Loading...
64-008ilESOLUTiON NO. 64R-8 A F~JSOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AME~ED AiYD THAT THE BOUND- ARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. W~REAS, the City Planning Commission of the City of 7maheim did hold ,s public hearing in Reclassification Pro- ceedings No. 63-64-57 to consider an amendment to Title 18 of ~!~e ~.naheim Municip~.i Code ~elatin-'?~ t .~ ~_ ~ o zoning, and to consider ~ change in the boundar~es of the zone or zones hereinafter mentioned and. described., and at said hearing did receive evidence and. reports from persons interested therein and from its staff; and WHEiIEAS, within a period of forty days following said ~earin~ thereon the Planning oommission did. duly adopt a resolu- tion containing a report of 'ts findings, a summary of the evidence presente~J at ssid hearinii~, and a recon~nendation that the proposed amendment be adopted by the City Council and that a certain zone or zones be changed, as hereinafter set forth; and ~'~"~r~E.:imA~~-' ~, upon receipt of sa~d_ resolution, summary of ev dence, report oz ~:~.,~noings, and reco~nendation oz the City ~ianning Co~ission the City Council did fix the 7th day of January, 1964, as the time and the City Council Chambers in the ~- ~_ ~ Anahe~_m as the p~ -~ ~y Hall o~~ the C-~ty o.~ ~ace for a public hearing upon said proposed am~endment ~o T~tie 18 of the Anaheim Municipal r~gode, and the exc]~asiop, of said property, hereinafter described, ~rom the zone or zones i.n which it is now situated, and the incor- pct,,ration thereof in the :~:cne or zones hereinafter set forth; and ,~?~ oive notice thereo~?~ 'n the manner and form as provided in said Title 18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code; and WHEPJEAS, at 'the time and place fixed, for said public hearing the City Council did hold and conduct such public hearing, and did o~' 1~ ozve a ~ persons interested therein an opportunity to be heard, and. did. receive evidence and reports, and did thereupon consider 'the summary of evidence presented at said. public hearing -i~efore the Planning Commission, its report of findings, and. recon~_end, ation: and WHEP~EAS, 'the City Council does find that 'the property ~.",ereinafter described -~s in an area which the Planning Staff and C-?.ty Plannin;~'.~ Commiss'on have previously recommended for R-3, ?~i'u!tipie-Fam-:iy kes'~dent'~al jone development by virtue of the plan an~ the ~.~enera]_ indication on the General Plan; studies on J-~!e, ~ ~,,~E"~H ~KEAS, the G~'ty Council. does further find and. determine that 'the amendment to Title i$ of the Anaheim Municipal Code should be adopted, and that the ?roperty hereinafter described. s~'~oul, d be exclu~ed ~ ~ ~zh r in which ~t is now ...... :~:rom e zone o zones situated and incerporate~ in '~,.e zone or zones as hereinafter set · ~ orth; NOW, THEi~JEFOi~, BE iT i~JESOLvED by the City Council of the City of Anaheim that T:_ltle !8 of 'the ~-!naheim Municipal Code be, and. the same is hereb~',~., amen~..ec] and that the following des- cribed property, s-~tuated in the City of ~maheim, County of Orange, ~'tate of California, to wit- -!- 63-64-57 The Easterly 551.30 "?eet of the North half of Lot 2, as shown on a ikeccrd, of Survey of part of Section 4, Township 4 South, Range 10 West, S. B. B. & M , .. f~!ed in Book 1, page 55 of i~ecord of Surveys in the office of the County Recorder of Orange County, California. ~_ EXCEPTING THEPd~FROM 'the South 27.00 feet. ~e excluded from R-A, RESIDENTIAL-AGi<ICULT RAL ZONE, and incorporated in R-3, MULTiPLE-FAHILY RESIDENTIAL ZONE, upon 'the following c ond. i t ions · !. Thst an irrevocaOle easement granting access to subject property from Euclid Street across the abuttingl property 'to the west shall be obtained by the ovmers of subject property, submitted to the City Attorney for approval, and then re- corded, in the Office of the Orange County Recorder prior to the adoption of ~an ordinance reci~ss~fying subject 'property. ~ 2. That 'the completion o~._ these reclassification proceedings is contingent upon the granting of a Conditional Use Permit on subject property. BE IT _~ ~ '¥~ .RTHm~-t SOLVED that the City' Attorney be, and, he is l--~.ereby suthorized, and directed to prepare and submit to 'the City C.,ouncil an ordinance amendin:~ Title 18 of the f~.naheim Municipal Code accomplish the objects he:.cein found and determined to be uecessary and proper. THE FOkiEGOT~G z,EoOLUTION is approved, and signed by me this January, 19.$4. ~.~,~R~/. OF" TiI:iE-CiT¥OF AN/{HEIM ............ - CITY-CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIH -2- STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, DENE M. WILLIAMS, City Clerk of the City of Anaheim, do hereby certify that the foregoing Resolution ~No. 64Rr8 was introduced and adopted at a regular meeting provided by law, of the City Council of the City of Anaheim, held on the 7th day of January, 1964, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Chandler, Schutte, Krein and Coons NOES: COUNCII22{N: None ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None AND I FURTHER CERTIFY that the Mayor of the City of Anaheim approved and signed said Resolution No. 64R-8 on the 7th day of January, 1964. IN WITNESS WHEREOF, t have hereunto set my hand and affixed the official seal of the City of Anaheim, this 7th day of January~ 1964. GIT~Y CLERK OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM (SEAL)