1976/09/2176-674
City H.a. ll,. Anaheim, Ca.l.i..f.0..rnia - COU:N.C. IL ~!.I!.IU. TES -, September 21, 1976! 1.;.3o P.M,
The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session.
PRESENT: COIRICIL :IE}fBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, ICott, and Roth
ABSEUT: COUNCIL }~MBERS: Thom
PRESENT; CITY I~NAGER; William O, Talley
ASSIST~2qT CITY ATTOP~IEY: I,'illiam P. Hopkins
CITY CLERK; Linda D. Roberts
DEPUTY CITY ATTORNEY: Frank A. Lowry, Jr.
PUBLIC WORKS DIRECTOR: Thornton E. Piersall
PLAN~II,~C DIRECTOR: P. onald L. Thompson
DATA PROCESSIHG ~&MNAGER: Keith Parkyn
AESISTA2~T CITY EMGINEER: William Devitt
Mayor Pro Tern Seymour called the meeting to order and welcomed
those in attendance to the Council meeting.
INVOCATION: Reverend Johnny Carlson of the West Anaheim united Methodist Church
gave the Invocation.
FLAG SALUTE; Councilman William Kott led the Assembly in the Pledge of
Allegiance to the Flag.
AUAPd]S - CERTIFICATES OF APPRECIATION: Mayor Pro Tern Seymour presented
Cer't~'f{cates of Appre~i~'ffion and the symbolic Big "A" Scoreboard expression of
thanks to the following four City employees in recognition of outstanding service
in saving the lives of three citizens: Fred Rousch, Anaheim Police Officer
revived an elderly unconscious lady hy cardio pulminary resuscitation; John
Parlapiano, Building Inspector, who restored breathing of a young boy who had
fallen into a .~winuning pool; and 3i~ Canales, tTater Division Pipe Fitter, and
'?ic!~ae! Janks, former CETA employee, who saved a young man who had been overcome
by carbon monoxide poisoning %y their quick action in moving him to open air.
Approval of minutes was deferred one week.
WAIVER OF READING - ORDINA/'~CES A/~] RESOLUTIOi~S: Councilwoman Y. aywood moveJ to
Waive the" reading in full of 'al'l ordinances '~nd resolutions, and that consent to
~he waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council .*[embers unless, after
reading of the title, specific request is made by a Council ~lember for the
readin8 of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Ro~h seconded ~he motion.
Councilman Thom absent. ~OTIOIi CARRIED.
FIi?21CIAL DE?~.~DE ~CA~.,S~ Till CI,~ in the amount of $558,587.97, in accordance
with ~h¢ 1976-77 Budget, were approved.
F~QUEST FOR BUDGET ADJUST~;T - LIBRARY ACCOUI:T: City Manager Talley requested
approval of a budget transfer of ~11,000 from the Library Account to the Parks,
Recreation and the Arts Department ~o pay for the Library's share of lighting
expenses for the parking lot at the Sunkist Branch Library. This adds no
increase to the budget.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City Council
approved a Budget transfer of $11,000 from the Library account to the Parks,
Recreation and the Arts Department. Councilman Thom absent. ~DTION CARRIED.
EXTENSION OF CETA I PROJECT ACTIVITIES FOR FISCAL YEAR 1977: }ir. Hepburn advised
that the funding provided through the Orange County Manpower Commission is the
~nitial fiscal year 1977 CETA allocation having no relationship to the Public
Servi~e Employment positions. Mr. Ilepburn explained that the dollar amounts
contained in the basic contract between the Manpower Commission and the City were
estimates at the time the contract was developed, but that in final negotiations
the figures varied to a certain degree; however, agreements were not being signed
in excess of funds available to the City.
RESOLUTION NOS. 76R-569 %%-IROUGH 76R-573: Councilman Roth offered Resolution Nos.
76R-569 through 76R-573, both inclusive, for adoption.
Refer to Resolution Book.
76-675
City HallI ~maheimI California - COtEICIL HINUTES - September 211, ].9761 1'~n T, ,f
R.ESOLUTIOi; NO. 76~-56.9: A ~SOLUTION OF THE CI~ COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY OF ANAITEIH
APPROVINC CO~,IT.ELL.,SI~E~,..~TPO~. '~ .P PROG~f AND AUTItORIZING DISBURSEMENT OF F~TDS
FOR APPROVED ACTIVITIES. ($656,'389.00)
RE~.OLUTIOH' NO~76R-570: A MI;SOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANA?!EIM
APPROVING AMD AUTHORIZI/-:C ~'?~,,~, EXECUTION OF AN AGREE?~T B].,T%.~EJ' "THE CITY OF
NTAJiEI~ ~TD TIlE NORTH OP~GE CO~TY CO~R~TITY COLLEGE DISTRICT Pi~LATING TO ~[E
ZSTABLISI[~NT OF A HOUSING REPAIR TP~ININC AND VORK EXPERIENCE PROGP~'~.
:-,~,~OLUTIO~, NO. 76R.-571' A RESOLUTION OF T,L, CITY COPi'rCIL OF TT~'] CITY OF ~UMIIilL'
J~'ROVE'~G ~TD AUTi!ORIZLC" TIlE EXECUTIO!I OF NT ACP~E~iNT n.~ET[a~.u..T, T ,~, TIIE CITY OF
~K;A~?IY 2d~D TIlE NORTI'. ORA~ICE COI~;TY COI.~[Uq.~ITY COLLEGE DISTRICT RELATING TO
V~CAT!ONAL ~);2!CE ~D ~.m,,,~-?
.... ~,,o~ uD';C SERVICES.
~cn, w~?,-,.?.,.,,,,.,~:,~,,, NO 76R-572: A Pi,~,OLU,IO.,Ve ~ "OF TIlE CITY ~a'~"CIL OF TIUi CITY OF
...... ~,,,'m ......... . ....... Tile CITY
,' ............ ;.-,, -
.................. , . 765-573: ~ PEqOLUTIOl, DF Tile
, ~.~ ,k ~.
*~'~,V'-,H ;lTD' ~Tm'WO~v"~C '"?'~ ~,XECUTION OF ~'~ ACREE~ITT BZTI'~EN TIkE
Y2 UT!' Df:'/":i, O?i.'I2 ?T PXOCPAi'~.
~o1.1 Call ~Wote.,:
~y'c. C~ID!'CIL '""?;~ " ' ' Ce)n';our, .":otc and Koch
· .' ~ ~ · ....... ~.~ .... : '~ .~.~, 00C~ ~ ~_.
Ti~ :.'~ayor Fro Ten declared P. csolution :;os. 76"~.,-~,~=~n. clu:ough 76R-573 duly. passe,.,'
and adopted..
T "~f' ~ ~r "O~"S '~..,'"r;"r r"'.% ......
~..,...f,~.PU3LIC ~',, .".. ._.,,,.~,,.~,..~. ACT OF 1976: City ~:anager Talley presented a
report from staff dated September-O, 1'976, which was a joint effort By Public
'..',~orks, Park~, Recreation and the Arts and the Fire n. epartr.mnts, and report dated
September 13, 1976 from his office listing proposed projects which would qualify,
~o. Federal funds under the ter~ of the newly passed Public Uorks 2i11. On
Council approval, the eight projects to be submitted include: civic center,
(Phase I, 2-story, 26,000 square-foot building, Phase II-A, Tower Council
Chamber, Phase II-B, plaza and parking garage); Barrier-Free Anaheim; Ga~:tont
Drive Storm Drain; Lincoln Avenue landscaping; Alley reconstruction; Fire
~rainin8 facility (joint powers projec~ with City Of Garden Grove and possibly
City of ..Orange); Modjeska Park Community Building; and the Lincoln Avenue
Comr, tunity Service Center.
Along with the subject reports, Hr, Talley submitted a letter sent to Mr.. Richard
Powers, City ?reneger of Garden Grove, confirming the understanding that the
proposed Fire Training Facility Project would be a Joint powers effort; report
from the Anaheim Citizens Capital Improvement Public Building gubcommittee; and
:he first and second City Hall structural analysis reports incl. uding the cost
estimates of refurbishing the present City tlall.
Mr. Talley stated the proposed resolution would authorize him. to initiate the
application for Federal funds to the Economic Development Agency which, on a
regional basis, could grant $1.5 to $2 million with waivers at the ~i~ashington
level up to $5 million or more. He stressed that no priority Of projects was
allowed.
In response to }layer Pro Tern Seymour, ~r. Talley articulated on the second report
relevant to the safety and' ability to remodel the existing City Hall. tie stated
that the current report substantiated the initial report (both performed by
different structural engineering firms) confirming that the building is a hazard
and requires substantial rehabilitation to meet modern building codes, and the
costs of refurbishment could'go as high as ,~1.6 million not including budget for
the relocation of staff in the ~nterim. The second report also stressed that
there were many potentially dangerous violations as the structure was not up to
code although it would perhaps survive under a moderate earthquake. It also
pointed out that the building had no historical significance o~her than it was 52
years old ~
76-676
City llal!, Anaheim~ Californi.a - COI~ICIL MI!.,!.U_T.E.s.- September_ 21, ,1976! 1:30
Mayor Pro Tern Seymour a.qked if anyone wished to address the Council.
.~fr. Arthur Uassel~rin',<, 2762 Fast Vermont Avenue, Chairman of the Anahei:~
Citizens Capital Improvement Public Building Subcommittee, submitted ~ report
dated September 29, 107~, ~nd outl~_ned t~.e findings an~ rcco~enJptions c,cnt,"i~.ed
therci,i. ~"'e stated that the P~,~blic ~,Jorks E?ploy~_.ent Act provides for fast ~qtart.~
which, in essence, meant that if someone could be put to work, the application
wou].~ be considered more readily. His committee specifically recommended
submittal of the three-phase application for City ilall explaining that if $5
million were granted, additional funds for completion would come from
Redevelopment, from Public Utilities (since they presently utilize 247; of the
present City Hall) and from the General Fund, if required.
The Capital I:.'.~prover~:ent Comrtttee was basically concerned with only two of the
ei~l~ proposed projects and it was unanix.ously agreed the following
recorl'r~endntions Le sul0mitted to Council:
i. :Taw City 7'a!l - proceed with subn, ittal of the application to the Economic
Development Agency (:qDA) as recommended by staff for Phase I, IIA and lib.
In the interim, further active study would be made to find other sources of
financing besides Redevelopment and the Central Fund.
2. Fire Training Facility - as the landowner, Anaheim is to submit the application
for funds and, if granted, arrange for reimbursement by Garden Grove and possibly
Orange under a proposed 3oint powers agreement.
~{r. Hasselbrink stressed that his Committee was still actively looking for
sources of revenue for a new City ilall and other public buildings especially
since the possibility of being granted Federal funds, as explained by ~r. Talley,
was 80~' yes,
~, and. 20% no. Other sources considered included joint powers, lease
back, and bonding; interrelated with their search for financing was educating the
public as to the need for such buildings, especially the need for a new City
ilall.
In answer to P~yor Pro Tern Seymour, :~r. Kasselbrink reported that, as yet, his
conlmittee did not have sufficient time to consider ~,~%ere the ~2.6 million from
the Utilities Department and the $2.3 million from the General Fund would come
from if the Government granted $5 million with the stipulation that all phases of
the Civic Center had ~o~ completed. However, he stressed that if additional
revenue could not be found to complete the project, Council would have the option
to turn down the grant, but since it would be at least 90 days before lTashington
responds, it could be determined during that time if the necessary funds could be
generaned.
,~hayor Pro Tern Seymour was concerned that if we did turn down any funds granted
because of the inability to find additional necessary funding, it would be a long
time before the City would be considered for such grants again.
Mr. Hasselbrink discussed potential sites for the new City Hall in answer to
Councilman Roth explaining that, using the Federal Grant as a guideline, the City
was locked in with the present site and it was his understanding that proposals
had already been made to purchase the Willdan Building and others adjacent to it.
He interjected that his Committee recommended the location be on the present
site. A secondary site, which under the Federal Grant, he understood could not
be pursued, was the land between the Library and the Police building on Ilarbor
Boulevard and the acquisition of property near Fremont Junior High School. On
the latter, i'~r. Hasselbrink indicated that he was aware of conflicting reports
that the Board of Education at one time indicated they would not release the
Fremont property, and then that they would do so.
M. ayor Pro Tern Cey~nour asked l~r. Talley if staff had considered financial
alternatives for funding the City Ilall/Civic Center Project.
Mr. Talley reported that the First Phase, 2-story building, could be entirely
funded with the Federal Grant, and it could be a stand-alone project. If the
City were able to get a subsequent grant of $5 million to:,e7.5 million, then it
would be the City's responsibility to finance the remainder of the project based
upon use of the property. ?'.r. Talley said that the Pedevelopment Agency stated
that since the project would stimulate downtown redeveloprmng, they would be
justified in spending a certain amount of money as determined by the Agency and
e~:pressed that it would also be appropriate for the Utilities Department to
76-677
_City Hall, Anahi.eiim! California - COUNCIl. MINUTES - September 21, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
contribute from its operating revenues rent in the amount of its share of space
used. Fir. Talley advised further that Jt could be done as a contribution, bond
payment, lease back or long term rental agreement. As another supplemental
alternative, Mr. Talley indicated that the General Fund could also contribute.
In summarizing staff's investigation of financial alternatives, Mr. Talley was of
the opinion that although funds were not now available, over a long range there
was no question that the money could be raised.
lle added that one of the requirements in submitting the application to the EDA
was a stipulation that the City must be prepared to go to bid within 30 days
after approval and start construction within 60 days thereafter.
bfayor Pro Tem Seymour asked if anyone wished to speak on any portion of the
Public Works Bill.
Mr. Jim Swanik, 1265 West Catalpa, questioned the City Hall portion of the
project specifcally regarding the estimated cost figures, proposed plans, and the
ultimate necessity to close Claudina Street between Broadway and Lincoln in order
to construct the Civic Center on the present site.
Mr. Talley explained that the costs estimates for a new City Hall as presented
were current costs if construction was started within 90 days and that the
subject plans were those submitted when the method of financing a new City Hall
was brought before the electorate. He also stated that other design criteria was
established and approved for the particular configuration proposed, and is still
considered adequate.
Mr. Thornton Piersall, Director of Public Works, addressed the closure of
Claudine Street and explained that if the proposed application was approved by
the Council, a public hearing date on the street closure would be established at
the Council meeting of September 28, 1976.
Mr. Swanik was also concerned that the other 7 projects which he considered more
labor intensive might never get funded if we turned down any funding which may be
granted.
Mr. Talley reiterated that the government specifically advised that no priority
is allowed and that each project would be judged on its own merits.
In summary, Mr. Swanik asserted that he was in support of the application as long
as the 7 other projects were included, without which in his opinion, the City
Hall proposal would not be considered.
.Mr. Ronald Roluffs, 1591 Minerva, speaking to the Civic Center project, was
concerned that Phase I did not include Council Chambers as confirmed by Fir.
Talley. ~Ir. Roluffs specifically asked if it would not be blackmail to supplant
a functional building with something new and necessary but which would require a
second phase since the first phase could not stand alone over time.
Mr. Talley stressed that since the present City Hall was a high hazard building
and $1.6 million was needed to bring it up to Code, he did not see that trying to
acquire funds for the project was blackmail.
Mr. Roluffs stated that the question was whether or not the City could get along
without the second and third phases without going through City funding if funds
were granted and accepted for Phase I. He was also concerned that, not only did
the electorate reject the funding method for a new City Hall in 1972, but also
the design criteria.
Mr. Talley emphasized that only the method of financing was rejected.
Mayor Pro Tem Seymour clarified that, in his opinion, Mr. Roluffs was trying to
point out that inherent in the electorate's rejection of financing a new City
Hall was a feeling of objection to the proposed plan as well.
Mr. Roluffs confirmed that this was the point he wanted understood.
Mr. John Dillon, 5241 Del Cerro, La Palma, expressed that his group, Barrier-Free
Anaheim, was very happy with the support and the enthusiasm they had thus far
76-678
City H~ll,.Anaheim, Calif.ornia -..COUNCIL.MINUTES _..~. Septgmber, 211 1976
received from Engineering, Public Works, and the Capital Improvement Committee
and were also in favor of submitting the applications for funds to the EDA.
Mrs. Pat Bayley, 801 North Loafs, stated that newspaper articles were being
maintained and sent to cities throughout the United States informing them of
Anaheim's pioneer Barrier-Free Program.
In answer to Councilman Kott, Mr. Tom Van Diver of the Fire Department explained
that the land on which the proposed Fire Training facility would be located was
not the same property as previously proposed for a tennis complex nor the
Multimodal Project but 4.75 acres between Rampart Street and the Santa Aha River,
south of Orangewood.
Councilwoman Kaywood commented on the report submitted regarding the structural
integrity of the present City Hall and was concerned that the City was placing
itself in a position of tremendous liability by cont~nuing to use it. She
expressed this was an excellent oportunity to do something about the situation
and asked that copies of the reports be included with the application.
RESOLUTION: Councilwoman Kaywood offered a resolution that the application for
Federal Funds under the Public Works Employment Act of 1976 be signed and
submitted covering all 8 projects as outlined in the staff reports,including
Phase I, II and III of City Hall.
Before a vote was taken, it was ascertained that at least a 90-day time period
would be involved before any word was received from Washington as to the status
of the application.
Mayor Pro Tem Seymour stated he had not read the second structural engineer's
report just now distributed. He saw no problem in support~ing all 8 projects
except for Phase II-A and II-B of the Civic Center Project as outlined in Joint
staff report dated September 8, 1976. He was concerned that if funds were
granted, the Council would be faced with the task of raising additional capital
and the alternatives, in his estimation, were, (1) an increase in utility rates
to generate sufficient revenue to meet a $2.6 million committment, (2)
development of other sources of revenue, (3) going to the already Iow
unappropriated reserve account and, (4) some form of lease back or Joint powers
agreement.
In considering alternativ~ number 4, Mayor Pro Tem Seymour indicated that while
this may be a viable way of financing a capital improvement, he has been opposed
to that type of financing at least for City Hall because such a move might be
interpreted as a scheme to build a new Civic Center without first going to the
electorate and, secondly, running a high risk of losing crediblity to the top
priority in the community, that of redevelopment itself which is much more than
Just a civic center, if substantial redevelopment funds were used.
Mayor Pro Tem Seymour stated he would be willing to support the application to
EDA if the resolution as proposed was amended to exclude Phase II-A and II-B of
City Hall, otherwise he would oppose it; something he did not want to do because
of the other valuable programs involved.
Councilwoman Kaywood stressed that she did not want to exclude the Phase II
portion because of the possibility that $5 millon or even more would be available
and that if it were excluded, the liabilty claim from people who could be killed
or injured in the present building would be much greater.
Mayor Pro Tem Seymour indicated he would be satisfied even with the inclusion of
all phases of the Civic Center if the resolution were amended to state that
whatever Covernment funds were received would not be augmented by funds from the
General Fund, utility rates, or lease back or Joint powers agreements.
Councilman Roth and City Manager Talley both indicated that at this point the
City would not be making any commitment of funds from the community or the
taxpayer until a commitment was received back from the Government and, prior to
accepting any grant, an acceptable financing program would be first presented.
Mr. Talley also reiterated for Councilman Roth that the City would have the
option to reject or amend any award granted.
As confirmed by Mr. Talley, if the City were given the grant as requested, the
Government assumes that construction would be started within 30 days; thereupon
76-679
City Hall, Anaheim, California -COUNCIL MINUTES - September 21', 1976, 1:30-P.M.
Mayor Pro Tem Seymour stated he wOuld still oppOse' the 'resolution as he wanted it
clear that unleSs the question of additional financing Was resolved, he was not
ready to commit other City funds to Join in this project.
Councilwoman Kaywood asserted that it was premature to assume there were no other
sources of funding especially since the Citizen's Capital Improvement Committee
had not yet completed their financial feasibility study to secure other
alternatives for financing.
The aforementioned resolution offered 'by Councilwoman Kaywood failed to carry.
RESOLUTION: Councilman Seymour offered a substitute resolution authorizing the
dity b~na'ger to. sign the subject application including all of the 8 stated
projects-excepting that which references PhaSe II of the Civic Center.
A vote was not taken on. the foregoing resolution but instead Councilwoman Kaywood
asked if MayOr Pro Tern Seymour WOuld consider including Phase II, at the same
time stating the methods of financing that could not be used.
Mayor Pro Tem SeYmour reiterated he would support the measure as long as the
Federal Government would finance it, but he would not want the promise of Federal
funds to go against' personal principles which he has 'voiced publicly.
Councilman Kott questioned whether or not Mayor Pro Tern Seymour could agree to a
lease back arrangement if the electorate had an opportunity to vote on it.
Mayor Pro Tern Seymour expressed favor to Councilman Kott's suggestion and
subsequently asked if long. term financing were to be used, would the Council
agree to only a lease back, Joint powers agreement or a bond issue approved by
the electorate. The consensus being positive, Mayor Pro Tem Seymour amended his
substitute resolution and offered Resolution No. 76R-574 for adoption authorizing
the City Mmn~ger to submit the application for Federal funds to the Office of
Economic Development Administration under the Public Works Employment Act of 1976
on all 8 proposed projects with the provision that any contribution from the City
of Anaheim, on Phase II-A and II-B of the Civic Center Project be approved by the
electorate or financed on a pay-as-you-~o basts. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-574: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A~AHEIM
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE CITY MANAGER TO EXECUTE APPLICATIONS ON BEttALF OF
TIlE CITY PURSUANT TO THE LOCAL PUBLIC WORKS EMPLOYMENT ACT OF 1976 FOR SUBMITTAL
TO T~tE OFFICE OF ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT ADMINISTRATION'
Roll CallVote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS .' None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Thom
The Mayor Pro Tern declared Resolution No, 76R-574 duly passed and adopted.
EI~VIRONMENTAL IMPACT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: (Fire Department~ Training Center,
Southeast corner Rampart and Orangewo0d)on motion by Councilman Kott. seconded
by Councllwoman. Kaywood, the City Council finds that the proposed project will
have no significant effect on the environment and is' therefore, exempt from the
requirement to prepare an Environmental Impact Report. Councilman Thom absent.
MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Kott, the City Manager
was authorized to sign a Joint Powers Agreement witbthe Cities of Garden Grove
and Orange for the construction of a Fire Training Facility on the proposed 4.75
acre site owned by the City of Anaheim. CounCilman Thom absent. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS: By general consent the Council recessed for 10 minutes. (2:40 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: The Mayor Pro Tern called the meeting to order, all Council Members
being present with the exception of Councilman Thom. (2:50 P.M.)
PUBLIC HEARING - ABANDON}f~2~T NO. 76-3A: In accordance with the application filed
by Mr. David B. Garrison, Chief Project Coordinator, Carl Karcher Enterprises,
Inc., and pursuant to Resolution No. 7~6R-53!, .public hearing was held on the
76-680
C_ity tlall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Sap:ambcr Zl! 19761 1;30
proposed abandonment of an existing public utility easement lying within the
property located at the southeast corner of La Palma Avenue and Kraemer
Boulevard.
Report of the City Engineer was submitted recommending approval of said
abandonment uncondit ionally.
The Mayor Pro Tern asked if anyone either in favor or in opposition to the
proposed abandonment, wished to speak,there being no response, he declared the
hearing closed.
Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 76R-575 for adoption. Refer to Resolution
Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-575: A RESOLUTION OF T~IE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ORDERING THE VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF THAT PORTION OF CERTAIN PROPERTY
DESCRIBED HEREIN. (76-3A)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Thom
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 76R-575 duly passed and adopted.
CALIFORNIA HIGHWAY PATROL - COMMERCIAL ENFORCEMENT AND ACCIDENT LNVESTICATION
CLASSES: Councilman Kott offered 'Res"~"lution NOs'. 76~-576' and 76R-577 'for ......
adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-576: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMk~T BETWEEN THE CITY OF
~N;dIEIM AI{D THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, DEPARTMENT OF HIGHWAY PATROL, RELATLNG TO
COMMERCIAL ENFORCEMENT CLASSES FOR ANA}~.IM POLICE OFFICERS AT THE CALIFORNIA
HI~IWAY PATROL ACADEMY. (April 18-29,1977)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-577; A P~ESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF T}LE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING ~ EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF
A~{AHEIM AI~D THE STATE OF CALIFOR~;IA, DEPARTMENT OF ttIGHWAY PATROL, RELATING TO
TP~aINING CLASSES FOR ANAt~IM POLICE OFFICERS AT TIlE CALIFORNIA HICtlWAY PATROL
ACADE}fY. (January 10-14,1977)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COL~CIL b~MBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL ~X~MBERS: None
ABSENT: COb~CIL MEMBERS: Thom
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution Nos. 76R-576 and 76R-577 duly passed and
adopt ed.
APPOINTMENTS TO COMMUNITY SERVICES BOARD; On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood,
seconded by Councilman Roth, appointments to the Community Services Board were
continued for two weeks for a full Council . Councilman Thom absent. MOTION
CARRIED.
ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT - FULLERTON CREEK CHANNEL: Councilman Kott
o--ffered Resolution No." 76R-578 for ad0Ptio~.'" Refer ~'o Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-578: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH THE ORANGE COUNTY FLOOD
CONTROL DISTRICT PROVIDING FOR REIMBURSEMENT TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FOR
RELOCATION COSTS TO CLEAR THE CONSTRUCTION AREA FOR THE FULLERTON CREEK CHANNEL
AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT ON BEHALF OF
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Thom
76-681
City Ilall~ Anaheim, .California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 21~ 1976~ 1:30 P.M.
The ~ayor declared Resolution No. 76R-578 duly passed and adopted.
SUNDIAL - PCB COMPANY: On the recommendation of the Utilities Director,
Councilman Kott offered Resolution No. 76R-579 for adoption Refer to Resolution
Book. '
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-579: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING THE TERMS OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN /lIE CITY OF AN~d{EIM AND SUNDIAL-PCB
COMPANY RE REIMBURSEMENT OF COSTS FOR SPECIAL WATER FACILITIES, AND AUTHORIZING
T~DZ biAYOR A~ND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT (Tract Nos. 913~, 0135 and
9136) '
Roll Call Vote:
Atq]S: COUNCIL b~HBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott and Roth
NOES; COUNCIL ~[EMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL ~MBERS: Thom
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 76R-579 duly passed and adopted.
AMENDMENT - TILES SOFTWARE CONTRACT; Data Processing Manager, Keith Parkyn,
requested approval of an amendment to the consulting services agreement with TRES
Computer Systems for an extension of 6 months, not to exceed $50,000, as outlined
in the Utilities Director's memorandum of September 16, 1976. Mr. Parkyn
clarified for Councilman Kott that the amendment was necessary to provide post
implementation maintenance and extension services for the new computer system now
in operation in the Utilities Department, as provided for in the 1976-77 Budget.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 76R-580 for adoption. Refer to
Resolution Book°
RESOLUTION NO. 7.6R-580: A RESOLUTION OF T}{E CITY COUNCIL OF TILE CITY OF ANAHEIM
APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF A SECONq) AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT DATED
JUNE 17, 1975, WITH TRES COMPUTER SYSTE~, INC., PROVIDING FOR MAINTENANCE AND
EXTENSIONS AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID
AMENDMENT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANAIIEIM.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood~ Seymour, Kott and Roth
NOES; COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Thom
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 76R-580 duly passed and adopted.
ANIMAL CONTROL SERVICES; Deputy City Attorney, Frank Lowry recommended the
adoption of three re~olutions establishing animal facility rules, regulations and
fees, animal permit rules and regulations, and approving terms and conditions of
a contract with the County of Orange for animal control services. Mr. Lowry
further requested first reading of a proposed Ordinance repealing Title 8,
Chapter 8.08 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and adopting a new Ordinance by
reference providing for the change~ as outlined in the three resolutions
proposed.
Councilman Kott offered Resolution Nos. 76R-581 through 76R-583, both inclusive,
for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-581: A RESOLUTION OF Tl~ CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
STATING AND ESTABLISHING ANIMAL FACILITY RULES, REGULATIO~IS AND FEES.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-582~ A RESOLUTION OF /]LE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAI~IM
ESTABLISHING ANIMAL PERMIT RULES AND REGULATIONS.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-583: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ~2~AHEIM
APPROV]2~G THE TERMS 'AND CONDITIONS OF AN AGREEMENT WITH TIIE COUNTY OF ORANGE FOR
ANIM~L CO~rROL SERVICES AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID
AGREEMenT ON BEHALF OF THE CITY OF ANA}IEIM.
76-682
City Hallt Anaheiml California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 21, 1976t 1:30. P.M.
Roll Call Vote:
AYES; COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBEP,$~ None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMJtERS: Thom
The Mayor Pro Tm declared Resolution Nos. 76R-581 through 76R-583 duly passed
and adopged.
ORDINANCE NO. 3594: Councilman Kott offered Ordinance No. 3594 for first
reading.
ORDINANCE .NO. 3594: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING TITLE 8,
CHAPTER 8.08 OF T~E ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADOPTING A NEW CHAPTER 8.08 IN ITS
PLACE AND STEAD.
FI(~JRE MODEL STUDIO ESTABLISHMENTS: Assistant City Attorney Hopkins explained
that" on 'July 29, 1976, there was an injunction and complaint for declaratory
Judgment br. ousht in the Superior Court in connection with the Figure Model Studio
Establishment Ordinance No. 3532 adopted by the City Council on May 11, 1976.
Although the Ordinance vas upheld, it was declared that due process required
notice and hearing provisions be inserted rather than suspension provided
summarily by the License Collector. By amending the present ordinance to require
notice and hearing, }ir. Hopkins believed this would conform vith the Judge's
order and, therefore, proposed first reading of an ordinance amending Chapter
4.31 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3595 for first reading.
ORDINANCE NO. 3595: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 4,
CHAPTER 4'.31.21'0 AND 4.31.220 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO FICURE
MODEL STUDIO ESTABLISHMENTS.
DOUCLASS/SUNKIST ACRICULTURAL PRESERVE: Mr. Lowry explained that in order to
establish whether an Agricultural Preserve is to be terminated, the Government
Code, in conjunction with the Williamson Act, requires the setting of a date,
time and place for public hearing. A recently approved Plan Amendment in the
area east of Sunkist, north of Cerri=os, and south of Ball Road involved the
annexation of an Agricultural Preserve of approximately 25 acres, part of which
is being proposed to be used for a mobile home park. Mr. Lowry confirmed that
the proposed resolution did not cover termination at this time, but was only to
establish the public hearing and ordering the Assessor to determine cancellation
value.
Councilman Kott offered Resolution No. 76R-584 for adoption. Refer ~o Resolution
Book.
P,~SOLUTION NO. 76R-584: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY CUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ESTABLISHINC A PUBLIC HEARINC TO DETERliINE WHETHER AGRICULTURAL PRESERVE AGREE-
MBNTS SHOULD OR SHOULD NOT BE CANCELLED. (Gregg, Fluor, and Simpson)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Thom
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 76R-584 duly passed and adopted.
SLURRY SEAL CONTRACT - EXTR~INC.BID DATE: CouncilwmanKayvood offered
Resolution No. 76R-§85 for adoption. Refer to ReBolution Book.
R~...SOLUTION NO. 76R-58}! A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. 76R-563. (Slurry Seal Contract)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott and Roth
NOF~: COUNCI/, Hi. BEltS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL ~: Thom
76-683
City Hall~ Anaheim~ CaliforD. ia - COUNCIL MINUTE. S , September 21! 1976! 1:30 P,M,
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 76R-585 duly passed and adopted.
PETITION - EUCLID STREET AND EUCLID WAY INTERSECTION: Assistant City Engineer,
William Devitt, reported on the petition from Robertshaw Controls employees
regarding the Euclid Street and Euclid Way intersection with the request for help
in obtaining access to northbound Euclid Street from Euclid Way as outlined in
the Engineering Department memo dated September 2, 1976.
Mr. Devitt explained that within the last two weeks a "keep clear" legend was
installed on the pavement at the problem location although he could not attest to
its effectiveness. A proposed agreement had been submitted to the City
Attorneyts Office which would provide for an additional roadway to the rear of
Robertshaw Controls which would allow exit onto Crescent Avenue avoiding Euclid
Street entirely. Mr. Devit~ indicated that both Robertshaw and U. S. Borax were
most anxious to proceed with this new road.
Councilman Roth expressed that top priority should be given to the completion and
execution of the agreement.
No further action was taken by the Council at this time.
CITY OF PLACENTIA ANNEXATION NO. 76-1 (Boundary Adjustment): Councilman Roth
offered Resolution No. 76R-586 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-586: A RESOLUTION OF TILt CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
C--ONSENTING TO THE DEf'AC}DiENT OF CERTAIN TERRITORY FROM THE CITY OF ANA/iEIM TO BE
~2~NEXED TO THE CITY OF PLACENTIA. (Miraloma between ~k~¥~ew alld ]~ee Alia ~tr~et)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL b~MBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Thom
The ~yor Pro Tern declared Resolution No. 76R-586 duly passed and adopted.
DESIGN AND PLAN PREPARATION - STORM DRAIN NO. 17: On motion by Councilman Roth,
seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council approved an agreement for
consulting engineers services with Tait and Associates for the design and plan
preparation for Storm Drain No. 17 in the Anaheim Canyon Industrial area.
Councilman Thom absent. MOTION CARRIED.
JOI:IT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH STANTON COUNTY WATER DISTRICT: Councilman Kott
offered Resolution No. 76R-587 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUT.I. ON. NO.' 7.6.R-587: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
AP'~ROVING A JOINT POWERS AGREEMENT WITH THE STANTON COUNTY WATER DISTRICT FOR THE
CONSTRUCTION AND PAYMENT OF A SEWER CONNECTION AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY
CLERK TO EXECUTE SAME. (Twila Reid Park)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Thom
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 76R-587 duly passed and adopted.
ABANDONME}~f NO. 75-15,A; PALM STREET BETUEEN HARBOR AND BALL: Councilwoman
Kaywood offered Resolution No. 76R'-'588 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-588: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND FIXING A
DATE FOR }H~ARING I~{EREON. (October 12, 1976, 2:30 P.M.)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott and Roth
NOES: COUNCIL ME~ERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Thom
76-684
City Hal!; Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 21~ 1976~ 1:30 P.M.
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution No. 76R-588 duly passed and adopted.
APPOINTMENT TO UTILITIES BOARD: On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by
Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council continued the appointments to the
Utilities Board for two weeks for a full Council Councilman Thom absent.
MOTION CARRIED. '
_FREDERICK LITTLE HOUSE; Andrew Deneau, Chairman, Anaheim Heritage Committee of
the Cultural Arts Commission explained that a temporary location had been secured
for the Frederick Little House on the southeast corner of Manchester and Broadway
and it was necessary at this time to obtain a moving permit for execution of the
move. Mr. Deneau further explained that the cost of the subsequent move to a
final site was being underwritten by a private donor.
Mr. Deneau stated that a report had been completed on the conceptual use of the
house as well as its administration which was to be presented to the Museum
Committee on September 22, 1976, basically proposing that the refurbishing of the
building be conducted by a non-profit organization. Subsequent to that meeting
Mr. Deneau said the conceptual plan would be presented to Council. He indicated
he was also recommending a funding budget for the building, not involving City
funds, but an administrative budget so that donations could be received and
monies expended and as a part of the recommendation, the $2,535 already received
from the Council Contingency Fund authorized to assist in the move be returned to
the Council as soon as budget permits.
Councilwoman Kaywood questioned Mr. Deneau on the outcome of a prior meeting
regarding a permanent location offered by Euclid Street Baptist Church. Mr.
Deneau explained that because the building was City property to be located on a
private parcel owned by a religious institution it would involve extensive legal
negotiations. On advice of the City Attorney's Office, the offer was declined.
Councilwoman Kaywood indicated that she would have to wait 'for a written report
by the Museum Committee before making the City responsible in this matter.
Mr. Deneau stressed that the building would be demolished by Pacesetter Homes if
there was another week's delay, and the City would be billed for the demolition.
Councilman Roth asked the City Attorney if he saw any liability in moving the
house onto the Shipkey property. Mr. Hopkins indicted that if a hold harmless
agreement was obtained holding the City harmless, there would be no problem.
Mayor Pro Tem Seymour indicated :hat any motion to approve the issuance of a
permit must speak to holding the City harmless.
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City approved
the issuance of a moving permit for the Frederick Little House to be moved to a
temporary location at the southeast corner of Manchester and Broadway, with the
condition that a hold harmless agreement, holding the City harmless from any
liability, be supplied by Mr. Art Shipkey, owner, prior to the house being moved.
Councilman Thom absent. To ~his motion, Councilwoman Kaywood voted "No". MOTION
CARRIED.
CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: On motion by Councilman Kott, seconded by Councilman
Roth, the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports and
recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent
Calendar Agenda:
1. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred to
the City's insurance carrier or self-insurance administrator,.
a. Claim submitted by Southern California Gas Company for damages purportedly
sustained to a gas main located at 1169 Knollwood by a City'water crew on or
about June 24, 1976.
b. Claim submitted by Cathy Leon for injuries and damages purportedly sustained
as a result of a collision with a City vehicle on or about June 30, 1976.
76-685
City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL~ MINUTES - September 21, 1976, 1:30 P.M.
c. Claim submitted by James Frisbie (dba McDonalds) for damages purportedly
sustained as a result of an electrical fire caused by a City employee closing the
main switch on or about September 16, 1975.
d. Claim submitted by Ilona Pergola for injuries purportedly sustained as a
result of being struck by a City vehicle on or about June 30, 1976.
e. Claim submitted by Catherine Pergola for injuries purportedly sustained as a
result of being struck by a City vehicle on or about June 30, 1976.
f. Claim submitted by Dora Cochran for damages purportedly sustained as a result
of a City employee shutting off water supply in the vicinity of 1518 N. Kenwood
on or about August 18, 1976.
g. Claim submitted by John W. Lauer for damages purportedly sustained as a
result of a golf ball, which shattered his front windshield while parked adjacent
to Dad Miller Municipal Golf Course on or about July 18, 1976.
h. Claim submitted by Pacific Telephone and Telegraph Company for damages
purportedly sustained to buried cable by City employees on or about August 27,
1976.
i. Claim submitted by Mr. and Mrs. Bernard Fratto for damages purportedly
sustained to their vehicle from a foul ball from La Palma Stadium on or about
August 24, 1976.
2. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed.
a. Community Redevelopment Commission -minutes - August 25, 1976.
b. City of Huntington Beach Resolution No. 4319 - urging the California State
Legislature to Review State Property Tax Structure and to enact legislation to
provide property tax relief to homeowners.
c. Application before the California Public Utilities Commission - Greyhound
Lines, Inc. for authority to abandon certain intercity and urban routes in Los
Angeles and Orange Counties.
d. Federal Power Commission - Order extending procedural dates, - Southern
California Edison Company, Docket No. ER76-205.
e. Local Agency Formation Commission - minutes - August 25, 1976.
f. City of Garden Grove Resolution No. 5145-76 - supporting the site in San
Bernardino County for development of the Ten Megawatt Solar Electric
Demonstration Plant.
g. Orange County Vector Control District - minutes - August 19, 1976.
h. Anaheim Sports Council Executive Board -minutes - September 1, 1976.
i. Monthly reports.. Electrical Division - July 1976
Building Division - August 1976
MOTION CARRIED.
TWILA RE. ID PARK~ ELECTRICAL SITE IMPROVEMENT~. W.O. NO. 812: The City Clerk
reported that staff has requested that Change Order No. 1 for the Twila Reid
Park, Electrical Site~Improvement, Work Order No. 812, be scheduled at a later
date.
RESOLUTION NOS. 76R-589 through 76R-592: Councilman Roth offered Resolution Nos.
76R-589 through 76R-592, both inclusive, for adoption in accordance with the
reports, recommendations and certifications furnished each Council Member and as
listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda. Refer to Resolution Book.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-589: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~{E CITY OF ANAI~IM
ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Calvin L. Kenny, et ux;
Placentia Unified School District; Charles Robert McGrady, et ux; and Olen P.
Boutcher, et ux)
76-686
City Hall, Anaheim, C. alifo.rni.a' -. COUNC.I.L .M.~.,N.U.T.ES - September 21, 1976. 1:30 p.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-590: A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE
CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEP~NT, TO I'~T: THE MODIFICATION OF
TRAFFIC SIGNALS AND SAFETY LICIITI*.~C AT THE INTERSECTION OF LA PALMA AVENUE AND
TUSTIN AVENUE AND KKAEMER BOULEVARD AND LA PALMA AVENUE, IN Tile CITY OF ANA/{EIM,
WORK ORDER NO. 793-B; APPROVING TIlE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND
SPECIFICATIONS FOR TIIE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID
PUBLIC IHPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE I,rlTH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND
AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED
PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF. (Bids to be opened October 21, 1976, 2:00
p.m.)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-591: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAItEIM
APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN ENCROACHMENT PER}fIT AND AUTHORIZING T~{E
MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID ENCROAC~fldENT PERMIT UITH MRS. ANNA P. KRO~EM.
P~SOLUTIO~; NO, 76R-592: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
DECLARING ITS INTENTION TO VACATE AND ABANDON CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND FIXING A
DATE FOR HEARING THEREON. (Abandon a portion of Jefferson Street lying easterly
of Tustin between La Palma and Coronado; public hearing, October 12, 1976, 2:30
p.m.)
Roll Call Vote;
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: KaYWood, Seymour, Kott and Roth
NOES: COLqqCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Thom
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution Nos. 76R-589 thriugh 76R-592, both
inclusive, duly passed and adopted.
CITY PLAI~{ING COMMISSION ITF~MS: Actions taken by the City Planning Commission at
their meeting held August '3'b~' 1976, pertaining to the following applications were
submitted for City Council information and consideration.
On motion by Councilman Kott, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City Council
authorized the actions pertaining to the following environmental impact
requirements as recommended by the City Planning Commission, and took no further
action on the following applications (Item Nos. 1 through 8).
1. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT P. EPORT - CATEGORICAL EXEMPTIONS: The Planning Director
has determined that the'proposed activity in the following listed zoning
applications falls within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 1, 3 and 4 of the
City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements for an Environmental Impact Report
and are, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an EIR:
Variance No. 2836
Variance No. 2837
Conditional Use Permit No. 1638
Conditional Use Permit No. 1647
2. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: The Planning Commission
recommends to the City Council that the subject project in the following listed
zoning application be declared exempt from ~he requirement to prepare an
Environmental Impact Report, pursuant to the provisions of the California
Environmental Quality Act:
Variance No. 2839
3~ VARIANCE N0. 2,8.36: Submitted by Imperial Properties for waiver of required
landscaped berm on property located at 5741 - 5791 Santa Aha Canyon Road.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC76-163 granted Variance No. 2836.
4. VARIANCE NO. 2837: Submitted by Doyle and MarJorie Smith for waiver of
permitted accessory uses and structures to construct a 2-story accessory
structure, on property located at 1643 Nest Cerritos Avenue.
76-687
City Hall} Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 21~ 1976, 1:.30 ..p~M.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC76-164 denied Variance No. 2837.
5. VARIANCE NO. 2839' Submitted by Sixpence Inns of America Inc., for waiver of
required stree~ fr~ontage to establish a lot without frontage on a public street.
Property located on the north side of the Riverside Freeway, southerly of the
southeast corner of Via Burton and State College Boulevard.
The City Planning Commission Resolution No, PC76-166 granted Variance No. 2839.
6. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1638: Submitted by First American Trust ~Company
and Thomas P. Walker, Jr., to permit auto painting and body repair at 2100 "B"
East Via Burton.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC76-167 granted Conditional Use Permit
No. 1638.
7. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO, 1647; Submitted by John H, and Valerie $.
Scudder, to permit auto sales and repair at 1552 "D" 1556 "B" 1558 "B" and "D"
and 1594 "D" South Anaheim Boulevard.
City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC76-168 granted Conditional Use Permit
No. 1647.
8. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT. NO.,,, 1!,.6..6 ~ EXTENSION OF TIME: Submitted by W. R. and
Patricia Miller for an extension of time t'o permit b~LsL storage and repair
facilities and the incidental rental of autos at 340 East Katella Way.
City Planning Commission granted one year extension of time to expire January 21,
1977.
MOT ION CARRI ED .
VARIANCE NO. 2838~ EIR NO. 185: (Tentative >~p 9466) Submitted by Texaco-Anaheim
Hills Inc. for waiver of requirement that all lots rear on arterial highways, to
establish a 64-1ot RS-HS-10,000 (SC) subdivision on property located on the north
and south sides of Canyon Rim Road, west of Serrano Avenue.
The City Planning Commission Resolution No. PC76-165 recommended that the City
Council certify EIR No. 185,supplemental to EIR No. 80, as being in conformance
with City and State Guidelines and the State of California Environmental Quality
Act and further granted Variance No. 2838.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 185 - CERTIFICATION: EIR No. 185, supplemental
to EIR No. 80, having been reviewed by the City staff and recommended by the City
Planning Commission to be in compliance with City and State Guidelines and the
State of California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council acting upon such
information and belief does hereby certify, on motion by Councilman Roth,
seconded by Councilman Kott, that EIR No, 185 is in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act and City and State Guidelines. Councilman
Thom absent. MOTION CARRIED,
The City Council took no action on Variance No. 2838.
TENTATIVE MAP, TRACT NO. 9466: Developer, Texaco-Anaheim Hills Inc.; Tract located
approximately 730 feet west of the centerline of Serrano Avenue, north side of
Canyon Rim Road, containing 64 RS-HS-10,000 (SC) zoned lots.
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Kott, the proposed subdivi-
sion, Tentative Map, Tract No. 9466, together with its design and improvement,
was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan, and the City Council
approved said Tentative Map subject to the following conditions recommended by the
City Planning Commission:
1. That the approval of Tentative Map of Tract No. 9466 is granted subject to the
approval of Reclassification No. 73-74-46 to the RS-HS-iO,000 (SC) Zone and
Variance No. 2838.
2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each
subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval.
76-688
City Hall~ Anahelm~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 21t 1976~ 1:30
3. That, in accordance with City Council policy, and as stipulated to by the
petitioner, a six (6) foot high, decorative, openwork fence shall be constructed
on the south property line separating Lot Nos. 1 and 2, 14 and 15, 19-21, 31-33,
52-56, 63 and 64 from Canyon Rim Road except that for corner Lot Nos. 2, 14, 15,
31, 32, and 63, said fence shall be stepped down to a height of thirty (30)
inches in the required front yard setback, except that pedestrian openings shall.
be provided in said fence where cul-de-sacs abut the planned highway right-of-way
line of the arterial highways; plans for said fence to be submitted to the
Planning Department for approval prior to final approval of the final tract map.
Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be installed in
the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said
fence; plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval
of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and
acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance
of said landscaping.
4. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities.
5. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved
by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange County
Recorder.
6. That the covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Attorneyts Office prior to City Council approval of the
final tract map and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and
restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map.
7. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit to the
City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed
functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the
articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bonding to
insure maintenance of common property and buildings, and such other information
as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the
purchasers of the project.
8. That street names shall be approved by the City Planning Department prior to
approval of a final tract map.
9. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory
to the City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site, sufficient grading is
required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on grading will be permitted
between October 15th and April lSth unless all required off-site drainage
facilities have been installed and are operative. Positive assurance shall be
provided the City that such drainage facilities will be completed prior to
October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site drainage facilities shall be
dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall have initiated condemnation
proceedings therefor (the costs of which shall be borne by the developer) prior
to the commencement of grading operations. The required drainage facilities
shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from
higher properties through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the
City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction
and shall be completed and be functional throughout the tract and from the
downstream boundary of the property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to
the issuance of any final building inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage
district reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developers of said
property upon their request.
10. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be
conducted in such a mannner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt
originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm
water originating from or flowing throu~ this project.
11. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary street
name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
12. That the developer of subject tract shall enter into a special facilities
agreement with the City for water facilities in the High Elevation System, as
required by Rule 15B of the Water Utility Rates, Rules, and Regulations prior to
approval of a final tract map.
76-689..~
City Hall, Aaa,helm,., California - COUNCIL MIN~.TE,SL- September 21~ 19.7,,6,~, 1:30, ,P.M;
13. That prior to the approval of the final tract map. the petitioner shall
submit final specific floor plans and elevations to the City Council for
approval.
14. That prior to the approval of the final tract map, a specimen tree plan or
other information, acceptable to the Planning Department, shall be submitted to
and approved by the Planning Department in accordance with the provisions of the
"SC" Scenic Corridor Zone-Overlay. Any decision made by the Planning Department
may be appealed to the Planning Commission.
15. In accordance with the requirements of Section 18.02.047 pertaining to the
initial sale of residential homes in the City of Anaheim Planning Area "B", the
seller shall provide each buyer with written information concerning the Anaheim
General Plan and the existing zoning within 300 feet of the boundaries of subject
tract,
Councilman Thom absent. MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE MAPt TRACT NO. 9465 AND EIR No. 184: Developer, Anaheim Hills Inc.;
Tract located approximately 2070 feet west of the centerline of Serrano Avenue,
south side of Canyon Rim Road; containing 60 RS-HS-10,000 (SC) proposed zoned
lots.
The City Planning Co~nission recommended that the City Council certify EIR No.
184, supplementing EIR No. 80, as being in conformance with City and State
Guidelines and the State of California Environmental Quality Act.
E.~IRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 184 - CERTIFICATI(R~: EIR No. 184, supplemental
to EIR No. 80, having been reviewed by the City Staff and recommended by the City
Planning Commission to be in compliance with the City and State Guidelines and
the State of California Environmental Quality Act, the City Council acting upon
such information and belief does hereby certify, on motion by Councilman Roth,
seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, that EIR No. 184 is in compliance with the
California Environmental Quality Act and City and State Guidelines. Councilman
Thom absent. MOTION CARRIED.
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Kott, the proposed
subdivision, Tentative Map, Tract No. 9465, together with its design and
improvement, was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan, and the
City Council approved said Tentative Map subject to the following conditions
recommended by the City Planning Commission:
1. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one subdivision, each
subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval.
2. That, in accordance with City Council policy, and as stipulated to by the
petitioner, a six (6) foot high, decorative, openwork fence shall be constructed
on the north property line separating Lot Nos. 1 through 5, and 51 through 54
from Canyon Rim Road and plans for said fence shall be submitted for Planning
Department approval prior to City Council approval of the final tract map.
Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, shall be ins:ailed in
the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said
fence; plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval
of the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance. Following installation and
acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance
of said landscaping.
3. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground'utilities.
4. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved
by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange County
Recorder.
5. That the covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and
approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the
final tract map and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and
restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map.
6. That prior to filing the final tract map, the applicant shall submit to the
City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed
76-690
City Hall, Anaheim..,. California - COIJNCIL ~ilNUTES - Septemb..e..r 21~ 1976! 1:30 P.M,
functioning of the operating corporation including, but not limited to, the
articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of management, bondin~ to
insure maintenance of common property and bui!dinKs, and such other information
as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the
purchasers of the project,
7. That street names shall be approved by the City Planning Department prior to
approval of a final tract map.
8. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory
to the City Engineer, If, in the preparation of the site, sufficient grading is
required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on grading will be permitted
between October 15th and April 15th unless all required off-site drainage
facilities have been installed and are operative. Positive assurance shall be
provided the City that such drainage facilities will be completed prior to
October 15th. Necessary right-of-way for off-site drainage facilities shall be
dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall have initiated condemnation
proceedings therefor (the costs of which shall be borne by the developer) prior
to the commencement of grading operations. The required drainage facilities
shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff waters originating from
higher properties through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by the
City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first item of construction
and shall be completed and be functional throughout the tract and from the
downstream boundary of the property to the ultimate point of disposal prior to
the issuance of any final building inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage
district reimbursement agreements may be made available to the developer of said
property upon their request.
9. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be
conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt
originating from this project being carried into the Santa Aha River by storm
water originating from or flowing through this project.
10. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary street
name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy.
11. That no water shall be allowed to drain from this tract into the Walnut
Canyon Keservolr without prior approval of the City of Anaheim Utilities
Department.
12. That the Heveloper of subject tract shall enter into a special facilities
agreement with the City for water facilities in the High Elevation System, as
required by Rule 15B of the Water U~ility Rates, Rules, and Regulations prior to
approval of a final tract map, as stipulated to by the petitioner.
13. That prior to the approval of the final tract map, the petitioner shall
submit final specific floor plans and elevations to the City Council for
approval.
14. That prior to approval of the final tract map, a specimen tree plan or other
information, acceptable to the Planning Department, shall be submit:ed to and
approved by the Planning Department in accordance with the provisions of the "SC"
Scenic Corridor Zone-Overlay. Any decision made by the Planning Department may
be appealed to the Planning Commission.
15. In aeeordane~ with th~ raquiram.nt~ of Section 18.02.047 p~rtainin~ to the
initial sale of residential homes in the City of Anaheim Planning Area "B", the
seller shall provide each buyer with written information concerning the Anaheim
General Plan and the existing zoning within 300 feet of the boundaries of subject
tract.
Councilman Thom absent. MOTION CARRIED,
WAIVER OF GRADING ORDINANCE - TRACT NOS, 9465 AND 9466: (Request by Lind and
Hillerud, Inc.) On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Roth,
the City Council approved the request for waiver of the Hillside Grading
Ordinance requirement that lot lines be located 2 to 3 feet from the top of
the slopes relating to Tentative Tract h~os. 9465 and 9466, as recommended by the
Planning Commisson. Councilman Thom absent. MOTION CARRIED.
76-691
City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - September 21, [976~ 1:30 P.M.
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: (Construction of a new collector
street, Hancock Place) The City Planning Commission recommended that the proposed
project be exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR and further that the proposed
new interior industrial street be constructed without a median and that the exist-
ing specimen trees be removed and replaced in accordance with the Tree Preservation
Ordinance on the basis that the proposed industrial street does not traverse a resi-
dential street, is not classified as an arterial highway, and provides good access
and circulation for approximately 150 acres of industrially-designated land.
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City CoUncil finds
that this project will have no significant effect on the environment and is,
therefore, exempt from the requirement to prepare an Environmental Impact Report.
Councilwoman Kaywood abstained. Councilman Thom absent. MOTION CARRIED.
TENTATIVE TRACT NOS. 8142, REVISION NO. 1~ AND 8560~ REVISION NO. 4: On motion by
Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City Council continued action
on Tentative Tract No. 8142 to bex,heard'in cOnjunction with Variance'No. 2829 and
EIR No. 182,.and on Tentative Tract No. 8560 to be considered in conjunction with
EIR No. 186. Councilman Seymour abstained. Councilman Thom absent. MOTION CARRIED.
WAIVER OF REQUIREMENT TO FORM COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION - TRACT NOS. 9169 AND 9170:
(Request from Madole and Associates, Inc.) On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded
by Councilman Seymour, the City Council approved the request for waiver of require-
ment to form a Community Association and proposed that each residence maintain the
slope pertaining to that lot, as recommended by the Planning Commission, subject to
the condition that the developer make provisions to assure that the purchasers of the
subject lots are informed about the requirement to maintain the slopes. Councilman
Thom absent. MOTION CARRIED.
"HENNING WAY" - REQUEST FOR STREET NAME CHANGE: Mayor Pro Tem Seymour referred to
the September 21, 1976 memorandum from the Planning Department recommending that the
street name "Henning Way" be changed to "Henning Canyon Road'' as requested by Mrs.
Charles W. Homer, 300 South Henning Way in her letter of June 30, 1976. The request
was made because of possible confusion which could result because of the similarity
in the sound of Henning Way and Hemmingway.
Councilman Roth moved that the name change be approved as recommended so as to
resolve any confusion in street names which might be cause for emergency vehicles.
Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion for discussion.
Councilwoman Kaywood referred to the letter dated September 20, 1976, from Mr.
Arthur Henning, wherein he expressed his opposition to the proposed new name
because it was too long and, in fact, no canyon was involved and suggested the
alternative name should be changed. The proposed alternative was acceptable to
Councilwoman Kaywood.
Councilman Roth and Councilwoman Kaywood respectively withdrew the motion and the
second and moved instead to continue the matter for one week so that residents
could be informed of the alternate name change proposed~ that of Henning Drive.
Councilman Thom absent. MOTION CARRIED.
Councilwoman Kaywood also asked for clarification by staff that there was, in fact,
a street named Hemmingway.
EXTENSION OF TIME - SIGN ENCROACHMENTS 607 AND 617 SOUTH HARBOR BOULEVARD: (Request
by Mr. Gray Kilmer, Laurel Insurance Agency) As recommended by the Planning
Department, on motion by Councilman Kott, seconded by Councilman Roth, the City
Council granted an extension of time for encroachment in the street right-of-way
for two free-standing signs located at 607 and 617 South Harbor Boulevard, retro-
active to June 8, 1976, to expire June 8, 1986, subject to the condition that the
encroachment apply only to the existing signs and not to any other"signs, and also
that the encroachment will expire in the event the buildings are removed, destroyed
or remodeled to the extent of 50% or more of their fair market value at the time
of remodeling. Councilman Thom absent. MOTION CARRIED.
AWARD OF WORK ORDER NOS. 791-B AND 777-B AND 872: Councilwoman Kaywood offered
Resolution Nos. 76R-593 and 76R-594 for adoption, awarding contracts in accordance
with the recommendations of the City Engineer.
Refer to Resolution Book.
76-692
City Hallt. AnaheimI California- COUNCI.L MINUTgg_~-..$~tem~r,,.21., 1976, 1:30 P.M.
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-593: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM
ACCEPTING A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CONTRACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE
BIDDER FOR THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT
AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND PERFORM-
ING ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT:
THE EUCLID STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT, 321' N/O S.P.R.R. TO 70' S/O S.P.R.R., IN
THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 791-B. (Ventura Contracting - $6,800)
RESOLUTION NO. 76R-594: A RESOLUTION OF T~E CITY C~CIL OF T~{E CITY ~F A3~AHEI~
ACCEPTING A sE~ED PROPOS~ A~ A~,~A~ING A CO~~T ~ ~ LOI~ST RESPONSIBLE
BIDDER FOR T~E ~I~tlING OF ALL PL~;T, ~BOR, ~RV~CBS, ~TBRIALS ~ EQUIPmeNT
~D ~L UTILITIES AND TR~SPORTATION, INCLUDING ~R, ~EL ~ WATER, ~
PERFO~ING ALL UO~ }~CEgS~Y TO CONSTRUCT ~ C~~ ~E FOLLOWING PUBLIC
IMPRO~NT; LINCOLN AVE~E STREET I~RO~~, ~I~ ST~ET TO STATE COLLEGE
BLVD., A.H.F.P. NO. 801, IN TIlE CITY OF ~EIM, ~ O~R NOS. 777-B & 872.
(Blair Paving Inc. - $90,019.10)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: CO~CIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Mort &~ Roth
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Thom
The Mayor Pro Tem declared Resolution Nos. 7~R-~93 em~ 76R-594 duly passed and
adopt ed.
ORDINANCE NO. 3593: Councilman Seymour offered O~~ No. 3593 for adoption.
Refer to Ordinance Book.
ORDINANCE NO. 3593: AN OPd]INANCE OF THE CITY OF 'ANA~'~M AM~ING TITLE 18 OF THE
~ ,
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (75-76-33., RS-5000)
Roll Call Vote:
AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour,
NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None
ABSEIff: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Thom
The Mayor Pro Tern delcared Ordinance No. 3593 duly passed and adopted.
Mayor Pro Tem abstained from any discussion on the fellowing Ordinances for first
reading.
ORDINANCE NOS. 3596 THROU~t 3600: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance Nos. 3596
through 3600, both inclusive, for first read~g.
ORDINANCE NO. 3596: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDINC TITLE 14,
CHAPTER 14.32, SECTION 14.32.190 OF THE ANAMEI[~ M~NXCXPAL CODE RELATING TO PARK-
ING. (Lincoln, both sides, from ECL to Sunkist; ~uak~s~, both sides, no parking
anytime, from Lincoln to Ball)
ORDINANCE NO. 3597: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY Of A~EIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF TIlE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONINg. ($9-70-25(4), R$-5000)
ORDINANCE NO. 3598: AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAREIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE
ANAHE"~M M~IC'IPAL'CODE RELATING TO ZONING. ( 7~-79-49,
ORDINANCE NO. 3599: AN ORDINANCE OF THE, CITY OF A~9~[gIM ~ING TITLE 18 OF THE
ANAHEIM }.flJNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (?0-71-~$(4), R$-5000)
ORDINANCE NO. 3600: AN ORDINANCE OF THE ClT~ OF ~~ AM~ING TITLE 18 OF THE
ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. ( 75-;~-~, ~-1200)
AB 12&6 - FORMATION OF, ORANGE COUNTY TRANSI,~,,~,t~S]~,~. Councilwoman Kaywood
reported that at the last Orange County Lea~ Of ~f~rmla Cities meeting, a
question arose on AB 1246 regarding the for~et~ e~ ~ Orange County Transit
Commission and that two members were required Co b~ e~ th~ commission; one
required to be a present member of the Orange C~ey ~eit District Board, the
other may also be on the Board. Voting is to take place at the October League
Meeting, and Councilwoman Kaywood, therefore, m~veg that Fiay~r Robin Young of La
Habra and Mayor A1 Hollinden of Fountain Valley, both present members of the
Orange County Transit District Board, be au~o.r~eg ge ~erve on the Orange County
Transit Commission. Councilman Seymour aecomieg the ~tiem. Councilman Thom
absent. MOTION CARRIED.
76-693
City Hall; Anaheim; California - COUNCIl. MINUTES - September 21~ 1976~ 1:30 P.M.
SOUT}~RN CALIFORNIA AIR QUALITY ~i~qAGE~MT BOARD: Councilman Roth recommended
that a resolution o£ be adopted, urging sup'port "~f Orange City Councilman, Jim
Beam, as a member of the Southern California Air Quality Management Board
(SCAO,~m).
Councilwoman Kaywood asked that no action be taken for two weeks so that
consideration could be given to all of the proposed members to this Board.
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Kott, consideration of
support of Jim Beam as a member.to the SCAQMB was continued for two weeks.
Councilman Thom absent. MOTION CARRIED.
REQUEST PEPd~ISSION .TO LEAVE THE STATE FOR NINETY DAYS: On motion by Councilman
Seymour, seconded by Councilman Roth, Councilman Kott~s request for permission to
leave the State for 90 days was approved. Councilman Thom absent. MOTION
CARRIED.
HALLOWEEN FESTIVAL: ~r. Stu Link presented a letter to Council dated September
21, 1976, from his Committee concerning the 53rd Annual Halloween Festival,
soliciting the continued support of the City as in past years.
Mayor Pro Tem Seymour assured Mr. Link that the support as given in the past
would continue; however, in aTask Force meeting with the Chamber of Commerce, it
was decided that a separate association be created in the future so that the City
would be in a position to contract directly with that association. Mayor Pro Tem
Seymour also inquired as to the financial needs of the Halloween Festival
Committee over and above all th~t had thus far been contracted.
Mr. Link estimated that, if additional funds were needed, the maximum required
would be $2,000~ ~
On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council
authorized a maximum of $2,000 for the Annual llalloween Festival from the Council
Contingency Fund, with an accounting of all expenditures to be provided by the
Festival Committee. Councilman Thom absent. MOTION CARRIED.
RECESS - 'EXECUTIVE SESSION: At the request of City Manager Talley and Assistant
City Attorney Hopkins, Councilwoman Kaywood moved to recess into Executive
Session. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. Councilman Thom absent. MOTION
CARRIED. (4:00 P.M.)
AFTER RECESS: Mayor Pro Tern Seymour called the meeting to order, all members
being present with the exception of Cpuncilman Thom; (4:35 P.M.)
ADJOURNMENT: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to adjourn. Councilman Roth seconded
the motion. Councilman Thom absent. MOTION CARRIED.
ADJOURNED: 4:35 P.M.
LINDA D. ROBERTS, CITY CLERK