Loading...
Resolution-PC 2000-14i ~ RESOLUTION NO. PC2000-14 A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION AMENDING RESOLUTION NO. PC2000-9 IN ITS ENTIRETY, NUNC PRO TUNC, ADOPTED IN CONNECTION WITH RECLASSIFICATION N0. 99-00-15 WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified petition for Reclassification for real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as those certain properties located in the approximately 807 acres bounded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west, and the Southern California Edison Company right-of-way on the north, and known as the "Anaheim Stadium Area"; and WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on January 19, 2000 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by faw and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That this is a city-initiated proposal to establish a resolution of intent to reclassify certain properties within the approximately 807-acre Anaheim Stadium Area to the Sports Entertainment (SE) Overlay Zone; and that said properties are currently located in the following zones: "CO" Commercial, Office and Professional, "CL" Commercial, Limited, "CH" Commercial, Heavy, "ML" Limited Industrial, "PR" Public Recreational and "RS-A-43,OOQ" Residential/Agricultural. 2. That each of these properties is located in one of the following Development Districts: Arrowhead Pond District, Gateway District, ~ene Autry District, Katella Corridor District and Sportstown District, as described in the Anaheim Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan which was adopted by the Anaheim City Council and is on file with the Planning Department. 3. That each of these properties will, upon reclassification, be subject to the land use and development standards established by Chapter 18.50 "Sports Entertainment Overlay (SE) Zone" of the Anaheim Municipal Code for the underlying Development District. 4. That the Anaheim General Plan designates subject properties for Business Office/Mixed Use/Industrial land uses and for Commercial Recreation land uses; and that this resolution of intent to reclassify such properties to the Sports Entertainment Overlay (SE) Zone is consistent with the General Plan designations for t~he area and with the Stadium Area Master Land Use Plan adopted by the City Council. 5. That ordinances to rezone specific parcels to the Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone will not be adopted until the underlying property owners request finalization of said zoning, as conditioned herein and specified in Section 18.50.040 "Implementation" of Chapter 18.50 "Sports Entertainment (SE) Overlay Zone." 6. That the proposed reclassification of subject properties is necessary and/or desirable for the orderly and proper development of the Anaheim Stadium Area and the community. 7. That the proposed reclassification of subject properties does properly relate to the zones and their permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject properties and to the zones and their permitted uses generally established throughout the community. CR3866as.doc -1- PC2000-14 / • ~ 8. That one concerned person spoke at the public hearing; that no one indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal; and that no correspondence was received in opposition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to establish a resolution of intent to reclassify certain properties from the "CO" Commercial, Office and Professional, "CL" Commercial, Limited, "CH" Commercial, Heavy, "ML" Limited Industrial, "PR" Public Recreational and "RS-A-43,000" Residential/Agricultural zones to the Sports Entertainment "(SE)" Overlay Zone on those certain properties located in the 807-acre area bouhded by the Santa Ana River on the east, the Anaheim City limits on the south, the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) on the west and the Southern California Edison Company right-of-way on the north, and further identified as the Anaheim Stadium Area; and does hereby determine that the previously certified Environmental Impact Report No. 321 is adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the subject request. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby approve the subject Petition for Reclassification to exclude the above-described properties from the "CO" Commercial, Office and Professional Zone, "CL" Commercial, Limited Zone, "CH" Commercial, Heavy Zone, "ML" Limited Industrial Zone, "PR" Public Recreational Zone and "RS-A- 43,000" Residential/Agricultural Zone, and #o incorporate said described properties into the "CO(SE)" Commercial, Office and Professional-Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone, "CL(SE)" Commercial, Limited- Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone, "CH(SE)" Commercial, Heavy-Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone, "ML(SE)" Limited Industrial-Sports Entertaimment Overlay Zone, "PR(SE)" Public Recreational-Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone and "RS-A-43,000(SE)" Residential/Agricultural-Sports Entertainment Overlay Zone, upon the following condition which is hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject properties in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: That prior to introduction of an ordinance to reclassify any parcel or parcels located in a Development District (other than Existing District), as defined in Chapter 18.50 "Sports Entertainment (SE) Overlay Zone" of the Anaheim Municipal Code, the following shall be submitted to the Planning Department in accordance with Section 18.50.040 "Implementation" of Chapter 18.50: (a) Letter from the property owner (or property owners where applicable) or the property owner's authorized agent requesting reclassification to the (SE) Overlay Zone. (b) Current title report or preliminary title report showing the legal vesting of title and containing a legal description of the property. (c) Map of the property (including scale and dimensions). (d) Filing fee in an amount as specified by resolution of the Anaheim City Council. BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicants' compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such conditions, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. BE IT FURTHER RESOLViED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a commitment by the City to rezone, the subject property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of the City Council which shall be a legislative act which may be approved or denied by the City Council at its sole discretion. -2- PC2000-14 ~ ~ THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of February 14, 2000. ~~ ~,~ CHAIRP RSON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: , `~~ SECRETARY, ANAH I CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Margarita Solorio, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on February 14, 2000, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNOLD, BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, KOOS, NAPOLES, VANDERBILT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~~ day of , 2000. SECRETARY, A EIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION _3_ PC2000-14