Loading...
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.
1976/10/05
76-710 ~ity !tall, Anaheim, California - COUUCIL HINUTES - Oqt.0ber 51..1976, 1:30 The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESZ:~T: COIDICIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom ABSE~'~T: COU~CIL I~MBERS: None PRESEI~T: CITY MAI'~AGER: ~Tilliam O. Talley ASSISTAI{T CITY ATTORI~EY: Uilliam P. Hopkins CITY CLE~i: Linde D. Roberts DEPUTY CITY ATTO..~.~EY: Frank A. Lowry, Jr. PLanNING DIRECTOR: Ronald L. Thompson DEPUTY CITY ATTOILNEY: Malcolm Slaughter CITY E.'.~GINEER: James P. ~addox ASS!ST.~T T?~tFFIC EIIGI~EEP.: %,~illiam ~. Stracker ASSISTAI. IT PL~P]IL~G DlPd~CTOR- ZOJL~G. Annika Santalahti PERSO!~'~EL DIRECTOR: Garry O. ~.~cRae ST;DIU~_--CONV?~TION CENTER--GOLF DIRECTOR: Tom Liegler ASSIST,~IT TO TI~Z CITY M~2~AGER: John ,'~arding ItOUSI'JG DIRECTOR: Rosario }~attessich PUBLIC IIIFO~TIO~ OFFICER: Ken Clements I~.ayor Thom called the ~eeting ~o order and welcomed those in attendance to the Council meeting. Ii,VOCATION: Reverend John Bevan of the Seventh Day Adventist Church ~ave the Invocation'. FLAG S;fLUTE: Councilwoman Xaywood led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegianc~ to the Flag. IT. OCLAI~iiTION: The following proclamation was issued by }[ayor Thom and u:~animously approved by the City Council and accepted by ~,r. Richard Taylor: "United ~.Zay ilonth" - October, 1976 ~,~oOLUTI0!~ OF COi~GRATULATIOHS: A Resolution of CongratulatiOns to }Ir. Gerald T Etedman was unanimously adopted on the occasion of his selection as Orange County's ~[an of the Year in recognition of his continued efforts to better the life of the working man through his service as an Orange County Planning , Commissioner, ttead of the Labor Coalition of Orange County and his recent election as Secretary of the Orange County District Council of Carpenters. HI]]UTES: Y~inutes of the Anaheim City Council regular meeting held August 3, 1976, were approved, on motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Thom. MOTION CAPJtIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINAI.~CES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to ~aive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after reading of the title, specific reques: is made by a Council ~.~ember for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Roth seconded the motion. I'~OTION ~ANIMOUSLY CARRIED. FINAI;CIAL DE}L~]DS AGAII.~ST TIIE CITY in the amount of $479 ,459 .44 in accordance with the 1976-77 Budget, were approved. S/~.'.~TA ~2,]A RIVER FLOOD PROTECTION: Mr. Ed Just of the Santa Aha River Flood Protection AgenCy reported On and thanked the Council and all others involved for their efforts in assisting with the ultimate passage by CongreSs of the Public Works Omnibus Bill on October 2, 1976, which included the Santa Aha River Project in the format desired by the Agency. Mr. Just explained that this was the combination of activities which started 6 years prior and Would now allow the Flood Protection Agency to ~build a dam at Mentone, raise Prado Dam, ehannelize the River through Orange County below 17th Street and channelize Santiago Creek; projects which will be completed approximately 1990. HUD RESEAI!CH CRAI~T NO. II-2582-HG: Councilwoman KaFwood offered Re.solution No. 76R-609 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 76R-609: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF TILE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVINd THE TEp~xS A~'D CONDITIONS OF AN ACREEME}Vf FOR HOUSINC AND URBAI'~ DEVELOP,~NT RESEARCH GRANT NO. H-2582-RG FOR ADVaNcE PLAN~ING PROJECT FOR STREET 76-711 City llall, Anaheir,:~ California - CODICIL IIII,~UT~S - October 5. 1976 ':ODIF!CAT~mm_,,.,~, ~2ID/0R IkPRO' ~r~T.:T~., ~ AND AUTiIORIZ~;C ~' CITY ...... ,., .... ~ ...... -,: : ISaywood, Seymour, Kott, ?.otb and Thom Tim 'layor declared q, esclu~ion :7o. 76V-60o July passo.-~ and adopter/. ,. -- . ........ (Ur'aCt 7.;os. 9169 and 917'~: CounCilman P. oth offered P. esoiuti0n'1~o. a~optton. Refer to Aesolutlon ~ook. ~"~ULUTIOi' :~0 76R-610: A . sOL. TI ,, .,~,., .,~., CITY OF APPT, C:VZ!C TIiE ~,,~,e~,,,,.,.~ ~ID COJDITIOUS OF ;Jl ..;C~ ~...--,--- ...... - v~,- fL..Ti." , ~,,~ -,wz,,o~ 'q'f ........ '"' ION ...... -,.~OCIATION I; CO.,,~;CT ~TH P~I}.~UP. SZ'~'''' OF ',~'~ ~IN ~v~'"'~O" · ~-~.~,~-~,~.,-.,~ ..... DIRECTING Ti~ ~'~YOR ,~D CITY CLEPJ': TO EXECUTE SAID ..-~ 3;2~F OF ~'"'~,~.~ CITY OF P. oll Call Vote: ALCIS: COLS~CIL ~IIBERS: I.'.aywood, Seymour, Ko:t, P. oth and Thom '~'~. ,,.,,,,~ .' CODICIL IIE~.~EP.S: None .~.o ....... : CO~.TCIL I.IE}~ERS: None The '~yor declared ~esolution No. 76P,-610 duly passed and adopted. AGPZiE;~Y;~T I.~TII 5~f ASSOCIATES - POLICE PISTOL P~A/~GZ: Councilman Kott posed several questions to staff pertatni'ng to the proposed agreememt for dmeigm modification of the Police pistol range, specifically speaking to the ma~t~.s responsibility for supervision of construction, labor and material costs, ,am~ approval of progress payments. Assistant to the City Hanager Ilarding explained that the superintendent would be responsible for supervising the the City acting as the consUltant by checking the work with building inspectors. City lMnager Talley briefly outlined the structure of the Architects fees confirmed that the Public ;.7orks Department was responsible for mpprov~mg ~, pa~v:~ents after the architect reviewed the request for such payments. }~f. further explained ~hat the deletions and corrections noted en the a~re~ pointed out by Councilman I'.ott were due to the fact that terra '.~m &dJ~~S requested and agreed to by both the City and RJM Associates and inst~ of retyping the agreement, it was forwarded to Council with correcting w~lCt~ Councilman Kott stated that he had additional questions ~hich ~muld be tee t~ consuming to discuss; however, unless they could be answered satisfactorily, would have to vote "Uo" on the proposed Resolution. Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 76R-611 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 76R-611: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF ~ CITY OF ~,~~ APPROV~QG TIlE TERMS ~ COI,~ITI~{S OF AI.I AGREE}~NT }~TII R~,! ASSOCIATES, I~iCORPORATED, FOR ARC]~TECTURAL SERVICES ~D AU~{ORIZIIIG AI,~ DIRECTING TIIE ~:D CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEmeNT ON BEttALF OF TI~ CITY OF ~AHED{. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL }~MBERS: Ka~w~, Seymour, Roth and Thom NOES: CO~CIL }~MBERS: Kott ABSEI~: CO~CIL ~ERS: None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 76R-611 duly passed and adopted. ~.TILA REID PAP~ PLAYGROUND EqUIP~.T.~.. W.O. NO. 812: Couneilmsm ~ot:h o~e~ed Resolution No. 76R-612 "£0r a~oPt~0n, Refer to Reao-luti~ ]~k, 76-712 City Hall Anahei:'~.! CaliFornia - C~U..CII, ~,T,.:TTm-, _ October 5;. 1~76~ 1:39 P.~ __ ~ ,, ~ · , - ,, _ ~'~ :-,~,, ,~' , , , - , ..... · ~"~n~UmIOU ~ 76R-612: ^ rt~S~I. UTT~I ~F ~ CI~x' C~. CI!, OF ~'~ ~ITV ~F A~ ~1~. ~ .,~"~., REJEnm*'~,~...~..:,... ALL ~ID,: FO!! SAID PUBLIC UOPD:S IHP¢CVEIU:;rT. (Western Wood Toys/Pon Renner Company) loll Call Vote: ^"-' ~ ..... .' C013~.~ rr IL., ."=',... .... ,,~.~,~°~..,: lla.~oo(~ , ,.~c~..our, ]lott, ?.ot]~ and Thom .... ; ....... : CCLTi;CiL ',~ .... .,,.,~, £i~ "ayor declared 'lasolution ';o. 762-612 duly passed and adopted. ..... ,~,.~ .-.~,~:~ .. ~LDL,G, - SCtR;E~ ..... ~.~ llIO VISTA AI~ JUAP~Z ,PAR!tS: On motion ].y Councili'~n-~ Roth, second~'~ ]i)y Councilman Thom~ the City Council approved the sc'.~.e:.atic dra~?ings for Park Control luitdings at Schweitzer, Rio Vista and Juarez ~.:::"/.i~: OF ,SCOP, Ei;OAIID ~fl' Al~,~lElli STADIUm;: City l~anager Talley reported .tha~ services of the original scoreboard builders, Stewart Uarner, had to be secured to fix the r;'.alfunctioning Stadium. scoreboard resulting in the cost of $4,546.59, including expenses, since t~e representatives had to be called out fro~?. Chicago. Stadium-Convention Canter-Golf Director Liegler explained the difficulties his staff experienced in trying to repair the board over four days and nights wit]~out success, lie also stated that he ~as endeavoring to resell scoreboard advertising space ~.~ith the resultant revenue dedicated to upgrading to a more reliable scoreboard since the pre~ent design was a first-generation board; Anaheim being among the first to acquire such a board. On motion by Councilr;mn Seymour, seconded by Councilman Roth, an expenditure of $4,546.5.0 to cover repair of the Anaheim Stadium scoreboard was approved. ::OTIO:~, CARRI~]D. JOIi:T FI?dS TRAIUIi~G FACILITY: City i.~anager Tailey indicated that Fire Chief ?.iley was available ~o discuss the proposed resolutions approving a Joint Powers Agreement with the Cities of Garden Grove and Orange for a fire training facility and an agreement with Anthony and Langford for architectural services, as ~,mll as approval of an expenditure not to exceed $1,000 for Anaheim's share of up-front architect's fees. Specific background details were documented in ~emorandum from Chief Riley dated September 23, 1976, a copy of which is on file in the City Clerk's Office. Chief P. iley confirmed for Councilman Sey~.~our that even if :he Ct:y of Orange did not participate in the Joint Powers Agreement, ~hich was a possibility, the partial pay~:~eng of architect's fees for the facility would still be $,l,OO0 for _&naheim. lie also clarified that the proposed agreement ~.~ould only become effective at such tine that appropriate funding ~.~as available for the project and, as explained in his subject memorandum, funding had been applied for under the newly announced Public ~Orks Bill Chief Riley was of the opinion the ,000 proposed to be expended by the Fire Department would be a good investr:.ent now so as to be prepared for the future. Councilwo~:~n l:aywood offered Resolution l:os. 76R-613 and 76R-614 for adoption. Refer to P. esolution Book. - n~en~T~Wn'~ :~0. 76R-613: ,~ REoOLUTI.:~~ O .... OF TIlE CITY COUUCIL OF T~."' CITY OF;,~,UmT f' , , ~nxrr'~G ~iE ~EF!IS '~2ID CONDITIONS OF A JOII'TT PO['~RS AGR~,~,E~:T !'~TiI ,;II:, CITIES CF GAP~E~~ GP. OVE AND OR~I~ I~ ~ "*" * ' ,.~,, A FIRE TP~I.,L,C FACILITY,, .~o.~. ~,,:,~,~ ;/ID DIIIECTIIG TiIE ;~YOR ~.~D CITY CLE~i *~.... ..... ,CLT SAID ,.,,~.~...~,wv-,~-~,~.,~ ~¢,.. ...... , ...... ~O. 76?,-614: A ;,I],~OLU,.ION aF "~"' ~ITY COIP~CIL OF TIlE CITY APPiI~VI::G T:~ ~,'.~,~e .~2~D .,OJDI~I0:.,,.~ OF ;j~ A~D L/d~CF0~D ~'"T~"~UP~L SERVICES ~ AUTIIORIZING ~ DIP~CTI~C ~:']CUT~ ~/~TD ~n~ ........... r" ?iU'J.F qF ~'"~ CITY OF 76-714 City. I:all;. ;~ahcitnI California - COUNCIL ~ol! Call Vote: COUNCIL --~,,m-~-. eeymour i[ott P. oth and Tho~ COUNCIL "~' ~'~ CO~'~CIL ~,~c. The ][ayor declared 2esolution Nos. 76R-613 and 76R-61&. duly passed and adopted. ~': motion by Councilwoman lla~a.~ood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, an expenditure of a sum not to exceed $1,000 by the Fire Department to cover up-front architect's fees with the firm of Anthony and Langford was approved. HOTION CAR~I,..D. ESTABLISiII~IiT OF EMERGENCY IIOUSING ASSISTAi]CE PROCR/Qf: City l!anager Talley, referring to report dated September 15, 1976, from the Community Development Department, indicated that since there was merit in some of the aspects of the fort~ter housing assistance prograt:~, he recommended that a contingency fund in the amount of $5,000 be allocated in the event temporary emergency shelter is required. Hr. P. osario ,'lattessich, Itousing Director, clarified the new proposed prograra as outlined in the subject report, indicating that it was a simpler one wherein the procedure for lending assistance was also simplified and would provide for temporary emergency shelter only; funding, to be provided ~hrough the Conununity Developmen~ Block Grant (CDBG) Contingency Fund in the amount of $5,000 from October 1, 1976 to June 30, 1977, as a local option activity. On notion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the establishment of an Emergency Housing Assistance Program with a Budget of $5,000 from CDBG Conti. ngency Funds to be operated by the existing Community Services Division staff was approved. MOTION CARRIED. Ii,iPL~.IENTATION OF CLERICAL CLASSIFICATION STUDY: City ~ianager Talley introduced two proposed Resolutions requested by the Pe~S°nnel Department as .documented in report submitted by Garry McRae, Personnel Director. }fr. Talley explained that the Clerical Classification Study was part of a two-year program as recommended by Arthur Young and Company, the results and recommendations of which were presented in the subject report. The resultant reclassification in 14 of the 210 positions studied represented a total yearly increase of $5,949 to be absorbed by the Departments involved. Councilman Seymour offered Resolution Nos. 76R-615 and 76R-616 for adoption. Refer to Resolution book. RESOLUTION NO. 76R-615: A RESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COU%.~CIL OF TIlE CITY OF ANA/LE=! A/i?L~DI:'IG P. ESOLUTION NO. 76R-307 ~ID '~STABLIShING' ' NEW CLASSIFICATIONS Al'ID P~TES OF PAY. (effective October 1, 1976) P~SOLUTION NO. 76R-616: A RESOLUTION OF TIIE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF A/~AHEIM .~UDIT?G RESOLUTION NO. 76R-312 AB.~D ESTABLISItING NEI7 CLASSIFICATIONs AND RATES OF PAY. (effective October 1, 1976, Personnel Action Clerk) Roll Call Vote: !YE S: COII.']CIL ?~,'.fBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Kott, Roth and Thom ~OiS: COI~CIL ~MBERS: None ABSE~: CO~CIL ~'~HBERS: ~7one The ~4ayor declared Resolution Nos. 76R-615 and 76R-616 duly passed and adopted. SOLICIT BIDS FOR LONG-TErn. f. DISABILITY INSUP. ANC.E: Iff. Tall.ey explained tha~ since a notice was received informing the City of a substantial increase in long-term disability insurance to take effect November 10, 1976, the Personnel Direg~r be authorized to solicit proposals for this insurance to guarantee that when recommendation is subsequently made to Council, the lowest possible bid will have been secured. On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Roth, the Personnel Director was authorized to solicit proposal~ for long-term disability insurance. ~TION CARRIED. AGREEH~{T - JOIE] RUSH - INSTRUCTIONAL .SERVICES: After clarifica~ion by }.ir. Gus Duran of Community Services Division that the proposed agreement cOvering 76-715 <l_ity. ilallt,,,,.,. Aqahei,!~ _Calif°rnia, , ~ - .COU~iCIL i[IHUTES.., . - Octol~er. 5~ 1976~... 1:30. P.~'.,~,. L~uructional services for the Youth Paint and Pick-up Program would not ]71] hours of vocational instruction, Councilwoman ][.a~ood offered 2esolution 7611-617 for adoption. 2efer to Resolution Book. ~ )LUTIOii 76R-617 A ~IiSOLUTION aF .... ITY COUNCIL OF T]H] C ~ OF C ~ I c,,, AL A~P~I,;iIqIT FOR I~;STRU ~ (John ?.oi1 Call Vote: AY:'. °: COUNCIL '"~ ....... e ~. 2..;,. .... .~; Iiasa~ood, Ceyz~our, Roth and Tlxon UO~]::;: COLq.ICIL ?!Z~IBERS: Iiott ,..~ .... ,~..: C,~o~;CIL !%HBZRS, ;one 7',e '~ayor declared ?,csolution :,'o. 76P~-617 duly passed and adopted. LA:ID SALE ACIIEEI~C'.IT~ C-B CO:iPAi!y~ SAVIi I I I ''C ;] I AL :' ' I~ Deputy City Attorney Malcolm ~laughter reported ti-tat as recommended by the City Engineer an agreenent had been prepared for sale of a certain portion of the old SAVI Canal for a total amount of C11,424.15 and the proposed resolution would authorize the e:.'.ecution of tl~e sale. Counciln~an Kott offered llesolution Uo. 762-618 for adoption. Refer to P. esolution !look. ~ ' 0" :.: ..... )LU~.I J T~,,~ CITY COIFJCIL OF TIT. CI~i OF AUAVEI:~ ~ ....OV~,G TiiZ _,,...~.~, f~D CONDITIONS OF Ail AGRZE~!ZNT TO SELL CE~.TAIH P'P. OI'ERTY ;~.D AUTIiORIZIUC ~,D DIPd]CTINC. Tt~ }~YOP. .A~'~,. CITY CLEPJ~ T0 AG!~J~:2;'2]'~ ;did A DZI";'~ ON ~,~.jj, r OF CITY OF ;g!AIIZII!. (C-B Company) ?.oli Call Vote: ' ~ 'r'' ,.~'m=~c '~oth and Thom ~'.~ ~.0 .... ~CIL ~ Seymour, Kott, ~. ? ........ ..... ~ .... .,,: Iia~ood, .,. ..... : CO U., CIL , ~, ~x~. I:one AD~.!.]~iT: COUNCIL , ~,, ~wp c,~;~..~ ~..,, .' None Tire ~!ayor declared 2asolution i~'o. 76P.-61~ duly passed and adopted. T'6^T 'h~"'P$?f?'~ '~:'I'' CITY LI~IITE' Councilman Thom offered Resolution 70 :~:..-o,:, for adoption. ~efer to Resolution .... ook. ....... T--~*a-- :~,O 76!'1-619' A P, ESOLUTION OF TIlE CITY COIr'tCIL OF Ti~ CITY OF COTIAF,.:D PROPOSAL Ai~ AIIAP~Ii~C A ~a~m~ TO nT~CO~elBTE "' ..... SA~) PROPOSAL ~"~'~ ~' , ,.,.!P,~,..:.~ FOR ALL l ,,; ~,~.~..,:~,,~ TO TI~, CITY OF /2:!~iEIH~S ~OTT ~"', .... ':oi1 Call Vote: ~' ~ ' .~%olu passed and adoptcd, · ...... duly ..~c ::ayor dec...area tion 1:o. 76~.-6~~ Clcr], reported for Council i~.~formation that '"~r. ~'.'.crn~n .T':. i'riest, Z::ecutive ?iractor of the P. edevelopment A~ency and Iiousing .^.uthority had filed a ~,ritten l~claration dated October 4, 1976, stating that he had no interest in any real or personal property within the boundaries of %edevelopment Projec~ Alpha, ~fi~ich Jac!aration was submitted pursuant to ..qcctio~] :.~ .... ~ _,~.~ of~n~ .... ~ealth an~'~ ~afety~ :~odc State of California. ,~*,~aw^T OF PLD2~S ;2ID SPECIFICATIONS - PLACE:;TIA ~=va.~nT"C BASI:i' On motion ty Councilwormn Xaywood, seconded by Councilman %oth, the City Council approved the plm'~s and specifications for the ?lacentia Retarding Basin (1]01~OZ~.23) - Phase II, as requested by the Orange County Environnen~al ,'!anagement A. gency, Develo~aent Division. :~OTION CARRIED. 76-716 City ~iall~ Anaheim, s! ... ..................................... ,, California,- COI~CIL ~'INUTES - October 51 19761 1:30 P,'.~. ~OA~LD. "~'~'wo.,~,.~,=,~, - SOUTH. COAS.'.F ;,IR. ,ClUAI'IT¥, ,,,~[AI~AGEI~i~T, ,, DISTRICT: On motion by Councilman R.°th, seconded by Councilman Seym6'ur, "the C'ity~s voting member at thc forthcoming League of California Cities, Orange County Division, meeting was instructed to vote for Orange City Councilman Jim Beam as first choice and Cypress City Councilwoman Sonia ,~on~u as second choice, as a member of the ~oard of the newly created South Coast Air Quality }!anagement District. CAEn. TED, AP?9~IT'~[ZiITS - PUBLIC UTILITIES BOARD; In accordance with previous discussion, each of the ~embers of the City Council was to appoint one member to serve on the 7-member Public Utilities Board with the additional 2 members to be selected and appointed by the entire Council. Appointments were made as follows and terms desitmated at randomly dra~,zn dates in the same order as members were appointed, eacl~ expiring on June 30, of the specified year. Councilwozmn !laywood appointed !~r. l~ynn Anderson, 2424 ©shkosh, term expires 197~; Councilman Seymour appointed Mr. Dale Stanton, 1509 !larle Place, term expires 1977; Councilman 71ott appointed ~!r. Jim Townsend, R0~ ,?orth Pine, term e~:pires 197~; Councilman Roth had earlier appointed ~!.r. Xen Keesee, 406 !~orth Pwyer, term expires 1977; ~ayor'Thom appointed ~'.r. Joe I,~ite, 809 ',.?est Broadway, term expires 1979. Councilman Seymour expressed that the Public I~tilities Board should be representative of all users, borneo%truers as well as large industrial users, the top three being Rockwell , Disneyland and Delco Remy. I!e explained that he had personally contacted the President of Rockwell ~o recommended ~.fr. Carl Keifer, 2~19 West DeVoy Drive, Director of Facilities and Industrial Engineering for Production, and the Plant ~anager of Delco Remy who recommended 7-.~r. Richard Iiaynie, Plant Superintendent, 122 ~outh ;lice. Councilman Seymour subsequently spoke ,to each of these gentlemen who expressed their willingness to serve. Councilwoman Kay~.~ood had spoken with a representative at Disneyland who raco:-:~cnded ~r. P. ichard Cook who also expressed his willingness to serve on the s~ject Board. Council discussion indicated that with those already appointed and the proposed a.~,~ition of representatives from large industrial companies, a good balance of both s~all and large customers on the Utilities Board would be provided. ~p.~ notion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman E. oth, Richard Iiaynie and Carl Keifer were appointed to thc Public Utilities Doard, terms expiring June 30, ln77 and 1979, respectively ,,n~ C. ~ ~.~.q...i..~J~.o..~ ~,07\ GE~.'~iL. PLAi~. ,~,D~,T:.. 1.{r. Dale Ingram, agent for L'rs. Jane Inch, n~ ..,.n ~ox 592~, ·El 1;onte, requeste~ that General Plan Amendment proceedings be instituted to designate the property located at the northwest corner of Orangewood Avenue and the southerly extension of Claudina Street for ~,~edimn density residental uses. .~{r. Ingram indicated that Council's decision of August 24, 1976, which postponed the General Plan Amendment involving the subject property for six months as a result of the Daniel, l.~ann, Johnson and }Iendenhall Multimodal Transportation Center Study, imposed a hardship to ~.'~rs. Inch who, although she has a buyer for the property, cannot complete the sale because of the existing situation ~ich has further caused her to become delinquent in taxes. l.[r. In~rm~ expressed tha~ he did not see the need any longer to freeze his clients property, and that the Planning Commission should be instructed to proceed on the zone reconsideration since the DMJM Study indicated the sub]ec~ property was not directly or indirectly involved as a proposed transportation center site. Councilman Seymour took exception to }Ir. Ingram's supposition that if a ~ultimodal Transportation Center were to be located in the City, it could only possibly be restricted to the property west of Harbor Boulevard. tle also ' expressed the opinion that ~[r. Ingram was asking the City to restric~ itself by requesting to have the General Plan changed to acconnnodate another type of development inviting future opposition relative to the development of a potential transportation center somewhere in the area of }~rs. Inch's property. 76-717 City Iiall~ Anaheir,~ California- COU:~CIL ~,!IUUTES - October 5~ 1976~ 1:3,9 P.~'~. Councilman Seymour stressed he could not support ~'~r. Ingram~s request ,~ntil tt was decided that the subject property could not be impacted by a transportation '~'r, Ingrm~: empl~asized that his main concern was to keep the matter ~-~efore' the Council by having the Planning Commission reconsider it so that it could be presented at the nep:t General Plan Amendment. Council:nan Seyr~our stated tl~at he would be agreeable to :~.r. Ingram's request wit]~ th.~ understanding that when the matter was again presented to Council the fact t~,~at having solicited the Planning Commission's approval would not be used as an ar ~j~ u'~en t. ~.,x :~otion by Councilman Tho~:~, seconded by Councilman Roth, request to include :',rs. Inch's property in the next General, Plan ;;:~endnent scheduled for l'ovember 16, 1976, was approved, i~OT%Oi'] CARRIED. ~a'r~,~o.~.,~.~,.~.. PUBLIC t.EA..I,.~ .~" ~ ~ G - PJ~CLASSIFICATION :]0. 76-77-3! VARIfY:CE '~O. 2o25." ' ~t) qequest by John V. and ~.!elen ii. 71. l°npson for a change in zone from ~°-~-43,0a0 to ?~!-129O, property located on the north side of ~rangewood Avenue. Public hearing continued from the meeting of August 31, 1976 at 'the request of thc agent. Fla~u-~ing Director Thompson indicated t!~at in view of t]~c fa,ct tl~at ~:h.~ public hearing concerning the subject property was contingent :.~I~On a change in thc Central Plan involving adjacent property, it would bc in order to co~.tinue ~.~t cz- until after the next General Plan Amendr:ent scheduled for 7~7o, ..... ~.~,~ Council concurred. ' ~ ' ~ that '~Tcr Ti~o~'.: r:?co~nlze~ so~eone was in the :ql~ar~oer ,,~,nc wis~.~ed to speak John Thonpson, 3* .,5 ~Test Crangewood Avenue, o~ner of the property un~!er co~si?~-~.ration appealed to Council not to postpone tl'~e zone change on his lan2 si~ce~ after such a long period, he now had an opportunity ::~ar~ner that, in his opinion, would not ir tc~'farc~ ~:,ith any propose~i transportation cc~ter in the area as discussed in the preceding request ~nade by ~r. Ingram; Tho:~:pson's property berg adjacent to that just discussed. ]~ayor Thom reiterated the concern previously articulated by Councilman Zebn~our, that if .~[r. Thompson's property were now to be rezoned for residential use as opposed to comnercial and the adjacent property were to be designated as the location for a proposed transportation center, the City would be faced with strong opposition from residents living on the adjoining property. Councilman ~oth expressed his concern that a decision on an individual's property rights was dependent on a County governing body, that of the OCTD, and voiced his opinion that other sites for a transportation center were available north of 9rangewood, both east and west. >layor ~]on stated that the question was %~ether or not the public hearing should be continued until after the next General Plan Amendment meeting on :.7ovember 16, 1976, since the subject proPerty was adjacent to land to be considered at that t i~.~ e. Councilwoman Kaywood expressed tl~at the only intelligent thing to do was to continue the public hearing. On motion by Councilwoman Kayw°od, seconded by Councilman Seymdur, public hearing on Reclassification No. 76-77-3, Variance No. 2825 was continued to the meeting of 'Jovember 30, 1976'. To this motion, Councilmen Roth and Thom voted ".':o". MOTIOU CARRIED. CO?~TP~UED ~BLIC t~EAR.II~G.- COND, ITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1306: Request of }~r. Joe ~icosila.fl0~ ci0hsi'der'~tion of revised Plans f~r a' previously approved motel with waiver of building setbacks from the westerly property line; property located between Ball Road and 'Berry Avenue, east of Itarbor Boulevard. Planning Director Thompson briefly reviewed the subject request since the matter had come before Council on three recent occasions. He also referred to a letter 76-718 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COU~']CIL "~IJUTES October 5t 1976~ 1.30 P.~.. ---- ., ..... ~ ~ · ,.. · ],'~te~? Septer~ber 24, ln76. , from ~aurice Gale Hartman, et al, opposing the setback waivcr, copies of which were submitted to Council. Council~n Sea,our, referring to the letter received from Mr. John Swint outlinin~ events ~M~ich occurred from October 1975 to the present on Conditional Use Permit ~o. 1306, asked staff if the information contained therein was in conformance with their understanding of the matter. ~{r. Thompson did not disagree with the letter but reiterated that the problem basically was caused by inconsistent provisions in the same resolution adopted by Council on ?Iovcmber 30, 1972, granting a 5-foot setback rather than the Z~5-foot sut]~ac? tntcn~ed. He further expressed the opinion that since ~ctober of 1975 when plans were submitted for approval, all parties, staff, ~r. ~:icoscia, and ?~r. q~int, ne[5otiated tn ~7ood faith. Mr. Thor, pson contended, however, that }~r. Lee '~abb wa~ aware of t!~e 45-foot setback requirement since revised plans stipulating this setback were given to the residential property owner to the west by llr. !Tebb to i~res~nt to Council for approval in 1972. Councii~.~en Seymour and ?.otb were concerned that the applicant went forward with his project on the assurance from staff that there ~:as no problem in so doing. 'layer Tho~, although sympatt~etic with the situation, expressed that he could not sanction now, just as in 1972, a 5-foot setback from r~sidential property. Councilman"o~. tt stateJ, that in good conscience he could not vote' against the requested setback considering the effort and monetary investment incurred to this point by the applicant. ~.~r. Dale Varner, Attorney representing the applicant, explained that l~r. ~icosia negotiated purchase of the subject property in~)~.eca.~ber~ of 1975 and went through all the necessary requirements including consultations with Planning who assured hi~~, he could build the proposed motel· ~'r. Varner explained that P~r. Uebb's involvement was some four year. s prior and that it was not to his discredit that he could not remember what was done that far back on a particular piece of property. In essence, k~r. Varner expressed that he was relying on the Council's power of equity in the matter since his client relied on the City to issue a building permit which was done enabling continuance of the project up to the point of initial construction work. lie stressed that to deny such request at this time would not only cause delay, but also extra costs that would be prohibitive. lfr. Will I;laine, 120S South Palm Street, owner of the property adjoining the motel buildin6 site to the west, explained that ~Jlen grading first started on August 15, I976, he went to Planning and Building and was told that there were no plans which approved such action. }'!r. Blaine also contacted the builder and advised hir~ that he was certain the plans were in error. On August 18, 1976, when Mr. Blaine saw that the motel was being built against his property, he contacted l~r. Kirkhart, in the Building Division, and Mr. ;a~derson and ~r. Compton in the Planning Department. On August 20, 1976, he was informed by the Planning Department that a ruling on the property had been made by the City Council that would not allow the motel to be built with only a 5-foot setback and that no plans were on file to allow such a building. }{r. Blaine then dropped the matter as he was assured there would be no problem. He summarized by adding that he did not object to the motel but could not live with a 5-foot setback from his property. The IIayor asked if anyone else was desirous of being heard; there being no response the public hearing was closed· After consultation with City Attorney Ilopkins, Councilman Thom offered a ' resolution that no amendment be made to Condition ~o. 7 of Resolution I~o. 72R- 204, thus disallowing a 5-foot setback and that the waiver granting the minimum side setback be deleted. Before a vote was taken, Councilman Kott indicated that a precedent had been set by granting a 5-foot setback to the International ?'[otel 6 adjacent to the proposed building site. 76-719 City ::all~ ;~ahcim~ California.....- COU::CIL ITU~TEC - ·Oct°her. 5~ 1976~ 1:30 ~.",. . j~'z~ co~.'~pansatiou could be granted to the applicant, l~o~mver, rcaliz~x~ tl~i:~ ~o~,IJ .~c ~ ~_,i t o~ pu!,lic funds. ~n ~'~, other ~,~nd, .. ~ .... ~c felt ~' was 'mzair ~ .... lair<, tc l:avc to sue his governmen: in order to r.~.at wl~at ,,c. felt was ~u:onL. ~o~n~cil. mn. ~ ~e~n:~our. conclu.Jc~~ ~,,:~'c" it was.. possible t'.:::t :~ court would ]~,c to sch~.l'~ suc]~ a situation and~,~u 'ity Attorney agreed. ou~c~wo~.mn llaywood, consigering previous .... ion and 2ave to ':r. Elaine, voicad ]~er opinion that it was obvious t]~,i':~[]s ,:are not +l~,e taxpayer ~]~ou].d not lmve to co; ~p]. er ely candid and, tharefore, ,~ . '.~o~' m~ ~c:'~ of th,ts ~at ''.~ . .:ozo.:.cntioned raso~.ation :fei!~ ' ~ ~.~ to carry hy the following vote. ,Council;~n Seymour summarized, explaining that ]~e cr.:pathizeJ wi~h ;'r. ,Blaine but was of ~ha opinion, however, that the proposed pro~ect would not damage either .... ~ envirom~',ent or ~he value of his property. the conclusion of discussion, Councilman Seymour offered ?.esolution ?:o. 7f..:i- for adoption ar, rending Condition ;!o. 7 of ~.esolution "o.:~ 72R-204 permitting a 5-foot setback from the westerly property line. ~.efer to Eesolution Book. ........ : ,~,:.OLU~IO~.~ OF T,.E CITY CnU~TCIL OF TIIE CITY n= ;SUEiDINC P, ESOLUT!O:I I~0. 7211-204 CR~TI,,C CONDITION~ USE PERI,fIT -n 1306. ~oI1 Call Vote: llott and Poth COUNCIL ...... .~ ~,.~,~: Ka~,ood and Thom COUNCIL ~I..{BERS: None The '~ayor declared Resolution No. 76P~-620 duly pas~ed and adopted. ~Ji;LIC T.,' . '- .. ~,.- .~f,/~.I.~C - CffICELLATION OF AGRICULTURAL .PR.~.::~R.VE ACREE!IE:~TS..:. (Douglass - Sunhist Agricultural"'Preserve) Re'qUest by James S. Gregg, 'jOhn S. Fluor and P, ayr')ond G. Simpson, to consider whether the City of Anaheim should agree to the cm.~cellation of the aforenentioned property o~mers' agricultural preserve agreements in connection with property located north of Cerritos Avenue, south of ~On, ega Avenue, east of Sunkist Street, west of the Route 57 Freeway. :.layor Thom referred to a letter from the County Assessor's Office regarding tl~e subject property indicating the: only ~he Orange County Board of Supervisors could permit the requested cancellation. :Ir. Cecil 1.7right, Attorney for the property owners, indicated that the letter' would not prevent the City Council from entering into an agreement with the property owners when the property is officially annexed to the City effective approximately October 26, 1976; Assistant City Attorney llopkins clarified that this was correct. >ir. Uright further requested that as part of the preserve agreenent cancellation, waiver of penalty fees on all three properties involved be authorized by the Council stating that under the government Code the City may recommend waiver of the fees if i~ is in the public interest to do so. l!r. '~right stressed that it was in the public interest because the State of California, in authorizing the construction of the Route 57 Freeway across the subject properties, negated its being used for agricultural purposes thereby causing it to be rezoned. The fees required under the Williamson Act to be paid for early withdrawal from the preserve were those requested to Be waived; such fees Being payable to the State. The l<ayor asked if anyone wished to be heard either in favor or opposition; there bein£ no response, he declared the public hearing closed. After further Council discussion regarding proposed future uses of the subject property, Councilman Roth offered Resolution !'~o. 76R-621 approving terms and conaitions of an agreement between the City and each of the three property owners 76-720 ~i~5' !iali~ Anaheim~ Califon]ia - COUiICIt. >,I?UTEC - October 5.,I 197(~1 1:30 ~:',,. cancel their agricultural preserve' agree~aents, and further including waiver of r~lated feus. !lefer to Resolution v"~"'UTIOi?-.-...~ UO. 76P,-621: A XZSOLUTIOi: OF T~[~ CITY ~OU.,CIL"~ OF ~IZ CITY OF A??XCVIt;G %:~.~ AGPgEIZE]T3 FOR T'~ C~IC.L~.IO~I OF A?~ AGRICULTUI~L PRESERVE WITii · ' ~ JOiiU S ~7D GLORIA ~R, PgI~401~ G SIHPSOII JfdEJ.J S GREGG~ ~ I,~IViDU~., . ~U~/C~ ~ILLZS ('~UG~S-~j~I~IST AGP, ICULTUP~ P ~ .RE,.~RV~) JE~ AUTIIORIZIUG ~CU ~ ~,~ ~AID loll Call Vote: %he :!ayor declared Resolution 7:o. 76P-621 duly passed and adopted. 222Z2Z: By general consent the City Council recessed for five minu~es. (4;00 ~.::.) A~.~.~..~oo : lIayor Thom called the meeting to order, all Council ~.lembers being present· (4:35 P.~.~.) ..... ~...~, - ~.o~o,~x:~ CERVICES BOARD: In accordance with previous discussions, it was ~de'tel~]lined th'at each Council ~.?ember waa to select .brae appointees to the newly created Community ~ervices Board. Preceding appointrx~nts, . l'r. Luis De Los Rios, who was in the Council Chamber, expressed his interest and requested that he ]~e appointed to serve on the ~oard. :iayor Thom agreed to replace one of his appointees, >Irs. Josephine ,,',,ontoya, by appointing instead :tr. De Los Rios since l:rs. L'ontoya was presently serving as a Tenant Commissioner on the }lousing Cormnission. It was established, however, that ~:.r.F.~e Los Pios ¢!ic] not meet the requirement for serving on the Board, that of being a qualified elector of the City. In his place, therefore, he submitted the name of Theresa Sales. The l~'ayor then agreed to appoint !Is. Sales, pending verification that she was a qualified elector. Appointments to the Co~nunity Services Board were made as follows and confirmed by zcneral consent. Terms were designated by randomly drawing dates; each term ea~piring on June 30th of the specified year. ;andres Fernandez 715 ?hiladelphia St. 1979 Albert llernandez 1146 Boden Drive 1978 Theresa Salas 423 Kroeger St f:l 1977 l:lckey OI~dred) Campbell 620 Gilbuck Drive 1980 A1 Peraza 845 S. Dickel Stree~ 1978 Richard Vargas 411 S. Clementine 1979 ~D Beverly Fast '~argaret S. Banales .~a~ita ii. Castro 907 g. Lemon St. 1979 611 1/2 g. Chartres St. 1980 8~9 So. Claudine St. 1978 218 ~. Florette St. 1980 279 E. Lincoln Ct. 1978 g01 ~o. Loara fit. ~:',!224 1977 ,.~jarat ~. Sullivan qodolfo Esca!ante Luna 11~,_ t~. Plamond 1977 71n. ~.° Philadelphia Ct. 1979 2q5 ~'. Car'~den Ave. 1980 ~"~ ~ .,%T.,O03 o~-.~ (Continued from ~ .....:.IONS FOR STOP SIG:.~S - ORdJIGE AVEi:'UE .iT ' ~ '~ ~,~.~: i i i ':eating of September 28.,, 1976.) '"~k report was submitted by :he City Engineer dated October 4, 1976, again recor.'..~nenging that stop signs not be /nstalled as 76-721 over t',~e past :five years. ":,;.. '7orr;a ".ao.~='"~urn, 507 So~t!,~ "',ut~ood, reiterated tlm request sl~e :~adc at tlm .... ~,,.:tin2 of ,"epCcr.~l>er 2g, I~75, on bc':~alf of ]mrsclf and the l~or:eoxr,'~r-~.rs in t',m n~i~;'.Lor]:oo:l of Orange Avc~',ue and Yut,~.mod Street ; that stop signs be installed ac tl~e intersection of :futuood Street and arange Avenue and on grange Avenue b~txEcen i]uclid and grookhurst. 2he stressed that so';~ething ~mst ]~e done for the p~'otcction of t:otlt childre~ and adults to help ~he~ safely cross Orange /.venue au..l further cmplxasized that xfl~ile a crossing guard is employed at ?.gate and grange for sc]~ool hours, there is no protection for crossing thereafter. iity" ~'~' '~ . 1976 t~,:at if ~a~ncer ?'~addox reco'~aended in Iris report of ,October 4, , Co~mcil approved the request for stop sit~s at qrange and '~utwood~ t]~c cross',:,.: -,:',.::,' at Agate gtreet and ,:;range be eliminated as being too close (~.rithin C, qq f~,-:?t) to a controlled intersection as specified in Council Resolution fi77.q, 2cction 3, Subsection f. ~'::s. :rashburn, in answerer to :rayor Thom, indicated that si~e x.:ould want the cressing guard maintained at Agate in consideration of the l~omeowners on the ot!;er side of qrange. ~'ayor ~or~. stated that he ~.,'as sympathetic to the request of the homeo~mers and also appreciated the position of she City Engineer; howcver~ since there were a nu',~]~er of very concerned parents and homeowners in the area who ~,mnted a four-*,;ay stop even though it would not necessarily prevent accidents, it was the next ~>est tltini; to satisfy the petitioners who were looking for so'~:~e rreasure of safety, especially for their children· ~_,. Councilman Thom moved that the request for a four-way stop at the intersection of Orange Avenue and :7.utwood be granted and that the crossing guard and crosswalk at Agate not be removed. Councilman l'.ott seconded the motion. Before a vote ~,~as taken, Councilm~n Seymour expressed his concern about the speeding problem :..~,hich was obvious on ~range Avenue and asked staff what other . alte~atives exist for slowing dox.,m traffic outsld(~ of ~.,tplo)in[, a radar equippe'~' Police car 24-hours a day. .\ssistant Traffic Engineer, Bill Ctracker, indicated that adequate Police enforcement was the only ~,my to reduce speed~ and stop sigms were not speed -leterrents. Itt further elaborated on some of the points contained in the City Engineer's report and explained that of the tx,,enty accidents uhich occurred ,t thc subject intersection x,rithin the last five years, only one could have been prevented by the presence of stop signs; the others being the result of driver inattention and carelessn~Ess. Councilx~or~an Kayx~,ood stated that xzhile she was very sympathetic and enpathatic ~ith the problem, she agreed ~Jith the City Engineer's report pointing to the fact that only one accident could have been prevented if stop signs were present, land indicated that it had been proven many tJ.~es that stop signs do not prevent accidents. She ~?.phasized that there x~,as no substitute for good safety habits. ,it the conclusion of discussion, Councilman Thom called for a vote on the aforementioned r~otion. To this ~aotion, Councilwoman i'.ag~ood voted "~,o". Councilman Roth requested staff ~o submit a report in six months relating to the effactive~ess of the stop signs at the subject intersection. ~ .... CITY PROGRA/I - Y. ITO CITY~ JAP;2.~' On motion by Councilma~ Roth, seconded llll ! i i i by C'oun~"i"l'r:~n Seymour, an additional expenditure of $500 vms approved over the original $1,000 to cover trip expenditure for ~layor Thom~s participation in the Sister City Program wi~h i[ito City, Japan. I.'.OTION CARRIED. .,,-~,,IN~iZUT OF DELEGATE TO TILE ORAE{GE COUNTY ilEALTIi PLAi~IiING COUNCIL: On notion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, Bill Daly was reappointed as delegate go the Orange Coun:y Health Planning Council and Pat iienworthy was appointed as alternate, i~O~ION CARRIED. 76-722 City Ilall, Anahe.$m, California.- CODICIL. }IINUTES - october. 5J 19.76, ..1:30 ,C k,,:.:,T CALEi~.DAR ITemS: C~ motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman llott~ the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports and reco~a~.~ndations furnished each Council }fember and as listed 0;% £hm Co.smut Calendar Agenda: 1. CLAI~[S AGAIi,~ST ~IE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred to City's insurance carrt'~r 0r the s~lf-insurance administrator: a. Claim submitted by John A. Bullet for damages purportedly sustained as a result of his vehicle falling into a hole at ~all Road and Knott on or about Sept~',~ber 10, 1976. b. Claiu submitted by l]radley John }{etscher for damages purportedly sustained am a result of his arrest by the Anaheim Police Department on o~ about July 21, ~O .~.~ 76. c. Claiz.~ submitted by Dan ?.~illiam Clyde for d~ages purportedly 'sustained as a result of his arrest by the Aa%aheim Police Department on or about June 19, 1976. d. Claim submitted by Jacob F. and Marilyn E. ~olenda for damages purportedly sustained as a result of a City powerline falling on their fence on or abouC June 2~, 1976. ~.. :,~o~..,,~ DEVICES: The following permits were granted sub]eot to the recommendations of the Chief of Police: a. ;~3~.usement Devices Permit for 2 pinball machines to be lo~ated a~ Fox Cine~aland Theatre, 1414 South Harbor Boulevard (C. !7. 17illiamson, applicant). b. ~^:'zusenent Devices Permit for 4 video pong TV games, 4 pinball machines, and 1 "Foosball" game to be located at the Crescendo, 1721 South ~anchemte~ (David L. lTarman, Servoma~ion Corporat ion, applicant). .... ', .... ,.~' .... ,.,.~,: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed: a. City of Garden Grove P. esolution :,To. 5139-76 urging the Caliform/a State Legislature to enact legislation authorizing local paramedic prog~mm~ on a permanent basis. b. Before the Public Utilities Commission and Energy Resources Conservation and Development Corm~ission - Uotice of !{earing - Joint Invest iga: ion ln~o the availability and potential use of solar energy in California. c. Anahein Library Board !Iighlights and Minutes for July 19, 1976 an~'i ~ugust 1~, 107~. ~?.. :~onth!y Peport - ;maheim Public Library - A~gust, 1976, e. ~ngineering Division, Department of Public ~.7orks, Annual P. epor: for !975-7~. f. Comr~u?.ity Redevelopment Commission .~[inutes - September 8, 1976. g. City of Pice ~ivera ~esolution No. 2061 supportins a Sutmmns to Action for refor~ of the Criminal Justice System. h. City of Tustin ~.esolution '.Io. 76-100, supporting development of an auditorium aa California Sta~e University Fuller=on. · ,~,-,'rr~-, CAPd~IED . .r~,~uU.IO,,....NO~.. 762-622 TI~OUGii. 76~-'626: Councilwoman Kayw~od offered R.esolution :~os. 7~R-622 through 76R-626, both inclusive, for adoption in ac¢ordan=e wi=h =bm reports, recommendation and cer~iflcations furnished each C~ncil Membe~ am~ a~ listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda. ...,.,,OLUTION .NO: 7._6.R-62.2: A RESOLUTION OF TiIE CITY COUNCIL OP 1~,~ CITY OF A/.~AI=~ ACCZt~fI~G CEP..TAIN D~EDS AND ORDERING THEIP. RECOPJJATIO~. (John UXnd~r .~eapy, e~ ux.; I;est Coast Development Company; First Church of Chris~ ScXm~s~ of An&he,m; David J. Althoen, et ux.; .'.']orman L. Hendricks, et ux.) 76-723 ~"~nLU~IO'.l '.IS. 7.6R-623: A %rSOLUTION OF Tt?Z CITY COUITCIL OF T!2] CITY ill'&'~l~ m m IL , m m m m m ?~ESOLUTIOU :.~p. 76R-624: A PY, SOLUTION OF TI..~, CITY COUNCIL OF TIIE CITY ~F AUA!SqIM F~..,~I. lO .~lD DE~I.,PE~J~'.G ~.IAT PUBLIC ~ONw~'~'''''~" ',~"~, C~;~ET~UCTIOii ~UD CO>~ZTIOtl OF A ~LIC I~IP~OVEI~t~T. T0 I,~T: FAIPCfOUT ~L%~. ST?L:Y~ SEl~P, ~ID STOP~I D~IN I~OVEi~NT ~OM S~ITA ANA C~TOU P,O~ TO Rill PO;~, A.iI.F.P. NO~. 741, 789 ~O l'~t ORDER l'lO~. 763-B, 782-D, 1265, 2124 2296; ~bq C~7YOIT 5I!~ ~0~ STPZET IYPEOVE1.ZNT ~OM SERP~'!O AVEC~E TO 585~' SZEP. Jfl9 AI~i~UE, A.!I.F.P. !?~. 735, PIIASE II, ~ID ~,70~ ORDER ~lOS, 781-?, 2~93, ~7~P 2295, IU ~IZ CITY OF JJl~I}~; APPROVIIIG TI~ 9ESI~IS, PL~S, PROFILES, 9%A!F!L~G~ ~iD SPECIFICATION~ FOR ~LE CONSTRUCTIO?! TIIEP. EOF; .~T!IORIZIiIG C'nTiST?~IC17 OF SAID PUBLIC IMPRO~I'~,IT IN ACCOP~Q~ICE ~'STtl SAID PL~IS, e~,pl.~w~iCA~iOjo,~ '" ~C.; ~.ID AU~IORIZINC ~lD DIRECTIIIG TIiE CITY CLEP~ TO ~LISll YOTICE IUVITIIIC SEAL PROPOS;~S FOR TIlE COI'!STP, UCTION %IEREDF. (Bids to be opened i'loverB, ber 6, 1976, 2:00 p.m.) ''ff'~'IImLUTIOJI,.1 . I I ~lOi I ', 7,6R--625 :,1 I. ~ A P~SOLUTIOIT OF Tt~ CITY COIDiCIL OF TIIE CITY OF F!~iALLY ACCEPTING ~!E CO}~LETI0I'T A.~ TIlE ~IIS!IING ~F iLL PL~'TT, LABOR, .~W~""~..~ ~,,~, }~TERIAL~ ~2lD E~UIP}~TT. AND ~L UTILITIES AND TP~TSPORTATIOH ITT~UDIUC F~q~q, ~IEL A/ID IFATZP, ;J!D TIIE PEP. FORI.~ICE OF ;LL ?0~.~ !!ECESCARY TO CONSTRUCT A'ID COI~I,I'~E ~IE FOLLOI'51IG ~'LLIC IMPROVEI'~IT, TO !ST; SECTION /~ - STEEL ~P!7!TU~] FOR ~iE FSCLID .~!D SU,~K!ST LIBRARY. (Bassett qffice Furniture RZSOLUTIO.N NO. 76R-626: .^. P~SOLUTIOY OF TIE CITY COI~JCIL OF TItE CITY OF E~AI~I~f ~I'~;~LY ACcE~II:C TIE -COI~LETION ~iD TI~ ~PJIIS!!.IiIG ~F ALL PLANT, LABOR, S!'iPT.'ICES, ~{ATEP. IALS ~P E~!P!~l~ ,~.!lD ;J~L UTILITIES AI~ TP~!SPORTATION INCLUDINC Pq~TP., ~ ;3ID !'TATER, A~ID THE PERFO~C~ OF ALL "70~,~ NECESSAP, Y TC C~iTSTPUCT .%N~ CO~TLETE %!E FOLLOIIIiIC PUBLIC I~IPROVE}E]UT, TO ~.~T: ~ECTION 5 - ST.~CYI~IC CYA!R~ ;f7~ TPUCiiS FOR ~LE EUCLIn ~TD SUI, EiIST E~NC!! LIBP. A.RY. (Eassett nffice Fu~iture Company) qo!! Call Vote: T. he W~yor declared Resolution ..',los. 7~P.-62P through 76~-626, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. CITY ........ ~,,~,'~3' The follo~ring actions taken by the Planning Cor~.~ission at their meeting held September 13, 1976, pertaining to the foll~wing applications were submitt~t for City Council information and consideration. C~ ;,~tion by Co~cil;0mn Roth, seconded by Councilman lEott, the City Council au~l,orized the actions pertaining to the following Environmental Impact requir~aents, ~ recorm~e~ded by the City Planning Commi~sion, and took no further action on the following applicaticras (Stem ].,'os. 1 through 9): s~ll' s .2:iVIIIOLL~i!TAL E.IPACT P~POP, T - CATEGORICAL ZXE}~TION: T~%e Planning Directo~ has determined that the proposed 'activ'itie's ih the following listed zoning applications fall within '~he definition of Section 3.01, Class 1, 3 and 11 of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements for an Environmental Impact ?.eps. ri and are, therefore, Categorically Exempt from the requirement to file an EIR; Conditional Use Permit No. 1648 Conditional Use Permit No. 1653 Conditional Use Permit Us. 1650 Variance 1Io. 2842 2. ~,VL,Oik.~i~TAL 1II4PACT,, R~P,OP%T - NEGATIVE DECLAP~TION: The Planning Commiseiea recomnekds t© Ehe C~t7 C~n~'~m Chat' c~e ~ubject p~OJect in the following l~t.~ zoning application be declared exempt from the requirement to prepare ~ Bnviron~ntal ~mpacC Report, purmuant to the provisions of the Califo~a Environ~ntal Q~lity Act: Conditional Use Permit No. 1652 76-724 City .i!all,..~aheim, Califorqia,,,- COL~CIL ?TII,~TES ,r Octobe,,r,, 51 !,9761 l:3Q P.![~ ,,3,.. C~TTDITI.ONAL USE PEIn[IT :T,,O,,. 1642: Submitted by R. C. Eoatman Construction Company, to permit the mixing and pacl~%ging of polish and coatings on ~'S-A-43,000 zoned property located at 1275 iTorth Grove Street· City Planning Commission %esolution Uo. PC76-177 granted Conditional .Use Permit Uo. 16Z~8. 4. CO..iJDIT!Oi],,AL' UpE PI.'.E/.:IT ?0. 1650: Submitted by Barbara .w.. Fitzpatrick to pe~i~ an office in an existing residential structure loca:ed at 515 South Harbor Boulevard, currently zoned PJi-1200, with code waivers. City Planning Commission ~%esolution ,Uo. PC76-17g granted Conditional Use Permit 7,',o. 1650 for a period of 5 years· 5. COND!TIOiTAL '°- PE?J!IT ::~0 : . 1652 Submitted by Pick ?~anches, to permit a motel with waiver of minimur~ nun',ber of parking spaces on '.~ zoned property located on the south side of Katella Avenue west of State College Boulevard. City Planning Commission ?~esolution ~?o. PC76-179 granted Conditional Use Permit 7!o. !652. · .,~ .... ~;~u,,.~,,, US'.'. P:.',P~IT :TO. 1653: Submitted by P.. Joseph ',[aag~ to permit a private club on :.~ zoned property located at 1910-1911 '.,,Tright Circle. City Planning Com~.nission ?.esolution T!o. PC76-180 granted Conditional Use Permit ;70. I~53 for a period of eno-year. Counci!woL~.an Tia)n,.~ood,z:~-~-^~,...~;,.~ staff to clarify whether the bingo Jackpot total of $250 was per game or total per evening, and Mr. Hopkins answered per game. 7. VA'IL!-i. TCE. ,0. 2q4~: SuM;itta.:~ !.:y '~'. ~ ' Fatricia A. ':!iller, for ~?aiver of -.a~'-~i~':~um si.~.~ height to construct an illuminated roof sign on CC zoned property ].ocr:tad at 304 Katella ~'~ay. City .Planning Commission ~asolution ;*o. PC7~-!~2 granted Variance ~;o. 2842. . ~ .... . ,.=, ,:.,,~,. ~,.:. .......... ,,, , , - ~ ..... ~ ............. ~.~: Submitted by Iiarie ~. ['~'tllz, for extension o"f' 't~.:e for an indefinite Period :o posit the establishment ...... '~ ,~ single-family resid~n, ce of a boarding home for ~i:; senior citizens in locate2 at 60! North Lemon Street. The City Planning Co~znission, by notion, [ranted a two-year extension of time ........ _._,~ ....... · ....GZE. TZP~;J~ PLAY, AT,~:TDI[ENT - SAVANNA STREET AREA; P. eques~ from o, mers of various parCels'"i~""'t~e 'Savanna Street area west of i'inott Street for a general Plan Anmndment to change :he designation from ~dium density residential uses to low density residential uses. The City Planning Commission denied the request for inclusion of the subject area in the next scheduled Amendment ~ith the recommendation that ~he Planning Department Staff consider scheduling said area for B~endment toward the end of 1977. '~OTIOii CARRIED. ~"~""~ PLAJTNIi~G COI~fISSIOI,~ ITEM: The following action taken by the City Planning Commission at their meeting held September 13, 1976, was removed from the Consent Calendar for discussion and separate action by the City Council: 1. COi~ITIONAL USE PEP~IIT TTO. 1642; Submitted by Dunn Properties, Inc., to pem'~it a drive-through restaurant on P,S-A-43,000 zoned property located on the wcs~ side of Magnolia Avenue, 555 feet north of La Palms Avenue was requested to be set for public hearing by Councilwoman Heywood. ,~VAnI;~ICE~ o No. ,2829, Ai'~D ENVIROI'~NT ,AL IMPACT REPORT :~0; ,1,82: (Tentative ~..iap, Tract :,o. ,~142, Re~ision 'i') "~ub~i'tted by Te~aco-Ana~'eir,, I, ill~ Inc., for waiver of requirement that all lots rear on arterial hishways to establish a 33-1ot 5000(SC) subdivision on the east side of Nohl Ranch Road, approximately 215 feet south of t!alnut Canyon Road. 76-725 i~orni,_...- COUi:CIL .%,UTE,~ - nctobar 5~ 197f.~ ~. :. ~ity Plaun~.nL], Con~.~,~ission 2esolution 7!o. PC76-151 reco?~rmnded that the qity Tounci! c~rtify EIR ]~o. 1S2, supplemental to ElF. Uo. fiD, as l~cin[; in co~forma~cc w±th City an~ State Cuidelines and the State of California '2nvironmental Q~ality .'..ct, an~, further granted Variance ¥o. 2~29. E'7'I,~IO.P%:[TAL I~.iFACT I~EPOP. T ~'a. !22 - CX?TIFICATIO:~: qIP. ~7o. 122, sul,p].emantal t'o' EIt ~o. SO, having been raviewe~ by the City staff and rcco~en, de~ ~:y the City PlanninG Co~:~,ission to t0e in compliance with City and State Guidelines and State of Califo~ia Environmental Q~ality Jot, the City Co,moil acting ~pon i~fomation and belief does hereby certify, on r'otion by Councilman P. oth, scco~ed by Councilman Kott, t~at EIR ~o. 1~2 is in compliance with the ~n!ifornia Environmental Quality ,~ct and qity and State euidelines. ~o this · "~otion qouncil~.~man Ka~ood vote~'~ "~o". ~OTI~'~ CARRIED. . '.~ ty Council tool: no action on Variance ~--' , ........ ~. ~.^n TP, ACT ~,O 914o fREw!SIq.N :'n 1): nn,,elop~ Texaco-Anaheim U~.l!s, ..... ~ I ',,., ,~.,;~ I ~ · · ~ ~ · . ~ ......... 7~c.; Tract ].oc~te~ o~ the e,~st a~.~a of ~'ohl '~ancb ~oa4, ~nuth of ?n. lnut no,yon .... ; ~ont ~3 .... ,, zop. e-~ lots. ~. motion ':y: Cnunc{~"~.an Potb, secopaea, by Councils. an. Thom, the proposed su~ivision, Tentative ~k~.p, Tract ilo. ~'."~,.,~ (Revision :~o. 1), fogether wit], its dcsi.:, a~d i;'q~rovaw, ant, ~as fou~d to be consis-~cnt ~it]~ the City's General ' ' ~ . tnc.~ wit]~ waiver cf the ::ills/~a and t,~a Council approved said Tentative ~[ap; '-ego : gradi~6 f~rdinance raquira:.~ant that lot lines be located 2 to 3 feet fro~',.~ t]:a top o'~ s!o?as,sui~ject to the following conditions raco~'~='~ended ]:y the City FlanninL :I.. T',:at the approval of Tentative :'ap of Tract '::o. C142 (P. evision i[o. !) is a~,u~_u subject to the approval of Wariance ~o. ~ , ~ ,. ;,- ~,' · 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more 'than one subdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative for~~, for approval· 3. That in accordance :,.,-i'~h City Council policy, a 6-foot, open, decorative wall shall be constructed on the ~:est property line separating Lot ::.os. ! and 72 from i7ohl Ranch P. oad. Reasonable landscaping, including irrigation facilities, si'fall be installed in tko uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full dis'tar, ce of said wall; plans for said landscaping to be submitted to and subject to the approval of the Superintendent of ?arlcway i~!_aintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall ass~m~e thc responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 4. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 5. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the Office of the Orange County P. ecorder. 6. That the covenm~ts, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to anJ approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract r.mp. 7. That prior to filing the final tract r.:ap, the applicant shall submit to the City Attorney for approval or denial a complete synopsis of the proposed functioning of the operating corporation including, but not' limited to, tl~e articles of incorporation, bylaws, proposed methods of ~-,anagement, bonding to insure maintenance of common property and buildings, and such other information as the City Attorney may desire to protect the City, its citizens, and the purchasers of the project· 2. That street names shall be approved by the City Planning Department prior to approval of a final tract map. 9 That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of ~.naheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the building permit is issued. 76-726 .~it.v ilallI ~%%aheimI California - COUI~CIL ,.~-,.-=e · ~ ~:~,~o.~,,, - October 51 1976~ 1:30 P. !. !'~. That draJ~age of said property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to thc City Engineer. If, in the preparation of the site, sufficient grading is required to necessitate a grading permit, no work on grading will be pe~]itted betzznen October 15th and April 15th unless all required off-site drainage facilities have been installed a~d are operative. Positive assurance shall he provided ~he City that sucl~ drainage facilities will be conpleted prior to Vats7 ~ '.qtF~. "acessary rig'~,t~f-way for off-site drainage facilities shall ,~c'ic.nted to thc City, or ti~e City Council sb. all have initiated conde~n, aticn ~.:-~c~,,:.-?i:'~g~ therefor (the costs of ~M'~ic}~ shall be borne by the developer)prior ~,~, t~-'c con~ance:.~e~.t of ~ra.~ing operations, Ti~c required drainage facilities zh ~ be o~- a size and ty~: suf=~cient~ to carry runoff waters ortginating~ fro~.~ ]~i~] ~r oropertics throug]~ ~oai~i ~roperty to u]tir.~ate c~izpomal as approved Ly the 2ity -ngineer. Caid drainage facilities shall be tl~e first item of construction an~i s]~ali be coz~plctc~i gg~d be functional throughout ti,c tract and fror .~.o~:~.::trear~ bour.~ary cf ~ .....:-c~c:*-~.:::..~y to tko ultirat:~ ~:,c~z,'~ of ~.isg:.osal~ prior to thc issuance of any final building inspections or occupancy permits. >rainage · 'li~trict reimburse~'.~ent agreements ~ay Ee r~ade available to the developers of said Fro. perry upon their request. 11. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall he conducted in such a uanner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originatJ~':g from. this project being carried into the Santa ;a~a River by storm water originatin$ fron or flowing ~F, rou~h this project. 12. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary street na~c gigj'~s shall be installed prior to any occupancy. 12. That the developer of subject tract shall enter into a special facilities agree~aent ~.~th the City for water facilities in ~he U. igh Elevation System, as required by Rule 15B of the Uater Utility Rates, Rules, and R.egulations prior to approval of a final tract map, as stipulated to by the petitioner. 14. That all construction in subject tract shall be in accordance with the require?,ents of Fire Zone 4 as approved by the City of Anaheim Fire Depart~.'zent. 15. In accordance with the requirements of Section 18.02.047 pertaining to the hqitial sale of residential homes in the City of Anaheim Planning Area "B", the seller shall provide each buyer with ~eritten information concerning the General Plan and the existing zoning within 300 feet of the boundaries of subject tract. 16. That prior to the issuance of building permits, the petitioner shall submit final specific plot plans to the Planning Conm~ission for approval showing conformance x,ith all RS-5000(SC) site development standards. To this r:~otion, .Councilwoman llaywood voted "No". I[OTION CARRIED. TEUTATI~ }~P TPJkCT...NO. 8560 (PgVISlQN %.~0. 4).- E~-UfIRO~!~TAL I}.{PACT REPORT 'i"86'____[: ~Peveloper, G. L. L~is Company; tract located sout'herly of Santa Aha CanYon Xoad, east of Imperial Highway; containing 80 RS-HS-22,000 (SC) zoned lots. ':."~r. Jim llintz, 263 Del Giorgio Road, expressed his concern regarding the traffic that would be generated by the proposed tract as well as the road patterns within it. lie pointed out from a map what tie considered to be the problem areas, m'aphasizing that most of the additional traffic would exit onto Fairmont Boulevard at an intersection in front of a Junior high school creating, in his opinion, an unsafe condition. His two main recommendations to alleviate the situation were, (1) widen the bridge exiting off Fairmont Boulevard by the Junior high school and, (2) provide a second access off Fairmont Boulevard. ~!r. Hintz et:pressed that since only the Tentative ~.~ap was being considered, potentially hazardous situations could best be prevented at this time by the evolvement of a better plan. Mayor Thom, while he appreciated Mr. Hintz' concern, explained that it would be difficult to go back and start all over again considering, (1) the developer had ?at with homeowners and their agents ~xo were satisfied and had no formidable objections to the plan and, (2) the Planning Commission, subject to certain conditions, recommended approval of the tentative tract, lie was, therefore, inclined to go along ~rith the majority. 76-727 City ~..!all, Anaheim, Cal.i. fornia -.COUNCIL HINUTES - October ~tr. tlintz also expressed his concern involving several lots with a grade differential which he asked to be restricted to one-story homes and preclude block walls stipulating instead something that would afford a see-through type view such as wrought iron. He also stressed that provisions be made for a sewer · nd drainage so as ~o prevent water from their lots (homeowners in his vicinity) running down into the backyards of the new development and suggested that an asphalt berm be used for drainage. Following further discussion of sewer and drainage matters, City Engineer. ~ddox, indicated that staff would look into all questions and see to it that an appropriate sewer system within the tract would be designed to preclude any prob lees. !~r. Sam Gaylord, Board }l~nber of SACPOA, explained that ~[r. Hintz' concerns about the view and runoff affected three or four homeowners out of approximately 300 and, since he liVed right next door, they were also his concerns. However, he did not expect that the homeowners he represented, pointing out where the majority of them lived, to be burdened %rlth the problems as presented by Hintz. l'{r. Gaylord stressed that the Association appreciated the willingness of the developer, G. L. Lewis, to evaluate and implement their proposals and were. well satisfied with the zoning, dedicated easements for horse and hiking trails, preservation of the trees amd the rural atmosphere; the only negative aspect being that of opening Avenue B to vehicular traffic through Come=fy Hill Road. Hr. Gaylord also expressed the opinion that the situation involving the traffic being diverted in front of the Junior high school merited further consideration. Before proceeding, Councilwoman Kaywood asked that a correction be made to the Plannin5 Commission minutes of September 13, 1976, P76-435, last paragraph wherein it was stated, . .."proposed plan to remove 757 specimen trees~' be changed to read ."191 specimen trees of the 757"; correction also to be made to any other documents %~ere the error may appear. MOTION: Councilman Thom moved that Tentative Tract "'ap ::o 8560 be approved with _J I I . * L · ~he additional condition that one-story homes be placed on the lots as requested by ~r. Ilintz. Before further action was taken on the foregoing motion, ~ir. Jim Halls, C. L. Lewis Company, 1745 Orangewood Avenue, Orange, addressed the Council and ~dicated that his Company received similar requests such as that asked for by ~r. Hintz in the past and that it was their policy to work with adjacent home- ~ners on any concerns they may have. However, he stated he could not agree to stipulate that one-story homes would be placed on the seven lots in question because such a move could cause problems specifically with re~ard to grading, lie explained that part of their presentatiom to the Planning Co~u[Ssion was that they were going to reduce the amount of grading on the subject lots by ~oing to split-level housing to take care of the grade differential w~thin the lots thus avoiding wide pads and bis slopes on either side. Hr. Ilalls stated he would work ~,rith ~M. I~intz and ~'Ir. Gaylor4 in trying to accommodate them but in conjunction ~ith conditions agreed to with ~he Planning Commission in the EIR on grading. iM. IL~lls furtlmr stipulated that his Company would take care of the drainage problem as pre~iously elaborated. Councilman Roth stated to go back and undo everything that had been done would be mnraasonable since the developer was willing to work ~dth the homeowners in planning some split-level type of arrangement on t~lc lot~ ~n question. Councilm~ SeM,~lour indicated that if a split-level, two-story home would not impinge on ~he view of the adjacent homeowners, he could ~e no problem· IIe also emphasized that he did not want to put "handcuffs" on a quality developer who had cooperated and worked with the homeowners by first meeting with them almost a ~ear prior. Councilman Seymour stressed that he would trust the developer to give every possible consideration to insure that the view of the adjacent h~meowners would not be disturbed. 76-728 City !I.allI ~tn.aheiml Calif.0. rnia .- CO?~CIL ![I'~U.?E~ .? nctobe.r .5~ 19.761 1:30 l'~iss Santalahti suggested the consideration of having the specific development plans approved by the City Council either before the approval of the Final Tract ~ap or the issuance of building permits. ~'r. ilalls stated that he would be agreeable to this suggestion providing that it was !i~ited only to the specific lots in question and not the ~,fnole development; thereupon lfayor Thom agreed to amend his previous motion. It was further clarified that six lots were actually involved -- ~'Tumbers 22, ~3, ~5 26 and o7 24,~ , ~ . E:!VI?~..01~[~!:TAL ~[PACT ..P~PORT .~'0. 186 - CERTIFICATIOH: EIR ~.~o. 186 having been i ii i i Ill ~ III reviewed by the City ~taff and recommended by the City Planning Commis~ion to be in cou.pliance with City and State Guidelines and the State of California Znvironmental Quality Act, the City Council acting upon such infor~ation and belief does hereby certify, on motion by Councilman Poth, seconded ~y Councilm~m Thom, that EIR No. 186 is in compliance with the California Environmental Qual~t~ Act and City and State Cuidelines. }.~TIO~ CARRIED. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Seymours =he proposed subdivision, Tentative ~.:ap, Tract No. 8560 (Revision }~Oo 4). ~gether wi~h design and improvement was found to be consistent with the City's .C~ne~al 1~ and the City Council approved said Tentative ~[ap subject to the ~ollowing conditions as recommended by the City. Planning Commission: 1. That should this subdivision be developed as nore than one subdivisions subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. 2. Th, at all lots ~,rithin this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 3. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County qecorder. 4. That any proposed covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be submitted to and approved by the City Attorney's Office prior to City Council approval of the final tract map and, further, that the approved covenants, conditions, and restrictions shall be recorded concurrently with the final tract map. 5. That street names shall be approved by the City Planning Department prior to approval of a final tract map. g. That the owner of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by ti~e City Council, said fees to be paid at the time ~he buil~in~ pcr~i~ is ~saue4. 7. That drainage of said property shall be disposed of in a manner to the City ~noineer If, in the preparation of the site, sufficient grading is required to necessitate a ~radin~ permit, no work on sradin~ will be permit~e~ between October 15th and April 15th unless all required off-site drainage facilities have been installed and are operative. Positive assurance shall be provided the City that such drainage facilities will be completed prior to October !Sth. ?ecessary right-of-way for off-site drainage facilities shall be dedicated to the City, or the City Council shall have initiated condemnation proceedings therefor (the costs of which shall be borne by the developer) prio~ to the commencement of grading operations· The required drainage facilitiee shall be of a size and type sufficient to carry runoff wa:ers originating fr~m higher properties through said property to ultimate disposal as approved by City Engineer. Said drainage facilities shall be the first i~em of and shall be completed and be functional throughout the tract and from the downstrem~,~ boundary of the proper~y to the ultimate point of disposal prio~ the issuance of any final building inspections or occupancy permits. Drainage district reimbursement agreements may be made available Co the developers of property upon their request. o~. That grading, excavation, and all other construction activities shall be conducted in such a manner so as to minimize the possibility of any silt originating from this project being carried into the Santa Ana River by storm water originating from or flowing through this project. 76-~9 q', Th-~'t ~.he ~%iiD%n~.Ht ra~'{,l'~terntnal point of isto.rP..d~ai;~s.~shown on this-.,tentat]ve tract~Stlp ghallX-notibe :consign,red final. Tlmse drains ~sIlall be subject pre~is~':db.~i~t ~d~qide,rAtions and approval of 'the ~,z~y ~ '' ~ngineer. 19. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary street na:~.e si.~'~-~q~ shall be installed prior to any occupancy. 11. ~ That ,%he ':bt;n~O.r~(s)':~'f L*ubj eat property stlall F::Y. ~ppropriat.e drainage '' ~ pri~r as~-~,~s:::ent ' f~deS, to ~:th.% ~::y of Anaheir,~- a.:s det crntned.~by ~hc City ~n.oineer, t o ~ hPp~OW~ ]. ~ f ' ~a 'f :i.~ al: ~ tract r~ p. !2. In the avant that mu~'dect property is to Ne diviJed for the pur~se of sale, 1.am~:<~., or fi~aucing, a '[:a. rce/ cap, to record the apl,roved division of subject pre~c'rty :sl~all Be: suM':,it'l',a<l to and approved,by the City of ;naheim and then ~,e recorda:] i~ tlzc o .... c ...... ~ ~range County,Recorder. ~3 That fire hy?'rants 'shall be installed and cha~.ged as require< .... n., ~ctenninc. to ~a necessary Ly the ~%{ief of the Fire Pepart~:,er~t prior to commence~,ent of structure! =-- 14. That the .developer o~ sul,ject tract s]~,qll enter i~o a specie! facilities abridgement ~,~tl~ the .City for '.:rater facilities iF~ thc Yigh ~levation Fystem, aa r<~,Nired !'y~Rulc !~5~Of'.C~: "atcr rtility Cat.s, l~les, and ~agulations prior,to ~ ~ ' " t o y , · dp~tb,~m!~'of a f~!~:al tract ~.p~ as ntipu~,ta~ I: ,'fha petitioner 1 ..· ~--.~ ,",..ccc .... ~,,~ raquire-~cnus cf io:~ ~..~n,. .~"7 pertaining to ~he L~i~ial Sale of r,asl.'~'~":ial.., h~:'x~s i~ the Cf.~:y of '~ ,=_.~'ci.. Planning c~ll. ar s~.~," .... ~.~ prcvi,2~ ::ach L:.yar with -,rittan iufor: :-+, ,. ion concarnin[ t ~t.'.c t. . ..... ~:~.~ any si.c, ctxar, trees rcuova? o;~ t.~e ~u~.jcct property s~::~l Le replaced on a .... :I ra'~ic~ sah= rcplace:,unt to La shc~x~ on a plan and subr~iatcd 'Lc r~f..=uc._ .~t Uo m. Cco?p!isi,e,a prior to final building an~.~ zoning inspections !9. 72hat L, ac co ri!:ancc ,.~iti~ City Council poi. icy, a 6'foot masonry ..-all shall constructr_l on the :~eSt property line separatir,.o Lot 77os. 50-63 and Fairmont LoulevarJ; ?rovidad, however~ that a o-~oot decorative wall may be provided >eh~'so~aLie !ar,d~scaPi:F~g,'~including irrigation faailities,' shall t,e installed ,in the unnmxented poTt-iOn of .the arterial highway parle:ay the full distance of :;all; plans ?bt. said. landscaping to be submit,ted to~ and subj.ect to the approval of the Superintendent of Parl.x~ay :ktintenance. Following installation and acceptance, the City of ;=~aheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said !~.und~ca. pinG. 19. Tltat t!~a c~,rner(s)of subject property si:al! dar~ica~te to the City of 2a-~ahei:': aase::'.ents =ar rid'' an,~ hikin~' trail purpescs prior to the approval of a final tract ~,ap, as stipulated to ];y the petitioner. 27,. That tit. owner(s) of subject property shall iecd to the City of Anaheim strip o= 'land~ ten (!O)'feet in wi:,tn alone the boun ~..aries of Lot ]'.os. I and adjacent To :!ohler ~ri. ve for street-widening purposes, as stipulated to by the petit ioner. ~1. That a cul-de-sac shall bc provzc, cc to terrainate Ctreet ";" at the northerly end of subject propertY prior to reaching '~:ohler ~rive, said cul-de-sac to be subject to the approval of the ,.City Engineer, as stipulated to by the petitioner. 22. That a street shall extend between Lot "os. 16 and 17, from ftreet "A" to Del Ciorgio ~oad, as :stipulated to by the petitioner. 27~. That access to Lot Nos. 1 and 2 shall be provided from the south boundaries of~srid lots to Street "A", as stipulated to by thc petitioner· 2z~. That access to Lot iio. 13 st~all be taken from Street "A", as stipulated to by the. petitioner. 76-730 City K.a..!l, Anahe..im, Cal.i..fornia- C.O~C..IL.. ~I?~TE.S- O.ctob.~.r 5, !.976,1:..30 p.t;.. 2.5. In order to preserve the view from homes on adjacent parcels to the west of subject property, the petitioner shall submit final specific floor plans and elevations on Lot Nos. 29. through 27 to the City Council for approval prior to the issuance of building_ permits. ::QTIO:': CAPjIIED . E'v,.IR~,~TAL~,~' ' . .... R!PACT ?d2P0?,T - ~GA,T,IVE DECLARATIONS - P~CEL. ~P_NOS., 58.3: ~ ~tion by Councilman-Thom~ seceded by Council~ Roth, it was detemnined by the City Co~cil that the filing of the following Parcel ~aps are excnpt from the requirc~ent to prepare an Environmental Impact Report as reco~andad by the City Planning Commission: a. narcel ~ap ~'1o. 579 to split an approxtnate ~.-ncra parcel into 4 lots, at 5100 Cast ~rescent ~rive, submitted by VanteJ. Corporation. b. Parcel Map No. 583 to split an existing 4.5-acre parcel into. R parcels and cr~.,~te a new public street at 2321 East Winston Poad, ~ubmitted by Winston ~ssociates. · ,OT ?'~ CAPllIED. ?,RCLASSIFICATION NO. ~74-75-26 -,_~ZQUEST F,On APl:ROYAL QF AL, TZm~4TE COI~.ZRClAL_ U.SZ5: Xeques'~ by Joseph ii. ?.ebb, Ralphs Grocery Company, for approval of alter- nate cou=~%ercial uses on approximately 4 acres of property located at the southwest corner of Lincoln Avenue and Sunkis~ S~reet. On motion by Councilman ~oth, seconded by Councilwoman l%aywood, Counci1 de,creWed that a public hearing would be required for any alternate commercial usaa,under Reclassifica~ion l~o. 74-75-26,as recommended by the City Planning Cor~:~ission. I[OTION CARRIZD. ~I.~AL~? ~ :~P~ TRACT.. UO. 7471: ..... Developer, Butler iiousing Corporation; tract located on :he north side of La Palms, east of Imperial Iitghway; containing 5000(CC) proposed zoned lots. Cn r:,otion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman i%ott, the proposed subdivision together with its design and improvement was found to be consistent with the City's General Plan and the City Council approved final map, Tract 7471 as recommended by :he City Engineer in his memorandum 'of September 23, 1976. To this motion Councilwoman i{aywood voted "~.~o". !DTION CARRIED. ~,~(~U,~ST - DIoCUooIO~ OF GRADING ,ON TRACT NO. 8783: Request of ~'~r Cliff Doubek, IIII II III I I I · 146 Orange tlill Road, to discuss grading on the Warmington project adjacent to the development located near the intersection of RoYal Oak and Santa Aha Canyon ?.oad. :Ir. Doubek stated that he was speaking not only for himself, but also the homeowners on Orange Hill Lane and two on Springhill Lane who were affected by the subject project; their concerns being slides, flooding and property values. '~. Doubek first addressed the grading matter relative to the slope above and behin~ his and adjacent homes since the slope for the new development went do%a% to their property line. He indicated that on several occasions, he had called Mr. Jay Titus, Office Engineer, who first indicated that the slope would be cut do~m and there would be a rise to the east; later Mr. Titus explained he misinterpreted the map, and the slope, in fact, was ~otng to be higher. lit. Doubek was also concerned about the dirt and debris :hat was falltn~ onto his property' and explained ~further that the de-eloper ~had graded off a co~r of his tot and in so doing dug 'Out the corner marker. Following a discussion between Mr. Doubek and City Engineer Maddo~:, it was determined that any overfill caused by grading would be t~lmmed back and a drainage swale would be constructed 3 fee: from Mr. Doubek's lot line which would take the drainage fro~ the slope south to Springhill and then to the storm drain thereby alleviating any potential problems. 76-731 City_ ilall.~ ;maheir~ California - C01f!CIL 'rT'TT'~--O~.L.,U ~ .... qctober ~,~ 1~74~ ~ 1 :~,.q n. TM~. 7]ayor Thom cxplaincd that since prior approval l~a~ I'~een granted on tl~e ~"'~',~o-~ of t~e slope which was ,~r. F:oubc?~s ~min concern, notl~!ng could 1,e done at t!~k:': ~'r. 7oubeL ashed that so~'mthin& be done to beep the developer off l,i~; i~ropert7 a~?, r~score the co~ner of l~is lot just as it ~zas l;cfore it was trL'u"c? nfl. ~:~ :'otiou hy Council.:,,.an ?.otl~, .%aconded I,7 Council"-.<m ~e~our~ st~77 ~ ~ .... '" ', ~ ~ t i~.~tt of or.e week i:~ lieu of an u,~ t].~ .iavcloFcr l, eforel,::..,..~, i?BTZ~'I ~APiLiED. ~oi~ Call Vote: The 7ayor declared Resolution '7o. 76~-627 duly passed and adopted.. - PR~.o - PZ-F, ID '"' 3118 The City l{anager re~rted on info,al bids received for ~]~.'~ purchase of an Enerpac Press, :~odel 1PA-10960 with P~[3042 air/hydraulic motor for the l'echanica]. IfaintenaDce Depart'u'~ent and recommended acceptance of the low birl of Ifine and '~ill l'achine - ~.,.~,273.28, including tan. ~ i~mtion by Councilman ?~oth, seconded by Councilman Thom, the iow bid of '?ine and ~.'_ill llachine was accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of ~3 27~ ~" ,~ ~~' I ~ ~ I .~. .... ,,~ OF EOUIF~., ., ..'-"r;... ~, - BEUCi!_ PRESS. , . - ?g-ElD ~!O. 3118'. The City l~_anager report.ed on informal bids received for the purchase of a bench press, %nerpac Press 1-~7-1039 for the ~lechanical Maintenance Department and recommended acceptance of the low and best bid of Jack X Change - $307.19, including %~ motion by Councilman. P. oth, seconded by Councilman Seynour, the low and best bi~ of Jack X Change was accepter] and purchase authorized in the amount of ~07 1~ including tax MOTION CARRIED t .' , · · ., .... I..,~.ICE .MO. 3597: Councilman Roth offcred Ordinance ,;o. 3.): 7 for adoption· Aefer to Ordinance Book. SXDI::?dICE N0. 3597: ;2~ ORDINANCE OF TIiE CITY OF ^'~^,,,-'r,r A'T:~ETC TITLE , ,, ,, i , , ~" ~ A ~..,;..t.. tZT~ZiY:~ t~'~IClP~J~ CODE P~AT~,IC TO ZONINC. (69-70-25 (4) , P,S-5000) ~olI Call Vote: AYES: CO~CIL !.~I',.~ERS: Y,o:t, %o~h and Thom NOES: COdiCIL }~?,T:,ERS: Kaywood ABSTAI?'~ED; COI~ICIL ~'~MBE~S: Se~our ABSEtIT: CODICIL ~,~HBERS: None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3597 duly passed and adopted. 76-732 City HqllI ;mah,e,imI Califor~,,ia,,- C,OLR,]CIL, :'ffNUTE,~ - October, 5.1 19761 ,l:3fl p,.~. .......... .,~,~,~, NO 3599 Councilman Roth offered Ordinance !~o 3599 for adoption. ~.efer to Ordinance ~ook. 3599: ;~! eP. nIUAY. CE OF %~IE CITY OF .~!A!~EI}.( A~{~TDINC~ TITLE 18 OF ~L': ~.!IC!?;L CODE RELATIUG TO ZONI~.G. (70-71-25(l~) , RS-500O) ?oll Call Vote: .Tb.e .~'ayor declared Ordinance 17o. 3599 duly passed and adopted. 3601' Councilwo~mn Kaywood offered qrdinance ~io · . . 3601 for first ^',~:T_. .....,~_,;""~,,,, 7.:0. 3601.' ~'27 ~.Y,..Di::,*2TC~] OF .... .~::.;, CITY ~ lyd::c ~.~ v~:'~C (72-7~-1g(2), Tracts 7946, 7947, and 79~g) ~.~ ~, ...... ~o. 3602 and 3603 Councilman Seyr~our offered ~rdinance ~:os 3d~92 and _~,~,.,~ for firs~ reading. ;,~.~...~u, :70. 3602' f-'2; 0Pd)i':AiICE 'OF T;i; CITY ~F A'%A%'%~T'? · ,~,,.~., ;C~iIDIiiG TITLE 1S CF ~,r,.~.~ ~U:.tiE!:i '.~U!CIP~ CODI; ?.EL).TIiIG TO ZOHIiIC. (65-66-59(6), CO) ........ 3603' f2~ O~I..:~C~ CF TI%~ CITY ~F ,-.,,-~.~.~ ~{ENDING .... ~I,L~' !8 OF ~E , ~'NICIP~ CODL KLLATING TO ZONING. (73-74-41, CL) ~,:L')~.,,,~,C~, "~ 3604: Councilwoman ]:aywood offered ~rdinance Y.o. 3604 for first reading, O?,DI:';;i:CE ,NO. 3604: F2: ORDI2~ANCE OF TI~ CITY OF ~C~;J~I2.i ;2-~,WDING O~.~ET~,CE' "' ITO. .... · R~, ~NC. (Community Services Board) G~L~2.T APPLICATION APPROVAL MIASE I TRAIN STATION PLATFOR}! AT ANAI..,,.I2I STADIIR.!: Councilwoman Kaywood reported that Grant Appltcati'on approval 'for Phase i 6f ~h~ Train Station Platform at Anaheim Stadium had been received and staff requested direction as to whether or not to proceed with the Grant, ~ no,ion by Councilwon~%n Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, staff was J~structed to proceed with the Grant relative to the Train Station Platform at Anaheim $tadtum. ~[OTION CARRIED. PEOPLE ~,.OV.R PROJECT: Councilwoman Kaywood reported that out of 36 candidates throughout the Nation, Anaheim was one of the 19 finalists on the People l[over Project concept and staff requested direction on whether or not to continue to pursue the rmtter. On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, staff was authorized to pursue the People ?-lover project to the final outcome. !~[OTI01~ C~ ~,I~D. TOUR OF JPL ACTIVAT.~p~ CARBON TREATMENT SYSTEM PLA/,~T: Councilwoman Ka~wood stated that prior to the next rejui'ar meeting' of" the' Sanitation District on Uednesday, October 13, 1976, there would be a tour of the 3PL Activated Carbon Treatment System Plant No. 1 from 5 to 7 p.m. with dinner to follow; the tour and dinner being open to staff and Council with reservations required. ?~SI,C::ATIOI!.' Fr',o,?,;, pAC COI.~{ITTEE - }~%RGUERITE LEE: A letter of resignation from "~arguerite Lee dated September 24, 1976, was received explaining that she could no longer serve as a member of the Project Area Committee (PAC). , On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom, the resignation of l;arguerite Lee from the PAC Committee was accepted with regret. CARRIED. On notion by Councilwoman llaywood, seconded by Councilman Roth, Oneida Copeland was appeinted to serve as a member of the PAC Committee to fill' the unexpired term of ?~arguerite Lee ending June 30~ 1977. ?~OTION CARRIED. 76-733 City. Xall, .AnaheimI Califor~,ia..- CO~:ClI, '""T'~"~ 1976 ]:30 ~.". ' .~.~..~,~...,- ............ ,~ ~ ...... ,. : .ounci.~:~an .°,cD.~o,,.:r referrc,.~ to" letter subz<itted to Counci~.. dated ~eptember 2~, !976, fro~ T~r. Jo]'m ?lochen, President o~ the ~%nal:eizu Cha~er of Cozzmerce, s~namartzing results of the meeting he and Council~n !la~vood ]~nd ~.~th the Chamber tatar<ling t",c resolution and ca~c,_lla=_..o~, o .,.a contract be=ween the i=y and ' Chamber. letter confir,.~ed thc Cimmber~s interest in, an~ t]mir Zoard of "tractor's ap~roval of ~h= craagton of an Economic Developmcnt %oard relative to the icono~":ic Dcvelop~,~ent )rogram. Council?.au Ce}nuour~s main concern ~?as gl'mt thc City take on an Econozuic D~vclcp,.~.~ ?rogram promo~ grcu, t:,, pr!:~.~rily f:': J~.e northaas~ iz.J'ustrial ar~a anl, ~._~ a result of being able to utilize ?.edevelop~'~ent ~'--<~, ~,,,.,.o, lawful placem~ of responsibility for g'hc program should be placed in the Eedevelopmant ~epartment wiCh proper input provided to the City '.'~nnager. Subsequently, tha~ ~eam, together with two Council ~ier/)ers and a "l~lue-ribbon" comities or Echoic Davelopme~;t Board made up of business ~d industrial leadership would work tox~ar~ bringing about the successful and rapid development of grox,,th in the northeast industrial area. Councilman Seymour explained that the aforementioned plan was the concept and final objective he had in mind which, after refining, would be brought Back to tl~e ~ity Council for final approval; no financial commitment was involve.~ at this ti~e. lle also stipulated that appointees to any "blue-ribbon" cormittee or Economic Development Board be named by the City Council. On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Council:-~n Thom, approval was given for Councilman Seganour and one other Council l~'ember to meet with the business ant'. industrial leadership ~J~o ]rave shown an interest in the Chamber of Commerce, together with City ?~.anager Talley and Executive Director Priest to further refine an Economic Development Program to present to the City Council for final approval. ~OTIOZ CARRIED. Counci!~n goth thereupon volunteered to serve with Councilman Seymour; Councilwoman llaywood volunteered to serve as an alternate. Councilman Kott stated that he was in accord with the proposed Economic Development Program concept as long as it was not taken over by another or saniz ation. :-,,-~.~ ,,,,~..,.. PAPJ~S - ,*2IZiIDI'{i3.',~ TO ORD1TI~ICE NO. 2789; Councilman Seymour referred to exi~'ting ()rdinance ?7o. 2789 relative to Mobile florae Parks as well as newly ~acted Sta~e Legislation governing such parks, tie expressed his interest and eonce~ of others that managers of }{obile !Iome Parks in ~aheim ~e a11o~d to sell existing mobile homes ~thin their parks if licensed under either real estate la~ or as a mobile home salesm~ having a dealers]'~ip under the ~epar:~n: of ~Iotor Vehicle Regulations. At the same time, however, all other people, real estate agents and those licensed by the Department of '~otor Vehicles could do ~he same. So as not to create mobile home sales lots as suggested might happen by the Planmim$ Department, Councilman Seymour requested that the City Attorney amend Ordinallca No. 2789 to provide adequate protection to insure that the only mobile hone~ thee people ~rithiu the park could sell are those occupied, by the people living in ~he mobile hor:e park itself. Cou~ct!~an Eey~,~our preferred amending the mrdinance as opposed to requestJ~g a variance and explained that after the amendment was preparerS, it ~uld be brought baa]: to the Cotmci]. for review and final appreval. ?~ayor Thom stated that at such time as the anendmev, t is Brought bac~.: to Council~ ~'fobile l'~ome Association representatives be notified so testimony could be seltciteH regarding the .proposed Ordinance ar.?.endment, ~cther it be a public heart~g or a public mea~ing. On morion by Council:~n Seynmur, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Attorney was directed to prepare an amendment to Ordinance iio. 27o~9 as articulated By Counci!mnn Seymour and that s~aff notify she Trailer Coach Association, all i~iobile ltome Par]: owners within the City, and the Tenant Association of tl%e public meeting %-g~en she amendment would be brough~ back to Council for final approval. ~,0,. IO., CAP~IZD. 76-734 Git), 71all~ Anaheim~ California__-COUliCIL '.ili;UTI.;S - ~ctober 5! 1976! ~7~,~. ~ I~LOOD DROTZC~' f~', ...... · J.~.:,~ AGENCY: Councilman Kott referred to a letter dated $ept~,:ber 1, 1976, sent by thle City of Costa ~:esa requesting support of concept of extending flood protection southerly of Garfield to t}:e mouth of the Canna Ama ?iver. ~'. :::orion by Council:~mn ;fort, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, staff was instructed, to send a letter to the Crange County Board of Supervisors in Support of thc concept of extendJ~]g protection southerly of Garfield to the mouth of the Santa Ana River. ?.,~OTIOI? CARRIED. i ~ ........ Councilman Kerr, referring to a letter sent to Uashington D. C. by the~':,,~,' '~A organization, asked if it would have any impact on thc application sent to thc,. Federal Government for funding under the Public !7orks Employment Act, specifically with regard to City llall, since the letter was in opposition to this portion of the application. City '~anager Talley expresseC the opinion, that it could have an adverse affect if Anahei~.',~.~; application was a borderline case. F~ ..... '~"' LITTLE I!OU2ii: Councilr. zan Roth referred to a letter dated ~ctober 4, i-97~, sent by Sarah pearson and Eileen £~thony, addressed to Councilwoman Y.a~zood, ~{~erein it was summarized that overtures to use the structure for a ~:.useu~', be discouraged. ~o Council action was taken. ~,~ ........ . - F,i(ECUTI\~,S~SSION:_.., Councilman Aoth moved to recess into Executive Eession. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion, llOTION CARRIED. (6110 P.>~.) .~"~,~. ~"~'~°C:,-....,o '.'.ayor Thom called the ~eeting to order, all Council I?embers present ',?ith the exception of Councilman .qeyr.~our (7:00 p.m.). Ile explained that due ~o a conflictinS Task Force ~meting, Councilwoman Iiay,:ood and Councilman Sefr~.~our ~:ould alternately be te:~:porarily absent for portions of the evening Council :.metinu, thereby enabling ther~ to cover both meetings. .ST.~..ET: :[ayor Thom stated that in a memo dated September 24~ 1976, the City Engineer race,ended the subject request for four-way stop signs at the co~er of Falmouth Avenue and Ventura Street be denied and asked if there was a spokesm~ h~ thc Chambe~ to speak on ~)enalf of the - re~i,,ents lived in the subject area. ':rs. Ponna ghackleford,2284 ]~est Falmouth, pointed out the intersection and surroundJ~-.g area fror~ a map, emphasizing that t~e problem basically ste~ed from e;~ccssivc speed of ~otorists driving do~m Falmouth after passing the curve ~ the roaJ~'~s.t 'afore "~.. "'~n't'~"-..~., intersection. ~hc elaborated on several accidents that ha~ occ~rrcd at the intersection causing property ~a~age and stras~eJ, that~ Ba~cra a:',y "o./i!y h~.m': ,.ms ~-'one, s~.e ~nd th~n residents as doc~ented in their petition ~?ant~d something done to preclude such an occurrence.".,~air- request -~i~ily for thc protection of th.air children. '/ayor Thom cot.stunted op. l~rs. ghackleford's rer.',ar?: vJ~.erein she acknowledged that step sights do not assure complete safety as was emphasized in a similar petition for stop smjns <~zscuss,..~.~ earlier in the afternoon ,~eeting. L, ans.:~ez' to liayor Thor;-,'s qucstion~ City Engineer ':addo:: :'mintained that a stap ~? '. x:c.'.:ll ' ?. it-effective at the subject location especially since it would be difficult to see after coming around the curve in the road· ilo indicated that tP,.~ auswer instead would be stricter enforcement. 'Ir James Lynn, 2283 ~'es · ~. t Falmouth, stated that even though he no longer had snell children, he sympathized ;.rith those in the neighborhood since a definite problmn exists, and spoke in favor of the installation of stop signs. Councilwoman ilaywood, referring to the City Engineer's report, explained that she ha~'~ to agree ~.rith the professionals in that more accidents could occur wit,h the Jmsta!lation of stop signs at the location in.question. After further Council discussion, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Coun¢i!man Kerr, installation of four-~ay stop sigms at the intersection of Falmouth Avenue and Ventura Street was approved. To this motion Councilwoman Xayxmod voted "Uo". Councilman Seymour was temporarily absent. }f0TION CARP. IED. 76-73~ Councilman Poth requested a report from ~taff in si=: ~'~onths re3arding tl~e cffectivencss of the added stop signs, as well a~ ipput from the spokesman of the residents. Councilwoman Kaywoo~. left the Council Clamber at 7:3~ P ~' ?~ayor Thot~ r'efar'red '~o' report dated Septemher ~, . , . t°v~ fro~. the City Enginee~ and report dated October 5, 1976, from the Zoning. Division relative to the subject request. "rs. I:aryn Cchon]mrz, 157 :Torth ,~!ohler Drive, s?okeswoman for the ~omeownerm, presented and read a petition signed by 175 residents requesting that Wia Copolla ,~e complete~l and designated as an access street to Santa Ama fian~on ~oad so ae te al!evia~e the pro~lems caused by all traffic trying to set out ~.'ohler .nrive. '.'.rs. echonherz explained t]mt before purchasing their homes, all. of the ho:~.eowners were under the assumption that an access street to Santa Ana Cany~ ,oad would be provided as the plot map in the sales office inferred that such stre. et was going to go through. IIowever, ~t ~.as later determined that the ~eve_!oper did not own the property on ~.~nich the access road was supposedly to ~:uilt and the land woulc~ remain undeveloped until someone else came in. "rs. ~chonherz further elaborated on additional problems relating to traffic '~o~:ler Drive and surrounding streets because of the ]_i~ited ingress and egress in t!~c area, ms ,Tall as a potential lazard thm~t coul~ .]evelop as a result of firs or ot]~er disaster, stressing that tkere ~zould be no way for resi~ents to leave the area. In answer to q',~estions by Councilman ,qoth, City Engineer ~'addox explained that Cauta ,~'aa Canyon ?,oad now belonged to t]~e City and that the access road requemtmd by the ~petitioners was a planned connection altl,oug]~ he was of the opinio~ th~ it ~.zould be difficult to build sucl~ a road on sor'eone else~s property and,without knowing tko plans for development; the other alternative ]~eing condemnation. ;~yor Thom confirmed tt~at ~.fnat the homeo%.mers were requesting was an accelera:~r~ of the planned connection as articulated by ,frs. Schonherz and as outlined in the Zoning Division's memo of October 5, 1976, Councilman Seyraour returned to the Council Chamber at 7:37 :ir. Cteve :"~anthorne, 1C7 :~orth Mohler Drive, was opposed to the City's spendia~ any tax dollars to acquire the property to build the road since an agent of Classic Development misle~ potential homeowners in telling them the road be there, tls explained further that Classic had every intention of build~ road since they had already studded it in, graded it from the canyon floor installed curbing halfway up the road. However, when Classic realized thm~ not own the property they dise~ntinued completion. Several people in the Council Chamber confirmed that, in fact, the road was already partially built by the developer, '[ayor Thom stated that there was no l~[al way of having Classic complete the ~Tn motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Kott, staff was instructed to ascertain the costs to complete ingress and egress as reguested~ inclu4~ negotiating acquisition of the su},~ect property, or advise condemnation co,tm and submit a report to Council on November 9, 1976, at a 7;00 p,m, meeting. Councilwoman Kaywood was temporarily abseut, MOTION CARRIED. ADJOUPC.~,.~-,.~.,{. Councilman Roth moved to ad.~lourn to Friday, t~ctober 8, 1~76 mt ~,~) ?.:~'. Councilman Thom seconded the motion,, Councilwoman Kaywood was ~s~~ absent. MOTION CARRIED._ Adjourned: ,q:00 P.!f. LINDA D. ROBERTS, CITY CLERK