Resolution-PC 2001-82i~
i
e
~~ ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC2001-82
A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2001-04372 BE GRANTED
WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for
Conditional Use Permit for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State
of California, described as:
PARCELS ONE THROUGH FIVE IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM, COUNTY OF
ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN
BOOK 175, PAGES 28 AND 29 OF PARCEL MAPS, IN THE OFFICE OF THE
COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY.
WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center
in the City of Anaheim on June 48, 2001 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly
given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter
18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed conditional use permit and to
investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by
itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing,
does find and determine the following facts:
1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by
Anaheim Municipal Code Sections 18.05.046.010 and 18.110.070.120 to construct two (2) marquee signs
for an existing church facility.
2. That the proposed use, which is located in Development Area 2(Expanded Industrial
Area) of the Northeast Area Specific Plan (Specific Plan No. 94-1), will not adversely affect the adjoining
land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located.
3. That the size and shape of the site for the proposed use is adequate to allow full
development of the proposal in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health,
safety and general welfare because the property has a large frontage along La Palma Avenue which will
accommodate the proposed marquee signs.
4. That the traffic generated by the proposal will not impose an undue burden upon the
streets and highways designed and improved to carry traffic in the area because the proposed marquee
signs will enhance access and visibility to the site by identifying the church and school uses to the
traveling public.
5. That granting of this conditional use permit, under the conditions imposed, will not be
detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim.
6. That the design of the proposed signs and removal of existing signs will be an
enhancement to the area.
7. That no one indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal;
and that no correspondence was received in opposition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: The Planning Director's
authorized representative has determined that the proposed project falls within the definition of
Categorical Exemptions, Class 11, as defined in the State of California Environmental Impact Report
("EIR") Guidelines and is, therefore, categorically exempt from the requirement to prepare an EIR.
CR3518PK.doc -1- PC2001-82
~ ~
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission
does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions which are
hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to
preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
That all existing freestanding signs on these parcels along the La Palma Avenue frontage shall be
removed; provided, however, that the Fairmont Private School freestanding sign which shall not
removed.
2. That lighting of signage for subject property shall be prohibited between the hours of midnight and
6:30 a.m. as specified in Zoning Code Section 18.05.091.052, unless a variance is applied for and
granted permitting such lighting.
3. That signage for subject facility shall be limited to that shown on the exhibits submitted by the
petitioner and approved by the Planning Commission. Any additional signs shall be submitted to the
Zoning Division for review and approval by the Planning Commission as a"Reports and
Recommendations" item.
4. That illuminated signs shall be constructed with an opaque background with only the wording and/or
logos being illuminated. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for sign
perm its.
That the trash storage area(s) shall be refurbished to comply with approved plans on file with the
Rub4ic 1RVor-I~s Departrne~t. Said in#ormation shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for
building permits.
6. That any required relocation of City of Anaheim electrical facilities shall to be at the developer's
expense. All pad-mounted equipment shall be screened by landscaping and/or hardscape.
7. That the legal owner of subject property shall provide the City of Anaheim with a public utilities
easement (to be determined as electrical design is completed). Said easement shall be submitted to
the City of Anaheim prior to connection of electrical service.
8. That subject property shall be developed substantially in accordance with plans and specifications
submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning
Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1 and 2, and as conditioned herein.
9. That prior to issuance of a sign permit or building permit, or within a period of one (1) year from the
date of this resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 4, 5 and 7, above-mentioned, shall be
complied with. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in
accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code.
10. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition No. 1, 3 and 8, above-mentioned, shall
be complied with.
11. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that
it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and
Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval
of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby
find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicanYs compliance
with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof,
be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this
Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
-2- PC2001-82
~
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted
June 18, 2001. ,
CHAIRPER
~
Commission meeting of
EIM ~I~CANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST: ~ I
J
~
SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Fernandes, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby
certify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning
Commission held on June 18, 2001, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: ARNOLD, BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, KOOS, NAPOLES, VANDERBILT
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: EOMMISSlONE~2S: BRISTOL
/ T~
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~[~ day of
~ ~ , 2001.
, ~.~~~Givio~~0
SECRETARY, ANAHEI CITY PLANNING COMMISSION
-3- PC2001-82