Loading...
Minutes-PC 2000/02/14}'~~Nt~MC~`'°Z CITY OF ANAHEIM ° ' PLANNING COMMISSION MINUTES ~~VNDED ~6y1 DATE: MONDAY, FEBRUARY 14, 2000 MORNING SESSION: Chairperson Boydstun called the Morning Session to order 11:00 a.m. in the Council Chamber. 11:00 A.M. • Staff update to Commission of various City developments and issues (as requested by Planning Commission) • Preliminary Plan Review PUBLIC HEARING: Chairperson Boydstun called the Public Hearing to order at 1:30 p.m. in the Council Chamber and welcomed those in attendance. 1:30 P.M. • Public Hearing Testimony ~ PLEDGE OF ALLEGIANCE: The Pledge Allegiance was led by Commissioner Bostwick. COMMISSIONERS PRESENT: Arnold, Bostwick, Boydstun, Bristol, Koos, Napoles, Vanderbilt COMMISSIONERS ABSENT; None STAFF PRESENT: Selma Mann Greg McCafferty Don Yourstone Susan Kim Alfred Yalda Melanie Adams Margarita Solorio Ossie Edmundson Assistant City Attorney Senior Planner Senior Code Enforcement Officer Assistant Planner Principal Transportation Planner Associate Civil Engineer Planning Commission Secretary Senior Secretary AGENDA POSTING: A complete copy of the Planning Commission Agenda was posted at 4:00 p.m. on February 10, 2000, inside the display case located in the foyer of the Council Chambers, and also in the outside display kiosk. PUBLISHED: Anaheim Bulletin Newspaper on Thursday, January 20, 2000 H: DOCS\CLERICALWIINUTESWC021400.DOC ~ www.qlanninacommission~anaheim.net 02-14-00 Page 1 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI QCTION AGENDA • Receiving and approving the Minutes for the Planning Commission Approved Meeting of January 19, 2000. (Motion) (Vote: 7-0) Receiving and approving the Minutes for the Planning Commission Approved with a correction Meeting of January 31, 2000. (Motion) stating that "no action was taken" on the Closed Session item. (Vote: 7-0) 1. REPORTS AND RECOMMENDATIONS A, a) CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED) ~ Approved r ~ ~ J b) CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4108 - REQUEST FOR Approved with REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF FINAL PLANS: Zulema Longoria, changes Greenberg Farrow Architecture, 15101 Red Hill Avenue, Suite 200, Tustin, CA 92780, requests review and approval of final (Vote: 7-0) elevation and landscape plans. Property is located at 8180 East Old Canal Road. ACTION: Commissioner 8ostwick offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Koos and MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby determine that the previously- approved negative declaration is adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for subject request. Commissioner Bostwick offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Koos and MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby determine that approve the Final Elevation Plans with the following stipulation: (a) That the landscape plan shall be adjusted during plan check for building permits where necessary, as requested by Planning Department staff to provide landscape materials in a size and species that will cover seventy-five percent of the above ground equipment at the time of planting. Said plan shall include eight (8), 24-inch box trees along the north front building elevation and a contrasting cornice around the top edge of the building. SR1144JD.DOC Greg McCafferty, Senior Planner, introduced this item by stating this is a request for review and approval of final elevation and landscape plans for a previously-approved self storage facility. Staff is recommending approval of the elevation and landscape plans with the stipulation noted in Paragraph No. 14 of the staff report. ~ 02-14-00 Page 2 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA • ApplicanYs Statement: Sulema Longoria stated she is representing Bill Hobin for the Storage USA project. They are returning for final approval of the final elevation and landscape plans which they have changed per Planning staff's recommendation. One of the changes was that they add a stucco layer to the CMU block wall to make it a smoother finish. Chairperson Boydstun suggested they plant 24-inch box trees along the front of the building elevation. Sulema Longoria responded that it would not be a problem to install them. Another stipulation was that the above ground mechanical equipment on the side be screened with landscaping. Greg McCafferty, Senior Planner, recommended since there are no conditions attached to this Reports and Recommendation Item that the applicant show on their plans submitted for a building permit that those are going to be on the front elevation, 24-inch box trees and that the species will be upsized or replaced if they do not cover the ground-mounted equipment. Commissioner Vanderbilt asked about the freatment on top of the parapet. Suggested adding some trim. His rationale is that the building is taller than what would is allowed by Code; it is in the Scenic Corridor and they are interested in having more intense use of landscaping to have it fit in better. Sulema Longoria stated what they currently have is not a decorative cornice but it is a cap. They will go ahead and add a decorative cornice. . Commissioner Vanderbilt asked if that would be a contrasting color to the stucco surtace. Sulema Longoria indicated that it would match the stucco as it is now and wiil give it some relief to appear that it is stepped or curved. Bill Hobin, the applicant, agreed to upgrade and install the trees but asked for a clarification regarding the number and location of the trees. Chairperson Boydstun explained that would be the front trees from the street view, (along the north front building elevation). (During the Commission's action, Greg McCafferty advised that fhere were 8 trees in the front.) Commissioner Koos stated that the last time this project was before Commission they were concerned with the uniqueness of this project. One of the favorable aspects of this project is that it did not look like a self-storage facility and looked more like an office building. In reviewing the rendering he was concerned that the doors of the units can still be seen with the level of tint of the glass and wondered whether they could tint the glass a little more. Bill Hobin responded they need those doors. They do not have any exterior doors around the perimeter of the project and, therefore, it is their identification. This is a very high-end storage facility. The recommendation at the previous public hearing showed blue doors in the interior of those corridors. It was felt as long as they could integrate those colors into the taupe and tan colors of the whole project that they would be allowed to still have those. That is why the doors have now been changed to a tan color to soften the look. Commissioner Koos stated he agreed when the applicant presented the project before it was a high ~ end self-storage facility. The public using this facility will tend to seek it out. Bill Hobin added this is a very high-end type of storage use and feels that is their identifier. 02-14-00 Page 3 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA • B. a) CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED b) VARIANCE NO. 4383 - REQUEST FOR REVIEW AND APPROVAL OF FINAL PLANS: Tim O'Neil, Evergreen Devco, Inc., 2920 East Camelback Road, Suite 100, Phoenix, AZ 85016, requests review and approval of final elevation and sign plans. Property is located at 940-956 South Brookhurst Street. ACTION: Commissioner Bostwick offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Napoles and MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby determine that the previously- approved negative declaration is adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for subject request. Commissioner Bosfinrick offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Napoles and MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby approve the Final Elevation and Sign Plans for Variance No. 4383. Approved Approved final plans (Vote: 7-0) SR1145JD.DOC Greg McCafferty, Senior Planner, introduced this item by stating that this item is a request for review and approval of final architectural and sign plans for a wall proposed at Walgreens Pharmacy located at 940-956 South Brookhurst Street. Tim O'Neal stated he is representing Evergreen Devco, 2929 East Camelback Road, • Suite 100, Phoenix, Arizona. They have worked with staff to revise their signage, materials and color board based on the Commission meeting on December 20, 1999 and request their recommendation of approval. C. a) CEQA EXEMPTION SECTION 15061(b)(3) b) CODE AMENDMENT NO. 99-05: City-initiated (Planning Department), 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805, request to amend the Zoning Code requirements for parking lot lighting in order to enhance the safety and security of parking lots and parking garages/structures servicing commercial, industrial, multiple-family and institutional properties. Continued to 3-13-2000 SR1007SK.DOC Commissioner Bristol offered a motion for a continuance to March 13, 2000, seconded by Commissioner Bosfinrick and motion was carried. • 02-14-00 Page 4 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA ~ D. a) CEQA EXEMPTION SECTION 15061(b)(3) b) REQUEST INITIATION OF RECLASSIFICATION PROCEEDINGS: City-initiated (Planning Department), 2000 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805, requests for initiation of reclassification proceedings from the CH (Commercial, Heavy) and ML (Industrial, Limited) Zones to the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone. Properties are located at 1541-1695 West Lincoln Avenue, 255-329 North Manchester Avenue and 200-225 North Loara Street. Continued to 3-13-2000 SR1037TW.DOC Greg McCafferty, Senior Planner, introduced this item by stating this is a City-initiated reclassification for properties located on the north side of Lincoln Avenue between Euclid and Manchester Avenue. In order to address some issues that came up at the morning session, staff is recommending that this item be continued to March 13, 2000, in order to return with an additional report to Commission with recommendations. Commissioner Vanderbilt indicated there was discussion af the morning session regarding expanding the scope of this Item and asked if there is an action that needs to be taken at this time. Greg McCafferty explained that at the time this Reports and Recommendations item is returned to Commission they can decide the appropriateness of the properties on the south side of Lincoln Avenue. ~ Commissioner Bristol offered a motion for a continuance to March 13, 2000, seconded by Commissioner Koos and motion carried. E. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 99-00-15 - REQUEST FOR A NUNC PRO TUNC RESOLUTION: City of Anaheim (Planning Department staf~, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, Anaheim, CA 92805, requests a nunc pro tunc resolution amending Resolution No. PC2000-09 in its entirety adopted in connection with the approval of Reclassification No. 99-00-15 (to establish a resolution of intent to reclassify certain properties within the Anaheim Stadium Area to the Sports Entertainment "(SE)" Overlay Zone). NUNC PRO TUNC RESOLUTION NO. PC2000-14 Approved (Vote: 7-0) SR1146AS.DOC There was no discussion related to this item. r~ ~J 02-14-00 Page 5 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA r~ ~J F. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2052 AND 1566 REQUEST FOR TERMINATION: Jim DesRochers, General Manager of CADE, 1320 North Tustin Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92807, requests for termination of Conditional Use Permit Nos. 2052 and 1566. Property is located at 1320 North Tustin Avenue. TERMINATION RESOLUTION NO. PC2000-15 Terminated (Vote: 7-0) SR7676KP.DOC There was no discussion related to this item. • • 02-14-00 Page 6 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA ~ PUBLIC HEARING ITEMS: 2a. ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT REPORT NO. 323 2b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 370 (READVERTISED) 2c. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 99-00-10 2d. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT 2e. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4171 2f. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF 2a. 2c, 2d, and 2e OWNER: California Drive-In Theaters, Attn: John Manavian, 120 North Robertson Boulevard, Los Angeles, CA 90048 LOCATION: 1500 North Lemon Street. Property is 26.34 acres located at the southeast corner of Lemon Street and Durst Street. General Plan Amendment No. 370 - An amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan to redesignate the subject property from the General Industrial designation to the General Commercial designation. Reclassification No. 99-00-10 - To reclassify subject property from the ML (Limited Industrial) Zone to the CL (Commercial, Limited) Zone. • Conditional Use Permit No. 4171 - To construct a 294,632 square foot commercial retail center including a home improvement store, health club, three (3) drive-through fast food restaurants, two (2) full-service restaurants, a multi-tenant pad building, and a freeway-oriented sign with waiver of (a) minimum number of parking spaces, (b) minimum parking !ot landscaping, and (c) required dedication and improvement of right-of-way. Continued from the Commission meetings of December 20, 1999, January 19, and January 31, 2000. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT RESOLUTION NO. RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION NO. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. Continued to April 10, 2000. DS.DOC Commissioner Bostwick offered a motion for a continuance to April 10, 2000, seconded by Commissioner Napoles and motion was carried. OPPOSITION: None ACTION: Continued subject request to the April 10, 2000 Planning Commission meeting in order to allow adequate time for the petitioner to recirculate the draft EIR and respond to comments. ~ VOTE: 7-0 DISCUSSION TIME: This item was not discussed. 02-14-00 Page 7 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA ~ 3a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Continued to 3b. GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. 371 February 28, 2000 3c. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 99-00-12 3d. REQUEST FOR CITY COUNCIL REVIEW OF 3a and 3c 1NITIATED BY: City of Anaheim (Planning Department), 200 South Anaheim Blvd., Suite 162, Anaheim, CA 92805 LOCATION: 848-930 South Knott Street and 3411-3441 West Ball Road. Property is 7.0 acres located north and east of the northeast corner of Knott Street* and Ball Road. General Plan Amendment No. 371 - Request for amendment to the Land Use Element of the General Plan to redesignate the subject properties from the Low Density Residential designation to the General Commercial designation; and the General Commercial, Low Density Residential, and Medium Density Residential designation to the Low- Medium Density Residential designation. Reclassification No. 99-00-12 - To reclassify subject properties from the CO (Commercial, Office and Professional) Zone to the CL (Commercial Limited) Zone (Portion A); and from the RM-1200 (Residential, Multiple- Family) Zone to the RM-3000 (Residential, Multiple-Family) Zone (Portion B**). • '` Originally advertised as Knott Avenue. ""~ Portion B has been deleted from this request. Continued from the Commission meetings of January 19, and January 31, 2000. GENERAL PLAN RESOLUTION NO. RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION NO. SR2002DS.DOC Commissioner Bostwick offered a motion for a continuance to February 28, 2000, seconded by Commissioner Bristol and motion was carried. OPPOSITION: None ACTION: Continued subject request to the February 28, Z000 Planning Commission meeting in order for staff to prepare a revised land use recommendation based on input from interested neighborhood groups. VOTE: 7-0 DISCUSSION TIME: This item was not discussed. ~ 02-14-00 Page 8 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA . 4a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 4b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT 4c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4170 (READVERTISED) OWNER: Canyon United Methodist Church, Attn: David Wynn, President, Board of Trustees, 101 Chaparral Court, Anaheim, CA 92808 AGENT: Greg Hammill, 414 Fernhill Lane, Anaheim, CA 92807 LOCATION: 101 Chaparral Court. Property is 1.3 acre located at the southwest corner of Kaiser Boulevard and Chaparral Court (Light of the Canyon United Methodist Church). To permit a finro-story, 35 to 40 foot high church facility with accessory training center classrooms and roof mounted equipment with waiver of minimum number of parking spaces. Continued from the Commission meeting of December 20, 1999. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. Continuance to February 28, 2000 SR7669KP. DOC Commissioner Napoles offered a motion for a continuance to February 28, 2000, seconded by • Commissioner Bristol and motion was carried. ~ • ~ ~- • ~ • • ~ ~ OPPOSITION: None ACTION: Continued subject request to the February 28, 2000 Planning Commission meeting in order for the petitioner to submit revised plans and a completed parking study. VOTE: 7-0 • DISCUSSION TIME: This item was not discussed. 02-14-00 Page 9 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA ~ 5a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION (PREVIOUSLY-APPROVED) Approved 5b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 3812 (READVERTISED) Approved reinstatement OWNER: TW Investments and IW Investment Corp., Attn: Kape (To expire 2-14-2001) Properties, P.O. Box 6474 Beverly Hills, CA 90212 AGENT: Kape Properties, Attn: Allen Weinstock, 1180 South Beverly Drive, Suite 511, Los Angeles, CA 90035 LOCATION: 1325, 1331 and 1341 North Blue Gum Street. Property is 9.7 acres located at the northwest corner of Miraloma Avenue and Blue Gum Street (Star Van Conversion). To consider reinstatement of this permit which currently contains a time limitation (originally approved on March 4, 1996 to expire on October 13, 1998 and reinstated on December 21, 1998 to expire on October 13, 1999) to retain previously-approved automotive van conversion and modification facility in an existing industrial business park. Continued from the Commission meetings of November 8, December 20, 1999 and January 3, 2000. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC2000-16 SR7670KP.DOC ~ Allen Weinstock, stated he is with the Cape Property Management representing the Blue Gum Industrial Park, TW & IW Investment Corp. Staff is recommending the reinstatement of this conditional use permit. He asked that Commission take into account that this industrial park was built in the 60's to Code and continues to remain to Code. They take issue with the staff report regarding some of the conditions which staff believes should be approved. Staff is recommending that outdoor storage material should not be visible above a fence line. Those fences are within their property and they should not be told what to do within their property. Staff is not taking into account that these are businesses that are being run. There are other concerns regarding fence materials and landscaping. They are in the Code and there is no reason to for them to be included into this CUP. This tenant is adhering to all the State and Federal government rules and regulations, specifically AQMD, OSCHA and the City of Anaheim's Fire Department. Those agencies have given this tenant approval in the way they run their business. They have not had any opposition at the previous hearings. The tenant is working behind fences and has asked to be able to wash cars as they come off the production line. AQMD and OSCHA do not seem to mind but the staff seems have a concern with this. He appreciates staff's cooperation but takes issue to a number of items. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commissioner Arnold asked Mr. Weinstock to clarify which conditions he was concerned with. He thought one of those was Condition No. 4 related to outdoor washing of vehicles. Allen Weinstock confirmed it was Condition No. 4, which involved the washing of vehicles, which includes ~ detailing, painting, repair, etc. This tenant does bring vans out into the light of day to inspect the vehicles and mark, with a pencil, any imperfections in order to return them to the building. They are not allowed to do this because this is considered working outside and felt this is a little far-fetched. 02-14-00 Page 10 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA • Commissioner Arnold asked Mr. Weinstock if he had a problem with the limitation of regular outdoor washing. Allen Weinstock confirmed he was concerned with that. At the last meeting they indicated that they were washing 10 cars a week. Commissioner Arnold stated at that meeting Commission had indicated that it was not permitted and needed to cease. Allen Weinstock confirmed it has ceased. Commissioner Arnold stated that there are a variety of properties in these cities and across the nation, which have soil and aquifer contamination, which nonetheless complied with Federal and State statutes, but there are still problems. Those tend of have land use impacts. It is a valid concern for the City to question ongoing operations where vehicles are being washed in concentrated areas on a frequent basis. Allen Weinstock responded that perhaps it should not concern Commission and should not be a part of this CUP. There are various agencies that deal with these issues and it is not the domain of the Commission. This is a conditional use permit for parking and for the operation of a van facility in Anaheim. Commissioner Arnold explained that if it involves land use impacts then it would be the concern of Commission. He asked staff to address these rules and discuss their concerns with the land use impacts. Melanie Adams, Associate Civil Engineer, explained that they are concerned with the washing of ~ vehicles. The concern would be the use of detergents to wash vehicles and then that detergent would go into the storm water system, causing pollution. It is an issue covered under the Anaheim Municipal Code, the National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System. The applicant should be limited to washing the vehicle with water. They can do some spot removals but they should not be using detergents and washing those detergents into the storm drain system. Greg McCafferty further explained that the Anaheim Municipal Code also requires that all work be done indoors, regardless of whether it is industrial or not. Regarding outdoor storage, the Code requires that it be screened from view, therefore, there can not be any work done outdoors. Commissioner Koos indicated that it appears these conditions do not go above and beyond the Code, but merely reiterate the Code. Allen Weinstock asked why it needed to be written into the CUP if it is already in the Code. Greg McCafferty explained because they repeatedly had to have Code Enforcement go out and spend City resources in order to make this business comply with the Code. Therefore, staff felt they should include it into the conditions of approval so the applicant is aware of the conditions. Commissioner Arnold did not understand why someone would be opposed to having them in their CUP if they are merely a reiteration of the Code. Allen Weinstock wondered why reiterate the Code and be redundant. Commissioner Bostwick explained because this particular business has not followed these regulations in the past and as a result they are reiterating them for the applicant in particular so that they would take special note and pay attention to them. a Commissioner Bristol stated in a letter from Mr. Weinstock he indicated that he was not in favor of the 24- hour period to remove graffiti but instead requested 72 hours and asked him to explain this. 02-14-00 Page 11 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA • Allen Weinstock explained that by Caftrans expanding the freeway it has created a tremendous problem for them. Someone can drive by the freeway and "tag" their facility. This is an undue burden to require them to comply within 24 hours. Their facility was originally built when it was far enough away from the freeway that it was nearly impossible to "tag". The front of their buildings on Blue Gum and the side on Miraloma, are only being tagged on the freeway side. They are asking permission to comply within 3 days and do not feel it is an unreasonable request. He further explained that if they were notified on a Friday afternoon then they would have to go into overtime to clean it up. If they were called on a Monday then it would not be unreasonable to comply within 24 hours because they have staff that works regular hours but a Friday afternoon is an undue burden. Commissioner Arnold asked Mr. Weinstock whether he would be receptive to having weekends excluded from the 24-hour requirement. Allen Weinstock responded yes, they would be in agreement. Commissioner Bristol asked if they are still negotiating with Caltrans to have them remove the graffiti. Allen Weinstock responded that they are still talking with Caltrans and there has not been anything in writing yet, although there appears to be a recent decline with graffiti activity. Commissioner Koos asked whether there were other conditions of approval that he was concerned about. Allen Weinstock stated he was concerned that Commission is interfering with their operations of the industrial park. He understands requiring landscaping be maintained on Miraloma and Blue Gum but it appears Commission is interFering with the way that they run an industrial park and which puts a burden . on their CUP. Specifically, Condition No. 16, the chainlink fencing and enclosing outdoor storage area shall be interwoven with PCV slats and shall be maintained in good condition at all times. Condition No. 17, that the parking lot serving the premises shall be equipped with lighting. They have upgraded the lighting but this is the discretion of someone saying it is not enough. To the best of his knowledge, no one has inspected the site in the evening hours to see if the lighting is adequate. Condition No. 12 regarding landscaping. They do maintain their landscaping and have maintained it continually since the property was built. Chairperson Boydstun explained to Mr. Weinstock that these are standard conditions. If they have been complying then there should be no problem. However, should they decide to sell their center in the future then that CUP goes with the property and Commission needs to ensure that these conditions are in the CUP in the event the next owner is not very cooperative. Commissioner Vanderbilt stated when travelling north from the 91 Fwy. to the 57 Fwy. he has noticed that there is a stretch between their building and the building to the south that has barbered wire fencing that secures an area where tires are stored. He was informed that this is contrary to Code. Greg McCafferry explained that barbed wire or concertina wire visible from the public-right-of-way is not permitted by Code. Commissioner Vanderbilt indicated they do enjoy some benefit or greater exposure that allows the public to see their business more clearly. He asked if they felt that the use of the barbed wire is a right they should have even though it is contrary to Code. Allen Weinstock stated they have had better advertisement before the freeway expanded. Commission required them to remove their logo, a van, which had been painted on the building for approximately 20 years. . 02-14-00 Page 12 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA ~ Ralph Caputo, general manager of Star Custom Industries, asked for an clarification regarding the washing issue. He asked if that meant that there is no washing of any vehicles allowed whatsoever outside of any premises or was that pertinent to this property only. Melanie Adams, Associate Civil Engineer, explained that the Code pertains to all properties in Anaheim, except single-family residences. This business should not be washing vehicles with detergents and discharging into the storm drains system. If they require that type of washing they would need to install a "wash rack" system where the flow would be directed to the sanitary sewer. They can spot remove the dirt off only rather than sudsing up the whole vehicle. Ralph Caputo stated there are several apartments in the area where there is a substantial amount of exterior washing of personal vehicles using various detergents. On the other hand, they are a conscientious business using a biodegradable product and meet all the specifications required. They feel they are far more conscientious than many other people washing their personai vehicies in that area. They feel it is unfair to have their business restricted. Commissioner Bristol asked where they wash their vehicles. Ralph Caputo explained they wash them in an area close to the storm drain as possible because they do not want a lot of material and water going through and they do want to keep the vehicles from driving through wet areas, so they try to minimize it as much as possible. Commissioner Bosfinrick suggested they might want to install a regular wash rack with a concrete pad and a drain in the center that drains to the sanitary sewer or a high-pressure rinse with deionized water, as used by the car deafers. ~ Ralph Caputo indicated he has worked in auto dealerships and they do use a detergent in their high powdered spray. They use the deionized water as a rinse so it does not spot the vehicles but the vehicles are washed with detergents. Commissioner Bostwick reiterated his suggestion of the wash racks with a drain to the sewer. Ralph Caputo stated that is an expense they would like to avoid for such a minimal use. They would like a reconsideration of that condition. Commissioner Arnold explained they are concerned with the quality of the storm water and the storm system and are trying to protect them as much as possible. Therefore, they need to be attentive and appreciates Mr. Caputo's willingness to understand that. Ralph Caputo stated he understands that and is simply speaking about his situation. Commissioner Bristol suggested he meet with City staff regarding the conditions because they are not unique. Greg McCafferty indicated that the letter from Mr. Weinstock indicates that 380 parking spaces are on-site inconsistent with the exhibit submitted. Should this request be approved, he suggested the applicant submit an updated site plan reflecting the correct parking count on the site. Allen Weinstock stated he wanted to address Commissioner Vanderbilt's issue regarding the barbed wire. It has not been brought up before. He knows that security is an issue for all of their tenants. That wire has probably been there for awhile. The tires come off and get hauled out once or finrice weekly. The tires may be backed up ready to be taken away. Or it may have been the Corvette people next door to them, he is not certain. ~ THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. 02-14-00 Page 13 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA • Commissioner Arnold asked staff about the 24-hour removal if there would be a problem with a weekend exception, given their concern about overtime. Greg McCafferty stated as Commissioner Bristol mentioned they do have the standard condition that is applied equally to all conditional use permits. He did not think that there would be any problem adding wording to state "except weekends". FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. ' OPPOSITION: None ACTION: Determined that the previously-approved negative declaration is adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for subject request. Approved reinstatement for Conditional Use Permit No. 3812, to expire on February 14, 2001. Deleted the conditions of approval of Resolution Nos. PC96-26, PC97-143 and PC98-200 in their entirety and replaced them with the following conditions of approval: 1. That this permit shall expire on February 14, 2001. 2. That the van conversion facility shall be limited to 1325 (Building D), 1331 (Building C) and 1341 (a portion of Building B) North Blue Gum Street for a total of 47,090 square feet as shown on Revision No. 3 of Exhibit No. 1, on file ~ in the Planning Department. 3. That all van storage shall be limited to: (a) the fenced areas between 1321 and 1325 North Blue Gum Street, 1325 and 1331 North Blue Gum Street and 1331 and 1341 North Blue Gum Street; and the 48 parking spaces located in the center aisle in front of the buildings at 1325 and 1341 North Blue Gum Street and as identified as Revision No. 3 of Exhibit No. 1. Further, that all vans shall be parked only in designated striped parking spaces, with no tandem parking permitted. 4. That no work on vehicles shall be permitted outside the buildings, including detailing, painting, washing, repair, or similar automotive related work. 5. That outdoor storage shall be limited to equipment, materials, finished products or refuse basic to the operations of the van conversion/modification facility and shall, at all times, be screened in accordance with applicable Code requirements. That there shall be no outdoor storage in any required parking area. 6. That no outdoor storage materials shall be visible above the fence-line. 7. That no awnings or patio-type covers shall be permitted unless they are permanent structures and have been approved by the Planning Department. The existing unpermitted posts and awning located at 1325 North Blue Gum Street shall be removed within fifteen (15) days of the date of this resolution. 8. That this van conversion/modification facility shall be limited to doing business • with retail dealerships only, and shall not engage in business with the general public. 02-14-00 Page 14 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA • 9. That all trash bins shall be stored within the approved masonry trash enclosure areas. 10. That subject facility shall be subject to monthly inspections by the City's Code Enforcement Division during the entire duration of the business. The cost of such inspections shall be borne by the operator of subject facility. 11. That the owner of subject property shall be responsible for the removal of any on-site graffiti within twenty-four (24) hours of its application, excluding weekends. 12. That the property shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion by providing regular landscape maintenance and removal of trash or debris. 13. That signage for subject facility shall be limited to that shown on the exhibits submitted by the petitioner. Any additional signage shall be subject to approval by the Planning Commission as a Reports and Recommendations item. 14. That this resolution shall be permanently posted within the employee work area to serve as a reminder of the conditions of approval contained herein. 15. That 3-foot high address numbers shall be displayed on the roof in a contrasting color to the roof material. The numbers shall not be visible from the view of the freeway, streets or adjacent properties. 16. That the chainlink fencing enclosing outdoor storage areas shall be interwoven • with PVC slats and shall be maintained in good condition at all times. 17. That the parking lot serving the premises shall be equipped with lighting of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance and conduct of all persons on or about the parking lot. Said lighting shall be directed, positioned and shielded in such a manner so as not to unreasonably illuminate the windows of nearby businesses. 18. That lockable pedestrian and/or vehicular access gates to the storage area shall be equipped with "knox Box" type or other devices as required and approved by the Fire Department for emergency access. 19. That no work vehicles shall be permitted outside the buildings, including detailing, painting, washing, repair, or other similar automotive related work. 20. That Condition Nos. 3, 7, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18 and 21, contained herein, shall be complied with within thirty (30) days from the date of this resolution. 21. That a site plan showing the number of parking spaces shall be submitted to the Zoning Division of the Planning Department. 22. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. ~ 02-14-00 Page 15 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA ~ VOTE: 7-0 Selma Mann, Assistant City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights. DISCUSSION TIME: 28 minutes (1:55-2:23) ~ ~J ~ 02-14-00 Page 16 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA i 6a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARAT(ON (PREViOUSLY-APPROVED) 6b. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4099 (READVERTISED) OWNER: Dong Hee Kang, 559 South Olive Street, Anaheim, CA 92805 AGENT: Jae J. Chung, 10042 Lampson Avenue, Garden Grove, CA 92840 LOCATION: 559 South Olive Street and 313 East Water Street. Property consists of finro parcels of land. Parcel 1 is 0.23 acre located at the northwest corner of Water Street and Olive Street. Parcel 2 is 0.12 acre located on the north side of Water Street, 140 feet west of the centerline of Olive Street. Request to revise site plans and amend or delete conditions of approval pertaining to time limitations and construction timeframes for a previously- approved liquor store/convenience market and coin-operated laundry facility (now proposed as a retail store). ~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. Continued to March 13, 2000 Commissioner Napoles offered a motion for a continuance to March 13, 2000, seconded by Commissioner Bostwick and motion carried. OPPOSITION: None ACTION: Continued subject request to the March 13, 2000 Planning Commission meeting in order to allow additional time for the petitioner to address staff's concerns regarding the proposed amendments. VOTE: 7-0 DISCUSSION TIME: This item was not discussed. ~ 02-14-00 Page 17 FEBRUARY 94, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA ~ 7a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION 7b. WAIVER OF CODE REQUIREMENT 7c. CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4177 Approved Approved, in part Granted, in part OWNER: Property Reserve, Inc., 35 Century Parkway, Salt Lake City, UT 84115 AGENT: Dennis Flynn Architects, Inc., 5109 East La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92807 LOCATION: 1303-1371 North Euclid Street. Property is 6.42 acres located at the northwest corner of Medicai Center Drive and Euclid Street (North County Toyota). To establish conformity with existing Zoning Code land use requirements for an existing commercial retail center and to permit an automotive dealership with accessory auto repair services and a 60-foot high freeway-oriented sign with waiver of (a) minimum number of required trees (deleted), (b) required parking lot landscaping (deleted, (c) minimum distance between freestanding signs, (d) minimum lot size for an auto dealership to permit a freeway-oriented sign, (e) minimum number of parking spaces, and (fl permitted encroachments into required yards (deleted). ~ CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT RESOLUTION NO. PC2000-17 (Denied the proposed freeway-oriented sign). SR7672KB.DOC ApplicanYs Statement: Dennis Flynn, with Dennis Flynn Architects, stated they are the architects for the proposed auto dealership. Staff has completed a thorough and complete staff report and appreciated working with them. They are proposing to renovate an existing building and add some additional square footage to conform its use for automotive sales and service. They plan to take the larger part of the existing building and convert it into an indoor service facility. They have display lots proposed in front of the existing store, service parking and employee parking to the rear. They are in agreement with the conditions and explanations within the staff report. There is only one concern that they would like discussed in more detail, which is the freestanding freeway oriented sign proposed for the project. Greg McCafferty, Senior Planner, informed Commission that the applicant had a video presentation of the proposed sign. Linda Francis narrated the video presentation, which she explained was taken from the 91 Freeway to show how difficult it is to see the facility and to show where they want the sign to be placed as well as other enhancements. The video demonstrates how the sound wall takes away much of their visibility. Fritz Hitchcock, majority owner of North Counfy Toyota, stated they are requesting a 60-foot high, freeway-oriented sign with Toyota's official brand sign for dealerships. The property is down 25 feet from the freeway at Euclid. Now that the freeway has been reconstructed with a higher center divider, the facility cannot be seen coming from east to west. The sound barrier hides the facility for those coming from west to east. The reason for the request is the difference in the freeway and in the property. • THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commissioner Arnold asked what kind of containment systems and precautions are going to take place for the materials that could be hazardous or polluting. 02-14-00 Page 18 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA ~ Dennis Flynn responded in regard fo oil storage, waste oii and new oil, there would be new tanks that will be employed and installed. Oils storage is highly regulated and they have to conform to Fire Department requirements. Typically tanks are above-ground, double-wall system in the event that there is a leak in the inner tank. Tanks are located adjacent to the service area to assure shorter runs. It would be to the rear of the service facility (northwest corner) near the detail building. Clarifiers will be installed that will trap waste from the ground water. Commissioner Arnold sfated it appears that the area pointed out is relatively close to the assisted living facility and asked if it could be moved more to the interior of the property. Dennis Flynn indicated tanks could be moved closer to the east side of the service building, bringing them more in-line with Euclid as opposed to residents. Commissioner Vanderbilt stated the proposal indicates 23,000 square feet of the second floor of the building wifl remain vacant to possibly become a community facility space in the future. Since parking is an issue, it is relevant to explore other uses such as car rental or other automotive related business that could occupy that space. Mr. Hitchcock explained a second story car rental is not practical because it takes up too much space. They will grow into the second floor over time; part of it will be a parts mezzanine and used for records storage. Also, Toyota's goals are to increase car sales up 50% by 2008 without adding new dealers. This means parts and service size will have to increase. This facility will allow them to grow. It will not be consumer oriented because it is not convenient. The proposal previously mentioned the possibility of a community facility, but it has since been changed. • Linda Francis stated the wording "community facility" is not the 23,000 square feet. The drawing stipulates a room proposed as a possible meeting room but not the entire 23,000 square feet. Chairperson Boydstun asked if they were including up to the dental office on Euclid Street when counting the size of the parcel. Dennis Flynn stated they traded a few spaces around in terms of where they park versus where they could display, but it was not counted. Commissioner Bristol asked Mr. Alfred Yalda whether the north side of Medical Center Drive could have parking. Alfred Yalda, Principal Transportation Planner, advised he had not reviewed at it, but it could be conditioned for no parking or remove parking if it is currently allowed. Greg McCafferty stated when the Sign Code was developed the 10-acre minimum was taken from the auto center at the 57 freeway to provide a critical mass where you could use a single sign for multiple dealerships. It was not set up for each individual dealership to have their own sign. For that reason, staff is discouraging the freeway-oriented sign. Also, with that Code requirement as part of the Sign Code, findings are difficult to make for that site to waiver the Code. Chairperson Boydstun asked the height of the sound wall as well as the hospital. Alfred Yalda responded that generally a sound wall is between 14 to 16 feet high. The hospital is approximately 100 feet away. Chairperson Boydstun felt the sound wall hides property from view and the applicant, therefore, needs ~ something there so people know when to get off the freeway. 02-14-00 Page 19 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA • Commissioner Koos stated he drives the freeway on a daily basis and does not have any problem seeing this building going westbound. He did not feel visibility of this site is an issue. People should atready know to get off at Euclid Street. Dennis Flynn explained that advertisement adds cost about $80,000 a month and one of the reasons you look for a freeway location, is to help overcome that, your buifding is your add. It is a major issue; this is really a non-freeway site without a sign. It is a huge economic impact for them to not have the ability to use the word "Toyota". If there were to be any other dealerships attracted to the area in the future, they would be happy to share the sign. Other cities make dealerships share signs and that is acceptable to them. Commissioner Koos stated it seems unlikely that another car dealership will locate adjacent to this site, but should some locate somewhere else along the freeway and then they would also want a sign. This would be a waiver and in Anaheim Hills would not be in favor of that. If Commission allows this sign, then they have to allow other signs to come in. He sees the building every day and feels the daily commuter on the 91 Freeway will know it is there. He feels the exposure will be there and it is a prominent location despite a sign. Dennis Flynn disagrees because their location is 25 feet fower. They would not be having this conversation if the land was level. He has owned 20 new car dealerships in the past and 8 currently. It does make a difference when there is only a"two-second window" view. Commissioner Koos stated if other dealerships come in they could point to this as a precedent and adding high rise signage it will reduce the aesthetics. Chairperson Boydstun asked how tall Norm's sign is, which does not appear inappropriate. ~ Greg McCafferty advised it is 25 feet. Commissioner Bostwick indicated it would not be seen over a 16-foot wall. Mr. Hitchcock advised they looked at a(I of the property between Euclid and Lemon, including the north side and concluded from a financial point of view there were no other locations. Commissioner 8osfinrick stated 10 acres or more, as indicated in the Code, was design for multiple dealerships and there is only one dealership here. Therefore, there is reason for a waiver. This property is different from an auto mall and needs that type of identification. The average person driving needs a landmark, they would be looking for a Toyota dealership sign. Commissioner Arnold stated on one hand there is an economic need for the sign, but on the other hand he is concerned about the general policy towards minimizing visual clutter along the freeway. In order to approve the waiver, Commission has to find that the strict application of the Zoning Code deprives the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties under identical zoning classifications in the vicinity. He did not see that they would grant similar types of approvals for other property. If Commission is going to exercise care about what goes up along the 91 Freeway, then Commission has to be attentive to that. Commissioner Bristol asked Mr. McCafferty what uses are allowed signage on a freeway. Greg McCafferty responded regional shopping centers and auto dealerships. There are about four or five types of businesses that allow freeway-oriented signs with a conditional use permit. Commissioner Vanderbilt asked the applicant about impulse purchasers. ~ Dennis Flynn referenced results of a study completed regarding the source of advertising. Only 50% of television watchers watch local TV stations, the others watch cable. Twenty-nine percent of Southern Californians read the newspaper. The top two N stations in Southern California are Hispanic. When 02-14-00 Page 20 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA • they sunreyed customers after purchasing a car, 25% saw the place of business, 12 to 15% were referred by a friend and rest fell into media mix consisting of a variety. Commissioner Vanderbilt felt the issue is the difference between advertising and finding a location. There is actually a benefit to not having a freestanding sign because there aren't many along that corridor. The signage on the building is in an area where there is not any other signage to compete with. The "finro- second window" opportunity might increase a little bit because there are no other signs to look at. He would be willing to allow for more signage on the building to compensate for that as opposed to the freestanding sign. Dennis Flynn stated their land lease alone for the first 15 years is $10.8 million and they are spending $3 million on the rehab. He disagrees with Commissioner Vanderbilt that the sign will stand out because it is on the side of a building. If the sound wall was not there and it were level, it would be an issue. Commissioner Koos stated it is a larger policy issue that they are dealing with. The direction that the City is moving in on freeway signage is the overriding issue. Commissioner Bristol stated Commissioner Koos had a good point about setting precedence, but the fact is that Commission has approved signage with a conditional use permit on particular properties. This is an issue that will be ultimately determined by the City Council. This use comes in, and for the most part they are variance free, but they need a variance to be successful. He feels there is an impulse buyer and that is the reason for signage and they do have restrictions with that wall that did not exist before. Selma Mann, Assistant City Attorney, stated Section 18.05.095 of the Code indicates that freeway- oriented signs as defined in the subsection maybe permitted subject to the approval of a conditional use permit only for service stations, restaurants, lodging facilities, regional shopping centers as defined, or ~ automobile dealership(s) occupying a site no less than 10 acres in size. During the Action: Commissioner Arnold recommending adding a condition to the CUP fhat the oil storage occur as much away from neighboring residential uses as possible and that the plans and locations be submitted to the City Engineer for approval. Melanie Adams advised it should actually be submitted to the City Fire Marshall. Commissioner Bristol asked to consider a condition that there be no parking on north side of Medical Center Drive. Greg McCafferty advised that the resolution would also include the denial of the sign since it is allowed by the CUP. Selma Mann requested clarification of the parking and to make sure that they are in compliance with the Code, subject to the City Engineer's approval. It is the Planning Commission's recommendation for this particular use, but it is the City Engineer who will make the fina! decision with regard to that. OPPOSITION: None ACTION: Approved Negative Declaration Approved, in part, Waiver of Code Requirement, as follows: ~ Denied waiver (a) pertaining to minimum number of required trees on the basis that it was deleted following submittal of revised plans. (Vote: 7-0) 02-14-00 Page 21 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA • Denied waiver (b) pertaining to required parking lot landscaping on the basis that the proposal is in compliance with Code for the parking iots and therefore, a waiver is not required. (Vote: 7-0) Approved waiver (c) pertaining to minimum distance between freestanding signs on the basis that special circumstances related to the shape of the property not having a significant frontage on Euclid Street and that the monument sign is replacing an existing permitted freestanding sign that is currently located within 300 feet of the existing monument signs, and that strict application of the Code would deprive the property of privileges to advertise on Euclid Street that other commercial businesses currently enjoy. (Vote: 7-0) Denied waiver (d) pertaining minimum lot size for an auto dealership to permit a freeway-oriented sign on the basis that the property is a regularly-shaped parcel, and a hardship could not be identified. (Vote: 4-3, Commissioners Bostwick, Boydstun and Bristol voted no) Approved waiver (e) pertaining to minimum number of parking spaces based on the parking study findings and the recommendation of approval by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager. (Vote: 7-0) Denied waiver (f) pertaining to permitted encroachments into required yards on the basis that it was deleted following submittal of revised plans. (Vote: 7-0) Granted, in part, Conditional Use Permit No. 4177, as follows: ~ Denied the 60-foot high freeway-oriented sign. Added the following conditions of approval: That oil storage shall occur as far away as possible from neighboring residential uses and that plans showing said storage locations shall be submitted to the City Fire Marshal for review and approval. That there shall be no parking allowed on the north side of Medical Center Drive, subject to the approval of the City Engineer. VOTE ON CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 4177: 7-0 Selma Mann, Assistant City Attorney, presented the 22-day appeal rights. DISCUSSION TIME: 1 hour (2:24-3:24) ~ J 02-14-00 Page 22 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA • 8a. CEQA NEGATIVE DECLARATION Approved 8b. RECLASSIFICATION NO. 99-00-13 Granted, unconditionally 8c. TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 99-227 Approved OWNER: Magali Rodriguez, 12316 Clearglen Avenue, Apt. D, Whittier, CA 90604 LOCATION: 127 South Hardinq Avenue. Property is 0.32 acre located on the west side of Harding Avenue, 340 feet north of the centerline of Del Monte Drive. Reclassification No. 99-00-13 - To reclassify subject property from the RS-7200 (Residential, Single-Family) Zone to the RS-5000 (Residential, Single-Family) Zone. Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-227 - To establish a two-lot single-family residential subdivision. RECLASSIFICATION RESOLUTION NO. PC2000-18 SR7663DB.DOC ApplicanYs Statement: Gordon Powers, 14396 Riverside Street, Hisperia, CA, stated he is the engineer for this project. This proposed project consists of dividing a piece of land that has frontage on finro streets. They are in . agreement with staff report and request Commission's approval of this project. THE PUBLIC HEARING WAS CLOSED. Commissioner Bristol stated, for the record, he wanted to ensure that Mr. Powers was aware of the dedication on Topanga. FOLLOWING IS A SUMMARY OF THE PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION. OPPOSITION: None ACTION: APPROVED NEGATIVE DECLARATION GRANTED RECLASSIFICATION NO. 99-00-13, UNCONDITIONALLY. VOTE ON RECLASSIFICATION NO. 99-00-13: 7-0 APPROVED TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP NO. 99-227 AS FOLLOWS: Commissioner Bristol offered a motion, seconded by Commissioner Bostwick and MOTION CARRIED, that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find that the proposed subdivision, together with its design and improvement, is consistent with the City of Anaheim General Plan, pursuant to Government Code Section 66473.5; and does, therefore, approve Tentative Parcel Map No. 99-227 to establish a two-lot single-family residential subdivision subject to the following conditions: 1. That approval of this parcel map is granted subject to the adoption of a zoning ordinance in connection with Reclassification No. 99-00-13, now pending. ~ 2. That prior to final parcel map approval, Condition No. 1, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. 02-14-00 Page 23 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA ~ 3. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement. VOTE ON TENTATIVE PARCEL MAP: 7-0 Selma Mann, Assistant City Attorney, presented the 10-day appeal rights for the tentative parcel map and the 22-day appeal rights for the reclassification. DISCUSSION TIME: 2 minutes (3:25-3:27) ~ ~ 02-14-00 Page 24 FEBRUARY 14, 2000 PLANNING COMMISSION MINI ACTION AGENDA ~ ITEMS OF PUBLIC INTEREST: THE MEETING ADJOURNED AT 3:27 P.M. TO MONDAY, FEBRUARY 28, 2000 AT 11:00 A.M. FOR PRELIMINARY PLAN REVIEW. Respectfully submitted, ~ v~..,~,~ Ossie Edmundson Senior Secretary ~ ' ~ J, Gf!~t~J ~ / Simonne Fannin Senior Office Specialist Received and approved by the Planning Commission on ~'~~" ~~ ~ 02-14-00 Page 25