Loading...
1975/10/0775-,'; 93 :-Ii~.,~Ti.,,' Dc obur 7~ 1~'7_,~ . .1. :.3;.., P.I'I. City ilall~ Anaheim~ California -COUNCII, "- '~- '~ - t 'file City Council of thc City of Pi.',LSiliTT: COUiiCIL :'I~.IBLi(S: tlaywood, Pel:.[ey, ,Sp. ec~las ar.x/ 'l'tto~a Af~SEiJT: COUI:CIL i4E~.~i~RS: Sey::~our ASSISTA/4T CI~ ATTORi;I]Y: Willia;..~ z)EPUTY CI"~ CLETd:(: I,inda D. P~i';iIIi.~G ;)IP, ECTO}I: konald Tho,npson ASSISTfH~T 2I?%CT,:)i',. - PI~%b[;';I;[(;: Don :lcDaniel ZONING SUPERVISOR: Annika Santalahti CI~' I,]NGINEEII: James P. ;'.iaddox TP~FFIC ENGIhEEK; Peril Singer PAIIKS, kECREATI(~iI AND Ti[I~ ARTS DI}iECTOITI: Jonn J. Collier .Iayor Thom called i.:~,,.e nteetin:~ to order and k~e].comed tl~osa in a~tendance to t!~e Council iieeting. FLAG SALUTL: Councilman Calvin L. Pebley led ti~e asse~tbiy in the Pledge of Allejiance to the Flag. i'tES~'E,UTIOi~I OF SUPPORT: A P, esolution of Support of the Senior i-teaith Fair to be p'z'esented in La Palina Park fro~.n 10:02 a.m. to ':0:i; p.m. on October 19, i~73, by Ana',tcira lietnorial Hospital in cooperation with abe Ana,,~.aim Parks, Recreation and tile Arts Department was unanin;ously adopted by t;'~e City Council and presented to Ruth Currier and Harry Barnes. ~{ESOLUTIOi~ OF CO:IGIU%TULATIONS: A Resolution of Congratulations for Lt. Alvin E. Rogers of tim Ap. ahcim Police ])epartment on i~is retirement after · 2JL~ years of service was unanimously adopted by tl~e City Council. RESOLUTION OF CONGRATULATIONS: A Resolution of Congratulations on t,~c 2t!.Z"ta birthday of tile United States Navy, encouraging the wearing of uniforms on "~iavy Uniform Day", October 10, 1975, was unanimously adopted by the City Council. Said Resolution was accepted witit thanks by Conlmander Wines. iII:-i'UTES: ~linutes of the Anaheim City Council Adjourr, ed Regular .?.leeting imld September 23, 1975 were approved, on motion by Councilwoman KayW°od, seconded by Councilman Thom. Councilman Seymour ab'~ent. MOTI()I.; CARIiIE~o. WAIVL;,[ OF iU.EJkDIi';G - OPd3I~IANCES AI,?O RLSOLUTIOi,~S: Councilman Petley moved to waive tl~c reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby 5iven by all Council liembers unless, after readin~; of tile title, specific request is made by a Council i'.lember for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Sneegas seconded thc ~aotion. Councilman Seymour absent, liOTION Ui.~ANIi,IOUSLY CARRIED. F, EPORT - FINA;~CIAL DEi~kNDS AGAI;{ST T~E CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $712,792.27, in accordance with the 1775-7~: Budget, were approved. Ei~GAGEIiENT PLANS - ARTIiUR YOUNG & COI.~PA~: Engagement Plans were presented by ;'Ir. Tim tlaidinger of the Arthur Young & Company for Management Practices Audits to be conducted in the Collections Section of t}te City Treasurer's Office and Public Works Department (excluding }Iechanical l,iaintenance which 7.~as already been reviewed). Mr. llaidinger briefly outlined the objectives of ti,.e Audit. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, tile City Council approved the Engagement Plans as submitted for Collections Section of the City Treasurer's Office and Public ' ~- l,.~or**s Department, excluding Mechanical >iaintenance. Councilman Seymour absent. ~'iO'l'IO~ CAP, RII]D. PJ~kC]£iIii;IT OF ARTHUR YOUNG & CO!'iP!~I,TY AUDIT RiJPOIiT,q ON FILE IN Till] LIE. RARY: llequest by ;.ir. Louis Dexter, 305 Horth Ranchito Street, t!mt t;m City Council direct the copies of the Arthur Youn% & Company tlanage:-acnt Audit report,~ be placed on file in the 7, Iothcr Colony Historical Records Roon~ at the Central Library was presented by ;layer Thom. ]ir. ~)e, xter was recognizc.,i anJ first con!~,ratulated tire Council on their attitude and intent of keepinp, such records open to the public. In this connection tlc remarked ~hat although i~eretoforc ail Arttmr Young a Company z-elberta i~ave been available to tim public l~y request to t,te City 14anager~s or 75-,J99 City Bali., Anaheim~ California - CO'UiiCIL ',~II~.TLTES - ()ctober 7~ 1~75~ 1;30 P.'I. City Clerk's Offices, neither of these have facilities to comfortably seat ~aenbers of the public who wis',~ to uti!i::e tim reports. ~ie wo~,ld therefore recommend ti~at ttmse be placeti at ti~c ~¥lain Library so ti,at they would be more conveniently available to ti~e public, tlc furti~er urged that this be accomplisi~ed now wl~ile rlm information is current. .~ir. Dexter advised Council that this action may set a precedent, estab- lishinf.; a new line of communication between ti~t5 City Council and the el¢.ctorate, and might mean that other reports would be made available at the Library for reference immediately rati~er than when they become of historical importance. }Ir. Dexter further felt timt if these reports are placed in the Library, this fact should be widely disseminated so tlmt many people will know they are available. ~lavor Thom concurred witi~ this suggestion and inquired of ilr. Haidinf.,.er, representative of the Arthur Young & Company, whether they r,~.i~t be able to suppiy an additional copy of each report for filing at ti~e Library. i.lr. }taidinger replied ti~at this would l,e possible for all future reports, but i~e would be concerned about those wi~ich are out of print. By general Council consent, Mr. Griffith was instructed to see that there are copies of all Arthur Young & Company Financial and Hanagement Practice Audit reports accepted by the City Council to date, as well as copies of future reports accepted, are placed on file at tim reference desk of the Anaheim Central Library. In response to Councilwoman Kaywood's concern tt~at copies also be made availaOle at the branch libraries, lqr. Griffith advised tlmt this could be accomplished later if the demand warrants. AGREEi-IEi.~TS RELATING TO MUNICIPAL DATA SYSTEi{: By general consent, an amendment to the agreement between the City of Anaheim and San Gabriel Valley l.lunictpal Data System and ~nendment No. 2 to the lease between Security Pacific National Bank and the City of Anaheim relating to tim Municipal Data System were continued to the meeting of October 14, 1975 pending report by City Attorney Alan Watts. PAIiiTING OF FIRE I~DRAI.~TS - Ai{AHLI?I BICEi~TEi4i~IAL Cl~.~.EBt.h\~IOz,: Hiss Patsy Ray, Chairperson of the Festival dSA Committee of the Anaheim Bicentennial Comraittee, advised that they have received requests for permission to paint fire hydrants in patriotic themes. She introduced ~lr. ];ill i, larshall of the Kiwanis Club of Greater Anaheii:~. >Ir. >larshall advised that tim Kiwanis Club would be happy ~o accept the responsibility of administration of a 9rogram to paint fire i~ydrants. They would require that sketches be submitted for approval prior to any painting and would cooperate with the Fire Chief as to whicl~ i,.ydrants mi.tsi~t be pai:~ted, as well as other details. :ir. Griffith advis~_~d that tills proposal has been reviewed wit!~ t.~e Fire Ci~ief, the Public Works Director an,:i City Yfanager and t'~ere ~'~re no objections. O:',. ~aotion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, ti~e City Coupcil approved tile proposed program to paint fire i~ydrant,~ in patriotic t'ncmes as requested by tim Anaheim Bicentennial. Celebration Con~mittee, sai~ program ~o be administered by the Kiwanis Club of Greater Anaheim with coordination through the Office of the Fire Chief. Commiiman Sey~aour aboent. A()TIOi~ CARRIED. COi~°ITiO~b\L USZ PEI~qlT i'{O. 13711 - O,,H)Er, TO SI{..')W CAUSL: llemorandum front tim City Attorney*s Office regardin~ the nois,:~ emanating from tire public address system at Open Road Recreational Ve~,icles, ;.c.~ Soutlt West Street, was submitted to the City Cou~tcil which indicates eimt complaints were presenCet~ on April 22, 1970 r~:gardinb~ this use (Conditional Use Permit No. 1373). Tim City Attorney's Of fie= recommended that tim Council set an Order to Show Cause imaring for October 2J, 1975 for the Open Road Recreational Ve~ticle Sales facility, as to wh7 t~eir conditional use permit s~ould not be terminated on the grounds specified in Section l'd.03.Ogl.95q. 75-900 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUi,~CIL MI'~IUTLS - Oc..tober 7~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M. Mr. Hopkins reported that a letter l~as been prepared by the City Attorney's Office advising the Open Road Company of this action. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, tile City Council set October 2~, 1975, 2:30 P.M., for an Order to Show Cause hearing as to why Conditional Use Permit No. 1373 should not be revoked, and ti~at the City Attorney's Office forward notice of same to Open Road Recreational Vehicles, 866 South West Street. Councilman Seymour absent. }iOTION CARRIED. R~,IOVAL OF DEED RESTRICTIONS - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 61-62-39: Mr. Hopkins reported on the proposed amendment to tile declaration of deed restrictions dated July 5, 1962 concerning property located at the southeast corner of La Palina Avenue and Harbor Boulevard, which was the subject of Reclassification No. 61-62-39. The property was subsequently the subject of further zoning actions (Reclassification Nos. 64-65-122 and ~,6-67-2, Variance No. 27Z0) and has been developed in accordance with these. At the time the deed restrictions were filed in 1962, site development standards were not in effect and parking requirements were placed in the deed. Subsequent to that time, site development standards have been established and these restrictions are no longer necessary. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City Council approved the removal of deed restrictions filed in connection with Reclassification No. 61-62-39 as recommended by the City Attorney's Office. Councilman Seymour absent. MOTION CARRIED. LETTER AGREEI.~NT - WE T.I.P.~ INC: A letter agreement providing for financial participation by the City to provide certain promotional materials to We T.I.P., Inc. in the amount of $1,000 was submitted for Council consideration. Councilwoman Kaywood requested that Page i~o.' 2, Item No. 2-A of subject letter agreement be amended to show a maximum of $1,000. Councilman Sneegas moved that the letter agreement between the City and We T.I.P., Inc. be approved and executed with tile amendment as outlined by Councilwoman Kaywood. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. Councilman Seymour absent. MOTION CARRIED. OPd~IUANCE i.~O. 3472 - PE~IIT PROCEDURE FOR SCHEDULING OF PARK AND SCHOOL DISTRICT FACILITIES: Mr. John J. Collier reported that this ordinance was pr~?ared as a result of recommendations by both the Parks and Recreation Commission and the Sports Council. In an attempt to alleviate some of the difficulties encountered in the scheduling of ball fields and other recreational and athletic facilities, it is proposed that a permit procedure be established. By providing for these permits via a City ordinance, the Police Department will have the necessary authority for enforcement, if necessary. Mr. Collier suggested one change to the ordinance as proposed, add to tile third line after "using any recreational facility of any park" the words "and School District property where so designated for scheduling by the Department". Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. ~472 for first reading with the amendment outlined by Mr. Collier. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ADDING TITLE 13, CHAPTER 13.08, SECTION 13.0i~.045 TO THE AiqAHEI~..I ~fUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO RECREATION PERMITS. PO'BLIC DAi~CE PEPSi, IT: Application filed by Mr. Jose E. Acevedo for permit to conduct public dance on October 11, 1975 at Saint Boniface Hall, 525 West Lincoln Avenue, was submitted and granted, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.16 of the Anaheim Municipal Code and further subject to the condition that two private security officers be employed to police the dance, as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas. Councilman Seymour absent. MOTION CARRIED. MISS ANAHEIM PAGEANT - USE OF CONVENTION CENTER: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council approved tile request submitted by Fran Mauck, Women's Division of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce, Executive Director of the Miss Anaheim Pageant, for use of the Anaheim Room at 75-901 City Hall~ Anaheim, Cal£fornia - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 7, 1975, 1:30 the Convention Center and related equipment to stage tl~e Annual Miss Anaheim Pageant on November 11, 1975, with rehearsal on November 10, 1975, on tile basis of out-of-pocket expenses only; and further, approved the City's co-sponsorsl~i~ of the event. Councilman Seymour absent. MOTION CARRIED. DI~tINAGE FEE - ANAHEIi~! CA,CrON IUDUSTRIAL AREA: Report dated September 12, 1~J75 from the City Engineer was submitted recommending the establislunent of a drainage fee in the Anaheim Canyon Industrial Area at $2,000 per acre, and further recommending that Project Alpha funds be used to provide the additional funds required to construct the master planned drainage facilities for this area during a five-year construction period. ~r. ~iaddox reported ~hat the Redevelopment Agency has already approved funding of the project, as requested, with Project Alpha funds, lie called attention to the fact that his report indicates a certain order of construction and wished the Council iie::~bers to be aware that this order is flexible and subject ~o change. He further noted that depending upon the work ioad in his Office and the amount of storm drain construction to be accomplished in one year, it might be necessary to i~ire consultants for design of these facilities. Councilman Sneegas restated that he has a lease-hold interest in a piece of ~roperty located in the Anaheim Canyon Industrial Area, and !,~r. Hopkins reaffirmed the City Attorney's ruling that this would not constitute a conflict. Councilwoman Kaywood felt that future sellers realizing 'high profits from sale of land after the storm drain is constructed should pay the additional $2,000 per acre to the City. Mayor Thom felt this could not be legislated and it would be too hard and too expensive to determine the price for each piece of land, before and after installat ion. On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council approved establishment of drainage fees for ti~e Anaaeim Canyon Industrial Area as recommended by the City Engineer, at $2,000 per acre. Councilman Seymour absent. MOTION CARRIED. TEEN COUNCIL - INTERIM BY-LAWS: Anaheim Youth Council proposed by-laws were sub- mitted together with recommendation from the Parks and Recreation Commission that these be adopted as interim by-laws by the City Council with formal adoption of by-laws to be considered after one year's experience. Councilman Pebley left the Council Chamber. (2:10 P.i~i.) Councilwoman Kaywood s~ggested that the proposed by-laws be revised to .~ow a representative of the Anaheim Youth Council meeting with the Library Board as well. She proposed that one representative, instead of two, be assigned to the City Council, thereby releasing one Youth Council Member to meet with the Library Board. Councilwoman Kaywood reported that she feels this Youth Council to be a very good idea and is looking forward to working with it. Councilwoman Kaywood thereupon moved that the interim by-laws for the Anaheim Youth Council be adopted and implemented for the 1975-76 school year, the amendment to Article VII, Page Nos. 2 and 3 to provide that one Member will be responsible to ~ tend City Council Meetings and one Member to attend Library Board Meetings. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. Councilman Pebley temporarily absent. Councilman Seymour absent. MOTION CARRIED. CONSEi~ CALENDAR ITEMS: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom, the following actions were authorized in accordance with reports and recommendations furnished each Council Member and as listed on the Consent Calendar Agenda: 1. CLAIMS AGAINST THE CITY: The following claims were denied and referred to the insurance carrier: a. Claim submitted by Anaheim Union High School District on behalf of Tim Vavro for purported loss sustained on or about May 31, 1975 at the Anaheim Convention Center. b. Claim submitted by Gladys C. Howard for injuries purportedly sustained in the vicinity of the 600 block of South Barnett Street, Anaheim, California, on or about July 4, 1975. c. Claim submitted by Marlene Arnegard for general and special damages purportedly sustained as a result of actions of the Anaheim Police Department, on or about July 15, 1975. See M/nuCes of November 4, 1975, 1;30 P.M., Page No. 75-964, "Minutes". City ~all, Anai~eim~ California - COUNCIL ~II;~UTI~S - October 7~ 1975~ 1:30 P.!I... d. Claim submitted by Ray Pfeifer on behalf of minor son, Scott Pfeifer for injuries purportedly sustained while playing baseball at Boysen Park, on or about July 17, 1975. e. Claim submitted by Richard Rousselle and Donna Cunningham on behalf of ileed Rousselle for special, general~ an~ exemplary damages purportedly sustained on or about July 24, 1{',75. f. Claim submitted by Mr. John F. Whiteside on behalf of John S. Whiteside, Son, for loss purportedly sustained as a result of actions of Anaheim Police Officers, on or about August 11, 1975. g. Claim submitted by Mike Seward for injuries purportedly sustained while attending a rock concert at Anaheim Stadium, on or about August 30, 1975. h. Claim submitted by Ramiro ~Ionguia for damages purportedly sustained as a result of being struck by a City vehicle, on or about Septa2ber 19, 1975. i. Claim submitted by Southern California Gas Company for damage purportedly sustained to gas service on Sequoia, west of Brooknurst as a result of City crews excavating to relocate water meter, on or about Sept~nber 19, 1975. j. Claim submitted by Kenneth W. Dukes for damages purportedly sustained to vehicle as a result of collision with City vehicle, on or about 8eptember 22, 1975. k. Claim submitted by Gerald Podolak, M. D., for injuries purportedly suscained as a result of a fall on stairs at Anaheim Stadium, on or about July 14, 1975. 2. DINNER-DANCING PLACE PER~4IT: Dinner-Dancing Place Permit was granted subject to the recommendations of the Chief of Police for the Chung King Cafe, 327 East Lincoln Avenue, with dancing Friday through Sunday from 9:00 p.m. to 2:00 a.m. (Ming Bing Wong, Applicant) 3. COI~II]SPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed: a. Local Agency Formation Commission - Minutes - September 10, 1975. b. Canyon Area General Planning Task Force - Minutes - September 23, 1975. c. Financial and Operating Reports for the month of August, 1975 for the City Treasurer and the Electrical Division. d. PAC Meeting (Alpha) - .qinutes - Septeznber 9, 1975. e. Santa Aha Canyon Property Owners Association - Election of Board 2 Iember s. Coun~ iman Pebley temporarily absent. Councilman Seymour absent, bIOTION CARRIED. Councilman Pebley returned to the Council Chamber. (2:15 P.~.I.) RESOLUTION NOS. 75R-522 THROUGH 75R-525: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution Nos. 75R-522 through 75R-525, both inclusive, for adoption in accordance with the reports and recommendations furnished each Council 24ember and as listed on [i~e Consent Calendar Agenda. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTIO2{ NO. 75R-522 - DEEDS OF EASEJ.IENT: A RESOLUTION OF T~L CITY COUNCIL OF Tile CITY OF AN~tEIiI ACCEPTII<G CERTAIN DEEDS AND OPd)ERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Imperial Properties; R. B. Perry, et ux.; Patricia J. Friend; Daniel Boone, et ax.; James E. Carter, et ux.) RESOLUTION NO. 75R-523 - ABA~NDONMENT NO. 75-6A: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DECLARIf~G ITS INTtii~TION TO VACATE CmRTAIN REAL PROPERTY AND FIXING A DATE FOR ttEAKIi;G ThnREON. (75-6A, October 25, 1975, 2:30 P.>I.; existing public utility easement located at the southeast corner of Coronet and 2iinot Streets) RESOLUTION NO. 75R-524 - E14CROACt~J4ENT PEFCIIT NO. 75-1E: A RESOLUTION OF TIiE CITY COUi~CIL OF TIlE CITY OF AIIAHEIA APPROVING TtlL TEPC.fS Ai'~D CONDITIONS OF AN Li~CiiOACI~.IENT PER2.IIT AND AUTHORIZING TIlE !,[AYOR AND CI'I~Y CLERK TO EXECUTE SAID E~CP. OACH~4ENT PEILMIT WITII JOHH A. AND :.,UkRGARET JOAN BURKE. (75-1~) (Submitted by >ir. and Mrs. John Burke, to encroach upon a portion of an existing public utility easement north of Westmont Drive, west of West Street within Lot No. 10 of Tract No. 1560, further described as 649 North Carleton Avenue) 75-903 City liall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL >1INUTES - October 7, 197.5~ 1:30 P.l~i. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-525 - ENCROAC~,~ENT PEP~IIT NO. 75-2E: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COdNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIm.! APPROVING TIlE TEPd~S A24D CONDITIONS OF A~ ENCROACH~[ENT PEtLMIT AbID AUTHORIZING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO ~ECUTE SAID ENCROACH}tENT PE~-~IT WITH JOHN LLOYD WATT AND ALICE D. WATT. (75-2E) (Submitted by i~r. and l~[rs. John L. Watt to encroach into a portion of an existing public utility easement located east of Walnut Street, at the east side of Hazelwood Street, in connection with Variance No. 2701) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL M~BERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL M~BERS: None ABSEi~: COUNCIL M~BERS: Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution Nos. 75R-522 through 75R-525, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. CITY PLANNING COI, R{ISSION ITk~MS: Actions taken by thc City Planning Commission at their meeting held September 15, 1975 pertaining to the following applications were submitted for City Council information and consideration. On motion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilman Pebley, the City Council authorized the actions pertaining to environmental impact requirements as recommended by the City Planning Commission and sustained the actions taken by nhe City Planning Commission in connection with the following applications: (Item Nos. 1 through 6) 1. ENVIRO~ENTAL IMPACT REPORT - CATEGORICAL EX~[PTION: The Planning Director has determined that the proposed activity in Conditional Use Permit No. 1563 falls within the definition of Section 3 ~1 Class 1 of the City of Anaheim · , ' Guidelines to the requirements for an environmental impact report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an environmental impact report. 2. ENVIRO~'DtENTAL IMPACT REPORT - NEGATIVE DECLARATION: The City Planning Commission recommends to the City Council that the subject project in Variance No. 2730 be declared exempt from the requirement to prepare an environmental impact report pursuant to the provisions of the California Enviror~mental Quality Act. 3. CONOITIONAL USE PER~IIT NO. 1563: Submitted by Thomas A. Dobbie, Jr., to permit on-sale beer and wine in an existing restaurant on CL zoned property located at 314 South Brookhurst Street. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution i~o. PC75-19~, granted said conditional use permit subject to conditions. 4. VARIANCE NO. 2730: Submitted by LeRoy C. Ramsey to construct a 9-unit apartment complex on RS-A-4],O0~ zoned property located at 3300 West Orange Avenue with Code waivers of: a. Maximum building height. b. l~inimum distance between buildings· The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-192, granted said variance, subject to conditions. 5. CONDITIONAL USE PEri,IT NO. 1423 - EXTENSION OF TI~'~E: Submitted by Gary E. ~artin, President, Board of Directors, Knott Avenue Christian Church, for an extension of time to permit the expansion of the church facilities and to con- struct a two-story educational classroom building with offices and storage facilities at 315 South Knott Street. The City Planning Commission by motion, granted a six-month extension of time expiring ~tarch 5, 1976. 6. CONDITIONAL USE PE~IT NO. 1525 - REVISED PLANS: Submitted by b~x D. Rapoport, The Church in Anaheim, requesting approval of revised plans to permit a two-story church building on the north side of Ball Road, east of Nutwood Street. 75-904 City ttallt Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 7~ 1975~ .1:30 P.M. The City Planning Commission, by motion, approved revised plans as submitted in connection with Conditional Use Permit No, 1525. Councilman Seymour absent. MOTION CARRIED. TENTATIVE !~P~ TRACT NO. 8866~ .REVISION NO. 1: Developer, Heltzer Lnterprises; property located west of State College Boulevard, between Romneya Drive and La Palma Avenue; proposed for subdivision into 16~ R~-4000 zoned lots. ~.[iss Santalahti reported that the environmental impact report regarding subject project (E.I.R. No. 141) was certified as being in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act on March 25, 1975 in connection with Reclassification No. 74-75-23, and that the recommended action shown on the printed Agenda for continuation of subject tentative tract was incorrect. She advised that the City Planning Commission at their meeting held Sept~nber 29, 1975 approved Tentative 5{ap, Tract No. ~866, Revision No. 1 on the basis that the proposed subdivision together with 'its design and improvement is consistent with the City's General Plan, pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5, subject to the following conditions: 1. That development of this tract is contingent upon the completion of Reclassification No. 74-75-2B, approving the zoning of the property. 2. That should this subdivision be developed as more than one s~bdivision, each subdivision thereof shall be submitted in tentative form for approval. j. That all lots within this tract shall be served by underground utilities. 4. That fire hydrants si~all be installed and charged as required and determined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department prior to cormnencement of structural framing. 5. That the owner(s) of subiect property si~all pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at ti~e time the building permit is issued. 6. That vehicular access rights, except at street and/or alley openings, to La Palma Avenue shall be dedicated to the City of Anaheim. 7. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. ~3. That the alignment and terminal point of storm drains sl~own on this tentative tract map shall not be considered final. These drains si~all be sub iect to precise design considerations and approval of the City Engineer. 9.' That street names shall be approved by the City of Anaheim prior to approval of a final tract map. 10. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary street name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy. il. That in accordance with City Council policy, a six-foot masonry wall shall be constructed on the south property line separating Lot Nos. 1 through 10 and 153 through 168 from La Palma Avenue. Reasonable landscaping, including irri~a~ion facilities~ shall be installed in the uncemented portion of the arterial highway parkway the full distance of said wall, plans for said landscaping ~o be submitted to and subject to the approval o£ the Superintendent of Parkway Maintenance, and following installation and acceptance, the City of Anaheim shall assume the responsibility for maintenance of said landscaping. 12. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, along the full 64-foot width and entire length of Baxter Street between Romneya Drive and La Palma Avenue, including preparation of improvement plans and installation of all improvements such as curbs, gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facilities, and other appurtenant work shall be complied with am required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the Office of the City Engineer, as stipulated to by the petitioner; and the submitted revised tract maps shall be further revi~ed to reflect the 64-foot width of Baxter Street. 13. That the property owner(s) shall dedicate to the City of Anaheim an easement to consist of a five-foot strip of land along the inside of the sidewalks in the subject tract, except on Baxter Street, said easement to be for the purpose of excavating, maintenance, etc., by the City. 14. That prior to the approval of the final tract map, the petitioner shall submit final specific floor plans and elevations to the City Council for approval. 75-905 qity llall~ ..Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 7~ 197.5~ 1:30 P.M. 15. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. In answer to Council questions, Miss Santalahti reported that this tract map is proposed with street sections ranging from 50 to 54 feet in width, which are typical for hillside subdivisions. Normally, street sections in develop- ment of the flat portion of Anaheim are between 60 and 64 feet. She advised that the Planning Commission action to approve this tentative map included the following specific findings to justify the deviation from standard street sections: 1) That the developer has decreased the density from 250 dwelling units originally approved to 164 dwelling units; 2) that the developer will construct storm drain improvements costing approximately $20u,0(i;0 to eliminate water run off in the subject area; 3) that the developer stipulated to con- str~cting full street improvements on Baxter Street. i~iss Santalahti reported that the 'Planning Co~mission made two recom- mendations for Council in connection with this tract map: 1. That the park and recreation in-lieu fees paid by the developer be utilized to improve either Edison Park facilities or the facilities at Sycamore Junior Hish School. 2. That Reclassification No. 74-75-23 approving RM-4000 zoning on the subject property be finalized to the RS-5000 Zone to reflect the actual development of the property as a 164-1ot RS-5000 subdivision. In reply to Councilwoman Kaywood, Mr. Thompson remarked that this is the first area in the flatland portion of Anaheim in which hillside street sections have been recommended by the City Planning Commission. tie indicated that the City might anticipate other developers proposing hillside street sections since the narrower street width provides space for additional lots. Hiss Santalahti informed Council Members that the Planning Commission has recommended a five-foot wide public utility easement be included behind the sidewalk in Tract No. 8866. Mr. Maddox stated that the practice of providing a public Utility easement in back of the sidewalk in hillside subdivisions t~as resulted in many encroach- ments of the easements with such items as steps, masonry walls, fences, etc. Should the City need to enter the public utility easement for any reason, it would require disruption of those items placed over it by the property owners. ~lr. Thompson reported that two street ~rees per lot would still be required by the Subdivision Ordinance. Councilwoman Kaywood advised that since, pursuant to the printed Asenda, she thought this item was recommended to be continued, she had not read the pertinent Planning Commission excerpts and recommendations and would, there- fore, abstain from voting on approval of this tract. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council approved Tentative Map, Tract No. ~866, Revision No. 1, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission and further subject to Reclassification No. 74-75-23 being finalized to RS-5OO0; and that the park in- lieu fees collected in conjunction with this development be utilized specifically for improvements to facilities at Edison Park or Sycamore Junior High School. Councilman Seymour absent. Councilwoman Kaywood abstained from voting. MOTION CARRIED. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1562: On motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the City Council referred the request submitted by Texaco Anaheim Hills, Inc. in conjunction with Conditional Use Permit No. 1562 to con- struct a public equestrian center on RS-A-43,000 (SC) zoned property located at the southerly corner of Serrano Avenue and Hidden Canyon Road with certain Code waivers back to the City Planning Commission for review and reaffirmation of previous action in relationship to E.I.R. No. 152 and Addendum thereto. RECESS: Councilwoman Kaywood moved for a five-minute recess. Councilnmn Thom seconded the motion. Councilman Seymour absent. ~[OTION CARRIED. (2:25 P.i,[.) 75-90f, City ilall.~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL i, IINUTES - October 7~ 1375~ 1:3o P.M. AFTLiI RECES,q: ~iayor Thom called the meeting to order, all ~{embers of the City Council being present with the exception of Councilman Seymour. (Z;3O P.M.) PJg~,IC tiL'~,ING - VARIAi',iCE NO. 2721: Application by E. J. Joi~nson for the following Code waivers to construct a free-standing sign on ;,fL zoned property locate2 at 711 South East Street, was submitted together wit~ application for exemption status from the requirement to prepare an enviro~m~ental impact report: a. b[aximum number of signs. b. Permitted sign location. c. !,finimum distance between signs. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolt~tion i~o. PC75-131, reported chat the Planning Director has determined that thc proposed activity falls within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 11, of ti~e City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements for an enVironmental impact report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from said requirement and, further, denied Variance No. 2721. Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Con~nission was filed by Mr. Bill ifurray, President, The Metz Corporation, and public hearing scheduled this date. ~iss Santalahti reported that a Hippopotamus recall bakery and thrift store is being conducted on subject property which is located in an indastrial complex. There is an existing sign on the property which is 30 square feet in area. Miss Santalahti briefly explained the Code waivers requested and read the findings upon which the City Planning Commission based their denial of the variance. Brief discussion was held between Council Members and staff relative to the provisions of the Code relating to signs in both industrial and commercial zones. It was pointed out that if the applicant wished to record a parcel map to subdivide the property, the need for the requested waivers would be eliminated. Rezoning of the property to the Commercial Zone would not permit the proposed signing without waivers. Several Council Members indicated they were familiar with the signing of this particular property and that the one sign which advertises the industrial use is located in front of that property. These two activities appear to be se~ ~rate parcels and not in an industrial park type situation. The possibility of adding on to the existing sign to increase it in size was also suggested. At the conclusion of Council discussion, the Mayor asked if the applicant was present as the Council Members had several questions to ask of him. Upon ascertaining that no representative was in the Council Chamber for the applicant, on motion by Councilman PeLley, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council continued the public hearing to October 2S, 1975, and directed that the applicant be renotified of said continuance. Councilman Seymour absent. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 2729: Application of Gus Mandas for the following Code waivers which would permit seven existing free-standing signs on CL zoned property located at 910 South Euclid Street, was submitted togetl~er with application for exemption status from the requirement to prepare att environ- mental impact report: a. Maximum number of signs. b. Permitted sign location. c. i~{inimum distance between signs. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC75-182, reported that the Planning Director has determined that the proposed activity fails within the definition of Section 3.C1, Class 11, of ti~e City of Anaheim Guidelines to the requirements for an environmental impact report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from said requirement and, further, denied Variance No. 2729. i J 75-907 City I',all~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL I.[Ii~UTEE - October Appeal from action taken by the City Plannin~. Co~nmission was filed on bel~alf of the applicant by JosepI~ A. harberth, Attorney, and public hearingg scheduled this date. Miss Santalahti reported subject property is c[evelopad with a food market. This variance application is 'the result of efforts of the Zoning Enforcement Officer who had received a complaint from a local businessman regarding the signing on the subject property. She described the Code waivers requested, which if ~ranted, would permit seven existing free-standing signs on tills prop- erty, whereas one free-standing sign wo~ld be allowed by Code. She adviseC that six of these existing signs were constructed illegally and described that the applicant has an existing free-standing sign which is 16,~ square feet in size which could be expanded by Code to permi~ 2f.?, square feet of si~nin~ on the one sign post. The reasons set forth by the Planning Commission for denial were read from their resolution. Councilman Pebley recalled that subject signs have been in place for several years and conjectured that these were existing at the time the property was annexed to the City. He questioned whether they would not then be con- sidered a legal non-conforming use. i,iayor Thom advised that when this problem initially arose, the Planning staff did some research which disclosed the signs were in place when the property was annexed, however, no County permits were issued ~for these. The Mayor asked if the applicant or his agent was present and wished to address the Council. Mr. John Harriman, 505 East Commonwealth Avenue, Fullerton, Attorney and Agent for Food Land Market, presented pictures of the parking lot area and subject signs. (These were reviewed by Council and returned.) Mr. Harriman stated that the subject signs have been in place for quite a number of years; that thc Food Land Market is a small independent business which does not have a large advertising budget and consequently depends substantially on these signs to advertise weekly specials, etc. Mr. Harriman reported that he had interviewed approximately 2() customers in the market recently and ascertained from the questions asked, that the signs were beneficial to the customers in determining whether or not to shop at the market on any particular day. Mr. Harriman remarked that the signs are not situated so as to attract attention on Euclid Street and do not constitute an eyesore or traffic hazard. Rather, they address the potential clientele already in the shop~ing center. ~lr. tiarriman also informed Council Members that the businessman who reportedly complained about subject signs actually had not complained, but merely mentioned them in a discussion with the City's Zoning Enforcement Officer.. lie stated that none of the other businesses in the sl~opping center have any objection to the signs, and neither do any of the residents living on ghe opposite side of the wall. He concluded that if the applicant were required to remove the signs at this late date, it would constitute a har,~s~ip for the n~arket. Placement of additional square footage or signs on the free- standing pole sign, in his opinion, would be unsightly. l,[r. Gus Mandas, owner of the Food Land Market, added t~'~at they do feel these signs are very important to their business because thc store itself is set back quite a distance from the street. He stated that they would like to continue to advertise their specials each week in this manner since they are a small, independent store and have no budget for advertising in the high circulat ion newspap ers. The Hayor asked if anyone wished to address the Council either in favor or in opposition to the proposed variance; there being no response, he declared the hearing closed. Councilman Pebley indicated he would be in favor of approving this vari- ance because ~he signs have been in place for so many years and, in him opinion, it would constitute a hardship on the business to require their removal at this point. 75-90g city ilall~ Anaheim~ California - COUi':CIL :'[I~UTES - October 7; 1975; 1:30 P.i~l. Mayor Thom concurred, noting that while he is usually opposed to sign variances, particularly in an area such as the canyon where certain standards have been established, in this case, lie felt it would be unj~.~st to require removal of the signs which have been present for at least 12 to 15 years. CATEGORICAL EX~fPTION - Ek~VIRONP.{ENTAL I~.DPACT REPORT: On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilwoman Kaywood, the City Council ratified the determination of the Planning Director that the proposed activity falls within the definition of Section 3.01, Class 11, of the City of Anaheim Guidelines to thc requirement for an enviroranental impact report and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to file an environmental impact report. Councilman Seymour absent. ~.~OTION CARRIE]). RESOLUTION NO. 75R-526: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 75R-526 for adoption, granting Variance No. 272~), subject to t'he following Interdepart- mental recommendations, on the basis that these signs have been in place for such a long time that it would be a hardship to require removal at this time. 1. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the Office of the Director of Public Works. 2. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with thc City of Anaheim marked Exhibit l~os. 1 and 2. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANANEIi'! GFu\NTING VARIANCE NO. 2729. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL M~MBERS: Pebley, Sneegas and. Thom NOES: COUNCIL M~BERS: Kaywood ABSENT: COUNCIL ME~BERS: Seymour The Mayor declared Resolution No. 75R-526 duly passed and adopted. Councilwoman Kaywood clarified that while, in ti~is particular case, she does not feel the signs are doing any actual harm, she is voting "no" because of her long-standing position on signs and because she did not wish the Council decision to appear unanimous. 5% ~H)HISSION-At~SEI[Ei~Cf TAX - PLAC~ENT ON THE 1976 GENEP~L i~d~]ICIPAL BALLOT: On motion by Councilwoman Kaywood, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Council continued the request submitted by ~1r. Bill Daly to discuss placement of the 5% Admission-Az~usement Tax Issue on the ballot for the April, 1976 General ~unicipal Election to the meeting of November z~, 1975, as verbally requested by ~1r. Daly. Councilman Seymour absent, i. IOTIOt.~ CARRIED. E~IULSTRIAN CENTER LEASE - REQUEST FOR REACTIVATION: Cormnunication from John Millick, Vice President, Anaheim Hills, Inc., dated September S, 1975 regarding reactivation of the lease proposal between his firm and the City for an equestrian center on property adjacent to the Anaheim Hills Golf Course was su!~mitted for Council consideration. Mr. Millick added to the information contained in his letter that his firm would be agreeable to including an option to purchase the ground within the lease agreement, wherein the property would be purchased .for the same purpose, that of the equestrian center. He remarked that this arrangement would make more sense economically to them, by permitting the construction of a large permanent equestrian center on that site. In response to the i~ayor~s question as to whether there has been a change in legal opinion regarding the sale of the surplus golf course property, ~[r. :~iillick noted that in connection with the original agreement between Anai~eim tiills and the City, an agreement was also executed providing that tl~e City would use said property for expansion of the golf course only, which has subsequently been amended. He advised that he felt an agreement could be arranged which would also release the liens against the deed which would enable the City to sell the property. 75-909 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - October 7~ 1975~ 1:30 P.M. ~yor Thom remarked that he would welcome an opportunity to reduce the Cityts burden on the golf course property and also observed that the proposed equestrian center use for the property would be in keeping with tile green, open space purposes originally intended for same. He stated that he would be willing to pursue the possible sale of that property to Anaheim tiills, Inc., as long as they would be willing to accept deed restrictions which would preclude the property from being used for any purpose other than a recreational or open sDac~2 use. 3ir. 3lillick indicated that he was aware, from t~.~c politics and general public feeling, that it would be difficult to re:;one this property from open space use and that they did not intend to do so. To put the problem in proper prospective, ,~lr. l. iillick zave a brief history of Anaheim Hills' original plans to locate the equestrian center at tile corner of Serrano Avenue and Nohl Ranci~ P. oad. tlowever, this plan was abandoned when the property was given to the Oran~;e Unified School District as an ele~.~entary school site followinb litigation. During the course of this discussion, blr. ~[illick reported that there is a "failure to perform" clause in the agreement conferrin~ t',~e school site at Serrano and Nohl Ranch Road to the Orange Unified School District and that it is anticil)ated the District will si~ortly be requesting an e~,~tension of time to pcr~it ahem to comply with the terms. Mr. }~illick advised Council Members that whe~ the request for extension of ~ime is made, Anal~eim }lills, Inc. intends to as!c for architectural control over the school to Lc built on this site inasmuch as they, as ~laster Builder, have l~ad such control over ail other construction on the ranch. He reported that they are not completely happy with the new high sci~ool constructed by the Orange Unified School District. ~,lr. l.lillick further related that he understands ti~e School District is planning to utilize "Butler" type buildings on this site. lie a~ivised that Anaheim hills feels very strongly, in light of the efforts put into establishment of stringent architectural controls by the Canyon General Planning Task Force in conjunction with the City, they sl~ould take this position regarding the type of construction to be performed by the School District. In connection with the proposed lease agreement, ~.lr. ~liliick stated that his finn would prefer a minimum term of five years with option to purchase at any given time since it will cost them over $1©0,0()0 to develop the facility. This expenditure would require a minimum three years to amortize tl~e various undergrounding, drainage and sewer costs. In' reply to Councilwoman Kaywood, l,ir. ~iillick reported that they would prefer the surplus golf course property to be the site of tl~eir permanent equestrian center, but primarily as a safety factor, will continue to consider the alternative site at Serrano Avenue and Hidden Canyon Road since they do have to supply an equestrian center, as advertised, within a reasonable period of time. Therefore, if an amenable agreement cannot be worked out for the golf course surplus property, they would then proceed on the alternative site. In response to Council questions, Mr. ~lillick advised that the sale ce the property in question to Anaheim Hills would definitely affect the propose(~ additional nine holes for the Anaheim Hills Golf Course, but that if a five- to seven-year lease could be arranged, it may not affect the addition of the nine holes. He pointed out that the property is now lying fallow, and a lease arrangement would give the City an opportunity to receive some return from it. lie recalled that they had agreed previously to lease the property at 10% of value rather than the usual 5%. He remarked that they would most likely use the five acres at the inception of the center and, once the equestrian market has been tested, most likely would immediately accept the option for tile remaining ten acres although he could not commit bis firm to that at this time because of prevailing economic conditions. Councilman Thom moved that the City Attorney's Office be directed to prepare again a lease purchase agreement for the excess golf course property for consideration by the City Council, pursuant to the request submitted by Anaheim Hills, Inc. Councilman Sneegas seconded the motion. Councilman Seymour absent. ~IOTION CARRIED. 75-~10 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MI]lUTES - October 7, 1975, 1:30 P.M. TP~\CT NO. 7417 - WITHHOLDING OF BUILDI~C PZP3IITS: Request of }~r. Leonard F. Goodman, Vice President, Operations, Pacesetter l~omes, Inc., for issuance of twelve building permits currently being withheld by the Planning Department for Tract No. 7417 was submitted. Subject tract is located south of hsperanza Road, north of the Santa Ana River and east of Imperial ~Ii~;~way. l{r. Ronald Thompson requested that consideration of this request be co~tinued one week inasmuch as the developer has just receive~ the report from t~e Orange County tiealth Department concerning tl~c noise b~rricr required adjacent to the Santa Fa Railroad tracks in Tract i,lo. 7417, and it is felt that a solution to the problem can be accomplished for presentation to the Council. On motion by Councilman Peb!ey, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, the request for issuance of twelve building permits being withheld by the Planning Department in connection with Tract No. 7417 was continued to tl~ meeting of October 14, 197 5. Councilman Seymour absent, i~OTION CARRIED. TEi:TATIVE TF~kCT ~.SiP NO. ~423 - EXTEi~SION OF TIi'[E: Request of Darrell Boyer, Classic Development Corporation for a one-year extension of time to Tentative Tract ~.~p No. ~423 was submitted, together wit!~ report from t~e Planning Department a~! the City Engineer· Report of the City Engineer recommends that the extension of time be granted subject to the following conditions: 1. If permanent street name signs have not been installed, temporary name signs shall be installed prior to any occupancy. 2. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay $2,0~0 per acre drain- ag~ fee to the City of Anaheim as adopted by the City Council for the Ana~eim Hills Road Reimbursement Area No. 1 prior to approval of a final tract map. 3. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer, and that Condition No. S o~f the originally approved conditions for Tentative Tract No. 3423 be deleted. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sneegas, a one-year · ']423 was granted, to expire extension of time to Tentative Tract ~4ap No ,~ October 16, 1976, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Engineer. To this motion, Councilwoman Kaywood voted "no". Councilman Seymour absent. ~.~OT ION CARRIED. GLOVEK STA~)ILR! - FIREWORKS DISPLAY PEt~Z'~IT: Application filed by Astro Pyrotechnics, Division of Trojan Fireworks Company, on behalf of the Anaheim Cha? ~er ~of Commerce for permit to allow public fireworks display at Glover Stadium in La Palma Park on October 25, 1975, commencing at dusk for a five- ninute duration was submitted an~! %ranted as requested, on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley. To this motion, Councilwoman Kaywood voted "no". Councilman Seymour absent. ~'[OTION CARRIED. GLOVE?. STADIUi! - FIREWORKS DISPLAY PE?~.~IT: Application filed by R. Bob Souza, Geueral ~'~ana~er, California Fireworks Display Company, or~ bei~alf of the Anahei~ liigi~ Sc~ool A.S.~. for permit to allow public fireworks display on ii~ovember 13, 1975, at Glover Stadium in La Palma Park during football game half-time was sabmitted and ~ranted as requested on ~otion by Councilman Sneegas, seconded by Councilwoman Pebley. To this motion, Councilwoman Kaywood voted "no". Councilman Seymour absent· MOTION CARRIED. Tih\CT I~0. 7J76~ REVISION NO. 3 - SOU]~O ATTENUATIOi~ 'i'~\SURLS: Pursuant to Condition ~o. 12 of Tentative i{ap, Tract !~o. 7~76, plans for proposed sound attenuation measures were submitted by t!~e Maurer Development Company, 1451 Quail Street, ~:ewport Beach, 72~2.], developer of Tract i.~o. 7~76, who had cnga~ed the services of Bio-Acoustical Engineering Corporation to evaluate the acoustical envirorunent and to determine the adequacy of the ~aeasures proposed to ~eet the above condition· Report from the Planning Department indicates the co~ditions which Dr. Joh~ Hilliard of Bio-Acoustical Engineering Corporation i~as set forth in als letter dated January 30, 1975 and supplement of June 11, 1973, as being necessary to comply with the condition. The measures in his estin~ation would reduce the noise level generated by the railroad to 65 dBA in the rear yards of the lots adjacent to Orangethorpe Avenue and the railroad and 45 dI;A inside the homes (with windows and doors closed) on said lots, and the petitioner has stipulated to providing these. The Planning Department reco~mnended that the proposed sound attenuation measures be approved. 75-911 City ttall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL ~'-IINUTES - October 7~ 1975~ 1:30 P.2I. In reply to Councilwoman Kaywood, Miss Santalahti reported that the project is a 21-lot, P~.{-1200 subdivision with density of approximately 27 units per net acre. On motion by Council~nan Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley, tl~c City Council approved tlm proposed sound attenuation measures for Tract No. 7976, as recommended by Bio-Acoustical Engineering Corporation and as described in the Planning Department memorandum dated October 7, 1975. Councilman Seymour absent. HOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NOS 75R-527 A~ ~'0~ · . 75R-o~o - AWARD OF COi~?~CTS~ WORK ORDER NOS 762-A AND 741-B; In accordance with recommendations of tt~e City Engineer~ Councilman Pebley offered Resolution Nos. 75ii-527 and 75R-52.1~ for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 75R-527 - WORK ORDER NO.~ 762-A: A RESOLUTION OF Tt/E CITY ~'OUi,iCIL OF THE CITY OF A~MtEI.M ACCEPTI~.~ ~G, A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDING A CO~P, ACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOR T~E FURNISHING OF ALL PLAI'~T, I~BOR, SERVICES, I~[ATERIALS Ai~D EQUIPMEL~T Al~ ALL UTILITIES Ai~D TIIANSPORTATION, INCLUDING POWER, FUEL Ai~ WATER, AhrD PERFOIhMIi:G ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT Ai~O COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC Ii,fPROVhI'IENT: PURCtk~SE OF 251 DIGITAL LOOP · Eo~ HI'.TER, Ii'~ TIlE 1)LTECTOR SENSOR ~'IODULES AND ONE (1) DETECTOR LOOP FREQUE'-;CY ~ o .... CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 762-A. (Canoga Controls Corporation - $27,716.77) RESOLUTION NO. 75R-528 - WORK ORDER ~'tO. 741-B: A RESOLUTIOI~ OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIH ACCEPTIMC A SEALED PROPOSAL AND AWARDIi,iG A CON- TBACT TO THE LOWEST RESPONSIBLE BIDDER FOIl THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, IYtiTERIALS AND EQUIPHEITr A~,C~ ALL UTII..ITIES A}U) TP¢~NSPORTATION, I~;CLUD- lNG POWER, ,VUEL AND WATER, AI~D PE?fFOP~"II~iG ALL WORK I'~ECESS~>.Y TO COi~STP. UCT AND CO~2LETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC I~'fl?ROV~-~E>iT: THE BROOKHURST STREET STREET IMPROVEMENT, BALL ROAD TO iqiTELLA AVEi~'UE, I~I TIlE CITY OF Ai'~AHEIH, WORK ORDEK . . . - . ~:~,7,31~. 6.~) ~i~() 741-B (R J. Noble Company Alternate I'~o l-B, ~ Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL HE:-fBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Tl~om NOES: COLq~CIL HE~:~BERS: None ABSEi~': COUNCIL ?.'H~:IBERS: Seymour The ?'Iayor declared Resolution Nos. 75R-527 and 75R-522~ duly passed and adopted. OPd0INANCE NO. 3469: Councilwoman Kaywood offered Ordinance No. 3469 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. Ai,~ O,~OlNANCE OF TttE CITY OF ANAtlEIH REPEALIi'IG TITLE 6, CHAPTER 6.60, SECTIONS 6.60.020, 6.60.050, 6.60.060 AlYO ADDI!~G THERETO i<EW SECTIONS 6.60.020, 6.iD.050 AND 6.60. 060 OF THE ANAHEDi MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO FLIES. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL I'I~iBERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL HE2~BERS: None ABSEilT: COUNCIL M~,IBERS: Seymour The b~yor declared Ordinance No. 3469 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 3470: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3470 for adopted. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDIz~ANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AME..~DIi~G TITLE 13 OF THE ANAHEI/~! bfJNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-24 (20), ML) Roll Call Vote: 75-912 City hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUi'~CIL ~,iINUTES - October 7~ 1975~ l:3u P.M. AYES: COUNCIL M}~BERS: Kaywood, Pebley, Sneegas and Thom NOES: COUNCIL ME~.~BERS: None ABSE~T: COUNCIL M~'~BERS: Seymour The ~.~ayor declared Ordinance No. 3470 duly passed and adopted. ORDIi,~Ai~CE NO. 3471: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 3471 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. A~ ORDI~ANCE OF THE CITY OF Ai<AHEI~,~ AME!'~DING TITLE lg OF THE ANAHEIM I, fUi~ICIPAL CODE RELATIi,~G TO ZONING. (73-74-60, P~-1200) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCIL ME>~ERS: Pebley, Sneegas and Thom i~OES: COUNCIL M~,~ERS: Kaywood ABSEi~T: CO~CIL M~IBERS: Seymour The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 3471 duly passed and adopted. OPd)INA!,~CE NO. 3473: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 3473 for first reading. Azq ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIi~I Ai. IEi~DING TITLE 1~ OF THE ANAttEI~i MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (65-66-59 (~), CO) I~P, KING ENVELOPES AS TO CONTEiFf: Councilwoman Kaywood displayed, as a sample, an envelope from the Orange County Sanitation District, which organization routinely marks on their envelopes an indication as to contents. She suggested in relation to legal notices, in particular, that the City Departments mailing these obtain stamps which would read "important legal notice, open at once" or a facsi~'~ile. She further suggested that it would be a convenience to Council, Board, and Commission ilembers that envelopes be marked appropriately, "Agenda, ~inates", etc. COUi,~TY COUI.~SEL OPINION - SCHOOL BOARD M~BERS SERVI~IG CONCURREi~TLY ON CITY: CO!'~IISSIONS: Councilwoman Kaywood inquired whether any further information had been received from the County Counsel regarding his ruling that School Board l~embers serving on City Commissions ~ concurrently constitutes a conflict. i~lr. Hopkins advised that thc City Attorney's Office has discussed this ;~atter verbally with the County Counsel's Office who have indicated they would probably continue to hold the position that School Board Memberships and City appointments are incompatible because of the severe penalties, i~[r. Hopkins adviseJ that they have cited a number of cases and are awaiting a final decision. i{OU'£~ 57 FREE!~AY E]iTEiiSION: Councilman Sneegas referred to ti~e letter and resolution receive~ from the City of Santa Aha supporting ti~e extension of Route 57 south to the Corona Del P[ar Freeway, via t'i~e Santa Ana River Corri~.ior. Councilman Snee}~as indicated t~at i~e felt before any impetus is given to completion of that freeway, that the State be requested to complete landscaping and south attenuation measures on those portions of the freeway which have already been built. He felt that these landscaping and sound attenuation measures should be budgeted and completed as a preamble to any extension of the freeway south and that this s~ould be t~e Council's position. By general consent the Council indicated they would decline to support any ez~tension of Route 57, until the State budgets and completes the landscaping and sound attenuation measures on the existing portion of the freeway. PATT STREET - PUBLIC WOOLS' SURVEY: ~.~ayor Thom remarked that at the Planning Commission meeting held Monday, October 6, 1975, to consider amendment to Redevelopment Project Alpha, a considerable amount of conversation centered upon the residential neighborhood located in the Part Street area, north of La Palma, which is generally surrounded by industrial uses. 75-913 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUi'iCIL ~,~Ii.~UTES - October 7, 1975, 1:30 P ~,.~vnr T~om noted that the residents of t!~is particular area, feeling that their neighborhood has been ignored as far as public improvements are, concerned, both because of its proximity within the industrial area and also because of its primarily l,~exican-American population, are not particularly empathetic toward City urban redevelopment efforts, l~e stated that t~e Planning Co,remission has recognized the situation and is working toward a general plan amendment in that area. b~yor Thom moved that the Public Worl~ Department be instructed to conduct a s~rvey of the Patt Street area to determine costs for paving of streets and alleys, installing curbs and gutters, sidewalks and street lights. Councilwoman Ka~ood seconded the motion. Councilman Seymour absent. MOTION C~kRRIED. Mayor Thom pointed out that he hopes ultimately, once the re~abilitative costs for this area are known, that staff would be able to incorporate the Part Street neighborhood into a community development project area. ADJOURIC~iEi~: Councilman Sneegas moved to adjourn. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. Councilman Seymour absent. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 3:45 P.M. ~kLONA M. HOUGARD, CITY CLE?d(