Resolution-PC 2007-6• ~
RESOLUTION NO. PC2007=6
ARESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
THATPETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2006-00180 BE GRANTED
(606 EAST ORANGEWOOD AVENUE)
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Planning Commission did receive a verified petition for
Reclassification for real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as foflows:
PARCEL 1: THE EAST 85 FEET OF THE NORTH 200 FEET OF LOT(S) FOURTEEN OF
ORANGEWOOD TRACT, JN THE CITY OF ANAHEfM, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF
CALIFORNIA AS SHOWN ON A MAP THEREOF RECORDED IN BOOK 7 PAGE(S) 42 OF
MISCELLANEOUS MAPS IN THE OFFICE OF THE COUNTY RECORDER OF SAID COUNTY,
THENCE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT FOURTEEN BEING THE SOUTH LINE OF ORANGEWOOD
AVENUE, AS SHOWN_ON SAID MAP, 40 FEET WIDE.
PARCEL 2: AN UNDIVIDED 1/70TH INTEREST IN AND TO THAT PORTION OF LOT
FOURTEEN OF ORANGEWOOD TRACT, AS SHOWN ON MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 7 PAGE(S)
42 OF MISCELLANEOUS MAPS, RECORDS OF ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA, DESCRIBED
AS FOLLOWS:
BEGINNING AT A POIN~ IN SAID LOT 145 FEET WESTERLY AND 237.5 FEET SOU7HERLY '
FROM THE NORTHEAST CORNER OF SAID LOT; THENCE SOUTHERLY PARALLEL TO THE
EAST LINE OF SAID LOT, 60 FEET; THENCE WESTERLY, PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF
SAID tOT, 25 FEET; THENCE NORTHERLY, PARALLEL TO SAID EAST LINE OF SAID LOT, 60
FEET; THENCE EASTERLY, PARALLEL TO THE NORTH LINE OF SAID LOT, 25 FEET TO THE
POINT OF BEGINNING.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of
Anaheim on January 8, 2007, at 2:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by
law and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60 "Procedures", to hear
and consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and study made by itself and
in its behalf, and after due consideration of a11 evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and
determine the following facts:
1. That the applicant proposes reclassification of subject property from the T(Transition) zone to
the RS-4 (Single-Family Residential) zone
2. That the Anaheim General Plan designates this property for Low Medium Density Residential
land uses. The RS-4 zone is a typical implementation zone for this land designation.
3. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for the
orderly and proper development of the community.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their
permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subject property and to the zones and their permitted
uses generally established throughout the community.
5. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition.
CR\PC2007-6 -1- PC2007-6
i •
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that
the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative
Declaration together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on the
basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substanfial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment. ,
NOW, THERE~ORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby
approve the subject Petition for Reclassification to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map of the Anaheim
Municipal Code to exclude the above-described property from"the T(Transition) Zone and to incorporate said
described property into the RS-4 (Single-Family Residential) Zone upon the' following conditions which are
hereby found to be a necessary prerequisite to the proposed use of subject property in order to preserve the
health and safety of the Citizens of the City of Anaheim:
1. That prior to introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, a preliminary title report shall be
furnished to the Planning Services Division showing the legal vesting of title, a legal description and
containing a map of the property.
2. That prior to placement of an ordinance rezoning subject property on an agenda for City Council
consideration, Condition No. 1, above-mentioned, shall be completed: The City Council may approve'or
disapprove a zoning ordinance at its discretion. If the ordinance is disapproved, the procedure set forth in
Anaheim Municipal Code Section 18.60.140 shall apply. The provisions or rights granted,by this
resolution shall become null and void by action of the Planning Commission unless said conditions are'
complied with within one (1) year from the date of this resolution, or such further time as the Planning
Commission may grant.
3. That timing for compliance with conditions of approval may be amended by the Planning Director upon a
showing of good cause provided (i) equivalent timing is established that satisfies the original intent and
purpose of the condition(s), (ii) the modification complies with the Anaheim Municipal Code and (iii) the
applicant has demonstrated significant progress toward establishment of the use or approved structure.
4. That approval of this application constitutes approval of the proposed request only to the extent that it
complies with the Anaheim Municipal Zoning Code and any other applicable City, State and Federal
regulations. Approval does not include any action or findings as to compliance or approval of the request
regarding any other applicable ordinance, regulation or requirement.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a
commitment by the City to rezone, the subject property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of the City
Council, which shaR be a legislative act, which may be approved or denied by the City Counci{ at its sole
discretion.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the Anaheim P(anning Commission does hereby find and
determine that adoption of this Resolution is expressly predicated upon applicanYs compliance with each and all
of the conditions hereinabove set forth. Should any such condition, or any part thereof, be declared invalid or
unenforceable by the final judgment of any court of competent jurisdiction, then this Resolution, and any
approvals herein contained, shall be deemed null and void.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to
the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to
the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay al1 charges shall result in
delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application.
-2- PC2007-6
~ •
7HE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of
January 8, 2007. Said reso{ution is subject to the appeai provisions set f h in C pter 18.60 `Procedures" of
the Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and m r d 'ty Council Resolution
in the event of an appeal. ,
CHAIRMAN, A IM PLANNING COMMISSION
A7TEST:
/~~2e~.~o
~~:~..r~--
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COtlNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
l, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary af the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certify that
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Planning Commission held on
January 8, 2007, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BUFFA, EASTMAN, FAESSEL, KARAKI, ROMERO, VELASQUEZ
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: FLORES
lN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this o2 3r d day of o.~ u a.r~~,
2007.
~ ~~~~~
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
,
-3- PC2007-6