Loading...
1975/07/0875-616 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1975, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley(arrived 1:40 P.M.) and Thom ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Sneegas PRESENT: ADMINISTRATIVE ASSISTANT: John Harding CITY CLERK: Alona M. Hougard CITY ATTORNEY: Alan R. Watts PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Garry O. McRae UTILITIES DIRECTOR: Gordon Hoyt PARKS, RECREATION AND THE ARTS DIRECTOR: John Collier ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDENT: George Edwards MANPOWER COORDINATOR: William Repburn CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox ZONING SUPERVISOR: Annika Santalahti ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Bill Young Mayor Thom called the meeting to order and welcomed those in attendance to the Council Meeting. INVOCATION: Reverend Cannon John K. Saville of Saint Michael Episcopal Church gave the invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilwoman Miriam Kaywood led the assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. PROCLAMATION: The following proclamation was issued by Mayor Thom and unanimously approved by the City Council: "Captive Nations Week" - July 13 to 19, 1975. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council regular meeting held June 3, 1975, were approved as corrected (typographic corrections) on motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Council Members unless, after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Council Member for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. REPORT - FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $9,133,514.64, in accordance with the 1974-75 Budget, were approved. ENGAGEMENT PLANS - SALARY SURVEY - ARTHUR YOUNG & COMPANY: Mr. Jim LeSieur of Arthur Young & Company submitted engagement plans prepared for the salary survey to be conducted in conjunction with the City Personnel Department, in accordance with direction given by Council at their meeting held July 1, 1975, together with transmittal letter dated July 8, 1975. Mr. LeSieur reported, as was previously discussed with the Audit Steering Committee, that the fees for professional services in connection with the task shown on the submitted engagement plans are estimated not to exceed $20,000 plus out-of-pocket expenses not to exceed $3,000. Mr. LeSieur requested, if Council approves the proposed engagement plans for the salary survey, that Arthur Young & Company be authorized to meet with the City Attorney to draft a contract. On motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council approved the engagement plans submitted by the Arthur Young & Company for salary survey to be conducted in conjunction with the City Personnel Department, and authorized the Arthur Young & Company to meet with the City Attorney for purposes of drafting a contract agreement in accordance with the terms outlined above. Council Members Sneegas and Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED. 75-615 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 1, 1975, 1:30 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 3441' Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3441 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (73-74-48 - CO) ORDINANCE NO. 3442: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3442 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONINC. (70-71-25(1) - RS-5,000 Tract No. 7422) ORDINANCE NO. 3443: Councilman Seymour offered Ordinance No. 3443 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-63(4) - CO) EXECUTIVE SESSION: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City Council recessed to Executive Session (4:15 P.M.). MOTION CARRIED. AFTER RECESS: Mayor Thom called the meeting to order at 4:20 P.M., all members of of the City Council being present with the exceptiOn of Councilman Pebley. PARKS & RECREATION COMMISSION APPOINTMENT: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Counci-~man S--~-~o~r~ ~ 'Sklar was reappointed to the Parks & Recreation Commission, representing the Anaheim City School District, for the ensuing term ending June 30, 1979. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. The City Clerk was instructed to notify the Savanna School District that the term of their representative on the Parks & Recreation Commission has expired, and a recommendation is requested by the City Council. CULTURAL ARTS COMMISSION APPOINTMENTS: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, Jack E. Brown and Mrs. Wesley B. (Mary) Jones were reap- pointed to the Anaheim Cultural Arts Commission for the ensuing terms ending June 30, 1979. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. LIBRARY BOARD APPOINTMENT: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom, Reuben P. Hughes was reappointed to the Anaheim Library Board for the ensuing term ending June 30, 1979. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. COMMUNITY REOEVELOPMENT COMMISSION APPOINTMENT: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Seymour, Herbert Leo and Glenn P. Fry were reappointed to the Community Redevelopment Commission for the ensuing terms ending June 30, 1979. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Seymour moved to adjourn. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. Councilman Pebley absent. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 4:22 P.M. Signed 75-617 _City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July §, 1975, 1;30 P.M. DISCUSSION - DRAINAGE POLICY - PERALTA HILLS: Mr. William L. Mauerhan, owner of property in Peralta Hills had requested an opportunity to address the City Council relative to the drainage policy in Peralta Hills and was recognized by the Mayor. Mr. Mauerhan advised that he originally purchased this property with the intent of building his own home and also subdividing the parcel to create four one acre estate lots. However, at the time he filed his parcel map (approximately three months ago) he learned of the possibility of a drainage assessment for the area. In attempting to work this requirement out with the City Engineering Department, Mr. Mauerhan stated that he ascertained that the City has no drainage plan for the area, but has completed a study on underground conduits in three or four different defined areas. These conduits, however, will not facilitate drainage from his property. He explained that his property is approximately 20 feet in elevation from the back of Santa Aha Canyon Road, and water runs from said property to Santa Ana Canyon Road, coursing 100 feet to a catch basin and box culvert constructed by the State Division of Highways when the freeway was built. Mr. Mauerhan stated that the study which has been conducted by the Engineering Department outlines three to four different methods of obtaining reimbursement for construction of the drainage systems; and, depending upon the method used, the assessments would range from $900 to $3,000 per acre. He contended that since his property has never, nor will it ever, drain into these future drainage facilities, it is not equitable that it be included in the drainage assessment area for reimbursement. He indicated his property on a topographical map, demonstrating the drainage courses. Mr. Maddox responded that the City does have a master plan of drainage which has been adopted by the City Council. This plan also shows the cost of drainage facilities but does not break it down on anacreage~basis. Mr. Maddox pointed out, as indicated on the map of the Peralta Hills area posted in Council Chambers, that the City has required, as a condition of approval of parcel maps and grading permits, the payment of drainage fees. He advised that Mr. Mauerhan's statement is correct in that his property would not be served by future drainage facilities constructed, but his property does contribute to that overall drainage system which would have to be constructed and is a part of the drainage plan. It is felt, in all fairness to the affected property owners, that an acreage fee should be required. Mr. Maddox advised that the Engineering Division is presently updating acreage fees to bring them into line with current costs and will be presenting these to Council for approval in approximately 4 weeks. This report will propose an acreage fee charge which is reasonable fOr all of the Peralta Hills area, based on the density of one dwelling unit per acre. He estimated that this fee will probably be 10% higher than the fee previously calculated at $1,136 per acre. Councilman Seymour noted that even if the fee were 20% higher, this is a much more specific and reasonable figure than the range of $900 to $3,000 quoted by Mr. Mauerhan. Mr. Mauerhan related that a letter drafted by the Engineering Division, which he was asked to sign prior to their signing his parcel map, indicated he would agree to pay a drainage fee in the amount adopted by the City Council. The letter did not specify any time limit or dollar amount, and therefore, he was not willing to sign it. Discussion ensued during which the City Engineer advised that other property owners in this area have already signed similar letters indicating agreement to be assessed for drainage fees. Councilman Seymour voiced the opinion that it would not be equitable to exclude only certain properties from the drainage assessment district as Mr. Mauerhan suggests. He questioned whether Mr. Mauerhan had a positive recommendation for digressing from the assessment plan. 75-618 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1975, 1!30 P.M. Mr. Mauerhan suggested that the City conduct a hydrology study of the area and assess property owners according to the percentage of amounts of drainage contributed to the system and Councilwoman Kaywood informed him that this would be a very costly and time consuming undertaking. Mr. Mauerhan remarked that he did not feel it is just to be faced with a variable cost as high as $12,000 to build a house. Councilman Seymour remarked that the City Engineer has advised the acreage fees will probably amount to approximately $1,100 per acre plus a 10 to 20% increase, which would amount to approximately $5,280 for the four acres. In response to Mr. Mauerhan's refusal to sign an open-ended letter with- out any amount of acreage fees specified, or any time limit on establishment of same, Council discussed the possibility of having Mr. Mauerhan sign a letter which indicated the maximum amount or a fee as established by the City Council in six months' time. However, on recommendation of the City Engineer, Council determined they would not wish to put a maximum fee in writing as this might result in an advantage to this property owner once fees are established. At the conclusion of discussion, Councilman Seymour advised that the best the Council can offer Mr. Mauerhan this date is the assurance that the acreage fees will be established within the next two months and that the Council intends to be as reasonable and fair in affixing said fees, as possible. Councilman Pebley entered the Council Chambers. (1:40 P.M.) POLICY DECISION - ELECTRIC 12KY LINE EXTENSION: (IMPERIAL HIGHWAY, SOUTH OF SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD): Mr. George Edwards reported on the memorandum he had forwarded to the City Council dated June 27, 1975, requesting a policy decision on electrical 12kV line extension on Imperial Highway, south of Santa Aha Canyon Road, .specifically as to whether this extension should be constructed overhead or underground. The report suggested this section of 12kV circuit be approved for overhead construction to connect to the existing facilities south of Avenida Bernardo North. Mr. Edwards reported that this extension is necessary to adequately serve the Anaheim Hills area. In reply to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Edwards reported that the differential cost between overhead and underground would amount to $63,220. He noted that the underground conversion costs fluctuate monthly with the cost of purchasing cable and equipment. He advised that it would cost in excess of $70,000 to install the circuit underground if the work proceeds ~ow. The present rules and regulations require that propert/ owners pay the differential costs of $63,220 to underground the circuit and participation has been discussed with the property owners but there has been no resolution of the situation. With the growth in the area this situation has come to the point that system reliability and service continuity are being jeopardized without extension of this circuit. Mr. John Harding advised that a portion of the property affected by the circuit in question is owned by the Orange Unified School District, and when this matter was discussed they refused to participate in the undergrounding cost. Mr. Bernardo Yorba, owner of properties affected by the circuit extension, stated that since the undergrounding of poles is purely an aesthetic considera- tion which would be enjoyed by the residents of the Santa Aha Canyon area, it would, in his opinion, be equitable that each pay their fair share by formation of an assessment district. In reference to his particular property, he advised that the additional costs to underground this circuit would have to be absorbed at this point and this is not possible. Mr. Yorba referred to the interest displayed by the City Council in preserving the beauty of the Santa Aha Canyon by removing billboards and restricting real estate signs and flags. He commented that the setting of overhead utility poles would constitute a more permanent type of pollution. He stated that in the development of his property at this intersection, they have made every effort to create an aesthetically pleasing project eno ne now feels 75-619 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1975, 1:30 P.M. it is the responsibility of the City Council to find some means of avoiding the placement of overhead utility poles. He recommended that the Council refer the problem to the Canyon Area General Planning Task Force for consideration and advised he would be willing to participate in the efforts of the Task Force on this particular problem. Councilman Seymour stated that he did not think it equitable to place the entire cost of undergrounding onto one property owner. He felt it would be appropriate for the City to develop some long-range plan for undergrounding, not only in the Canyon area, but for existing power lines throughout the City. Councilwoman Kaywood agreed with Mr. Yorba that the question of aesthetics is an important issue. She also pointed out that because of high winds and fire hazard in the Canyon area it would be much safer and more logical to put these circuits underground. Mr. Gordon Hoyt noted that some time ago the Utilities Department pre- pared a recommendation based on the type of idea proposed by Mr. Yorba, i.e., Assessment Districts for undergrounding of utilities, which proposal was subsequently turned down by the City Council. At that time the proposal was approximately $1100 per acre, which would undoubtedly increase. He suggested that this proposal be reviewed and updated and presented informally for Council consideration. Mayor Thom inquired what the time constraints are on the pending policy decision, and Mr. Hoyt replied that the Utilities Department has been waiting on this particular circuit since 1972. On ascertaining that the revision of the report on acreage fees for under- grounding would take approximately 6 to 8 weeks, Councilwoman Kaywood stated that she would prefer to defer any policy decision on the matter until she had an opportunity to review said report. In reply to Mayor Thom's question on the time factor, Mr. Edwards advised that this circuit would be critical to guarantee system reliability and continuity during peak loads this summer. Mr. Harding explained that either way the circuit is extended, underground or overhead, the City's portion of the cost would be approximately $7,000. Councilwoman Kaywood was of the opinion that this circuit should be built underground, and voiced her concern that should the Electrical Division set poles at this time and this sytem eventually be converted, then the $7,000 investment in overhead utilities would be wasted. During Council discussion, the majority opinion reflected was that the method of choice would be to underground the circuit, however, due to the higher costs and the potential problems at peak loads this summer, the over- head extension appears to be the momt logical. Mr. Hoyt pointed out that any consideration of undergrounding electrical utilities at City expense should be tempered by the knowledge that this would set a precedent with which the Council will have to deal the next time a developer is required to pay the differential costs between overhead and under- ground utility line construction. At the conclusion of discussion, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council determined that the electrical 12kV line extension on Imperial Highway, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road be con- structed overhead. Councilman Sneegas absent. Councilwoman Kmywood abstained from voting on the motion. MOTION CARRIED. STATUS OF INTEGRATED SIGNS: ~IMPERIAL HIGHWAY AND SANTA ANA CANYON ROAD): During discussion of Council Policy on electrical distribution lines, Councilman Seymour questioned Mr. Bernardo Yorba as to the status of his proposal to erect an integrated sign at the corner of Imperial Highway and Santa Ana Canyon Road since he had noticed that several billboards were still in place. 75-620 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1975, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Yorba advised that he had forwarded letters to all those firms with signs on his property, requesting the removal of said signs. However, because the time limit on these signs is determined by certain contractual agreements, some of these are still standing. He assured the Council Members that he is also eager to see these signs removed and has taken steps in this direction. RESOLUTION. NO. 75R-340 - NORTH ORANGE COUNTY R.O.P. - PRESCHOOL ASSISTANT TRAINING: On report and recommendation from Mr. William Hepburn, Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-340 for adoption, extending the term of the Preschool Assistant Training Program ~ith the North Orange County Regional Occupational Program to August 31, 1975, at the existing, previously approved dollar amount and without any changes in the program. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE NORTH ORANGE COUNTY REGIONAL OCCUPATIONAL PROGRAM EXTENDING THE TERM THEREOF AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AMENDMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Sneegas The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-340 duly passed and adopted. ANAHEIM PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SYSTEM (A.P.E.S.): In response to the Council's request for clarification of Manpower Services Center activity information presented at the meeting of 3uly 1, 1975, and for a plan to evaluate perfor- mance levels of the center~ Mr. William Hepburn submitted a package of material to Council including: 1. Revised description of prior year's activities and next year's perfor- mance objectives for the Manpower Services Center. 2. Recently developed data collection format, compatible with the perfor- mance objectives established for the coming year and with evaluation method- ology proposed in the operational plan. 3. Manpower Services Division Operational Plan for fiscal year 1975-76, describing the planning management structure for all CETA activities. A proposed evaluation system is summarized and designed to be compatible with the proposed A.P.E.S. 4. Proposed Anaheim Performance Evaluation System (A.P.E.S) designed to provide measurable base-line information for manpower project implementation, operation and evaluation to provide Management and the City Council with the necessary information for making policy decisions concerning manpower and other social services programs. (Copies of said materials on f~ in the office of the City Clerk.) Mr. Hepburn summarized that this information describes the Manpower Services Center plan and goal for last year as well as the performance objectives for the coming year. In terms of a managment information system, Mr. Hepburn advised that they establish a program structure (which was demonstrated with graphic display posted on the wall of Council Chambers) whereby there is division of programs by functional components. He advised that the proposed Anaheim Performance Evaluation System would provide a total profile in terms of performance and costs on the overall activity. Mr. Hepburn reported that at the present time the Orange County Manpower Commission has provided an interim management information and data collection system which does not generate the information needed to make performance evaluation .judgments. Consequently, the Manpower Service Center staff is exploring the possibility of developing an internal system while continuing to work with the County Commission. 75-621 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1975, 1:30 P.M. Further, Mr. Hepburn advised that they have contacted several agencies including the Department of Labor and National Science Foundation to determine whether or not they might be interested in supporting this effort, as this would be a pilot program. However, although interest has been indicated, no financial support was committed to date. He related that they would continue to explore these possibilities as well as work with the County Manpower Commission. Councilman geymour stated that attachments three and four developed by the Manpower Service Center staff provides the type o£ measurement he had in mind. He inquired what the cost of implementing and operating this type of management information system would be. Mr. Hepburn explained that in terms o£ direct City dollars, there would be no cost. However, in terms of CETA dollars coming into the City, the cost for the client-tracking portion would be $33,000 to install, and the estimate from Data Processing on operation was approximately $1000 per month. Additionally, there is still in development a finance system to analyze the costs of various programs which he would estimate would cost $15,000. The Anaheim Performance Evaluation System would possibly cost another $15,000 to ~$20,000. An overall cost estimate for these systems would range between $65,000 and $75,000. Councilman Seymour thanked Mr. Hepburn and the Grant-In-Aid Coordinator for an outstanding job of putting together a system which would give the Council the information which he requested at the Council Meeting of July 1, 1975. Now that these systems have been defined, he advised that he did not know if he was prepared to pay the price. He indicated that he would like the Manpower Service Center to pursue the direction indicated with these systems so that the City could have an accurate accounting of performance from the Manpower Program. He stated that he would also be interested in the response to these proposed systems from the Orange County Manpower Commission. In response to Councilwoman Kaywood's question as to how many people specifically were trained or employed as a result of the Manpower Services efforts for the total amount of money expended, Mr. Hepburn advised that the system proposed this date obviously has not been installed, and the type of informmtion necessary to perform that analysis is not available from the Orange County Manpower Commission regarding dollars administered by them for the City. Councilman Seymour calculated that for last year's CETA program, 96 people employed with a total budget of $1,013,000 amounts to almost $10,000 per individual employed, which figure, however, includes all administrative overhead, equipment and fringe benefit costs. Councilwoman Kaywood left the Council Chambers. (2:40 P.M.) PUBLIC HEARING - AMENDMENT TO TITL~ 18 ANAHEIM MIINICIPAL CODE: To consider amendment to Title 18 (Zoning Code) of the City of Anaheim to require approval of a conditional use permit for the conduct of any business activity wherein any patronage and/or employment is limited to persons 18 years of age or older. The City Planning Conm~ission pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-115 recommend- ed adoption of Exhibit "A" as set forth therein. Mr. Bill Young advised that this proposed amendment to the Zoning Code originated through concerns of the Council regarding the regulation of adult- only oriented businesses such as modeling studios, massage parlors, photo- graphy studios, etc. After considerable discussion between staff,~ the City Attorney =nd the City Planning Commission, it was determined to place this regulation in a more general vein by requiring any business activity whose patronage is limited to persons 18 years of age or older to obtain a condi- tional use permit in all commercial zones. Mr. Young further reported that the second section of "Exhibit A" as set forth in the Planning Commission Resolution is a housekeeping section which is included in order to provide for certain portions relating to co~m~ercial zones which were overlooked during recodification. 75-622 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1975, 1:30 P.M. Councilwoman Kaywood returned to Council Chambers. (2:43 P.M.) Councilman Pebley inquired whether this proposed amendment would require that an individual must be 18 years of age to be employed in some capacity in a Dentist or Physician office. Mr. Young replied that this requirement would apply only if the patronage of the business were limited to persons 18 years of age and older. Mr. Watts advised that a bar, in addition to the question of serving alcoholic beverages, would be required to obtain a conditional use permit because of the age limitation of their patrons. The Mayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either in favor or in opposition to the proposed amendment to the Anaheim Municipal Code; there being no response, he declared the hearing closed. ORDINANCE NO. 3444: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3444 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING CERTAIN SECTIONS AND SUBSECTIONS OF TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE AND ADDING NE%; SECTIONS AND SUBSEC- TIONS TO TITLE 18 PERTAINING TO ZONING. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-341 - LICENSE AGREEMENT, KIRST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY: Mr. Watts reported that in connection with construction being performed by the Orange County Water District on the Burris Sand Pit, their contractor, Kirst Construc- tion Company has asked the City for permission to use a portion of City-owned property located just south of Lincoln Avenue and adjacent to the Santa Ana River Bed (2920 East Lincoln Avenue) for a project office and for storage purposes. Mr. Watts advised that a license agreement has been prepared authorizing the Kirst Construction Company to utilize the site for the sum of $250 per month. The agreement is cancelable on 30 days written notice by either party and pro- vides for a temporary term of lease. In reply to Councilwoman Kaywood's concern regarding noise which might be generated through this use, Mr. Watts referred to the city ordinance governing construction noise and advised that it would have to remain within the confines of same. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-341: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-341 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND THE CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE A LICENSE AGREEMENT WITH KIRST CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. Roll Call Vote: AYES.: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Sneegas The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-341 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-342 - TRANSFER OF UNCLAIMED PROPERTY: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 75R-342 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING CERTAIN UNCLAIMED PROPERTY IS NEEDED FOR PUBLIC USE AND TRANSFERRING THE SAME TO THE CITY PURCHASING DEPARTMENT. 75-623 Citv..Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1975, 1:30 P.M. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Sneegas The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-342 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-343 - JOINT COMMUNITY RECREATION PROGRAM - ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT: Councilman Seymour offered Resolution No. 75R-343 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AND THE ORANGE UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT TO ORGANIZE, PROMOTE AND CONDUCT A JOINT PROGRAM OF COlvfMUNI TY RECREATION. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Sneegas The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-343 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-344 - AMENDMENT TO ELECTRIC RATES - SCHEDULE GS-2: Mr. Gordon Hoyt reported on the recommended amendment to Schedule GS-2 to change the wording within said schedule to indicate that the voltage dis- count is not applicable to fuel cost adjustment charges. He advised that through May 14, 1975, the City Utilities Department applied the voltage discount to demand and energy charges including the applicable fuel cost adjustment charges. This proposed amendment will change the wording to indicate the charges before power factor and fuel cost adjustments will be reduced by the percentage for service delivered. The amendment is necessary in order to make the voltage discount policy clear and has been requested by customers doing business with the federal government. Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 75R-344 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RATES, RULES, AND REGULATIONS FOR THE SALE AND DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC ENERGY AS ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO.71R-478 AND AMENDED BY RESOLUION NOS. 73R-25, 73R-373, 73R-531, 74R-75, 74R-630 AND 75R-243. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Sneegas The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-344 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-345 - REDUCTION OF RATE BLOCKS GS-1B, GS-2 AND PA: Mr. Hoyt reported on the recommended reduction in three energy blocks, two industrial rates and the agricultural pumping rate. This is possible because the wholesale fuel cost adjustment has decreased to the point where these rates can now be similarly established at a level of 95% of Edison rates. This rate correction will bring all Anaheim retail rates equal to 95% of Edison retail rates. Mr. Hoyt reported that the proposed reduction will reduce revenue, by $36,000 per month, which is offset by the decrease in wholesale cost of energy of $70,000 per month. He advised that he believes this situation will continue because of the higher allotment of natural gas given Edison and because it has been a good hydro power year. 75-624 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1975, 1:30 P.M. Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution No. 75R-345 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL~ THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING RATES, RULES AND REGULATIONS FOR THE SALE AND DISTRIBUTION OF ELECTRIC ENERGY ~S ADOPTED BY RESOLUTION NO. 71R-478 AND AMENDED BY RESOLUTION NOS. 73R-25, 73R-373, 73R-531, 74R-75, 74R-630, 75R-243 and 74R-344 REDUCING THE LOWEST-PRICE ENERGY BLOCKS OF RATE SCHEDULES GS-1B, GS-2 AND PA. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEIMBERS: ~one ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Sneegas The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-345 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NOS. 75R-346 AND 75R-347 - AMENDING AGREEMENTS RE MILLION GALLON RESERVOIR - BOYLE ENGINEERING, ANAHEIM HILLS, INC./TEXACO.ANAHEIM HILLS, INC.: Mr. Hoyt reported on recommended amendments to agreements dated October 1, 1974, with Boyle Engineering and Anaheim Hills, Inc./Texaco Anaheim Hills, Inc. The amendments specify that Boyle Engineering will perform landscape design services and that the developer, Anaheim Hills, Inc., will pay the cost for same, and be reimbursed by the City through the water surcharge. On report and recommendation of the Utilities Director, Councilman Seymour offered Resolution Nos. 75R-346 and 75R-347 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-346: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 1, 1974, WITH BOYLE ENGINEERING, EXTENDING THE SCOPE OF SAID AGREEMENT AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-347: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE TERMS AND CONDITIONS OF AN AMENDMENT TO AN AGREEMENT DATED OCTOBER 1, 1974, WITH ANAHEIM HILLS, INCORPORATED/TEXACO ANAHEIM HILLS, INC., INCREASING THE ESTIMATED COSTS OF DESIGN, PLANS AND SPECIFICATIONS IN SAID AGREEMENT~ AND AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID AGREEMENT. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley and Thom NOES; COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Sneegas The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 75R-346 and 75R-347 duly passed adopted. APPROVAL OF PLANS - SPECIAL RECREATIONAL FACILITY - PELANCONI PARK~ RECLASSIFI- CATION NO. 70-71-13~ TRACT_NO. 8783: The request submitted for approval of plans of a special recreation facility on the RanchoYorba development plan, continued from several meetings beginning March 18, 1975 to the present date, was considered by Council together with a list of proposed pro forma park improvement costs dated July 8, 1975, showing the following division of costs: Presley of Southern California Grant Company of California Manny Fingerhut Bernardo Yorba & Martina Pelanconi $56,100 89,820 20,197 20,197 The overall participation, according to this proposal amounts to $186,314 towards the total park improvement costs of $240,670 (excluding park fees and land dedication) thereby leaving a deficit of $54,356 which is further reduced by the costs of public restroom facilities ($28,530), leaving $25,826 remaining. 75-625 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1975, 1:30 P.M. Mr. Fred Wilson representing Presley of Southern California, 4600 Campus Drive, Newport Beach, advised that there is one more revision to the proposed pro forma costs, which occurred since the printing of same, specifically that the listed deficit cost of $25,826 has been split by the Grant Company and Bernardo Yorba & Martina Pelanconi, so that disregarding payments of park in-lieu fees, and assuming that the City will install the public restroom facilities, all other costs of improvement for the special recreational facility are provided in this pro forma agreement. In response to concern expressed by Council Members that some binding agreements or documents be drawn up to specify each developer,s, commitment and further specify a time for these commitments'to be fulfilled; Mr. Wilson suggested that a condition be imposed that these improvements be under construction or that bonds for same be provided prior to approval or recordation of their final tract map. He indicated that such condition would be acceptable to his company. Following brief discussion, during which the City Attorney indicated that if the plan for pro forma park improvement costs as submitted for the special recreational facility is acceptable to the City Council, it would appear that this would fulfill the intent of the' Condition imposed at the meeting of December 10, 1974, that the developers submit a plan for development of the park. I'n relation to time frames, however, Mr. Watts advised that from the proposals submitted these could not be determined. He therefore suggested that if the plan is acceptable, the Council approve same in concept and instruct the City Attorney's Office to draft the means to assure perfor- mance within acceptable time periods. Councilman Seymour advised that he envisions this park construction taring place simultaneouslywithdevelopment of the tract involved in the pro forma agreement. Councilwoman Kaywood questioned the figure of $15,500 shown as "participation in excess of cost of park" and Mr. Wilson explained that this represents the park in-lieu fees to be paid by developers. If the in-lieu fees were applied toward the cost of this special recreational facility together with their contributions, the total cost for the park would be exceeded by $15,900. Councilwoman Kaywood further questioned why the Grant Company is listed as participating in the amount of $89,000 when originally they had agreed to provide $142,000 in improvements. Mr. Wilson advised that the improvement originally contemplated to be provided by the Grant Company included undergrounding of a substantial water system. However, with the development of this proposed recreational facility, drop structures are planned and the difference between $89,000 and $142,000 is basically the difference in cost of building the o'ne system versus the other. He advised that the Grant Company did agree to additionally participate for one half of the $25,826 in deficit towards the cost. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council approved in concept the pro forma park improvement cost plan dated July 8, 1975, a~ amended to show equal division of the $25,826 deficit between the Grant Company and Bernardo Yorba and Marti~na Pelanconi; and directed the City Attorney to draft the means of providing reasonable assurance of performance within acceptable time periods. Councilman Sneegas absent. MOTION CARRIED. CONTINUATION - WORK ORDER NO. 752 A: On the recommendation of the City Engineer tbe award of contract, Wot k Order No. 752 A, Lincoln Avenue Median Island fimprovement, continued from the meetings of June 24 and July 1, 1975, Councilman Pebley moved that said award be continued to the meeting of July 15, 1975. Councilman Seymour seconded the motion. Councilman Sneegas absent MOTION CARRIED. · ~Tr"~ C 7 i 75-626 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1975, 1:30 DISCUSSION - CULTURAL ARTS FACILITY TASK FORCE: The Parks, Recreation and the Arts Director submitted a list of organizations which have indicated interest in ~epresentation on a task force to study the possibility of a permanent Cultural Arts facility for the City of Anaheim. Councilman Seymour noted that at the time this task force was originally discussed it was indicated that there were some 30 to 50 civic groups that would be interested in serving on such a committee, and now, recognizing that there are far fewer than that number shown on the list, questioned how it was compiled. Mr. Collier reported that this list was prepared following .communication with all groups oriented towards the cutural and performing arts, pursuant to the request made by the Anaheim Redevelopment Agency at their meeting of June 17, 1975, and represents all of the positive responses received. Mayor Thom commented that it would be foolhardy to embark on a project such as a permanent cultural arts facility with such minimal support as has been indicated. Councilwoman Kaywood remarked that most voluntary groups are inactive during the summer months and that perhaps this was the reason for the poor response. She suggested that these groups be contacted again in September and a list compiled for possible establishment of the task force at that time. Mayor Thom interjected that he does not consider commercial organizations compatible in a list of community support groups or civic groups interested in the arts. At the conclusion of discussion, Mr. Collier was requested to circulate the interest finding letter to the appropriate civic groups again in September and resubmit the matter to the Council. CONSENT CALENDAR ITEMS: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Seymour the following actions were authorized in accordance with the reports and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the consent calendar agenda: 1. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT: Entertainment permit was granted subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Polic~ for a piano bar at the Mira Loma Inn~ 3291Miraloma Avenue, Monday through Saturday from 9:00 P.M. to 1:00 A.M. for a period of one year. (Edward O. Brown, applicant) 2. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim submitted by Robert E. Reich for damage sustained purportedly as a result of collision with city vehicle at Cerritos Avenue, east of Vernon Street on or about June 13, 1975 was denied and referred to the insurance carrier. 3. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed. a. Public Utilities Commission - Letter to Pacific Gas and Electric Company regarding insulation plan. b. California Horse Racing Board - Notice of Meeting - Application of Orange County Fair to conduct 14 days of fair racing at the Los Alamitos Race Course. c. Southern California Edison Company - In the matter of applicati~ of Southern California Edison Company for authority to make effectiVe a reduction in the fuel cost adjustment billing factor set forth in Table 4 of Advice No. 405-E. d. Financial and Operating reports for the month of May, 1975, for the Electrical Division. Councilman Sneegas absent. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NOS. 75R-348 THROUGH 75R-352: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Resolution Nos. 75R-348 through 75R-352, both inclusive, for adoption in accordance with the reports, recommendations and certifications furnished each Council Member and as listed on the consent calendar agenda. 75-627 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1975, 1:30 P.M. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-348 - DEEDS OF EASEMENT.. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION (Robert R. Whipple, et ux.) ' RESOLUTION NO. 75R-349 - ABANDONMENT NO. 74-14A: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARING ITS I'N~ENTION TO VACATE CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND FIXING A DATE FOR HEARING THEREON. (No. 74-14A, July 29, 1975, 2:30 P.M.; dedicated alleys located betwaen Santa Ana and Water Streets, west of Atchison Street) RESOLUTION NO. 75R-350 - ABANDONMENT NO. 74-20A: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM SETTING A DATE FOR HEARING IN CONNECTION WITH REQUEST FOR VACATION AND ABANDONMENT OF CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY. (74-20A, July 29, 1975, 2:30 P.M.: existing public utility easement located in Lot 69, Tract 6809, 'northwest corner of Annika Street and Nyon Avenue) .RESOLUTION NO. 75R-351 - WORK ORDER NO. 754 A: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVEN- IENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT.. THE RAYMOND AVENUE STORM DRAIN IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 754 A. (Bids to be opened August 7, 1975, 2:00 P.M.) RESOLUTION NO. 75R-352 - WORK ORDER NO. 1254: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE FEE ANA STREET SEWER IMPROVEMENT, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1254. (Espinosa and Espinosa, Inc.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: S'neegas The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 75R-348 through 75R-352, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. REPORT - SOCIAL SERVICES AD HOC COMMITTEE: Mr. Howard Wade, 509 North Claudina Street, Anaheim, acting chairman of the Social Services ad hoc Committee presented the final committee report to the Council. (Original on file in the office of the City Clerk). Mr. Wade stated that the committee shares the Council's concern that social services be provided in a planned, organized and coordinated fashion im the City of Anaheim and that the taxpayers would be assured that their dollars are spent in the most effective manner by providing the services with the most extensive impact in clearly measurable terms. Mr. Wade advised that the Social Services ad hoc Committee feels that the work they have completed is only a beginning. They advocate the formation of an on-going committee or commission to act in an advisory capacity to the City Council on h!~-n needs, resources and social services. They support the recommen- dation made by the League of California Cities that equal emphasis be placed on human services planning as has been placed on environmental and land use planning. Mr. Wade summarized the Committee's final conclusion as follows: 1. The ad hoc Committee strongly urges the City to insure the delivery of all essential social services, either by serving as~an advocate or catalyst to appropriate public and/or private agencies, or by delivering the services themselves. 2. The ad hoc Co~m~ittee feels that it is economically advantageous to support community based non-profit~ private agencies in the delivery of social services wherever possible. 75-628 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1975, 1:30 P.M. 3. The ad hoc Committee recommends that a Social Services Advisory Commission be formed, composed of community people, excluding those who would have a conflict of interest by virtue of City or County employment; that an advisory board composed of people from governmental agencies be established to advise the Social Services Commission. Mr. Wade concluded that the report submitted represents twenty weeks of work performed by the Committee. He reported that they are confident that this will provide the beginning for a social services framework for the city. He thanked the Council for allowing him the opportunity to work with the Committee, and noted that it was a learning experience for him- self and his fellow Committee Members. Mayor Thom thanked Mr. Wade and the remainder of the ad hoc Committee Members for the many hours they contributed to this project. Councilman Seymour echoed the Mayor's appreciation and commended the Committee for tackling a difficult task made even more problematic because of the extremely broad spectrum of the subject matter and because of the diverse philosophies and personalities which the Council intentionally set up in order to assure a true feedback from the community. Councilwoman Kaywood noted that the report appeared very readable. She stated that she is looking forward to reviewing same. No further action was taken by the Council at this time. REESTABLISftMENT OF CITY YOUTH COUNCIL: A resolution drafted by students of Anaheim High School participating in YOUTH IN GOVERNMENT DAY, 1975, re- questing that the City Council consider reestablishment of the City Youth Council was submitted for Council consideration. Mayor Thom noted that none of the participating students were present in the audience to discuss the resolution and reestablishment of the Youth Council and was informed that the students were not notified of this agenda item, since it was forwarded by the Parks, Recreation and the Arts Director for Council review and input. Councilman Seymour indicated he was in favor of the concept and eager to see it implemented. During Council discussion, it was suggested that the resolution and consideration of establishment of a Youth Council be held over until school begins in the fall and new senior leaders are selected to participate. However, the City Council also recognized that those students who drafted the recommendation and resolution would also want to participate in the discussion. At the conclusion of discussio~Gouncilwoman Kaywood requested that the matter be scheduled on the Council agenda of August~ 12, 1975, and that all the 1975 Youth in Government Day participants be so nofified by the Public Information Officer. Councilwoman Kaywood further pointed out that she felt it would be much more worthwhile if the date for the annual Youth in Government Day function be scheduled earlier in the school year so that the students would have sufficient time to convey and utilize the information they receive from this exercise during the remainder of the school year. She requested that the sponsoring agency be requested to determine whether or not this is possible. No further action was taken by the City Council at this time. EXTENSION OF TIME - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 73-74-2~ CUP 1412: Request of A. Rea Bradley, Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company, 700 Newport Center Drive, Newport Beach, 92663, dated June 16, 1975, for an extension of time to Reclassification No. 73-74-2 and Conditional Use Permit No. 1412 was submitted together with reports from Development Services Department and the City Engineer recommending said extension be granted retroactive to September25, 1974, expiring September 2% 1975, subject to the following conditions: 75-629 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1975, 1:30 P.M. 1. That 53 foot of right-of-way on Lincoln Avenue be dedicated within 90 days. 2. That 15 foot of right-of-way from centerline of existing alley along the north property line be conditionally dedicated within 90 days. 3. The vehicular access rights on Lincoln Avenue be dedicated within 90 days. On motion by Councilman Pebley, saconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council granted a one year extension of time retroactive to September 25, 1974, and expiring September 25, 1975, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Engineer and s e t forth above. Councilman Sneegas absent. MOTION CARRIED. REQUEST FOR TIME EXTENSIONS TRACT NOS. 8513~ 8514, 8515 AND 851'6: Request of George Saupe, VTN Consolidated, Inc., 2301 Campus Drive, Irvine, 92663, for extensions of time to Tentative Tract Nos. 8513, 8514, 8515 and 8516 was submitted together with report from the Development Services Department and City Engineer. The City Engineer's report recommended denial, of said request for extensions of time on the basis of the State Subdivision Map Act Section 66452.6(b) states that "the expiration of an approved tenta~veshall termi- nate all proceedings and no final map or parcel map.., shall be filed with- out processing a new map", and it is the opinion of the City Attorney's Office that the City is without power to process an expired tentative map. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by COuncilman Pebley, the City Council denied the request for extension of time to Tentative Tract Nos. 8513, 8515 and 8516 in accordance with Section 66452.6(b) of the State Subdivision Map Act. (No extension of time was necessary for Tract No. 8514, which has been recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder.) Councilman Sneegas absent. MOTION CARRIED. E.I.R. - NEGATIVE DECLARATION - GRADING PERMIT - 160 CERRO VISTA WAY: On recommendation of the City Planning Commission, the City Council determined that application for a grading permit for a single-family homesite at 160 Cerro Vista Way will have no significant effect on the environment and is therefore exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report, on motion by Councilman Seymour, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood. Councilman Sneegas absent. MOTION CARRIED. FAIRMONT BOULEVARD E.I.R. - WESTEC SERVICES, INC.: Mr. John Harding presented the recommendation from the City Engineer that Council authorize employment of WESTEC Services, Inc. of Tustin, California, to prepare the environmental impact report for Fairmont Boulevard. He reported that of three firms re- quested to submit a proposal for said E.I.R., WESTEC Services, Inc. was the low bidder at $4,900. Mayor Thom questioned why some of the Anaheim firms who perform this type of service were not considered. Mr. Maddox replied that it was felt better to have a firm which is completely unbiased to prepare the report. He noted'that the Anaheim engineering firms in question have done a considerable amount of work for developers in that area, whereas the recommended firm will have a fresh approach. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Seymour, the City Council accepted the bid submitted by WESTEC Services. Inc. to prepare the E.I.R. for Fairmont Boulevard fro~ Santa Ana Canyon Road to Canyon Rim Road in the amount of $4,900 and instructed the City Attorney to prepare the necessary agreement. Councilman Sneegas absent. MOTION CARRIED. 75-630 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1975, 1:30 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 3441: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3441 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITI.E 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (73-74-38 C-0) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Sneegas The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3441 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3442: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3442 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-25(1) RS-5000) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Seymour, Pebley and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Sneegas The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3442 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3443: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3443 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-63(4) C-0) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Kaywood, Seymour, Pebley and Thom NOES: COUNCIL MEMBERS: None ABSENT: COUNCIL MEMBERS: Sneegas The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3443 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3445: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3445 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM REPEALING SECTIONS 14.40.010, 14.40.020, 14.40.030, 14.40.040, 14.40.050, 14.40.060, 14.40.070 AND ADDING NEW SECTIONS IN THEIR PLACE PERTAINING TO TRAFFIC SPEED LIMITS. ORDINANCE NO. 3446: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3446 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-33(10) RS-A-43,000) ORDINANCE NO. 3447: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3447 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-33(11) RS-A-43,000) REPORT - BICYCLE TRAILS: Councilwoman Kaywood recalled that some time ago a report was authorized by the City Council on the subject of bicycle trails within the City of Anaheim. She inquired when this would be presented and was informed that such presentation has been scheduled for the Council Meeting of July 15, 1975. 75-631 City Hall, Anaheim, Cali£ornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - July 8, 1975, 1:30 P.M. REVISED FLOOD HAZARD MAP: Councilwoman Kaywood inquired whether the revised maps designating the flood hazard zone have been received by Development Services Department. Miss Santalahti replied that no further information has been received from the federal contractor in Pennsylvania during the past week~ RECOMMENDATION ON INCRFASRD RATER TO TRASH COLLECTION CONTRACTORS: Councilman Seymour requested that the recommendation from the Public Works Director on increase of fees to the trash collection contractors be scheduled for the meeting of July 22, 1975, as he would be unable to attend the July 15, 1975, meeting and does wish to be present for discussion on this matter. UTILITY BILL - RAY YATES, INC.: (Concessionaire Anaheim Hills. Golf Course Club House) Mayor Thom requested an update on the matter of the delinquent utility bill of Mr. Ray Yates~ Anaheim Hills Golf Course Club House Concessionaire. Mr. John Harding reported that when the problem was last discussed on May 13, 1975, it was referred to the Golf Course Advisory Commission for their consideration. He noted that there was a meeting between the Parks, Recreation and the Arts Department and Mr. Yates this date regarding a method to split the metering. RECESS - EXECUTIVE SESSION: Councilman Pebley moved to recess to executive session as requested by Councilwoman Kaywood. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (3:50 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Thom called the meeting to order, all Council Members being present with the exception of Councilman Sneegas. (3:58 P.M.) APPOINTMENTS - CANYON AREA GENERAL PLANNING TASK FORCE: Councilman Seymour moved that the following be appointed to the Canyon Area General Planning Task Force to equalize the representation on said committee of the developers interest: J. Lynn Buffington, American National Housing Corporation; Robert Dunham, Ashley Economics Services, Inc. and James Barisic, Anaheim Hills, Inc. Councilwoman Kaywood seconded the motion. Councilman Sneegas absent. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 4:00 P.M. Signed City ClePR