Loading...
Resolution-PC 2002-151~ RESOLUTION NO. PC2002-151 • A RESOLUTION OF THE~ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION THAT PETITION FOR CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 2002-04573 BE GRANTED WHEREAS, the Anaheim City Planning Commission did receive a verified Petition for Conditional Use Permit for certain real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California, described as: A STRIP OF LAND, 70.0 FEET MORE OR LESS, IN WIDTH, AND 2680 FEET, MORE OR LESS, IN LENGTH, BEING ALL THAT PART OF THE ANAHEIM BRANCH (NOW ABANDONED) OF THE UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, SUCCESSOR IN INTEREST TO THE LOS ANGELES & SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY, SITUATED IN THE SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE'/4) OF SECTION 3, TOWNSHIP 4 SOUTH, RANGE 10 WEST, SAN BERNARDINO BASE & MERIDIAN, CITY OF ANAHEIM, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, THE SAID STRIP LYING BETWEEN LINES DISTANT 0.00 FEET AND 70.0 FEET WESTERLY, WHEN MEASURED AT RIGHT ANGLES AND/OR RADIALLY, FROM THE WESTERLY LINE OF THE RIGHT OF WAY OF THE BURLINGTON NORTHERN SANTA FE RAILROAD, AS PRESENTLY CONSTRUCTED AND OPERATED, THE SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING BOUNDED ON THE NORTH BY THE NORTHERLY LINE OF THE SAID SOUTHEAST QUARTER (SE Y,) OF SECTION 3, AND BOUNDED ON THE SOUTH BY THE NORTH LINE OF THE PUBLIC ROADWAY COMMONLY KNOWN AS "LA PALMA STREET', THE CENTERLINE OF WHICH STREET BEING THE SOUTHERLY LINE OF THE SAID SECTION 3, AND THE SAID STRIP OF LAND BEING ALL OR PART OF ~HOS€ SAM€ TRA~TS . OF LANQ HERETOFORE ACQUIRED BY THE SAID LOS ANGELES 8~ SALT LAKE RAILROAD COMPANY. WHEREAS, the City Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of Anaheim on July 29 2002 at 1:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.03, to hear and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and that said Planning Commission hearing was continued to the August 12, August 26 and October 7, 2002 meetings; and WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and determine the following facts: 1. That the proposed use is properly one for which a conditional use permit is authorized by Anaheim Municipal Code Sections 18.61.050.433, 18.61.050.502 and 18.61.050.507, and with waiver of the following: Section 18.61.063.020 - Minimum side yard setback adiacent to a residential zone. (18-foot setback required between 18-foot high buildings and adjacent residential zoning; 1-foot setback proposed befinreen the proposed 18-foot high building and RS-A- 43,000 zoning to the east) 2. That there are special circumstances applicable to the property consisting of its location or surroundings, which do not apply to other identically zoned properties in the vicinity, because Staff supports the requested waiver because the adjacent residentially zoned property is an active railroad with no potential for residential development. 3. That strict application of the Zoning Code would the property of privileges enjoyed by other properties under identical zoning classification in the vicinity. 4. That the proposed use, under the conditions imposed, will not adversely affect the adjoining land uses and the growth and development of the area in which it is proposed to be located. Cr5479dm.doc -1- PC2002-151 • ~ 5. That the size and shape of the site for the proposed use is adequate to allow full development of the proposal in a manner not detrimental to the particular area nor to the peace, health, safety and general welfare. 6. That the traffic generated by the proposed use will not impose an undue burden upon the streets and highways designed and improved to carry the traffic in the area. 7. That granting of this conditional use permit, under the conditions imposed, will not be detrimental to the peace, health, safety and general welfare of the citizens of the City of Anaheim. 8. That no one indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal; and that no correspondence was received in opposition. CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim City Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to permit indoor self-storage and an outdoor storage yard (including RV, boat, tractor trailer, automobile/truck and construction vehicle storage) in the ML (Limited Industrial) Zone with waiver of minimum side yard setback adjacent to a residential zone on a rectangularly-shaped 4.3- acre property having a frontage of 70 feet on the north side of La Palma Avenue and a maximum depth of 2,680 feet, and being located 255 feet east of the centerline of Pauline Avenue; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will have a significant effect on the environment. ~OW~ THEREFOR~, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby grant subject Petition for Conditional Use Permit, upon the following conditions which are hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of the subject property in order to preserve the safety and general welfare of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim: That approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 2002-04573 is contingent upon the approval and finalization (i.e., adoption of an ordinance rezoning the property) of Reclassification No. 2002-00078. 2. That elevation and floor plans for the Phase II storage buildings, and elevation and floor plans for the caretaker's unit and office shall be submitted to the Zoning Division for review by the Planning Commission as "Reports and Recommendations" item. That outdoor storage shall be limited to the vehicles specified by the applicant on the list labeled "Allowed/Not Allowed" (Attachment "A" to this resolution) and submitted to the Planning Commission at the October 7, 2002 meeting, provided that "Construction or landscaping materials or debris" shall be added to the "Not Allowed" column. No parking or storage of wrecked or inoperable cars or vehicles or parts shall be permitted. Said outdoor storage shall be completely screened from surrounding properties, public rights-of-way and the SR-91/Riverside Freeway. 4. That the outdoor storage of vehicles shall not be permitted north of the SR-91/Riverside Freeway. 5. That the area north of Commercial Street to one hundred eighty (180) feet north of the SR-91/Riverside Freeway shall be secured with fencing. Paving of this section of the property shall be completed in connection with development of said area for storage. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. 6. That the entire width of the property from La Palma Avenue to Commercial Street on the north shall be paved with the exception of landscaped areas. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. 7. That no canopies or overhead coverings of any kind shall be permitted. 8. That there shall be no on-site maintenance or repair of vehicles of any kind. -2- PC2002-151 • • 9. That a minimum of fifty eight (58) parking spaces plus such other parking as required for the office area shall be provided on-site in compliance with Anaheim Municipal Code Sections 18.06.050.020.028 and 18.06.050.030.033. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. 10. . Condition No. 10 was infentionally de/eted at the Planning Commission public hearing. 11. That an easement or agreement, which instrument shall be determined by the City Attorney, shall be obtained from CALTRANS to provide adequate fire truck turn-around(s) and to allow the proposed buildings near the north property line. This document shall be in a form satisfactory to the City Attorney. 12. That this self-storage facility shall be controlled through the use of electronically programmed gates and access doorways. Said gates and doorways shall be reviewed and approved by the Traffic and Transpo~tation Manager, and shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. 13. That exterior lighting fixtures shall be decorative and specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. 14. That trash storage area(s) shall be provided and maintained in location(s) acceptable to the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division, and in accordance with approved plans on file with said Department. Said storage area(s) shall be designed, located and screened so as not to be readily identifiable from adjacent streets. The walls of the storage area(s) shall be protected from graffiti opportunities by the use of plant materials such as minimum one (1) gallon sized clinging vines planted on maximum three (3) foot centers or tall shrubbery. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. 15. That a plan sheet for solid waste storage, collection and a plan for recycling shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division, for review and approval. 16. That prior to grading plan approval, the developer shall submit a Water Quality Management Plan ("WQMP") specifically identifying the post construction best management practices that will be used on- site to control predictable pollutants from storm water runoff. The WQMP shall be submitted to the Public Works Department, Development Services Division, for review and approval. 17. That an on-site trash truck turn-around area shall be provided in accordance with Engineering Standard Detail No. 610; and that said turn-around shall be maintained to the satisfaction of the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division. Said turn-around area shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. 18. (a) That the legal property owner shall submit an application for a Subdivision Map Act Certificate of Compliance to the Public Works Department, Development Services Division; and (b) That prior to issuance of a building permit, a Ce~tificate of Compliance or Conditional Certificate of Compiiance shail be approved by the City Engineer and recorded in the Office of the Orange County Recorder. 19. That the developer shall construct a five (5) foot wide sidewalk adjacent to the right-of-way line on La Palma Avenue in conformance to Public Works Standard Detail No. 110-E, and shall install landscaping and irrigation facilities between the sidewalk and the curb as approved by the Parks Division of the Community Services Department. The developer shall obtain a Right-of-Way Construction Permit from the Public Works Department for these improvements. The improvements shall be constructed prior to final zoning inspection. 20. That a striping plan specifying drive-aisle widths and dimensions, and the locations of all utility poles shall be submitted to the Ciry Traffic and Transportation Manager for review and approval prior to issuance of a building permit. Subject property shall thereupon be developed and maintained in conformance with said plans. -3- PC2002-151 • • 21. That a gate shall not be installed across any driveways or private street in a manner which may adversely affect vehicular traffic on the adjacent public street(s). Installation of any gates shall conform to the Engineering Standard Plan No. 609 and shall be subject to review and approval by the City Traffic and Transportation Manager. 22. That plans shall be submitted to the City Traffic and Transportation Manager for review and approval in showing conformance with the current versions of Engineering Standard Plan Nos. 436, 601 and 602 pertaining to parking standards and driveway location. Subject property shall thereupon be developed and maintained in conformance with said plans. 23. That plans shall be submitted to the City Traffic and Transportation Manager for review and approval showing conformance with Engineering Standard No. 137 pe~taining to sight distance visibility for sign or wall/fence locations. 24. That the required parking shall be clearly shown on plans submitted to the Planning Department; and that no required parking area shall be fenced or otherwise enclosed for storage or other outdoor uses. 25. That emergency vehicular access shall be provided and maintained in accordance with Fire Department specifications and requirements. 26. That the property shall be permanently maintained in an orderly fashion through the provision of regular landscaping maintenance, removal of trash or debris, and removal of graffiti within twenty four (24) hours from time of occurrence. 27. That the locations for future above-ground utility devices including, but not limited to, electrical transforcraers, water backflow devices, gas, communications and cable devices, etc., shall be shown on the plans submitted for building permits. Said plans shall also identify the specific screening treatment of each device (i.e., landscape screening, color of walls, materials, identifiers, access points, etc.) and shall be subject to the review and approval of the appropriate City departments. 28. That the Electrical Engineering Division of the Utilities Department shall approve distance requirements of proposed buildings from all existing utility poles and the proposed pole barrier methods to prevent damage from vehicular traffic. 29. That the parking IoUstorage area serving the premises shall be equipped with lighting of sufficient power to illuminate and make easily discernible the appearance and conduct of all persons on or about the parking lot. Said lighting information shall be specified on the plans submitted for building permits for the review and approval of the Zoning Division and the Police Department, Community Services Division. 30. That al! air conditioning facilities and other roof and ground mounted equipment shall be screened from view as required by Code Section. 18.61.030.100. Such information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. 31. That a PVC slatted (or other acceptable screening material), chain link fence shall be installed to a height sufficient to screen the outdoor storage of recreational vehicles. Minimum one (1) gallon sized clinging vines or tall shrubbery shall be planted on maximum three (3) foot centers adjacent to said fencing to eliminate graffiti opportunities, and that said plants shall be appropriately irrigated and maintained. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. 32. That a finaf landscaping plan, which plan shall include landscaping to fully screen all proposed storage as quickly as possible, shall be submitted to the Zoning Division for review and approval. Said plan shal6 specify a minimum of four (4), thirty six (36) inch box sized, trees adjacent to La Palma Avenue and three (3), thirty six (36) inch box sized, trees adjacent to Commercial Street within the landscaped setback areas. Said landscaping plan shall also specify shrubs and groundcover for all planter areas and for the required parking lot landscaped areas. Alt landscaping shall be served by permanent irrigation facilities. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. -4- PC2002-151 • • 33. That minimum five (5) gallon sized clinging vines planted on maximum three (3) foot centers, including appropriate irrigation facilities, shall be installed and maintained along all east building walls. Said information shall be specifically shown on the plans submitted for building permits. 34. That an on-site landscaping and irrigation system shall be maintained in compliance with City standards. 35. That any tree planted on-site shall be replaced in a timely manner in the event that it is removed, damaged, diseased and/or dies; and that the landscaped planters shall be permanently maintained with live and healthy plants. 36. That in the event trash containment becomes a nuisance, a second trash enclosure shall be installed in a location acceptable to the Public Works Department, Streets and Sanitation Division 37. That four (4) foot high street address numbers shall be displayed on the roof of the building(s) in a contrasting color to the roof material. The numbers shall not be visible to the adjacent streets or properties. Said information shall be specifically shown on plans submitted for Police Department, Community Services Division, approval. 38. That the proposal shall comply with all signing requirements of the ML (Limited Industrial) Zone unless a variance allowing sign waivers is approved by the Planning Commission or City Council. 39. That the proposed sign on Commercial Street shall be located within a landscaped planter; and that the location of the sign shall be approved by the appropriate railroad authorities. 40 That final sign plans shall be submitted to the Zoning Division for review and approval indicating monument-type signs not exceeding eight (8) feet in height and ten (10) feef in widtF~ as measured from the grade of the sidewalk, with a maximum sign copy area of thirty five (35) square feet per face for La Palma Avenue and thirty (30) square feet per face for Commercial Street. Said signs shall be subject to the review and approval of the City Traffic and Transportation Manager to verify adequate lines-of sight. 41. That no Special Event permits shall be issued for this property. 42. That prior to commencing operation of this business, a valid business license shall be obtained from the Business License Division of the City of Anaheim Finance Department. 43. That subject property shall be developed and maintained substantially in accordance with plans and specifications submitted to the City of Anaheim by the petitioner and which plans are on file with the Planning Department marked Exhibit Nos. 1, 2 3 and 4(except for freestanding signage), and as conditioned herein. 44. That prior to issuance of a building permit, or prior to commencement of the activity authorized by this resolution, or within a period of one (1) year from the date of this resolution, whichever occurs first, Condition Nos. 1, 2, 5, 6, 9, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 37, 39 and 40, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. Extensions for further time to complete said conditions may be granted in accordance with Section 18.03.090 of the Anaheim Municipal Code. 45. That prior to final building and zoning inspections, Condition No. 19, 42 and 43, above-mentioned, shall be complied with. 46. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement 47. That the items listed in the City of Anaheim Electrical Engineering draft letter, dated October 7, 2002 and labeled "Work Plan for Relocation of Electrical Facilities, 711 E. La Palma Avenue, Anaheim, CA 92805 (Attachment "B" to this resolution) shall be incorporated as conditions of approval. The timing and completion of these conditions shall be as required by the Electrical Engineering Division. -5- PC2002-151 • LJ BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim City Planning Commission does hereby find and determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicanYs compliance with each and all of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of October 7, 2002. / CHA PE SON, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: ~ Leo _ SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Fernandes, Secretary of the Anaheim City Planning Commission, do hereby certify #hat tbe for.egoing resolution was_passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim City Planning Commission held on October 7, 2002, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BOSTWICK, BOYDSTUN, BRISTOL, EASTMAN, KOOS, ROMERO, VANDERBILT NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~v~ h~day of , 2002. ~~crL~-~e~2D SECRETARY, ANAHEIM CITY PLANNING COMMISSION -6- PC2002-151 A~~o~E~ ~ .~ R~s ..: ~ '~oa~.ks ... '~c~~le I -}-~;A ~ler s ~Ya;lerS JC kk ~~ .~'fA~~e.Y'S Se~- S k ~ s... 1v~ afia~cyc.leS ~TV 5 ~ G o I~ C'a r-f S. ~'ars ... ~-ck- `' ~O -}-r `~c'~ S S-~. ~- ~ p...-~ v~~~ s S-{-a~ e. - I~ -{-r v c~~Cs ~ e r~ ~ cA. .-}-y~~c,~ s ~j~ - f't -}-~`a~c.~ors a.~~d -t'~'oa~ ~e,Y`s ~ 5 ~x ~~r~~S ~"~~Y ~ o V~ti'!f`~rc ~~ -~-f' t~~ ~ S ~a~k~oeS. ~,. v c~.c~ e r S ... 2o~;Ei~s ... _ . ~ ~"o r ~ , fi`~' . . . ~, ~~; ~ G4v~ 41~-Y'Cl 4~ . ~~(U. t ~. ~"~.,~ ~O 1 ~I..LO~ E.~ ~t,~rk ~/~I~~c~es ~vel~~cles ~~,=. }Mc~~o r bo c~~ c~av~na~2 ~ ~n o e~n~~r~ ~ ~,~ kQ~ 51Qs s , -~ l °~-~' -~' r~= . ) ~e~t~~les CarrY-~~ c.,~v~cover~o~ Y~'~ rn-~-e r I a~s . }Mc~~'er~m..~ ~,~aq~ Cl ve~~c~e pa,r~s s~t'Q~ ~. ~uc~h ~ ~~~`-~~e~ , -~it'es, oi I , ~~-c. RECENED AT THE COMMISSION MEETING OF - ' - D'Z.- iN CONNECTION ~ WI~~ITEM NO. n_~-, Eleanor Fernandes,-Senior Secretary ~ ~ e~.S2 ~- ~ e~e /. O i" O'~Y a-~'~ c~h -t~v~r y~. l O t~ Attachment "A" to Resolution No. PC2002-151 c~1-a~~s. Oct-Ot-02 - 10~55am~Prom-Anahaim P.W~ct.En~. ~' Post I~ Fax Note':~ . 7671 °a«jp --O CoJDcpt. I ~• phone ~k IP~ :- 714 765 4655 . T-Z18 P.001/002 F-424 ~ ~ R ~1~ r October 7, 2002 Coorg Corporation Subject: WO~.ZK PLAN FOR ~tELOCATZON OF EI,ECTRYC.AL F~CII.ZTIES 711 E. ~.APAX..MA AVENUE~ ~N~~~ C~ 92805 Dear Mr. The purpose of this Ietter is to identify zhe work that is raqu~red ta facilitafe btrild~g on ~he properry owned by Commercial FamilY ~a nort o La Ppaln~a Avenueeto 1 Ot north of the Topeka and Santa Fe railroad tracks exte , SR91 Freeway. The followina ~s a work plan and estimated costs: 1) '~he guy wixe east of ~ole No. Zb699D is currently anchored outside of the easennent and cannot be shortened. By mutual understandin~g the down guy and anchor will be relocated by in~s~alling a guy pole, span ~uy, and anchor in a proposed 10' x 55' easement located on the subject property. Coorg Corporation (Developer) will modify one of its proposed buildings to accoznmodate the 10' wide easement. The Public ITtilities Department (PUD) has reviewed its easement requirerr~ents for the 70'wide by 400' long easement and can proceed with the City's abandozlment of a l,2' wide by 55' str~p across the north side of the 70' wide easement section. The guy pole will be located between tlne buildings and the Developer will ensure that the pole is protected from tra~c• 2) ~'he Developer will protect Pole No. 27619D through the installation of 2 steel concrete reinxrorced bollards installed at 1' from the pole and 2 steel concrete rei.nfarced bo~lards installed at 1' £rom the guy wire anchor to the north to provide protection from site tra$c. The buildina has been modified to accommodate traffi~c circulation. The cost will be borne by the Developer. -- - 3) Pole ~To. 27618D will be moved 3'/2' to the west to accommadate ixaffic circulation on the site. The cost to trench the gole is estimated at $3,080. The neveloper is required to pay 50% of the pole trenchina cost. The T~eveloper will beat the cost o~ insta~ling 2 steel concrete reiuforced bollards installed at 1' from the pole to provide protection from site ~ traffic. Attachment "B" to Resolution No. PC2002-151 page 1 of 2 Oct-07-02 10:55am From-Anaheim P.W. t.Ena. ~ 714 765 4655 ~ T-218 P.002/002 F-424 Coorg Corporation ~~ - _ - ~~ 711 ~, La~.'alma Ave ~~~` October 7, 2002 • Page 2 of 2 4) Pole 276171~, does not require relocation at this time. At the Developer's reque~t, the pole could be moved 3'/z' to the west at an estimated cost of $9,321~. The Aeveloper shall obtain an easement on NorCal property to accommodate guying of the overhead conductors east o~ the pole. If the Developer elects to relocate the pole, the Developer will bear the cost o~the pole relocation, concrete reinforced bollards and easement acquisition. 5) Pole I~To.'s 30164D & 27611D along the west side of the properiy and north of the railroad spur do not require relocatian. The Developer v+rill bear the cost o~ installing Z bollards 1' f,rom the pole to provide protection from site tra£fic. 6) Pole No.'s 27615D & 27614D will be removed as a result of NorCal's praject and are not an issue. ~ 7) pole l~o. 30165D (just South of Commexcial Street) will be moved at the City's cost to be inside the easement. The City is responsible ~or the cost ($400) to install 2 steel concrete reinforced bollards iz~stalled at 1' from the pole to provide protection from site tza~'ic. 8) As required by the Developer to accommodate ~uture bu~d'vngs, the 4 po1~~ t~ the north of Commercial Street (30164D, 27611I~, 27610A, & 276090rJ) will be trenched 4' to the west. 'Z'he cost to trench each of the poles is estimated at 53,080. The Developer is required to pay 50% of the pole trenching costs. The Aeveloper will bear the cost of installing 2 steel concrete re'u~£orced. bollards at each pole to provide proteetion from site traffic. ~lectrical Engineering provided Coor~ Corporat~on with the City's Right of Way Abandonment Form for processing. Coorg Corporation will proceed with the prepa~arion of leaal drawings and descriptidns ~or the proposed easement area and the proposed abandvnment {Item 1 above). Electrical ~ngineerino will process the paper work through the City's Riaht of Way Seecion once the dacuments have been received at no cost to the'Developer. The processing of the document takes approximately two months. Sincerely, ~.tobert Templeton principal E~ectrical System Designer c: Fxle Attachment "B" to Resolution No. PC2002-151 page 2 of 2