. In addition, the request
for variance from minimum buildinK setback would establish a precedent for
davelop;tent in that area. S!~e noted that at some drive-up photo facilities she
l~ao observed that if a second car pulls into line to use that facility, it
blocks the driveway.
In response to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Fogarty stated that this facility
would be quite a distance to the east of the intersection of Lincoln and
i;rookhurst; that they request the minimum building setback variance for a
maximum period of five years; and that the proposed facility could not be set-
back any further as it would infringe upon other development.
'£he Mayor asked if anYone wished to address the Council in favor or in
opposition to the proposed project.
l~ir. Lewis Dexter, 305 ?~orth Ranchito 2treet, Anaheim, spoke in favor of
the project, ile voiced the opinion that it would be an asset to the area.
noted that the traffic problem at this intersection has existed for years and
tl~e impact of such a small business as this one would not be appreciable, lie
consequently recommended that the Council sustain the Planning Commission
approval.
Ti~e Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council; there being
no response, he declared the hearing closed.
Councilman Seymour stated that although he shared Councilwoman Kaywo0d's
concern relative to the establishment of a precedent concerning waivers of the
35-foot setback from Lincoln Avenue, however, due to the interim nature of the
project, he felt it justified.
E?;VIROi~i~TAL IMPACT ?d~POKT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTION: On motion by Councilman
Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman kaywood, the City Council ratified the
determination of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls within
the definition of Section 3.01, Class 3, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to
the requirements for an environmental impact report and is, therefore,
categorically exempt from the requircr~mnt to file an environmental impact
report. Councilman Pebley absent. ~[OTION CARRIED.
}~ZSOLUTION NO. 76R-92: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution ~o. 76R-92,
Kranting Variance ilo. 2769, subject to the conditions recommended by the City
Flanning Commission.
Refer to Resolution ]~ook.
A RESOLUTIOi~ OF TilE CITY COU~CIL OF %]IEC,I~Y' OF ~.:AIIEI~! GRf~:TIi~G VARIA~CE '~O.
2769.
Roll Call Vote:
76-157
City i[all. I AnaheimllCalifornia _ (:O~CIL :[INUTI:S - February 11,,~.4~, 1976!
AYES: COU~,]CIL )~MBERS: Seymour, Sneegas and Thom
UOES: COUNCIL ~M3ERS: i~aywood
ABSi~qT: COUNCIL MEMBERS; Pebley
Tl~e Mayor declared Resolution 17o. 76R-92 duly passed and adopted.
ENVIRO~F. hgl)TAL IMPACT REPORT ~,~O. 165 - CERTIFICATION: (Tract :;o. 8533) l~nviron-
mental Impact Report No. 165, supplementary to E.I.~.. l)o. 80 and pertainin~ to
off-site grading in connection with Tract ~o. 8533, property located south of
Uohl Ranch Road, west of the extension of Imperial Highway, was submitted
together with recommendation of the City Planning Commission that E.I.R. ~o.
165 be certified as being in compliance with the California Environmental
Quality Act.
£.I.R. ~;o. 165 (supplementary to E.I..X.i.[o. g0) having been reviewed by
t[~e City staff and recormaended by the City Planning Commission to be in
compliance with City and State Guidelines and the State of California Environ-
~ental Quality Act, the City Council acting upon such information and belief
does hereby certify, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman
iCeymour, that E.I.R. i:o. 165 (supplementary to E.I.R. ~o. CO) is in compliance
witl~ the California Environmental Quality Act and City and State Guidelines.
Councilman Pebley absent. ~[OTIOi~ CARRIED.
~i~VI,RON.~rCNTAL IMPACT PJ3PORT i;O. 169 (I.[ULTIMODAL TRANSPORTATION CIiNTER~: E.I.R.
~.;o. 169 prepared in connection with the lease of City-owned property adjacent
to the Stadium, proposed to be developed into a multimodal transportation
center with associated commercial facilities, was submitted together with
recommendation of the Planning Commission that ~.I.E. !~o. 169 be certified as
being in conformance with the California Znvironmental Quality Act.
It was noted that a request was received from the City of Orange for addi-
tional information relative to this activity, and Mr. Uatts explained that they
were supplied with a copy of the draft environmental impact report. The type
of more detailed information on the proposed development itself, which they are
seeking, is not yet available, but it might be appropriate to advise the City
of Orange that supplementary environmental impact reports will be prepared in
conjunction with each project and these would also be made available for their
review.
Hr. i.~orm Smedegaard of Rutan and Tucker, Attorney representing Multimodal
Group, Inc., requested that consideration of the lease be continued for one
we ek.
Environmental Impact Report No. 169, having been reviewed by the City
staff and recommended by the City Planning Com~nission to be in compliance with
City and State Guidelines and the State of California Environmental Quali~y
Act, the City Council acting upon such information and belief does hereby
certify on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Seymour that
Z.I.K. I]o. 169 is in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act
and City and State Cuidelines. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City
Council continued action on the proposed lease of City-owned property adjacent
to the Stadium to Multimodal Group, Inc., to the meeting, of March 2, 1976 and
directed that a letter be forwarded in response to the City of Orange,
apprising them that the precise detail concerning the activity and construction
being contemplated at this site has not yet been refined into a form which can
be transmitted for comment and reaction at this time, and that supplementary
environmental impact reports will be submitted in conjunction with each
project. Councilman Pebley absent. I~.~OTION CARRIED.
At [he request of Mayor Thom, ~Ir. Murdoch gave a brief informal status
report on the progress of the study being performed by Daniel, Mann, Johnson
and ,~Iendenhall.
SOLICITATIO:~ PEFJ:IT - iiANDS OF GOD ~,~INISTRY) INC: Application of Reverend 2. M.
l'~ands, the iiands of Cod ~'~inistry, Inc., to solicit for charitable funds within
the City of Anaheim was submitted for Council consideration together with
reports from the Police Department and Attorney's Office.
76-15~
City ;.~all~ ~knaheim~ California C. OIIXCIL ?:%] '' 'c
- ILqLo - February 2l~, 1076! 1:30
__ , ...... 111 Illll I
It was noted that ti~e application indicates the organization intends to
solicit door-to-door, and ;%ayor 2'hem observed that this is the type of activity
about which the Council receives citizen complaints; that they apparently
expect door-to-door solicitation from Anaheim-based organizations, but take
umbrage when organizations from out~ide Anaheim solicit in this manner,
althoush they do not object if approached outside of a ;~lace of business or in
a shopping center.
:'!rs. Patricia ]~ailay, 2260 ~"est Lincoln, Anaheim, -tated that she con-
curred wit~ Mayor Thorn's statement, that she would prefer tt~at solicitation
activities be conducted in a business area and not at her door.
Councilman ',gneegas stated that he would agree if tl~e request were strictly
for solicitation, but this particular request is to distribute religious
materials and request contributions therefor, and he personally felt a denial
would be an infringement on the individual's basic religious freedom.
On motion by Councilman ~om, seconded by Councilwoman i'.aywood, the City
Council denied the request for solicitation permit for the ilands of God
ilinistry, Inc., to conduct door-to-door solicitation in the City of Anaheim.
Councilr~mn Sneegas voted "no". Councilman ]'ebley absent· ~.~OTIO~.$ CARRIED.
[._L]QUEST - BICYCLE PA%RtS: Request submitted by Judy L. Yarnovich, q25 Marjan
Street, Anaheim, on behalf of the parents of St. Anthony Claret School, to
address the City Council regarding the need for bicycle paths on La ?alma, Pie
Vista and Sunkist Street, was reported to have been withdrawn by ~'[rs. Yarnovich
inasmuch as the time schedule established by I!r. licltzer for construction of
the storm drain on State College will alleviate the situation.
Later in the meeting, Councilman feymour advised that he has received many
inquiries and complaints relative to this bicycle access situation and would
like to have a report from staff on the subject so that he might be able to
appropriately respond to his constituents.
RE¢~UECT - CO~]TINUED USE OF LXISTING BILLE. OARD: Request of Judge '~'~'ax Z. !~isot for
continued use of a billboard located at 310D !'Test Lincoln Avenue, Anaheim, was
submgtted together with report from the Building Division, recommending that
should Council grant an extension of time for use of t]~e l~illboard that it be
subject to the following conditions:
1. That a date certain be set for removal.
2. That the Council require posting of a -'!00 cash deposit to guarantee
removal.
3. That the Council require a letter from the applicant authorizing the
City to remove said billboard.
?'?r. Ben Baines, representing Judge !Tisot, displayed a sketch of the
subject property· He advised that they have made a commitment with an
advertiser for the balance of this year and the notice to remove the billboard
places them in a difficult and embarrassing position in connection with their
contract. They therefore request that they be pern'itted to retain the bill-
board until the end of this year.
Council discussion ensued during which it was noted that the billboard was
originally erected 12 years ago without a permit. ~r. Iiatts advised that the
City's billboard ordinance was adopted in 1065 and provided for amortizing of
existing billboards over a number of years. The longest period allowable
pursuant to that ordinance was ten years. ?.~erefor~ according to the provi-
sions of that ordinance, this particular billboard ~-ould certainly ]:ave been
required to have been removed by 1975, unless a conditional use pernit or
variances, had been granted to continue its use.
Because of Council's concern regarding; the establishment of a precedent in
permitting this billboard to remain, it was suggested that the applicant pro-
vide a copy of the contract indicating the term of commitment, and if Council
deems it appropriate to extend the use of t~,e billboard to that date, they
would have as justification the fact ti,at ~o require removal before the con-
tract expiration would place the applican: in violation of his contract·
76-159
City. :~all, Anaheim~ California -. C.0UNCIL ,~IINUTES - February 24~ 1976~ I:30P.M.
>layor Thom inquired whether the applicant would be agreeable to the
posting of the $100 bond to ensure removal of the billboard, and .'..ir. Baines
replied affirmatively.
Councilwoman Xaywood recalled that the Council had discussed increasing
the bond amount to be posted to ensure removal, and Miss Santalahti advised she
would research and report back to the Council next week regarding the required
bonding amounts as revised.
Councilwoman i'.aywood also voiced her concern over the fact ~hat the appli-
cant was the owner of =his property at the time subject billboard was erected
without a permit.
On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the
Council continued decision on the request to retain use of a billboard located
at 310','] Uest Lincoln Avenue to the meeting of March 2, 1976, pending submission
oi a copy of advertising contract for said billboard. Councilman Pebley
absent. MOTION CARRIED.
~q)D?d2£S T.O T31E CITY C..QUNCIL - MR. ROBERT L, GALLA2fI: Nr. Gallant made inquiries
about several aspects 6'f redevelopment and City government in general. He
specifically questioned the s:atemenr reported in the press that Mr. Murdoch
advised he would remain in the Office of City ~.,'anager for three additional
years, as well as placement of housing for senior citizens in the downtown
area.
i'Ir. Gallant also cormmented on the fact that the green fees at the two
municipal golf courses have been raised and that a golfer pays an average of $6
,,C 10 -..
to to play a game of golf at the City courses. ~e voiced his opinion that
it is unfair for the City to provide tennis facilities without charge, when
they do charge for golf, for use of the municipal pool, and for other recrea-
t ional facilit les.
The Council pointed out the costs for development and maintenance of the
', if courses
oo ; the fact that it would be difficult and/or expensive to s~ation
employees a~ tennis courts to collect fees, but mechanical devices are in use
to assist in paying for lighting at the Pearson Park courts; and there is some
experimental, mechanical equipment which the City may consider for new tennis
courts wherein the nets are controlled by a coin-operated machine.
~iayor Thom advised ~.Ir. Gallant that t]~e type of questions he has raised
regarding redeveloprmnt would take considerable time to discuss and referred
him for further information to the Community Development Department.
Council~lan Seymour offered to sit do~.m and discuss the various attributes of
2olf and tennis with 'Ar. Gallant, privately, without taking Council time.
At the conclusion of discussion, I-ir. l~urdoch stated t]~at ]~e wished to
clear the public record regarding the statenent made by l'r. Gallant. lie
advised that he had at no time indicated to the Council that he would stay in
l~is position for three years, but ratl~er when he indicated his intention to
retire, the Council requested a commitment of his interest in redevelopment and
he agreed to remain for a maximum of three additional years.
further action was taken by the City Council.
?,£C£S5: by general consent the Council recessed for 15 minutes. (3:55 P.li.)
AF2'LK :.:£CLSS: IIayor Thom called the meeting to order, all ,'iembers of the City
Council being present, with the exception of Councilman Pebley. (4:10 P.~.l.)
?~;$OLUii(li gO. 76R-93 - AUARD OF l:ORi, i ORDER ':0. 2090: In accordance with tt~e
recommendation of the City Engineer, Councilman Sneegas offered Resolution ilo.
76R-93 for adoption.
;[efer to Resolution Look.
A F, ESOLUYIOi~ OF IHE CITY COUNCIL OF ThE CITY OF ANAIIEIM ACCEPTING A SCALED PRO-
POCAL ,%JD Ai;APJOING A CONTRACT TO TIlE LOI.~ST FJZSPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR TIlE FURNISII-
ll]G PF ALL PLAi:T, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AZD EQUIP~flZNT A/~D ALL UTILITIES
,%;D TKAi;S?ORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, Iro'EL :'C~D !TATER, A2ID PERFOPdSIING ALL
City ~iall; Ana2~eim; California - COU. ICIL I.rINUTES -Fcbruary 24; 1976; 1:30 I'.:4.
:,~ECESSAIIY re CONSTRUCT 4;D CO?iFLLTL ':lie FOLLO~,~NG J'UBLIC I~IPROVEi~NT: WALLRJT
DAM- I',OCii SLOPE PROTECTION, I:I ~,~ CITY OF ?.i:At,, ~.,,
....... I'I" !.YOR}: OPd)ER NO .
(Silberberger !'.:ngineers, Inc. -
~oll Call Vote;
AYES; COU~ICIL "-~ "~' :iesnnour " gas and TI'tom
~IOES' COUi~C IL ,-,,,--,,p c
A~ISi2IT; COUNCIL ~-.,-~-,~oc.
The lla. yor declared qesolution ~:o. 76~I-93 duly pass~:,d and adopted.
PUIICtiASE OF L'i]UIPI,~iIT - O.ql;-TON CAB A~¢D CIiASSIS: 'Jim Assistant City ~4anager
reported in connection with ~i;id ~:o. 3031 for a one-ton cab and chassis
previously awarded to Santa Aha Dodge on December 23, 1975, that firm has been
advised by their factory tltat they can no loncer provide the engine specified
on the original quotation. Therefore bids were once again requested and on the
basis of this rebid, it is recommended that the one-ton cab and chassis be
purchased from ~icCoy Ford of Anaheim, whicl~ is the lowest bid meeting
specifications, at a cost of ~5,002.22, including tax.
in motion by Councilwoman i.aywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the
City Council rescinded the motion previously made to authorize purchase from
Santa Aha Dodge, accepted the bid from ~,~cCoy Ford, and authorized purchase in
the amount of $5,002.22, including tax. Councilman Pebley absent, lIOTIOIq
CARRIED.
PURC!k~SE OF ZqUIPMKIT - CARGO Vf~l: The Assistant City l'lanager reported on
informal bids received for tee purchase of one cargo van for the Parks,
Recreation and the Arts Department and recor~r,.ended acceptance of the bid
received from McCoy Ford, Anaheim, as the only bid ~neeting tlie City's
specifications (Bid Uo. 3013).
,3n motion by Councilwoman iiaywood, seconded by Councilman '~eymour, the
City Council accepted the bid of I:cCoy Ford and authorized purchase of one
cargo van in the amount of..~5 ~ ,3.°,4.77, including tax. Councilman Pebley absent.
· ~0~. I0;~ CARRIED.
9~3I~7A:?Ct; NO. 3511: Councilwoman i[aywood offered ~}rdtnance ~:o. 3511 for first
readin ~
A.i !¢2)ihA2ICE OF THE CITY OF ~[;A!iEIM REPEALING SECTION 1.04.310 2did ADDING A NEW
SECTIOi.I 1.04.310 TO THE ,~IAI~IM i~'IICIPAL CODE Iii ITS ~'LACE. (Purchasing Agent -
Agencies served)
COUi~'Y 3A~ITATIOi] DISTRICT: Councilwoman ]~.aywood reported that in connection
with the County Sanitation District's voting regarding increase of expense
compensation for Directors, she voted "no" in District Nos. 2 and 3. Results
were District Nos. 2, 3, and 11, passed the measure to increase the compensa-
tion; District No. ldidnotvote; andDistrictNo. 6 left the compensationas it is.
ROUTE 57 I~OISE ATTENUATION }~ASURES: Councilwoman ~laywood reported that
Assemblyman griggs' bill regardihg the Route 57 noise attenuation measures has
been set for hearing on ,,'-'larch 17, 1976. She suggested that correspondence be
forwarded to Assemblyman Briggs to determine whetimr or not it is absolutely
necessary for a representative from the Anaheim City Council to be present at
the hearing and to advise that they do not wish to be invited as a courtesy.
SCAG LXECUTIVE COMMITTEE: Councilwoman iiaywood reported on the notification that
Anaheim has been invited to join the SCAG Executive Coramittee as a member at
large.
The Council by general consent indicated they wish the representation on
SCAG to remain as Councilwoman Kaywood the delegate, and name Mayor Thom as
a 1 terns te.
Councilwoman ilaywood further indicated that she wished CCAC to be advised
that she would prefer to receive her committee agenda and correspondence mailed
to her t~ome address.
76-161
~i_ty itallt Anaheimt Cali£0,rnia _ COUNCIL HINUTES - February 24! 19761 1;30 F.~c~.
3&~A k~A RIVER/SJC~TIAGO CREEK GREENBELT COPR.~ISSION - CURTAILMENT OF ACTIVITIES:
Councilman Sneegas stated that tm would appreciate comments from fellow Council
l'~embers on the materials he had presented to them regarding the survey of the
Greenbelt Commission regarding curtailment of activities.
Councilman Sneegas explained that it is the position of the various
citizen committees working on the Greenbelt that if the Coordinator's position
is dissolved at this point, there will not be a significant difference in co~t
inasmucl~ as his duties will be taken over by someone in the County Planning
Department and further they felt their objectives would more likely be accom-
plished if he were retained.
On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City
Council went on record as favoring retention of the position of Greenbelt
Coordinator. Councilman Pebley absent. ~.IOTIOi~ CARRIED.
,,~C~S - ,~X~,~UTIV~ SESSIO'J: Councilman Sneegas moved to recess to Executive
!;ossion. Councilworrmn .!~aywood seconded the motion. Councilman Pebley absent.
:~OTION CARRIED. (4:20 P.?I.)
AFk~ER ilJCESS: ~layor Thom called the meeting to order, all ~4embers of the City
Council being present with the exception of Council. nan Pebley. (5:34 P.".)
~..,.DJOER:~L~:i: Councilman geymour moved to adjourn. Councilwoman i[aywood seconded
the morion. :~'OTIO~I CARRIZD.
Adjourned: 5:35 P.~[.
CITY
;~O.iA ;[. ilOUGAF.~,
Deputy