Resolution-PC 2007-62• •
RESOLUTION NO: PC2007-62
`A RESOLUTION OF THE ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
THAT PETITION FOR RECLASSIFICATION NO. 2007-00203
BE GRANTED, UNCONDITIONALLY '
(2000 SOUTH STATE COLLEGE BOULEVARD)
WHEREAS, the Anaheim Planning Commission did receive a City-initiated petition for -
Reclassification for real property situated in the City of Anaheim, County of Orange, State of California,
described as a portion of the property located at 2000 South State College Boulevard (Parcel A) and further
described as follows: -
THAT PORTION OF RANCHO SANTIAGO DE SANTA ANA, IN THE CITY OF -
ORANGE, COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA, AS SHOWN 1N BOOK 3,
PAGE 420 OF PATENTS, RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY AND FILED IN
BOOK 3 PAGE 101 OF MISCELLANEOUS RECORDS OF LOS ANGELES IN THE
' OFFICE OF THE RECORDER OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY, TOGETHER WITH THAT
PORTION OF THE SANTA`.ANA RIVER CHANNEL IN THE CITY OF ORANGE,
COUNTY OF ORANGE, STATE OF CALIFORNIA AS DESCRIBED IN A DEED,
RECORDED IN BOOK 5748 PAGE 2LC OF OFFICIAL RECORDS, IN THE OFFICE OF.
SAID COUNTY RECORDER, MORE PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED AS FOLLOWS:
COMMENCING AT THE CENTERLINE INTERSECTION OF RAMPART STREET AND
ORANGEWOOD AVENUE, 90 FEET WIDE, 11 THENCE (1) EASTERLY ALONG THE
CENTERLINE OF ORANGEWOOD AVENUE 23.24 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL
ANGLE OF 1°06' 39" TO A POINT OF REVERSE CURVE . SAID CENTERLINE BEING
A CURVE CONCAVE SOUTHERLY AND HAVING A RADIUS OF 1199.97 FEET, A
RADlAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT OF COMMENCEMENT BEARS NORTH
18°59'C3" EAST; THENCE (2) EASTERLY ALONG THE CENTERLINE OF
ORANGEWOOD AVENUE 403.79 FEET THROUGH A CENTRAL ANGLE OF L9°L6'48".
SAID CENTERLINE BEING A CURVE CONCAVE NORTHERLY AND HAVING 15 A
RADIUS OF 1199.97 FEET, A RADIAL LINE THROUGH SAID POINT OF REVERSE
CURVE BEARS SOUTH 20'05'42" WEST; THENCE (3) SOUTH 89°11'06" EAST 115.04
FEET TO THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF THE SANTA ANA RIVER CHANNEL AS '
DESCRIBED IN DEED RECORDED IN BOOK 5748 PAGE 210 OF OFFICIAL
RECORDS IN THE OFFICE OF THERECORDER, ORANGE COUNTY, CALIFORNIA;
THENCE (4) .LEAVING SAID CENTERLINE NORTH 18°48'24"EAST 47.31 FEET
ALONG SAID NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID SANTA ANA RIVER TO THE TRUE
POINT OF BEGINNING; THENCE (5) NORTH 89°11'06" WEST 46.07 FEET ALONG
THE NORTHERLY LINE OF SAID ORANGEWOOD AVENUE TO THE CITY OF
ANAHEIM CITY LIMIT AS SHOWN ON A MAP RECORDED IN BOOK 165, PAGES 1
TO 13 OF RECORD OF SURVEYS (RS 88-1014) IN THE OFFICE OF THE RECORDER
OF SAID ORANGE COUNTY; THENCE (6) NORTH 22°53' 44" EAST 614.64 FEET
' ALONG SAID CITY OF ANAHEIM CITY LIMIT TO THE INTERSECTION WITH THE
NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID SANTA ANA RIVER; THENCE (7) SOUTH
L8°48'24" WEST 598.84 FEET ALONG THE NORTHWESTERLY LINE OF SAID SANTA
ANA RIVER TO THE TRUE POINT OF BEGINNING.
WHEREAS, the Planning Commission did hold a public hearing at the Civic Center in the City of ,
Anaheim on June 25, 2007, at 2:30 p.m., notice of said public hearing having been duly given as required by law
and in accordance with the provisions of the Anaheim Municipal Code, Chapter 18.60 "Procedures", to hear and
consider evidence for and against said proposed reclassification and to investigate and make findings and
recommendations in connection therewith; and
CR\PC2007-62 -1- PC2007-62
. •
WHEREAS, said Commission, after due inspection, investigation and studymade by itself and ,
in its behalf, and after due consideration of all evidence and reports offered at said hearing, does find and
determine the following facts
1: That the subject property, which comprises approximately 0.07 acres, is currently utilized as
parking for Anaheim Stadium and is owned by the City of Anaheim.
2. That the subject property is currently situated in the City of-0range, and the proposed
reclassification is a preliminary step required by the Local Agency Foundation Commission (LAFCO) prior to
annexation into the City of Anaheim.
3. That the proposed reclassification of the subject property to the PR (PTMU Overlay) (Pubfic
Recreation, PlatinumTriangle Mixed Use Overlay) zone, is the appropriate implementation zone for the
' proposed Mixed Use land use designation of the Anaheim General Plan.
4. That the proposed reclassification of subject property is necessary and/or desirable for the
orderly and proper development of the community.
5. That the proposed reclassification of subject property does properly relate to the zones and their
permitted uses locally established in close proximity to subjectproperty and to the zones'and their permitted
uses generally established throughout the community that is consistent with the type of uses envisioned for the
area.
6. That no one indicated their presence at said public hearing in opposition; and that no
correspondence was received in opposition to subject petition.
CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ACT FINDING: That the Anaheim Planning
Commission has reviewed the proposal; and does hereby approve the Negative Declaration upon finding that
the declaration reflects the independent judgment of the lead agency and that it has considered the Negative
Declaration and together with any comments received during the public review process and further finding on
the basis of the initial study and any comments received that there is no substantial evidence that the project will
have a significant effect on the environment.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Anaheim Planning Commission does hereby
unconditionally approve the subject Petition for Reclassification to authorize an amendment to the Zoning Map
of the Anaheim Municipal Code to exclude the above-described property from the City of Orange and to
incorporate said described property into the PR (PTMU Overlay) (Public Recreation, Platinum Triangle Mixed
Use Overlay) zone.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this resolution shall not constitute a rezoning of, or a
commitment by the City to rezone, the subject property; any such rezoning shall require an ordinance of the City
Council, which shall be a legislative act, which may be approved or denied by the City Council at its so~e
discretion.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED that the applicant is responsible for paying all charges related to
the processing of this discretionary case application within 15 days of the issuance of the final invoice or prior to
the issuance of building permits for this project, whichever occurs first. Failure to pay all charges shall result in
delays in the issuance of required permits or the revocation of the approval of this application.
-2-
PC2007-62
• •
THE FOREGOING RESOLUTION was adopted at the Planning Commission meeting of -
June 25; 2007. Said resolution is subject to the appeal provisions set forth in Chapter 18.60 "Procedures'' of the
Anaheim Municipal Code pertaining to appeal procedures and may be replac by a City Council Resolution in
the event of an appeaL
~
CHAIRMAN, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
ATTEST:'
~
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
STATE OF CALIFORNIA )
COUNTY OF ORANGE ) ss.
CITY OF ANAHEIM )
I, Eleanor Morris, Senior Secretary of the Anaheim Planning Commission, do hereby certifythat
the foregoing resolution was passed and adopted at a meeting of the Anaheim Planning Commission held on
June 25, 2007, by the following vote of the members thereof:
AYES: COMMISSIONERS: BUFFA, EASTMAN, FAESSEL, FLORES, KARAKI, ROMERO
NOES: COMMISSIONERS: NONE
ABSENT: COMMISSIONERS: VELASQUEZ
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand this ~ day of ,
2007.
~
z
SENIOR SECRETARY, ANAHEIM PLANNING COMMISSION
PC2007-62