1976/07/27
7ó- 525
City Pall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL HINUTES - July 27, }C~76, 1:30 P.u.
The City ~ouncil of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT:
ABSENT:
PPESENT:
COUNCIL :ffiHBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Them
COIDJCIL ~ffiMRF.RS: None
CITY MA11AGER: \1illiam O. Talley
CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Hatts
ACTIN~ DEPUTY CITY CLEFK: Leonora Soh!
nEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Frank A. Lowry, Jr.
UTILITIES DIR~CTOR: Gordon Hoyt
PARKS, RECREATION A~ THE ARTS nIRECTOR: James Ruth
CITY ENGPTFER: James P. Maddox
ZONING SUPERVISOR: Annika Santalahti
Mayor Thorn called the meetinv to order and welcomed those in attendance
to the Council meetin~.
DIVOCATION: Reverend Harold Wayman of the Anaheim United Methodist Church pave
the Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE: Councilman l!illiam I. Kott led the Assembly in the Pledge of
Allepiance to the Flag.
~I~nJTFS :
There were no ~finutes for approval of the City Council.
í.]AIVER OF REAnING - ()RDI~~ANCES ANn RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Kott moved to waive
the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the
waiver of read in? is hereby 8iven by all Council Members unless, after reading
of the ti.tle, specific request is made by a Council Member for the readin~ of
such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Thorn seconded the motion. MOTION
INANIMOUSLY CARRIED.
1{f.PORT - FINANCIAL DE}W~DS AGAI~~ST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the
amount of ~16,113,852.63 in accordance with the 1976-77 Budget were approved.
P!r.REASE - COST OF INTER-MOUNTAIN FEASIBLITY STUDY: Utilities Director Gordon
Hoyt recommended in his report of July 16, 1976 that Amendment No.1 to the
Inter-Mountain Power Project ~embership and Study Agreement be approved, and
that ~57n,nOn be authorized from electric revenue bond proceeds as Anaheim's
share of project study costs from July 1, 1976 to December 31, 1977. Funds
were included in the ~6 ~illion electric revenue bond issue of lQ16 to cover
thè cost of the IPP feasibility studies.
Before a vote was taken, Mayor Thorn voiced the position he has taken some
tiMe ago; that he would never vote to approve additional funds from bond
proceerls for studies, feasibilities, EIR's or the like; that he feels the bond
funds should be utilized only for direct investment in a new or existing gener-
ating plant, or for purchase of electric power.
~EsnLUTION NO. 76R-43R:
adoption.
Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 7~R-438 for
Refer to Resolution Book.
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHRIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND
CONDITIONS OF AHE1'ID}ŒNT no. ()NE OF THE INTERMOUNTAIN PO~.JER PROJECT MEMBERSHIP
AND STUDY AGREE}ŒNT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID
AGRFEMrJTT .
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
NOES:
ABSE~TT :
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL HEMBERS:
COUNCIL HEHBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, and Roth
I~o t t an d Thorn
"Tone
The Mayor declared Resolution No. 16R-438 duly passed and adopted.
RESOLUTIOl! ~10. 16R-43Q - INCREASE "EDISON PROBLEMS" CONTRACT: Mr. Hoyt requested
that the contract dated June 12, 1q73 with R. W. Beck and Associates be
increased by $5n,~n() to an amount not to exceed $170,000. Funds for this
purpose were included in the current budget. This contract essentially
T!
cc ,,""'¡ ".'= ""';>;~--,..""""'.". '" - ...,
7 r--- '"\ ') (.
City 1;all, Anaheim, California - r.OUNCIL HnnJTES - July ')7., 107(;., 1:10 P.U.
continups consultin: services with R. P. neck anrl Associates in connection ..;.7Íth
\';Œious proceedinr,s 'hefore the Federal Power Commission.
Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 7f)R-t~39 for adoption.
f\efer to Resolution Book.
I. RfC:rìLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE
prC'RfASr. IN THE HAXIHUH AMOUNT TO BE PI> In rrO R. T-T. nECK A~m ASSOCIATES PURSUANT
TO THAT CERTAIN AGREE~ŒNT DATED JUNE 12 t 1 Q7 '3 BY ANn BET~\TEEN THE CITY OF
Mjl,:H~Uf AND R. 1";1. Br.CK. .\¡ID ASSOCIATES.
~oll Call Vote:
:\YT:f):
r.mmCIL HEHBERS:
COUNCIL HFJffiERS:
C()l!~;CIL ffTi:'f13ERS:
I~ywood, Seynour, Roth and Thom
Kott
None
~!()!'..s :
!\ ßsr/TT :
The l1ayor declared l\eso1ution No. 7f)R-l~3q duly passed and adopted.
T(~5nLT1TT()n no. 7óR-440 - INCREASING "REvr~TUE ROND 'PROJECT" CONTRACT: Hr. Hoyt
recommended that R. ~,T. ~eck and Associates be employed in accordance with the
contract entered April 15, lQ75, to provide con~lltin~ enpineering services and
render an opinion as to the technical and economic feasibility of the City's
participation in the ownership and operation of San Onofre Nuclear Generating
~;tat Jon, Uni ts 2 and 3, and that said contract be amended to increase the maxi-
1'1111" anthorizp-d amount by $ls,nnn.
'Ir. Hoyt pointp.d out that subsequent to the defeat of Proposition 15, an
jnrlepenòent consult in? engineer's report is needed to confirm that the City
~:h(ì1Jlrì. participate in San Onofre Units 2 and 3 from a technical and economic
stAndpoint, as he may recommend that the City commit to this project in the
1':111 of lO7f..
~T.snurTIm1 NO. 76R-44(): Consirlerinr- the Utility Director's opinion in para-
f'raph four of his July If), 197ó report, Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution
':0. 7f)R-440 for adoption.
~efer to Resolution Rook.
/ RES()UJ'"rI()~1 OF THE CITY COUNCIL ()F THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AN INCREASE
rJf ~ 15, non IN TEI ~~AXIHU'1 fu~OUNT OF COMPr.~~SATION TO BE PAID TO R. TJ. BECK AND
t\~c:()rIATr.~ Ptr~SUA'-TT TO THAT AGREEHFNT BF.T'V.1TIEN TH."R CITY OF ANAHEIH AND R. ~\T.
Twry :\'1f) ASS()CIATES DATED APRIL 15, 1975.
P,oll Call Vote:
AYES: COUnCIL MEHBE~S: Kaywood, SeytTlour and Roth
~TOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kott and Thorn
ÞJ3 S :~nT: COm,TCIL HEHBERS: None
The t1ayor declared Resolution No. 76R-440 duly passed and adopted.
STrITJrSERT PROJECT - PLANNING AND FEASIBILITY STUDY: Mr. Hoyt recommended the
fol1owinr: 1) that the City Council approve the Sundesert Nuclear Project
planning and feasihility study a~reement; 2) authorize the Utility nirector to
execute the agreement with such minor changes as may be needed durin~ the
course of approval by the participants; 3) that the Utilities Director be
appointed by the City Council to represent Anaheim on the Sundesert Nuclear
Project Coordinatin~ Committee; and 4) that he be authorized to appoint his
alternate on that committee.
The cost of the planning and feasi.bility sturly is estimated to be
(2C;,Q13,O()O and should be completed by the end of 1l}78. Anaheim's proposed
participation is 5'? or ~1,290,650. Funds for this project study were included
in the ~6 million electric revenue bond issue of 1976, which was sold April 27,
}f)7f.
PESOLUTION NO. 76R-441: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution ~!o. 76R-I~41 for
~doption, and the r.ouncil further authorized the Utilities Director to be the
".
..
._"..n_-"-",----",,""-,
,,_..~~-
7(,-5':>7
('i.ty I!:lll, AnaheiT'1, r.aliforniél - r.(\U~1CIL HINUTFS - July 27, lQ7fi, 1 :30 P.H.
rity'~ representative on the Sun Desert Nuclear Project Coordinatinp, Committee
",TÍth authority to also 1lppoint an alternate on that committee.
~efer to Resolution Rook.
~ 17rsnUTTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE (',ITY OF ANAHF.IH APPROVING THE TERMS A~m
C(V'l) ITIO'JS OF TIlE SUlmESERT :mCLEAR PROJECT PLA~Jl.lING Arm FEAS IBIL ITY STUDY
'\(',P~m,E~HT AJlm AUTHnRT? PJ~ TEE nTIL TTIES D TRF,CTOR TO FX~CUTE SAID AGREEMENT nN
BFPALF OF THE CITY nF A~~AHEIH.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
~ror.~ :
COŒ¡CIL ME~mERS:
CntT~1CIL }fEHBf.RS:
COUNCIL MEMBERS:
y.qywood, SeYT'1our, and ~oth
Kott and Thorn
None
AB5r.nT:
The Mayor declared Resolut i.on "10. 71;R-441 duly passed and adopted.
CITY OF AZUSA - JO~T MEETING - EDISON LITIGATION: A letter received by City
~1anarer Hilliarn o. Talley from the City of Azusa indicating the desirability
of one or two Council }feMbers from each of the five cities involved in Edison
liti~ation to meet and assess, from a Council standpoint, the cities' status in
this matter was submitted for (',ouncil consideration.
Both CouncilMen Seymour and Roth volunteered their participation.
PEsnLUTIŒ1 NO. 76R-442 - .ATJTHORI7ATION FOR EXECUTION OF DnCtJMBNTS: City Hana~er
r-!illian O. Talley explained that the proposed resolution merely requests
authori7.ation for certain individuals in the City's Disaster Services
DepartT'1ent to execute documents In connection witt! the Federal Civil Defense
PrograT"1, and no requests for funds were involved.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution ~10. 76R-442 for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
,\ pT:snLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIH AUTHORIZING CERTAIN
T:1DIVrDUALS TO EXr;:CUTE DOCIDŒNTS IN CONNECTION '(-11TH FF.DERAL CIVIL DEFENSE PRO-
r'.RA\.fS.
Roll Call Vote:
AYr.S:
'rOES:
AßSFJTT:
COU~TCIL MEMBERS:
COUNCIL MEHBERS:
COUNCIL HEMBERS:
Kaywood. Seymour, Roth and Thom
Rott
None
The Hayor declared Resolution No. 76R-442 duly passed and adopted.
Tr:'TNI~ COHPLEX - SOLICITATION OF PROPOSALS FOR DFVELOPNF.NT: James Ruth, Director
of Parks, Recreation and the Arts Department recommended that the City Council
authorize his Department to solicit proposals from private enterprise for the
construction of a tennis complex on City-owned property bounded on the north hy
nrangewood Avenue, the east by Rampart Street and the Santa Ana River, the
south hy an existin~ residential trailer park, and the 'to1est by industrial pro-
perty under a lease agreement. This property, containing 13.Q acres of land,
'vas fornerl y used as a motorcycl e park.
~1r. Ruth was contacted by two different firms who are interested in sub-
mitting formal proposals and, after approaching the Parks and Recreation
Commission with this as a conceptual program, they have endorsed the explora-
tion of such possibilities.
The intent is to have a minimum of twelve lighted tournament-quality
tennis courts and a pro shop constructed on the site with the additional possi-
hility of construction of handball/raquetball facilities and two lighted soft-
hall dia~onds in a phased development program. Under a lease agreement, the
City would provide the land for a period of not to exceed twenty (20) years And
would receive a percentage of gross receipts. The less~e would construct, man-
aÇ"'e, provide instructional prorrarns and assume the full maintenance responsi-
hilitv for the facility.
..,.
.'
, ",." "",7'",,., ,"'"~',,,
,<.c'_',n"",,",,, ,'..'~",- ~ ~l
__'.~M"" '
'"-, ,
~. n
-", ,
.c it ~ Pall, j\naheim, Cnlif ornia - COUNCIL HPTUTES - July 7.7, 1 Q76, 1:]() P. H.
~ounciln~n Roth ask~d about r~sponsibilities and liabilities if the l~ssee
r1i,l not perform anrl the r..ity wanted to brea1: the lease. Hr. Hatts indicated
that this would have to he dealt with by clearly specifying in the terms of the
:t"ree~erct whnt would happen to the improve~ents in the event of terMination.
r'.ouncilman Kott voiced his concerns regardinr, the l1ultimoda1 project,
Hnerei n the previous Citv Hanager had indic~ted to hi~ that i~ '{vas possible the
r i tv could not meet ~fultirlOdal' s future parking requirements. It might then
~eco~e necessary to utilize the property across the street, which is the same
property under consideration for the tennis co~plex.
1-,lr. Talley indicated his disagreement statinp; that if the City does even-
tufll1v allow this acreage to be developed, other alternatives are available to
;lC'cor".Tnodate l1ultimodal.
^-t this pain t, Hayor Thom clarified that even thoupn, conceptually, the
r,itv has encouraged Hu1tinodal, an ar,reement has not been executed to date, and
the proposal under consi(1eration 'Would not be j eopardi?:ed b~cause of any pre-
vious action.
Councilman Kott suggested that if it is the City's intention to get into a
business profit-makinr situation in this case, a IO-year contract with re-
evaluation for another ten years, and option to renew should he offered rather
thfln a straißht 2~-year contract on today's terms. If the goal is to make a
profit, there is no puarantee this ten~is complex will do so.
r,ouncil~an Seyrlour interjected that the objective is not to make a profit,
but to provide money for a capital improvement propram to fill a community
rpcreation need and, since other methods of financinp capital improvements have
been unsuccessful, such as bond issues for parks and recreation, then assets
h~ve to be put to work. In this case, land is the asset and Councilman Seymour
eypressed that this type of "marriage" with private enterprise could be one of
the Most successful things ever to be done.
r'.ouncilman Kott further pointed out that for future situations which may
,qrise, uhen he uses the '-lord "profit", he means more income than outgo anrt is
'JP:rv much opposen to buildinr something at any cost.
~{r. ~.Tatts explained that "mat ~1r. Ruth proposes in this situation would be
a rental based upon a percentage of the gross receipts of the business.
~1r. Talley also clarified for Councilman Kott that the operator, and not
the City, 'vould be subject to possessory income tax.
Councilwoman Kaywood explained that land acquired throughout the City for
parks and recreation has, in some instances, been unused for fifteen years
because the City has not been able to build a park, and since the choice actu-
ally cones do\lm to one of "something or nothing", she will vote for
" h'"
so~et l..ng .
()n motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the
Parks, P.ecreation :ind the Arts Department 'Was authorized to solicit proposals
fro~ private enterprise for the construction of a tennis complex on City-o~med
property under a lease agreement. MOTION CARRIED.
TRACT ~1(). 89[;9 - TREE REHOVAL PLM1 - JOlll1 HERTlt1 DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION: Mr.
Patts presented a report from the Parks, Recreation and the Arts Departnent
\,111i ch contained an evaluat ion of the cond it ion of the eucalyptus tree wind row
in Tract No. RQ4q hy Mr. nick Kamphefner, ~uperintendent of Parks, as requested
and recommended at the City Council Meeting of July 20, lQ76.
~r. Kamphefner's report indicated that in the final analysis nine healthy
trees would he removed instead of six healthy trees, as reported by staff at
the July 20, lo7~ meetin~, and further ur~ed the immediate maintenance of
twenty-two healthy trees in the ,rlnd row to prevent then from dying.
~1r. Herhert Chris tensen, President of the Peralta Hills Homeo~offiers'
Association, 51n~ Crescent Drive, Anaheim, addressed the Council. Mr.
Christensen reiterated the major points of his and the homeowners' opposition
to the approval of the developer's tree removal plan - the developer has not
'Yr'
, " """"",~c~"""~~=~"
",-,","".
7f-'1?Q
City Hall, Anaheitl, (',alifornia - COUNCIL HINUTES - July ?7, 197ó, 1:30 P.rt.
exercised ter~s of the Tree Preservation Ordinance, he has not done everythinr
~ossible to preserve the trees and, most importantly, the homeowners in Peralta
Fills, havinr chosen to live there because of the rural atmosphere, are opposed
t~ removal of not only the trees in question, but also of any other trees.
Counc ib.,ol11an Ka~.,ood asked }'iss Santalahti if ~!r. Hertin were to chanr.e
f\,,"!(1 location on Lots 1. Rand 1 q in order to save the six healthy trees, would
this change require foing throur,h the whole procedure a~ain.' ?fiss Santalahti
indicated th~t the rradinr plan submitted, which broupht up the subject in the
first place, ~'To111d at least have to be revised. ~he also indicated the exist-
ence of other m~jor eucalyptus Hind rO~:IS on the site, primarily one, numberinr;
in excess of 100 trees that had not been discussed.
"1ayor Thorn askerl if there ,.;rere other people in the Chambers who wished to
be heard vrho ,.¡ere not heard before.
A1thou~h she had addressed the Council on the subject tree removal before,
'.frs. ~1itzy Ozaki, jl~n TiMken ~oad, Anaheirl, on behalf of active hoTTteowners'
:~r()ups, namely, T'!estr iel ge, ßroadrnoor, Santa ,Ana f",anyon Improvement Assoc iat ion,
Santa Ana Canyon Property Owners' Association and Peralta Eills, urged the
Council to enforce the Tree Preservation Ordinance.
'1r. \'!atts, subsequent to Councilman !{ott's question, indicated tnat the
Tree Preservation Ordinance basically states that certain specimen trees shall
not be removed unless approved by the Planning Department with two major con-
ditions to guide theY"': 1) 'Nhether or not trees will be replaced and, in this
case, the proposal is to replace more trees than would he removed; and 2)
~.n1etner or not the trees are diseased or hazardous to existinr or proposed
structures.
"'1r. TJatts further ind icaterl that the contention of the builder in this
case is that his proposal did meet with the terMS of the Tree Preservation
'lrdinance.
Councill;tan Seyr1our was concerned that staff had not provided the Council
,;.'1 th enough expertise or specific recomr:1endations as to whether or not the
developer had done the best he could within reasonable limits to save the
(~reatest number of trees. The question had been raised that the developer
could nove a few lot lines and he would be able to save the trees. Councilman
(; ç'}"1"our ,.¡anted to know if thi s ,.¡as rip;ht or wrong. If ripht, then would such a
~ectesirn enable hiM to obtain reasonable density.
~'!iss Santalahti indicated that the builder wanted the maxiMum flexibility
for the builel:f.nf' pnd proposen, and on that hasis Hanted the trees removed. If
tnf' developer reciesi~ner1 the entire tract he ~.rould be able to save the trees,
but net density ,\-1Ould he different as less usable acrear,e would be available.
~1r. Lm.¡ry indicatecl that since the City Council had previously approved
t}1e developer's tentative tract map, the issue at hand was whether the tree
rerooval Map, as presented, substantially co~plied with the tentative map
already approved.
~fr. Joseph R. Gold, lQl Cobblestone Lane, Anaheim, developer of the land
ndjacent to the Hertin development, addressed the Council. Hr. Gold expressed
his opinion that the trees on Tract ~o. 8940 could be saved, as he had per-
formed a feasibility study almost two years ago on the same property. Regard-
in~ Miss Santalahti's statement concerning the additional eucalyptus wind row
of approximately l()O trees on the northwest boundary of the site near Crescent
1)rive, Hr. Gold indicated that since Crescent Drive was on the State Highway
Plan, someday this wind row, too, mi~ht have to he removed.
Mayor Thorn made a motion that, based upon the staff report, the developer
be allowed to re~ove all but the 22 trees that were worth saving, as identified
by Mr. Kamphefner Whose expert testimony he accepted as valid. There being no
second to the motion, the ~otion died.
The Mayor indicated that if the Council was not going to be able to
resolve the question before them, the matter should be continued for another
week.
Tr
.,<. ._",c"",-., """"'--"'--".~~""'.~""_" ""--""
-;,-Cln
C"..!!.: Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL HI~mTr.S - July ')7 t J.r~76, 1 :1() P.~f.
In response to CouncilTf'an ~eY11our's question as to whether Nr. Pertin haò
accepted the Parks and ~ecreation report, Miss ~antalahti advised that the
'le'reloper was a,.¡aTe of the report anrl that it vlas acceptable to hiM.
nn motion 11y rouncilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thorn, the City
Council accepted the report dated July 23, 1Q7(" subT"itteò by Hr. Karnphefner, parks
necreation and the Arts Department, indicatinr that there were 22 healthy trees
,.,Thieh could justifiably be saved within Tract ~¡o. r.9t~q, and approved the tree
re~oval plan submitted by the John Hertin nevelopMent r.orporation. (Exhibit
It.t\, It) . (',ounc ib..roT:1an Kaywood voted "no". ~1OTI()N CARRIED.
Consistent ,vith the foregoinp motion, Hr. Hatts indicated the need for the
rouncil to also approve the final tract map. ()n Motion by CouncilT'1an Seymour,
seconded by Councilman l{oth, the City Council approved the final map for Tract
'To. q9t~ Q st ipulatinr the retention of the 2' livinr trees. ~10TION CARRIED.
R:-:ì1""'~T FOR rXvrPTIVE SESSION:
end of reLular business.
Hr. Patts requested an Executive Session at the
Council l'fembers Kaytvood and SeYMour left the Council Chamber.
(2:40 P.H.)
Council Hembers Raytvood and Seymour returned to the r',ouncil Chamber.
(~:L13 P.H.)
C()),TTIPUED PUBLIC HEARING - ABANnO}1}fENT NO. 75-141\: (Request by Hr. John Kra.iacic
to abancton a portion of an existing dedicated alley located east of Harbor
TIoulevr:trd between ~anta Ana and Pater Streets). This request 1;'ms continued
fran the meeting of July 13, 1q7A for additional report and recommendation from
the City Fnfl',ineer ref'aròinf possible alternative alif'nments for the alley.
~ince Council Nenbers did not have any questions regardinr the City
rn:'ineer's supplemental report dated July ~?, 1 Q7F., 'Hayor Thorn asked if the
apDlicant ~1ished to add anythinr not yet presented to the Council before they
oroceened ,rlth the decision on the abandonment.
The applicantt ~,fr. John Krajacic, 1f..77 Beacon Avenue, Anaheim, addressed
the rouncil and stated that he ,.ranted Abancionnent rTo. 7('-1l~A approved as ori-
'-'jnallv proposed. If not, he would be open to any suff'oestions from the City
rolineil and City Fnrineer.
~frs. Anna Schindler, 519 South Helena ~treet, Anaheim, addressed the
rollncil and stated that she felt as she did at the July 13, 1976 meeting - the
,\nendonnent as proposed would be detriMental to her property, due to the fact
tllnt the alley ,.¡ouli! now be adj acent to t~70 sirles of her home.
'1rs. Jane Cook, 541 South Helena ~treet, ^naheim, read and submitted the
petltion to the Council which basically requested denial of the proposed
ahandonmen t. ~frs. Cook elaborated on the reasons ,.rhy denial ",as requested: 1)
since no specific future development plans have been submitted, the property
mmers in the immediate area would not kno't.¡ what kind of developMent they would
he acconnodating. If traffic TJere to increase alonp the alley due to future
development, this could mean a devaluation of Hrs. Schindler's home and even-
tually the homes of all others in the area; 2) the alley Hay, as proposed,
~vould he both visible and audible from Helena Street t thereby adversely affect-
in~ the present residential environment; and 3) the proposed alley realignment
nakes it possible for the developer to escape certain Code stipulations
r1fH-d (tT'l~d to protect residential environments ap;ainst impacts o£ commercial
ricvelopnent. Hrs. Cook expressed that this was the most important aspect of
their request for denial and went on to explain that when a residential zone is
directly adjacent to a commercial zonet the rode requires a developer to allo-
cate a 20-foot buffer zone, with trees, to proviJe visual and noise impact pro-
tection to single-family dwellinps.
In summation, denial was requested because the realipnment request would
make it possible for the developer to evade Code restrictions designed to
protect the residential quality of the neighborhood, and the abandonment, if
~ranted, would be premature and should be postponed to a time when rezoning has
occurred and development plans submitted to the Council.
..,'
..
d.. ~_._."~~-"-"-,..
,-....-
7f=,-r;11
-,",ity Hall, AnahetT'1, California - COUnCIL HPIDTFS - July 27, ]O7fi, 1:10 P.'!.
It was confirMed hy ?'iss Santalahti, on Councilman Roth's question, that
t\Th,1t Hrs. Cook statp-d H'1S correct; that the usual Code requiretnents for a land-
sc-jped nu ffer str1n 1"TOtllrl not he applicahle adj acent to an alley 't.yay.
net ty ~oncon i, m.rn er of property at I) 1 P, Farnor Boulevard,
'~rc:;. rook on the fact that this abanrlonment would he preMature
process would h3ve to 'h~ repeatf'.d if reali~rnent occurred now,
,late ðeveloprJer.t plans calleò for an alternate realignment.
concurred '(.]'i tn
since the whol e
and at a later
There bein¡ no further persons 'IDa "lished to speak, Mayor Thorn closed the
nu1-1ic hearinr..
Cotlncilrr'can Hoth expressed hls particular concern about the condition of
su}).;ect property anc1 its êffect on the adjacent COMMercial development. lIe
favored eliminating the present detrimental effects by commercial development
nf sane sort as the applicant intends to promote.
p_T'snLUTIn~T "Tn. 7F,"-L~lll~: r.ouncilman Path offered ~esolution ~~o. 7hP-I~I~4 for
adoption aprovinf AlJandonnent :10. 75-J41\ as originally proposed, surject to
the subMission of specific developmentp18ns for review by the Pl8nning st8ff and
r:itv Connci1 prior to recordation.
n,efer to 1)esoll1tion nook.
\ D:-'SOL1T7IO'¡ OF T1I:: CITY CnlP1f:IL nF Tnr CITY OF ANAnEn,~ ORDERI:'TG TEL VACATIf)"'T
;^,.':1ìA BMmm-:m;TT OF THAT PORTIO\, nF CI:TlT/I,PT PROP~~TY DESCRIBED lŒREnT.
nolI Call Vote:
AYf.S:
C()F~\1C It ~m~Jp' ~:PS :
COTT1'1CP. "f,'!11P'PS:
com,: C 11, Hf'-.'ŒEPS:
Yaywood, Seymour, !(ott, ~oth and Thon
~rone
)Tone
'!ITr,r"'C' .
). ; ,,) .
An~~PT:
The ~fayor declared Resolution '10. 76R-I~44 duly passed and adopted.
rT'}~LrC HT':.f.RIHG - 'PEr,LASSIFICATIDU NO. 75-76-41 A1ID VARIAnCE NO. 28]6:
t\pnlication bv John F., "'~ary ,t.,. t Daisy R. anrl Robert D. Vuksanovich for a
chr1n;o:e in ~one froT'1 R.S-r\-4',()f)n to Cl., and the followinv Code '(vaivers to permit
thp manufacturinp of clothes on property located on the north side of Lincoln
\venue, approxiT:".ate1y .113() feet west of Euclid Street:
.:1.
PerMitted uses.
~faximt!m but Idin~ height.
~finiIT'u~ structural set'hack.
"Required site screenin~.
b.
c.
d.
The City Plannin~ Commission, pursuant to Resolution 'To. PC76-110,
reco~Mended that the subject project be declared exempt from the requirement to
prep,qre an environMenta 1 iTT'pact report pursuant to the provisions of the
~alifornia ~nvironmental ()uality Act anrl, further, recoMmends that
ryeclassification ~jo. 75-76-41 ~e approved, suhject to th~ following conditions:
1. That all enpineerin~ requirernentR of the City of Anaheim alonp Lincoln
^ven11e, includinr preparation of improve~ent plans and installation of all
inproveMents such as curbs and putters, sidewalks, street grading and paving,
tÌrñinape facilities or other appurtenant work, shall be complied ~vith as
renuir~d by the City En~ineer and in accordance with standard plans and
specifications on file in the office of the City Engineer; or that a bond,
certificate of deposit, letter of credit, or cash in an aTT'.ount and forM
satisfactory to the ~ity of Anaheim shall be posted with the City to guarantee
the installation of the above-mentioned requirements.
2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the SUM of ~2.00 per front foot along Lincoln Avenue for street lighting
purposes.
1. That the owner(s) of suþject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim
the ~UM of ~Oç per front foot along Lincoln Avenue for tree planting purposes.
4. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved
plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Porks.
...,.
.
"..",w,...--.~..~,....".,. ..., , ~~,~_..~.o...-.~~,"~--,._"..."
"7 (- - ') ,"' '1
I': 1 t Y '1all, ,^naheim, California - cOlmcr!. ~nmJTES - July '/.7, 1 °7 f), 1: 1'1 P. ~1.
I). Thi1t fire 11Yc1rants shall be installed ancl charred as reQuired and
det~rr'incd to be nf>cessary by the Chief of the Fire nepartment prior to
COr'T'encenen t of st rllctural fraT"1inp,.
h. Thé1t subject property shall be serveà by t1nderr:roun~ utilities.
7. That clrainare of subject property shall he disposeel of in a ~anner
~:;:ltisfactory t.o the City Enfineer.
~. Prior to the introduction of an orrlinance rezoning s1.~bject property,
Cond it ion "Jos. 1, 2 and '3, ahove-ment ioned, shall he coMpleted. The provisions
or ri~llts r:ranted llY this resolution shall become l1ull and voicl by action of
the Cftv Council unless said conditions are coMplied ~vith vlithin one year fraT'"
the date hereof, or stich further time as the t:ity rouncil May !",rant.
q. ':hat Conditton '~os. 4, 6 an(~ 7, ahove-Mentionerlt shall he co111plied
"7it" nrior to final r-uilòinp ancl zoning i.nspections.
'The ritv Planninp Comr1Íssion, pursuant to Pesolution '10. PC7h-12", rranted
n;1riance ~10. ?R16, in part, subject to the followin~ conclitions:
1. That this Variance is ~ranted subject to the completion of
Reclassification ~o. 75-7~-41, now pendinp.
2. That subject property ~al1 be developed substantially in accordance
':rith plans and specifications on file vdth the City of AnaheiM lTtarked !',xhibit
jos. 1, 2 and 1; provid eel, however, that a masonry wall sh~Ül be constructed
al("\n~~ the e;:¡st and ~vest property lines adjacent to the Pf',~-43,r"") ?:oning; said
,.ral1 to be a Minimu~. of I! '} inches in height, as st ipulated to hy the
'Jet it ioner.
1. That (',ondition '!o. 2, above-!'"1entioned, shall be coMplied ~~ith prior to
:he COMnence~ent of the activity authorized under this resolution, or prior to
:'he ti.ne that the buildinp; perMit is issued, or TNithin a period of one year
¡:-ro~ ("late hereof, Hhichever occurs first, or such further tiJ11e as the City
~ouncil ~ay ~rant.
!f. That rondition 'TO. 2. above-mentioned. shall he complied '{vith prior to
~inal ~uildinr and zonin~ inspections.
~fiss Santalahti c1escri.bed the subj ect property and surrounding zoninr and
Land usps. She outlined the findings given in the staff report whicb ,vas
suhr'Íttpd to and considered by the City Planning ComTY1ission.
'rhf> Hayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council.
'1r. Lynn ThoMson, agent, 71f) t!. r.uclic1 r,treet, indicated that he ';'laS
~~tisfied with the recommendations of the Planning Commission but wanted to
inrlicatc a chanre jn exterior 'huildinro TY1aterial frot'!'1 tilt-up concrete to cinder
'.!lock.
The '~ayor asked if anyone else wished to address the Council, either in
favor or in opposition; there being no response, he declared the hearing
,~losed .
~-=;1VIRmnfFJJTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DF..CLARATlnN: On Motion by Councilman
<)eynonr, seconded by Councilman P.oth, the City Council finds that this project
\¡Jil1 have no sipnificant effect on the environment and is, therefore, exet"pt
fro!" the requirement to prepare an EIR. ~10TION CARRIED.
'\'7,::-:nLUTIO!1 NO. 76R-41~5: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-445 for
adoption authorizinv the preparation of the necessary ordinance changing the
~one as requested, subject to the conditions recommended hy the City Planning
(~o~~ission and including the requested chan~e in building material from tilt-up
~oncrete to cinder block.
~efer to Resolution Book.
,\ Rr::S'lLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIH FrmING AND DETERHI~nNG
TPAT 1'111.£ 18 nF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD ~E
,\HE~7DEn AND THAT THE BOU~mARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (75-7~-41,
!~L)
Roll Call Vote:
.."
..
~,----~ ~ ..p-'~"~"',,*-,~ ,-
. ,,-,.-
7';-1)11
~ítv 11:\11, Anaheif'1, r.alifornia - ('.OUNCIL HPTTJTE~ - July ')7, lo.7~, 1:1') P.H.
AYr~ :
"\TOE ~ :
/\ R~~~TT :
r.OU~!rTT, ~fr!,fn~R~:
rnTmr. 11 HE~~B~E~:
(',OTJnc IL HE'1B17,RS:
r:aywood, Seymour, J(ott, Roth and Thom
~Tone
;Ton e
The Hayor declared T"teRolution ""To. 7f)R-I~45 duly passed and adopted.
'?~~nLl;TI()~T NO. 76R-44ó: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution no. 76R-446 for
,1(~option rrantinp' Variance Po. 2816, su~ject to the City Planning Commission
conditions, oMitting, however ~ond1tion :70. :3 thereof.
~efer to resolution nook.
,\ PESIlLUTIŒT OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHFIH GRA1ITTI~1C VARIAnCE ~TO.
')01 F, nT PART.
~oll Call Vote:
A y~ ~ :
~1Oi'.S :
r,()t~U',IL ~IT'ŒF.PS:
COU~TCIL ~Œ'mERS:
('.OU'JCIL HEH13f.T',S:
T:élywood, ~f'.~our, T(ott, Roth and Them
~1 one
"Tone
ABSr.~jT :
The ~~ayor rleclarerl "qesolution ':'0. 7 (i'R-44ñ duly passed and adopted.
~U~LIr I1EARn1G - PARC~L nAr~ fi~-4q AND 7f'-} R: (Reclassification !Tos. 7'-73-51
Rnd 74-71)-14) TIequest by ~filton P. O~'1ens for waiver from the requireT:1ent of
the Hi.llside (;radinr Ordinance to form R mandatory Homeowners' Association to
provide for the maintenance of landscaped slopes. Parcels are located on the
north Ri~e of }~ohler Drive, east of Santa Ana Canyon Road.
\{iss Santalaht i describeò the sllhj ect property and surrounding zoning and
J~nrl uses. She briefed the report suhmitted to and considered by the City
Planning Commission wherein it stated that the applicant has requested a waiver
of th~ require~ent to create a co~munity association and proposes, instead, to
establish covenants, conditions and restrictions which ~rould provide that the
m.Jner of each parcel would be responsi~le for the maintenance (excepting
irri~Rtion) of that portion of the slope on his property.
Counc ilman Se:yT1our, in read inp the ~~inutes of the Planning Comtl1ission
neetin;-- of June 2Q, lQ76, noted that it was Nr. Lowry's opinion that the
sn~j ect property could further be subdidivrled anrl thereby comply '(.¡ith the ~H-
~?,~~n ~onin~ orrlinance, and with the propo~ed waiver, it was Councilman
~PVT'1our' s impression there '(.7011ld be no requireMent on the ensuing owners to
foIT' a community asRociation.
'1r. Hatts confirrneri that if further parcel Maps ~]ere necessitated they
"70uld he subj ect to the same kinds of requireMents that now exist, no matter
hmv f eH divisions would he involved; they '.vould have to COMe back to the City
for approval.
~eferrinr to the last paragraph of the ~xcerpt of Minutes of the Planning
CoMmission's June 21, lQ7ó meeting, Councilwoman Kaywood asked if this covered
the situation lerally, \merein stipulations were documented assisting the
Planninr: Commission to recommend conditional approval of the requested ~.¡aiver.
~1r. TJatts indicated that this was correct.
Th~ ~,1ayor asker) if anyone wished to address the Council.
~1il ton H. Owens, 543 N. Handy Street, Orange, stated that he intended to
develop the property only as seven individual parcels, and that with the
isntallation of sprinklers there would be no problem concerning water for the
landscaped slopes since it would be turned on automatically.
T1rere being no further persons who wished to address the Council, the
'fayor closed the puhl ic hearinr:.
~n motion by ~ouncilMan ~e~our, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City
r.ouncil granted the waiver from the requirement of the Hillside Gradinr,
~rñinance to form a mandatory Homeowners' Association to provide for the Main-
tenance of landscap~d slopes in connection with Parcel Map nos. ~A-4~ and 7~-
..,.
.
. ,,- ,,- ,""..-",," '-"""~'~"_C=-"----'-"----
f (" - "", ~~ :'
"'tty Pall, ^naheiT'l, Callfornla - COlnTCIL HPTUTfS - July ')7, JCn~, 1 :1() P.'f.
1\1, '3uhjf'ct to covenants, conditions anci re~triction~ :1~ approved by the rtty
\ttorne~" s ()ffice, beinn recorded prior to the sale or developMent of thp-
l'r(~p('rty PIS seven ine'! ivirlual parcels, as snm^'11 on said parcel maps, and in the
(\VPPt that any or aJ 1. of ~ai(l seven parcels .1re proposerl for further sllhò i-
.rision, said walver may he deeMed null an~ voi~ and suh~ect to further
(' ()'!s i.-~ era t ion 1Jy the Planninr: CO!~mjssion. l!OTIf11-'1 C^RP TTD.
I)""" (" r' r (' .
. ' } .
ny peneral consent, the Council recessed for ten minutes.
(1:1' P.H.)
----
~FTf~ R~~~SS: The ~ayor called the meetinr to order, all Council !'emhers beinp
present. (1:2? P.!1.)
r:~r.'~,:, Tn LEASE DTSTZ STOR¡\.GF. U~nT: Pursuant to an afreerrent with the nranpe
~ountv Transit District to provide rlata processin~ services, Hr. Uatts
reouec;te>.d the approval of a letter agreement ,vith Security Pacific ~Tational
~an1,:. sté1tinr: the City's intention to lease a Type 313'1, Hodel I Disk Storage
thro11~h them, as well as adoption of a resolution to authorize the lease.
'1r. 'I'alley explaineri briefly the technicalities and function of the nisl,-
;'torage, indicating that the lease of this unit -';vould be a cost-effective
~ertsure.
~n motion by ~ouncilwoman I:aywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the
~itv ~ouncil authorized a letter agreement statinp our intention to lease a
':'"'Ypf' 113'), ~fodel '[ Disk Storage \\rith ~ecurity Pacific 'National Bank. ~fOTImT
'":A;:'D P~T).
_~r:~nUITIO~: !'rO. 76TJ..-1,43: r'.ouncib'7o,."an Kaywoorl offered Resolution no. 76R-41~3
Authorizing the lease of a Type 333'1, lfodel I Disk Storage for adoption.
~efer to Pesolution Rook.
}, r.17~()LeTION OF TEE CITY COUNCIL OF TIm CITY OF ANAHFTH ¡\PPTU)VING THE 'T'EmfS Þ.:m
cn~;1ìr:rI(n:s OF AN AGPEE~1:"',,~T'I' FITH ~ECU~ITY PACIFIC ~TÞ.,TIONAL BANK PERTAINING TO
"'pr Lr-:A~E OF CERTAIn r.QUIPHE~!T AND AUTTrORI7.UTG TEE ~AYOR AND CITY CLFRK TO
T~;'Tr:UTr., SAID AGREE~.Œ"'TT. (IBM T)isk Storage, Type 3~3n, SIN 26795)
~oll ~all Vote:
AY;:S:
COt'NCIL ~'F)"mEP.S:
cnr!~TCIL HFJŒF.RS:
COP'TCIL 'Œ~f!3ERS:
Kaywood, Seyr'1our, Kott, noth and Thorn
"'Tone
!Tone
~T()f.S :
.f¡ Rr,'~'TT :
'T'he Hayor declared "?esolution "To. 7r-~-4!l3 duly passed and adopted.
C()""~r:"'?T CALENDAR ITmfS: On motion by Counc ib'70man I(aywood, seconded by
Councilnan Se~our, the followinp actions were authorized in accordance with
the reports and recommendations furnished each Council }fember and as listed on
the ~onsent Calendar Agenda:
1. r:ORRESpnNDFNC'T7.:
filec1:
The following correspondence was ordered received anrl
:1.
La ~abra Resolution ~o. 256q and Seal Reach Resolution No. 2572 -
the Inadequate Television roverage of the Orange County Elections.
Cultural Arts ~ommission HemoranduM - July R, J Q7f. Informal 'feetinr:.
Community Redevelopment Connnission - ltinutes - June 23 and 30, lQ7f'.
Project Area Committee (Alpha) - ~inutes - June 2Q, lQ76.
npposinr
b.
c.
ri.
(f',ouncil'troman Kaywood removed La Habra Resolution no. 2569 and Seal Beach
~esolution No. 2572 regarding inadequate television coverage of Orange County
~lecttons, anrl inasMuch as Mayor Thorn explained that a presentation on this
subi ec t would be presented by Mr. Pat r.'ichaels of Rad io Station KPI7. at the
Au?ust 3, lCJ76 Council ~eeting, the discussion of television coverage of Orange
~ounty P.lections was continued for one week). HOTION CARRIED.
2. CLAIMS, MID LEAVE TO PRESENT LATE CLAIM:
rer~oved from the Consent Calendar.
Claims a~ainst the City were
".."
"
, ;c"""""""¿¡,,~~--,,, .~-~c '--"'_u
...,-.".- '
7f;-!)15
'-:Jtv Pall, Anahei~, California - r,OIJ1:.TCIL HnnJTES - July ';)7, lO7tí, 1:30 P.~~.
în motion ~y rounc il~voMan Yaywood, secondp.d by CouncilMan ~eymour, an applica-
tion for leave to present late claim hy Claude D. Brock on behalf of Charles
'¡e~an, Jr., was denied, and the following claims were denied and referred to
tbp City's insurance carrier or the self-insurance administrator:
él. C1ait'1 suh71itted hy Ronald L. Trent for injuries purportedly sustained
fror actions by Police personnel on or about May 23, lq7~.
'h. r:laim suhnitterl. hy Linrla D. Fast for dama~es purportedly sustained
fraT"" electrlcity being turned off in error during the T"!onth of June.
c. Clain subnittec1 hy ~1r~. ~~ildred 't.7alero anit !--frs. r.eraldine ElooT:1herp,
for injuries purportedly sustained resulting from falls on Convention renter
stairs on or about June 1, lo7h.
-1. ClaiM suhr:->itted by SllS<1n A. Food for ctamages purportedly sustained to
freezer resulting fro~ 3 reduction in power supply on or about June 1~, la7~.
e. (",lain suh~itted hy <"umnit Sheet '-fetal for damages purportedly
sustZ1inec1 to vehicle rQ~uJtin~ fror" a traffic signal failure on or about June
?1, lo7h.
f. rlain submittecì r,y Loretta raldwell for damages purportedly sustained
to vehicle resl!ltinr from an accirlent caused by traffic sirnal malfunction on
or about \fay 13, 1 rl] f.
;::;. rlain suhr1Ítted by Donald "R.ould for damages purportedly sustained to
vehicle resultinr: from an accident ,.nth a rity vehicle on or about June If),
lo7f.
lI,!()TION CARRIED.
crT"! PL\lTNI'!'!G COr'í}HSSIO:1 ITE}fS: Actions taken by the City Planninf Commission at
their neetin~ held July 7, IQ7ó pertaining to the following applications were
subr:ittec1 for City Council information and consideration.
()n motion hy CouncilwoMan Yaywood, seconded by CouncilMan Seymour, the
City Council nuthorized the actions pertaining to the following environmental
iMpact requirements as recomMended by the rity Planning Commission, and took no
"'urther action on the follow'inr applications (IteM. Nos. 1 through In)
It was noted at the meetin~ that the 22-day appeal period on the followinr
arrJications Houlr} close on Thursday, July 2Q, lQ7F at 5:()() P.H., and not July
~7, 1 Q76, as normall v 'toJould be the case because of the intervening July l~, 1 Q7~
1o1JdRv*
1. PF.TIPJ)W:fEìT'TAl. PfPACT REP'1RT - CATEGORICAL EXF.HPTIO~T: The Planning Director
has deter~ined that the proposed activity in the following listed zoning
apn]ications falls 'Hlthin the definition of C)ection 3.()1, Class 1, 3 and 11 of
the ~ity of AnaheiM ~uidelines to the reouirements for an environmental impact
rr>pc'rt n.nr. are, therefore, cater;orically exempt from the requirement to file an
r'TP .
" '"
ronditional Use Permit No. 1~28
Variance ~o. 2821
Variance No. 2820
Variance Mo. 2824
2. E:TVIRO*WJ1TAL HfPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: The Planning
Commission recommends to the City Council that the subject project in the
followinp listed zoning applications be declared exe~pt from the requirement to
prepare an environMental tr:pact report, pursuant to the provisions of the
Caltfornia Environ~ental Quality Act:
Conditional Use Permit No. 1633
Variance No. 2823
Variance !To. 2R22
3. r()lImrTIO~TAL USE PEP-MIT NO. 1628: Submitted by G. and R. Distributors to
per~it truck and trailer rentals from a service station and CL zoned property
located at the southeast corner of T.inco1n and Pestern Avenues.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC76-126 denied Conditional Use
Pp-rMit no. 1i12A.
!~. Cf)'IDITrONAL USE PEP-MIT ~!O. If;33: Submitted by r:onsolidated Capital Realty
Investors to permit truck dispatching and maintenance on ~IT. zoned property
Y'.
.,
T.~.H'..'.'-'.",_..".",.,...._.~
..., (, - 1 f
E'ity !bll, Anaheim, ralifornié1 - cnUNCTL HnTn'rr~ - July ')7, 1Q7/;, 1:1n P.H.
lC'C'1tcd at l~Q T.i.herty ^-venue (north',¡ef;t corner of T,i'herty Avenue and /\T"Icrjcan
"treet).
ritv Planniní1' rornmi~sion ne~olution 1110. PC7()-]?Q p,ranted Conditional Use
r'\erT"'it qo. 1(,31.
'). VARIA!"fr.T', ~TO. 2Rlo: Submitted hy ~tandard nil of r:alifornia reqnestinr
cr>rtain rode Haivers to perJT'.it the est~bl ishrnent of t,oJO unlawfully constructed
frec-standinv Ripns at 27q? ~est RaIl Poad.
::'he petition for Variance no. 2RIQ Has ~Tithdra'tvn by the applicant and the
ritv Plnnnin~ CoMmission terminated all proceedings.
(. VARIA~1C"E 11(\. 2A?J': Submitted by P.onny C. Joyce, Jerry and Fawn .Anderson
rc'(Juestinp: 'tvaiver of permitted primary uses to permit the retail sales of san(!-
'~ches on ,~ zoned property 10cAteð at &~1~ F. La Palma Avenue.
City PlAnnin~ Commission Resolution "70. PC7f,-]?Q franted Variance "';0.
:'~')f).
7. UARIANCE no. 2R21: Submitted by AIm". n. Hontez requestin?- waiver of
;'l,l~'i::1UP1 fence neip"ht to permit a 6n-inch hlp:h chainlink fence on n,S-7?()'1 zoned
nropprtv at l]'~ r.'f. rh~teau Avenue.
City Plannin?, Commission Resolution "to. P~7{;-13'" denied Variance '10. 2~~l.
Q VAnlA"1~F. nO. ?~22: ~t1bT"dtted by John 1'. D,reen and H. Harp.aret ~allopy
r"Gllestinr; waiver of perMitted primary uses to perMit outnoor storap:e of heavy
er:llipTIlent on n~-¡\.-I,3,f')""" zoned property at R/~2 S. Ynott ~treet.
!~ity Plannin~ Commisf;ion Resolution 1-10. PC76-131 denied Variance no. 282~.
(). VARIA~1CE no. 2R 2 3: ~ubmi t ted by C. Forrest and Florence E. HaT\1IT!ond
rec¡ucstin;-'" ,.,aiver of permitted primary uses to establish a recreational vehicle
stnra~e yard on CB zoned property at 173'" ~. ÞnaheiM Boulevard.
ritv Planning f'.ommission Resolution 'To. PC76-] 32 r;ranted Variance No. 2q21 for
a period of eirht years.
11l. ~J^n.IAì!CE NO. 2R24: ~ubmitted by John E. Feberp to establish a second
fr~e-s tandinr sirn 'tvi th four Code waivers on CL zoned property located at 12R7
~ ~..incoln Avenue.
City Planning Commission Resolution "10. PC76-133 granted Variance Ho.
:~~26., in part.
~1()TIO"I CARRlt:;D.
'P1'Z;~rI;::F PLN1S - TRACT NO. 8456: Hestfield Development CoMpany submitted precise
plans for approval of Tract ~o. 8456 for 24 of 34 R~-5,nOn lots. Plans for a
~ccorative open~ork wall were also submitted.
Councilwoman Kaywood noted from the Planning Commission report dated July
7, lq7(; that since cedar shake roofs were being used, the requirement for fire
treatment of sa~e shoulñ have been stated.
'lHss Santalahti indicated that the Planning Department would contact the
rleveloper and clarify the need for fire treating the cedar shake roofs.
~n motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Thom, precise plans
for Tract No. 8456, including plans for a decorative wall, were approved as
recommended by the City Plannln~ Commission. To this motion, Councilwoman
v.aywoocl voted "No". MOTION CARRIED.
TTJJ~CT~~ PLANS - TRACT NO. QO80: Hoodbine Corporation submitted precise plans for
approval of Tract No. q()Rn; property located on the south side of Serrano
^v~nue, approximately 43'1 feet west of Hidden Canyon Road.
..,'
..
.,^.>. ~,;>. ._'-~".'---~"~>'.~"
,.-.---
7()-í17
"1t" Hall, Anahe ir: , California - rnUNCIL HPrUTE~ - July 27, JQ7ó, 1:30 P.H.
On motion hy CouncilMan ThoP1, seconded 'hv r.ouncilman Roth, precise plans
::or Tract ~Jo. qn~O were ,'lpprovccl as recoM'lended by the City Planninr
C'orn<rission. To this notion, Councib.¡oman K:rywood voted "no". HoTIn~7 CARRIET).
Cf':TT"AL PLAN t\Jn~:m~æ'TT 1';0. 140 A~m E. I. R. rom. un: f')n T"'otion hy Councih'70man
r~[l~.roo(1, seconded hv Councilman ~eymotlr, the rity Council set General Plan
.\llend1'1P-nt ~;o. 140 ann E. I. r. '~o. 1~1 for puhlic hearinp on Au~ust 2¿, lQ7(; at
2:10 P.H. 'H()TIœ-J r.AmU'::T).
TT:"Ti\TTV:: ~L-\P - TP,ACT ~:rn. RQ05 (PJ:VISION'TO. 1): neveloper, Bill ;)river; tract
loeated on the ea~t side of -^.naheiT"'. Hills Road, approxiMately 022 feet south of
~anta Ana Canyon Road; containinr 11 RM-4,nnO(SC) proposerl zoned lots.
It 'vas noted t~At ~.I.P. '-10. 15q (suppleJT1entary to E.I.P.. 'To. RO) ,.yas
orioin:llly suhr-.ittecl in conjunction "{.rith "'ract ~ro. pnOI) and "{,Jas certified }ly
the rity rouncil on January ~, Jo7~ as heinp in compliance with the California
~nvironnental ()l1al ity l"Ct and rity and ~tate Guidelines.
~ouncilman Roth noted that there were t,ro specimen trees On the property
And quest toned 'h1hether these would cause prohlems, since he is :\nxious to avoid
~nv additional tree problems as have heen encountered in the recent past.
'1r. Phillip Bettencourt, on behalf of .^.naheiJ11 Pills, Inc., 3~() Anaheil'1
Hills Road, stated that the developer was aware of the trees and stipulated
th;-..t he intended to he in full compliance with the Tree T'reservation ()rdlnance
',¡hen the question arose hefore the 'Planning rommission, especially in light of
the previous controversy on the Pertin DeveloPMent.
()n notion by r.ounc ilMan P..oth, seconded by (',ouncilP1Rn Seymour, the proposed
subdivision, Tentative "'~ap, Tract no. Raos, togetner ~"ith its design and
fny¡rnvenent, ~.ras found to he consistent "{~7i th the r.ity's r.eneral Plan and tne
(~it y ~ot1nc il approved S,qid Tentati'Je ~~ap su1'\j ect to the follmrlnp conditions
rpcom:rlende(1 by the rity Plannin;'t Commisfdon, with aMendMent to Condition no. 2
to in:-1ieate apfJc:lI woul¡1 he to 'Planninr Commission.
1. That a bond in Rn amount anrl forM satisfactory to the City of Anaheim
sh;111 he posted \d.th the rity to ?uarantee the installation of all enp;:f_neerin~
reruirenents alon~ the private drives.
~. That prior to apnroval of t~e final tract JT1ap, a specimen tree plan or
etn..r inforMation, acceptable to the 'Planning Department, shnll be subMitted to
~nè Approve~ hy the ?lanninr nepart~ent in accordance with the provisions of
the "se" Scenic Corridor 70ne-()verlay. Any decision t:1ade by the Planninp,
DepartMent nay be appealed to the City Council.
1. In accordance with the requirementR of Section 18.r¡2.047 pertaining to
the initial sale of resirientiéll homes in the City of Anaheim Planning Area "B",
the seller shall provide each 'huyer "{rlth ~.rritten information concerning the
\nanein General Plan and the existtnr: zoninr '{..rithin 3r¡n feet of the boundaries
of SU'hjACt tract.
4. !hat should thi!=: suhdivision he developed a~ More than one
suhrH vision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for
::ipprovRI.
5. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground
utilities.
~. That a final tract map of suhject property shall be subMitted to and
approved hy the ~ity Council and tnen be recorded in the office of the Orange
rountv Recorder.
./
7. That any proposed covenants, conditions and restrictions shall be
suh~itterl to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council
approval of the final tract map, and, further, that the approved covenants,
conditions and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract
r"1a n .
1. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit
to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed
functioning of the operatinr corporation includin~, but not limited to, the
C1 rt ic leg of incorporation, bylm:.JS, proposed methods of Management, honding to
insure naintenance of COMMon property and buildings, :\nd suen other information
~s the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the
purchaserR of the project.
q. That drainage of said property shall he disposed of in a manner satis-
factory to the í'.ity Fnpineer. If, in the preparation of the site sufficient
9r
- .
-~'--"'"'~--~-r"'-....~_-~--- -
h ì3S
:'i.ty 1'[111, i\n:\'h~iT", r:11iforni:\ - rJHTNCIl.. HI'TPT~~ - Jn1y 77, 1°7l', 1:10 P.1I1.
(>ré1(linr is requirpd to necpssitate :1 ~radjnr ppr!'1it, no '{.mrk on rr:ldjn~ '{.!ill ñ(>
;ìerrittC'd ~etHeen f)ctoher 15th anrl April 15th unless all required off-site
(lrrdn:l~p facilities havE' heen installed an(l are operative. Positive assuranc~
sj¡~dl "he rrovir1e~ the rjty that such rlr,qinagp facilities will 1;e cor:1pleterl
pri or to nctor,er 15th. }Tecess:lry rir,ht-of-way for off-site rlrain:lpe f:lcili t leg
~l~ll ~p dedicated to the rity, or the rity rounciJ shall have initiated
con¡lennntion proceedinrs therefor (the costs of which sh~.ll 1->e borne hy the
-~f~velop~r) prior to the COf'T"encement of rrading operations. The required
dr..-dné1f':p. facil:itieo sh1l11 be of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff
"raters oririnatin~ from hip-her properties throu~h said property to ultiMate
~isrosal as Rpproverl by the ~ity Enrineer. Said draina~e facilities shall be
the firRt ite~ of construction and shall be coMpleted ann be functional
th rou"hout the tract and froM the do"{..mstream "houndary of the property to the
ultimate point of disposal prior to the issuanc~ of any final huildinr
i.f1~pections or occupancy perMits. T)ratnare district reir'.bursenent ap;reements
r-'c'1Y he nade avé!il:1ble to the developers of ~ftid property upon their request.
J'l. rrhat ¡rac1inp, excavation and all other construction activities shall
hE' con(lncted iT' such a manner so as to mininize the possibility of any silt
ori~inatinr fro~ this project bein? carried into the Santa ^na Piver by stor~
T,'a ter orifinr1tinp from or flmvinr through this proj ect.
11. Th~ t thp own er (s) of sub'; ect property shall pay to the C tty of 1'.naheir1
the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be
npnropriate "hy the rity Council, sai~ fees to he paid at the tine the builctinp
permit is issued.
I". That all structures constructed in suhject tract shall comply Hith the
t"C'rruirenents of Fire Zone I~, as required by the AnaheiT"1 C:f.ty F:i.re DepartMent.
11. That a fire fuel break shall be providerl at the periMeter of the
t rnc t, as required by the þ,naheir- City Fire Departr'ent.
16. That 3R-foot radius turn-arounds shall be provided for fire and trash
'1ccess, af; reouired by the Anaheim City Fire and 'Public Forks nepartments.
15. That a parcel map shall be filed and recorded in the office of the
rnuntv r".ecorder nrior to anproval of the finei! tract Map.
.' . L . .
1~. That the m.mer(s) of subject property shall conditionally dedicate to
tt~p ri.ty of Anahei!' easeMents for equestrian trail pnrposes, conditioned 'IrO!'
the .qr1option {"\f a ~ity of Anaheim ~1aster Plan for fonestrian Tra:i.ls, as
stipulaterl to by the petitioner.
""'1e f:ity Council aeined that the question of the speciT""'cn trees must be
settleò before final map approval.
'mTIO~i CAP,RI:',D.
l'T="'~'¡' 'I'IV;: TRACT ros. 81f61!þ 8461~ ,^.tm 8l~65, (REVI SIœ.¡ ,~o. 1): Anaheim Hills, I nc.
reQuested a one-year extension of time on said tentative tracts.
~Tr. Phillip Bettencourt, on behalf of f..naheim Pills. Inc., further
request~d that a correction be Made to the Planning nepartment's staff report
dated July 7..7, 1076, Item II, wherein it indicated that the applicant "expects
to file a ~radinr plan "I;.1Íth the City I:nr:ineer in August of 107(;." ~!r.
~ettencourt stated that the rrading plan haei already been accomplished and that
the report should now read "as-built" r:radinr; plan.
~n rotion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman ThoM, a one-year
tire extension '{"as p,ranted on Tract "'~os. ~4n3, 8/+64 and P4()5 expiring August
27, 1 q77 . ~10TIn"! CARRIED.
n~S()LUTII')!! ~m. 76R-447 - nET:DS f)F F.ASF.ML1!T:
Desolution no. 7óR-447 for arloption.
~ouncilMan ~eynour offered
Refer to Resolution Book.
^ PP.~OLUTIO~T ()F THE CITY C()m~CIL nF THF. CITY OF ANAH~IM þ,CCEPTING CERTAIn DEEDS
N;T) n~DrRI~1G THEIR RECORDATION. (Jerome A. Stewart, et al; Orange Unified
~chool District of Orange County; Corp. of the Pres. of the Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-~ay Saints; Grace J. Eailey, et al; Galen N. r.iichols t et al;
S'idney 11. Toney, et ux; John P. Hary, Jr., et ux.)
R.oll Call Vote:
..,.
.-~.". .c=, . ..C_~----"~,"""""""""L'-~.",-.."_.. .. ._,-- -
76-539
City Lall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 27, 1976. 1:3n P.H.
AYf,S: COUNCIL HEHBERS: Kaywood. !"-eymour, r~ott, Roth and Thorn
~mES: COUNCIL HE~fBERS: !'~one
ABSf.nT: COl11CIL ~Œ~mF.RS: "Tone
The rfayor declareil Resolution No. 7 ~R-4¿ 7 duly passed and adopted.
¡A,r.T.,\pJ) '1F HAPrTEì1ANCr: rONTRACT - TRAFFIC SIG1'TALS: In connection wi th the
scneduled award of the traffic sign1 maintenance contract, a letter ,ms
r~ceiverl and copied for Council from ~ignal Maintenance indicatinp that they
~~ished to suhnit a formal protest regardinp the proposed award of contract to
Stei~y ~nd rompany for Maintenance of traffic si~nals.
Jim Haddox inclicaterl that there could ~e a possible problem which his
T)epartnent was not aware of until today and requested that the matter be
cant inued for one ~V'eek
On motion by Councilr1an ~eymour, seconded by Councilman Roth, the a'vard of
contract for traffic si~nal maintenance. Account "To. 1"n-/~5';-245, was continued
for one week on recommendation by the City Engineer. MOTION CARRIED.
P'URCPASE ('IF EOUIPHENT - l~ THREE-PHASE SHITCHES - BID NO. 3104: On recommendation
,
of the City Hanager, rouncilMan Roth moved that the bid of Sand C Electric
Company in the amount of ~lR,()~5.44 be accepted and purchase authorized as tne
~p~t-qualifierl bi~, as th~ low ~id received did not meet specifications.
Councilnan Thorn secondeiJ the TI1otion. HOTION CARRIED.
P'J~CPASr. OF EQUIP~Œ"TT - PARAHT:DIC VEHICLE: The City Manager reported on the
recomMendeð purchase of a paraMedic vehicle and advised that Leader Industries,
Inc. has submitted a quotation for said equipment in the amount of ~14,774.2(),
includinr ta:::{. He thereupon recommended that the purchase be author:f.zed.
'1n motion by CouncilMan Thorn, seconded by Councilrn.an Kott, purchase Has
authori~ed in the aMount of ~14.774.20, including tax, as recommended by the
r,ity ~~anager. \fOTIO't<1 CARRIED.
"URcrA~p' ('IF EQTTTPMF.\1T - PARAMEDIC ELF.CTRO~~!C/RADIO HARDHARE: The City Hanap;er
reported on the recomtTIended purchase of Paramed1.c Electronic/Radio Hard'vare and
.'ldvise(l thAt ~~otorola Parlio nag subMitted a quotation for said equipment in the
a7:'Ol1nt of ~12,4P7. ~.I)t including tax. Pe thereupon recoMMended the purchase be
;lU ~n ori?ed .
nn motion by r,ouncilman Thorn, seconded by Counci1~an Kott, purchase was
Ruthorizerl in th~ aMount of ~1?,487.~5, including tax, as recoMMended by the
(:itv '1anager. H()TI()~T CARRIED.
J ..)
~n.T) r:A.~rc~ NO. 3568:
Council~m~an Kaywood offered Ordinane No. 3568 for adoption.
~efer to nrdinance Book.
A~: (m.DI::A1TcE OF TIIE CITY OF ANAHEI1-1 AME}IDP1G TITLE 17, CHAPTER 17. OR OF ~HE
A"IA1mIH "m~nCIPAL CODE "BY REPRALING SECTIONS 17.08.:U.O, 17.08,250, 17.ng.2~O,
17 .I)~. 340, 17.0'3. 150 AJID 17.08.360, Arm ADDING THERETO ìffiH SECTIONS.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES:
~OES:
A flS I:~TT :
COUNC It }Œ}ŒERS:
COID'TCIL ~m}mERS:
COUNCIL HENBERS:
Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thorn
None
None
The ~fayor declared Ordinance No. 3568 duly passed and adopted.
'ìRnrLA.~TCE ~TOS. 3569 THROUGH 3571: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance nos. 3569
throuhh 3571, both inclusive, for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Rook.
ORnrTAHCE NO. 3569: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEDf AMENDING TITLE 18 OF
THf AlTA.'f{EIH mmICIPAL CnDE RELATING TO ZO~~InG. «(,5-66-25(2), ML(SC)
..,.
..
';h\-t()
-=-J t y-- ~'all, .^.naheiT'l, r:ali fornia - COtr.¡CIL \~rTU~ES - July 77, 1 Q7F" 1: 10 11. ~1.
np;'r7\~Ir.E :10. 357n: fI,N nRDINA1JCE OF TPF CITY OF ^nfi.nf.IH N-r~:TDP;~ TITIP. lR ('If
'1'1T~ i\NAJI~nf lflPnCIP/\L rí)nE nr.LATING Tn 70NIHC. «(;(;-(;7-61 (7'1), r-R)
nn.DI':A~Trr '.1'). 357]: /\1-". "RDINN'!CP. (YF TEE CITY nF f~'T!\nPIH ^Hr.~mInG TITLE p~ ()F
'"MH-"'!'L"l~EI:f !v~r1'TICTAL COT)E 'PELATn~c Tn ZOnInG. (""R-~Q-17(11), 'fT.)
~oll Call Vote:
AYf. ~:
'Inrs:
\ßSF~TT :
COUNCIL }m~fBERS:
COt~Ir.IL HF.'!~:,RS:
COU~1CIL 'MF'fBER~:
Y_aywood, SeYMour, Kott, ~oth anfl Thom
~Tone
~Tone
The Hayor declared Ordinance ~Tos. 356(') through 1571, hoth inclusive, duly
passerl and adopted.
1)'Q.nI::".'1C'~ ::0. 3572:
Councilr1an '1"hom offered ordinance 1'TO. 1572 for first
!"O::1d in~.
'-!' rvprqYr'TC;:', ('IF THE CITY ()F ^N.A.Frp-~ N-lr.NDING TITL:" lR 'IF 1'HE AJ'TAP!,:p1 'TIr-TICIPl\L
r:(V':. 7_1-7r,-'J5, ~fI.)
r¡~np'N'Ic'~ t'TO. 357]:
rr>;::din"'".
Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance no. 3573 for first
'.~T f)~nr' A"~r.1~ ('IF THr'. CITY nF ANAnr.U'" ^lff.~mn:(', TITLE 18 f)F rEF. AiIAHF.TM ~fu'nCIP l\L
rnTìT"' ~.~~LATrJC TO ?:ONPTG. (75-7h-17, P}1-1?J)n)
"T;'TJ í:yr~ ~ T r.J~ L I'T"T'I r" T:I01JST". ro . I v d i d t f ^ ~
~ .. ... - -J . .L ~.lL ... ~ L . \."ounc 1 woman .ayt.,]oo rece ve. a reques roTn ..nnre'(¡J
"Jeneau, ChairMan, Anaheim Heritare Committee of the c'ultural Arts ComT"1Íssion to
~~ve a presentation rerardinr the relocation and preservation of this historic
"fre:1erick Little" house, one of the oldest in AnaheiM.
~'!r. T)eneau explained that Pacesetter Homes, Inc., the developer of the
'ìrr)Derty on '{.]'hich the "Little" house is presently located, has offered to
dOT"Rte the structure plus the cost of movin?, it to a selected site as a public
service to the citizens of Anahei~.
"1"r. Deneau further explained that his committee has invest igated possible
pP~."'.'lnp.nt sites for the house, such as fillinr- out the Fest Street property
dl ere the 1-fother r::olony house is located, or the proposed Heritap-e Park in tne
TJrnan nevelop~cnt Project. Relocation to a temporary site is necessitated,
~10Vcupr, because of the acceleration of the Pacesetter Hotnes development. This
potential t~~orary site is located on the south side of Sycamore street,
:1pnroxi~ately ISO yards east of T7est Street on surplus, presently unused
property, owned by the Anahei:"! Cnion High <;chool T'listrict.
'!(lyor Thor] stated, first, that "1r. !'eneau is askinr: the Council to
conceptually afree or approve the fact that the house should he preserved 2.nd,
secondly, to pursue with their staff Methods of accomplishing same.
'1r. T!at ts presented a copy of a letter from Pacesetter Homes dated July
1/, 1 197/1, wherein they agree to give the "Frederick Little" house to ^naheim,
3nc' confirminr thn_t t'hey 1;.70uld pay for the cost of relocat ion (one tiT:1e). The
(,jtv, in return, is to ~old Pacesetter 1:omes harmless for any ðarnage to the
~tructnre or property or tnird parties from the tiMe of the Move, during the
~()~re, anri froM that date forward.
"fr. Pat ts further explained that the Council must decide as to ~vhat extent
t1le City should becoffie involved in the rehabilitation anè ~aintenance of this
structure on a perManent basis.
'fr. Talley stated that the Superintendent of the
~istrict advised bin that his Board would be aMenable
on the ~ycamore Street site, hut they also wanted the
plete indemnity from any type of liability.
Anaheim Union Eip,h School
to a temporary location
City to give them com-
It was concluded that two letters of agreement were necessary: 1) letter
of agreement lJith Pacesetter Homes indentical to their letter dated July 14,
lQ76, stipulating to the conditions outlined; and 2) letter of agreement with
"'8t'
..
76-541
t'":itv r:a1l, AnaheiT'1, CAliforniA - COUNCIL HINUTES - July '1.7, 1976, I:)') P.N.
the ATTISn stipulatinr to the temporary storap,e site and holdinp, the District
~~r~l~ss fron any type of liability.
Since it vr:lll be approxiT'1ate1y four weeks until the house is noved, "fr.
Tìeneau, in the ~eantime, ,viII continue to explore perr1anent sites for r~loca-
tion, thereby eli.y¡inatinp costs that 'V'ollld he involved in a second I"'.ove.
Fol10Hinf1: discll~sion, the Council, beinr; agreeable that' the ItFrec1.erick
Little" house shoulò be preserved, on motion by ~ouncilMan Seymour, seconded by
r'ouncilnan Tho1"1, authorized a letter of af!ree1"'!ent be sent to Pacesetter
rToJ'es stipl1latin¡ to the conditions outlined in their letter of July 14, In7(;,
:1nn also to the /1UH~~ confirminp the temporary site for the house and holding
the District harrlless froI'1 any damaf':eR that May be involved. HOTIm1 CARRIr.n.
p~T\~!T~SIOn TO Lr¡\V~ STAT~ FOP. 90 DAYS: On motion by Councilman Thorn, seconded by
Councilnan Seymour, Counc ibvo!'!lan Kaywood' s request for permission to leave the
~tate for QO days H<1S approved. ',mTIOt" rARRIED.
QFFICIAL ~OY ScnUT TRnup: Council~ro~an Yaywood received a letter from TIoy Scout
Troup 5h requesting thôt they be named official troup of the City of Anahei.~
for a trip they Hill be making to Canada, August 7 through 21, 1~76.
nn P1otion by Councib.rornan Ka)"(Ÿood, seconded hy Councilman Roth, a letter
proclaininr Boy Scout ~roup 56 as the official troup for the City of ^nahei~
\\7<1 c; r1 irecten to be sent to the "rroup' s ~coutMaster. ~()TION CARRIED.
T'-:(:(ìH~,!r:~mATIn~: - ~mLTI}fODAL TRANSPORTATION COHMITTEF: Councilwoman Kaywood
inòicated that the League of California ~ities requested a letter he sent
repl<lcinp Don HcDaniel on the nrange County ~~u1ti!"'odal Transportation
Committee, since he has ta~en another position out of ~tate. Councilwoman
::ctywood has spoken Hith and recommended that Phillip ~chHartze, Associate
Dlanner, fill the vacant position, and Paul Sin~er, Traffic Enr:ineer, he 1~r.
~chwart~e' alternate. By ~eneral consent, the ~ouncil endorse~ said
ar>pointnents.
,,-rT)TT ~EpnRT - F^~'ULY r'~'ŒRGE~:rCY /\~SI~TAT'ICE P~OCRA~~: Councilman r~ott, after
n:)\7ieTvinp the Al1dit 'Deport issued to neet the requirements of finance account-
ah1] ity of the City of I'\naheim to the County of f)range to assist in its
accountinp to the United States GovernMent for rounty Revenue Sharing Funds,
co~~ented unfavorably on so~e of the findings contained therein, namely, one
section "(mich indicated that Motel rooms for needy farlilies were paid for
\\7Í thout actually hein r used.
'Ir. Tallf'Y stated that such allegations were investigated and found to be
false, hut were included in the report because one of the purposes of the audit
report Has to brinr: about an investir,ation.
]A"~j\Gr: TO TRASH e'1CLOSURES: Councilman Kott received a letter fron a City resi-
rtent indicatinr, that SOT11e trash enclosures were purportedly damaged hy the
City's disposal people and requested that Hr. Talley handle the !;latter accord-
in ~1 y. <"'-_ouncilwoman Ka~vood had received the same letter last ~veek and
re~erreñ it to Thornton Piersall.
L;f)PERATILf. SCOREBOARD - ANAIIEIH STADIUH: Councilman Roth inquired as to the
status of the still inoperable Qain scoreboard sign at Anaheim StadiuM.
~r. Talley assured CouncilMan Roth that action has been taken to correct this as
Soon as possible.
RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSIO~: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to recess to Executive
Session. Councilman Roth seconded the Motion. !fOTION CARRIED. (4:17 P.H.)
.~F~T' RE~r.SS: The Hayor called the meeting to 'order, all ~'embers of the City
Council beinp present. (4:44 P.~.)
..,.
..
"""".."....,...
.., '" w.""""" ..c>=""...~,"""'.'
........_"", . ",_..
ï. - 2
/b >4
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIl. MI"1nTF.~ - July 27, lC)7~, 1:1() "'.H.
ADJOUR'P-ŒHT: Counc il woman Kaywood moved to adj ourn.
the motion. HOTTON CARRIED.
Councilman Thorn seconderl
,!\.ctj ourned:
4:45 P.N.
¡\LŒ1A H. nOUGARD, CITY CLERK
~/}( ~~
Rv:
~
--
ne~
..."
..
.u~.'-.c.,..,.__.#,._-~....~_....,. .,.
,-~._.