Loading...
64-278 RESOLUTION NO. 64R-278 A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING VARIANCE NO. 1622. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of Anaheim did initiate a petition for a zoning variance on certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as follows: Lot 6 of Tract No. 1428 as shown on a map recorded in Book 47, Page 9 of Miscellaneous Maps, Records of Orange County, California. AND WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the City Hall in the City of Anaheim on March 16, 1964, notice of which said public hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code;, and WHER~S, said City Planning Commission after due in- spection, investigation and studies made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, did adopt Resolution No. 1099, Series 1963-64, denying Variance No. 1622; and WHEREAS, thereafter within twenty-two (22) days from the date of the adoption of said resolution, the City Council did elect, upon its own motion, to review the action taken by the City Planning Commission in denying said variance and did set a public hearing thereon to be held on the 21st day of April, 1964, at 7-00 o'clock P.M. in the City Hall in the City Of Anaheim, and notice of such public hearing was duly given as required by law and the provisions of Title 18, Chapter 18.76 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEREAS, the City Council does find that: · There is no substantial property right possessed by other property in the same vicinity and zone and denied the subject property. · It appears that the subject property can be adequately developed and used under the present zone. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that the action of the City Planning Commission denying Variance No. 1622 be, and the same is hereby sustained, and that the petition for a variance permitting the residential structure situated on the property hereinbefore described to be used for escrow offices, be, and the same is hereby denied. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION is approved and signed by me this 21st day of April, 1964. __ MAYOR OF THE~ CItY OF 'KNAHEIM~-: ...... ATTEST: . STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I~ DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution No. 64R-278 was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim~ held on the 21st day of April, 1964, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCILN~N: Pebley, Dutton, Schutte, Krein and Chandler NOES: COUNCI IJ~N: None ABSEN/: COUNC ILN~N: None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 64R-278 on the 21st day of April, 1964. IN WITNESS WHEREOF~ I have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim this 215t day of April~ 1964. ·. ~.~ ~ , .~ ~ CITY CLERK OF IH~ CITY OF ANAH~-IM