Loading...
1967/01/319933 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 31~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. PERSONNEL DIRECTOR: Roy Heissner. ASSISTANT FIRE CHIEF: Jim Heying. CONVENTION CENTER AND STADIUM DIgECTOR: Tom Liegler. Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Krein proclaimed Sunday, February 26, 1967 as "Heart Sunday" and the Month of February as "Heart Month". Said proclamation was unanimously ratified by the City Council. MINUTES: Approval of the Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Meetings held January 17 and 24, 1967, and Adjourned Regular Meetings of JanuarY 18 and 20, 1967 was deferred one week, February 7, 1967. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Dutton moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED° REPORT FINANCIAL DEMANDS AGAINST THE CITY: Demands against the City in the amount of $727,078.41, in accordance with the 1966-67 Budget, were approved. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - VARIANCE NO. 1846: Submitted by Walter J. and Gladys Cannon Furie requesting waivers of aggregate sign area, number and location of free-standing signs, and maximum permitted sign height; M-1 zoned property located at 1354 South Anaheim Boulevard. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolution No. PC66-172 denied said variance. ~ Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Walter L. Brooks, of Excell-Ad Electric Signs, and public hearing held January 17, 1967, at which time said hearing was continued to this date to allow representatives of Astrodata, Incorporated, an oportunity to review the application to determine how the request might affect their property. Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson briefly reviewed the location of subject property and the Planning Commission's action and findings as previously reported. Mayor Krein asked if a representative of the petitioners wished to address the City Council. Mr. Walter Brooks, of Excell-Ad Electric Signs, representing the petitioners, again stipulated that they would relocate the small entrance signs on the property to a height of eight feet above grade, and the "nervous arrow" signs would be removed. Mr. Brooks further advised that he had contacted a representative of Astrodata, Inc., who advised that in their opinion, the proposed free- standing sign would be an improvement to the property in question. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council for or against the proposed sign, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. 9934 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 31, 1967, 1:30 P.M. Councilman Chandler questioned whether findings were made by the City Council in granting the back-drop fence sign. Decision on the foregoing issue was deferred, pending research on the previous Council approval of the back-drop sign. Later in the meeting, it was reported that no findings were made in the connection with the December 26, 1962 Council approval of the sign painted on the back-drop fence located on subject property. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-59: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 67R-59 for adoption, granting Variance No. 1846, subject to the following conditions: 1o That adequate clearance of existing electrical signs shall be provided as required by the Electridal Division, Department of Public Utilities, and the State of California G. O. 95. 2. That existing entrance signs on the property shall be raised to a height of 8 feet above grade. 3. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications on file with the City of Anaheim, marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM GRANTING VARIANCE NO. 1846. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-59 duly passed and adopted. ENTERTAINMENT PERMIT - RENEWAL: Application filed by Jack S. Stansfield for renewal of entertainment permit to allow variety acts,.dancers and musicians at the Tap City Restaurant, 1116 Fountain Way, was submitted and granted for a period of one year, subject to provisions of Chapter 4.18 of the Anaheim Municipal Code as recommended by the Chief of Police, on motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Schutte. MOTION CARRIED. SIDEWALK WAIVER - 1644 SOUTH LEWIS STREET: Request of Green & White Construction Company for temporary waiver of sidewalks at 1644 South Lewis Street, was submitted. On the recommendations of the City Engineer, Councilman Chandler moved that said temporary sidewalk waiver be granted, subject to no permanent planting or permanent type improvements being permitted within the area reserved for future sidewalks. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion° MOTION CARRIED. CITY OF ORANGE ZONE CHANGE NO. 472: Excerpt from the Minutes of the City Planning Commission Meeting held January 30, 1967, pertaining to City of Orange Zone Change No. 472, proposing reclassification from M-l, Light Industrial (Orange County Zoning) to M-2, Industrial; property located on the north side of Katella Avenue extending westerly from Batavia Street to the Santa Ana River, was submitted recommending that the City of Orange Planning Commission be advised that the proposed zone change is consistent with the existing and projected industrial land use of those areas along the Santa Ana River in the City of Anaheim. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Schutte, recommendation of the City Planning Commission was sustained and a copy thereof ordered forwarded to the City of Orange Planning Commission. MOTION CARRIED. 9935 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California COUNCIL MINUTES - January 31~ 1967~ 1:30 PoM. BILLIARD PARLOR PERMIT: The City Council at their meeting held January 10, 1967, granted application filed by Cecil M. Napier for amusement and entertainment premises permit to allow a billiard parlor at 821 South Brookhurst Street. Communication dated January 26, 1967, from Cecil M. Napier was submitted requesting that said permit be granted for premises at 2325 West Sequoia Avenue (relocation). Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson briefed report from the Zoning Division, advising that the new location was zoned C-l, and a billiard center is a permitted use in the C-i, Commercial Zone° Change of location from 821 South Brookhurst Street to 2~2q West Sequoia Avenue was approved and per~it granted, subject to the provisions of Chapter 4.24 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Sch~tte~ MOTION CARRIED~ RESOLUTION NO. 67R-60 - PROJECT NO. 473B: Councilman Chandler offered Resolution No. 67R-60 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT PUBLIC CONVENIENCE AND NECESSITY REQUIRE THE CONSTRUCTION AND COMPLETION OF A PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF LEMON STREET, FROM ORANGETHORPE AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 1600 FEET SOUTH THEREOF, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, PROJECT NO. 473B; AND APPROVING THE DESIGNS, PLANS, PROFILES, DRAWINGS AND SPECIFICATIONS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF; AUTHORIZING THE CONSTRUCTION OF SAID PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT IN ACCORDANCE WITH SAID PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS, ETC.; AND AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE CITY CLERK TO PUBLISH A NOTICE INVITING SEALED PROPOSALS FOR THE CONSTRUCTION THEREOF~ (Bids to be opened February 23, 1967, 2:00 PoM.) Roll call vote~ AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution Noo 67R-60 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT PROJECTS FINAL ACCEPTANCE: Upon receipt of certification from the Director of Public Works, Councilman Pebley offered Resolutions Nos. 67R-61, 67R-62 and 67R-63 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-61: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTA- TION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE IMPROVEMENT OF JEFFERSON STREET, FROM APPROXIMATELY 300 FEET NORTH OF LA PALMA AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 628 FEET SOUTH OF LA PALMA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 478B. (RoJ. Noble Company) RESOLUTION NO. 67R-62: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTA- TION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE VERMONT STREET NURSERY DRIVEWAY IMPROVEMENT AT 1426 EAST VERMONT STREET, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, WORK ORDER NO. 1066. (Ro J~ Noble Company) 9936 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 31, 1967, 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-63: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINALLY ACCEPTING THE COMPLETION AND THE FURNISHING OF ALL PLANT, LABOR, SERVICES, MATERIALS AND EQUIPMENT AND ALL UTILITIES AND TRANSPORTATION INCLUDING POWER, FUEL AND WATER, AND THE PERFORMANCE OF ALL WORK NECESSARY TO CONSTRUCT AND COMPLETE THE FOLLOWING PUBLIC IMPROVEMENT, TO WIT: THE GROVE STREET SEWER IMPROVE- MENT, FROM LA PALMA AVENUE TO APPROXIMATELY 1270 FEET SOUTH OF LA PALMA AVENUE, IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, JOB NO. 1203. (Martin's Sewer Construction) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 67R-61, 67R-62 and 67R-63, duly passed and adopted. PURCHASE: The City Manager reported on informal bids received for the purchase of two four door station wagons, as follows, and recommended acceptance of the low bid of McCoy Ford, Anaheim: McCoy Ford, Anaheim McPeek Plymouth, Anaheim Anaheim Dodge, Anaheim Cone Brothers Guardian Chevrolet $2,487238 2,747.20 3,152.55 No Quote No Quote On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Chandler moved that the low bid of McCoy Ford be accepted and purchase authorized in the amount of $2,487.38, including trade-in allowance and sales tax. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. PURCHASE OF EQUIPMENT: The City Manager reported on necessary purchase of a Scrubmobile and a Power Sweeper for use at the Anaheim Convention Center, and advised that the one manufacturer, American-Lincoln Products, Inc., Los Angeles, has submitted a quotation for said equipment, as follows: American Lincoln Model 560GT Scrubmobile American Lincoln Power Sweeper Model A1446M $7,344.80 incl~ tax. 2,752.00 inclo tax. On the recommendations of the City Manager, Councilman Dutton moved that the bid of American Lincoln Products, Inc., be accepted and purchase authorized from the only supplier. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. CANCELLATION OF COUNTY TAXES: On motion by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the Orange County Board of Supervisors was requested to cancel county taxes on property acquired by the City of Anaheim for municipal purposes, pursuant to Resolution No. 67R-20, formerly assessed to the State of California Department of Public Works, Directors Deed recorded January 17, 1967, as Document No. 8878, in Book No. 8154 at Page 965, Official Records of Orange County, California (07-0RA 57). MOTION CARRIED. RIGHT OF WAY CERTIFICATION: On the recommendations of the City Engineer, it was moved by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley, that the Mayor and City Clerk be authorized to sign Right-of-Way Certification in connection with the right-of-way for Lemon Street (street improvement from 253 feet south of Orangethorpe Avenue to centerline of Lemon Street connector). MOTION CARRIED. MID-YEAR SALARY REVIEW: Personnel Director Roy Heissner presented report of Mid- Year Salary Review, dated January 31, 1967 (copies furnished each Councilman), recommending no general mid-year salary adjustments be made for the second half of the fiscal year 1966-67. He advised that after a review of salary data concerning administra- tive, professional, trades and clerical bench marks, there was not sufficiently significant movement to warrant any increase in salaries at the present time. 9937 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 31, 1967~ 1:30 P.M. It was also recommended that the City approve a proposed rate increase of 25 to 29 percent, and pay the cost thereof, for major medical group health insurance for employees, amounting to approximately $12,000.00 for the balance of the current contract year. Mr. Heissner advised that said increase would amount to approximately $48,000.00 for the next contract year, commencing April 1, 1967. He briefed the reasons for the proposed increase in insurance rates, advising that the City's experience was reviewed with the insurance carrier, and in addition to the above normal serious illness rate during the past year, hospital rates have risen, necessitating the first health insurance premium increase in three years, and he recommended that the City continue to pay lO0. percent of the employees' insurance costs, and 50 percent of their families' costs° Relative to a request from the Firemen's Association for amend- ment to the state employee retirement program to afford an increase for retired City employees, Mr. Heissner reported that in 1965, after a thorough review of the alternatives had been made, the 1963 "Cost-of-Living Adjustment" was adopted by the City benefiting both safety and miscellaneous classified employees. He further reported on additional request from the Firemen's Association that a section be adopted to the retirement program providing the widow of a retired safety employee with one-half of his retirement payments. The total cost for such an amendment would be borne by the City as contracting agency, and Mr. Heissner reported that under the existing program, employees may, by the option selected, provide for lifetime payments to the surviving widow. That a recommendation can not be made until the actuarial survey currently being conducted is received. Mr. Murdoch briefed the request from the Firemen's Association, relative to a 5 percent increase in the salaries of Captains and Battalion Chiefs, and setting forth the basis for said request. He advised that comparisons of titles in other jurisdictions can be misleading, since actual duties do not necessarily compare with those having the same titles in another area; that it was felt no increase was warranted in the two positions, unless an adjustment were to be made in the basic positions also. Concerning the requested amendments to the retirement program, Mr. Murdoch recommended that the request concerning retired safety employees' widows benefits be further considered in conjunction with other budgetary matters, after completion of the actuarial survey. Mayor Krein asked if a representative of the Fire Department personnel wished to address the Council° Mr. William Horan, 1723 South Ivanhoe, representing the Firemen's Association, advised that because their work is mostly of an emergency nature, there is no comparison with other positions in the City. The Fire Department accident or death rate is five-to-one, contrasted to other positions, and they were strongly recommending the requested 5 percent increase in the classifications of Captain and Battalion Chief. Councilman Dutton moved that the recommendations of the Personnel Director be accepted. Mr. Norman Cook. 1728 East Willow Street, requested permission to address the City Council representing the Anaheim Police Association, and advised that information had just been received this date which they felt was pertinent to the police salaries; that said information had not yet been prepared for presentation, and thereupon requested the final decision on the Personnel Director's recommendations be deferred for one week. Councilman Dutton withdrew the foregoing motion, and Council decision on this issue was ordered continued to February 7, 1967. 9938 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 31~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Dutton, seconded by Councilman Pebley: a. Resolution of the Board of Supervisors designating February 12th, 1967 - as Home Visit Day in Orange County. bo Resolution of the Board of Supervisors authorizing cooperation with waste water control agencies. c. City of Costa Mesa Resolution No. 67-8 urging legislative action with respect to pre-emption by the state in the field of vice and gambling. d. Minutes Anaheim Public Library Board - Meeting of December 19, 1966. e. Financial & Operating Reports for the month of December 1966. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCES NOS. 2351 AND 2352 - R-H ZONE: On the recommendations of the Development Services Director, it was moved by Councilman Chandler, seconded by Councilman Pebley that final reading of Ordinances Nos. 2351 and 2352, be deferred, and Ordinance No. 2351 be referred back to the City Planning Commission for clarifi- cation of Section 18~!3.030(B), Minimum Site Requirements, pertaining to loca- tion of main structures in relation to dedicated streets. MOTION CARRIED. AMBULANCE RATE SURVEY: The City Manager briefed report submitted to the City Council on January 17, 1967, together with comparative rates and types of ambulance services in various locations in California, advising that rates in various jurisdictions within Orange County are approximately the same, it being his understanding that these rates are established by an association of ambulance services. He advised that rates in the various Los Angeles County areas are somewhat less, being established by City or County Ordinances, however these ordinances usually allow for some type of subsidy, therefor although the rate may be lower to the patient, the community absorbs the difference. In response to Council questioning Mr. Murdoch advised that the City of Anaheim could convert the three presently operating rescue units to rescue-ambulance units at a cost of approximately $12,000.00, with no additional cost for personnel since the rescue units are currently operated on a 24 hour a day basis; that based on a past years 1,541 ambulance calls, $15 for each call would recover the cost of converting the units and fee collection costs. He was of the opinion that the rate would necessarily be greater, to absorb a share of the personnel cost, as well as overhead and administrative costs. He noted that rescue services are presently provided with no charge to the public. Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that, rather than the city offering the service, it would be more feasible to control ambulance rates through a need and necessity ordinance for licensing, and provide funds for payment to the operating ambulance services for any deficiency between the City's permitted rates and the going market rate, or a cost and profit structure. At the conclusion of the discussion, Councilman Chandler moved that the City Manager be instructed to prepare necessary data and cost breakdown providing some contribution by the City, in the event a need and necessity ordinance was adopted, establishing a basic rate structure; further, that the City Attorney be instructed to prepare a draft of such a need and ordinance for Council consideration. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. The City Manager noted some form of State legislation pertaining to ambulance rates may be introduced during the current session of the Legislature. There being no urgency on this matter, it was agreeable with the City Council to defer further action pending possible State legislation. 9939 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES January 31, 1967~ 1:30 P.M. PROPOSAL - BOOKING AGENT CONTRACT ARENA, CONVENTION CENTER - MADISON SQUARE GARDEN CORPORATION MAJOR ATTRACTIONS, INCORPORATED: Councilman Chandler left the Council Table and took no part in this issue due to possible conflict of interest. (2:55 P.M.) Mr. Danny Dare, 235 West Orangewood Avenue, Anaheim, addressed the Council advising he represented a group of business men to be known as Major Attractions, Inc., and to be owned and operated by Danny Dare, Sammy Lewis, Melodyland Theatre, Inc., Jack Wrather, Frank Brett, H. H. Thomson and Tommy Walker. He thereupon presented a Letter of Intent to enter into contract to perform the service of producing and booking entertainment events in the arena portion of the Convention Center. Said letter was read in public in full. Mayor Krein noted that the Letter of Intent made no reference to the term of the proposed contract, provision for cancellation or guaranteed minimum amount to the City. Mr. Tommy Walker, 722 Westwood Place, Anaheim, advised that Major Attractions, Inc., was prepared to make a firm commitment, however, felt it was neither proper nor fair, nor in the best interest of the City to report the figures or terms of the proposed contract of Major Attranctions, Inc., as they did not feel this issue should become a bidding-type situation with the other organization. In answer to Councilman Peble~s question relative to qualifications of the newly organized local group as compared to Madison Square Garden, Mr. Walker reported that their organization was composed of people with a great deal of production and promotion background who were currently active in this field. Messages of assurances were read, which were received by Mr. Walker from Associated Booking, New York, and Sol Hurok, New York (West Coast Office). Councilman Dutton asked if they could equate themselves on a par with the capability that Madison Square Garden presents. Mr. Walker advised of his years of experience and noted some of the productions for which he was responsible, and also noted some of the productions for which Mr. Dare was responsible. Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that written proposals should be obtained from both organizations to be submitted to the City Council after being analyzed by the City Manager, City Attorney and Stadium and Convention Center Director. Councilman Dntton was of the opinion that the Letter of Intent appeared to infer that the local organization could provide the City with a better contract when in fact negotiations with Madison Square Garden were not yet completed. Mr. Walker advised that as an interested citizen he read the proposed contract of Madison Square Garden, which was recommended for acceptance and noted that the proposed contract did not provide for a guarantee to the city nor cancellation. Councilman Dutton felt that the following factors should be determined by the City Council: a. Will the facility be used in this manner. W~ll a prod~ction and booking agent be obtained. c. Will the City act as its own agent. It was determined that until the two proposals were analyzed and cost to the City projected, should the City act as its own agent, the issue co~ld not be resolved. 9940 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 31, 19677 1:30 P.M. Mayor Krein felt that the proposal of Major Attractions, Inc., and the amended proposal of Madison Square Garden should be delivered to the City Manager or City Attorney un-be-known to anyone on the City Council to be analyzed and presented to the City Council at the same time. Mr. Murdoch reported, according to his understanding, the Major Attractions, Inc. proposal contemplates a minimum annual payment, an option on the part of the City to cancel at five year increments if a specified minimum performance, expressed in dollars, is not reached. The dollar amount ~as not been specified. Further, he has verbally obtained the dollar figure, and basis for it, from Madison Square Garden, which figure has not yet been conveyed to the City Council pending a decision, hence no figures have been disclosed due to the fact that this is not an auction bidding-type contract. Reference was made to a previous suggestion of Councilman Schutte, wherein with proper notice a convention might be booked during the period of the proposed contract, should an event not be scheduled by the exclusive booking agent, and it was noted that such flexibility would necessarily require an adjustment accordingly to any guarantee provisions of the contract. Mr. Murdoch advised that negotiations with Madison Square Garden did not follow along the lines of Mr. Schutte's suggestion; that the current proposal provides for city reservation of maximum of five days upon two years notice. Mr. Murdoch thereupon asked specific Council direction on the following: 1. Are the rules or format on which negotiations were made with Madison Square Garden now to be changed? Will the basis of Council decision be made on whatever is presented in writing allowing no changes to one that is not allowed to the other? 3. It is there a possibility that the City would not enter into a contract with any booking or producing agency? Councilman Pebley was of the opinion that no decision could be made on either proposal until an estimate of cost and revenues is prepared reflecting the possibilities should this activity be operated by the City. Mr. Murdoch stated that it must be decided whether or not the City wanted to entertain the possibility of the City of Anaheim booking the events in the Convention facility, and further stated that the necessary informa- tion can be prepared, however, he was reluctant to do this, and ask the other two organizations to submit their proposal unless this is what the City Council desires. Mayor Krein thereupon offered a motion that the City Council not consider an exclusive booking agent for the Convention facility. Further discussion was held, and Councilman Schutte and Pebley stated that they were not ready to vote on such a motion. Mr. Walker, speaking as a citizen and not as a representative of Major Attractions, Inc., advised of offers he personally has received from many of the other arenas seeking people to produce shows, and further stated that Anaheim is unique in that they have an opportunity to obtain the experience of a professional group who would take the responsibility of financing, timing, staging and scheduling diversified events for maximum financial returns. Mr. Walker further stated that before any resolution or motion is adopted, these points such as programing and the caliber of events should be considered, and unless somebody had the entire contract, they would not be in position to program and schedule properly. Mayor Krein's motion was restated and roll call vote called for. Councilman Dutton: No. 9941 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 31, 1967, 1:30 P.M. Councilman Pebley, not wishing to vote until further information is received, moved that the motion be tabled for one week. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Councilman Chandler returned to the meeting. (3:55 P.M.) RESOLUTION NO. 67R-64: On report and recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 67R-64 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR, AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION, BY EMINENT DOMAIN, OF REAL PROPERTY FOR HIGHWAY EASEMENT AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Katella Avenue underpass) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-64 duly passed and adopted. Councilman Dutton left the meeting, 3:55 P.M. PROPOSED ILLUMINATED BILLBOARD - ANAHEIM STADIUM: City Manager Keith A. Murdoch submitted for Council review a sketch of proposed on-site double faced reader panel vari-vision structure, proposed to be located on Anaheim Stadium Property, together with outline of price, projected maintenance costs and leasing price. He advised that Stadium Director Tom Liegler recommends the sign as proposed, the $14,750.00 cost to be divided equally between the California Angels, Canteen Corporation of America, and the City of Anaheim. Mr. Murdoch reported that a portion of the sign would be animated; that the reader panel would be used to advertise the baseball games and the Stadium Club alternately, according to the season, and by the City for advertising other events and tenants. Mr. Liegler advised that content of copy on the advertising structure would be by mutual agreement between the three participants, and that portion illustrated on the sketch with the emblem of the California Angels could be designated for another use, such as the City Seal, and be changed every few months if desired. Councilman Chandler questioned who would have final authority in the event the three parties did not agree on copy to be used. Mr. Liegler reported that nothing specific had been set out as to the final authority on the two thirds of the reader panel which would be used by the Ball Club and the Stadium Club. In response to question by the City Manager relative to the contracts held by the City with the California Angels and with Canteen Corporation, City Attorney Joseph Geisler advised that these documents provide that the City has the right of control of advertising outside the Stadium structure. However, he was of the opinion that some provision for control should be made, due to the proposed three way participation in the cost of the advertising structure. Mr. Liegler expressed agreement that some control priority should be established for any copy on the reader panel. At the conclusion of the discussion that followed Councilman Chandler moved that the City Council approve the design of the structure, and the City's participation of one third the cost thereof, subject to an agreement which gives the City the final authority for copy, in the event 9942 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 31~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. of failure to mutually agree upon said copy. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-65: Councilman Schutte offered Resolution No. 67R-65 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING AND AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN JAMES, POND & CLARK, INC. AND CIRCLE SEAL PRODUCTS CO., INC., AND THE CITY OF ANAHEIM RELATING TO THE DEPUTIZING OF GUARDS FOR THE PURPOSE OF DIRECTING TRAFFIC ENTERING, LEAVING, AND TRAVERSING THAT PORTION OF BROOKHURST STREET WHICH BORDERS THE CIRCLE SEAL CENTER PROPERTY. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None Dutton The Mayor declared Resolution No. 67R-65 duly passed and adopted. DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Schutte offered Resolutions Nos. 67R-66 through 67R-70, both inclusive, for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-66: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Coastwise Investment Co. and Orange Development Co., Inc.) RESOLUTION NO. 67R-67: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR STORM DRAIN PURPOSES. California Drive-In Theatres) RESOLUTION NO. 67R-68: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Edward R. Harpstrite) RESOLUTION NO. 67R-69: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING A GRANT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR AN EASEMENT FOR ROAD AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (William A. Simpson and Leslie G. Landau) RESOLUTION NO. 67R-70: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING AN EASEMENT DEED CONVEYING TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM CERTAIN REAL PROPERTY FOR A TEMPORARY EASEMENT FOR CONSTRUCTION PURPOSES. (California Drive-In Theatres, Inc.) Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein None Dutton The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 67R-66 through 67R-70, both inclusive, duly passed and adopted. RECESS: Councilman Chandler moved to recess to 7:00 P.M. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. (4:15 P.M.) AFTER RECESS: Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. 9943 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES January 31, 1967, 1:30 P.M. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein. COUNCILMEN: None. CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. PLANNING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Grudzinski. INVOCATION: Chaplain John Bevan, of Anaheim Memorial Hospital, gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Chandler led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. CONTINUED PUBL%C HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-42 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 905: Submitted by Earl T. and Clara C. Spratlen and Hector M. and Alice Pelayo requesting change of zone from R-1 to C-1 and permission to establish a service station at the intersection of a secondary street and a local street within 75 feet of a residential zone, with waiver of maximum building height; property briefly described as located at the north- east corner of East Street and Kenwood Avenue (1302 and 1308 North East Street). Public hearing was continued from the meeting of January 17, 1967, at the request of the authorized agent. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolutions Nos. PC66-173 and PC66~174 recommended denial of said reclassification, and denied said conditional use permit. Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area, summarizing the evidence submitted to and considered by the City Planning Commission. He called attention to findings of the Commission, particularly concerning the detrimental effect of the service station on the residential integrity of the adjacent properties, the size and shape of subject property, necessitating access from the residential street, and the 15 foot high structural wall adjacent to the east property line. In answer to Councilman Dutton's question, Mr. Thompson advised that a five foot dedication of property would be necessary for the ultimate widening of East Street. Mayor Krein asked if a representative of the petitioners wished to address the City Council~ Mr. William A. Toplikar, Authorized Agent, 3505 Mungall Drive, addressed the Council advising that the owners of the two lots had moved away because of the noise and the heavy traffic conditions on East Street. He further advised he had just learned that the tenants in the dwelling adjacent to subject property on the north were moving for the same reasono In addition, the tenants at 1308 North East Street, one of the lots in question, have given notice that they are leaving after only a few weeks residence. He was of the opinion that it is dangerous to back an auto- mobile out of a garage unto East Street. Mr. Toplikar called attention to existing service stations in the immediate area and a restaurant under construction across East Street to the west. He was of the opinion that subject property was too small for any other commercial use, and requested that subject petitions be approved. Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council, and Mayor Krein asked if anyone wished to address the Council in opposition. 9944 City Hall~ Anaheim7 California - COUNCIL MINUTES January 317 19677 1:30 P.M. Mr. Don Smith, 1303 Norwood Street, directly behind subject pro- perty, advised that there was a swimming pool in his rear yard, which would receive no afternoon sun if the service station is approved. He was appreciative of the hardship of those people residing on East Street, but noted that this situation exists on many busy thoroughfares within the city; and to allow the proposed service station would create a hardship for other residents in the area. Mr. Smith further advised that the house on the corner lot is vacant, however people are apparently living in the dwelling on the second lot adjacent on the north. He was of the opinion that houses on subject property could be rented, that these homes are in a good residential area, and he had no desire to sell his property for commercial development. Further, that the neighborhood was too near the Riverside Freeway for commercial development of the entire block. In conclusion Mr. Smith requested that, should subject applications be approved, the lighting of the service station be directed away from re- sidential properties, and that adequate fencing be required on the east property line to protect residential properties, and that the use of public address systems be prohibited. The Mayor asked if anyone else wished to address the City Council, there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Council discussion was held, and Councilman Schutte questioned the 15 foot structural wall noted in the findings of the Planning Commission, Mr. Thompson explained that the rear wall of the service station structure would be 15 feet in height, extending along a portion of the east property line. In response to other questions of the Council, Mr. Fred Tinthoff, representing Texaco Inc., advised that the service station would be of steel construction, however they would be willing to provide a wall or fence of any type of construction required. That there would be no windows on the east side of the building, and lighting would be directed away from the adjoining residential properties. He further stated they would be willing to stipulate the prohibition of any loud speakers or public address systems. Reference was made to the size and shape of subject properties, and Mr. Tinthoff advised that a net size of 135 feet by 135 feet was ideal for a service station lot, however, due to the shape of subject 14,000 square foot property, he felt that to acquire an additional lot to the north would not provide for any improvement to the layout of the proposed station. RESOLUTION: Councilman Schutte was of the opinion that the properties in question were no longer desirable for residential purposes, and thereupon offered a resolution to approve the Reclassification and Conditional Use Permit, subject to conditions. Further discussion was held, and in response to question by Mayor Krein as to applicable studies conducted, Planning Supervisor Ronald Grudzinski briefly reviewed the status of the current study of properties fronting on major streets and highways throughout the city, and advised that the East Street front-on properties were recently considered in con- junction with General Plan Amendments Nos. 18 and 52, and it was recommended that this area not be designated as potential commercial at this time. Councilman Pebley was of the opinion that the proposed service station would necessarily be located too close to residential properties. Councilmen Dutton and Chandler indicated that if the subject property were of the normal dimensions for a service station, they would be inclined to appro~Te the applications, and Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that a lighter commercial use would be appropriate for the property. The resolution offered by Councilman Schutte was restated. Roll call vote: 9945 City Hall~ Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - January ~1~ 1967, 1:>0 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: Schutte NOES: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: None The foregoing resolution to approve subject applications failed to carry by a majority vote. RESOLUTIONS NOS. 67R-71 AND 67R-72: Councilman Dutton offered Resolutions Nos. 67R-71 and 67R-72 for adoption, disapproving Reclassification No. 66-67-42 and denying Conditional Use Permit No. 905. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-71: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (66-67-42) RESOLUTION NO. 67R-72: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 905. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton, Pebley, Chandler and Krein Schutte None The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 67R-71 and 67R-72, duly passed and adopted. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 66-67-43 AND CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 906: Submitted by William H. Grebel and Voge, Inc., requesting a change of zone from C-l, Deed Restricted, to C-l, Unrestricted, to permit full range of C-1 uses; further requesting permission to establish a service station at the intersection of a collector street and a primary street within 75 feet of a residential zone, with waiver of required six foot masonry wall on Parcel No. 1. Property briefly described as follows: Parcel No. 1 - located at the southwest corner of South Street and State College Boulevard; Parcel No. 2 - located on the west side of State College Boulevard, the northerly boundary thereof being adjacent to the southerly boundary of Parcel No. 1. The City Planning Commission pursuant to Resolutions Nos. PC66-177 and PC66-178 recommended denial of said reclassification and denied said conditional use permit. Public hearing was continued from the meeting of January 17, 1967, at the request of the applicant. Zoning Supervisor Ronald Thompson noted the location of subject property and the existing uses and zoning in the immediate area. He briefed the history of zoning requests for the property, advising that Parcel No. 1 was deed restricted to professional and medical offices only, as condition of Reclassification No. 62-63-3; that Conditional Use Permit No. 723 for a service station, and Conditional Use Permit No. 804 for a walk-up restaurant on Parcel No. 1 had been previously denied by the Council. He noted findings of the City Planning Commission precedent to their action taken on subject applications. Councilman Dutton questioned the finding of the Commission that no economic or land use change has taken place in the area and noted the recent developments including Anaheim Stadiut~. Mr. Thompson advised that the Commission felt the character of the residential area had not changed since the deed restrictions were required on subject property. The Mayor asked if a representative of the petitioners wished to address the City Council. 9946 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 31~ 1967, 1:30 P.M. Mr. William C. Adams, 615 West 8th Street, Santa Ana, Attorney representing Voge Inc., advised that Mr. Voge is the owner of the primary parcel at the corner, that he was forced to acquire the property to recover funds deposited into escrow after an agreement to construct a medical building on said parcel failed to materialize approximately three years ago, and he has been attempting to develop the property since that time. Mr. Adams further advised that the commercially zoned property is not adaptable for multiple residential development; that some years ago the owners of properties in the block, facing State College Boulevard, entered into commercial deed restrictions in cooperation with the City. Since that time, only two of the properties have been developed, which in his opinion was indicative of the possibility that said restrictions were unwise. The street has been widen to a 100 foot right-of-way, and he noted that the oil company which at one time intended to develop the corner parcel, now has plans for a service station at the southeast corner of South Street and State College Boulevard, together with a small market adjacent on the south. At the northeast corner of the same intersection, a service station is under construction, with a block wall constructed along the alley, 20 feet from residential properties to the east. Relative to the walk-up restaurant which had been denied on subject property, Mr. Adams called attention to property to the south, at the corner of Morava Avenue, also deed restricted, where a convenience food market and stores have been constructed, and in his opinion the changing characteristics of the area were clearly indicated. Other factors which would complete State College Boulevard's status as a major arterial highway, were the base- ball stadium to the south, and the State College to the north in the City of Fullerton, together with the Boulevard's access to major industrial areas. In response to Council questioning, Mr. Adams advised that the property owner's hardship was evidenced in the fact that other nearby pro- perties have been allowed to develop for similar uses to those previously requested by the petitioner. Mr. Oscar W. Louderback, representing Standard Oil Company, sub- mitted to each Councilman copies of an area map illustrating various zoning cases along State College Boulevard which had been considered by the City. In his opinion, there has been considerable change in the character of the neighborhood, and he noted that South Street extends from the Santa Ana Freeway on the west to the Santa Ana River on the east, with an approxi- mate 350 foot "jog" at State College Boulevard. That State College Boulevard extends from the City of Fullerton to the Santa Ana Freeway on the south, and is projected to extend north to the City of La Habra. Refering to the map submitted, Mr. Louderback noted the service stations and market approved at South Street on the east side of State College Boulevard, and the Baptist Church Mission immediately adjacent to subject property on the west, which he noted would need to expand existing facilities in the near future. Slide photographs were projected on the west wall of the Council Chamber to illustrate the point to which Mr. Louderback was referring. In summary, Mr. Louderback was of the opinion that the property in question was truly commercial, that service stations do not generate traffic but are constructed because the traffic is already present. He noted that only six residential properties were located within 75 feet of subject pro- perty, four of which are located on the north side of South Street. He reported that they are willing to comply with all conditions recommended by the Development Services Department Staff. Plans and the files were reviewed by the City Council, and Mayor Krein asked for a show of hands of those present in opposition. Many persons raised their hands, and the Mayor asked if one of them wished to address the City Council. Mr. Robert Ko Matheison, 1915 East South Street, stated he had resided at that location since 1960, and had been authorized to speak on behalf of neighbors at 1903 and 1909 East South Street. That they are 9947 City Hall, Anaheim, California COUNCIL MINUTES - January 31~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. strongly opposed to the proposed development, and to the bright lights, noise and increased traffic on their residential street. That the property has been designated by the City Council for medical-professional develop- ment, and the proposed use would be in direct conflict with the residential area. He noted that this is the third time they have been before the City Council to protest developments proposed by the owner of the corner parcel, and their position remains unchanged. Mr. Matheison further advised that presently there are 20 service stations on State College Boulevard between the Riverside Freeway and Anaheim Stadium, in addition to the one under construction across the street, that there is a one-tenth mile distance between the alignment of South Street on each side of the boulevard. Further, that they are not opposed to development of the property as restricted, but felt that the city would not be acting in good faith if these applications were granted; that they are hoping for a development which would be an intelligent transition from the residential properties to the commercial area. Relative to the Baptist Mission, he stated that they have been good neighbors, and are welcome in the area. In his opinion, nothing has occurred in the area to alter the position taken by the City Council on previous requests for development. In answer to question by the Mayor, a member of the audience advised that he concurred with statements of Mr. Matheison. Mr. Albert N. Kluthe, 18 year resident~ on property immediately adjacent to subject property on the south, addressed the Council expressing the opinion that many changes have taken place in the neighborhood, and he briefly reviewed the history of the area. He advised that he was in favor of the proposed development, and noted problems he has experienced in attempting to develop his property, expressing the hope that some of the restrictions can be liberalized. Mr. Arthur Ramey, 544 South Elder Street, Pastor of the Baptist Mission, advised that the church has hopes of acquiring additional property to enlarge the Mission at some time in the future. Mr. Adams again addressed the Council advising that for safety, a service station would allow for greater visibility at the corner than would a large building, that lighting can be controlled so as to not intrude into the residential area, that their gasoline pumps would be oriented to State College Boulevard, and not the residential street, having access from the boulevard. He stated that they would comply with any conditions the City Council would require, and if necessary, would stipulate to no liquor being served on the premises adjacent to the service station. Mayor Krein stated that a good cross section of the evidence had been presented, and thereupon declared the hearing closed. Councilman Chandler was of the opinion that the residential character of the neighborhood had not changed, and the restricted C-1 zoning previously granted remained appropriate for subject property. Councilman Dutton was of the opinion that changes which have taken place in the area do warrant the proposed lifting of restrictions, and that similar developments already are in existance nearby. RESOLUTIONS NOS. 67R~73 AND 67R-74: Councilman Schutte stated he believed it was the responssibility of the City Council to uphold the previous restrictions imposed on the property, and thereupon offered Resolutions Nos. 67R-73 and 67R-74 for adoption~ disapproving Reclassification No. 66-67-43 and denying Conditional Use Permit No. 906. Refer to Resolution Book. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-73: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT A CHANGE OF ZONE SHOULD NOT BE GRANTED IN A CERTAIN AREA OF THE CITY HEREINAFTER DESCRIBED. (66-67-43) 9948 City Hall~ Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - January 31~ 1967~ 1:30 P.M. RESOLUTION NO. 67R-74: A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DENYING CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 906. Roll call vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein Dutton None The Mayor declared Resolutions Nos. 67R-73 and 67R-74 duly passed and adopted. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Pebley moved to adjourn. Councilman Chandler seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. ADJOURNED: 8:30 P.M. SIGNED City Clerk City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 7, 1967, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Pebley, Schutte, Chandler and Krein. ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Dutton. PRESENT: ASSISTANT CITY MANAGER: Robert Davis. CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph Geisler. CITY CLERK: Dene M. Williams. CITY ENGINEER: James P. Maddox. DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Alan G. Orsborn. ASSISTANT DEVELOPMENT SERVICES DIRECTOR: Robert Mickelson. ZONING SUPERVISOR: Ronald Thompson. ASSOCIATE PLANNER: Marvin Krieger. FINANCE DIRECTOR: Douglas Ogden. CONVENTION CENTER AND STADIUM DIRECTOR: Tom Liegler. Mayor Krein called the meeting to order. INTRODUCTION: Mayor Krein introduced and welcomed students of the St.. Justin Martyr Civics Club, in attendance at today's meeting. INTRODUCTION: Safety and Training Coordinator Thomas Tyre introduced new employees taking part in personnel orientation. PROCLAMATION: Mayor Krein proclaimed the month of February as Philharmonic Penny Parade Month. Said proclamation was unanimously ratified by the City Council. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council Meetings held January 17 and 24, 1967, and Adjourned Regular Meetings of January 18 and 20, 1967 were approved on motion by Councilman Schutte, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Pebley moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after reading of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Schutte seconded the motion~ MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED.