Loading...
Resolution-PC 2005-49~, ' . RESOLUTION NO. PC2005-49 ' A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING.COMMISSION ADOPTING AND RECOMMENDING TO TTHE CITY COUNCIL ADOPTION OF GENERAL PLAN AMENDMENT NO. GPA 2005-00429 PERTAINING TO THE LAND USE ELEMENT WHEREAS, on December 14, 2004, the Anaheim City Council approved a memorandum of understanding with the County of Orange`stiputating that the City would pursue a process that may lead to annexation of County lslands (i.e., pockets of land that are surrounded by but not within any city's boundaries) 4-AN-6, 4-AN-7, and 4-AN-8 into the City of Anaheim; and - WHEREAS, the City of Anaheim has an adopted General Plan, which was updated by the City Council on May 25, 2005, by its Resolution No. 2004-95; and WHEREAS, on March 7, 2005, the Anaheim City Planning Commission directed staff to initiate an amendment to the Land `Use Element of the Anaheim General Plan'to designate certain real properties comprising approximately 30 acres generally bounded by Pacific Place to the north, Gilbert Street to the east, Katella Avenue to the south and 156 feet to the centerline of Markev'Street to the west, as shown on Exhibit A attached hereto andlabeled "LAND USE ELEMENT, General Plan Amendment Na 2005-00429, Area Na-17" (hereinafter described as Area No. 17), to the Low-Medium Density Residenfial land use designation; and ` WHEREAS, pursuant to Chapter 18.68 of the Anaheim Municipal Code, provisions of the General Plan may be amended whenever the public necessity and convenience and the general welfare require such amendment when adopted by a resolution of the City Council in the manner prescribed by law; and WHEREAS, on April 18, 2005, at 6:00p.m., the Anaheim Planning Commission did hold a' public hearing at the Anaheim CivicCenter, Council Chamber, 200 South Anaheim Boulevard, notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law and in accordance with the provisions Chapter 18:60 "Procedures", of the Anaheim Municipal Code, to hear and consider evidence for and against said Generat Plan Amendmenf No: 2005-00429 and to investigate and make findings and recommendations in connection therewith; and WHEREAS, the General Plan Amendment proposes to amend the Land Use Element of the General Plan, as follows: 1. Land Use Element (a) Amend Table LU-4 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan, General P/an Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City, by adding density provisions for Area No. 17 to Table LU-4 as shown on Exhibit B attached hereta (b) Amend Figure LU-5 of the Land Use Element of the General Plan, Areas of the City with Special Density Limitations, which identifies the areas in the City that have special density provisions in place to limit future growth, by designating Area No. 17on Figure LU-S, Areas of the City with Special Density Limitations map. WHEREAS, said Commission, after due consideration, inspection, investigation and study made by itself, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said fiearing, DOES HEREBY FIND: 1. That the evidence presented substantiates the need for an amendment to the Anaheim General , Plan and that, therefore, Area No. 17 should be designated in said General Plan for Low-Medium Density Residential land uses and the permitted density should be up to 240 dwelling units maximum (two dwelling units per parcel). 2. : Thaf the proposed amendmenY maintains the' internal consistency of the General Plan. _ Cr\PC2005-049 -1- PC2005-49 : • • 3. That'the proposed amendment would not be detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or welfare of the City. 4. That the proposed amendment wouid maintain the balance of land uses within the City. 5. - That the subject properties are physically suitabfe to accommadate the,proposed modification, including but not limited to access, physical constraints, topography, provisions of utilities, and compatibility with surrounding land uses: ' 6. That 3 people indicated their presence at the public hearing in opposition to the proposal, 1 letter was received in opposition; and 2 people relayed their concerns/questions to the proposaL CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Planning Commission has reviewed the proposal to amend #he Land Use Element of the General Plan to designate Area No. 17 to the Low-Medium Density Residential or less intense designation; and did recommend, that the City Council, based on its independent review of the Initial Study and unless additional or contrary information is received during the public meeting, approve the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program Na 133 as modified by the Planning Commission to include refinements to Mitigation Measure 5.6-3 and find and determine that' based upon said Initial Study and any evidence received at the public meeting; that there is no substantial eVidence;that the project will have'a significant'effect on the environment that cannot be mitigated to a level of insignificance as identified in the Mifigated Negative Declaration, that no new mitigation measures or alternatives will be required beyond those identifled in Mitigation Monitoring Program No.°133, and that the Mitigated Negative Declaration and Mitigation Monitoring Program No. 133 are in compliance with the California Environmental Quality Act ("CEQA") and the State and City CEQA Guidelines and are adequate to serve as the required environmental documentation for the proposed Amendment and satisfy all requirements of CEQA; and thaf no further environmental documentation need be prepared for the proposed General Plan ' Amendment. NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that pursuant to the above findings, the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby adopt and recommend to the City Council of the City of Anaheim adoption of General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00429, to designate Area No. 17 to the Low-Medium Density Residenfial land use designation and amend Figure LU-5, Areas of fhe City with Special Density Limftations and Table LU-4, General Plan Density Provisions for Specific Areas of the City. THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was ado ted a Planning Com 'ssion meeting of April 18, 2005. ----- ~RM , ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION ATTEST: ~ ~ - _ r SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION -2- : 'PC2005-49 , • ~ STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss. CITY OF ANAHEIM ) I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby cerfify that the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of theAnaheim Planning Commission held on ` Apri1 18, 2005, by the following vote of the members thereof: AYES; COMMISSIONERS: BUFFA, EASTMAN, FLORES, PEREZ, VELASQUEZ NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: NONE VACANT: COMMISSIONERS: TWO VACANCIES IN WITNESS WHEREOF, Ihave hereunto set my hand this l~ ~~ ` day of_/~~I , 2005: ' J~~v-~.c.~e : SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIMPLANNING COMMISSION ~ ~ . .. .. . D(~ <~3~ . DO < N~ D~ < "^ . ~ f) Aw ~ (~ ~ O C1 YO ~.~ <-.~ ~ 91 D~ <~ Dn .~<'+ ~ ~ D .<~ DO G . N . . . . ~ N Cl 3 ~p : . N 3 ~ . N ~ 3 ~ o ~ .N= L ~.. ~. 0. N . 3 7 N(~ 7 p' ~~ . N ~ 7 N ~ ~ N~ ~ 3 ~ . N . 7 7 . ~ .. ~ . . . . . fD~~~ . . ~ ID N ~. (Dd ~ ~ N. . . N .._ ~ N~ , N~ ~ N . ID N ~ ~ . . . . . . ~ j . ~ i . N . . ? . Knott Knott SVeet Street Western Westem Avenue Avenue Beach Bouievard Beach Boulevard Dale Dale Avenue Avenue Av ea Ma nolia e enu nue Av GilbeR Gilbert Street Street Brookhurst Brookhurst Street SVeet G~ m Nutwood ~ N Street ~ N ~ Euclid Euclid ~ ~ ~ Street Street n Z ~ D p ^* D ~ Ninth ~ ~ Street c ~ ~ °- m ~ ~' ~ ~ r West Harbor _ -' ~ ' -~ ~" R7 Street ` Boulevard 3 v Z~ Lemon StJ ~ o ITl Anaheim Blvd. ~ . Z ' Harbor a o --I Boulevard 0 ~ ~ ~ Haster East ~ A Street Street ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ N . ~ . ~ ' ~ ~ . ~ ~ .~ ., .. ~ . . - . . . Lewis Street St. College State College Boulevard BouleVard r _ ~ N ~ f ~ co m Z ~ Kraemer Boulevard ° o ~ p ,. (n v -o p~ ~ o Z ~ Miller ~ ~• 3 u> Street ' m ' o ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ o Aven ue ~ ~ ~ cn 0 ~ ~ , _ ,• • _ . • EXISTING ACRES NO CITY OF ANAHEIM GENERAL PLAN LAND USE bESIGNATION 30A . . . LLI ~ . . O~ YJ . ~ . . O. . . . . . . tiQ S N V . . . . . . ~ ~ . . ~ ~Nl- . . ~ . ~ ~ ' . . ~ . ~ ~ VSITY ~ . ~ . .. ~ ~co . `. . , . ~ . , . . a . . ~ ~ . . .. - ~ ITIAL ~ ~ . ~ ~ . ~ ~ 3 ~ LOW DENSIN ~ ~ LOW DENSITY LOW DENSITV ~ . LOW OENSITY ~ ~ : ~ ~ . ~ ~ p~~ RESIDENTIAI. RESIDENTIAL ~~ RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ~- - STANTON ClfY L/MIfS ~ . .. VE. .. ORANGECOUNTYL/MITS . ' . ~ ' PACIFICAVE . ~. .. . ... . . . . . ~ . . ~ ~ ~ . NO CITY OF ANAHEIM CENERAL PLAN LOW UENSITV ~ . LOW DENSITY . LOW DENSIN ~ .~~ ~ ~ ~. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~LANDUSEDESIGNATION . ~ RESiDENTIAL RHSIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ~ , - ~ ~. ~ ORANGECOUNIY[IMITS ~ ~ ~ ~ . ' . . - STANTON CITY LIMITS .. ~ . . . - ~. . . . . . ~ . . ~ . ~ ~ .. ~~ .. . ~ . ~ . ~ ~ OPEN SPACEfRECREATIONAL ~ . . . .. ~ I ~. ' OPENSPACE ~ . . . . . . ~ ~ ~ ~ cnaFic ai . . RAILROAD-+-~-~--~-» . ~~ ~ ~ . . . . ~ ~ . ~ . ORANGECOUNTYLIMRS ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ . . . ~ ~• ~- ~~r~~ ~'.~,~ ~~~~ ~`~ i~~l ~'~ ~'~~'ilau*~ ~° ~ --n~~~ ~ . . ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ;~~~~~~ ~,~,~ ;~i,i~~~ < <n ~ s ~ ~ ~. ~. . ~ . . ~ . '~r ~' ~. li) ~ i' T . ; '~~r~ ~ 3 i K ~ ' ~ ~"~~ ' y~F PUBUC/INSTITUTIONAL~ ~ ~~ ~# '~~r aN ~~ ~ ~i . _ . . . ~T~ s ~ i19IP'.=s ~ q = ~I~ 5 ~'" ~t ~i~ ~ ~{~ ~ . y ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ .-r'~'ka~ , y. ~- `~ a ~ I~ ,z,~~.£~~~ "~.~-~`~ ; ~~' ~~k s ~ ~` . .i ~ g . ~ ~ ~ ~ ° ~ s ~ r ` a ~Ck~ a~'s ~ ~ ~ t~li~I~~ a~ c ~i ~ ~ z i ~ `~~ ' t ~11t~~~ ~'~ ~ x a 3 ~~a~4~~ ~ y ~ ~~a' ~~ o c ~ow oeNSm ~ ~ srqHrow cm uMVS ~ "-~! ~- ~ ~ a~~ ~r =- ~ ~° '~ = a ~ U4~-c~~; i ~ RESIDENTIAL ~ ~ ~ ~ ~k ~a ~ ~'~~~~ 3" ~ 3a~;~~ ~ ~~+"~ r'~ ,~..-r~`;~ ioi~. ~: ~-,,,ii~h~i~F ~, ~pII 3 . ~. o~ . .. ~ GAFDENGROVE CITY UMITS ~ ~, ; ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ =r,~~r ~ ~~ p~ s~ ~` ",,, ~ +3~1~y,7~~kr ~ r ~ ~ ,~`~~~~` ~ ~`'~~ ~ ~ ~ . . ~ > -~ ~ t i i ,.,.x..G., ,. ~,4,~'ws»i,,,,. ...;.,.~.~ .,a~..~ .~. ~ ~~l~~kf~ r ~ . ~ . ~ zx ~ Z NO CITY OF ANAHEIM GENERAL PLAN ~,~~~~ ~, e W ~ ~ ~ ` 5 ~ ~ LAND USE DESIGNATION ~ a ~ ~~ ~ ~ ~ow oeHSm ~ ~ . . i a $~ ,. y RES~DENTIAI ~ . . . w z ~ ~' . ~ ~ . e 0 . . ~ ~ . Z ~ ~ Z ~ q < ~ q ~i~ m , . . . ~ 2 .. ~y i ~ ~ ~ ~ `i,~ ~ ~7 ~JQ . .. .. ~ ~ ~ ~ < W G n ~ ~ '~~ ~ ~ F- . ~ . ~ . . ~ ~ ~ - ~. S W e.~ ; t , a' 2= . ~ ~ ~ ~ Reounve '=.z~i. - tt oo LGWOEN617Y ~ ~ . a o 4 . ~ 3 W RESIDENTIAL ~ i ~~ pz z ~~ ~ . ~ ~. . o ~ ~g ' s E ~ y ~ V G V ; 2 ~ (~ F . . .. I ' I I 'N ~ '~j\/ }~f' ~ i ~ . . . . ~ LOWI OENSITV 14 . . L _ _ - -KA7ELLAA=E - _ - ~ orsnn~~+ecou~ uMrrs GARDENGROVE•CITY-LIMIT3 ~ ~ ~ LAND USE ELEMENT General Pian Amendment No. 2005-00429 Area No. 17 Existing Figure 2 1750-7 • ~ EXHIBIT A ACRES LOW MEDIUM DENSITY RESIDENTIAL ' 30A . . ~J~J " . . ~ ~ . . O ~ Y J . . . . ~ ~ . ' ~ ~ .. fQ.. . . . g . . ~ . . .. m . ~ ~ NF ~ . . . . ~ . . . Zz ~. ~ . ~.. .,~ ~ ~ . .. . . ~ ~°NSITY >. ~ . . . . . ~ <oo LOW DENSITY LOW DENSITY ° ~ NT~A~ ~ ` . . p ~ RESIDENTIA4 ~ RESIDENTIAL ~~RESIDENTIAL ~LOW DENSITY ~ . . . . . ~ .. . ~ ~ ~ - RESIDENTIAI . ~ ~ , ~ . STANTON G1Y LIM/1S ~ ~ . . , . ' ~ ~AVE ~ ~ ORANGECOUMYLIMIiS.... ~ ~ . . . . PACIFICAVE . ~ ~~ . . . . .. . . ~ . . . ~ '~NOCITYOFANAHEIMGENERALPLAN ~ LOWDENSITV LOWDENSIN ~ LOWDENSITV ~~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ . ~~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ . LAND USE DESIGNATION ~ ~ RES'DENTIAL RESIDENTIAL RESIDENTIAL ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ORANGECOUNTYL/M?S ~ ~ . . . .. . STANTON CIfY L/MRS ~ . . . . . .. . ~ ~ .. .. . . .. . , ' . . . . . . . . ~ ~ ~ . . . ~ . . . ~ . . ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ . ~ , ' ~ . . OPEN SPACE/RECREATIONAL . ~ ~ ~ , ' ~ OpENSPACE . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~~ ~ . ~ ~ raac~cr~ RAILROAD-~-i-~~-~- ~~ . . . ~ .. . . . . . . . . OftANGE CaUNtt IfMITS ~. . . . . ~ , . . ~~ ~' € ~ I`f~`'~ ~ 1'n " s'ti~t a n " `' = ~,~ ~` ' ~,"~ - . .. - ~ . ~ ~~ . ~ ap,~~iGh;n~ ~~. r,~a~ ~k~"~-~ .~. '~~aG~ '~~~~P 'III~i ~: ~ ~.~~~H~q'~.. . . ~ ~ . ~ . ~ . . . . . ~ ~ ~ 5 ~~ ~h~ ~4~.~ i~~'ia~~,~ ~4 PI [( ~ PUBLICIINSTITUTIONAL ~~~~ '~ ~'~~~~`~ ~~ °''"" ~~ -a ~-~~' i ~~ ~~~ ~„~ . . . . - `~`?. ~b 'y ~~I .§ .-I''~°d'{ °~-t ~s ~?1flk -a~` ( '~ YJ 3~ i .. . : ~' r~ ,~~.~ : #:~pr ~~ {~, ~ ~`5,~,~1,~~a ~. ,~ ~ ~+a ~"~~ca tg . . ~ . . . ~ 3. Ft i ~ ~:4.~ ,~ "t x ~ ~~ay.'~~ry ?i o '~~d ~ ~7~~ `~ ~ ~ ~` ~ ~ . ~ . ~ ~ ~ . . ~. ~ ~ ~~tik~~ 9 „~,~~ ;a ; '~ ~~..yPk'-~ r L,~ .~,'''fi i~-7i~r+~ .: v~~m*u~ oo ~ LOWDENSITY ~ ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ sinMoe cm uMrrs ~ ~ a " i ' ~ }~;s~ RESIDENTIAL . . ~ t s g ~+~`~' ~~' i y~ ° 3 W . ~ ~ ~ ~ CaAftDENOROVE C/7Y LIMITS '" ~ - ' ~°` ~ . '~~"'~ "~`": ~~ O J~ ~ ~ ~ ~: ~` x ~ ~ '~,, ` ~~+ ~ a~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ,, .?~p~° ~z ..... .~, ~'~~ ~ ~ ~ ~ . '~ ~ ~ i ~ t,, d t ~:> ~ . ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ : ~~~ .. . ~ . .. . . . a -~ z ~ ~~~~ ~ ~ . . .. . ,.. Z ~ Z ~ ~S < ~ N S ~J.;~U W . ~ . . ~ 2 ~ . . ~ ~ ~~ ~ z ;. ~ z ~ . ~ z ~` ~ " ~-'~ ~ ~ z ~ ~. I~S~ ~ K ~ LOW DENSITY - . . . .. . . ~ o . ~ o ~ ~,,. ~ o ~e ~ a ~ ~ o ,, I;, y RE9IDENTIAL ~ . . Y jWW~ 'wWk': WW , s S` € ;WW~a.,F ~ ~ ~ . . ~ . ~ ~, ~ ~ ~ .,o~ _ ~~~r ~~°. a ~3~i"~r~s u' .. . .... .~ . j 0 ~ aS ~ ~*~` O . 3a`~ ro ~ .. ~ ~ ~-vz . 'n~ J ~ , i ~ - U' Y J ~ . . ~ F ~ ~ A~ ~ `i Wf . . . ~ ~ ~ nECUnve ~ i ;r .~,~ oo LOWDENSITY . ~ . . ~ RESIDENTIAL ~ ~ i ~' ~ , ~'~ p ~ - . . . ~ 7 _ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ U ~ W 4 ~ p ~ " ' ~ow oeNSin ~ ~ '~ :,~ ~ RESIDENTIAL u z -E . - . ~ ~ ~ KATELLAAVE . ,. . ..,. ... . . . .. ~. (.~TANGECOUNTYUMITS ~ 24RDEN fiROVE•GTY-L6.I/TS . . .. .. . . LAND USE ELEMENT General Plan Amendment No. 2005-00429 Area No. 17 Exhibit A . 1750-7 8 ~ ~ TABLE Lt7-~l: GENERAL PLANDENSITY PROVISfONS FOR'SPECIFIC`AREAS OF THE CITY Location General Plan Land Use besi nations `` Permitted Densit The Mountain Low Medium Hillside Density Residential 485 Park Area ' (Up to 6 du/ac) Low Medium Density Residential -' 2,015 (Up to 16 du/ac) (Up to 2,500 dwelling units) Area ~~A„ (Parcel Map Low-Medium Density Residential Up to 140 dwelling units 94-205 The Disneyland Commercial Recreation See Note No. 1 on next page. ' Resort Specific Plan (SP 92-1) Area The Anaheim Commercial Recreation See Note No. 2 on next page. Resort~ Specific Plan (SP 92-2) Area Hotel Circle Commercial Recreation The Hotel Circle Specific Plan allows for a Specific Plan master planned hotel project including up (SP 93-1) Area to 969 hotel rooms and integrated guest oriented amenities including full-service restaurants, conference room/banquet facilities, pool and spa areas, tour bus/shuttle facilities, and pedestrian promenades and plaza areas with comprehensive landscaping. The Platinum Mixed-Use Up to 9,175 dwelling units at densities up Triangle Area to 100 dwelling units per acre; up to 3,265,000 s.f. of o~ce development at maximum FAR of 2.00; and, up to 2,044,300 s.f. of commercial development at a maximum FAR of 0.40. Office High and Office Low Up to 1,735,000 s.f. of o~ce development . at a maximum FAR of 2.0 for properties designated Office-High and a maximum FAR of 0.50 for properties designated Office-Low. "Area No. 17 °Low Medium Density Residential" "Up to 240 dwelling units maximum (two (General Plan dwelling units per parcel)" Amendment No. 2005-00429" TABLE LU-4: GENERAL PLAN DENSITY PROVISIONS FOR SPECIFIC PLANS WITHIN THE ANAHEIM RESORT AND FOR THE PLATINUM TRIANGLE AREA CONTINUED Note No. 1: The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of an approximate 489.7 acre international multi-day vacafion designation resort including ongoing modifications to the'Disneyland theme park, the ' development of a new theme park, additional hotels and entertainment areas, administrative office facilities, new public antl private parking facilities, and an internai transportation system. This development is within #ive planning Districts (Theme Park, Hotel, Parking, Future Expansion and District A) and a C-R Averlay, which allows development within the Overlay to either be consistent with the underlying Resort District or subject to the same land uses as in the Anaheim'Resort Specific Plan No. 92-2 Zone. The Disneyland Resort Specific Plan also identifies maximum development density designations for hotel/motel development in the Hotel District (up to 5,600 hotel rooms for the entire District with up to 1,000 hotel rooms transferable to the Theme Park District); in District A(the maximum number of units permitted would be 75 hotel/motel rooms per gross acre or 75 hotel/motef rooms per parcel existing on June 29; 1993, whichever is greater) and the C-R Overlay (the maximum number of units permitted on a parcel would be the following: 1) for pa~cels designated Low Density - up to 80 hotel rooms pergross acre or 75 rooms, whichever is greater; and 2) for parcels designated Medium Density - up to 75 hotel rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms, whichever is greater; provided that for those parcels that are developed with hotel/motel rooms which exceeded the maximum density designation, the number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of The bisneyland Resort Specific Plan Ordinance may be rebuilt or modified aftheir existing density.) it should be noted that accessory uses may be developed as well as other visitor-serving commercial/retail and restaurant uses along with these hotel/motel uses. The Disneyland Resort SpecificPian also provides for the development of the PointeAnaheim Lifestyle Retail and Entertainment Complex pursuant to the Pointe Anaheim Overlay at the following density and subject to the approval of Conditional Use Permit No. 4078 to permit the following: up to 634,600 gross square feet of retail/dining/entertainment = uses; three to four hotels comprising 1,662 hotel rooms/suites (of which up,to 200 units can be developed as vacation ownership resort units) with approximately 282,071 gross square feet of related accessory Uses (the hoteL rooms/accessory uses would encompass a maximum of 1,330,771 gross square feet) and, of that total, an approximate 133,630 gross square foot area on the top fioor of the parking structure to be used for a hotel conference center; and, a 1,949,800 gross square foot parking strueture with 4,800 striped parking spaces and 15 bus parking spaces at full buildout with a 10,200 gross square foot bus terminal/facility for airport transport and to/from sightseeing venues. The Pointe*Anaheim Overlay encompasses District A and the portion of the Parking District (East Parking , Area /CR Overla south of Disne Wa . Note No. 2: The Anaheim Resort Specific Plan provides for the development of approximately 549.5 acres within the C-R (Commercial Recreation) District which ailows for hotels, motels, convention and conference facilities, as well as restaurants, retail shops and entertainment facilities; the PR (Public Recreation) District which encompasses the Anaheim Convention Center and associated parking facilities and provides for the orderty use of City-owned property as well as the existing Anaheim Hilton Hotel; and, the Mobilehome Park (MHP) Overlay which encompasses existing mobilehome parks within the C-R District and provides development standards for mobilehome parks and regulations and procedures to mitigate relocation concerns and adverse effects of displacement upon mobilehome owners when a park is converted to another land use. The Anaheim Resort Specific Pfan also identifies maximum devetopment density designations in the C-R District. These designations are based upon hotel/motel development and allow up to 20% of each hotel/motel project gross square footage, excluding parking facilities, to be developed with integrated (i.e., included within the main hotel/motel complex) accessory uses. These accessory uses will reduce the otherwise maximum permitted hotel/motel density at the rate of one hotel/motel room per six hundred (600) gross square feet of accessory use. For properties proposed to be developed with permitted and conditionalty permitted uses other than hotels/motets with accessory uses, the traffic generation characteristics of said uses shall not exceed those associated with the othervvise permitted fiotel/motel(including accessory uses) density as determined by the City Tra~c and Transportation Manager prior to Final Site Plan review and approval. The density designations are as follows: "Low Density,° which has a maximum density of up to 50 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater; "Low-Medium Density," up to 75 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater; "Medium Density," up to 100 rooms per gross acre or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater; and, "Convention Center (CC) Medium Density,° up to 125 rooms per gross acre with trip generation characteristics mitigated to the equivalent of 100 rooms per gross acre, or 75 rooms per lot or parcel, whichever is greater. For those parcels that are developed with hotellmotel rooms which exceed the maximum density designation, the number of rooms existing on the date of adoption of the Anaheim Resort Specific Plan Ordinance may be rebuilt or modified at their existin densit .