Loading...
1971/02/0971-78 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 2, 1971, 1:30 P.M. In reply to Councilman Roth, Mr. Cline advised that the project would be begun with the $50,000.00 available at this time, and would be com- pleted in stages, as funds became available from the 10% of gross revenues set aside for the project. He also advised that although there still are problems with the Burris Sand Pit, a lawsuit now is in progress, and with the new River Improvement Plan to separate the River from the Flood Channel, the potential flood hazard no longer is prevalent at that point. He further advised that the Burris Pit would not delay the proposed project in any way. By general consent, the City Council agreed the proposal should be further explored; that maintenance and operation costs, costs of the parking area and also possible revenues be projected and that a form of agreement of contract between the two agencies be drawn for further consideration. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Thom moved to adjourn. Councilman Dutton seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 5:10 P.M. City Clerk City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 9~ 1971, 1:30 P.M. The City Council of the City of Anaheim met in regular session. PRESENT: ABSENT: PRESENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton COUNCILMEN: None CITY MANAGER: Keith A. Murdoch CITY ATTORNEY: Joseph B. Geisler DEPUTY CITY CLERK: Alona M. Farrens DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Alan Orsborn CITY ENGINEER: James Maddox ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF DEVELOPMENT SERVICES: Ronald Thompson ZONING SUPERVISOR: Charles Roberts Mayor Dutton called the meeting to order. INVOCATION; Reverend Carman, of the West Anaheim Baptist Church~ gave the Invocation. FLAG SALUTE: Councilman Calvin L. Pebley led the Assembly in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag. MINUTES: Minutes of the Anaheim City Council meetings held January 19 and 26,1971, were approved on motion by Councilman Thom, seconded by Councilman Pebley. MOTION CARRIED. 71-79 City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- February 9~ 1971~ 1:30 P.M. WAIVER OF READING - ORDINANCES AND RESOLUTIONS: Councilman Thom moved to waive the reading in full of all ordinances and resolutions, and that consent to the waiver of reading is hereby given by all Councilmen, unless after read- ing of the title, specific request is made by a Councilman for the reading of such ordinance or resolution. Councilman Pebley seconded the motion. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. RUNNING MARATHON: Dick Doyle, representing the Committee that sponsored the Vigorade-Anaheim Marathon Meet held February 6, 1971 on the Anaheim Stadium parking lot and allied streets in the City of Anaheim and City of Orange, attributed much of the success of the long distance running marathon to the cooperation of the Stadium Staff, the Anaheim Police Department and the Orange Police Department and officials. CONTINUED DECISION - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 69-70-25 AND VARIANCE NO. 2142 (TENTA- TIVE TRACT NO. 7137, REVISION NO. 1): Submitted by Geraldine E. Roth, et al, re- questing a change of zone from County Al, to City of Anaheim R-2-5,000, to establish a 451-1ot, single-family subdivision on property located south of Esperanza Road, east of Imperial Highway, with waiver of: a. Minimum building site width. Public hearing was held and closed on February 2, 1971. Council- man Thom offered a Resolution denying R-2-5,000 Zoning and granting R-1 Zon- ing, as recommended by the City Planning Commission, which Resolution failed to carry, due to a tie vote. Decision was continued to this date to allow Councilman Roth time to review the proposed Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone and the past actions on subject property. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-52: Councilman Pebley stated he believed that by indi- cating approval at the time the County granted R-S-5,000 Zoning on this pro- perty, the City of Anaheim had made a moral commitment to the property ow- ners to grant commensurate zoning, regardless of whether it now is felt a lower density factor would be more desirable. He thereupon offered Resolu- tion No. 71R-52 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary or- dinance, changing the zone as requested to R-2-5,000, subject to the condi- tions recommended by the City Planning Commission dated "Revised January 29, 1971." Councilman Dutton expressed the opinion some of the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission were excessively stringent, and asked if they were meant to conform to the proposed Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone. He specifically noted Condition No. 5, 1), that called for almost complete plans prior to the introduction of an Ordinance, as an example. He further stated that he believed contractors would not attempt to develop an area where excessive restrictions were imposed. City Manager Keith Murdoch explained the unusually detailed condi- tions were occasioned by the fact that the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone had not been finally approved by the City Planning Commission, and thus they were attempting to include those conditions thought probable under that proposed ordinance. In reply to Councilman Pebley's query on whether the zoning could be granted, subject to the Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone as finally approved, City Attorney Joseph Geisler advised that since the intent of the Scenic Corridor Study is to set up an Overlay Zone governing property considered to be adjacent to the Scenic Highway, conditions imposed by the final ordinance would necessarily be imposed on those properties. Councilman Pebley expressed objection to the condition that any windbreak of Eucalyptus trees either shall be retained or replaced, Condition No. 5, 5), and stated that he also felt conditions imposed recently tend to be too restrictive. Assistant Director of Development Services Ronald Thompson, sugges- ted that since the Applicants probably would not be doing construction for a 71-80 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 9~ 1971, 1:30 P.M. few months, if the conditions presently recommended for their reclassification prove to be in conflict with the final Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone ordinance, the conditions could be amended at that time. Mr. Geisler advised this procedure could necessitate repeating the entire reclassification process, since it would constitute changing an allow- able use, and also certain conditions to be imposed would probably have a re- lationship to the adjoining properties. Councilman Stephenson expressed the opinion R-1 Zoning on property as large as 330 acres, such as subject property, would not impose a hardship on the owners, since he believed most of the property in the Hill and Canyon Area is overpriced at this time. He specifically referred to one tract of 5,000-square foot lots that sold for $7,000.00 each, with approximately 2,000- square feet of each lot on a slope and unbuildable. He stated he believed granting R-2-5,000 Zoning on subject property would set a precedent for the rest of the Canyon area. Councilman Roth expressed the opinion that since this property would be subjected to as many as 33 trains a day passing by at the north end, and the River bed located at the south end, it would be difficult to sell an expensive home in the area. Councilman Thom stated his main concern was he felt the community was more interested in assuring the quality of homes to be built in the area, rather than keeping the quantity of homes down and, therefore, if the proposed project was to be built according to the concept of the Scenic Corridor Over- lay, he would have no further objections to R-2-5,000 Zoning. Development Services Director Alan Orsborn advised the Scenic Cor- ridor Overlay Zone had been approved by the City Planning Commission at their meeting on February 8, 1971, and would come before the City Council for ap- proval in two or three weeks. Gilbert Kraemer, Placentia, one of the Applicants, in answer to Council questioning, advised he would be willing to wait for final approval of the Scenic Corridor Study and abide by those regulations; however, the pos- sibility of further amendments by the City Council could cause further con- tinuances. In reply to Councilman Roth, Mr. Kraemer stated the Applicants would accept the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission, with the exception of the requirement that specific plans be approved prior to the in- troduction of an ordinance (Condition No. 5, 1). Following explanation by the City Manager that the Council would be making their commitment as to zoning at this time by the aoption of the reso- lution of intent to zone subject property R~2-5,000, Mr. Kraemer stated no further objections to the conditions as set forth. Following Council discussion of possible changes in conditions oc- casioned by the final approval of the Scenic Corridor Study, Mr. Orsborn sug- gested that the City Planning Commission or City Council could initiate one action to amend the resolution accordingly on all conditions affected. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (69-70- 25 - R-2-5,000) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Pebley, Thom and Dutton Stephenson None The MAyor declared Resolution No. 71R-52 duly passed and adopted. 71-81 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 9, 1971, 1:30 P.M VARIANCE NO. 2142 AND TEN~TATIVE TRACT NO. 7137, REVISION NO. 1: Councilman Pebley moved to continue Variance No. 2142 and Tentative Tract No. 7137, Re- vision No. 1, to February 22, 1971. Councilman Thom seconded the motion. Upon being informed that the City Planning Corm~ission had contin- ued their consideration of these two items to that same date, Councilman Pebley withdrew his motion and Councilman Thom withdrew his second. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, Var- iance No. 2142 and Tentative Tract No. 7137, Revision No. 1, were referred back to the City Planning Commission to be rescheduled following Planning Commission action. MOTION CARRIED. CONTINUED PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71-25: Initiated by the Ana- heim City Council, for a change of zone from County Al, to City of Anaheim R-2-5,000 on property located on the south side of Esperanza Road, east of Imperial Highway; and further described as the Esperanza-Carrillo Annexation. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-3, recommended that R-2-5,000 Zoning be disapproved and R-1 Zoning be approved for subject reclassification, subject to the following conditions: 1. That a final tract map of subject property shall be submitted to and approved by the City Council and then be recorded in the office of the Orange County Recorder. 2. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject property, Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be completed. The provi- sions or rights granted by this resolution shall become null and void by ac- tion of the City Council unless said conditions are complied with within one year from the date hereof, or such further time as the City Council may grant. 3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall pay to the City of Anaheim the appropriate park and recreation in-lieu fees as determined to be appropriate by the City Council, said fees to be paid at the time the build- ing permit is issued. 4. That these reclassification proceedings are granted subject to the completion of annexation of subject property to the City of Anaheim. 5. That subject property shall be developed in accordance with standards as follows: 1) That prior to the introduction of an ordinance reclassify- ing subject property, a specific plan shall be required for any use, subdivision, site design or the construction of any building, fence, sign or structure, or the removal or deposit of natural material. Plans shall be submitted indicating front, side, and rear elevations, plan view and a cross section through the proposal and through suf- ficient adjacent properties to indicate the relationship of the proposal to those properties. Plans or drawings should also show proposed building or structure locations, and in reasonable detail walls, walks, topography, exist- ing vegetation, proposed parking layout and location, land- scape and irrigation proposals, building and roofing ma- terials. 2) Ail buildings or mobilehome coaches along La Palma Avenue, A.T. & S.F. Railroad right-of-way and Fairmont Boulevard, shall maintain a landscaped setback area having a minimum depth of 50 feet. Said setbacks shall be measured hori- zontally from the planned highway right-of-way line~ a~ indicated on the Circulation Element of the General Plan to the building. The 50-foot setback may be reduced to 40-feet where variations in wall designs are provided. Variations in the required solid wall that are designed to include such decorative materials as wrought iron, wood, stone or landscaping are encouraged, provided that no more than ten percent of the required wall length consist of variations and that no var~tion have a width greater than 5-feet. 71-82 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 9, 1971, 1:30 P.M. 3) The entire required setback area except where driveways cross said areas, shall be landscaped as follows: Land- scaping shall consist of lawn, trees, shrubs, ground cover and certain architectural features as listed below. Ail landscaped areas shall be permanently maintained in a neat and orderly manner as a condition of use and shall be pro- vided with hose bibbs, sprinklers, or similar permanent irrigation facilities. The following architectural features, structures, and ac- cessways may be permitted in the required setback area: a. Fountains, ponds, pools, sculpture, planters and open or covered walkways where they are an integral part of a landscaping scheme comprised primarily of plant materials. b. Decorative screen-type walls. c. Flag poles. (Maximum of 25-feet in height.) 4) Where a building site is adjacent to the A.T. & S.F. Rail- road right-of-way a solid decorative masonry wall, an earthen berm or combination of the two shall be provided parallel to the right-of-way line. The wall or berm shall be at least six (6) feet high as measured from the high grade side of the property line. In order to insure privacy to the dwell- ing units a wall or berm in excess of six (6) feet in height may be approved. Adequate landscaping to fully screen to a height of ten (10) feet the subject property from the rail- road within two (2) years, shall be provided adjacent to the right-of-way line. 5) Where a prospective building site and/or subdivision con- tains a Eucalyptus tree windbreak the developer shall either: (1) leave the windbreak in its natural state; (2) prune the trees to a height of not less than 25 feet, or; (3) remove the existing trees and replace them, one tree for every three trees (not necessarily in the same location) with windbreak substitute trees. Trees shall be at least eight (8) feet in height at the time of planting. Where a pros- pective building site and/or subdivision does not contain a Eucalyptus tree windbreak the developer shall plant trees in windbreak fashion along a convenient property line at the rate of ten (10) trees per gross acre. Trees shall be selected from the list of windbreak substitute trees at the end of this chapter and must be at least eight (8) feet high at the time of planting. Any prospective building site and/or subdivision shall not be required to have more than ten (10) windbreak trees per gross acre. 6) All natural terrain or areas left in an undisturbed state shall contain or be planted with adequate native plant ma- terial. An irrigation system shall not be required for these natural areas. 7) All cut or fill slopes shall be planted with adequate plant materials and irrigated with an irrigation system to protect the slopes against erosion. Said planting shall consist of at least one (1) tree per 3©0-square feet and one (1) shrub per 150-square fee? of actual bank slope area and a ground cover to completely cover thc bank within two (2) years from the time of planting. 8) The maximum overall height of any building shall be 25 feet measured from the highest portion of the structure to the highest finished grade level at the foundation. 9) Roo~mounted equipment including exterior mounted and ground mounted radio and television antennas shall not be permitted. That Condition Nos. (3), (4), and (5), above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. 71~ 83 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 9, 1971, 1:30 P.M. Public hearing was scheduled for February 2, 1971, and continued to this date, awaiting decision on adjoining property, Reclassification No. 69-70-25. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the City Council in favor of subject application. James Liberio, 1721 West La Palma Avenue, one of the owners of subject property, reminded the Council of their previous approval to Orange County granting R-S-5,000 Zoning on subject property, and requested the Coun- cil now continue that approval by granting the corresponding City of Anaheim R-2-5,000 Zoning on the property at this time. Referring to the proposed Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone, Mr. Liberio stated the owners would be willing to accept any amended conditions occasioned by passage of that ordinance; although they did not approve of some of the conditions presently recommen- ded by the City Planning Commission for approval of R-2-5,000 Zoning on their property, they would agree to them. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council in op- position; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. Councilman Stephenson stated that, inasmuch as the City Council, by majority vote, had set a precedent of approving R-2-5,000 Zoning in this area by its action on Reclassification No. 69-70-25, it would not be fair to disapprove subject application, therefore, he would not oppose the action. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-53: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 71R-53 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to R-2-5,000, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission dated "Revised January 29, 1971." Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETER- MINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (70-71-25 - R-2-5,000) Roll Call Vote: AYE S: C OUNC ILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-53 duly passed and adopted. SCENIC CORRIDOR OVERLAY ZONE - WORK SESSION: The City Council requested a work session with the City Planning Commission, Tuesday, February 16, 1971, at 7:30 P.M., on the subject of the proposed Scenic Corridor Overlay Zone, in an effort to expedite final approval. PUBLIC HEARING - CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT NO. 1215: Submitted by Kilroy Industries, to establish a miniature golf course and related clubhouse activities on M-1 zoned property located on the south side of Carpenter Avenue, adjacent to the Riverside Freeway. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC70-227, denied said conditional use permit° Appeal from action taken by the City Planning Commission was filed by Kilroy Industries, Applicants, and public hearing scheduled this date. The Deputy City Clerk submitted correspondence from Coldwell, Ban- ker & Company, Agent for the Applicants, requesting public hearing be con- tinued to February 16, 1971, to allow for the presence of the representative of the Applicants. 71-84 .City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 9~ 1971~ 1:30 P.M. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom, public hearing was continued to February 16, 1971, 1:30 P.M., as requested. MOTION CARRIED. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71-26: Initiated by the City Planning Com- mission for a change of zone from County of Orange Al, to City of Anaheim R-A, on property located adjacent to Walnut Canyon Road, south of Santa Ana Canyon Road, and further described as the Walnut Canyon Annexation. The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-8, re- commended said reclassification be approved unconditionally. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject pro- perty recently acquired by the City of Anaheim for a Golf Course in Walnut Can- Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the City Council; h~.~ ing no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-54: Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 71R-54 for adop- tion, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended by the City Planning CommissioL~. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (70-71-26 - R-A) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-54 duly passed and adopted. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71-27: Initiated by the City Planning Com- mission for a change of zone from County of Orange Al, to City of Anaheim R-A, on property located in the Southeast Industrial Area at the northeast corner of Howell Avenue and Katella Avenue. (Proposed Howell-Katella Annexation). The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-9, re- commended said reclassification be approved unconditionally. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject pro- perty, and advised that the Development Services Department recommends if said application is approved it be subject to annexation. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-55: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 71R-55 for adop- tion, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone as recommended by the City Planning Corm~ission, subject to completion of annexa- tion of subject property to the City of Anaheim. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMINING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (70-71-27 - R-A) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-55 duly passed and adopted. 71-85 City Hall~ Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- February 9, 1971~ 1:30 P.M. PUBLIC HEARING - RECLASSIFICATION NO. 70-71-28: Initiated by the City Planning Commission, for a change of zone from County of Orange, A-i, to City of Anaheim M-I, on property located at the northeast corner of Katella Avenue and Howell Avenue. (Proposed Howell-Katella Annexation). The City Planning Commission, pursuant to Resolution No. PC71-10, recommended said reclassification be approved, subject to the following con- ditions: 1. That dedication shall be made to the City of Anaheim of all streets within the area according to the Circulation Element of the General Plan - Highway Rights-of-Way Map and in accordance with Area Development Plan No. 105. 2. That all engineering requirements of the City of Anaheim, such as curbs and gutters, sidewalks, street grading and paving, drainage facili- ties, or other appurtenant work shall be complied with as required by the City Engineer and in accordance with standard plans and specification on file in the office of the City Engineer, at the time the property is ,!avel- oped. 3. That the owner(s) of subject property shall install lighting on all streets within the area, as required by the Director of Pub- lic Utilities and in accordance with standard plans and specifications on file in the office of the Director of Public Utilities, at the time the pro- perty is developed. 4. That drainage of subject property shall be disposed of in a manner satisfactory to the City Engineer. 5. That subject property shall be served by underground utilities. 6. That a preliminary title report shall be furnished prior to the adoption of the ordinance rezoning the property, showing legal vesting of title, legal description, and containing a map of the property. 7. That ordinances reclassifying the property shall be adopted as each parcel is ready to comply with conditions pertaining to such parcel, provided, however, that the word "parcel" shall mean presently existing par- cels of record and any parcel or parcels approved by the City Council for a lot split. 8. That trash storage areas shall be provided in accordance with approved plans on file with the office of the Director of Public Works. 9. That fire hydrants shall be installed as required and deter- mined to be necessary by the Chief of the Fire Department. 10. That all air conditioning facilities shall be properly shielded from view. 11. Prior to the introduction of an ordinance rezoning subject pro- perty, Condition No. 1, above mentioned, shall be completed. 12. That Condition Nos. 2, 3, 4, 7, 8, 9, and 10, above mentioned, shall be complied with prior to final building and zoning inspections. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject property, and advised the Development Services Department recommends if said reclassification is approved, a condition be added requiring annexation. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council; there being no response, declared the hearing closed. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-56: Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 71R-56 for adoption, authorizing the preparation of necessary ordinance changing the zone to M-l, subject to the conditions recommended by the City Planning Commission, and further subject to completion of annexation of subject property to the City of Anaheim. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM FINDING AND DETERMIN- ING THAT TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING SHOULD BE AMENDED AND THAT THE BOUNDARIES OF CERTAIN ZONES SHOULD BE CHANGED. (70-71- 28 - M-i) Roll Call Vote: 71-86 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 9, 1971, 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-56 duly passed and adopted. BUS ZONES - SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA RAPID TRANSIT DISTRICT: Request of Carl E. Carlson, of Southern California Rapid Transit District, was submitted to establish and/or extend bus zones on Anaheim Boulevard, together with report of the City Engin- eer recommending approval and also recommending the City Ordinance be amended to permit installation of bus zones not to exceed 100-feet in length. Mayor Dutton asked if the Applicant's Agent was present and concurred with the City Engineer's recommendation, to which he received an affirmative reply from Frank Screech, representing the Applicant. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Pebley, requested changes and/or additions of bus stops on Route 58 Line of the Sou- thern California Rapid Transit District were approved and preparation of an ordinance was authorized to amend Anaheim Municipal Code, Section 14.32.050, to permit installation of bus zones, not to exceed 100-feet in length, as re- commended by the City Engineer. MOTION CARRIED. GREEN FEES - SENIOR CITIZENS CLUB: Request of E.O. Hutson, Treasurer, Anaheim Se- nior Citizens' Club, was submitted to establish a special rate for green fees at the Anaheim Municipal Golf Course, together with report of the Parks and Recreation Director, recommending denial. Mayor Dutton invited representatives of the Anaheim Senior Citizens' Club to address the Council. E.O. Hutson stated their organization presently has 1,500 members, and they are requesting a special green fee rate at the Anaheim Municipal Golf Course during weekdays or at times when the course is not normally busy for members of their organization. In reply to Councilman Stephenson, Mr. Hutson advised they would pre- fer to have the green fees set at $1.00 for 9 holes of golf, which he believed is the amount charged by Los Angeles County for Senior Citizens. Frank W. Porter explained the Los Angeles County Golf Course charges Senior Citizens $1.00 for 9 or 18 holes, after purchase of an identification card for $10.00. He added that their members could furnish their Senior Citizens cards as an identification, if a special rate was approved. In reply to Council questioning, Mr. Porter advised that their organiza- tion's minimum age limit is 50; however, the City Council could set any age restric- tions it desired. Councilman Dutton advised that presently there is no time when the Ana- heim Municipal Golf Course is not busy, since it cannot accommodate all of those who want to golf now; that the golfers willingly accepted an increase in green fees in order to finance a proposed second golf course in Anaheim; also, grant- ing such a request would set a precedent and possibly result in similar requests from several organizations. Mr. Porter advised that he presently plays golf in Brea or Los Angeles County because the green fees at Anaheim are too high. Councilman Thom suggested further investigation of the possibility of granting Anaheim Senior Citizens over a specific age, such as over 60 or 65, spe- cial permits to play golf on the Anaheim Municipal Golf Course, similar to what is now offered by Los Angeles County, and referred to the special Library Cards issued to non-residents. In reply to Councilman Pebley, Mr. Porter stated membership in the Ana- heim Senior Citizens' Club requires residence in the Anaheim Union High School District. 71-87 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 9, 1971, 1:30 P.M. The Applicants were advised that the Anaheim High School District also includes areas within the boundaries of several adjacent cities. City Attorney Joseph Geisler advised that in his opinion, it would be illegal and improper for the City of Anaheim to specify a certain club membership could allow special privileges in the City; that if such a permit was granted it would have to include all Anaheim citizens over a specific age, whether they were or were not members of the Anaheim Senior Citizens' Club. The City Manager reminded Mr. Porter that there presently are re- duced green fees during weekdays. The City Council referred subject request to the City Manager's office for further investigation and report and recommendations. REQUEST - BUDGET PRIORITIES: Petitions purportedly containing 110 signatures were submitted, requesting Fiscal Year 1971-72 Budget priorities be given to construction of a Fire Station at Euclid Street and Crescent Avenue, ex- pansion of Library services, additional Storm Drain facilities, and a study relative to expanding emergency rescue services, without the necessitating of raising tax monies. Mayor Dutton asked if anyone wished to address the Council with reference to subject petitions. Roy Hutts, 1681 West Broadway, stated that although he did not op- pose construction of a second golf course, it was felt that this and such other things as the Cultural Arts Center would be deferred in favor of more essential programs. He added it was believed that the golf revenues should continue to go to the General Fund, rather than to construction of a second golf course; and that if a second course is deemed necessary, land could be purchased by the City and a private developer allowed to construct the golf course so as not to use any tax money for the facilities. Councilman Dutton advised that, since the proposed golf course would be financed entirely out of golf revenues, no general funds would be diverted to this purpose. Also, passage of the Electrical Revenue Bonds by the voters could have provided the necessary funds to amortize General Ob- ligation Bonds for the needed Library and Storm Drain facilities; however, the majority of those voting had indicated they did not want these facili- ties by voting down the Bond issues. The City Manager advised that the golf course project can and is going ahead because the owners of the land are willing to sell the land on a long-term basis to allow the City to keep this land for a desirable open- space recreational use; and in order to purchase the land on a long-term basis the City must use funds which have a separate source of revenue other than the general obligations of the City, and the golf course revenue does fit into this category. Mr. Murdoch suggested the petitioners generate sup- port for these improvements and circulate petitions requesting the bond is- sues again be placed on the election ballot, since such improvements are not possible out of general fund revenues. Mr. Hutts questioned how the City planned to make up the funds that were going into the General Fund from Golf Course revenues, and which now are diverte~ to the special £und for the proposed new golf course. Mr. Murdoch replied that originally General Funds were advanced to construct the first golf course and revenues from that course went back into the General Fund to replace those monies and the costs of operation; when those monies were all returned to the General Fund over a period of seven or eight years, the additional revenues totaling about $309,000.00 were then placed into the Capital Outlay Fund to be used to construct the second course. 71-88 .City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 9, 1971, 1:30 P.M. The City Attorney advised that the area purchased for the second golf course is located at the toe of the dam for the major lake; and although the dam is constructed so there is very little poSsibility of any rupture, if this should occur the entire golf course area would be inundated; thus the purchase of this golf course land has eased a possible liability problem for Anaheim. William F. Daly stated he believed that, rather than pay an outside architect to design the proposed golf course, the City of Anaheim should use the capable talents available in the Landscaping Division of the Parks and Rec- reation Department. Councilman Dutton and the City Manager advised that the original intent was to use in-house capabilities; however, consultation with both the Engineering Department and Landscaping Division indicated they would not be able to undertake the project for at least a year. Also, there no longer is anyone in these divisions who have the experience of designing the first golf course. In reply to Mr. Daly's question on which golf courses the selected architect had designed, Councilman Dutton advised that City representatives had inspected a completed course at Hollister, and one the architect is redoing at Fesno; and added that the architect also has assisted in designing several courses that were not accredited to his name. Mr. Daly stated he understood the City of Anaheim departments ori- ginally were given deadline dates they could meet, however, after consulting outside architects these dates were pushed forward to where it was impossible for the City departments to meet these deadlines. The City Attorney advised the architect's contract requires prelimi- nary cost estimates and layout of the first 27 holes of the golf course by April, 1971, and detailed construction drawings for the first 9 holes by May 1, 1971 and, to his knowledge, none of these dates have ever been changed. ORANGE COUNTY USE PERMIT NO. 3121: Excerpt from the Minutes of the City Planning Commission meeting held February 8, 1971, pertaining to Orange County Use Per- mit No. 3121, to establish a mobile home park with 347 spaces, on a 35-acre site, located on the north side of Santa Ana Canyon Road opposite Mohler Drive, was submitted recommending that approval of said mobile home park would be contrary to concepts of the density studies and the proposed Scenic Corridor Overlay for development of the Canyon. The Council reviewed a plot plan of the proposed mobile home park and a map showing subject property and its relation to various access points along the Santa Ana Canyon Road. Zoning Supervisor Charles Roberts noted the location of subject pro- perty, owned by Mr. Danker, and reminded the Council that prior to the County granting R-2-4,000 zoning on this property, the Council had recommended such zoning action be deferred until such time as the Scenic Highway and Density Studies had been fully considered. Council discussion followed, regarding the limited access points along Santa Ama Canyon Road, and the Circulation System for this area, as shown on the Anaheim General Plan, noting the possibility of several adjacent parcels becoming landlocked due to the private internal streets proposed in said development, instead of continuation of arterial and local streets in this Canyon area. Councilman Pebley recalled a mobile home park on Howell Avenue that had been approved by the County, which property required the utilities ser- vices of Anaheim and subsequently was annexed to the City. He stated he be- lieved the same situation could occur with subject property. Assistant Director of Development Services Ronald Thompson, advised subject property probably would be dependent upon Anaheim for sewer service, and suggested specific plans should be subject to the approval of the City of Anaheim. He recalled a situation where a fire on Wasatch Drive could not rea- dily be reached because of poor circulation facilities, and advised that the Circulation Element connected with Wasatch Drive was better than possibly would be provided for subject property whid~ shows only one exit for 40 or 50 acres of land. 71-89 City Hall, Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 9~ 1971~ 1:30 P.M. The City Manager advised that, since the County Sanitation District had been unable to install sewer lines along the south side of the Canyon a few years ago, Anaheim had provided them on a reimbursible basis; thus, it presently is under the control of Anaheim. On motion by Councilman Roth, seconded by Councilman Stephenson, the City Clerk was directed to forward to the Orange County Planning Commission emphatic opposition of the Council to Orange County Use Permit No. 3121; fur- ther, with reference to theuse of City facilities by developers in County ter- ritory, that City of Anaheim sewer and water facilities would willingly be ex- tended to serve subject area in any development not contra to what is con- sidered acceptable by the City of Anaheim. MOTION UNANIMOUSLY CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-57 - DEEDS OF EASEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 71R-57 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM ACCEPTING CERTAIN GRANT DEEDS AND ORDERING THEIR RECORDATION. (Covington Brothers Investment Company, Lucille G. Jewell and James H. Jewell, Jack M. Hankins and June L. Hankins, Charles F. Panusis and Barbara L. Panusis, Irene C. Armentrout, Leslie E. Grimes and Patricia E. Grimes, Violet Van Delden, Margaret Green, and H.H. Haase and Katherine Haase.) Roll Call Vote: AYM$: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: AB SENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-57 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-58 - CONDEMNATION: On report and recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 71R-58 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM DETERMINING THE NECESSITY FOR, AND DIRECTING THE ACQUISITION BY EMINENT DOMAIN, OF REAL PROPERTY FOR HIGHWAY EASEMENT AND PUBLIC UTILITY PURPOSES. (Northeast Corner of Lincoln Avenue and Brookhurst Street). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None ~he Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-58 duly passed and adopted. CLAIM AGAINST THE CITY: Claim filed by Mrs. Carmen Trainer, for personal property damages purportedly caused by a City truck, sustained on or about January 28, 1971 was denied, as recommended by the City Attorney and ordered referred to the insurance carrier, on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-59 - FRONTERA STREET DRAINAGE: Councilman Thom offered Resolu- tion No. 71R-59 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING T~IE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE THAT CERTAIN COOPERATIVE AGREEMENT WITH THE ~ ~ o~.A~E ~F CALIFORNIA. (DRAINAGE OF FRONTERA STREET). Roll Call Vote: 71-90 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 9: 1971~ 1:30 P.M. AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-59 duly passed and adopted. CORRESPONDENCE: The following correspondence was ordered received and filed on motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Thom: a. Orange County Board of Supervisors - Resolution No. 71-88 - In- viting and encouraging Mr. Ralph C. Wilson, Jr., owner of the Buffalo Bills Football Club, to relocate the Buffalo Bills in Anaheim, California. b. City of ¥orba Linda - Resolution No. 267 - Requesting the Orange County Board of Supervisors, the Orange County Parks Department, and the United States Corps of Engineers to take various actions regarding the future of the Santa Bna Canyon and Santa Bna River. c. Financial and Operating Reports for the month of January, 1971. MOTION CARRIED. ORDINANCE NO. 2904: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 2904 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 3, CHAPTER 3.04, OF THE ANAHEIM MITNICIPAL CODE BY ADDING THERETO SECTION 3.04.115 RELATING TO EXEMP- TION FROM BUSINESS LICENSE TAX. (Persons Subject to Highway Carriers Uniform Business License Tax Act.) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2904 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2905: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 2905 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF TH~ ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-10 - R-3) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COb-NC ILMEN: AB SENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2905 duly passed and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2906: Councilman Roth offered Ordinance No. 2906 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM~-NICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (70-71-21 - R-l) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2906 duly passed and adopted. 71-91 City Hall~ Anaheim, California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 9, 1971, 1:30 P.M. ORDINANCE NO. 2856: Councilman Pebley offered Ordinance No. 2856 for adoption. Refer to Ordinance Book. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (69-70-10 - R-3 - Portion B) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Ordinance No. 2856 duly passed, and adopted. ORDINANCE NO. 2907: Councilman Thom offered Ordinance No. 2907 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 6, CHAPTER 6.16 OF THE ANAHEIM MUNICIPAL CODE, RELATING TO DIRT, RUBBISH, WEEDS AND RANK GROWTH. ORDINANCE NO. 2908: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 2908 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAHEIMMUNI- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (61-62-30 - C-1 - Lot 1 and 2) ORDINANCE NO. 2909: Councilman Stephenson offered Ordinance No. 2909 for first reading. AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AMENDING TITLE 18 OF THE ANAKEIM MUNi- CIPAL CODE RELATING TO ZONING. (69-70-33 - C-1 - Portion B). ALCOHOLIC BEVERAGE LICENSE APPLICATION: Application submitted by Bobby L. Wal- lace, for Original Transaction, On-Sale Beer, for Bob Family Billiards, 3015 West Ball Road, Anaheim, was presented by the City Manager to the City Council for their information. On motion by Councilman Pebley, seconded by Councilman Dutton, the City Attorney was authorized to file a conditional protest with the Alcoholic Beverage Control Board against said application, on the basis that the premises presently are located in a C-1 Zone, which does not per- mit the on-sale sale of alcoholic beverages, unless a conditional use per- mit is granted by the City. MOTION CARRIED. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-60 - ANAHEIM SPORTS, INC. - CONCESSION STAND AT LA PALMA PARK: On report and recommendation of the City Manager, Councilman Roth offered Resolution No. 71R-60 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESO~JTION OF THE CiTY COUNCIL OF TIlE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EXECUTION BY THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK OF AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ANAKEIM AND ANAHEIM SPORTS, INCORPORAT~D, RELATING TO A CONCESSION STAND AT LA PALMA PARK. (American Legion) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-60 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-61 - RICHARD BIGLER ASSOCIATES, ARCHITECTS - GOLF COURSE: On recommendation of the City Attorney, Councilman Dutton offered Resolution No. 71R-61 for adoption. Refer to Resolution. Book. 71-92 City Hall, Anaheim, California- COUNCIL MINUTES- February 9, 1971, 1:30 P.M. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING THE EMPLOYMENT OF RICHARD BIGLER ASSOCIATES TO RENDER ARCHITECTURAL SERVICES FOR THE CITY OF ANAHEIM IN THE PREPARATION OF PLANS, SPECIFICATIONS AND MODELS FOR A 27-HOLE GOLF COURSE ON CERTAIN CITY-OWNED PROPERTY IN THE WALNUT CANYON AREA IN THE CITY OF ANAHEIM. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley and Dutton Thom None The Mmyor declared Resolution No. 71R-61 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-62 - CORONADO STREET IMPROVEMENT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 71R-62 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AUTHORIZING AND DIRECTING THE MAYOR AND CITY CLERK TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH THE COUNTY OF ORANGE RELATING TO TWE IMPROVEMENT OF CORONADO STREET. Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mayor declared Resolution No. 71R-62 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-63 - GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION - DEED OF GIFT: Councilman Pebley offered Resolution No. 71R-63 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM AGREEING TO THE CON- DITIONS OUTLINED IN CONNECTION WITH A PROPOSED GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION DEED OF GIFT. (MAGNOLIA AVENUE NORTH OF LA PALMA). Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The Mmyor declared Resolution No. 71R-63 duly passed and adopted. RESOLUTION NO. 71R-64 - ESPERANZA-CARRILLO ANNEXATION: Pursuant to authority granted by the Local Agency Formation Commission, Resolution No. 71-156, Councilman Thom offered Resolution No. 71R-64 for adoption. Refer to Resolution Book. A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF ANAHEIM APPROVING THE ANNEXA- TION TO THE CITY OF ANAHEIM OF THE TERRITORY kqqOWN AND DESIGNATED AS ESPERANZA- CARRILLO ANNEXATION. (Uninhabited) Roll Call Vote: AYES: COUNCILMEN: NOES: COUNCILMEN: ABSENT: COUNCILMEN: Roth, Stephenson, Pebley, Thom and Dutton None None The M~yor declared Resolution No. 71R-64 duly passed and adopted. Mayor Dutton left the Council Chambers. (4:00 P.M.). Mayor Pro Tem Pebley assumed Chairmanship of the meeting. 71-93 City Hall, Anaheim~ California - COUNCIL MINUTES - February 9, 1971, 1:30 P.M. REQUEST - KINGSMEN DRUM AND BUGLE CORPS: The City Manager reported a request from Donald Palinsky, Kingsmen Drum and Bugle Corps, for a waiver of license fees in connection with a "Kiddie Karnival" to be held at the Payless parking lot, Katella Avenue and Euclid Street, February 12 through 15, 1971, where the Kingsmen would operate everything except the specific rides. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom, waiver of license fees on behalf of the Kingsmen Drum and Bugle Corps "Kid- die Karnival" was granted for the dates requested, with the exception of the specific rides concession, for which standard license fees must be paid. MOTION CARRIED. CARROUSEL OF ANAHEIM - 1971 BUDGET REQUEST: The City Manager repdrted a r~quest from the Women's Division of the Anaheim Chamber of Commerce for approval of a tentative budget of $7,500.00 to cover expenses at the Convention Cen- ter Facility for the 1971 Carrousel of Anaheim, May 7, 8 and 9. However, he added, at this time there is no information on what this budget figure would cover. By general consent of the Council, said request was referred to the City Manager for additional report including an itemized breakdown of total cost to both the City and Anaheim Chamber of Commerce for the 1970 Carrousel event. ANAHEIM UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT - CONVENTION CENTER USE: The City Attorney reported that the Anaheim Union High School District has indicated a pre- ference that the District have the right to use the Exhibit portion of the Convention Center each year on a priority basis for graduation exercises, rather than the Grad Night Party, as approved by the City Council on Janu- ary 5, 1971. On motion by Councilman Stephenson, seconded by Councilman Thom, the City Attorney was authorized to forward to the Anaheim Union High School District Board of Trustees an amended letter granting priority use of the Convention Center Exhibit facilities for Graduation Exercises, rather than "Grad Night," as requested. MOTION CARRIED. TRACT NO. 5083 - ACCESS ROAD - WASATCH DRIVE: The City Engineer advised he was prepared to report on investigation into correspondence from Kyle Thomas, (January 26, 1971 Council meeting), regarding closing of an access road into Tract No. 5083 near the intersection of Taylor Street and Santa Ana Canyon Road, (Wasatch Drive.) By general Council consent, subject was deferred to February 23, 1971, 1:30 P.M., to enable interested property owners to be present. ADJOURNMENT: Councilman Thom moved to adjourn to February 15, 1971, 7:30 P.M., in the Convention Center Garden Grove Room, for the purpose of a joint meet- ing with the Community Center Authority and the Anaheim Union High Sc%ool District Board of Trustees; and to further adjourn meeting o.f February 15, 1971 to Tuesday, February 16, 1971, 9:00 A.M., for Executive Session in the Council Chambers, Anaheim City Hall, and also moved waiver of further notice of said adjournments. Councilman Rotb seconded the motion. MOTION CARRIED. Adjourned: 4:20 P~M. Signed Deputy City Clerk