Loading...
1975/02/1075-108 Multipurpose Room, Central Library, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES February .10~ 1975~ 3:.00 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in adjourned regular session. PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Thom ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pebley, Sneegas PRESENT: LIBRARY BOARD: Stanton, Dahl, Hoover, Schultz ABSENT: LIBRARY BOARD: Hughes PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts CITY CLERK: Alona M. Hougard LIBRARY DIRECTOR: William Jo Griffith PARKS RECREATION AND THE ARTS DIRECTOR: John Collier PARK SUPERINTENDENT: Dick Kamphefner Mayor Thom called the adjourned regular Council meeting to order° Mrs. Schultz called the Library Board meeting to order. I. PRESENTATION OF PLANS - EUCLID BRANCH LIBRARY: At the invitation of Mrm Schultz Donald Fears, Architect, presented and explained plot plans, rendering of street view of the proposed structure and color scheme for the Euclid branch library° He advised that the plans call for access to the parking lot from Euclid Street, and the lot to be located to the rear of the building. The structure itself is planned to be constructed of economical materials--tilt-up concrete, with wood structure and pain,ed exterior. The floor plans were drawn following detailed analysis of the functional space needs of the building. He pointed out the work/utility and rest room section and noted that the majority of space (7,000 square feet) will be open area and completely flexible° The entire building will consist of 10,600 square feet. At the conclusion of his presentation Mr. Fears submitted a proposed time schedule for construction of this branch library° During discussion of these plans Councilman Seymour inquired whether they reflect the City's experience at the Central Library, Where budget funds were requested for certain modifications, and Mr. Griffith explained that the need for those modifications arose because the Central Library was built on a tight budget and as much of that money as possible was spent on enclosing space. This problem is not anticipated at the Euclid library site. In reply to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Fears explained that the proposed library structure will have an exit to the parking area from the multipurpose room so that there will be access to s~ne without going through the library, thereby allowing the use of this room at times when the library itself is not open. II. CONSIDERATION OF APPLICATION OF THE EUCLID PLANS AT TfI~ JUARDZ LIBRARY SIT~: In reply to Mayor Thom, Mr. Fears advised that he had done some preliminary exploration of the use of the plans drawn for the Euclid Branch Library at the Juarez site, and indicated these would be very adaptable to that site, especial- ly if the parking area could be located to the south of the building. In reply to the Parks, Recreation and the Arts Director, John Collier, Mr. Fears stated that parking could be located to the north, however, in order to maintain the same relationship between the parking lot and building, and to orient the main entrance toward the street, this would require that the building be turned 180 degrees and face Sunkist Street. The present plans could be adapted to accom- plish this by performing a complete reversal, or "mirror-image" building. Discussion ensued regarding the relative advantages and disadvantages in- volved in simultaneous construction at two sites with the plans reversed for the Juarez Park site, during which Mr. Fears pointed out that construction cost savings would be appreciable. Me estimated these at five to seven percent. He reported that architectural and engineering fees, if the building were to be repeated without reversal, but with minor modifications, would be approxi- mately sixty-five percent of the cost of the original plans, and for the "mirror- image" building, the fees would run to approximately seventy-five percent of the original. 75-109 Multipurpose Room, Central Library. Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 10~ 1975a 3:00 PoM. During the discussion Mr. Dick Kamphefner presented the plot plan for Juarez Park. He reported that they are twenty percent along in their working drawings. He pointed out that one parking area is planned to service both park and library functions, and is shown on the plot plan at the northeast corner of the property. He explained the rationale behind the planning, noting the areas surrounding the library in which they plan to include quiet activities, and the ball diamond to be adjacent to the school property. The question as to whether or not simultaneous construction at two sites would create any problems for either the architect or the construction contrac- tor was addressed, and Mr. Fears indicated that he foresaw no difficulty and could adhere to the original time schedule submitted and produce necessary plans and drawings for both buildings. In answer to concerns expressed that perhaps the contractor would run into technical problems building identical but reverse buildings simultaneously, Mayor Thom voiced the opinion that a sufficiently experienced contractor should be able to control the situation. The development schedule for Juarez Park was discussed and compared with the time schedule proposed for construction of the libraries. It was ascertain- ed that the Parks, Recreation and the Arts Department plan to commence develop- ment at the Juarez site in September of 1975 and that there would be no problem in concurrent development of both park and library elements. Mr. Collier also felt that the park could be completed by March 1976 to coincide with the com- pletion of the library construction. Councilman Seymour inquired whether the Library Board had any reservations, assuming the parking provided is sufficient, to using the Euclid branch library plans, prepared by Donald Fears, for the Juarez library site with reversal of the building orientation by 180 degrees, to produce a "mirror-image'" structure. It was the general consensus of the Library Board that this would be accept- able, and Mr. Dahl voiced the opinion that the discussion had outlined what the Library Board had intended would be the result of this meeting. Councilman Seymour asked all LiBrary Board,' Council and Staff Members to consider all contingencies in advance and point out any obstacle they might foresee in keeping the time schedule. Mr. Murdoch observed that operating costs for these libraries during the following fiscal year (1976-77) have not been included in budgetary requirements and would have to be considered. Mr. Kamphefner suggested that contracts include written notice that more than one contractor would be working on the site. It was further determined that the parking lot at the Juarez site be included as a portion of the park development and assigned to the contractor employed for the park project. The matter of the City's lessee at the Juarez site was introduced and Mr. Watts advised that these agricultural leases are terminable during the off-season, which in this case, would be June. Mr. Dahl inquired whether the reversed building plan design would present any difficulties in utilization at the Juarez site, to which Mr. Fears replied that, if anything, that site has a slight advantage because of its rectangular configuration° Mayor Thom advised the Library Board that the City Council had allocated one million dollars for the two library construction projects, assuming that approximately one-half million dollars would construct a branch library. Mr. Fears estimated that the total development cost at the Euclid site, including architectural and engineering fees, and provisions for landscaping and furnishing the building at $450,000. He indicated that the Juarez branch, if the parking lot is not included, would be somewhat less. Mr. Fears cautioned that the Euclid project estimate does not include two special problems which are related to the land, these being the necessity for a flood control channel, and relocation of an underground telephone line system. In response to concerns expressed that the proposed time schedule would not allow the prospective contractors sufficient time to calculate and work out their bids, the submitted time schedule was, by general consent of the 75-110 Multipurpose Room, Central Library. Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 10~ 1975~ 3:00 P.M. Architect, City Council, Library Board and Parks, Recreation and the Arts Depart- ment Representatives amended as follows: 1. Drawings and specifications ready for Building Committee review March 26, 1975 2. Drawings and specifications approved for bidding April 29, 1975 3. Construction bidding complete May 28, 1975 4. Construction agreements signed and construction started June 11, 1975 5. Estimated Construction completion March 1976 Councilman Seymour pointed out that timing is critical and should anyone encounter delays or problems, it is imperative that Council be informed of same immediately so that corrective action can be taken. In reply to Mrs. Stanton's question on the drainage problem, Mr. Fears ad- vised that the City Engineering Department has the responsibility of designing the drainage facility, which will consist of 1,250 feet of open flood control channel with a complex concrete culvert box and transition. The cost to relocate the telephone line has b~&n estimated at $6,000, and the telephone company indicates they require six weeks construction time. Mr. Murdoch advised that it would probably behoove the City to bid the drainage channel along with the construction project, although the cost for this portion could be identified as a separate item. At the conclusion of discussion it was agreed that: 1. The construction of the two branch libraries would proceed simultaneous- ly, according to the above-noted time schedule, with the Juarez branch developed according to the same plans as Euclid, but reversed 180 degrees to produce a "mirror image" building. 2. The Library Board will be given the opportunity to review the final development plans for Juarez Park prior to call for construction bids for same. 3. The Park and Recreation Commission will have the opportunity to re- view final construction plans for the 3uarez branch library prior to call for construction bids on same. Mr. Murdoch suggested that it would perhaps be appropriate to schedule a joint meeting between the Library Board and Park and Recreation Commission rela- tive to this project, with which the Library Board concurred. City Attorney Alan Watts advised that no Council action would be necessary at this time, and that he would prepare an amendment to the City's contract with Donald Fears to perform the additional architectural work necessary for the Juarez building and present same for adoption° III. '~FTER SCHOOL HOURS" LIBRARY PROJECT: Copies of Report and letters of June 21, 1972 and November 25, 1974 describing the.'~fter School Hours" Library Project as proposed by the Anaheim Union High School District were presented to the Council Members present. Following brief discussion it was noted that the Council's intent to simul- taneously construct two branch libraries would undoubtedly impact the recommenda- tion forwarded by the Anaheim Union High School District, since that was based on the fact that there were no branch library locations in certain areas. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council authorized that the Anaheim Union High School District be advised that their response to the general problem which the "After School Hours" Library Project proposal sought to resolve is the simultaneous construction of two branch libraries, with March, 1976 asthe target date for completion. MOT-ION CARRIED 75-111 Multipurpose Room; Central Library; Anaheim, Califurnia - COUNCIL MINUTES = February 10~ 1975~ 3:00 PoM. IV. HILL AND CANYON LIBRARY PROJECT: Mr. Murdoch brought Council and Library Board Members up to date on the Hill and Canyon Library Project, indicating that staff level discussions with the Orange Unified School District have achieved some progress in pursuit of the idea of placing an elementary school, park and library facility on property located at the intersection of Imperial Highway and Nohl Ranch Road. He noted that the Architect for the School Dis- trict has prepared preliminary plans which would indicate .location of the school buildings on the property in such a way that excavation and/or dirt movement is held to a minimum. The Parks, Recreation and the Arts Department has also done extensive work on schematics and the concept which has been accep- ted by staff members in a preliminary way places the library in the corner location of the two intersecting roads. (The schematic under discussion was exhibited.) Mr. Murdoch also advised that at staff level it was tentatively agreed that the City of Anaheim should pay its proportionate share in the cost of overall site design and excavation. The financing of this project has not been discussed in detail and will depend on the outcome of the Orange Unified School District's tax override proposition scheduled on the March 4, 1975 ballot° He noted that originally there was interest in a joint powers agreement for construction of the school and library, which was considered particularly appropriate if both uses were included in a single structure. However, that concept is no longer under consideration. He advised that the City was reluctant to enter a joint powers agreement at that time since it might have resulted in construction of this library earlier than the previously scheduled branches. Prior to adjournment, Mrs. Schultz thanked the Council for their action this date implementing simultaneous construction of the two branch libraries. She advised that the Library Board is grateful for their interest in improving library services to the community. Mayor Thom advised that the Council appreciates the opportunity to have met with the Library Board and commented that he felt it had been a productive meeting. ADJOURNMENT-LIBRARY BOARD: Mrs. Schultz deciared the Library Board meeting adjourned. (4:20 p.m.) ADJOUR194ENT-CITY COUNCIL: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council adjourned to 7:30 p.m., February 10, 1975 at the Cultural Arts Center, 931 North Harbor Boulevard, Anaheim. MOTION CARRIED o (4: 20 p om. ) Signed City Clerk 75-112 Cultural Arts Center, 931 North Harbor Boulevard Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 10, 1975, 7:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in adjourned regular session. ~ PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour (arrived at 7:35 P.M.) and Thom ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Pebley and Sneegas PRESENT: CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION: Brown, Salaets, Dahl, Jones, Overholt, Wheeler and Travers PRESENT: CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts CITY CLERK: Alone M. Hougard PARKS, RECREATION AND THE ARTS DIRECTOR: John J. Collier RECREATION SUPERINTENDENT: Lloyd J. Trapp RECREATION SUPERVISOR: Patsy Ray . CHAIRMAN OF THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION: Dr. Butterworth MOTHER COLONY ADVISORY BOARD: Sarah Pearson RED CROSS: Mrs. Eileen Anthony ANAHEIM FOUNDATION FOR CULTURE AND THE ARTS VICE PRESIDENT: Mrs. Pat Jones ANAHEIM FOUNDATION FOR CULTURE AND THE ARTS TREASURER: Mr. Robert J. Anthony Prior to the meeting the City Council and the Cultural Arts Commission Members were presented with a packet of informational material containing an agenda for this evening's meeting, copies of the ordinance and Municipal Code relating to the establishment and organization of the Cultural Arts Commission; bylaws, organizational chart and minutes of the joint meeting held between the Cultural Arts Commission and the Park and Recreation Commission, January 31, 1974. Mayor Thom called the meeting to order at 7:30 P.M. and suggested that this be basically an informal work session as it is called for the purpose of information and to fulfill the stated intention of the City Council to meet with all boards and commissions to identify purposes, goals and objectives. I. PURPOSES~ GOALS AND OBJECTIVES OF THE CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION: Chairman Dahl summarized that the major function of the Cultural Arts Commission is to act as an arm of the City which can explore in detail the potentialities of Cultural Arts' programs and develop cooperation among members of the community, and then reflect the feelings of the community, making recommendations for greater cultural activities in the City. He reviewed the history of the forma- tion of the Commission as well as the establishment of the Cultural Arts Center. Il. DISCUSSION OF THE RELATIONSHIP OF THE CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION WITH ITS SUBCOMMITTEES, THE CULTURAL ARTS FOUNDATION~ MOTHER COLONY HOUSE BOARD AND THE PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION: Mayor Thom inquired what committees the Cultural Arts Commission currently has working, and Commissioner Dahl responded that their sub-committees are Anaheim Beautiful, Anaheim Arts Council and the Heritage Committee. It was stressed by Commissioner Dahl and other Commission members that the Anaheim Foundation for Culture and the Arts is not directly tied to the Commission although one member of the Commission~ currently Mrs. Salaets, also serves as representative on the Foundation Board, as specified in the Foundation bylaws. The Commission members further explained that the Anaheim Foundation for Culture and the Arts is an incorporated non-profit entity which has the responsi- bility of operating the Cultural Arts Center with some assistance from the City on the landscaping and building maintenance, and accepts grants of money whereas the City cannot. Commissioner Overholt advised that the Anaheim City School District looks to the City of Anaheim to carry out'the terms of the lease under which they retain this structure which houses the Cultural Arts Center. He explained that as a member of the School District, he is under the impression that the Cultural Arts Commission is the City's vehicle which oversees that the facility is used in accordance with the terms of the lease. In response to further comments .later in the meeting on the trusteeship' role vested with the Cultural Arts Commission relating to the Cultural Arts Center and how this affects its relationship with the Foundation, the reasons for establish ment of the Anaheim Foundation for Culture and the Arts were outlined as follows: 75-113 Cultural Arts Center, 931 North Harbor Boulevard Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 10~ 1975~ 7:30 P.M. 1. To be able to receive funds privately. 2. To encourage and solicit contributions from individuals, groups and trusts for the benefit of cultural arts. Commissioner Jones related that part of the rationale for establishment of the Foundation was the attitude of the City Council at that time, which indi- cated that they would not favor the Cultural Arts Center as a City-operated function. That Council stressed this should be citizen supported and operated and for that reason the Foundation ultimately became a reality. She pointed out that the members of the Cultural Arts Commission were in agreement that the Cultural Arts Center project be citizen supported. Mr. Murdoch pointed out that part of the impetus behind that Council decision was the interest of the citizens themselves who wished a facility strictly non-City operated, and this also served to elicit a favorable response from the local newspaper which most likely would not have been the case were it to be a City project. The discussion next led to the relationship and connection between the Cultural Arts Commission and the Park and Recreation Commission, and it was pointed out that the budget for Parks, Recreation and the Arts program, which is comprised of funds coming from the school districfs and City, is reviewed by the Park and Recreation Commission since that Commission has representatives appointed from each involved school district. That portion of this budget which relates to the Cultural Arts program is within the jurisdiction of the Cultural Arts Commission, who act in an advisory capacity regarding these programs to the Park and Recreation Commission. Commissioner Dahl pointed out that there are occasions such as in connec- tion with the Oral History Program, when the Cultural Arts Commission works in conjunction with the Library Board. In connection with the Cultural Arts Commission advisory capacity on cultural activities to the Park and Recreation Commission, Commissioner Salaets contended that the Commission has not been consulted on these matters. Commis- sioner Overholt noted that one workshop session has already been held on the Cultural Program administered by the Parks, Recreation and the Arts Department, and Commissioner Dahl advised that this item was not completed at the work session but that the February 13, 1975 Cultural Arts Commission meeting will be adjourned to a work session on that budget. Commissioner Brown stressed that the interrelationship between Cultural Arts and the Park and Recreation Commission has made significant progress, and they do request input from the Cultural Arts Commission for which opportunity he is grateful. He indicated he did not feel that the Cultural Arts Commission was subservient to Park and Recreation, but that there has been a productive interchange between the two Commissions. The basic problem area, according to Commissioner Brown, lies in the fact that Cultural Arts Commission does not have direct supervision over a total City financed cultural program activity. Mayor Thom indicated that he would like to hear concurrence in the matter by all Commission members, since this contention was one of the reasons the meeting was called. Dr. Butterworth, as Chairman of the Park and Recreation Commission, indi- cated he concurred on receiving input from the Cultural Arts Commission. III. REPORT - WORKING COMMITTEES OF CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION AND PROJECTS IN PROGRESS: Commissioner Dahl briefly reported that the Oral History Program is progressing, a meeting is scheduled with Dr. Shumway on February 13, 1975 to consider recommendations which may result in application for grants to finance further works in this connection. The Heritage Committee is currently taking inventories of buildings which may be of historical significance if meeting certain criteria. 75-114 Cultural Arts Center, 93l North Harbor Boulevard Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 10~_j.~.75, 7'30 Commissioner Violet Wheeler, who is also the President of the Anaheim Arts Council reported on their current activities, these being the Cultural Arts calendar, the Directory of Anaheim Arts Organizations. She described the com- munity box office at the Anaheim Plaza at which tickets and information are available regarding cultural events. The second annual soiree and auction will be conducted in April. She further noted that the Anaheim Arts Council, in connection with their goal to encourage the expansion of arts education programs in the schools, have a study committee working on needs projections for cultural arts facilities in the future. The Redevelopment C~mmission has requested sug- gestions and recommendations in this vein and these will be forwarded, once approved by the Cultural Arts Commission. IV. DISCUSSION OF THE HERITAGE COMMITTEE~ ITS RESPECTIVE ROLE IN HISTORICAL BUILD- ING PRESERVATION IN REDEVELOPMENT AREA AND BICENTENNIAL: In reply to Mayor Thom, Commissioner Dahl listed the following as members of the Heritage Committee: Chairman Andrew Deneau, Eleni Boukidis, Sarah Pearson, D. Cameron SpJ~cer, Vera Wilson, Eileen Anthony, Bill ~i~ones, Ruth Salaets and Homer Wallace. Mrs. Sarah Pearson and Mrs. Eileen Anthony stated that they have never performed any function as members of the Heritage Committee of the Cultural Arts Commission. Mrs. Anthony filed a letter and stated that she was a member of the Heritage Committee of the Bicente'nnia] Commission, however, for the Chamber of Commerce. Councilwoman Kaywood inquired whether the Heritage Committee reports regularly to the Commission or prior to issuing statements to nhe press. Commissioner Brown suggested that it is significant to point out that when an entity handles or controls money it exercises more control over its sub- committees, however when the contribution is~limited to tJ~me, talent and head- aches, whatever control is exerted is not as effective. He advised that this has been the situation of the Cultural Arts Commission. Councilwoman Kaywood stated that while she found Mr. Deneau, Chairman of the Heritage Committee, to be a very nice and bright young man, and of the caliber of volunteer which the City needs, she questioned his sincerity in some matters because of the long letter which was written prior to a hearing and was then subsequently published in the newspaper. This letter carried not only inaccurate information as to Council's intent but engaged in name calling as well. In response to Councilwoman Kaywood's comments, Commissioner Dahl related the manner in which the Cultural Arts Commission became aware of Project Alpha and emphasized that they do regard the Redevelopment Commission to have the responsibility for expertise in developing the City together with their consul- tant, the only thing the Cultural Arts Commission would like to see happen is that within the Redevelopment Plan there be some consideration given for cul- tural development of the City, as well as its business development. Councilwoman Kaywood inquired whether the activities initiated by Mr. Deneau, as Chairman of the Heritage Committee, were reviewed by the Commis- sion and whether a majority of the members concur with the way in which he is proceeding. Commissioner Dahl indicated that the Commission has not checked his mode of operation, but that he did make presentations concerning development of the cultural area and City Hall, and they approved in concept the idea on cultural development in the City, but this did not include modification of any City plans. Commissioner Jones advised that this particular sub-committee chairman has not gone through the appropriate channels and has not made the Cultural Arts Commission aware of his activities. Other than approving the concept presented, nothing else has been discussed with the Commission, and his activities were conducted on his own. Councilwoman Kaywood stated that as a private individual, of course, it is Mr. Deneau's privilege to take such unilateral actions, but that his title as Chairman of the Heritage Committee of the Cultural Arts Commission certainly gives him some standing and status which he would not otherwise enjoy, and per- haps he has gone too far in the use of that title. 75-115 Cultural Arts Center, 931 North Harbor Boulevard Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - Febr-mry 10, i975~ 7:30 P.M. Commissioner Brown reiterated that Mr. Deneau's comments do not speak for the Cultural Arts Commission in any way except as they relate to his original presentation and that there has been no further contact from him since that time. At the conclusion of discussion, Councilman Seymour summarized that Mr. Deneau's cause, i.e., the preservation of historical structures in the City of Anaheim is a goal everyone is in favor of, and the problem lies in the area of the Commission making certain that it has the opportunity to review these activities and channel these energies appropriately, perhaps by broadening the base of this Committee to include the input of such esteemed citizens as Mrs. Anthony and Mrs. Pearson, or in whatever manner the Cultural Arts Commis- sion deems suitable. Councilwoman Kaywood suggested that the remaining individuals named on the list of members of the Cultural Arts Heritage Committee also be contacted to determine whether or not they are aware they are members and wish to remain on that Committee. V. REPORT FROM ANAHEIM FOUNDATION FOR CULTURE AND THE ARTS Ml~,MBERS: At the request of the Mayor, Mrs. Pat Jones, Vice President of the Anaheim Foundation for Culture and the Arts, reported on their activities, calling attention to the Westways Exhibit currently being shown in the Cultural Arts Center, a recent antique show which brought about 750 people to the Center. She advised that they now have a group working on membership and fund raising. She recog- nized the Women's Division of the Chamber of Commerce for their participation in the kitchen remodeling. She reported that there are 18 classes conducted at the Center which are attended by over 600 people per week. Mr. Robert J. Anthony, Treasurer of the Board of Directors, Anaheim Foundation for Culture and the Arts was introduced. VI. MOTHER COLONY ADVISORY BOARD: At the request of the Mayor, MrS. Sarah Pearson of the Mother Colony Advisory Board addressed the group and related the history of the formation of that body as well as the manner in which the Mother Colony House finally was given to the City of Anaheim. She stated that the Mother Colony Advisory Board was established and vested with the responsibility of trusteeship of the Mother Colony House. She described the establishment of the "Mother Colony Household" which now has over 350 members. Mrs. Pearson related that although the Mother Colony Advisory Board is responsible for the house, they do not have direct access to funds which has been established for its maintenance and preservation; that these monies must be released by approval of the City Council, according to the terms in which the City accepted that house. She stated that this method has not proven efficient since there are so many people to go through and she urged that this process be streamlined to some degree. Mrs. Pearson outlined some of the projects which the Mother Colony Board would like to undertake at the house, specifically restoration of a horsehair sofa from one of the original Anaheim wineries and the installation of a rose garden, if Council would see fit to release the necessary funds. Mrs. Pearson stressed that the Mother Colony House is actually a property of the City and consequently her group, which is simply an advisory board has no authority to spend monies to repair or to complete these projects. Commissioner Dahl interjected that there has also been some interest and discussion in the Bicentennial Committee meetings of taking on a project at the Mother Colony House, although no definite plans have yet been formulated. Mrs. Pearson informed the group present of the Mother Colony Advisory Board project to identify the graves of the first persons buried in Anaheim, which is planned as a bicentennial project. At the conclusion of discussion, the Mayor advised Mrs. Pearson that the administrative problems she has encountered were certainly not intentional and asked if she would please have a list drawn up of the projects which the Mother Colony Board would like to accomplish, for the City Council to act upon. Councilwoman Kaywood suggested that the document accepting the Mother Colony House be reviewed to see if these administrative problems might be rectified. 75-116 Cultural Arts Center, 931 North Harbor Boulevard Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February i0~ 1975~ 7:30 P.M. VII. REPORTS: Commissioner Jones reported on the Orange County Arts Alliance, which has been established to act as a liaison agency for cultural resources and organizations in the County. She described some of their goals as being to provide an opportunity for communication between different cultural organiza- tions in the County; to conduct conferences on cultural items of interest; to compile a registry of all cultural arts organizations in the County. Commissioner Brown reported on his association with Anaheim Beautiful. Chairman Dahl advised that the Cultural Arts Commission would very much like to have Council representation at re§ular Cultural Arts meetings and invited the Council to appoint a member to attend. Councilman Seymour and Mayor Thom both commented that the session had been extremely informational and meaningful to them. The Mayor was of the opinion that the Council and Cultural Arts Commission should meet at least semi-annually and advised that in the interim the Council would like to have some form of communication from the Commission as to on- going programs, sub-committees which report directly to the Commission and their activities. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Thom moved to adjourn. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 9:25 P.M. Signed City